CA2745343A1 - Odorant for fire suppression system - Google Patents
Odorant for fire suppression system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2745343A1 CA2745343A1 CA2745343A CA2745343A CA2745343A1 CA 2745343 A1 CA2745343 A1 CA 2745343A1 CA 2745343 A CA2745343 A CA 2745343A CA 2745343 A CA2745343 A CA 2745343A CA 2745343 A1 CA2745343 A1 CA 2745343A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- odor
- odorant
- inert gas
- enclosed environment
- chosen
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- A62C99/0009—Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames
- A62C99/0018—Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames using gases or vapours that do not support combustion, e.g. steam, carbon dioxide
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C3/00—Fire prevention, containment or extinguishing specially adapted for particular objects or places
- A62C3/07—Fire prevention, containment or extinguishing specially adapted for particular objects or places in vehicles, e.g. in road vehicles
- A62C3/08—Fire prevention, containment or extinguishing specially adapted for particular objects or places in vehicles, e.g. in road vehicles in aircraft
Abstract
A method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment includes providing an enclosed environment that holds cargo that has first odor;
flowing a gas to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the gas, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the gas is present.
flowing a gas to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the gas, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the gas is present.
Description
ODORANT FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This disclosure relates to fire suppression systems, and more particularly to the use odorants in fire suppression systems.
It is well known in the art that fire requires fuel, heat, and oxygen to propagate. Some fire suppression methodologies use inert gases to dilute the supply of oxygen in the air to suppress the spread and propagation of fire.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to an example embodiment, a method for protecting a user in an environment includes providing an enclosed environment that holds cargo that has first odor; flowing a gas to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the inert gas, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the inert gas is present.
According to another example embodiment a method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment includes; providing an enclosed environment holding cargo that has a first odor; flowing an inert gas to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the inert gas, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the inert gas is present and the chosen second odor does cause concern in humans adjacent the enclosed environment.
According to a still further example embodiment, a method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment includes providing an enclosed environment holding cargo that has a first odor; providing a passenger compartment adjacent the cargo area; providing a fire suppressant system, flowing an inert gas from the suppressant system to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the inert gas as the gas flows, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the inert gas is present and the second odor does not cause concern in humans adjacent the enclosed environment.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a prior art depiction of an inert gas discharge pipe and a module containing an odorant.
Figure 2 is an embodiment showing a fire suppressant system utilizing the prior art of Figure 1.
Figure 3 shows a method of utilizing the embodiments in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 4 shows an environment for the fire suppressant system of Figure 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to Figure 1, prior art conduit 10 through which a gas, which may be an inert gas such as nitrogen, helium argon or the like, flows to suppress a fire (not shown) is shown. The conduit 10 has an elbow 15 in which a module 20 containing an odorant 25 is disposed. The module 20 screws into an elbow bracket 30 to retain it there. A disc seal 35 seals the odorant 25 within the module 20 and ruptures if an inert gas flows through conduit 10. Typically, the disc seal 35 bursts at five atmospheres of pressure or more, i.e., below the pressure of the flowing inert gas, and therefore other burst pressures are anticipated herein. The odorant 25 is not placed in high pressure canisters 55 (see Figure 2) because it stays as a liquid if stored in the inert gas canisters and therefore it is difficult to get into the inert gas flow.
Referring now to Figure 2, a system 45 for use in an enclosed environment 65, such as a cargo bay, is shown. Gases may accumulate in rooms or pits, and be dangerous to human health. One working in an enclosed environment, which may be enclosed, like a worker entering a cargo bay (shown schematically as 65 -see also Figure 4) may not be aware of the presence of the inert gas and a worker's health may be affected.
The system 45 includes plurality of high pressure canisters 55 that hold an inert gas are connected by conduit 10 and pipes 60 to enclosed environments 65, such as a storage or cargo bay in an aircraft 63, where fire may occur and be suppressed. In the aircraft 63 a passenger compartment 67 may be near or adjacent to an enclosed environment 65. The system 45 ports inert gas to enclosed environments 65 in the event of a fire.
Each canister 55 is attached to the conduit 10 by a discharge pressure regulator/control valve 70 and to the enclosed environment 65 by a diverter valve 75. Each enclosed environment 65 has a room pressure transducer 80, a temperature transmitter 85, and a fire detector 90 (such as a smoke detector). A control valve 95 is placed in fluid communication with the conduit 10 that prevents inert gas from flowing from the canisters 55 to the enclosed environments 65.
Typically, if a fire is detected in an enclosed environment 65, e.g., from signals from any of the room pressure transducer 80, the temperature transmitter 85, and/or the fire detector 90, a controller 103, which is conventionally in signal communication with the room pressure transducer 80, the temperature transmitter 85, and/or the fire detector 90, causes the discharge pressure regulator/control valve 70 of one or more of the canisters 55 to port inert gas through conduit 10, through open control valve 95 to the diverter valves 75. The diverter valves 75 port the inert gas downstream to the nozzles 100 in the relevant enclosed environment 65 to suppress fire therein.
The valves such as pressure regulator/control valve 70 and diverter valve 75 and or the canisters 55 may fail or leak. If a failure does occur, or if the system 45 suppresses a fire but the controller 103, for instance, fails to alert a user that there may be inert gas in the enclosed environments 65, one who might enter the enclosed environments 65 might be entering an unhealthy place.
If the regulator/control valve 70 and diverter valve 75 fail, leak or operate properly, enough pressure may be exerted on the odorant module 20 to cause the disc seal 35 to burst and gas passing through the conduit 10 acts as a venturi to pull an odorant 110 into the conduit 10 and odorize the inert gas. In an alternative embodiment, an odorant 110 may be included in the canisters 55 to be released with the gas contained therein.
By using a particular odorant 110 as discussed hereinbelow, one who enters an enclosed environment 65, in which the oxygen content in that enclosure may be at unhealthy levels, senses the odorant and vents the enclosed environment 65 and shuts off the system 45 by closing valve 95 before safely entering the enclosed environment 65.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This disclosure relates to fire suppression systems, and more particularly to the use odorants in fire suppression systems.
It is well known in the art that fire requires fuel, heat, and oxygen to propagate. Some fire suppression methodologies use inert gases to dilute the supply of oxygen in the air to suppress the spread and propagation of fire.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to an example embodiment, a method for protecting a user in an environment includes providing an enclosed environment that holds cargo that has first odor; flowing a gas to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the inert gas, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the inert gas is present.
According to another example embodiment a method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment includes; providing an enclosed environment holding cargo that has a first odor; flowing an inert gas to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the inert gas, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the inert gas is present and the chosen second odor does cause concern in humans adjacent the enclosed environment.
According to a still further example embodiment, a method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment includes providing an enclosed environment holding cargo that has a first odor; providing a passenger compartment adjacent the cargo area; providing a fire suppressant system, flowing an inert gas from the suppressant system to the enclosed environment; and adding an odorant having a second odor to the inert gas as the gas flows, the first odor being distinctive from the second odor such that a presence of the second odorant provides a warning that the inert gas is present and the second odor does not cause concern in humans adjacent the enclosed environment.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a prior art depiction of an inert gas discharge pipe and a module containing an odorant.
Figure 2 is an embodiment showing a fire suppressant system utilizing the prior art of Figure 1.
Figure 3 shows a method of utilizing the embodiments in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 4 shows an environment for the fire suppressant system of Figure 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to Figure 1, prior art conduit 10 through which a gas, which may be an inert gas such as nitrogen, helium argon or the like, flows to suppress a fire (not shown) is shown. The conduit 10 has an elbow 15 in which a module 20 containing an odorant 25 is disposed. The module 20 screws into an elbow bracket 30 to retain it there. A disc seal 35 seals the odorant 25 within the module 20 and ruptures if an inert gas flows through conduit 10. Typically, the disc seal 35 bursts at five atmospheres of pressure or more, i.e., below the pressure of the flowing inert gas, and therefore other burst pressures are anticipated herein. The odorant 25 is not placed in high pressure canisters 55 (see Figure 2) because it stays as a liquid if stored in the inert gas canisters and therefore it is difficult to get into the inert gas flow.
Referring now to Figure 2, a system 45 for use in an enclosed environment 65, such as a cargo bay, is shown. Gases may accumulate in rooms or pits, and be dangerous to human health. One working in an enclosed environment, which may be enclosed, like a worker entering a cargo bay (shown schematically as 65 -see also Figure 4) may not be aware of the presence of the inert gas and a worker's health may be affected.
The system 45 includes plurality of high pressure canisters 55 that hold an inert gas are connected by conduit 10 and pipes 60 to enclosed environments 65, such as a storage or cargo bay in an aircraft 63, where fire may occur and be suppressed. In the aircraft 63 a passenger compartment 67 may be near or adjacent to an enclosed environment 65. The system 45 ports inert gas to enclosed environments 65 in the event of a fire.
Each canister 55 is attached to the conduit 10 by a discharge pressure regulator/control valve 70 and to the enclosed environment 65 by a diverter valve 75. Each enclosed environment 65 has a room pressure transducer 80, a temperature transmitter 85, and a fire detector 90 (such as a smoke detector). A control valve 95 is placed in fluid communication with the conduit 10 that prevents inert gas from flowing from the canisters 55 to the enclosed environments 65.
Typically, if a fire is detected in an enclosed environment 65, e.g., from signals from any of the room pressure transducer 80, the temperature transmitter 85, and/or the fire detector 90, a controller 103, which is conventionally in signal communication with the room pressure transducer 80, the temperature transmitter 85, and/or the fire detector 90, causes the discharge pressure regulator/control valve 70 of one or more of the canisters 55 to port inert gas through conduit 10, through open control valve 95 to the diverter valves 75. The diverter valves 75 port the inert gas downstream to the nozzles 100 in the relevant enclosed environment 65 to suppress fire therein.
The valves such as pressure regulator/control valve 70 and diverter valve 75 and or the canisters 55 may fail or leak. If a failure does occur, or if the system 45 suppresses a fire but the controller 103, for instance, fails to alert a user that there may be inert gas in the enclosed environments 65, one who might enter the enclosed environments 65 might be entering an unhealthy place.
If the regulator/control valve 70 and diverter valve 75 fail, leak or operate properly, enough pressure may be exerted on the odorant module 20 to cause the disc seal 35 to burst and gas passing through the conduit 10 acts as a venturi to pull an odorant 110 into the conduit 10 and odorize the inert gas. In an alternative embodiment, an odorant 110 may be included in the canisters 55 to be released with the gas contained therein.
By using a particular odorant 110 as discussed hereinbelow, one who enters an enclosed environment 65, in which the oxygen content in that enclosure may be at unhealthy levels, senses the odorant and vents the enclosed environment 65 and shuts off the system 45 by closing valve 95 before safely entering the enclosed environment 65.
In order to optimize the training of the worker, a recognizable odorant 110 may be used consistently within systems 45 that use inert gas for alerting workers of this unhealthy or below appropriate level of oxygen in the air.
The choice of odorant 110 should be sufficiently different from any odors that might arise from the normal range of cargo 61, or other goods in an enclosed environment 65, known to be instantly recognizable, yet at the same time it may not be an odor that might likely cause anxiety or concern if the odorant 110 entered the passenger cabin 67 atmosphere during flight. Generally, odorants 25 used in the prior art are sulfur based chemicals such as thiols or mercaptans, sulfides or similar odorant. These are foul smelling "stench agents." This practice is so well known that the general public believes that this is in fact the odor of natural gas.
Other odorants include limonene, which has a pungent, sickly, orange smell and it is very obvious. When choosing an odorant one may have the following known choices:
1 Esters Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Methyl formate Ethereal Methyl acetate Sweet, nail polish Solvent Methyl butyrate Fruity, apple, Pineapple Methyl Butanoate Ethyl acetate Sweet, solvent Wine Ethyl butyrate Fruity, orange Ethyl butanoate Pineapple Fruity, banana Isoamyl acetate Pear Pentyl butyrate Fruity, pear Pentyl butanoate Apricot Pentyl pentanoate Fruity, apple Octyl acetate Fruity, orange Fructone Fruity, apple-like Hexyl acetate Apple, floral, fruity Ethyl meth 1 hen 1 lycidate strawberry 2 Terpenes Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Myrcene Woody, complex Verbena, bay Geraniol Rose, flowery Geranium, lemon Nerol Sweet rose, flowery Neroli, lemongrass Citral, lemonal Lemon Lemon myrtle, lemongrass Geranial, neral Citronellal Lemon Lemongrass Citronellol Lemon Lemongrass, rose Pelargonium Floral, sweet Coriander, sweet basil Linalool Woody, lavender Lavender Neroli, ginger Merolidol Woody, fresh bark Jasmine 3 Cyclic terpenes Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Limonene Orange Orange, lemon Camphor Camphor Camphor laurel Terpineol Lilac Lilac, ca u ut Al ha-lonone Violet, woody Violet Thujone Minty Cypress, lilac, Juniper 4 Aromatic Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Benzaldehyde Almond Eugenol Clove Clove Cinnamaldehyde Cinnamon Cassia, Cinnamon Ethyl maltol Cooked fruit Caramelized sugar Vanillin Vanilla Vanilla Anisole Anise Anise Anethole Anise anise, Sweet basil Estragole Terra on Terragon Thymol Thyme Thyme Amines Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Trimethylamine Fishy, Ammonia Putrescine Rotting flesh Rotting flesh Diaminobutane Cadaverine Rotting flesh Rotting flesh Pyridine Fishy Indole Faecal, flowery Faeces jasmine Skatole Faecal Faeces 6 Alcohols Compound Fragrance Natural ccurrence Furaneol strawberry 1-Hexanol herbaceous, woody Cis-3-Hexen-l-ol Fresh cut grass Menthol peppermint 5 7 Aldehydes Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Acetaldehyde ungent Hexanol Green, grassy Cis-3-Hexen-l-ol Green tomatoes Furfural Burnt oats 8 Ketones Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Dihydrojasmone Fruity, woody, floral Oct-l-en-3-one Blood, metallic, mushroom-like 2-Acetyl- I -pyrroline Fresh bread, jasmine rice 6-Acetyl-2, 3, 4,, 5- Fresh bread, tortillas, tetrah dro yridine popcorn 9 Lactones Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Gamma-Decalactone Intense peach flavour Gamma-Nonalactone Coconut odour, Popular in suntan lotions Delta-Octalactone Creamy note Jasmine lactone Powerful fatty fruity peach and apricot Massoia lactone Powerful creamy coconut Wine lactone sweet coconut odour Sotolon Maple syrup, curry, fenugreek Thiols Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Furaneol strawberry 1-Hexanol herbaceous, woody Cis-3-Hexen- l -ol Fresh cut grass Menthol peppermint 5 11 Miscellaneous Compounds Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Methylphospine & Garlic-metallic Two of the most potent dimethylphosphine odorants known Nerolin Tetrah drothio hene 2, 4, 6-Trichloroanisole Substituted pyrazines When choosing the particular odorant 110 to use, one must be aware of the odors in the environment and/or the passenger compartment. For instance if meat is being air freighted, one may choose to avoid any of the odorants (first odors) from 10 the amine group that smell like rotted flesh (not shown) cited hereinabove that conflict with the smell of meat (i.e., first odor). Similarly, if one is transporting flowers (not shown), an odorant (i.e., second odors) from the Terpene groups, that smell like flowers (i.e., first odors) cited hereinabove. If fruit (not shown) is being transported, an odorant (i.e., second odors) from the Ester group that smell like fruit (i.e., first odors) may be avoided. Also, an odorant may be chosen from the list above (i.e., second odor) that has the lowest possibility of matching or resembling the odors (i.e., first odor) that might normally be expected to exist in the passenger compartment and then used on a permanent basis. It should be noted that a first odor may have no distinguishable odor and be deemed ambient odor. The second odor is distinguishable from the ambient or distinguishable first odor.
In order to take advantage of the distinctive odorants described above, one may determine a type of cargo 61 carried or held in an enclosed environment 65 (step 150), choose an odorant that is not likely to alarm, cause anxiety or concern of passengers nearby the enclosed environment 65 as in an aircraft 63 and that is distinctive from a normal odor of the cargo to be carried (step160), educate personnel who may enter the enclosed environment (step 170), insert an odorant module 20 including the chosen odorant 110 (step 180) and infuse any flowing inert gas with the chosen odorant 110 to an enclosed environment 65 (step 190) so that anyone who might enter the enclosed environment is warned of the presence of the inert gas by detecting the chosen odorant 110.
Although a combination of features is shown in the illustrated examples, not all of them need to be combined to realize the benefits of various embodiments of this disclosure. In other words, a system designed according to an embodiment of this disclosure will not necessarily include all of the features shown in any one of the Figures or all of the portions schematically shown in the Figures. Moreover, selected features of one example embodiment may be combined with selected features of other example embodiments.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature.
Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this disclosure. The scope of legal protection given to this disclosure can only be determined by studying the following claims.
The choice of odorant 110 should be sufficiently different from any odors that might arise from the normal range of cargo 61, or other goods in an enclosed environment 65, known to be instantly recognizable, yet at the same time it may not be an odor that might likely cause anxiety or concern if the odorant 110 entered the passenger cabin 67 atmosphere during flight. Generally, odorants 25 used in the prior art are sulfur based chemicals such as thiols or mercaptans, sulfides or similar odorant. These are foul smelling "stench agents." This practice is so well known that the general public believes that this is in fact the odor of natural gas.
Other odorants include limonene, which has a pungent, sickly, orange smell and it is very obvious. When choosing an odorant one may have the following known choices:
1 Esters Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Methyl formate Ethereal Methyl acetate Sweet, nail polish Solvent Methyl butyrate Fruity, apple, Pineapple Methyl Butanoate Ethyl acetate Sweet, solvent Wine Ethyl butyrate Fruity, orange Ethyl butanoate Pineapple Fruity, banana Isoamyl acetate Pear Pentyl butyrate Fruity, pear Pentyl butanoate Apricot Pentyl pentanoate Fruity, apple Octyl acetate Fruity, orange Fructone Fruity, apple-like Hexyl acetate Apple, floral, fruity Ethyl meth 1 hen 1 lycidate strawberry 2 Terpenes Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Myrcene Woody, complex Verbena, bay Geraniol Rose, flowery Geranium, lemon Nerol Sweet rose, flowery Neroli, lemongrass Citral, lemonal Lemon Lemon myrtle, lemongrass Geranial, neral Citronellal Lemon Lemongrass Citronellol Lemon Lemongrass, rose Pelargonium Floral, sweet Coriander, sweet basil Linalool Woody, lavender Lavender Neroli, ginger Merolidol Woody, fresh bark Jasmine 3 Cyclic terpenes Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Limonene Orange Orange, lemon Camphor Camphor Camphor laurel Terpineol Lilac Lilac, ca u ut Al ha-lonone Violet, woody Violet Thujone Minty Cypress, lilac, Juniper 4 Aromatic Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Benzaldehyde Almond Eugenol Clove Clove Cinnamaldehyde Cinnamon Cassia, Cinnamon Ethyl maltol Cooked fruit Caramelized sugar Vanillin Vanilla Vanilla Anisole Anise Anise Anethole Anise anise, Sweet basil Estragole Terra on Terragon Thymol Thyme Thyme Amines Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Trimethylamine Fishy, Ammonia Putrescine Rotting flesh Rotting flesh Diaminobutane Cadaverine Rotting flesh Rotting flesh Pyridine Fishy Indole Faecal, flowery Faeces jasmine Skatole Faecal Faeces 6 Alcohols Compound Fragrance Natural ccurrence Furaneol strawberry 1-Hexanol herbaceous, woody Cis-3-Hexen-l-ol Fresh cut grass Menthol peppermint 5 7 Aldehydes Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Acetaldehyde ungent Hexanol Green, grassy Cis-3-Hexen-l-ol Green tomatoes Furfural Burnt oats 8 Ketones Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Dihydrojasmone Fruity, woody, floral Oct-l-en-3-one Blood, metallic, mushroom-like 2-Acetyl- I -pyrroline Fresh bread, jasmine rice 6-Acetyl-2, 3, 4,, 5- Fresh bread, tortillas, tetrah dro yridine popcorn 9 Lactones Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Gamma-Decalactone Intense peach flavour Gamma-Nonalactone Coconut odour, Popular in suntan lotions Delta-Octalactone Creamy note Jasmine lactone Powerful fatty fruity peach and apricot Massoia lactone Powerful creamy coconut Wine lactone sweet coconut odour Sotolon Maple syrup, curry, fenugreek Thiols Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Furaneol strawberry 1-Hexanol herbaceous, woody Cis-3-Hexen- l -ol Fresh cut grass Menthol peppermint 5 11 Miscellaneous Compounds Compound Fragrance Natural occurrence Methylphospine & Garlic-metallic Two of the most potent dimethylphosphine odorants known Nerolin Tetrah drothio hene 2, 4, 6-Trichloroanisole Substituted pyrazines When choosing the particular odorant 110 to use, one must be aware of the odors in the environment and/or the passenger compartment. For instance if meat is being air freighted, one may choose to avoid any of the odorants (first odors) from 10 the amine group that smell like rotted flesh (not shown) cited hereinabove that conflict with the smell of meat (i.e., first odor). Similarly, if one is transporting flowers (not shown), an odorant (i.e., second odors) from the Terpene groups, that smell like flowers (i.e., first odors) cited hereinabove. If fruit (not shown) is being transported, an odorant (i.e., second odors) from the Ester group that smell like fruit (i.e., first odors) may be avoided. Also, an odorant may be chosen from the list above (i.e., second odor) that has the lowest possibility of matching or resembling the odors (i.e., first odor) that might normally be expected to exist in the passenger compartment and then used on a permanent basis. It should be noted that a first odor may have no distinguishable odor and be deemed ambient odor. The second odor is distinguishable from the ambient or distinguishable first odor.
In order to take advantage of the distinctive odorants described above, one may determine a type of cargo 61 carried or held in an enclosed environment 65 (step 150), choose an odorant that is not likely to alarm, cause anxiety or concern of passengers nearby the enclosed environment 65 as in an aircraft 63 and that is distinctive from a normal odor of the cargo to be carried (step160), educate personnel who may enter the enclosed environment (step 170), insert an odorant module 20 including the chosen odorant 110 (step 180) and infuse any flowing inert gas with the chosen odorant 110 to an enclosed environment 65 (step 190) so that anyone who might enter the enclosed environment is warned of the presence of the inert gas by detecting the chosen odorant 110.
Although a combination of features is shown in the illustrated examples, not all of them need to be combined to realize the benefits of various embodiments of this disclosure. In other words, a system designed according to an embodiment of this disclosure will not necessarily include all of the features shown in any one of the Figures or all of the portions schematically shown in the Figures. Moreover, selected features of one example embodiment may be combined with selected features of other example embodiments.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature.
Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this disclosure. The scope of legal protection given to this disclosure can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Claims (20)
1. A method for protecting a user in an environment, said method comprising;
flowing a gas to said environment having a first odor;
adding an odorant having a second odor to said gas, said first odor being distinctive from said second odor such that a presence of said second odorant provides a warning that said gas is present.
flowing a gas to said environment having a first odor;
adding an odorant having a second odor to said gas, said first odor being distinctive from said second odor such that a presence of said second odorant provides a warning that said gas is present.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said second odor is chosen from a group of Esters, Terpenes, Cyclic Terpenes, Aromatics, Alcohols, Aldehydes, Ketones, or Lactones.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said second odor is chosen from a group of Methylphospine, Dimethylphosphine, Nerolin, Tetrahydrothiophene, 2, 4, 6-Trichloroanisole or Substituted pyrazines.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising educating users that a chosen second odor is a warning that gas is present.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising inserting said odorant into a fire suppressant system.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said fire suppressant system is in a cargo bay of an aircraft that is separate from a passenger compartment of the aircraft.
7. The method of claim 5 wherein said gas is an inert gas.
8. A method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment, said method comprising;
flowing an inert gas to an enclosed environment having a first odor;
adding an odorant having a second odor to said inert gas, said first odor being distinctive from said second odor such that a presence of said second odorant provides a warning that said inert gas is present and said second odor does not cause concern in humans adjacent said enclosed environment.
flowing an inert gas to an enclosed environment having a first odor;
adding an odorant having a second odor to said inert gas, said first odor being distinctive from said second odor such that a presence of said second odorant provides a warning that said inert gas is present and said second odor does not cause concern in humans adjacent said enclosed environment.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein said second odor is chosen from a group of Esters, Terpenes, Cyclic Terpenes, Aromatics, Alcohols, Aldehydes, Ketones, or Lactones.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein said second odor is chosen from a group of Methylphospine, Dimethylphosphine, Nerolin, Tetrahydrothiophene, 2, 4, 6-Trichloroanisole or Substituted pyrazines.
11. The method of claim 8 further comprising educating users that a chosen second odor is a warning that inert gas is present.
12. The method of claim 8 further comprising inserting said odorant into a fire suppressant system
13. The method of claim 12 wherein said fire suppressant system is in a cargo bay of an aircraft that is adjacent to a passenger compartment of said aircraft.
14. A method for protecting a user in an enclosed environment, said method comprising;
providing an enclosed environment holding cargo having a first odor;
providing a passenger compartment adjacent said cargo area;
providing a fire suppressant system, flowing an inert gas from said suppressant system to said enclosed environment;
adding an odorant having a second odor to said inert gas, said first odor being distinctive from said second odor such that a presence of said second odorant provides a warning that said inert gas is present and said second odor does not cause concern in humans adjacent said enclosed environment.
providing an enclosed environment holding cargo having a first odor;
providing a passenger compartment adjacent said cargo area;
providing a fire suppressant system, flowing an inert gas from said suppressant system to said enclosed environment;
adding an odorant having a second odor to said inert gas, said first odor being distinctive from said second odor such that a presence of said second odorant provides a warning that said inert gas is present and said second odor does not cause concern in humans adjacent said enclosed environment.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said second odor is chosen from a group of Esters, Terpenes, Cyclic Terpenes, Aromatics, Amines, Alcohols, Aldehydes, Ketones, Lactones, or Thiols.
16. The method of claim 14 wherein said second odor is chosen from a group of Methylphospine, Dimethylphosphine, Nerolin, Tetrahydrothiophene, 2, 4, 6-Trichloroanisole or Substituted pyrazines.
17. The method of claim 14 further comprising educating users that a chosen second odor is a warning that inert gas is present.
18. The method of claim 14 further comprising inserting said odorant into a fire suppressant system.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein said fire suppressant system is in an aircraft.
20. The method of claim 14 wherein said gas is an inert gas.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/835,865 | 2010-07-14 | ||
| US12/835,865 US20120012346A1 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2010-07-14 | Odorant for fire suppression system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2745343A1 true CA2745343A1 (en) | 2012-01-14 |
| CA2745343C CA2745343C (en) | 2014-05-27 |
Family
ID=44735847
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2745343A Expired - Fee Related CA2745343C (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2011-07-05 | Odorant for fire suppression system |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20120012346A1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP2407212A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2012020126A (en) |
| CN (1) | CN102335492B (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2011203542A1 (en) |
| BR (1) | BRPI1103313A2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2745343C (en) |
| IL (1) | IL213803A0 (en) |
| RU (1) | RU2011128265A (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9421406B2 (en) * | 2013-08-05 | 2016-08-23 | Kidde Technologies, Inc. | Freighter cargo fire protection |
| US20170281996A1 (en) | 2016-04-04 | 2017-10-05 | Kidde Graviner Limited | Fire suppression system and method |
| GB2557228B (en) * | 2016-11-30 | 2021-12-15 | Graviner Ltd Kidde | Gas generator fire suppression system |
Family Cites Families (45)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1800084A (en) * | 1928-01-05 | 1931-04-07 | Kramer Edward Francis | Pressure-operated switch |
| FR768288A (en) * | 1934-02-08 | 1934-08-03 | Automatic extinguishing system for fires occurring in any premises | |
| US2586809A (en) * | 1946-05-07 | 1952-02-26 | Specialties Dev Corp | System for dispensing a fireextinguishing medium |
| US2536694A (en) * | 1948-06-28 | 1951-01-02 | Northwest Airlines Inc | Smoke detection and extinguishing system |
| US2704127A (en) * | 1952-07-15 | 1955-03-15 | C O Two Fire Equipment Co | Method of and system for odorized fluid discharge |
| DE2037196C2 (en) * | 1970-07-27 | 1972-12-07 | Selbsttaetige Feuerloeschanlagen Gmbh | Device for adding fragrance to a fire extinguishing gas, in particular carbon dioxide |
| US3720501A (en) * | 1970-11-02 | 1973-03-13 | Bendix Corp | System for enriching inhalable air with oxygen |
| US3861350A (en) * | 1971-07-23 | 1975-01-21 | Albert B Selleck | Warning system and device, and malodorous warning composition of matter and process for its preparation |
| US4042522A (en) * | 1975-03-24 | 1977-08-16 | Ciba-Geigy Corporation | Aqueous wetting and film forming compositions |
| US4566542A (en) * | 1981-11-25 | 1986-01-28 | William A. Enk | Fire protection system for aircraft |
| JPH02209147A (en) * | 1989-02-07 | 1990-08-20 | Shimizu Corp | Ultrasonic type scent generator |
| JPH0654921A (en) * | 1992-08-06 | 1994-03-01 | Ohbayashi Corp | Carbon dioxide fire facility |
| JPH06170010A (en) * | 1992-08-20 | 1994-06-21 | Nippon Dry Chem Co Ltd | Method of warning dangerous gas interlocking to fire extinguisher |
| FI98494C (en) * | 1994-04-14 | 1997-07-10 | Goeran Sundholm | Fire extinguishing device |
| SE501823C2 (en) * | 1994-05-27 | 1995-05-22 | Erik Smaars Konsult Ab | Method and apparatus for adding odorant to a consumable gas flowing in a gas line |
| JP2813318B2 (en) * | 1995-05-12 | 1998-10-22 | 株式会社コーアツ | Inert gas fire extinguishing equipment |
| US7900709B2 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2011-03-08 | Kotliar Igor K | Hypoxic aircraft fire prevention and suppression system with automatic emergency oxygen delivery system |
| US5642092A (en) * | 1995-10-27 | 1997-06-24 | Dunne; Grace | Evacuation assistance system |
| US6282458B1 (en) * | 1996-09-17 | 2001-08-28 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Methods and systems for controlling olfactory stimuli |
| US5924597A (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-07-20 | Lynn; David M. | Building fragrance distribution system and method |
| AU2001277654B2 (en) * | 2000-04-17 | 2006-09-07 | Igor K. Kotliar | Hypoxic fire prevention and fire suppression systems and breathable fire extinguishing compositions |
| US20020066798A1 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2002-06-06 | Christophe Laudamiel-Pellet | Multiple scent-containing article of manufacture with theme |
| DE60003682T2 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2004-05-27 | Ing. Erich Pfeffer Gmbh | Miniature dispenser for dispensing fragrances in various areas of application and environments |
| ATE452657T1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2010-01-15 | Zakrytoe Aktsionernoe Obschest | DEVICE FOR AROMATIZING A GAS MEDIUM |
| DE10058805A1 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2002-06-06 | Ticona Gmbh | Odorants for gases |
| US8417533B2 (en) * | 2001-09-25 | 2013-04-09 | Jeffrey J. Clawson | Method and system for the fire response dispatch protocol of an emergency dispatch system |
| DE10152964C1 (en) * | 2001-10-26 | 2003-08-21 | Airbus Gmbh | Extinguishing system for extinguishing a fire that has broken out inside the cabin or cargo hold of a passenger aircraft |
| US7632321B2 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2009-12-15 | Idatech, Llc | Fuel processing systems, fuel cell systems, and improved feedstocks therefor |
| ZA200202057B (en) * | 2002-03-13 | 2003-05-28 | Nigel George Woodward | Safety system. |
| US6881382B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2005-04-19 | International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | Fragrance signaling of an event |
| AU2003302720B9 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2008-08-21 | Smiths Detection-Pasadena, Inc. | Non-specific sensor array detectors |
| US7656287B2 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2010-02-02 | Innovalarm Corporation | Alert system with enhanced waking capabilities |
| US7504940B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2009-03-17 | Eaton Corporation | Home system, method and wireless node employing non-physical configuration of embedded device or sensor of a household object |
| US7569170B2 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2009-08-04 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Compositions comprising a fluoroolefin |
| EP1868657A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2007-12-26 | Bioneutral Laboratories Corporation USA | Deodorizing compositions for biowast |
| FR2883759B1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2007-06-15 | Air Liquide | METHOD FOR EXTINGUISHING FIRE IN A COMPARTMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT |
| US7837541B2 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2010-11-23 | The Boeing Company | Method for reducing outside air inflow required for aircraft cabin air quality |
| EP2306180A4 (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2016-03-09 | Atonarp Inc | System for handling information related to chemical materials |
| US20100117828A1 (en) * | 2008-11-07 | 2010-05-13 | Stuart Owen Goldman | Alarm scheme with olfactory alerting component |
| GB2473060B (en) * | 2009-08-28 | 2012-11-07 | Kidde Tech Inc | Fire suppression system with pressure regulation |
| GB2477718A (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-17 | Graviner Ltd Kidde | Inert gas suppression system for temperature control |
| US20110308823A1 (en) * | 2010-06-17 | 2011-12-22 | Dharmendr Len Seebaluck | Programmable controller for a fire prevention system |
| US8581716B2 (en) * | 2010-09-13 | 2013-11-12 | Michael Wright | Vehicle crash hazard notice system |
| GB2486267B (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2014-12-17 | Kidde Tech Inc | Combined fire extinguishing system |
| US20120217027A1 (en) * | 2011-02-24 | 2012-08-30 | Kidde Technologies, Inc. | Extended discharge of odorant |
-
2010
- 2010-07-14 US US12/835,865 patent/US20120012346A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2011
- 2011-06-28 IL IL213803A patent/IL213803A0/en unknown
- 2011-06-29 EP EP11250616A patent/EP2407212A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2011-07-05 CA CA2745343A patent/CA2745343C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2011-07-08 JP JP2011151322A patent/JP2012020126A/en active Pending
- 2011-07-11 RU RU2011128265/12A patent/RU2011128265A/en unknown
- 2011-07-12 BR BRPI1103313-4A patent/BRPI1103313A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2011-07-12 AU AU2011203542A patent/AU2011203542A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-14 CN CN201110196781.2A patent/CN102335492B/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN102335492B (en) | 2015-04-01 |
| CN102335492A (en) | 2012-02-01 |
| IL213803A0 (en) | 2011-11-30 |
| EP2407212A1 (en) | 2012-01-18 |
| RU2011128265A (en) | 2013-01-20 |
| US20120012346A1 (en) | 2012-01-19 |
| AU2011203542A1 (en) | 2012-02-02 |
| CA2745343C (en) | 2014-05-27 |
| JP2012020126A (en) | 2012-02-02 |
| BRPI1103313A2 (en) | 2012-11-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2745343C (en) | Odorant for fire suppression system | |
| US6676081B2 (en) | System for extinguishing and suppressing fire in an enclosed space in an aircraft | |
| US20100117828A1 (en) | Alarm scheme with olfactory alerting component | |
| ATE521390T1 (en) | FIRE EXTINGUISHING DEVICE AND METHOD, IN PARTICULAR FOR FIGHTING FIRE IN CARGO COMPARTMENTS OF AIRCRAFT | |
| US10010734B2 (en) | Method and device for the testing of fire extinguishing systems | |
| KR950704008A (en) | FIRE EXYINGUISHING APPARATUS | |
| GB2190286A (en) | Fire-extinguishing installation for freight compartments of transport means | |
| Kim et al. | Composition of key offensive odorants released from fresh food materials | |
| AU2012200991A1 (en) | Extended discharge of odorant | |
| AU2012200990A1 (en) | Active odorant warning | |
| GB1587907A (en) | Perfumed fluorocarbon compositions | |
| US20180147430A1 (en) | Gas generator fire suppression system | |
| KR101739735B1 (en) | System for forcing advance withdrawal of people from hazardous gas discharging facility and method for controling the system | |
| KR101739733B1 (en) | System for forcing advance withdrawal of people from hazardous gas discharging facility and method for controling the system | |
| US20140260553A1 (en) | Detection device for detecting at least one fault state | |
| CA3033486A1 (en) | Method of detecting pre-fire situations arising as a result of electrical circuit faults | |
| KR101623376B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for forcing people to withdraw in advance before activating extinguishers and automatic extinguishing system using the same | |
| KR101623378B1 (en) | Cabinet-type fire extinguisher with advance withdrawal guiding functionality and method for controlling the same | |
| KR20170006408A (en) | System for forcing advance withdrawal of people from hazardous gas discharging facility and method for controling the system | |
| Handley et al. | Hardware Odor Containment Validation Methodology Development Using Gas Analysis and Human Odor Evaluation Methods | |
| Kallergis | New fire/smoke detection and fire extinguishing systems for aircraft applications | |
| RU2089285C1 (en) | Method and devices for enriching environment with gas | |
| RU2189841C2 (en) | Fire-fighting system | |
| JP2010069066A (en) | Pre-action fire-extinguishing system | |
| Milburn | Space Station Freedom Node 2 Fire Detection and Suppression System Design and Performance |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20160705 |