One question: how the hell did we pick Trump to be President to begin with?

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 3 years ago

Opinion

One question: how the hell did we pick Trump to be President to begin with?

By Gail Collins

OK, perhaps not exactly what you were hoping for. Election night wasn't a real thriller for a whole lot of people, and now it looks as if we're going to be counting votes for … quite a while. Will everybody still be talking about it at Thanksgiving dinner? If so, be careful not to invite your cousin in Pennsylvania who forgot to vote.

Clear as mud ... US President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden on election night.

Clear as mud ... US President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden on election night.Credit: AP

The post-election fog was so thick that we occasionally lost track of some details – like, say, who was winning. Joe Biden certainly seems to be doing better when it comes to little details like getting the most votes. Donald Trump, whom you can feel free to refer to as "the long-shot contender", has responded exactly the way you'd expect – declaring victory while waving around lawsuits.

"This is a fraud on the American public. This is an embarrassment to our country," said the man who is definitely an expert in being fraudulent and embarrassing.

All this leaves us with two questions: one practical and one cosmic.

The cosmic one has been with us for four years now – how the hell could American voters have picked Trump to be President to begin with? And how, after four years of his Fib-a-Minute administration, could they have come even remotely close to re-electing him?

Loading

Excellent query, and I am happy to say that answering it will require us to go back to the early 1800s, when average Americans – OK, average American white males – got the right to vote. Popular elections took over from the rule of the elite property owners. The new voters, many of them in very small rural towns, led lives that were isolated and pretty darned boring.

Then in came politics! Newspapers, taking advantage of the expanding postal system, took the side of one party or another, with the strong expectation that editorial support would lead to advertising patronage. Political wheeler-dealers wooed voters with parades, dances and quite a bit of alcohol. The presidential contenders tended to be heavily along the war-hero line, and the drunken, parading, flag-waving elections were the closest thing many people had to entertainment.

Now, in a way, we've gone back – we're watching elections work themselves out through a world of howling social media. It's naturally chaotic, sometimes engrossing and occasionally – all right, often – horrifying. The voting process no longer necessarily involves a lot of drinking, though on nights like Tuesday, much of the citizenry may well have had to make up for lost time. (Keen-eyed observers have also noted that Tuesday featured a whole lot of election victories for legalising drugs of many different kinds.)

Advertisement

The entertainment quotient is the key reason we have Trump in the White House in the first place. We've had racist, sexist presidents before, presidents with no real experience in government, presidents who struck associates as mean-spirited, presidents whose personal finances were extremely messed up. But all at once is a lot.

Loading

And it's sure not his analytic powers. Trump's deconstruction of the evils of mail-in ballots has been the latest example of the depth of his thinking. ("It would be very, very proper and very nice if a winner were declared on November 3, instead of counting ballots for two weeks, which is totally inappropriate, and I don't believe that that's by our laws.")

After that cry last week for quick public election results came an announcement on Wednesday from Trump's campaign that it was going to demand a recount in Wisconsin. Not comparable at all! But Trump's campaign manager complained about "irregularities", and you know how much trouble those irregularities are.

Now The President himself has claimed a "major fraud" has been perpetrated on the nation in the form of a Trump defeat. So, he said, "we'll be going to the US Supreme Court." You remember the Supreme Court?

Trump doesn't seem to have considered that if the vote-counting was stopped, among the disenfranchised citizens would be a lot of folks in the military who mailed in their ballots towards the end of the legal time period. And why not? Letting our soldiers vote is all well and good, but not if it gets in the way of a party.

"We were getting ready for a big celebration," Trump complained on election night. "We were winning everything, and all of a sudden it was just called off."

Loading

I hate it when victory celebrations are cancelled due to vote-counting. The party was going to be vintage Trump –in the White House, short on masks, short on charm and short on social distancing.

Instead, he was stuck sending out letters to supporters along classic Trumpian lines, writing that he was "WINNING like no one thought possible right now," but that "THE DEMOCRATS WILL TRY TO STEAL THIS ELECTION". A fate that could apparently be avoided with the help of a $5 donation.

Meanwhile, the other question: what ever happened to Joe Biden? Is he gonna be president or something? "I'm not here to declare we have won," he said on Wednesday. It was vintage Biden – he opened up with the promise of not saying anything exciting, then followed through.

He did, mention, however, that he thought he was "winning enough". Works for me.

The New York Times

Trump Biden 2020

Understand the election result and its aftermath with expert analysis from US correspondent Matthew Knott. Sign up to The Sydney Morning Herald's newsletter here, The Age's here, Brisbane Times' here and WAtoday's here