WO2009105054A1 - Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures - Google Patents
Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009105054A1 WO2009105054A1 PCT/US2006/060946 US2006060946W WO2009105054A1 WO 2009105054 A1 WO2009105054 A1 WO 2009105054A1 US 2006060946 W US2006060946 W US 2006060946W WO 2009105054 A1 WO2009105054 A1 WO 2009105054A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- measurements
- signals
- possible locations
- wireless
- remote device
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S5/00—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
- G01S5/02—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
- G01S5/0252—Radio frequency fingerprinting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04H—BROADCAST COMMUNICATION
- H04H60/00—Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
- H04H60/35—Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users
- H04H60/49—Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users for identifying locations
- H04H60/51—Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users for identifying locations of receiving stations
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W64/00—Locating users or terminals or network equipment for network management purposes, e.g. mobility management
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to position determination. More particularly, the present invention relates to location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures.
- the invention features an apparatus comprising: a receiver to receive one or more wireless signals; and a measurement circuit to obtain measurements of one or more characteristics of each of the wireless signals; wherein one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the apparatus are selected based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
- the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more navigation aid signals, one or more cellular phone network signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, a type of the wireless signal, information content of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency.
- a precise location of the apparatus is determined based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals.
- Some embodiments comprise a transmitter to transmit the measurements to a location server, wherein the location server selects the one or more possible locations of the apparatus.
- Some embodiments comprise a memory to store the associations; and a processor to select the one or more possible locations of the apparatus.
- the invention features an apparatus comprising: a receiver to receive measurements of one or more characteristics of each of one or more wireless signals obtained by a remote device; and a processor to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
- the processor determines distances between a first vector comprising the measurements received by the receiver and one or more second vectors each comprising the expected values of the measurements, and selects the one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the distances.
- the measurements comprise one or more frequency measurements of the wireless signals; and, to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device, the processor compares ratios of the frequency measurements to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements.
- the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more navigation aid signals, one or more cellular phone network signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, a type of the wireless signal, information content of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency.
- Some embodiments comprise a transmitter to transmit a signal representing the one or more possible locations of the remote device.
- the processor determines a precise location of the remote device based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals.
- Some embodiments comprise a memory to store the associations; wherein the processor modifies the expected measurements of one or more of the associations based on the precise location determined for the remote device and the measurements obtained by the remote device.
- the invention features a computer program comprising: receiving measurements of one or more characteristics of each of one or more wireless signals obtained by a remote device; and selecting one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
- selecting one or more of the plurality of possible locations of the remote device comprises: determining distances between a first vector comprising the measurements received by the receiver and one or more second vectors each comprising the expected values of the measurements; and selecting the one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the distances.
- the measurements comprise one or more frequency measurements of the wireless signals, and selecting one or more of the plurality of possible locations of the remote device comprises: comparing ratios of the frequency measurements to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements.
- the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, an analog/digital type of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency.
- Some embodiments comprise causing a transmitter to transmit a signal representing the one or more possible locations of the remote device.
- Some embodiments comprise determining a precise location of the remote device based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals. Some embodiments comprise storing the associations; and modifying the expected measurements of one or more of the associations based on the precise location determined for the remote device and the measurements obtained by the remote device.
- FIG. 1 shows a location identification system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 shows a process for the system of FIG. 1 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- Embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus, methods, and computer programs for location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures.
- the wireless signals preferably include, and are discussed in terms of, broadcast television signals
- the wireless signals can also or instead include broadcast radio signals, radio navigation aids, wireless local area network (LAN) signals, cellular phone networks, and the like.
- Embodiments of the present invention select one or more possible locations for an apparatus by comparing a signature assembled from measurements of the characteristics of the wireless signals, such as their signal strength, type, frequency, frequency offset, information content, and the like, to similar known signatures for known locations. The selected location can be used, in conjunction with measurements of the wireless signals, to calculate a precise location for the apparatus.
- Television positioning technology uses broadcast TV signals to determine the exact location of an electronic device. This technique uses the principle of measuring propagation delays between TV broadcast towers and the device, combining measurements from multiple TV channels, and computing the device's precise location via multilateration, which is the fixing of a position by reference to the time difference of arrival of multiple signals.
- Television positioning techniques are disclosed in patent applications Serial No. 10/867,577, filed June 14, 2004, Serial No. 09/932,010, filed August 17, 2001, Serial No. 09/932,010, filed August 17, 2001, Serial No. 10/397,068, filed March 24, 2003, and Serial No. 10/290,984, filed November 8, 2002, the disclosures thereof incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
- Positioning techniques using digital audio broadcast signals are disclosed in patent application Serial No. 10/741,431, filed December 18, 2003, the disclosure thereof incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
- the specific transmitter source can be identified with very little ambiguity. For example, if the device is known to be somewhere in Los Angeles and it detects channel 2, it is clear that it is receiving KCBS, serving Los Angeles, and not WCBS, serving New York.
- a device at an unknown location measures the local wireless channel signature, uses that signature to identify the approximate location of the device, and then optionally uses the approximate location to seed a precise television location computation.
- a device's precise location in two steps: 1) identifying the approximate location with wireless channel signatures; and 2) computing the precise location with multilateration using the approximate location as a reference point.
- a device can position itself from a "cold start" without other information such as GPS.
- FIG. 1 shows a location identification system 100 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- System 100 comprises a user terminal 102, a location server 104, and a plurality of transmitters 106A-N.
- User terminal 102 comprises a receiver 108, a transmitter 110, a measurement circuit 112, a processor 114, and an optional memory 116.
- Location server 104 comprises a receiver 122, a transmitter 124, a processor 118, and an optional memory 120.
- User terminal 102 preferably communicates wirelessly with location server 104, although other modes are contemplated.
- FIG. 1 is used to illustrate various aspects of the invention but the invention is not limited to this implementation.
- the phrase "user terminal” is meant to refer to any object capable of implementing the techniques described herein. Examples of user terminals include PDAs, mobile phones, cars and other vehicles, and any object which could include a chip or software implementing the techniques.
- User terminal 102 is not intended to be limited to objects which are "terminals" or which are operated by "users.”
- FIG. 2 shows a process 200 for system 100 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- Receiver 108 of user terminal 102 receives one or more wireless signals (step 202).
- the wireless signals preferably include one or more broadcast television signals, but can also or instead include one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals, and the like.
- Measurement circuit 112 obtains measurements of one or more characteristics of each of the wireless signals (step 204). The measurements together form a signature that is used to select one or more possible locations for user terminal 102 (step 206), as described in detail below.
- the measurements of the wireless signals can include characteristics such as signal strength, type, frequency, frequency offset, and others. For example, some TV stations broadcast a signal representing their call letters as part of the TV signal. As another example, some TV stations includes a mix of utility signals such as closed caption signals, ghost canceling reference signals, and the like. Such signals can be included in the signal signatures.
- Transmitters are selectively allocated so that broadcasters on the same channel are far enough away from each other to avoid interference.
- cities are geographically arranged with irregular shapes, sizes, and spacing.
- television transmitters are installed with irregular spacing and coverage footprints. This has the effect of shuffling or randomizing the order in which transmitters are allocated in order to maintain a "clean" network.
- channel re-use patterns cause the active TV signal set (that is, all operating channels in an area) to vary from one city to the next.
- Each market is served by a subset of all the possible television transmissions (channels 2 through 69 in the U.S.).
- other wireless broadcasts like AM/FM radio, navigation aids, and cellular networks, can be combined to form regionally unique channel sets. When that set can be identified and is unique enough, it will match the theoretical channel set for the city of interest, or at least narrow the search down to a very small number of candidates.
- a signature measured by an electronic device in some unknown city is compared against a database of wireless channel signatures to find one or more matches.
- Channel characteristics used in wireless channel signatures preferably include channel allocations (whether a channel is present), channel types (whether a channel is analog, digital, or has some other broadcast type or sub-type), frequency, frequency offset (deviation from nominal channel frequencies), and the like.
- TV channel allocation most cities have several channels serving the average viewer.
- a typical U.S. city may have multiple network channels (e.g., ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX), public channels (e.g., PBS), shopping networks, and local access channels.
- Each of these television transmitters has been allocated a specific broadcast channel within the available television spectrum.
- there are 67 possible channel allocations (numbered 2 thru 36 and 38 thru 69). These allocations are regulated by the FCC to ensure that signals do not interfere with each other and thus provide the best possible viewing signal to the public.
- This allocation procedure takes into account signal strength, propagation losses, terrain features, and many other factors to determine which channels to allocate in each market. Similar channel allocation rules apply to nearly all broadcast signals (e.g., AM/FM radio, navigation aids, etc.).
- TV channel types broadcast television technology originally began with analog modulation technologies like NTSC in the U.S., PAL, SECAM, and other variants in other countries. Now digital television standards are being introduced, like ATSC in the U.S., DVB- T in Europe, and ISDB-T in Japan.
- the U.S. is transmitting both analog (NTSC) and digital (ATSC) broadcasts simultaneously, giving consumers time to transition from their old analog receivers to new digital receivers.
- NTSC analog
- ATSC digital
- These digital channels have been introduced to each market using the same rules for minimizing channel interference, resulting in a mix of analog and digital channels that varies from market to market. For example, if a device detects a digital TV signal on channel Ci, it is clear that the device is not located in a city where the signal on channel Ci is analog. The same goes for all the other detected channels, Cj, Ck, etc. Considering all the channels together, the particular pattern of analog and digital signals become characteristic of specific geographic regions.
- the FCC further optimizes the allocation of channels by specifying frequency offsets for individual transmissions. This means that instead of transmitting exactly on their designated channel, some broadcasters shift their transmission to slightly higher or lower frequencies. This helps spread broadcasters from each other in frequency, thus further reducing the potential for interference from neighboring broadcasters.
- the direction (higher or lower) and amount of the offset is individually determined for each transmitter because it depends on which other transmitters are in the neighborhood. This gives each transmitter some distinctive characteristics, even compared to other transmitters on the same channel in other cities. Therefore, in addition to a channel's presence, its particular frequency offset adds more particularity to the channel signature that further refines its uniqueness, giving greater precision to the signature matching process. For example, if a device detects a signal on channel 2 with a negative 10 kHz offset, the device is probably not in a city where the local channel 2 offset is positive 10 kHz.
- location server 104 performs the selection.
- transmitter 110 of user terminal 102 transmits the measurements to location server 104.
- Receiver 122 of location server 104 receives the measurements.
- Processor 118 of location server 104 performs the selection using the received measurements and the associations (that is, the signature database) stored in memory 120.
- Transmitter 124 optionally sends the selected location(s) to user terminal 102.
- user terminal 102 performs the selection locally. According to such embodiments, processor 114 of user terminal 102 performs the selection using the associations stored in memory 116.
- Each city or region is associated with a signature representing the available channels in that area.
- These expected wireless channel signatures can be created in many ways including the use of published transmitter information, simulation of receivable channels, actual measurements taken from each area, or a combination of these techniques.
- Finding a match for a signature within the database is equivalent to finding a "distance" to each of the signatures.
- Signatures that are "close” to each other represent a good match, while signatures that are "far apart” do not match well.
- Each signature can be thought of as a point within this N-dimensional space and the distance between points will indicate the difference or delta between signatures.
- the distance is determined between a first vector X 1 comprising the measurements made by user terminal 102 and one or more second vectors x, each comprising the expected values of the measurements.
- first vector X 1 comprising the measurements made by user terminal 102
- second vectors x each comprising the expected values of the measurements.
- X j [xji> X j2> — , X j N ] ( 2 ) the distance between them can be measured in many ways (e.g., Hamming distance, etc.), but for most cases is it sufficient and easiest to use the standard Euclidian distance equation
- each dimension in the "signature space” can be scaled to give each measurement a different weighting to optimize the selectivity between signatures. For example, detecting a digital channel where an analog channel is expected is usually an important indication of a mismatch, whereas detecting a variation in frequency offset (possibly due to small measurement errors) is a weaker indication of signature mismatch.
- the channel type mismatch is therefore preferably weighted more than the frequency offset deviation.
- NTSC TV broadcast on channel 2 has a nominal pilot frequency of 55.250 MHz.
- a device with a clock that is 0.1% faster than nominal would see this channel at 55.195 MHz, which looks like a negative offset of about 55 kHz.
- the same receiver would see channel 69, nominally 801.250 MHz, at 800.450 MHz, which looks like a negative offset of about 800 kHz.
- Higher frequency channels will have larger frequency offset errors.
- embodiments of the present invention compare frequency ratios instead. That is, ratios of the frequency measurements are compared to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements. This technique is preferably applied to all frequency measurements, including measurement of absolute and offset frequencies. For example, given a second frequency measurement/ and its expected value F 1 , the comparison is given by
- Ratios of measured frequencies should always equal the ratios of theoretically perfect frequencies regardless of the device's frequency scaling error. To compare in units of frequency, both sides of equation (5) can be multiplied by the nominal frequency F 1 to yield
- process 200 optionally determines a precise location of user terminal 102 based on the possible location(s), the wireless signals received by user terminal 102, and locations of transmitters 106 of the wireless signals (step 208).
- This precise location is preferably performed according to the techniques disclosed in the patent applications cited above, and can be performed by user terminal 102, location server 104, or some combination of the two.
- a precise location can be determined for each. Then the best of the precise locations is selected.
- the wireless signal signature collected by user terminal 102 optionally is used to revise the signature database, for example to correct any errors or to introduce new data (step 210).
- Embodiments of the invention can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations of them.
- Apparatus of the invention can be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied in a machine- readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor; and method steps of the invention can be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and generating output.
- the invention can be implemented advantageously in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.
- Each computer program can be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language can be a compiled or interpreted language.
- Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors.
- a processor will receive instructions and data from a readonly memory and/or a random access memory.
- a computer will include one or more mass storage devices for storing data files; such devices include magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks.
- Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM disks. Any of the foregoing can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).
- ASICs application-specific integrated circuits.
Abstract
An apparatus having a corresponding computer program comprises a receiver to receive one or more wireless signals; and a measurement circuit to obtain measurements of one or more characteristics of each of the wireless signals; wherein one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the apparatus are selected based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
Description
LOCATION IDENTIFICATION USING BROADCAST WIRELESS SIGNAL SIGNATURES
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates generally to position determination. More particularly, the present invention relates to location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures.
SUMMARY
In general, in one aspect, the invention features an apparatus comprising: a receiver to receive one or more wireless signals; and a measurement circuit to obtain measurements of one or more characteristics of each of the wireless signals; wherein one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the apparatus are selected based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
In some embodiments, the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more navigation aid signals, one or more cellular phone network signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, a type of the wireless signal, information content of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency. In some embodiments, a precise location of the apparatus is determined based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals. Some embodiments comprise a transmitter to transmit the measurements to a location server, wherein the location server selects the one or more possible locations of the apparatus. Some embodiments comprise a memory to store the associations; and a processor to select the one or more possible locations of the apparatus.
In general, in one aspect, the invention features an apparatus comprising: a receiver to receive measurements of one or more characteristics of each of one or more wireless signals obtained by a remote device; and a processor to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations. In some embodiments, to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device, the processor determines distances between a first vector
comprising the measurements received by the receiver and one or more second vectors each comprising the expected values of the measurements, and selects the one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the distances. In some embodiments, the measurements comprise one or more frequency measurements of the wireless signals; and, to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device, the processor compares ratios of the frequency measurements to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements. In some embodiments, the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more navigation aid signals, one or more cellular phone network signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, a type of the wireless signal, information content of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency. Some embodiments comprise a transmitter to transmit a signal representing the one or more possible locations of the remote device. In some embodiments, the processor determines a precise location of the remote device based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals. Some embodiments comprise a memory to store the associations; wherein the processor modifies the expected measurements of one or more of the associations based on the precise location determined for the remote device and the measurements obtained by the remote device. In general, in one aspect, the invention features a computer program comprising: receiving measurements of one or more characteristics of each of one or more wireless signals obtained by a remote device; and selecting one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations. In some embodiments, selecting one or more of the plurality of possible locations of the remote device comprises: determining distances between a first vector comprising the measurements received by the receiver and one or more second vectors each comprising the expected values of the measurements; and selecting the one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the distances. In some embodiments, the measurements comprise one or more frequency measurements of the wireless signals, and selecting one or more of the plurality of possible locations of the remote device comprises: comparing ratios of the frequency measurements to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements. In some embodiments, the wireless signals are selected from
the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, an analog/digital type of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency. Some embodiments comprise causing a transmitter to transmit a signal representing the one or more possible locations of the remote device. Some embodiments comprise determining a precise location of the remote device based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals. Some embodiments comprise storing the associations; and modifying the expected measurements of one or more of the associations based on the precise location determined for the remote device and the measurements obtained by the remote device.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows a location identification system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a process for the system of FIG. 1 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The leading digit(s) of each reference numeral used in this specification indicates the number of the drawing in which the reference numeral first appears.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus, methods, and computer programs for location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures. While the wireless signals preferably include, and are discussed in terms of, broadcast television signals, the wireless signals can also or instead include broadcast radio signals, radio navigation aids, wireless local area network (LAN) signals, cellular phone networks, and the like. Embodiments of the present invention select one or more possible locations for an apparatus by comparing a signature assembled from measurements of the characteristics of the wireless signals, such as their signal strength, type, frequency, frequency offset, information content, and the like, to similar known signatures for known locations. The selected location can be
used, in conjunction with measurements of the wireless signals, to calculate a precise location for the apparatus.
Television positioning technology uses broadcast TV signals to determine the exact location of an electronic device. This technique uses the principle of measuring propagation delays between TV broadcast towers and the device, combining measurements from multiple TV channels, and computing the device's precise location via multilateration, which is the fixing of a position by reference to the time difference of arrival of multiple signals. Television positioning techniques are disclosed in patent applications Serial No. 10/867,577, filed June 14, 2004, Serial No. 09/932,010, filed August 17, 2001, Serial No. 09/932,010, filed August 17, 2001, Serial No. 10/397,068, filed March 24, 2003, and Serial No. 10/290,984, filed November 8, 2002, the disclosures thereof incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Positioning techniques using digital audio broadcast signals are disclosed in patent application Serial No. 10/741,431, filed December 18, 2003, the disclosure thereof incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
However, it is desirable to know exactly which broadcast sources are being detected in this process. Television channels can be re-used in different cities, and the multilateration results will be quite different when using channel 2 from Los Angeles vs. channel 2 from New York. The position calculation depends on knowledge of the correct transmitter locations for each detected channel, which depends on knowing the approximate location of the device within the TV coverage domain. Once an approximate location of the device (e.g., to the nearest city) is identified, it becomes easy to determine the specific local television transmitters in use. This is because the television broadcast network is designed to have maximum clarity on every channel, which means having minimum interference on every channel. Transmitters on the same channel that can potentially interfere with each other are separated by great distances to avoid overlap. So for every detected channel, the specific transmitter source can be identified with very little ambiguity. For example, if the device is known to be somewhere in Los Angeles and it detects channel 2, it is clear that it is receiving KCBS, serving Los Angeles, and not WCBS, serving New York.
That still leaves the matter of how to identify the rough seed location of the device in the first place. There are many alternate technologies that can provide this information (e.g., GPS, cellular networks, etc.), but there are many situations where these other technologies are not available or lack coverage (e.g., GPS does not work indoors). In fact, one of the strengths
of television-based positioning is that it can be used in places where other technologies are known to fail.
One possibility is to use the television signals themselves, and other signals of opportunity, to make this initial estimation. Since television, navigation aids, and other wireless broadcasts are regional, the specific combination of signals in any location is unique. When enough signal characteristics can be measured from received channels, it is possible to identify an approximate location based on a "wireless channel signature."
According to embodiments of the present invention, a device at an unknown location measures the local wireless channel signature, uses that signature to identify the approximate location of the device, and then optionally uses the approximate location to seed a precise television location computation. Thus without assistance from GPS and similar technologies, it is possible to determine a device's precise location in two steps: 1) identifying the approximate location with wireless channel signatures; and 2) computing the precise location with multilateration using the approximate location as a reference point. Thus a device can position itself from a "cold start" without other information such as GPS.
FIG. 1 shows a location identification system 100 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. System 100 comprises a user terminal 102, a location server 104, and a plurality of transmitters 106A-N. User terminal 102 comprises a receiver 108, a transmitter 110, a measurement circuit 112, a processor 114, and an optional memory 116. Location server 104 comprises a receiver 122, a transmitter 124, a processor 118, and an optional memory 120. User terminal 102 preferably communicates wirelessly with location server 104, although other modes are contemplated.
FIG. 1 is used to illustrate various aspects of the invention but the invention is not limited to this implementation. For example, the phrase "user terminal" is meant to refer to any object capable of implementing the techniques described herein. Examples of user terminals include PDAs, mobile phones, cars and other vehicles, and any object which could include a chip or software implementing the techniques. User terminal 102 is not intended to be limited to objects which are "terminals" or which are operated by "users."
FIG. 2 shows a process 200 for system 100 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Receiver 108 of user terminal 102 receives one or more wireless signals (step 202). The wireless signals preferably include one or more broadcast television signals, but can also or instead include one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more wireless local
area network (LAN) signals, and the like. Measurement circuit 112 obtains measurements of one or more characteristics of each of the wireless signals (step 204). The measurements together form a signature that is used to select one or more possible locations for user terminal 102 (step 206), as described in detail below. The measurements of the wireless signals can include characteristics such as signal strength, type, frequency, frequency offset, and others. For example, some TV stations broadcast a signal representing their call letters as part of the TV signal. As another example, some TV stations includes a mix of utility signals such as closed caption signals, ghost canceling reference signals, and the like. Such signals can be included in the signal signatures.
Television broadcasts are carefully regulated to maximize signal quality with a finite set of shared broadcast channels. Transmitters are selectively allocated so that broadcasters on the same channel are far enough away from each other to avoid interference. However, cities are geographically arranged with irregular shapes, sizes, and spacing. And by the same token, television transmitters are installed with irregular spacing and coverage footprints. This has the effect of shuffling or randomizing the order in which transmitters are allocated in order to maintain a "clean" network.
These variations in channel re-use patterns cause the active TV signal set (that is, all operating channels in an area) to vary from one city to the next. Each market is served by a subset of all the possible television transmissions (channels 2 through 69 in the U.S.). Similarly, other wireless broadcasts, like AM/FM radio, navigation aids, and cellular networks, can be combined to form regionally unique channel sets. When that set can be identified and is unique enough, it will match the theoretical channel set for the city of interest, or at least narrow the search down to a very small number of candidates.
In addition to a channel's presence or absence, there are other kinds of information that can be collected and compared to help identify specific transmitters and cities. When all the pieces of channel information are gathered and combined, they collectively form a wireless channel signature which can be used for localization. According to embodiments of the present invention, a signature measured by an electronic device in some unknown city is compared against a database of wireless channel signatures to find one or more matches. Channel characteristics used in wireless channel signatures preferably include channel allocations (whether a channel is present), channel types (whether a channel is analog, digital, or has some other broadcast type or sub-type), frequency, frequency offset (deviation from nominal channel frequencies), and the like.
As for TV channel allocation, most cities have several channels serving the average viewer. This gives the general public a variety of programming to choose from. For example, a typical U.S. city may have multiple network channels (e.g., ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX), public channels (e.g., PBS), shopping networks, and local access channels. Each of these television transmitters has been allocated a specific broadcast channel within the available television spectrum. In the U.S., there are 67 possible channel allocations (numbered 2 thru 36 and 38 thru 69). These allocations are regulated by the FCC to ensure that signals do not interfere with each other and thus provide the best possible viewing signal to the public. This allocation procedure takes into account signal strength, propagation losses, terrain features, and many other factors to determine which channels to allocate in each market. Similar channel allocation rules apply to nearly all broadcast signals (e.g., AM/FM radio, navigation aids, etc.).
In the most basic sense, this means that no two neighboring cities use the same channels. When many neighboring cities are considered together, the channel allocations in each city affect all of its neighbors and vice versa. The combination of channels allocated around each city will vary. In the U.S., there are over 4,000 licensed television broadcasts, each assigned to one of the 67 possible channels. This obviously means that each channel is used simultaneously by many transmitters throughout the country. The optimization efforts of the FCC make certain that all same-channel broadcasts are separated from each other to avoid overlap.
As for TV channel types, broadcast television technology originally began with analog modulation technologies like NTSC in the U.S., PAL, SECAM, and other variants in other countries. Now digital television standards are being introduced, like ATSC in the U.S., DVB- T in Europe, and ISDB-T in Japan.
At present, the U.S. is transmitting both analog (NTSC) and digital (ATSC) broadcasts simultaneously, giving consumers time to transition from their old analog receivers to new digital receivers. This means that within any given city, some broadcasters might be transmitting both analog and digital versions of their programming on separate channels. These digital channels have been introduced to each market using the same rules for minimizing channel interference, resulting in a mix of analog and digital channels that varies from market to market. For example, if a device detects a digital TV signal on channel Ci, it is clear that the device is not located in a city where the signal on channel Ci is analog. The same goes for all the other detected channels, Cj, Ck, etc. Considering all the channels together, the particular pattern of analog and digital signals become characteristic of specific geographic regions.
As for frequency and frequency offset, the FCC further optimizes the allocation of channels by specifying frequency offsets for individual transmissions. This means that instead of transmitting exactly on their designated channel, some broadcasters shift their transmission to slightly higher or lower frequencies. This helps spread broadcasters from each other in frequency, thus further reducing the potential for interference from neighboring broadcasters.
The direction (higher or lower) and amount of the offset is individually determined for each transmitter because it depends on which other transmitters are in the neighborhood. This gives each transmitter some distinctive characteristics, even compared to other transmitters on the same channel in other cities. Therefore, in addition to a channel's presence, its particular frequency offset adds more particularity to the channel signature that further refines its uniqueness, giving greater precision to the signature matching process. For example, if a device detects a signal on channel 2 with a negative 10 kHz offset, the device is probably not in a city where the local channel 2 offset is positive 10 kHz.
Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 2, one or more of a plurality of possible locations of user terminal are selected based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements (that is, the signatures) for that location. In some embodiments, location server 104 performs the selection. According to such embodiments, transmitter 110 of user terminal 102 transmits the measurements to location server 104. Receiver 122 of location server 104 receives the measurements. Processor 118 of location server 104 performs the selection using the received measurements and the associations (that is, the signature database) stored in memory 120. Transmitter 124 optionally sends the selected location(s) to user terminal 102.
In some embodiments, user terminal 102 performs the selection locally. According to such embodiments, processor 114 of user terminal 102 performs the selection using the associations stored in memory 116.
Each city or region is associated with a signature representing the available channels in that area. These expected wireless channel signatures can be created in many ways including the use of published transmitter information, simulation of receivable channels, actual measurements taken from each area, or a combination of these techniques.
Finding a match for a signature within the database is equivalent to finding a "distance" to each of the signatures. Signatures that are "close" to each other represent a good match, while signatures that are "far apart" do not match well. For clarification, consider an
environment like the U.S., where there are 67 possible TV channel slots (on/off), 67 slots for channel types (analog/digital), and 67 possible frequency offsets for a theoretical total of 201 "degrees of freedom." Each signature can be thought of as a point within this N-dimensional space and the distance between points will indicate the difference or delta between signatures.
Preferably the distance is determined between a first vector X1 comprising the measurements made by user terminal 102 and one or more second vectors x, each comprising the expected values of the measurements. When the vectors are represented as
*, = [*,i>*,2>- ">*,*] C1) and
Xj = [xji> Xj2> — , XjN] (2) the distance between them can be measured in many ways (e.g., Hamming distance, etc.), but for most cases is it sufficient and easiest to use the standard Euclidian distance equation
The signatures with the fewest differences have the best matching quality. Each dimension in the "signature space" can be scaled to give each measurement a different weighting to optimize the selectivity between signatures. For example, detecting a digital channel where an analog channel is expected is usually an important indication of a mismatch, whereas detecting a variation in frequency offset (possibly due to small measurement errors) is a weaker indication of signature mismatch. The channel type mismatch is therefore preferably weighted more than the frequency offset deviation. When considered together, after appropriate weighting has been applied, the signature distances indicate the overall signature match quality.
However, most consumer electronic devices can make only relative frequency measurements because the local oscillators used on these devices are usually not referenced to any absolute timing reference (e.g., atomic clocks, GPS, etc.). Thus all frequency measurements from a particular device will have a built-in scaling error. For example, a device might have an oscillator that is 1% faster than nominal. From this device's perspective, all measured frequencies will appear to be about 99.01% of their actual value. No matter what the scaling factor is, it applies to all frequencies equally, so for a scaling factor s and a nominal frequency F1 the measured frequency at the device is given by I1 = SF1 (4)
Without compensation for this frequency measurement scaling, the estimates of frequency offsets can be severely skewed. For example, a U.S. NTSC TV broadcast on channel 2 has a nominal pilot frequency of 55.250 MHz. A device with a clock that is 0.1% faster than nominal would see this channel at 55.195 MHz, which looks like a negative offset of about 55 kHz. The same receiver would see channel 69, nominally 801.250 MHz, at 800.450 MHz, which looks like a negative offset of about 800 kHz. Higher frequency channels will have larger frequency offset errors.
It is desirable to compensate for the scaling factor, but that value is generally not known and can even drift slowly over time. Therefore, it is not useful to directly compare the measured frequencies / with the expected frequencies F1 in the signature database. To negate the effect of the scaling factor, embodiments of the present invention compare frequency ratios instead. That is, ratios of the frequency measurements are compared to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements. This technique is preferably applied to all frequency measurements, including measurement of absolute and offset frequencies. For example, given a second frequency measurement/ and its expected value F1, the comparison is given by
L.iL.L (5)
Ratios of measured frequencies should always equal the ratios of theoretically perfect frequencies regardless of the device's frequency scaling error. To compare in units of frequency, both sides of equation (5) can be multiplied by the nominal frequency F1 to yield
Organizing the pairwise ratios of frequencies/ and/ in matrix format yields
F1 F2 FN
F2 F2
F1 F2 FN (8)
FN FN FN
F1 F2 FN
The relationship in equation (6) allows the rearrangement of the matrix as
where any differences between matrices (9) and (10) indicate a deviation of one or more channels from their expected frequency offsets.
This comparison can be simplified somewhat because comparing a frequency ratio and its reciprocal is redundant. Therefore, the lower triangle of the matrix is discarded, without losing any information. Ratios of frequencies to themselves are also of no use, so all the diagonal elements are discarded as well. The resulting matrices are given by
0 .. AF
/_ fN N
0 0 •• AF (H) fN N
0 0 0 and
0 F R
0 0
(12)
0 0
All the non-zero elements can be collapsed into a simple vector form for easy comparison. For example, for N = 4, the vectors are
and
[F11F11F11F21 F21F3 ] (14)
This problem is quite manageable for two reasons. First, there is an upper bound to the problem size. The total number of possible broadcast channels in any country is finite and relatively small. Second, only the subset of received channels needs to be compared. Each city typically utilizes a small subset of all the defined channel slots, leaving several open channels for neighboring cities to use. The computation of even several hundred frequency ratios is well within the capability of even modest computing resources. In vector form, it is easy to combine the frequency measurements with the other parts of the TV channel signature and use the normal "distance" calculation in N-dimensional space to determine match quality.
Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 2, once one or more possible locations have been selected for user terminal 102, process 200 optionally determines a precise location of user terminal 102 based on the possible location(s), the wireless signals received by user terminal 102, and locations of transmitters 106 of the wireless signals (step 208). This precise location is preferably performed according to the techniques disclosed in the patent applications cited above, and can be performed by user terminal 102, location server 104, or some combination of the two. When more than one possible location is selected, a precise location can be determined for each. Then the best of the precise locations is selected.
Once a precise location for user terminal 102 is known, the wireless signal signature collected by user terminal 102 optionally is used to revise the signature database, for example to correct any errors or to introduce new data (step 210).
Embodiments of the invention can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations of them. Apparatus of the invention can be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied in a machine-
readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor; and method steps of the invention can be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and generating output. The invention can be implemented advantageously in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computer program can be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language can be a compiled or interpreted language. Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a readonly memory and/or a random access memory. Generally, a computer will include one or more mass storage devices for storing data files; such devices include magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM disks. Any of the foregoing can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits). A number of implementations of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Claims
1. An apparatus comprising: a receiver to receive one or more wireless signals; and a measurement circuit to obtain measurements of one or more characteristics of each of the wireless signals; wherein one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the apparatus are selected based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 : wherein the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more navigation aid signals, one or more cellular phone network signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, a type of the wireless signal, information content of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 : wherein a precise location of the apparatus is determined based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a transmitter to transmit the measurements to a location server, wherein the location server selects the one or more possible locations of the apparatus.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a memory to store the associations; and a processor to select the one or more possible locations of the apparatus.
6. An apparatus comprising: a receiver to receive measurements of one or more characteristics of each of one or more wireless signals obtained by a remote device; and a processor to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
7. The apparatus of claim 6: wherein, to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device, the processor determines distances between a first vector comprising the measurements received by the receiver and one or more second vectors each comprising the expected values of the measurements, and selects the one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the distances.
8. The apparatus of claim 6: wherein the measurements comprise one or more frequency measurements of the wireless signals; and wherein, to select one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device, the processor compares ratios of the frequency measurements to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements.
9. The apparatus of claim 6: wherein the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, one or more navigation aid signals, one or more cellular phone network signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, a type of the wireless signal, information content of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency.
10. The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising: a transmitter to transmit a signal representing the one or more possible locations of the remote device.
11. The apparatus of claim 6: wherein the processor determines a precise location of the remote device based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising: a memory to store the associations; wherein the processor modifies the expected measurements of one or more of the associations based on the precise location determined for the remote device and the measurements obtained by the remote device.
13. A computer program comprising: receiving measurements of one or more characteristics of each of one or more wireless signals obtained by a remote device; and selecting one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the measurements and a plurality of associations each associating one of the possible locations with expected values for the measurements for the one of the possible locations.
14. The computer program of claim 13, wherein selecting one or more of the plurality of possible locations of the remote device comprises: determining distances between a first vector comprising the measurements received by the receiver and one or more second vectors each comprising the expected values of the measurements; and selecting the one or more of a plurality of possible locations of the remote device based on the distances.
15. The computer program of claim 13, wherein the measurements comprise one or more frequency measurements of the wireless signals, and wherein selecting one or more of the plurality of possible locations of the remote device comprises: comparing ratios of the frequency measurements to corresponding ratios of the expected values for the frequency measurements.
16. The computer program of claim 13 : wherein the wireless signals are selected from the group consisting of one or more broadcast television signals, one or more broadcast radio signals, and one or more wireless local area network (LAN) signals; and wherein the measurements are selected from the group consisting of a signal strength of the wireless signal, an analog/digital type of the wireless signal, a frequency of the wireless signal, and a frequency offset of the wireless signal from a predetermined frequency.
17. The computer program of claim 13, further comprising: causing a transmitter to transmit a signal representing the one or more possible locations of the remote device.
18. The computer program of claim 13, further comprising: determining a precise location of the remote device based on the one or more possible locations, the one or more wireless signals, and locations of transmitters of the one or more wireless signals.
19. The computer program of claim 18, further comprising: storing the associations; and modifying the expected measurements of one or more of the associations based on the precise location determined for the remote device and the measurements obtained by the remote device.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/284,800 | 2005-11-22 | ||
US11/284,800 US8102317B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2005-11-22 | Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2009105054A1 true WO2009105054A1 (en) | 2009-08-27 |
Family
ID=37805879
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/060946 WO2009105054A1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2006-11-15 | Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8102317B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009105054A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2453903B (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2011-11-23 | Sirf Tech Inc | Cell ID based positioning from cell intersections |
Families Citing this family (48)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7463195B2 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2008-12-09 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using global positioning signals augmented by broadcast television signals |
US8106828B1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2012-01-31 | Trueposition, Inc. | Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures |
AU2002251852A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2002-08-19 | Rosum Corporation | Services based on position location using broadcast digital television signals |
US7471244B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2008-12-30 | Rosum Corporation | Monitor units for television signals |
US8754807B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2014-06-17 | Trueposition, Inc. | Time, frequency, and location determination for femtocells |
US8233091B1 (en) | 2007-05-16 | 2012-07-31 | Trueposition, Inc. | Positioning and time transfer using television synchronization signals |
US20020184653A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2002-12-05 | Pierce Matthew D. | Services based on position location using broadcast digital television signals |
US8677440B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2014-03-18 | Trueposition, Inc. | Position determination using ATSC-M/H signals |
US8179318B1 (en) | 2005-09-28 | 2012-05-15 | Trueposition, Inc. | Precise position determination using VHF omni-directional radio range signals |
US7498873B2 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2009-03-03 | Rosom Corporation | Wide-lane pseudorange measurements using FM signals |
US20070121555A1 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2007-05-31 | David Burgess | Positioning using is-95 cdma signals |
US9015736B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2015-04-21 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for episode tracking in an interactive media environment |
US8149168B1 (en) | 2006-01-17 | 2012-04-03 | Trueposition, Inc. | Position determination using wireless local area network signals and television signals |
US20070234412A1 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2007-10-04 | Smith Ned M | Using a proxy for endpoint access control |
US7466266B2 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2008-12-16 | Rosum Corporation | Psuedo television transmitters for position location |
US7737893B1 (en) | 2006-06-28 | 2010-06-15 | Rosum Corporation | Positioning in a single-frequency network |
US8103293B2 (en) | 2006-10-17 | 2012-01-24 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | System and related circuits and methods for detecting and locating wireless communication device use within a geographical area or facility |
US8682341B1 (en) | 2006-11-22 | 2014-03-25 | Trueposition, Inc. | Blind identification of single-frequency-network transmitters |
WO2009009463A1 (en) * | 2007-07-06 | 2009-01-15 | Rosum Corporation | Positioning with time sliced single frequency networks |
CA2704264C (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2015-03-17 | Novatel Inc. | System and method for distributing accurate time and frequency over a network |
CN101855566B (en) * | 2007-11-13 | 2014-06-04 | 诺瓦特公司 | System and method for determining position over a network |
WO2009076577A1 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2009-06-18 | Rosum Corporation | Transmitter identification for wireless signals having a digital audio broadcast (dab) physical layer |
US7792156B1 (en) | 2008-01-10 | 2010-09-07 | Rosum Corporation | ATSC transmitter identifier signaling |
US8558738B2 (en) * | 2008-05-22 | 2013-10-15 | Novatel Inc. | GNSS receiver using signals of opportunity and assistance information to reduce the time to first fix |
WO2010030825A1 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2010-03-18 | Commlabs. Inc. | Wide area positioning system |
US8917209B2 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2014-12-23 | Nextnav, Llc | Coding in a wide area positioning system (WAPS) |
US9057606B2 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2015-06-16 | Nextnav, Llc | Wide area positioning system |
US9035829B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2015-05-19 | Nextnav, Llc | Wide area positioning systems and methods |
GB2463714A (en) * | 2008-09-24 | 2010-03-31 | H W Comm Ltd | Determining the position of a mobile station in a wireless communication network |
US8125389B1 (en) | 2008-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Trueposition, Inc. | Doppler-aided positioning, navigation, and timing using broadcast television signals |
US8253627B1 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2012-08-28 | David Burgess | Position determination with NRSC-5 digital radio signals |
WO2011003104A1 (en) * | 2009-07-02 | 2011-01-06 | Maxlinear, Inc. | Methods and systems for location estimation |
US8766849B2 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2014-07-01 | Maxlinear, Inc. | GPS-assisted source and receiver location estimation |
US20110034189A1 (en) * | 2009-08-05 | 2011-02-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and systems for identifying transmitters in a single frequency network broadcast system |
US9291712B2 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2016-03-22 | Nextnav, Llc | Cell organization and transmission schemes in a wide area positioning system (WAPS) |
US9372266B2 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2016-06-21 | Nextnav, Llc | Cell organization and transmission schemes in a wide area positioning system (WAPS) |
US8819757B2 (en) * | 2011-01-11 | 2014-08-26 | Manolo Fabio Rivera | Advanced wireless IPTV set top box |
US9176217B2 (en) | 2011-08-02 | 2015-11-03 | Nextnav, Llc | Cell organization and transmission schemes in a wide area positioning system (WAPS) |
WO2013184701A1 (en) | 2012-06-05 | 2013-12-12 | Arun Raghupathy | Systems and methods for location positioning of user device |
US20140030982A1 (en) * | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-30 | Javier Cardona | Method and apparatus for distance estimate using signal strength information |
US9390279B2 (en) | 2012-09-11 | 2016-07-12 | Nextnav, Llc | Systems and methods for providing conditional access to transmitted information |
US9286490B2 (en) | 2013-09-10 | 2016-03-15 | Nextnav, Llc | Systems and methods for providing conditional access to transmitted information |
US9473562B2 (en) * | 2013-09-12 | 2016-10-18 | Apple Inc. | Mediated data exchange for sandboxed applications |
KR101819970B1 (en) * | 2014-02-13 | 2018-01-19 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and method for recognizing position of terminal |
US9264656B2 (en) | 2014-02-26 | 2016-02-16 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing storage space |
US9510149B2 (en) * | 2015-04-08 | 2016-11-29 | Abb Technology Ag | Location estimation within a wireless mesh network utilizing wireless signal signatures |
US20200322681A1 (en) * | 2019-04-08 | 2020-10-08 | Edge Networks, Inc. | Congestion Aware Hybrid File Transfer |
US11533600B2 (en) | 2019-05-07 | 2022-12-20 | West Pond Technologies, LLC | Methods and systems for detecting and distributing encoded alert data |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5835060A (en) * | 1996-10-07 | 1998-11-10 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Self-resolving LBI triangulation |
US20020122003A1 (en) * | 2001-01-05 | 2002-09-05 | Patwari Neal K. | Method and apparatus for location estimation |
Family Cites Families (85)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US614413A (en) * | 1898-11-15 | Track-sanding apparatus | ||
US2209971A (en) * | 1937-02-13 | 1940-08-06 | Hartford Nat Bank & Trust Co | Sound record |
US2333445A (en) * | 1941-08-14 | 1943-11-02 | American Cyanamid Co | Hydroxyaminobenzenesulphonamides |
US2351841A (en) * | 1943-07-27 | 1944-06-20 | Dutchess Tool Company Inc | Dough divider and rounder |
SE445784B (en) * | 1981-06-24 | 1986-07-14 | Bo Wallmander | DEVICE FOR VISUALIZATION OF THE RUBRICTS OF MARINE COSTS BY TELEVISION VIEW |
JPS58129277A (en) | 1982-01-28 | 1983-08-02 | Japan Radio Co Ltd | Radio navigation device of hyperbola system |
US4894662A (en) * | 1982-03-01 | 1990-01-16 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method and system for determining position on a moving platform, such as a ship, using signals from GPS satellites |
US4555707A (en) * | 1982-08-27 | 1985-11-26 | Connelly Will A | Television pulsed navigation system |
DE3242997A1 (en) | 1982-11-20 | 1984-05-24 | Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart | Position indicating system |
DE3426851C1 (en) * | 1984-07-20 | 1985-10-17 | Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., 5300 Bonn | Satellite navigation system |
EP0303371B1 (en) * | 1987-08-10 | 1993-03-10 | Lynxvale Limited | Navigation and tracking system |
GB2222922B (en) | 1988-06-16 | 1993-01-20 | Spectronics Micro Syst Ltd | Vehicle location system |
US5157686A (en) * | 1990-05-24 | 1992-10-20 | Cylink Corporation | Method and apparatus for the modulation of spread spectrum radio signals |
US5166952A (en) * | 1990-05-24 | 1992-11-24 | Cylink Corporation | Method and apparatus for the reception and demodulation of spread spectrum radio signals |
US5481316A (en) * | 1990-11-05 | 1996-01-02 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System, apparatus and method for canceling televison ghost signals |
GB2254508A (en) | 1991-04-02 | 1992-10-07 | James Collier Mitchinson | Vehicle location determining system |
US5271034A (en) * | 1991-08-26 | 1993-12-14 | Avion Systems, Inc. | System and method for receiving and decoding global positioning satellite signals |
US5323322A (en) * | 1992-03-05 | 1994-06-21 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Networked differential GPS system |
US5398034A (en) * | 1993-03-29 | 1995-03-14 | Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. | Vector delay lock loop processing of radiolocation transmitter signals |
US5510801A (en) * | 1994-03-01 | 1996-04-23 | Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. | Location determination system and method using television broadcast signals |
DE69523746T2 (en) * | 1994-03-25 | 2002-08-01 | Qualcomm Inc | LOCATION DETERMINATION METHOD FOR USE WITH AN ANALOGUE CELLULAR SYSTEM |
US5504492A (en) * | 1994-08-01 | 1996-04-02 | Honeywell Inc. | Look ahead satellite positioning system position error bound monitoring system |
US5630206A (en) * | 1994-08-11 | 1997-05-13 | Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. | Position enhanced cellular telephone system |
JP3538907B2 (en) * | 1994-08-19 | 2004-06-14 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Broadcast wave receiver for mobile |
US5648982A (en) * | 1994-09-09 | 1997-07-15 | Omnipoint Corporation | Spread spectrum transmitter |
US5953370A (en) * | 1994-09-09 | 1999-09-14 | Omnipoint Corporation | Apparatus for receiving and correlating a spread spectrum signal |
US5604765A (en) * | 1994-12-23 | 1997-02-18 | Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. | Position enhanced communication system including system for embedding CDMA navigation beacons under the communications signals of a wireless communication system |
US5640452A (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 1997-06-17 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Location-sensitive decryption of an encrypted message |
ZA965340B (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 1997-01-27 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Code division multiple access (cdma) communication system |
GB9519087D0 (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 1995-11-22 | Cursor Positioning Sys Ltd | Navigation and tracking system |
WO1997014055A1 (en) * | 1995-10-09 | 1997-04-17 | Snaptrack, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the location of an object which may have an obstructed view of the sky |
US5774829A (en) * | 1995-12-12 | 1998-06-30 | Pinterra Corporation | Navigation and positioning system and method using uncoordinated beacon signals in conjunction with an absolute positioning system |
US6393046B1 (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 2002-05-21 | Sirf Technology, Inc. | Spread spectrum receiver with multi-bit correlator |
US5815114A (en) * | 1996-04-05 | 1998-09-29 | Discovision Associates | Positioning system and method |
US6107959A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 2000-08-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Positioning determination using one low-Earth orbit satellite |
US5920284A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-07-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Ambiguity resolution for ambiguous position solutions using satellite beams |
US6078284A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 2000-06-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Passive position determination using two low-earth orbit satellites |
US5953311A (en) * | 1997-02-18 | 1999-09-14 | Discovision Associates | Timing synchronization in a receiver employing orthogonal frequency division multiplexing |
EP0968577B1 (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 2009-09-23 | The Board of Trustees of The Leland S. Stanford Junior University | A system using leo satellites for centimeter-level navigation |
US5784339A (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 1998-07-21 | Ocean Vision Technology, Inc. | Underwater location and communication system |
US6201497B1 (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2001-03-13 | Dlb Limited | Enhanced global navigation satellite system |
US6006097A (en) | 1997-11-24 | 1999-12-21 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method for determining position of mobile communication terminals |
US6184921B1 (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2001-02-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method for transmitting VSB digital TV with carrier frequency near co-channel NTSC audio carrier frequency |
US6147642A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2000-11-14 | Decisionmark Corp. | Method and apparatus for limiting access to satellite communication signals |
US6144413A (en) * | 1998-06-25 | 2000-11-07 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Synchronization signal detection and phase estimation apparatus and method |
US6137441A (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2000-10-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Accurate range and range rate determination in a satellite communications system |
US20050026589A1 (en) | 1999-07-29 | 2005-02-03 | Bryan Holland | Remote locator system using A E911-enabled wireless system |
US6374177B1 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2002-04-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing navigational services in a wireless communication device |
US6559894B2 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2003-05-06 | Digeo, Inc. | Block-adaptive equalization using partial decision feedback in digital broadcast communications |
US6437832B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2002-08-20 | General Electric Company | Mitigation of multipath using ultra wideband DTV overlay signal |
US6289280B1 (en) | 1999-12-10 | 2001-09-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for determining an algebraic solution to GPS terrestrial hybrid location system equations |
US6590529B2 (en) * | 2000-02-14 | 2003-07-08 | Mysky Communications | Individualized, location specific weather forecasting system |
GB0014719D0 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2000-08-09 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | A method of providing an estimate of a location |
US6589173B1 (en) * | 2000-07-17 | 2003-07-08 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Ultrasound system for disease detection and patient treatment |
US6861984B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2005-03-01 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using broadcast digital television signals |
US7471244B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2008-12-30 | Rosum Corporation | Monitor units for television signals |
US6970132B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2005-11-29 | Rosum Corporation | Targeted data transmission and location services using digital television signaling |
US6522297B1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2003-02-18 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using ghost canceling reference television signals |
US6559800B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2003-05-06 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using broadcast analog television signals |
US20050251844A1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2005-11-10 | Massimiliano Martone | Blind correlation for high precision ranging of coded OFDM signals |
US7042396B2 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2006-05-09 | Rosom Corporation | Position location using digital audio broadcast signals |
US6753812B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2004-06-22 | Rosum Corporation | Time-gated delay lock loop tracking of digital television signals |
US20020184653A1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2002-12-05 | Pierce Matthew D. | Services based on position location using broadcast digital television signals |
US6963306B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2005-11-08 | Rosum Corp. | Position location and data transmission using pseudo digital television transmitters |
US6952182B2 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2005-10-04 | The Rosom Corporation | Position location using integrated services digital broadcasting—terrestrial (ISDB-T) broadcast television signals |
US20050066373A1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2005-03-24 | Matthew Rabinowitz | Position location using broadcast digital television signals |
US7126536B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2006-10-24 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using terrestrial digital video broadcast television signals |
US7463195B2 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2008-12-09 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using global positioning signals augmented by broadcast television signals |
US6717547B2 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2004-04-06 | Rosum Corporation | Position location using broadcast television signals and mobile telephone signals |
US6859173B2 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2005-02-22 | The Rosum Corporation | Position location using broadcast television signals and mobile telephone signals |
EP1235076A1 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-28 | Cambridge Positioning Systems Limited | Improvements in positioning systems and methods |
US6727847B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2004-04-27 | Rosum Corporation | Using digital television broadcast signals to provide GPS aiding information |
US7042949B1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2006-05-09 | Rosum Corporation | Robust data transmission using broadcast digital television signals |
US6839024B2 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2005-01-04 | Rosum Corporation | Position determination using portable pseudo-television broadcast transmitters |
JP3547412B2 (en) * | 2001-07-24 | 2004-07-28 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Wireless terminal device and positioning system |
US7962162B2 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2011-06-14 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Simulcasting OFDM system having mobile station location identification |
US6914560B2 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2005-07-05 | The Rosum Corporation | Position location using broadcast digital television signals comprising pseudonoise sequences |
US6917328B2 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2005-07-12 | Rosum Corporation | Radio frequency device for receiving TV signals and GPS satellite signals and performing positioning |
US6806830B2 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2004-10-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Electronic device precision location via local broadcast signals |
AU2003258995A1 (en) | 2002-07-05 | 2004-02-25 | Rosum Corporation | Precision time transfer using television signals |
US7269424B2 (en) * | 2002-10-16 | 2007-09-11 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab | Mobile terminal implementing a ranging signal receiver and method |
WO2004064374A2 (en) | 2003-01-13 | 2004-07-29 | Rosum Corporation | Clock recovery for the digital television signal |
US7498873B2 (en) | 2005-11-02 | 2009-03-03 | Rosom Corporation | Wide-lane pseudorange measurements using FM signals |
US20070121555A1 (en) | 2005-11-08 | 2007-05-31 | David Burgess | Positioning using is-95 cdma signals |
US7466266B2 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2008-12-16 | Rosum Corporation | Psuedo television transmitters for position location |
-
2005
- 2005-11-22 US US11/284,800 patent/US8102317B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-11-15 WO PCT/US2006/060946 patent/WO2009105054A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5835060A (en) * | 1996-10-07 | 1998-11-10 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Self-resolving LBI triangulation |
US20020122003A1 (en) * | 2001-01-05 | 2002-09-05 | Patwari Neal K. | Method and apparatus for location estimation |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2453903B (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2011-11-23 | Sirf Tech Inc | Cell ID based positioning from cell intersections |
US8364164B2 (en) | 2006-08-11 | 2013-01-29 | Csr Technology Inc. | Cell ID based positioning from cell intersections |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8102317B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 |
US20070050824A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8102317B2 (en) | Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures | |
US8106828B1 (en) | Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signatures | |
JP2009027696A (en) | Location identification using broadcast wireless signal signature | |
US11343818B2 (en) | Enhanced positioning reference signal patterns for positioning | |
US20070121555A1 (en) | Positioning using is-95 cdma signals | |
US9651675B2 (en) | Estimating frequency of a GNSS enabled device based on time stamps | |
EP2663143B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the location of a mobile device in a wireless network | |
US7202914B2 (en) | Digital television transmitter identification system using pseudo-random sequences | |
US7042396B2 (en) | Position location using digital audio broadcast signals | |
US20110039583A1 (en) | Muting time masks to suppress serving cell interference for observed time difference of arrival location | |
US7719465B2 (en) | Method of acquiring initial GPS signal in broadcasting system and system using the method | |
US20080299918A1 (en) | Cognitive radio terminal | |
US9572044B2 (en) | Mobile broadcast-based location determination method and apparatus | |
US11540085B2 (en) | Determining a position of a mobile communication device | |
WO1996026591A1 (en) | Chirped spread spectrum positioning system | |
US20150133172A1 (en) | Distributed-Input OFDM Angle-of-Arrival Scheme for Location Determination | |
US9813877B1 (en) | Accurate indoor positioning with cellular signals | |
US20110285585A1 (en) | Position Location Using Opportunistic Analog and Digital Radio-Frequency Signals | |
US20040073914A1 (en) | Precision time transfer using television signals | |
JP2004208274A (en) | Service based on position recognition using digital television signal for broadcasting | |
EP1858184A2 (en) | Server and method for collecting information relating to the viewing or listening mode of a portable terminal for receiving terrestrial digital broadcast and program for transmitting information relating to the viewing or listening mode of a portable terminal device for receiving terrestrial digital broadcast | |
US8677440B2 (en) | Position determination using ATSC-M/H signals | |
US20130237219A1 (en) | Frequency adjustment method | |
JP2016536894A (en) | Geolocation information for DVB-T2 style system | |
WO1996026579A1 (en) | Novel cellular positioning system (cps) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 06852064 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 06852064 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |