WO2006008731A1 - System and method for monitoring driving - Google Patents
System and method for monitoring driving Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2006008731A1 WO2006008731A1 PCT/IL2005/000566 IL2005000566W WO2006008731A1 WO 2006008731 A1 WO2006008731 A1 WO 2006008731A1 IL 2005000566 W IL2005000566 W IL 2005000566W WO 2006008731 A1 WO2006008731 A1 WO 2006008731A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- driving
- event
- driver
- turn
- maneuver
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
- G09B19/16—Control of vehicles or other craft
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/08—Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
- G07C5/0841—Registering performance data
- G07C5/085—Registering performance data using electronic data carriers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F7/00—Methods or arrangements for processing data by operating upon the order or content of the data handled
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
- G09B19/16—Control of vehicles or other craft
- G09B19/167—Control of land vehicles
Definitions
- the present invention relates to driving monitoring systems and methods.
- Tokitsu United States Patent 4,500,868 to Tokitsu et al.
- Tokitsu is intended as an adjunct in driving instruction.
- sensors such as engine speed, vehicle velocity, selected transmission gear, and so forth
- Tokitsu is able to determine if certain predetermined condition thresholds are exceeded, and, if so, to signal an alarm to alert the driver. Alarms are also recorded for later review and analysis.
- a simple system such as Tokitsu can be valuable. For example, if the driver were to strongly depress the accelerator pedal, the resulting acceleration could exceed a predetermined threshold and sound an alarm, cautioning the driver to reduce the acceleration.
- Tokitsu's system is of limited value under other conditions. For example, if the driver were to suddenly apply the vehicle brakes with great force, the resulting deceleration could exceed a predetermined threshold, and thereby signal an alarm and be recorded. Although the records of such behavior could be valuable, such strong braking is usually done under emergency conditions where the driver is already aware of the emergency, and where an alarm would be superfluous (and hence of little or no value), or perhaps distracting (and hence of dubious value or even detrimental).
- Lemelson 111 United States Patent 4,671,111 to Lemelson (herein denoted as “Lemelson 111”) teaches the use of accelerometers and data recording / transmitting equipment for obtaining and analyzing vehicle acceleration and deceleration. Although Lemelson 111 presents this in the context of analyzing vehicle performance, however, there is no detailed discussion of precisely how an analysis of the resulting data would be done, nor how meaningful information could be obtained thereby. In related United States Patent 5,570,087 also to Lemelson (herein denoted as “Lemelson 087”) the analyzed vehicular motion is expressed in coded representations which are stored in computer memory.
- Lemelson 079 United States Patent 5,805,079 to Lemelson
- Kamishima United States Patent 5,270,708 to Kamishima discloses a system that detects a vehicle's position and orientation, turning, and speed, and coupled with a database of past accidents at the present location, determines whether the present vehicle's driving conditions are similar to those of a past accident, and if so, alerts the driver. If, for example, the current vehicle speed on a particular road exceeds the (stored) speed limit at that point of the road, the driver could be alerted. Moreover, if excessive speed on that particular area is known to have been responsible for many accidents, the system could notify the driver of this.
- Tano describes a system which analyzes raw driving data (such as speed and acceleration data) in a statistical fashion to obtain statistical aggregates that can be used to evaluate driver performance. Unsatisfactory driver behavior is determined when certain predefined threshold values are exceeded. A driver whose behavior exceeds a statistical threshold from what is considered “safe” driving, can be deemed a “dangerous" driver. Thresholds can be applied to various statistical measures, such as standard deviation. Because Tano relies on statistical aggregates and thresholds which are acknowledged to vary according to road location and characteristics, however, a system according to Tano has limited ability to evaluate driver performance independent of the statistical profiles and thresholds.
- the statistical characterization of a driver's performance is generally not expressible in terms of familiar driving patterns.
- a driver may have a statistical profile that exceeds a particular lateral acceleration threshold, and the driver may therefore be classified as a "dangerous" driver.
- driving pattern is responsible for excessive lateral acceleration? Is it because this driver tends to take curves too fast? Or is it because he tends to change lanes rapidly while weaving in and out of traffic?
- Both are possibly "dangerous" patterns, but a purely threshold-oriented statistical analysis, such as presented in Tano, may be incapable of discriminating between these, and therefore cannot attribute the resulting statistical profile to specific patterns of driving.
- Tano's statistical analysis is also incapable of providing information in terms of familiar driving patterns.
- the "Mastertrak” system by Vetronix Corporation of Santa Barbara, CA is intended as a fleet management system which provides an optional "safety module". This feature, however, addresses only vehicle speed and safety belt use, and is not capable of analyzing driver behavior patterns.
- the system manufactured by SmartDriver of Houston, TX monitors vehicle speed, accelerator throttle position, engine RPM, and can detect, count, and report on the exceeding of thresholds for these variables.
- driving patterns which cannot be classified on the basis of thresholds, and which are nevertheless pertinent to detecting questionable or unsafe driving behavior. For example, it is generally acknowledged that driving too slowly on certain roads can be hazardous, and for this reason there are often minimum speed limits.
- prior art analysis and evaluation is based on overall performance during a particular driving session, or is based on statistical averages over a number of different sessions.
- the analysis and evaluation can be made with regard to a particular road or road segment, through the application of GPS locating.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the general prior art analysis and evaluation approach.
- a typical set of sensors 101 has a tachometer 103, a speedometer 105, one or more accelerometers 107, a GPS receiver 109, and optional additional sensors 111.
- accelerometers it is understood that an accelerometer is typically operative to monitoring the acceleration along one particular specified vehicle axis, and outputs a raw data stream corresponding to the vehicle's acceleration along that axis.
- the two main axes of vehicle acceleration that are of interest are the longitudinal vehicle axis — the axis substantially in the direction of the vehicle's principal motion ("forward” and “reverse”); and the transverse (lateral) vehicle axis — the substantially horizontal axis substantially orthogonal to the vehicle's principal motion ("side-to- side”).
- An accelerometer which is capable of monitoring multiple independent vector accelerations along more than a single axis is herein considered as, and is denoted as, a plurality of accelerometers, wherein each accelerometer of the plurality is capable of monitoring the acceleration along only a single axis.
- Additional sensors can include sensors for driver braking pressure, accelerator pressure, steering wheel control, handbrake, turn signals, and transmission or gearbox control, clutch (if any), and the like. Some of the sensors, such as tachometer 103 and speedometer 105 may simply have an analog signal output which represents the magnitude of the quantity. Other sensors, such as a transmission or gearbox control sensor may have a digital output which indicates which gear has been selected. More complex output would come from GPS receiver 109, according to the formatting standards of the manufacturer or industry. Other sensors can include a real- time clock, a directional device such as a compass, one or more inclinometers, temperature sensors, precipitation sensors, available light sensors, and so forth, to gauge actual road conditions and other driving factors. Digital sensor output is also possible, where supported.
- the output of sensor set 101 is a stream of raw data, in analog and/or digital form. Sensor outputs are input into an analysis and evaluation unit 113, which has threshold settings 115 and a threshold discriminator 117. A statistical unit 119 provides report summaries, and an optional continuous processing unit 121 may be included to preprocess the raw data. The output of analysis and evaluation unit 113 is statistically-processed data.
- a report / notification / alarm 123 is output with the results of the statistical analysis, and may contain analysis and evaluations of one or more of the following: an emergency alert 125, a driving session 1 statistics report 127, a driving session 2 statistics report 129, etc., and a driving session n statistics report 131, a driving session average statistics report 133, and a road-specific driving session statistics report 135.
- These reports may be useful in analyzing and evaluating driver behavior, skill, and attitude, but the use of statistics based predominantly on thresholds or on localization of the driving, and the aggregation over entire driving sessions or groups of driving sessions also result in the loss of much meaningful information.
- one of the key benefits of monitoring driving behavior is the ability to determine a driver's consistency, because this is an important indicator of that driver's predictability, and therefore of the safety of that driver's performance. If the driver begins to deviate significantly from an established driving profile, this can be a valuable advance warning of an unsafe condition. Perhaps the driver is fatigued, distracted, or upset, and thereby poses a hazard which consistency analysis can detect. It is also possible that the driver has been misidentified and is not the person thought to be driving the vehicle. Unfortunately, however, statistically aggregating data, as is done in the prior art, does not permit a meaningful consistency analysis, because such an analysis depends on the particular driving situations which are encountered, and prior art analysis completely ignores the specifics of those driving situations,
- a typical prior art report presents information such as: the number of times a set speed limit was exceeded; the maximum speed; the number of times a set RPM limit was exceeded; the maximum lateral acceleration or braking deceleration; and so forth.
- Such information may be characteristic of the driver's habits, but it would be much better to have a report that is based on familiar driving situations, maneuvers, and patterns — for example, by revealing that the driver has a habit of accelerating during turns, or makes frequent and rapid high-speed lane changes. Additionally, a new and relatively inexperienced driver might drive very cautiously and thereby have very "safe" overall statistics, but might lack skills for handling certain common but more challenging driving situations.
- the present invention provides a system and method for analyzing and evaluating a raw data stream related to the operation of a vehicle for the purpose of classifying and rating the performance of the vehicle's driver.
- embodiments of the present invention are not restricted to performing statistical and threshold analysis and evaluation of the driver's skills and behavior, but rather are based on detecting driving events and based thereon identifying driving maneuvers, which allows then classification of the driver's driving behavior.
- the driver's driving behavior can be expressed in terms of familiar driving patterns and maneuvers. The invention thus yields analyses and evaluations which contain more information and which are more readily put to use.
- the raw data stream from the vehicle sensors is progressively analyzed to obtain descriptors of the driving operations which are less and less "data" and more and more expressive of driving maneuvers, typically familiar driving operations and situations.
- the present invention allows identifying the context in which each event takes place. For example, braking suddenly is defined as an event, and the context of such an event may be the making of a turn which was entered at too high a speed. The events can then be identified in the context of driving situations.
- the present invention also facilitates the classification of a driver's skill on the basis of sensor utility monitoring of the driven vehicle.
- the present invention also facilitates the classification of a driver's attitude on the basis of sensor utility monitoring of the driven vehicle.
- the term "attitude” as used herein denotes the driver's approach toward driving and the tendency of the driver to knowingly take risks. Attitude categories include, but are not limited to: “safe” (or “normal”); “aggressive” (or “risky”); “thrill-seeking”; “abusive”; and “dangerous”.
- aggressive or dangerous behavior is logged as an event.
- the present invention also enables, according to one of its embodiments, the making of quantitative and qualitative comparisons between a current driver's behavior and a previously-recorded profile either of drivers in general, e.g. a group of drivers in a fleet of vehicles, or a profile of the same driver, independent of the particular details of the driving sessions involved, by qualifying and quantifying the driver's behavior when performing common driving maneuvers in common driving situations.
- a system for analyzing and evaluating the performance and behavior of the driver of a vehicle comprising: a vehicle sensor utility operative to monitor the state of the vehicle and to output a raw data stream corresponding thereto; a driving event handler operative to receive the raw data stream, detect driving events based thereon and to output a driving event string containing at least one driving event representation corresponding thereto; and a maneuver detector operative to receive said at least one driving event representation, recognize patterns of driving maneuvers and to construct and output a driving maneuver representation corresponding thereto, the driving maneuver representation containing a representation of at least one driving maneuver.
- a method for analyzing and evaluating the performance and behavior of the driver of a vehicle comprising: (a) monitoring the state of a vehicle to obtain a raw data stream corresponding thereto; (b) from the raw data stream detecting driving events and generating therefrom a driving event string containing at least one driving event representation corresponding thereto; and (c) from said driving event string, constructing and outputting a driving maneuver representation containing a representation of at least one driving maneuver.
- state of a vehicle refers to any physical parameter associated with driving and may including, without limitation, one or more of the vehicle's position, speed, acceleration (in one, two or three axes), engine revolutions, extent of use of the vehicle's accelerator (gas) pedal, extent of use of the vehicle's brakes or brake pressure and use of steering wheel.
- the sensor utility will thus comprise sensing devices operative to monitor one or more of the above “state of the vehicle” parameters.
- the state of the vehicle that is monitored is acceleration, in one, preferably two and optionally three axes.
- the sensor utility comprises one or more accelerometers operative to monitor the vehicle's acceleration in one, preferably two and optionally three axes.
- the sensor utility is operative to monitor vehicle acceleration and comprises at least one accelerometer operative to output a raw data stream corresponding to the acceleration of the vehicle along a specified vehicle axis.
- the driving event handler and the maneuver detector may each, independently, be a software utility operating in a processor, a hardware utility configured for that purpose or, typically, a combination of the two.
- the event handler and the maneuver detector are both included in one computing unit, as hardware and/or software modules in such unit.
- each one constitutes a separate hardware and/or software utility operative in different units.
- Such different units may be installed in a vehicle, although, as may be appreciated, they may also be constituted in a remote location, e.g. in a system server, or one installed in the vehicle and the other in the remote location.
- the receipt of input from the upstream vehicle installed component may be wireless, in which case the input may be continuous or batch wise (e.g. according to a predefined transmission sequence) or may be through physical or proximity communication, e.g. when a vehicle comes for service or refueling.
- the system may also include a driver identification unit for driver identification, e.g. by a driver swiping an identification card, or by punching of an identification code.
- said at least one driving event representation is associated with one or more numerical parameters.
- the at least one driving event representation may corresponds to a driving event being one or more of the group consisting of: a start event, an end event, a maximum event, a minimum event, a cross event, a flat event, a local maximum event, and a local flat event.
- the driving maneuver representation may correspond to a variety of different driving maneuvers.
- said at least one driving maneuver is a representation of one or more of the group consisting of: accelerate, accelerate before turn, accelerate during lane change, accelerate into turn, accelerate into turn out of stop, accelerate out of stop, accelerate out of turn, accelerate while passing, braking, braking after turn, braking before turn, braking into stop, braking out of turn, braking within turn, failed lane change, failed passing, lane change, lane change and braking, passing, passing and braking, turn, turn and accelerate, and U-turn.
- said at least one driving maneuver representation is associated with one or more numerical parameters.
- the invention is not limited to the use of numerical parameters and other type of parameters may be employed as well.
- the driving maneuver representation is utilized for assessing the driver's skill.
- the driving maneuver representation is utilized for assessing the driver's attitude.
- the system comprises, respectively a skill assessor utility operative to analyzing the skill of the driver based upon said at least one driving maneuver, or an attitude assessor utility operative to analyzing the attitude of the driver based upon said at least one driving maneuver.
- the skill assessor utility and the attitude assessor utility may each, independently, be a software utility operating in a processor, a hardware utility configured for that purpose or, typically, a combination of the two.
- Both utilities may be included in one computing unit, as hardware and/or software modules in such unit; or each one may constitute a separate hardware and/or software utility operative in different units.
- One or both of these utilities may, under some embodiments of the invention, be installed in the same unit with one or more of the driving event handler and the maneuver detector.
- the utilities may be installed in a vehicle, although, as may be appreciated, they may also be constituted in a remote location, e.g. in a system server.
- the receipt of input from the upstream vehicle installed component may be wireless, in which case the input may be continuous or batch wise (e.g. according to a predefined transmission sequence) or may be through physical or proximity communication, e.g.
- the system of the invention typically comprises a database operative to record characteristic driving maneuver representations and an anomaly detector operative to compare said at least one driving maneuver representation to said characteristic driving maneuver representations.
- the database may record driving maneuver representations representative of an average driver's performance, e.g. an average performance in a fleet of drivers, in a defined neighborhood, in a country, drivers of a specific age group, etc. In such a case the driving maneuver for a driver may be compared to a characteristic driving maneuver for a plurality of drivers.
- the database may record individual driving maneuver representations for drivers and accordingly the driver maneuver for a driver may be compared to his previous or historical driving performance, for example for the purpose of detecting instances where the driver's attitude towards driving changes as a result of a certain mental state, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, etc.
- a report may be output.
- the system comprisess an analyzer utility operative to output a report.
- FIG 1 conceptually illustrates prior art analysis and evaluation of vehicle driving data.
- Figure 2 is a block diagram of a system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 3 is an example of a graph of a raw data stream from multiple vehicle accelerometers.
- Figure 4 is an example of the filtering of the raw data stream to remove noise, according to the present invention.
- Figure 5 is an example of parsing a filtered data stream to derive a string of driving events, according to the present invention.
- Figure 6 shows the data and event string analysis for a "lane change" driving maneuver, according to the present invention.
- Figure 7 shows the data and event string analysis for a "turn" driving maneuver, according to the present invention.
- Figure 8 shows the data and event string analysis for a "braking within turn” driving maneuver, according to the present invention.
- Figure 9 shows the data and event string analysis for an "accelerate within turn” driving maneuver, according to the present invention.
- Figure 10 shows a non-limiting illustrative example of transitions of a finite state machine for identifying driving maneuvers, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 11 is a flowchart of a method for analyzing and evaluating vehicle driver performance according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 12 is a conceptual block diagram of an arrangement for assessing driver skill according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 13 is a conceptual block diagram of an arrangement for assessing driver attitude according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 14 is a conceptual block diagram of an arrangement for determining whether there is a significant anomaly in the current driver's behavior and/or performance according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Sensor set 101 may be comparable to that of the prior art system illustrated in Figure 1 by some embodiments and different from others, serving for monitoring states of the vehicle, and having an output in the form of a raw data stream.
- the raw data is input into a driving event handler 201, which contains a low-pass filter 202, a driving event detector 203, a driving events stack and driving event extractor 205 for storing and managing the driving events, and a driving event library 207, which obtains specific data from a database 209.
- driving events are "simple" driving operations that characterize basic moves of driving, as explained and illustrated in detail below.
- Driving event handler 201 performs a basic analysis on the raw data from sensor set 101, and outputs a string of driving events corresponding to the raw data stream.
- a driving event string is represented, in this embodiment, as a time- ordered non-empty set of driving event symbols arranged in order of their respective occurrences.
- Driving event detector 203 performs a best-fit comparison of the filtered sensor data stream with event types from event library 207, such as by using the well- known sliding window technique over the data stream.
- a real-time clock 208 provides a reference time input to the system, illustrated here for a non-limiting embodiment of the present invention as input to driving event handler 201.
- a driving event is characterized by a symbol that qualitatively identifies the basic driving operation, and may be associated with one or more numerical parameters which quantify the driving event.
- These parameters may be derived from scaling and offset factors used in making the best-fit comparison against events from event library 207, as described above.
- the scaling of the time axis and the scaling of the variable value axis which produce the best fit of the selected segment of the input data stream to the model of the event in event library 207 can be used as numerical parameters (in most cases, one or more of these numerical parameters are related to the beginning and end times of the driving event). If close fits can be obtained between the string of driving events and the input data stream, the event string (including the event symbols and associated parameter set) can replace the original data stream, thereby greatly compressing the data and providing an intelligent analysis thereof.
- a simple event is to start the vehicle moving forward from a stopped position (the "start” event).
- a numerical parameter for this event is the magnitude of the acceleration.
- a generalized version of this event is a speed increase of a moving vehicle (the “accelerate” event).
- Another simple event is to slow the vehicle to a halt from a moving condition (the "stop” event).
- Other events are of like simplicity.
- the output driving event string is a sequence of basic driving events as explained above.
- a driving maneuver is a combination of driving events which are encountered as a familiar pattern in normal driving.
- a "lane change”, for example, is a driving maneuver that, in the simplest case, may be represented by a combination of a lateral acceleration followed by a lateral deceleration during a period of forward motion.
- a lane change during a turn is more involved, but can be similarly represented by a combination of driving events.
- driving maneuvers can contain one or more numerical parameters, which are related to the numerical parameters of the driving events which make up the driving maneuver.
- a driving maneuver sequence is a time-ordered non-empty set of driving maneuvers arranged according to the respective times of their occurrence.
- maneuver detector 211 contains a maneuver library 213 fed from database 209, a pattern recognition unit 215 to recognize patterns of driving maneuvers to identify clusters of driving events which make up driving maneuvers, and a maneuver classifier 217 to construct a reasonable driving maneuver sequence output corresponding to the input driving event string.
- patterns include sequences of events such as accelerating out of stops and changing lanes while speeding or approaching turns too fast.
- a skill assessor 219 can develop and assign a skill rating for the current driver's handling of the driving maneuver. Furthermore, by analyzing the magnitude of certain key parameters (such as those related to acceleration and deceleration during the maneuver), an attitude assessor 221 can develop and assign an attitude rating to the current driver's execution of the driving maneuver. Moreover, each maneuver may be assigned a weighting driving risk coefficient for developing and assigning an aggregate attitude rating for the current driver.
- Table 1 includes non-limiting examples of some common driving maneuvers, their common meaning in a driving context, and their suggested driving risk coefficients. It is noted that there are many possible descriptive terms for the driving events and driving maneuvers described herein, and the choice of the terms that are used herein has by itself no significance in the context of the invention. For example, the "Passing" driving maneuver is herein named after the common term for the maneuver in the United States, but may commonly referred to as “bypassing” in some countries and as “overtaking” in other countries; etc.
- coefficients range from 1 to 10, with 10 representing the most dangerous driving maneuvers.
- Risk coefficients are subjective, and according to other embodiments of the present invention may be redefined to suit empirical evidence.
- the coefficients may also be different for different countries, different driver populations, etc. Table 1. Examples of Driving Maneuvers and Driving Risk Coefficients
- a driving anomaly detector 223 checks the output driving maneuvers for inconsistencies in the driving profile of the driver.
- a profile or set of profiles for a driver can be maintained in database 209 for comparison with the driver's current behavior.
- a set of profiles for various maneuvers can be maintained so that whatever the current driving maneuver happens to be, a comparison can be made with a recorded maneuver of the same category (namely, for example, a lane change maneuver with a recorded lane change maneuver, etc.). If there is a substantial discrepancy between the current driving maneuvers and stored profiles for the driver, which are used as reference, the driving inconsistencies can be reported to an emergency alert 227 for follow-up checking or investigation. As previously noted, a significant discrepancy or inconsistency may indicate an unsafe condition (e.g. as a result of a driver's current attitude, as a consequence of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs, etc.).
- the sequence of driving maneuvers that is output by driving maneuver detector 211 also goes to an analyzer 225, which outputs analysis and evaluation of the driving behavior to a report / notification / alarm 229.
- report / notification / alarm 229 can contain information on a driving situation 1 analysis report 231, a driving situation 2 analysis report 233, etc., and a driving situation n analysis report 235.
- by statistically-processing the driving situation analysis reports it is possible to produce some overall analyses and evaluations, such as a driving skill assessment report 237 and a driving attitude assessment report 239.
- Figure 3 illustrates an example of raw data from multiple vehicle accelerometers, as plotted in a 3 -dimensional form.
- An x-axis 301 represents the longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle (in the direction in which the vehicle is normally traveling), and hence "forward" and “reverse” acceleration and deceleration data 307 is plotted along the x-axis.
- a y-axis 303 represents the transverse (lateral) acceleration of the vehicle to the left and right of the direction in which the vehicle is normally traveling, and hence "side-to-side” acceleration data 309 is plotted along the
- a time axis 305 is orthogonal to the x and; ⁇ -axes.
- Data 307 and data 309 are representative of the time-dependent raw data stream output from sensor set 101 ( Figure 2).
- Figure 3 is a non-limiting example for the purpose of illustration.
- Other raw sensor data streams besides acceleration can be represented in a similar manner. Examples are extent of use of accelerator (gas) pedal, speed, extent of use of brake pedal and brake pressure, gear shifting rate, etc.
- the graph may not need multiple data axes. Acceleration is a vector quantity and therefore has directional components, requiring multiple data axes. Scalar variables, however, have no directional components and two-dimensional graphs suffice to represent the data stream in time. Speed, brake pressure, and so forth are scalar variables.
- Figure 4 illustrates the effect of the initial filtering of the raw data stream performed by low-pass filter 202.
- Figure 4 also depicts acceleration data in two dimensions, but these are collapsed onto the same axis.
- a raw data stream 401 is representative of the time-dependent output from sensor set. 101 ( Figure 2).
- a filtered data stream 403 is output.
- low-pass filter 202 can also apply a moving average and/or a domain filter. Filtered data stream 403 is thus a data stream with the unwanted noise removed.
- Figure 5 illustrates the parsing of filtered data stream 403 to derive a string of driving events. Driving events are indicated by distinctive patterns in the filtered data stream, and can be classified according to the following non-limiting set of driving events:
- each of these driving events designated by a symbolic representation also has a set of parameters which quantify the numerical values associated with the event. For example, a "Max" event M has the value of the maximum as a parameter.
- the time of occurrence of the event is also stored with the event. It is possible to define additional driving events in a similar fashion.
- the driving event designations are expanded to indicate whether the event relates to the x component or the y component. For example, a maximum of the x-component (of the acceleration) is designated as Mx, whereas a maximum of the ⁇ -component (of the acceleration) is designated as My.
- filtered data 403 represents the following time-ordered sequence of driving events:
- driving maneuvers can be created from sequences of driving events.
- a non-limiting sample of driving maneuvers is listed in Table 1 above.
- maneuver library 213 which contains the most common driving maneuvers, and with the aid of pattern recognition unit 213 ( Figure 2), it is possible to determine a sequence of driving maneuvers which corresponds to a long string of driving events.
- Figure 6 illustrates raw data 601 for a Lane Change driving maneuver, in terms of a 3-dimensional representation of x- and y- acceleration components.
- FIG. 603 shows the x- and y- acceleration component representations superimposed on a 2- dimensional plot.
- the driving events indicated are: an Sy event 605; an My event 607; a Cy event 609; an Ly event 611; and an Ey event 613.
- the driving event sequence Sy My Cy Ly Ey corresponds to a Lane Change driving maneuver.
- Figure 7 illustrates raw data 701 for a Turn driving maneuver, in terms of a 2- dimensional plot.
- the driving events indicated are: an Sy event 703; an Ly event 705; and an Ey event 707.
- the driving event sequence Sy Ly Ey corresponds to a
- Figure 8 illustrates raw data 801 for a Braking within Turn driving maneuver, in terms of a 2-dimensional plot.
- the driving events indicated are: an Sy event 803; an Sx event 805; an My event 807; an Ey event 809; an Lx event 811; and an Ex event 813.
- Sy Sx My Ey Lx Ex corresponds to a Braking within Turn driving maneuver.
- the Braking within Turn driving maneuver illustrates how the relative timing between the x- component events and the y- component events can be altered to create a different driving maneuver.
- Sx event 805 and My event 807 can in principle be reversed, because they are events related to different independent variables (the forward x- component of acceleration versus and the lateral .y-component of acceleration).
- the resulting driving event sequence, Sy My Sx Ey Lx Ex thus corresponds to a driving maneuver where the maximum of the lateral acceleration (My) occurs before the braking begins (Sx), rather than afterwards as in the original driving maneuver Sy Sx My Ey Lx Ex, as shown in Figure 8.
- timing difference between these two maneuvers can be only a small fraction of a second, the ability of a driver to successfully execute one of these maneuvers in preference over the other may depend critically on the level of driving skill and experience.
- embodiments of the present invention are able to differentiate between similar, but distinct driving maneuvers, and thereby are able to evaluate driver performance, skill, and behavior in ways that prior art analysis systems and methods cannot achieve through the current statistical and threshold analysis techniques.
- Prior art statistical and threshold analysis is incapable of considering the effect of such timing nuances on the risks involved in different driving situations.
- Ey event 809 and Lx event 811 are also related to independent variables and in principle can be interchanged to create another different driving event sequence, Sy My Sx Lx Ey Ex. All in all, it is possible to create a total of four distinct, but related event sequences: 1 . Sy My Sx Ey Lx Ex 2 . Sy Sx My Ey Lx Ex 3 . Sy My Sx Lx Ey Ex
- Figure 9 illustrates raw data 901 for an Accelerate within Turn driving maneuver, in terms of a 2-dimensional plot.
- the driving events indicated are: an Sy event 903; an Sx event 905; an Mx event 907; an Ex event 909; an My event 911; and an Ey event 913.
- Sy Sx Mx Ex My Ey corresponds to an Accelerate within Turn driving maneuver.
- Figure 10 illustrates a non-limiting example of the transitions of a finite state machine for identifying driving maneuvers, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- a finite state machine for identifying driving maneuvers, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Such a machine can perform pattern recognition and function as pattern recognition unit 215 ( Figure 2), or can supplement the action thereof.
- the machine of Figure 10 can recognize four different driving maneuvers:
- the transitions initiate at a begin point 1001, and conclude at a done point 1003.
- the machine examines each driving event in the input event string, and traverses a tree with the branchings corresponding to the recognized driving maneuvers as shown. If the first event is Sx, then the maneuver is either Accelerate or Braking. Thus, if the next events are Mx Ex 5 it is an Accelerate maneuver, and a transition 1005 outputs Accelerate. If the next events are Lx Ex, however, a transition 1007 outputs Braking. Similarly, if the first event is Sy, the maneuver is either Turn or Turn and Accelerate. If the next events are My Ey, a transition 1009 outputs Turn.
- a transition 1011 outputs Turn and Accelerate.
- the machine makes a transition to done point 1003 without identifying any maneuver.
- the finite state machine will associate a driving maneuver with each physically- possible input string.
- Figure 11 is an overall flowchart of a method according to the present invention for analyzing and evaluating vehicle driver performance and behavior.
- the input to the method is a raw sensor data stream 1101, such as the output from sensor set 101 ( Figure 2).
- the method starts with a filter step 1103 in which the sensor data stream is filtered to remove extraneous noise.
- an event-detection step 1105 after which a driving event string 1107 is generated in a step 1109.
- a pattern-matching step 1111 matches the events of event string 1107 to maneuvers in maneuver library 213 ( Figure 2), in order to generate a maneuver sequence 1113 in a step 1115.
- a step 1119 assesses the driver's skill and creates a skill rating 1117.
- a step 1123 assesses the driver's attitude and creates an attitude rating 1121.
- a step 1127 detects driving anomalies by comparing the current driver behavior with a stored driver profile (if any), and in a decision point 1129 determines if there are any significant anomalies. If there are significant anomalies, a step 1131 initiates an alert to this effect.
- a step 1133 analyzes and evaluates the ratings and other findings, including the preparation of statistical summaries as desired.
- reports are issued, such as reports 231, 233, 235, 237, and 239 ( Figure 2). If significant indicators of danger have been revealed, such as the case if attitude rating 1121 indicates danger, a step 1139 initiates an appropriate alert. Assessing Skill and Attitude
- Figure 12 is a conceptual diagram of an arrangement or process according to an embodiment of the present invention for assessing driver skill for a maneuver 1201.
- maneuver 1201 is represented by a driving event sequence, as presented above.
- Maneuver library 213 ( Figure 2) contains a poorly-skilled maneuver template 1203, which is a driving event sequence for the same maneuver, but with parameters corresponding to those of an inexperienced or poor driver.
- Maneuver library 213 also contains a highly-skilled maneuver template 1205, which is a driving event sequence for the same maneuver, but with parameters corresponding to those of an experienced and skilled driver.
- Poorly-skilled maneuver template 1203 and highly-skilled maneuver template 1205 are combined in a weighted fashion by being multiplied by a multiplier 1207 and a multiplier 1209, respectively, with the weighted components added together by an adder 1211.
- Multiplier 1209 multiplies highly-skilled maneuver template 1205 by a factor/ which ranges from 0 to 1, whereas multiplier 1207 multiplies poorly-skilled maneuver template 1203 by a factor (1 -/), so that the output of adder 1211 is a weighted linear combination of poorly-skilled maneuver template 1203 and highly-skilled maneuver template 1205.
- This weighted linear combination is input into a comparator 1213, which also has an input from maneuver 1201.
- the output of comparator 1213 adjusts the value of/ for both multiplier 1207 and multiplier 1209, such that the stable value of/ corresponds to the weighted combination of poorly-skilled maneuver template 1203 and highly- skilled maneuver template 1205 that comes closest to being the same as maneuver 1201.
- skill ratings corresponding to many driving maneuvers can be statistically- combined, such as by analyzer 225 ( Figure 2).
- Figure 12 is a conceptual diagram of a process to assess skill level for a maneuver. From the perspective of an algorithm or method, the procedure is simply to find the value of/ in the interval [0, 1] for which the /-weighted highly- skilled template added to a (1 -/)-weighted poorly-skilled most closely approximates the maneuver in question.
- the assessing of skill by comparison of the maneuver with various standards is accomplished through the application of well-known principles of fuzzy logic.
- the templates retrieved from maneuver library 213 are a template 1303 for a safely- executed maneuver corresponding to maneuver 1201, and a template 1305 for a dangerously-executed maneuver corresponding to maneuver 1201. These are combined in a weighted fashion by a multiplier 1309, which multiplies dangerously- executed maneuver 1305 by a factor g, on the interval [0, 1], and a multiplier 1307, which multiplies safely-executed maneuver 1303 by a factor of (1 -g).
- the multiplied maneuvers are added together by an adder 1311, and the combination is compared against maneuver 1201 by a comparator 1313 to find the value of g which yields the closest value to the original maneuver.
- Figure 13 is a conceptual diagram of a process to assess attitude level for a maneuver. From the perspective of an algorithm or method, the procedure is simply to find the value of g in the interval [0, 1] for which the ⁇ -weighted dangerously-executed maneuver template added to a (1 - ⁇ -weighted safely-executed maneuver most closely approximates the maneuver in question.
- attitude ratings corresponding to many driving maneuvers can be statistically-combined, such as by analyzer 225 ( Figure 2).
- analyzer 225 Figure 2
- attitude ratings corresponding to many driving maneuvers can be statistically-combined, such as by analyzer 225 ( Figure 2).
- Table 1 The more risk a maneuver entails, the higher is the risk coefficient.
- the factors /and g are arbitrary regarding the choice of the interval [0, 1], and the assignment of meaning to the extremes of the interval.
- a different interval could be chosen, such as 1 - 10, for example, with whatever respective meanings are desired for the value 1 and the value 10.
- the examples above are non-limiting.
- Figure 14 is a conceptual diagram of an arrangement or process according to an embodiment of the present invention for determining whether there is a significant anomaly in the behavior and/or performance of the current driver with reference to that driver's past behavior and performance.
- a particular driving maneuver 1401 is under scrutiny, and is compared against a characteristic record 1403 of the current driver's past performance of the same maneuver which is considered representative of that driver.
- Characteristic record 1403 is retrieved from database 209 ( Figure 2). The magnitude of the difference between maneuver 1401 and characteristic maneuver
- a discriminator 1409 compares the difference magnitude from magnitude subtractor 1405 against a threshold value 1407. If the difference magnitude exceeds threshold value 1407, discriminator 1409 outputs a driving inconsistency signal.
- Figure 14 is a conceptual diagram of a process to assess discrepancies or anomalies in the performance of a maneuver when compared to a previously-recorded reference. From the perspective of an algorithm or method, the procedure is simply to compare the magnitude of the difference of the maneuver and the previously-recorded reference against a threshold value 1407. If the magnitude of the difference exceeds threshold value 1407, a discrepancy is signaled.
- the system may update the characteristic records in database 209 to account for improved quality of driving. While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications and other applications of the invention may be made.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002574549A CA2574549A1 (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | System and method for monitoring driving |
CN2005800263203A CN101002239B (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | System and method for monitoring driving |
JP2007522116A JP4865711B2 (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | Operation monitoring system and method |
BRPI0513541-9A BRPI0513541A (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | system and method for analyzing and evaluating the performance and behavior of a driver of a vehicle |
EP05747252A EP1774492A1 (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | System and method for monitoring driving |
AU2005264151A AU2005264151B2 (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | System and method for monitoring driving |
IL180805A IL180805A (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2007-01-18 | System and method for monitoring driving |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/894,345 | 2004-07-20 | ||
US10/894,345 US7389178B2 (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2004-07-20 | System and method for vehicle driver behavior analysis and evaluation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2006008731A1 true WO2006008731A1 (en) | 2006-01-26 |
Family
ID=35058257
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2005/000566 WO2006008731A1 (en) | 2004-07-20 | 2005-06-01 | System and method for monitoring driving |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7389178B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1774492A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4865711B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20070065307A (en) |
CN (1) | CN101002239B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005264151B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0513541A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2574549A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006008731A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200700558B (en) |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2434346A (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-25 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
WO2007139495A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Scania Cv Ab (Publ) | Device and system for classifying vehicle surroundings |
WO2007139493A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Scania Cv Ab (Publ) | Device for determining an anticipation ability of a driver |
WO2007139494A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Scania Cv Ab (Publ) | Device for brake wear assessment |
GB2470146A (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2010-11-10 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
GB2470147A (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2010-11-10 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
EP2359344A1 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2011-08-24 | Scania CV AB (PUBL) | Braking anticipation ability determining system |
AT507033B1 (en) * | 2008-06-05 | 2011-09-15 | Efkon Ag | PROCESS AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULTANEOUS VEHICLE AND DRIVING PROFILE MONITORING |
EP2426648A1 (en) * | 2010-09-01 | 2012-03-07 | Key Driving Competences | A driver behavior diagnostic method and system |
WO2012028883A1 (en) * | 2010-09-01 | 2012-03-08 | Ricardo Uk Ltd | Lesson based driver feedback system & method |
CN102629426A (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2012-08-08 | 北京精英智通交通系统科技有限公司 | Self-checking method and self-checking system of side line crossing signal |
CN102889949A (en) * | 2012-10-19 | 2013-01-23 | 北京精英智通交通系统科技有限公司 | Side line self-examining method in driver test item |
US8565964B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2013-10-22 | Luna Co., Ltd. | Driving evaluation method |
CN104464026A (en) * | 2014-10-31 | 2015-03-25 | 成都众易通科技有限公司 | Vehicle information monitoring system |
US9730254B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2017-08-08 | Airbiquity Inc. | Efficient headunit communication integration |
US11004277B2 (en) | 2012-06-08 | 2021-05-11 | Airbiquity Inc. | Assessment of electronic sensor data to remotely identify a motor vehicle and monitor driver behavior |
EP3671174B1 (en) * | 2013-09-05 | 2023-11-01 | Crown Equipment Corporation | Dynamic operator behavior analyzer |
Families Citing this family (317)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8090598B2 (en) | 1996-01-29 | 2012-01-03 | Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance |
US8140358B1 (en) | 1996-01-29 | 2012-03-20 | Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | Vehicle monitoring system |
CA2531662C (en) | 2003-07-07 | 2016-04-26 | Sensomatix Ltd. | Traffic information system |
US20080255869A1 (en) * | 2004-02-02 | 2008-10-16 | Young Ayden F | Generating safety report for fleet of vehicles |
DE102004021174A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-24 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method for controlling a safety-relevant component of a motor vehicle and motor vehicle with a preventive triggering safety system |
US7574409B2 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2009-08-11 | Vericept Corporation | Method, apparatus, and system for clustering and classification |
TWM282149U (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2005-12-01 | S C Security World Co Ltd | Recording device used on a vehicle for recording the path of the moving object and for recording video and audio information of environment |
US7626749B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2009-12-01 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle mirror assembly with indicia at reflective element |
EP1886202A4 (en) | 2005-06-01 | 2011-09-21 | Allstate Insurance Co | Motor vehicle operating data collection and analysis |
JP4882285B2 (en) * | 2005-06-15 | 2012-02-22 | 株式会社デンソー | Vehicle travel support device |
CN101208238B (en) * | 2005-06-25 | 2011-12-14 | 株式会社堀场制作所 | Driving recorder |
EP1914691A4 (en) * | 2005-07-01 | 2011-11-02 | Japan Automobile Res Inst | Driving recorder |
WO2007004452A1 (en) * | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-11 | Horiba, Ltd. | Driving recorder |
JP4815943B2 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2011-11-16 | 株式会社デンソー | Hazardous area information display device |
JP4265592B2 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2009-05-20 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Vehicle deceleration control device |
US10878646B2 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2020-12-29 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle event recorder systems |
US20070150138A1 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2007-06-28 | James Plante | Memory management in event recording systems |
US20070142169A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2007-06-21 | Jean-Pierre Marcil | Erroneous sudden acceleration neutralization system and method |
US7537293B2 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2009-05-26 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill |
US20070203637A1 (en) * | 2006-01-23 | 2007-08-30 | Jon Passman | System and method for identifying operational usage of fleet vehicles related to accident prevention |
JP4238875B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2009-03-18 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Battery life evaluation system for hybrid vehicles |
US20070213992A1 (en) * | 2006-03-07 | 2007-09-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Verifying a usage of a transportation resource |
US20070213886A1 (en) * | 2006-03-10 | 2007-09-13 | Yilu Zhang | Method and system for driver handling skill recognition through driver's steering behavior |
US9201842B2 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2015-12-01 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems |
US8996240B2 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2015-03-31 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server |
US8849501B2 (en) | 2009-01-26 | 2014-09-30 | Lytx, Inc. | Driver risk assessment system and method employing selectively automatic event scoring |
US8630768B2 (en) | 2006-05-22 | 2014-01-14 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for monitoring vehicle parameters and driver behavior |
US9067565B2 (en) | 2006-05-22 | 2015-06-30 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for evaluating driver behavior |
US7739040B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-06-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Computation of travel routes, durations, and plans over multiple contexts |
JP5204778B2 (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2013-06-05 | ボルボ ラストバグナー アーベー | How to adapt a mechanical automatic transmission in large vehicles |
US20080077451A1 (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2008-03-27 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System for synergistic data processing |
KR100826011B1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2008-04-29 | 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 | Display device |
DE102006051922A1 (en) * | 2006-11-03 | 2008-05-08 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Driver information and dialogue system |
US8989959B2 (en) | 2006-11-07 | 2015-03-24 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle operator performance history recording, scoring and reporting systems |
US8649933B2 (en) | 2006-11-07 | 2014-02-11 | Smartdrive Systems Inc. | Power management systems for automotive video event recorders |
US8868288B2 (en) | 2006-11-09 | 2014-10-21 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle exception event management systems |
US7765058B2 (en) * | 2006-11-20 | 2010-07-27 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Driver input analysis and feedback system |
US8139820B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2012-03-20 | Smartdrive Systems Inc. | Discretization facilities for vehicle event data recorders |
US20080147267A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Smartdrive Systems Inc. | Methods of Discretizing data captured at event data recorders |
US8498796B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2013-07-30 | Deere & Company | Perception model for trajectory following autonomous and human augmented speed control |
US8195364B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2012-06-05 | Deere & Company | Perception model for trajectory following autonomous and human augmented steering control |
US7895135B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2011-02-22 | Deere & Company | Human perception model for speed control performance |
US7769512B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2010-08-03 | Deere & Company | Vehicle steering control method and performance |
JP4720770B2 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2011-07-13 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Information recording system for vehicles |
US8239092B2 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2012-08-07 | Smartdrive Systems Inc. | Distributed vehicle event recorder systems having a portable memory data transfer system |
US9129460B2 (en) * | 2007-06-25 | 2015-09-08 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for monitoring and improving driver behavior |
US9117246B2 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2015-08-25 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing a user interface for vehicle mentoring system users and insurers |
US8818618B2 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2014-08-26 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing a user interface for vehicle monitoring system users and insurers |
JP4687698B2 (en) * | 2007-09-06 | 2011-05-25 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Fuel-saving driving support device |
US7876205B2 (en) | 2007-10-02 | 2011-01-25 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for detecting use of a wireless device in a moving vehicle |
US9665910B2 (en) | 2008-02-20 | 2017-05-30 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System and method for providing customized safety feedback |
US7519472B1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2009-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Inferring static traffic artifact presence, location, and specifics from aggregated navigation system data |
US20100023180A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on lane-change maneuvers |
US20100019880A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on traffic sensing |
US8060260B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2011-11-15 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on vehicle passing maneuvers |
US7831407B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-11-09 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on vehicle U-turn maneuvers |
US8280601B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2012-10-02 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Adaptive vehicle control system with integrated maneuver-based driving style recognition |
US8170740B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2012-05-01 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on vehicle launching |
US8195341B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2012-06-05 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on maneuvers at highway on/off ramps |
US8280560B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2012-10-02 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on headway distance |
US20100023265A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with integrated driving style recognition |
US20100023197A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on behavioral diagnosis |
US20100019964A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition and road condition recognition |
US8260515B2 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2012-09-04 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition |
BRPI0916722A2 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2019-09-24 | Choicepoint Services Inc | steering performance data provision system and method of obtaining steering performance data |
JP5133810B2 (en) * | 2008-08-01 | 2013-01-30 | 株式会社デンソー | Driving diagnosis device and driving diagnosis system |
EP2151808A1 (en) * | 2008-08-07 | 2010-02-10 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Safe driving evaluation system and safe driving evaluation method |
JP5115817B2 (en) * | 2008-08-07 | 2013-01-09 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Safe driving evaluation system and safe driving evaluation program |
JP5013211B2 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2012-08-29 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Driving evaluation system and driving evaluation program |
US11482058B2 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2022-10-25 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for utilizing telematics data to improve fleet management operations |
WO2010030341A1 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2010-03-18 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods of utilizing telematics data to improve fleet management operations |
EP2335438A4 (en) * | 2008-10-09 | 2014-08-13 | Univ Utah Res Found | System and method for preventing cell phone use while driving |
JP5057167B2 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2012-10-24 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Safe driving evaluation system and safe driving evaluation program |
SE533135C2 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2010-07-06 | Scania Cv Abp | Brake feedback system |
US20100152951A1 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2010-06-17 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on vehicle accelerating and decelerating |
US20100152950A1 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2010-06-17 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on vehicle stopping |
US8963702B2 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2015-02-24 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | System and method for viewing and correcting data in a street mapping database |
US20100209889A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill based on multiple types of maneuvers |
US20100209882A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Driving skill recognition based on straight-line driving behavior |
US20100209887A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operation, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill based on vehicle backup maneuver |
US20100209886A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Driving skill recognition based on u-turn performance |
US20100209891A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Driving skill recognition based on stop-and-go driving behavior |
EP2221581B1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2017-07-19 | Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH | Method of estimating a propulsion-related operating parameter |
US20100209892A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Driving skill recognition based on manual transmission shift behavior |
US8170725B2 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2012-05-01 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill based on highway on/off ramp maneuver |
US20100209883A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill based on passing maneuver |
US20100209884A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Driving skill recognition based on vehicle left and right turns |
US20100209881A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Driving skill recognition based on behavioral diagnosis |
US20100209888A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill based on curve-handling maneuvers |
US20100209890A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill with integrated driving skill recognition |
US20100209885A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-08-19 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle stability enhancement control adaptation to driving skill based on lane change maneuver |
US20100245064A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Greenroad Driving Technologies Ltd. | Method and means for providing safety related messages to drivers |
US20100311017A1 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2010-12-09 | Trapeze Software Inc. | Modular monitoring system |
US9916625B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2018-03-13 | Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | Mobile insurance platform system |
US8369608B2 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2013-02-05 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | System and method for detecting drowsy facial expressions of vehicle drivers under changing illumination conditions |
JP2011065527A (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2011-03-31 | Toyota Motor Corp | Driving evaluation system, vehicle-mounted machine, and information processing center |
IL201810A (en) | 2009-10-29 | 2015-06-30 | Greenroad Driving Technologies Ltd | Method and device for evaluating a vehicle's fuel consumption efficiency |
US8405496B2 (en) * | 2009-11-13 | 2013-03-26 | William Bennett | Wheel watcher |
US20110121961A1 (en) * | 2009-11-13 | 2011-05-26 | William Bennett | Wheel Watcher |
JP5482167B2 (en) * | 2009-12-10 | 2014-04-23 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | Vehicle travel guidance device, vehicle travel guidance method, and computer program |
CA2726160A1 (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2011-06-30 | Trapeze Software Inc. | System and method for storing performance data in a transit organization |
CA2726124A1 (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2011-06-30 | Trapeze Software Inc. | System and method for analyzing performance data in a transit organization |
JP5512331B2 (en) * | 2010-03-03 | 2014-06-04 | 積水化成品工業株式会社 | Foamed sheet and foamed resin container |
AU2011226623B2 (en) | 2010-03-11 | 2014-07-17 | Inrix, Inc. | Learning road navigation paths based on aggregate driver behavior |
CA2734219A1 (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-18 | Assetworks Inc. | Maintenance system and method for vehicle fleets |
US9785702B1 (en) * | 2010-04-23 | 2017-10-10 | Numerex Corp. | Analytical scoring engine for remote device data |
WO2011158307A1 (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2011-12-22 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | System for inferring driver's lane change intention |
US9460471B2 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2016-10-04 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System and method for an automated validation system |
EP2431244A1 (en) * | 2010-09-20 | 2012-03-21 | Givenpath Ltd | Driver profiling system and method |
US8907772B1 (en) * | 2010-09-29 | 2014-12-09 | Cyber Physical Systems, Inc. | System and method for automatic unsafe driving determination and notification |
US8880282B2 (en) * | 2010-10-04 | 2014-11-04 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Method and system for risk prediction for a support actuation system |
US8762009B2 (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2014-06-24 | I.D. Systems, Inc. | Impact sensor calibration tool |
US8863256B1 (en) | 2011-01-14 | 2014-10-14 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for enabling secure transactions using flexible identity management in a vehicular environment |
IT1403839B1 (en) * | 2011-02-09 | 2013-11-08 | Infomobility It S P A | SAFETY DEVICE FOR VEHICLE. |
US9542847B2 (en) | 2011-02-16 | 2017-01-10 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Lane departure warning/assistance method and system having a threshold adjusted based on driver impairment determination using pupil size and driving patterns |
US9292471B2 (en) | 2011-02-18 | 2016-03-22 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Coordinated vehicle response system and method for driver behavior |
US8698639B2 (en) | 2011-02-18 | 2014-04-15 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | System and method for responding to driver behavior |
US8731736B2 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2014-05-20 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | System and method for reducing driving skill atrophy |
US9221428B2 (en) | 2011-03-02 | 2015-12-29 | Automatic Labs Inc. | Driver identification system and methods |
US9953468B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2018-04-24 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Segmenting operational data |
US9208626B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2015-12-08 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for segmenting operational data |
US8727056B2 (en) | 2011-04-01 | 2014-05-20 | Navman Wireless North America Ltd. | Systems and methods for generating and using moving violation alerts |
IL213373A (en) | 2011-06-05 | 2016-11-30 | Greenroad Driving Tech Ltd | Method and device for providing advanced warning to a vehicle driver |
JP5386543B2 (en) * | 2011-05-25 | 2014-01-15 | 株式会社審調社 | Driving evaluation system, driving evaluation program, and driving evaluation method |
US8626568B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2014-01-07 | Xrs Corporation | Fleet vehicle management systems and methods |
IL214092A (en) | 2011-07-14 | 2016-03-31 | Greenroad Driving Technologies Ltd | Method and system for determining a driving performance variable |
CA2844673C (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2019-11-05 | Otman A. Basir | Vehicle monitoring system with automatic driver identification |
US8483904B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2013-07-09 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Drivability evaluation target levels |
JP5392686B2 (en) | 2011-09-26 | 2014-01-22 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Driving support apparatus and method |
US8996234B1 (en) | 2011-10-11 | 2015-03-31 | Lytx, Inc. | Driver performance determination based on geolocation |
US9298575B2 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2016-03-29 | Lytx, Inc. | Drive event capturing based on geolocation |
US8791806B2 (en) | 2011-11-28 | 2014-07-29 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Real-time detection of hazardous driving |
EP2600326A1 (en) * | 2011-11-29 | 2013-06-05 | ATS Group (IP Holdings) Limited | Processing event data streams to recognize event patterns, with conditional query instance shifting for load balancing |
US8510200B2 (en) | 2011-12-02 | 2013-08-13 | Spireon, Inc. | Geospatial data based assessment of driver behavior |
US10169822B2 (en) | 2011-12-02 | 2019-01-01 | Spireon, Inc. | Insurance rate optimization through driver behavior monitoring |
US9659500B2 (en) | 2011-12-05 | 2017-05-23 | Navman Wireless North America Ltd. | Safety monitoring in systems of mobile assets |
US9824064B2 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2017-11-21 | Scope Technologies Holdings Limited | System and method for use of pattern recognition in assessing or monitoring vehicle status or operator driving behavior |
US20130166326A1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2013-06-27 | Scope Technologies Holdings Limited | System and method for characterizing driver performance and use in determining insurance coverage |
US8892385B2 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2014-11-18 | Scope Technologies Holdings Limited | System and method for use with an accelerometer to determine a frame of reference |
EP2795562B1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2018-11-21 | Scope Technologies Holdings Limited | Systems and methods for assessing or monitoring vehicle status or operator behavior |
CA2863229A1 (en) * | 2012-01-13 | 2013-07-18 | Pulse Function F6 Limited | Telematics system with 3d inertial sensors |
US20130219294A1 (en) * | 2012-02-16 | 2013-08-22 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Team-Oriented Human-Vehicle Interface For Adaptive Cruise Control System And Methods For Using Same |
US10032123B2 (en) * | 2012-03-08 | 2018-07-24 | Husqvarna Ab | Fleet management portal for outdoor power equipment |
EP2823267A4 (en) | 2012-03-08 | 2015-09-30 | Husqvarna Ab | Equipment data sensor and sensing for fleet management |
SE537647C2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2015-09-08 | Scania Cv Ab | Procedure and system for assessing driver behavior when braking vehicles |
IL218979A0 (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2012-06-28 | Greenroad Driving Technologies Ltd | Method and system for evaluating driving performance |
US9285294B2 (en) * | 2012-04-13 | 2016-03-15 | Wi-Tronix, Llc | Mobile asset data recorder and transmitter |
US8688380B2 (en) * | 2012-04-23 | 2014-04-01 | Geotab Inc. | Even driven data acquisition switch |
US9037394B2 (en) * | 2012-05-22 | 2015-05-19 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System and method to determine an initial insurance policy benefit based on telematics data collected by a smartphone |
DE112012006465B4 (en) * | 2012-06-05 | 2021-08-05 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Driving characteristic estimating device and driving assistance system |
CN103077603A (en) * | 2012-06-06 | 2013-05-01 | 王晓原 | Identification system for free flow car driving tendency based on dynamic collaborative deduction of people and vehicle environment |
US9135759B2 (en) | 2012-07-28 | 2015-09-15 | LinkeDrive, Inc. | Driver measurement and incentive system for improving fuel-efficiency |
US9728228B2 (en) | 2012-08-10 | 2017-08-08 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle event playback apparatus and methods |
CA2882086A1 (en) * | 2012-08-12 | 2014-02-20 | Insurance Services Office, Inc. | Apparatus and method for detecting driving performance data |
WO2014031723A2 (en) * | 2012-08-21 | 2014-02-27 | Insurance Services Office, Inc. | Apparatus and method for analyzing driving performance data |
FR2994923B1 (en) * | 2012-08-31 | 2015-11-27 | IFP Energies Nouvelles | METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ENERGY INDICATOR OF A MOVEMENT OF A VEHICLE |
US20140195310A1 (en) * | 2012-10-04 | 2014-07-10 | Zonar Systems, Inc. | Virtual trainer for in vehicle driver coaching and to collect metrics to improve driver performance |
US9424696B2 (en) | 2012-10-04 | 2016-08-23 | Zonar Systems, Inc. | Virtual trainer for in vehicle driver coaching and to collect metrics to improve driver performance |
CA2887494A1 (en) * | 2012-10-09 | 2014-04-17 | Insurance Services Office, Inc. | System and method for classifying and identifying a driver using driving performance data |
US9342983B1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2016-05-17 | Greenroad Driving Technologies Ltd. | User interface for driver performance application |
US8933802B2 (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2015-01-13 | Spireon, Inc. | Switch and actuator coupling in a chassis of a container associated with an intermodal freight transport system |
US9779379B2 (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2017-10-03 | Spireon, Inc. | Container verification through an electrical receptacle and plug associated with a container and a transport vehicle of an intermodal freight transport system |
US20150006023A1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2015-01-01 | Scope Technologies Holdings Ltd | System and method for determination of vheicle accident information |
US9344683B1 (en) | 2012-11-28 | 2016-05-17 | Lytx, Inc. | Capturing driving risk based on vehicle state and automatic detection of a state of a location |
US9569984B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2017-02-14 | Abalta Technologies, Inc. | Recording, monitoring, and analyzing driver behavior |
US11176845B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2021-11-16 | Abalta Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive analysis of driver behavior |
US10657598B2 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2020-05-19 | Scope Technologies Holdings Limited | System and method for use of carbon emissions in characterizing driver performance |
CN103061882B (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2015-03-25 | 王志欣 | Automatic grouping display method of automobile motor data flow |
US11625745B1 (en) | 2012-12-31 | 2023-04-11 | Allstate Insurance Company | Vehicle telematics system to promote good driving behavior using positive feedback and award points |
RU2643459C2 (en) * | 2013-01-03 | 2018-02-01 | Краун Эквайпмент Корпорейшн | Quality control of operator of industrial vehicles |
EP2941656B1 (en) * | 2013-01-06 | 2022-10-26 | Ionroad Technologies Ltd. | Driving support |
US9361409B2 (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2016-06-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic driver modeling for integration of human-controlled vehicles into an autonomous vehicle network |
JP5862643B2 (en) * | 2013-02-20 | 2016-02-16 | 株式会社デンソー | In-vehicle device |
US10347127B2 (en) * | 2013-02-21 | 2019-07-09 | Waymo Llc | Driving mode adjustment |
US9751534B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-09-05 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | System and method for responding to driver state |
US20140277833A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Mighty Carma, Inc. | Event triggered trip data recorder |
US8876535B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-11-04 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Real-time driver observation and scoring for driver's education |
US10499856B2 (en) | 2013-04-06 | 2019-12-10 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | System and method for biological signal processing with highly auto-correlated carrier sequences |
WO2014169182A2 (en) * | 2013-04-12 | 2014-10-16 | Dana Limited | Vehicle and operator guidance by pattern recognition |
CN103247092B (en) * | 2013-04-26 | 2015-08-26 | 广州通易科技有限公司 | A kind of driving behavior evaluation method based on scene |
CN104299289B (en) * | 2013-07-17 | 2016-12-28 | 焦焱 | The assessment of electric motor car usage behavior and excitation system and method |
US9779449B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2017-10-03 | Spireon, Inc. | Veracity determination through comparison of a geospatial location of a vehicle with a provided data |
US9153116B2 (en) * | 2013-09-09 | 2015-10-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time vehicle driver performance monitoring |
US10115164B1 (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2018-10-30 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Systems and methods to quantify and differentiate individual insurance risk based on actual driving behavior and driving environment |
WO2015053423A1 (en) * | 2013-10-11 | 2015-04-16 | (주)나노포인트 | System and method for analyzing and diagnosing driving habit |
EP2862741B1 (en) * | 2013-10-15 | 2017-06-28 | Volvo Car Corporation | Vehicle driver assist arrangement |
US9501878B2 (en) | 2013-10-16 | 2016-11-22 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle event playback apparatus and methods |
US9172477B2 (en) | 2013-10-30 | 2015-10-27 | Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. | Wireless device detection using multiple antennas separated by an RF shield |
US9610955B2 (en) | 2013-11-11 | 2017-04-04 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle fuel consumption monitor and feedback systems |
US9805521B1 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2017-10-31 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for assessing turns made by a vehicle |
US20150161913A1 (en) * | 2013-12-10 | 2015-06-11 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Method, computer-readable storage device and apparatus for providing a recommendation in a vehicle |
KR101539302B1 (en) * | 2013-12-11 | 2015-07-30 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Vehicle and control method for the same |
US20150186991A1 (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-02 | David M. Meyer | Creditor alert when a vehicle enters an impound lot |
CN103871263B (en) * | 2014-01-02 | 2017-01-25 | 深圳市成为智能交通系统有限公司 | Method for realizing driving risk rating by utilizing vehicle diagnose interface |
US9511778B1 (en) * | 2014-02-12 | 2016-12-06 | XL Hybrids | Controlling transmissions of vehicle operation information |
US8892310B1 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2014-11-18 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers |
US9824505B2 (en) | 2014-02-25 | 2017-11-21 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for triggering a vehicle system monitor |
US9734685B2 (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2017-08-15 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Vehicle operator emotion management system and method |
US9135803B1 (en) | 2014-04-17 | 2015-09-15 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Advanced vehicle operator intelligence system |
US11669090B2 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2023-06-06 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle operation feature monitoring and evaluation of effectiveness |
US10599155B1 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2020-03-24 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle operation feature monitoring and evaluation of effectiveness |
US10373259B1 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2019-08-06 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Fully autonomous vehicle insurance pricing |
US10185999B1 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2019-01-22 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous feature use monitoring and telematics |
US10089693B1 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2018-10-02 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Fully autonomous vehicle insurance pricing |
US9972054B1 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2018-05-15 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Accident fault determination for autonomous vehicles |
US10319039B1 (en) | 2014-05-20 | 2019-06-11 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Accident fault determination for autonomous vehicles |
US9664126B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2017-05-30 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and methods for engine-off natural vacuum tests |
DE102015109134A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-31 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Monitoring vehicle operation |
DE102015109135A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-31 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Monitoring vehicle operation |
US10540723B1 (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2020-01-21 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Methods of providing insurance savings based upon telematics and usage-based insurance |
EP3147171A4 (en) * | 2014-08-05 | 2018-01-24 | Launch Tech Company Limited | Method, device, and system for generating driving behavior guidance information |
KR101575296B1 (en) * | 2014-08-13 | 2015-12-07 | 현대자동차 주식회사 | System and method of controlling vehicle using turning degree |
EP3195211A1 (en) | 2014-09-14 | 2017-07-26 | Crown Equipment Corporation | Dynamic industrial vehicle measure |
JP6486640B2 (en) * | 2014-10-09 | 2019-03-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Driving characteristic diagnostic device, driving characteristic diagnostic system, driving characteristic diagnostic method, information output device, information output method |
US9663127B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 | 2017-05-30 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Rail vehicle event detection and recording system |
US10336321B1 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2019-07-02 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle control assessment and selection |
US11069257B2 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2021-07-20 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | System and method for detecting a vehicle event and generating review criteria |
GB201420988D0 (en) * | 2014-11-26 | 2015-01-07 | Tomtom Telematics Bv | Apparatus and method for vehicle economy improvement |
CN104599347B (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2016-11-02 | 广州通易科技有限公司 | A kind of method representing driving behavior on map |
US9852551B2 (en) | 2015-02-05 | 2017-12-26 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Programmatically determining location information in connection with a transport service |
US9994172B2 (en) * | 2015-02-26 | 2018-06-12 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Methods and systems to determine and communicate driver performance |
US9551788B2 (en) | 2015-03-24 | 2017-01-24 | Jim Epler | Fleet pan to provide measurement and location of a stored transport item while maximizing space in an interior cavity of a trailer |
CN104700468B (en) * | 2015-03-27 | 2017-11-24 | 黄斐 | A kind of motor vehicle driving technical intelligence assessment system |
US9679420B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2017-06-13 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle event recording system and method |
JP6511930B2 (en) * | 2015-04-16 | 2019-05-15 | 株式会社デンソー | Evacuation driving support device |
US20160334225A1 (en) | 2015-05-11 | 2016-11-17 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Determining street segment headings |
JP6511982B2 (en) * | 2015-06-19 | 2019-05-15 | 株式会社デンソー | Driving operation discrimination device |
US9995588B2 (en) | 2015-06-23 | 2018-06-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Quantifying anomalous behavior by identifying anomalies at subtrajectories |
JP6342858B2 (en) * | 2015-08-06 | 2018-06-13 | 矢崎エナジーシステム株式会社 | Driving evaluation device |
US9870649B1 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2018-01-16 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Shared vehicle usage, monitoring and feedback |
US10867270B2 (en) * | 2015-09-18 | 2020-12-15 | Capital One Services, Llc | Systems and methods for vehicle tracking and service prediction |
JP6408971B2 (en) | 2015-09-29 | 2018-10-17 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Driving assistance device that provides assistance according to the characteristics and skills of the driver |
US10726493B1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2020-07-28 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | System and method for incentivizing driving characteristics by monitoring operational data and providing feedback |
US10984479B1 (en) * | 2015-10-20 | 2021-04-20 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | System and method for tracking the operation of a vehicle and/or the actions of a driver |
WO2017086827A1 (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2017-05-26 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method, device, and system for detecting a dangerous road event and/or condition |
SE539283C8 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-07-18 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
SE539489C2 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-10-03 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
SE539427C2 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-09-19 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
SE539429C2 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-09-19 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
SE539488C2 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-10-03 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
SE539428C2 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-09-19 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
SE539436C2 (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2017-09-19 | Greater Than S A | Method and system for assessing the trip performance of a driver |
US9905131B2 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2018-02-27 | Thunder Power New Energy Vehicle Development Company Limited | Onboard vehicle notification system |
US11719545B2 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2023-08-08 | Hyundai Motor Company | Autonomous vehicle component damage and salvage assessment |
US11242051B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2022-02-08 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle action communications |
US11441916B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2022-09-13 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle trip routing |
US10395332B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2019-08-27 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Coordinated autonomous vehicle automatic area scanning |
US10493936B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2019-12-03 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Detecting and responding to autonomous vehicle collisions |
US10324463B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2019-06-18 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle operation adjustment based upon route |
US9940834B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2018-04-10 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle application |
US10134278B1 (en) | 2016-01-22 | 2018-11-20 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Autonomous vehicle application |
US9764741B2 (en) * | 2016-01-27 | 2017-09-19 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Operator skill scoring based on comparison to automated vehicle operation |
US9778654B2 (en) * | 2016-02-24 | 2017-10-03 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Systems and methods for advanced resting time suggestion |
EP3219567A1 (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2017-09-20 | Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH | Method, system and vehicle for analyzing a rider performance |
US9639804B1 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2017-05-02 | Smartdrive Systems, Inc. | System and method to determine responsiveness of a driver of a vehicle to feedback regarding driving behaviors |
US10407078B2 (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2019-09-10 | Sivalogeswaran Ratnasingam | Dynamic learning driving system and method |
EP3469437A4 (en) | 2016-06-13 | 2020-03-25 | Xevo Inc. | Method and system for providing auto space management using virtuous cycle |
CN106056946A (en) * | 2016-06-13 | 2016-10-26 | 黄明 | Method and system for monitoring running processes of vehicles |
US20170369069A1 (en) * | 2016-06-22 | 2017-12-28 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Driving behavior analysis based on vehicle braking |
DE102016213346A1 (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2018-01-25 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for further processing at least one parameter of a drive or an event of a vehicle for a vehicle |
US11146929B2 (en) * | 2016-10-07 | 2021-10-12 | Cyber Physical Systems, Inc. | System and method for driving condition detection and notification |
US10839716B2 (en) * | 2016-10-27 | 2020-11-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modifying driving behavior |
CN106585636B (en) * | 2016-11-28 | 2019-01-18 | 上海工程技术大学 | The method of vehicle running state description and driving behavior detecting based on state machine |
KR101907662B1 (en) * | 2016-12-08 | 2018-12-19 | 인포뱅크 주식회사 | A method and an appratus controlling vehicles for preventing driving of revenge |
WO2018119461A1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Surround.IO Corporation | Method and system for providing interactive parking management via artificial intelligence analytic (aia) services using cloud network |
US10371542B2 (en) | 2017-02-17 | 2019-08-06 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | System and methods for performing multivariate optimizations based on location data |
US10223598B2 (en) | 2017-02-20 | 2019-03-05 | Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft | Method of generating segmented vehicle image data, corresponding system, and vehicle |
DE102017206005A1 (en) * | 2017-04-07 | 2018-10-11 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Method for vehicle navigation, computer-readable storage medium, navigation system and vehicle |
US11610441B1 (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2023-03-21 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Detecting and mitigating local individual driver anomalous behavior |
CN110662682B (en) * | 2017-06-01 | 2022-08-26 | 三菱电机株式会社 | Mobile body control device, mobile body control method, and computer-readable storage medium |
US20180365986A1 (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2018-12-20 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Driver fatigue warning system |
US10259468B2 (en) | 2017-06-15 | 2019-04-16 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Active vehicle performance tuning based on driver behavior |
DE102017214241A1 (en) * | 2017-08-16 | 2019-02-21 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for determining a driving behavior |
WO2019048034A1 (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2019-03-14 | Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd. | Electronic logging and track identification system for mobile telematics devices, and corresponding method thereof |
JP6955944B2 (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2021-10-27 | パーク二四株式会社 | Vehicle management server and computer program |
JP6984312B2 (en) * | 2017-10-26 | 2021-12-17 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | In-vehicle device, information processing system, and information processing method |
US11688212B2 (en) | 2017-10-31 | 2023-06-27 | Upstream Security, Ltd. | Machine learning techniques for classifying driver behavior |
JP6926957B2 (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2021-08-25 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Lane change support device |
US10677686B2 (en) * | 2017-11-14 | 2020-06-09 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Method and apparatus for autonomous system performance and grading |
US20210316720A1 (en) | 2018-01-09 | 2021-10-14 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Vehicle collision alert system and method for directing collision avoidance action |
US10957215B2 (en) | 2018-01-11 | 2021-03-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Analyzing driver pattern deviations for training |
WO2019216584A1 (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2019-11-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and electronic device for determining safety driving score |
US11001273B2 (en) * | 2018-05-22 | 2021-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing a notification based on a deviation from a determined driving behavior |
WO2019229175A1 (en) * | 2018-05-31 | 2019-12-05 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Apparatus and method for controlling vehicle movement |
US20190377359A1 (en) * | 2018-06-12 | 2019-12-12 | Telenav, Inc. | Navigation system with vehicle operation mechanism and method of operation thereof |
CN109360445B (en) * | 2018-07-09 | 2021-02-09 | 重庆大学 | High-speed lane change risk detection method based on transverse and longitudinal kinematic feature distribution |
CN110702127A (en) * | 2018-07-10 | 2020-01-17 | 上海舆策智能科技有限公司 | Vehicle driving track detection system and method |
US11688207B2 (en) | 2018-07-26 | 2023-06-27 | Upstream Security, Ltd. | System and method for contextually monitoring vehicle state |
JP7226938B2 (en) * | 2018-07-30 | 2023-02-21 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Driving evaluation system, driving evaluation method, program, and medium |
US10974728B2 (en) | 2018-09-11 | 2021-04-13 | Lightmetrics Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | Methods and systems for facilitating drive related data for driver monitoring |
US10875538B2 (en) | 2018-09-18 | 2020-12-29 | Allstate Insurance Company | Exhaustive driving analytical systems and modelers |
JP7076357B2 (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2022-05-27 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Emotion estimator |
JP7136720B2 (en) * | 2019-02-27 | 2022-09-13 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Evaluation device |
US11315427B2 (en) | 2019-06-11 | 2022-04-26 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Vehicle-to-vehicle sensor data sharing |
US10769953B1 (en) | 2019-06-11 | 2020-09-08 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Vehicle-to-vehicle sensor data sharing |
US10773727B1 (en) | 2019-06-13 | 2020-09-15 | LinkeDrive, Inc. | Driver performance measurement and monitoring with path analysis |
US11255685B2 (en) | 2019-08-15 | 2022-02-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time route determination based on localized information |
EP3806004A1 (en) * | 2019-10-09 | 2021-04-14 | Tata Consultancy Services Limited | Method and system for trip classification |
IT201900023244A1 (en) * | 2019-12-06 | 2021-06-06 | Ferrari Spa | ASSISTANCE METHOD TO IMPROVE A DRIVER'S PERFORMANCE BY ASSESSING HIS ABILITY AND FILTERING THE INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED ON THE BASIS OF THE VALUE OBTAINED |
US11312345B2 (en) * | 2020-01-21 | 2022-04-26 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for detecting and controlling a fluid consumption detection warning |
US11494517B2 (en) | 2020-02-12 | 2022-11-08 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Computer system and device for controlling use of secure media recordings |
US11720114B2 (en) | 2020-03-19 | 2023-08-08 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Safety of transport maneuvering |
US11097735B1 (en) | 2020-03-19 | 2021-08-24 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Transport lane usage |
US11488424B2 (en) | 2020-03-19 | 2022-11-01 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Motion-based transport assessment |
US11407428B2 (en) | 2020-03-23 | 2022-08-09 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Transport safety |
US11699205B1 (en) * | 2020-05-20 | 2023-07-11 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Providing a GUI to enable analysis of time-synchronized data sets pertaining to a road segment |
US11640577B2 (en) | 2020-06-16 | 2023-05-02 | Geotab Inc. | Data capture instructions for asset tracking |
US11550337B2 (en) | 2020-06-16 | 2023-01-10 | Geotab Inc. | Data capture trigger configuration for asset tracking |
US11798321B2 (en) * | 2020-08-28 | 2023-10-24 | ANI Technologies Private Limited | Driver score determination for vehicle drivers |
CN112141102B (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2022-02-15 | 阿波罗智能技术(北京)有限公司 | Cruise control method, cruise control device, cruise control apparatus, vehicle, and cruise control medium |
CN112613786B (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2022-05-06 | 武汉理工大学 | Individualized and differentiated driving risk evaluation method based on driving safety event |
DE102021108937A1 (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2022-10-13 | Robert Bosch Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung | Method for evaluating driving maneuvers of a rider on a bicycle |
US11820387B2 (en) * | 2021-05-10 | 2023-11-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Detecting driving behavior of vehicles |
US11736194B1 (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2023-08-22 | Nocell Technologies, LLC | System and method for determining a driver device from a plurality of network devices |
US11737049B1 (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2023-08-22 | Nocell Technologies, LLC | System and method for rapid release of policy implemented on a mobile device |
US11785418B1 (en) | 2021-06-11 | 2023-10-10 | Nocell Technologies, LLC | System and method for determining network device handling |
US11676470B2 (en) | 2021-09-01 | 2023-06-13 | Nocell Technologies, LLC | Systems and methods for determining a wireless communications module of a network device has been disabled |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5270708A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1993-12-14 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Accident information providing system for automotive vehicle |
US5546305A (en) * | 1991-11-11 | 1996-08-13 | Kondo; Shigeru | Motor vehicle driving analytically diagnosing method and device |
US6438472B1 (en) * | 1998-09-12 | 2002-08-20 | Data Tec. Co., Ltd. | Operation control system capable of analyzing driving tendency and its constituent apparatus |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5790106A (en) * | 1980-11-26 | 1982-06-04 | Nippon Denso Co Ltd | Driving indicator for automobile |
US4671111A (en) * | 1984-10-12 | 1987-06-09 | Lemelson Jerome H | Vehicle performance monitor and method |
EP0427036B1 (en) * | 1989-11-01 | 1996-01-10 | Ferdinand Nande Niklsbacher | Keyboard for the control of processor units |
US5570087A (en) * | 1994-02-18 | 1996-10-29 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | Motor vehicle performance monitor and method |
JP3229297B2 (en) * | 1998-10-12 | 2001-11-19 | 株式会社データ・テック | Method for analyzing operation tendency of moving object, operation management system and its constituent devices, recording medium |
US6060989A (en) * | 1998-10-19 | 2000-05-09 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | System and method for preventing automobile accidents |
JP3592602B2 (en) * | 2000-02-21 | 2004-11-24 | 株式会社データ・テック | Moving object operation management method, system and constituent devices thereof |
JP3593502B2 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2004-11-24 | 株式会社データ・テック | Vehicle driving technology diagnosis system, components thereof, and driving technology diagnosis method |
US6879969B2 (en) * | 2001-01-21 | 2005-04-12 | Volvo Technological Development Corporation | System and method for real-time recognition of driving patterns |
JP2004157880A (en) * | 2002-11-07 | 2004-06-03 | Toyota Central Res & Dev Lab Inc | Confirmation action evaluation device |
WO2006131926A2 (en) * | 2005-06-09 | 2006-12-14 | Drive Diagnostics Ltd. | System and method for displaying a driving profile |
-
2004
- 2004-07-20 US US10/894,345 patent/US7389178B2/en active Active - Reinstated
-
2005
- 2005-06-01 CN CN2005800263203A patent/CN101002239B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-01 WO PCT/IL2005/000566 patent/WO2006008731A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-06-01 AU AU2005264151A patent/AU2005264151B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-06-01 JP JP2007522116A patent/JP4865711B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-01 CA CA002574549A patent/CA2574549A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-06-01 KR KR1020077003887A patent/KR20070065307A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-06-01 EP EP05747252A patent/EP1774492A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-06-01 BR BRPI0513541-9A patent/BRPI0513541A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2007
- 2007-01-19 ZA ZA200700558A patent/ZA200700558B/en unknown
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5270708A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1993-12-14 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Accident information providing system for automotive vehicle |
US5546305A (en) * | 1991-11-11 | 1996-08-13 | Kondo; Shigeru | Motor vehicle driving analytically diagnosing method and device |
US6438472B1 (en) * | 1998-09-12 | 2002-08-20 | Data Tec. Co., Ltd. | Operation control system capable of analyzing driving tendency and its constituent apparatus |
Cited By (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2470146A (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2010-11-10 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
GB2470147A (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2010-11-10 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
GB2470146B (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2011-01-05 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
GB2434346B (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2011-01-05 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
GB2470147B (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2011-01-05 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
GB2434346A (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-25 | Airmax Group Plc | Method and system for driver style monitoring and analysing |
WO2007139495A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Scania Cv Ab (Publ) | Device and system for classifying vehicle surroundings |
WO2007139493A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Scania Cv Ab (Publ) | Device for determining an anticipation ability of a driver |
WO2007139494A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-12-06 | Scania Cv Ab (Publ) | Device for brake wear assessment |
AT507033B1 (en) * | 2008-06-05 | 2011-09-15 | Efkon Ag | PROCESS AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULTANEOUS VEHICLE AND DRIVING PROFILE MONITORING |
EP2690603A1 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2014-01-29 | Scania CV AB (publ) | Braking anticipation ability determining system |
EP2359344A4 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2012-06-27 | Scania Cv Abp | Braking anticipation ability determining system |
EP2359344A1 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2011-08-24 | Scania CV AB (PUBL) | Braking anticipation ability determining system |
US8565964B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2013-10-22 | Luna Co., Ltd. | Driving evaluation method |
US9730254B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2017-08-08 | Airbiquity Inc. | Efficient headunit communication integration |
US10159098B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2018-12-18 | Airbiquity Inc. | Efficient headunit communication integration |
WO2012028883A1 (en) * | 2010-09-01 | 2012-03-08 | Ricardo Uk Ltd | Lesson based driver feedback system & method |
EP2426648A1 (en) * | 2010-09-01 | 2012-03-07 | Key Driving Competences | A driver behavior diagnostic method and system |
WO2012028690A1 (en) * | 2010-09-01 | 2012-03-08 | Key Driving Competences | A driver behavior diagnostic method and system |
AU2011298342B2 (en) * | 2010-09-01 | 2015-06-25 | Key Driving Competences | A driver behavior diagnostic method and system |
CN102629426A (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2012-08-08 | 北京精英智通交通系统科技有限公司 | Self-checking method and self-checking system of side line crossing signal |
US11004277B2 (en) | 2012-06-08 | 2021-05-11 | Airbiquity Inc. | Assessment of electronic sensor data to remotely identify a motor vehicle and monitor driver behavior |
CN102889949A (en) * | 2012-10-19 | 2013-01-23 | 北京精英智通交通系统科技有限公司 | Side line self-examining method in driver test item |
EP3671174B1 (en) * | 2013-09-05 | 2023-11-01 | Crown Equipment Corporation | Dynamic operator behavior analyzer |
CN104464026A (en) * | 2014-10-31 | 2015-03-25 | 成都众易通科技有限公司 | Vehicle information monitoring system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4865711B2 (en) | 2012-02-01 |
ZA200700558B (en) | 2008-09-25 |
JP2008507721A (en) | 2008-03-13 |
CN101002239A (en) | 2007-07-18 |
US7389178B2 (en) | 2008-06-17 |
CN101002239B (en) | 2010-12-01 |
KR20070065307A (en) | 2007-06-22 |
BRPI0513541A (en) | 2008-05-06 |
AU2005264151A1 (en) | 2006-01-26 |
CA2574549A1 (en) | 2006-01-26 |
EP1774492A1 (en) | 2007-04-18 |
AU2005264151B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 |
US20050131597A1 (en) | 2005-06-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2005264151B2 (en) | System and method for monitoring driving | |
US7561054B2 (en) | System and method for displaying a driving profile | |
US20070005404A1 (en) | System and method for providing driving insurance | |
US11919523B2 (en) | Systems and methods for driver scoring with machine learning | |
CN110660194A (en) | Driving monitoring early warning method and system | |
WO2011004372A1 (en) | Driver profiling | |
CN108769104B (en) | Road condition analysis and early warning method based on vehicle-mounted diagnosis system data | |
WO2018180347A1 (en) | Information processing device, information processing system, information processing method, and program | |
KR20170115831A (en) | Method and apparatus for guiding automobile insurance using driver recognizing | |
CN108091131B (en) | Traffic incident identification method and device | |
CN107539038B (en) | Vehicle tire pressure state monitoring method and device | |
KR101898153B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for recognizing driving patten based on vehicle driving data | |
Yarlagadda et al. | Heterogeneity in the driver behavior: an exploratory study using real-time driving data | |
CN111016914B (en) | Dangerous driving scene identification system based on portable terminal information and identification method thereof | |
JP4675859B2 (en) | Operation management device, operation management program, and operation management method | |
CN114841483A (en) | Safety monitoring method and system for logistics freight vehicle | |
CN110459034A (en) | A kind of fatigue driving method for early warning and system | |
IL180805A (en) | System and method for monitoring driving | |
CN111341106B (en) | Traffic early warning method, device and equipment | |
IL187834A (en) | System and method for displaying a driving profile | |
ALMEIDA | Driver’s behavior classification in vehicular communication networks for commercial vehicles | |
WO2021024497A1 (en) | Operation incident image display system, method, and program | |
CN116762000A (en) | Systems and methods for estimating tire wear using acoustic footprint analysis | |
CN114742287A (en) | Driving behavior analysis method and system | |
CN115905901A (en) | Method and system for determining alarm threshold of driver monitoring system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 180805 Country of ref document: IL |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2005264151 Country of ref document: AU Ref document number: 2574549 Country of ref document: CA Ref document number: 2007522116 Country of ref document: JP Ref document number: 200700558 Country of ref document: ZA |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200580026320.3 Country of ref document: CN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2005747252 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2005264151 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20050601 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2005264151 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020077003887 Country of ref document: KR |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 249/MUMNP/2007 Country of ref document: IN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2005747252 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI0513541 Country of ref document: BR |