WO2008030750A2 - System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network - Google Patents

System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008030750A2
WO2008030750A2 PCT/US2007/077185 US2007077185W WO2008030750A2 WO 2008030750 A2 WO2008030750 A2 WO 2008030750A2 US 2007077185 W US2007077185 W US 2007077185W WO 2008030750 A2 WO2008030750 A2 WO 2008030750A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
content
distribution
digital content
level
producer
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2007/077185
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2008030750A3 (en
Inventor
Christopher Amidon
Alfredo Issa
Richard Walsh
Sid Stafford
Original Assignee
Qurio Holdings, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Qurio Holdings, Inc. filed Critical Qurio Holdings, Inc.
Priority to EP07841587.4A priority Critical patent/EP2067291A4/en
Priority to CN2007800411261A priority patent/CN101573904B/en
Publication of WO2008030750A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008030750A2/en
Publication of WO2008030750A3 publication Critical patent/WO2008030750A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/04Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks
    • H04L63/0428Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks wherein the data content is protected, e.g. by encrypting or encapsulating the payload
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L2463/00Additional details relating to network architectures or network communication protocols for network security covered by H04L63/00
    • H04L2463/101Additional details relating to network architectures or network communication protocols for network security covered by H04L63/00 applying security measures for digital rights management

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to controlled sharing of digital content over a network, and is more particularly concerned with a computer software application and corresponding method of providing limited and controlled distribution of digital content in a dynamic, unstructured social network.
  • the scenarios mentioned above involve situations where a "limited viral distribution" is desired.
  • the content producer does not want to identify exactly who is extended family or what constitutes “close friend”.
  • the content producer wants the content to spread virally to some "degree of separation”.
  • Degree of separation used here refers to how far away (levels) one user is away from the originating user in a "friend of a friend” (FOAF) or other type of social network.
  • FOAF friend of a friend
  • the user wants to seed the content to a select group of people and allow them to have the freedom to spread the content further - at their discretion, and to users of their choice.
  • the viral spread needs to be controlled, so as not to permit the content going to the general public.
  • the content producer may want to provide a different quality or portion of the content for users as they are farther "out” on the social network.
  • the present invention is directed to a system and method for providing controlled distribution of digital content through a predetermined number of levels in a social network.
  • a controlled content distribution system includes a desktop application and corresponding program instructions that may be provided on users' peer systems.
  • the CCDS application includes features and steps for ensuring that a given content producer can share digital content with other contacts in a social network (hereinafter referred to as "content recipients") while maintaining control over the access and limited distribution of the shared content.
  • Content distribution rules may be configured by a content producer for one or more authorized levels of distribution in a network.
  • a content producer can specify distribution parameters including a level limit representative of the maximum number of levels, or degrees of separation, a potential content recipient may be from the content producer.
  • Additional content distribution rules/parameters are definable by the content producer for one or more allowable levels of access, and typically include alteration definitions that may specify degradations, augmentations, or partial deletion of the digital content as it propagates through selected designated levels in the social network.
  • a content producer specifies an initial distribution list and the above distribution parameters, and this information is sufficient to control the distribution of specified digital content without prior knowledge of participants and their relationships. As such, limited and controlled distribution of digital content to a dynamic and unstructured social network is afforded.
  • One exemplary embodiment of the presently disclosed content distribution technology corresponds to a method for distributing digital content among one or more levels within a dynamically created social network.
  • a first step in accordance with such method corresponds to obtaining access to digital content provided by a content producer.
  • a second step involves identifying one or more distribution parameters that establish limitations on how the digital content is to be distributed to one or more content recipients.
  • Distribution parameters may be provided as selected input by the content producer.
  • the distribution parameters may include a level number (n) representative of the maximum number of separation levels allowed between the content producer and any content recipient.
  • An initial distribution list may also be provided.
  • Distribution parameters also include one or more alteration definitions for selected levels of the n allowable levels in the social network.
  • Alteration definitions may define degradation characteristics for the digital content, such as a number of frames per second, file resolution, file size, length, color or bit rate, or other file characterization parameters as will be known or appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. Alteration definitions may also define an augmentation file, such as but not limited to a visible or invisible watermark or other hindrance, an advertisement, a portion of text, or a supplemental audio or video segment for appending, prepending or otherwise incorporating into the digital content. Another parameter may correspond to a maximum number of total content recipients for overall distribution or for maximum distribution per level. A still further distribution parameter may include one or more relationship types for identifying desirable characteristics or limitations associated with content recipients authorized to receive versions of the digital content.
  • a distribution package may also be created for relay across a network to an FOAF License Server (FLS) and also to one or more content recipients.
  • FLS FOAF License Server
  • Such step of creating a distribution package is performed each time the digital content is passed from one allowable level to the next in the social network.
  • Creating a distribution package may involve in part the generation of a configuration data file, which may be prepared in a rights expression language (REL) such as XML or the like.
  • the configuration data file identifies the distribution parameters per level selected by the content producer.
  • a key ID for uniquely identifying the distribution package and digital content therein may also be generated. This key ID, along with a license key seed, the configuration data file, and an encrypted version of the digital content are all included in a distribution package.
  • Still further steps may involve inviting one or more content recipients as designated in an initial distribution list to view the digital content, verifying authenticity of each content recipient who subsequently requests access to the digital content, and initiating playback of an altered form of the digital content as defined by the alteration definition for the given level.
  • CCDS controlled content distribution system
  • Additional instructions related to the above article of manufacture may be configured to direct a computing device to send notification to the content producer to prepare a configuration data file, generate a unique key ID, encrypt the digital content, send notifications of user viewing or distribution, and/or interface with a media playback device.
  • FIG. 1 provides a block diagram representation of an exemplary network interaction among multiple peer clients and a license server in a social network, specifically depicting an example of controlled distribution among three levels;
  • FIG. 2 provides a block diagram representation of exemplary hardware and software components as well as coupled peripheral devices for a peer system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 3 depicts exemplary portions of a distribution package as created and distributed in accordance with a controlled content distribution system of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 provides a block diagram representation of exemplary aspects of a server system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, including modular components of a distribution management system;
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram representation of exemplary steps for distributing digital content as may occur in a CCDS application provided at a content producer's peer system;
  • Fig. 6 is a flow diagram representation of exemplary steps for managing the distribution of digital content as may occur in a license server.
  • Fig. 7 is a flow diagram representation of exemplary steps for distributing digital content as may occur in a CCDS application provided at a content recipient's peer system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Social networks such as friend-of-a-friend networks, are often utilized to share information among a group of networked contacts.
  • Shared information may correspond to many different forms of electronic content, including but not limited to digital videos, digital images, digital photos, digital audio, text, graphics, html code or other file types.
  • the present specification is directed to the sharing of digital content with particular exemplary reference to content in video or graphic file format, although it should be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the disclosed content distribution technology can be applied to other types of electronic content provided in digital or other suitable form. It should also be appreciated that more than one piece of digital content may be selected for distribution, and multiple pieces of content may correspond to different file types.
  • aspects of the present invention provide features and steps for ensuring that a given content producer can share digital content with other contacts in a social network (hereinafter referred to as "content recipients") while maintaining control over the access and limited distribution of the shared content.
  • a content producer can specify distribution parameters including a level limit representative of the maximum number of levels, or degrees of separation, a potential content recipient may be from the content producer. Additional content distribution rules/parameters are definable by the content producer for one or more of the allowable levels of access, and typically include alteration definitions that may specify degradations, augmentations, or partial deletion of the digital content as it propagates through designated levels in the social network.
  • a content producer specifies an initial distribution list and the above distribution parameters, and this information is sufficient to control the distribution of specified digital content without prior knowledge of participants and their relationships. As such, limited and controlled distribution of digital content to a dynamic and unstructured social network is afforded.
  • server processes discussed herein may be implemented using a single server or multiple servers working in combination.
  • Databases and applications may be implemented on a single system or distributed across multiple systems. Distributed components may operate sequentially or in parallel. When data is obtained or accessed between a first and second computer system or component thereof, the actual data may travel between the systems directly or indirectly.
  • a first computer accesses a file from a second computer
  • the access may involve one or more intermediary computers, proxies, and the like.
  • the actual file may move between the computers, or one computer may provide a pointer or metafile that the second computer uses to access the actual data from a computer other than the first computer, for instance.
  • a content producer 10 identifies digital content that is to be shared with others in a network. Such digital content identified by the content producer may have been originally created by the content producer. For example, the content producer may have taken a video or picture to be shared with others. However, it is not essential that the content producer is the original source of the digital content. In some embodiments, the content producer may have obtained the digital content from another source and is simply selecting the digital content for further dissemination. It should be appreciated that users of the disclosed technology, including content producer 10 as well as content recipients may correspond to individuals, groups of individuals, business entities, etc. and should not be a limiting feature of the present subject matter.
  • Distribution parameters can include such information as a level limit representative of the maximum number of "degrees of separation" allowed between the content producer and any content recipient.
  • content producer 10 designates a level limit of three levels, which means that the selected digital content can only be distributed up to a maximum of three levels away from the content producer 10.
  • Distribution parameters can also include an initial distribution list that designates the starting nodes for the dynamically created social network. In the example of Fig.
  • content producer 10 selects three users in an initial distribution list, corresponding to level one (1) content recipients 12a, 12b and 12c (herein collectively referred to as recipients 12).
  • Level one recipients 12 and others are free to distribute to any entity they wish.
  • level one recipient 12a may choose to send the selected digital content to level two (2) recipient 14a.
  • Recipient 12b may choose to send the digital content to three recipients 14b, 14c and 14d, and recipient 12c does not forward the digital content.
  • recipient 14a decides to forward the digital content to level three (3) recipient 16a, and recipient 14c sends the digital content to recipient 16b.
  • Level three recipients 16a and 16b are restricted from further distributing the selected digital content since content producer 10 selected a distribution level limit of three.
  • the entire spectrum of distribution is not defined by the content producer. Instead, the subject content distribution network involves dynamic (or viral) distribution as opposed to a predetermined configuration.
  • Content producer 10 doesn't know if the selected digital content will reach three or three-hundred people, but it will not be distributed beyond three levels deep in the dynamically created social network.
  • Additional distribution parameters that are specified by content producer 10 include alteration definitions for one or more of the three allowable levels in the social network. Alteration definitions allow the selected content to be degraded or augmented in some fashion as it is passed from friend to friend. The content is degraded or otherwise altered by a peer application provided at each designated user's location prior to distributing the file. In other words, the controlled content distribution system employs a "just in time” or "lazy" alteration.
  • content producer 10 may select a digital video for controlled distribution to content recipients and may wish to degrade the quality level of the video as it spreads farther away from the content producer.
  • first level recipients 12a, 12b and 12c receive a highest quality video from content producer 10. Second level recipients 14a-14d respectively receive a medium quality version of video, and third level recipients 16a and 16b receive a version that is low quality and has advertisements preceding the video playback. More specific aspects of potential alteration definitions will be provided later in further detail.
  • the subject controlled content distribution system consists in part of a desktop application that is required by every peer-level participant in the social network.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates exemplary physical components that may be present in each of the peer-level participant systems illustrated in Fig. 1 , including a system associated with the content producer and each content recipient.
  • peer system 20 includes a processor unit 22, which may be any type of processor as included or associated with a personal computer (PC), mobile terminal device (e.g., cellular telephone), Personal Digital Assistant, or the like.
  • the processor unit 22 of exemplary peer system 20 may be configured to process data transmitted to or received from other users.
  • a communications interface 24 may also be provided to buffer or otherwise handle the actual relay of such communicated data as it is sent or received over a network 26.
  • Network 26 may correspond to a dial-in network, a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), public switched telephone network (PSTN), the Internet, intranet or ethemet type networks and others over any combination of hard-wired or wireless communication links.
  • Optional input peripherals, such as input peripheral 28 may be coupled to peer system 20 so that a user can provide input such as user identification, registration and/or authentication information, content selection, and definitions for distribution parameters in accordance with the subject controlled content distribution technology. Examples of possible input peripheral devices include a keyboard, touch-screen monitor, mouse, scanner, microphone, etc. Although not illustrated in Fig. 2, additional peripheral devices including but not limited to user displays, printers, etc. may also be provided in conjunction with peer system 20.
  • memory 30 is also provided for storing a variety of digital information, including data and software or firmware.
  • Memory 30 may be provided as a variety of computer-readable medium, such as but not limited to any combination of volatile memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM, such as DRAM, SRAM, etc.) and nonvolatile memory (e.g., ROM, flash, hard drives, magnetic tapes, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, etc.).
  • RAM random access memory
  • nonvolatile memory e.g., ROM, flash, hard drives, magnetic tapes, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, etc.
  • memory 30 may be a designated storage location for digital content 32 that is selected for distribution and also for storing the program instructions and executable code corresponding to the controlled content distribution system (CCDS) desktop application 34.
  • Program instructions and executable code that are stored in memory 30 are typically read and executed by the processor unit 22 in the corresponding peer system.
  • the CCDS application 34 is required by every participant in the social network. In one embodiment, no formal registration process is required. A user participating in the system only needs to download and install the application 34 and associate a communication identifier such as e-mail and/or IM address.
  • the application 34 is responsible for content packaging and content alteration, as will be described later in further detail.
  • Application 34 may utilize the user's primary e-mail and/or instant messaging and/or short message service (SMS) systems or the like (not illustrated in Fig. 2 but also provided in peer system 20) for the actual content distribution.
  • Application 34 may also be designed to integrate with, or to utilize, existing media playback applications, such as but not limited to Windows Media Player, QuickTime, iTunes, etc. for content playback and other features.
  • a content producer provides input to define the distribution parameters.
  • One exemplary distribution parameter includes a level limit (n) representative of the maximum number of "degrees of separation” allowed between the content producer and any content recipient.
  • Additional distribution parameters include an alteration definition for one or more of the allowable levels (n levels total) selected by the content producer.
  • the level limit is three (3)
  • the content producer defines an alteration definition for one or more of the three (3) allowable levels.
  • Digital content is distributed in accordance with the subject technology in a form that is altered from the original digital content. Alterations may include various levels of content degradation, augmentation, or other modifications.
  • an alteration definition is chosen to define a certain degradation level for the digital content, it should be appreciated that such degradation can be identified in terms of a given number of frames per second (fps), file resolution, file size, length, bit rate or other compression characteristic.
  • selected compression characteristics to digital content are defined in terms of percentages.
  • an original digital video may be provided to a first level distribution list of identified recipients with a quality level of 25% relative to the original quality of the digital video.
  • compression characteristics are defined as a specific quality level.
  • an altered digital video may be characterized as one with a quality level of 30 frames per second or a file size of 5.0 Megabytes.
  • Additional modifications may correspond to deleting a portion of video or audio, cropping a photo or other image or graphic file, or changing the color characteristics of a photo, image or graphic file from color to black and white or vice versa.
  • Alterations may also include augmentations, such as but not limited to the addition of visible or invisible watermarks or other visual or invisible hindrances to a file, the addition of video or image advertisements to the original content, the addition of text comments to a photo, or the addition of annotations to a video.
  • An advertisement may be placed before, during or after the original content for levels farther out in the network. Alternatively, portions of the digital content may be deleted.
  • a user may make "additional scenes" available for users closer in the network, while those scenes are removed for user farther out in the network.
  • Yet another form of augmentation may involve selective or random reordering of the content in a text, graphic, video file or the like. It should be appreciated that the types of modifications available often vary depending on the type of digital content selected for distribution.
  • the CCDS application provides features for a user to define additional distribution parameters or rules that can be stored with the above alteration definitions to further customize the distribution of content.
  • a content producer may wish to further limit the spread of content by placing a maximum number of invitations per user and/or per level.
  • the CCDS provides users with an ability to apply an expiration timestamp on the content distribution. If the timestamp passes, users are not able to view or share the distributed content.
  • additional distribution parameters may include the following: (1) a maximum number of users to distribute content (total or per level); (2) a pre-defined possible user list, blocked user list, acceptable domains, etc. (for example, a content producer may define that the content can only be distributed to users with addresses at
  • flashpoint.com or other specified domain name or group of domain names, or users with a given IP address, range of IP addresses, or other identification parameter(s)); (3) a timeframe for distribution (total or per level); and (4) users associated with a specific group, FOAF network, or other social network, or that have specific interests.
  • a distribution parameter such as (3) above, the content producer may have the ability at each level to configure the start and end time for distribution. This would allow a slow rollout by, for example, distributing one level per week. Similarly, simple distribution duration can be assigned.
  • the controlled content distribution system can be integrated with an existing service, such as but not limited to MySpace, Friendster, or others, and permit or allow the invitation for accessing digital content based on the user ID matching given or selected parameters.
  • an existing service such as but not limited to MySpace, Friendster, or others
  • the CCDS application creates a distribution package. Each time content distribution is initiated on a different allowed level in the social network, the application creates a new distribution package. Prior to distributing the content, the application creates the version of the content that is defined by the next allowed level. It should be appreciated that the first distribution of the digital content should preserve the original content format in a lossless fashion such that each subsequent level in the distribution network has the necessary quality level associated with its given alteration definition. Once a new distribution package is ready, the peer system integrates with a content distribution mechanism for actual distribution of the altered content.
  • An example of one suitable content distribution mechanism corresponds to one using a BitTorrent protocol, such as created and maintained by BitTorrent, Inc.
  • the distribution package is sent to each user identified by a content producer or authorized content recipient in an initial distribution list.
  • Such initial distribution list may be selected by a user when the CCDS application presents a list of possible user contacts from the user's primary e-mail, instant message (IM), short message service (SMS) or other messaging application.
  • Fig. 3 provides a block diagram of exemplary file portions provided therein. It should be appreciated that distribution packages 40 are typically created as a binary or other digital file with a combination of various information and/or instructions. A first portion included in the exemplary distribution package 40 of Fig.
  • configuration data file 44 is expressed in a rights expression language (REL) which is created by the application provided at the content producer's peer system.
  • REL rights expression language
  • configuration data file 44 is provided in Extensible Markup Language (XML) format, although other code languages may be utilized.
  • XML Extensible Markup Language
  • a structured format is used to describe the defined alterations (including degradations, augmentations, deletions, or other modifications), and the XML structure will vary based on the type of media file selected in the digital content.
  • Level 1 Original Level 2: Medium Quality
  • distribution package 40 may also include a key ID 46, which corresponds to a unique identifier for the selected digital content 40 that is created by the content producer's peer application.
  • a license key seed (LKS) 48 is also included in distribution package 40.
  • LKS 48 is a value that is only known by the content producer and a license server, and is used to encrypt the distribution package.
  • the distribution package ultimately contains a form of the digital content that has been encrypted and locked with a digital "key". The result is an encrypted file that can only be unlocked by a person who has obtained a license with the required key for decrypting the digital content.
  • a license may be received from a license server, as will be discussed later in further detail.
  • Distribution package 40 may also include content 49 that is to be used for augmentation to a form of the digital content.
  • some alteration definitions may include an advertisement for displaying before, during or after a given form of digital video.
  • level three recipients are shown a car ad such as one located at the web address or URL of http://mycarads.com/ad 1 ,mpg. If placing an advertisement or other augmented file for level three users, the advertisement can be extracted from the Internet during the creation step of a level two user sending to a level three user. By utilizing references and loading the content only when needed, original file size of the distribution package can be reduced.
  • FLS 50 may be a standalone centrally hosted license server or a distributed license server that is accessible from the peer systems of a content producer and content recipients (as represented by the network configuration of Fig. 1). It should be appreciated that although FLS 50 is only depicted in Fig. 1 as being in bi-directional communication via dashed lines with content recipients 12c, 14d and 16b, such communication is actually provided for each recipient in the social network. The limited depiction is merely provided for ease of illustration.
  • FLS 50 may generally function as a distribution and licensing management system.
  • FLS 50 may include a select combination of the exemplary hardware components already discussed in relation to a peer system 20 as illustrated in Fig. 2.
  • processor unit 22' at least a processor unit 22', a communications interface 24' and memory 30' are provided.
  • Memory 30' is used to store program instructions and executable code that is read and executed by processor unit 22'.
  • Such components function together to provide a plurality of operative modules, including a license-level creation module 52, a registration module 54, an authentication module 56 and a license assignment module 58.
  • memory 30' associated with FLS 50 may also include a database for storing information identifying the relationship between a given piece of content and the corresponding levels, level-licenses and users to whom the content is distributed. It should be appreciated that a particular piece of content typically has several different level-licenses and a user can have more than one level-license assigned to him which belongs to a different piece of content.
  • License-level creation module 52 is used after a content producer selects digital content and defines parameters for its distribution.
  • the resulting digital package (such as previously discussed with reference to Fig. 3) is sent to FLS 50, where a level-license is created for each of the allowed levels defined by the content producer.
  • FLS 50 would produce three level-licenses, one for each of the three levels defined by content producer 10.
  • Each level-license captures the rights at that level as expressed in the REL of the configuration data file associated with the digital content.
  • Registration module 54 may optionally be used to register each user in a social network, including content producers and recipients. In one embodiment, registration module 54 may be used to coordinate a formal registration process in which a user provides certain identifying information including name, contact information, program purchase specifics, serial number, etc. In another embodiment, registration module 54 is used simply to ensure that the required CCDS application has been downloaded to the user's peer system. [0048] Authentication module 56 is used to verify the identity of a content recipient. When a content recipient receives an invitation to view digital content, that content recipient must be authenticated with the FLS 50 before being able to decrypt the digital content for viewing or further distribution.
  • FLS 50 typically compares the identity of the content recipient seeking authentication with the distribution list created by a sending user at the previous level in the network. If the content recipient is successfully matched to a member of the distribution list, then authentication will be successful. Otherwise, the content recipient may not be able to access the distributed digital content.
  • License assignment module 58 corresponds to a portion of FLS 50 that creates licenses for received content in response to an access request from a content recipient. Licenses are created according to the level-rights and distribution parameters defined for the particular level of the content recipient.
  • a license generated by FLS 50 includes a key that can be used to unlock, or decrypt the content that was previously encrypted by a user's content distribution application.
  • License assignment module 58 may also coordinate the revocation, denial and explicit assignment of level-rights. For example, a content producer can revoke all license-level rights originally issued. This procedure would be handled by the license assignment module 58. Similarly, a content producer can revoke rights for a particular license-level (e.g., all level three content recipients) while leaving all other license-levels intact. In accordance with denying user rights, a content producer may also specify a user or group of users that may never receive a license for any or all content independent of how through the social network that content was received, in accordance with explicit rights assignment, a content producer may specify that a particular user, no matter where in the social network, can receive a specific level-right.
  • a first step 60 involves obtaining access to digital content.
  • Digital content may correspond to one or more types of similar or different electronic media and is typically imported by the content producer into the CCDS application.
  • Distribution parameters are then identified in step 62, and may include information such as a level limit, an alteration definition for one or more allowable levels, an initial distribution list, and other parameters as previously discussed.
  • a content producer may select a digital video to share to a maximum of four levels in a social network. Distribution parameters are then defined in terms of level-rights for each of the four allowable levels.
  • level-rights may be configured as follows: (1) Level One - full size access at 30 frames per second (fps); (2) Level Two - half size access at 15 fps; (3) Level Three - half size access at 15 fps and access to only the first 30 seconds of the video; and (4) Level Four - a thumbnail access of the first frame only. Levels Five and beyond are granted no access to the digital video.
  • the CCDS application generates a configuration data file in step 64.
  • the configuration data file may be prepared in a rights expression language (REL), such as XML or the like.
  • REL rights expression language
  • the CCDS application then generates a unique key ID in step 66 for the content identified in step 60.
  • a license key seed (LKS) is then used in step 68 to encrypt the distribution package, including the digital content, configuration data file setting forth all distribution parameters, key ID, and LKS.
  • the distribution package is then sent in step 70 to a FOAF license server (FLS) and to content recipients identified in the initial distribution list.
  • FLS FOAF license server
  • Fig. 6 illustrates exemplary process steps that may occur at an FLS after it receives a distribution package created by a content recipient.
  • the initial step of receiving the distribution package is indicated as step 72.
  • the FLS creates level-licenses for each allowable level as defined by the content producer. For example, if a content producer selects a level limit of four as described above, the FLS will create four level-licenses that capture the type of file quality or related characteristics associated with any alteration definitions provided for each level.
  • the FLS may receive in step 76 an access request from a content recipient.
  • the FLS may then register and/or authenticate the content recipient in step 78 to ensure that the content recipient matches with the initial distribution list generated by the content producer.
  • the FLS then creates a license in step 80 for content access according to the defined alteration definition for that content recipient.
  • the FLS then sends this license to the content recipient.
  • the license should include a key that allows the content recipient to decrypt and open the received digital content.
  • a content recipient receives an invitation to view digital content. Users may be notified of such invitation via their e-mail, instant messaging, short message service or other messaging application. The invitation typically is sent in conjunction with the actual encrypted distribution package. When the user attempts to open the file, their CCDS application will be launched. The content recipient then authenticates (or registers and authenticates) himself with the FLS in step 84. Authentication consists of verifying that the current user was one of the designated content recipients that are identified in the configuration data file within the distribution package.
  • the verification may be checked against the e-mail, instant messaging, SMS, or other addresses that were assigned to the current user's instance of the CCDS application.
  • the CCDS application on the user's peer system passes the content playback function to the user's designated media player.
  • the CCDS application may be integrated with the media player or may be separate whereby the CCDS application streams the digital content to the media player.
  • Such playback functions are known to those of ordinary skill in the art, and so more detailed discussion of such functions are not provided herein.
  • content recipient receives in step 86 a license to access the digital content, and using a key provided within the license is able to decrypt the digital content for viewing.
  • the content recipient will invite additional users in step 88.
  • a content producer decides to share selected digital content with a certain number of people corresponding to m users.
  • the content producer sends invitations to those users.
  • the CCDS application informs the FLS that the content producer has invited these m users.
  • the FLS then grants level one rights to those m users since the content producer has invited them.
  • a level one user receives the invitation via a dedicated CCDS application, acquires an encrypted copy of the digital content and undergoes authentication with the FLS.
  • the FLS creates a license for that content using the level one rights, and sends the license and required key to the requestor.
  • the CCDS application provided at the level one recipient's peer system receives the license, which then allows level one access to the user for that particular piece of content.
  • the level one user in turn decides to send an invitation to view that content to another set of users, p.
  • the CCDS application at the level one user's peer system informs the FLS that the level one user has invited these p users.
  • the FLS then grants level two rights to those p users (as long as this additional level of distribution is allowed according to initial distribution parameters defined by the content producer).
  • the FLS informs the invitee that no rights are available.
  • the FLS may also block users from accessing digital content if that user is selectively blocked by a content producer or otherwise lacks authorization to access one or more given portions of digital content.
  • a CCDS application in accordance with the present technology may optionally provide users with an audit trail feature that tracks usage and distribution of the digital content. Since an object of the CCDS application is to control viral content distribution, tracking the actual usage of the content is a significant capability.
  • An audit trail feature initiates a step of sending notification back to an original content producer any time another user attempts to open, view or further share the distributed files.
  • a mechanism for sending data back over a network to the content producer depends on the configuration of the overall system network.
  • the CCDS is implemented as a peer-to-peer (P2P) system
  • the data is sent back to the user either via e-mail or via a web service on the peer system of the content producer.
  • the CCDS is implemented with a central server
  • the data is collected via a web service on the central server.
  • the content producer is able to view details and summaries of the viewing and distribution activities through a user interface either on the peer system desktop or from the central server.
  • Another additional capability of the subject CCDS and related system application is a profiling mechanism which allows a user to save a distribution configuration as a profile for future distributions.
  • a parent who wants to share video footage of her child's latest sports game can save a "Home Video Profile" that specifies a level limit of three (3) levels deep, whereby level one recipients are configured to receive an original version of the video, level two recipients are configured to receive a medium quality version of the digital video, and level three recipients are configured to receive a low quality version of the video.
  • Another example may correspond to a movie producer who wants to distribute a preview of his newest work. The movie producer saves a profile with a level limit of four (4), the level one recipients are designated to receive an original version of the content, while recipients at levels two, three and four are only able to receive a medium quality version with an advertisement inserted at the beginning of the original content.

Abstract

A controlled content distribution system (CCDS) employs a peer-level application into which a content producer can import digital content (e.g., video, audio, graphic, image, text, code files, etc.) The content producer identifies distribution parameters including an initial distribution list and a level limit representing the maximum number of levels, or degrees of separation for allowed distribution in a FOAF social network. Distribution parameters also include an alteration definition for one or more allowable levels in the network. Alteration definitions may identify a file degradation characteristic, file augmentation, or deletion parameter for altering the digital content from its original form. Alteration definitions often vary at each level. A distribution package is created by the CCDS and includes the digital content, a configuration data file, a key ID and a license key seed. The distribution package is processed at a FOAF license server before being sent to additional content recipients.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLED VIRAL DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL CONTENT IN A SOCIAL NETWORK
FIELD OF THE INVENTION [001] The present invention generally relates to controlled sharing of digital content over a network, and is more particularly concerned with a computer software application and corresponding method of providing limited and controlled distribution of digital content in a dynamic, unstructured social network.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[002] Modern technology has provided consumers with a wide variety of electronic devices with which to capture digital content, such as but not limited to content captured in video, audio, photo, text or other format. This phenomenon coupled with advances in networked communication, such as communication via the Internet, has resulted in greater content sharing among individuals. Several existing computer-based applications or related systems provide features for assisting a content producer with the distribution of digital content.
[003] There are systems in place today that can distribute content to a known set of users. Also, some peer-to-peer (P2P) systems exist that can distribute content to anyone and everyone. However, such known systems do not account for potential scenarios where a content producer desires a limited, controlled distribution to a dynamic, unstructured social network. For example, a teenager creates a home video for fun. He wants some of his friends to see it, but not the entire world. Another scenario may involve a movie producer who wants to distribute a movie preview to a select number of reviewers and their associates, but not to everyone. Yet another example is where a family takes some video of a child's birthday party. The family would like for extended family and close friends to see it, but not have it available to the general public.
[004] The scenarios mentioned above involve situations where a "limited viral distribution" is desired. The content producer does not want to identify exactly who is extended family or what constitutes "close friend". Ideally, the content producer wants the content to spread virally to some "degree of separation". "Degree of separation" used here refers to how far away (levels) one user is away from the originating user in a "friend of a friend" (FOAF) or other type of social network. In these examples the user wants to seed the content to a select group of people and allow them to have the freedom to spread the content further - at their discretion, and to users of their choice. However, the viral spread needs to be controlled, so as not to permit the content going to the general public. Additionally, the content producer may want to provide a different quality or portion of the content for users as they are farther "out" on the social network.
[005] Despite the availability of various computer-based applications for distributing digital content in a network environment, a need exists for a method and related article of manufacture that provides a content producer with an ability to virally distribute digital content to their social network while providing controls on distribution and access.
SUMMARY QF THE INVENTION [006] Objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
[007] In general, the present invention is directed to a system and method for providing controlled distribution of digital content through a predetermined number of levels in a social network. A controlled content distribution system (CCDS) includes a desktop application and corresponding program instructions that may be provided on users' peer systems. The CCDS application includes features and steps for ensuring that a given content producer can share digital content with other contacts in a social network (hereinafter referred to as "content recipients") while maintaining control over the access and limited distribution of the shared content.
[008] Content distribution rules may be configured by a content producer for one or more authorized levels of distribution in a network. A content producer can specify distribution parameters including a level limit representative of the maximum number of levels, or degrees of separation, a potential content recipient may be from the content producer. Additional content distribution rules/parameters are definable by the content producer for one or more allowable levels of access, and typically include alteration definitions that may specify degradations, augmentations, or partial deletion of the digital content as it propagates through selected designated levels in the social network. A content producer specifies an initial distribution list and the above distribution parameters, and this information is sufficient to control the distribution of specified digital content without prior knowledge of participants and their relationships. As such, limited and controlled distribution of digital content to a dynamic and unstructured social network is afforded.
[009] One exemplary embodiment of the presently disclosed content distribution technology corresponds to a method for distributing digital content among one or more levels within a dynamically created social network. A first step in accordance with such method corresponds to obtaining access to digital content provided by a content producer. A second step involves identifying one or more distribution parameters that establish limitations on how the digital content is to be distributed to one or more content recipients. Distribution parameters may be provided as selected input by the content producer. The distribution parameters may include a level number (n) representative of the maximum number of separation levels allowed between the content producer and any content recipient. An initial distribution list may also be provided. Distribution parameters also include one or more alteration definitions for selected levels of the n allowable levels in the social network. Alteration definitions may define degradation characteristics for the digital content, such as a number of frames per second, file resolution, file size, length, color or bit rate, or other file characterization parameters as will be known or appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. Alteration definitions may also define an augmentation file, such as but not limited to a visible or invisible watermark or other hindrance, an advertisement, a portion of text, or a supplemental audio or video segment for appending, prepending or otherwise incorporating into the digital content. Another parameter may correspond to a maximum number of total content recipients for overall distribution or for maximum distribution per level. A still further distribution parameter may include one or more relationship types for identifying desirable characteristics or limitations associated with content recipients authorized to receive versions of the digital content. [0010] In further accordance with the above exemplary method, a distribution package may also be created for relay across a network to an FOAF License Server (FLS) and also to one or more content recipients. Such step of creating a distribution package is performed each time the digital content is passed from one allowable level to the next in the social network. Creating a distribution package may involve in part the generation of a configuration data file, which may be prepared in a rights expression language (REL) such as XML or the like. The configuration data file identifies the distribution parameters per level selected by the content producer. A key ID for uniquely identifying the distribution package and digital content therein may also be generated. This key ID, along with a license key seed, the configuration data file, and an encrypted version of the digital content are all included in a distribution package.
[001 1] Still further steps may involve inviting one or more content recipients as designated in an initial distribution list to view the digital content, verifying authenticity of each content recipient who subsequently requests access to the digital content, and initiating playback of an altered form of the digital content as defined by the alteration definition for the given level.
[0012] Features and steps for saving configuration profiles with selected distribution parameters may also be provided, as well as an audit trail mechanism for tracking the viewing and distribution of the digital content as it propagates through a network. Signal notification of such viewing and/or distribution may be sent back to the content producer.
[0013] Another related aspect of the subject controlled content distribution system (CCDS) application and corresponding methodology concerns an article of manufacture such as a computer program comprising a program storage medium readable by a computing device having a memory, the medium tangibly embodying one or more programs of instructions executable by the computing device to perform method steps of importing digital content for controlled distribution, receiving input in the form of distribution parameters identified by a content producer for establishing limitations on how the digital content is to be distributed, and creating a distribution package for subsequent relay across a network. [0014] Additional instructions related to the above article of manufacture may be configured to direct a computing device to send notification to the content producer to prepare a configuration data file, generate a unique key ID, encrypt the digital content, send notifications of user viewing or distribution, and/or interface with a media playback device.
[0015] Other features and aspects of the present invention are discussed in greater detail below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS [0016] The foregoing and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:
[0017] Fig. 1 provides a block diagram representation of an exemplary network interaction among multiple peer clients and a license server in a social network, specifically depicting an example of controlled distribution among three levels;
[0018] Fig. 2 provides a block diagram representation of exemplary hardware and software components as well as coupled peripheral devices for a peer system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; [0019] Fig. 3 depicts exemplary portions of a distribution package as created and distributed in accordance with a controlled content distribution system of the present invention;
[0020] Fig. 4 provides a block diagram representation of exemplary aspects of a server system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, including modular components of a distribution management system;
[0021] Fig. 5 is a flow diagram representation of exemplary steps for distributing digital content as may occur in a CCDS application provided at a content producer's peer system;
[0022] Fig. 6 is a flow diagram representation of exemplary steps for managing the distribution of digital content as may occur in a license server; and
[0023] Fig. 7 is a flow diagram representation of exemplary steps for distributing digital content as may occur in a CCDS application provided at a content recipient's peer system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0024] The invention will now be described in detail with reference to particular embodiments thereof. The embodiments are provided by way of explanation of the invention, and are not meant as a limitation of the invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, features described or illustrated as part of one embodiment may be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention include these and other modifications and variations as come within the scope and spirit of the invention, including the appended claims and their equivalents.
[0025] Social networks, such as friend-of-a-friend networks, are often utilized to share information among a group of networked contacts. Shared information may correspond to many different forms of electronic content, including but not limited to digital videos, digital images, digital photos, digital audio, text, graphics, html code or other file types. The present specification is directed to the sharing of digital content with particular exemplary reference to content in video or graphic file format, although it should be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the disclosed content distribution technology can be applied to other types of electronic content provided in digital or other suitable form. It should also be appreciated that more than one piece of digital content may be selected for distribution, and multiple pieces of content may correspond to different file types. [0026] Aspects of the present invention provide features and steps for ensuring that a given content producer can share digital content with other contacts in a social network (hereinafter referred to as "content recipients") while maintaining control over the access and limited distribution of the shared content. A content producer can specify distribution parameters including a level limit representative of the maximum number of levels, or degrees of separation, a potential content recipient may be from the content producer. Additional content distribution rules/parameters are definable by the content producer for one or more of the allowable levels of access, and typically include alteration definitions that may specify degradations, augmentations, or partial deletion of the digital content as it propagates through designated levels in the social network. A content producer specifies an initial distribution list and the above distribution parameters, and this information is sufficient to control the distribution of specified digital content without prior knowledge of participants and their relationships. As such, limited and controlled distribution of digital content to a dynamic and unstructured social network is afforded.
[0027] Aspects of the subject content distribution technology are discussed herein in the context of a peer-to-peer network. It should be appreciated that this description is for exemplary purposes only and additional networked communications, such as those employing client-server, central server or other network environments may also employ the features and steps disclosed in accordance with aspects of the present invention.
[0028] Additional aspects of the presently disclosed technology make reference to servers, processing units, databases, software applications, and other computer-based systems, as well as actions taken and information sent to and from such systems. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the inherent flexibility of computer-based systems allows for a great variety of possible configurations, combinations, and divisions of tasks and functionality between and among components. For instance, server processes discussed herein may be implemented using a single server or multiple servers working in combination. Databases and applications may be implemented on a single system or distributed across multiple systems. Distributed components may operate sequentially or in parallel. When data is obtained or accessed between a first and second computer system or component thereof, the actual data may travel between the systems directly or indirectly. For example, if a first computer accesses a file from a second computer, the access may involve one or more intermediary computers, proxies, and the like. The actual file may move between the computers, or one computer may provide a pointer or metafile that the second computer uses to access the actual data from a computer other than the first computer, for instance.
[0029] A basic example illustrating some general principles afforded by the presently disclosed technology will now be discussed with reference to Fig. 1. A content producer 10 identifies digital content that is to be shared with others in a network. Such digital content identified by the content producer may have been originally created by the content producer. For example, the content producer may have taken a video or picture to be shared with others. However, it is not essential that the content producer is the original source of the digital content. In some embodiments, the content producer may have obtained the digital content from another source and is simply selecting the digital content for further dissemination. It should be appreciated that users of the disclosed technology, including content producer 10 as well as content recipients may correspond to individuals, groups of individuals, business entities, etc. and should not be a limiting feature of the present subject matter.
[0030] Before a content producer actually distributes digital content, certain distribution parameters that establish limitations on how the digital content is to be distributed to one or more content recipients must be selected. Distribution parameters can include such information as a level limit representative of the maximum number of "degrees of separation" allowed between the content producer and any content recipient. In the example of Fig. 1 , content producer 10 designates a level limit of three levels, which means that the selected digital content can only be distributed up to a maximum of three levels away from the content producer 10. Distribution parameters can also include an initial distribution list that designates the starting nodes for the dynamically created social network. In the example of Fig. 1 , content producer 10 selects three users in an initial distribution list, corresponding to level one (1) content recipients 12a, 12b and 12c (herein collectively referred to as recipients 12). Level one recipients 12 and others are free to distribute to any entity they wish. For example, in accordance with a second level of content distribution as illustrated in Fig. 1 , level one recipient 12a may choose to send the selected digital content to level two (2) recipient 14a. Recipient 12b may choose to send the digital content to three recipients 14b, 14c and 14d, and recipient 12c does not forward the digital content. In accordance with a third level of content distribution, recipient 14a decides to forward the digital content to level three (3) recipient 16a, and recipient 14c sends the digital content to recipient 16b. Level three recipients 16a and 16b are restricted from further distributing the selected digital content since content producer 10 selected a distribution level limit of three. As observed from the layered communication among networked users depicted in Fig. 1 , the entire spectrum of distribution is not defined by the content producer. Instead, the subject content distribution network involves dynamic (or viral) distribution as opposed to a predetermined configuration. Content producer 10 doesn't know if the selected digital content will reach three or three-hundred people, but it will not be distributed beyond three levels deep in the dynamically created social network.
[0031] Additional distribution parameters that are specified by content producer 10 include alteration definitions for one or more of the three allowable levels in the social network. Alteration definitions allow the selected content to be degraded or augmented in some fashion as it is passed from friend to friend. The content is degraded or otherwise altered by a peer application provided at each designated user's location prior to distributing the file. In other words, the controlled content distribution system employs a "just in time" or "lazy" alteration. In one example, content producer 10 may select a digital video for controlled distribution to content recipients and may wish to degrade the quality level of the video as it spreads farther away from the content producer. In one example, first level recipients 12a, 12b and 12c receive a highest quality video from content producer 10. Second level recipients 14a-14d respectively receive a medium quality version of video, and third level recipients 16a and 16b receive a version that is low quality and has advertisements preceding the video playback. More specific aspects of potential alteration definitions will be provided later in further detail.
[0032] The subject controlled content distribution system (CCDS) consists in part of a desktop application that is required by every peer-level participant in the social network. Fig. 2 illustrates exemplary physical components that may be present in each of the peer-level participant systems illustrated in Fig. 1 , including a system associated with the content producer and each content recipient. In one embodiment, peer system 20 includes a processor unit 22, which may be any type of processor as included or associated with a personal computer (PC), mobile terminal device (e.g., cellular telephone), Personal Digital Assistant, or the like. The processor unit 22 of exemplary peer system 20 may be configured to process data transmitted to or received from other users. A communications interface 24 may also be provided to buffer or otherwise handle the actual relay of such communicated data as it is sent or received over a network 26. Network 26 may correspond to a dial-in network, a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), public switched telephone network (PSTN), the Internet, intranet or ethemet type networks and others over any combination of hard-wired or wireless communication links. Optional input peripherals, such as input peripheral 28 may be coupled to peer system 20 so that a user can provide input such as user identification, registration and/or authentication information, content selection, and definitions for distribution parameters in accordance with the subject controlled content distribution technology. Examples of possible input peripheral devices include a keyboard, touch-screen monitor, mouse, scanner, microphone, etc. Although not illustrated in Fig. 2, additional peripheral devices including but not limited to user displays, printers, etc. may also be provided in conjunction with peer system 20. [0033] Referring still to the peer system of Fig. 2, memory 30 is also provided for storing a variety of digital information, including data and software or firmware. Memory 30 may be provided as a variety of computer-readable medium, such as but not limited to any combination of volatile memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM, such as DRAM, SRAM, etc.) and nonvolatile memory (e.g., ROM, flash, hard drives, magnetic tapes, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, etc.). As will be further discussed in the present specification, memory 30 may be a designated storage location for digital content 32 that is selected for distribution and also for storing the program instructions and executable code corresponding to the controlled content distribution system (CCDS) desktop application 34. Program instructions and executable code that are stored in memory 30 are typically read and executed by the processor unit 22 in the corresponding peer system.
[0034] The CCDS application 34 is required by every participant in the social network. In one embodiment, no formal registration process is required. A user participating in the system only needs to download and install the application 34 and associate a communication identifier such as e-mail and/or IM address. The application 34 is responsible for content packaging and content alteration, as will be described later in further detail. Application 34 may utilize the user's primary e-mail and/or instant messaging and/or short message service (SMS) systems or the like (not illustrated in Fig. 2 but also provided in peer system 20) for the actual content distribution. Application 34 may also be designed to integrate with, or to utilize, existing media playback applications, such as but not limited to Windows Media Player, QuickTime, iTunes, etc. for content playback and other features.
[0035] As previously mentioned, when digital content is selected for controlled distribution in a network, a plurality of distribution parameters must be identified for establishing limits on how the digital content is to be distributed. In one embodiment, a content producer provides input to define the distribution parameters. One exemplary distribution parameter includes a level limit (n) representative of the maximum number of "degrees of separation" allowed between the content producer and any content recipient.
[0036] Additional distribution parameters include an alteration definition for one or more of the allowable levels (n levels total) selected by the content producer. As an example, if the level limit is three (3), then the content producer defines an alteration definition for one or more of the three (3) allowable levels. Digital content is distributed in accordance with the subject technology in a form that is altered from the original digital content. Alterations may include various levels of content degradation, augmentation, or other modifications. When an alteration definition is chosen to define a certain degradation level for the digital content, it should be appreciated that such degradation can be identified in terms of a given number of frames per second (fps), file resolution, file size, length, bit rate or other compression characteristic. In one embodiment, selected compression characteristics to digital content are defined in terms of percentages. For example, an original digital video may be provided to a first level distribution list of identified recipients with a quality level of 25% relative to the original quality of the digital video. In another embodiment, compression characteristics are defined as a specific quality level. For example, an altered digital video may be characterized as one with a quality level of 30 frames per second or a file size of 5.0 Megabytes.
[0037] Additional modifications may correspond to deleting a portion of video or audio, cropping a photo or other image or graphic file, or changing the color characteristics of a photo, image or graphic file from color to black and white or vice versa. Alterations may also include augmentations, such as but not limited to the addition of visible or invisible watermarks or other visual or invisible hindrances to a file, the addition of video or image advertisements to the original content, the addition of text comments to a photo, or the addition of annotations to a video. An advertisement may be placed before, during or after the original content for levels farther out in the network. Alternatively, portions of the digital content may be deleted. Still further, a user may make "additional scenes" available for users closer in the network, while those scenes are removed for user farther out in the network. Yet another form of augmentation may involve selective or random reordering of the content in a text, graphic, video file or the like. It should be appreciated that the types of modifications available often vary depending on the type of digital content selected for distribution.
[0038] The CCDS application provides features for a user to define additional distribution parameters or rules that can be stored with the above alteration definitions to further customize the distribution of content. In one example, a content producer may wish to further limit the spread of content by placing a maximum number of invitations per user and/or per level. In another example, the CCDS provides users with an ability to apply an expiration timestamp on the content distribution. If the timestamp passes, users are not able to view or share the distributed content. Some further examples of additional distribution parameters may include the following: (1) a maximum number of users to distribute content (total or per level); (2) a pre-defined possible user list, blocked user list, acceptable domains, etc. (for example, a content producer may define that the content can only be distributed to users with addresses at
"flashpoint.com" or other specified domain name or group of domain names, or users with a given IP address, range of IP addresses, or other identification parameter(s)); (3) a timeframe for distribution (total or per level); and (4) users associated with a specific group, FOAF network, or other social network, or that have specific interests. In accordance with a distribution parameter such as (3) above, the content producer may have the ability at each level to configure the start and end time for distribution. This would allow a slow rollout by, for example, distributing one level per week. Similarly, simple distribution duration can be assigned. In accordance with a distribution parameter such as (4) above, the controlled content distribution system can be integrated with an existing service, such as but not limited to MySpace, Friendster, or others, and permit or allow the invitation for accessing digital content based on the user ID matching given or selected parameters.
[0039] After digital content is selected by a content producer for subsequent controlled distribution and the necessary distribution parameters are defined, the CCDS application creates a distribution package. Each time content distribution is initiated on a different allowed level in the social network, the application creates a new distribution package. Prior to distributing the content, the application creates the version of the content that is defined by the next allowed level. It should be appreciated that the first distribution of the digital content should preserve the original content format in a lossless fashion such that each subsequent level in the distribution network has the necessary quality level associated with its given alteration definition. Once a new distribution package is ready, the peer system integrates with a content distribution mechanism for actual distribution of the altered content. An example of one suitable content distribution mechanism corresponds to one using a BitTorrent protocol, such as created and maintained by BitTorrent, Inc. The distribution package is sent to each user identified by a content producer or authorized content recipient in an initial distribution list. Such initial distribution list may be selected by a user when the CCDS application presents a list of possible user contacts from the user's primary e-mail, instant message (IM), short message service (SMS) or other messaging application. [0040] With more particular reference to an exemplary distribution package, Fig. 3 provides a block diagram of exemplary file portions provided therein. It should be appreciated that distribution packages 40 are typically created as a binary or other digital file with a combination of various information and/or instructions. A first portion included in the exemplary distribution package 40 of Fig. 3 is the digital content 42 selected by a content producer. A second portion corresponds to a configuration data file 44, which is created based on the content producer's settings for the content and placed alongside the content as part of the content distribution package. In one embodiment, the configuration data file is expressed in a rights expression language (REL) which is created by the application provided at the content producer's peer system. In one particular exemplary embodiment, configuration data file 44 is provided in Extensible Markup Language (XML) format, although other code languages may be utilized. A structured format is used to describe the defined alterations (including degradations, augmentations, deletions, or other modifications), and the XML structure will vary based on the type of media file selected in the digital content. An example of an XML file which defines the alterations mentioned in the previous example discussed with reference to Fig. 1 is now presented.
[0041]
<comment>
Level 1: Original Level 2: Medium Quality
Level 3: Low Quality and Advertisement Pre-pended </comment>
<current-level>O</current-level> <distribution-list> <user name="Sue" contact="sue(α>vahoo.com" />
<user name="John" contact="iohn@msn.com" />
<user name="Mike" contact=mike@hotmail.com" /> </distribution-list>
<media type="video">
<level id="1"> </level> <level id="2"> <fps reduce="25%" />
<size reduce="25%7> </level> <level id="3"> <fps reduce="25%" /> <size reduce="25%7> <append location="0">
<media type="video", name="car ad", url=http://mycarads. com/ad 1.mpq>
</append> </media>
[0042] Referring still to Fig. 3, distribution package 40 may also include a key ID 46, which corresponds to a unique identifier for the selected digital content 40 that is created by the content producer's peer application. A license key seed (LKS) 48 is also included in distribution package 40. LKS 48 is a value that is only known by the content producer and a license server, and is used to encrypt the distribution package. The distribution package ultimately contains a form of the digital content that has been encrypted and locked with a digital "key". The result is an encrypted file that can only be unlocked by a person who has obtained a license with the required key for decrypting the digital content. Such a license may be received from a license server, as will be discussed later in further detail. [0043] Distribution package 40 may also include content 49 that is to be used for augmentation to a form of the digital content. For example, some alteration definitions may include an advertisement for displaying before, during or after a given form of digital video. As set forth in the above exemplary XML file, level three recipients are shown a car ad such as one located at the web address or URL of http://mycarads.com/ad 1 ,mpg. If placing an advertisement or other augmented file for level three users, the advertisement can be extracted from the Internet during the creation step of a level two user sending to a level three user. By utilizing references and loading the content only when needed, original file size of the distribution package can be reduced. Although the above extraction process may be used in one embodiment, it should be understood that the advertisement could alternatively be included as additional content from the outset of the content distribution and inserted for viewing only when distribution reaches third level recipients. [0044] Certain aspects relating to the control of content distribution in accordance with the disclosed technology are afforded via an FOAF license server (FLS) 50, such as represented in Figs. 1 and 4. FLS 50 may be a standalone centrally hosted license server or a distributed license server that is accessible from the peer systems of a content producer and content recipients (as represented by the network configuration of Fig. 1). It should be appreciated that although FLS 50 is only depicted in Fig. 1 as being in bi-directional communication via dashed lines with content recipients 12c, 14d and 16b, such communication is actually provided for each recipient in the social network. The limited depiction is merely provided for ease of illustration.
[0045] Referring now to Fig. 4, FLS 50 may generally function as a distribution and licensing management system. FLS 50 may include a select combination of the exemplary hardware components already discussed in relation to a peer system 20 as illustrated in Fig. 2. In one embodiment, at least a processor unit 22', a communications interface 24' and memory 30' are provided. Memory 30' is used to store program instructions and executable code that is read and executed by processor unit 22'. Such components function together to provide a plurality of operative modules, including a license-level creation module 52, a registration module 54, an authentication module 56 and a license assignment module 58. Although not specifically illustrated in Fig. 4, memory 30' associated with FLS 50 may also include a database for storing information identifying the relationship between a given piece of content and the corresponding levels, level-licenses and users to whom the content is distributed. It should be appreciated that a particular piece of content typically has several different level-licenses and a user can have more than one level-license assigned to him which belongs to a different piece of content.
[0046] License-level creation module 52 is used after a content producer selects digital content and defines parameters for its distribution. The resulting digital package (such as previously discussed with reference to Fig. 3) is sent to FLS 50, where a level-license is created for each of the allowed levels defined by the content producer. In the previous example discussed with reference to Fig. 1 , FLS 50 would produce three level-licenses, one for each of the three levels defined by content producer 10. Each level-license captures the rights at that level as expressed in the REL of the configuration data file associated with the digital content.
[0047] Registration module 54 may optionally be used to register each user in a social network, including content producers and recipients. In one embodiment, registration module 54 may be used to coordinate a formal registration process in which a user provides certain identifying information including name, contact information, program purchase specifics, serial number, etc. In another embodiment, registration module 54 is used simply to ensure that the required CCDS application has been downloaded to the user's peer system. [0048] Authentication module 56 is used to verify the identity of a content recipient. When a content recipient receives an invitation to view digital content, that content recipient must be authenticated with the FLS 50 before being able to decrypt the digital content for viewing or further distribution. FLS 50 typically compares the identity of the content recipient seeking authentication with the distribution list created by a sending user at the previous level in the network. If the content recipient is successfully matched to a member of the distribution list, then authentication will be successful. Otherwise, the content recipient may not be able to access the distributed digital content.
[0049] License assignment module 58 corresponds to a portion of FLS 50 that creates licenses for received content in response to an access request from a content recipient. Licenses are created according to the level-rights and distribution parameters defined for the particular level of the content recipient. A license generated by FLS 50 includes a key that can be used to unlock, or decrypt the content that was previously encrypted by a user's content distribution application.
[0050] License assignment module 58 may also coordinate the revocation, denial and explicit assignment of level-rights. For example, a content producer can revoke all license-level rights originally issued. This procedure would be handled by the license assignment module 58. Similarly, a content producer can revoke rights for a particular license-level (e.g., all level three content recipients) while leaving all other license-levels intact. In accordance with denying user rights, a content producer may also specify a user or group of users that may never receive a license for any or all content independent of how through the social network that content was received, in accordance with explicit rights assignment, a content producer may specify that a particular user, no matter where in the social network, can receive a specific level-right.
[0051] Referring now to Fig. 5, exemplary steps for distributing digital content in a controlled fashion as may occur within the peer system and corresponding CCDS application of a content producer are illustrated. A first step 60 involves obtaining access to digital content. Digital content may correspond to one or more types of similar or different electronic media and is typically imported by the content producer into the CCDS application. Distribution parameters are then identified in step 62, and may include information such as a level limit, an alteration definition for one or more allowable levels, an initial distribution list, and other parameters as previously discussed.
[0052] In one example of the method in Fig. 5, a content producer may select a digital video to share to a maximum of four levels in a social network. Distribution parameters are then defined in terms of level-rights for each of the four allowable levels. In one example, level-rights may be configured as follows: (1) Level One - full size access at 30 frames per second (fps); (2) Level Two - half size access at 15 fps; (3) Level Three - half size access at 15 fps and access to only the first 30 seconds of the video; and (4) Level Four - a thumbnail access of the first frame only. Levels Five and beyond are granted no access to the digital video.
[0053] Referring still to Fig. 5, the CCDS application generates a configuration data file in step 64. The configuration data file may be prepared in a rights expression language (REL), such as XML or the like. The CCDS application then generates a unique key ID in step 66 for the content identified in step 60. A license key seed (LKS) is then used in step 68 to encrypt the distribution package, including the digital content, configuration data file setting forth all distribution parameters, key ID, and LKS. The distribution package is then sent in step 70 to a FOAF license server (FLS) and to content recipients identified in the initial distribution list. The distribution package cannot be
"unlocked" or decrypted by any content recipient unless a key is received, which is typically provided when a license is assigned to the recipient by the FLS. [0054] Fig. 6 illustrates exemplary process steps that may occur at an FLS after it receives a distribution package created by a content recipient. The initial step of receiving the distribution package is indicated as step 72. In a subsequent step 74, the FLS creates level-licenses for each allowable level as defined by the content producer. For example, if a content producer selects a level limit of four as described above, the FLS will create four level-licenses that capture the type of file quality or related characteristics associated with any alteration definitions provided for each level. As content is shared across a social network, users are automatically granted level-licenses depending on where they are in the network. It is important to note that users have different level-licenses for different pieces of content depending on how the content arrived over the network. For example, it is possible that user A has level one rights on content b shared to him by user S, but the same user A has level four rights on content c shared to him by user C. [0055] With further reference to Fig. 6, the FLS may receive in step 76 an access request from a content recipient. The FLS may then register and/or authenticate the content recipient in step 78 to ensure that the content recipient matches with the initial distribution list generated by the content producer. If this authentication step is successful, the FLS then creates a license in step 80 for content access according to the defined alteration definition for that content recipient. The FLS then sends this license to the content recipient. As previously mentioned, the license should include a key that allows the content recipient to decrypt and open the received digital content.
[0056] Referring now to Fig. 7, exemplary steps for receiving and further distributing digital content in a controlled fashion as may occur within the peer system and corresponding CCDS application of a content recipient are illustrated. In accordance with a first exemplary step 82, a content recipient receives an invitation to view digital content. Users may be notified of such invitation via their e-mail, instant messaging, short message service or other messaging application. The invitation typically is sent in conjunction with the actual encrypted distribution package. When the user attempts to open the file, their CCDS application will be launched. The content recipient then authenticates (or registers and authenticates) himself with the FLS in step 84. Authentication consists of verifying that the current user was one of the designated content recipients that are identified in the configuration data file within the distribution package. The verification may be checked against the e-mail, instant messaging, SMS, or other addresses that were assigned to the current user's instance of the CCDS application. After verifying the user, the CCDS application on the user's peer system passes the content playback function to the user's designated media player. The CCDS application may be integrated with the media player or may be separate whereby the CCDS application streams the digital content to the media player. Such playback functions are known to those of ordinary skill in the art, and so more detailed discussion of such functions are not provided herein. If authentication is successful, content recipient then receives in step 86 a license to access the digital content, and using a key provided within the license is able to decrypt the digital content for viewing. In some embodiments, if desired by the content recipient and if allowed by the content producer, the content recipient will invite additional users in step 88.
[0057] To further illustrate the above exemplary steps, assume that a content producer decides to share selected digital content with a certain number of people corresponding to m users. Using a CCDS application, the content producer sends invitations to those users. The CCDS application informs the FLS that the content producer has invited these m users. The FLS then grants level one rights to those m users since the content producer has invited them. A level one user receives the invitation via a dedicated CCDS application, acquires an encrypted copy of the digital content and undergoes authentication with the FLS. The FLS creates a license for that content using the level one rights, and sends the license and required key to the requestor. The CCDS application provided at the level one recipient's peer system receives the license, which then allows level one access to the user for that particular piece of content. The level one user in turn decides to send an invitation to view that content to another set of users, p. The CCDS application at the level one user's peer system informs the FLS that the level one user has invited these p users. The FLS then grants level two rights to those p users (as long as this additional level of distribution is allowed according to initial distribution parameters defined by the content producer). When and if the level of invitations reaches the point where the content originator has no assigned rights, the FLS informs the invitee that no rights are available. The FLS may also block users from accessing digital content if that user is selectively blocked by a content producer or otherwise lacks authorization to access one or more given portions of digital content. [0058] A CCDS application in accordance with the present technology may optionally provide users with an audit trail feature that tracks usage and distribution of the digital content. Since an object of the CCDS application is to control viral content distribution, tracking the actual usage of the content is a significant capability. An audit trail feature initiates a step of sending notification back to an original content producer any time another user attempts to open, view or further share the distributed files. A mechanism for sending data back over a network to the content producer depends on the configuration of the overall system network. For example, if the CCDS is implemented as a peer-to-peer (P2P) system, the data is sent back to the user either via e-mail or via a web service on the peer system of the content producer. If the CCDS is implemented with a central server, the data is collected via a web service on the central server. The content producer is able to view details and summaries of the viewing and distribution activities through a user interface either on the peer system desktop or from the central server. [0059] Another additional capability of the subject CCDS and related system application is a profiling mechanism which allows a user to save a distribution configuration as a profile for future distributions. For example, a parent who wants to share video footage of her child's latest sports game can save a "Home Video Profile" that specifies a level limit of three (3) levels deep, whereby level one recipients are configured to receive an original version of the video, level two recipients are configured to receive a medium quality version of the digital video, and level three recipients are configured to receive a low quality version of the video. Another example may correspond to a movie producer who wants to distribute a preview of his newest work. The movie producer saves a profile with a level limit of four (4), the level one recipients are designated to receive an original version of the content, while recipients at levels two, three and four are only able to receive a medium quality version with an advertisement inserted at the beginning of the original content. [0060] While the specification has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments of the invention, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to these embodiments. These and other modifications and variations to the present invention may be practiced by those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, which is more particularly set forth in the appended claims. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the invention.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for distributing digital content among one or more levels within a dynamically created social network, comprising the following steps: obtaining access to digital content provided by a content producer; identifying one or more distribution parameters that establish limitations on how the digital content is to be distributed to one or more content recipients, wherein the distribution parameters include a level number (n) representative of the maximum number of separation levels allowed between the content producer and any content recipient, and also at least one alteration definition for one or more of the n allowable levels in the social network; and creating a distribution package for subsequent relay across a network.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said creating step is performed each time the digital content is passed from one allowable level to the next in the social network.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more distribution parameters from said identifying step are received as input from the content producer.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising a step of saving a profile of selected distribution parameters identified by the content producer.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said creating step comprises preparing a configuration data file identifying the distribution parameters per level selected by the content producer.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the configuration data file is prepared using a rights expression language (REL) format.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein said creating step further comprises generating a unique key ID for identifying the distribution package and digital content therein.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said creating step further comprises encrypting the digital content using a license key seed.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the distribution package includes the encrypted digital content, the configuration data file, the key ID and license key seed.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein selected alteration definitions identify a degradation characteristic for applying to the digital content.
1 1. The method of claim 10, wherein said degradation characteristic comprises number of frames per second, file resolution, file size, file length, color, or bit rate.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein selected alteration definitions identify an augmentation file for incorporating into and altering the digital content.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the augmentation file comprises a visible watermark, an invisible watermark, an advertisement, a portion of text, or an additional video or audio segment.
14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the digital content comprises one or more of a video, audio, photo, text or graphic file.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distribution parameters further comprise an initial distribution list of content recipients.
16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distribution parameters further comprise a maximum number of content recipients.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the maximum number is number of total content recipients.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the maximum number is defined per level.
19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising a step of sending the distribution package to content recipients.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein said sending step comprises: inviting one or more content recipients as designated in an initial distribution list to view the digital content; verifying authenticity of each content recipient who subsequently requests access to the digital content; and initiating playback of an altered form of the digital content as defined by the alteration definition for the given level.
21. The method of claim 1 , further comprising a step of sending notification to the content producer each time a content recipient views a form of the digital content.
22. The method of claim 1 , further comprising a step of sending notification to the content producer each time a content recipient further distributes a form of the digital content.
23. An article of manufacture comprising a computer-readable medium embodying program instructions for directing a computing device to: import digital content for controlled distribution from a content producer to one or more levels of content recipients within a dynamically created social network; receive input from the content producer, wherein the input corresponds to one or more distribution parameters that establish limitations on how the digital content is to be distributed to one or more content recipients, wherein the distribution parameters include a level number (n) representative of the maximum number of separation levels allowed between the content producer and any content recipient, and also at least one alteration definition for one or more of the n allowable levels in the social network; and create a distribution package for subsequent relay across a network.
24. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to save a profile of selected distribution parameters identified by the content producer.
25. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to prepare a configuration data file using a rights expression language (REL) to identify the distribution parameters per level identified by the content producer.
26. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to generate a unique key ID for identifying the distribution package and digital content therein.
27. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to encrypt the digital content using a license key seed.
28. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to send notification to the content producer each time a content recipient views or further distributes a form of the digital content.
29. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to track viewing and usage of the digital content as it propagates through a network.
30. The article of manufacture of claim 23, further comprising program instructions for directing a computing device to interface with a media playback device for viewing an altered form of the digital content.
PCT/US2007/077185 2006-09-06 2007-08-30 System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network WO2008030750A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07841587.4A EP2067291A4 (en) 2006-09-06 2007-08-30 System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network
CN2007800411261A CN101573904B (en) 2006-09-06 2007-08-30 System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/516,294 2006-09-06
US11/516,294 US7992171B2 (en) 2006-09-06 2006-09-06 System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008030750A2 true WO2008030750A2 (en) 2008-03-13
WO2008030750A3 WO2008030750A3 (en) 2008-07-24

Family

ID=39153569

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/077185 WO2008030750A2 (en) 2006-09-06 2007-08-30 System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US7992171B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2067291A4 (en)
CN (1) CN101573904B (en)
WO (1) WO2008030750A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (106)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090037278A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2009-02-05 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Implementing visual substitution options in media works
US8296373B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2012-10-23 Facebook, Inc. Automatically managing objectionable behavior in a web-based social network
US8549651B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2013-10-01 Facebook, Inc. Determining a trust level in a social network environment
US9459622B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2016-10-04 Legalforce, Inc. Driverless vehicle commerce network and community
US9070101B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2015-06-30 Fatdoor, Inc. Peer-to-peer neighborhood delivery multi-copter and method
US8965409B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-02-24 Fatdoor, Inc. User-generated community publication in an online neighborhood social network
US9037516B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-05-19 Fatdoor, Inc. Direct mailing in a geo-spatial environment
US9071367B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-06-30 Fatdoor, Inc. Emergency including crime broadcast in a neighborhood social network
US9064288B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-06-23 Fatdoor, Inc. Government structures and neighborhood leads in a geo-spatial environment
US9373149B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2016-06-21 Fatdoor, Inc. Autonomous neighborhood vehicle commerce network and community
US9002754B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-04-07 Fatdoor, Inc. Campaign in a geo-spatial environment
US9098545B2 (en) 2007-07-10 2015-08-04 Raj Abhyanker Hot news neighborhood banter in a geo-spatial social network
US7873988B1 (en) 2006-09-06 2011-01-18 Qurio Holdings, Inc. System and method for rights propagation and license management in conjunction with distribution of digital content in a social network
US7992171B2 (en) 2006-09-06 2011-08-02 Qurio Holdings, Inc. System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network
US20080066182A1 (en) * 2006-09-12 2008-03-13 Andrew Hickmott Security techniques for cooperative file distribution
US7925592B1 (en) 2006-09-27 2011-04-12 Qurio Holdings, Inc. System and method of using a proxy server to manage lazy content distribution in a social network
US8554827B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2013-10-08 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Virtual peer for a content sharing system
US8010657B2 (en) * 2006-11-27 2011-08-30 Crackle, Inc. System and method for tracking the network viral spread of a digital media content item
US7886334B1 (en) 2006-12-11 2011-02-08 Qurio Holdings, Inc. System and method for social network trust assessment
US20080154626A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Microsoft Corporation Aggregating and sharing trust-owned media
US9195996B1 (en) 2006-12-27 2015-11-24 Qurio Holdings, Inc. System and method for classification of communication sessions in a social network
US8667160B1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2014-03-04 Max Haot System and method for internet audio/video delivery
US8300877B2 (en) * 2007-02-20 2012-10-30 Sony Mobile Communications Ab Copy protected information distribution
US8046838B1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2011-10-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Using a modulation transfer function of a device to create digital content for the device
US8055708B2 (en) * 2007-06-01 2011-11-08 Microsoft Corporation Multimedia spaces
JP2008306232A (en) * 2007-06-05 2008-12-18 Funai Electric Co Ltd Video receiver and broadcasting receiver
US9396195B1 (en) * 2007-08-07 2016-07-19 Aol Inc. Community generated playlists
US20090164600A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Concert Technology Corporation System and method for place-shifting media items
US8182346B2 (en) * 2007-12-26 2012-05-22 Scientific Games Holdings Limited System and method for collecting and using player information
US8229819B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2012-07-24 Wildfire Interactive, Inc. Providing online promotions through social media networks
US8725740B2 (en) 2008-03-24 2014-05-13 Napo Enterprises, Llc Active playlist having dynamic media item groups
US8352371B2 (en) * 2008-04-30 2013-01-08 General Instrument Corporation Limiting access to shared media content
US8688841B2 (en) * 2008-06-05 2014-04-01 Modena Enterprises, Llc System and method for content rights based on existence of a voice session
US20100015976A1 (en) * 2008-07-17 2010-01-21 Domingo Enterprises, Llc System and method for sharing rights-enabled mobile profiles
US20100015975A1 (en) * 2008-07-17 2010-01-21 Kota Enterprises, Llc Profile service for sharing rights-enabled mobile profiles
US20100037288A1 (en) * 2008-08-06 2010-02-11 International Business Machines Corporation Inherited Access Authorization to a Social Network
US9300993B2 (en) * 2008-08-29 2016-03-29 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc Method and system for providing a content notification for a set-top box
US9167206B2 (en) 2008-08-29 2015-10-20 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc Method and system for communication with a set-top box
US9215419B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2015-12-15 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for set-top box recording
WO2010076770A2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-08 France Telecom Communication system incorporating collaborative information exchange and method of operation thereof
KR101593569B1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2016-02-15 삼성전자주식회사 System and method for configurating of content object
US8489458B2 (en) 2009-02-24 2013-07-16 Google Inc. Rebroadcasting of advertisements in a social network
US20100235878A1 (en) * 2009-03-13 2010-09-16 Creative Technology Ltd. Method and system for file distribution
US9654285B2 (en) * 2009-04-27 2017-05-16 International Business Machines Corporation Defining access rights to content
US8467275B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2013-06-18 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for sharing user content through a set-top box
US8253558B2 (en) 2009-06-11 2012-08-28 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for emergency communication of a location through a set-top box
US20100325025A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-23 Etchegoyen Craig S System and Method for Sharing Media
US20100324981A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-23 Etchegoyen Craig S System and Method for Media Distribution on Social Networks
US20110040627A1 (en) * 2009-08-11 2011-02-17 Microsoft Corporation Viral advertisements
US8370895B2 (en) 2009-08-12 2013-02-05 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Social network privacy by means of evolving access control
US8768846B2 (en) * 2009-08-27 2014-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and apparatus for management of media objects
KR101672454B1 (en) * 2009-10-30 2016-11-04 삼성전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for managing content service in network based on content use history
US10621608B2 (en) * 2010-03-05 2020-04-14 Ethan Fieldman Systems and methods for tracking referrals among a plurality of members of a social network
US9454763B2 (en) * 2010-08-24 2016-09-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Distribution of offer to a social group by sharing based on qualifications
US20120059700A1 (en) * 2010-09-03 2012-03-08 Andrew James Darbyshire Incentivized peer-to-peer content and royalty distribution system
US9208239B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2015-12-08 Eloy Technology, Llc Method and system for aggregating music in the cloud
US9703539B2 (en) 2010-10-29 2017-07-11 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Viral application distribution
US20130014141A1 (en) 2011-07-06 2013-01-10 Manish Bhatia Audience Atmospherics Monitoring Platform Apparatuses and Systems
US10142687B2 (en) 2010-11-07 2018-11-27 Symphony Advanced Media, Inc. Audience content exposure monitoring apparatuses, methods and systems
DE102010053653A1 (en) * 2010-12-03 2012-06-06 Txtr Gmbh System for transmission of licensed or insured digital contents e.g. text format, from subscriber e.g. personal computer, to another subscriber in book market to market electronic books, has terminal addressed in network by identifications
DE102010053727A1 (en) * 2010-12-09 2012-06-14 Lufthansa Technik Ag Arrangement and method for playing media data on board a means of transport
US20160255035A1 (en) * 2014-12-29 2016-09-01 StarClub, Inc. Method and system for transmission of a message to authorized recipients with selected content
US20170300590A1 (en) * 2010-12-15 2017-10-19 StarClub, Inc. Method and system for transmission of a message to authorized recipients with selected content
EP2487904A1 (en) * 2011-02-10 2012-08-15 Thomson Licensing Method and device for excerpt licensing
US20120209718A1 (en) * 2011-02-16 2012-08-16 Plut William J Methods and systems for providing compensation for electronic interpersonal advertising
US20120209719A1 (en) * 2011-02-16 2012-08-16 Plut William J Systems for electronic interpersonal advertising
US8635226B2 (en) 2011-03-02 2014-01-21 Adobe Systems Incorporated Computing user micro-segments for offer matching
US9177327B2 (en) 2011-03-02 2015-11-03 Adobe Systems Incorporated Sequential engine that computes user and offer matching into micro-segments
US8630902B2 (en) 2011-03-02 2014-01-14 Adobe Systems Incorporated Automatic classification of consumers into micro-segments
US8700468B2 (en) 2011-03-02 2014-04-15 Adobe Systems Incorporated Micro-segment definition system
US8392526B2 (en) 2011-03-23 2013-03-05 Color Labs, Inc. Sharing content among multiple devices
CN102737062B (en) * 2011-04-15 2016-08-17 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 A kind of good friend's Notification Method and device
CN102761790B (en) * 2011-04-27 2014-12-17 航天信息股份有限公司 Digital-watermark-based digital copyright management method and device for IPTV terminals
US8635107B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2014-01-21 Adobe Systems Incorporated Automatic expansion of an advertisement offer inventory
US8850201B2 (en) * 2011-07-01 2014-09-30 Kiora, Inc. System, apparatus, and method for digital distribution
WO2013006554A2 (en) 2011-07-01 2013-01-10 Ahmed Tewfik Bouzid Voice enabled social artifacts
US8861937B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2014-10-14 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to access media
US9430439B2 (en) * 2011-09-09 2016-08-30 Facebook, Inc. Visualizing reach of posted content in a social networking system
US9633365B1 (en) 2011-09-21 2017-04-25 Google Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for serving detailed social annotations
US8621019B2 (en) 2011-09-21 2013-12-31 Color Labs, Inc. Live content sharing within a social networking environment
US20130226710A1 (en) * 2012-02-28 2013-08-29 Trustedad, Inc. Ad creation interface for an interpersonal electronic advertising system
US20130311565A1 (en) * 2012-05-15 2013-11-21 Kai Barry Systems and methods for sharing and tracking the propagation of digital assets
US20130339130A1 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Trustedad, Inc. Interpersonal ad ranking
US20130339127A1 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Trustedad, Inc. Interpersonal timing in ad ranking
US20140222555A1 (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-08-07 Brian Dass Social Revenue Management Method
US9491038B2 (en) 2013-02-21 2016-11-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Content virality determination and visualization
US9955204B2 (en) 2013-03-06 2018-04-24 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for distributing content through a set-top box
US9955227B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2018-04-24 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for communicating alerts through a set-top box
CN104283847B (en) * 2013-07-03 2019-05-31 中兴通讯股份有限公司 The social service implementation method and device shared based on video
CN103442044B (en) * 2013-08-15 2018-11-23 广州三人行壹佰教育科技有限公司 file sharing method, server, terminal and system
US9832284B2 (en) 2013-12-27 2017-11-28 Facebook, Inc. Maintaining cached data extracted from a linked resource
US9442903B2 (en) 2014-02-06 2016-09-13 Facebook, Inc. Generating preview data for online content
US10133710B2 (en) 2014-02-06 2018-11-20 Facebook, Inc. Generating preview data for online content
US9439367B2 (en) 2014-02-07 2016-09-13 Arthi Abhyanker Network enabled gardening with a remotely controllable positioning extension
US9457901B2 (en) 2014-04-22 2016-10-04 Fatdoor, Inc. Quadcopter with a printable payload extension system and method
US9004396B1 (en) 2014-04-24 2015-04-14 Fatdoor, Inc. Skyteboard quadcopter and method
WO2015163736A1 (en) * 2014-04-25 2015-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Methods of providing social network service and server performing the same
US9022324B1 (en) 2014-05-05 2015-05-05 Fatdoor, Inc. Coordination of aerial vehicles through a central server
US10567327B2 (en) * 2014-05-30 2020-02-18 Facebook, Inc. Automatic creator identification of content to be shared in a social networking system
US9441981B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2016-09-13 Fatdoor, Inc. Variable bus stops across a bus route in a regional transportation network
US9971985B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2018-05-15 Raj Abhyanker Train based community
US9451020B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2016-09-20 Legalforce, Inc. Distributed communication of independent autonomous vehicles to provide redundancy and performance
EP2996361A1 (en) * 2014-09-10 2016-03-16 YouMe.im ltd Method and system for secure messaging in social network
US20180330325A1 (en) 2017-05-12 2018-11-15 Zippy Inc. Method for indicating delivery location and software for same
US20190347287A1 (en) * 2018-01-15 2019-11-14 Adam Thomas Crossno Method for screening and injection of media content based on user preferences
CN111292088A (en) * 2020-01-21 2020-06-16 杭州趣链科技有限公司 Block chain-based multi-level authorization method, system, equipment and storage medium

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030216824A1 (en) 2002-05-14 2003-11-20 Docomo Communications Laboratories Usa, Inc. Method and apparatus for self-degrading digital data
WO2006047879A1 (en) 2004-11-04 2006-05-11 Topeer Corporation System and method for creating a secure trusted social network

Family Cites Families (261)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5220657A (en) 1987-12-02 1993-06-15 Xerox Corporation Updating local copy of shared data in a collaborative system
US5537586A (en) 1992-04-30 1996-07-16 Individual, Inc. Enhanced apparatus and methods for retrieving and selecting profiled textural information records from a database of defined category structures
US5517617A (en) 1994-06-29 1996-05-14 Digital Equipment Corporation Automatic assignment of addresses in a computer communications network
US5629980A (en) 1994-11-23 1997-05-13 Xerox Corporation System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works
JPH08263438A (en) 1994-11-23 1996-10-11 Xerox Corp Distribution and use control system of digital work and access control method to digital work
US5892900A (en) * 1996-08-30 1999-04-06 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US5857077A (en) 1995-06-01 1999-01-05 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Tracing system having follow-up distribution section for distributing information based on a distribution history of prior distributed information stored in distribution history storing section
US6807534B1 (en) 1995-10-13 2004-10-19 Trustees Of Dartmouth College System and method for managing copyrighted electronic media
JP2000503154A (en) 1996-01-11 2000-03-14 エムアールジェイ インコーポレイテッド System for controlling access and distribution of digital ownership
US5884035A (en) 1997-03-24 1999-03-16 Pfn, Inc. Dynamic distributed group registry apparatus and method for collaboration and selective sharing of information
US6260069B1 (en) 1998-02-10 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Direct data retrieval in a distributed computing system
US6594693B1 (en) 1998-02-10 2003-07-15 Nitin A. Borwankar Method and apparatus for a structured, synchronized conversation using electronic messages over a computer network
US6088702A (en) 1998-02-25 2000-07-11 Plantz; Scott H. Group publishing system
US7051003B1 (en) 1998-02-26 2006-05-23 Atabok Japan, Inc. Method and apparatus for delivering electronic data through a proxy server
US7756892B2 (en) 2000-05-02 2010-07-13 Digimarc Corporation Using embedded data with file sharing
US6389541B1 (en) 1998-05-15 2002-05-14 First Union National Bank Regulating access to digital content
NL1009376C1 (en) 1998-06-11 1998-07-06 Boardwalk Ag Data system for providing relationship patterns between people.
US6338086B1 (en) 1998-06-11 2002-01-08 Placeware, Inc. Collaborative object architecture
US7349838B2 (en) * 1998-07-31 2008-03-25 Summers Gary J Management training simulation method and system
US6487583B1 (en) 1998-09-15 2002-11-26 Ikimbo, Inc. System and method for information and application distribution
AU6392899A (en) 1998-09-15 2000-04-03 Local2Me.Com, Inc. Dynamic matching TM of users for group communication
US7713282B2 (en) * 1998-11-06 2010-05-11 Atritech, Inc. Detachable atrial appendage occlusion balloon
US6149441A (en) * 1998-11-06 2000-11-21 Technology For Connecticut, Inc. Computer-based educational system
JP3991178B2 (en) * 1998-11-11 2007-10-17 ソニー株式会社 Replication generation management method, information signal recording device, information signal output device, and information signal reproducing device
US6963884B1 (en) 1999-03-10 2005-11-08 Digimarc Corporation Recoverable digital content degradation: method and apparatus
JP3644580B2 (en) 1999-03-19 2005-04-27 富士通株式会社 Display control method and apparatus
US6421439B1 (en) 1999-03-24 2002-07-16 Microsoft Corporation System and method for user affiliation in a telephone network
US8533038B2 (en) 1999-05-21 2013-09-10 International Business Machines Corporation Offer delivery system
GB9913165D0 (en) 1999-06-08 1999-08-04 Secr Defence Access control in a web environment
US6525747B1 (en) 1999-08-02 2003-02-25 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for conducting a discussion relating to an item
US6763343B1 (en) 1999-09-20 2004-07-13 David M. Brooke Preventing duplication of the data in reference resource for XML page generation
US6748420B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2004-06-08 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for providing shared access to an application
US6832245B1 (en) 1999-12-01 2004-12-14 At&T Corp. System and method for analyzing communications of user messages to rank users and contacts based on message content
WO2001042942A1 (en) 1999-12-10 2001-06-14 Myteam.Com, Inc. Tools for administering leagues and accessing and populating a community website structure
US6651086B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2003-11-18 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for matching participants to a conversation
US6442693B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2002-08-27 Ge Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. Method and system for providing secure online communications between registered participants
US20020032905A1 (en) 2000-04-07 2002-03-14 Sherr Scott Jeffrey Online digital video signal transfer apparatus and method
US6816906B1 (en) 2000-05-08 2004-11-09 International Business Machines Corporation Mechanism for building access control structures for authoring systems
JP2001351008A (en) 2000-06-06 2001-12-21 Fujitsu Ltd Method and system for advertisement delivery
US20020057284A1 (en) 2000-06-29 2002-05-16 Dalby Richard Sean Methods and systems for delivering announcements to users of an information system
US7047202B2 (en) 2000-07-13 2006-05-16 Amit Jaipuria Method and apparatus for optimizing networking potential using a secured system for an online community
AU7593601A (en) 2000-07-14 2002-01-30 Atabok Inc Controlling and managing digital assets
WO2002007011A1 (en) 2000-07-18 2002-01-24 Learningsoft Corporation Adaptive content delivery system and method
JP2002055935A (en) 2000-08-07 2002-02-20 Sony Corp Apparatus and method for information processing, service providing system, and recording medium
US20020032634A1 (en) 2000-09-11 2002-03-14 Abrams Howard Allan Method and system for online live auctions
WO2002029509A2 (en) 2000-10-03 2002-04-11 Vidius Inc. Secure distribution of digital content
US7197470B1 (en) 2000-10-11 2007-03-27 Buzzmetrics, Ltd. System and method for collection analysis of electronic discussion methods
JP4433600B2 (en) 2000-10-31 2010-03-17 ソニー株式会社 Information processing apparatus and method, and recording medium
CA2361022A1 (en) 2000-11-03 2002-05-03 Charles Allan Armstrong Knowledge management system
US7140044B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2006-11-21 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method for separation of user communities
US7103634B1 (en) 2000-11-16 2006-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for e-mail chain group
US7024391B2 (en) 2000-12-04 2006-04-04 Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc. System, method and program product for sharing information
US6993564B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2006-01-31 At&T Corp. Method of authorizing receipt of instant messages by a recipient user
US7467212B2 (en) 2000-12-28 2008-12-16 Intel Corporation Control of access control lists based on social networks
US20020091556A1 (en) 2001-01-08 2002-07-11 Onepub.Com.Inc. Systems and methods for travel networking
US7685224B2 (en) 2001-01-11 2010-03-23 Truelocal Inc. Method for providing an attribute bounded network of computers
US7774279B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2010-08-10 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. Rights offering and granting
US7165107B2 (en) 2001-01-22 2007-01-16 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for dynamic, transparent migration of services
AU2002234258A1 (en) 2001-01-22 2002-07-30 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Peer-to-peer network computing platform
US20040148503A1 (en) 2002-01-25 2004-07-29 David Sidman Apparatus, method, and system for accessing digital rights management information
US7120681B2 (en) 2001-01-30 2006-10-10 International Business Machines Corporation Cluster control in network systems
US7043644B2 (en) 2001-01-31 2006-05-09 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Facilitating file access from firewall-protected nodes in a peer-to-peer network
US20030018968A1 (en) 2001-02-01 2003-01-23 Mark Avnet Method and apparatus for inserting data into video stream to enhance television applications
US7366759B2 (en) 2001-02-22 2008-04-29 Parity Communications, Inc. Method and system for characterizing relationships in social networks
CN100483335C (en) 2001-03-16 2009-04-29 内托梅特公司 Sharing, managing and communication information over computer network
US7047406B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2006-05-16 Qurlo Holdings, Inc. Method and system for providing a secure peer-to-peer file delivery network
US7272636B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2007-09-18 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Peer group name server
ATE354224T1 (en) 2001-05-02 2007-03-15 Symbian Ltd GROUP COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR A RADIO COMMUNICATION DEVICE
US6757517B2 (en) 2001-05-10 2004-06-29 Chin-Chi Chang Apparatus and method for coordinated music playback in wireless ad-hoc networks
JP4098490B2 (en) 2001-05-15 2008-06-11 株式会社東芝 Knowledge accumulation support system and user operation restriction method in the same system
US20040024892A1 (en) 2001-05-21 2004-02-05 Creswell Carroll W. System for providing sequenced communications within a group
WO2003003173A1 (en) 2001-06-26 2003-01-09 Sealedmedia Limited Digital rights management
US6631098B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2003-10-07 Prolific Technology Inc. Dual-mode MP3 player
US7421411B2 (en) 2001-07-06 2008-09-02 Nokia Corporation Digital rights management in a mobile communications environment
JP4040849B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2008-01-30 株式会社東芝 Knowledge accumulation support system and message transfer method in the same system
US7249107B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2007-07-24 Microsoft Corporation Redistribution of rights-managed content
US7203753B2 (en) 2001-07-31 2007-04-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Propagating and updating trust relationships in distributed peer-to-peer networks
GB2378274A (en) 2001-07-31 2003-02-05 Hewlett Packard Co Distributing electronic content
US7383433B2 (en) * 2001-07-31 2008-06-03 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Trust spectrum for certificate distribution in distributed peer-to-peer networks
CN1284088C (en) 2001-08-03 2006-11-08 松下电器产业株式会社 Access control system
GB2379297B (en) * 2001-09-03 2005-02-23 Intercede Ltd Server with file verification
US20030046587A1 (en) 2001-09-05 2003-03-06 Satyam Bheemarasetti Secure remote access using enterprise peer networks
US7454464B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2008-11-18 Intel Corporation Peer discovery and connection management based on context sensitive social networks
US8041803B2 (en) 2001-09-26 2011-10-18 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Method and system for delivering files in digital file marketplace
EP1442411A4 (en) 2001-09-30 2006-02-01 Realcontacts Ltd Connection service
US20050021398A1 (en) 2001-11-21 2005-01-27 Webhound Corporation Method and system for downloading digital content over a network
US7406537B2 (en) 2002-11-26 2008-07-29 Progress Software Corporation Dynamic subscription and message routing on a topic between publishing nodes and subscribing nodes
US20030120928A1 (en) 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Miles Cato Methods for rights enabled peer-to-peer networking
US7088823B2 (en) * 2002-01-09 2006-08-08 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for secure distribution and evaluation of compressed digital information
US7287053B2 (en) 2002-01-15 2007-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Ad hoc data sharing in virtual team rooms
US7167910B2 (en) 2002-02-20 2007-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Social mapping of contacts from computer communication information
US20030171941A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2003-09-11 Kraenzel Carl Joseph System and method for identifying synergistic opportunities within and between organizations
US7251689B2 (en) 2002-03-27 2007-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Managing storage resources in decentralized networks
US7177929B2 (en) 2002-03-27 2007-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation Persisting node reputations in transient network communities
JPWO2003082931A1 (en) 2002-03-28 2005-08-04 サンメディカル株式会社 Paste polymerization initiator composition, dental or surgical adhesive and adhesive kit
US6938042B2 (en) 2002-04-03 2005-08-30 Laplink Software Inc. Peer-to-peer file sharing
US20030195851A1 (en) 2002-04-11 2003-10-16 Ong Lance D. System for managing distribution of digital audio content
US7668901B2 (en) 2002-04-15 2010-02-23 Avid Technology, Inc. Methods and system using a local proxy server to process media data for local area users
WO2003090395A2 (en) 2002-04-16 2003-10-30 Sky Kruse Method and system for watermarking digital content and for introducing failure points into digital content
US20030204602A1 (en) 2002-04-26 2003-10-30 Hudson Michael D. Mediated multi-source peer content delivery network architecture
US6970444B2 (en) 2002-05-13 2005-11-29 Meshnetworks, Inc. System and method for self propagating information in ad-hoc peer-to-peer networks
US7346696B2 (en) 2002-05-21 2008-03-18 At&T Deleware Intellectual Property, Inc. Group access management system
US20030220980A1 (en) 2002-05-24 2003-11-27 Crane Jeffrey Robert Method and system for providing a computer network-based community-building function through user-to-user ally association
US20060184617A1 (en) 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Nicholas Frank C Method and system for the creating, managing, and delivery of feed formatted content
US7568004B2 (en) 2002-06-20 2009-07-28 Linda Gottfried Method and system for sharing brand information
US7107317B2 (en) 2002-06-24 2006-09-12 International Business Machines Corporation Targeted information delivery to multiple users
US8150922B2 (en) 2002-07-17 2012-04-03 Research In Motion Limited Voice and text group chat display management techniques for wireless mobile terminals
US7263560B2 (en) 2002-08-30 2007-08-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Decentralized peer-to-peer advertisement
US20040044774A1 (en) 2002-09-04 2004-03-04 Ruchi Mangalik System for providing content sharing and method therefor
US7822810B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2010-10-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for peer to peer common channel collaboration
US7206934B2 (en) 2002-09-26 2007-04-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Distributed indexing of identity information in a peer-to-peer network
US8204992B2 (en) 2002-09-26 2012-06-19 Oracle America, Inc. Presence detection using distributed indexes in peer-to-peer networks
US20040073659A1 (en) 2002-10-15 2004-04-15 Carl Rajsic Method and apparatus for managing nodes in a network
US7249123B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2007-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for building social networks based on activity around shared virtual objects
US20050188108A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2005-08-25 Volera, Inc. Enriched tree for a content distribution network
US20040103044A1 (en) 2002-11-26 2004-05-27 Vandewater Eric J. System and method of protecting and promoting digital content
EP1576447A1 (en) 2002-12-17 2005-09-21 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. System to allow content sharing
US7636719B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2009-12-22 Microsoft Corporation Contact schema
US7451217B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2008-11-11 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for peer-to-peer authorization
US7177880B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2007-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method of creating and displaying relationship chains between users of a computerized network
US7769881B2 (en) 2003-01-24 2010-08-03 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus for peer-to peer access
US7472110B2 (en) 2003-01-29 2008-12-30 Microsoft Corporation System and method for employing social networks for information discovery
US7774495B2 (en) 2003-02-13 2010-08-10 Oracle America, Inc, Infrastructure for accessing a peer-to-peer network environment
US20060146765A1 (en) 2003-02-19 2006-07-06 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. System for ad hoc sharing of content items between portable devices and interaction methods therefor
US20060167804A1 (en) 2003-02-25 2006-07-27 Ali Aydar Track listening and playing service for digital media files
US20040181487A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2004-09-16 Microsoft Corporation Digital media clearing house platform
US20040181517A1 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-09-16 Younghee Jung System and method for social interaction
US7136945B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2006-11-14 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for extending protected content access with peer to peer applications
US20050031096A1 (en) 2003-04-11 2005-02-10 Richard Postrel Command synchronization method and system
US7099882B2 (en) 2003-04-29 2006-08-29 Navteq North America, Llc Method and system for forming, updating, and using a geographic database
US20050015357A1 (en) 2003-05-21 2005-01-20 Active Path Solutions, Inc. System and method for content development
US20040237045A1 (en) 2003-05-21 2004-11-25 Eintelligence, Inc. Method for asynchronous sharing of integrated spreadsheets using a network
EP1484693A1 (en) 2003-06-04 2004-12-08 Sony NetServices GmbH Content recommendation device with an arrangement engine
JP4331203B2 (en) 2003-06-04 2009-09-16 株式会社ソニー・コンピュータエンタテインメント Content distributed overlay network for peer-to-peer networks
US7069308B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2006-06-27 Friendster, Inc. System, method and apparatus for connecting users in an online computer system based on their relationships within social networks
US7146352B2 (en) * 2003-06-23 2006-12-05 Microsoft Corporation Query optimizer system and method
US7739602B2 (en) 2003-06-24 2010-06-15 Aol Inc. System and method for community centric resource sharing based on a publishing subscription model
US7519989B2 (en) * 2003-07-17 2009-04-14 Av Thenex Inc. Token device that generates and displays one-time passwords and that couples to a computer for inputting or receiving data for generating and outputting one-time passwords and other functions
US8200775B2 (en) 2005-02-01 2012-06-12 Newsilike Media Group, Inc Enhanced syndication
US7188254B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2007-03-06 Microsoft Corporation Peer-to-peer authorization method
KR100493900B1 (en) 2003-08-21 2005-06-10 삼성전자주식회사 Method for Sharing Rights Object Between Users
US20050047573A1 (en) 2003-08-28 2005-03-03 Cameron Jeffrey M. Controlling access to features of call processing software
JP2005100325A (en) 2003-08-29 2005-04-14 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Method for retrieving distribution history of product, method for retrieving production history and system and data thereof
US7316027B2 (en) 2004-02-03 2008-01-01 Novell, Inc. Techniques for dynamically establishing and managing trust relationships
US20050091316A1 (en) 2003-10-03 2005-04-28 Oscar Ponce System and method for creating and selectively sharing data elements in a peer-to-peer network
US7281274B2 (en) * 2003-10-16 2007-10-09 Lmp Media Llc Electronic media distribution system
US7567987B2 (en) 2003-10-24 2009-07-28 Microsoft Corporation File sharing in P2P group shared spaces
US20050165726A1 (en) 2003-10-30 2005-07-28 Pepper Computer, Inc. Packaged, organized collections of digital information, and mechanisms and methods for navigating and sharing the collection
US7181498B2 (en) 2003-10-31 2007-02-20 Yahoo! Inc. Community-based green list for antispam
WO2005048601A1 (en) 2003-11-12 2005-05-26 Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh Program recommendation system
US20050114672A1 (en) 2003-11-20 2005-05-26 Encryptx Corporation Data rights management of digital information in a portable software permission wrapper
US20050203801A1 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-09-15 Jared Morgenstern Method and system for collecting, sharing and tracking user or group associates content via a communications network
US7451190B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2008-11-11 Yahoo! Inc. Associating multiple visibility profiles with a user of a real-time communication system
US7526458B2 (en) 2003-11-28 2009-04-28 Manyworlds, Inc. Adaptive recommendations systems
US7606772B2 (en) 2003-11-28 2009-10-20 Manyworlds, Inc. Adaptive social computing methods
US7526459B2 (en) 2003-11-28 2009-04-28 Manyworlds, Inc. Adaptive social and process network systems
US7209933B2 (en) 2003-12-12 2007-04-24 Oracle International Corporation Object versioning
US7882360B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2011-02-01 Aol Inc. Community messaging lists for authorization to deliver electronic messages
US20050138139A1 (en) 2003-12-23 2005-06-23 Jain Naveen K. System and method for distribution and tracking of digital content
US7475110B2 (en) 2004-01-07 2009-01-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and interface for multi-threaded conversations in instant messaging
US8015119B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2011-09-06 Google Inc. Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
US8010459B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2011-08-30 Google Inc. Methods and systems for rating associated members in a social network
US7761569B2 (en) 2004-01-23 2010-07-20 Tiversa, Inc. Method for monitoring and providing information over a peer to peer network
US7269590B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2007-09-11 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for customizing views of information associated with a social network user
US8612359B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2013-12-17 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for sharing portal subscriber information in an online social network
US7885901B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2011-02-08 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for seeding online social network contacts
US20050171954A1 (en) 2004-01-29 2005-08-04 Yahoo! Inc. Selective electronic messaging within an online social network for SPAM detection
US7707122B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2010-04-27 Yahoo ! Inc. System and method of information filtering using measures of affinity of a relationship
US7702728B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2010-04-20 Microsoft Corporation Mobile shared group interaction
US7310676B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2007-12-18 Proxpro, Inc. Method and computer system for matching mobile device users for business and social networking
US20050193054A1 (en) 2004-02-12 2005-09-01 Wilson Eric D. Multi-user social interaction network
US20050195978A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Miodrag Babic Method and apparatus for encoding and selective distribution of licensed digital content
US20050197846A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for generating a proximity index in a social networking environment
US20050198031A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for controlling access to user information in a social networking environment
US20050198305A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for associating a thread with content in a social networking environment
US8635273B2 (en) 2004-03-05 2014-01-21 Aol Inc. Announcing new users of an electronic communications system to existing users
US20050204038A1 (en) 2004-03-11 2005-09-15 Alexander Medvinsky Method and system for distributing data within a network
US7016307B2 (en) 2004-03-11 2006-03-21 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for finding related nodes in a social network
EP1738323A4 (en) 2004-03-15 2009-02-04 Aol Llc Sharing social network information
US8788492B2 (en) 2004-03-15 2014-07-22 Yahoo!, Inc. Search system and methods with integration of user annotations from a trust network
US20050210409A1 (en) 2004-03-19 2005-09-22 Kenny Jou Systems and methods for class designation in a computerized social network application
US20050210104A1 (en) 2004-03-19 2005-09-22 Marko Torvinen Method and system for presence enhanced group management and communication
US20060020960A1 (en) 2004-03-24 2006-01-26 Sandeep Relan System, method, and apparatus for secure sharing of multimedia content across several electronic devices
US20050229243A1 (en) 2004-03-31 2005-10-13 Svendsen Hugh B Method and system for providing Web browsing through a firewall in a peer to peer network
US8234414B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2012-07-31 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Proxy caching in a photosharing peer-to-peer network to improve guest image viewing performance
US7849135B2 (en) 2004-04-09 2010-12-07 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Sharing content on mobile devices
US20050262246A1 (en) 2004-04-19 2005-11-24 Satish Menon Systems and methods for load balancing storage and streaming media requests in a scalable, cluster-based architecture for real-time streaming
US20050243736A1 (en) 2004-04-19 2005-11-03 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and service for finding an optimal collection of paths among a plurality of paths between two nodes in a complex network
US7908663B2 (en) 2004-04-20 2011-03-15 Microsoft Corporation Abstractions and automation for enhanced sharing and collaboration
US20050234864A1 (en) 2004-04-20 2005-10-20 Shapiro Aaron M Systems and methods for improved data sharing and content transformation
US20050240773A1 (en) 2004-04-21 2005-10-27 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Secure file sharing
US7620685B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2009-11-17 Microsoft Corporation Smart shares and transports
US8234374B2 (en) 2004-04-26 2012-07-31 Microsoft Corporation Privacy model that grants access rights and provides security to shared content
US7673003B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Social network email filtering
US7716324B2 (en) 2004-05-12 2010-05-11 Baytsp.Com, Inc. Identification and tracking of digital content distributors on wide area networks
WO2005116979A2 (en) 2004-05-17 2005-12-08 Visible Path Corporation System and method for enforcing privacy in social networks
US8190999B2 (en) 2004-05-20 2012-05-29 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for in-context, topic-oriented instant messaging
US20050262530A1 (en) 2004-05-24 2005-11-24 Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for multimedia communication
US8572221B2 (en) 2004-05-26 2013-10-29 Facebook, Inc. System and method for managing an online social network
US8010458B2 (en) 2004-05-26 2011-08-30 Facebook, Inc. System and method for managing information flow between members of an online social network
US7512984B2 (en) 2004-06-01 2009-03-31 Imera Systems, Inc. Distributed and scalable instant multimedia communication system
KR100916274B1 (en) * 2004-06-07 2009-09-10 슬링 미디어 인코퍼레이티드 Personal media broadcasting system
US7478078B2 (en) 2004-06-14 2009-01-13 Friendster, Inc. Method for sharing relationship information stored in a social network database with third party databases
US7788260B2 (en) 2004-06-14 2010-08-31 Facebook, Inc. Ranking search results based on the frequency of clicks on the search results by members of a social network who are within a predetermined degree of separation
US8832138B2 (en) 2004-06-17 2014-09-09 Nokia Corporation System and method for social network search operations
US7788713B2 (en) 2004-06-23 2010-08-31 Intel Corporation Method, apparatus and system for virtualized peer-to-peer proxy services
US7359894B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2008-04-15 Google Inc. Methods and systems for requesting and providing information in a social network
US7668957B2 (en) 2004-06-30 2010-02-23 Microsoft Corporation Partitioning social networks
FR2873526A1 (en) 2004-07-21 2006-01-27 France Telecom METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING IDENTITY OVERLOAD AND PRIVATE / PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF AN INSTANT MESSAGING ADDRESS
US8302164B2 (en) 2004-07-22 2012-10-30 Facebook, Inc. Authorization and authentication based on an individual's social network
WO2006015237A2 (en) 2004-07-28 2006-02-09 Visible Path Corporation Systems and methods for using social networks for the distribution of communications
US7634539B2 (en) 2004-08-02 2009-12-15 Sap Ag Relations between collaboration workspaces
US7890871B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2011-02-15 Redlands Technology, Llc System and method for dynamically generating, maintaining, and growing an online social network
US7849329B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2010-12-07 Microsoft Corporation Licensing the use of a particular feature of software
US7702730B2 (en) 2004-09-03 2010-04-20 Open Text Corporation Systems and methods for collaboration
US7664109B2 (en) 2004-09-03 2010-02-16 Microsoft Corporation System and method for distributed streaming of scalable media
US7756540B2 (en) 2004-09-17 2010-07-13 Nextel Communications Inc. Public dispatch chatroom
US7707167B2 (en) 2004-09-20 2010-04-27 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for creating a knowledge interchange profile
US8683351B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2014-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Chat user interface for threaded text chat systems
US7620996B2 (en) 2004-11-01 2009-11-17 Microsoft Corporation Dynamic summary module
US8413198B2 (en) 2004-11-12 2013-04-02 Intel Corporation System and method for the controlled on-demand distribution of content via a centralized server and a peer-to-peer network
US7698386B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2010-04-13 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Serving content from an off-line peer server in a photosharing peer-to-peer network in response to a guest request
US20060184464A1 (en) 2004-11-22 2006-08-17 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. System and methods for data analysis and trend prediction
US7749084B2 (en) 2004-12-07 2010-07-06 Microsoft Corporation Tool for real-time graphical exploration of interconnected friends and groups
US8876606B2 (en) 2004-12-07 2014-11-04 Microsoft Corporation User-centric method of aggregating information sources to reinforce digital identity
US20060123127A1 (en) 2004-12-08 2006-06-08 Evil Twin Studios, Inc. System and method for organizing online communities and virtual dwellings within a virtual environment
US7607164B2 (en) * 2004-12-23 2009-10-20 Microsoft Corporation Systems and processes for managing policy change in a distributed enterprise
US7657458B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2010-02-02 Diamond Review, Inc. Vendor-driven, social-network enabled review collection system and method
US20060143183A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-06-29 Goldberg Adam J System and method for providing collection sub-groups
US20060143084A1 (en) 2004-12-28 2006-06-29 Boloto, Inc. Software and method for advertisor sponsored events within a private centrally managed local or distributed network of users and an optional associated private network card for specialty marketing identification or banking
US20060143236A1 (en) 2004-12-29 2006-06-29 Bandwidth Productions Inc. Interactive music playlist sharing system and methods
US20060155813A1 (en) 2005-01-12 2006-07-13 International Business Machines Corporation Instant messaging communications network with selectable responses to active status queries, made to individual user display stations by other user stations, personalized to such other querying user stations
US7606168B2 (en) 2005-01-28 2009-10-20 Attenex Corporation Apparatus and method for message-centric analysis and multi-aspect viewing using social networks
US7689556B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2010-03-30 France Telecom Content navigation service
US8200700B2 (en) 2005-02-01 2012-06-12 Newsilike Media Group, Inc Systems and methods for use of structured and unstructured distributed data
US20060173963A1 (en) 2005-02-03 2006-08-03 Microsoft Corporation Propagating and responding to announcements in an environment having pre-established social groups
US7716300B2 (en) 2005-02-22 2010-05-11 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods to facilitate self regulation of social networks through trading and gift exchange
US20060190536A1 (en) 2005-02-23 2006-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for building social networks
US7675874B2 (en) 2005-02-24 2010-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Peer-to-peer instant messaging and chat system
US7818350B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2010-10-19 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for creating a collaborative playlist
US7665107B2 (en) 2005-03-11 2010-02-16 Microsoft Corporation Viral advertising for interactive services
US20060218225A1 (en) 2005-03-28 2006-09-28 Hee Voon George H Device for sharing social network information among users over a network
US20060218153A1 (en) 2005-03-28 2006-09-28 Voon George H H Building social networks using shared content data relating to a common interest
US8117277B2 (en) * 2005-04-27 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Component based infrastructure for sharing files
US20060248573A1 (en) 2005-04-28 2006-11-02 Content Guard Holdings, Inc. System and method for developing and using trusted policy based on a social model
WO2006118398A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-11-09 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for changing service quality of a content adaptively
US7770229B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2010-08-03 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for the propagation of DRM protected content
EP1737180B1 (en) 2005-06-06 2018-12-26 Comptel Corporation System and method for processing data records in a mediation system
US7849199B2 (en) 2005-07-14 2010-12-07 Yahoo ! Inc. Content router
US9076175B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2015-07-07 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile comparison shopping
US20070106551A1 (en) * 2005-09-20 2007-05-10 Mcgucken Elliot 22nets: method, system, and apparatus for building content and talent marketplaces and archives based on a social network
AU2006326015A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2007-06-21 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for social mapping
US20070143228A1 (en) 2005-12-15 2007-06-21 Microsoft Corporation Licensing matrix
EP1969477A4 (en) 2005-12-22 2009-04-08 Catalog Com Inc Social network-enabled interactive media player
US20070173325A1 (en) 2006-01-20 2007-07-26 Microsoft Corporation Join in-progress on-line game session
US8037506B2 (en) * 2006-03-03 2011-10-11 Verimatrix, Inc. Movie studio-based network distribution system and method
US20070233828A1 (en) 2006-03-31 2007-10-04 Jeremy Gilbert Methods and systems for providing data storage and retrieval
US8046411B2 (en) 2006-04-28 2011-10-25 Yahoo! Inc. Multimedia sharing in social networks for mobile devices
US20080016081A1 (en) 2006-07-14 2008-01-17 Anthology Solutions, Inc. System and method for automatic digital library creation
US7992171B2 (en) 2006-09-06 2011-08-02 Qurio Holdings, Inc. System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network
US20080120397A1 (en) 2006-10-30 2008-05-22 Hartman Jalali H Peer-to-peer social networking optimization engine

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030216824A1 (en) 2002-05-14 2003-11-20 Docomo Communications Laboratories Usa, Inc. Method and apparatus for self-degrading digital data
WO2006047879A1 (en) 2004-11-04 2006-05-11 Topeer Corporation System and method for creating a secure trusted social network

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2067291A4

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101573904A (en) 2009-11-04
EP2067291A4 (en) 2013-06-26
CN101573904B (en) 2013-03-20
US20080059992A1 (en) 2008-03-06
EP2067291A2 (en) 2009-06-10
WO2008030750A3 (en) 2008-07-24
US7992171B2 (en) 2011-08-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7992171B2 (en) System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network
US7873988B1 (en) System and method for rights propagation and license management in conjunction with distribution of digital content in a social network
Ma et al. Blockchain for digital rights management
US11914684B2 (en) Secure messaging service with digital rights management using blockchain technology
US7925592B1 (en) System and method of using a proxy server to manage lazy content distribution in a social network
EP3123383B1 (en) System and method for partial url signing with applications to dynamic adaptive streaming
US8555367B2 (en) Method and system for securely streaming content
Tootoonchian et al. Lockr: social access control for web 2.0
US8719912B2 (en) Enabling private data feed
JP6741778B2 (en) System and method for identifying matching content
AU2007292453B2 (en) DRM aspects of peer-to-peer digital content distribution
KR101458237B1 (en) Remote data access techniques for portable devices
KR100856027B1 (en) System for providing copyright-verified video data and method thereof
US20160063223A1 (en) Distributing protected content
RU2419222C2 (en) Secured instant transfer of messages
US9990513B2 (en) System and method of applying adaptive privacy controls to lossy file types
US9654288B1 (en) Securing group communications
JP2005526320A (en) Secure content sharing in digital rights management
AU2005241238A1 (en) Integrity protection of streamed content
MXPA04012326A (en) Access control and key management system for streaming media.
JP2017204706A (en) Content distribution system, content distribution method, content generation device and content generation program
US9160720B2 (en) Digital rights management of streaming contents and services
US20030217163A1 (en) Method and system for assessing a right of access to content for a user device
WO2019227225A1 (en) Systems and methods for establishing communications via blockchain
US20060242074A1 (en) Encrypting digital rights management protected content

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200780041126.1

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07841587

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2007841587

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007841587

Country of ref document: EP