WO2010065195A1 - System and method for context based query augmentation - Google Patents

System and method for context based query augmentation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010065195A1
WO2010065195A1 PCT/US2009/060476 US2009060476W WO2010065195A1 WO 2010065195 A1 WO2010065195 A1 WO 2010065195A1 US 2009060476 W US2009060476 W US 2009060476W WO 2010065195 A1 WO2010065195 A1 WO 2010065195A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
data
user
question
network
identified
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2009/060476
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Christopher William Higgins
Marc Eliot Davis
Christopher T. Paretti
Simon P. King
Rahul Nair
Carrie Burgener
Original Assignee
Yahoo!I Nc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yahoo!I Nc. filed Critical Yahoo!I Nc.
Publication of WO2010065195A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010065195A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/332Query formulation
    • G06F16/3322Query formulation using system suggestions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to systems and methods for managing data relating to users on a network and, more particularly, to systems and methods for managing data relating to users on a network which is drawn, in part, from third party sources.
  • the invention is a method.
  • a question is received, over a network, from a questioning user, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria.
  • a first query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria.
  • the question is modified, via the network, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data.
  • a second query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria.
  • the knowledge data is transmitted, over the network, to the questioning user.
  • the invention is a method.
  • a request is received, over a network from a requesting user for at least one suggested question, the question comprising an identification of a user.
  • a first query is formulated, so as to so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context.
  • the identified knowledge data is transmitted, over the network to the requesting user.
  • the invention is a system comprising: a user manager that receives questions, over a network, from questioning users, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria; a query analyzer manager that, for each question received by the user manager, formulates a query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria, wherein the query analyzer manager modifies the question, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; and a question manager that, for each modified question, formulates a query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria, wherein
  • the invention is a system comprising: a user manager that receives requests for at least one suggested question, over a network, from requesting users, the request comprising an identification of a user; and a question manager that, for each request received by the user manager, formulate queries so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context, wherein the user manager transmits, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates relationships between real-world entities (RWE) and information objects (IO) on one embodiment of a W4 Communications Network (W4 COMN.)
  • FIG. 2 illustrates metadata defining the relationships between RWEs and IOs on one embodiment of a W4 COMN.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a conceptual model of one embodiment of a W4 COMN.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the functional layers of one embodiment of the W4 COMN architecture.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the analysis components of one embodiment of a W4 engine as shown in FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a W4 engine showing different components within the sub-engines shown in FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a how a W4 COMN can provide context enhanced knowledge search services.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of how the users, devices and associated data objects shown in FIG. 7 can be defined to a W4 COMN.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of a data model showing how the RWEs and IOs shown in FIG. 8 can be related a users question within a W4 COMN.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of a process of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide augmented queries for a knowledge system.
  • a network for example, a W4 COMN
  • FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment of a process of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide automatically generated context sensitive queries.
  • a network for example, a W4 COMN
  • FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of an Query Augmentation Engine capable of supporting processes such as that illustrated in FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 that provides query augmentation and automatically generated context sensitive queries within a network, such as a W4 COMN, having temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a users.
  • a network such as a W4 COMN
  • These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a genrel purpose computer, special purpose computer, ASIC, or other programmable data processing apparatus, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, implements the functions/acts specified in the block diagrams or operational block or blocks.
  • the functions/acts noted in the blocks can occur out of the order noted in the operational illustrations. For example, two blocks shown in succession can in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks can sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
  • server should be understood to refer to a service point which provides processing, database, and communication facilities.
  • server can refer to a single, physical processor with associated communications and data storage and database facilities, or it can refer to a networked or clustered complex of processors and associated network and storage devices, as well as operating software and one or more database systems and applications software which support the services provided by the server.
  • end user or “user” should be understood to refer to a consumer of data supplied by a data provider.
  • end user can refer to a person who receives data provided by the data provider over the Internet in a browser session, or can refer to an automated software application which receives the data and stores or processes the data.
  • the term “media” and “media content” should be understood to refer to binary data which contains content which can be of interest to an end user.
  • the term “media” and “media content” can refer to multimedia data, such as video data or audio data, or any other form of data capable of being transformed into a form perceivable by an end user.
  • Such data can, furthermore, be encoded in any manner currently known, or which can be developed in the future, for specific purposes.
  • the data can be encrypted, compressed, and/or can contained embedded metadata.
  • a computer readable medium stores computer data in machine readable form.
  • a computer readable medium can comprise computer storage media and communication media.
  • Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non- removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
  • Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid-state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other mass storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
  • a module is a software, hardware, or firmware (or combinations thereof) system, process or functionality, or component thereof, that performs or facilitates the processes, features, and/or functions described herein (with or without human interaction or augmentation).
  • a module can include sub-modules.
  • Software components of a module may be stored on a computer readable medium. Modules may be integral to one or more servers, or be loaded and executed by one or more servers. One or more modules may grouped into an engine or an application.
  • an engine is a software, hardware, or firmware (or combinations thereof) system, process or functionality that performs or facilitates the processes, features, and/or functions described herein (with or without human interaction or augmentation).
  • Embodiments of the present invention utilize information provided by a network which is capable of providing data collected and stored by multiple devices on a network.
  • Such information may include, without limitation, temporal information, spatial information, and user information relating to a specific user or hardware device.
  • User information may include, without limitation, user demographics, user preferences, user social networks, and user behavior.
  • a network is a W4 Communications Network.
  • a "W4 Communications Network” or W4 COMN provides information related to the "Who, What, When and Where" of interactions within the network.
  • the W4 COMN is a collection of users, devices and processes that foster both synchronous and asynchronous communications between users and their proxies providing an instrumented network of sensors providing data recognition and collection in real-world environments about any subject, location, user or combination thereof.
  • the W4 COMN can handle the routing/addressing, scheduling, filtering, prioritization, replying, forwarding, storing, deleting, privacy, transacting, triggering of a new message, propagating changes, transcoding and linking. Furthermore, these actions can be performed on any communication channel accessible by the W4 COMN.
  • the W4 COMN uses a data modeling strategy for creating profiles for not only users and locations, but also any device on the network and any kind of user-defined data with user-specified conditions.
  • every entity known to the W4 COMN can be mapped and represented against all other known entities and data objects in order to create both a micro graph for every entity as well as a global graph that relates all known entities with one another.
  • such relationships between entities and data objects are stored in a global index within the W4 COMN.
  • a W4 COMN network relates to what may be termed "real- world entities", hereinafter referred to as RWEs.
  • a RWE refers to, without limitation, a person, device, location, or other physical thing known to a W4 COMN.
  • each RWE known to a W4 COMN is assigned a unique W4 identification number that identifies the RWE within the W4 COMN.
  • RWEs can interact with the network directly or through proxies, which can themselves be RWEs.
  • Examples of RWEs that interact directly with the W4 COMN include any device such as a sensor, motor, or other piece of hardware connected to the W4 COMN in order to receive or transmit data or control signals.
  • RWE may include all devices that can serve as network nodes or generate, request and/or consume data in a networked environment or that can be controlled through a network.
  • Such devices include any kind of "dumb” device purpose-designed to interact with a network (e.g., cell phones, cable television set top boxes, fax machines, telephones, and radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, sensors, etc.).
  • RFID radio frequency identification
  • Examples of RWEs that may use proxies to interact with W4 COMN network include non-electronic entities including physical entities, such as people, locations (e.g., states, cities, houses, buildings, airports, roads, etc.) and things (e.g., animals, pets, livestock, gardens, physical objects, cars, airplanes, works of art, etc.), and intangible entities such as business entities, legal entities, groups of people or sports teams.
  • non-electronic entities including physical entities, such as people, locations (e.g., states, cities, houses, buildings, airports, roads, etc.) and things (e.g., animals, pets, livestock, gardens, physical objects, cars, airplanes, works of art, etc.), and intangible entities such as business entities, legal entities, groups of people or sports teams.
  • “smart” devices e.g., computing devices such as smart phones, smart set top boxes, smart cars that support communication with other devices or networks, laptop computers, personal computers, server computers, satellites, etc.
  • RWE Remote Access Protocol
  • proxies to interact with the network, where software applications executing on the device that serve as the devices' proxies.
  • a W4 COMN may allow associations between RWEs to be determined and tracked.
  • a given user an RWE
  • RWE e.g., the user's phone for the cell phone service, the user's set top box and/or a location for cable service, or a username and password for the online service
  • This explicit association can include the user identifying a specific relationship between the user and the RWE (e.g., this is my device, this is my home appliance, this person is my friend/father/son/etc. , this device is shared between me and other users, etc.).
  • RWEs can also be implicitly associated with a user based on a current situation.
  • a weather sensor on the W4 COMN can be implicitly associated with a user based on information indicating that the user lives or is passing near the sensor's location.
  • a W4 COMN network may additionally include what may be termed "information-objects", hereinafter referred to as IOs.
  • An information object (IO) is a logical object that may store, maintain, generate or otherwise provides data for use by RWEs and/or the W4 COMN.
  • data within in an IO can be revised by the act of an RWE
  • An IO within in a W4 COMN can be provided a unique W4 identification number that identifies the IO within the W4 COMN.
  • IOs include passive objects such as communication signals (e.g., digital and analog telephone signals, streaming media and interprocess communications), email messages, transaction records, virtual cards, event records (e.g., a data file identifying a time, possibly in combination with one or more RWEs such as users and locations, that can further be associated with a known topic/activity/significance such as a concert, rally, meeting, sporting event, etc.), recordings of phone calls, calendar entries, web pages, database entries, electronic media objects (e.g., media files containing songs, videos, pictures, images, audio messages, phone calls, etc.), electronic files and associated metadata.
  • communication signals e.g., digital and analog telephone signals, streaming media and interprocess communications
  • email messages e.g., email messages, transaction records, virtual cards, event records (e.g., a data file identifying a time, possibly in combination with one or more RWEs such as users and locations, that can further be associated with a known topic/activity/significance such as a concert, rally, meeting
  • IOs include any executing process or application that consumes or generates data such as an email communication application (such as OUTLOOK by MICROSOFT, or YAHOO! MAIL by YAHOO!), a calendaring application, a word processing application, an image editing application, a media player application, a weather monitoring application, a browser application and a web page server application.
  • an email communication application such as OUTLOOK by MICROSOFT, or YAHOO! MAIL by YAHOO!
  • a calendaring application such as a word processing application, an image editing application, a media player application, a weather monitoring application, a browser application and a web page server application.
  • Such active IOs can or can not serve as a proxy for one or more RWEs.
  • voice communication software on a smart phone can serve as the proxy for both the smart phone and for the owner of the smart phone.
  • RWE for every IO there are at least three classes of associated RWEs.
  • the first is the RWE that owns or controls the 10, whether as the creator or a rights holder (e.g., an RWE with editing rights or use rights to the 10).
  • the second is the RWE(s) that the IO relates to, for example by containing information about the RWE or that identifies the RWE.
  • the third are any RWEs that access the IO in order to obtain data from the IO for some purpose.
  • "available data" and W4 data” means data that exists in an IO or data that can be collected from a known IO or RWE such as a deployed sensor.
  • sensor means any source of W4 data including PCs, phones, portable PCs or other wireless devices, household devices, cars, appliances, security scanners, video surveillance, RFID tags in clothes, products and locations, online data or any other source of information about a real-world user/topic/thing (RWE) or logic-based agent/process/topic/thing (10).
  • RWE real-world user/topic/thing
  • logic-based agent/process/topic/thing 10
  • FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of relationships between RWEs and IOs on a W4 COMN.
  • a user 102 is a RWE provided with a unique network ID.
  • the user 102 may be a human that communicates with the network using proxy devices 104, 106, 108, 110 associated with the user 102, all of which are RWEs having a unique network ID.
  • These proxies can communicate directly with the W4 COMN or can communicate with the W4 COMN using IOs such as applications executed on or by a proxy device.
  • the proxy devices 104, 106, 108, 110 can be explicitly associated with the user 102.
  • one device 104 can be a smart phone connected by a cellular service provider to the network and another device 106 can be a smart vehicle that is connected to the network.
  • Other devices can be implicitly associated with the user 102.
  • one device 108 can be a "dumb" weather sensor at a location matching the current location of the user's cell phone 104, and thus implicitly associated with the user 102 while the two RWEs 104, 108 are co-located.
  • Another implicitly associated device 110 can be a sensor 110 for physical location 112 known to the W4 COMN. The location 112 is known, either explicitly (through a user-designated relationship, e.g., this is my home, place of employment, parent, etc.) or implicitly (the user 102 is often co-located with the RWE 112 as evidenced by data from the sensor 110 at that location 112), to be associated with the first user 102.
  • the user 102 can be directly associated with one or more persons 140, and indirectly associated with still more persons 142, 144 through a chain of direct associations.
  • Such associations can be explicit (e.g., the user 102 can have identified the associated person 140 as his/her father, or can have identified the person 140 as a member of the user's social network) or implicit (e.g., they share the same address).
  • Tracking the associations between people (and other RWEs as well) allows the creation of the concept of "intimacy", where intimacy may be defined as a measure of the degree of association between two people or RWEs. For example, each degree of removal between RWEs can be considered a lower level of intimacy, and assigned lower intimacy score.
  • Intimacy can be based solely on explicit social data or can be expanded to include all W4 data including spatial data and temporal data.
  • each RWE 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 140, 142, 144 of a W4 COMN can be associated with one or more IOs as shown.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates two IOs 122, 124 as associated with the cell phone device 104.
  • One IO 122 can be a passive data object such as an event record that is used by scheduling/calendaring software on the cell phone, a contact IO used by an address book application, a historical record of a transaction made using the device 104 or a copy of a message sent from the device 104.
  • the other IO 124 can be an active software process or application that serves as the device's proxy to the W4 COMN by transmitting or receiving data via the W4 COMN.
  • Voice communication software, scheduling/calendaring software, an address book application or a text messaging application are all examples of IOs that can communicate with other IOs and RWEs on the network.
  • IOs may additionally relate to topics of interest to one or more RWEs, such topics including, without limitation, musical artists, genre of music, a location and so forth.
  • the IOs 122, 124 can be locally stored on the device 104 or stored remotely on some node or datastore accessible to the W4 COMN, such as a message server or cell phone service datacenter.
  • the IO 126 associated with the vehicle 108 can be an electronic file containing the specifications and/or current status of the vehicle 108, such as make, model, identification number, current location, current speed, current condition, current owner, etc.
  • the IO 128 associated with sensor 108 can identify the current state of the subject(s) monitored by the sensor 108, such as current weather or current traffic.
  • the IO 130 associated with the cell phone 110 can be information in a database identifying recent calls or the amount of charges on the current bill.
  • RWEs which can only interact with the W4 COMN through proxies, such as people 102, 140, 142, 144, computing devices 104, 106 and locations 112, can have one or more IOs 132, 134, 146, 148, 150 directly associated with them which contain RWE- specif ⁇ c information for the associated RWE.
  • IOs associated with a person 132, 146, 148, 150 can include a user profile containing email addresses, telephone numbers, physical addresses, user preferences, identification of devices and other RWEs associated with the user.
  • the IOs may additionally include records of the user's past interactions with other RWEs on the W4 COMN (e.g., transaction records, copies of messages, listings of time and location combinations recording the user's whereabouts in the past), the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location and/or any relationship information (e.g., explicit user-designations of the user's relationships with relatives, employers, co-workers, neighbors, service providers, etc.).
  • records of the user's past interactions with other RWEs on the W4 COMN e.g., transaction records, copies of messages, listings of time and location combinations recording the user's whereabouts in the past
  • the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location e.g., explicit user-designations of the user's relationships with relatives, employers, co-workers, neighbors, service providers, etc.
  • IOs associated with a person 132, 146, 148, 150 includes remote applications through which a person can communicate with the W4 COMN such as an account with a web-based email service such as Yahoo! Mail.
  • a location's IO 134 can contain information such as the exact coordinates of the location, driving directions to the location, a classification of the location (residence, place of business, public, non- public, etc.), information about the services or products that can be obtained at the location, the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location, businesses located at the location, photographs of the location, etc.
  • RWEs and IOs are correlated to identify relationships between them.
  • RWEs and IOs may be correlated using metadata.
  • metadata For example, if an IO is a music file, metadata for the file can include data identifying the artist, song, etc., album art, and the format of the music data. This metadata can be stored as part of the music file or in one or more different IOs that are associated with the music file or both.
  • W4 metadata can additionally include the owner of the music file and the rights the owner has in the music file.
  • the IO is a picture taken by an electronic camera
  • the picture can include in addition to the primary image data from which an image can be created on a display, metadata identifying when the picture was taken, where the camera was when the picture was taken, what camera took the picture, who, if anyone, is associated (e.g., designated as the camera's owner) with the camera, and who and what are the subjects of/in the picture.
  • the W4 COMN uses all the available metadata in order to identify implicit and explicit associations between entities and data objects.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of metadata defining the relationships between RWEs and IOs on the W4 COMN.
  • an IO 202 includes object data 204 and five discrete items of metadata 206, 208, 210, 212, 214.
  • Some items of metadata 208, 210, 212 can contain information related only to the object data 204 and unrelated to any other IO or RWE. For example, a creation date, text or an image that is to be associated with the object data 204 of the IO 202.
  • Some of items of metadata 206, 214 can identify relationships between the IO 202 and other RWEs and IOs.
  • the IO 202 is associated by one item of metadata 206 with an RWE 220 that RWE 220 is further associated with two IOs 224, 226 and a second RWE 222 based on some information known to the W4 COMN.
  • some information known to the W4 COMN could describe the relations between an image (IO 202) containing metadata 206 that identifies the electronic camera (the first RWE 220) and the user (the second RWE 224) that is known by the system to be the owner of the camera 220.
  • Such ownership information can be determined, for example, from one or another of the IOs 224, 226 associated with the camera 220.
  • FIG. 2 also illustrates metadata 214 that associates the IO 202 with another IO 230.
  • This IO 230 is itself associated with three other IOs 232, 234, 236 that are further associated with different RWEs 242, 244, 246.
  • This part of FIG. 2 could describe the relations between a music file (IO 202) containing metadata 206 that identifies the digital rights file (the first IO 230) that defines the scope of the rights of use associated with this music file 202.
  • the other IOs 232, 234, 236 are other music files that are associated with the rights of use and which are currently associated with specific owners (RWEs 242, 244, 246).
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a conceptual model of a W4 COMN.
  • the W4 COMN 300 creates an instrumented messaging infrastructure in the form of a global logical network cloud conceptually sub-divided into networked-clouds for each of the 4Ws: Who, Where, What and When.
  • the Who cloud 302 are all users whether acting as senders, receivers, data points or confirmation/certification sources as well as user proxies in the forms of user-program processes, devices, agents, calendars, etc.
  • cloud 304 are all physical locations, events, sensors or other RWEs associated with a spatial reference point or location.
  • the When cloud 306 is composed of natural temporal events (that is events that are not associated with particular location or person such as days, times, seasons) as well as collective user temporal events (holidays, anniversaries, elections, etc.) and user-defined temporal events (birthdays, smart-timing programs).
  • the What cloud 308 is comprised of all known data - web or private, commercial or user - accessible to the W4 COMN, including for example environmental data like weather and news, RWE-generated data, IOs and IO data, user data, models, processes and applications. Thus, conceptually, most data is contained in the What cloud 308.
  • Some entities, sensors or data may potentially exist in multiple clouds either disparate in time or simultaneously.
  • some IOs and RWEs can be composites in that they combine elements from one or more clouds. Such composites can be classified as appropriate to facilitate the determination of associations between RWEs and IOs. For example, an event consisting of a location and time could be equally classified within the When cloud 306, the What cloud 308 and/or the Where cloud 304.
  • a W4 engine 310 is center of the W4 COMN's intelligence for making all decisions in the W4 COMN.
  • the W4 engine 310 controls all interactions between each layer of the W4 COMN and is responsible for executing any approved user or application objective enabled by W4 COMN operations or interoperating applications.
  • the W4 COMN is an open platform with standardized, published APIs for requesting (among other things) synchronization, disambiguation, user or topic addressing, access rights, prioritization or other value-based ranking, smart scheduling, automation and topical, social, spatial or temporal alerts.
  • One function of the W4 COMN is to collect data concerning all communications and interactions conducted via the W4 COMN, which can include storing copies of IOs and information identifying all RWEs and other information related to the IOs (e.g., who, what, when, where information).
  • Other data collected by the W4 COMN can include information about the status of any given RWE and IO at any given time, such as the location, operational state, monitored conditions (e.g., for an RWE that is a weather sensor, the current weather conditions being monitored or for an RWE that is a cell phone, its current location based on the cellular towers it is in contact with) and current status.
  • the W4 engine 310 is also responsible for identifying RWEs and relationships between RWEs and IOs from the data and communication streams passing through the W4 COMN.
  • the function of identifying RWEs associated with or implicated by IOs and actions performed by other RWEs may be referred to as entity extraction.
  • Entity extraction can include both simple actions, such as identifying the sender and receivers of a particular 10, and more complicated analyses of the data collected by and/or available to the W4 COMN, for example determining that a message listed the time and location of an upcoming event and associating that event with the sender and receiver(s) of the message based on the context of the message or determining that an RWE is stuck in a traffic jam based on a correlation of the RWE's location with the status of a co-located traffic monitor.
  • the IO when performing entity extraction from an 10, the IO can be an opaque object with only where only W4 metadata related to the object is visible, but internal data of the IO (i.e., the actual primary or object data contained within the object) are not, and thus metadata extraction is limited to the metadata.
  • internal data of the IO if internal data of the IO is visible, it can also be used in entity extraction, e.g. strings within an email are extracted and associated as RWEs to for use in determining the relationships between the sender, user, topic or other RWE or IO impacted by the object or process.
  • the W4 engine 310 can be one or a group of distributed computing devices, such as a general-purpose personal computers (PCs) or purpose built server computers, connected to the W4 COMN by communication hardware and/or software.
  • Such computing devices can be a single device or a group of devices acting together.
  • Computing devices can be provided with any number of program modules and data files stored in a local or remote mass storage device and local memory (e.g., RAM) of the computing device.
  • a computing device can include an operating system suitable for controlling the operation of a networked computer, such as the WINDOWS XP or WINDOWS SERVER operating systems from MICROSOFT CORPORATION.
  • RWEs can also be computing devices such as, without limitation, smart phones, web-enabled appliances, PCs, laptop computers, and personal data assistants (PDAs).
  • Computing devices can be connected to one or more communications networks such as the Internet, a publicly switched telephone network, a cellular telephone network, a satellite communication network, a wired communication network such as a cable television or private area network.
  • Computing devices can be connected any such network via a wired data connection or wireless connection such as a wi-fi, a WiMAX (802.36), a Bluetooth or a cellular telephone connection.
  • Local data structures can be stored on a computer- readable medium (not shown) that is connected to, or part of, any of the computing devices described herein including the W4 engine 310.
  • the data backbone of the W4 COMN includes multiple mass storage devices that maintain the IOs, metadata and data necessary to determine relationships between RWEs and IOs as described herein.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the functional layers of a W4 COMN architecture.
  • the sensor layer 402 At the lowest layer, referred to as the sensor layer 402, is the network 404 of the actual devices, users, nodes and other RWEs.
  • Sensors include known technologies like web analytics, GPS, cell-tower pings, use logs, credit card transactions, online purchases, explicit user profiles and implicit user profiling achieved through behavioral targeting, search analysis and other analytics models used to optimize specific network applications or functions.
  • the data layer 406 stores and catalogs the data produced by the sensor layer 402.
  • the data can be managed by either the network 404 of sensors or the network infrastructure 406 that is built on top of the instrumented network of users, devices, agents, locations, processes and sensors.
  • the network infrastructure 408 is the core under-the-covers network infrastructure that includes the hardware and software necessary to receive that transmit data from the sensors, devices, etc. of the network 404. It further includes the processing and storage capability necessary to meaningfully categorize and track the data created by the network 404.
  • the user profiling layer 410 performs the W4 COMN's user profiling functions. This layer 410 can further be distributed between the network infrastructure 408 and user applications/processes 412 executing on the W4 engine or disparate user computing devices. Personalization is enabled across any single or combination of communication channels and modes including email, IM, texting (SMS, etc.), photo-blogging, audio (e.g. telephone call), video (teleconferencing, live broadcast), games, data confidence processes, security, certification or any other W4 COMM process call for available data.
  • the user profiling layer 410 is a logic-based layer above all sensors to which sensor data are sent in the rawest form to be mapped and placed into the W4 COMN data backbone 420.
  • the data (collected and refined, related and deduplicated, synchronized and disambiguated) are then stored in one or a collection of related databases available applications approved on the W4 COMN.
  • Network- originating actions and communications are based upon the fields of the data backbone, and some of these actions are such that they themselves become records somewhere in the backbone, e.g. invoicing, while others, e.g. fraud detection, synchronization, disambiguation, can be done without an impact to profiles and models within the backbone.
  • Actions originating from outside the network come from the applications layer 414 of the W4 COMN.
  • Some applications can be developed by the W4 COMN operator and appear to be implemented as part of the communications infrastructure 408, e.g. email or calendar programs because of how closely they operate with the sensor processing and user profiling layer 410.
  • the applications 412 also serve as a sensor in that they, through their actions, generate data back to the data layer 406 via the data backbone concerning any data created or available due to the applications execution.
  • the applications layer 414 can also provide a user interface (UI) based on device, network, carrier as well as user-selected or security-based customizations.
  • UI user interface
  • Any UI can operate within the W4 COMN if it is instrumented to provide data on user interactions or actions back to the network.
  • the UI can also be used to confirm or disambiguate incomplete W4 data in real-time, as well as correlation, triangulation and synchronization sensors for other nearby enabled or non-enabled devices.
  • the network effects enough enabled devices allow the network to gather complete or nearly complete data (sufficient for profiling and tracking) of a non- enabled device because of its regular intersection and sensing by enabled devices in its real-world location.
  • the communications delivery network 416 can be operated by the W4 COMN operator or be independent third-party carrier service. Data may be delivered via synchronous or asynchronous communication. In every case, the communication delivery network 414 will be sending or receiving data on behalf of a specific application or network infrastructure 408 request.
  • the communication delivery layer 418 also has elements that act as sensors including W4 entity extraction from phone calls, emails, blogs, etc. as well as specific user commands within the delivery network context. For example, "save and prioritize this call" said before end of call can trigger a recording of the previous conversation to be saved and for the W4 entities within the conversation to analyzed and increased in weighting prioritization decisions in the personalization/user profiling layer 410.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of the analysis components of a W4 engine as shown in FIG. 3.
  • the W4 Engine is responsible for identifying RWEs and relationships between RWEs and IOs from the data and communication streams passing through the W4 COMN.
  • the W4 engine connects, interoperates and instruments all network participants through a series of sub-engines that perform different operations in the entity extraction process.
  • the attribution engine 504 tracks the real-world ownership, control, publishing or other conditional rights of any RWE in any IO. Whenever a new IO is detected by the W4 engine 502, e.g., through creation or transmission of a new message, a new transaction record, a new image file, etc., ownership is assigned to the IO .
  • the attribution engine 504 creates this ownership information and further allows this information to be determined for each IO known to the W4 COMN.
  • the correlation engine 506 can operates two capacities: first, to identify associated RWEs and IOs and their relationships (such as by creating a combined graph of any combination of RWEs and IOs and their attributes, relationships and reputations within contexts or situations) and second, as a sensor analytics pre-processor for attention events from any internal or external source.
  • the identification of associated RWEs and IOs function of the correlation engine 506 is done by graphing the available data, using, for example, one or more histograms
  • a histogram is a mapping technique that counts the number of observations that fall into various disjoint categories (i.e. bins.). By selecting each IO, RWE, and other known parameters (e.g., times, dates, locations, etc.) as different bins and mapping the available data, relationships between RWEs, IOs and the other parameters can be identified.
  • a histogram of all RWEs and IOs is created, from which correlations based on the graph can be made.
  • the correlation engine 506 monitors the information provided by RWEs in order to determine if any conditions are identified that can trigger an action on the part of the W4 engine 502. For example, if a delivery condition has been associated with a message, when the correlation engine 506 determines that the condition is met, it can transmit the appropriate trigger information to the W4 engine 502 that triggers delivery of the message.
  • the attention engine 508 instruments all appropriate network nodes, clouds, users, applications or any combination thereof and includes close interaction with both the correlation engine 506 and the attribution engine 504.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a W4 engine showing different components within the sub-engines described above with reference to FIG. 4.
  • the W4 engine 602 includes an attention engine 608, attribution engine 604 and correlation engine 606 with several sub-managers based upon basic function.
  • the attention engine 608 includes a message intake and generation manager 610 as well as a message delivery manager 612 that work closely with both a message matching manager 614 and a real-time communications manager 616 to deliver and instrument all communications across the W4 COMN.
  • the attribution engine 604 works within the user profile manager 618 and in conjunction with all other modules to identify, process/verify and represent ownership and rights information related to RWEs, IOs and combinations thereof.
  • the correlation engine 606 dumps data from both of its channels (sensors and processes) into the same data backbone 620 which is organized and controlled by the W4 analytics manager 622.
  • the data backbone 620 includes both aggregated and individualized archived versions of data from all network operations including user logs 624, attention rank place logs 626, web indices and environmental logs 618, e-commerce and financial transaction information 630, search indexes and logs 632, sponsor content or conditionals, ad copy and any and all other data used in any W4C0MN process, IO or event. Because of the amount of data that the W4 COMN will potentially store, the data backbone 620 includes numerous database servers and datastores in communication with the W4 COMN to provide sufficient storage capacity.
  • the data collected by the W4 COMN includes spatial data, temporal data, RWE interaction data, IO content data (e.g., media data), and user data including explicitly- provided and deduced social and relationship data.
  • Spatial data can be any data identifying a location associated with an RWE.
  • the spatial data can include any passively collected location data, such as cell tower data, global packet radio service (GPRS) data, global positioning service (GPS) data, WI-FI data, personal area network data, IP address data and data from other network access points, or actively collected location data, such as location data entered by the user.
  • GPRS global packet radio service
  • GPS global positioning service
  • WI-FI personal area network data
  • IP address data and data from other network access points or actively collected location data, such as location data entered by the user.
  • Temporal data is time based data (e.g., time stamps) that relate to specific times and/or events associated with a user and/or the electronic device.
  • the temporal data can be passively collected time data (e.g., time data from a clock resident on the electronic device, or time data from a network clock), or the temporal data can be actively collected time data, such as time data entered by the user of the electronic device (e.g., a user maintained calendar).
  • Logical and IO data refers to the data contained by an IO as well as data associated with the IO such as creation time, owner, associated RWEs, when the IO was last accessed, the topic or subject of the IO (from message content or "re" or subject line, as some examples) etc.
  • an IO may relate to media data.
  • Media data can include any data relating to presentable media, such as audio data, visual data, and audiovisual data.
  • Audio data can be data relating to downloaded music, such as genre, artist, album and the like, and includes data regarding ringtones, ringbacks, media purchased, playlists, and media shared, to name a few.
  • the visual data can be data relating to images and/or text received by the electronic device (e.g., via the Internet or other network).
  • the visual data can be data relating to images and/or text sent from and/or captured at the electronic device.
  • Audiovisual data can be data associated with any videos captured at, downloaded to, or otherwise associated with the electronic device.
  • the media data includes media presented to the user via a network, such as use of the Internet, and includes data relating to text entered and/or received by the user using the network (e.g., search terms), and interaction with the network media, such as click data (e.g., advertisement banner clicks, bookmarks, click patterns and the like).
  • click data e.g., advertisement banner clicks, bookmarks, click patterns and the like.
  • the media data can include data relating to the user's RSS feeds, subscriptions, group memberships, game services, alerts, and the like.
  • the media data can include non-network activity, such as image capture and/or video capture using an electronic device, such as a mobile phone.
  • the image data can include metadata added by the user, or other data associated with the image, such as, with respect to photos, location when the photos were taken, direction of the shot, content of the shot, and time of day, to name a few.
  • Media data can be used, for example, to deduce activities information or preferences information, such as cultural and/or buying preferences information.
  • Relationship data can include data relating to the relationships of an RWE or IO to another RWE or IO.
  • the relationship data can include user identity data, such as gender, age, race, name, social security number, photographs and other information associated with the user's identity.
  • User identity information can also include e-mail addresses, login names and passwords.
  • Relationship data can further include data identifying explicitly associated RWEs.
  • relationship data for a cell phone can indicate the user that owns the cell phone and the company that provides the service to the phone.
  • relationship data for a smart car can identify the owner, a credit card associated with the owner for payment of electronic tolls, those users permitted to drive the car and the service station for the car.
  • Relationship data can also include social network data.
  • Social network data includes data relating to any relationship that is explicitly defined by a user or other RWE, such as data relating to a user's friends, family, co-workers, business relations, and the like.
  • Social network data can include, for example, data corresponding with a user- maintained electronic address book.
  • Relationship data can be correlated with, for example, location data to deduce social network information, such as primary relationships (e.g., user-spouse, user-children and user-parent relationships) or other relationships (e.g., user-friends, user-co-worker, user-business associate relationships). Relationship data also can be utilized to deduce, for example, activities information.
  • Interaction data can be any data associated with user interaction of the electronic device, whether active or passive. Examples of interaction data include interpersonal communication data, media data, relationship data, transactional data and device interaction data, all of which are described in further detail below. Table 1 , below, is a non-exhaustive list including examples of electronic data.
  • Interaction data includes communication data between any RWEs that is transferred via the W4 COMN.
  • the communication data can be data associated with an incoming or outgoing short message service (SMS) message, email message, voice call (e.g., a cell phone call, a voice over IP call), or other type of interpersonal communication related to an RWE.
  • SMS short message service
  • Communication data can be correlated with, for example, temporal data to deduce information regarding frequency of communications, including concentrated communication patterns, which can indicate user activity information.
  • the interaction data can also include transactional data.
  • the transactional data can be any data associated with commercial transactions undertaken by or at the mobile electronic device, such as vendor information, financial institution information (e.g., bank information), financial account information (e.g., credit card information), merchandise information and costs/prices information, and purchase frequency information, to name a few.
  • the transactional data can be utilized, for example, to deduce activities and preferences information.
  • the transactional information can also be used to deduce types of devices and/or services the user owns and/or in which the user can have an interest.
  • the interaction data can also include device or other RWE interaction data.
  • Such data includes both data generated by interactions between a user and a RWE on the W4 COMN and interactions between the RWE and the W4 COMN.
  • RWE interaction data can be any data relating to an RWE's interaction with the electronic device not included in any of the above categories, such as habitual patterns associated with use of an electronic device data of other modules/applications, such as data regarding which applications are used on an electronic device and how often and when those applications are used.
  • device interaction data can be correlated with other data to deduce information regarding user activities and patterns associated therewith. Table 2, below, is a non-exhaustive list including examples of interaction data.
  • knowledge search services such as Yahoo! Answers.
  • Such services allow users to post questions and receive answers from a broad base of other users, some of whom may be subject matter experts, some of whom may have had similar life experiences and some of whom have an interest in the subject matter of the question.
  • a wide array of questions and answers are accumulated and together form a knowledge base that can be indexed and searched. Searching such knowledge bases can carry significant advantages over searching the web for content matching keywords, since oftentimes such as search can provide precise and targeted answers to specific questions.
  • a user's context can be broadly defined as the total set of circumstances that surround a user at any point in time.
  • a user's context includes the user's current location, the date and the time, but can also include any other spatial, temporal, social and topical data that define who the user is and where the user has been, where the user is going, with whom are they going for what purpose and what is the user interested in.
  • a W4 COMN or a similar network that tracks Who, What, When and
  • data can mine data accumulated about users to enhance searching a knowledge base, or any other kind of database that contains information about people, places, things, events or topic to augment questions posed by a user.
  • questions asked by specific users in specific contexts can be archived and used to form predictive models that can be used to predict questions that a user having specific attributes is likely to ask in specific situations.
  • a user's path history shows that the user never uses train station bathrooms, it might display taxis or the nearest hotel or fast food bathroom depending on my individual data history and profile.
  • a user who has a history of buying souvenirs at concerts would have his device display the location of memorabilia vendors at the venue.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a how a W4 COMN can provide context enhanced knowledge search services.
  • the W4 COMN 1900 maintains one or more knowledge databases 1940 that contains questions posed by questioning users 1100 and answers given by answering users 1500 (i.e. a Q&A database.) Access to the knowledge database 1940 is provided by a query augmentation engine 1920.
  • a questioning user 1100 can submit a question to the query augmentation engine 1920 through a proxy device, such as a PDA 1102 and receive one or more answers to the question through the proxy device.
  • the questioning user 1110 is currently located in New York City, is a customer of a business 1130 and is currently dining at a restaurant 1140.
  • the questioning user 1100 additionally maintains a BLOG 1150, has an email account 1120 and has a group of friends. All of these entities and data objects, as well as their association to the questioning user 1100, are known to the W4 COMN 1900 and help define the user's current context.
  • the user's current context can be broadly defined as the total set of social, topical, temporal and spatial information that locates the user in space and time and identifies the user's interests, activities and social associations.
  • Each answer in the Q&A database 1940 is provided by an answering user 1500.
  • Each answering user 1500 has his or her own context as well.
  • each of the answering users 1500 is located somewhere in the U.S. 1510, is a customer of one or more businesses 1530, dines at one or more restaurants 1540, has at least one email account 1520, and maintains at least one BLOG 1550. All of these entities and data objects, as well as their association to the answering users 1500, are known to the W4 COMN 1900 and help define the answering users' current contexts.
  • the query augmentation engine 1920 can mine the social, topical, temporal and spatial information relating to a questioning user's current context to supplement questions asked by the user.
  • the query augmentation engine 1920 could determine that it is lunchtime, that the user is in New York City 1110 and that the user has dined frequently at a sushi restaurant 1140, and thus compose a more specific question "where is a sushi restaurant in New York City that is open for lunch?"
  • the query augmentation engine 1920 can additionally mine the social, topical, temporal and spatial information relating to answering users' current contexts to help refine the set of answers returned to the question. For example, in response to the question "where is a sushi restaurant in New York City that is open for lunch?", the query augmentation engine 1920 could preferentially select answers given by the questioning user's friends 1160, could preferentially select answers by users who are residents of New York City, who are demographically similar to the questioning user (e.g. same age, income level, same interests), and so forth.
  • the query augmentation engine 1920 could preferentially select answers given by the questioning user's friends 1160, could preferentially select answers by users who are residents of New York City, who are demographically similar to the questioning user (e.g. same age, income level, same interests), and so forth.
  • the W4 COMN 1900 can additionally store historical context information relating to each question and answer.
  • the questioning user 1110 might live most of the year in Hawaii, but is on vacation in New York City when the question "where should I eat?" is asked.
  • the historical context for the question will contain a specific spatial location, New York City.
  • An answering user 1500 may now be in a high income bracket, but may have been at a low income level when he or she answered the question.
  • the historical context for the question will contain a specific demographic, low income level.
  • the Q&A databases 1940 can accumulate a large repository of questions and answers relating to a wide array of contexts.
  • the query augmentation engine 1920 can tap into this information to suggest questions even when none are asked. For example, if users on vacation in New York City who like sushi frequently ask the question "where should I eat?" around 12:00 PM, the query augmentation engine 1920 can detect when a user is in such a context and suggest such a question spontaneously to the user.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of how the users, devices and associated data objects shown in FIG. 7 can be defined to a W4 COMN.
  • Users 1110 and 1500 are represented as user RWEs, 2110 and 2500 respectively.
  • the questioning user's PDA 1102 is represented as a proxy RWE 2102.
  • Businesses 1130 and 1150 are represented as location RWEs 2130 and 2150 respectively.
  • Restaurants 1140 and 1540 are represented as a location RWEs 2140 and 2540 respectively.
  • New York City and other U.S. locations 1110 and 1510 are represented as a location RWEs 2110 and 2510 respectively.
  • User emails 1120 and 1520 are represented as passive data IOs 2120 and 2520 respectively.
  • User BLOGS 1150 and 1550 are represented as passive data IOs 2150 and 2550 respectively.
  • the query augmentation engine 1920 and the knowledge databases 1940 are represented as active IOs 2920 and 2940 respectively.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of a data model showing how the RWEs and IOs shown in FIG. 8 can be related a users question within a W4 COMN.
  • the submission of a question by a questioning user using a proxy device creates a passive question IO 2108 associated with the questioning user RWE 2100, the user's PDA proxy RWE 2104 and the query augmentation engine IO 2920.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 is directly associated with a user profile IO 2108.
  • the user profile IO 2108 is a consolidated profile that relates the user to all personal and demographic data available to the network relating to the user.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 is currently associated with a location RWE for New York City because the user is physically present in New York City.
  • the network may have detected the user's current location through, for example, the user's PDA using an embedded GPS device or by triangulation of cellular signals broadcast by the device.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 is further directly associated with an RWE for a business 2130 that the user patronizes, which itself has at least one IO 2132 containing information about the business such as the type of the business, ownership information and hours of operation.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 is further directly associated with an RWE for a restaurant 2140 that the user patronizes, which itself has at least one IO 2142 containing information about the business such as menus, reviews and hours of operation.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 is further directly associated with IOs for emails 2120 sent and received by the questioning user and a BLOG 2150 maintained by the user.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 indirectly associated with a group of user RWEs 2160 representing the user's friends though a social network IO 2162, which could be a passive data IO, such as a contact list, or could be an active IO, such as a social networking website provided by a third party provider.
  • Each of the user RWEs 2160 has at least one profile IO containing, for example, demographic information about each user.
  • the data relationships in the illustrated embodiment discussed above are exemplary, and do not exhaust the myriad number of entities and IOs that can be directly or indirectly related to the questioning user RWE 2100.
  • the questioning user RWE 2100 can be indirectly related to a large, and potentially unbounded set of entities and data known to the network through various data relationships and at varying degrees of separation.
  • the user's friends 2160 each may patronize different businesses and restaurants, maintain their own BLOGs, be in a different physical location at any point in time, and so forth.
  • the total set of RWEs and IOs directly or indirectly related to the questioning user RWE 2100 provide a detailed picture of the user's current and historical contexts that can be used to augment questions posed by a user within that context.
  • each answering user RWE 2500 is associated, directly or indirectly, with a potentially unbounded set of RWEs and IOs through a network of data relationships.
  • each answering user RWE 2500 is directly associated with RWEs for businesses and restaurants 2530 and 2540 patronized by the users and RWEs representing the current location 2510 of the users.
  • Each answering user RWE 2500 is further directly associated with IOs representing user emails 2520, user BLOGs 2550 and user profiles 2502.
  • the RWEs for businesses and restaurants 2530 and 2540 each are associated with IOs 2532 and 2542 for information relating to the business and restaurant respectively.
  • the total set of RWEs and IOs directly or indirectly related to the answering user RWEs 2500 provide a detailed picture of the answering user's current and historical contexts that can be used to select users whose answers are most likely to be helpful or of interest to the questioning user.
  • RWEs 2160 for the questioning user's friends is an answering user RWE 2500 and at least one of the questioning users emails 2120 is associated with an answering user RWE, for example, because the email is directed to, or refers to, the answering user the RWE relates to.
  • the relationships shown in FIG. 9 are built and maintained by one or more correlation engines within a W4 engine which services the W4 COMN.
  • the creation of such relationships may be automatic and part of the normal operation of the W4 COMN. Alternatively, such relationships can be created on demand.
  • questions 2108 that are being posted for the first time are inserted into the knowledge database 2940 and can be responded to by answering users.
  • every question inserted into the knowledge database 2940 is associated with the context of the questioning user at the time the question was posed.
  • questions in the knowledge database 2940 which have been asked multiple times by various users are associated with the contexts of all, or substantially all, of the questioning users at the time the question was posed.
  • every answer inserted into the knowledge database 2940 is associated with the context of the answering user at the time the answer was given.
  • the query augmentation engine 2920 can automatically create a question IO 2108 by examining the current context of a user RWE 2100 and matching the user's context to contexts for questions stored in the knowledge database 2940. The IO 2108 can then be sent to the user's proxy device 2104 as a suggested question.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of a process 3000 of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide augmented queries for a knowledge system.
  • a network for example, a W4 COMN
  • a question is received 3010, over a network, from a questioning user relating to any topic of interest to the user.
  • the question comprises, at a minimum, an identification of a user and at least one question criteria.
  • the identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login, an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network.
  • the identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website.
  • the identification of a user refers to the questioning user.
  • the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the questioning user.)
  • Question criteria can, without limitation, comprise any spatial, temporal, topical or social criteria relating to real world entities and topics of interest.
  • the criteria can be related to one another using standard relational or set operators.
  • the question can be stated as a natural language query.
  • the question can be stated as a media object such as a photo or video or audio clip.
  • query criteria are tokens formed with standard characters such as words or symbols.
  • query criteria can include data objects.
  • a user could enter the query such as "what is this? ⁇ image>", “show me more like this ⁇ image>”, or "who wrote the lyrics to this? ⁇ media>” where ⁇ image> and ⁇ media> represent actual image and media data objects the user attaches to the question.
  • questioning user can submit an image or video clip in real-time, for example, of a co-located building or object. The process can then automatically format a question to gather a set of similar multimedia content labeled with the name, function, known information related to the building/object.
  • the identification of a user and the question criteria are then 3020 used to formulate a first query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network (including network databases 3022 and sensors 3024) that relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria.
  • the data object can be processed to help further define the object by, without limitation, extracting keywords from the object content, extracting metadata from the object, classifying the object using an image classifier, deriving a checksum, or deriving a signature from the object.
  • the user context data is then used, via processing capabilities available to the network, to add additional criteria to the original question 3030 to create a modified question qualified with user context data.
  • the additional criteria can be any kind of spatial, temporal, social or topical criteria that qualify, personalize and refine the original question so as to form a more specific and targeted question.
  • the original question criteria and the additional question criteria are formed into multiple questions that can range in specificity or relate to alternative topics.
  • the modified question or questions can be transmitted to the user 3040, via the network, so as to allow the user to select specific modified questions for further processing. After the user completes his or her selection, the user's selection is received over the network 3050 and only selected questions are processed.
  • the identification of a user and modified question criteria are then used to formulate a second query 3060 so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network (including network databases 3022 and sensors 3024 and knowledge databases 3062) that relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria.
  • the identified knowledge data retrieved by the second query can be an exact match to the modified question criteria, or can be a close fit. For example, the question "where's a good sushi or Thai restaurant in Santa Fe?" could retrieve a related question "where's a good seafood restaurant in Santa Fe?" or "where's a good Japanese restaurant in the Santa Fe area?”
  • knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a plurality of users.
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises an identification of each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers.
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers at the time such questions and answers were entered (that is to say, the context of the users at the time the questions and answers were entered.)
  • the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a plurality of users who have consumed the knowledge data (e.g. any users who have viewed the knowledge data.)
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the data was consumed (e.g., the context of the users viewing the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was viewed.)
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises a selection of a best answer, wherein the user who originally entered the question has selected a best answer from among the answers posted.
  • the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data (e.g.. the number of times a question or answer was selected or viewed.)
  • the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations which, in one embodiment, can be entered by any user of the system.
  • the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness by users, which can be entered by the questioning user or by consuming users.
  • the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data. In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who entered the knowledge data relating to the user's questions. In another embodiment, the identified knowledge data can be ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who discovered, browsed or interacted with the knowledge data relating to the user's questions, e.g. as search results to a similar or identical query or context.
  • the selected knowledge data is then transmitted 3070 to the end user. Data transmitted to questioning users can be formatted in any electronic format suitable for consumption or display by a user device such as, for example, HTML or XML documents.
  • the modified question, the original question or both are posted to the knowledge databases 3062 such that other users can view the questions and post answers.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment of a process 4000 of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide automatically generated context sensitive queries.
  • a network for example, a W4 COMN
  • the current context of users is constantly updated. Spatial, temporal, topical and social data is tracked, correlated and indexed for individual users from a panoply of sources.
  • the W4 COMN can, if a user carries a geo-locatable proxy device, track the user's location in real time.
  • the W4 COMN can infer activities that a user engages in by extracting interaction data from a variety of sources such as emails, text messages and so forth.
  • the W4 COMN can also be aware of a person's preferences, aversions, hobbies, social circle and so forth. Every instant, a user's context, the Who, What, When and Where surrounding a user can change.
  • the knowledge database can be made context aware by storing the context of the user asking a question at the time the question was asked. Where a question is frequently repeated in a particular context, on an empirical basis, it can be inferred that such a question has particular relevance to users in such a context.
  • the knowledge database not only accumulates the knowledge of the users using the database, but also effectively indexes questions by context, enabling the system to suggest questions where none are asked.
  • the process begins when a request for a suggested question or questions is received 4010 over a network from or on behalf of a requesting user.
  • the request could be triggered by a user-initiated event, such as a user taking a user interface action on a proxy device or when a user speaks a keyword or key phrase into a cell phone or PDA.
  • the request could be automatically triggered on behalf of the user by a process within the W4 COMN on a periodic basis, such as every hour.
  • the request could also be automatically triggered on behalf of the user by the W4 COMN or a W4 COMN application based upon sensor or data values on the proxy device beyond a specific threshold so as to initiate a question without user involvement.
  • a proxy device may sense quick de-acceleration over a small distance followed by an impact, and derive that the user has been in some kind of accident, thus triggering a knowledge data request and response.
  • a process within the W4 COMN could track multiple spatial, temporal, topical or social variables in a user's current context and trigger a request for a suggested question when any such variables change.
  • the process could trigger a request for a suggested question when a user physically enters a new town, a new city or a new neighborhood, when a user downloads and listens to a new song, when a user sends an email or a text message or when a user meets a friend by chance on the street.
  • the trigger event can be a change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user.
  • the sensor can be associated with the user's proxy device (e.g. the temperature goes up drastically, so a suggested question might be "what to do in a fire” comes up or accelerometer stops quickly, so “what to do in a crash” comes up, etc.)
  • the sensor could be a network sensor located in proximity to the user (e.g. a traffic or weather sensor.
  • the request comprises, at a minimum, an identification of a user.
  • the identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network.
  • the identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website.
  • the identification of a user refers to the requesting user.
  • the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the requesting user) who is relevant to the query, e.g. co- located with the requesting user or a preferred filtering source for the requesting user on this subject matter.
  • a first query is formulated 4020 so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network (including network databases 3022 and sensors 3024 and knowledge databases 3062) that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context.
  • the identified knowledge data comprises a set of questions and answers entered by a plurality of users which can be transmitted 4070 directly to the user without further processing.
  • the process identifies the best match question and answer pair and further identifies closely related questions.
  • the process only identifies questions relevant to the identified user's current context.
  • the identified questions can be transmitted to the requesting user 4030, via the network, so as to allow the requesting user to select specific questions for further processing.
  • the user's selection is received over the network 4040 and only selected questions are processed. If the first query did not retrieve answers to the selected questions, the selected questions are used to formulate a second query 4060 so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the selected question criteria and the user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the user and the selected questions.
  • the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who entered the knowledge data relating to the user's questions.
  • the selected knowledge data is then transmitted 4060 to the requesting user.
  • Data transmitted to requesting users can be formatted in any electronic format suitable for consumption or display by a user device such as, for example, HTML or XML documents.
  • knowledge data returned to a requesting user is filtered using user preferences. For example, a user may choose to filter adult or unwanted topics/subjects, sources, users or any other combination of spatial, temporal, social or topical criteria.
  • the knowledge database is updated to reflect the fact the question has been selected by the user.
  • the number of times a question has been selected is stored on the knowledge database.
  • the context of every user that has selected the question is recorded on the knowledge database.
  • selection count data can be used to rank the identified knowledge data transmitted to the end user.
  • the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who have selected the question in the past.
  • FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of an Query Augmentation Engine 5000 capable of supporting processes such as that illustrated in FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 that provides query augmentation and automatically generated context sensitive queries within a network, such as a W4 COMN, having temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a users.
  • a network such as a W4 COMN
  • the Query Augmentation Engine 5000 comprises four managers, a User Manager 5100, a Query Analyzer Manager 5200, a Question Manager 5300 and an Answer Manager 5400.
  • the Query Augmentation Engine 5000 is a component of a W4 COMN.
  • the Query Augmentation Engine 5000 resides on one or more servers and is connected to a network that has access to spatial, social, temporal and topical data relating to a plurality of users.
  • each of the managers 5100, 5200, 5300 and 5400 are comprised of one or more modules, some of which can be shared between one or more managers. One or more of such modules may be components of other engines within a W4 COMN.
  • the Query Augmentation Engine 5000 is accessible, via the W4 COMN, to users entering questions 5140 and answering questions 5160.
  • the users 5140 and 5160 are shown inside of clouds indicating that each user asks or answers questions from within a cloud of spatial, temporal, topical and social data associations — the user's current context.
  • Knowledge data is stored in one or more knowledge databases 5900 accessible via the network.
  • the W4 COMN continuously gathers spatial, temporal, social and topical data relating to entities known to the network 5600, which can include persons 5610, locations 5620, businesses 5640, sensors 5660, and events 5680.
  • entities known to the network 5600 can include persons 5610, locations 5620, businesses 5640, sensors 5660, and events 5680.
  • using spatial, temporal, social and topical data available about a specific user, topic or logical data object every entity known to the W4 COMN can be mapped and represented against all other known entities and data objects in order to create both a micro graph for every entity as well as a global graph that relates all known entities with one another.
  • such relationships between entities and data objects are stored in a global index within the W4 COMN.
  • W4 data and the global index are stored on one or more databases accessible to the network 5800.
  • the User Manager 5100 provides facilities that allow end users to access the services of the Query Augmentation Engine 5000.
  • the User Manager 5100 is configured to receive questions from questioning users 5140, over a network, relating to any topic of interest to the users.
  • the questions each comprise, at a minimum, an identification of a user and at least one question criteria.
  • the identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network.
  • the identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website.
  • the identification of a user refers to the questioning user.
  • the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the questioning user.)
  • Question criteria can, without limitation, comprise any spatial, temporal, topical or social criteria relating to real world entities and topics of interest.
  • the criteria can be related to one another using standard relational or set operators.
  • the question can be stated as a natural language query.
  • the question can be stated as a media object such as a photo or video or audio clip.
  • query criteria are tokens formed with standard characters such as words or symbols.
  • query criteria can include data objects.
  • a user could enter the query such as "what is this? ⁇ image>", "where can I find one of these? ⁇ image>", or "who wrote the lyrics to this? ⁇ media>” where ⁇ image> and ⁇ media> represent actual image and media data objects the user attaches to the question.
  • the User Manager is configured to allow questioning users to submit images or video clips in real-time of a co-located building or object. The User Manager can then automatically format a question to return to the user a set of similar multimedia content labeled with the name, function, known information related to the building/object.
  • the User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to receive requests for suggested questions.
  • the request comprises, at a minimum, an identification of a user.
  • the identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network.
  • the identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website.
  • the identification of a user refers to the requesting user.
  • the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the requesting user.)
  • requests for suggested questions are triggered by a user- initiated event, such as a user taking a user interface action on a proxy device or when a user speaks a keyword or key phrase into an cell phone or PDA.
  • the User Manager 5100 can automatically trigger a suggested question on behalf of the user on a periodic basis, such as every hour.
  • the User Manager tracks multiple spatial, temporal, topical or social variables in a user's current context and triggers a request for a suggested question when any such variables change.
  • the change in the requesting user's current context data can be change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user.
  • the change in the requesting user's current context data can be change in the user's physical location (detected, for example, through a geo-locatable proxy device.)
  • the User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to transmit questions modified by the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 or identified by the Question Manager 5300 (described in more detail below) back to questioning users and to receive selections of questions from questioning users.
  • the User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to transmit knowledge data identified by the Question Manager 5300 in response to user questions back to the questioning users 5140.
  • Data transmitted to questioning users 5140 can be formatted in any electronic format suitable for consumption or display by a user device such as, for example, HTML or XML documents. In one embodiment, data is transmitted to questioning users 5140 via an API.
  • the User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to receive answers to posted questions from answering users 5160.
  • the User Manager 5100 can provide an interface to allow answering users 5160 to browse questions posted by questioning users 5140.
  • answers can include data objects, such as media objects, text objects, formatted documents and so forth.
  • the User Manager 5100 provides an API that allows third party applications on user proxy devices to display questions and post answers to questions.
  • the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 provides facilities to analyze and augment user questions received by the User Manager 5100.
  • the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 uses the identification of users and question criteria to a formulate queries so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network (including network databases 5800 and sensors 5700) and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria.
  • the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 can process the data object to help further define the object by, without limitation, extracting keywords from the object content, extracting metadata from the object, classifying the object using an image classifier, deriving a checksum, or deriving a signature from the object.
  • the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 is further configured, to use user context data to add additional criteria to questions to create modified questions qualified with user context data.
  • the additional criteria can be any kind of spatial, temporal, social or topical criteria that qualify, personalize and refine the original question so as to form a more specific and targeted question.
  • the original question criteria and the additional question criteria can formed into multiple questions that can range in specificity or relate to alternative topics.
  • the Question Manager 5300 provides facilities that allow users to access and knowledge data stored in the knowledge databases 5800.
  • the Question Manager 5300 can receive modified questions from the Query Analyzer Manager 5200.
  • the Question Manager 5300 can receive unmodified questions from the User Manager 5100.
  • the Question Manager 5300 can receive selected questions from the User Manager 5100.
  • the Question Manager 5300 uses the identification of users and question criteria to formulate queries so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network (including network databases 5800, sensors 5700, and knowledge databases) and relates to the question criteria and the identified users so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the user and question criteria.
  • identified knowledge data is passed to the User Manager 5100 for transmission back to questioning users 5140.
  • the identified knowledge data retrieved by the queries can be an exact match to the question criteria, or can be a close fit.
  • knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a plurality of users.
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises an identification of each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers. In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers at the time such questions and answers were entered (that is to say, the context of the users at the time the questions and answers were entered.)
  • the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a plurality of users who have consumed the knowledge data (e.g. any users who have viewed the knowledge data.)
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who have consumed the knowledge data at the time the data was consumed (e.g., the context of the users viewing the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was viewed.)
  • the knowledge data additionally comprises a selection of a best answer, wherein the user who originally entered the question has selected a best answer from among the answers posted.
  • the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data (e.g.. the number of times a question or answer was selected or viewed.)
  • the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations which, in one embodiment, can be entered by any user of the system.
  • the knowledge data for at least some some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness by users, which can be entered by the questioning user or by consuming users.
  • the Question Manager 5300 can receive requests for suggested questions from the User Manager 5100, each request comprising at least an identification of a user.
  • a query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data and relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the user's current context.
  • the Question Manager 5300 only identifies questions that are responsive to the requests for suggested questions.
  • the Question Manager 5300 identifies questions and answers that are responsive to the requests for suggested questions.
  • the identified knowledge data is passed to the User Manager 5100 for transmission back to questioning users 5160.
  • the User Manager 5100 can present the questions to requesting users 5140 for selection and receive selections of suggested questions from the users.
  • the Question Manager 5300 can then use the selected questions to formulate queries so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data and relates to selected question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the selected questions.
  • the identified knowledge data is passed to the User Manager 5100 for transmission back to requesting users 5160.
  • the Question Manager 5300 updates the knowledge database 5900 to reflect the fact the question has been selected by the user.
  • the number of times a question has been selected is stored on the knowledge database.
  • the context of every user that has selected the question is recorded on the knowledge database.
  • selection count data can be used to rank the identified knowledge data transmitted to the end user.
  • the Question Manager 5300 can rank identified knowledge data is based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can rank identified knowledge data based the closeness of fit between the context of the user entering the original question, and the current or historical context of the users who entered the knowledge data relating to the user's questions, (e.g. the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was collected. )
  • the Question Manager 5300 can rank identified knowledge data based the closeness of fit between the context of the user entering the original question, and the current or historical context of the users who consumed the knowledge data relating to the user's questions, (e.g. the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed. )
  • the Question Manager 5300 is configured to add questions to the knowledge databases 5800 when a user enters a question that has not previously been posed.
  • each question added to the knowledge databases comprises an identification of a user and at least one question criteria, which may include data objects.
  • the Question Manager 5300 adds spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related the user who entered the question at the time the question was entered (that is to say, the context of the user at the time the question was entered.)
  • the data object is added to the knowledge database in association with the question.
  • the context of every user entering the question is added to the knowledge database in association with the question.
  • the Answer Manager 5400 is configured to add answers to the knowledge databases 5800 when a user answers a question using, in one embodiment, a user interface provided by the User Manager 5100.
  • each answer added to the knowledge databases comprises an identification of a user and answer data, which can include text, and other data objects such as media objects.
  • the Answer Manager 5400 adds spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related the user who entered the answer at the time the question was entered (that is to say, the context of the user at the time the answer was entered.)
  • the Answer Manager is further configured to receive selections of best answers, wherein the user who originally entered the question has selected a best answer from among the answers posted.

Abstract

A system and method for context based query augmentation. A question is received over a network from a questioning user comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria. A first query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria. The question is modified using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data. A second query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria. The knowledge data is transmitted, over the network, to the questioning user.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTEXT BASED QUERY AUGMENTATION
[0001] This application includes material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to systems and methods for managing data relating to users on a network and, more particularly, to systems and methods for managing data relating to users on a network which is drawn, in part, from third party sources.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A great deal of information is generated when people use electronic devices, such as when people use mobile phones and cable set-top boxes. Such information, such as location, applications used, social network, physical and online locations visited, to name a few, could be used to deliver useful services and information to end users, and provide commercial opportunities to advertisers and retailers. However, most of this information is effectively abandoned due to deficiencies in the way such information can be captured. For example, and with respect to a mobile phone, information is generally not gathered while the mobile phone is idle (i.e., not being used by a user). Other information, such as presence of others in the immediate vicinity, time and frequency of messages to other users, and activities of a user's social network are also not captured effectively.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] In one embodiment, the invention is a method. A question is received, over a network, from a questioning user, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria. A first query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria. The question is modified, via the network, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data. A second query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria. The knowledge data is transmitted, over the network, to the questioning user.
[0005] In another embodiment, the invention is a method. A request is received, over a network from a requesting user for at least one suggested question, the question comprising an identification of a user. A first query is formulated, so as to so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context. The identified knowledge data is transmitted, over the network to the requesting user.
[0006] In another embodiment, the invention is a system comprising: a user manager that receives questions, over a network, from questioning users, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria; a query analyzer manager that, for each question received by the user manager, formulates a query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria, wherein the query analyzer manager modifies the question, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; and a question manager that, for each modified question, formulates a query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria, wherein the identified knowledge data is transmitted by the user manager, via the network, to the questioning user. [0007] In another embodiment, the invention is a system comprising: a user manager that receives requests for at least one suggested question, over a network, from requesting users, the request comprising an identification of a user; and a question manager that, for each request received by the user manager, formulate queries so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context, wherein the user manager transmits, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the various views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating principles of the invention.
[0009] FIG. 1 illustrates relationships between real-world entities (RWE) and information objects (IO) on one embodiment of a W4 Communications Network (W4 COMN.)
[0010] FIG. 2 illustrates metadata defining the relationships between RWEs and IOs on one embodiment of a W4 COMN.
[0011] FIG. 3 illustrates a conceptual model of one embodiment of a W4 COMN.
[0012] FIG. 4 illustrates the functional layers of one embodiment of the W4 COMN architecture.
[0013] FIG. 5 illustrates the analysis components of one embodiment of a W4 engine as shown in FIG. 2.
[0014] FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a W4 engine showing different components within the sub-engines shown in FIG. 5. [0015] FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a how a W4 COMN can provide context enhanced knowledge search services.
[0016] FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of how the users, devices and associated data objects shown in FIG. 7 can be defined to a W4 COMN.
[0017] FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of a data model showing how the RWEs and IOs shown in FIG. 8 can be related a users question within a W4 COMN.
[0018] FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of a process of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide augmented queries for a knowledge system.
[0019] FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment of a process of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide automatically generated context sensitive queries.
[0020] FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of an Query Augmentation Engine capable of supporting processes such as that illustrated in FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 that provides query augmentation and automatically generated context sensitive queries within a network, such as a W4 COMN, having temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a users.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0021] The present invention is described below with reference to block diagrams and operational illustrations of methods and devices to select and present media related to a specific topic. It is understood that each block of the block diagrams or operational illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams or operational illustrations, can be implemented by means of analog or digital hardware and computer program instructions.
[0022] These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a genrel purpose computer, special purpose computer, ASIC, or other programmable data processing apparatus, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, implements the functions/acts specified in the block diagrams or operational block or blocks. [0023] In some alternate implementations, the functions/acts noted in the blocks can occur out of the order noted in the operational illustrations. For example, two blocks shown in succession can in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks can sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
[0024] For the purposes of this disclosure the term "server" should be understood to refer to a service point which provides processing, database, and communication facilities. By way of example, and not limitation, the term "server" can refer to a single, physical processor with associated communications and data storage and database facilities, or it can refer to a networked or clustered complex of processors and associated network and storage devices, as well as operating software and one or more database systems and applications software which support the services provided by the server.
[0025] For the purposes of this disclosure the term "end user" or "user" should be understood to refer to a consumer of data supplied by a data provider. By way of example, and not limitation, the term "end user" can refer to a person who receives data provided by the data provider over the Internet in a browser session, or can refer to an automated software application which receives the data and stores or processes the data.
[0026] For the purposes of this disclosure the term "media" and "media content" should be understood to refer to binary data which contains content which can be of interest to an end user. By way of example, and not limitation, the term "media" and "media content" can refer to multimedia data, such as video data or audio data, or any other form of data capable of being transformed into a form perceivable by an end user. Such data can, furthermore, be encoded in any manner currently known, or which can be developed in the future, for specific purposes. By way of example, and not limitation, the data can be encrypted, compressed, and/or can contained embedded metadata.
[0027] For the purposes of this disclosure, a computer readable medium stores computer data in machine readable form. By way of example, and not limitation, a computer readable medium can comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non- removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid-state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other mass storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
[0028] For the purposes of this disclosure a module is a software, hardware, or firmware (or combinations thereof) system, process or functionality, or component thereof, that performs or facilitates the processes, features, and/or functions described herein (with or without human interaction or augmentation). A module can include sub-modules. Software components of a module may be stored on a computer readable medium. Modules may be integral to one or more servers, or be loaded and executed by one or more servers. One or more modules may grouped into an engine or an application.
[0029] For the purposes of this disclosure an engine is a software, hardware, or firmware (or combinations thereof) system, process or functionality that performs or facilitates the processes, features, and/or functions described herein (with or without human interaction or augmentation).
[0030] Embodiments of the present invention utilize information provided by a network which is capable of providing data collected and stored by multiple devices on a network. Such information may include, without limitation, temporal information, spatial information, and user information relating to a specific user or hardware device. User information may include, without limitation, user demographics, user preferences, user social networks, and user behavior. One embodiment of such a network is a W4 Communications Network.
[0031] A "W4 Communications Network" or W4 COMN, provides information related to the "Who, What, When and Where" of interactions within the network. In one embodiment, the W4 COMN is a collection of users, devices and processes that foster both synchronous and asynchronous communications between users and their proxies providing an instrumented network of sensors providing data recognition and collection in real-world environments about any subject, location, user or combination thereof.
[0032] In one embodiment, the W4 COMN can handle the routing/addressing, scheduling, filtering, prioritization, replying, forwarding, storing, deleting, privacy, transacting, triggering of a new message, propagating changes, transcoding and linking. Furthermore, these actions can be performed on any communication channel accessible by the W4 COMN.
[0033] In one embodiment, the W4 COMN uses a data modeling strategy for creating profiles for not only users and locations, but also any device on the network and any kind of user-defined data with user-specified conditions. Using Social, Spatial, Temporal and Logical data available about a specific user, topic or logical data object, every entity known to the W4 COMN can be mapped and represented against all other known entities and data objects in order to create both a micro graph for every entity as well as a global graph that relates all known entities with one another. In one embodiment, such relationships between entities and data objects are stored in a global index within the W4 COMN.
[0034] In one embodiment, a W4 COMN network relates to what may be termed "real- world entities", hereinafter referred to as RWEs. A RWE refers to, without limitation, a person, device, location, or other physical thing known to a W4 COMN. In one embodiment, each RWE known to a W4 COMN is assigned a unique W4 identification number that identifies the RWE within the W4 COMN.
[0035] RWEs can interact with the network directly or through proxies, which can themselves be RWEs. Examples of RWEs that interact directly with the W4 COMN include any device such as a sensor, motor, or other piece of hardware connected to the W4 COMN in order to receive or transmit data or control signals. RWE may include all devices that can serve as network nodes or generate, request and/or consume data in a networked environment or that can be controlled through a network. Such devices include any kind of "dumb" device purpose-designed to interact with a network (e.g., cell phones, cable television set top boxes, fax machines, telephones, and radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, sensors, etc.).
[0036] Examples of RWEs that may use proxies to interact with W4 COMN network include non-electronic entities including physical entities, such as people, locations (e.g., states, cities, houses, buildings, airports, roads, etc.) and things (e.g., animals, pets, livestock, gardens, physical objects, cars, airplanes, works of art, etc.), and intangible entities such as business entities, legal entities, groups of people or sports teams. In addition, "smart" devices (e.g., computing devices such as smart phones, smart set top boxes, smart cars that support communication with other devices or networks, laptop computers, personal computers, server computers, satellites, etc.) may be considered RWE that use proxies to interact with the network, where software applications executing on the device that serve as the devices' proxies.
[0037] In one embodiment, a W4 COMN may allow associations between RWEs to be determined and tracked. For example, a given user (an RWE) can be associated with any number and type of other RWEs including other people, cell phones, smart credit cards, personal data assistants, email and other communication service accounts, networked computers, smart appliances, set top boxes and receivers for cable television and other media services, and any other networked device. This association can be made explicitly by the user, such as when the RWE is installed into the W4 COMN.
[0038] An example of this is the set up of a new cell phone, cable television service or email account in which a user explicitly identifies an RWE (e.g., the user's phone for the cell phone service, the user's set top box and/or a location for cable service, or a username and password for the online service) as being directly associated with the user. This explicit association can include the user identifying a specific relationship between the user and the RWE (e.g., this is my device, this is my home appliance, this person is my friend/father/son/etc. , this device is shared between me and other users, etc.). RWEs can also be implicitly associated with a user based on a current situation. For example, a weather sensor on the W4 COMN can be implicitly associated with a user based on information indicating that the user lives or is passing near the sensor's location. [0039] In one embodiment, a W4 COMN network may additionally include what may be termed "information-objects", hereinafter referred to as IOs. An information object (IO) is a logical object that may store, maintain, generate or otherwise provides data for use by RWEs and/or the W4 COMN. In one embodiment, data within in an IO can be revised by the act of an RWE An IO within in a W4 COMN can be provided a unique W4 identification number that identifies the IO within the W4 COMN.
[0040] In one embodiment, IOs include passive objects such as communication signals (e.g., digital and analog telephone signals, streaming media and interprocess communications), email messages, transaction records, virtual cards, event records (e.g., a data file identifying a time, possibly in combination with one or more RWEs such as users and locations, that can further be associated with a known topic/activity/significance such as a concert, rally, meeting, sporting event, etc.), recordings of phone calls, calendar entries, web pages, database entries, electronic media objects (e.g., media files containing songs, videos, pictures, images, audio messages, phone calls, etc.), electronic files and associated metadata.
[0041] In one embodiment, IOs include any executing process or application that consumes or generates data such as an email communication application (such as OUTLOOK by MICROSOFT, or YAHOO! MAIL by YAHOO!), a calendaring application, a word processing application, an image editing application, a media player application, a weather monitoring application, a browser application and a web page server application. Such active IOs can or can not serve as a proxy for one or more RWEs. For example, voice communication software on a smart phone can serve as the proxy for both the smart phone and for the owner of the smart phone.
[0042] In one embodiment, for every IO there are at least three classes of associated RWEs. The first is the RWE that owns or controls the 10, whether as the creator or a rights holder (e.g., an RWE with editing rights or use rights to the 10). The second is the RWE(s) that the IO relates to, for example by containing information about the RWE or that identifies the RWE. The third are any RWEs that access the IO in order to obtain data from the IO for some purpose. [0043] Within the context of a W4 COMN, "available data" and "W4 data" means data that exists in an IO or data that can be collected from a known IO or RWE such as a deployed sensor. Within the context of a W4 COMN, "sensor" means any source of W4 data including PCs, phones, portable PCs or other wireless devices, household devices, cars, appliances, security scanners, video surveillance, RFID tags in clothes, products and locations, online data or any other source of information about a real-world user/topic/thing (RWE) or logic-based agent/process/topic/thing (10).
[0044] FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of relationships between RWEs and IOs on a W4 COMN. A user 102 is a RWE provided with a unique network ID. The user 102 may be a human that communicates with the network using proxy devices 104, 106, 108, 110 associated with the user 102, all of which are RWEs having a unique network ID. These proxies can communicate directly with the W4 COMN or can communicate with the W4 COMN using IOs such as applications executed on or by a proxy device.
[0045] In one embodiment, the proxy devices 104, 106, 108, 110 can be explicitly associated with the user 102. For example, one device 104 can be a smart phone connected by a cellular service provider to the network and another device 106 can be a smart vehicle that is connected to the network. Other devices can be implicitly associated with the user 102.
[0046] For example, one device 108 can be a "dumb" weather sensor at a location matching the current location of the user's cell phone 104, and thus implicitly associated with the user 102 while the two RWEs 104, 108 are co-located. Another implicitly associated device 110 can be a sensor 110 for physical location 112 known to the W4 COMN. The location 112 is known, either explicitly (through a user-designated relationship, e.g., this is my home, place of employment, parent, etc.) or implicitly (the user 102 is often co-located with the RWE 112 as evidenced by data from the sensor 110 at that location 112), to be associated with the first user 102.
[0047] The user 102 can be directly associated with one or more persons 140, and indirectly associated with still more persons 142, 144 through a chain of direct associations. Such associations can be explicit (e.g., the user 102 can have identified the associated person 140 as his/her father, or can have identified the person 140 as a member of the user's social network) or implicit (e.g., they share the same address). Tracking the associations between people (and other RWEs as well) allows the creation of the concept of "intimacy", where intimacy may be defined as a measure of the degree of association between two people or RWEs. For example, each degree of removal between RWEs can be considered a lower level of intimacy, and assigned lower intimacy score. Intimacy can be based solely on explicit social data or can be expanded to include all W4 data including spatial data and temporal data.
[0048] In one embodiment, each RWE 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 140, 142, 144 of a W4 COMN can be associated with one or more IOs as shown. FIG. 1 illustrates two IOs 122, 124 as associated with the cell phone device 104. One IO 122 can be a passive data object such as an event record that is used by scheduling/calendaring software on the cell phone, a contact IO used by an address book application, a historical record of a transaction made using the device 104 or a copy of a message sent from the device 104. The other IO 124 can be an active software process or application that serves as the device's proxy to the W4 COMN by transmitting or receiving data via the W4 COMN. Voice communication software, scheduling/calendaring software, an address book application or a text messaging application are all examples of IOs that can communicate with other IOs and RWEs on the network. IOs may additionally relate to topics of interest to one or more RWEs, such topics including, without limitation, musical artists, genre of music, a location and so forth.
[0049] The IOs 122, 124 can be locally stored on the device 104 or stored remotely on some node or datastore accessible to the W4 COMN, such as a message server or cell phone service datacenter. The IO 126 associated with the vehicle 108 can be an electronic file containing the specifications and/or current status of the vehicle 108, such as make, model, identification number, current location, current speed, current condition, current owner, etc. The IO 128 associated with sensor 108 can identify the current state of the subject(s) monitored by the sensor 108, such as current weather or current traffic. The IO 130 associated with the cell phone 110 can be information in a database identifying recent calls or the amount of charges on the current bill.
[0050] RWEs which can only interact with the W4 COMN through proxies, such as people 102, 140, 142, 144, computing devices 104, 106 and locations 112, can have one or more IOs 132, 134, 146, 148, 150 directly associated with them which contain RWE- specifϊc information for the associated RWE. For example, IOs associated with a person 132, 146, 148, 150 can include a user profile containing email addresses, telephone numbers, physical addresses, user preferences, identification of devices and other RWEs associated with the user. The IOs may additionally include records of the user's past interactions with other RWEs on the W4 COMN (e.g., transaction records, copies of messages, listings of time and location combinations recording the user's whereabouts in the past), the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location and/or any relationship information (e.g., explicit user-designations of the user's relationships with relatives, employers, co-workers, neighbors, service providers, etc.).
[0051] Another example of IOs associated with a person 132, 146, 148, 150 includes remote applications through which a person can communicate with the W4 COMN such as an account with a web-based email service such as Yahoo! Mail. A location's IO 134 can contain information such as the exact coordinates of the location, driving directions to the location, a classification of the location (residence, place of business, public, non- public, etc.), information about the services or products that can be obtained at the location, the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location, businesses located at the location, photographs of the location, etc.
[0052] In one embodiment, RWEs and IOs are correlated to identify relationships between them. RWEs and IOs may be correlated using metadata. For example, if an IO is a music file, metadata for the file can include data identifying the artist, song, etc., album art, and the format of the music data. This metadata can be stored as part of the music file or in one or more different IOs that are associated with the music file or both. W4 metadata can additionally include the owner of the music file and the rights the owner has in the music file. As another example, if the IO is a picture taken by an electronic camera, the picture can include in addition to the primary image data from which an image can be created on a display, metadata identifying when the picture was taken, where the camera was when the picture was taken, what camera took the picture, who, if anyone, is associated (e.g., designated as the camera's owner) with the camera, and who and what are the subjects of/in the picture. The W4 COMN uses all the available metadata in order to identify implicit and explicit associations between entities and data objects.
[0053] FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of metadata defining the relationships between RWEs and IOs on the W4 COMN. In the embodiment shown, an IO 202 includes object data 204 and five discrete items of metadata 206, 208, 210, 212, 214. Some items of metadata 208, 210, 212 can contain information related only to the object data 204 and unrelated to any other IO or RWE. For example, a creation date, text or an image that is to be associated with the object data 204 of the IO 202.
[0054] Some of items of metadata 206, 214, on the other hand, can identify relationships between the IO 202 and other RWEs and IOs. As illustrated, the IO 202 is associated by one item of metadata 206 with an RWE 220 that RWE 220 is further associated with two IOs 224, 226 and a second RWE 222 based on some information known to the W4 COMN. For example, could describe the relations between an image (IO 202) containing metadata 206 that identifies the electronic camera (the first RWE 220) and the user (the second RWE 224) that is known by the system to be the owner of the camera 220. Such ownership information can be determined, for example, from one or another of the IOs 224, 226 associated with the camera 220.
[0055] FIG. 2 also illustrates metadata 214 that associates the IO 202 with another IO 230. This IO 230 is itself associated with three other IOs 232, 234, 236 that are further associated with different RWEs 242, 244, 246. This part of FIG. 2, for example, could describe the relations between a music file (IO 202) containing metadata 206 that identifies the digital rights file (the first IO 230) that defines the scope of the rights of use associated with this music file 202. The other IOs 232, 234, 236 are other music files that are associated with the rights of use and which are currently associated with specific owners (RWEs 242, 244, 246).
[0056] FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a conceptual model of a W4 COMN. The W4 COMN 300 creates an instrumented messaging infrastructure in the form of a global logical network cloud conceptually sub-divided into networked-clouds for each of the 4Ws: Who, Where, What and When. In the Who cloud 302 are all users whether acting as senders, receivers, data points or confirmation/certification sources as well as user proxies in the forms of user-program processes, devices, agents, calendars, etc.
[0057] In the Where cloud 304 are all physical locations, events, sensors or other RWEs associated with a spatial reference point or location. The When cloud 306 is composed of natural temporal events (that is events that are not associated with particular location or person such as days, times, seasons) as well as collective user temporal events (holidays, anniversaries, elections, etc.) and user-defined temporal events (birthdays, smart-timing programs).
[0058] The What cloud 308 is comprised of all known data - web or private, commercial or user - accessible to the W4 COMN, including for example environmental data like weather and news, RWE-generated data, IOs and IO data, user data, models, processes and applications. Thus, conceptually, most data is contained in the What cloud 308.
[0059] Some entities, sensors or data may potentially exist in multiple clouds either disparate in time or simultaneously. Additionally, some IOs and RWEs can be composites in that they combine elements from one or more clouds. Such composites can be classified as appropriate to facilitate the determination of associations between RWEs and IOs. For example, an event consisting of a location and time could be equally classified within the When cloud 306, the What cloud 308 and/or the Where cloud 304.
[0060] In one embodiment, a W4 engine 310 is center of the W4 COMN's intelligence for making all decisions in the W4 COMN. The W4 engine 310 controls all interactions between each layer of the W4 COMN and is responsible for executing any approved user or application objective enabled by W4 COMN operations or interoperating applications. In an embodiment, the W4 COMN is an open platform with standardized, published APIs for requesting (among other things) synchronization, disambiguation, user or topic addressing, access rights, prioritization or other value-based ranking, smart scheduling, automation and topical, social, spatial or temporal alerts.
[0061] One function of the W4 COMN is to collect data concerning all communications and interactions conducted via the W4 COMN, which can include storing copies of IOs and information identifying all RWEs and other information related to the IOs (e.g., who, what, when, where information). Other data collected by the W4 COMN can include information about the status of any given RWE and IO at any given time, such as the location, operational state, monitored conditions (e.g., for an RWE that is a weather sensor, the current weather conditions being monitored or for an RWE that is a cell phone, its current location based on the cellular towers it is in contact with) and current status.
[0062] The W4 engine 310 is also responsible for identifying RWEs and relationships between RWEs and IOs from the data and communication streams passing through the W4 COMN. The function of identifying RWEs associated with or implicated by IOs and actions performed by other RWEs may be referred to as entity extraction. Entity extraction can include both simple actions, such as identifying the sender and receivers of a particular 10, and more complicated analyses of the data collected by and/or available to the W4 COMN, for example determining that a message listed the time and location of an upcoming event and associating that event with the sender and receiver(s) of the message based on the context of the message or determining that an RWE is stuck in a traffic jam based on a correlation of the RWE's location with the status of a co-located traffic monitor.
[0063] It should be noted that when performing entity extraction from an 10, the IO can be an opaque object with only where only W4 metadata related to the object is visible, but internal data of the IO (i.e., the actual primary or object data contained within the object) are not, and thus metadata extraction is limited to the metadata. Alternatively, if internal data of the IO is visible, it can also be used in entity extraction, e.g. strings within an email are extracted and associated as RWEs to for use in determining the relationships between the sender, user, topic or other RWE or IO impacted by the object or process.
[0064] In the embodiment shown, the W4 engine 310 can be one or a group of distributed computing devices, such as a general-purpose personal computers (PCs) or purpose built server computers, connected to the W4 COMN by communication hardware and/or software. Such computing devices can be a single device or a group of devices acting together. Computing devices can be provided with any number of program modules and data files stored in a local or remote mass storage device and local memory (e.g., RAM) of the computing device. For example, as mentioned above, a computing device can include an operating system suitable for controlling the operation of a networked computer, such as the WINDOWS XP or WINDOWS SERVER operating systems from MICROSOFT CORPORATION.
[0065] Some RWEs can also be computing devices such as, without limitation, smart phones, web-enabled appliances, PCs, laptop computers, and personal data assistants (PDAs). Computing devices can be connected to one or more communications networks such as the Internet, a publicly switched telephone network, a cellular telephone network, a satellite communication network, a wired communication network such as a cable television or private area network. Computing devices can be connected any such network via a wired data connection or wireless connection such as a wi-fi, a WiMAX (802.36), a Bluetooth or a cellular telephone connection.
[0066] Local data structures, including discrete IOs, can be stored on a computer- readable medium (not shown) that is connected to, or part of, any of the computing devices described herein including the W4 engine 310. For example, in one embodiment, the data backbone of the W4 COMN, discussed below, includes multiple mass storage devices that maintain the IOs, metadata and data necessary to determine relationships between RWEs and IOs as described herein.
[0067] FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the functional layers of a W4 COMN architecture. At the lowest layer, referred to as the sensor layer 402, is the network 404 of the actual devices, users, nodes and other RWEs. Sensors include known technologies like web analytics, GPS, cell-tower pings, use logs, credit card transactions, online purchases, explicit user profiles and implicit user profiling achieved through behavioral targeting, search analysis and other analytics models used to optimize specific network applications or functions.
[0068] The data layer 406 stores and catalogs the data produced by the sensor layer 402. The data can be managed by either the network 404 of sensors or the network infrastructure 406 that is built on top of the instrumented network of users, devices, agents, locations, processes and sensors. The network infrastructure 408 is the core under-the-covers network infrastructure that includes the hardware and software necessary to receive that transmit data from the sensors, devices, etc. of the network 404. It further includes the processing and storage capability necessary to meaningfully categorize and track the data created by the network 404.
[0069] The user profiling layer 410 performs the W4 COMN's user profiling functions. This layer 410 can further be distributed between the network infrastructure 408 and user applications/processes 412 executing on the W4 engine or disparate user computing devices. Personalization is enabled across any single or combination of communication channels and modes including email, IM, texting (SMS, etc.), photo-blogging, audio (e.g. telephone call), video (teleconferencing, live broadcast), games, data confidence processes, security, certification or any other W4 COMM process call for available data.
[0070] In one embodiment, the user profiling layer 410 is a logic-based layer above all sensors to which sensor data are sent in the rawest form to be mapped and placed into the W4 COMN data backbone 420. The data (collected and refined, related and deduplicated, synchronized and disambiguated) are then stored in one or a collection of related databases available applications approved on the W4 COMN. Network- originating actions and communications are based upon the fields of the data backbone, and some of these actions are such that they themselves become records somewhere in the backbone, e.g. invoicing, while others, e.g. fraud detection, synchronization, disambiguation, can be done without an impact to profiles and models within the backbone. [0071] Actions originating from outside the network, e.g., RWEs such as users, locations, proxies and processes, come from the applications layer 414 of the W4 COMN. Some applications can be developed by the W4 COMN operator and appear to be implemented as part of the communications infrastructure 408, e.g. email or calendar programs because of how closely they operate with the sensor processing and user profiling layer 410. The applications 412 also serve as a sensor in that they, through their actions, generate data back to the data layer 406 via the data backbone concerning any data created or available due to the applications execution.
[0072] In one embodiment, the applications layer 414 can also provide a user interface (UI) based on device, network, carrier as well as user-selected or security-based customizations. Any UI can operate within the W4 COMN if it is instrumented to provide data on user interactions or actions back to the network. In the case of W4 COMN enabled mobile devices, the UI can also be used to confirm or disambiguate incomplete W4 data in real-time, as well as correlation, triangulation and synchronization sensors for other nearby enabled or non-enabled devices.
[0073] At some point, the network effects enough enabled devices allow the network to gather complete or nearly complete data (sufficient for profiling and tracking) of a non- enabled device because of its regular intersection and sensing by enabled devices in its real-world location.
[0074] Above the applications layer 414, or hosted within it, is the communications delivery network 416. The communications delivery network can be operated by the W4 COMN operator or be independent third-party carrier service. Data may be delivered via synchronous or asynchronous communication. In every case, the communication delivery network 414 will be sending or receiving data on behalf of a specific application or network infrastructure 408 request.
[0075] The communication delivery layer 418 also has elements that act as sensors including W4 entity extraction from phone calls, emails, blogs, etc. as well as specific user commands within the delivery network context. For example, "save and prioritize this call" said before end of call can trigger a recording of the previous conversation to be saved and for the W4 entities within the conversation to analyzed and increased in weighting prioritization decisions in the personalization/user profiling layer 410.
[0076] FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of the analysis components of a W4 engine as shown in FIG. 3. As discussed above, the W4 Engine is responsible for identifying RWEs and relationships between RWEs and IOs from the data and communication streams passing through the W4 COMN.
[0077] In one embodiment the W4 engine connects, interoperates and instruments all network participants through a series of sub-engines that perform different operations in the entity extraction process. The attribution engine 504 tracks the real-world ownership, control, publishing or other conditional rights of any RWE in any IO. Whenever a new IO is detected by the W4 engine 502, e.g., through creation or transmission of a new message, a new transaction record, a new image file, etc., ownership is assigned to the IO . The attribution engine 504 creates this ownership information and further allows this information to be determined for each IO known to the W4 COMN.
[0078] The correlation engine 506 can operates two capacities: first, to identify associated RWEs and IOs and their relationships (such as by creating a combined graph of any combination of RWEs and IOs and their attributes, relationships and reputations within contexts or situations) and second, as a sensor analytics pre-processor for attention events from any internal or external source.
[0079] In one embodiment, the identification of associated RWEs and IOs function of the correlation engine 506 is done by graphing the available data, using, for example, one or more histograms A histogram is a mapping technique that counts the number of observations that fall into various disjoint categories (i.e. bins.). By selecting each IO, RWE, and other known parameters (e.g., times, dates, locations, etc.) as different bins and mapping the available data, relationships between RWEs, IOs and the other parameters can be identified. A histogram of all RWEs and IOs is created, from which correlations based on the graph can be made.
[0080] As a pre-processor, the correlation engine 506 monitors the information provided by RWEs in order to determine if any conditions are identified that can trigger an action on the part of the W4 engine 502. For example, if a delivery condition has been associated with a message, when the correlation engine 506 determines that the condition is met, it can transmit the appropriate trigger information to the W4 engine 502 that triggers delivery of the message.
[0081] The attention engine 508 instruments all appropriate network nodes, clouds, users, applications or any combination thereof and includes close interaction with both the correlation engine 506 and the attribution engine 504.
[0082] FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a W4 engine showing different components within the sub-engines described above with reference to FIG. 4. In one embodiment the W4 engine 602 includes an attention engine 608, attribution engine 604 and correlation engine 606 with several sub-managers based upon basic function.
[0083] The attention engine 608 includes a message intake and generation manager 610 as well as a message delivery manager 612 that work closely with both a message matching manager 614 and a real-time communications manager 616 to deliver and instrument all communications across the W4 COMN.
[0084] The attribution engine 604 works within the user profile manager 618 and in conjunction with all other modules to identify, process/verify and represent ownership and rights information related to RWEs, IOs and combinations thereof.
[0085] The correlation engine 606 dumps data from both of its channels (sensors and processes) into the same data backbone 620 which is organized and controlled by the W4 analytics manager 622. The data backbone 620 includes both aggregated and individualized archived versions of data from all network operations including user logs 624, attention rank place logs 626, web indices and environmental logs 618, e-commerce and financial transaction information 630, search indexes and logs 632, sponsor content or conditionals, ad copy and any and all other data used in any W4C0MN process, IO or event. Because of the amount of data that the W4 COMN will potentially store, the data backbone 620 includes numerous database servers and datastores in communication with the W4 COMN to provide sufficient storage capacity. [0086] The data collected by the W4 COMN includes spatial data, temporal data, RWE interaction data, IO content data (e.g., media data), and user data including explicitly- provided and deduced social and relationship data. Spatial data can be any data identifying a location associated with an RWE. For example, the spatial data can include any passively collected location data, such as cell tower data, global packet radio service (GPRS) data, global positioning service (GPS) data, WI-FI data, personal area network data, IP address data and data from other network access points, or actively collected location data, such as location data entered by the user.
[0087] Temporal data is time based data (e.g., time stamps) that relate to specific times and/or events associated with a user and/or the electronic device. For example, the temporal data can be passively collected time data (e.g., time data from a clock resident on the electronic device, or time data from a network clock), or the temporal data can be actively collected time data, such as time data entered by the user of the electronic device (e.g., a user maintained calendar).
[0088] Logical and IO data refers to the data contained by an IO as well as data associated with the IO such as creation time, owner, associated RWEs, when the IO was last accessed, the topic or subject of the IO (from message content or "re" or subject line, as some examples) etc. For example, an IO may relate to media data. Media data can include any data relating to presentable media, such as audio data, visual data, and audiovisual data. Audio data can be data relating to downloaded music, such as genre, artist, album and the like, and includes data regarding ringtones, ringbacks, media purchased, playlists, and media shared, to name a few. The visual data can be data relating to images and/or text received by the electronic device (e.g., via the Internet or other network). The visual data can be data relating to images and/or text sent from and/or captured at the electronic device.
[0089] Audiovisual data can be data associated with any videos captured at, downloaded to, or otherwise associated with the electronic device. The media data includes media presented to the user via a network, such as use of the Internet, and includes data relating to text entered and/or received by the user using the network (e.g., search terms), and interaction with the network media, such as click data (e.g., advertisement banner clicks, bookmarks, click patterns and the like). Thus, the media data can include data relating to the user's RSS feeds, subscriptions, group memberships, game services, alerts, and the like.
[0090] The media data can include non-network activity, such as image capture and/or video capture using an electronic device, such as a mobile phone. The image data can include metadata added by the user, or other data associated with the image, such as, with respect to photos, location when the photos were taken, direction of the shot, content of the shot, and time of day, to name a few. Media data can be used, for example, to deduce activities information or preferences information, such as cultural and/or buying preferences information.
[0091] Relationship data can include data relating to the relationships of an RWE or IO to another RWE or IO. For example, the relationship data can include user identity data, such as gender, age, race, name, social security number, photographs and other information associated with the user's identity. User identity information can also include e-mail addresses, login names and passwords. Relationship data can further include data identifying explicitly associated RWEs. For example, relationship data for a cell phone can indicate the user that owns the cell phone and the company that provides the service to the phone. As another example, relationship data for a smart car can identify the owner, a credit card associated with the owner for payment of electronic tolls, those users permitted to drive the car and the service station for the car.
[0092] Relationship data can also include social network data. Social network data includes data relating to any relationship that is explicitly defined by a user or other RWE, such as data relating to a user's friends, family, co-workers, business relations, and the like. Social network data can include, for example, data corresponding with a user- maintained electronic address book. Relationship data can be correlated with, for example, location data to deduce social network information, such as primary relationships (e.g., user-spouse, user-children and user-parent relationships) or other relationships (e.g., user-friends, user-co-worker, user-business associate relationships). Relationship data also can be utilized to deduce, for example, activities information.
[0093] Interaction data can be any data associated with user interaction of the electronic device, whether active or passive. Examples of interaction data include interpersonal communication data, media data, relationship data, transactional data and device interaction data, all of which are described in further detail below. Table 1 , below, is a non-exhaustive list including examples of electronic data.
Table 1 - Examples of Electronic Data
Figure imgf000024_0001
[0094]
[0095] Interaction data includes communication data between any RWEs that is transferred via the W4 COMN. For example, the communication data can be data associated with an incoming or outgoing short message service (SMS) message, email message, voice call (e.g., a cell phone call, a voice over IP call), or other type of interpersonal communication related to an RWE. Communication data can be correlated with, for example, temporal data to deduce information regarding frequency of communications, including concentrated communication patterns, which can indicate user activity information.
[0096] The interaction data can also include transactional data. The transactional data can be any data associated with commercial transactions undertaken by or at the mobile electronic device, such as vendor information, financial institution information (e.g., bank information), financial account information (e.g., credit card information), merchandise information and costs/prices information, and purchase frequency information, to name a few. The transactional data can be utilized, for example, to deduce activities and preferences information. The transactional information can also be used to deduce types of devices and/or services the user owns and/or in which the user can have an interest.
[0097] The interaction data can also include device or other RWE interaction data. Such data includes both data generated by interactions between a user and a RWE on the W4 COMN and interactions between the RWE and the W4 COMN. RWE interaction data can be any data relating to an RWE's interaction with the electronic device not included in any of the above categories, such as habitual patterns associated with use of an electronic device data of other modules/applications, such as data regarding which applications are used on an electronic device and how often and when those applications are used. As described in further detail below, device interaction data can be correlated with other data to deduce information regarding user activities and patterns associated therewith. Table 2, below, is a non-exhaustive list including examples of interaction data.
Table 2 - Examples of Interaction Data
Figure imgf000025_0001
Figure imgf000026_0001
[0098]
CONTEXT BASED QUERY AUGMENTATION
[0099] One of the most popular information services used on the Internet are knowledge search services such as Yahoo! Answers. Such services allow users to post questions and receive answers from a broad base of other users, some of whom may be subject matter experts, some of whom may have had similar life experiences and some of whom have an interest in the subject matter of the question. Over time, a wide array of questions and answers are accumulated and together form a knowledge base that can be indexed and searched. Searching such knowledge bases can carry significant advantages over searching the web for content matching keywords, since oftentimes such as search can provide precise and targeted answers to specific questions.
[00100] The potential value of such a knowledge base grows with every question posed and answer given, but the difficulty in using the knowledge base grows as well. A user may have difficulty translating a general question into a form that yields a manageable set of questions and answers. There simply be too many questions and answers to browse manually. A keyword search of a knowledge base may yield no answers at all or answers that are marginally relevant to the user.
[00101] Users of knowledge search services commonly ask questions that relate, in one way or another, to their current context. A user's context can be broadly defined as the total set of circumstances that surround a user at any point in time. A user's context includes the user's current location, the date and the time, but can also include any other spatial, temporal, social and topical data that define who the user is and where the user has been, where the user is going, with whom are they going for what purpose and what is the user interested in.
[00102] For example, a user might ask, "where's a good place to eat?" Obviously, any answers referring to restaurants that are not reasonably close to the user are not useful. Thus, if the user is currently in Santa Fe, the question is actually "where's a good place to eat in Santa Fe?" But the user might have food preferences, for example, the user might like sushi or Thai, so the question is actually "where's a good sushi or Thai restaurant in Santa Fe?" At an even more abstract level, if its past 12:00 PM, and a user hasn't had lunch, it might be obvious that the next question is "where's lunch?", unless, of course, the user always skips lunch. Users may also prefer to hear the opinion of people who are similar to them, e.g. same age, same profession, and so forth.
[00103] A W4 COMN, or a similar network that tracks Who, What, When and
Where data can mine data accumulated about users to enhance searching a knowledge base, or any other kind of database that contains information about people, places, things, events or topic to augment questions posed by a user. Furthermore, over time, questions asked by specific users in specific contexts can be archived and used to form predictive models that can be used to predict questions that a user having specific attributes is likely to ask in specific situations.
[00104] For example, suppose a user has been on a long-distance train ride, has been stationary in his or her seat for 2.5 hours and has used a credit card to buy four beers during that time from the train's mobile snack vendor. As the user exits the train, the user pulls out a PDA to make a query, and the device automatically pops up a map of the station with the nearest bathrooms already indicated on the map. The user might select a "not this" button and the next likely answer is displayed, e.g. the currency exchanges and/or checked baggage claim and or taxi stands. Each individual might receive a differently constituted or ranked set of most likely answers to their current situation, e.g. if a user's path history shows that the user never uses train station bathrooms, it might display taxis or the nearest hotel or fast food bathroom depending on my individual data history and profile. In another automatic embodiment, perhaps sponsored by an advertiser, a user who has a history of buying souvenirs at concerts would have his device display the location of memorabilia vendors at the venue.
[00105] FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a how a W4 COMN can provide context enhanced knowledge search services.
[00106] The W4 COMN 1900 maintains one or more knowledge databases 1940 that contains questions posed by questioning users 1100 and answers given by answering users 1500 (i.e. a Q&A database.) Access to the knowledge database 1940 is provided by a query augmentation engine 1920. A questioning user 1100 can submit a question to the query augmentation engine 1920 through a proxy device, such as a PDA 1102 and receive one or more answers to the question through the proxy device.
[00107] The questioning user 1110 is currently located in New York City, is a customer of a business 1130 and is currently dining at a restaurant 1140. The questioning user 1100 additionally maintains a BLOG 1150, has an email account 1120 and has a group of friends. All of these entities and data objects, as well as their association to the questioning user 1100, are known to the W4 COMN 1900 and help define the user's current context. The user's current context can be broadly defined as the total set of social, topical, temporal and spatial information that locates the user in space and time and identifies the user's interests, activities and social associations.
[00108] Each answer in the Q&A database 1940 is provided by an answering user 1500. Each answering user 1500 has his or her own context as well. For example, each of the answering users 1500 is located somewhere in the U.S. 1510, is a customer of one or more businesses 1530, dines at one or more restaurants 1540, has at least one email account 1520, and maintains at least one BLOG 1550. All of these entities and data objects, as well as their association to the answering users 1500, are known to the W4 COMN 1900 and help define the answering users' current contexts. [00109] The query augmentation engine 1920 can mine the social, topical, temporal and spatial information relating to a questioning user's current context to supplement questions asked by the user. Thus, for example, if the questioning user 1100 asks "where should I eat?", the query augmentation engine 1920 could determine that it is lunchtime, that the user is in New York City 1110 and that the user has dined frequently at a sushi restaurant 1140, and thus compose a more specific question "where is a sushi restaurant in New York City that is open for lunch?"
[00110] The query augmentation engine 1920 can additionally mine the social, topical, temporal and spatial information relating to answering users' current contexts to help refine the set of answers returned to the question. For example, in response to the question "where is a sushi restaurant in New York City that is open for lunch?", the query augmentation engine 1920 could preferentially select answers given by the questioning user's friends 1160, could preferentially select answers by users who are residents of New York City, who are demographically similar to the questioning user (e.g. same age, income level, same interests), and so forth.
[00111] The W4 COMN 1900 can additionally store historical context information relating to each question and answer. For example, the questioning user 1110 might live most of the year in Hawaii, but is on vacation in New York City when the question "where should I eat?" is asked. The historical context for the question will contain a specific spatial location, New York City. An answering user 1500 may now be in a high income bracket, but may have been at a low income level when he or she answered the question. The historical context for the question will contain a specific demographic, low income level.
[00112] Over time, the Q&A databases 1940 can accumulate a large repository of questions and answers relating to a wide array of contexts. The query augmentation engine 1920 can tap into this information to suggest questions even when none are asked. For example, if users on vacation in New York City who like sushi frequently ask the question "where should I eat?" around 12:00 PM, the query augmentation engine 1920 can detect when a user is in such a context and suggest such a question spontaneously to the user.
[00113] FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of how the users, devices and associated data objects shown in FIG. 7 can be defined to a W4 COMN.
[00114] Users 1110 and 1500 are represented as user RWEs, 2110 and 2500 respectively. The questioning user's PDA 1102 is represented as a proxy RWE 2102. Businesses 1130 and 1150 are represented as location RWEs 2130 and 2150 respectively. Restaurants 1140 and 1540 are represented as a location RWEs 2140 and 2540 respectively. New York City and other U.S. locations 1110 and 1510 are represented as a location RWEs 2110 and 2510 respectively. User emails 1120 and 1520 are represented as passive data IOs 2120 and 2520 respectively. User BLOGS 1150 and 1550 are represented as passive data IOs 2150 and 2550 respectively. The query augmentation engine 1920 and the knowledge databases 1940 are represented as active IOs 2920 and 2940 respectively
[00115] FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of a data model showing how the RWEs and IOs shown in FIG. 8 can be related a users question within a W4 COMN.
[00116] In one embodiment, the submission of a question by a questioning user using a proxy device creates a passive question IO 2108 associated with the questioning user RWE 2100, the user's PDA proxy RWE 2104 and the query augmentation engine IO 2920. The questioning user RWE 2100 is directly associated with a user profile IO 2108. In one embodiment, the user profile IO 2108 is a consolidated profile that relates the user to all personal and demographic data available to the network relating to the user.
[00117] The questioning user RWE 2100 is currently associated with a location RWE for New York City because the user is physically present in New York City. The network may have detected the user's current location through, for example, the user's PDA using an embedded GPS device or by triangulation of cellular signals broadcast by the device. The questioning user RWE 2100 is further directly associated with an RWE for a business 2130 that the user patronizes, which itself has at least one IO 2132 containing information about the business such as the type of the business, ownership information and hours of operation. The questioning user RWE 2100 is further directly associated with an RWE for a restaurant 2140 that the user patronizes, which itself has at least one IO 2142 containing information about the business such as menus, reviews and hours of operation.
[00118] The questioning user RWE 2100 is further directly associated with IOs for emails 2120 sent and received by the questioning user and a BLOG 2150 maintained by the user. The questioning user RWE 2100 indirectly associated with a group of user RWEs 2160 representing the user's friends though a social network IO 2162, which could be a passive data IO, such as a contact list, or could be an active IO, such as a social networking website provided by a third party provider. Each of the user RWEs 2160 has at least one profile IO containing, for example, demographic information about each user.
[00119] The data relationships in the illustrated embodiment discussed above are exemplary, and do not exhaust the myriad number of entities and IOs that can be directly or indirectly related to the questioning user RWE 2100. The questioning user RWE 2100 can be indirectly related to a large, and potentially unbounded set of entities and data known to the network through various data relationships and at varying degrees of separation. For example, the user's friends 2160 each may patronize different businesses and restaurants, maintain their own BLOGs, be in a different physical location at any point in time, and so forth. The total set of RWEs and IOs directly or indirectly related to the questioning user RWE 2100 provide a detailed picture of the user's current and historical contexts that can be used to augment questions posed by a user within that context.
[00120] Similarly, each answering user RWE 2500 is associated, directly or indirectly, with a potentially unbounded set of RWEs and IOs through a network of data relationships. In the illustrated embodiment, each answering user RWE 2500 is directly associated with RWEs for businesses and restaurants 2530 and 2540 patronized by the users and RWEs representing the current location 2510 of the users. Each answering user RWE 2500 is further directly associated with IOs representing user emails 2520, user BLOGs 2550 and user profiles 2502. The RWEs for businesses and restaurants 2530 and 2540 each are associated with IOs 2532 and 2542 for information relating to the business and restaurant respectively. The total set of RWEs and IOs directly or indirectly related to the answering user RWEs 2500 provide a detailed picture of the answering user's current and historical contexts that can be used to select users whose answers are most likely to be helpful or of interest to the questioning user.
[00121] There can also be relationships between a questioning user RWE and answering user RWEs. Such relationships may arise through similar interests, common friends, common physical locations, common online browsing, community or communications and so forth. In the illustrated embodiment, at least one of the RWEs 2160 for the questioning user's friends is an answering user RWE 2500 and at least one of the questioning users emails 2120 is associated with an answering user RWE, for example, because the email is directed to, or refers to, the answering user the RWE relates to.
[00122] In one embodiment, within a W4 COMN, the relationships shown in FIG. 9 are built and maintained by one or more correlation engines within a W4 engine which services the W4 COMN. The creation of such relationships may be automatic and part of the normal operation of the W4 COMN. Alternatively, such relationships can be created on demand.
[00123] In one embodiment, questions 2108 that are being posted for the first time are inserted into the knowledge database 2940 and can be responded to by answering users. In one embodiment, every question inserted into the knowledge database 2940 is associated with the context of the questioning user at the time the question was posed. In one embodiment, questions in the knowledge database 2940 which have been asked multiple times by various users are associated with the contexts of all, or substantially all, of the questioning users at the time the question was posed. In one embodiment, every answer inserted into the knowledge database 2940 is associated with the context of the answering user at the time the answer was given.
[00124] In one embodiment, the query augmentation engine 2920 can automatically create a question IO 2108 by examining the current context of a user RWE 2100 and matching the user's context to contexts for questions stored in the knowledge database 2940. The IO 2108 can then be sent to the user's proxy device 2104 as a suggested question.
[00125] FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of a process 3000 of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide augmented queries for a knowledge system.
[00126] A question is received 3010, over a network, from a questioning user relating to any topic of interest to the user. The question comprises, at a minimum, an identification of a user and at least one question criteria. The identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login, an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network. The identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website. In one embodiment, the identification of a user refers to the questioning user. In one embodiment, the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the questioning user.)
[00127] Question criteria can, without limitation, comprise any spatial, temporal, topical or social criteria relating to real world entities and topics of interest. In one embodiment, the criteria can be related to one another using standard relational or set operators. In one embodiment, the question can be stated as a natural language query. In one embodiment, the question can be stated as a media object such as a photo or video or audio clip. In one embodiment, query criteria are tokens formed with standard characters such as words or symbols.
[00128] In one embodiment, query criteria can include data objects. For example, a user could enter the query such as "what is this?<image>", "show me more like this<image>", or "who wrote the lyrics to this?<media>" where <image> and <media> represent actual image and media data objects the user attaches to the question. In one embodiment, questioning user can submit an image or video clip in real-time, for example, of a co-located building or object. The process can then automatically format a question to gather a set of similar multimedia content labeled with the name, function, known information related to the building/object. [00129] The identification of a user and the question criteria are then 3020 used to formulate a first query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network (including network databases 3022 and sensors 3024) that relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria. In formulating the query, if a data object is included in among the question criteria, the data object can be processed to help further define the object by, without limitation, extracting keywords from the object content, extracting metadata from the object, classifying the object using an image classifier, deriving a checksum, or deriving a signature from the object.
[00130] The user context data is then used, via processing capabilities available to the network, to add additional criteria to the original question 3030 to create a modified question qualified with user context data. The additional criteria can be any kind of spatial, temporal, social or topical criteria that qualify, personalize and refine the original question so as to form a more specific and targeted question. In one embodiment, the original question criteria and the additional question criteria are formed into multiple questions that can range in specificity or relate to alternative topics.
[00131] Optionally, the modified question or questions can be transmitted to the user 3040, via the network, so as to allow the user to select specific modified questions for further processing. After the user completes his or her selection, the user's selection is received over the network 3050 and only selected questions are processed.
[00132] The identification of a user and modified question criteria are then used to formulate a second query 3060 so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network (including network databases 3022 and sensors 3024 and knowledge databases 3062) that relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria. The identified knowledge data retrieved by the second query can be an exact match to the modified question criteria, or can be a close fit. For example, the question "where's a good sushi or Thai restaurant in Santa Fe?" could retrieve a related question "where's a good seafood restaurant in Santa Fe?" or "where's a good Japanese restaurant in the Santa Fe area?"
[00133] In one embodiment, knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a plurality of users. In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises an identification of each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers. In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers at the time such questions and answers were entered (that is to say, the context of the users at the time the questions and answers were entered.)
[00134] In one embodiment, the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a plurality of users who have consumed the knowledge data (e.g. any users who have viewed the knowledge data.) In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the data was consumed (e.g., the context of the users viewing the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was viewed.)
[00135] In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises a selection of a best answer, wherein the user who originally entered the question has selected a best answer from among the answers posted. In one embodiment, the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data (e.g.. the number of times a question or answer was selected or viewed.) In one embodiment, the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations which, in one embodiment, can be entered by any user of the system. In one embodiment, the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness by users, which can be entered by the questioning user or by consuming users.
[00136] In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data. In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who entered the knowledge data relating to the user's questions. In another embodiment, the identified knowledge data can be ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who discovered, browsed or interacted with the knowledge data relating to the user's questions, e.g. as search results to a similar or identical query or context. The selected knowledge data is then transmitted 3070 to the end user. Data transmitted to questioning users can be formatted in any electronic format suitable for consumption or display by a user device such as, for example, HTML or XML documents.
[00137] In one embodiment, if no knowledge data is a close fit to the modified question, the modified question, the original question or both are posted to the knowledge databases 3062 such that other users can view the questions and post answers.
[00138] FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment of a process 4000 of how a network, for example, a W4 COMN, can use temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a user to provide automatically generated context sensitive queries.
[00139] As part of the normal operation of a W4 COMN, the current context of users is constantly updated. Spatial, temporal, topical and social data is tracked, correlated and indexed for individual users from a panoply of sources. The W4 COMN can, if a user carries a geo-locatable proxy device, track the user's location in real time. The W4 COMN can infer activities that a user engages in by extracting interaction data from a variety of sources such as emails, text messages and so forth. The W4 COMN can also be aware of a person's preferences, aversions, hobbies, social circle and so forth. Every instant, a user's context, the Who, What, When and Where surrounding a user can change.
[00140] Over time, knowledge database is accumulated, users in various contexts will tend to ask similar, or identical questions. The knowledge database can be made context aware by storing the context of the user asking a question at the time the question was asked. Where a question is frequently repeated in a particular context, on an empirical basis, it can be inferred that such a question has particular relevance to users in such a context. Thus, the knowledge database not only accumulates the knowledge of the users using the database, but also effectively indexes questions by context, enabling the system to suggest questions where none are asked.
[00141] The process begins when a request for a suggested question or questions is received 4010 over a network from or on behalf of a requesting user. The request could be triggered by a user-initiated event, such as a user taking a user interface action on a proxy device or when a user speaks a keyword or key phrase into a cell phone or PDA. The request could be automatically triggered on behalf of the user by a process within the W4 COMN on a periodic basis, such as every hour. The request could also be automatically triggered on behalf of the user by the W4 COMN or a W4 COMN application based upon sensor or data values on the proxy device beyond a specific threshold so as to initiate a question without user involvement. For example, a proxy device may sense quick de-acceleration over a small distance followed by an impact, and derive that the user has been in some kind of accident, thus triggering a knowledge data request and response.
[00142] More generally, a process within the W4 COMN could track multiple spatial, temporal, topical or social variables in a user's current context and trigger a request for a suggested question when any such variables change. For example, the process could trigger a request for a suggested question when a user physically enters a new town, a new city or a new neighborhood, when a user downloads and listens to a new song, when a user sends an email or a text message or when a user meets a friend by chance on the street.
[00143] In another example, the trigger event can be a change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user. The sensor can be associated with the user's proxy device (e.g. the temperature goes up drastically, so a suggested question might be "what to do in a fire" comes up or accelerometer stops quickly, so "what to do in a crash" comes up, etc.) The sensor could be a network sensor located in proximity to the user (e.g. a traffic or weather sensor. [00144] The request comprises, at a minimum, an identification of a user. The identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network. The identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website. In one embodiment, the identification of a user refers to the requesting user. In one embodiment, the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the requesting user) who is relevant to the query, e.g. co- located with the requesting user or a preferred filtering source for the requesting user on this subject matter.
[00145] In the next step of the process a first query is formulated 4020 so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network (including network databases 3022 and sensors 3024 and knowledge databases 3062) that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context. In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data comprises a set of questions and answers entered by a plurality of users which can be transmitted 4070 directly to the user without further processing. In one embodiment, the process identifies the best match question and answer pair and further identifies closely related questions.
[00146] In one embodiment the process only identifies questions relevant to the identified user's current context. The identified questions can be transmitted to the requesting user 4030, via the network, so as to allow the requesting user to select specific questions for further processing. After the user completes his or her selections, the user's selection is received over the network 4040 and only selected questions are processed. If the first query did not retrieve answers to the selected questions, the selected questions are used to formulate a second query 4060 so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the selected question criteria and the user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the user and the selected questions. [00147] In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who entered the knowledge data relating to the user's questions. The selected knowledge data is then transmitted 4060 to the requesting user. Data transmitted to requesting users can be formatted in any electronic format suitable for consumption or display by a user device such as, for example, HTML or XML documents. In one embodiment, knowledge data returned to a requesting user is filtered using user preferences. For example, a user may choose to filter adult or unwanted topics/subjects, sources, users or any other combination of spatial, temporal, social or topical criteria.
[00148] In one embodiment, when a suggested question is selected by a user, the knowledge database is updated to reflect the fact the question has been selected by the user. In one embodiment, the number of times a question has been selected is stored on the knowledge database. In one embodiment, the context of every user that has selected the question is recorded on the knowledge database. In one embodiment, selection count data can be used to rank the identified knowledge data transmitted to the end user. In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the context of the identified user and the current or historical context of the users who have selected the question in the past.
[00149] FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of an Query Augmentation Engine 5000 capable of supporting processes such as that illustrated in FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 that provides query augmentation and automatically generated context sensitive queries within a network, such as a W4 COMN, having temporal, spatial, and social data relating to a users.
[00150] The Query Augmentation Engine 5000 comprises four managers, a User Manager 5100, a Query Analyzer Manager 5200, a Question Manager 5300 and an Answer Manager 5400. In one embodiment, the Query Augmentation Engine 5000 is a component of a W4 COMN. In another embodiment, the Query Augmentation Engine 5000 resides on one or more servers and is connected to a network that has access to spatial, social, temporal and topical data relating to a plurality of users. In one embodiment, each of the managers 5100, 5200, 5300 and 5400 are comprised of one or more modules, some of which can be shared between one or more managers. One or more of such modules may be components of other engines within a W4 COMN.
[00151] The Query Augmentation Engine 5000 is accessible, via the W4 COMN, to users entering questions 5140 and answering questions 5160. The users 5140 and 5160 are shown inside of clouds indicating that each user asks or answers questions from within a cloud of spatial, temporal, topical and social data associations — the user's current context. Knowledge data is stored in one or more knowledge databases 5900 accessible via the network.
[00152] In one embodiment, the W4 COMN continuously gathers spatial, temporal, social and topical data relating to entities known to the network 5600, which can include persons 5610, locations 5620, businesses 5640, sensors 5660, and events 5680. In one embodiment, using spatial, temporal, social and topical data available about a specific user, topic or logical data object every entity known to the W4 COMN can be mapped and represented against all other known entities and data objects in order to create both a micro graph for every entity as well as a global graph that relates all known entities with one another. In one embodiment, such relationships between entities and data objects are stored in a global index within the W4 COMN. In one embodiment, W4 data and the global index are stored on one or more databases accessible to the network 5800.
[00153] The User Manager 5100 provides facilities that allow end users to access the services of the Query Augmentation Engine 5000. The User Manager 5100 is configured to receive questions from questioning users 5140, over a network, relating to any topic of interest to the users. The questions each comprise, at a minimum, an identification of a user and at least one question criteria. The identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network. The identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website. In one embodiment, the identification of a user refers to the questioning user. In one embodiment, the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the questioning user.)
[00154] Question criteria can, without limitation, comprise any spatial, temporal, topical or social criteria relating to real world entities and topics of interest. In one embodiment, In one embodiment, the criteria can be related to one another using standard relational or set operators. In one embodiment, the question can be stated as a natural language query. In one embodiment, the question can be stated as a media object such as a photo or video or audio clip. In one embodiment, query criteria are tokens formed with standard characters such as words or symbols.
[00155] In one embodiment, query criteria can include data objects. For example, a user could enter the query such as "what is this?<image>", "where can I find one of these?<image>", or "who wrote the lyrics to this?<media>" where <image> and <media> represent actual image and media data objects the user attaches to the question. In one embodiment, the User Manager is configured to allow questioning users to submit images or video clips in real-time of a co-located building or object. The User Manager can then automatically format a question to return to the user a set of similar multimedia content labeled with the name, function, known information related to the building/object.
[00156] The User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to receive requests for suggested questions. The request comprises, at a minimum, an identification of a user. The identification of a user can be, without limitation, a name, a login an email address, a certified introduction from a trusted source or any other token or set of tokens that uniquely identifies a user within the network. The identification could comprise a user ID on a social networking website. In one embodiment, the identification of a user refers to the requesting user. In one embodiment, the identification of the user can refer to a second user (i.e. other than the requesting user.)
[00157] In one embodiment, requests for suggested questions are triggered by a user- initiated event, such as a user taking a user interface action on a proxy device or when a user speaks a keyword or key phrase into an cell phone or PDA. In one embodiment, the User Manager 5100 can automatically trigger a suggested question on behalf of the user on a periodic basis, such as every hour. In one embodiment, the User Manager tracks multiple spatial, temporal, topical or social variables in a user's current context and triggers a request for a suggested question when any such variables change. In one embodiment, the change in the requesting user's current context data can be change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user. In one embodiment, the change in the requesting user's current context data can be change in the user's physical location (detected, for example, through a geo-locatable proxy device.)
[00158] The User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to transmit questions modified by the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 or identified by the Question Manager 5300 (described in more detail below) back to questioning users and to receive selections of questions from questioning users. The User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to transmit knowledge data identified by the Question Manager 5300 in response to user questions back to the questioning users 5140. Data transmitted to questioning users 5140 can be formatted in any electronic format suitable for consumption or display by a user device such as, for example, HTML or XML documents. In one embodiment, data is transmitted to questioning users 5140 via an API.
[00159] The User Manager 5100 is additionally configured to receive answers to posted questions from answering users 5160. The User Manager 5100 can provide an interface to allow answering users 5160 to browse questions posted by questioning users 5140. In one embodiment, answers can include data objects, such as media objects, text objects, formatted documents and so forth. In one embodiment, the User Manager 5100 provides an API that allows third party applications on user proxy devices to display questions and post answers to questions.
[00160] The Query Analyzer Manager 5200 provides facilities to analyze and augment user questions received by the User Manager 5100. In one embodiment, for each question received by the User Manager 5100, the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 uses the identification of users and question criteria to a formulate queries so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network (including network databases 5800 and sensors 5700) and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria. If a data object is included in the question criteria, the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 can process the data object to help further define the object by, without limitation, extracting keywords from the object content, extracting metadata from the object, classifying the object using an image classifier, deriving a checksum, or deriving a signature from the object.
[00161] In one embodiment, the Query Analyzer Manager 5200 is further configured, to use user context data to add additional criteria to questions to create modified questions qualified with user context data. The additional criteria can be any kind of spatial, temporal, social or topical criteria that qualify, personalize and refine the original question so as to form a more specific and targeted question. In one embodiment, the original question criteria and the additional question criteria can formed into multiple questions that can range in specificity or relate to alternative topics.
[00162] The Question Manager 5300 provides facilities that allow users to access and knowledge data stored in the knowledge databases 5800. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can receive modified questions from the Query Analyzer Manager 5200. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can receive unmodified questions from the User Manager 5100. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can receive selected questions from the User Manager 5100.
[00163] In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 uses the identification of users and question criteria to formulate queries so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network (including network databases 5800, sensors 5700, and knowledge databases) and relates to the question criteria and the identified users so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the user and question criteria. In one embodiment, identified knowledge data is passed to the User Manager 5100 for transmission back to questioning users 5140. The identified knowledge data retrieved by the queries can be an exact match to the question criteria, or can be a close fit. [00164] In one embodiment, knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a plurality of users. In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises an identification of each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers. In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who entered the questions and answers at the time such questions and answers were entered (that is to say, the context of the users at the time the questions and answers were entered.)
[00165] In one embodiment, the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a plurality of users who have consumed the knowledge data (e.g. any users who have viewed the knowledge data.) In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the plurality of users who have consumed the knowledge data at the time the data was consumed (e.g., the context of the users viewing the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was viewed.)
[00166] In one embodiment, the knowledge data additionally comprises a selection of a best answer, wherein the user who originally entered the question has selected a best answer from among the answers posted. In one embodiment, the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data (e.g.. the number of times a question or answer was selected or viewed.) In one embodiment, the the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations which, in one embodiment, can be entered by any user of the system. In one embodiment, the knowledge data for at least some some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness by users, which can be entered by the questioning user or by consuming users.
[00167] In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can receive requests for suggested questions from the User Manager 5100, each request comprising at least an identification of a user. In one embodiment, for every request for a suggested question, a query is formulated so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data and relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the user's current context. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 only identifies questions that are responsive to the requests for suggested questions. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 identifies questions and answers that are responsive to the requests for suggested questions. In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is passed to the User Manager 5100 for transmission back to questioning users 5160.
[00168] In one embodiment, if only questions are initially retrieved by the Question Manager 5300, the User Manager 5100 can present the questions to requesting users 5140 for selection and receive selections of suggested questions from the users. The Question Manager 5300 can then use the selected questions to formulate queries so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data and relates to selected question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the selected questions. In one embodiment, the identified knowledge data is passed to the User Manager 5100 for transmission back to requesting users 5160.
[00169] In one embodiment, when a suggested question is selected by a user, the Question Manager 5300 updates the knowledge database 5900 to reflect the fact the question has been selected by the user. In one embodiment, the number of times a question has been selected is stored on the knowledge database. In one embodiment, the context of every user that has selected the question is recorded on the knowledge database. In one embodiment, selection count data can be used to rank the identified knowledge data transmitted to the end user.
[00170] In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can rank identified knowledge data is based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data. In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can rank identified knowledge data based the closeness of fit between the context of the user entering the original question, and the current or historical context of the users who entered the knowledge data relating to the user's questions, (e.g. the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was collected. )
[00171] In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 can rank identified knowledge data based the closeness of fit between the context of the user entering the original question, and the current or historical context of the users who consumed the knowledge data relating to the user's questions, (e.g. the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed. )
[00172] In one embodiment, the Question Manager 5300 is configured to add questions to the knowledge databases 5800 when a user enters a question that has not previously been posed. In one embodiment, each question added to the knowledge databases comprises an identification of a user and at least one question criteria, which may include data objects. In one embodiment, for each question added to the knowledge database, the Question Manager 5300 adds spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related the user who entered the question at the time the question was entered (that is to say, the context of the user at the time the question was entered.) In one embodiment, if a question contains a data object, the data object is added to the knowledge database in association with the question. In one embodiment, if the same question is asked by more that one user, the context of every user entering the question is added to the knowledge database in association with the question.
[00173] In one embodiment, the Answer Manager 5400 is configured to add answers to the knowledge databases 5800 when a user answers a question using, in one embodiment, a user interface provided by the User Manager 5100. In one embodiment, each answer added to the knowledge databases comprises an identification of a user and answer data, which can include text, and other data objects such as media objects. In one embodiment, for each question added to the knowledge database, the Answer Manager 5400 adds spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related the user who entered the answer at the time the question was entered (that is to say, the context of the user at the time the answer was entered.) In one embodiment, the Answer Manager is further configured to receive selections of best answers, wherein the user who originally entered the question has selected a best answer from among the answers posted.
[00174] Those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods and systems of the present disclosure may be implemented in many manners and as such are not to be limited by the foregoing exemplary embodiments and examples. In other words, functional elements being performed by single or multiple components, in various combinations of hardware and software or firmware, and individual functions, may be distributed among software applications at either the client level or server level or both. In this regard, any number of the features of the different embodiments described herein may be combined into single or multiple embodiments, and alternate embodiments having fewer than, or more than, all of the features described herein are possible. Functionality may also be, in whole or in part, distributed among multiple components, in manners now known or to become known. Thus, myriad software/hardware/firmware combinations are possible in achieving the functions, features, interfaces and preferences described herein. Moreover, the scope of the present disclosure covers conventionally known manners for carrying out the described features and functions and interfaces, as well as those variations and modifications that may be made to the hardware or software or firmware components described herein as would be understood by those skilled in the art now and hereafter.
[00175] Furthermore, the embodiments of methods presented and described as flowcharts in this disclosure are provided by way of example in order to provide a more complete understanding of the technology. The disclosed methods are not limited to the operations and logical flow presented herein. Alternative embodiments are contemplated in which the order of the various operations is altered and in which sub-operations described as being part of a larger operation are performed independently. [00176] While various embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, such embodiments should not be deemed to limit the teaching of this disclosure to those embodiments. Various changes and modifications may be made to the elements and operations described above to obtain a result that remains within the scope of the systems and processes described in this disclosure.

Claims

CLAIMSWe claim:
1. A method comprising: receiving a question, over a network, from a questioning user, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to the at least one question criteria; modifying the question, via the network, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; formulating a second query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the questioning user.
2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the identification of a user is selected from the list: a name, a login an email address, a user ID on a social networking website, a certified introduction from a trusted source.
3. The method of Claim 1 wherein the identification of a user refers to the questioning user.
4. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one question criteria comprise spatial, temporal, topical and social criteria.
5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one question criteria are related to one another using standard relational operators
6. The method of Claim 1 wherein the question is stated as a natural language query.
7. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one question criteria comprises at least one data object.
8. The method of Claim 7 wherein the at least one data object is selected from the list: image file, audio file, media object, document.
9. The method of Claim 7 wherein the at least one data object is a media object captured by the questioning user in real-time.
10. The method of Claim 7 wherein the data object is processed to extract metadata from the object which is used in formulating the first and second queries.
11. The method of Claim 1 wherein the knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a first plurality of users.
12. The method of Claim 11 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data.
13. The method of Claim 12 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was entered.
14. The method of Claim 11 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data.
15. The method of Claim 14 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
16. The method of Claim 11 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data.
17. The method of Claim 11 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations.
18. The method of Claim 11 wherein the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness.
19. The method of Claim 1 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data.
20. The method of Claim 13 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was entered.
21. The method of Claim 15 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
22. The method of Claim 1 wherein the identified knowledge data transmitted to the questioning user is filtered using user preferences.
23. The method of Claim 22 wherein the user preferences comprise spatial, temporal, social and topical criteria.
24. A method comprising: receiving a question, over a network, from a questioning user, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to the at least one question criteria; modifying the question, via the network, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; transmitting, over the network, the at least one modified question to the questioning user; receiving, over a network, from the questioning user, a selection of at least one of the at least one modified questions; formulating a second query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the criteria of the selected at least one modified questions and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the criteria of the selected at least one modified questions; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the questioning user.
25. A method comprising: receiving a request for at least one suggested question, over a network, from a requesting user, the question comprising an identification of a user; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
26. The method of Claim 25 wherein the identification of a user is selected from the list: a name, a login an email address, a user ID on a social networking website, a certified introduction from a trusted source.
27. The method of Claim 25 wherein the identification of a user refers to the requesting user.
28. The method of Claim 25 wherein the request is submitted in response to a user initiated event on the requesting user's proxy device.
29. The method of Claim 25 wherein the request is automatically submitted on behalf of the requesting user in response to a trigger event.
30. The method of Claim 29 wherein the trigger event is the expiration of a time interval.
31. The method of Claim 29 wherein the trigger event is a change in the requesting user's current context data.
32. The method of Claim 31 wherein the change in the requesting user's current context data is a change in the requesting user's current physical location.
33. The method of Claim 31 wherein the change in the requesting user's current context data is a change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user.
34. The method of Claim 25 wherein the knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a first plurality of users.
35. The method of Claim 34 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data.
36. The method of Claim 35 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data at the time such knowledge data was entered.
37. The method of Claim 34 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data.
38. The method of Claim 37 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
39. The method of Claim 34 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data.
40. The method of Claim 34 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations.
41. The method of Claim 34 wherein the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness.
42. The method of Claim 25 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data.
43. The method of Claim 36 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was entered
44. The method of Claim 38 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was entered.
45. The method of Claim 25 wherein the identified knowledge data transmitted to the questioning user is filtered using user preferences.
46. The method of Claim 45 wherein the user preferences comprise spatial, temporal, social and topical criteria.
47. A method comprising: receiving a request for at least one suggested question, over a network, from a requesting user, the question comprising an identification of a user; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify at least one question relevant to the identified user's current context; transmitting, over the network, the identified at least one question to the requesting user; receiving, over a network, from the requesting user, a selection of at least one of the identified at least one questions; formulating a second query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the criteria of the selected at least one question and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the criteria of the selected at least one questions; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
48. The method of Claim 32 comprising the additional step of updating the knowledge data relating to the selected at least one questions to reflect that the selected at least one questions was selected by the requesting user.
49. The method of Claim 33 wherein the knowledge data relating to the selected at least one questions is updated to reflect the number of times the question has been selected.
50. The method of Claim 33 wherein the knowledge data relating to the selected at least one questions is updated to include the context data for substantially all users that have selected the question.
51. A system comprising: a user manager that receives questions, over a network, from questioning users, each question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria a query analyzer manager that, for each question received by the user manager, formulates a query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to question criteria, wherein the query analyzer manager modifies the question, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; a question manager that, for each modified question, formulates a query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria, wherein the identified knowledge data is transmitted by the user manager, via the network, to the questioning user.
52. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the identification of a user is selected from the list: a name, a login an email address, a user ID on a social networking website, a certified introduction from a trusted source.
53. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the identification of a user refers to the questioning user.
54. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the at least one question criteria comprise spatial, temporal, topical and social criteria.
55. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the at least one question criteria are related to one another using standard relational operators
56. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the question is stated as a natural language query.
57. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the at least one question criteria comprises at least one data object.
58. The system of Claim 57 wherein the at least one data object is selected from the list: image file, audio file, media object, document.
59. The system of Claim 57 wherein the at least one data object is a media object captured by the questioning user in real-time.
60. The system of Claim 51 wherein, for at least some questions, the data object is processed by the query analyzer manager to extract metadata from the object which is used in formulating the first and second queries.
61. The system of Claim 51 wherein the knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a first plurality of users.
62. The system of Claim 61 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data.
63. The system of Claim 62 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data at the time such knowledge data was entered.
64. The system of Claim 61 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data.
65. The system of Claim 64 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
66. The system of Claim 61 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data.
67. The system of Claim 61 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations.
68. The system of Claim 61 wherein the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness.
69. The system of Claim 61 wherein for each modified question processed by the question manager, the identified knowledge data is ranked by the question manager based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data.
70. The system of Claim 61 wherein for each modified question processed by the question manager, the identified knowledge data is ranked by the question manager based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was entered.
71. The system of Claim 64 wherein for each modified question processed by the question manager, the identified knowledge data is ranked by the question manager based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
72. The system of Claim 51 wherein the identified knowledge data transmitted to the questioning user is filtered by the user manager using user preferences.
73. The system of Claim 71 wherein the user preferences comprise spatial, temporal, social and topical criteria.
74. The system of Claim 51 wherein the user manager is further configured to transmit, over the network, modified questions to questioning users so as to allow the questioning users to select modified questions to be processed by the question manager, wherein the user manager is further configured to receive selections of modified questions from questioning users, and the question manager is further configured to only process modified questions that have been selected by questioning users.
75. A system comprising: a user manager that receives requests for at least one suggested question, over a network, from requesting users, the request comprising an identification of a user; a question manager that, for each request received by the user manager, formulate queries so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context, wherein the user manager transmits, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
76. The system of Claim 75 wherein the identification of a user is selected from the list: a name, a login an email address, a user ID on a social networking website, a certified introduction from a trusted source.
77. The system of Claim 75 wherein the identification of a user refers to the requesting user.
78. The system of Claim 75 wherein at least some requests are transmitted to the user manager in response to a user initiated event on the requesting user's proxy device.
79. The system of Claim 75 wherein at least some requests are automatically generated by the user manager in response to a trigger event.
80. The system of Claim 79 wherein the trigger event is the expiration of a time interval.
81. The system of Claim 79 wherein the trigger event is a change in the requesting user's current context data.
82. The system of Claim 79 wherein the change in the requesting user's current context data is a change in the requesting user's current physical location.
83. The system of Claim 79 wherein the change in the requesting user's current context data is a change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user.
84. The system of Claim 75 wherein the knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a first plurality of users.
85. The system of Claim 84 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data.
86. The system of Claim 85 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data at the time such knowledge data was entered.
87. The system of Claim 84 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data.
88. The system of Claim 87 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
89. The system of Claim 84 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data.
90. The system of Claim 84 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations.
91. The system of Claim 84 wherein the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness.
92. The system of Claim 75 wherein for each modified question processed by the question manager, the identified knowledge data is ranked by the question manager based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data.
93. The system of Claim 86 wherein for each modified question processed by the question manager, the identified knowledge data is ranked by the question manager based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was entered.
94. The system of Claim 88 wherein for each modified question processed by the question manager, the identified knowledge data is ranked by the question manager based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
95. The system of Claim 75 wherein the identified knowledge data transmitted to the questioning user is filtered by the user manager using user preferences.
96. The system of Claim 95 wherein the user preferences comprise spatial, temporal, social and topical criteria.
97. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for method comprising the steps of: receiving a question, over a network, from a questioning user, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to the at least one question criteria; modifying the question, via the network, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; formulating a second query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the modified question criteria and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the modified question criteria; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the questioning user.
98. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the identification of a user is selected from the list: a name, a login an email address, a user ID on a social networking website, a certified introduction from a trusted source.
99. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the identification of a user refers to the questioning user.
100. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the at least one question criteria comprise spatial, temporal, topical and social criteria.
101. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the at least one question criteria are related to one another using standard relational operators
102. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the question is stated as a natural language query.
103. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the at least one question criteria comprises at least one data object.
104. The computer-readable medium of Claim 103 wherein the at least one data object is selected from the list: image file, audio file, media object, document.
105. The computer-readable medium of Claim 103 wherein the at least one data object is a media object captured by the questioning user in real-time.
106. The computer-readable medium of Claim 103 wherein the data object is processed to extract metadata from the object which is used in formulating the first and second queries.
107. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a first plurality of users.
108. The computer-readable medium of Claim 107 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data.
109. The computer-readable medium of Claim 108 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was entered.
110. The computer-readable medium of Claim 107 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data.
111. The computer-readable medium of Claim 110 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
112. The computer-readable medium of Claim 107 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data.
113. The computer-readable medium of Claim 107 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations.
114. The computer-readable medium of Claim 107 wherein the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness.
115. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data.
116. The computer-readable medium of Claim 109 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was entered.
117. The computer-readable medium of Claim 111 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
118. The computer-readable medium of Claim 97 wherein the identified knowledge data transmitted to the questioning user is filtered using user preferences.
119. The computer-readable medium of Claim 118 wherein the user preferences comprise spatial, temporal, social and topical criteria.
120. A computer-readable comprising: receiving a question, over a network, from a questioning user, the question comprising an identification of a user and at least one question criteria; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network, for user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the question criteria and the identified user so as to identify user context data relevant to the at least one question criteria; modifying the question, via the network, using the user context data to create at least one modified question having at least one additional criteria based on the user context data; transmitting, over the network, the at least one modified question to the questioning user; receiving, over a network, from the questioning user, a selection of at least one of the at least one modified questions; formulating a second query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the criteria of the selected at least one modified questions and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the criteria of the selected at least one modified questions; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the questioning user.
121. A computer-readable comprising : receiving a request for at least one suggested question, over a network, from a requesting user, the question comprising an identification of a user; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user's current context; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
122. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the identification of a user is selected from the list: a name, a login an email address, a user ID on a social networking website, a certified introduction from a trusted source.
123. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the identification of a user refers to the requesting user.
124. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the request is submitted in response to a user initiated event on the requesting user's proxy device.
125. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the request is automatically submitted on behalf of the requesting user in response to a trigger event.
126. The computer-readable medium of Claim 125 wherein the trigger event is the expiration of a time interval.
127. The computer-readable medium of Claim 125 wherein the trigger event is a change in the requesting user's current context data.
128. The computer-readable medium of Claim 127 wherein the change in the requesting user's current context data is a change in the requesting user's current physical location.
129. The computer-readable medium of Claim 125 wherein the change in the requesting user's current context data is a change in the state of a sensor associated with the requesting user.
130. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the knowledge data comprises questions and answers entered by a first plurality of users.
131. The computer-readable medium of Claim 130 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data.
132. The computer-readable medium of Claim 131 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the knowledge data at the time such knowledge data was entered.
133. The computer-readable medium of Claim 130 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises an identification of at least one of a second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data.
134. The computer-readable medium of Claim 133 wherein the knowledge data for each question and answer additionally comprises spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
135. The computer-readable medium of Claim 130 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises consumption popularity data.
136. The computer-readable medium of Claim 130 wherein the knowledge data for at least some questions and answers additionally comprises annotations.
137. The computer-readable medium of Claim 130 wherein the knowledge data for at least some answers additionally comprises ratings of the answer's usefulness.
138. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between the modified question criteria and the identified knowledge data.
139. The computer-readable medium of Claim 132 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the first plurality of users who entered the identified knowledge data at the time the identified knowledge data was entered.
140. The computer-readable medium of Claim 134 wherein the identified knowledge data is ranked based on the closeness of fit between social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available, via the network, that relates to the identified user and the spatial, temporal, social and topical data that related to each of the second plurality of users who consumed the identified knowledge data at the time the knowledge data was consumed.
141. The computer-readable medium of Claim 121 wherein the identified knowledge data transmitted to the questioning user is filtered using user preferences.
142. The computer-readable medium of Claim 141 wherein the user preferences comprise spatial, temporal, social and topical criteria.
143. A computer-readable comprising: receiving a request for at least one suggested question, over a network, from a requesting user, the question comprising an identification of a user; formulating a first query so as to search, via the network for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data available to the network that relates to the identified user so as to identify at least one question relevant to the identified user's current context; transmitting, over the network, the identified at least one question to the requesting user; receiving, over a network, from the requesting user, a selection of at least one of the identified at least one questions; formulating a second query so as to search, via the network, for knowledge data, user profile data, social network data, spatial data, temporal data and topical data that is available via the network and relates to the criteria of the selected at least one question and the identified user so as to identify knowledge data relevant to the identified user and the criteria of the selected at least one questions; transmitting, over the network, the identified knowledge data to the requesting user.
144. The computer-readable medium of Claim 143 comprising the additional step of updating the knowledge data relating to the selected at least one questions to reflect that the selected at least one questions was selected by the requesting user.
145. The computer-readable medium of Claim 144 wherein the knowledge data relating to the selected at least one questions is updated to reflect the number of times the question has been selected.
146. The computer-readable medium of Claim 144 wherein the knowledge data relating to the selected at least one questions is updated to include context data for substantially all users that have selected the question.
PCT/US2009/060476 2008-12-05 2009-10-13 System and method for context based query augmentation WO2010065195A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/329,038 2008-12-05
US12/329,038 US8055675B2 (en) 2008-12-05 2008-12-05 System and method for context based query augmentation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010065195A1 true WO2010065195A1 (en) 2010-06-10

Family

ID=42232220

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/060476 WO2010065195A1 (en) 2008-12-05 2009-10-13 System and method for context based query augmentation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US8055675B2 (en)
TW (1) TWI443532B (en)
WO (1) WO2010065195A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10409851B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2019-09-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Gesture-based search
KR20190113712A (en) * 2012-09-10 2019-10-08 구글 엘엘씨 Answering questions using environmental context
US10444979B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2019-10-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Gesture-based search
US10984337B2 (en) * 2012-02-29 2021-04-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Context-based search query formation
WO2022190079A1 (en) * 2021-03-09 2022-09-15 Webtalk Ltd Dynamic audio content generation

Families Citing this family (138)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7624172B1 (en) 2000-03-17 2009-11-24 Aol Llc State change alerts mechanism
US9736209B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2017-08-15 Facebook, Inc. State change alerts mechanism
US7606819B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2009-10-20 Maya-Systems Inc. Multi-dimensional locating system and method
US8316306B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2012-11-20 Maya-Systems Inc. Method and system for sequentially navigating axes of elements
US20080058106A1 (en) 2002-10-07 2008-03-06 Maya-Systems Inc. Multi-dimensional locating game system and method
US8965964B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-24 Facebook, Inc. Managing forwarded electronic messages
US8701014B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2014-04-15 Facebook, Inc. Account linking
US7640306B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-12-29 Aol Llc Reconfiguring an electronic message to effect an enhanced notification
US7899862B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2011-03-01 Aol Inc. Dynamic identification of other users to an online user
US7428580B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2008-09-23 Aol Llc Electronic message forwarding
US8122137B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2012-02-21 Aol Inc. Dynamic location of a subordinate user
US7590696B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-09-15 Aol Llc Enhanced buddy list using mobile device identifiers
US8005919B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2011-08-23 Aol Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
CA2506585A1 (en) 2002-11-18 2004-06-03 Valerie Kucharewski People lists
US20040210639A1 (en) 2003-03-26 2004-10-21 Roy Ben-Yoseph Identifying and using identities deemed to be known to a user
US7653693B2 (en) 2003-09-05 2010-01-26 Aol Llc Method and system for capturing instant messages
US8375048B1 (en) * 2004-01-20 2013-02-12 Microsoft Corporation Query augmentation
US8788588B2 (en) 2006-05-03 2014-07-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method of providing service for user search, and apparatus, server, and system for the same
US8826123B2 (en) 2007-05-25 2014-09-02 9224-5489 Quebec Inc. Timescale for presenting information
CA2601154C (en) 2007-07-07 2016-09-13 Mathieu Audet Method and system for distinguising elements of information along a plurality of axes on a basis of a commonality
US8601392B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2013-12-03 9224-5489 Quebec Inc. Timeline for presenting information
CA2657835C (en) 2008-03-07 2017-09-19 Mathieu Audet Documents discrimination system and method thereof
US20090287693A1 (en) 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Mathieu Audet Method for building a search algorithm and method for linking documents with an object
US8452855B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2013-05-28 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for presentation of media related to a context
US20100005085A1 (en) * 2008-07-03 2010-01-07 Oracle International Corporation Creating relationship maps from enterprise application system data
CA2677921C (en) 2008-09-12 2017-06-13 Mathieu Ma Audet Method of managing groups of arrays of documents
US20100125569A1 (en) * 2008-11-18 2010-05-20 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for autohyperlinking and navigation in url based context queries
US20100153215A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced search result relevance using relationship information
US10275530B2 (en) * 2009-02-02 2019-04-30 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for communal search
US9626405B2 (en) 2011-10-27 2017-04-18 Edmond K. Chow Trust network effect
WO2010141216A2 (en) * 2009-06-02 2010-12-09 Xobni Corporation Self populating address book
US20100318537A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2010-12-16 Microsoft Corporation Providing knowledge content to users
US9015597B2 (en) * 2009-07-31 2015-04-21 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Generation and implementation of a social utility grid
US9104737B2 (en) 2009-10-08 2015-08-11 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Social distance based search result order adjustment
US20110125734A1 (en) * 2009-11-23 2011-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Questions and answers generation
US20120154633A1 (en) * 2009-12-04 2012-06-21 Rodriguez Tony F Linked Data Methods and Systems
US8412770B2 (en) * 2010-02-08 2013-04-02 Yellowpages.Com Llc Providing an answer to a question from a social network site using a separate messaging site
US9223866B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2015-12-29 Yellowpages.Com Llc Tagged favorites from social network site for use in search request on a separate site
US8688791B2 (en) * 2010-02-17 2014-04-01 Wright State University Methods and systems for analysis of real-time user-generated text messages
US20110219030A1 (en) * 2010-03-03 2011-09-08 Daniel-Alexander Billsus Document presentation using retrieval path data
US8700592B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Shopping search engines
US9785987B2 (en) 2010-04-22 2017-10-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc User interface for information presentation system
US9043296B2 (en) * 2010-07-30 2015-05-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc System of providing suggestions based on accessible and contextual information
WO2012027877A1 (en) * 2010-08-30 2012-03-08 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus for conducting a search based on context
JPWO2012046562A1 (en) * 2010-10-06 2014-02-24 日本電気株式会社 Request acquisition support system, request acquisition support method and program in system development
US8762852B2 (en) * 2010-11-04 2014-06-24 Digimarc Corporation Smartphone-based methods and systems
US20120116872A1 (en) 2010-11-05 2012-05-10 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Selecting Advertisements from One or More Databases for Sending to a Publisher
US10417660B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2019-09-17 Yellowpages.Com Llc Selecting advertisements for users via a targeting database
US10565610B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2020-02-18 Yellowpages.Com Llc Ranking advertisements selected from one or more databases by georelevance
US20120173566A1 (en) * 2010-12-31 2012-07-05 Quora, Inc. Multi-functional navigation bar
US9122374B2 (en) 2011-02-01 2015-09-01 9224-5489 Quebec Inc. Expandable and collapsible arrays of documents
US8843433B2 (en) * 2011-03-29 2014-09-23 Manyworlds, Inc. Integrated search and adaptive discovery system and method
US9552376B2 (en) 2011-06-09 2017-01-24 MemoryWeb, LLC Method and apparatus for managing digital files
US8566394B2 (en) 2011-06-17 2013-10-22 Microsoft Corporation Mobile social interaction
US9390137B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2016-07-12 Nokia Technologies Oy Method and apparatus for providing an ordering metric for a multi-dimensional contextual query
US20130007061A1 (en) * 2011-06-29 2013-01-03 Nokia Corporation Apparatus and associated methods
US8849819B2 (en) 2011-08-05 2014-09-30 Deacon Johnson System and method for controlling and organizing metadata associated with on-line content
US9740883B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2017-08-22 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for enabling control of mobile device functional components
US9407492B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2016-08-02 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for enabling control of mobile device functional components
CA2790799C (en) 2011-09-25 2023-03-21 Mathieu Audet Method and apparatus of navigating information element axes
EP2763052A4 (en) * 2011-09-29 2015-05-20 Fujitsu Ltd Search method and information management device
US20130110827A1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 Microsoft Corporation Relevance of name and other search queries with social network feature
IL216059A (en) * 2011-10-31 2016-11-30 Verint Systems Ltd System and method for target profiling using social network analysis
US8868590B1 (en) 2011-11-17 2014-10-21 Sri International Method and system utilizing a personalized user model to develop a search request
US8706716B2 (en) 2011-11-23 2014-04-22 Rawllin International Inc. Iterative and dynamic search of publicly available data based on augmentation of search terms and validation of data relevance
US9819753B2 (en) 2011-12-02 2017-11-14 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for logging and reporting mobile device activity information
US9154901B2 (en) 2011-12-03 2015-10-06 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for disabling and enabling mobile device functional components
US20130151514A1 (en) * 2011-12-09 2013-06-13 Yahoo! Inc. Extracting tips
US20130159404A1 (en) * 2011-12-19 2013-06-20 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus for initiating a task based on contextual information
US10002194B2 (en) * 2011-12-22 2018-06-19 James Neil Russell Event location with social network integration
US9922378B2 (en) * 2011-12-27 2018-03-20 Nokia Technologies Oy Method and apparatus for providing intent-based monitoring using sensory information
US9390403B2 (en) * 2012-02-09 2016-07-12 International Business Machines Corporation Augmented screen sharing in an electronic meeting
US9183597B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2015-11-10 Location Labs, Inc. Mobile user classification system and method
US9489531B2 (en) * 2012-05-13 2016-11-08 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for controlling access to electronic devices
US9519693B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2016-12-13 9224-5489 Quebec Inc. Method and apparatus for displaying data element axes
US9646080B2 (en) 2012-06-12 2017-05-09 9224-5489 Quebec Inc. Multi-functions axis-based interface
US9141707B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2015-09-22 Facebook, Inc. Context-based object retrieval in a social networking system
US8935299B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2015-01-13 Facebook, Inc. Identifying relevant data for pages in a social networking system
US20140030688A1 (en) * 2012-07-25 2014-01-30 Armitage Sheffield, Llc Systems, methods and program products for collecting and displaying query responses over a data network
US10621880B2 (en) 2012-09-11 2020-04-14 International Business Machines Corporation Generating secondary questions in an introspective question answering system
US8903914B2 (en) * 2012-10-10 2014-12-02 Microsoft Corporation Selecting user accounts in social network to answer question
US20140122612A1 (en) * 2012-10-26 2014-05-01 Xiaomu Wu Activity-Based Discoverable Mode
US9591452B2 (en) 2012-11-28 2017-03-07 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for enabling mobile device applications and functional components
US9734220B2 (en) 2012-12-04 2017-08-15 Planet Os Inc. Spatio-temporal data processing systems and methods
US9554190B2 (en) 2012-12-20 2017-01-24 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for controlling communication device use
US9015162B2 (en) * 2013-01-25 2015-04-21 International Business Machines Corporation Integrating smart social question and answers enabled for use with social networking tools
US20140244837A1 (en) * 2013-02-26 2014-08-28 Adience SER LTD Determining a user's identity from an interaction with an identifiable service
US10560324B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-02-11 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for enabling user device control
US9685001B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-06-20 Blackberry Limited System and method for indicating a presence of supplemental information in augmented reality
US9244952B2 (en) 2013-03-17 2016-01-26 Alation, Inc. Editable and searchable markup pages automatically populated through user query monitoring
US9646062B2 (en) * 2013-06-10 2017-05-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc News results through query expansion
US10984430B2 (en) 2013-08-12 2021-04-20 Thryv, Inc. Sales lead qualification of a consumer based on sales lead rules
US9407767B2 (en) 2013-07-31 2016-08-02 Yp Llc Systems and methods for tracking calls responsive to advertisements using back channel messaging and data channel communications
US9886523B2 (en) * 2013-09-16 2018-02-06 Delonaco Limited Intelligent search and service customization
KR101549220B1 (en) 2013-10-15 2015-09-03 네이버 주식회사 Method and System for Managing Database, and Tree Structure for Database
KR20150045774A (en) * 2013-10-21 2015-04-29 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for searching context awareness
US9898554B2 (en) * 2013-11-18 2018-02-20 Google Inc. Implicit question query identification
US20150151195A1 (en) * 2013-11-22 2015-06-04 Donald F. Pettigrew, SR. Song Guessing Card Game
US9396236B1 (en) * 2013-12-31 2016-07-19 Google Inc. Ranking users based on contextual factors
US8812647B1 (en) 2014-04-03 2014-08-19 Yp Intellectual Property Llc Centralized publisher management
US9756091B1 (en) 2014-03-21 2017-09-05 Google Inc. Providing selectable content items in communications
CN103914548B (en) * 2014-04-10 2018-01-09 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Information search method and device
US9754284B2 (en) * 2014-05-22 2017-09-05 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for event triggered search results
US10148805B2 (en) 2014-05-30 2018-12-04 Location Labs, Inc. System and method for mobile device control delegation
US11354340B2 (en) 2014-06-05 2022-06-07 International Business Machines Corporation Time-based optimization of answer generation in a question and answer system
US9785684B2 (en) * 2014-06-05 2017-10-10 International Business Machines Corporation Determining temporal categories for a domain of content for natural language processing
US9690860B2 (en) * 2014-06-30 2017-06-27 Yahoo! Inc. Recommended query formulation
US9740746B2 (en) 2014-07-23 2017-08-22 International Business Machines Corporation Question answer system using physical distance data
US9781261B2 (en) 2014-08-12 2017-10-03 Yp Llc Systems and methods for lead routing
US9703860B2 (en) 2014-10-06 2017-07-11 International Business Machines Corporation Returning related previously answered questions based on question affinity
US10347146B2 (en) 2014-12-23 2019-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Managing answer feasibility
US10366107B2 (en) 2015-02-06 2019-07-30 International Business Machines Corporation Categorizing questions in a question answering system
US9996604B2 (en) 2015-02-09 2018-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Generating usage report in a question answering system based on question categorization
CN106033418B (en) 2015-03-10 2020-01-31 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Voice adding and playing method and device, and picture classifying and retrieving method and device
US10795921B2 (en) 2015-03-27 2020-10-06 International Business Machines Corporation Determining answers to questions using a hierarchy of question and answer pairs
US10997512B2 (en) 2015-05-25 2021-05-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Inferring cues for use with digital assistant
US10289740B2 (en) * 2015-09-24 2019-05-14 Searchmetrics Gmbh Computer systems to outline search content and related methods therefor
US11216735B2 (en) * 2015-10-05 2022-01-04 Verizon Media Inc. Method and system for providing synthetic answers to a personal question
KR102558437B1 (en) 2015-11-27 2023-07-24 삼성전자주식회사 Method For Processing of Question and answer and electronic device supporting the same
US10467888B2 (en) * 2015-12-18 2019-11-05 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for dynamically adjusting an emergency coordination simulation system
US10740375B2 (en) * 2016-01-20 2020-08-11 Facebook, Inc. Generating answers to questions using information posted by users on online social networks
US10289729B2 (en) * 2016-03-17 2019-05-14 Google Llc Question and answer interface based on contextual information
US10372767B2 (en) * 2016-08-22 2019-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Sensor based context augmentation of search queries
US10275519B2 (en) * 2016-08-22 2019-04-30 International Business Machines Corporation Sensor based context augmentation of search queries
US9842297B1 (en) * 2016-09-29 2017-12-12 International Business Machines Corporation Establishing industry ground truth
US10762082B2 (en) 2017-01-05 2020-09-01 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for augmenting answers from a QA system with additional temporal and geographic information
US20180203856A1 (en) 2017-01-17 2018-07-19 International Business Machines Corporation Enhancing performance of structured lookups using set operations
US10956409B2 (en) * 2017-05-10 2021-03-23 International Business Machines Corporation Relevance model for session search
US20180336280A1 (en) * 2017-05-17 2018-11-22 Linkedin Corporation Customized search based on user and team activities
US10671266B2 (en) 2017-06-05 2020-06-02 9224-5489 Quebec Inc. Method and apparatus of aligning information element axes
US10242502B2 (en) 2017-07-27 2019-03-26 Facebook, Inc. Providing an augmented reality overlay for display over a view of a user
CN108399216A (en) * 2018-02-07 2018-08-14 山东浪潮通软信息科技有限公司 A kind of intelligent assistant's realization method and system based on software function
US11042505B2 (en) * 2018-04-16 2021-06-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Identification, extraction and transformation of contextually relevant content
US10885081B2 (en) 2018-07-02 2021-01-05 Optum Technology, Inc. Systems and methods for contextual ranking of search results
US10936178B2 (en) 2019-01-07 2021-03-02 MemoryWeb, LLC Systems and methods for analyzing and organizing digital photos and videos
US11025704B2 (en) 2019-07-08 2021-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and systems for enhanced component relationships in representations of distributed computing systems
CN111428019B (en) * 2020-04-02 2023-07-28 出门问问信息科技有限公司 Data processing method and equipment for knowledge base questions and answers
TWI754489B (en) * 2020-12-14 2022-02-01 中華電信股份有限公司 Shopping service system and voice control shopping method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050055321A1 (en) * 2000-03-06 2005-03-10 Kanisa Inc. System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US20060047615A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Yael Ravin Knowledge management system automatically allocating expert resources
US20060184508A1 (en) * 2001-05-01 2006-08-17 Fuselier Christopher S Methods and system for providing context sensitive information

Family Cites Families (364)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6850252B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2005-02-01 Steven M. Hoffberg Intelligent electronic appliance system and method
US5446891A (en) 1992-02-26 1995-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation System for adjusting hypertext links with weighed user goals and activities
US5544352A (en) * 1993-06-14 1996-08-06 Libertech, Inc. Method and apparatus for indexing, searching and displaying data
US5583763A (en) 1993-09-09 1996-12-10 Mni Interactive Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system
US5493692A (en) 1993-12-03 1996-02-20 Xerox Corporation Selective delivery of electronic messages in a multiple computer system based on context and environment of a user
US5758257A (en) 1994-11-29 1998-05-26 Herz; Frederick System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US6571279B1 (en) 1997-12-05 2003-05-27 Pinpoint Incorporated Location enhanced information delivery system
EP0718784B1 (en) 1994-12-20 2003-08-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for the retrieval of personalized information
US5651068A (en) 1995-03-08 1997-07-22 Hewlett-Packard Company International cryptography framework
JP3134040B2 (en) 1995-05-25 2001-02-13 三菱電機株式会社 Time division multiplex communication control method
US5764906A (en) 1995-11-07 1998-06-09 Netword Llc Universal electronic resource denotation, request and delivery system
AU1122997A (en) 1995-11-07 1997-06-11 Cadis, Inc. Search engine for remote object oriented database management system
US5794210A (en) 1995-12-11 1998-08-11 Cybergold, Inc. Attention brokerage
US5802510A (en) 1995-12-29 1998-09-01 At&T Corp Universal directory service
US5781879A (en) 1996-01-26 1998-07-14 Qpl Llc Semantic analysis and modification methodology
JP2785794B2 (en) 1996-03-25 1998-08-13 日本電気株式会社 Dynamic channel allocation method and apparatus
US6014638A (en) 1996-05-29 2000-01-11 America Online, Inc. System for customizing computer displays in accordance with user preferences
US6457004B1 (en) 1997-07-03 2002-09-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Document retrieval assisting method, system and service using closely displayed areas for titles and topics
US6021403A (en) 1996-07-19 2000-02-01 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent user assistance facility
US5920854A (en) * 1996-08-14 1999-07-06 Infoseek Corporation Real-time document collection search engine with phrase indexing
US5933811A (en) 1996-08-20 1999-08-03 Paul D. Angles System and method for delivering customized advertisements within interactive communication systems
US20050165699A1 (en) 1996-11-12 2005-07-28 Hahn-Carlson Dean W. Processing and management of transaction timing characteristics
US5836771A (en) * 1996-12-02 1998-11-17 Ho; Chi Fai Learning method and system based on questioning
US6098065A (en) 1997-02-13 2000-08-01 Nortel Networks Corporation Associative search engine
US7236969B1 (en) 1999-07-08 2007-06-26 Nortel Networks Limited Associative search engine
US6708184B2 (en) 1997-04-11 2004-03-16 Medtronic/Surgical Navigation Technologies Method and apparatus for producing and accessing composite data using a device having a distributed communication controller interface
US20010013009A1 (en) 1997-05-20 2001-08-09 Daniel R. Greening System and method for computer-based marketing
US6064978A (en) * 1997-06-24 2000-05-16 Experts Exchange, Inc. Question and answer system using computer networks
US6182068B1 (en) * 1997-08-01 2001-01-30 Ask Jeeves, Inc. Personalized search methods
US6047234A (en) 1997-10-16 2000-04-04 Navigation Technologies Corporation System and method for updating, enhancing or refining a geographic database using feedback
US6708203B1 (en) 1997-10-20 2004-03-16 The Delfin Project, Inc. Method and system for filtering messages based on a user profile and an informational processing system event
US6112181A (en) 1997-11-06 2000-08-29 Intertrust Technologies Corporation Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information
US6157924A (en) 1997-11-07 2000-12-05 Bell & Howell Mail Processing Systems Company Systems, methods, and computer program products for delivering information in a preferred medium
US6212552B1 (en) 1998-01-15 2001-04-03 At&T Corp. Declarative message addressing
SE511584C2 (en) 1998-01-15 1999-10-25 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M information Routing
JP3004254B2 (en) 1998-06-12 2000-01-31 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 Statistical sequence model generation device, statistical language model generation device, and speech recognition device
US6141010A (en) 1998-07-17 2000-10-31 B. E. Technology, Llc Computer interface method and apparatus with targeted advertising
US6317722B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2001-11-13 Amazon.Com, Inc. Use of electronic shopping carts to generate personal recommendations
US6845370B2 (en) 1998-11-12 2005-01-18 Accenture Llp Advanced information gathering for targeted activities
US6859799B1 (en) 1998-11-30 2005-02-22 Gemstar Development Corporation Search engine for video and graphics
US6324519B1 (en) * 1999-03-12 2001-11-27 Expanse Networks, Inc. Advertisement auction system
US6523172B1 (en) 1998-12-17 2003-02-18 Evolutionary Technologies International, Inc. Parser translator system and method
US7073129B1 (en) 1998-12-18 2006-07-04 Tangis Corporation Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context
US6826552B1 (en) 1999-02-05 2004-11-30 Xfi Corporation Apparatus and methods for a computer aided decision-making system
US6397307B2 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-05-28 Legato Systems, Inc. Method and system for mirroring and archiving mass storage
US6694316B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2004-02-17 Microstrategy Inc. System and method for a subject-based channel distribution of automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data
US6741980B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2004-05-25 Microstrategy Inc. System and method for automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via content delivery device
US7039639B2 (en) 1999-03-31 2006-05-02 International Business Machines Corporation Optimization of system performance based on communication relationship
US6327590B1 (en) 1999-05-05 2001-12-04 Xerox Corporation System and method for collaborative ranking of search results employing user and group profiles derived from document collection content analysis
US6490698B1 (en) 1999-06-04 2002-12-03 Microsoft Corporation Multi-level decision-analytic approach to failure and repair in human-computer interactions
US7181438B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2007-02-20 Alberti Anemometer, Llc Database access system
US6889382B1 (en) 1999-07-27 2005-05-03 Mediaone Group, Inc. Remote TV control system
CN1176432C (en) 1999-07-28 2004-11-17 国际商业机器公司 Method and system for providing national language inquiry service
US7178107B2 (en) 1999-09-16 2007-02-13 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Audiovisual information management system with identification prescriptions
EP1087321A1 (en) 1999-09-24 2001-03-28 Alcatel A method of manipulating an already sent E-Mail and a corresponding server
AUPQ312299A0 (en) 1999-09-27 1999-10-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and system for addressing audio-visual content fragments
US7010492B1 (en) 1999-09-30 2006-03-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamic distribution of controlled and additional selective overlays in a streaming media
US6665640B1 (en) 1999-11-12 2003-12-16 Phoenix Solutions, Inc. Interactive speech based learning/training system formulating search queries based on natural language parsing of recognized user queries
US7139557B2 (en) 1999-11-15 2006-11-21 Pango Networks, Inc. Systems, devices and methods for providing services in a proximity-base environment
US6968313B1 (en) 1999-11-15 2005-11-22 H Three, Inc. Method and apparatus for facilitating and tracking personal referrals
US20010047384A1 (en) 1999-11-29 2001-11-29 John Croy Methods and systems for providing personalized content over a network
US7062510B1 (en) 1999-12-02 2006-06-13 Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. Consumer profiling and advertisement selection system
US7284033B2 (en) 1999-12-14 2007-10-16 Imahima Inc. Systems for communicating current and future activity information among mobile internet users and methods therefor
US7822823B2 (en) 1999-12-14 2010-10-26 Neeraj Jhanji Systems for communicating current and future activity information among mobile internet users and methods therefor
US6845448B1 (en) * 2000-01-07 2005-01-18 Pennar Software Corporation Online repository for personal information
US20030191816A1 (en) 2000-01-11 2003-10-09 Spoovy, Llc System and method for creating and delivering customized multimedia communications
US6314365B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2001-11-06 Navigation Technologies Corp. Method and system of providing navigation services to cellular phone devices from a server
US6662195B1 (en) 2000-01-21 2003-12-09 Microstrategy, Inc. System and method for information warehousing supporting the automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via content delivery device
US20020035605A1 (en) 2000-01-26 2002-03-21 Mcdowell Mark Use of presence and location information concerning wireless subscribers for instant messaging and mobile commerce
US6829333B1 (en) 2000-01-31 2004-12-07 Frazier Spaeth Llc Automated system for messaging based on chains of relationships
US6789073B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2004-09-07 Harvey Lunenfeld Client-server multitasking
FI112433B (en) 2000-02-29 2003-11-28 Nokia Corp Location-related services
US20010035880A1 (en) 2000-03-06 2001-11-01 Igor Musatov Interactive touch screen map device
US7320025B1 (en) 2002-03-18 2008-01-15 Music Choice Systems and methods for providing a broadcast entertainment service and an on-demand entertainment service
AU2001243637A1 (en) 2000-03-14 2001-09-24 Blue Dolphin Group, Inc. Method of selecting content for a user
US6773344B1 (en) 2000-03-16 2004-08-10 Creator Ltd. Methods and apparatus for integration of interactive toys with interactive television and cellular communication systems
US6785670B1 (en) 2000-03-16 2004-08-31 International Business Machines Corporation Automatically initiating an internet-based search from within a displayed document
US6601012B1 (en) 2000-03-16 2003-07-29 Microsoft Corporation Contextual models and methods for inferring attention and location
US7260837B2 (en) 2000-03-22 2007-08-21 Comscore Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for user identification, user demographic reporting and collecting usage data usage biometrics
WO2001076120A2 (en) * 2000-04-04 2001-10-11 Stick Networks, Inc. Personal communication device for scheduling presentation of digital content
US6757661B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2004-06-29 Netzero High volume targeting of advertisements to user of online service
US7725523B2 (en) 2000-04-11 2010-05-25 Bolnick David A System, method and computer program product for gathering and delivering personalized user information
US6714158B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2004-03-30 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and system for data detection in a global positioning system satellite receiver
US6731940B1 (en) 2000-04-28 2004-05-04 Trafficmaster Usa, Inc. Methods of using wireless geolocation to customize content and delivery of information to wireless communication devices
US6985839B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2006-01-10 Technocom Corporation System and method for wireless location coverage and prediction
CA2349914C (en) 2000-06-09 2013-07-30 Invidi Technologies Corp. Advertising delivery method
US7404084B2 (en) 2000-06-16 2008-07-22 Entriq Inc. Method and system to digitally sign and deliver content in a geographically controlled manner via a network
WO2002001416A2 (en) 2000-06-23 2002-01-03 The Johns Hopkins University Architecture for distributed database information access
US6954778B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2005-10-11 Microsoft Corporation System and method for accessing directory service via an HTTP URL
GB0017380D0 (en) 2000-07-14 2000-08-30 Mailround Com Limited Information communication system
KR20040041082A (en) 2000-07-24 2004-05-13 비브콤 인코포레이티드 System and method for indexing, searching, identifying, and editing portions of electronic multimedia files
US6494457B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2002-12-17 Shelly Conte Enhanced hide and seek game and method of playing game
US6618717B1 (en) 2000-07-31 2003-09-09 Eliyon Technologies Corporation Computer method and apparatus for determining content owner of a website
US6882977B1 (en) 2000-07-31 2005-04-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and facility for displaying customer activity and value
US20020052786A1 (en) 2000-08-09 2002-05-02 Lg Electronics Inc. Informative system based on user's position and operating method thereof
US6931254B1 (en) 2000-08-21 2005-08-16 Nortel Networks Limited Personalized presentation system and method
US7437312B2 (en) 2000-08-23 2008-10-14 Bizrate.Com Method for context personalized web browsing
EP1187485B1 (en) 2000-09-11 2003-04-02 MediaBricks AB Method for providing media content over a digital network
US20020111956A1 (en) 2000-09-18 2002-08-15 Boon-Lock Yeo Method and apparatus for self-management of content across multiple storage systems
US6907465B1 (en) 2000-09-22 2005-06-14 Daniel E. Tsai Electronic commerce using personal preferences
US7865306B2 (en) 2000-09-28 2011-01-04 Michael Mays Devices, methods, and systems for managing route-related information
JP2003044708A (en) 2000-10-02 2003-02-14 Omron Corp Information mediating system and information mediating method to be used in the system
US6502033B1 (en) 2000-10-05 2002-12-31 Navigation Technologies Corp. Turn detection algorithm for vehicle positioning
US6904160B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2005-06-07 Red Hen Systems, Inc. Method for matching geographic information with recorded images
US20020112035A1 (en) 2000-10-30 2002-08-15 Carey Brian M. System and method for performing content experience management
US6961731B2 (en) 2000-11-15 2005-11-01 Kooltorch, L.L.C. Apparatus and method for organizing and/or presenting data
US7925967B2 (en) 2000-11-21 2011-04-12 Aol Inc. Metadata quality improvement
US20020065844A1 (en) 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Rich Robinson Metadata internet platform for enabling customization of tags in digital images
AUPR230700A0 (en) 2000-12-22 2001-01-25 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha A method for facilitating access to multimedia content
US7058508B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2006-06-06 Energy Control Technologies Automated building service broker
JP2002222145A (en) 2001-01-26 2002-08-09 Fujitsu Ltd Method of transmitting electronic mail, computer program, and recording medium
US20020138331A1 (en) 2001-02-05 2002-09-26 Hosea Devin F. Method and system for web page personalization
US7027801B1 (en) 2001-02-06 2006-04-11 Nortel Networks Limited Method delivering location-base targeted advertisements to mobile subscribers
US6701311B2 (en) 2001-02-07 2004-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation Customer self service system for resource search and selection
US20050015451A1 (en) 2001-02-15 2005-01-20 Sheldon Valentine D'arcy Automatic e-mail address directory and sorting system
CA2437726A1 (en) 2001-02-15 2002-08-22 Suffix Mail Inc. E-mail messaging system
US20020133400A1 (en) 2001-03-13 2002-09-19 Boomerangmarketing.Com Incorporated Systems and methods for internet reward service
WO2002076077A1 (en) 2001-03-16 2002-09-26 Leap Wireless International, Inc. Method and system for distributing content over a wireless communications system
WO2002078229A1 (en) 2001-03-21 2002-10-03 Stine John A An access and routing protocol for ad hoc networks using synchronous collision resolution and node state dissemination
US7512407B2 (en) 2001-03-26 2009-03-31 Tencent (Bvi) Limited Instant messaging system and method
US20020173971A1 (en) 2001-03-28 2002-11-21 Stirpe Paul Alan System, method and application of ontology driven inferencing-based personalization systems
JP2002297753A (en) 2001-03-30 2002-10-11 Fujitsu Ltd System for providing image data
ITTO20010296A1 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-09-30 Telecom Italia Lab Spa METHOD FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF LOCALIZATION DATA OF MOBILE APPARATUS FOR MOBILE TELEPHONY.
US7039643B2 (en) 2001-04-10 2006-05-02 Adobe Systems Incorporated System, method and apparatus for converting and integrating media files
JP3709423B2 (en) 2001-04-13 2005-10-26 繁幸 梨木 Word-of-mouth information transmission device, word-of-mouth information transmission method, and word-of-mouth information transmission program
CA2452380A1 (en) 2001-05-08 2002-11-14 Ipool Corporation Privacy protection system and method
US20020198786A1 (en) 2001-05-30 2002-12-26 Tripp Cynthia Pope Marketing system
US7194512B1 (en) 2001-06-26 2007-03-20 Palm, Inc. Method and apparatus for wirelessly networked distributed resource usage for data gathering
US20030009495A1 (en) 2001-06-29 2003-01-09 Akli Adjaoute Systems and methods for filtering electronic content
US20030008661A1 (en) 2001-07-03 2003-01-09 Joyce Dennis P. Location-based content delivery
US6798358B2 (en) 2001-07-03 2004-09-28 Nortel Networks Limited Location-based content delivery
US20030009367A1 (en) 2001-07-06 2003-01-09 Royce Morrison Process for consumer-directed prescription influence and health care product marketing
EP1282054A1 (en) 2001-08-01 2003-02-05 Alcatel Method for implementing an appointment service for participants of a communication network, and a service processor and program module for such
US6778979B2 (en) 2001-08-13 2004-08-17 Xerox Corporation System for automatically generating queries
US7284191B2 (en) 2001-08-13 2007-10-16 Xerox Corporation Meta-document management system with document identifiers
FI115419B (en) 2001-08-20 2005-04-29 Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu User-specific personalization of information services
US7185286B2 (en) * 2001-08-28 2007-02-27 Nvidia International, Inc. Interface for mobilizing content and transactions on multiple classes of devices
US7403938B2 (en) * 2001-09-24 2008-07-22 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Natural language query processing
EP2290916B1 (en) 2001-09-28 2015-12-16 Level 3 CDN International, Inc. Configurable adaptive global traffic control and management
US20030078978A1 (en) 2001-10-23 2003-04-24 Clifford Lardin Firmware portable messaging units utilizing proximate communications
US7421466B2 (en) 2001-10-29 2008-09-02 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Dynamic mapping of wireless network devices
WO2003038377A1 (en) 2001-11-02 2003-05-08 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Terminal apparatus
US7136871B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2006-11-14 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for selectively displaying advertisements
US6781920B2 (en) 2001-12-05 2004-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method for resolving meeting conflicts within an electronic calendar application
WO2003067473A1 (en) 2002-02-04 2003-08-14 Cataphora, Inc. A method and apparatus for sociological data mining
US20030149574A1 (en) 2002-02-05 2003-08-07 Rudman Daniel E. Method for providing media consumers with total choice and total control
JP2005518114A (en) 2002-02-14 2005-06-16 アバイア テクノロジー コーポレーション Presence tracking and namespace interconnect technology
US7680796B2 (en) 2003-09-03 2010-03-16 Google, Inc. Determining and/or using location information in an ad system
US20060069616A1 (en) 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 David Bau Determining advertisements using user behavior information such as past navigation information
US7013149B2 (en) 2002-04-11 2006-03-14 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Environment aware services for mobile devices
US7065345B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2006-06-20 Stephen J. Carlton Data processing apparatus and method for correlation analysis
US20050192025A1 (en) 2002-04-22 2005-09-01 Kaplan Richard D. Method and apparatus for an interactive tour-guide system
US20050182824A1 (en) 2002-04-30 2005-08-18 Pierre-Alain Cotte Communications web site
US20040015588A1 (en) 2002-07-22 2004-01-22 Web.De Ag Communications environment having multiple web sites
US20040148341A1 (en) 2003-01-29 2004-07-29 Web.De Ag Web site having an individual event settings element
US8611919B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2013-12-17 Wounder Gmbh., Llc System, method, and computer program product for providing location based services and mobile e-commerce
US7194463B2 (en) 2002-05-28 2007-03-20 Xerox Corporation Systems and methods for constrained anisotropic diffusion routing within an ad hoc network
US20060026067A1 (en) 2002-06-14 2006-02-02 Nicholas Frank C Method and system for providing network based target advertising and encapsulation
US7209915B1 (en) 2002-06-28 2007-04-24 Microsoft Corporation Method, system and apparatus for routing a query to one or more providers
US7707317B2 (en) 2002-07-01 2010-04-27 Prolifiq Software Inc. Adaptive electronic messaging
US7752072B2 (en) 2002-07-16 2010-07-06 Google Inc. Method and system for providing advertising through content specific nodes over the internet
JP4300767B2 (en) 2002-08-05 2009-07-22 ソニー株式会社 Guide system, content server, portable device, information processing method, information processing program, and storage medium
US7363345B2 (en) 2002-08-27 2008-04-22 Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company Electronic notification delivery mechanism selection based on recipient presence information and notification content
US7570943B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2009-08-04 Nokia Corporation System and method for providing context sensitive recommendations to digital services
US7657907B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2010-02-02 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Automatic user profiling
US7254581B2 (en) 2002-11-13 2007-08-07 Jerry Johnson System and method for creation and maintenance of a rich content or content-centric electronic catalog
US7802724B1 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-09-28 Steven Paul Nohr Identifications and communications methods
US20040203909A1 (en) 2003-01-01 2004-10-14 Koster Karl H. Systems and methods for location dependent information download to a mobile telephone
US8225194B2 (en) 2003-01-09 2012-07-17 Kaleidescape, Inc. Bookmarks and watchpoints for selection and presentation of media streams
US7305445B2 (en) 2003-01-28 2007-12-04 Microsoft Corporation Indirect disposable email addressing
US7406502B1 (en) 2003-02-20 2008-07-29 Sonicwall, Inc. Method and system for classifying a message based on canonical equivalent of acceptable items included in the message
US7543237B2 (en) 2003-03-19 2009-06-02 Accenture Global Servicecs Gmbh Dynamic collaboration assistant
KR100478019B1 (en) 2003-04-03 2005-03-22 엔에이치엔(주) Method and system for generating a search result list based on local information
US7007014B2 (en) 2003-04-04 2006-02-28 Yahoo! Inc. Canonicalization of terms in a keyword-based presentation system
US7613687B2 (en) 2003-05-30 2009-11-03 Truelocal Inc. Systems and methods for enhancing web-based searching
US7069308B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2006-06-27 Friendster, Inc. System, method and apparatus for connecting users in an online computer system based on their relationships within social networks
US7392311B2 (en) 2003-06-19 2008-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for throttling events in an information technology system
US20050015599A1 (en) 2003-06-25 2005-01-20 Nokia, Inc. Two-phase hash value matching technique in message protection systems
US20040267880A1 (en) 2003-06-30 2004-12-30 Kestutis Patiejunas System and method for delivery of media content
US7219013B1 (en) 2003-07-31 2007-05-15 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Method and system for fault detection and exclusion for multi-sensor navigation systems
US8200775B2 (en) 2005-02-01 2012-06-12 Newsilike Media Group, Inc Enhanced syndication
US20060236258A1 (en) 2003-08-11 2006-10-19 Core Mobility, Inc. Scheduling of rendering of location-based content
US7213036B2 (en) 2003-08-12 2007-05-01 Aol Llc System for incorporating information about a source and usage of a media asset into the asset itself
US7529811B2 (en) 2003-08-21 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for the implementation of a core schema for providing a top-level structure for organizing units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system
US7840892B2 (en) 2003-08-29 2010-11-23 Nokia Corporation Organization and maintenance of images using metadata
US7849103B2 (en) 2003-09-10 2010-12-07 West Services, Inc. Relationship collaboration system
US8639520B2 (en) 2003-10-06 2014-01-28 Cerner Innovations, Inc. System and method for creating a visualization indicating relationships and relevance to an entity
US7752210B2 (en) 2003-11-13 2010-07-06 Yahoo! Inc. Method of determining geographical location from IP address information
US7529215B2 (en) 2003-11-17 2009-05-05 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Encapsulation of independent transmissions over internal interface of distributed radio base station
US8306874B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2012-11-06 Buy.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for word of mouth selling via a communications network
WO2005054994A2 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-06-16 Buy.Com, Inc. Method and system for word of mouth advertising via a communications network
US20050203801A1 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-09-15 Jared Morgenstern Method and system for collecting, sharing and tracking user or group associates content via a communications network
CA2490220A1 (en) 2003-12-15 2005-06-15 Gordon Wilson Method and interface system for facilitating access to fantasy sports leagues
KR100556438B1 (en) 2004-01-02 2006-03-03 엘지전자 주식회사 Remote Controller of The Display Device and Method for Controlling of The Same
US20050151849A1 (en) 2004-01-13 2005-07-14 Andrew Fitzhugh Method and system for image driven clock synchronization
US20050160080A1 (en) 2004-01-16 2005-07-21 The Regents Of The University Of California System and method of context-specific searching in an electronic database
US8375048B1 (en) * 2004-01-20 2013-02-12 Microsoft Corporation Query augmentation
US8015119B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2011-09-06 Google Inc. Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
US7472113B1 (en) * 2004-01-26 2008-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Query preprocessing and pipelining
US7707122B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2010-04-27 Yahoo ! Inc. System and method of information filtering using measures of affinity of a relationship
US7269590B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2007-09-11 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for customizing views of information associated with a social network user
US7522995B2 (en) 2004-02-05 2009-04-21 Nortrup Edward H Method and system for providing travel time information
US10417298B2 (en) 2004-12-02 2019-09-17 Insignio Technologies, Inc. Personalized content processing and delivery system and media
US20050216295A1 (en) 2004-02-27 2005-09-29 Abrahamsohn Daniel A A Method of and system for obtaining data from multiple sources and ranking documents based on meta data obtained through collaborative filtering and other matching techniques
WO2005089286A2 (en) 2004-03-15 2005-09-29 America Online, Inc. Sharing social network information
JP2005293020A (en) 2004-03-31 2005-10-20 Fujitsu Ltd Method for searching for video data of moving object, apparatus for imaging/detecting moving object, and apparatus for searching for video data of moving object
US7379968B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2008-05-27 International Business Machines Corporation Multiple moderation for networked conferences
US7746376B2 (en) 2004-06-16 2010-06-29 Felipe Mendoza Method and apparatus for accessing multi-dimensional mapping and information
US7984037B2 (en) 2004-07-16 2011-07-19 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for evaluating xpath-like fragment identifiers of audio-visual content
US7958115B2 (en) 2004-07-29 2011-06-07 Yahoo! Inc. Search systems and methods using in-line contextual queries
WO2006025044A2 (en) 2004-07-29 2006-03-09 Ziv Ben-Yehuda System and method for travel planning
US20070043766A1 (en) 2005-08-18 2007-02-22 Nicholas Frank C Method and System for the Creating, Managing, and Delivery of Feed Formatted Content
US20060040719A1 (en) 2004-08-20 2006-02-23 Jason Plimi Fantasy sports league pre-draft logic method
US8615731B2 (en) 2004-08-25 2013-12-24 Mohit Doshi System and method for automating the development of web services that incorporate business rules
US20060053058A1 (en) 2004-08-31 2006-03-09 Philip Hotchkiss System and method for gathering consumer feedback
US20060047563A1 (en) 2004-09-02 2006-03-02 Keith Wardell Method for optimizing a marketing campaign
US20060069612A1 (en) 2004-09-28 2006-03-30 Microsoft Corporation System and method for generating an orchestrated advertising campaign
US20060085392A1 (en) 2004-09-30 2006-04-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for automatic generation of search results based on local intention
DE102004050785A1 (en) 2004-10-14 2006-05-04 Deutsche Telekom Ag Method and arrangement for processing messages in the context of an integrated messaging system
KR101061265B1 (en) 2004-10-19 2011-08-31 야후! 인크. System and method for location based social networking
US7324957B2 (en) 2004-10-21 2008-01-29 Soundstarts, Inc. Proximal advertising using hand-held communication devices
US20060129313A1 (en) 2004-12-14 2006-06-15 Becker Craig H System and method for driving directions based on non-map criteria
KR100703468B1 (en) 2004-12-29 2007-04-03 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for guiding path in personal navigation terminal
US20060184579A1 (en) 2005-01-05 2006-08-17 Michael Mills Framework for providing ancillary content in a television environment
US7472397B2 (en) 2005-01-11 2008-12-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system to correlate and consolidate a plurality of events
WO2006089994A1 (en) 2005-01-12 2006-08-31 Nokia Corporation Name service in a multihop wireless ad hoc network
US7895574B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2011-02-22 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for automatically verifying management packs
US7689556B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2010-03-30 France Telecom Content navigation service
US7343364B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2008-03-11 Efunds Corporation Rules-based system architecture and systems using the same
US20060212401A1 (en) 2005-03-15 2006-09-21 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and system for network-based promotion of particular digital media items
US20060212330A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2006-09-21 Erkki Savilampi Network based processing of calendar meeting requests
US20080285886A1 (en) 2005-03-29 2008-11-20 Matthew Emmerson Allen System For Displaying Images
US7953720B1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2011-05-31 Google Inc. Selecting the best answer to a fact query from among a set of potential answers
US7777648B2 (en) 2005-04-21 2010-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Mode information displayed in a mapping application
US10210159B2 (en) 2005-04-21 2019-02-19 Oath Inc. Media object metadata association and ranking
US7466244B2 (en) 2005-04-21 2008-12-16 Microsoft Corporation Virtual earth rooftop overlay and bounding
US8732175B2 (en) 2005-04-21 2014-05-20 Yahoo! Inc. Interestingness ranking of media objects
US7607582B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2009-10-27 Microsoft Corporation Aggregation and synchronization of nearby media
US7606580B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2009-10-20 Aol Llc Personalized location information for mobile devices
US7451102B2 (en) 2005-06-03 2008-11-11 Shadow Enterprises Inc. Ordering method utilizing instant messaging
US20060282455A1 (en) 2005-06-13 2006-12-14 It Interactive Services Inc. System and method for ranking web content
US7899469B2 (en) 2005-07-12 2011-03-01 Qwest Communications International, Inc. User defined location based notification for a mobile communications device systems and methods
US7259668B2 (en) 2005-07-12 2007-08-21 Qwest Communications International Inc. Mapping the location of a mobile communications device systems and methods
WO2007092050A2 (en) 2005-08-26 2007-08-16 Spot Runner, Inc. Systems and methods for media planning, ad production, ad placement and content customization
US8560385B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2013-10-15 Bees & Pollen Ltd. Advertising and incentives over a social network
US20070150359A1 (en) 2005-09-09 2007-06-28 Lim Kok E S Social marketing network
US7577665B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-08-18 Jumptap, Inc. User characteristic influenced search results
GB2430507A (en) 2005-09-21 2007-03-28 Stephen Robert Ives System for managing the display of sponsored links together with search results on a mobile/wireless device
US20070073641A1 (en) 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Redcarpet, Inc. Method and system for improving search results
WO2007035959A2 (en) 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Grape Technology Group Inc. Enhanced directory assistance system and method including location and search functions
US7496548B1 (en) 2005-09-26 2009-02-24 Quintura, Inc. Neural network for electronic search applications
US8688673B2 (en) * 2005-09-27 2014-04-01 Sarkar Pte Ltd System for communication and collaboration
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
US7499586B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2009-03-03 Microsoft Corporation Photographing big things
US7933897B2 (en) 2005-10-12 2011-04-26 Google Inc. Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US20070088852A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2007-04-19 Zohar Levkovitz Device, system and method of presentation of advertisements on a wireless device
US7796285B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2010-09-14 Dialogic Corporation Supplementing facsimile image data
US9299077B2 (en) 2005-10-25 2016-03-29 Vie, Inc. Method and apparatus for obtaining revenue from the distribution of hyper-relevant advertising through permissive mind reading, proximity encounters, and database aggregation
US20070100956A1 (en) 2005-10-29 2007-05-03 Gopesh Kumar A system and method for enabling prospects to contact sponsoring advertisers on the telephone directly from an Internet-based advertisement with just a single-click, and efficiently tracking from what Internet location (URL) the telephone contacts are initiated.
US20070168430A1 (en) 2005-11-23 2007-07-19 Xerox Corporation Content-based dynamic email prioritizer
WO2007064874A2 (en) 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 Adchemy, Inc. Method and apparatus for representing text using search engine, document collection, and hierarchal taxonomy
US9135304B2 (en) 2005-12-02 2015-09-15 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for optimizing text searches over structured data in a multi-tenant environment
US20080086356A1 (en) 2005-12-09 2008-04-10 Steve Glassman Determining advertisements using user interest information and map-based location information
US20070150168A1 (en) 2005-12-12 2007-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Traffic channel
US7681147B2 (en) 2005-12-13 2010-03-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for determining probable meanings of inputted words
US7729901B2 (en) 2005-12-13 2010-06-01 Yahoo! Inc. System for classifying words
US7725492B2 (en) 2005-12-23 2010-05-25 Facebook, Inc. Managing information about relationships in a social network via a social timeline
US9183599B2 (en) 2005-12-14 2015-11-10 Facebook, Inc. Mapping relationships between members in a social network
US7451162B2 (en) 2005-12-14 2008-11-11 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Methods and apparatus to determine a software application data file and usage
WO2007081734A2 (en) 2006-01-04 2007-07-19 Innofone.Com, Inc. Interactive mobile messaging system
US20070162850A1 (en) 2006-01-06 2007-07-12 Darin Adler Sports-related widgets
US20070161382A1 (en) 2006-01-09 2007-07-12 Melinger Daniel J System and method including asynchronous location-based messaging
WO2007084616A2 (en) 2006-01-18 2007-07-26 Ilial, Inc. System and method for context-based knowledge search, tagging, collaboration, management and advertisement
US7788188B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2010-08-31 Hoozware, Inc. System for providing a service to venues where people aggregate
US20070185599A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2007-08-09 Yahoo! Inc. Sports player ranker
US8485876B2 (en) 2006-02-27 2013-07-16 Maurice S. Bowerman Monitoring a sports draft based on a need of a sports team and the best available player to meet that need
WO2007105212A2 (en) 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Tal David Ben Simon Device, system and method of interactive gaming and investing
US7519470B2 (en) 2006-03-15 2009-04-14 Microsoft Corporation Location-based caching for mobile devices
US20070239517A1 (en) 2006-03-29 2007-10-11 Chung Christina Y Generating a degree of interest in user profile scores in a behavioral targeting system
EP1843256A1 (en) 2006-04-03 2007-10-10 British Telecmmunications public limited campany Ranking of entities associated with stored content
US7693652B2 (en) 2006-04-05 2010-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Waypoint adjustment and advertisement for flexible routing
US8442973B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2013-05-14 Surf Canyon, Inc. Real time implicit user modeling for personalized search
US9602512B2 (en) 2006-05-08 2017-03-21 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp Methods and apparatus to distribute media delivery to mobile devices
US7503007B2 (en) 2006-05-16 2009-03-10 International Business Machines Corporation Context enhanced messaging and collaboration system
US9507778B2 (en) 2006-05-19 2016-11-29 Yahoo! Inc. Summarization of media object collections
US20070282675A1 (en) 2006-05-30 2007-12-06 Kivin Varghese Methods and systems for user-produced advertising content
US20070282621A1 (en) 2006-06-01 2007-12-06 Flipt, Inc Mobile dating system incorporating user location information
US7831586B2 (en) 2006-06-09 2010-11-09 Ebay Inc. System and method for application programming interfaces for keyword extraction and contextual advertisement generation
US20070288278A1 (en) 2006-06-13 2007-12-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for automatically scheduling and managing agendas for presentation-style meetings
US7624104B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2009-11-24 Yahoo! Inc. User-sensitive pagerank
US7742399B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2010-06-22 Harris Corporation Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) and method for implementing multiple paths for fault tolerance
US20080005313A1 (en) 2006-06-29 2008-01-03 Microsoft Corporation Using offline activity to enhance online searching
WO2008007364A2 (en) 2006-07-10 2008-01-17 Vringo, Inc. Pushed media content delivery
US7783622B1 (en) 2006-07-21 2010-08-24 Aol Inc. Identification of electronic content significant to a user
US20080028031A1 (en) 2006-07-25 2008-01-31 Byron Lewis Bailey Method and apparatus for managing instant messaging
US8266131B2 (en) 2006-07-25 2012-09-11 Pankaj Jain Method and a system for searching information using information device
US8568236B2 (en) 2006-07-28 2013-10-29 Yahoo! Inc. Fantasy sports agent
US8403756B2 (en) 2006-07-28 2013-03-26 Yahoo! Inc. Fantasy sports alert generator
US20080040283A1 (en) 2006-08-11 2008-02-14 Arcadyan Technology Corporation Content protection system and method for enabling secure sharing of copy-protected content
US20080133327A1 (en) 2006-09-14 2008-06-05 Shah Ullah Methods and systems for securing content played on mobile devices
US20080086458A1 (en) 2006-09-15 2008-04-10 Icebreaker, Inc. Social interaction tagging
US8099105B2 (en) 2006-09-19 2012-01-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Device based trigger for location push event
US8230037B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2012-07-24 Audible, Inc. Methods and apparatus for customized content delivery
US20080172632A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2008-07-17 Stambaugh Thomas M Distributed web-based processing, spatial organization and display of information
US20080109761A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2008-05-08 Stambaugh Thomas M Spatial organization and display of travel and entertainment information
US20080147655A1 (en) 2006-10-10 2008-06-19 Alok Sinha Virtual network of real-world entities
US7656851B1 (en) 2006-10-12 2010-02-02 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Adaptive message routing for mobile ad HOC networks
WO2008046043A2 (en) 2006-10-12 2008-04-17 Umagination Labs, L.P. Systems and methods for communicating personal information
US20080102911A1 (en) 2006-10-27 2008-05-01 Yahoo! Inc. Integration of personalized fantasy data with general sports content
US9817902B2 (en) 2006-10-27 2017-11-14 Netseer Acquisition, Inc. Methods and apparatus for matching relevant content to user intention
US8108501B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2012-01-31 Yahoo! Inc. Searching and route mapping based on a social network, location, and time
WO2008061121A2 (en) * 2006-11-14 2008-05-22 Hayes Paul V System and method for searching for internet-accessible content
US20080120690A1 (en) 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Microsoft Corporation Client enforced network tunnel vision
US20080120308A1 (en) 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 Ronald Martinez Methods, Systems and Apparatus for Delivery of Media
US20090234814A1 (en) 2006-12-12 2009-09-17 Marco Boerries Configuring a search engine results page with environment-specific information
US8935296B2 (en) 2006-12-14 2015-01-13 Taylor Morgen Corp. Method of facilitating contact between mutually interested people
US7769745B2 (en) 2006-12-15 2010-08-03 Yahoo! Inc. Visualizing location-based datasets using “tag maps”
US20080154720A1 (en) 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Microsoft Corporation Shopping route optimization and personalization
US20080163284A1 (en) 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 Microsoft Corporation Browse filters on a television interface
WO2008134595A1 (en) 2007-04-27 2008-11-06 Pelago, Inc. Determining locations of interest based on user visits
US7752279B2 (en) 2007-05-29 2010-07-06 Research In Motion Limited System for facilitating thread-based message prioritization
US20080320000A1 (en) 2007-06-21 2008-12-25 Sreedhar Gaddam System and Method for Managing Data and Communications Over a Network
US8321794B2 (en) 2007-06-28 2012-11-27 Microsoft Corporation Rich conference invitations with context
US8332402B2 (en) 2007-06-28 2012-12-11 Apple Inc. Location based media items
US20090012965A1 (en) 2007-07-01 2009-01-08 Decisionmark Corp. Network Content Objection Handling System and Method
US20090012934A1 (en) 2007-07-03 2009-01-08 Corbis Corporation Searching for rights limited media
US20090043844A1 (en) 2007-08-09 2009-02-12 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for name conflict resolution
US9946975B2 (en) 2007-08-24 2018-04-17 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and apparatus to identify influencers
US8001002B2 (en) 2007-09-07 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Interactively presenting advertising content offline
US20090100052A1 (en) 2007-10-16 2009-04-16 Stern Edith H Enabling collaborative networks
US8635360B2 (en) 2007-10-19 2014-01-21 Google Inc. Media playback point seeking using data range requests
US20090299837A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-12-03 Ryan Steelberg System and method for brand affinity content distribution and optimization
US9245041B2 (en) 2007-11-10 2016-01-26 Geomonkey, Inc. Creation and use of digital maps
US9203912B2 (en) 2007-11-14 2015-12-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and system for message value calculation in a mobile environment
US10346854B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2019-07-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Feature-value attachment, reranking and filtering for advertisements
US20090150507A1 (en) 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for prioritizing delivery of communications via different communication channels
US8307029B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2012-11-06 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for conditional delivery of messages
US20090165051A1 (en) 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 United Video Properties, Inc. Methods and devices for presenting an interactive media guidance application
US7769740B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2010-08-03 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods of ranking attention
US7865308B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2011-01-04 Yahoo! Inc. User-generated activity maps
US9471898B2 (en) 2007-12-31 2016-10-18 International Business Machines Corporation Endorsing E-mail messages using social network verification
US7925708B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2011-04-12 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for delivery of augmented messages
US8073795B2 (en) 2008-01-07 2011-12-06 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Location based services platform using multiple sources including a radio frequency identification data source
US20090186330A1 (en) * 2008-01-19 2009-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Reusable ad hoc self-posed questions and answers for social network profiles
US20090204484A1 (en) 2008-02-07 2009-08-13 Grayson Johnson Method of Displaying Targeted Digital Electronic Advertising Using Global Positioning System (GPS) Coordinates and Associated Demographic Data
US20090204676A1 (en) 2008-02-11 2009-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Content based routing of misaddressed e-mail
US20090204672A1 (en) 2008-02-12 2009-08-13 Idelix Software Inc. Client-server system for permissions-based locating services and location-based advertising
US8930238B2 (en) 2008-02-21 2015-01-06 International Business Machines Corporation Pervasive symbiotic advertising system and methods therefor
US8560390B2 (en) 2008-03-03 2013-10-15 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for social network marketing with brand referral
US8554623B2 (en) 2008-03-03 2013-10-08 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for social network marketing with consumer referral
US8682960B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2014-03-25 Nokia Corporation Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for providing filtered services and content based on user context
US8220050B2 (en) 2008-03-31 2012-07-10 Sophos Plc Method and system for detecting restricted content associated with retrieved content
US20090313546A1 (en) 2008-06-16 2009-12-17 Porto Technology, Llc Auto-editing process for media content shared via a media sharing service
US20090320047A1 (en) 2008-06-23 2009-12-24 Ingboo Inc. Event Bundling
US8813107B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2014-08-19 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for location based media delivery
US7792040B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2010-09-07 Yahoo! Inc. Bandwidth and cost management for ad hoc networks
US20100063993A1 (en) 2008-09-08 2010-03-11 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for socially aware identity manager
KR101024149B1 (en) 2008-09-11 2011-03-22 야후! 인크. Method of registering advertisements on an electronic map using advertisement registration reference information
US9519636B2 (en) * 2008-10-15 2016-12-13 Business Objects S.A. Deduction of analytic context based on text and semantic layer
US8032508B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2011-10-04 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for URL based query for retrieving data related to a context
US9805123B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2017-10-31 Excalibur Ip, Llc System and method for data privacy in URL based context queries
US8024317B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2011-09-20 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for deriving income from URL based context queries
US20100125569A1 (en) 2008-11-18 2010-05-20 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for autohyperlinking and navigation in url based context queries
US20100185642A1 (en) 2009-01-21 2010-07-22 Yahoo! Inc. Interest-based location targeting engine

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050055321A1 (en) * 2000-03-06 2005-03-10 Kanisa Inc. System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US20060184508A1 (en) * 2001-05-01 2006-08-17 Fuselier Christopher S Methods and system for providing context sensitive information
US20060047615A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Yael Ravin Knowledge management system automatically allocating expert resources

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10409851B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2019-09-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Gesture-based search
US10444979B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2019-10-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Gesture-based search
US10984337B2 (en) * 2012-02-29 2021-04-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Context-based search query formation
KR20190113712A (en) * 2012-09-10 2019-10-08 구글 엘엘씨 Answering questions using environmental context
KR102140177B1 (en) 2012-09-10 2020-08-03 구글 엘엘씨 Answering questions using environmental context
WO2022190079A1 (en) * 2021-03-09 2022-09-15 Webtalk Ltd Dynamic audio content generation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8856167B2 (en) 2014-10-07
US20100145976A1 (en) 2010-06-10
TWI443532B (en) 2014-07-01
TW201030544A (en) 2010-08-16
US20120078938A1 (en) 2012-03-29
US8055675B2 (en) 2011-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8856167B2 (en) System and method for context based query augmentation
US11055325B2 (en) System and method for context enhanced mapping
US9858348B1 (en) System and method for presentation of media related to a context
US8386506B2 (en) System and method for context enhanced messaging
US10311452B2 (en) Computerized systems and methods of mapping attention based on W4 data related to a user
US9600484B2 (en) System and method for reporting and analysis of media consumption data
US9026917B2 (en) System and method for context enhanced mapping within a user interface
US9946782B2 (en) System and method for message clustering
US7769740B2 (en) Systems and methods of ranking attention
US8166016B2 (en) System and method for automated service recommendations
US20100082427A1 (en) System and Method for Context Enhanced Ad Creation
US8166124B2 (en) System and method for delivery of augmented messages
US20100063993A1 (en) System and method for socially aware identity manager

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09830779

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09830779

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1