HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROMIRROR ARRAYS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to arrays of electromechanical micromirror devices and methods of manufacturing the same. Such arrays have appHcations in spatial light modulators.
2. Description of the Prior Art
[0002] Electromechanical micromirror devices have drawn considerable interest because of their application as spatial light modulators (SLMs). A spatial light modulator requires an array of a relatively large number of such micromirror devices. In general, the number of devices required ranges from 60,000 to several milHon for each SLM. Despite significant advances that have been made in recent years, there is still a need for improvement in the performance and manufacturing yields of electromechanical micromirror devices. [0003] An example of an early generation prior art device is disclosed in US 4592628. US 4592628 describes an array of light reflecting devices on a substrate.
Each device comprises a hollow post and a deflectable polygonal mirror attached thereto. Each mirror acts as a deflectable cantilever beam. The mirrors are deflected by a beam of electrons from a cathode ray tube. The hollow posts act as scattering and diffraction sites. Since the mirror is the deflectable cantilever beam, the mirror will not be flat when deflected. As a result, the light throughput of the mirror into a certain acceptance cone is not as good as if the mirror were optically flat. Preferred mirror shapes include squares, rectangles, and hexagons. [0004] Another early generation device is disclosed in US 4229732. In this case, addressing circuits using MOSFETs were fabricated on the surface of the substrate. Deflectable metallic mirrors were also fabricated on the surface of the substrate. The metallic mirrors are not flat when deflected. As a result, the light throughput into a certain acceptance cone is not as good as if the mirror were optically flat. Since the MOSFET circuits and mirrors could not overlap, the fill factor of the array was not as high as if the mirrors could cover the entire surface area.
[0005] A 1st generation Texas Instruments, Inc. (IT) device is described in US 4662746. A micromirror is suspended by 1 or 2 hinges. If suspended by 1 hinge,
the rnicrornirror deflects like a cantilever beam. If suspended by 2 hinges, the micromirror deflects like a torsion beam. Addressing electrodes are located below the rnicromirrors and addressing circuits are located at the same level in the substrate as the addressing electrodes. This means that the fill factor is improved. Fig. la of this patent shows a perspective view of a rnicrornirror. The micromirror has plasma etch access holes that are used for plasma et hing the underlying sacrificial layer. These plasma etch access holes lower the fill factor and increase scattering and diffraction. Note that the hinge metal layer has a substantially smaller thickness than the beam metal layer. This means that most of the bending occurs at the hinge and not at the beam. This design improves the flatness of the mirror; however, flatness would be improved further by placing the hinge at a lower level than the mirror, as discussed below. [0006] A 2nd generation TI device is described in US 5583688. A 2nd generation TI device is one in which the torsion hinge is at a different level than the reflective mirror. As described more fully in US 5583688, the mirror is supported by a mirror support post, which is attached to the torsion hinge by a yoke. In US 5583688, the mirrors are actuated by electrostatic forces between the mirror and address electrodes. The device is designed such that the mirror edge do not touch the address electrodes. Instead, the yoke edge touches the yoke landing site. In this design, the mirror is expected to remain flat during operation. The fill factor is relatively high because the CMOS circuits and torsion hinges are hidden under the mirror.
[0007] Fig. 2 of US 5583688 shows that the mirror support post forms a rectangular recess in the mirror surface. This arises because the metallic mirror layer and mirror support post are formed by sputter deposition on a sacrificial layer that has had a via formed in it. It can be understood that the rectangular recesses are a source of scattering and diffraction.
[0008] The problem of the diffraction from the mirror support post (also called spacervia) is discussed in Dewald et al, "Advances in contrast enhancement for DLP projection displays," Journal of the SID, vol. 11/1, pp. 177-181 (2003). The projection of the propagation vector of the incident light beam on the substrate plane is called the nlumination axis. In an earher design, the rectangular edges of the spacervia were placed parallel and perpendicular to the iUumination axis. In the earlier design, the dimensions of the spacervia were approximately 4 microns by 3 microns. In an improved design, called small rotated via (SRV), the dimensions of the spacervia were reduced to 2 microns by 3 microns. The area of the spacervia was reduced by 50 %. Furthermore, the spacervia was rotated by 45
degrees relative to earlier designs, such that no rectangular edge of the spacervia was perpendicular to the iπurnination axis. As a result of these improvements, contrast increased by 50 %.
[0009] The problem of diffraction effects is discussed in US 6469821. It is shown that modified mirror designs are preferable. An improved mirror has 2 sides that are straight and parallel to the nlumination axis. Instead of 2 additional sides that are perpendicular to the ulumination axis, a modified mirror provides a leading jagged edge and a trailing jagged edge, such that no side is perpendicular to the iUumination axis. If the spacervia edges are also not perpendicular to the iUumination axis, then no edge of the mirror is perpendicular, and as a result, diffraction is reduced. Furthermore, it is shown that the overall size and cost of the display can be reduced by placing the light source relative to the micromirror array such that the iUumination axis is parallel to 2 sides of the rectangular array and perpendicular to the remaining 2 sides of the rectangular array. Despite these improvements, the limitation of US 6469821 is that it does not disclose how to obtain an optically flat mirror, i.e. one that eliminates diffraction effects from the spacervia. Furthermore, the device architecture that is described in US 6469821 is one in which the mirrors are fabricated on top of CMOS circuits. There are additional problems associated with this architecture as discussed below. [0010] Micromirrors that are described in US 4662746 and US 5583688 are fabricated on top of CMOS circuits. There may be manufacturing problems associated with the fabrication of rmcro irrors on top of CMOS circuits. This issue is discussed in US 5216537. In this patent, it is discussed that the surface of the CMOS chip has certain manufacturing artifacts, namely aluminum hillocks, pinholes, nonplanar surfaces, and steep sidewalls in the protective oxide at edges of aluminum leads. In response to these problems, US 5216537 discloses an improved architecture in which an air gap is provided between the top surface of the CMOS chip and the mirror addressing electrodes. A further advantage of this approach is that because of the low dielectric constant of air, parasitic coupling between the CMOS and the micromirror is reduced.
[0011] The placement of CMOS circuits directly under the micromirrors is also responsible for problems of photosensitivity. As discussed in US 6344672, it was found that the CMOS memory cells are unstable in a high-intensity light environment. The patent provided an active collector region in which photogenerated carriers could recombine before reaciiing the addressing electrode.
[0012] Reflectivity, Inc. (Sunnyvale, California) is also known to be developing micromirror devices. As disclosed in US 5835256, the aforementioned problems associated with placing CMOS and micromirrors on the same substrate are solved by placing the micromirrors and CMOS on different substrates. In other words, a hinge and a micromirror are fabricated on an opticaUy transparent substrate, such that the optically reflective surface of the micromirror is proximate the opticaUy transparent substrate. Addressing circuits including mirror addressing electrodes are fabricated on a 2nd substrate (typicaUy silicon) and the 2 substrates are bonded together with a predetermined gap between the micromirror and the addressing electrodes.
[0013] In order to reduce scattering by non-planar surfaces and increase the fiU factor, it was necessary to provide a light shield on the opticaUy transparent substrate in the hinge areas. In an improved device according to US 6529310, the hinges are placed on the side of the mirror opposite to the side that is proximate the opticaUy transparent substrate.
[0014] However, another difficulty with the architecture of US 5835256 is that the gap between the mirror and rnirror addressing electrodes is difficult to control. Since the actuation force is superlinearly dependent on this gap, it is imperative to achieve uniform gap over the entire array to obtain uniform performance characteristics. As discussed in US 2003/0134449, 2nd and higher order adjustments in the gap may be needed in the manufacturing process. Such adjustments make the manufacturing process more compUcated. It would be preferable to have a device architecture in which the mirror address electrodes and mirrors are disposed on the same substrate. [0015] US 6523961 also discusses the problem of rnirror design for reduced diffraction. Improved mirrors are non-rectangular. Numerous non-rectangular mirrors are proposed. AU of the preferred mirrors are characterized by having at least 2 sides that are paraUel to the Ulumination axis and 2 other sides that are non-perpendicular to the iUumination axis. Furthermore, it shown that the overaU size and cost of the display can be reduced by placing the Ught source relative to the rnicromirror array such that the iUurnination axis is paraUel to 2 sides of the rectangular array and perpendicular to the remaining 2 sides of the rectangular array. [0016] US 6523961 describes a potential problem with certain mirror designs, when used as pixels in a spatial light modulator. For example, if an array of square mirrors were placed at a 45 degree angle relative to the SLM's x-y grid, twice as many row or column wires to the pixel controller ceUs would be required
compared to the case where the array were placed at a 0 degree angle relative to the x-y grid. However, this is a potential difficulty with electrical connections to the array and is not directly related to the fabrication of micromirrors. [0017] Despite these improvements, the Umitation of US 6523961 is that the preferred embodiments are -frustrated with respect to a device architecture in which the addressing electrodes and micromirrors are disposed on separate substrates. As discussed above, this architecture causes compUcations in the manufacturing process, since the gap between the mirror and the electrode must be precisely and accurately controlled within an array. [0018] US 5631782 discloses an improvement to TI's 2nd generation micromirror device. It is discussed that conventional spacervias on the mirror surface are undesirable because of diffraction effects. It would be possible to cover the spacervia by sputtering sufficiently thick films of mirror material. However, a heavier mirror requires a higher resonant reset frequency. Reset efficiency drops off significantly with increasing reset frequency, because of frequency dependent damping effects. Therefore, it is desirable to keep the mirror as Ught as possible. US 5631782 describes a mirror support pillar in which the top of the pillar is covered and closed. Since there is no hole, this is caUed a pillar instead of a spacervia. The support pillar is fabricated as foUows. The pUlar material may be a photoresist or a dielectric such as silicon oxide, sUicon nitride, or silicon oxynitride. The piUar material is deposited on the underlying substrate, and is patterned into a piUar. A metal layer is then deposited. The metal covers the pillar as weU as the surrounding area. This metal layer forms the sheath of the piUar. A photoresist layer sacrificial layer is formed by spin-coating. The photoresist on the top side of the pillar can be removed by plasma etching. The etdiing process at the top of the piUar essentially stops when the metal layer is exposed. However, the plasma etch also etches elsewhere else on the photoresist spacer layer, and therefore a mirror layer that is subsequently deposited on top of the spacer layer is not expected to be flat. Therefore, a Umitation of US 5631782 is that although it provides a method to ehrninate the diffraction due to spacervias, a flat rnirror cannot be made since the underlying spacer layer is not flat. [0019] It is widely known that multilayer dielectric mirrors offer superior reflectivity compared to metaUic mirrors. The use of multilayer dielectric mirrors has been weU documented in the fabrication of Fabry-Perot etalons and lasers for example. In the case of electromechanical micromirrors, US 6538800 discloses that a 96 ran thick layer of silicon dioxide (n = 1.46) on top of a 68 ran thick layer of silicon nitride (n = 2.0) wUl enhance the reflectivity of an alurriinum layer from
92 % to over 95 %. In addition to improving the optical performance of the micromirror, a higher reflectivity is preferred because there is less heat generated in the rnicrornirror array from the incident light.
[0020] US 6538800 also discusses the use of amorphous siUcon as a sacrificial layer. It is shown that amorphous silicon can be deposited for this purpose by
LPCVD in a quartz tube of a Tylan furnace. It is also shown that a xenon difluoride etch process can be used to etch amorphous silicon with a selectivity of 100 to 1. Therefore, amorphous silicon can be used successfuUy as a sacrificial layer in addition to photoresists, siUcon oxide, siUcon nitride, and silicon oxynitride.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[0021] The present invention provides arrays of micrormrror devices and fabrication methods for said arrays that overcome some of the Umitations of the prior art. According to the present invention, an array of electromechanical micromirror devices comprises a device substrate with a 1st surface and a 2nd surface, control circuitry disposed on said 1st surface, and a pluraUty of micromirrors disposed on said 2nd surface. The arrays may be 1 -dimensional (linear) or 2-dimensional and may be used as a spatial Ught modulators (SLMs).
According to the present invention, methods of fabricating rmcromirror arrays generaUy involve providing a device substrate with a 1st surface and a 2nd surface, fabricating control circuitry on the 1st surface, and fabricating micromirrors on the 2nd surface. Each rmcromirror comprises a reflective surface that is substantiaUy opticaUy flat, with neither recesses nor protrusions. In a preferred embodiment, control circuits are fabricated using CMOS technology. In another preferred embodiment, the control circuits on the 1st surface are protected by a protective layer during the fabrication of rnicromirrors on the 2nd surface. In yet another preferred embodiment, the device substrate is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate. Optically flat rnicromirrors are obtained by depositing a sacrificial layer, planarizing said sacrificial layer, and depositing the micromirror layer. A preferred planarization method is chemical mechanical poUshing (CMP). [0022] A 1st advantage of the present invention is that it provides improved dielectric isolation between the control circuit and the rmcromirror. A 2nd advantage of the present invention is that provides improved optical isolation of the control circuit area. This is particularly advantageous when the rmcromirror
array is used as a spatial Ught modulator (SLM) and the 1st surface (the rmcromirror side) is exposed to high intensity radiation. A 3rd advantage of the present invention is that it provides improved manufacturing yields because the control circuit manufacturing processes and micromirror manufacturing processes can be substantiaUy isolated from each other. In other words, manufacturing artifacts arising from the control circuit process wiU not damage the micromirror because the micromirror is not built on top of the control circuit. A 4th advantage of the present invention is that the micromirrors are substantiaUy flat, with no recesses or protrusions on its surface. These and other advantages of the present invention wiU become apparent from the detailed description and the claims below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023] Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a 4-pixel array of micrormrror devices, comprising control circuits, addressing electrodes, and rracromirrors.
[0024] Fig. 2 is a schematic cross sectional view of a rnicrornirror device in accordance with the present invention.
[0025] Fig. 3A is a schematic plan view of a micromirror device in accordance with a 1st embodiment of the present invention.
[0026] Fig. 3B is a schematic cross sectional view along line a-b of Fig. 3A.
[0027] Fig. 4A is a schematic plan view of a micromirror device in accordance with a 2nd embodiment of the present invention.
[0028] Fig. 4B is a schematic cross sectional view along line c-d of Fig. 4A. [0029] Fig. 5A is a schematic plan view of a micromirror device in accordance with a 3rd embodiment of the present invention.
[0030] Fig. 5B is a schematic cross sectional view along line e-f of Fig. 5A.
[0031] Figs. 6A through 6D are sd ematic plan views of a micromirror device according to a 4th embodiment of the present invention, at varying levels of elevation.
[0032] Figs. 7A through 7D are cross sectional views iUustrating the fabrication steps on a 1st device substrate surface, in accordance with a 4th embodiment of the present invention.
[0033] Figs. 8A through 8M are cross sectional views iUustrating the fabrication steps on a 2nd device substrate surface, in accordance with a 4th embodiment of the present invention.
[0034] Fig. 9 is a schematic plan view iUustrating a rmcromirror array of , rectangular micromirrors according to a 5th embodiment of the present invention. [0035] Fig. 10 is a schematic plan view iUustrating an array of hexagonal micromirrors in accordance with a 6th embodiment of the present invention. [0036] Fig. 11 A is a schematic plan view of a micromirror device in accordance with a 7th embodiment of the present invention. [0037] Fig. 1 IB is a schematic cross sectional view along line i-j of Fig. 11 A. [0038] Fig. 11C is a schematic plan view of a micromirror device in accordance with an 8th embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0039] The present invention relates to electromechanical micromirror devices and arrays of such devices. Shown schematicaUy in Fig. 1 is an array 100 comprising vertical data lines (101 and 102) and horizontal addressing lines (103 and 104), with each intersection of these data and addressing lines forming an electromechanical micromirror device (105, 106, 107, and 108). Each micromirror device comprises a rmcromirror (109, 110, 111, and 112), an addressing electrode (113, 114, 115, and 116), and an NMOS transistor (117, 118, 119, and 120). Micrormrror 109 is shown to be in a deflected state while the other micromirrors are in their undeflected states. A possible scheme for addressing the micromirrors is as foUows: The micromirrors (109, 110, 111, and 112) are electricaUy connected to ground. The deflection of a micromirror is determined by the bias voltage between the micromirror and its addressing electrode. The desired bias voltage is set by the voltages on the vertical data lines (101 and 102). The NMOS transistors are turned on by sending a low-high-low pulse on the addressing lines (103 and 104), which results in the bias voltages being stored between the micromirrors and addressing electrodes. [0040] Wfule array 100 (Fig. 1) has been shown to consist of 4 rnicrornirror devices, an array may typicaUy consist of greater than 60,000 rmcromirror devices and may be used as a spatial Ught modulator (SLM). Furthermore, while Fig. 1 shows a pluraUty of micromirror devices disposed in a 2-dimensional array, 1-dimensional (linear) array are also possible. [0041] The circuitry as shown in Fig. 1 comprises the foUowing: 1) rmcromirrors; 2) rmcromirror addressing electrodes; and
3) control circuitry.
In the particular case of Fig. 1, control circuitry consists of the vertical data lines (101 and 102), horizontal addressing lines (103 and 104), NMOS transistors (117, 118, 119, and 120), and electrical connections among them. In general, control circuitry is understood to mean any circuitry that is provided to control the apphcation of bias voltages between a rmcromirror and its addressing electrode. As shown in Fig. 1, the control circuitry comprised NMOS transistors. However, it should be understood that the control circuitry could comprise other types of circuits, including CMOS circuits, PMOS circuits, bipolar transistor circuits, BiCMOS circuits, DMOS circuits, HEMT circuits, amorphous siUcon thin film transistor circuits, polysiUcon thin film, transistor circuits, SiGe transistor circuits, SiC transistor circuits, GaN transistor circuits, GaAs transistor circuits, InP transistor circuits, CdSe transistor circuits, organic transistor circuits, and conjugated polymer transistor circuits. [0042] Some of the important concepts of the present invention are iUustrated schematicaUy in Fig. 2. A device substrate 201 has a bottom surface on which control circuitry 202 is fabricated. Micromirror 203 and addressing electrodes 204 and 205 are fabricated on the top surface of substrate 201. For simplicity, support structures for supporting micromirror 203 are not shown. Electrical connections between the addressing electrodes (203 and 204) and control circuitry 202 are provided by electrical routing lines 206 and 207. The electrical routing lines 206 and 207 may be in the form of vias in the device substrate 201 with metallization in these vias. The device substrate may be selected from among the following: silicon-on-insulator (SOI), siUcon, polycrystalUne silicon, glass, plastic, ceramic, germanium, SiGe, SiC, sapphire, quartz, GaAs, and InP. In general, the choice of device substrate should be consistent with the choice of control circuit technology. For example, a siUcon-on-insulator substrate may be suitable for CMOS circuits, and a glass substrate may be suitable for amorphous silicon thin film transistor circuits. [0043] As discussed with reference to Fig. 1, a micromirror device comprises a control circuitry, a rmcromirror, and addressing electrodes. Fig. 3A is a schematic plan view of a portion of a rnicrornirror device 300 in accordance with a 1st embodiment of the present invention. Micromirror 301 is shown with its reflective side facing towards the reader. The reflective side of rmcromirror 301 is substantiaUy planar, with neither recessions nor protrusions. Micromirror 301 is supported by a torsion hinge 302. In the case that rmcromirror portion 300 is disposed in an array for a spatial light modulator (SLM), arrow 303 indicates the projection of the incident light propagation direction on the device substrate plane. Note that rmcromirror 301 has 4 edges and no edge is perpendicular to
arrow 303. Fig. 3B is a schematic cross sectional view along line a-b through torsion hinge 302. Micrormrror 301 and torsion hinge 302 are supported by support structures 304 and 305, which are disposed on device substrate 306. Since the micromirror deflects by torsion, the axis of rotation of the micromirror is approximately perpendicular to arrow 303.
[0044] Fig. 4A is a schematic plan view of a portion of a micromirror device 400 in accordance with a 2nd embodiment of the present invention. Micromirror 401 is shown with its reflective side facing towards the reader. The reflective side of micromirror 401 is substantiaUy planar, with neither recessions nor protrusions. Micromirror 401 is supported by a beam 402. In the case that micromirror device
400 is disposed in an array for a spatial light modulator (SLM), arrow 403 indicates the projection of the incident light propagation direction on the device substrate plane. Note that rmcromirror 401 has 4 edges and no edge is perpendicular to arrow 403. Fig. 4B is a schematic cross sectional view along line c-d through beam 402. Beam 402 is supported by support structure 404, which is disposed on device substrate 406. In contrast to rmcromirror 301 (Figs. 3A and 3B), the axis of rotation of micromirror 401 is approximately paraUel to arrow 403. [0045] Fig. 5A is a schematic plan view of a portion of a micrormrror device 500 in accordance with a 3rd embodiment of the present invention. Micromirror 501 is shown with its reflective side facing towards the reader. The reflective side of micromirror 501 is substantiaUy planar, with neither recessions nor protrusions. In the case that micromirror device 500 is disposed in an array for a spatial Ught modulator (SLM), arrow 503 indicates the projection of the incident Ught propagation direction on the device substrate plane. Fig. 5B is a schematic cross sectional view along line e-f. Micromirror 501 is supported by a support structure 504, which is disposed on device substrate 506. The axis of rotation of micromirror 501 is approximately parallel to arrow 503.
[0046] An important difference between between micromirror device 400 (Figs. 4A and 4B) and micromirror device 500 (Figs. 5A and 5B) is that in device 400, there is a beam 402 which supports the rmcrornirror 401 on the support structure
404, whereas in device 500, the micromirror is positioned directly on support structure 504. Therefore, in Fig. 5A, the top side 502 of support structure 504 is visible in the plan view. [0047] Figs. 6A through 6D are schematic plan views of a nricromirror device 600 accoding to a 4th embodiment of the present invention, at varying levels of elevation. Fig. 6 A shows the reflective side (top side) of a micromirror 601. In the case that micromirror device 600 is disposed in an array for a spatial Ught
modulator (SLM), arrow 602 indicates the projection of the incident light propagation vector on the device substrate plane. Arrow 602 is not perpendicular to any of the 4 sides of micromirror 601. Arrow 602 is shown to be approximately 45 degrees from the leading edges of micromirror 601. The reflective side of micromirror 601 is is substantiaUy flat, with neither recesses nor protrusions. As a result, there are no diffraction effects that would be caused by recesses or protrusions in the micromirror.
[0048] Fig. 6B shows a plan view that is analogous to Fig. 6A except that micromirror 601 has been removed. Addressing electrodes 603 and 604, rnicrornirror support structure 605, and torsion hinge 606 are visible. Torsion hinge 606 supports rmcromirror support structure 605. Addressing electrodes 603 and 604 are electrically connected to control circuitry which is not shown. Micrormrror 601 is actuated by electrostatic forces between it and one or both of the addressing electrodes 603 and 604. Fig. 6C shows the result of removing the mirror support structure 605.
[0049] Fig. 6D shows the result of removing torsion hinge 606. Torsion hinge support structures 607 and 608 are shown. Figs. 7A through 7D and 8A through 8M show a fabrication sequence of a micromirror device using a cross sectional view along the line g-h. In many cases, the micromirror device would be fabricated in an array for use as a spatial Ught modulator. Therefore, although
Figs. 7A through 7D and 8A through 8M hTustrate the fabrication of a single micromirror device, it should be understood that the teachings can be extended to the fabrication of an array of rmcromirror devices. [0050] Figs. 7A through 7D Ulustrate a fabrication sequence on the control circuitry side. Fig. 7A shows a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate 700 comprising an epitaxial top silicon layer 703 with a thickness typically ranging from 50 ran to 600 nm, an intermediate insulator layer 702 with a thickness typically ranging from 50 ran to 2 m, and a bottom siUcon layer 701 with a thickness of around 775 m. One of the advantages of SOI over silicon substrates is the improved dielectric isolation. In the case of the present invention, the SOI substrate is used to improve the dielectric isolation of the control circuitry and micromirror portion.
[0051] Fig. 7B shows the formation of control circuitry 704 on epitaxial layer 703 of the SOI substrate 700. In general, any integrated circuit technology can be considered for fabricating the control circuitry. For example, CMOS circuitry may be used. However, for applications requiring high frequency or high voltages, BiCMOS or DMOS circuitry may be used.
[0052] Fig. 7C shows the step of forming a trench 705 through the top epitaxial siUcon layer 703 and insulator layer 702, using standard patterning and an anisotropic etch. The anisotropic etch is stopped before the trench 705 reaches the bottom siUcon layer 701. This is foUowed by a metal deposition and patterning step (Fig. 7D) which forms an electrical connection 706 between the control circuitry and the trench. It should be understood that this metal could be any metal that is used in semiconductor fabrication, such as Al alloy, and methods of metal deposition include sputtering, thermal evaporation, and CVD. [0053] At this point the process steps on the control circuitry side are complete. It may be preferable to form a protective layer on the control circuitry side. Figs.
8A through 8M illustrate a fabrication sequence on the rmcromirror side. The control circuitry side is mounted on a carrier to securely hold the substrate for the subsequent step (Fig. 8A) of backgrinding and chemical mechanical poUshing (CMP) of the back sUicon layer 701 to expose the intermediate insulator layer 702. [0054] As shown in Fig. 8B, insulator layer 702 is pattered to form a trench 801, thereby completing the via that had been started in the step of Fig. 7C. Another metaUization (deposition and patterning) step (Fig. 8C) forms addressing electrodes 802 that are electricaUy connected, through via 801, to control circuitry 704. [0055] After the formation of the addressing electrodes 802, the torsion hinge and its support structures are formed. An embodiment of this process is iUustrated in Figs. 8D through 8H. An amorphous sUicon sacrificial layer 803 is deposited by LPCVD (Fig. 8D). Other suitable methods of depositing amorphous siUcon are PECVD, catalytic CVD (also known as hot wire CVD), and sputtering. As discussed in the Background Art section, xenon difluoride can be used to etch amorphous siUcon with a selectivity of 100 to 1. Other possible sacrificial layers are photoresists, siUcon oxide, siUcon nitride, and sUicon oxynitride. As shown in Fig. 8E, a photolithographic patterning and anisotropic et iing step is carried out to form a recess 804 where the torsion hinge wiU be formed. Then, another photoUthographic patterning and anisotropic etching step (Fig. 8F) is carried out to form holes 805 and 806 where the torsion hinge support structures wiU be formed. The holes 805 and 806 for the torsion hinge support structures reach the intermediate insulator layer. [0056] As shown in Fig. 8G, a layer 807 of structural material is deposited. For example, the structural material may be an Al aUoy comprising 0.2 % Ti, 1 % Si, and the remainder Al. A preferred method of depositing this Al alloy is sputter deposition. A metal is chosen for the structural material because the micromirror
is typicaUy held at ground potential. As shown in Fig. 8H, structural material layer 807 is patterned to form a torsion hinge 808 and torsion hinge support structures 809 and 810. Torsion hinge 808 and torsion hinge support structures 809 and 810 are at least partially embedded in sacrificial layer 803. [0057] A rmcromirror support structure is placed between the torsion beam and the micromirror. As shown in Fig. 81, a metal layer is deposited and then patterned to provide a micromirror support structure 811 on torsion beam 808. The metal may be an Al aUoy comprising 0.2 % Ti, 1 % Si, and the remainder Al. A preferred method of depositing this Al aUoy is sputter deposition. Another layer of sacrificial amorphous siUcon is deposited (Fig. 8J) such that the micromirror support structure 811 is fuUy covered by sacrificial layer 803. A chemical mechanical poUshing (CMP) process is carried out to planarize the surface such that the foUowing requirements are satisfied: 1) the top of the rmcromirror support structure 811 is exposed and planar; 2) the sacrificial layer 803 is planar; and
3) the top of the rmcrornirror support structure 811 and the top of the sacrificial layer 803 are at the same level.
In this description, top is understood to mean bottom on the drawing page. The result of the planarization step is shown schematicaUy in Fig. 8K. [0058] A metaUic layer is deposited and patterned to form a micromirror 812 as shown in Fig. 8L. The metal may be an Al alloy comprising 0.2 % Ti, 1 % Si, and the remainder Al. A preferred method of depositing this Al aUoy is sputter deposition. The micromirror 812 is connected to the rnicrornirror support structure 811. A xenon difluoride etch is carried out to remove the amorphous siUcon sacrificial layer (Fig. 8M).
[0059] In the foregoing discussion the preferred micromirror comprised a metaUic coating. However, it is also possible to construct a rnicrornirror out of multiple alternating layers of higher refractive index and lower refractive index dielectrics. This may be accompUshed by using sUicon oxide and sUicon nitride. Therefore, if an Al mirror has a reflectivity of 92 %, the reflectivity can be increased to over 95 % by first depositing 68 nm of sUicon nitride (n = 2.0) and then depositing 96 ran of silicon dioxide (n = 1.46). [0060] In the foregoing discussion of Figs. 8G to 8M, aU of the structural members (torsion hinge, torsion hinge support structures, rnicrornirror, micromirror support structures) were metaUic. Alternatively, it is possible to use a dielectric (e.g. hardened photoresist, sUicon oxide, siUcon nitride, siUcon
oxynitride) that has been covered with a metaUic sheath as a structural member, as described more fuUy in US 5631782.
[0061] Typically, micromirror devices are incorporated into an array. Fig. 9 shows a 2-dimensional array 900 of rectangular micromirrors (901, 902, 903, and 904), according to a 5th embodiment of the present invention. Arrow 906 indicates the projection of the incident light propagation vector on the mirror plane (device substrate plane). The reflective side of the micromirror has no edges that are perpendicular to arrow 906. This is a configuration that reduces diffraction into the acceptance cone of the optical system. Another possible shape for a rmcrornirror is a hexagon, shown being disposed in an array 1000 in Fig. 10, according to a 6th embodiment of the present invention. There are micromirrors 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, and 1005. Arrow 1006 indicates the projection of the incident Ught propagation vector on the mirror plane (device substrate plane). The reflective side of the micromirrors has no edges that are perpendicular to arrow 1006.
[0062] A 7th embodiment of the present invention is explained with reference to Figs. 11A and 11B. Fig. 11A is a schematic plane view of a micromirror device 1100, comprising a micromirror 1101 and a micromirror support structure 1104. Arrow 1103 indicates the projection of the incident light propagation vector on the micromirror plane (device substrate plane). The reflective side of the rmcromirror has no edges that are perpendicular to arrow 1103. The reflective side of rmcromirror 1101 is substantially planar, with neither recessions nor protrusions. Fig. 11B is a schematic cross sectional view along line i-j of Fig. 11A. An addressing electrode 1108 is located under rmcromirror 1101 and on top of device substrate 1106. Furthermore, a stopper 1107 has been provided. The purpose of stopper 1107 is to prevent micromirror 1101 from contacting addressing electrode 1108 under deflection. This may cause an electrical short. Instead, micromirror 1101 contacts stopper 1107. In cases where a micromirror deflects in 2 directions from its undeflected state, it is possible to provide 2 stoppers with 1 stopper for each direction of deflection.
[0063] Fig. 11C iUustrates a modification to micromirror device 1100 in accordance with an 8th embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 11C is a plan view of a micromirror device 1100 comprising a rmcrornirror 1101, a support structure 1104, and a stopper 1107. In its undeflected state, the reflective side of rnicrornirror 1101 has no edges that are perpendicular to arrow 1103. When the micromirror 1101 is actuated, the region 1108 of micromirror 1101 that is adjacent to support structure 1104 gets deflected. Therefore, an edge that is perpendicular
to arrow 1103 may appear in region 1108. In order to reduce diffraction effects from this edge, it is possible to coat region 1108 with a light absorbing material. A preferred Ught absorbing material is a black dye.