|Publication number||US3922787 A|
|Publication date||2 Dec 1975|
|Filing date||7 May 1974|
|Priority date||7 May 1974|
|Also published as||CA1043595A, CA1043595A1, DE2520191A1|
|Publication number||US 3922787 A, US 3922787A, US-A-3922787, US3922787 A, US3922787A|
|Inventors||Fischer Kenneth J, Orlowski Jan A|
|Original Assignee||Fischer Kenneth J, Orlowski Jan A|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (60), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 1 1 Fischer et al.
[ 1 Dec. 2, 1975 154] PLASTIC ORTHODONTIC BRACKET  Inventors: Kenneth J. Fischer, 18925 Vose St.,
Reseda, Calif. 91335; Jan A. Orlowski, 1304 Rubio St., Altadena, Calif. 91001  Filed: May 7, I974  Appl. No.: 467,675
Primary Examiner-Robert Peshock ABSTRACT An all plastic orthodontic bracket is disclosed which is adapted to be attached directly to the labial surface of a tooth. The bracket has a quasi triangular shaped body as viewed from the facial view to minimize forces being applied to the bracket during mastication and occlusion. The apical section of the triangular shaped body is adapted to be attached to the incisal section of the tooth and the base of the triangular shaped body is adapted to be attached to the gingival section of the tooth. All surfaces of the bracket body extending from a ligature undercut over the front surface of the bracket body are smooth and convex with the exception of those surfaces defined by an archwire slot and a second slot which is perpendicular to the archwire slot. Smooth convex bracket body surfaces substantially lessen plastic fatigue commonly found in prior art plastic orthodontic brackets having sharp corners. The ligature undercut is of a depth which is substantially filled by a small gauge archwire or an elastic ring. The relatively shallow depth of the ligature undercut insures that maximum bracket bulk is distributed between the archwire slot and the ligature undercut to lessen the tendency for bracket body fatigue between these points.
14 Claims, 4'Drawing Figures PLASTIC ORTHODONTIC BRACKET BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of Invention The invention relates to plastic orthodontic brackets of the type which are adapted to be directly cemented to the labial surface of a tooth. More particularly, the invention is directed to the shape of the bracket body which lessens the tendency of plastic fatigue found in prior art plastic brackets.
2. Description of the Prior Art Prior art plastic orthodontic brackets are geometrically configurated to have the same shape as their all metal counterparts. The history of use of plastic orthodontic brackets as a result of this type of design has been replete with frustration and disappointment caused by bracket distortion and breakage. Bracket distortion and breakage manifest themselves in increased clinical time consumption on a per patient basis. As a result of the clinical time expended in replacing broken and distorted plastic brackets, many orthodontists insist upon using all metal brackets even in light of the unaesthetic appearance of the all metal look.
The following United States patents disclose plastic orthodontic brackets which do not have a design which minimizes breakage and distortion:
None of the aforementioned patents embodies a plastic orthodontic bracket which is concerned with eliminating bracket breakage or distortion by utilizing a quasi triangular shaped bracket body, more effective material bulk distribution between the archwire slot and a ligature undercut by lessening the depth of the ligature undercut and the use of a smooth convex shape of the bracket body which eliminates sharp angles except in the archwire slot and in a vertical slot disposed perpendicular to the archwire slot which is used for applying mesio-distal rotational forces to the tooth to which the bracket is attached.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In light of the disadvantages of plastic bracket breakage and distortion, the present invention represents a substantial improvement in minimizing the aforementioned drawbacks by utilizing a design which incorporates the inherent structural properties of plastic as the criteria for shaping the bracket instead of the structural properties of metal.
One aspect of the present invention is the quasi triangular shape of the bracket body as seen from the facial view. When the bracket base is attached to the labial surface of a tooth, the narrower apical section is oriented closest to the incisal section while the wider base portion of the triangular bracket body is oriented closest to the gingival section. The quasi triangular shape of the bracket functions to minimize the forces applied to the bracket during mastication and occlusion by minimizing the surface area of the bracket which contacts food or other teeth when the jaws are about to close during mastication or occlusion.
Another aspect of the invention is the provision of a relatively shallow'ligature undercut which extends at least partially around the periphery of the side of the bracket body. The ligature undercut is substantially filed when a small gauge ligature wire or elastic ring is disposed therein. The preferred depth is approximately 0.030-0.035 inch. The use of the shallow ligature undercut insures that the maximum amount of bulk bracket material is located between the ligature undercut and an archwire slot cut in the front surface of the bracket body to lessen the chance of plastic fatigue. The base of the bracket extends away from the ligature undercut a distance sufficient to prevent the adhesive used for attaching the back surface of base portion of the bracket to the labial surface of the tooth from occluding the ligature undercut.
A final aspect of the invention is that all surfaces on the bracket body as defined from the ligature undercut extending to the archwire slot and to a slot disposed perpendicular to the archwire slot which is used for rotating the teeth mesio-distally are smooth and convex to lessen internal stress in the bracket body which is caused by surfaces meeting in sharp corners.
The invention will be readily appreciated by reference to the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings'in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures and wherein:
FIG. I is a perspective view of a prior art plastic orthodontic bracket;
FIG. II is a front view of a plastic orthodontic bracket constructed according to the invention;
FIG. III is a side view of a plastic orthodontic bracket constructed according to the invention; and
FIG. IV is a top view of a plastic orthodontic bracket constructed according to the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Referring to FIG. 1, a typical prior art plastic orthodontic bracket 10 is shown therein. The bracket 10 is comprised of a base 12 and a body 14. Archwire slot 16 is cut horizontally through the center of the bracket. The upper and lower surfaces 18 and 20 are of equal width. The bracket 10 may either be cemented to a metal band which encircles a tooth to provide a strong bond therewith or cemented directly to a tooth. As may be seen from inspection of FIG. I, the top and bottom surfaces 18 and 20 of bracket 10 each have a substantial surface area which is contacted by food or other teeth during mastication and occlusion. This substantial surface area causes the body of the bracket 14 to be subjected to considerable force during mastication or occlusion with the attendant likelihood of stress fatigue in the plastic body 14 of the bracket. A ligature undercut 22 is provided partially around the periphery of the bracket body 14. Ligature undercut 22 is cut so deep that a small gauge ligatu re wire or adhesive band would not substantially fill the ligature undercut 22. The deep ligature design concept substantially lessens the material bulk distribution between archwire slot 16 and ligature undercut 22 with the attendant likelihood of an increase in stress fatigue between these points. Reference numerals 24, 26 and 28 identify sharp edges defined by the meeting of relatively flat surfaces. Each of these sharp edges represents an internal stress point of the plastic bracket which may fatigue under continued stress.
3 Referring to FIGS. II-IV, a plastic orthodontic bracket which is constructed according to the present invention is shown as it would be attached to a maxillary lateral tooth. Bracket 10 has a horizontally dis- 4 of the bracket body is positioned closest to the incisal edge of a tooth to which the bracket base is attached. This configuration minimizes the forcesapplied to the bracket body during mastication and occlusion. While posed archwire slot 30 cut in the front surface of the 5 many types of dental adhesives may be used to cement bracket body 32. The rear surface of base 34 of bracket the bracket directly to a tooth, the preferred type of adis concavely contoured mesio-distally and gingivohesive is disclosed in United States patent application incisally to conform to the labial contour of the tooth to Ser. No. 386,416 filed Aug. 7, 1973. which the bracket is adapted to be attached. The base The preferred type of plastic used in constructing the contour of brackets which are used on different types 10 bracket is chosen from the polycarbonate family. It has of teeth are chosen to conform to the different labial the following physical properties: If a filled polycarboncontours of those teeth to which the bracket is to be atate is chosen, the shear strength should range from tached. The preferred bracket shape is quasi triangular 10,000 to 16,000 p.s.i. Deformation at 70F under a with top section 36 comprising the base of a triangle 4000 psi load is less than 0.1%. If an unfilled polycarwhile bottom section 38 forms the apical section of a bonate is chosen, the shear strength should range from triangle. However, other tapered geometrical shapes 6000 to 8500 psi. Deformation at 70F under a 4000 could also be used. Vertical slot 40 is provided to allow psi load is from 0.1 to 0.3%. an archwire to be tied in utilizing a mesial or distal rota- It should be understood that the foregoing disclosure tional force. The preferred position is over the clinical relates to only a preferred embodiment of the invention crown of the tooth. Ligature undercut 42 is purposely and that it is intended to cover all changes and modificut shallow enough to be substantially filled by a small cations which do not constitute departures from the gauge ligature wire or elastic ring. Preferably, the depth spirit and scope of the invention. of ligature undercut 42 is approximately 0.035 inch or What is claimed is: less. This shallow undercut provides maximum material 1. A plastic orthodontic bracket comprising a base bulk between the ligature undercut 42 and archwire which is adapted to be attached to the labial surface of slot to lessen the chance of plastic fatigue between a tooth between the gingival and the incisal sections these points. The ligature undercut 42 is smooth and and a body which is joined to said base, said body havconcave in shape. Extending from ligature undercut 42 ing a quasi-triangular shaped front surface, an archwire over the front surface of the bracket body 32, all surslot cut in the front surface of said body, a ligature unfaces are smooth and convex except the archwire and 30 dercut extending completely around the periphery of vertical slots 30 and 40 to lessen internal stress which the front surface of said body, and a smooth and connormally occurs in plastic brackets which have sharp vex surface extending from said ligature undercut to comers. The base 34 of the bracket 10 is extended, as said archwire slot. identified by reference numeral 44, from the ligature 2. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 1 undercut 42 a distance sufficient to prevent the adhe- 35 wherein said plastic is a filled polycarbonate having the sive used for attaching the back surface of the base 34 following physical properties: to the labial surface of the tooth from occluding the ligshear strength ranging from 10,000 to 16,000 p.s.i. ature undercut 42. The lip section 46 of the bracket and deformation at 70F under a 4,000 p.s.i. load body 32 located next to the ligature undercut 42 is rebeing less than 0.1%. lieved incisally and gingivally to the archwire to facili- 3. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 1 tate easy placement of the ligature. wherein said plastic is an unfilled polycarbonate having Referring specifically to FIG. III, it may be seen that the following physical properties: archwire slot 30 is not perpendicular to the plane of the shear strength ranging from 6,000 to 8,500 p.s.i. and base 34. The archwire slot forms an acute angle which deformation at 70F under 4,000 p.s.i. load being is measured between a perpendicular line from the base 45 from 0.1% to 0.3%. of the archwire slot and the base of the bracket which 4. A plastic orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 1 is parallel to the labial surface of the tooth. This acute further comprising means cut in the front surface of angulation produces a built in torque in the bracket said bracket body for use in applying mesial or dital rowhich requires less torque to be placed in the archwire. tational forces to a tooth to which the bracket is at- This configuration produces less destructive wear of tached. the plastic material where it is in contact with the sharp 5. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 4 corners of the metal wire. wherein said means comprises a slot cut in the front The following table gives the preferred bracket disurface of said bracket body, said slot being perpendicmensions and angulations which are to be used with difular to said archwire slot. ferent types of teeth. 6. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 1 TABLE 1 bracket slot base bracket base width angulation curvature height thickness mm mm mm maxillary central 5.8 6.3 0 21 0.5 maxillary lateral 4.8 5.3 0 14 1.0 maxillary cuspid 5.8 6.3 7 0.5 mandibular central 4.8 5.3 0 17 1.0 mandibular lateral 4.3 6.3 0 17 1.0 mandibular cuspid 5.8 6.3 4 0.5
To use the bracket, base 34 is cemented to the labial surface of the tooth so that the narrow apex section 38 wherein said ligature undercut is smooth and concave and has a maximum depth of 0.0l5mm or less.
7. A plastic orthodontic bracket comprising a base portion which is adapted to be attached to the labial surface of a tooth between the gingival and incisal sections and a body which is joined to said base, said body having a front surface which is quasi-triangular shaped for minimizing the forces exerted on said bracket during mastication and occlusion when said bracket is attached to said tooth so that the apex of said quasi-triangular shaped front surface is positioned closest to the incisal section of a tooth and the base of said quasitriangular shaped front surface is positioned closest to the gingival section of the tooth.
8. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 7 further comprising an archwire slot cut in the front surface of said bracket body and a ligature undercut extending completely around the periphery of said front surface, said ligature undercut being smooth and concave and having a depth of 0.0l5mm or less.
9. An orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 7 wherein said bracket body further comprises an archwire slot, means cut in the front surface of said bracket body for use in applying mesial or distal rotational forces to a tooth to which the bracket is attached, said slot being cut into the front surface of said bracket body, and a ligature undercut extending completely around the periphery of said bracket body, and a smooth and convex surface extending from said ligature undercut to said archwire slot.
10. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 8 wherein said means comprises a slot cut in the front surface of said bracket body, said slot being perpendicular to said archwire slot.
11. An orthodontic bracket as defined in claim 3 wherein said base portion of said bracket extends away from the ligature undercut a distance sufficient to prevent adhesive used for attaching the base of the bracket to the labial surface of the tooth from occluding the ligature undercut.
12. An orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 5 wherein the base is extended away from the ligature undercut at least for 0.015 inch.
13. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 7 wherein said plastic is a filled polycarbonate having the following physical properties:
shear strength ranging from 10,000 to 16,000 p.s.i.
and deformation at F under a 4,000 psi. load being less than 0.1%.
14. In an orthodontic bracket as recited in claim 7 wherein said plastic is an unfilled polycarbonate having the following physical properties:-
shear strength ranging from 6,000 to 8,500 psi. and
deformation at 70F under 4,000 psi. load being from 0.1% to 0.3%.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 5,922,787 Dated December 2, 1975 Inventor(s) Kenneth J. Fischer et' a1,
It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Column line #8, Claim "dital" should read distal-m Signed and Scaled this Third Day of August 1976 [SEAL] AUGSI.
RUTH C. MASON C. MARSHALL DANN 8 ff Commissioner ofParents and Trademarks
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1467789 *||20 Sep 1922||11 Sep 1923||Griffin Edward M||Orthodontist's locking device|
|US2368851 *||24 Apr 1943||6 Feb 1945||Laskin Jacob E||Orthodontic bracket|
|US3303565 *||9 Apr 1964||14 Feb 1967||Newman George V||Orthodontic brackets|
|US3423833 *||15 Aug 1967||28 Jan 1969||Pearlman Lawrence||Adjustable orthodontic device|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4167813 *||29 Apr 1977||18 Sep 1979||Bernhard Forster||Dental fixing element|
|US4198753 *||27 Feb 1978||22 Apr 1980||Firma Bernhard Forster||Dental fixing element|
|US4216583 *||3 Aug 1978||12 Aug 1980||Zulauf Inc.||Orthodontic appliance|
|US4322206 *||11 Apr 1980||30 Mar 1982||Zulauf Inc.||Orthodontic appliance|
|US4337037 *||23 Apr 1981||29 Jun 1982||Kurz Craven H||Fixed lingual orthodontic appliance for the maxillary arch|
|US4386908 *||14 Sep 1981||7 Jun 1983||Kurz Craven H||Lingual orthodontic appliance system for the mandibular arch|
|US4470809 *||6 Jun 1983||11 Sep 1984||Klepacki Frank H||Orthodontic appliance|
|US4597739 *||21 May 1985||1 Jul 1986||Farel Rosenberg||Tow element bracket system for true straight wire orthodontics|
|US4669981 *||20 Sep 1982||2 Jun 1987||Kurz Craven H||Lingual orthodontic appliance system|
|US4674978 *||4 Jun 1986||23 Jun 1987||Raul Acevedo||Orthodontic appliance|
|US4819316 *||29 Jul 1987||11 Apr 1989||Rmo, Inc.||Method of making a pre-adjusted orthodontic bracket assembly|
|US4878840 *||22 Feb 1988||7 Nov 1989||Zulauf, Inc.||Orthodontic appliance|
|US5018259 *||21 Sep 1988||28 May 1991||Wildman Alexander J||Method of design and manufacture of laminated orthodontic brackets|
|US5032080 *||23 Jun 1989||16 Jul 1991||Scandinavian Bioortodontic Ab||Orthodontic appliance bracket and arch|
|US5067897 *||24 Apr 1990||26 Nov 1991||American Orthodontics Corporation||Twin tie wing bracket|
|US5254002 *||8 Apr 1991||19 Oct 1993||Ormco Corporation||Orthodontic plastic bracket|
|US5299934 *||4 Dec 1990||5 Apr 1994||Jobert Suzanne||Teeth straightening bracket|
|US5302116 *||7 Apr 1993||12 Apr 1994||Viazis Anthony D||Orthodontic bracket|
|US5558516 *||14 Oct 1994||24 Sep 1996||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pretreated plastic dental appliances and methods|
|US5575644 *||23 Aug 1994||19 Nov 1996||American Orthodontics||Orthodontic appliance|
|US5595484 *||22 Aug 1994||21 Jan 1997||Gac International, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|US5597302 *||14 Oct 1994||28 Jan 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Aesthetic plastic orthodontic bracket with load bearing framework|
|US5607301 *||1 Nov 1994||4 Mar 1997||Lancer Orthodontics||Orthodontic bracket and method of mounting|
|US5618174 *||11 May 1994||8 Apr 1997||Mors; Wayne A.||Orthodontic bracket and system|
|US5692898 *||27 Oct 1995||2 Dec 1997||Gac International, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|US5746592 *||5 Sep 1996||5 May 1998||Rmo, Inc.||Edgewise orthodontic bracket with tie wing relief for enhancing ligature removal|
|US5769634 *||2 Jun 1997||23 Jun 1998||Choi; John||Dental articulator|
|US5813852 *||2 Jun 1995||29 Sep 1998||Gac International, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|US5908293 *||3 Apr 1997||1 Jun 1999||Voudouris; John C.||Orthodontic bracket|
|US6361314 *||27 Apr 2001||26 Mar 2002||American Orthodontics||Orthodontic bracket|
|US6733285 *||14 Dec 2001||11 May 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Orthodontic appliance with lingual retaining groove|
|US6799966||4 Mar 1999||5 Oct 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymeric orthodontic article|
|US7140875 *||3 Feb 2004||28 Nov 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Orthodontic bracket with reinforced tiewings|
|US7661281||17 May 2007||16 Feb 2010||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method and device for shaping an orthodontic archwire|
|US7751925||18 Oct 2006||6 Jul 2010||3M Innovative Properties Company||System to manufacture custom orthodontic appliances, program product, and related methods|
|US7811087 *||12 May 2004||12 Oct 2010||3M Innovative Properties Company||Modular system for customized orthodontic appliances|
|US7850451||22 Jul 2004||14 Dec 2010||3M Innovative Properties Company||Modular system for customized orthodontic appliances|
|US8057226||18 Sep 2006||15 Nov 2011||3M Innovative Properties Company||Customized orthodontic bracket system|
|US20050003321 *||22 Jul 2004||6 Jan 2005||Dirk Wiechmann||Modular system for customized orthodontic appliances|
|US20050005554 *||3 Feb 2004||13 Jan 2005||Oppermanm R. Scott||Equipment support for a metal building|
|US20050158686 *||12 May 2004||21 Jul 2005||Dirk Wiechmann||Modular system for customized orthodontic appliances|
|US20050170308 *||3 Feb 2004||4 Aug 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Orthodontic bracket with reinforced tiewings|
|US20060008761 *||12 Jul 2004||12 Jan 2006||Allred Peter M||Dental appliances having separate performance and bonding regions|
|US20070134612 *||13 Mar 2006||14 Jun 2007||Bernard Contencin||Dento-facial orthopedic treatment and orthodontic arch wire for implementing the same|
|US20070178423 *||18 Oct 2006||2 Aug 2007||Lingualcare, Inc.||System to manufacture custom orthodontic appliances, program product, and related methods|
|USD660435||13 May 2011||22 May 2012||Rmo, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|USD660436||13 May 2011||22 May 2012||Rmo, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|USD660968||13 May 2011||29 May 2012||Rmo, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|USD721811||29 Oct 2013||27 Jan 2015||Rmo, Inc.||Orthodontic bracket|
|USD726318||17 Jan 2013||7 Apr 2015||Rmo, Inc.||Dental instrument for a self-ligating orthodontic clip|
|USRE42815||16 Aug 2007||11 Oct 2011||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method and system for customizing an orthodontic archwire|
|USRE44668||7 Oct 2011||24 Dec 2013||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method and system for customizing an orthodontic archwire|
|DE4118248A1 *||4 Jun 1991||10 Dec 1992||Foerster Bernhard Gmbh||Kieferorthopaedische vorrichtung|
|DE4118248C2 *||4 Jun 1991||24 Sep 1998||Foerster Bernhard Gmbh||Kieferorthopädische Vorrichtung|
|DE10300010A1 *||2 Jan 2003||22 Jul 2004||Fricke, Clemens, Dr.||Dental bracket for correcting teeth positions, comprises a base part that is held against the tooth so that a wire elbow holding slit is essentially upright when the bracket is placed in the mouth|
|DE10300010B4 *||2 Jan 2003||9 Aug 2007||Fricke, Clemens, Dr.||Brackets sowie ein Verfahren zu ihrer Herstellung|
|EP0128474A1 *||1 Jun 1984||19 Dec 1984||Frank H. Klepacki||Orthodontic appliance|
|EP0453689A1 *||28 Dec 1990||30 Oct 1991||American Orthodontics Corporation||Twin tie wing bracket|
|EP0706785A1||13 Oct 1995||17 Apr 1996||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pretreated plastic dental appliances and methods|
|WO1995031150A1 *||9 May 1995||23 Nov 1995||Mors Wayne A||Orthodontic bracket and system|
|U.S. Classification||433/15, 433/8|
|International Classification||A61C7/12, A61C7/14, A61C7/00, A61C7/28|