WO2005102202A1 - Method for permanent calibration based on actual measurement - Google Patents
Method for permanent calibration based on actual measurement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005102202A1 WO2005102202A1 PCT/CA2005/000635 CA2005000635W WO2005102202A1 WO 2005102202 A1 WO2005102202 A1 WO 2005102202A1 CA 2005000635 W CA2005000635 W CA 2005000635W WO 2005102202 A1 WO2005102202 A1 WO 2005102202A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- true parameters
- tracker
- parameters
- true
- measuring
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/90—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags
- A61B90/94—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags coded with symbols, e.g. text
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/90—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags
- A61B90/94—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags coded with symbols, e.g. text
- A61B90/96—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags coded with symbols, e.g. text using barcodes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/90—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags
- A61B90/98—Identification means for patients or instruments, e.g. tags using electromagnetic means, e.g. transponders
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00526—Methods of manufacturing
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00681—Aspects not otherwise provided for
- A61B2017/00725—Calibration or performance testing
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2046—Tracking techniques
- A61B2034/2055—Optical tracking systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2046—Tracking techniques
- A61B2034/2065—Tracking using image or pattern recognition
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/25—User interfaces for surgical systems
- A61B2034/256—User interfaces for surgical systems having a database of accessory information, e.g. including context sensitive help or scientific articles
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/39—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers
- A61B2090/3983—Reference marker arrangements for use with image guided surgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to instrumentation and, more particularly, to a method for calibrating instrumentation used in a computer- assisted surgery environment.
- Instruments and implants such as surgical instruments and orthopedic implants are manufactured according to specifications usually illustrated in manufacturing drawings .
- the manufacturing drawings specify dimensions and precision requirements for the manufactured instruments. These precision requirements are stricter when the instruments or implants are used in an environment such as is encountered in a Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) system. After the manufacturing of an instrument, comparative measurements of the manufactured instrument are made with the initial specifications. If the end result of the measurements is outside the specifications of the manufacturing drawings, the instrument is rejected. To achieve high precision, the manufacturing process can be expensive.
- a CAS system creates a precision environment where a surgeon uses a computer system to track, in a 3 -dimensional reference spatial system, one or more instruments and implants.
- a first known calibration method consists in identifying the tip 'and the axis of a tool with the help of a calibration block.
- the block has a base plate with a pin hole located at its center to position the tip of the instrument. Around the pin hole, eight posts are placed in a quasi-circular position.
- the tool is equipped with a means for registering and tracking the tool in a 3D environment .
- a second calibration method consists in using a simplified calibration block capable of positioning the tool against a reference pinhole and clamp in a known position. The system registers both the calibration block and the instrument.
- the system can extrapolate the position of the tip and, since the calibration block has clamped the instrument in a known position, the system can extract the axis of the tool from the registration of the tool and the calibration block and the known position of the clamped instrument.
- a method to calibrate a tool or implant that would reduce the time spent in the operating room performing the calibration, and simplify the procedure.
- an object of the present invention is to provide a method for permanent calibration based on actual measurement.
- a method of manufacturing a device to be used with a computer- aided surgery system a method of calibrating the device, and the device itself.
- the device is measured to obtain true parameters thereof.
- the true parameters are stored on a storage medium associated with the device and include measurement data of high precision relating to dimensions of the device as well as to relative positioning of a tracker on the device with respect to the device.
- the true parameters are entered into the system and when the tracker is located in the 3D environment, the device can then be located in the 3D environment with a high degree of precision using the true parameters.
- true parameters can either be a set of points, a single point, a set of ranges within which the points can be found, or a single range within which a point can be found.
- the precision used to determine the points or ranges will vary depending on the instruments used to take the measurements.
- the instrument can be, for example, a coordinate measuring machine, an interferometer, or any other type of measuring device known in the art .
- a method for manufacturing a device to be used with a computer aided surgery system comprising: fabricating the device in accordance with its specifications, wherein the fabricating includes providing the device with a tracker of a known configuration recognizable by the computer aided surgery system; after the fabricating, measuring the device to obtain true parameters thereof, the measuring including determining a relative position of the tracker with respect to the device; and storing the true parameters in a storage medium associated with the device such that the true parameters accompany the device.
- a method of calibrating a device to be used with a computer aided surgery system the device having a tracker of a known configuration recognizable by the system provided thereon, the method comprising: measuring the device after fabrication to obtain true parameters thereof, the measuring including determining a relative position of the tracker with respect to the device; storing the true parameters in a storage medium associated with the device such that the true parameters accompany the device; entering the true parameters into the computer aided surgery system, including the relative position of the tracker with respect to the device; and identifying the device in a three dimensional environment of the system by using the true parameters and recognizing a position of the tracker within the system.
- a device to be used with a computer aided surgery system comprising: a tracker mounted to the device, the tracker being of a known configuration and recognizable by the system; and a storage medium associated with the device, the storage medium comprising true parameters of the device obtained by measuring the device after fabrication, the true parameters including a relative position of the tracker with respect to the device.
- storage medium is used herein to refer to any material that holds data in any form, such as paper, transparencies, multipart forms,' hard, floppy and optical disks, magnetic tape, wire, cable and fiber.
- the true parameters can be stored on a code engraved on the device, a code printed on a sticker applied to the device, a serial number marked on the device, or any type of temporary memory such as a CD-ROM, a flash card, a USB stick, or a tape that is packaged with the device .
- the data can be stored electronically or not.
- the code marked on the device can be in machine readable format or human readable format . It can be entered manually into a computer system, or be entered electronically by either scanning the code into the system or sending the information by other means .
- the code can include various types of data about the device, such as the precise measurements taken after fabrication, the relative measurements between the tip of the tool and the tracker, the configuration of the tracker, a serial number to identify the tool, etc.
- the calibration data marked on the device may be validated or confirmed using known calibration methods. If the data obtained during ' the validation differs from the true parameters marked on the device, the user may decide which set of data the system is to use. For example, the true parameters marked on- the device may be updated using the validation data. Alternatively, the system may be told to override the validation data with the true parameters .
- Fig. 1 is a view of an instrument with exemplary machine readable format marking
- Fig. 2 is a flow chart of the method of manufacture of the device in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 3 is a view of the system, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
- Fig. 4 is an example of a linear bar code
- Figs. 5a and 5b are examples of 2-dimensional matrix bar codes
- Fig. 6 is a flow chart of the method of calibration of the device in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- the characteristics of the instrument needed by a CAS system are precisely measured. Those measurements, unique to that instrument, are recorded on a media and constitute the permanent calibration of that instrument.
- the instrument is selected and those measured characteristics, which are its true parameters, are fed to a CAS system, which can store the information.
- the operator can select the instrument per its identification and the system can use the stored information or read again the information related to the true parameters of the instrument .
- FIG. 1 an instrument 130 with exemplary marking 132 is shown.
- the instrument 130 is manufactured according to manufacturing drawings containing measurement specifications and precision requirements.
- CMM Coordinate Measuring Machine
- the measurements represent the true parameters of the instrument 130 to be used in an environment requiring a high degree of precision.
- the marking 132 on the instrument 130 is made on a section visible to the operator. Alternatively, typographical characters readable (not shown) by a video system and identifiable by a computer system can be used. The characters can also be entered manually by the user. However, this is more time-consuming.
- the content of marking 132 can consist of an identification of the instrument including a product code, a serial number for tracking inventory or measurements made to a specified degree of precision (including ranges of measurements) . Fig.
- step 200 an instrument is manufactured according to the specifications in the manufacturing drawings.
- the drawings specify dimensions for the instrument with various tolerance levels.
- the true parameters (dimension, plane) of the manufactured instrument required by the system are precisely measured. These measurements are converted to machine readable format at step 220.
- the converted measurements are marked onto the instrument .
- the process illustrated in figure 2 reduces the cost of manufacturing by preventing instruments that do not fall within the tolerance requirements from being rejected. These instruments are usually rejected because their true parameters differ too greatly from the specifications and therefore, they would lead to precision errors in an environment such as a CAS.
- the CAS system can simply read the true parameters from the marking on the device itself and eliminate the possibility of error due to imprecise measurements.
- the method of figure 2 also permits the use of the instrument in a high precision environment. The measurements obtained using high- precision measurement devices immediately after fabrication can provide measurements of higher precision than the standard calibration techniques used in the operating room. Therefore, the data used by the CAS is more precise.
- the described method eliminates the calibration previously required in the operating room. However, to properly ensure the tool is registered, a validation step can be used (not shown on the figure) .
- the system validates the position of the tracker in relation to an extremity of the tool. This is particularly useful in the case where the tracker may have moved or the
- FIG. 3 shows a system using the instrument illustrated in Fig. 1.
- the system used for identifying an instrument in a high precision ⁇ environment is generally shown at 310.
- a computer 312, comprising a database 314 is shown.
- the database 314 may already contain part of the geometrical characteristics of the instruments (such as generic information) .
- the information • can be completed with the results of the measurements taken in step 210 in order to take into account the small variations from one instrument to another.
- the computer 312 can be part of a CAS system (not shown) .
- the computer 312 is connected, through link 318, to a reader 316.
- the reader 316 can be mechanical, optical, electromagnetic, RF or other type generally known in the art of readers capable of reading machine code format .
- the data may be sent to the reader in an active or in a passive way.
- the machine readable format may be a bar code.
- the bar code format can be a linear format or a 2-dimensional matrix bar code permitting higher data density marking.
- the instrument 320 is marked with machine reader format data 324.
- the data 324 marked on the instrument 320 contains the true parameters of the instrument 320. These true parameters relate to identification of the instrument and accurate dimensions of the instrument 320 measured after manufacturing .
- computer 316 identifies the instrument. It can get generic characteristics about the instrument 320 from the database 314. With the precise measurements read from the machine reader format data 324, the computer 316 can adjust the characteristics of instrument 320.
- Another method for entering the data to be marked on the instrument is through manual data entry.
- the data related to the serial number of the instrument and the measured characteristics are keyed into a device capable of converting to a machine readable format. That converted data is then marked onto the instrument .
- the instrument 320 can be packaged with a CD-ROM or another temporary storage medium containing the characteristics of the instrument.
- database 314 can be a temporary storage media and not necessarily a permanent database.
- the database 314 can be remotely accessed through a communication means .
- Fig. 6 relates to the method used to calibrate the device, as per the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The instrument, which has been .
- the true parameters are stored on a storage medium (electronically ⁇ or not) associated with the instrument 410.
- the true parameters are entered into the CAS system (manually or automatically) 420.
- the CAS system uses the true parameters to locate the instrument in ⁇ the 3D environment 430.
- the tracker Since the true parameters have the dimensions of the .tool and the relative positioning of the tip of the tool with respect to the tracker, and the tracker is of a known configuration, when the system identifies the tracker and is able to position it in the 3D environment, it can then position the tip of the tool and all dimensions which are relative to the tip of the tool, allowing it to provide an image of the tool on a display in the 3D environment .
- the tracker used with the present invention may be of any known type in the art, such as optical, magnetic, RF, passive, active, etc.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/593,563 US7634374B2 (en) | 2004-04-26 | 2005-04-26 | Method for permanent calibration based on actual measurement |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US56496304P | 2004-04-26 | 2004-04-26 | |
US60/564,963 | 2004-04-26 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005102202A1 true WO2005102202A1 (en) | 2005-11-03 |
Family
ID=35196700
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2005/000635 WO2005102202A1 (en) | 2004-04-26 | 2005-04-26 | Method for permanent calibration based on actual measurement |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7634374B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005102202A1 (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2055255A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-05-06 | BrainLAB AG | Verification of the calibration status of an optical tracking system |
WO2010078009A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-08 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Fiducial marker design and detection for locating surgical instrument in images |
US8184880B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2012-05-22 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Robust sparse image matching for robotic surgery |
US8792963B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2014-07-29 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods of determining tissue distances using both kinematic robotic tool position information and image-derived position information |
US8830224B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2014-09-09 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Efficient 3-D telestration for local robotic proctoring |
WO2015003727A1 (en) * | 2013-07-08 | 2015-01-15 | Brainlab Ag | Single-marker navigation |
US8971597B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2015-03-03 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Efficient vision and kinematic data fusion for robotic surgical instruments and other applications |
US9155592B2 (en) | 2009-06-16 | 2015-10-13 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery |
US9492240B2 (en) | 2009-06-16 | 2016-11-15 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery |
US9867669B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2018-01-16 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Configuration marker design and detection for instrument tracking |
US10405873B2 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2019-09-10 | Orthosoft Ulc | Computer-assisted surgery tools and system |
US10555775B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2020-02-11 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9482755B2 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2016-11-01 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Measurement system having air temperature compensation between a target and a laser tracker |
US9772394B2 (en) | 2010-04-21 | 2017-09-26 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for following an operator and locking onto a retroreflector with a laser tracker |
US9377885B2 (en) | 2010-04-21 | 2016-06-28 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for locking onto a retroreflector with a laser tracker |
US8619265B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2013-12-31 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Automatic measurement of dimensional data with a laser tracker |
US9400170B2 (en) | 2010-04-21 | 2016-07-26 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Automatic measurement of dimensional data within an acceptance region by a laser tracker |
BE1019572A5 (en) * | 2010-11-10 | 2012-08-07 | Materialise Nv | OPTIMIZED METHODS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF PATIENT-SPECIFIC MEDICAL TOOLS. |
GB2518769A (en) | 2011-03-03 | 2015-04-01 | Faro Tech Inc | Target apparatus and method |
US9686532B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2017-06-20 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | System and method of acquiring three-dimensional coordinates using multiple coordinate measurement devices |
US9164173B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2015-10-20 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Laser tracker that uses a fiber-optic coupler and an achromatic launch to align and collimate two wavelengths of light |
US9482529B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2016-11-01 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Three-dimensional coordinate scanner and method of operation |
GB2504890A (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2014-02-12 | Faro Tech Inc | Enhanced position detector in laser tracker |
GB2515922A (en) | 2012-01-27 | 2015-01-07 | Faro Tech Inc | Inspection method with barcode identification |
US9041914B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-05-26 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Three-dimensional coordinate scanner and method of operation |
US9395174B2 (en) | 2014-06-27 | 2016-07-19 | Faro Technologies, Inc. | Determining retroreflector orientation by optimizing spatial fit |
CN108955897B (en) * | 2018-08-13 | 2019-11-01 | 成都森川科技股份有限公司 | Move goods train thermometric restoring method |
CN109084900B (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2019-11-01 | 成都森川科技股份有限公司 | A kind of mobile object thermal imagery hangover pixel detecting method |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4672306A (en) * | 1985-04-08 | 1987-06-09 | Tektronix, Inc. | Electronic probe having automatic readout of identification and status |
US5357953A (en) * | 1992-05-21 | 1994-10-25 | Puritan-Bennett Corporation | Measurement device and method of calibration |
US5617857A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-08 | Image Guided Technologies, Inc. | Imaging system having interactive medical instruments and methods |
US5987960A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 1999-11-23 | Picker International, Inc. | Tool calibrator |
US6347460B1 (en) * | 1998-01-27 | 2002-02-19 | Synthes | Device for gauging and verifying the precision of surgical instruments |
US6640607B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2003-11-04 | Mitutoyo Corporation | Method and apparatus for calibrating measuring machines |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4303984A (en) * | 1979-12-14 | 1981-12-01 | Honeywell Inc. | Sensor output correction circuit |
JPS5711634A (en) * | 1980-06-26 | 1982-01-21 | Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co | Apparatus for measuring live body information |
US4382215A (en) * | 1981-07-16 | 1983-05-03 | General Electric Company | System and method of precision machining |
DE3446248A1 (en) * | 1984-12-19 | 1986-06-19 | Robert Bosch Gmbh, 7000 Stuttgart | SENSOR FOR MEASURING PHYSICAL SIZES AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING THE SENSOR |
JPS62130160A (en) * | 1985-11-27 | 1987-06-12 | Hitachi Seiki Co Ltd | Automatic tool correcting device for nc machine tool |
US4868476A (en) * | 1987-10-30 | 1989-09-19 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Transducer with integral memory |
US5089979A (en) * | 1989-02-08 | 1992-02-18 | Basic Measuring Instruments | Apparatus for digital calibration of detachable transducers |
US5347476A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1994-09-13 | Mcbean Sr Ronald V | Instrumentation system with multiple sensor modules |
US5839094A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 1998-11-17 | Ada Technologies, Inc. | Portable data collection device with self identifying probe |
US5790432A (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1998-08-04 | Solar Light Company, Inc. | Universal measuring instrument with signal processing algorithm encapsulated into interchangeable intelligent detectors |
DE19730158A1 (en) * | 1997-07-14 | 1999-02-18 | Endress Hauser Gmbh Co | Measuring arrangement |
JP4944109B2 (en) * | 2005-07-25 | 2012-05-30 | シルバーブルック リサーチ ピーティワイ リミテッド | Product item with encoded data that identifies the layout |
JP2007212405A (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2007-08-23 | Denso Corp | Gas sensor, gas concentration detection system using the same, and manufacturing method therefor |
-
2005
- 2005-04-26 US US10/593,563 patent/US7634374B2/en active Active
- 2005-04-26 WO PCT/CA2005/000635 patent/WO2005102202A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4672306A (en) * | 1985-04-08 | 1987-06-09 | Tektronix, Inc. | Electronic probe having automatic readout of identification and status |
US5357953A (en) * | 1992-05-21 | 1994-10-25 | Puritan-Bennett Corporation | Measurement device and method of calibration |
US5617857A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-08 | Image Guided Technologies, Inc. | Imaging system having interactive medical instruments and methods |
US5987960A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 1999-11-23 | Picker International, Inc. | Tool calibrator |
US6347460B1 (en) * | 1998-01-27 | 2002-02-19 | Synthes | Device for gauging and verifying the precision of surgical instruments |
US6640607B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2003-11-04 | Mitutoyo Corporation | Method and apparatus for calibrating measuring machines |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11672606B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2023-06-13 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
US11478308B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2022-10-25 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
US11116578B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2021-09-14 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
US10842571B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2020-11-24 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
US8971597B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2015-03-03 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Efficient vision and kinematic data fusion for robotic surgical instruments and other applications |
US10792107B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2020-10-06 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
US10555775B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2020-02-11 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods and system for performing 3-D tool tracking by fusion of sensor and/or camera derived data during minimally invasive robotic surgery |
US10405873B2 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2019-09-10 | Orthosoft Ulc | Computer-assisted surgery tools and system |
US8792963B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2014-07-29 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Methods of determining tissue distances using both kinematic robotic tool position information and image-derived position information |
US8096163B2 (en) | 2007-10-31 | 2012-01-17 | Brainlab Ag | Verifying the calibration status of an optical tracking system |
EP2055255A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-05-06 | BrainLAB AG | Verification of the calibration status of an optical tracking system |
US8830224B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2014-09-09 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Efficient 3-D telestration for local robotic proctoring |
US9526587B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2016-12-27 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Fiducial marker design and detection for locating surgical instrument in images |
US9867669B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2018-01-16 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Configuration marker design and detection for instrument tracking |
US9402690B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2016-08-02 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Efficient 3-D telestration for local and remote robotic proctoring |
US10675098B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2020-06-09 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Configuration marker design and detection for instrument tracking |
US8639000B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2014-01-28 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Robust sparse image matching for robotic surgery |
US11471221B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2022-10-18 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Configuration marker design and detection for instrument tracking |
US8184880B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2012-05-22 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Robust sparse image matching for robotic surgery |
WO2010078009A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-08 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Fiducial marker design and detection for locating surgical instrument in images |
US9492240B2 (en) | 2009-06-16 | 2016-11-15 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery |
US9155592B2 (en) | 2009-06-16 | 2015-10-13 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery |
US9987093B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2018-06-05 | Brainlab Ag | Single-marker navigation |
WO2015003727A1 (en) * | 2013-07-08 | 2015-01-15 | Brainlab Ag | Single-marker navigation |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7634374B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 |
US20070265715A1 (en) | 2007-11-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7634374B2 (en) | Method for permanent calibration based on actual measurement | |
US7809184B2 (en) | Devices and methods for automatically verifying, calibrating and surveying instruments for computer-assisted surgery | |
US8207863B2 (en) | Geometrical properties measuring device for a medical treatment device including an RFID transponder | |
CN109077822B (en) | Dental implant handpiece calibration system and method based on vision measurement | |
CA2468226C (en) | Ultrasound catheter calibration system | |
US9243934B2 (en) | Automatic calibration of a microscope scanning system | |
US20040210553A1 (en) | Spatial coordinate-based method for identifying work pieces | |
CN113243991A (en) | Checking method and checking system of osteotomy guiding tool and detection target | |
EP2233078A1 (en) | Medical imaging marker and program for utilizing same | |
CN105307591A (en) | Traceability of surgical instruments in a hospital compound | |
US7860298B2 (en) | Method and system for the calibration of a computer vision system | |
KR100446020B1 (en) | Method for operating a pick-and-place device, pick-and-place device, exchangeable component for a pick-and-place device and system that consists of a pick-and-place device and an exchangeable component | |
US20140180620A1 (en) | Calibration Artifact and Method of Calibrating a Coordinate Measuring Machine | |
CN1961335A (en) | An image processing apparatus, an imaging system, a computer program and a method for scaling an object in an image | |
KR20090014988A (en) | Method of manufacturing substrate for mask blank, method of manufacturing mask blank, method of manufacturing mask, substrate for mask blank | |
CN109556515A (en) | A kind of systematic error calibration method, system and equipment based on machine vision | |
US6819789B1 (en) | Scaling and registration calibration especially in printed circuit board fabrication | |
US3982837A (en) | Method and apparatus for calibrating Reseau grids | |
Houston | The application of computer aided digital analysis to orthodontic records | |
US20090310869A1 (en) | System, apparatus, method, and computer program product for determining spatial characteristics of an object using a camera and a search pattern | |
CN104010602A (en) | Test device for calibrating a laser device | |
EP0414559B1 (en) | Optical angle measuring apparatus | |
CN112945109B (en) | Laser displacement meter array system parameter calibration method based on horizontal displacement table | |
US11896286B2 (en) | Magnetic and optical catheter alignment | |
CN112998852A (en) | Method, device, terminal and storage medium for verifying precision |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10593563 Country of ref document: US |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 10593563 Country of ref document: US |