WO1996033478A1 - Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system - Google Patents
Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1996033478A1 WO1996033478A1 PCT/US1995/004731 US9504731W WO9633478A1 WO 1996033478 A1 WO1996033478 A1 WO 1996033478A1 US 9504731 W US9504731 W US 9504731W WO 9633478 A1 WO9633478 A1 WO 9633478A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- programming
- sensor transmitter
- sensor
- transmitter
- code
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/02—Monitoring continuously signalling or alarm systems
- G08B29/04—Monitoring of the detection circuits
- G08B29/046—Monitoring of the detection circuits prevention of tampering with detection circuits
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/007—Details of data content structure of message packets; data protocols
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/01—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems characterised by the transmission medium
- G08B25/10—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems characterised by the transmission medium using wireless transmission systems
Definitions
- the present invention relates to remote monitoring, including for example, remote sensor/transmission arrays including security /fire/alarm systems and the like, and more particularly to a system for preventing unauthorized access to the programming and control features of a remote sensors utilized in such a system.
- the exemplary embodiment of the present invention utilizes an association of transmitter identity/address with a central processor, or control panel/security data base, which in turn is configured to securely program each transmitter with its location and function, or "personality".
- An alternative embodiment of the present invention teaches the utilization of a site- specific or customer specific seed incorporated into sensor/transmitter transmissions, in order to provide a secure means of communicating between the sensor and central processor/control panel.
- This secure programming may be accomplished utilizing an magnetic loop or other transmission means.
- the present system contemplates the utilization of verification means to verify correct sensor programming, as well as a method of preventing alteration of sensor programming after installation via a JAM command.
- the various, individual sensors and central processor/control unit communicate individually via individual, repeatable pseudo randomization algorithms, producing a several bit result.
- the communicating central processor/control and each sensor must have a match on outgoing/incoming code before the transmitting sensor will accept the programming on its personality.
- the exemplary embodiment of the present invention also utilizes a randomization seed, which can altered occasionally, to further increase security.
- Still other teachings of the present invention relate to a sensor transmitter which is shipped in a power saving mode, and which powers up upon sensing predetermined conditions, said sensor further including power saving transmission modes, EEROM power saving modes and redundant memory with error checking features, optical and magnetic loop power/programming systems, and a unique sequence of events "wake up" string.
- each transmitter must be pre-programmed at the factory, which further requires the utilization of additional non-volatiie ram or burned-in PROM, which is not required by the present invention.
- volatile RAM is utilized in lieu of the above, the transmitter must be powered from its time of programming at the factory, via battery and any interruption in power due to burn out of the power supply or battery will result in loss of programming data, and the need for re- programming.
- the 713 system requires extra modes in order to prevent the transmitters from continually transmitting while in shipment, not only to conserve batteries, but also to prevent dangerous conditions such transmissions may cause when in close proximity or aboard airplanes and the like.
- Such systems if not deactivated in transport, have been known to cause false alarms in the security systems of the storage facility, etc.
- the '606 patent to Mallory teaches a "Central Monitor for Home Security System” wherein there is taught a system wherein each of the transmitters is programmed with individual information data, which is fed back to the central monitor during an alarm, which is matched with the data in the central monitor's memory for a match, which establishes the monitor and nature of the alarm.
- the '606 device can be programmed by any unsecured, unauthorized programming device, since no scrambling or authorized identification mode is required; nor does said system contemplate a means to alter access codes for programming of transmitters.
- the '606 device requires the utilization of a programming wire which can easily be compromised (unlike the present invention), and which may not be removable when transmitters require magnetic, electromagnetic, or optical means of communication.
- the present invention overcomes these prior art problems by providing a system wherein there is provided an association of transmitter identity/addresses with the central monitoring panel, which in turn is configured to securely program each transmitter with its location and function, or "personality"
- the present invention is typically utilized with an array of remote sensor/transmitters, as utilized with, for example fire/security/control systems, which includes a central monitoring panel interfacing with a plurality of external sensors.
- the sensors may be configured to provide a wide variety of information in the form of monitoring for smoke, temperature flux, motion or heat detection, intrusion, water flow detection or monitoring, voice dispatch, voltage level monitoring, power meter monitoring, analog level reporting, or the like.
- Other applications may further include time and attendance accounting, building or home automation, process control, remote terminal programming, and the like.
- Each of the above receivers in the present embodiment of the invention communicates via wire, radio, or optically with one or more receivers, relaying said information to the fire/security panel, which has the capacity to process said information according to the program, and act upon said information in the appropriate manner.
- Each of said sensors must be set up with PERSONALITY information, assigning an identity of the unit amongst the other components in the system, as well as a function, appropriate response, and communication parameters and protocol, including identification/address bits, property/system code(s), frequency channel or spread spectrum channel, transmission timing, as well as input condition(s) and calibration.
- An alternative embodiment of the present invention teaches the utilization of a site- specific or customer specific seed incorporated into sensor/transmitter transmissions, in order to provide a secure means of communicating between the sensor and central processor/control panel.
- This secure programming may be accomplished utilizing an magnetic loop or other transmission means.
- the present system contemplates the utilization of verification means to verify correct sensor programming, as well as a method of preventing alteration of sensor programming after installation via a JAM command.
- Still other teachings of the present invention relate to a sensor transmitter which is shipped in a power saving mode, and which powers up upon sensing predetermined conditions, said sensor further including power saving transmission modes, power backup mode, EEROM power saving modes and redundant memory with error checking features, optical and magnetic loop power/programming systems, and a unique sequence of events "wake up" string.
- the present invention discloses a system for insuring data security, and for preventing unauthorized alteration of the personality program of the sensors, once installed and set.
- Figure 1 is a logic circuit diagram of the sensor/transmitter programming input schematic of the preferred embodiment of the secure sensor/transmitter array of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a logic circuit of the jam command logic circuit schematic of the secure sensor/transmitter array of Figure 1.
- Figure 3 is a diagram of the programming input schematic of the secure sensor/transmitter array of Figure 1.
- Figure 4 is a block diagram of the system of programming the sensor/transmitter(s) comprising the secure sensor/transmitter array of Figure 1.
- Figure 5 is a block diagram of the jam command and security/randomization bits of the secure sensor/transmitter array of Figure 1.
- Figures 6a and 6b illustrate an alternative embodiment of the present invention, which utilizes EEROM in providing a power saving and redundant memory feature.
- the present invention teaches various and diverse improvements in the programming and operation of a sensor transmitter array in combination with a central processing unit, which may be in the fonn of a fire/security control panel. Amoung these is an association of transmitter identity /address with a fire/security panel data base, or central processing unit, which in turn contains transmitter location and function, typically for a plurality of individual transmitters forming a monitoring sensor array.
- a central processing unit which may be in the fonn of a fire/security control panel.
- transmitter identity /address with a fire/security panel data base, or central processing unit, which in turn contains transmitter location and function, typically for a plurality of individual transmitters forming a monitoring sensor array.
- the process must be simple to perform in any field /installation related work. 2. The process must be economical and readily manufacturable.
- the fire/security panel causes each sensor or TRANSMITTER to be programmed.
- the transmitters may be manufactured with NO or little initial "personality" or address/identification built in, although sensors may be set, as desired, at the factory with preliminary address and related information, and placed into a non-transmission mode for shipping, thereby providing a partial programming of the sensor.
- transmit modes which may be provided as part of the firmware or software of the sensor transmitter, and which may be utilized selectively during the operation of said sensor transmitter, may include 'burst" transmit modes, wherein a burst of data information is transmitted, or "parcel" transmit modes, wherein timed data packets of data, which may, as desired, comprise partial data strings, are transmitted, and, if desired, repeated during time intervals.
- the sensors may have programmed therein diagnostic routines or other test modes which assist during manufacture and use, providing the operator with operational status and verification information on said sensor/transmitter, as needed.
- the fire/security, or control panel 1 by contrast with the sensor transmitter, which has little or no personality data, includes a data base 41 which contains the desired transmitter personality data, as well as, the address/device ID bits for each said transmitter.
- This data can be programmed at the site, or at the factory, as desired.
- Such personality data can be any combination of: transmitter TYPES, such as passive infrared, smoke detector, keypad, contact input, etc; transmitter PROPERTY/SYSTEM code which is common to all elements of a system to prevent adjacent but separate systems from interfering with one another; FREQUENCY CHANNEL or SPREAD SPECTRUM CDMA CODE, which is also typically common to all elements of a system for the same reason; there are also programmable functioning such as number of redundant alarm transmissions, alarm transmission separation, supervision interval timing, calibration factors and the like; there is also sensor input condition such as normally open/normally closed charge detect, debounce time, cut alarm wire detection or the like.
- transmitter TYPES such as passive infrared, smoke detector, keypad, contact input, etc
- transmitter PROPERTY/SYSTEM code which is common to all elements of a system to prevent adjacent but separate systems from interfering with one another
- FREQUENCY CHANNEL or SPREAD SPECTRUM CDMA CODE which is also typically common to all elements
- each transmitter must be programmed with this information in order for it to function in the system.
- the fire/security, or control panel 4C or a separate programming device, is connected to the transmitter 4A either directly through a wire cable 4H or through an intermediate hand-held programmer 4D via link 4F which programmer is then connected to the transmitter 4A through a wire cable 4G
- the hand-held programmer can be either electrically programmed by the fire/security, or control panel or operator.
- the programmer can receive data and provide visual indicia via the fire/security, or control panel 4K, to key in programming commands 4D, or the programming device can be self sufficient, configured to communicate with said fire/security, or control panel as well as said sensor or transmitter.
- an electromagnetic field 2 in the form of, for example, a magnetic loop induction coil, or optical data link 3 can replace the wire cable, as shown in Figure 3.
- the electromagnetic or optical programming would be facilitated by a magnetic, electromagnetic 3A or optical 3E pick-up device.
- Those received signals are amplified by amplifier 3B.
- amplifier 3B can be biased into a very low current or no current state to reduce power. This has the desirable effect of requiring a larger peak to peak voltage swing on pickup 3A. This forces a programming device to be physically close access to a sensor element and reduces the chance of tampering or unauthorized operation.
- the senor or transmitter can be programmed to "wake up”, “power up”, handshake with the programming device and go into a programming mode upon exposure, via magnetic loop induction coil, of a electromagnetic field of a predetermined field strength, or exceeding said predetermined field strength.
- This "wake up” feature allows the sensor transmitter to "sleep" during non-use or non- programming, and is initiated into the “wake up” mode by certain predesignated events, such as exposure to the inductive loop, above, or other external events, or internal events, such as, for example, timer, programmable counter, etc.
- a sequence of events occurs, including powering up, handshake protocol, if it believes a programming device is attempting to communicate, then programming protocol. Also, a self diagnostic and reporting transmission may be provided, as desired.
- This sequence of events feature provides the ability to allow the sensor transmitter to respond to a programming device, while maintaining low power consumption.
- Utilization of an inductive field coil for programming can have the additional advantage, with an appropriately configured sensor, of providing power to said transmitter via said magnetic or electromagnetic field 2, during at least the programming phase, which may be a power-intensive application. While it has been known in other applications that a magnetic coil can be utilized to provide inductive power to devices, it is believed that such usage in the present application would be unique and, combined with the power up sequence above, is especially useful.
- the senor can be configured so as to "power up”, or “wake up” then “power up”, handshake, and go into a programming mode upon exposure, via optical input 3, of light of a predetermined brightness, frequency, modulation rate, or other variance.
- said photo detector 3E can be include or be combined with photo generative power means, such as, for example, photo cells or the like to utilize said light generated by said optical input to provide power to said transmitter during at least the programming phase, which may be a power-intensive application.
- the output of amplifier 3B is then decoded by I/O decoder 3C to determine 1/0 logic levels, as well as, both clock and data information 4. Many such methods are commonly available including ratio encoding, Manchester encoding, Non-Return to Zero (NRZ) encoding, or the like; alternatively, a
- the fire/security, or control panel 4C chooses the necessary programmable transmitter functions and stores them into its data base 41. Next, a transfer of the fire/security, or control panel desired programming must be sent to the sensor or transmitter 4A.
- Both the transmitter 4A and receiver 4B contain an identical, repeatable pseudo randomization algorithm in ROM or in ASIC logic.
- the algorithm is applied to outgoing programming data 5D from the fire/security, or control panel 5A and produces a number of security/randomization bits 5C which are appended to the outgoing programming message or message
- the transmitter likewise applies this pseudo randomization algorithm as the security/randomization bits (Fig 5. 5C) to the outgoing programming data (Fig 5, 5D), now forming the incoming programming data 1A to the transmitter (Fig 5, 5B) and produces a several bit result in the shift register 1F.
- the scrambling algorithm is devised such that a small difference in the programming bit stream causes a great difference in the pseudo randomization result.
- the present invention uses a 16 bit polynomial to produce this pseudo randomization.
- both the pseudo random code, stored in the data in shift register 1G from the fire/security, or control panel and the transmitter, in shift register 1F must match via comparitor ID, indicating unauthorized acceptance use. In addition to insuring authorized access, this process also insures that the data itself is correct. The longer the polynomial sequence used, the greater the security.
- a preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizing spread spectrum or other RF transmission means should include a programming means to determine that the frequency or spread spectrum code is unique to the area. If a spread spectrum code, system code, or frequency channel is found to be occupied at a future time of use, then the system should be programmed to re-program the sensors and central processor unit so as to alter the programming such that a new, unused spread spectrum code or system code or frequency channel can be selected, or, in the alternative, the control panel of the central processor unit can alert the programmer to re-program the system to accomplish the same task. To further increase security of the fire/security, or control system, not all systems have to operate on the same randomization code. The randomization seed 1H can be altered occasionally.
- an alternative means of enhancing programming security would comprise the steps of: a. placing a programming device 4D in a programming mode, selectively generating a random seed, and communicating said seed into the memory of said central processing unit or fire/security, or control panel 4C and said programming device 4D, said random seed to be utilized in the validation of data transmitted all sensor/transmitters utilized in the alarm system to said fire/security, or control panel 4C or central processing unit, providing a unique, site-specific operational code for said sensor array; b. placing said programming device 4D within the reception range of a sensor 4A; c. placing said sensor 4A into a mode by which it can accept data via transmitted programming information from said programming device 4D; d.
- Said sensor/transmitter 4A could include EEROM as the memory means, for example, which could be partitioned to allow for redundantly saving said seed and programming data in said EEROM, thereby providing a backup of said programming data upon corruption of part of the memory of said sensor transmitter.
- EEROM Electrical Erasable Read Only Memory
- the use of an EEROM (Electrically Erasable Read Only Memory) device in a circuit whose power supply varies unpredictably from, for example, 0 to 5 volts, with the voltage changing at varying rates from very slow (for example, days) to very fast (microseconds) represents many challenges.
- the EEROM devices are designed to maintain date without power present, and to allow reading and writing of data while power is present, do not always perform correctly when operated with variable power systems. To prevent loss of data under such circumstances, three techniques may be implemented. The first may comprise removing power from the EEROM entirely unless it is desired to operate it. This prevents mis-operation at other times.
- the power switch may be programmed into the system, and may take the form, as shown in Figure 6a, of a pass transistor t in series with the EEROM's Ucc power lead, or, as shown in Figure 6b, the utilization of a logic gate L whose logic high output is capable of conveying sufficient power to the EEROM.
- a third technique is to store multiple, such as, for example, four copies of the data, each with an error detection code, to allow for determination of the integrity of the data upon later retrieval, thereby providing redundant memory storage of important data.
- the redundant storage provides back up data.
- step "e” would include, for example, the step of said sensor/transmitter 4A inputting said programming message and saving said seed in memory; f. said sensor/transmitter 4A utilizing said seed to code digital data bits transmitted
- the sensor transmitters and said central processor unit could utilized for example, the CRC (cyclic redundancy check) coding method or check sum.
- CRC cyclic redundancy check
- the data transmitted by said security/transmitter may be coded by appending said seed to said digital data bits, and wherein said central processor unit validates or rejects received upon detection of said seed string appended to said digital data bits, or, in the alternative, said digital data bits may be coded and decoded by applying a scrambling algorithm utilizing said seed.
- the programming device may be configured to transmit data to said sensor utilizing a variety of alternative transmission means, including, for example, RF, IR, optical, or a magnetic loop/induction system, and wherein said sensor is configured to be shipped in a non-programmable mode, and is configured only to initiate programming sequence only upon exposure to a magnetic field of predetermined field strength, generated by said magnetic loop/induction system.
- the random seed may be communicated to said programming device via scanning a bar code, manual input, magnetic strip, or random number generation.
- the transmitter 4A accepts the programming as correct, it then either transmits 4E one or more verification messages or repeats its programming through the electric, magnetic or optical link 4G, 4H. In this manner the fire/security, or control data base can match and verify 100% correctness of the desired program.
- the programming method of the present invention may include the further step of monitoring for the other utlization of the spread spectrum code, system code, or frequency channel, and upon discerning other use, re-initiating programming of said spread spectrum code, system code, or frequency of said sensor/transmitters and said central processing unit to change said spread spectrum code, system code, or frequency to an new spread spectrum code, system code, or frequency.
- this link can also be used to aid in production of the transmitter. For example, special program commands can be used to test battery low or help automated tuning of transmitter elements. Further, this feature can be used in the field to insure full functionality of the device prior to installation.
- An alternative embodiment of the present invention, wherein the transmitter would provide the security/randomization code could work as follows: a. placing an unprogrammed transmitter in near proximity to an unprogrammed fire/security, or control receiver; b. said receiver set into a mode by which it can accept programming data via transmitted programming information from said transmitter; c. limiting the signal strength of said transmitter to a near proximity of the receiver or by way of a special bit in the transmitted message signifying that the message is a programming message; d.
- said transmitter having a random number means for generating random numbers; e. selectively generating a security/randomization bit for said transmitter by initiating said random number generator, and designating said random number generated as said security/randomization bit, and transmitting said bit to said receiver; f. said receiver imputing programming message and determining if such a device ID/address already exists in the system; g. if said new device ID/address is acceptable it becomes internally associated by the receiver or security /fire panel with the appropriate transmitter; h. if the new device ID/address is not acceptable the receiver or fire/security, or control panel so makes an appropriate indication; i. Step e is repeated until step h is met, once met the transmitter is removed from the programming mode.
- the above method could include the additional step after step "e" of the receiver inputting said transmission and appending said security/randomization bit to programming data including new device
- the ability to disable said programming button in order to prevent further tampering of the receiver once programmed would be desirable; such a means to disable could include, for example, switching the input protocol into a loop, preventing further input from said button.
- Said programming button might also be utilized to set the transmitter type code in the transmitter for transmission to the receiver.
- the wire programming link or the magnetic field or optical programming link WILL NOT or COULD NOT be disconnected. Further, it is important that an unauthorized person COULD NOT AT A FUTURE POINT, after the initial programming of the transmitter, alter that programming by simple re-connection of a programming cable. If the transmitter became re-programmed it would be possible for the transmitter to create false or unrecognizable information which would render the fire/security, or control system ineffective. This is especially true of more sophisticated systems which require extensive programmability of sensor/transmitter personality. To facilitate these essential needs, the present invention provides a "JAM" 2C function, as illustrated in Figure 2.
- a "JAM" command ( Figure 5, 5E) can be sent.
- the incoming programming message is stored in memory means 2B as shown in Figure 2.
- the programming message is compared to a unique bit pattern 5C which represents the JAM command.
- the JAM command is permanently latched into flip-flop 2E.
- the JAM command logically disconnects the programming connection via logic circuit 2F so that future incoming programming commands via programming input 2A will be ignored.
- the JAM command could be replaced or augmented by a switch 2G or a jumper located within the transmitter which disconnects the incoming programming commands via programming input 2A.
- optical or magnetic means of imputing programming do not have to directly interface with a portable programmer or with a fire/security, or control panel. Instead those inputs could directly sense the information contained on an optical or magnetic bar code or the like or the H field information on a magnetic strip.
- the bar code or magnetic strip could be coded or printed either at the time of manufacture, or at the time of installation and be optionally affixed to the sensor transmitter itself.
- a sheet of pre-programmed bar codes with their associated meaning could be produced and distributed to fire/security system installers. In this manner the installer need only choose the appropriate personality features and addresses and pass them by the magnetic or optical input of the sensor.
- an electricity detachable bar code wand could be used to input the bar codes or magnetic strip.
- Such a programming method has the advantage of needing no portable programmer, it is a non-volatile storage means and needs no electrical connection.
- the bar code or magnetic strip need only be passed by the magnetic or optical programming input of the sensors.
- a second bar code with the JAM command could then terminate potential future programming.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1995/004731 WO1996033478A1 (en) | 1995-04-17 | 1995-04-17 | Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system |
EP95917024A EP0823107A4 (en) | 1995-04-17 | 1995-04-17 | Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system |
AU23869/95A AU2386995A (en) | 1995-04-17 | 1995-04-17 | Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1995/004731 WO1996033478A1 (en) | 1995-04-17 | 1995-04-17 | Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1996033478A1 true WO1996033478A1 (en) | 1996-10-24 |
Family
ID=22248983
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1995/004731 WO1996033478A1 (en) | 1995-04-17 | 1995-04-17 | Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0823107A4 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2386995A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996033478A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002058025A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-07-25 | Crowcon Detection Instruments Ltd | Optical activation |
GB2397478A (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2004-07-21 | Agilent Technologies Inc | A communication device (e.g. a fibre-optic transceiver) stores software which can be executed to configure the device |
WO2015071606A1 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-21 | Finsecur | Method and device for deploying a link between at least one security system and an alarm centre |
US10542607B2 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2020-01-21 | Hubbell Incorporated | Wireless radio control for sensors |
US20230066816A1 (en) * | 2021-08-31 | 2023-03-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Programmable Spread Spectrum Signaling over a Pin of an Integrated Circuit Device |
US11783696B2 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2023-10-10 | Carrier Corporation | Fire detection system diagnostic systems and methods |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4737770A (en) * | 1986-03-10 | 1988-04-12 | Interactive Technologies, Inc. | Security system with programmable sensor and user data input transmitters |
US4772876A (en) * | 1986-10-10 | 1988-09-20 | Zenith Electronics Corporation | Remote security transmitter address programmer |
US4831438A (en) * | 1987-02-25 | 1989-05-16 | Household Data Services | Electronic surveillance system |
US4847577A (en) * | 1985-07-18 | 1989-07-11 | Gerhart Roland T | Security and alarm system employing a particular pulse width discriminator |
US4903340A (en) * | 1988-03-23 | 1990-02-20 | Spacelabs, Inc. | Optical data connector having magnetic interconnect sensor |
US4952817A (en) * | 1989-05-31 | 1990-08-28 | Dallas Semiconductor Corporation | Self-starting test station |
US4977577A (en) * | 1988-11-02 | 1990-12-11 | Axonn Corporation | Wireless alarm system |
US5259029A (en) * | 1990-05-16 | 1993-11-02 | Duncan Jr F Jeff | Decoding device for computer software protection |
US5268980A (en) * | 1991-06-14 | 1993-12-07 | Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. | Active optical coupler for optical data link communication system |
US5302941A (en) * | 1992-01-07 | 1994-04-12 | Detection Systems Inc. | Multi-sensor security/fire alarm system with mated master control |
US5305008A (en) * | 1991-08-12 | 1994-04-19 | Integrated Silicon Design Pty. Ltd. | Transponder system |
US5341988A (en) * | 1991-10-01 | 1994-08-30 | American Standard Inc. | Wireless air balancing system |
US5396541A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 1995-03-07 | At&T Corp. | Call handoff in a wireless telephone system |
US5408217A (en) * | 1994-03-21 | 1995-04-18 | Sanconix, Inc. | Secure fire/security/sensor transmitter system |
-
1995
- 1995-04-17 WO PCT/US1995/004731 patent/WO1996033478A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1995-04-17 EP EP95917024A patent/EP0823107A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1995-04-17 AU AU23869/95A patent/AU2386995A/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4847577A (en) * | 1985-07-18 | 1989-07-11 | Gerhart Roland T | Security and alarm system employing a particular pulse width discriminator |
US4737770A (en) * | 1986-03-10 | 1988-04-12 | Interactive Technologies, Inc. | Security system with programmable sensor and user data input transmitters |
US4772876A (en) * | 1986-10-10 | 1988-09-20 | Zenith Electronics Corporation | Remote security transmitter address programmer |
US4831438A (en) * | 1987-02-25 | 1989-05-16 | Household Data Services | Electronic surveillance system |
US4903340A (en) * | 1988-03-23 | 1990-02-20 | Spacelabs, Inc. | Optical data connector having magnetic interconnect sensor |
US4977577A (en) * | 1988-11-02 | 1990-12-11 | Axonn Corporation | Wireless alarm system |
US4952817A (en) * | 1989-05-31 | 1990-08-28 | Dallas Semiconductor Corporation | Self-starting test station |
US5259029A (en) * | 1990-05-16 | 1993-11-02 | Duncan Jr F Jeff | Decoding device for computer software protection |
US5268980A (en) * | 1991-06-14 | 1993-12-07 | Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. | Active optical coupler for optical data link communication system |
US5305008A (en) * | 1991-08-12 | 1994-04-19 | Integrated Silicon Design Pty. Ltd. | Transponder system |
US5341988A (en) * | 1991-10-01 | 1994-08-30 | American Standard Inc. | Wireless air balancing system |
US5302941A (en) * | 1992-01-07 | 1994-04-12 | Detection Systems Inc. | Multi-sensor security/fire alarm system with mated master control |
US5396541A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 1995-03-07 | At&T Corp. | Call handoff in a wireless telephone system |
US5408217A (en) * | 1994-03-21 | 1995-04-18 | Sanconix, Inc. | Secure fire/security/sensor transmitter system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP0823107A4 * |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002058025A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-07-25 | Crowcon Detection Instruments Ltd | Optical activation |
GB2397478A (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2004-07-21 | Agilent Technologies Inc | A communication device (e.g. a fibre-optic transceiver) stores software which can be executed to configure the device |
GB2397478B (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2007-03-14 | Agilent Technologies Inc | Communication module and related method |
WO2015071606A1 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-21 | Finsecur | Method and device for deploying a link between at least one security system and an alarm centre |
US10542607B2 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2020-01-21 | Hubbell Incorporated | Wireless radio control for sensors |
US10869377B2 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2020-12-15 | Hubbell Incorporated | Wireless radio control for sensors |
US11783696B2 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2023-10-10 | Carrier Corporation | Fire detection system diagnostic systems and methods |
US20230066816A1 (en) * | 2021-08-31 | 2023-03-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Programmable Spread Spectrum Signaling over a Pin of an Integrated Circuit Device |
US11894868B2 (en) * | 2021-08-31 | 2024-02-06 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Programmable spread spectrum signaling over a pin of an integrated circuit device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2386995A (en) | 1996-11-07 |
EP0823107A1 (en) | 1998-02-11 |
EP0823107A4 (en) | 1999-09-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5408217A (en) | Secure fire/security/sensor transmitter system | |
US6166650A (en) | Secure self learning system | |
US5686904A (en) | Secure self learning system | |
US6191701B1 (en) | Secure self learning system | |
EP0827616B1 (en) | Initialisation of a wireless security system | |
US4855713A (en) | Learn mode transmitter | |
US20060123466A1 (en) | System and method of extending communications with the weigand protocol | |
CA1277394C (en) | Accessory-expandable, radio-controlled, door operator with multiple security levels | |
US4772876A (en) | Remote security transmitter address programmer | |
US5182543A (en) | Miniaturized data communication and identification system | |
KR19990007983A (en) | Code hopping system | |
US5077547A (en) | Non contact programming for transmitter module | |
GB2222288A (en) | Remote control systems | |
US10178016B1 (en) | Deployment and communications test of intermediate-range devices using a short-range wireless mobile device | |
GB2278463A (en) | Central heating control system | |
US5565852A (en) | Smoke detector with digital display | |
WO1996033478A1 (en) | Secure remote sensor/transmitter array system | |
US6326880B1 (en) | Detector with control switch | |
EP0688929B1 (en) | Secure self-learning | |
US10206081B1 (en) | Deployment of intermediate-range devices using a short-range mobile device | |
US10700885B2 (en) | Deployment of intermediate-range devices using a short-range mobile device | |
AU663508B2 (en) | Device for encoding or decoding of signals | |
KR100189289B1 (en) | Security arrangement | |
CN113031491A (en) | 4-20 mA analog signal sensor with encryption function and method | |
JPS62145940A (en) | Fluid regulating valve communication system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AU CA JP US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: US Ref document number: 1997 945280 Date of ref document: 19971016 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1995917024 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1995917024 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1995917024 Country of ref document: EP |