WO2009124256A1 - Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations - Google Patents
Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009124256A1 WO2009124256A1 PCT/US2009/039480 US2009039480W WO2009124256A1 WO 2009124256 A1 WO2009124256 A1 WO 2009124256A1 US 2009039480 W US2009039480 W US 2009039480W WO 2009124256 A1 WO2009124256 A1 WO 2009124256A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- stakeholder
- asset
- model representation
- meta
- data
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/80—Management or planning
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations in a system model.
- the present invention therefore, meets the above needs and overcomes one or more deficiencies in the prior art by providing systems and methods for correlating only approved manipulations of meta-data-model representations and asset-logic model representations in a system model.
- the present invention includes a computer implemented method for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations, which comprises: i) manipulating a system model, the system model comprising a meta-data model representation controlled by only a stakeholder and an asset- logic model representation controlled by only the stakeholder or another stakeholder; ii) notifying only at least one of the stakeholder and the another stakeholder of a manipulation of at least one of the meta-data model representation and the asset-logic model representation; iii) recording each manipulation approved or rejected by the at least one of the stakeholder and the another stakeholder; and iv) transforming the system model on a computer system by Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- the present invention includes a program carrier device for carrying computer executable instructions for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations.
- the instructions are executable to implement: i) manipulating a system model, the system model comprising a meta-data model representation controlled by only a stakeholder and an asset-logic model representation controlled by only the stakeholder or another stakeholder; ii) notifying only at least one of the stakeholder and the another stakeholder of a manipulation of at least one of the meta-data model representation and the asset-logic model representation; iii) recording each manipulation approved or rejected by the at least one of the stakeholder and the another stakeholder; and iv) transforming the system model by correlating only each approved manipulation between the meta-data model representation and the asset-logic model representation.
- the present invention includes a computer system for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations, which comprises: i) a system model, the system model comprising a meta-data model representation controlled by only a stakeholder and an asset-logic model representation controlled by only the stakeholder or another stakeholder; ii) a notification module for notifying only at least one of the stakeholder and the another stakeholder of a manipulation of at least one of the metadata model representation and the asset-logic model representation; iii) a recording module for recording each manipulation approved or rejected by the at least one of the stakeholder and the another stakeholder; and iv) a transformation module for transforming the system model by correlating only each approved manipulation between the meta-data model representation and the asset-logic model representation.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system for implementing the present invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the collaborative network matrix model of the present invention in relation to a wider system for collaboration.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the collaborative network matrix model in FIG. 2.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the collaborative network matrix model in FIG. 2 after a system change.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating the collaborative network matrix model in FIG. 2 as a transformation.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the development and change of a collaborative network matrix model over time.
- FiG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method for implementing the present invention.
- step may be used herein to describe different elements of methods employed, the term should not be interpreted as implying any particular order among or between various steps herein disclosed unless otherwise expressly limited by the description to a particular order. While the following description refers to the oil and gas industry, the systems and methods of the present invention are not limited thereto and may also be applied to other industries to achieve similar results.
- the present invention provides a model based solution to select the appropriate level of model detail for the preferences of dissimilar users, also referred to herein as clients or stakeholders. Unlike the prior art, the present invention correlates different models. Thus, the present invention permits moving between models with different levels of detail. Moreover, while different models with various levels of detail may be known in the art, the present invention, instead, provides the opportunity to utilize different models in a single application with each model related to a common system model.
- the present invention may be implemented through a computer-executable program of instructions, such as program modules, generally referred to as software applications or application programs executed by a computer.
- the software may include, for example, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- the software forms an interface to allow a computer to react according to a source of input.
- DecisionSpace® which is a commercial software application marketed by Landmark Graphics Corporation, may be used as an interface application to implement the present invention.
- the software may also cooperate with other code segments to initiate a variety of tasks in response to data received in conjunction with the source of the received data.
- the software may be stored and/or carried on any variety of memory media such as CD-ROM, magnetic disk, bubble memory and Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- semiconductor memory e.g., various types of RAM or ROM.
- the software and its results may be transmitted over a variety of carrier media such as optical fiber, metallic wire, free space and/or through any of a variety of networks such as the Internet.
- the invention may be practiced with a variety of computer-system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable-consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Any number of computer-systems and computer networks are acceptable for use with the present invention.
- the invention may be practiced in distributed-computing environments where tasks are performed by remote- processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote computer-storage media including memory storage devices.
- the present invention may therefore, be implemented in connection with various hardware, software or a combination thereof, in a computer system or other processing system.
- FIG. 1 a block diagram of a system for implementing the present invention on a computer is illustrated.
- the system includes a computing unit, sometimes referred to as a computing system, which contains memory, application programs, a client interface, and a processing unit.
- the computing unit is only one example of a suitable computing environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of the invention.
- the memory primarily stores the application programs, which may also be described as program modules containing computer-executable instructions, executed by the computing unit for implementing the present invention described herein and illustrated in FIGS. 2-7.
- the memory therefore, includes a CNMM Module, which enables the method illustrated and described in reference to FIG. 7.
- the CNMM Module includes a Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- collaborative-network-matrix model also known as a system model, which is illustrated and described in reference to FIGS, 2-7.
- the CNMM Module also may interact with DecisionSpace ® , AssetObserverTM, AssetSolver ⁇ u and AssetConnectTM as further described in reference to FIG. 2.
- the systems and methods of the present invention are thus, based on a system model that correlates meta-data-model representations of a production asset with the various asset-logic model representations (or taxonomies) to provide a collaborative, consistent, and relevant representation of the asset to the different stakeholders.
- the system model performs the correlations between different meta-data model representations using the various asset-logic model representations for common data items and attributes shared across the system thus, addressing the many key activities relating to the asset that may have different meta-model representations representing their pertinent data requirements. In this manner, effective interoperability is achieved.
- the computing unit typically includes a variety of computer readable media.
- computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media.
- the computing system memory may include computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as a read only memory (ROM) and random access memory (RAM).
- ROM read only memory
- RAM random access memory
- a basic input/output system (BIOS) containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computing unit, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM.
- the RAM typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by the processing unit.
- the computing unit includes an operating system, application programs, other program modules, and program data.
- the components shown in the memory may also be included in other removable/nonremovable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media.
- a Attorney Docket No. 33849-270 is shown in other removable/nonremovable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media.
- hard disk drive may read from or write to nonremovable, nonvolatile magnetic media
- a magnetic disk drive may read from or write to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk
- an optical disk drive may read from or write to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk such as a CD ROM or other optical media.
- Other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media may include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like.
- the drives and their associated computer storage media discussed above therefore, store and/or carry computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computing unit.
- a client may enter commands and information into the computing unit through the client interface, which may be input devices such as a keyboard and pointing device, commonly referred to as a mouse, trackball or touch pad.
- input devices may include a microphone, joystick, satellite dish, scanner, or the like.
- These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit through the client interface that is coupled to a system bus, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port or a universal serial bus (USB).
- a monitor or other type of display device may be connected to the system bus via an interface, such as a video interface.
- computers may also include other peripheral output devices such as speakers and printer, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface.
- system model 2114 a collaborative-network-matrix model (system model 214) is illustrated within a wider system 200 for collaboration among multiple clients Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- Additional system components typically associated with a production asset may include, for example, different types of data 202 (e.g. operations data, business data and engineering data), a data analytics engine 204, a data integration platform 206, a data environment 208, a workflow integration platform 210, a software applications environment 212 and a collaborative environment 216.
- the various components of the system 200 enable specific inter-related functions and therefore, must interact with each other seamlessly in order to avoid discontinuities and/or errors.
- the role of the system model 214 is to provide interoperability across the various diverse applications and datasets within the overall system 200. Thus, the system model 214 functions as a common base model for collaboration among the stakeholders 218.
- Other components of the system 200 may include interfaces to and from an Enterprise Resource Planning System (e.g. SAP) or a computerized Maintenance Management System, or a computerized Work Management System controlling work in the physical asset and necessary status of equipment and system isolations.
- SAP Enterprise Resource Planning System
- a computerized Maintenance Management System e.g., computerized
- the data analytics engine 204 allows data to be manipulated to produce numerous reports and analysis using simple to complex proprietary and industry standard algorithms. It typically supports data filtering and cleaning as well as appropriate visualization technologies to present data in meaningful, relevant and insightful ways into the viewing or collaborative environment 216 for use by the stakeholders 218.
- the data integration platform 206 typically provides data connectors appropriate to each data language and database. This component allows the stakeholders 218 to map to particular data sets such as asset equipment tags or unique well identifiers, thus enabling data flow throughout the system 200.
- the data environment 208 typically interfaces with some regulatory or distributed control system incorporating data to and from instruments, meters, and control devices, such as actuators, valves and the like, across the asset. Considering the typical Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- the data environment 208 typically includes multiple types of data 202, each designed to best suit particular types of data.
- data for example, a relational database for business data, a data historian for high frequency operations data and a data warehouse for engineering data such as well tables and production allocation tables.
- the data will exist in one or more data languages, such as, for example, OPC, ODBC, HTML, WITSML, and PRODML, which are well known in the art and conform to respective corresponding data standards.
- the workflow integration and orchestration platform 210 spans the various IT operating environments, connects to the numerous software applications, maps to the respective data tags and items used by the software applications and interfaces with some viewing or shared collaborative environments to interface and interact with numerous stakeholders 218 involved across the workflows.
- the workflows are numerous but might include frequent and infrequent activities such as; for example, well test validation, production allocation, production surveillance, production optimization and others more particularly described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/266,766, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the software applications environment(s) 212 includes different IT operating environments such as Windows and Linux, appropriate to the range of applications used across the asset.
- the software applications environment(s) 212 may also include well known, proprietary applications for providing diverse, complex, and relatively simple functionality. These applications, for example, may include petro-technical and geoscience applications common to the industry as well as more common software applications commonly used such as MS Office. These applications may also be used for, but not limited to, reservoir and well simulation, modeling of hydraulic networks and facilities systems, material balance, nodal analysis, production allocation, production surveillance, hydrocarbon accounting, regulatory Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- the function of the system model 214 is to manage the numerous interfaces and interactions between the data items and their correct and consistent usage within the various logic schemes that are representative of the system 200 and its architecture. It does so in a dynamic operating environment where all or many of the components may be used simultaneously and/or continuously by the stakeholders 218, which may be given specific and varying access and authority rights to control the components.
- the collaborative environment 216 typically represents a web-based (intranet or internet) access and viewing environment that can be used by a diverse range of potential geographically located stakeholders 218, which will provide secure access and bandwidths appropriate to the range of data and software applications included in the system 200.
- the use of portals will typically allow diverse stakeholders 218 to have relevant custom views of only the information they require from the system 200 and also may provide effective communications via e-mail, instant messaging, net meetings and the like.
- DecisionSpace ® for Production may be used to provide the system architecture, component integration and set of functionality illustrated in FIG. 2.
- the system model 214 interacts with AssetObserver ⁇ M , AssetConnectTM and AssetSolverTM to achieve overall functionality.
- Asset ⁇ bserverTM provides the data integration platform 206 and also the collaborative environment 216 for data organization and visualization within the overall system 200.
- AssetConnectiM provides the software application environment(s) 212 and also the workflow integration platform 210, which, together, enable orchestration or technical workflows that utilize both technical applications and related data 202.
- AssetSolverTM provides the data analytics engine 204, which is capable of handling both high volume and real-time data about operations and aggregate historical data used for engineering purposes. Each of the components jointly and separately benefit from the functionality provided by the system model 214.
- FIG. 3 a block diagram of the collaborative-network-matrix model in FIG. 2 (system model 214) is illustrated.
- the system model 214 is static, meaning at rest, when transformations and manipulations are not occurring.
- the system model 214 acts purely as a data router - providing the flow of appropriate information to different organizational stakeholders and/or applications.
- the system model 214 includes several com p onents such as the vertical co ⁇ vonents Ll-LN the horizontal components Ml-MN, transformations and manipulations.
- the vertical components Ll-LN may include logical representations of the various taxonomies representative of the asset such as, for example, business logic, operations logic, engineering logic, scientific logic and organizational logic, among others. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the taxonomies include scientific logic and business logic.
- the horizontal components Ml-MN are meta-data model representations of specific key activities or stakeholder domains or other manifestations of meta-data model representations appropriate to the asset such as, for example, production data, business data, engineering data and equipment data, among others.
- the meta data model representations include operations, design, regulatory, meter, flow and physical network-
- the meta-data model representations comprise numerous data items and their attributes.
- Transformations are the routines for definition, identification and correlation of data items and attributes within the meta-data model representation layers, which are shared across the various asset-logic model representations. This might include, for example, Attorney Docket No. 33849-270
- Routines may include, for example, initial screening, searching, comparison and matching of the data items and attributes across the various components of the system model 214. Screening is an activity undertaken by proprietary software in order to identify the range of data attributes in the system model 214. Searching may involve a search engine to find the locations of such attributes and a comparison may utilize artificial intelligence (such as a neural network or expert system) in order to determine correlations and interrelationships between meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations, across the system model 214. This function allows translation of common data items and attributes between one meta-data model representation layer and others.
- Artificial intelligence such as a neural network or expert system
- Manipulations are automatically initiated at occurrence of an event and may include, for example: a) the various and multiple uses of data items and attributes across the asset by the multiple stakeholders using the diverse data sources, applications and programs common to a production asset, b) the control or subsequent change of those relatively static asset-logic model representations and meta-data model representations and/or the correlations or attributes of data items therein such as, for example: i) a permanent or temporary physical change to the production system configuration by insertion or removal of an item of equipment, ii) a change on the organization structure and/or individuals in a given role or to their approval authority or iii) modification to an engineering algorithm, and c) the control or subsequent change of the asset-logic model representations, the meta-data model representations and/or the correlations or attributes of data items therein such as, for example: i) a change to a valve brought about by, and consistent with, well testing operations or shutdown of an item of equipment for planned maintenance routines, or ii) the routine change to
- FIG. 4 a block diagram of the collaborative-network-matrix model in FIG. 2 (system model 214) is illustrated after a system change.
- a first stakeholder such as, for example, a production engineer may manipulate several horizontal components to reflect a system change that has occurred.
- a system change reflects a manipulation of the operations, flow and physical network meta-data model representations.
- the system model 214 is able to determine which stakeholder or stakeholders need to be informed of the changes to the horizontal components and/or vertical components and who initiated the change(s). This is achieved through an event notification service. The status of the components may be tracked during periods of change to ensure appropriate adjustment according to outcome of the system change controls.
- the system model 214 may be housed within a data repository with real time audit control. This mechanism is utilized to track component changes. Components of the system model 214 may be designated more or less critical at the establishment of the system model 214 such that risk can be determined and communicated with alerts to the system stakeholders.
- the system model 214 may record rejected and approved changes and Attorney Docket No.33849-270
- Approval's are generated either by human interaction with the system or by a logic based expert system.
- Changes can include changes to stakeholders, asset-logic model representations, meta-data model representations and/or data items and attributes.
- FIG. 7 a flow diagram illustrates one embodiment of a method 700 for implementing the present invention.
- a system model is created, which comprises one or more metadata model representations and one or more asset-logic model representations.
- the system model may include, for example, the same meta-data model representations and/or asset logic model representations described in reference to FIGS. 2-5. Furthermore, the system model may operate, for example, in the same manner as the system model described in reference to FIGS. 1-6.
- Each meta-data model representation may be controlled by one or more respective stakeholders and each asset-logic model representation may be controlled (owned) by one or more respective stakeholders. In other words, each meta-data model representation may be controlled by a respective stakeholder and each asset-logic model representation may be controlled by a respective stakeholder.
- any respective stakeholder may control more than one meta-data model representation and/or more than one asset-logic model representation.
- each meta-data model representation and each asset-logic model representation should not be controlled by more than one respective stakeholder however, may be controlled by more than one stakeholder under exceptional circumstances.
- Each meta-data model representation may include at least one data item and an attribute.
- each asset-logic model representation may include at least one data item and an attribute.
- the system model is manipulated using a GUI or other means well known in the art.
- a collaborative environment and/or API may be utilized within a wider system to facilitate manipulation of the system model.
- the system model may be manipulated, for example, by a manipulation of one or more of the meta-data model representations and/or one or more of the asset-logic model representations. A manipulation therefore, may represent a change to at least one of the meta-data model representations and the asset-logic model representations.
- the system model may be manipulated on a computer system by any stakeholder. Each stakeholder therefore, may access the system model through a collaborative environment to manipulate the system model on the computer system.
- Each stakeholder therefore, may control one or more meta-data model representations and/or asset-logic model representations, while having access to the system model through a collaborative environment for purposes of manipulating the system model.
- Each stakeholder however, having access to the system model through a collaborative environment for purposes of manipulating the system model may not have control of one or more meta-data model representations and/or asset-logic model representations.
- each stakeholder in control of the one or more meta-data model representations and/or the one or more asset-logic model representations is notified of a manipulation of each respective meta-data model representation and/or each respective asset- logic model representation controlled by each respective stakeholder.
- a collaborative environment and/or API may be utilized within a wider system to facilitate notification of each manipulation.
- a stakeholder may manipulate one or more of the meta-data model representations and/or one or more of the asset-logic model representations, which it does not control, and only each stakeholder in control of each respective manipulated meta-data model representation and/or asset-logic model representation is notified of the manipulation.
- each manipulation approved or rejected by each respective stakeholder in control of the manipulated meta-data model representation(s) and/or asset- logic model representation(s) is recorded by the system model.
- Each approved manipulation therefore, may represent a change to a data item and/or an attribute in one or more of the meta-data model representations and/or one or more of the asset-logic model representations.
- step 710 the system model is transformed on a computer system based on the approved manipulation(s) by correlating each approved manipulation between the metadata model representation(s) and the asset-logic model representation(s).
- Transforming the system model comprises using at least one routine for correlating each approved manipulation between the meta-data model representation(s) and the asset-logic model representation(s) .
- step 712 the method 700 determines whether to repeat. If the method 700 is repeated, then the method 700 proceeds to step 704. If the method 700 does not repeat, then the method 700 ends.
- the system model may be deployed in conjunction with a production allocation application whereby data pertaining to allocation changes to the production system might be more readily identified and for differing purposes such as technically correct allocation and fiscal allocation for operations, engineering and/or business uses.
- Other applications utilizing the system modei may include, for example, production loss reporting, whereby the various causes of lost production might be attributed as they are reported, understood and associated with relevant operations, engineering and business data and uses.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN200980112469.1A CN101990659B (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
BRPI0906540A BRPI0906540A2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | devices and methods for correlating metadata model representations and logical model representations of assets |
CA2719937A CA2719937C (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
MX2010010785A MX2010010785A (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations. |
AU2009231624A AU2009231624B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
EP09727609.1A EP2266021A4 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US4254208P | 2008-04-04 | 2008-04-04 | |
US61/042,542 | 2008-04-04 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2009124256A1 true WO2009124256A1 (en) | 2009-10-08 |
Family
ID=41134217
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/039480 WO2009124256A1 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-04-03 | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8229938B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2266021A4 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101990659B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2009231624B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0906540A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2719937C (en) |
MX (1) | MX2010010785A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009124256A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10552391B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2020-02-04 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Systems and methods for real time data management in a collaborative environment |
WO2009124256A1 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-10-08 | Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
US9191266B2 (en) | 2012-03-23 | 2015-11-17 | Petrolink International | System and method for storing and retrieving channel data |
US9518459B1 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2016-12-13 | Petrolink International | Logging and correlation prediction plot in real-time |
US9512707B1 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2016-12-06 | Petrolink International | Cross-plot engineering system and method |
US9460403B2 (en) | 2012-07-31 | 2016-10-04 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Methods and systems related to hydrocarbon recovery strategy development |
US10590761B1 (en) | 2013-09-04 | 2020-03-17 | Petrolink International Ltd. | Systems and methods for real-time well surveillance |
US10428647B1 (en) | 2013-09-04 | 2019-10-01 | Petrolink International Ltd. | Systems and methods for real-time well surveillance |
US10614048B2 (en) | 2013-09-20 | 2020-04-07 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for correlating data in a repository system |
CN105940417A (en) | 2014-02-26 | 2016-09-14 | 界标制图有限公司 | Production engineering networks |
CN107315776B (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2020-06-23 | 国网安徽省电力公司信息通信分公司 | Data management system based on cloud computing |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030050807A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-03-13 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for a gas station supply chain management framework |
US20030188863A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-09 | Eugene Hooper And Britt Gilbert | Carbon dioxide pipeline |
Family Cites Families (54)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5710918A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for distributed task fulfillment of web browser requests |
US5745754A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sub-agent for fulfilling requests of a web browser using an intelligent agent and providing a report |
US5930786A (en) | 1995-10-20 | 1999-07-27 | Ncr Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing shared data to a requesting client |
US5821925A (en) | 1996-01-26 | 1998-10-13 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Collaborative work environment supporting three-dimensional objects and multiple remote participants |
US6425016B1 (en) | 1997-05-27 | 2002-07-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing collaborative replicated objects for synchronous distributed groupware applications |
US6621505B1 (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2003-09-16 | Journee Software Corp. | Dynamic process-based enterprise computing system and method |
US6338086B1 (en) | 1998-06-11 | 2002-01-08 | Placeware, Inc. | Collaborative object architecture |
US6304864B1 (en) | 1999-04-20 | 2001-10-16 | Textwise Llc | System for retrieving multimedia information from the internet using multiple evolving intelligent agents |
US7698160B2 (en) | 1999-05-07 | 2010-04-13 | Virtualagility, Inc | System for performing collaborative tasks |
US6678882B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2004-01-13 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Collaborative model for software systems with synchronization submodel with merge feature, automatic conflict resolution and isolation of potential changes for reuse |
US6266619B1 (en) | 1999-07-20 | 2001-07-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for real time reservoir management |
US6853921B2 (en) | 1999-07-20 | 2005-02-08 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for real time reservoir management |
US6539396B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2003-03-25 | Accenture Llp | Multi-object identifier system and method for information service pattern environment |
MXPA02003545A (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2002-10-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corp | Training method using industry and university collaboration. |
US6826483B1 (en) | 1999-10-13 | 2004-11-30 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Petroleum reservoir simulation and characterization system and method |
AU1928701A (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2001-06-04 | Accenture Llp | Technology sharing during asset management and asset tracking in a network-basedsupply chain environment and method thereof |
US6980940B1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2005-12-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Intergrated reservoir optimization |
US6792431B2 (en) | 2001-05-07 | 2004-09-14 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | Method, system, and product for data integration through a dynamic common model |
US8412746B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for federated querying of data sources |
US7673282B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2010-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enterprise information unification |
US20030033179A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-13 | Katz Steven Bruce | Method for generating customized alerts related to the procurement, sourcing, strategic sourcing and/or sale of one or more items by an enterprise |
GB0123403D0 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2001-11-21 | Tamesis Ltd | Publish subscribe system |
US7424473B2 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2008-09-09 | Centricmedia, Inc. | System and method for asset tracking with organization-property-individual model |
US7043521B2 (en) | 2002-03-21 | 2006-05-09 | Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc | Search agent for searching the internet |
US7987491B2 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2011-07-26 | Richard Reisman | Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases |
US7243093B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2007-07-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Federated query management |
US7146356B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2006-12-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time aggregation of unstructured data into structured data for SQL processing by a relational database engine |
US20040230571A1 (en) | 2003-04-22 | 2004-11-18 | Gavin Robertson | Index and query processor for data and information retrieval, integration and sharing from multiple disparate data sources |
US7269607B2 (en) | 2003-09-29 | 2007-09-11 | International Business Machines Coproartion | Method and information technology infrastructure for establishing a log point for automatic recovery of federated databases to a prior point in time |
US7287048B2 (en) | 2004-01-07 | 2007-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Transparent archiving |
BRPI0513195A (en) | 2004-07-09 | 2008-04-29 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | systems for administering user authentication and authorization, and for user support, methods for administering user authentication and authorization, for accessing services from multiple networks, for the authentication controller to process an authentication request message, to select the combination of authentication controllers. search result authentication, authenticating a user, and finding the way to a domain having business relationship with the home domain, for the authorization controller to process the service authorization request message, and perform service authorization for a domain controller. authentication and authorization perform authentication and service authorization, to protect the user token, and for the user's home domain access control authority to provide the authentication controller with a limited user signature profile information, to achieve authentication and authorize fast access, and to achieve single registration to access multiple networks, and formats for subscription capability information, for a user symbol, for a domain having business relationship with a user's home domain to request authentication and authorization assertion , and for a user terminal to indicate their credentials for accessing multiple networks across multiple administrative domains. |
US7707249B2 (en) | 2004-09-03 | 2010-04-27 | Open Text Corporation | Systems and methods for collaboration |
US20060074980A1 (en) | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Sarkar Pte. Ltd. | System for semantically disambiguating text information |
US7461052B2 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2008-12-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Abstract query plan |
US20060167868A1 (en) * | 2005-01-27 | 2006-07-27 | Weijia Zhang | Universal and extensible packaging process for computer system software integration and deployment |
US7610264B2 (en) | 2005-02-28 | 2009-10-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing a learning optimizer for federated database systems |
US7469248B2 (en) | 2005-05-17 | 2008-12-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Common interface to access catalog information from heterogeneous databases |
FR2886030B1 (en) | 2005-05-19 | 2007-08-10 | Airbus Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING A PARAMETRIC MODEL RELATING TO 3D GEOMETRY |
US20070073674A1 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2007-03-29 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for providing federated events for content management systems |
CA2524527A1 (en) | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee | Systems, methods and tools for facilitating group collaborations |
US7984389B2 (en) | 2006-01-28 | 2011-07-19 | Rowan University | Information visualization system |
US7523118B2 (en) | 2006-05-02 | 2009-04-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for optimizing federated and ETL'd databases having multidimensionally constrained data |
US7865487B2 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2011-01-04 | Raytheon Company | System and method for providing remote access to events from a database access system |
US8572633B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2013-10-29 | Sap Ag | Exception handling for collaborating process models |
US7580946B2 (en) | 2006-08-11 | 2009-08-25 | Bizweel Ltd. | Smart integration engine and metadata-oriented architecture for automatic EII and business integration |
US8527502B2 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2013-09-03 | Blade Makai Doyle | Method, system and computer-readable media for software object relationship traversal for object-relational query binding |
US7933921B2 (en) | 2006-11-29 | 2011-04-26 | Netapp, Inc. | Referent-controlled location resolution of resources in a federated distributed system |
US8250583B2 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2012-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Workflow processing system and method with federated database system support |
US8136124B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2012-03-13 | Oracle America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for synthesizing hardware counters from performance sampling |
US7519503B2 (en) | 2007-02-15 | 2009-04-14 | Epsis As | Data handling system |
US20080255892A1 (en) | 2007-04-11 | 2008-10-16 | The University Of Southern California | System and Method for Oil Production Forecasting and Optimization in a Model-Based Framework |
CN102007504A (en) | 2007-11-10 | 2011-04-06 | 兰德马克绘图国际公司,哈里伯顿公司 | Systems and methods for workflow automation, adaptation and integration |
US10552391B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2020-02-04 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Systems and methods for real time data management in a collaborative environment |
WO2009124256A1 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-10-08 | Landmark Graphics Corporation, A Halliburton Company | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations |
-
2009
- 2009-04-03 WO PCT/US2009/039480 patent/WO2009124256A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-04-03 CA CA2719937A patent/CA2719937C/en active Active
- 2009-04-03 CN CN200980112469.1A patent/CN101990659B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-04-03 BR BRPI0906540A patent/BRPI0906540A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-04-03 MX MX2010010785A patent/MX2010010785A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2009-04-03 AU AU2009231624A patent/AU2009231624B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2009-04-03 US US12/418,367 patent/US8229938B2/en active Active
- 2009-04-03 EP EP09727609.1A patent/EP2266021A4/en not_active Ceased
-
2012
- 2012-06-21 US US13/529,084 patent/US8554778B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030050807A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-03-13 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for a gas station supply chain management framework |
US20030188863A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-09 | Eugene Hooper And Britt Gilbert | Carbon dioxide pipeline |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2266021A4 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
MX2010010785A (en) | 2010-11-09 |
CA2719937C (en) | 2017-03-28 |
BRPI0906540A2 (en) | 2015-09-22 |
AU2009231624A1 (en) | 2009-10-08 |
US8554778B2 (en) | 2013-10-08 |
CN101990659A (en) | 2011-03-23 |
US8229938B2 (en) | 2012-07-24 |
EP2266021A1 (en) | 2010-12-29 |
US20100005111A1 (en) | 2010-01-07 |
EP2266021A4 (en) | 2014-01-01 |
AU2009231624B2 (en) | 2014-07-03 |
CA2719937A1 (en) | 2009-10-08 |
US20120323943A1 (en) | 2012-12-20 |
CN101990659B (en) | 2014-08-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8554778B2 (en) | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations | |
AU2010222952B2 (en) | Systems and methods for real time data management in a collaborative environment | |
US9536225B2 (en) | Aggregating business analytics architecture and configurator | |
CA2858060A1 (en) | System for collaboration and meeting management | |
US20050267771A1 (en) | Apparatus, system and method for integrated lifecycle management of a facility | |
Onggo | Symbiotic simulation system (S3) for industry 4.0 | |
AU2014233592B2 (en) | Systems and methods for correlating meta-data model representations and asset-logic model representations | |
US7822796B2 (en) | Method and system for electronically qualifying supplier parts | |
AU2013200561B2 (en) | Systems and methods for real time data management in a collaborative environment | |
Kuryanti et al. | Company Asset Management Information System (Case Study: Branch Office Bpjs Ketenakerjaan, Bogor) | |
Möller | Continuous simulation in material flow networks | |
Green | Configuration Management-An Automated Solution | |
Neely et al. | SYNERGE: A Tool for Managing System Engineering Information |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200980112469.1 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 09727609 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2719937 Country of ref document: CA Ref document number: 2009231624 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: MX/A/2010/010785 Country of ref document: MX |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2009727609 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2009727609 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2009231624 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20090403 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI0906540 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20101004 |