WO2005018134A2 - Method and system for crosstalk cancellation - Google Patents
Method and system for crosstalk cancellation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005018134A2 WO2005018134A2 PCT/US2004/025232 US2004025232W WO2005018134A2 WO 2005018134 A2 WO2005018134 A2 WO 2005018134A2 US 2004025232 W US2004025232 W US 2004025232W WO 2005018134 A2 WO2005018134 A2 WO 2005018134A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- crosstalk
- signal
- communication
- filter
- channel
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 55
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 139
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 14
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 31
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001151 other effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920005994 diacetyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008649 adaptation response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001808 coupling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000744 eyelid Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011545 laboratory measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002040 relaxant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005316 response function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/02—Details
- H04B3/20—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other
- H04B3/23—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/02—Details
- H04B3/32—Reducing cross-talk, e.g. by compensating
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J1/00—Frequency-division multiplex systems
- H04J1/02—Details
- H04J1/12—Arrangements for reducing cross-talk between channels
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J3/00—Time-division multiplex systems
- H04J3/02—Details
- H04J3/10—Arrangements for reducing cross-talk between channels
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R5/00—Stereophonic arrangements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/02—Details
- H04B3/20—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other
- H04B3/23—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers
- H04B3/238—Reducing echo effects or singing; Opening or closing transmitting path; Conditioning for transmission in one direction or the other using a replica of transmitted signal in the time domain, e.g. echo cancellers using initial training sequence
Definitions
- Provisional Patent Application Serial Number 60/494,072 are hereby incorporated by reference.
- This application is related to U.S. Nonprovisional Patent Application Serial No. 10/108,598, entitled “Method and System for Decoding Multilevel Signals," filed on March 28, 2002, and U.S. Nonprovisional Patent Application Serial No. 10/620,477, entitled “Adaptive Noise Filtering and Equalization for Optimal High Speed Multilevel Signal Decoding,” filed on July 15, 2003.
- the contents of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/108,598 and U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/620,477 are hereby incorporated by reference.
- the present invention relates to the field of communications, and more specifically to improving the signal fidelity in a communication system by compensating for crosstalk interference that occurs between two or more communication channels that is prevalent at high data communication rates.
- Crosstalk is a condition that arises in communications systems wherein a signal in one communication channel is corrupted by interference (or bleed-over) from a different signal being communicated over another channel.
- the interference may arise due to a variety of effects. For example, in electrical systems such as circuit boards, electrical connectors, and twisted pair cable bundles, each electrical path serves as a channel. At high communication speeds, these conductive paths behave like antennae, both radiating and receiving electromagnetic energy.
- the radiated energy from one channel is undesirably coupled into or received by another channel, referred to herein as the "victim channel.”
- This undesirable transfer of signal energy can compromise data integrity on the receiving channel.
- Crosstalk is typically bidirectional in that a single channel can both radiate energy to one or more other channels and receive energy from one or more other channels.
- Crosstalk is emerging as a significant barrier to increasing throughput rates of communications systems. When not specifically addressed, crosstalk often manifests itself as noise. In particular, crosstalk degrades signal quality by increasing uncertainty in the received signal value thereby making reliable communications more difficult, i.e. data errors occur with increased probability. In other words, crosstalk typically becomes more problematic at increased data rates.
- each signal in a binary or multi-level communication signal is composed of high-frequency signal components that are more susceptible to crosstalk degradation compared to lower frequency components.
- the crosstalk impediment to increasing data throughput rates is further compounded by the tendency of the high-frequency content of the victim signal to attenuate heavily over long signal transmission path lengths (e.g.
- circuit traces that are several inches in length for multi-gigabit per second data rates). That is, high-frequency components of a communication signal not only receive a relatively high level of crosstalk interference, but also are susceptible to interference because they are often weak due to transmission losses. While these attenuated high-frequency components can be amplified via a technique known as channel equalization, such channel equalization frequently increases noise and crosstalk as a byproduct of amplifying the high-frequency signals that carry data. The amount of crosstalk present in a communication link often limits the level of equalization that can be utilized to restore signal integrity.
- the level of crosstalk energy on a communication channel can exceed the level of victim signal energy at the high frequencies that underlie such high-speed communication.
- extraneous or stray signal energy can dominate the energy of the desirable data-carrying signals, thus rendering communicating at these data rates impractical with most conventional system architectures.
- the term "noise,” as used herein, is distinct from crosstalk and refers to a completely random phenomenon.
- Crosstalk in contrast, is a deterministic, but often unknown, parameter. The conventional art includes knowledge that it is theoretically possible to modify a system in order to mitigate crosstalk.
- the crosstalk can be theoretically determined and cancelled. That is, those skilled in the art understand that crosstalk signal degradation can be cancelled if the data carried by a communication signal that is input into a communication channel is known and the signal transformation imposed on the communication signal by crosstalk is also known.
- achieving a level of definition of this signal transformation having sufficient precision and accuracy to support a practical implementation of a system that adequately cancels crosstalk is difficult with conventional technology. Consequently, conventional technology that addresses crosstalk is generally insufficient for high-speed (e.g. multi-gigabit per second) communications systems.
- crosstalk cancellation system and method with sufficient flexibility to: (i) accommodate the variety of crosstalk transfer functions that can stem from ordinary operations of a given system; and (ii) self-calibrate in order to avoid a complex manual task of characterizing and adjusting for each victim-aggressor pair. While the general concept of crosstalk cancellation is known in the conventional art, conventional crosstalk cancellation is typically not applicable to high-speed environments, such as channels supporting multi-gigabaud rates.
- Compensating for crosstalk can improve signal quality and enhance communication bandwidth or information carrying capability.
- a communication signal transmitted on one communication channel can couple an unwanted signal, such as crosstalk, into another communication channel and interfere with communication signals transmitting on that channel.
- this crosstalk effect can couple between and among multiple communication channels with each channel imposing crosstalk on two or more channels and receiving crosstalk from two or more channels.
- a channel can be a medium, such as an electrical conductor or an optical fiber that provides a signal path.
- a single optical fiber or wire can provide a transmission medium for two or more channels, each communicating digital or analog information.
- each channel can have a dedicated transmission medium.
- a circuit board can have multiple conductors in the form of circuit traces in which each trace provides a dedicated communication channel.
- a crosstalk cancellation device can input a crosstalk cancellation signal into a channel receiving crosstalk interference to cancel or otherwise compensate for the received crosstalk.
- the crosstalk cancellation signal can be derived or produced from a signal that is propagating on another channel, generating the crosstalk.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can be coupled between the channel that generates the crosstalk and the channel that receives the crosstalk.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can sample or receive a portion of the signal that is causing the crosstalk and can compose the crosstalk cancellation signal for application to the channel that is receiving the unwanted crosstalk.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can tap into the channel that is causing the crosstalk, generate a crosstalk cancellation signal, and apply the crosstalk cancellation signal to the channel receiving crosstalk interference to provide crosstalk cancellation or correction.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can generate the crosstalk cancellation signal via a model of the crosstalk effect.
- the model can generate the crosstalk cancellation signal in the form of a signal that estimates, approximates, emulates, or resembles the crosstalk signal.
- the crosstalk cancellation signal can have a waveform or shape that matches the actual crosstalk signal. A setting or adjustment that adjusts the model, such as a set of modeling parameters, can define characteristics of this waveform.
- the crosstalk cancellation signal can be synchronized with the actual crosstalk signal.
- the timing of the crosstalk cancellation signal can be adjusted to match the timing of the actual crosstalk signal.
- a timing delay or other timing parameter can define the relative timing or temporal correspondence between the crosstalk cancellation signal and the actual crosstalk signal.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can implement modeling and timing adjustments so the crosstalk cancellation signal closely matches the actual crosstalk, thereby yielding effective crosstalk cancellation.
- a controller of the crosstalk cancellation device can monitor and analyze the output of the crosstalk cancellation device. That is, a controller can process the crosstalk-cancelled signal, which is an improved communication signal that results from applying the crosstalk cancellation signal to the channel having crosstalk interference. The controller can vary the modeling parameters and the timing delay, individually or in unison, to minimize any residual crosstalk remaining after crosstalk cancellation.
- a crosstalk cancellation device can undergo a calibration or setup procedure that is initiated internally or externally.
- the crosstalk cancellation device, or another device executing the calibration procedure can initiate the transmission of a known or predetermined test signal on a communication channel.
- a test signal can be transmitted on the channel that causes crosstalk or the channel that receives crosstalk interference.
- one test signal can be transmitted on a channel generating crosstalk, while a different test signal is transmitted on a channel that receives the generated crosstalk interference.
- a randomized communication signal can propagate on the crosstalk-generating channel, while the crosstalk-receiving channel can have a uniform voltage or current signal that is representative of essentially no data transmission.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can utilize these known conditions to define the timing and shape of a crosstalk cancellation signal that effectively compensates for crosstalk interference.
- the crosstalk cancellation device can define or refine its model of the crosstalk effect based on operating the crosstalk cancellation device with test signals transmitting on the crosstalk- generating and the crosstalk-receiving communication channels.
- Figure 1 illustrates a functional block diagram of a communication system having two linecards communicating over a backplane and incurring crosstalk.
- Figure 2 illustrates a functional block diagram of a crosstalk model for the system illustrated in Figure 1.
- Figure 3 illustrates a plot of a crosstalk response for a backplane-to-linecard connector according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 4 illustrates a functional block diagram of a crosstalk cancellation system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 5 illustrates a functional block diagram of a crosstalk cancellation system including functional blocks of a crosstalk cancellation device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 6 is a functional block diagram of a tapped delay line filter according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 7 is a functional block diagram of a crosstalk modeling filter of a crosstalk cancellation device with an adjustable delay according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 8 is a functional block diagram of a crosstalk modeling filter of a crosstalk cancellation device with a high-pass filter according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 9 is a functional block diagram of a control module of a crosstalk cancellation device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 10 is a flow chart illustrating a process for canceling crosstalk according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 11 is a flow chart illustrating a process for calibrating a crosstalk cancellation device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Figures 12A and 12B respectively illustrate testing data of a communication system before and after implementing crosstalk cancellation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention supports canceling crosstalk on one or more communication paths in a communication system, such as a high-speed digital data communication system.
- a flexible and adaptable model of the crosstalk effect can output a cancellation signal that accurately represents crosstalk interference. Coupling this cancellation signal onto a signal path that has crosstalk can cancel such crosstalk and thereby negate the impairment that crosstalk can impose on bandwidth.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a functional block diagram of a communication system 100 having two linecards 101a, 101b communicating over backplane signal paths 120, 130 exhibiting crosstalk 150, 151. More specifically, Figure 1 illustrates an occurrence of backplane crosstalk 150, and connector crosstalk 151 in the exemplary case of a backplane communications system 100.
- a linecard 101a, 101b is a module, typically a circuit board that slides in and out of a chassis slot and provides communication capabilities associated with a communication channel.
- a backplane 103 is a set of signal paths, such as circuit traces, at the rear of such a chassis that transmit signals between each installed linecard 101a, 101b and another communication device, such as another linecard 101a, 101b or a data processing component in a rack-mounted digital communication system.
- Each linecard 101a, 101b in the system 100 illustrated in Figure 1 transmits and receives multiple channels of data, such as the two illustrated channels 120, 130.
- An exemplary channel 130 starts at a transmitter (Tx) 104a on a linecard 101a; (ii) transmits off the linecard 101a through a connector 102a to the backplane 103; (iii) continues across the backplane 103 to another connector 102b and linecard 101b; and (iv) is received by a receiver (Rx) 105b.
- Figure 1 shows two such channels labeled the "victim” or "vict.” (from victim transmitter 104a to victim receiver 105b) and the "aggressor” or “agg.” (from aggressor transmitter 104b to aggressor receiver 105a).
- signal energy radiates from the aggressor channel 120 and is incorporated into the victim channel 130. That is, in areas of the backplane 103 and connectors 102a, 102b in which a first signal path is located close to a second signal path, a portion of the signal energy propagating in the first signal path can couple into the second signal path and corrupt or impair signals propagating on this second signal path.
- This crosstalk coupling 150 may occur on a linecard 101a, 101b, in a connector 102a, 102b, on a backplane 103, or any combination thereof, for example. While not illustrated in Figure 1, crosstalk can also occur in the reverse direction.
- the "victim" channel 130 often radiates energy which corrupts the "aggressor" channel 120. That is, crosstalk frequently occurs in a bidirectional manner, transferring not only from a first signal path to a second signal path but also from the second signal path to the first signal path. Furthermore, in systems having three or more signal paths coexisting in close proximity to one another (not illustrated), crosstalk can transfer among and between three or more signal paths. That is, a single signal can not only impose crosstalk on two or more other signals, but also receive crosstalk interference from two or more other signals. Similar to the multi-physical-path case illustrated in Figure 1 and described above, crosstalk can occur with the aggressor and victim channels propagating on a single transmission medium (e.g. a single cable or trace).
- a single transmission medium e.g. a single cable or trace
- each channel can correspond to a particular signal band (e.g. a frequency band in frequency division multiplexing system, a spectral band as in an optical wavelength division multiplexing system, or a temporal window in time-division multiplexing system).
- a particular signal band e.g. a frequency band in frequency division multiplexing system, a spectral band as in an optical wavelength division multiplexing system, or a temporal window in time-division multiplexing system.
- two communication channels, one generating crosstalk, one receiving crosstalk can coexist in a communication medium such as an optical waveguide or a wire, with each cormnunication channel supporting transmission of a dedicated communication signal.
- a communication medium such as an optical waveguide or a wire
- FIG. 2 illustrates a functional block diagram 200 of a crosstalk model 210 for the system 100 illustrated in Figure 1. More specifically, Figure 2 illustrates a model 210 of the crosstalk effect 151 in the connector 102b based on a single, exemplary transfer function 210.
- the aggressor transmitter 104b outputs an aggressor communication signal u(t) 215 on the aggressor channel 120.
- the aggressor communication signal u(t) 215 couples into the victim channel 130 via crosstalk 151 in the connector 102b.
- the aggressor communication signal u(t) 215 is composed of a spread of frequencies. Since crosstalk 151 is a frequency dependent phenomenon, the frequencies of the aggressor communication signal u(t) 215 couple into the victim channel at varying efficiency.
- the frequency model H(f) 210 of the crosstalk effect 151 expresses the extent to which each of these frequency components couples into the victim channel 130 in the form of a signal n(t) 230.
- This crosstalk signal n(t) 230 combines with the unadulterated communication signal x(t) 214 propagating on the victim channel 130 from the victim transmitter 104a.
- the victim channel 130 transmits the resulting combined signal y(t) 260 to the victim receiver 105b.
- the crosstalk transfer function 210 can be characterized by the frequency response H(f) 210 (or its time-domain equivalent impulse response h(t)). As depicted in Figure 2, the response H(f) 210 conveys the transformation that the aggressor data signal u(t) 215 experiences in the connector portion of its route from the aggressing transmitter 104b to the victim receiver 105b. The specifics of this response 210 usually vary among particular victim-aggressor channel pairs. Nevertheless, the general nature of the response is based on geometric constraints and underlying physics. For example, a backplane connector's crosstalk response 151 can depend upon physical system parameters.
- the backplane crosstalk 150 can also be modeled with a transfer function, and the backplane and connector crosstalks 150, 151 can even be captured with a single (albeit different) transfer function.
- An exemplary, non-limiting embodiment of the present invention, in which a crosstalk cancellation device compensates for crosstalk occurring on a linecard-to- backplane connection will be described below- with reference to Figures 3-12B.
- the embodiments disclosed herein are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will convey the scope of the invention to those having ordinary skill in the art. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be applied to address crosstalk occurring on a backplane or other locations in a communication system and that the present invention can compensate for various forms of crosstalk.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a plot 300 of a crosstalk response 210 for a backplane-to-linecard connector 102b according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- This plot 300 illustrates laboratory measurements of the power in the crosstalk signal 151, more specifically the power transferred from the aggressor channel 120 to the victim channel 130 in the connector 102b, as a function of frequency.
- the horizontal axis is frequency measured in units of gigahertz (GHz).
- the vertical axis describes signal power in decibels ("dB"), more specifically ten times the base-ten logarithm of the crosstalk frequency response 210 squared.
- this plot 300 illustrates the level of crosstalk power transferred from one channel 120 to another channel 130 for each frequency component of the aggressor signal u(t) 215.
- the dominant mechanism for crosstalk 151 is typically capacitive coupling between the connector's pins. This mechanism is clearly evident in Figure 3 as the general high-pass nature of the response of the plot 300.
- the plot 300 shows a trend of higher signal frequencies, above about 1 GHz, transferring energy via crosstalk mechanisms 151 more readily than lower frequencies, below 1 GHz.
- the left side of the plot 300 less than approximately 1 GHz, exhibits an attenuated crosstalk signal having a power less than approximately -25 dB.
- this plot 300 shows that the frequency components less than approximately 1 GHz of a communication signal u(t) 215 transfer a relatively small portion of their carried power to a victim channel 130 via connector crosstalk 151.
- the magnitude of crosstalk 151 increases between approximately 0.25 GHz and 1 GHz.
- the components of a victim communication signal x(t) 214 that have frequencies between approximately 1 GHz and 4.25 GHz are particularly prone to crosstalk effects 151 from an aggressor communication signal u(t) 215 with similar signal frequencies.
- the fluctuations in the frequency response plot 300 at frequencies above 2 GHz illustrate that the crosstalk effect 151 is heavily influenced by other effects than simple capacitive coupling between a pair of pins.
- the plot 300 deviates from a classical capacitive coupling response, which typically asymptotically (and monotonically) increases with increased frequency.
- the illustrated plot 300 exhibits a pattern of peaks and valleys at higher frequencies, such as a local minimum at approximately 4.6 GHz.
- adequate crosstalk cancellation depends heavily on accurately modeling a system's crosstalk response.
- Crosstalk cancellation performance is particularly dependent upon model accuracy for frequencies in which the crosstalk effect is strong, namely for frequencies above approximately 1 GHz.
- the higher order effects of the aforementioned peaks and valleys in the plot 300 are highly dependent on specific relative geometric relations between the victim signal path 130 and aggressor signal path 120 which are not known a priori, in general.
- the plot 300 of Figure 3 illustrates that the higher frequency components of a communication signal 214, 215 are particularly prone to crosstalk 151 and that modeling the crosstalk response 210 for these higher frequency components involves addressing the inherently erratic nature of this high frequency response. Since an accurate model of a system's crosstalk response 210 can provide the basis for adequate crosstalk cancellation, such a model needs to accurately represent these higher-order, erratic response characteristics. While passive circuit analysis does not readily derive a model with requisite accuracy, actual signal responses can serve as a basis for constructing an appropriate model.
- a crosstalk model in a crosstalk cancellation device can be defined based on crosstalk measurement data such as the measurement data presented in the plot 300 illustrated in Figure 3.
- the data can be acquired during field operations, for example by switching a crosstalk cancellation device into a calibration mode as will be discussed below in reference to Figure 9 and Figure 11.
- Figure 4 this figure illustrates a functional block diagram of a crosstalk cancellation system 400 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention can provide crosstalk cancellation in high-speed digital communication systems, such as the communication system 100 illustrated in Figures 1 and 2 and discussed above.
- Figure 4 illustrates a crosstalk cancellation device or crosstalk canceller ("XTC") 401 arranged to cancel crosstalk 151 occurring in a backplane-to-line card connector 101b as discussed above with reference to Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4.
- Digital data x(t) 214 propagates in the victim channel 130 for reception by the victim receiver 105b.
- the victim channel 130 also carries the unwanted crosstalk signal n(t) 230 that is derived from digital data u(t) 215 output by the aggressor transmitter 104b and that is not intended for reception at the victim receiver 105b.
- the intended data stream signal x(t) 214 and the crosstalk signal n(t) 230 additively form the composite signal y(f) 260.
- the crosstalk canceller 401 receives the composite signal y(t) 260, corrects the crosstalk interference n(t) 230 from this signal 260 via cancellation and outputs a corrected signal, z(t) 420 for receipt by the victim receiver 105b. That is, the crosstalk canceller 401 applies an estimate of the actual crosstalk 230 to the signals 260 propagating in the victim channel 130 to effectively cancel the crosstalk signal elements 230 while leaving the desired data signal 214 essentially intact.
- the steps that the crosstalk canceller 401 performs include: (i) accepting as separate inputs y(t) 260 (the victim signal corrupted by crosstalk 151) and a representative portion of u(t) 215 (the aggressor signal propagating on the aggressor channel 120 giving rise to the crosstalk signal 230); (ii) transforming the transmitted aggressor signal u(t) 215 into crosstalk estimates that emulate the signal transformation 210 that actual occurs in the system 200 via the crosstalk effect 151; (iii) subtracting the modeled crosstalk from the victim y(t) 260 to cancel its crosstalk signal n(t) 230 component; and (iv) outputting the compensated signal z(t) 420 to the victim receiver 105b, which can be a conventional receiver without specific technology for crosstalk compensation.
- Figure 5 illustrates a functional block diagram of a crosstalk cancellation system 500 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. More specifically, Figure 5 illustrates an architectural overview of an exemplary crosstalk canceller 401 that has three functional elements 501, 502, 503, a crosstalk model 501, a summation node 502, and a 503 controller, electronic control "mechanism", or control module.
- the model 501 generates a crosstalk estimate signal w(t) 520, while the summation node 502 applies this crosstalk estimate 520 to the victim channel 130.
- the controller 503 adjusts parameters in the model 501 based on the output z(t) 420 of the summation node 502.
- the model 501 emulates the aggressor transfer function H ⁇ 210 in the form of an adjustable frequency response function G ⁇ 501. That is, the model 501 generates an artificial crosstalk signal w(t) 520 that can be a model, simulation, estimate, or emulation of the actual, interfering crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230 caused by electromagnetic coupling in the connector 102b between the aggressor channel 120 and the victim channel 130.
- the model frequency response G ⁇ 501 effectively filters the aggressor data signal u(t) 215 in a manner that applies a frequency dependent response similar to the plot 300 illustrated in Figure 3 and discussed above.
- the output w ⁇ 520 of the model 510 is, in the ideal case, equal to the aggressor signal component n ⁇ 230. That is, G ⁇ 501 equals H ⁇ 210 in a theoretical or ideal case in which the environment is noise- free and all system parameters are known and modeled perfectly. Furthermore, in this ideal scenario, the respective output signals n ⁇ 230 and w(t) 520 of H ⁇ 210 and G ⁇ 501 would also be equal to one another.
- G ⁇ 501 approximates H ⁇ 210 with sufficient precision and accuracy to support essentially error-free communications of high-speed data rates.
- the difference node 502 subtracts the emulated aggressor signal w ⁇ 520, or emulation signal 520, from the composite signal y ⁇ 260, thus removing or reducing crosstalk interference from the received victim signal y ⁇ 260.
- the model G ⁇ 501 does not exactly match the true response H ⁇ 210.
- the controller 503 adjusts the model 501 to mimmize this error related to inaccuracies between the actual crosstalk effect H ⁇ 210 and the emulated or modeled crosstalk effect G ⁇ 501.
- the output of the difference node 502) is tapped off and fed to the controller 503, providing the controller 503 with essentially the same signal 420 that the victim receiver 105b receives.
- the controller adjusts the parameters of the modeling filter 501, characterized by the response G ⁇ 501, to maximize the goodness-of-fit to the actual response H ⁇ 210.
- the controller 503 takes as input the crosstalk compensated signal z ⁇ 420 and processes, monitors, or analyzes that signal 420 to determine signal fidelity.
- the controller 503 evaluates the model's performance by analyzing the extent to which the model's output 520 has cancelled the crosstalk signal 230.
- the controller 503 also adjusts the model 501 to enhance crosstalk cancellation and to provide dynamic response to changing conditions.
- the controller 503 can adjust the modeled response G ⁇ 420. Consequently, the controller 503 can manipulate the modeling filter 501 to maximize the fidelity of the compensated signal 420, i.e. the match between G ⁇ 420 and H ⁇ 210, by minimizing crosstalk on z ⁇ 420. Stated another way, the controller 503 monitors the corrected, crosstalk-cancelled signal z ⁇ 420 and dynamically adjusts the crosstalk model G ⁇ 420 to improve the crosstalk cancellation and enhance signal quality.
- a crosstalk cancellation device 401 can include a feedback loop that adapts, self-corrects, or self configures crosstalk cancellation to compensate for modeling errors, fluctuating dynamic conditions, and other effects.
- the system illustrated in Figure 5 can be implemented primarily using analog integrated circuitry to provide a relatively low degree of complexity, power consumption, and cost.
- the model 501 and difference node 502 are entirely analog.
- certain aspects of the model 501 are implemented digitally to exploit the digital nature of the aggressor data source 104b.
- the controller 503 typically includes both analog and digital circuitry. Due to particular aspects of the analog pre-processing in the controller 503, this digital circuitry can operate at a low speed relative to the communication data rate and thus can facilitate practical implementation.
- the digital circuitry can operate at speeds that are orders of magnitude less than the channel baud rate.
- a digital circuit in the controller 503 operates at least one order of magnitude below the channel baud rate.
- a digital circuit in the controller 503 operates at least two orders of magnitude below the channel baud rate.
- a digital circuit in the controller 503 operates at least three orders of magnitude below the channel baud rate.
- a tapped delay line filter 600 is a device that generates an output signal 620 from an input signal 215 by delaying the input signal 215 through a series of delay stages 601a, 601b, 601c; scaling the output of each delay stage 601a, 601b, 601c, typically with an amplifier 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d; and adding or otherwise combining these scaled outputs.
- the tapped delay line filter 600 can be an analog component of the model 501 that generates a signal v ⁇ 620 having a shape or waveform approximating that of the imposed crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230.
- the tapped delay line filter 600 can be an exemplary waveform shaper that is implemented via analog components.
- accurately modeling the actual crosstalk response 210 facilitates adequate removal of crosstalk interference 230 via crosstalk cancellation.
- a crosstalk cancellation device (not illustrated) were based on an inaccurate crosstalk model (not illustrated) such a device might degrade, rather than improve, signal quality.
- a "correction" signal intended to cancel crosstalk might add interference to a received victim signal while leaving the crosstalk signal that is targeted for cancellation essentially intact.
- a crosstalk model for example based on a filtering mechanism, should have sufficient flexibility to support modeling a variety of crosstalk transfer functions that may be encountered in an application.
- an analog tapped delay line filter 600 (also known as transversal filter) with electrically controllable gain coefficients 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d; models the aggressor crosstalk transfer function 210.
- This filter 600 can provide a desirable level of flexibility and adaptability that supports a wide range of operating conditions and situations. More specifically, the tapped delay line filter 600 can generate a waveform approximating the waveform of the crosstalk signal 230 imposed on the victim channel 130.
- the output v ⁇ 620 of the tapped delay filter 600 can be written as v(t) - ao u(t) + ai u(t- ⁇ ) + ... + a ⁇ u(t-N ⁇ ). Changing the values of the gain coefficients an, o-i, ⁇ 2 ... n (alphao, alpha l3 alpha 2 ...
- N should be chosen so that the majority of the aggressor impulse response is contained within a temporal span of N ⁇ ( ⁇ times delta). Equivalently, the aggressor frequency response 210 should not exhibit large fluctuations below frequencies of f-l/(N ⁇ ) (frequency equals the reciprocal of N times delta). These conditions for selecting N and ⁇ (delta) contrast with the aggressor signal's conditions. It is not critical if aggressor noise remains above the specified frequency, because a well designed receiver can readily suppress these higher frequencies without degrading victim signal quality. While a tapped delay line filter 600 can emulate, estimate, or mimic pulse shaping caused by the aggressor response 210, this filter 600 typically cannot adequately address highly variable temporal delay without an unwieldy number of taps or delay stages.
- Temporal delay is directly associated with the length of the signal path that spans between (i) the circuit tap that directs a portion of the aggressor data signal u ⁇ 215 to the crosstalk canceller 401 and (ii) the summation node 502 in the crosstalk canceller 401, as illustrated in Figure 5 and discussed above. More specifically, the modeled temporal delay should closely approximate the temporal delay of the actual crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230 so that the modeled and acmal signals 230, 520 are properly synchronized or timed with respect to one another for effective mutual cancellation.
- the output 620 of the tapped delay line filter 600 can be directly used as the output w ⁇ 520 of the model 501, synchronizing the tapped delay line filter's output 620 with the crosstalk signal 230 on the victim channel 130 can enhance crosstalk cancellation, provide heightened signal fidelity to the victim receiver 105b, and improve overall modeling flexibility. Because the locations of the coupling points of both the actual crosstalk signal 230 and its modeled counterpart 520 can be significantly variable among victim- aggressor pairs, their respective delays can be ill-defined or subject to uncertainty. Even in the relatively simple case of dominant coupling via the backplane-linecard connector 102b, the signal path length on the linecard 101b is often variable. Thus, the temporal delay can be difficult to predict without specific knowledge and analysis of linecard layout.
- an adjustable delay 701 can be incorporated into the cross talk modeling filter 501 as illustrated in Figure 7.
- Figure 7 this figure is a functional block diagram of a crosstalk modeling filter ("XTMF") 501 of a crosstalk cancellation device 401 with an adjustable delay 701 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the adjustable delay 701 can either precede or succeed (as shown in Figure 7) the tapped delay line filter 600.
- placing the adjustable delay 701 on the input side of the analog tapped delay line filter 600, rather than the output side as illustrated, can simplify the implementation.
- This simplification can result from the discrete nature of the digital signal u(t) 215 wherein signal linearity can be readily maintained by quantizing or hard-limiting the output of the delay device 701.
- the adjustable delay 701 follows the tapped delay line filter 600, in accord with the illustrated configuration, the signal v ⁇ 620 is analog at the input to the adjustable delay 701. Inputting an analog signal into the adjustable delay 701 can impose a need for a linear response over a broad range of signal values and frequencies, which can be difficult to achieve for large delay values.
- the adjustable delay 701 synchronizes the waveform of the correction signal 520 with the waveform of the undesirable crosstalk signal 230. That is, the adjustable delay 701 times or coordinates the correction signal 520 so it temporally matches and is synchronized with the actual crosstalk interference 230.
- the crosstalk modeling filter 501 Based on the functions of the tapped delay line filter 600 and the adjustable delay 701, the crosstalk modeling filter 501 outputs a cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 having form and timing accurately matching the actual crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230.
- FIG. 8 is a functional block diagram of a crosstalk modeling filter 501' of a crosstalk cancellation device 800 with a high-pass filter 801 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the high-pass filter 801 is typically a fixed or non-adjustable filter. In the configuration of the exemplary embodiment of the illustrated in Figure 8, the adjustable delay 701 feeds the tapped delay line filter 600, thus offering advantages, as discussed above in reference to Figure 7, for certain applications. Including the optional high-pass filter 801 in the exemplary crosstalk modeling filter 501 ⁇ as illustrated in Figure 7, can enhance performance in some applications or operating environments.
- a high-pass filter 801 is a device that receives a signal having a range of frequency components, attenuates frequency components below a frequency threshold, and transmits frequency components above the frequency threshold.
- While tapped delay line filters 600 have a flexible modeling response over the frequency range l/(N ⁇ ) ⁇ f ⁇ l/(2 ⁇ ), they are often less flexible at lower frequencies such as ⁇ l/(N ⁇ ) (frequencies less than the reciprocal of two times delta). Thus, accurately modeling low-frequencies characteristics of the crosstalk response 210 may require a large number N of filter taps that increase filter complexity or may require a longer delay increment ⁇ (delta) that reduces high-frequency flexibility. In many applications, it is preferable to avoid such trade-offs.
- a high-pass filter such as a simple first- order resistor-capacitor ("RC") high-pass filter. That is, inserting the high-pass filter 801 into the crosstalk modeling filter 801 can provide a high level of performance without requiring a cumbersome or expensive number of tap filters in the tapped delay line filter 600. Similar to the exemplary embodiment of the crosstalk modeling filter 501 depicted in Figure 7, the ordering of the tapped delay line filter 600, the adjustable delay 701, and high-pass filter 801 can be permuted to support various arrangements.
- RC resistor-capacitor
- the present invention supports arranging physical components corresponding to each of the functional blocks 701, 600, 801 illustrated in Figure 8 in any parallel or series configuration that provides acceptable performance for an intended application. Nevertheless, certain configurations or ordering may provide certain advantages or tradeoffs for select application situations as compared to other configurations.
- the exemplary inline configuration illustrated in Figure 8 places the adjustable delay 701 on the input side of the tapped delay line filter 600 and the high-pass filter 801 on the output side of the tapped delay line filter 600. With this ordering, the implementation of the adjustable delay 701 can be simplified by exploiting the discrete- amplitude nature of both its input and output signal.
- the tapped delay line filter 600 can also exploit, via digital delay elements, the discrete-amplitude input provided from the adjustable delay 701.
- the high-pass filter 801 is an analog device that does not receive benefit from providing it with a discrete amplitude input. Thus, there is typically no drawback to placing the high-pass filter 801 at the output side of the crosstalk modeling filter 50F or in another position.
- the control module 503 takes as input the crosstalk compensated signal z ⁇ 420 and outputs control signals 820, 830 to adjust the crosstalk response model 501.
- the control module's outputs 820, 830 to the crosstalk modeling filter 501 comprises: (i) a "delay control" signal 830 to control the time delay implemented by the adjustable delay component 701; and (ii) a set of "filter control” signals 820 to control the gains on the variable coefficient amplifiers 602a-d in the tapped delay line filter 600. That is, the controller 503 outputs modeling parameters to the tapped delay line filter 600 and timing parameters to the adjustable delay 701. These output control values are determined based on observation, processing, and/or analysis of the compensated signal z ⁇ 420.
- One or more of the crosstalk model 501, the tapped delay line filter 600, and the adjustable delay 701 can each be controlled and/or adjusted using a method and/or system disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 10/108,598 or U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 10/620,477.
- the temporal delay adjustment of the adjustable delay 701 can be determined by treating the delay control as a variable that is swept through its entire range of potential values following the disclosure of these patent applications, for example.
- FIG 9 illustrates an exemplary system 900 for controlling a crosstalk model 501 such as the exemplary crosstalk modeling filter 501" illustrated in Figure 8 or the exemplary crosstalk modeling filter 501 illustrated in Figure 7 and their associated adjustable delays 701.
- Figure 9 is a functional block diagram of a control module 900 of a crosstalk cancellation device 401 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the exemplary controller 900 illustrated in Figure 9 facilitates relatively simple theoretical analysis and implementation and, in that regard, can offer benefit to certain application over the control methods and systems disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial Numbers 10/620,477 and U.S. Patent Application Serial Numbers 10/108,598 that are discussed above.
- the controller 900 of Figure 9 includes a filter 901, having a frequency transfer response P ⁇ , that receives the crosstalk-cancelled signal z ⁇ 420 destined for reception by the victim receiver 105b.
- Filter 901 can be a spectral weighting filter based on this frequency transfer response.
- the output of this filter 901 couples to a power detecting or signal squaring device 902, which provides an output to a low-pass filter 903.
- a low- pass filter 903 is a device that receives a signal having a range of frequency components, attenuates frequency components above a frequency threshold, and transmits frequency components below the frequency threshold.
- An analog-to-digital converter (“ADC") receives the low-pass filter's output and generates a corresponding digital signal which feeds into the digital controller 905.
- the digital controller 905 in turn generates digital control signals for each of the adjustable delay 701 and the tapped delay line filter 600.
- Respective digital-to-analog converters (“DACs”) 906a, 906b convert these signals into the analog domain for respective transmission over a delay control line 830 and a filter control line 820.
- the analog delay control signal adjusts the adjustable delay 701, while the analog filter control signal adjusts the tapped delay line filter 600.
- crosstalk is imposed on a channel that is in a temporary condition of not carrying data. More specifically, consider a case in which the victim transmitter 104a does not transmit any data while the aggressing transmitter 104b is sending data with a broad spectral content or range of signal frequencies, such as pseudo-random or coded pseudo-random data.
- the signal x(t) 214 is essentially zero, while u(t) 215 is a digital data signal having broad analog spectral content resulting from randomly varying digital data patterns.
- the signal y ⁇ 260 is simply the incurred aggressor n ⁇ 230, and the signal w ⁇ 520 is the modeled aggressor.
- the signal z ⁇ 420 is actually the modeling error of the cancellation device.
- z ⁇ 420 is zero.
- transmitting an essentially uniform voltage on the victim channel 130 while transmitting signals having a broad range of frequencies on the aggressor channel 120 provides essentially pure crosstalk on the victim channel 130 and n ⁇ 230 equals y ⁇ 260.
- the control module 900 can implement this state of transmitting a defined signal on the aggressor channel 120 and transmitting a constant voltage or essentially no data signal on the victim channel 130.
- the control module 900 can then adjust the adjustable parameters of the crosstalk modeling filter 501 to minimize the signal z ⁇ 420 received by the victim receiver 105b, thereby providing a crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 that matches the actual crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230 and further providing a modeled crosstalk response G ⁇ 501 that effectively matches the acmal crosstalk response H ⁇ 210. More generally, the control module 900 cause transmission of defined or known signal patterns on the aggressor channel 120, the victim channel 130, or both the aggressor channel 120 and the victim channel 130 to characterize the crosstalk effect 151 and to control, optimize, or adjust crosstalk cancellation or another form of crosstalk compensation.
- control module 900 can have a learning or adaptive mode in the form of a setup mode or a self-configuration procedure and can implement automatic or self calibration.
- this error signal z ⁇ 420 can be spectrally weighted with an optional filter 901, whose response is denoted as P ⁇ , to emphasize any higher importance of certain frequencies over others. For example, it may be desired to high- pass filter the error signal z ⁇ 420 to emulate the effect of equalization in the victim receiver 105b.
- the (potentially spectral weighted) error signal z ⁇ 420 is then squared or power-detected, i.e.
- the output of the squaring device 902 is the signal power.
- the power signal is then passed through a low-pass filter 903 (or integrator) with a relatively low cutoff-frequency to obtain the integrated power, i.e. energy, of the error signal z ⁇ 420.
- the signal at this point corresponds to an analog estimate of the statistical variance (i.e. the square of the standard deviation) of the error signal z ⁇ 420.
- the error variance is a useful metric for gauging fidelity. Because the cutoff frequency of the low-pass filter 903 is at a very low frequency (typical orders of magnitude below the symbol transmission rate), the variance signal is nearly a constant after the transient effects of any modeling filter changes decay away.
- the analog variance signal can be sampled with a simple low-speed high- resolution analog-to-digital converter 904.
- the digitized signal output by the analog-to- digital converter 904 provides the error variance information to a simple microprocessor, state machine, finite state machine, digital controller, or similar device (referred to herein as a "digital controller") 905.
- the digital controller 905 may then specify a new filter configuration by digitally outputting the new parameters to a set of DACs 906 which provide the corresponding analog signal to the aggressor emulation module 501.
- the digital controller 905 can find a parameter set that maximizes the fit of the aggressor response model 501 to the actual response 210. Because trial-and-error processing is not overly complicated, all combinations of model parameters can be tested in many instances. However, other empirical search/optimization methodologies known to those skilled in the art may be alternatively employed. In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a coordinate-descent approach, as described in U.S. Patent Application No. 10/620,477, discussed above, provides search and optimization to identify acceptable model parameters.
- the control module 900 can comprise a combination of analog and digital circuitry to provide a practical control implementation.
- Filter 901 and power detecting device 902 collectively input and output a high-speed analog signal.
- the low-pass filter 903 takes as input a high-speed analog signal and outputs a low-speed analog signal.
- Filter 901, power detecting device 902, and low-pass filter 903 collectively take a projection of a high-speed signal onto a low-speed signal by extracting the relevant statistical information from the high-speed signal and presenting it in a more concise form.
- the ADC 904 takes this low-speed analog signal as an input and outputs a corresponding digitized approximation. Consequently, the controller 905 receives and processes this low-speed digital signal.
- the control module 900 provides signal analysis based on a powerful statistical characterization and implements a robust control methodology with relatively little circuit complexity, which are factors that can facilitate practical crosstalk cancellation in high-speed communications systems.
- a full-wave-rectifier (which takes the absolute value of the signal) may be used as an alternative.
- the output of the low-pass filter 903 will now no longer correspond to error variance, but will nevertheless represent a valid fidelity criterion.
- the 1-norm of the error signal 420 it is the 1-norm of the error signal 420, and thus the fidelity metric still has suitable mathematical properties.
- determining the "1-norm" of a signal typically comprises integrating the absolute value of the control signal.
- the 1-norm signal may have a reduced dynamic range (thus relaxing resolution constraints on the analog-to-digital converter 904); and (ii) full-wave-rectifiers may be easier to implement than power-detectors.
- the power detector 902 may also be replaced with a half-wave-rectifier or any like device that is used to assess signal magnitude.
- a crosstalk cancellation system is a single integrated circuit ("IC"), such as a monolithic IC.
- IC integrated circuit
- Each of a crosstalk cancellation device, a control module, and a crosstalk modeling filter can also be single ICs.
- Such ICs can be complementary metal oxide semiconductor ("CMOS”) ICs and can be fabricated in a 0.18 micron process, for example.
- CMOS complementary metal oxide semiconductor
- FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating Process 1000, entitled Cancel Crosstalk, for canceling crosstalk 151 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the aggressor transmitter 104b transmits an aggressor communication signal u ⁇ 215 on the aggressor channel 120.
- This communication signal 215 can be an analog or a digital signal carrying data.
- the crosstalk effect 151 couples energy from the aggressor communication signal u(t) 215 into the victim channel 130 as crosstalk n ⁇ 230.
- the coupling mechanism can be electromagnetic coupling, as in the exemplary case of electrical data signals propagating on a backplane 103, or another optical or electrical crosstalk mechanism.
- the energy transfer of the crosstalk effect 151 generates the crosstalk signal n ⁇ 215 in the victim channel 130 in a manner that results in signal propagation towards the victim receiver 105b.
- the victim transmitter 104a transmits the victim communication signal x(t) 214 on the victim channel 130.
- the victim communication signal 214 can be either an analog or a digital signal.
- the crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230 coexists or mixes with the victim communication signal x ⁇ 214 in the victim channel 130.
- the composite signal .yf ⁇ ) 260 results from the combination of these signals 214, 230.
- the crosstalk model 501 acquires a sample of the aggressor communication signal u ⁇ 215. In other words, a tap or other node directs a representative portion of the aggressor communication signal 215 to the crosstalk canceller 401 for reception and processing by the crosstalk model 501.
- the crosstalk model 501 processes the sampled portion of the aggressor communication signal u ⁇ 215 via the tapped delay line filter 600.
- Modeling parameters such as the gain or scaling constants of the tapped delay line filter 600, provide the basis for generating a waveform estimate v ⁇ 620 of the crosstalk signal n ⁇ 215. More specifically, the coefficients ceo, cci, ⁇ 2 ... ⁇ context (alphao, alpha ! , alpha 2 ... alpha n ) of the variable coefficient amplifiers 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d in the tapped delay line filter define a waveform v ⁇ 620 approximating the crosstalk signal 215.
- the adjustable delay 701 in the crosstalk model 501 applies a time delay to the waveform estimate v ⁇ 620 to synchronize this waveform 620 with the interfering crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230 propagating in the victim channel 130.
- the summation node 502 of the crosstalk canceller 401 applies the resulting crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 to the victim channel 130 and the combined crosstalk and communication signal y ⁇ 260 propagating therein.
- the crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 cancels at least a portion of the crosstalk signal component w ⁇ 520 propagating in the victim channel 130.
- the controller 503 processes or analyzes the crosstalk compensated signal z ⁇ 420 to determine effectiveness of crosstalk cancellation. In other words, the controller 503 assesses signal fidelity to determine if the crosstalk canceller is applying a crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 that accurately matches the actual crosstalk n ⁇ 230, both in waveform and in timing.
- the controller 503 adjusts the modeling parameters, specifically the coefficients of the variable coefficient amplifiers 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d in the tapped delay line filter 600, to optimize the waveform match between the crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 and the actual crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230.
- the controller 503 further adjust the variable or adjustable time delay of the adjustable delay 701 to synchronize the crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520 with the acmal crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230. That is, the controller 503 adjusts the operation of the crosstalk canceller 401 by implementing parameter adjustments to the crosstalk modeling filter 501 to enhance the fidelity of the net communication signal z ⁇ 420 delivered to the victim receiver 105b.
- Process 1000 iterates Steps 1010-1055.
- the crosstalk canceller 401 continues canceling crosstalk 230 and implementing adaptive responses to dynamic conditions, thereby providing an ongoing high level of communication signal fidelity.
- FIG 1110 the first step in Process 1100, the controller 503 initiates a calibration sequence.
- the controller 900 instructs the aggressor transmitter 104b to output a signal having a known or defined test pattern, for example a random or pseudo random bit pattern of data, onto the aggressor channel 120.
- This test or calibration signal can have the format of an aggressor communication signal u ⁇ 215 or can be uniquely formatted for characterizing the crosstalk response H ⁇ 210. That is, the controller 900 can control transmission of signals having predetermined voltage patterns on the aggressor channel 120.
- the controller 900 instructs the victim transmitter 104b to output a known victim test or reference signal onto the victim channel 130.
- the test signal can be a predetermined communication signal or simply a constant voltage, null of data. Sending a known test signal on the victim channel 130 facilitates isolating the crosstalk response H ⁇ 210 from other effects that may generate signal distortion on the victim channel 130. That is, the controller 900 can control transmission of signals having predetermined voltage patterns on the victim channel 130.
- crosstalk n ⁇ 230 from the known aggressor signal u ⁇ 215 couples into the victim channel 130.
- the composite communication and crosstalk signal y ⁇ 260 on the victim channel 130 is essentially the crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230.
- the crosstalk canceller 401 generates an estimate w ⁇ 520 of the crosstalk signal n(f) 230 for crosstalk cancellation.
- the crosstalk canceller 401 generates this estimate 520 using modeling and delay parameters that result in a waveform and timing match between the crosstalk signal n ⁇ 230 and the crosstalk cancellation signal w ⁇ 520.
- the crosstalk compensator 401 applies the crosstalk estimate 520 to the victim channel 130 and cancels at least a portion of the crosstalk 230 propagating thereon.
- the resulting crosstalk-cancelled signal z ⁇ 420 propagates to the victim receiver 105b.
- the controller 503 processes and analyzes the crosstalk-cancelled signal z ⁇ 420 output by the crosstalk canceller 401. Based on the analysis, the controller 503 adjusts the modeling and delay parameters to minimize the energy in the crosstalk cancelled signal z ⁇ 420. That is, the controller 503 varies the operational parameters of the crosstalk canceller 401 towards reducing the residual crosstalk. This control action matches the crosstalk compensation signal w ⁇ 520 with the actual crosstalk n ⁇ 230 imposed on the victim channel 130.
- the controller 503 completes the calibration cycle and provides notification to the aggressor and victim transmitters 104a, 104b that the crosstalk canceller 401 is set to process live data.
- the victim transmitter 104a and the aggressor transmitter 104b each transmit live data on their respective channels 130, 120.
- crosstalk 230 from live data 215 transmitting on the aggressor channel 120 couples into the victim channel 130.
- the crosstalk canceller 401 processes a sample of the live data 215 transmitting in the aggressor channel 120 and generates an emulation or estimate 520 of the crosstalk 230 using the modeling and delay parameters defined or updated during calibration.
- the crosstalk canceller 401 applies the crosstalk estimate 520 to the victim channel 130 for crosstalk cancellation and presents the victim receiver 105 with a high-fidelity signal.
- Process 1100 ends following Step 1160.
- the controller 503 can repeat the calibration procedure at defined or regular time intervals or when the controller's monitoring capability determines that signal fidelity is impaired or as fallen below a threshold.
- Figures 12A and 12B these figures respectively illustrate testing data of a communication system before and after implementing crosstalk cancellation according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. These figures present eye diagrams 1200, 1250 of measured data captured under laboratory conditions. As is well known to those skilled in the art, eye diagrams 1200, 1250 provide a visual indication of signal quality.
- FIG. 12A is an eye diagram 1200 from a 5 Gigabits per second binary communication system operating under laboratory conditions believed to be representative of field conditions.
- the victim signal 130 has an amplitude of 800 millivolts, while the aggressor signal 120 has an amplimde of 1,200 millivolts.
- Figure 12A illustrates the eye diagram 1200 of the received signal 260 after equalization and limiting amplification but without crosstalk compensation.
- Figure 12B illustrates the eye diagram 1250 of the received signal 420 after application of crosstalk cancellation in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention followed by equalization and limiting amplification.
- the victim signal 130 has an amplitude of 800 millivolts
- the aggressor signal 120 has an amplitude of 1,200 millivolts.
- the signal path includes a limiting amplifier in both the crosstalk- corrected eye diagram 1250 and the eye diagram 1200 without crosstalk compensation, the thicknesses of the horizontal "eye-lids" at the top and bottom of each eye diagram 1200, 1250 do not provide a useful gauge of signal quality.
- a system in accordance with the present invention can comprise a circuit that cancels, corrects, or compensates for crosstalk imposed on one communication signal by another signal
- those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention is not limited to this application and that the embodiments described herein are illustrative and not restrictive.
- various other alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described here may be employed in practicing the invention.
- the scope of the invention is intended to be limited only by the claims below.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2006522704A JP2007502054A (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2004-08-05 | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation |
DE112004001455.7T DE112004001455B4 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2004-08-05 | Cross-talk cancellation method and system |
GB0603563A GB2421674B (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2004-08-05 | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation |
KR1020067002618A KR101109847B1 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2004-08-05 | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US49407203P | 2003-08-07 | 2003-08-07 | |
US60/494,072 | 2003-08-07 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005018134A2 true WO2005018134A2 (en) | 2005-02-24 |
WO2005018134A3 WO2005018134A3 (en) | 2005-11-24 |
WO2005018134B1 WO2005018134B1 (en) | 2006-01-26 |
Family
ID=34193198
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/025232 WO2005018134A2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2004-08-05 | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7050388B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007502054A (en) |
KR (1) | KR101109847B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE112004001455B4 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2421674B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005018134A2 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7725079B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2010-05-25 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for automatic control in an interference cancellation device |
US7804760B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2010-09-28 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for signal emulation |
US7934144B2 (en) | 2002-11-12 | 2011-04-26 | Quellan, Inc. | High-speed analog-to-digital conversion with improved robustness to timing uncertainty |
US8005430B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2011-08-23 | Quellan Inc. | Method and system for reducing signal interference |
US8068406B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2011-11-29 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation |
US8311168B2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2012-11-13 | Quellan, Inc. | Adaptive noise filtering and equalization for optimal high speed multilevel signal decoding |
US8576939B2 (en) | 2003-12-22 | 2013-11-05 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for slicing a communication signal |
US9252983B2 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2016-02-02 | Intersil Americas LLC | Method and system for reducing radiated emissions from a communications channel |
US9264787B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2016-02-16 | Rosemount Inc. | Communication system for process field device |
Families Citing this family (161)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7173551B2 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2007-02-06 | Quellan, Inc. | Increasing data throughput in optical fiber transmission systems |
US6658091B1 (en) | 2002-02-01 | 2003-12-02 | @Security Broadband Corp. | LIfestyle multimedia security system |
CN100362854C (en) * | 2003-02-13 | 2008-01-16 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Solid state image pickup apparatus, method for driving same, and camera using same |
US8315583B2 (en) * | 2006-08-23 | 2012-11-20 | Quellan, Inc. | Pre-configuration and control of radio frequency noise cancellation |
US7230553B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2007-06-12 | Teradyne, Inc. | Parallel source/capture architecture |
US20050195892A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Training and updating for multiple input-output wireline communications |
US20160065414A1 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2016-03-03 | Ken Sundermeyer | Control system user interface |
US11368327B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-06-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system for premises automation |
US11368429B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-06-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises management configuration and control |
US10375253B2 (en) | 2008-08-25 | 2019-08-06 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen and gateway |
US10237237B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-03-19 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10721087B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2020-07-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method for networked touchscreen with integrated interfaces |
US11316958B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-04-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Virtual device systems and methods |
US10200504B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-02-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US11201755B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2021-12-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system management using status signal |
US8635350B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2014-01-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | IP device discovery systems and methods |
US10127802B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2018-11-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture |
US9609003B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2017-03-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system |
US8988221B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-03-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture |
US10156959B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2018-12-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US11343380B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-05-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system automation |
US10142392B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2018-11-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Methods and systems for improved system performance |
US10313303B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-06-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US10522026B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2019-12-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Automation system user interface with three-dimensional display |
US11489812B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-11-01 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US10339791B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-07-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrated with premise security system |
US10444964B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-10-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US11677577B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2023-06-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system management using status signal |
US9191228B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-11-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US11582065B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-02-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for device communication |
US11277465B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-03-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system |
US20090077623A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2009-03-19 | Marc Baum | Security Network Integrating Security System and Network Devices |
US9531593B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2016-12-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US11244545B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-02-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US11811845B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2023-11-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US9141276B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-09-22 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated interface for mobile device |
US11159484B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2021-10-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US9729342B2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2017-08-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Defining and implementing sensor triggered response rules |
US8963713B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-02-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security network with security alarm signaling system |
US7711796B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2010-05-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway registry methods and systems |
AU2005223267B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2010-12-09 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises management system |
US11113950B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2021-09-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway integrated with premises security system |
US11916870B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2024-02-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway registry methods and systems |
US10382452B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-08-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US9306809B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2016-04-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US10999254B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2021-05-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | System for data routing in networks |
US11700142B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2023-07-11 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrating security system and network devices |
US20170180198A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-06-22 | Marc Baum | Forming a security network including integrated security system components |
US11496568B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2022-11-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US20120324566A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2012-12-20 | Marc Baum | Takeover Processes In Security Network Integrated With Premise Security System |
US11615697B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2023-03-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premise management systems and methods |
US20110128378A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2011-06-02 | Reza Raji | Modular Electronic Display Platform |
US7412221B2 (en) * | 2005-03-29 | 2008-08-12 | Intel Corporation | Crosstalk reduction method, apparatus, and system |
US8543954B1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2013-09-24 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Concurrent noise and delay modeling of circuit stages for static timing analysis of integrated circuit designs |
US8595669B1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2013-11-26 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Flexible noise and delay modeling of circuit stages for static timing analysis of integrated circuit designs |
JP2009506668A (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2009-02-12 | ケラン インコーポレイテッド | Method and system for signal emulation |
US7706755B2 (en) * | 2005-11-09 | 2010-04-27 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Digital, down-converted RF residual leakage signal mitigating RF residual leakage |
US8054876B2 (en) * | 2005-12-13 | 2011-11-08 | Infinera Corporation | Active delay line |
US8290027B2 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2012-10-16 | Broadcom Corporation | Transceiver with automatic detection of unshielded twisted pair or shielded twisted pair cabling |
US8005513B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2011-08-23 | Cellynx, Inc. | Cell phone signal booster |
US20080261519A1 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2008-10-23 | Cellynx, Inc. | Dual cancellation loop wireless repeater |
US8761387B2 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2014-06-24 | Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. | Analog transmit crosstalk canceller |
US8949120B1 (en) | 2006-05-25 | 2015-02-03 | Audience, Inc. | Adaptive noise cancelation |
US10079839B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2018-09-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Activation of gateway device |
US7378832B2 (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2008-05-27 | Lecroy Corporation | Probing high-frequency signals |
US7659790B2 (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2010-02-09 | Lecroy Corporation | High speed signal transmission line having reduced thickness regions |
US9861305B1 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2018-01-09 | Masimo Corporation | Method and apparatus for calibration to reduce coupling between signals in a measurement system |
JP2008148186A (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-26 | Seiko Epson Corp | Receiving circuit and electronic device |
JP2008167198A (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-17 | Seiko Epson Corp | Noise canceling circuit and electronic circuit |
US20080159448A1 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2008-07-03 | Texas Instruments, Incorporated | System and method for crosstalk cancellation |
US11706279B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2023-07-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Methods and systems for data communication |
US7633385B2 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2009-12-15 | Ucontrol, Inc. | Method and system for communicating with and controlling an alarm system from a remote server |
US20080219389A1 (en) * | 2007-03-06 | 2008-09-11 | Sige Semiconductor Inc. | Feed-forward cancellation in wireless receivers |
US20080219377A1 (en) * | 2007-03-06 | 2008-09-11 | Sige Semiconductor Inc. | Transmitter crosstalk cancellation in multi-standard wireless transceivers |
DE102007013314A1 (en) * | 2007-03-20 | 2008-09-25 | Qimonda Ag | Concept for reducing crosstalk |
US8451986B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2013-05-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method and system for automatically providing alternate network access for telecommunications |
US7809070B2 (en) * | 2007-05-24 | 2010-10-05 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Crosstalk estimation methods and apparatus using auxiliary time-domain signals |
US11601810B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-03-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10423309B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-09-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Device integration framework |
US11237714B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-02-01 | Control Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US10498830B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-12-03 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Wi-Fi-to-serial encapsulation in systems |
US10523689B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-12-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US10616075B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2020-04-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11316753B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-04-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11089122B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2021-08-10 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing among networks |
US11212192B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2021-12-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11218878B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-01-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10051078B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2018-08-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | WiFi-to-serial encapsulation in systems |
US10666523B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2020-05-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11423756B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-08-23 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10389736B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-08-20 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11646907B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-05-09 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US20080309349A1 (en) * | 2007-06-15 | 2008-12-18 | Computer Access Technology Corporation | Flexible interposer system |
SI22566A (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2008-12-31 | Vinko Kunc | Insulated interface with a capacitance barrier including a differentiating circuit and signal transmission procedure by way of such an insulated interface |
JP4849025B2 (en) | 2007-07-18 | 2011-12-28 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Reception circuit, electronic device, and noise canceling method |
JP5029190B2 (en) * | 2007-07-24 | 2012-09-19 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Reception circuit, electronic device, and noise canceling method |
US7778550B2 (en) * | 2007-07-27 | 2010-08-17 | Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications Llc | System and method for wavelength monitoring and control |
US11831462B2 (en) | 2007-08-24 | 2023-11-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing in premises management systems |
GB0800891D0 (en) * | 2008-01-17 | 2008-02-27 | Cambridge Silicon Radio Ltd | Method and apparatus for cross-talk cancellation |
US11916928B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2024-02-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
CN101925973B (en) * | 2008-01-28 | 2013-01-16 | 打矢恒温器株式会社 | Thermal protector |
US20170185278A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-06-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Automation system user interface |
US11729255B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-08-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation |
US11792036B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-10-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Mobile premises automation platform |
US10530839B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2020-01-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation |
US11258625B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-02-22 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Mobile premises automation platform |
US11758026B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-09-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Virtual device systems and methods |
DE112009002020T5 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2011-06-30 | Intersil Americas Inc., Calif. | Noise reduction for an antenna module |
US20100074315A1 (en) * | 2008-09-24 | 2010-03-25 | Quellan, Inc. | Noise sampling detectors |
FR2940869B1 (en) * | 2009-01-08 | 2011-02-11 | Excem | MULTI-CHANNEL INTERFACE DEVICE WITH SWITCHING CIRCUIT |
US8036606B2 (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2011-10-11 | Ubidyne, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interference cancellation |
US8380771B2 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2013-02-19 | Quellan, Inc. | Filter shaping using a signal cancellation function |
US8166084B2 (en) * | 2009-03-27 | 2012-04-24 | Intersil Americas Inc. | Calibration of adjustable filters |
US8422412B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2013-04-16 | Quellan, Inc. | Duplexer and switch enhancement |
US8638211B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2014-01-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Configurable controller and interface for home SMA, phone and multimedia |
US8429439B2 (en) * | 2009-05-20 | 2013-04-23 | Quellan, Inc. | Inter-pair skew adjustment |
US8183711B2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2012-05-22 | Quellan, Inc. | Power extraction from signal sinks |
US8818206B2 (en) * | 2009-06-24 | 2014-08-26 | Ciena Corporation | Electrical domain suppression of linear crosstalk in optical communication systems |
US8718290B2 (en) | 2010-01-26 | 2014-05-06 | Audience, Inc. | Adaptive noise reduction using level cues |
US8473287B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2013-06-25 | Audience, Inc. | Method for jointly optimizing noise reduction and voice quality in a mono or multi-microphone system |
AU2011250886A1 (en) | 2010-05-10 | 2013-01-10 | Icontrol Networks, Inc | Control system user interface |
EP2388983B1 (en) * | 2010-05-18 | 2012-12-19 | Alcatel Lucent | Method for testing a component of a vectoring system and line termination equipment configured to carry out said method |
US8412095B2 (en) | 2010-07-15 | 2013-04-02 | John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc. | Apparatus for minimizing amplifier oscillation in an antenna system |
US8836467B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-09-16 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method, system and apparatus for automated reporting of account and sensor zone information to a central station |
EP2458742B1 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2013-10-16 | Alcatel Lucent | Crosstalk emulator for xDSL cable |
US20120155650A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2012-06-21 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Speaker array for virtual surround rendering |
US11750414B2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2023-09-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Bidirectional security sensor communication for a premises security system |
US9147337B2 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2015-09-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method and system for logging security event data |
US8509626B2 (en) | 2010-12-22 | 2013-08-13 | General Instrument Corporation | System and method for reducing mutual leakage between distributed feedback laser and electro-absorption modulator in integrated electro-absorption modulated laser |
CN103339881B (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2016-11-09 | 富士通株式会社 | Optical transmitter and optical signal transmitting method |
US9673894B2 (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2017-06-06 | Exfo Inc. | Characterization of linear crosstalk on multiplexed optical signals |
US9331781B2 (en) | 2011-09-15 | 2016-05-03 | Go!Foton Corporation | Two way burst mode digital optical cable communication system |
US8811824B2 (en) | 2011-09-15 | 2014-08-19 | Golfoton Holdings, Inc. | Two way burst mode digital optical cable communication system |
US9020779B2 (en) * | 2011-10-25 | 2015-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting cross-talk on processor links |
US8826092B2 (en) | 2011-10-25 | 2014-09-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Characterization and validation of processor links |
US8471741B2 (en) * | 2011-11-14 | 2013-06-25 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Method and device for reducing inter-channel coupling in interleaved and multi-channel ADCs |
US8610081B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2013-12-17 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for generating control signals in radiation detector systems |
US8737188B1 (en) | 2012-01-11 | 2014-05-27 | Audience, Inc. | Crosstalk cancellation systems and methods |
US9425857B2 (en) * | 2012-08-05 | 2016-08-23 | Eci Telecom Ltd. | Method and device for secured sharing of signals for crosstalk cancellation |
US9113481B2 (en) | 2012-09-27 | 2015-08-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Adaptive non-linear interference cancellation using side-band information |
US9640194B1 (en) | 2012-10-04 | 2017-05-02 | Knowles Electronics, Llc | Noise suppression for speech processing based on machine-learning mask estimation |
US9536540B2 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2017-01-03 | Knowles Electronics, Llc | Speech signal separation and synthesis based on auditory scene analysis and speech modeling |
US11405463B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2022-08-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Media content management |
US11146637B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2021-10-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Media content management |
DE112015003945T5 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2017-05-11 | Knowles Electronics, Llc | Multi-source noise reduction |
JP6561713B2 (en) * | 2015-09-15 | 2019-08-21 | 富士通株式会社 | Transmission apparatus and transmission system |
WO2017151650A1 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-09-08 | Littrell Robert J | A piezoelectric mems device for producing a signal indicative of detection of an acoustic stimulus |
US10200085B1 (en) | 2016-05-19 | 2019-02-05 | Keysight Technologies, Inc. | System and method of analyzing crosstalk induced jitter |
US10033554B1 (en) * | 2016-05-31 | 2018-07-24 | Keysight Technologies, Inc. | System and method of analyzing crosstalk and intersymbol interference for serial data signals |
US9673862B1 (en) * | 2016-06-15 | 2017-06-06 | Keysight Technologies, Inc. | System and method of analyzing crosstalk without measuring aggressor signal |
CN108228501B (en) * | 2016-12-14 | 2020-07-24 | 澜起科技股份有限公司 | Signal transmission circuit |
US10110263B2 (en) | 2017-02-01 | 2018-10-23 | Roshmere, Inc. | Crosstalk-correction in digitizers using coupling coefficients |
US10734438B2 (en) | 2018-03-15 | 2020-08-04 | Kla Corporation | Spread-spectrum clock-signal adjustment for image sensors |
KR20210141549A (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2021-11-23 | 베스퍼 테크놀로지스 인코포레이티드 | Microphones with digital outputs determined at different power consumption levels |
US11418882B2 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2022-08-16 | Vesper Technologies Inc. | Piezoelectric MEMS device with an adaptive threshold for detection of an acoustic stimulus |
US10917717B2 (en) | 2019-05-30 | 2021-02-09 | Nuance Communications, Inc. | Multi-channel microphone signal gain equalization based on evaluation of cross talk components |
US11726105B2 (en) | 2019-06-26 | 2023-08-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Piezoelectric accelerometer with wake function |
US11246001B2 (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2022-02-08 | Thx Ltd. | Acoustic crosstalk cancellation and virtual speakers techniques |
KR20210151316A (en) | 2020-06-04 | 2021-12-14 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Device and method for compensating crosstalk of image sensor having multi-color filter array |
CN115700385A (en) * | 2021-07-28 | 2023-02-07 | 合肥本源量子计算科技有限责任公司 | Method for acquiring direct current crosstalk coefficient and direct current crosstalk matrix between quantum bits |
CN116600242B (en) * | 2023-07-19 | 2023-11-07 | 荣耀终端有限公司 | Audio sound image optimization method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6411117B1 (en) * | 1998-11-13 | 2002-06-25 | Broadcom Corporation | Dynamic register with IDDQ testing capability |
US20040213354A1 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2004-10-28 | Jones William W. | Mixed domain cancellation |
US20040218756A1 (en) * | 2003-05-03 | 2004-11-04 | Xiangguo Tang | ISDN crosstalk cancellation in a DSL system |
Family Cites Families (304)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2632058A (en) | 1946-03-22 | 1953-03-17 | Bell Telephone Labor Inc | Pulse code communication |
US2698459A (en) * | 1951-06-21 | 1955-01-04 | American Viscose Corp | Spinning or extruding apparatus |
US3445771A (en) | 1966-02-28 | 1969-05-20 | Honeywell Inc | Automatic data channel equalization apparatus utilizing a transversal filter |
US3571725A (en) | 1967-05-25 | 1971-03-23 | Nippon Electric Co | Multilevel signal transmission system |
CH486805A (en) | 1968-10-10 | 1970-02-28 | Philips Nv | Filter network with at least one tapped electromagnetic delay line |
US3633108A (en) * | 1969-03-18 | 1972-01-04 | Bell Telephone Labor Inc | Timing recovery through distortion monitoring in data transmission systems |
US3714437A (en) | 1970-08-14 | 1973-01-30 | Bell Telephone Labor Inc | Optical communication system with pcm encoding with plural discrete unequally spaced intensity levels |
US3806915A (en) | 1972-09-05 | 1974-04-23 | Us Navy | Multithreshold analog to digital converter |
BE810757A (en) | 1973-02-15 | 1974-08-08 | PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING THE MODULATION TRANSMISSION FUNCTION | |
IT1091439B (en) * | 1977-10-13 | 1985-07-06 | Studi E Lab Telcomunicazioni S | Modulation process for digital fibre=optic transmission - using combined pulse amplitude and pulse position modulation and three signal patterns per signal period |
IT1118625B (en) | 1979-05-11 | 1986-03-03 | Cselt Centro Studi Lab Telecom | IMPROVEMENTS TO EQUALIZERS FOR TRANSMISSION OF CI NUMBER SIGNALS |
US4287756A (en) | 1979-10-24 | 1981-09-08 | Gallagher John J | Stratified fluid interface recorder |
DE2944459C2 (en) | 1979-11-03 | 1984-04-26 | ANT Nachrichtentechnik GmbH, 7150 Backnang | Method for transmitting bipolar signals by means of an optical transmitter |
US4386339A (en) | 1980-03-31 | 1983-05-31 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Direct flash analog-to-digital converter and method |
US4349914A (en) | 1980-04-01 | 1982-09-14 | Ford Aerospace & Communications Corp. | Bit synchronous switching system for space diversity operation |
US4363127A (en) | 1981-01-12 | 1982-12-07 | Ford Aerospace & Communications Corporation | Line signaling apparatus and techniques for digital data links |
US4393499A (en) | 1981-03-11 | 1983-07-12 | Ford Aerospace & Communications Corporation | Adaptive signal quality measurement circuit for PSK and FSK demodulators |
US4387461A (en) | 1981-03-11 | 1983-06-07 | Ford Aerospace & Communications Corporation | Experientially determined signal quality measurement device for antipodal data |
FR2508254A1 (en) | 1981-06-22 | 1982-12-24 | Roche Bernard | INTEGRATED MONOLITHIC "CODEC + FILTERS" CIRCUITS |
FR2511566A1 (en) | 1981-08-12 | 1983-02-18 | Thomson Csf | THRESHOLD OPTICAL RECEIVER FOR DIGITAL RATE DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM |
US4470126A (en) | 1981-10-29 | 1984-09-04 | American Microsystems, Inc. | Programmable transversal filter |
US4464771A (en) | 1982-04-02 | 1984-08-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Phase-locked loop circuit arrangement |
US4475227A (en) | 1982-04-14 | 1984-10-02 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Adaptive prediction |
DE3379767D1 (en) | 1982-09-02 | 1989-06-01 | British Telecomm | Optical communication |
JPS5974756A (en) | 1982-10-21 | 1984-04-27 | Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co Ltd <Kdd> | Monitoring device of signal quality |
JPS59147580A (en) * | 1983-02-14 | 1984-08-23 | Hitachi Ltd | Ghost eliminating device |
GB2143096B (en) | 1983-07-06 | 1987-02-04 | Motorola Israel Ltd | Clock recovery circuit |
US4618941A (en) | 1983-09-19 | 1986-10-21 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for generating filtered multilevel data from NRZ data |
DE3422828A1 (en) * | 1984-06-20 | 1986-01-02 | Robert Bosch Gmbh, 7000 Stuttgart | DATA RECEIVER FOR RECORDED DATA |
JPS6178237A (en) * | 1984-09-26 | 1986-04-21 | Fujitsu Ltd | Pull-in system |
JPS61245718A (en) | 1985-04-24 | 1986-11-01 | Iwatsu Electric Co Ltd | Digital-analog converter |
FR2608792B1 (en) | 1986-12-23 | 1989-03-31 | Thomson Csf | DEVICE FOR AMPLIFYING OPTICAL SIGNALS WITH A PHOTOSENSITIVE MEDIUM |
FR2614484B1 (en) * | 1986-12-30 | 1994-04-08 | Telecommunications Sa | DATA TRANSMISSION TERMINAL ON A BIDIRECTIONAL ANALOGUE CHANNEL WITH ECHO COUPLED AT THE RECEIVING PACE |
EP0296253B1 (en) | 1987-01-12 | 1995-06-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Discrimination timing control circuit |
GB8713699D0 (en) | 1987-06-11 | 1987-07-15 | British Telecomm | Optical receiver circuit |
US4873700A (en) | 1987-10-14 | 1989-10-10 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Auto-threshold/adaptive equalizer |
US4830493A (en) | 1987-10-29 | 1989-05-16 | Beckman Instruments, Inc. | UV scanning system for centrifuge |
CA1272529A (en) | 1987-12-31 | 1990-08-07 | Northern Telecom Limited | Apparatus and method for noise reduction in a digital line receiver |
JPH01223837A (en) | 1988-03-03 | 1989-09-06 | Nec Corp | Optical multi-value transmitter |
US5387887A (en) | 1988-05-20 | 1995-02-07 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Miniature digitally controlled programmable transversal filter using LSI GaAs integrated circuits |
US5072221A (en) | 1988-08-04 | 1991-12-10 | Signal Processing Technologies, Inc. | Error limiting analog to digital converter |
GB2223369B (en) | 1988-08-18 | 1992-11-18 | Plessey Co Plc | Analogue-to-digital converters |
US4953041A (en) | 1989-01-24 | 1990-08-28 | Maxtor Corporation | Read channel detector for use in digital magnetic recording systems |
US5225798A (en) | 1989-02-13 | 1993-07-06 | Electronic Decisions Incorporated | Programmable transversal filter |
JP2800233B2 (en) | 1989-03-10 | 1998-09-21 | 株式会社日立製作所 | AD converter |
US5237590A (en) | 1989-03-13 | 1993-08-17 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Timing extraction circuit and communication system utilizing the same |
US4942593A (en) | 1989-03-16 | 1990-07-17 | Dallas Semiconductor Corporation | Telecommunications interface with improved jitter reporting |
DE3913520A1 (en) | 1989-04-25 | 1990-10-31 | Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag | OPTICAL CABLE TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SYSTEM |
JP2672146B2 (en) | 1989-04-26 | 1997-11-05 | キヤノン株式会社 | Communication system, communication system, transmitter and receiver |
CA1326719C (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1994-02-01 | Thomas E. Moore | Ds3 to 28 vt1.5 sonet interface circuit |
US5184131A (en) | 1989-07-06 | 1993-02-02 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | A-d converter suitable for fuzzy controller |
US5115450A (en) | 1989-07-06 | 1992-05-19 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | High speed digital to analog to digital communication system |
US5132639A (en) | 1989-09-07 | 1992-07-21 | Ortel Corporation | Predistorter for linearization of electronic and optical signals |
US5252930A (en) | 1989-09-07 | 1993-10-12 | Ortel Corporation | Predistorter for linearization of electronic and optical signals |
FR2652215B1 (en) | 1989-09-19 | 1994-06-10 | France Etat | METHOD FOR ENCODING A DIGITAL SIGNAL, ENCODER AND DECODER FOR IMPLEMENTING SAID METHOD, REGENERATION METHOD AND CORRESPONDING REGENERATOR. |
CA1323657C (en) | 1989-09-22 | 1993-10-26 | Mohsen Kavenrad | Optical homodyne dpsk receiver with optical amplifier |
US5007106A (en) | 1989-11-08 | 1991-04-09 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Optical Homodyne Receiver |
US5111065A (en) | 1990-03-23 | 1992-05-05 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Diode driver circuit utilizing discrete-value DC current source |
US5012475A (en) | 1990-04-17 | 1991-04-30 | Wavelength Lasers, Inc. | Analog compensation system for linear lasers |
IT1239609B (en) | 1990-05-11 | 1993-11-11 | Bordoni Ugo Fondazione | METHOD FOR THE FORMATION OF A MULTI-LEVEL SIGNAL ON A COHERENT OPTICAL CARRIER THROUGH PHASE MODULATION AND POLARIZATION OF THE CARRIER AND HETERODINE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION APPARATUS OF SIGNALS FORMED WITH SUCH METHOD |
US5121411A (en) | 1990-07-24 | 1992-06-09 | Motorola, Inc. | Multi-edge clock recovery method |
JPH07105999B2 (en) | 1990-10-11 | 1995-11-13 | ヤマハ株式会社 | Sound image localization device |
FR2668867B1 (en) | 1990-11-02 | 1993-01-29 | Burger Jacques | BINARY CODING METHOD WITH SUBSTANTIALLY UNIFORM BINARY ELEMENTS, AND CORRESPONDING INCREMENTATION AND DECREMENTATION METHODS. |
DE4040170A1 (en) | 1990-12-15 | 1992-06-17 | Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag | TRANSMISSION SIGNAL |
US5222103A (en) | 1991-01-02 | 1993-06-22 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated | Differential quadrature phase shift keying encoder for subcarrier systems |
EP0503588B1 (en) | 1991-03-11 | 1997-10-01 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation | Quadrature amplitude modulator with distortion compensation |
US5208833A (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1993-05-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Multi-level symbol synchronizer |
JPH04329025A (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1992-11-17 | Toshiba Corp | D/a converter |
US5678198A (en) | 1991-05-22 | 1997-10-14 | Southwestern Bell Technology Resources, Inc. | System for controlling signal level at both ends of a transmission link, based upon a detected value |
FR2681202B1 (en) | 1991-09-06 | 1993-11-12 | Alcatel Cit | OPTICAL COMMUNICATION LINK WITH CORRECTION OF NON-LINEAR EFFECTS, AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING AN OPTICAL SIGNAL. |
US5243613A (en) | 1991-11-05 | 1993-09-07 | Synchronous Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus to compensate for distortion in optical transmission systems |
US5282072A (en) | 1991-11-19 | 1994-01-25 | Harmonic Lightwaves, Inc. | Shunt-expansive predistortion linearizers for optical analog transmitters |
US5223834A (en) | 1991-11-29 | 1993-06-29 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Timing control for precharged circuit |
US5361156A (en) | 1991-12-09 | 1994-11-01 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Method and apparatus for predistortion |
FR2685835A1 (en) | 1991-12-31 | 1993-07-02 | France Telecom | VERY LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ON OPTICAL FIBER COMPENSATED FOR DISTORTIONS AT RECEPTION. |
EP0554736B1 (en) | 1992-02-01 | 1996-04-10 | Alcatel SEL Aktiengesellschaft | Digital optical transmission system with a dispersing optical waveguide at the working wavelength |
JP3255179B2 (en) | 1992-02-14 | 2002-02-12 | ソニー株式会社 | Data detection device |
US5291031A (en) | 1992-04-06 | 1994-03-01 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Optical phase difference range determination in liquid level sensor |
JP3223562B2 (en) | 1992-04-07 | 2001-10-29 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Optical transmission device, optical transmission device, and optical modulator |
AU4269193A (en) | 1992-05-05 | 1993-11-29 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Optical switching device |
CA2072052C (en) | 1992-06-23 | 1999-01-26 | Ian R. Macdonald | Apparatus for optoelectronic transversal filter |
US5327279A (en) | 1992-07-17 | 1994-07-05 | United Technologies Corporation | Apparatus for linearization of optic modulators using a feed-forward predistortion circuit |
US5450044A (en) | 1993-04-14 | 1995-09-12 | Acrodyne Industries, Inc. | Quadrature amplitude modulator including a digital amplitude modulator as a component thereof |
DE69317181T2 (en) | 1992-08-06 | 1998-08-20 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Device for reproducing a digital signal from a recording medium with a variable equalizer |
FR2694862B1 (en) | 1992-08-14 | 1994-09-16 | Cit Alcatel | Predistortion semiconductor optical source. |
GB9217819D0 (en) | 1992-08-21 | 1992-10-07 | Philips Electronics Uk Ltd | Data coding system |
GB9218009D0 (en) | 1992-08-25 | 1992-10-14 | Philips Electronics Uk Ltd | A method of,and transmitter for,transmitting a digital signal |
US5436756A (en) | 1992-09-30 | 1995-07-25 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Suppressed photocurrent, quantum well optical modulation device |
US5481389A (en) | 1992-10-09 | 1996-01-02 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Postdistortion circuit for reducing distortion in an optical communications system |
US5321543A (en) | 1992-10-20 | 1994-06-14 | General Instrument Corporation | Apparatus and method for linearizing an external optical modulator |
SG52501A1 (en) | 1992-10-21 | 1998-09-28 | At & T Corp | Cascaded distortion compensation for analog optical systems |
US5483552A (en) | 1992-10-27 | 1996-01-09 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Adaptive equalizing apparatus for controlling the input signal level of quantized feedback |
DE4236488A1 (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1994-05-05 | Sel Alcatel Ag | Circuit at the receiving end for a system for the optical transmission of a digital signal via an optical fiber with dispersion |
WO1994011955A1 (en) | 1992-11-06 | 1994-05-26 | Pericle Communications Company | Adaptive data rate modem |
JP2982519B2 (en) * | 1992-11-12 | 1999-11-22 | 日本電気株式会社 | Near-end crosstalk canceller |
US5444864A (en) | 1992-12-22 | 1995-08-22 | E-Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cancelling in-band energy leakage from transmitter to receiver |
US5428831A (en) | 1993-01-08 | 1995-06-27 | American Nucleonics Corporation | Signal path length correlator and method and an interference cancellation system using the same |
JPH06224852A (en) | 1993-01-25 | 1994-08-12 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Optical transmission system |
US5606734A (en) | 1993-03-02 | 1997-02-25 | American Nucleonics Corporation | Structure generated composite reference signal for interference suppression in an adaptive loop |
US5321710A (en) | 1993-04-19 | 1994-06-14 | Raynet Corporation | Predistortion method and apparatus for laser linearization |
US5783630A (en) | 1993-07-13 | 1998-07-21 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyether amine modification of polypropylene |
US5985999A (en) | 1993-07-13 | 1999-11-16 | Huntsman, Petrochemical Corporation | Dyeable polyolefin containing polyetheramine modified functionalized polyolefin |
US6031048A (en) * | 1993-07-13 | 2000-02-29 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyether amine modification of polypropylene |
DE69403398T2 (en) * | 1993-07-13 | 1997-09-25 | Huntsman Spec Chem Corp | Modification of polypropylene by polyether amines |
US5959032A (en) * | 1993-07-13 | 1999-09-28 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyether amine modification of polypropylene |
US5506289A (en) * | 1993-07-23 | 1996-04-09 | Gen Electric | Liquid injection molding inhibitors for curable compositions |
JPH0779424A (en) | 1993-09-06 | 1995-03-20 | Hitachi Ltd | Multi-point video communication equipment |
US5761243A (en) | 1993-09-16 | 1998-06-02 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Digital receiver with noise filter which also serves as a feedback filter providing intersymbol interference reduction |
US5413047A (en) | 1993-10-15 | 1995-05-09 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Overburden removal method with blast casting and excavating apparatus |
US5382955A (en) | 1993-11-04 | 1995-01-17 | Tektronix, Inc. | Error tolerant thermometer-to-binary encoder |
US5424680A (en) | 1993-11-30 | 1995-06-13 | Harmonic Lightwaves, Inc. | Predistorter for high frequency optical communications devices |
DE4341408A1 (en) | 1993-12-04 | 1995-06-08 | Sel Alcatel Ag | Optical system for the transmission of a multi-stage signal |
US5534101A (en) * | 1994-03-02 | 1996-07-09 | Telecommunication Research Laboratories | Method and apparatus for making optical components by direct dispensing of curable liquid |
US5626360A (en) * | 1994-03-14 | 1997-05-06 | Morton International, Inc. | Linear igniters for airbag inflators |
DE69517614T2 (en) | 1994-03-22 | 2001-02-15 | Uniphase Opto Holdings Inc | Semiconductor diode laser and its manufacturing process |
US5648987A (en) | 1994-03-24 | 1997-07-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Rapid-update adaptive channel-equalization filtering for digital radio receivers, such as HDTV receivers |
JPH0854425A (en) | 1994-04-28 | 1996-02-27 | Hoechst Celanese Corp | Electro-optical sensor device |
US5408485A (en) | 1994-05-11 | 1995-04-18 | Alcatel Network Systems, Inc. | Laser modulation controller using NRZ electrical modulation level control |
US5574978A (en) | 1994-05-12 | 1996-11-12 | American Nucleonics Corporation | Interference cancellation system and radio system for multiple radios on a small platform |
US5798854A (en) | 1994-05-19 | 1998-08-25 | Ortel Corporation | In-line predistorter for linearization of electronic and optical signals |
IT1268070B1 (en) | 1994-06-06 | 1997-02-20 | Cselt Centro Studi Lab Telecom | CIRCUIT IN CMOS TECHNOLOGY FOR HIGH SPEED PILOTING OF OPTICAL SOURCES. |
US5539774A (en) | 1994-06-15 | 1996-07-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dual decision equalization method and device |
DE69507438T2 (en) | 1994-06-20 | 2000-05-25 | Uniphase Opto Holdings Inc | INDEX-GUIDED LIGHT-EMITTING SEMICONDUCTOR DIODE |
JP2864988B2 (en) | 1994-06-21 | 1999-03-08 | 日本電気株式会社 | Soft decision signal output type receiver |
JPH0817088A (en) * | 1994-06-28 | 1996-01-19 | Hitachi Ltd | Ld driver for magneto-optical disk |
US5757763A (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1998-05-26 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Optical information storage via amplitude modulation |
DE4431237A1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1996-03-07 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method for obtaining bit-specific reliability information |
JP2768296B2 (en) | 1994-09-26 | 1998-06-25 | 日本電気株式会社 | Signal processing device |
JP2690027B2 (en) * | 1994-10-05 | 1997-12-10 | 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 | Pattern recognition method and apparatus |
US5644325A (en) | 1994-12-12 | 1997-07-01 | Auravision Corporation | Digital to analog converter with improved output level control |
US5625722A (en) | 1994-12-21 | 1997-04-29 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating data encoded pulses in return-to-zero format |
KR960024899A (en) * | 1994-12-31 | 1996-07-20 | 김주용 | Representative selector and its implementation |
CA2166829A1 (en) | 1995-02-02 | 1996-08-03 | Attilio Joseph Rainal | System and method for minimizing nonlinear distortion in optical communication systems employing laser intensity modulation |
JP3419130B2 (en) * | 1995-02-03 | 2003-06-23 | Kddi株式会社 | Echo canceller device |
TW282598B (en) | 1995-02-22 | 1996-08-01 | Fujitsu Ltd | |
EP0815682B1 (en) | 1995-03-16 | 2002-01-23 | Telecommunications Research laboratories | Networking computers via shared use of voice telephone lines |
US5691978A (en) | 1995-04-07 | 1997-11-25 | Signal Science, Inc. | Self-cancelling full-duplex RF communication system |
US5548253A (en) | 1995-04-17 | 1996-08-20 | Omnipoint Corporation | Spectrally efficient quadrature amplitude modulator |
US5612653A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-03-18 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | LAN star connection using negative impedance for matching |
US5557439A (en) | 1995-07-25 | 1996-09-17 | Ciena Corporation | Expandable wavelength division multiplexed optical communications systems |
JP3417159B2 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 2003-06-16 | Kddi株式会社 | Echo canceller device |
US5625360A (en) | 1995-09-05 | 1997-04-29 | Motorola, Inc. | Current source for reducing noise glitches generated in a digital to analog converter and method therefor |
US5920600A (en) | 1995-09-18 | 1999-07-06 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Bit phase synchronizing circuitry for controlling phase and frequency, and PLL circuit therefor |
JP3260263B2 (en) | 1995-09-27 | 2002-02-25 | 富士通株式会社 | Laser diode drive |
US6002274A (en) | 1995-09-29 | 1999-12-14 | Dallas Semiconductor | Oversampled state machine for jitter tolerant pulse detection |
US5825825A (en) | 1996-09-17 | 1998-10-20 | Northern Telecom Limited | Method of processing multi-level signals for simple clock recovery |
GB2306066B (en) | 1995-10-02 | 2000-02-16 | Northern Telecom Ltd | Method of processing multi-level signals for simple clock recovery |
CN1179493C (en) | 1995-10-10 | 2004-12-08 | 北方电讯网络有限公司 | Co-channel interference reduction |
CA2161847A1 (en) | 1995-10-31 | 1997-05-01 | Wayne D. Grover | Method for preconfiguring a network to withstand anticipated failures |
US5784032A (en) | 1995-11-01 | 1998-07-21 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Compact diversity antenna with weak back near fields |
JP2871561B2 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1999-03-17 | 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 | Unspecified speaker model generation device and speech recognition device |
US5861966A (en) * | 1995-12-27 | 1999-01-19 | Nynex Science & Technology, Inc. | Broad band optical fiber telecommunications network |
US5764542A (en) | 1996-01-11 | 1998-06-09 | Eaton Corporation | Noise filtering utilizing running average |
US5699022A (en) | 1996-02-09 | 1997-12-16 | Dsc Communications Corporation | Adaptive cable equalizer |
US5978417A (en) | 1996-02-23 | 1999-11-02 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Adaptive cable equalizer |
US5706008A (en) * | 1996-03-01 | 1998-01-06 | Analog Devices, Inc. | High bandwidth parallel analog-to-digital converter |
US6140858A (en) | 1996-03-20 | 2000-10-31 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Predistortion circuit for an analog signal in a video communication network |
FR2746994B1 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-04-30 | Alcatel Telspace | ROBUST PHASE ESTIMATOR AND RECOVERY FOR DIGITAL SIGNALS AFFECTED IN PARTICULAR BY PHASE JIT |
US5774505A (en) | 1996-04-04 | 1998-06-30 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Intersymbol interference cancellation with reduced complexity |
US5903337A (en) * | 1996-04-18 | 1999-05-11 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Film viewer |
US5959750A (en) | 1996-06-06 | 1999-09-28 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method of upgrading transmission capacity by Raman amplification |
US5887022A (en) * | 1996-06-12 | 1999-03-23 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Peer-peer frequency hopping spread spectrum wireless system |
JP2817785B2 (en) * | 1996-06-20 | 1998-10-30 | 日本電気株式会社 | Automatic discrimination point control discriminator and control method thereof |
US6317469B1 (en) | 1996-06-28 | 2001-11-13 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and apparatus for utilizing a data processing system for multi-level data communications providing self-clocking |
JP3056077B2 (en) | 1996-07-19 | 2000-06-26 | 静岡日本電気株式会社 | Time diversity receiver |
CA2183140C (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 2001-11-20 | Grant Mcgibney | Ofdm timing and frequency recovery system |
JP3099745B2 (en) | 1996-08-13 | 2000-10-16 | 日本電気株式会社 | Automatic equalizer |
US5968198A (en) | 1996-08-16 | 1999-10-19 | Ericsson, Inc. | Decoder utilizing soft information output to minimize error rates |
CA2213767A1 (en) | 1996-08-20 | 1998-02-20 | Norand Corporation | Wireless communication system having reduced noise mode operation capability |
JP3148692B2 (en) | 1996-09-04 | 2001-03-19 | 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 | Similarity search device |
JP3340341B2 (en) | 1996-10-03 | 2002-11-05 | 沖電気工業株式会社 | Level identification circuit |
CA2188358A1 (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1998-04-21 | Michael J. Sieben | optical modulation system |
US5802089A (en) | 1996-10-22 | 1998-09-01 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Laser diode driver having automatic power control with smooth enable function |
US5844436A (en) | 1996-11-06 | 1998-12-01 | Northern Telecom Ltd. | Method of recovering a sampling clock in a framed data communications format with reduced phase jitter and wander |
US5848139A (en) | 1996-11-19 | 1998-12-08 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Telecommunication traffic pricing control system |
US5828329A (en) | 1996-12-05 | 1998-10-27 | 3Com Corporation | Adjustable temperature coefficient current reference |
EP0849723A3 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 1998-12-30 | ATR Interpreting Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Speech recognition apparatus equipped with means for removing erroneous candidate of speech recognition |
US5835848A (en) | 1996-12-30 | 1998-11-10 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Range repeater for a transmission system |
US6160790A (en) | 1996-12-31 | 2000-12-12 | Paradyne Corporation | Crosstalk canceller system and method |
US6185300B1 (en) * | 1996-12-31 | 2001-02-06 | Ericsson Inc. | Echo canceler for use in communications system |
US5801657A (en) | 1997-02-05 | 1998-09-01 | Stanford University | Serial analog-to-digital converter using successive comparisons |
US5912749A (en) | 1997-02-11 | 1999-06-15 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Call admission control in cellular networks |
CA2197624C (en) | 1997-02-14 | 2003-07-29 | Robert J. Davies | Hybrid single sideband optical modulator |
US6002717A (en) | 1997-03-06 | 1999-12-14 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Method and apparatus for adaptive equalization using feedback indicative of undercompensation |
JP2996926B2 (en) * | 1997-03-11 | 2000-01-11 | 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 | Phoneme symbol posterior probability calculation device and speech recognition device |
US5850409A (en) | 1997-03-21 | 1998-12-15 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Laser modulation control method and apparatus |
JPH10276093A (en) | 1997-03-28 | 1998-10-13 | Sony Corp | D/a converter |
CA2201834A1 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 1998-10-04 | Gennum Corporation | Serial digital data communications receiver with improved automatic cable equalizer, agc system, and dc restorer |
CA2202457A1 (en) | 1997-04-11 | 1998-10-11 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Microwave phase shifter including a reflective phase shift stage and a frequency multiplication stage |
CA2202458C (en) | 1997-04-11 | 2001-02-06 | Surinder Kumar | Direct qam modulator |
JP3039439B2 (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 2000-05-08 | 日本電気株式会社 | Identification level control circuit |
JPH10313260A (en) * | 1997-05-13 | 1998-11-24 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Receiver |
US6052420A (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 2000-04-18 | Northern Telecom Limited | Adaptive multiple sub-band common-mode RFI suppression |
JP3094950B2 (en) | 1997-05-28 | 2000-10-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Optical transmission device and optical transmission method |
CA2206661C (en) * | 1997-05-29 | 2004-07-20 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | A duplex decision feedback equalization system |
US5872468A (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 1999-02-16 | Northern Telecom Limited | Level detector circuit, interface and method for interpreting and processing multi-level signals |
US6072615A (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2000-06-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Phase modulator-based generation of high-quality high bit rate return-to-zero optical data streams |
US5825257A (en) | 1997-06-17 | 1998-10-20 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | GMSK modulator formed of PLL to which continuous phase modulated signal is applied |
US6072364A (en) | 1997-06-17 | 2000-06-06 | Amplix | Adaptive digital predistortion for power amplifiers with real time modeling of memoryless complex gains |
US6034996A (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2000-03-07 | Globespan, Inc. | System and method for concatenating reed-solomon and trellis codes |
US6035080A (en) * | 1997-06-20 | 2000-03-07 | Henry; Charles Howard | Reconfigurable add-drop multiplexer for optical communications systems |
US5883910A (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 1999-03-16 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | High speed semiconductor laser driver circuits |
US6298459B1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 2001-10-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Analog to digital converter with encoder circuit and testing method therefor |
US6212654B1 (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 2001-04-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Coded modulation for digital storage in analog memory devices |
US6311045B1 (en) | 1997-07-28 | 2001-10-30 | Roke Manor Research Limited | Apparatus for signal isolation in a radio transmitter-receiver |
US6388786B1 (en) * | 1997-08-15 | 2002-05-14 | Nec Corporation | Method for generating duobinary signal and optical transmitter using the same method |
US6191719B1 (en) | 1997-08-25 | 2001-02-20 | Broadcom Corporation | Digital to analog converter with reduced ringing |
US6031874A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2000-02-29 | Ericsson Inc. | Unequal error protection in coded modulation schemes |
US6118567A (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2000-09-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Efficient encoding and detection method and device for binary intensity modulated optical data signals |
US6285709B1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-09-04 | 3 Com Corporation | Error filtering in a hybrid equalizer system |
US6084931A (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2000-07-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Symbol synchronizer based on eye pattern characteristics having variable adaptation rate and adjustable jitter control, and method therefor |
US6314147B1 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2001-11-06 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Two-stage CCI/ISI reduction with space-time processing in TDMA cellular networks |
US6154301A (en) | 1997-11-10 | 2000-11-28 | Harvey; Philip C. | Fiber optic receiver |
US6295325B1 (en) | 1997-11-14 | 2001-09-25 | Agere Systems Guardian Corp. | Fixed clock based arbitrary symbol rate timing recovery loop |
JP2965537B2 (en) | 1997-12-10 | 1999-10-18 | 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 | Speaker clustering processing device and speech recognition device |
US6108474A (en) | 1997-12-11 | 2000-08-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Optical pulse compressor for optical communications systems |
EP0960521A4 (en) | 1997-12-12 | 2004-08-04 | Motorola Inc | Apparatus and method for adapting an echo canceller in a communication system |
US5949926A (en) | 1997-12-15 | 1999-09-07 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Minimum phase dispersion compensator |
US6078627A (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2000-06-20 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Circuit and method for multilevel signal decoding, descrambling, and error detection |
US6011952A (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2000-01-04 | Viasat, Inc. | Self-interference cancellation for relayed communication networks |
US6141127A (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2000-10-31 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | High capacity chirped-pulse wavelength-division multiplexed communication method and apparatus |
US6452945B1 (en) | 1998-03-05 | 2002-09-17 | Kestrel Solutions, Inc. | Electrical add-drop multiplexing for optical communications networks utilizing frequency division multiplexing |
CA2670691A1 (en) * | 1998-03-09 | 1999-09-16 | Broadcom Corporation | Gigabit ethernet transceiver |
JP2986792B2 (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 1999-12-06 | 株式会社エイ・ティ・アール音声翻訳通信研究所 | Speaker normalization processing device and speech recognition device |
US6141387A (en) | 1998-03-19 | 2000-10-31 | Motorola, Inc. | Digital QAM modulator using post filtering carrier recombination |
US6169764B1 (en) * | 1998-03-19 | 2001-01-02 | Plato Labs, Inc. | Analog adaptive line equalizer |
US5943457A (en) | 1998-03-24 | 1999-08-24 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Generalized resonant coupler filters |
US6118563A (en) | 1998-03-25 | 2000-09-12 | Corning Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for reducing four-wave mixing |
DE19815011A1 (en) | 1998-04-03 | 1999-10-14 | Temic Semiconductor Gmbh | Process for the transmission of digital transmission signals |
US6093496A (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2000-07-25 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyolefin containing polyetheramine modified functionalized polyolefin |
US6259836B1 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2001-07-10 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Optical frequency shifter and transmission system |
US6148428A (en) | 1998-05-21 | 2000-11-14 | Calimetrics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for modulation encoding data for storage on a multi-level optical recording medium |
US20010024542A1 (en) | 1998-06-09 | 2001-09-27 | Stefano Aina | Method and device for dropping optical channels in an optical transmission system |
US6226112B1 (en) * | 1998-06-18 | 2001-05-01 | Agere Systems Inc. | Optical time-division-multiplex system |
US7242782B1 (en) | 1998-07-31 | 2007-07-10 | Onkyo Kk | Audio signal processing circuit |
US6219633B1 (en) * | 1998-08-06 | 2001-04-17 | Atr Interpreting Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Apparatus and method for producing analogically similar word based on pseudo-distances between words |
AU6382299A (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2000-03-06 | Feher Kamilo | Efficient spectral saving fqpsk and fqam signal transmission and reception systems |
KR100323585B1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2002-10-25 | 한국전기통신공사 | Bias Stabilization Method of Electro-optical Optical Modulator by Off-Level Sampling |
US6222861B1 (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 2001-04-24 | Photonic Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling the wavelength of a laser |
US6356374B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2002-03-12 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Digital optical transmitter |
US6163638A (en) | 1998-10-29 | 2000-12-19 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Article comprising an optical pulse compressor |
US6289151B1 (en) | 1998-10-30 | 2001-09-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | All-pass optical filters |
US6373908B2 (en) | 1998-11-11 | 2002-04-16 | Broadcom Corporation | Adaptive electronic transmission signal cancellation apparatus for full duplex communication |
CA2255516A1 (en) | 1998-12-11 | 2000-06-11 | Telecommunications Research Laboratories | Multiport antenna and method of processing multipath signals received by a multiport antenna |
US6215812B1 (en) * | 1999-01-28 | 2001-04-10 | Bae Systems Canada Inc. | Interference canceller for the protection of direct-sequence spread-spectrum communications from high-power narrowband interference |
US6211978B1 (en) * | 1999-02-10 | 2001-04-03 | Anacom Systems, Inc. | Multi-channel wave division multiplexer system |
US6201916B1 (en) * | 1999-03-15 | 2001-03-13 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Article comprising means for optical pulse reshaping |
DE60025290T2 (en) | 1999-03-26 | 2006-08-31 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Kadoma | Multi-level signal discriminator |
US6169912B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2001-01-02 | Pericom Semiconductor Corp. | RF front-end with signal cancellation using receiver signal to eliminate duplexer for a cordless phone |
FR2791853B1 (en) | 1999-04-01 | 2001-05-25 | Sagem | MOBILE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANAGING A SLEEP MODE IN SUCH A MOBILE APPARATUS |
US6259847B1 (en) | 1999-04-07 | 2001-07-10 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Optical communication system including broadband all-pass filter for dispersion compensation |
US6304199B1 (en) | 1999-05-05 | 2001-10-16 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Method and apparatus for deglitching digital to analog converters |
JP4180738B2 (en) * | 1999-06-14 | 2008-11-12 | 株式会社東芝 | Digital signal quality monitoring method and communication apparatus using the method |
US6271944B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2001-08-07 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Laser wavelength control in an optical communication system |
US6341023B1 (en) * | 1999-07-23 | 2002-01-22 | Tycom (Us) Inc. | Multiple level modulation in a wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) systems |
US6208792B1 (en) * | 1999-09-20 | 2001-03-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Article comprising a planar optical waveguide with optically non-linear core |
US6313713B1 (en) | 1999-09-28 | 2001-11-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Matched pair circulator antenna isolation circuit |
US7061657B1 (en) | 1999-10-12 | 2006-06-13 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Multichannel optical communication system and method utilizing wavelength and coherence division multiplexing |
US6297678B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2001-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Circuit for rapidly charging a system net |
US6920315B1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2005-07-19 | Ericsson Inc. | Multiple antenna impedance optimization |
IT1320364B1 (en) | 2000-05-25 | 2003-11-26 | A E Assemblaggi Elettromeccani | WEAR SENSOR DEVICE OF A DRIVE BELT OR CHAIN, IN PARTICULAR FOR A DRIVE SHAFT OF THE DRIVE SHAFT |
US6473131B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2002-10-29 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | System and method for sampling an analog signal level |
US6961019B1 (en) | 2000-08-10 | 2005-11-01 | Sirf Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing GPS receiver jamming during transmission in a wireless receiver |
IL154552A0 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2003-09-17 | Millimetrix Broadband Networks | Improved spatial efficiency for wireless rings and network of links in millimeter wave (mmw) communication systems |
US6539204B1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2003-03-25 | Mobilian Corporation | Analog active cancellation of a wireless coupled transmit signal |
US6560257B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2003-05-06 | Harris Corporation | Low power laser driver |
US7173551B2 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2007-02-06 | Quellan, Inc. | Increasing data throughput in optical fiber transmission systems |
US6892054B2 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2005-05-10 | Wherenet Corp | Interference suppression for wireless local area network and location system |
US6665500B2 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2003-12-16 | Oyster Optics, Inc. | Dual-mode fiber optic telecommunications system and method |
US6445476B1 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2002-09-03 | Stratalight Communications, Inc. | Transmission and reception of duobinary multilevel pulse-amplitude-modulated optical signals using subsequence-based encoder |
US7307569B2 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2007-12-11 | Quellan, Inc. | Increasing data throughput in optical fiber transmission systems |
US7149256B2 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2006-12-12 | Quellan, Inc. | Multilevel pulse position modulation for efficient fiber optic communication |
WO2002067521A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-08-29 | Quellan, Inc. | Increasing data throughput in optical fiber transmission systems |
DE60238602D1 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2011-01-27 | Quellan Inc | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DECODING MULTI-LEVEL SIGNALS |
US6978125B2 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2005-12-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Methods and apparatus for tuning pre-selection filters in radio receivers |
US20030030873A1 (en) | 2001-05-09 | 2003-02-13 | Quellan, Inc. | High-speed adjustable multilevel light modulation |
US7068948B2 (en) | 2001-06-13 | 2006-06-27 | Gazillion Bits, Inc. | Generation of optical signals with return-to-zero format |
JP4278332B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2009-06-10 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Optical transmitter and optical transmission system |
JP2003060578A (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2003-02-28 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Optical transmitter, optical receiver and optical wavelength division multiplexing system |
US6956914B2 (en) * | 2001-09-19 | 2005-10-18 | Gennum Corporation | Transmit amplitude independent adaptive equalizer |
US7092644B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2006-08-15 | New Focus, Inc. | Optical receiver including a dual gain path amplifier system |
US20030067990A1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2003-04-10 | Bryant Paul Henry | Peak to average power ratio reduction in a digitally-modulated signal |
US6575613B2 (en) * | 2001-10-04 | 2003-06-10 | Pumpkin Ltd. | Portable special effects illumination device |
US6751587B2 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2004-06-15 | Broadcom Corporation | Efficient excitation quantization in noise feedback coding with general noise shaping |
US7054393B2 (en) | 2002-01-25 | 2006-05-30 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Short and long sequence boundary detection algorithm for wireless LAN modems |
WO2003071731A1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2003-08-28 | Quellan, Inc. | Multi-level signal clock recovery technique |
WO2003077423A2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2003-09-18 | Quellan, Inc. | High speed analog-to-digital converter using a unique gray code having minimal bit transitions |
AU2003223687A1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2003-11-10 | Quellan, Inc. | Combined ask/dpsk modulation system |
US7035361B2 (en) * | 2002-07-15 | 2006-04-25 | Quellan, Inc. | Adaptive noise filtering and equalization for optimal high speed multilevel signal decoding |
US7756421B2 (en) | 2002-10-03 | 2010-07-13 | Ciena Corporation | Electrical domain compensation of non-linear effects in an optical communications system |
US20040114888A1 (en) | 2002-10-09 | 2004-06-17 | Rich Brian Gerald | Multi-function security cable with optic-fiber sensor |
AU2003287628A1 (en) | 2002-11-12 | 2004-06-03 | Quellan, Inc. | High-speed analog-to-digital conversion with improved robustness to timing uncertainty |
US6819166B1 (en) | 2003-01-03 | 2004-11-16 | Silicon Image, Inc. | Continuous-time, low-frequency-gain/high-frequency-boosting joint adaptation equalizer and method |
US20040190661A1 (en) | 2003-03-26 | 2004-09-30 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for equalizing communication signals |
DE112004001455B4 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2020-04-23 | Intersil Americas LLC | Cross-talk cancellation method and system |
US7804760B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2010-09-28 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for signal emulation |
US20050069063A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Intel Corporation | Broadband interference cancellation |
JP4510832B2 (en) | 2003-11-17 | 2010-07-28 | ケラン インコーポレイテッド | Method and system for antenna interference cancellation |
US7616700B2 (en) | 2003-12-22 | 2009-11-10 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for slicing a communication signal |
US7725079B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2010-05-25 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for automatic control in an interference cancellation device |
US7522883B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2009-04-21 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for reducing signal interference |
WO2006065883A2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2006-06-22 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for reducing signal interference |
WO2007127369A2 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2007-11-08 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for reducing radiated emissions from a communications channel |
CN106094338B (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2023-06-30 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | Double-sided display device and electronic equipment |
-
2004
- 2004-08-05 DE DE112004001455.7T patent/DE112004001455B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-08-05 JP JP2006522704A patent/JP2007502054A/en active Pending
- 2004-08-05 KR KR1020067002618A patent/KR101109847B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-08-05 US US10/911,915 patent/US7050388B2/en active Active
- 2004-08-05 WO PCT/US2004/025232 patent/WO2005018134A2/en active Application Filing
- 2004-08-05 GB GB0603563A patent/GB2421674B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-01-19 US US11/334,864 patent/US7626916B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-10-19 US US12/581,511 patent/US8068406B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6411117B1 (en) * | 1998-11-13 | 2002-06-25 | Broadcom Corporation | Dynamic register with IDDQ testing capability |
US20040213354A1 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2004-10-28 | Jones William W. | Mixed domain cancellation |
US20040218756A1 (en) * | 2003-05-03 | 2004-11-04 | Xiangguo Tang | ISDN crosstalk cancellation in a DSL system |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8311168B2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2012-11-13 | Quellan, Inc. | Adaptive noise filtering and equalization for optimal high speed multilevel signal decoding |
US7934144B2 (en) | 2002-11-12 | 2011-04-26 | Quellan, Inc. | High-speed analog-to-digital conversion with improved robustness to timing uncertainty |
US7804760B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2010-09-28 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for signal emulation |
US8068406B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2011-11-29 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation |
US8605566B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2013-12-10 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for signal emulation |
US8576939B2 (en) | 2003-12-22 | 2013-11-05 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for slicing a communication signal |
US7725079B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2010-05-25 | Quellan, Inc. | Method and system for automatic control in an interference cancellation device |
US8005430B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2011-08-23 | Quellan Inc. | Method and system for reducing signal interference |
US8135350B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2012-03-13 | Quellan, Inc. | System for reducing signal interference |
US8503940B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2013-08-06 | Quellan, Inc. | Reducing signal interference |
US9252983B2 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2016-02-02 | Intersil Americas LLC | Method and system for reducing radiated emissions from a communications channel |
US9264787B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2016-02-16 | Rosemount Inc. | Communication system for process field device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7626916B2 (en) | 2009-12-01 |
DE112004001455T5 (en) | 2006-07-06 |
US20050030884A1 (en) | 2005-02-10 |
US20100039923A1 (en) | 2010-02-18 |
GB0603563D0 (en) | 2006-04-05 |
WO2005018134A3 (en) | 2005-11-24 |
US7050388B2 (en) | 2006-05-23 |
JP2007502054A (en) | 2007-02-01 |
GB2421674B (en) | 2006-11-15 |
KR101109847B1 (en) | 2012-04-06 |
GB2421674A (en) | 2006-06-28 |
DE112004001455B4 (en) | 2020-04-23 |
US20060159002A1 (en) | 2006-07-20 |
KR20060114322A (en) | 2006-11-06 |
US8068406B2 (en) | 2011-11-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7050388B2 (en) | Method and system for crosstalk cancellation | |
US7804760B2 (en) | Method and system for signal emulation | |
DE69928561T2 (en) | MEASUREMENT OF NONLINEAR DISTORTION IN TRANSMITTERS | |
US6236645B1 (en) | Apparatus for, and method of, reducing noise in a communications system | |
US7706434B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for cancelling interference in a communication system | |
US7826568B2 (en) | Far-end crosstalk (FEXT) canceller | |
JP6697007B2 (en) | Receiver calibration and tracking | |
US7469025B2 (en) | Decision feedback transceiver for multichannel communication system | |
US9461703B1 (en) | Interference signal compensation | |
KR20090014152A (en) | Method and system for reducing radiated emissions from a communications channel | |
US6621862B1 (en) | Equalization for multichannel receiving node | |
JP5401568B2 (en) | Method and system for signal emulation | |
US10284180B2 (en) | Circuits for correction of signals susceptible to baseline wander | |
US7957456B2 (en) | Selection of filter coefficients for tranceiver non-linearity signal cancellation | |
CN103888221A (en) | Baseline drift compensation method, baseline correction module and Ethernet transceiver thereof | |
JP2006505211A (en) | Multistage nonlinear echo canceller for digital communication systems with or without frequency division duplexing. | |
US11558126B2 (en) | Echo estimation system and echo estimation method | |
US11184209B1 (en) | Signal processing circuit in digital domain and method thereof | |
Integrity | DesignCon 2006 | |
US20020154701A1 (en) | Digital preemphasizer for transmission of PCM codes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DPEN | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
B | Later publication of amended claims |
Effective date: 20051206 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006522704 Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020067002618 Country of ref document: KR |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1120040014557 Country of ref document: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 0603563 Country of ref document: GB |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1020067002618 Country of ref document: KR |