CA2798664A1 - Dental prosthesis connector design - Google Patents
Dental prosthesis connector design Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2798664A1 CA2798664A1 CA2798664A CA2798664A CA2798664A1 CA 2798664 A1 CA2798664 A1 CA 2798664A1 CA 2798664 A CA2798664 A CA 2798664A CA 2798664 A CA2798664 A CA 2798664A CA 2798664 A1 CA2798664 A1 CA 2798664A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- connector
- acceptability
- dental restoration
- restoration component
- providing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
- A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
- A61C5/70—Tooth crowns; Making thereof
- A61C5/77—Methods or devices for making crowns
Abstract
Presented herein are methods, systems, devices, and computer-readable media for dental prosthesis connector design. Embodiments include providing a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector that connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component in a dental prosthesis; providing, via a cross-sectional representation of the connector, an acceptability design constraint for the connector, such as whether the connector meets production constraints and / or encompasses the intersection between neighboring teeth; modifying the connector based on operator input; determining whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and providing an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
Claims (23)
1. A computer-implemented method for dental prosthesis connector design, comprising:
providing a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector, wherein the connector connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component, and wherein the connector, the first dental restoration component, and second dental restoration component are part of a prosthesis;
representing, via a cross-sectional portion on the computer-based interface, an acceptability design constraint for the connector;
modifying the connector based on operator input;
determining whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and providing an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
providing a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector, wherein the connector connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component, and wherein the connector, the first dental restoration component, and second dental restoration component are part of a prosthesis;
representing, via a cross-sectional portion on the computer-based interface, an acceptability design constraint for the connector;
modifying the connector based on operator input;
determining whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and providing an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the prosthesis is a full anatomic restoration.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein providing the acceptability indication comprises providing a visual indication via the connector cross-section portion of the computer-implemented interface.
4. The method of any of claims 1 to 3, wherein modifying the connector based on operator input comprises receiving operator input modifying a connection curve between the connector and the first dental restoration component.
5. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein providing the acceptability indication comprises providing an indication that a connection curve between the connector and the first dental restoration component overlaps an unacceptable production area.
6. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the method further comprises:
providing, via the cross-sectional portion, a second indication of where the first dental restoration component and second dental restoration component intersect.
providing, via the cross-sectional portion, a second indication of where the first dental restoration component and second dental restoration component intersect.
7. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein determining whether the modified connector is acceptable comprises determining whether the modified connector is acceptable relative to an intersection of the first dental restoration component and the second dental restoration component.
8. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein providing the acceptability indication comprises providing a colored region in the cross-sectional representation.
9. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein providing the acceptability indication comprises providing a patterned region in the cross-sectional representation.
10. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein providing the acceptability indication comprises providing a non-manipulable curve representing a connection curve between the connector and the second dental restoration component.
11. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the method further comprises providing, via the computer-based interface, a second acceptability indication of whether the connector is of sufficient cross-sectional area to meet material constraints.
12. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the method further comprises:
determining whether the modified connector is of sufficient cross-sectional area; and in response to determining that the modified connector is not of sufficient cross-sectional area, providing a second acceptability indication via the computer-based interface that the modified connector is not of sufficient cross-sectional area.
determining whether the modified connector is of sufficient cross-sectional area; and in response to determining that the modified connector is not of sufficient cross-sectional area, providing a second acceptability indication via the computer-based interface that the modified connector is not of sufficient cross-sectional area.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein providing the second acceptability indication comprises providing a colored border for the connector in an overlapped portion on the computer-based interface.
14. The method of claim 12 or 13, wherein providing the second acceptability indication comprises providing a textual representation that the connector is not of sufficient cross-sectional area.
15. The method of any of claims 12 to 14, wherein the method further comprises automatically determining the connector based at least in part on the first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component.
16. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the method further comprises producing a physical version of the prosthesis.
17. The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the first dental restoration component is a pontic.
18. A system for dental prosthesis connector design, said system comprising:
a computer system comprising computer hardware, the computer system programmed to:
provide a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector, wherein the connector connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component, and wherein the connector, the first dental restoration component, and second dental restoration component are part of a prosthesis;
represent, via a cross-sectional representation of the connector on the computer-based interface, an acceptability design constraint for the connector;
modify the connector based on operator input;
determine whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and provide an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
a computer system comprising computer hardware, the computer system programmed to:
provide a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector, wherein the connector connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component, and wherein the connector, the first dental restoration component, and second dental restoration component are part of a prosthesis;
represent, via a cross-sectional representation of the connector on the computer-based interface, an acceptability design constraint for the connector;
modify the connector based on operator input;
determine whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and provide an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
19. The system of Claim 18, wherein the acceptability indication is an indication that a connection curve between the connector and the first dental restoration component overlaps an unacceptable production area.
20. The system of Claim 18 or 19, wherein determining whether the modified connector is acceptable comprises determining whether the modified connector is acceptable relative to an intersection of the first dental restoration component and the second dental restoration component.
21. A computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions for performing a method of dental prosthesis connector design, the method comprising:
providing a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector, wherein the connector connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component, and wherein the connector, the first dental restoration component, and second dental restoration component are part of a prosthesis;
representing, via a cross-sectional representation of the connector on the computer-based interface, an acceptability design constraint for the connector;
modifying the connector based on operator input;
determining whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and providing an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
providing a computer-based interface for manipulating a connector, wherein the connector connects a first dental restoration component and a second dental restoration component, and wherein the connector, the first dental restoration component, and second dental restoration component are part of a prosthesis;
representing, via a cross-sectional representation of the connector on the computer-based interface, an acceptability design constraint for the connector;
modifying the connector based on operator input;
determining whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint; and providing an acceptability indication for the modified connector, wherein said acceptability indication is determined based at least in part on whether the modified connector is acceptable with respect to the acceptability design constraint.
22. The computer-readable storage medium of Claim 21, wherein providing the acceptability indication comprises providing an indication that a connection curve between the connector and the first dental restoration component overlaps an unacceptable production area.
23. The computer-readable storage medium of any of Claims 21 or 22, wherein determining whether the modified connector is acceptable comprises determining whether the modified connector is acceptable relative to an intersection of the first dental restoration component and the second dental restoration component.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/787,116 | 2010-05-25 | ||
US12/787,116 US9179988B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2010-05-25 | Dental prosthesis connector design |
PCT/EP2011/002570 WO2011147559A1 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2011-05-24 | Dental prosthesis connector design |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2798664A1 true CA2798664A1 (en) | 2011-12-01 |
CA2798664C CA2798664C (en) | 2018-07-03 |
Family
ID=44358402
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2798664A Active CA2798664C (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2011-05-24 | Dental prosthesis connector design |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9179988B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2798664C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011147559A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102054091A (en) * | 2009-11-09 | 2011-05-11 | 无锡时代天使医疗器械科技有限公司 | Method for manufacturing dental instrument for correcting the position of teeth |
US9934360B2 (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2018-04-03 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Dental data planning |
US9179988B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2015-11-10 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Dental prosthesis connector design |
US9037439B2 (en) * | 2011-05-13 | 2015-05-19 | Align Technology, Inc. | Prioritization of three dimensional dental elements |
US11351011B1 (en) | 2021-06-03 | 2022-06-07 | Oxilio Ltd | Methods and systems for determining tooth structure |
Family Cites Families (49)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5027281A (en) | 1989-06-09 | 1991-06-25 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for scanning and recording of coordinates describing three dimensional objects of complex and unique geometry |
JPH1075963A (en) | 1996-09-06 | 1998-03-24 | Nikon Corp | Method for designing dental prosthetic appliance model and medium recording program for executing the method |
US6409504B1 (en) | 1997-06-20 | 2002-06-25 | Align Technology, Inc. | Manipulating a digital dentition model to form models of individual dentition components |
US6514074B1 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2003-02-04 | Align Technology, Inc. | Digitally modeling the deformation of gingival |
US6328567B1 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2001-12-11 | Dentech, Llc | Method, apparatus and system for automated tooth shade analysis and matching |
US7234937B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2007-06-26 | Orametrix, Inc. | Unified workstation for virtual craniofacial diagnosis, treatment planning and therapeutics |
US7013191B2 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2006-03-14 | Orametrix, Inc. | Interactive orthodontic care system based on intra-oral scanning of teeth |
US6648640B2 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2003-11-18 | Ora Metrix, Inc. | Interactive orthodontic care system based on intra-oral scanning of teeth |
AU2607301A (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2001-07-09 | Ormco Corporation | Custom orthodontic appliance forming method and apparatus |
US7717708B2 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2010-05-18 | Orametrix, Inc. | Method and system for integrated orthodontic treatment planning using unified workstation |
US9421074B2 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2016-08-23 | Orametrix, Inc. | Unified three dimensional virtual craniofacial and dentition model and uses thereof |
US7156655B2 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2007-01-02 | Orametrix, Inc. | Method and system for comprehensive evaluation of orthodontic treatment using unified workstation |
US8021147B2 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2011-09-20 | Orametrix, Inc. | Method and system for comprehensive evaluation of orthodontic care using unified workstation |
WO2004008981A2 (en) | 2002-07-22 | 2004-01-29 | Cadent Ltd. | A method for defining a finish line of a dental prosthesis |
DE10252298B3 (en) | 2002-11-11 | 2004-08-19 | Mehl, Albert, Prof. Dr. Dr. | Process for the production of tooth replacement parts or tooth restorations using electronic tooth representations |
DE10313690B4 (en) | 2003-03-26 | 2013-08-22 | 3M Deutschland Gmbh | Processing of design data of a dental prosthesis |
US7856286B2 (en) * | 2003-03-26 | 2010-12-21 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Processing of shape data of a dental prosthesis |
US7228191B2 (en) | 2003-05-02 | 2007-06-05 | Geodigm Corporation | Method and apparatus for constructing crowns, bridges and implants for dental use |
US7245753B2 (en) | 2003-06-26 | 2007-07-17 | Carestream Health, Inc. | Method for determining dental alignment using radiographs |
US7474932B2 (en) * | 2003-10-23 | 2009-01-06 | Technest Holdings, Inc. | Dental computer-aided design (CAD) methods and systems |
US7333874B2 (en) | 2004-02-24 | 2008-02-19 | Cadent Ltd. | Method and system for designing and producing dental prostheses and appliances |
DE102004035970A1 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-16 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for processing a digitized workpiece, in particular of three-dimensional models of tooth replacement parts to be produced and device |
US7322824B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2008-01-29 | Schmitt Stephen M | Design and manufacture of dental implant restorations |
EP1629793A1 (en) | 2004-08-25 | 2006-03-01 | Remedent NV | Dental appliances |
US7862336B2 (en) | 2004-11-26 | 2011-01-04 | Cadent Ltd. | Method and system for providing feedback data useful in prosthodontic procedures associated with the intra oral cavity |
US7236842B2 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2007-06-26 | Cadent Ltd. | System and method for manufacturing a dental prosthesis and a dental prosthesis manufactured thereby |
US20060183082A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-17 | D4D Technologies, Lp | Method and computer system for creating a dental restoration model |
DE102005011066A1 (en) | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for establishing the positional match of 3D data sets in a dental CAD / CAM system |
US20060275736A1 (en) | 2005-04-22 | 2006-12-07 | Orthoclear Holdings, Inc. | Computer aided orthodontic treatment planning |
DK1905379T3 (en) * | 2006-09-27 | 2010-04-19 | Degudent Gmbh | Method of constructing a connector |
US7993133B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2011-08-09 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Digital orthodontic treatment planning |
EP2101677A2 (en) * | 2006-11-28 | 2009-09-23 | Sensable Technologies, Inc. | Systems for haptic design of dental restorations |
WO2008086526A2 (en) * | 2007-01-11 | 2008-07-17 | Geodigm Corporation | Design of dental appliances |
DE102007002144A1 (en) | 2007-01-15 | 2008-07-17 | Aepsilon Rechteverwaltungs Gmbh | Procedures relating to implants and a computer-readable medium and a computer |
US8425229B2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2013-04-23 | Nobel Biocare Services Ag | Method and system for dental planning |
US9675431B2 (en) | 2007-08-21 | 2017-06-13 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for designing a plurality of adjacent tooth restorations using CAD/CAM technology |
US20090133260A1 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2009-05-28 | Ios Technologies, Inc | 3D dental shade matching and apparatus |
AU2009206331A1 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-30 | Sensable Technologies, Inc. | Haptically enabled dental modeling system |
WO2010031404A1 (en) | 2008-09-18 | 2010-03-25 | 3Shape A/S | Tools for customized design of dental restorations |
US8255071B2 (en) | 2008-11-13 | 2012-08-28 | Innovative Health Technologies, Llc | Method and system for forming a dental prosthesis |
US9934360B2 (en) | 2010-02-10 | 2018-04-03 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Dental data planning |
US10314674B2 (en) | 2010-02-10 | 2019-06-11 | Nobel Biocare Canada Inc. | Dental prosthetics manipulation, selection, and planning |
US8457772B2 (en) | 2010-02-10 | 2013-06-04 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Method for planning a dental component |
US8630869B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2014-01-14 | Imagdent Management And Development Services, L.L.C. | Dental implant system and method |
US9179988B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2015-11-10 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Dental prosthesis connector design |
US8949730B2 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2015-02-03 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Library selection in dental prosthesis design |
US8594820B2 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2013-11-26 | Nobel Biocare Services Ag | Prosthesis manipulation in dental prosthesis design |
US9226806B2 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2016-01-05 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Occlusion estimation in dental prosthesis design |
US8712733B2 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2014-04-29 | Biocad Medical, Inc. | Adjusting dental prostheses based on soft tissue |
-
2010
- 2010-05-25 US US12/787,116 patent/US9179988B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-05-24 WO PCT/EP2011/002570 patent/WO2011147559A1/en active Application Filing
- 2011-05-24 CA CA2798664A patent/CA2798664C/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2798664C (en) | 2018-07-03 |
WO2011147559A1 (en) | 2011-12-01 |
US20110295402A1 (en) | 2011-12-01 |
US9179988B2 (en) | 2015-11-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2798664A1 (en) | Dental prosthesis connector design | |
CA2808722C (en) | Adjusting dental prostheses based on soft tissue | |
USD800737S1 (en) | Display screen or portion thereof with animated graphical user interface | |
WO2010105628A3 (en) | System and method for effective planning, visualization, and optimization of dental restorations | |
US10314674B2 (en) | Dental prosthetics manipulation, selection, and planning | |
KR101805003B1 (en) | dental CAD system and method of driving the same, and recording medium | |
USD774519S1 (en) | Display screen or portion thereof with transitional graphical user interface | |
WO2007059172A3 (en) | Systems and methods for editing a model of a physical system for a simulation | |
EP2618142A3 (en) | Ultrasonic modeling for inspection of composite irregularities | |
GB201116083D0 (en) | System and method for performing computerized simulations for image-guided procedures using a patient specific model | |
WO2011153030A3 (en) | Dual monitor information display system and method for an excavator | |
WO2008080013A3 (en) | System and method for representation, modeling and application of three-dimensional digital pontics | |
WO2008095574A3 (en) | Use of graphs, method and computer system for creating a construction drawing, method for manufacturing a product, and use of said method | |
WO2012096451A3 (en) | Method and apparatus for editing touch display | |
JP2015502209A5 (en) | ||
WO2008026064A3 (en) | System and method for modeling and application of interproximal reduction of teeth | |
CN103108604A (en) | Prosthesis manipulation in dental prosthesis design | |
US8949730B2 (en) | Library selection in dental prosthesis design | |
WO2013068124A3 (en) | Milling block, method for producing partial or total prostheses, and complete milling block system | |
ZA201203484B (en) | Apparatus,method and computer program for providing one or more adjusted parameters for provision of an upmix signal representation on the basis of a downmix signal representation and a parametric side information associated with the downmix signal representation, using an average value | |
Kamenskiy et al. | A mathematical evaluation of hemodynamic parameters after carotid eversion and conventional patch angioplasty | |
US20160242881A1 (en) | Method and user interface for use in manufacturing multi-shaded dental restorations | |
US20180368956A1 (en) | Method for designing a restoration and a reduction coping | |
EP2741259A3 (en) | A system and method for generating a mesh | |
CN106405891A (en) | Mosaic area splicing method and system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20160520 |