|Publication number||US4511976 A|
|Application number||US 06/395,792|
|Publication date||16 Apr 1985|
|Filing date||6 Jul 1982|
|Priority date||6 Jul 1982|
|Publication number||06395792, 395792, US 4511976 A, US 4511976A, US-A-4511976, US4511976 A, US4511976A|
|Inventors||Raymond J. Graf|
|Original Assignee||Cincinnati Incorporated|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (21), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (21), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
M.sub.θ =M.sub.O (k.sub.O +k.sub.1 θ.sub.u +k.sub.2 θ.sub.u.sup.2 +k.sub.3 θ.sub.u.sup.3)
M.sub.θ =M.sub.o (k.sub.O +k.sub.1 θ.sub.u +k.sub.2 θ.sub.u.sup.2 +k.sub.3 θ.sub.u.sup.3)
The present invention is directed to a control system for press brakes, and more particularly to a control system for use with hydraulic press brakes to predict the point of stroke reversal to produce a desired bend angle based upon in-process measurements made during the forming cycle.
A common problem which occurs with conventional press brakes used to bend sheet metal or the like to a predetermined angle is the return or spring back of the material to a position somewhat less than the desired bend upon retraction of the punch member from the die. Generally, the terminal punch position is selected manually by an operator so that the stroke of the ram is reversed at a predetermined point to produce the desired angle of bend. Consequently, the selection of the reversal point by the operator is an artful choice to insure that the metal sheet is overbent just enough to spring back to the desired angle. This procedure is usually based on trial and error coupled with the experience of the press brake operator.
The proper point of stroke reversal for a particular bend angle depends upon the properties of the material, the geometry of the die and punch, and the specific angle desired. This point is often found by making several trial bends to empirically determine the reversal point producing the best bend angle including compensation for spring back. It has been found that once this point is found, it will vary from bend to bend as the material varies in thickness and physical properties.
The present invention includes an electronic control system associated with the press brake which monitors the actual angle of bend of the work piece and the bending load and processes this information to provide a control signal for activating the ram reversal mechanism at the precise point of punch penetration to accurately produce the desired bend angle in the work piece with a single ram stroke. The control system of the present invention may be retrofitted to an existing press brake without modification to the basic brake operating controls.
In a preferred embodiment, the control of the present invention includes a load transducer in the form of a load cell associated with either or both of the ram hydraulic pistons which produces a load signal representative of the instantaneous force supplied to the work piece as well as a sensor in contact with the work piece which measures the actual instantaneous angle of bend, commonly referred to as the flank angle. Using information derived from these two input sources, the instantaneous ram force-flank angle characteristics of the work piece can be continuously monitored.
During the forming cycle, successive ram force-flank angle data point pairs are taken and used to calculate the slope of the elastic portion of the force-angle characteristic curve for that particular work piece. The linearity of the loading portion of the curve is also monitored in order to determine when the plastic portion of the curve is entered. It has been found that the theoretical unloading characteristics may be derived from the measured loading characteristics of the work piece. The slope of the theoretical unloading curve may be calculated using the measured slope of the loading characteristic and the desired or unloaded bend angle.
During the plastic portion of the characteristic curve, additional data point pairs are measured and a slope for this portion of the curve calculated. Using this information, the theoretical intersection point for the linear portion of the plastic curve and the theoretical unloading curve may be calculated. This point corresponds to the calculated loaded flank angle which will produce the desired unloaded flank angle. Consequently, when this point is reached, the ram is reversed allowing the work piece to relax or spring back to the desired flank angle.
In the preferred embodiment, mathematical relationship between the loading and unloading characteristics, and slopes of specific force/displacement/flank angle curves is disclosed which provides accurate results for many types of materials.
Further features of the invention will become apparent from the detailed description which follows.
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic block diagram of the control system of the present invention in connection with a conventional hydraulically operated press brake illustrated in front elevation.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic side elevation view of a portion of the press brake of FIG. 1 illustrating the angle measurement mechanism associated with the present invention, with the work piece shown in the bent and unbent positions.
FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the ram force-flank angle characteristic curve for a typical work piece.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram for the program associated with computer 12.
A general block diagram of the control system of the present invention is illustrated generally at 1 in FIG. 1. This arrangement includes a conventional hydraulically operated press brake 2 having a rigid structural frame fixedly mounting a bed 3 supporting a V die 4. Press brake 2 also includes a pair of spaced vertically oriented hydraulically operated cylinders 5 operating piston rods 6 which in turn are connected to a ram member 7. Ram member 7 is vertically displaceable with respect to bed 3 as is well known in the art. The lowermost edge of ram 7 mounts a punch 8 of the proper configuration to enter V die 4 to produce the proper bend.
FIG. 2 illustrates diagrammatically a side elevation view of the lower portion of press brake 2. In a typical bending operation, a flat metallic work piece W, illustrated in the relaxed or unbent state, is placed on top of V die 4. As the punch 8 is moved downwardly by the hydraulically controlled brake ram 7, it enters the V-shaped channel of V die 4, bending the work piece W to a particular angle, illustrated in dashed lines in FIG. 2. At the furthest downward extent of travel of punch 8, the work piece W will be bent to a loaded angle, θl, somewhat greater than the desired bend or flank angle. As the direction of travel of punch 8 is reversed, work piece W returns to a slightly smaller angle, and when fully unloaded assumes an unloaded flank angle designated θu. The amount of "spring back" associated with the work piece W will depend on the particular characteristics and size of the material used, as well as the parameters of the punch and die. It will be observed that a certain degree of downward over travel of the punch 8 is usually necessary to produce a particular desired unloaded flank angle θu. The control system of the present invention provides the necessary amount of punch over travel to produce the desired finished bend angle.
Returning to FIG. 1, also associated with press brake 2 is an electro-hydraulic brake control 9 which issues commands to hydraulic circuitry (not shown) associated with hydraulic cylinders 5 for causing ram 7 to move downwardly under control of an electrical ram stroke command, and upwardly under control of a ram reverse command. In the present invention, the downwardly directed ram stroke operates as in a conventional press brake. However, the ram reverse command is modified to cause reversal of the ram at the precise point calculated by the digital processing means to be described hereinafter to insure the proper bend angle.
A load transducer 10 is associated with either or both of piston rods 6 and produces an electrical signal on line 11 proportional to the ram force being exerted against the work piece W. For example, load transducer 10 may comprise a load cell formed from a piece of steel having strain gages arranged at the end of piston rod 6 to form a conventional bridge circuit as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,564,883, Hydraulic Press Control, issued Feb. 23, 1971 to C. W. Koors et al.
The electrical signal appearing on line 11, which may be of digital format, is applied to digital processing means formed by digital computer 12. In instances where a load transducer 10 is associated with each of hydraulic piston 6, the readings obtained from each transducer may be added to produce an electrical signal proportional to the sum force exerted by ram 7.
The instantaneous flank angle of the work piece W is sensed by a position encoder 13 which applies to digital computer 12 on electrical output line 14 a signal representative of the instantaneous flank angle of the work piece. A specific embodiment of position encoder 13 is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 2 and includes a vertically extending rod 15 having a rounded upper end 16 which remains in physical contact with the undersurface of work piece W. Rod 15 is restrained to move in vertical directions depicted by arrows 17 by means of spaced guide members 18 attached to the frame of press brake 2. The lower end of rod 15 is in contact with a lever arm 19 which has one end fixedly attached to the shaft of a rotary encoder 20. As rod 15 is moved upwardly and the position illustrated in dotted lines as work piece W is moved to a bent position, lever arm 19 correspondingly moves upwardly to the dotted position shown at 19a, thereby causing rotation of the shaft associated with rotary encoder 20, and an electrical signal output on line 14 proportional to the angle of bend of the work piece. It will be observed that other methods of measuring the angle of bend of the work piece, both contact and non-contact, such as laser or other optical methods, may also be utilized.
It will be observed that the arrangement just described permits the force exerted by the ram against the work piece as well as the actual flank angle of the work piece to be continuously measured. These measurements will result in a force-angle characteristic of the type graphically illustrated in FIG. 3. The initial linear or elastic region of the curve depicted in FIG. 3 represents the loading characteristics of work piece W. If at any point during this loading portion the ram is reversed, the work piece will return to its normal unbent state. As will be described in more detail hereinafter, during the loading portion of the curve, a number of data points are measured relating ram force to flank angle. For purposes of an exemplary showing, two such data point pairs are illustrated, the first data point P1 relating flank angle θ1 to ram force F1 and a second data point P2 relating flank angle θ2 to ram force F2. In the specific processing under consideration, more than two points will be measured so as to provide a continuous representation of the force-angle relationship during the loading portion of the curve.
From this data, the slope MO of the loading portion for the curve may be calculated, such as by the relationship: ##EQU1##
The calculation of the loading slope MO is terminated when the processing senses that the relationship between the ram force and flank angle is departing from linearity, indicating that the work piece is entering the plastic portion 21 of the curve. Once this has occurred, the process examines data point pairs, depicted as point P3 and P4 in FIG. 3. By relating data point pairs on the linear part of the plastic portion of the curve, an assumed straight line segment 22 can be formulated.
As illustrated in FIG. 3, if the ram is reversed at the theoretical ram reversal location 23, corresponding to a loaded flank angle θ1, the work piece will relax along the unloading curve 24 to produce the desired flank angle θu. From the data already calculated, it is only necessary to know the slope M.sub.θ of the unloading curve to determine where the ram reversal location 23 should occur. It has been found empirically that a relationship exists between the unloading slope M.sub.θ, the loading slope M0, and the unloaded flank angle θu, expressed mathematically in the general form M.sub.θ =f(MO, θu). Although this derived expression will vary somewhat for the size of the V die and material, it may be expressed as a third order equation as follows:
M.sub.θ =M.sub.O (k.sub.O +k.sub.1 θ.sub.u +k.sub.2 θ.sub.u.sup.2 +k.sub.3 θ.sub.u.sup.3)
Once the value of the unloaded slope has been calculated, the loaded flank angle θ1 corresponding to the point 23 at which the ram should be reversed may be calculated from the expression: ##EQU2## It will be observed that data for the previous equation is obtained by in-process machine measurements, P3 and P4, as well as a previous calculation for the value M.sub.θ and user supplied data, θu, the unloaded flank angle desired.
A flow diagram for the processing to carry out the above processing in computer 12 is illustrated in FIG. 4. The system is initialized to be certain that the ram force and flank angle start at zero values. The loading characteristics are then calculated by measuring successively a number of ram force-flank angle data pairs as described above, and using this information to calculate the loading slope M0. If the force-angle relationship continues to be linear, the calculation just described continues. However, when non-linearity is noted, indicating that the force-angle characteristic is entering the plastic phase, the processing branches to calculate the theoretical unloading characteristics, specifically the unloading slope M.sub.θ as described hereinabove based on the measured value of MO and the desired unloaded flank angle. A value of loading slope MO calculated before the onset of non-linearity is selected as the value of loading slope used in subsequent calculations.
The plastic characteristics are then calculated by measuring successively a number of data point pairs relating ram force and flank angle in the plastic portion of the curve. These values, together with the value of M.sub.θ and the desired unloaded flank angle θu, are used to determine the point of theoretical ram reversal location. In other words, the processing seeks to determine a point of intersection between linear line segment 22 and the theoretical unloading curve 24. As long as such an intersection has not occurred, the system continues to relate the plastic characteristics to the theoretical unloading curve. However, when an intersection point 23 is detected, computer 14 outputs a signal on line 18 to brake control 9 to reverse the direction of travel of ram 7, thereby terminating the forming operation. At this point, the work piece W, which has been bent to a loaded flank angle θl, relaxes or springs back to the desired unloaded flank angle θu along unloading curve 24.
It will be observed that the processing described in FIG. 4 may be used to program a general purpose digital computer, or may be furnished as "firmware" such as a ROM associated with computer 12.
It will be understood that various changes in the details, steps, materials and arrangements of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in connection with the present invention, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3145756 *||19 Sep 1961||25 Aug 1964||Baldwin Lima Hamilton Corp||Numerically controlled tube bending machine|
|US3156287 *||12 Dec 1961||10 Nov 1964||Pines Engineering Co Inc||Control means for metal forming apparatus|
|US3181331 *||27 Jun 1962||4 May 1965||Ite Circuit Breaker Ltd||Article bending machine|
|US3333445 *||23 Jun 1964||1 Aug 1967||Case Inst Of Technology||Digitally controlled metal forming|
|US3352136 *||22 Mar 1965||14 Nov 1967||Conrac Corp||Metal forming machine|
|US3459018 *||4 Feb 1966||5 Aug 1969||Univ Court Of The Univ Of Glas||Method of and apparatus for bending bars|
|US3553990 *||23 Apr 1968||12 Jan 1971||Pines Engineering Co Inc||Tube bender pressure die interference control|
|US3564883 *||30 Jul 1968||23 Feb 1971||Cincinnati Shaper Co||Hydraulic press control|
|US3620066 *||25 Jun 1969||16 Nov 1971||Neville T Henkel||Metal bending method and machine therefor|
|US3653251 *||17 Feb 1970||4 Apr 1972||British Aircraft Corp Ltd||Pipe bending|
|US3713312 *||7 Sep 1971||30 Jan 1973||R Galdabini||Methods and apparatus for straightening or blending elongated workpieces|
|US3729969 *||19 Aug 1971||1 May 1973||Gen Electric||Barrel forming press|
|US3777525 *||30 Aug 1971||11 Dec 1973||Peddinghaus Carl Ullrich Dr||Machine for bending concrete-reinforcing bars|
|US3812694 *||30 Nov 1971||28 May 1974||P Peddinghaus||Bending machine for metal rods|
|US3821525 *||16 Mar 1972||28 Jun 1974||Conrac Corp||Method and apparatus for automatically compensated tube bending|
|US3895509 *||18 May 1973||22 Jul 1975||Peddinghaus Carl Ullrich Dr||Bending machine for rods, wires and other elongated articles of steel, etc.|
|US3943746 *||17 Sep 1974||16 Mar 1976||Eitel Kg., Werkzeugmaschinenfabrik||Automatic aligning process and aligning press having a single aligning station|
|US3948076 *||17 Sep 1974||6 Apr 1976||Eitel Kg., Werkzeugmaschinenfabrik||Automatic process and aligning apparatus having a plurality of aligning stations|
|US3955389 *||21 Apr 1975||11 May 1976||The Boeing Company||Springback compensated continuous roll forming machines|
|US4148203 *||7 Oct 1977||10 Apr 1979||Dreis & Krump Mfg. Co.||Computer-controlled press brake|
|US4408471 *||29 Oct 1980||11 Oct 1983||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Press brake having spring-back compensating adaptive control|
|1||ICAM Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing, presented at 4th Annual _Industry Briefing, Sep. 11, 1979, Southfield, Michigan, pp. 503-506.|
|2||*||ICAM Integrated Computer Aided Manufacturing, presented at 4th Annual Industry Briefing, Sep. 11, 1979, Southfield, Michigan, pp. 503 506.|
|3||ICAM Mathematical Modeling of Sheet Metal Formability Indices and Sheet _Metal Forming Processes, AFML-TR-79-4168, Nov. 1979, pp. 235-_237, by Air Force Materials Laboratory.|
|4||*||ICAM Mathematical Modeling of Sheet Metal Formability Indices and Sheet Metal Forming Processes, AFML TR 79 4168, Nov. 1979, pp. 235 237, by Air Force Materials Laboratory.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4611156 *||5 Oct 1984||9 Sep 1986||Dr. Johannes Heidenhain Gmbh||Method and apparatus for determining the position or dimensions of a test object|
|US4797831 *||18 Nov 1986||10 Jan 1989||Cincinnati Incorporated||Apparatus for synchronizing cylinder position in a multiple cylinder hydraulic press brake|
|US4802357 *||28 May 1987||7 Feb 1989||The Boeing Company||Apparatus and method of compensating for springback in a workpiece|
|US4812722 *||26 Oct 1987||14 Mar 1989||Cams, Inc.||Multi-mode force control circuit|
|US4819467 *||17 Sep 1986||11 Apr 1989||Cincinnati Incorporated||Adaptive control system for hydraulic press brake|
|US4824632 *||31 Dec 1987||25 Apr 1989||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Fuel assembly alignment pin straightening device|
|US4831862 *||22 Jun 1987||23 May 1989||Amada Company, Limited||Multistep bending machine|
|US4864509 *||29 Sep 1987||5 Sep 1989||The Boeing Company||Method and related apparatus for controlling the operation of a press brake|
|US5394335 *||31 Mar 1993||28 Feb 1995||Amada Engineering & Service Co., Inc.||Retrofit auto-indexing system|
|US5729462 *||25 Aug 1995||17 Mar 1998||Northrop Grumman Corporation||Method and apparatus for constructing a complex tool surface for use in an age forming process|
|US5829288 *||26 Aug 1994||3 Nov 1998||L.V.D. Company N.V.||Adaptive folding|
|US5857366 *||7 Jul 1995||12 Jan 1999||Amada Company, Ltd.||Method of bending workpiece to target bending angle accurately and press brake for use in the same method|
|US7079919||15 Mar 2002||18 Jul 2006||Bystronic Laser Ag||Method for setting the travel of a press brake|
|US7607329 *||17 Mar 2006||27 Oct 2009||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method for free bending|
|US9463500 *||9 Oct 2012||11 Oct 2016||The Boeing Company||Dynamic stringer forming system|
|US20040111177 *||15 Mar 2002||10 Jun 2004||Gerrit Gerritsen||Method for setting the travel of a press brake|
|US20060218984 *||17 Mar 2006||5 Oct 2006||Burkhard Heller||Method for free bending|
|EP0752290A1 *||27 Mar 1995||8 Jan 1997||Komatsu Ltd.||Automatic mold bending corner depth amount compensating method|
|EP0752290A4 *||27 Mar 1995||9 Jul 1997||Komatsu Mfg Co Ltd||Automatic mold bending corner depth amount compensating method|
|WO1988001916A1 *||21 Jan 1987||24 Mar 1988||Cincinnati Incorporated||Adaptative control system for hydraulic press brake|
|WO1995005905A1 *||26 Aug 1994||2 Mar 1995||L.V.D. Company N.V.||Adaptive folding|
|U.S. Classification||700/165, 72/702, 72/20.1, 700/193|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S72/702, B21D5/006, B21D5/02|
|European Classification||B21D5/00D, B21D5/02|
|6 Jul 1982||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CINCINNATI INCORPORATED; P.O. BOX 11111, CINCINNAT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:GRAF, RAYMOND J.;REEL/FRAME:004021/0097
Effective date: 19820628
Owner name: CINCINNATI INCORPORATED; A CORP OF OH., OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GRAF, RAYMOND J.;REEL/FRAME:004021/0097
Effective date: 19820628
|24 Aug 1988||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|21 Jul 1992||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|23 Sep 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12