US20040062349A1 - Phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of an object and method for creating the phase contrast image - Google Patents

Phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of an object and method for creating the phase contrast image Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040062349A1
US20040062349A1 US10/673,170 US67317003A US2004062349A1 US 20040062349 A1 US20040062349 A1 US 20040062349A1 US 67317003 A US67317003 A US 67317003A US 2004062349 A1 US2004062349 A1 US 2004062349A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
radiation
phase contrast
ray
ray source
ray device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10/673,170
Other versions
US7154992B2 (en
Inventor
Manfred Schuster
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Assigned to SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT reassignment SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SCHUSTER, MANFRED
Publication of US20040062349A1 publication Critical patent/US20040062349A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7154992B2 publication Critical patent/US7154992B2/en
Assigned to SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH reassignment SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48Diagnostic techniques
    • A61B6/484Diagnostic techniques involving phase contrast X-ray imaging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/02Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
    • G01N23/04Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
    • G01N23/041Phase-contrast imaging, e.g. using grating interferometers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21KTECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
    • G21K2207/00Particular details of imaging devices or methods using ionizing electromagnetic radiation such as X-rays or gamma rays
    • G21K2207/005Methods and devices obtaining contrast from non-absorbing interaction of the radiation with matter, e.g. phase contrast

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of at least one object with at least one X-ray source for generating an X-radiation that exhibits a specific spatial coherence within a specific optical distance to the X-ray source and at least one evaluation unit for converting the X-radiation after the X-radiation has passed through the object arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source in the phase contrast image of the object.
  • a method for creating a phase contrast image of an object by using the phase contrast X-ray device is also described.
  • a phase contrast image means a graphical representation of a phase contrast converted to an amplitude contrast.
  • images of objects are considered throughout in which the contrast image is actually based on phase contrast and not amplitude contrast.
  • phase contrast radiography underlying the invention is based on the fact that X-rays which pass through a phase contrast object, i.e. through adjacent ranges of different optical thickness, have a well-defined phase difference to one another. Therefore, these X-rays can interfere with one another (X-ray interference). As a result of this X-ray interference, an amplitude or intensity contrast image is observed at a sufficient distance. The interference is also related to a deflection of the radiation to the direction of incidence (diffraction).
  • the above-mentioned phase contrast object can be seen as a transparent object with one lateral variation of the thickness, the refractive index or both.
  • an image of an object can be generated with the phase contrast radiography which has a lower absorption for X-rays and small absorption contrasts based on the thickness, the density or the element composition.
  • a phase contrast X-ray device of the kind mentioned at the beginning and an appropriate method is e.g. known from Wilkins et al., Nature, 384 (1996), pages 335-338 (cf. FIG. 2).
  • the X-ray source of the known X-ray device is point-shaped and has a very small diameter from 5 ⁇ m to 15 ⁇ m.
  • the evaluation unit is, for example, an X-ray film.
  • the object to be investigated is arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source between the point-shaped X-ray source and the evaluation unit. The optical distance results from a ray path of the X-radiation. Divergent X-rays radiated from the point-shaped X-ray source pass through the object.
  • phase contrast image At a phase limit of the object, a passing through of the object causes a phase shift of the X-radiation. Both phase-shifted and non-phase shifted X-rays reach the evaluation unit, are converted to an amplitude contrast there and made visible as a so-called phase contrast image.
  • phase contrast X-ray device Based on the smaller diameter of the point-shaped X-ray source of the known phase contrast X-ray device, a (radiographic) output of the X-ray source is restricted to below 50 W. Because of the lower output, the phase contrast X-ray device is suitable for creating a phase contrast image of a thin, small object, for example an insect.
  • the known phase contrast X-ray device is not suitable for larger and thicker objects, for example a human being, because of the lower output. Therefore, the phase contrast X-ray device is also not suitable for use in medical technology.
  • a monochromator as a gradient multilayer reflector is known from Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198.
  • the gradient multilayer reflector is an artificial, one-dimensional grid that allows the Bragg area of reflection of X-radiation.
  • the reflector distinguishes itself by means of a periodic series of layers of a first layer type A and a further layer type B.
  • the first layer type A has a first refractive index r A and a first layer thickness d A and a further layer thickness B, a further refractive index r B and a layer thickness d B differing from the first refractive index r A .
  • the gradient multilayer reflector then has an area of reflection that can be elliptical, parabolic, circular or planar.
  • the gradient multilayer reflector is used, for example, as a mirror in X-ray diffractometry.
  • This gradient multilayer reflector parallel and nonparallel X-radiation of a relatively great photon energy bandwidth can be reflected and can be monochromated with a relatively small intensity loss.
  • the object of the present invention is to specify an improved phase contrast X-ray device compared to the known prior art by means of which a phase contrast image of a larger or thicker object can be created. Another object is to specify an improved method for creating a phase contrast image compared to the known prior art.
  • a phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of at least one object with at least one X-ray source for generating an X-radiation that has a specific spatial coherence within the specific optical distance to the X-ray source and at least one evaluation unit for converting the X-radiation after the X-radiation has passed through the object arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source in the phase contrast image of the object.
  • the phase contrast X-ray device is characterized in that the X-ray source has an output ranging from 50 W up to and including 10 kW and a spatial coherence length of the X-radiation has been selected within the optical distance to the X-ray source ranging from 0.05 ⁇ m up to and including 10 ⁇ m.
  • the object is characterized by at least one boundary surface that can be made visible with the phase contrast image.
  • the boundary surface is, for example, formed by different, adjacent parts of the object. These parts can be, for example, different vessels of a plant or an animal.
  • the evaluation unit features a detector for the X-radiation passing through the object.
  • the detector is, for example, an X-ray film.
  • An X-ray tracer or an X-ray tracer carrier that converts the X-radiation into visible light is also feasible.
  • the phase contrast image is created from the visible light.
  • the basic idea of the invention is to prepare a phase contrast X-ray device with an X-ray source for X-radiation in which case the X-radiation has an X-radiation within the optical distance to the X-ray source that is suitable for recording a phase contrast image of an object.
  • the X-radiation has a specifically suitable spatial coherence within the optical distance for recording a phase contrast image.
  • the spatial coherence also becomes a transversal coherence.
  • the spatial coherence length of the X-radiation is only a few ⁇ m within the optical distance.
  • the X-ray source output must be selected in such a way that it is between 50 W and 10 kW.
  • phase contrast X-ray device is suitable for creating a phase contrast image of both a smaller object, for example, an insect and a larger object, for example, a human being.
  • a recording period of the phase contrast image is also acceptable for larger objects. Therefore, the phase contrast X-ray device can also be used in medical technology, for example, in a laboratory or a hospital.
  • the semiconductor technology and the microstructure technology is also feasible. For example, in semiconductor technology, a thin bonding wire of aluminum on a silicon chip could be shown.
  • Application in safety engineering for testing a safety-relevant object is also feasible.
  • the safety-relevant object is, for example, a bag whose contents are to be shown by means of the phase contrast X-ray device.
  • the contours of explosives or drugs could be rendered visible in the phase contrast image.
  • the X-ray source has a line-shaped focus.
  • the focus is elongated.
  • a focus length of the focus is considerably greater than a focus width of the focus.
  • the focus can then also have a rectangular focus area.
  • An elliptical focus area is also feasible.
  • the focus width is only a few ⁇ m and the focus length, on the other hand, is up to several mm.
  • the line-shaped focus allows a considerably higher tube output and therefore a higher intensity than a comparable tube with point-shaped focus.
  • a longitudinal extension of the line-shaped focus is actually aligned in the direction towards the object.
  • the longitudinal extension is determined by the focus length.
  • the direction of the object is given by the light path of the X-radiation from the X-ray source to the object.
  • the alignment of the focus is elongated.
  • the elongated alignment guarantees a useable spatial coherence length (cf. F. S. Crawford Jr., “Schwingungen und Wellen” (Oscillations and Waves) (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1989), pages 259-271).
  • an X-ray source is used together with a conventional X-ray tube.
  • the X-ray tube resembles a fine focus or finest focus from X-ray diffractometry.
  • the alignment of the line-shaped focus is elongated.
  • an anode roughness in the (sub) ⁇ m range is suitable.
  • the X-ray source has an X-ray tube with a transmission anode.
  • the X-ray tube is a transmission X-ray tube.
  • the X-radiation is measured from the anode in the direction of bombardment of the electrons—therefore, in transmission (cf. L. M. N. Tavora, E. J. Morton, W. B. Gilboy, SPIE vol 3771 (1999) 61-71).
  • the anode is used at the same time as the tube window.
  • the X-ray source has a parametric X-radiation source.
  • the parametric X-radiation source is a very efficient and powerful X-radiation source that can also be fitted in the described X-radiation device.
  • electrons are bombarded typically with 50 MeV into a monocrystalline anode material, e.g. graphite, diamond or beryllium. Therefore, X-radiation emerges that is considerably intensified if it is measured under the Bragg angle corresponding to the X-radiation.
  • Parametric X-radiation (PXR: parametric x-radiation, cf. M. A. Piestrup, Xizeng Wu, V. V. Kaplan, S. R. Uglov, J. T. Cremer, D. W. Rule, R. B. Fioroto, Rev. Sci. Intrum. 72 (2001) 2159-2170) is a type of X-radiation from many different X-radiation types, the generation process of which is very similar, but the generation of which requires different operating parameters.
  • These X-radiation types are, for example, coherent X-radiation in crystals (CBS), Vavilov-Cerenkov radiation (VR), channeling radiation (CHR) and resonant radiation (RR) (cf.
  • an electron-excited plasma X-ray source or a laser-excited plasma X-ray source is feasible (cf. A. Tsunemi et al. IEEE 3 (1999) 926-927; A. Tsunemi et al. IEEE 4 (1999) 2552-2554).
  • the X-radiation of the phase contrast X-ray device displays a specific temporal coherence.
  • the temporal coherence is also designated as the longitudinal coherence or monochromatism. Therefore, a temporal coherent X-radiation is a monochromatic X-radiation of a smaller bandwidth.
  • the phase contrast X-ray device has at least one monochromator.
  • the monochromator filters X-radiation of a specific wave length ⁇ or a specific energy E from the polychromatic X-radiation of the X-ray source.
  • the monochromator is arranged in the light path of the X-radiation between the X-ray source and the optical distance.
  • the coherence of the temporal X-radiation is particularly advantageous for creating phase contrast images of thicker objects.
  • Thicker objects are objects whose extension in the direction of propagation of the X-radiation is clearly greater than the coherence length of the X-radiation.
  • the coherence length is, for example, only a few ⁇ m and the thickness of the object, on the other hand, up to several mm or cm.
  • the thickness is preferably less than ⁇ /2 ⁇ . To prevent an ambiguity in the interferences, it is advantageous if a fluctuation of the wave length ⁇ and the refractive index decrement ⁇ is small.
  • the evaluation unit comprises at least a film or an X-ray detector with selective area analysis capabilities.
  • the evaluation unit also preferably has an analyzer for analyzing the direction of propagation after the X-radiation has passed through the object.
  • the analyzer can then have a collimator.
  • the analyzer particularly has a monochromator or resembles a monochromator. Whereas the wavelength of the photons is determined with a monochromator, the direction of propagation/collimation of the photons is determined with an analyzer.
  • the monochromator and/or analyzer has at least one gradient multilayer reflector.
  • the reflector distinguishes itself by means of a periodic series of layers of a first layer type A and a further layer type B.
  • the first layer type A has a first refractive index r A and a first layer thickness d A and a further layer thickness B, a further refractive index r B and a layer thickness dB differing from the first refractive index r A .
  • the gradient multilayer reflector By using the gradient multilayer reflector, parallel and non-parallel X-radiation can be monochromated or collimated with a relatively small intensity loss.
  • the gradient multilayer reflector then has an area of reflection that can be elliptical and/or parabolic and/or planar and/or circular.
  • the area of reflection either curves in only one direction of propagation or in two propagation directions of the gradient multilayer reflector. Because an area of reflection curves in two propagation directions of the gradient multilayer reflector it is possible not to only deflect the radiation in the plane of the arriving X-radiation, but also to change the plane of the reflecting X-radiation. Therefore, a spatial focusing can be obtained.
  • a spatial coherence needed to record the phase contrast image can, in particular, be accessed by using the gradient multilayer reflector.
  • the reflector By using the reflector, the light path in which the object is arranged can be developed in parallel or divergently.
  • a divergent light path can be obtained with a planar area of reflection. In the case of an elliptical or circular area of reflection, a focused light path is obtained.
  • a parabolic area of reflection collimates the light path, i.e. the X-rays run in parallel.
  • another monochromator as a gradient multilayer reflector is used as an analyzer.
  • the analyzer is suitable for a special embodiment of the invention after an X-radiation which is deflected when passing through the object for creating a phase contrast image and/or an X-radiation which is non-deflected when passing through the object is detected.
  • the deflected and/or non-deflected X-radiation is selected by means of an analyzer with a gradient multilayer reflector. For example, at the reflector only the non-deflected X-radiation is guided in the direction of the detector of the evaluation unit.
  • the X-radiation forms an interference pattern after it has passed through the object that is detected for creating the phase contrast image.
  • the interference pattern for example, is recorded on an X-ray film.
  • phase contrast images are created by means of the X-radiation of different spatial coherences that are processed to an overall phase contrast image by means of an image processing unit.
  • the individual phase contrast images are digitized and then converted by the image processing unit into the overall phase contrast image.
  • the individual phase contrast images are recorded with a single X-ray film and are superimposed onto an overall phase contrast image in this way.
  • a greater coherence length brings about a stronger diffraction effect and allows a higher phase contrast and sharper boundaries.
  • complicated object structures can superimpose the diffraction patterns of different object structures that are difficult to interpret.
  • the phase contrast is less and, on the other hand, the phase contrast of specific object structures can be allocated in a simpler manner.
  • image processing phase contrast images with greater coherence lengths can possibly no longer be determined.
  • image processing programs also supply artifacts if a phase contrast image should be processed with a greater coherence length. Therefore, a repetitive evaluation algorithm is proposed in which the rough contours/boundaries of the object structures are first of all recorded in images with smaller coherence lengths and then these contours/boundaries are refined by means of images with a greater coherence length.
  • the optical distance between the object and the X-ray source preferably varies for generating the different spatial coherence.
  • the spatial coherence length is then enlarged in both dimensions to the same extent with the distance.
  • orientation of the object to the direction of propagation of the X-radiation varies for generating the different spatial coherence.
  • the object is rotated in the case of an unchanged light path.
  • One requirement for this is an anisotropy of the spatial coherence length, i.e. that the spatial coherence length differs in the two transversal directions.
  • This method preferably uses an object that, in essence, consists of a material with a low absorption coefficient for the X-radiation.
  • an object or a part of the object cannot be shown directly, i.e. by using X-ray absorption.
  • This object or a part of the object can be any soft part of humans, an animal or a plant.
  • the soft part for example, is a vessel of a body fluid of an animal.
  • Organs that are not in a position to record a radioopaque medium needed to directly create an X-ray absorption image can, in particular, also be shown by means of the visualized phase contrast X-ray devices.
  • Such organs are, for example, cartilages or periosteum.
  • phase contrast images of the object are recorded to create a phase contrast computer tomogram of the object.
  • phase contrast X-ray radiography can also generate a sufficient contrast when there is no absorption contrast, the local details—as is customary for a projection technology—can only be shown superimposed.
  • the method of computer tomography overcomes this problem: The object to be tested is scanned linearly and turned at slight angles throughout the process. A transversal sector tomogram is then generated from the position and angle-dependent intensities according to the well-known process of computer tomographic reconstruction.
  • this phase contrast X-ray device presented can, in particular, be used in medical technology for showing the soft parts of larger objects.
  • a gradient multilayer reflector in particular, is used as an analyzer. With the reflector, the X-radiation that has passed through the object can be analyzed in a simple way.
  • phase contrast X-ray device and the method for creating the phase contrast image of an object is shown by means of the phase contrast X-ray device.
  • the figures are diagrammatic and do not display images to scale.
  • FIG. 1 shows the cross-section of a phase contrast X-ray device with an X-ray source with line-shaped focus.
  • FIG. 2 shows the cross-section of a phase contrast X-ray device known from the state of the art.
  • FIG. 3 shows the cross-section of a gradient multilayer reflector.
  • FIG. 4 shows the light path of a phase contrast X-ray device with a monochromator as a gradient multilayer reflector with a planar area of reflection.
  • FIG. 5 shows the light path of a phase contrast X-ray device with a monochromator and an analyzer each in the form of a gradient multilayer reflector with a planar area of reflection.
  • FIG. 6 in each case shows the light path of a phase contrast X-ray device with a monochromator and an analyzer each in the form of a gradient multilayer reflector with a bent area of reflection.
  • FIG. 7 shows a method for creating a phase contrast image by means of the phase contrast X-ray device.
  • phase contrast X-ray device 101 known from the state of the art that is described in the introduction is shown in FIG. 2. Taking the point-shaped X-ray device 2 as a starting basis, the divergent X-rays 11 arrive at the object 4 arranged within the optical distance 6 to the X-ray source 2 . After the X-radiation 11 has passed through the object 4 , non-deflected, deflected and X-radiation 12 and 13 arrive at an evaluation unit 16 as an X-ray film by means of which the phase contrast image is generated. In order to obtain sufficient coherence length 15 for recording a phase contrast image, the diameter of the point-shaped X-ray source 2 is restricted and therefore the output of the X-ray source 2 is also limited to a maximum of 50 W.
  • the output of X-ray source 2 of this phase contrast X-ray device 1 exceeds 50 W.
  • a phase contrast image of an object 3 is created in each case.
  • the object is cartilage on a bone.
  • the object 3 is arranged within the optical distance 6 to the X-ray source 2 (FIG. 7, 71).
  • the object distinguishes itself with boundary surfaces 5 that can be shown by means of phase contrast radiography.
  • X-radiation passes through the object (FIG. 7, 71) and the phase contrast image is created from the X-radiation passing through the object by means of the evaluation unit 16 .
  • the evaluation unit 16 also has an X-ray film by means of which the X-radiation is detected. A phase contrast image is created.
  • the spatial coherence of the X-radiation used is changed gradually by varying the optical distance (FIG. 7, 74).
  • the optical distance FIG. 7, 74
  • several phase contrast images are created with X-radiation having different spatial coherence.
  • These different phase contrast images are digitized and processed by means of an image processing unit into an overall phase contrast image.
  • many phase contrast images are generated by turning the object.
  • a phase contrast tomogram is created from the many phase contrast images via an image processing device.
  • phase contrast X-ray device 1 is equipped with an X-ray source 2 with line-shaped focus 7 (example 1).
  • the second route provides an optical system in the light path to optimize the radiation intensity and the spatial coherence 14 and, if required, the temporal coherence 15 of the X-radiation 11 (examples 2 to 7).
  • Phase contrast X-ray device 1 with X-ray source 2 with line-shaped focus 7 (FIG. 1).
  • the X-ray source 2 has a line-shaped focus 7 .
  • the X-ray source 2 has an output of 1500 W within the optical distance 6 in which the object 4 to be investigated is arranged.
  • the longitudinal alignment 8 i.e. the focus length (longitudinal extension) of the focus 7 is aligned along two boundary surfaces 5 of the object 4 .
  • the condition sin ⁇ ⁇ L/D ⁇ s is aligned in which case the angle ⁇ corresponds to an angle deviation of the focus longitudinal direction of the tangential surface boundary that should be made visible, s is the focus length of the focus, b the focus width of the focus, k the wave length of the X-radiation, L the optical distance between the focus of the X-ray source and the surface boundaries of the object and D a minimum distance between the surface boundaries 5 to be shown.
  • the minimum distance D between the surface boundaries to be shown corresponds to the spatial coherence length 14 .
  • Focus 7 can easily be aligned if it is known how the boundary surfaces 5 to be shown are oriented. If an orientation of the boundary surfaces 5 to one another is unknown, several phase contrast images are recorded to determine the optimum alignment. A good alignment can be seen in a clear phase contrast. The searched for boundary surfaces 5 lead to clear borders of light and dark lines in the phase contrast image.
  • Phase contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 as a gradient multilayer reflector 20 with a planar area of reflection 27 (FIG. 4).
  • the gradient multilayer reflector 18 with a planar area of reflection 27 is shown in FIG. 3.
  • a periodic series of layers of two layer types 22 (A) and 24 (B) is arranged on a substrate 21 .
  • the layer types distinguish themselves in each case via a refractive index r A and r B and corresponding layer thicknesses d A and d B .
  • a total layer thickness (total of the layer thicknesses d A and d B ) increases in a direction of propagation. The total d 2 exceeds the total d 1 .
  • the gradient multilayer reflector 20 is arranged in the excitation light path between the X-ray source 2 and the object 4 and functions as a monochromator 18 .
  • the X-radiation reflected from the reflector 20 apparently emerges from the mirrored (virtual) X-ray source 3 and then hits the object 4 that is arranged within the optical distance 6 .
  • X-radiation of suitable spatial and temporal coherence 14 and 15 passes through the object 4 .
  • the X-radiation passes through the object 4 to the evaluation unit 16 .
  • the evaluation unit 16 has an X-ray film. The inference patterns resulting from the X-radiation passing through the object via the surface boundaries 5 are made visible on the X-ray film.
  • Phase contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 as two gradient multilayer reflectors with planar areas of reflection 27 (FIG. 5).
  • a further multilayer reflector is arranged 20 in the light path of the X-radiation 11 between the object 3 and the evaluation unit 16 .
  • the object of the second multilayer reflector is that of an analyzer 19 .
  • Monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 form a so-called monochromator analyzer set.
  • Monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 are arranged with areas of reflection 27 aligned parallel to one another.
  • the analyzer 19 is designed in such a way that non-deflected X-radiation 12 arrives at the X-ray film of the evaluation unit 16 and is detected.
  • X-radiation 13 deflected from object 4 is not reflected and does not reach the X-ray film.
  • Monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 have a gradient course d(x) along the direction of propagation x of the specific reflector that is aligned to the same source point 2 or its mirror images 3 and 3′ and the same wave length L of the X-radiation 11 .
  • the monochromator area of reflection 271 and the analyzer area of reflection 272 are arranged opposite one another in such a way that their center lines 28 and 29 are aligned parallel to one another. Unlike the preceding examples, the object 4 is in a parallel light path.
  • the gradient course of a gradient multilayer reflector with parabolic areas of reflection is described in Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198.
  • the monochromator analyzer set is specifically tuned to a specific wave length. Unlike the planar gradient multilayer reflectors, the wave length is hereby changed by replacing the monochromator analyzer set.
  • the monochromator analyzer set is specifically tuned to a specific wave length.
  • the wave length is also changed here by replacing the monochromator analyzer set.
  • Both reflectors 20 have sharp focal circles.
  • the gradient courses are tuned to the same wave length.
  • the gradient course of a gradient multilayer reflector with circular areas of reflection is described in Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198.
  • the monochromator analyzer set is specifically tuned to a specific wave length.
  • the wave length can also be changed here by replacing the monochromator analyzer set.
  • Phase contrast X-ray device with monochromator and analyzer as two gradient multilayer reflectors with different areas of reflection.

Abstract

The invention concerns a phase contrast X-ray device (1) for creating a phase contrast image of at least one object (4) with at least one X-ray source (2) for generating an X-radiation that has a specific spatial coherence (14) within a specific optical distance (6) to the X-ray source and at least one evaluation unit (16) for converting the X-radiation after the X-radiation has passed through the object arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source in the phase contrast image of the object. The phase contrast X-ray device is characterized in that the X-ray source has an output ranging from 50 W up to and including 10 kW and a spatial coherence length of the X-radiation has been selected within the optical distance to the X-ray source ranging from 0,05 μm. This is obtained by using an X-ray source with line-shaped focus (7) and/or by monochromating the X-radiation by using a gradient multilayer reflector (20). With monochromating, the X-radiation has a temporal coherence (15) suitable for recording the phase contrast image of a thicker object. The X-ray device is suitable for use in medical technology and the non-destructive material testing.

Description

  • The invention relates to a phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of at least one object with at least one X-ray source for generating an X-radiation that exhibits a specific spatial coherence within a specific optical distance to the X-ray source and at least one evaluation unit for converting the X-radiation after the X-radiation has passed through the object arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source in the phase contrast image of the object. A method for creating a phase contrast image of an object by using the phase contrast X-ray device is also described. [0001]
  • In the same way as in the visible light optical range, the X-ray optical range must also convert a phase contrast to an amplitude contrast to make a phase contrast object visible. Therefore, a phase contrast image means a graphical representation of a phase contrast converted to an amplitude contrast. However, images of objects are considered throughout in which the contrast image is actually based on phase contrast and not amplitude contrast. [0002]
  • The phase contrast radiography underlying the invention is based on the fact that X-rays which pass through a phase contrast object, i.e. through adjacent ranges of different optical thickness, have a well-defined phase difference to one another. Therefore, these X-rays can interfere with one another (X-ray interference). As a result of this X-ray interference, an amplitude or intensity contrast image is observed at a sufficient distance. The interference is also related to a deflection of the radiation to the direction of incidence (diffraction). The above-mentioned phase contrast object can be seen as a transparent object with one lateral variation of the thickness, the refractive index or both. In contrast to the X-ray absorption radiography, an image of an object can be generated with the phase contrast radiography which has a lower absorption for X-rays and small absorption contrasts based on the thickness, the density or the element composition. [0003]
  • A phase contrast X-ray device of the kind mentioned at the beginning and an appropriate method is e.g. known from Wilkins et al., Nature, 384 (1996), pages 335-338 (cf. FIG. 2). The X-ray source of the known X-ray device is point-shaped and has a very small diameter from 5 μm to 15 μm. The evaluation unit is, for example, an X-ray film. The object to be investigated is arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source between the point-shaped X-ray source and the evaluation unit. The optical distance results from a ray path of the X-radiation. Divergent X-rays radiated from the point-shaped X-ray source pass through the object. At a phase limit of the object, a passing through of the object causes a phase shift of the X-radiation. Both phase-shifted and non-phase shifted X-rays reach the evaluation unit, are converted to an amplitude contrast there and made visible as a so-called phase contrast image. [0004]
  • Based on the smaller diameter of the point-shaped X-ray source of the known phase contrast X-ray device, a (radiographic) output of the X-ray source is restricted to below 50 W. Because of the lower output, the phase contrast X-ray device is suitable for creating a phase contrast image of a thin, small object, for example an insect. The known phase contrast X-ray device is not suitable for larger and thicker objects, for example a human being, because of the lower output. Therefore, the phase contrast X-ray device is also not suitable for use in medical technology. [0005]
  • A monochromator as a gradient multilayer reflector is known from Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198. The gradient multilayer reflector is an artificial, one-dimensional grid that allows the Bragg area of reflection of X-radiation. The reflector distinguishes itself by means of a periodic series of layers of a first layer type A and a further layer type B. The first layer type A has a first refractive index r[0006] A and a first layer thickness dA and a further layer thickness B, a further refractive index rB and a layer thickness dB differing from the first refractive index rA. In one lateral direction of propagation of the reflector, the layer thicknesses increase by a total of d=dA+dB. The gradient multilayer reflector then has an area of reflection that can be elliptical, parabolic, circular or planar.
  • The gradient multilayer reflector is used, for example, as a mirror in X-ray diffractometry. By using this gradient multilayer reflector, parallel and nonparallel X-radiation of a relatively great photon energy bandwidth can be reflected and can be monochromated with a relatively small intensity loss. [0007]
  • The object of the present invention is to specify an improved phase contrast X-ray device compared to the known prior art by means of which a phase contrast image of a larger or thicker object can be created. Another object is to specify an improved method for creating a phase contrast image compared to the known prior art. [0008]
  • In order to achieve the object of the invention, a phase contrast X-ray device is specified for creating a phase contrast image of at least one object with at least one X-ray source for generating an X-radiation that has a specific spatial coherence within the specific optical distance to the X-ray source and at least one evaluation unit for converting the X-radiation after the X-radiation has passed through the object arranged within the optical distance to the X-ray source in the phase contrast image of the object. The phase contrast X-ray device is characterized in that the X-ray source has an output ranging from 50 W up to and including 10 kW and a spatial coherence length of the X-radiation has been selected within the optical distance to the X-ray source ranging from 0.05 μm up to and including 10 μm. [0009]
  • In order to achieve the further object of the invention, a method for creating a phase contrast image of an object by using the phase contrast X-ray device is given with the following procedural steps: [0010]
  • a) Arranging the object within the optical distance to the X-ray source, [0011]
  • b) X-radiation passing through the object and [0012]
  • c) Creating the phase contrast image from where the X-radiation passes through an object by means of the evaluation unit. [0013]
  • The object is characterized by at least one boundary surface that can be made visible with the phase contrast image. The boundary surface is, for example, formed by different, adjacent parts of the object. These parts can be, for example, different vessels of a plant or an animal. [0014]
  • The evaluation unit features a detector for the X-radiation passing through the object. The detector is, for example, an X-ray film. An X-ray tracer or an X-ray tracer carrier that converts the X-radiation into visible light is also feasible. The phase contrast image is created from the visible light. [0015]
  • The basic idea of the invention is to prepare a phase contrast X-ray device with an X-ray source for X-radiation in which case the X-radiation has an X-radiation within the optical distance to the X-ray source that is suitable for recording a phase contrast image of an object. For that, the X-radiation has a specifically suitable spatial coherence within the optical distance for recording a phase contrast image. The spatial coherence also becomes a transversal coherence. The spatial coherence length of the X-radiation is only a few μm within the optical distance. Over and above this basic requirement for recording a phase contrast image, the X-ray source output must be selected in such a way that it is between 50 W and 10 kW. Therefore, the output is higher than that of the known phase contrast X-ray device. The phase contrast X-ray device is suitable for creating a phase contrast image of both a smaller object, for example, an insect and a larger object, for example, a human being. A recording period of the phase contrast image is also acceptable for larger objects. Therefore, the phase contrast X-ray device can also be used in medical technology, for example, in a laboratory or a hospital. Using the phase contrast X-ray device in botany, the semiconductor technology and the microstructure technology is also feasible. For example, in semiconductor technology, a thin bonding wire of aluminum on a silicon chip could be shown. Application in safety engineering for testing a safety-relevant object is also feasible. The safety-relevant object is, for example, a bag whose contents are to be shown by means of the phase contrast X-ray device. The contours of explosives or drugs could be rendered visible in the phase contrast image. [0016]
  • Measures based on special embodiments by means of which the basic idea of the invention is developed further are given below. [0017]
  • In a special embodiment, the X-ray source has a line-shaped focus. The focus is elongated. A focus length of the focus is considerably greater than a focus width of the focus. The focus can then also have a rectangular focus area. An elliptical focus area is also feasible. For example, the focus width is only a few μm and the focus length, on the other hand, is up to several mm. The line-shaped focus allows a considerably higher tube output and therefore a higher intensity than a comparable tube with point-shaped focus. [0018]
  • In a further embodiment, a longitudinal extension of the line-shaped focus is actually aligned in the direction towards the object. The longitudinal extension is determined by the focus length. The direction of the object is given by the light path of the X-radiation from the X-ray source to the object. The alignment of the focus is elongated. The elongated alignment guarantees a useable spatial coherence length (cf. F. S. Crawford Jr., “Schwingungen und Wellen” (Oscillations and Waves) (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1989), pages 259-271). [0019]
  • For example, an X-ray source is used together with a conventional X-ray tube. The X-ray tube resembles a fine focus or finest focus from X-ray diffractometry. In contrast to X-ray diffractometry, the alignment of the line-shaped focus is elongated. For such a flat measurement, an anode roughness in the (sub)μm range is suitable. [0020]
  • In a special embodiment, the X-ray source has an X-ray tube with a transmission anode. The X-ray tube is a transmission X-ray tube. For this type of X-ray tube, the X-radiation is measured from the anode in the direction of bombardment of the electrons—therefore, in transmission (cf. L. M. N. Tavora, E. J. Morton, W. B. Gilboy, SPIE vol 3771 (1999) 61-71). Very often, in the case of transmission X-ray tubes, the anode is used at the same time as the tube window. [0021]
  • In a special embodiment, the X-ray source has a parametric X-radiation source. The parametric X-radiation source is a very efficient and powerful X-radiation source that can also be fitted in the described X-radiation device. In the case of a parametric X-radiation source, electrons are bombarded typically with 50 MeV into a monocrystalline anode material, e.g. graphite, diamond or beryllium. Therefore, X-radiation emerges that is considerably intensified if it is measured under the Bragg angle corresponding to the X-radiation. [0022]
  • Parametric X-radiation (PXR: parametric x-radiation, cf. M. A. Piestrup, Xizeng Wu, V. V. Kaplan, S. R. Uglov, J. T. Cremer, D. W. Rule, R. B. Fioroto, Rev. Sci. Intrum. 72 (2001) 2159-2170) is a type of X-radiation from many different X-radiation types, the generation process of which is very similar, but the generation of which requires different operating parameters. These X-radiation types are, for example, coherent X-radiation in crystals (CBS), Vavilov-Cerenkov radiation (VR), channeling radiation (CHR) and resonant radiation (RR) (cf. V. G. Baryshevsky, I. D. Feranchuk, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 228 (1985) 490-495; W. Knupfer, M. G. Huber, Physik in unserer Zeit 6 (Physics in our time 6) (1984) 163-172). These types of X-radiation can be used in the phase contrast X-ray device of this invention. [0023]
  • In addition to the X-ray sources described, an electron-excited plasma X-ray source or a laser-excited plasma X-ray source (laser Compton scattering) is feasible (cf. A. Tsunemi et al. IEEE 3 (1999) 926-927; A. Tsunemi et al. IEEE 4 (1999) 2552-2554). [0024]
  • In a further embodiment, the X-radiation of the phase contrast X-ray device displays a specific temporal coherence. The temporal coherence is also designated as the longitudinal coherence or monochromatism. Therefore, a temporal coherent X-radiation is a monochromatic X-radiation of a smaller bandwidth. In order to generate the temporal coherence, the phase contrast X-ray device has at least one monochromator. The monochromator filters X-radiation of a specific wave length λ or a specific energy E from the polychromatic X-radiation of the X-ray source. The monochromator is arranged in the light path of the X-radiation between the X-ray source and the optical distance. Therefore, monochromatic X-radiation passes through the object. The coherence of the temporal X-radiation is particularly advantageous for creating phase contrast images of thicker objects. Thicker objects are objects whose extension in the direction of propagation of the X-radiation is clearly greater than the coherence length of the X-radiation. The coherence length is, for example, only a few μm and the thickness of the object, on the other hand, up to several mm or cm. [0025]
  • In order to be able to distinguish the phase shift of objects with a thickness T from those with a multiple thickness T*n, the thickness is preferably less than λ/2δ. To prevent an ambiguity in the interferences, it is advantageous if a fluctuation of the wave length λ and the refractive index decrement δ is small. [0026]
  • The evaluation unit comprises at least a film or an X-ray detector with selective area analysis capabilities. The evaluation unit also preferably has an analyzer for analyzing the direction of propagation after the X-radiation has passed through the object. The analyzer can then have a collimator. The analyzer particularly has a monochromator or resembles a monochromator. Whereas the wavelength of the photons is determined with a monochromator, the direction of propagation/collimation of the photons is determined with an analyzer. [0027]
  • In a special embodiment, the monochromator and/or analyzer has at least one gradient multilayer reflector. The reflector distinguishes itself by means of a periodic series of layers of a first layer type A and a further layer type B. The first layer type A has a first refractive index r[0028] A and a first layer thickness dA and a further layer thickness B, a further refractive index rB and a layer thickness dB differing from the first refractive index rA. In at least one lateral direction of propagation of the reflector, the layer thicknesses increase by a total of d=dA+dB. By using the gradient multilayer reflector, parallel and non-parallel X-radiation can be monochromated or collimated with a relatively small intensity loss. The gradient multilayer reflector then has an area of reflection that can be elliptical and/or parabolic and/or planar and/or circular. The area of reflection either curves in only one direction of propagation or in two propagation directions of the gradient multilayer reflector. Because an area of reflection curves in two propagation directions of the gradient multilayer reflector it is possible not to only deflect the radiation in the plane of the arriving X-radiation, but also to change the plane of the reflecting X-radiation. Therefore, a spatial focusing can be obtained.
  • A spatial coherence needed to record the phase contrast image can, in particular, be accessed by using the gradient multilayer reflector. By using the reflector, the light path in which the object is arranged can be developed in parallel or divergently. A divergent light path can be obtained with a planar area of reflection. In the case of an elliptical or circular area of reflection, a focused light path is obtained. A parabolic area of reflection collimates the light path, i.e. the X-rays run in parallel. [0029]
  • In particular, another monochromator as a gradient multilayer reflector is used as an analyzer. The analyzer is suitable for a special embodiment of the invention after an X-radiation which is deflected when passing through the object for creating a phase contrast image and/or an X-radiation which is non-deflected when passing through the object is detected. The deflected and/or non-deflected X-radiation is selected by means of an analyzer with a gradient multilayer reflector. For example, at the reflector only the non-deflected X-radiation is guided in the direction of the detector of the evaluation unit. [0030]
  • In a special embodiment, the X-radiation forms an interference pattern after it has passed through the object that is detected for creating the phase contrast image. The interference pattern, for example, is recorded on an X-ray film. [0031]
  • In a special embodiment, several phase contrast images are created by means of the X-radiation of different spatial coherences that are processed to an overall phase contrast image by means of an image processing unit. For example, the individual phase contrast images are digitized and then converted by the image processing unit into the overall phase contrast image. It is also feasible that the individual phase contrast images are recorded with a single X-ray film and are superimposed onto an overall phase contrast image in this way. [0032]
  • A greater coherence length brings about a stronger diffraction effect and allows a higher phase contrast and sharper boundaries. However, complicated object structures can superimpose the diffraction patterns of different object structures that are difficult to interpret. For a smaller coherence length, the phase contrast is less and, on the other hand, the phase contrast of specific object structures can be allocated in a simpler manner. Without image processing, phase contrast images with greater coherence lengths can possibly no longer be determined. However, image processing programs also supply artifacts if a phase contrast image should be processed with a greater coherence length. Therefore, a repetitive evaluation algorithm is proposed in which the rough contours/boundaries of the object structures are first of all recorded in images with smaller coherence lengths and then these contours/boundaries are refined by means of images with a greater coherence length. [0033]
  • The optical distance between the object and the X-ray source preferably varies for generating the different spatial coherence. The spatial coherence length is then enlarged in both dimensions to the same extent with the distance. [0034]
  • As an alternative, orientation of the object to the direction of propagation of the X-radiation varies for generating the different spatial coherence. For example, the object is rotated in the case of an unchanged light path. One requirement for this is an anisotropy of the spatial coherence length, i.e. that the spatial coherence length differs in the two transversal directions. [0035]
  • It is indeed also feasible that the object remains laboratory proof, but that the anisotropic alignment is turned at an angle, by for example varying the two lateral extensions of the X-ray source. The focus and therefore also an X-ray source form can be changed in an X-ray tube. [0036]
  • This method preferably uses an object that, in essence, consists of a material with a low absorption coefficient for the X-radiation. Such an object or a part of the object cannot be shown directly, i.e. by using X-ray absorption. This object or a part of the object can be any soft part of humans, an animal or a plant. The soft part, for example, is a vessel of a body fluid of an animal. Organs that are not in a position to record a radioopaque medium needed to directly create an X-ray absorption image can, in particular, also be shown by means of the visualized phase contrast X-ray devices. Such organs are, for example, cartilages or periosteum. [0037]
  • In a further embodiment, many phase contrast images of the object are recorded to create a phase contrast computer tomogram of the object. Although the phase contrast X-ray radiography can also generate a sufficient contrast when there is no absorption contrast, the local details—as is customary for a projection technology—can only be shown superimposed. The method of computer tomography overcomes this problem: The object to be tested is scanned linearly and turned at slight angles throughout the process. A transversal sector tomogram is then generated from the position and angle-dependent intensities according to the well-known process of computer tomographic reconstruction. [0038]
  • Summarizing, the Following Exceptional Advantages Result From This Invention: [0039]
  • Based on the higher tube output, this phase contrast X-ray device presented can, in particular, be used in medical technology for showing the soft parts of larger objects. [0040]
  • By using an X-ray source with line-shaped focus and/or by using one or several gradient multilayer reflectors, the intensity of the X-radiation within the optical distance increases or is used more efficiently. [0041]
  • Via the shape and alignment of the X-ray source, the spatial coherence of the X-radiation suitable for creating a phase contrast image can be ensured. [0042]
  • By using the gradient multilayer reflector, monochromating and also the temporal coherence of the X-radiation can be obtained with small intensity losses. Based on the temporal coherence, the phase contrast images of thicker objects can be accessed. [0043]
  • A gradient multilayer reflector, in particular, is used as an analyzer. With the reflector, the X-radiation that has passed through the object can be analyzed in a simple way.[0044]
  • Based on several examples and the appropriate figures, the phase contrast X-ray device and the method for creating the phase contrast image of an object is shown by means of the phase contrast X-ray device. The figures are diagrammatic and do not display images to scale. [0045]
  • FIG. 1 shows the cross-section of a phase contrast X-ray device with an X-ray source with line-shaped focus. [0046]
  • FIG. 2 shows the cross-section of a phase contrast X-ray device known from the state of the art. [0047]
  • FIG. 3 shows the cross-section of a gradient multilayer reflector. [0048]
  • FIG. 4 shows the light path of a phase contrast X-ray device with a monochromator as a gradient multilayer reflector with a planar area of reflection. [0049]
  • FIG. 5 shows the light path of a phase contrast X-ray device with a monochromator and an analyzer each in the form of a gradient multilayer reflector with a planar area of reflection. [0050]
  • FIG. 6 in each case shows the light path of a phase contrast X-ray device with a monochromator and an analyzer each in the form of a gradient multilayer reflector with a bent area of reflection. [0051]
  • FIG. 7 shows a method for creating a phase contrast image by means of the phase contrast X-ray device.[0052]
  • The phase [0053] contrast X-ray device 101 known from the state of the art that is described in the introduction is shown in FIG. 2. Taking the point-shaped X-ray device 2 as a starting basis, the divergent X-rays 11 arrive at the object 4 arranged within the optical distance 6 to the X-ray source 2. After the X-radiation 11 has passed through the object 4, non-deflected, deflected and X-radiation 12 and 13 arrive at an evaluation unit 16 as an X-ray film by means of which the phase contrast image is generated. In order to obtain sufficient coherence length 15 for recording a phase contrast image, the diameter of the point-shaped X-ray source 2 is restricted and therefore the output of the X-ray source 2 is also limited to a maximum of 50 W.
  • On the other hand, the output of [0054] X-ray source 2 of this phase contrast X-ray device 1 exceeds 50 W. By means of the phase contrast X-ray device 1, a phase contrast image of an object 3 is created in each case. The object is cartilage on a bone. For that, the object 3 is arranged within the optical distance 6 to the X-ray source 2 (FIG. 7, 71). The object distinguishes itself with boundary surfaces 5 that can be shown by means of phase contrast radiography. After arranging, X-radiation passes through the object (FIG. 7, 71) and the phase contrast image is created from the X-radiation passing through the object by means of the evaluation unit 16. The evaluation unit 16 also has an X-ray film by means of which the X-radiation is detected. A phase contrast image is created.
  • In an embodiment of the method for creating the phase contrast image, the spatial coherence of the X-radiation used is changed gradually by varying the optical distance (FIG. 7, 74). In this way, several phase contrast images are created with X-radiation having different spatial coherence. These different phase contrast images are digitized and processed by means of an image processing unit into an overall phase contrast image. [0055]
  • According to a further embodiment of the method, many phase contrast images are generated by turning the object. A phase contrast tomogram is created from the many phase contrast images via an image processing device. [0056]
  • The way in which the output of the [0057] X-ray source 2 of the phase contrast X-ray device 1 can be increased and an image quality of the phase contrast image that can be created with this, can be increased, is described below. In essence, two routes are then followed: According to the first route, the phase contrast X-ray device 1 is equipped with an X-ray source 2 with line-shaped focus 7 (example 1). The second route provides an optical system in the light path to optimize the radiation intensity and the spatial coherence 14 and, if required, the temporal coherence 15 of the X-radiation 11 (examples 2 to 7).
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • Phase [0058] contrast X-ray device 1 with X-ray source 2 with line-shaped focus 7 (FIG. 1).
  • The [0059] X-ray source 2 has a line-shaped focus 7. The X-ray source 2 has an output of 1500 W within the optical distance 6 in which the object 4 to be investigated is arranged.
  • The [0060] longitudinal alignment 8, i.e. the focus length (longitudinal extension) of the focus 7 is aligned along two boundary surfaces 5 of the object 4. For a required phase contrast, the condition sin α <<λ·L/D·s is aligned in which case the angle α corresponds to an angle deviation of the focus longitudinal direction of the tangential surface boundary that should be made visible, s is the focus length of the focus, b the focus width of the focus, k the wave length of the X-radiation, L the optical distance between the focus of the X-ray source and the surface boundaries of the object and D a minimum distance between the surface boundaries 5 to be shown. The minimum distance D between the surface boundaries to be shown corresponds to the spatial coherence length 14. With λ=0,070 nm, s=2 μm, b=10 μm, L=1 m and D=1 μm it thus follows that b<<70 μm and a<<2°. In order to record the phase contrast image, the focus width b is clearly less than 70 μm. For a focus length s of 2 mm the alignment is more exact than 20.
  • [0061] Focus 7 can easily be aligned if it is known how the boundary surfaces 5 to be shown are oriented. If an orientation of the boundary surfaces 5 to one another is unknown, several phase contrast images are recorded to determine the optimum alignment. A good alignment can be seen in a clear phase contrast. The searched for boundary surfaces 5 lead to clear borders of light and dark lines in the phase contrast image.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • Phase [0062] contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 as a gradient multilayer reflector 20 with a planar area of reflection 27 (FIG. 4).
  • The gradient multilayer reflector [0063] 18 with a planar area of reflection 27 is shown in FIG. 3. A periodic series of layers of two layer types 22 (A) and 24 (B) is arranged on a substrate 21. The layer types distinguish themselves in each case via a refractive index rA and rB and corresponding layer thicknesses dA and dB. A total layer thickness (total of the layer thicknesses dA and dB) increases in a direction of propagation. The total d2 exceeds the total d1.
  • The [0064] gradient multilayer reflector 20 is arranged in the excitation light path between the X-ray source 2 and the object 4 and functions as a monochromator 18. The X-radiation reflected from the reflector 20 apparently emerges from the mirrored (virtual) X-ray source 3 and then hits the object 4 that is arranged within the optical distance 6. As a result, X-radiation of suitable spatial and temporal coherence 14 and 15 passes through the object 4. The X-radiation passes through the object 4 to the evaluation unit 16. The evaluation unit 16 has an X-ray film. The inference patterns resulting from the X-radiation passing through the object via the surface boundaries 5 are made visible on the X-ray film.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • Phase [0065] contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 as two gradient multilayer reflectors with planar areas of reflection 27 (FIG. 5).
  • In addition to the preceding example, a further multilayer reflector is arranged [0066] 20 in the light path of the X-radiation 11 between the object 3 and the evaluation unit 16. The object of the second multilayer reflector is that of an analyzer 19. Monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 form a so-called monochromator analyzer set. Monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 are arranged with areas of reflection 27 aligned parallel to one another. The analyzer 19 is designed in such a way that non-deflected X-radiation 12 arrives at the X-ray film of the evaluation unit 16 and is detected. X-radiation 13 deflected from object 4 is not reflected and does not reach the X-ray film.
  • Monochromator [0067] 18 and analyzer 19 have a gradient course d(x) along the direction of propagation x of the specific reflector that is aligned to the same source point 2 or its mirror images 3 and 3′ and the same wave length L of the X-radiation 11. For a gradient multilayer reflector 20 with a planar area of reflection 27, the following applies to the gradient course: d(x)=(λ/2)(x/a) with the wave length λ of the X-radiation and the distance a of the reflector 20 from the source point of the X-ray source 2 (cf. Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198). If the monochromator 18 is arranged within the distance aM and the analyzer 19 within the distance aA from the X-ray source 2, the following applies to the gradient course of the monochromator 18 dM(x)=(λ/2) (x/aM) and for the gradient course of the analyzer 19 dA(x)=(λ/2)(x/aA).
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • Phase [0068] contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 as two gradient multilayer reflectors 20 with parabolic areas of reflection 271 and 272 (FIG. 6).
  • The monochromator area of [0069] reflection 271 and the analyzer area of reflection 272 are arranged opposite one another in such a way that their center lines 28 and 29 are aligned parallel to one another. Unlike the preceding examples, the object 4 is in a parallel light path. The gradient course of a gradient multilayer reflector with parabolic areas of reflection is described in Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198.
  • The monochromator analyzer set is specifically tuned to a specific wave length. Unlike the planar gradient multilayer reflectors, the wave length is hereby changed by replacing the monochromator analyzer set. [0070]
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • Phase [0071] contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 as two gradient multilayer reflectors with elliptical areas of reflection.
  • The gradient course of a gradient multilayer reflector with elliptical areas of reflection is described in Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198. [0072]
  • In the same way as for gradient multilayer reflectors with parabolic areas of reflection, the monochromator analyzer set is specifically tuned to a specific wave length. The wave length is also changed here by replacing the monochromator analyzer set. [0073]
  • EXAMPLE 6
  • Phase [0074] contrast X-ray device 1 with monochromator 18 and analyzer 19 as two gradient multilayer reflectors with circular areas of reflection.
  • Both [0075] reflectors 20 have sharp focal circles. The gradient courses are tuned to the same wave length. The gradient course of a gradient multilayer reflector with circular areas of reflection is described in Schuster et al., Proc. SPIE, 3767 (1999), pages 183-198.
  • In the same way as for [0076] gradient multilayer reflectors 20 with parabolic or elliptical areas of reflection, the monochromator analyzer set is specifically tuned to a specific wave length. The wave length can also be changed here by replacing the monochromator analyzer set.
  • EXAMPLE 7
  • Phase contrast X-ray device with monochromator and analyzer as two gradient multilayer reflectors with different areas of reflection. [0077]
  • Such an arrangement is then, for example, possible when the light paths are taken over in the focal points of the reflectors or as a parallel ray. [0078]

Claims (20)

1. Phase contrast X-ray device (1) for creating a phase contrast image (17) of at least one object (4), with
at least one X-ray source (2) for generating an X-radiation (11), that has a specific spatial coherence (15) within a specific optical distance (6) to the X-ray source (2), and
at least one evaluation unit (16) for converting the X-radiation (12, 13) after the X-radiation (11) has passed through the object (4) arranged within the optical distance (6) to the X-ray source (2) in the phase contrast image (17) of the object (4), characterized in that
the X-ray source (2) shows an output ranging from 50 W up to and including 10 kW and
a spatial coherence length (14) of the X-radiation (11) has been selected within the optical distance (6) to the X-ray source (2) ranging from 0,05 μm up to and including 10 μm.
2. X-ray device according to claim 1 in which the X-ray source (2) has a line-shaped focus (7).
3. X-ray device according to claim 1 or 2 in which a longitudinal extension of the line-shaped focus (7) is aligned in the direction towards the object (4).
4. X-ray device according to one of the claims 1 to 3 in which the X-ray source (2) has an X-ray tube with a transmission anode.
5. X-ray device according to one of the claims 1 to 3 in which the X-ray source (2) has a parametric X-radiation source (PXR).
6. X-ray device according to one of the claims 1 to 5 in which the X-radiation (11) has a specific temporal coherence (15).
7. X-ray device according to one of the claims 1 to 6 in which there is at least one monochromator (18) for generating the temporal coherence (15) of the X-radiation (11).
8. X-ray device according to one of the claims 1 to 7 in which the evaluation unit (16) has at least one analyzer (19) for analyzing the X-radiation (12, 13) after it has passed through the object (4).
9. X-ray device according to claim 7 or 8 in which the monochromator (18) and/or analyzer (19) has at least one gradient multilayer reflector (20).
10. X-ray device according to claim 9 in which the gradient multilayer reflector (20) has a periodic series of layers of a first layer type A (22) and at least a further layer type B (24) in which case the first layer type A (22) has a first refractive index rA and a first layer thickness dA (23) and a further layer type B (24), a further refractive index rB and a layer thickness dB (25) differing from the first refractive index rA and in at least one direction of propagation of the reflector (20), there is a monotone increase in layer thicknesses by a total of (d dA+dB) (26).
11. X-ray device according to claim 9 or 10 in which the gradient multilayer reflector (20) has at least one area of reflection (27) from the elliptical and/or parabolic and/or planar and/or circular and/or hyperbolic group.
12. Method for creating a phase contrast image of an object by using a phase contrast X-ray device according to one of the claims 1 to 11, with the following procedural steps:
a) Arranging the object within the optical distance to the X-ray source,
b) X-radiation passing through the object and c) Creating the phase contrast image from where the X-radiation passes through an object by means of the evaluation unit.
13. Method according to claim 12 in which the X-radiation forms an interference pattern after it has passed through the object that is detected for creating the phase contrast image.
14. Method according to claim 12 in which an X-radiation which is deflected when passing through the object for creating the phase contrast image and/or an X-radiation which is non-deflected when passing through the object is detected.
15. Method according to claim 14 in which the deflected X-radiation and/or non-deflected X-radiation is selected by means of an analyzer with a gradient multilayer reflector.
16. Method according to one of the claims 12 to 15 in which several phase contrast images are created by means of the X-radiation of different spatial coherences that are processed to an overall phase contrast image by means of an image processing unit.
17. Method according to claim 16 in which the optical distance between the object and the X-ray source varies for generating the different spatial coherence.
18. Method according to claim 16 or 17 in which orientation of the object to the direction of propagation of the X-radiation varies for generating the different spatial coherence.
19. Method according to one of the claims 12 to 18 in which an object that, in essence, consists of a material with a low absorption coefficient for the X-radiation is used.
20. Method according to one of the claims 12 to 19 in which many phase contrast images of the object are created to generate a phase contrast computer tomogram of the object.
US10/673,170 2002-09-30 2003-09-30 Phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of an object and method for creating the phase contrast image Expired - Fee Related US7154992B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10245676.3 2002-09-30
DE10245676A DE10245676B4 (en) 2002-09-30 2002-09-30 Phase-contrast x-ray machine with line focus for creating a phase-contrast image of an object and method for producing the phase-contrast image

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040062349A1 true US20040062349A1 (en) 2004-04-01
US7154992B2 US7154992B2 (en) 2006-12-26

Family

ID=32010012

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/673,170 Expired - Fee Related US7154992B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2003-09-30 Phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of an object and method for creating the phase contrast image

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7154992B2 (en)
DE (1) DE10245676B4 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070041613A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2007-02-22 Luc Perron Database of target objects suitable for use in screening receptacles or people and method and apparatus for generating same
US20090080609A1 (en) * 2005-06-01 2009-03-26 Yuko Shinden Digital radiation image imaging system
US20090116615A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2009-05-07 Yuko Shinden Digital radiation image radiographing system
WO2009064495A2 (en) * 2007-11-17 2009-05-22 Michael Keith Fuller Schlieren-type radiography using a line source and focusing optics
US7734102B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2010-06-08 Optosecurity Inc. Method and system for screening cargo containers
US7899232B2 (en) 2006-05-11 2011-03-01 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for providing threat image projection (TIP) in a luggage screening system, and luggage screening system implementing same
US7991242B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2011-08-02 Optosecurity Inc. Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons, having image distortion correction functionality
US20110200164A1 (en) * 2010-02-16 2011-08-18 Panalytical B.V. X-ray diffraction and computed tomography
ITMI20101992A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-04-28 Univ Degli Studi Milano DEVICE FOR MEASURING PROPERTIES OF A BODY BY MEANS OF RADIATION DISTRIBUTION AND RELATIVE METHOD
US8494210B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2013-07-23 Optosecurity Inc. User interface for use in security screening providing image enhancement capabilities and apparatus for implementing same
US20160290937A1 (en) * 2013-11-11 2016-10-06 University Of Science And Technology Of China Apparatus and method for x-ray grating phase-contrast imaging
US9632206B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2017-04-25 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
US10302807B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2019-05-28 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
JP2020516921A (en) * 2016-11-29 2020-06-11 サントル ナシオナル ドゥ ラ ルシェルシェ シアンティフィクCentre National De La Recherche Scientifique Spectral selection element for XUV radiation
US20230270394A1 (en) * 2021-09-01 2023-08-31 Malvern Panalytical B.V. Adaptable X-Ray Analysis Apparatus

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4015934B2 (en) * 2002-04-18 2007-11-28 株式会社東芝 Video coding method and apparatus
JP5273955B2 (en) * 2007-06-26 2013-08-28 株式会社日立製作所 X-ray imaging apparatus and X-ray imaging method
US8406378B2 (en) 2010-08-25 2013-03-26 Gamc Biotech Development Co., Ltd. Thick targets for transmission x-ray tubes
DE102013214393A1 (en) 2013-07-23 2014-11-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft X-ray system for differential phase-contrast imaging of an examination object with phase-stepping
JP6025211B2 (en) * 2013-11-28 2016-11-16 株式会社リガク X-ray topography equipment
EP3933881A1 (en) 2020-06-30 2022-01-05 VEC Imaging GmbH & Co. KG X-ray source with multiple grids

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4945552A (en) * 1987-12-04 1990-07-31 Hitachi, Ltd. Imaging system for obtaining X-ray energy subtraction images
US5319694A (en) * 1991-05-14 1994-06-07 Ingal Viktor N Method for obtaining the image of the internal structure of an object
US5715291A (en) * 1996-01-10 1998-02-03 Hitachi, Ltd. Phase-contrast X-ray CT apparatus
US20010038680A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2001-11-08 Davidson Charles J. X-ray phase-contrast medical micro-imaging methods

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995005725A1 (en) * 1993-08-16 1995-02-23 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Improved x-ray optics, especially for phase contrast imaging
AUPN201295A0 (en) * 1995-03-28 1995-04-27 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Simplified conditions and configurations for phase-contrast imaging with hard x-rays

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4945552A (en) * 1987-12-04 1990-07-31 Hitachi, Ltd. Imaging system for obtaining X-ray energy subtraction images
US5319694A (en) * 1991-05-14 1994-06-07 Ingal Viktor N Method for obtaining the image of the internal structure of an object
US5579363A (en) * 1991-05-14 1996-11-26 V-Ray Imaging Corporation Method for obtaining the image of the internal structure of an object
US5715291A (en) * 1996-01-10 1998-02-03 Hitachi, Ltd. Phase-contrast X-ray CT apparatus
US20010038680A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2001-11-08 Davidson Charles J. X-ray phase-contrast medical micro-imaging methods
US6594335B2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2003-07-15 Charles J. Davidson X-ray phase-contrast medical micro-imaging methods

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070041613A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2007-02-22 Luc Perron Database of target objects suitable for use in screening receptacles or people and method and apparatus for generating same
US7734102B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2010-06-08 Optosecurity Inc. Method and system for screening cargo containers
US7991242B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2011-08-02 Optosecurity Inc. Apparatus, method and system for screening receptacles and persons, having image distortion correction functionality
US20090080609A1 (en) * 2005-06-01 2009-03-26 Yuko Shinden Digital radiation image imaging system
US20090116615A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2009-05-07 Yuko Shinden Digital radiation image radiographing system
US7746977B2 (en) 2005-07-08 2010-06-29 Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic Inc. Digital radiation image radiographing system
US7899232B2 (en) 2006-05-11 2011-03-01 Optosecurity Inc. Method and apparatus for providing threat image projection (TIP) in a luggage screening system, and luggage screening system implementing same
US8494210B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2013-07-23 Optosecurity Inc. User interface for use in security screening providing image enhancement capabilities and apparatus for implementing same
WO2009064495A2 (en) * 2007-11-17 2009-05-22 Michael Keith Fuller Schlieren-type radiography using a line source and focusing optics
WO2009064495A3 (en) * 2007-11-17 2009-07-02 Michael Keith Fuller Schlieren-type radiography using a line source and focusing optics
US8477904B2 (en) 2010-02-16 2013-07-02 Panalytical B.V. X-ray diffraction and computed tomography
US20110200164A1 (en) * 2010-02-16 2011-08-18 Panalytical B.V. X-ray diffraction and computed tomography
ITMI20101992A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-04-28 Univ Degli Studi Milano DEVICE FOR MEASURING PROPERTIES OF A BODY BY MEANS OF RADIATION DISTRIBUTION AND RELATIVE METHOD
WO2012056413A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 Università Degli Studi Di Milano - Bicocca Device for measuring properties of a medium by scattered radiation and relative method
US9632206B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2017-04-25 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
US10422919B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2019-09-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing
US10509142B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2019-12-17 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Distributed analysis x-ray inspection methods and systems
US10830920B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2020-11-10 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Distributed analysis X-ray inspection methods and systems
US11099294B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2021-08-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Distributed analysis x-ray inspection methods and systems
US20160290937A1 (en) * 2013-11-11 2016-10-06 University Of Science And Technology Of China Apparatus and method for x-ray grating phase-contrast imaging
US11287391B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2022-03-29 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
US10302807B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2019-05-28 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
US10768338B2 (en) 2016-02-22 2020-09-08 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detecting threats and contraband in cargo
JP2020516921A (en) * 2016-11-29 2020-06-11 サントル ナシオナル ドゥ ラ ルシェルシェ シアンティフィクCentre National De La Recherche Scientifique Spectral selection element for XUV radiation
US11270808B2 (en) 2016-11-29 2022-03-08 Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique Spectral selection component for XUV radiation
JP7269878B2 (en) 2016-11-29 2023-05-09 サントル ナシオナル ドゥ ラ ルシェルシェ シアンティフィク Spectral selective element for XUV radiation
US20230270394A1 (en) * 2021-09-01 2023-08-31 Malvern Panalytical B.V. Adaptable X-Ray Analysis Apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE10245676A1 (en) 2004-05-06
DE10245676B4 (en) 2008-01-17
US7154992B2 (en) 2006-12-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7154992B2 (en) Phase contrast X-ray device for creating a phase contrast image of an object and method for creating the phase contrast image
US9823202B2 (en) Differential phase contrast X-ray imaging system and components
JP3971776B2 (en) Simplified conditions and configuration for phase contrast imaging with hard X-rays
RU2180439C2 (en) Process of generation of image of internal structure of object with use of x-rays and device for its realization
US7486770B2 (en) Focus-detector arrangement of an X-ray apparatus for generating projective or tomographic phase contrast recordings
US20140226785A1 (en) System and method for phase-contrast x-ray imaging
US5406609A (en) X-ray analysis apparatus
US20070189449A1 (en) Method and measuring arrangement for nondestructive analysis of an examination object by means of x-radiation
JP2007203060A (en) Focal point-detector device having x-ray optical grating for measuring phase contrast
JP2007203066A (en) X-ray optically transmissive grating of focal point-detector device for x-ray device
Treimer et al. Refraction as imaging signal for computerized (neutron) tomography
MacDonald et al. Polycapillary X-ray optics for microdiffraction
EP1449037B1 (en) X-ray phase contrast imaging
WO1995022758A1 (en) X-ray analysis device
Bogomazova et al. Diffraction of real and virtual photons in a pyrolytic graphite crystal as source of intensive quasimonochromatic X-ray beam
Hutton et al. Determining the phase of the structure factor by Kossel cone analysis with the use of synchrotron radiation
Suzuki Surface extended x-ray-absorption fine-structure spectroscopy measurement using the evanescent-wave effect of fluorescent x rays
Bushuev et al. Wave theory of x-ray phase-contrast radiography
JP6206901B2 (en) Scattering intensity distribution measuring method and measuring apparatus
JP2008170236A (en) Measuring method for reflectivity curve of x ray and of neutron radiation and measuring instrument
JP5504502B2 (en) X-ray and neutron beam reflectivity curve measuring method and measuring apparatus
Protopopov et al. X-ray dark-field refraction-contrast imaging of micro-objects
US6650728B2 (en) Apparatus and method for the analysis of atomic and molecular elements by wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometric devices
Jark et al. On amplitude beam splitting of tender X-rays (2–8 keV photon energy) using conical diffraction from reflection gratings with laminar profile
Spiller X-Rays: Optical Elements

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHUSTER, MANFRED;REEL/FRAME:014550/0919

Effective date: 20030929

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT;REEL/FRAME:039271/0561

Effective date: 20160610

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.)

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20181226