WO2003001420A2 - Financial portfolio risk management - Google Patents
Financial portfolio risk management Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003001420A2 WO2003001420A2 PCT/GB2002/002906 GB0202906W WO03001420A2 WO 2003001420 A2 WO2003001420 A2 WO 2003001420A2 GB 0202906 W GB0202906 W GB 0202906W WO 03001420 A2 WO03001420 A2 WO 03001420A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- portfolio
- computer
- returns
- assets
- vector
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
Definitions
- This invention relates to financial portfolio risk management and more particularly to methods for selecting a portfolio which meets pre-defined criteria for risk and/or return on investment based on historical performance data for a collation of financial equities.
- the price of N investments at given instant in time, i, is described by vector p;.
- the total wealth of a portfolio at time i is proportional to the inner (dot) product w.p ; .
- Determining a portfolio which satisfies some pre-defined risk/return compromise amounts to selecting a particular weight vector w. In order to do this, it is usual to consider the vector of returns between time periods , ( f Pj. t )/Pi -t • By deducting non-random trends and according a mean value of zero to vector p, the task is then to find a value for such that w.p has a minimum variance. This can be expressed as:
- C is the covariance matrix of the multi-variate Gaussian and Z is the normalisation factor expressed as:
- the present invention aims to provide novel methods for the calculation of risk associated with a financial portfolio which, at least in part, alleviates some of the problems and inaccuracies which the inventors have identified in the prior art methods.
- the invention provides a method for selecting a portfolio w consisting of N assets of prices p ; each having a history of T + l returns at time intervals , (uncompounded returns over the previous t time steps) comprising the steps of;
- step b) optionally removing any deterministic trends identified in step a);
- step c) calculating using support vector algorithms a linear combination of the vectors defined in step a), of maximal length and which is as near as possible perpendicular to each vector ⁇ in the series for optimal alpha values between C " and C +
- the invention provides a method for selecting a portfolio w consisting of N assets of prices p f each having a history of T+ l returns at time intervals /, (uncompounded returns over the previous t time steps) comprising the steps of ;
- step b) optionally removing any deterministic trends identified in step a);
- step c) calculating using support vector algorithms a linear combination of the vectors defined in step a), of maximal length and which is as near as possible perpendicular to each vector qi in the series for optimal alpha values;
- the invention provides a A method for selecting a portfolio w consisting of N assets of prices p s each having a history of T+ l returns at time intervals i, (uncompounded returns over the previous t time steps) comprising the steps of;
- ⁇ t are positive (non-zero) slack variables reflecting the amount the portfolio w historically fell short of the desired value of r; c) optimise the problem in step b) by applying the Langrangian function
- ⁇ represents the non-zero slack variables of step b) to a power p and C is a weighting constant
- a time-aligned historical price time series is defined for each of the N assets to be considered in the portfolio .
- the length (in time-steps) of these series is arbitrary and will be denoted by T + 1.
- the time intervals i between the prices are also arbitrary, but are assumed equal. For the rest of this description it is assumed (without loss of generality) that they are daily prices - thus the term 'daily' can be replaced in the following by any other time interval.
- a desired minimum threshold level of daily return is denoted r. This is the risk level, the algorithm minimises the amount and size of portfolio returns that have historically fallen below this level. Note that although this return is calculated daily, the algorithm can be adjusted to reflect the return over a longer time period (e.g. a week or a month), that is it is the (uncompounded) return over the previous t days until the present day.
- a constant C which tells the algorithm how 'strict' to be about penalising the occasions when the return falls below the threshold r.
- a large value of C will result in a portfolio which achieves the desired risk control on the historical data, but which may not generalise well into the future.
- a lower value of C allows the return threshold violations to be greater, but can produce portfolios that are more robust (and typically more realistic) in the future.
- the algorithm produces as its output a set of weights, one for each asset, which we denote by the vector w, which has dimension N. These weights may be negative, which simply means that the particular asset is 'sold short'. Later we will impose the constraint that the sum of the elements of w is equal to unity. This is simply stating that we have made an investment of one unit in the portfolio and that it is relative to this unit investment at the start that any returns are measured.
- the algorithm finds an optimal balance between minimising the risk of sharp falls in price (“drawdowns") expressed through r, and producing a portfolio that has minimum complexity in the sense of the so-called VC-dimension (Vapnik Chervonenkis dimension). Minimisation of the complexity in this way produces portfolios that work well in the future as well as on the historical data. In this application the 'minimum complexity' portfolio in the absence of any other constraints on risk or return is simply to weight every asset equally, this is consistent with what one may intuitively decide in the absence of relevant data. Description of Algorithm
- ⁇ is the mean returns vector for the historical price data and ⁇ is the vector of predicted future returns. If there is no available method to compute (or estimate) the future returns then
- the algorithm is tasked to ensure that, as often as possible, at least the minimum threshold desired return r (over the period t) is achieved and that any downwards deviations from this are minimal. This can be expressed mathematically for the portfolio as
- w is the vector of weights to be applied when apportioning investment between assets
- the first term is the traditional SVM complexity control term, which minimises the length of w - which has the effect of maximising the margin (i.e. reducing the complexity) of the resulting solution.
- the second term adds up all the errors (measured by the non-zero slack variables to some power p, and is weighted by the pre-defined constant C which controls the trade-off between complexity and accuracy.
- ⁇ is the usual Kronecker delta (equal to 1 for equal indices and 0 otherwise) subject to the following constraints
- the portfolio may be defined as follows:
- the invention is a method for selecting a portfolio w consisting of N assets of prices Pi each having a history of T+l returns at time intervals , (uncompounded returns over the previous t time steps) comprising the steps of;
- step b) optionally removing any deterministic trends identified in step a);
- step b) calculating a linear combination of the vectors defined in step b), of maximal length and which is as near as possible perpendicular to each vector p; in the series applying the regression SVM algorithm;
- step d) solving the solution to the Lagrangian dual of step d) for optimal alpha parameters between C " and C + ;
- the present invention provides a method for selecting a portfolio w consisting of N assets of prices p; each having a history of T+ 1 returns at time intervals i, (uncompounded returns over the previous t time steps) comprising the steps of;
- step b) optionally removing any deterministic trends identified in step a);
- step c) calculating a linear combination of the vectors defined in step a), of maximal length and which is as near as possible perpendicular to each vector qj in the series;
- the method may conveniently be carried out by use of regression Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms.
- SVM Support Vector Machine
- This method is particularly beneficial in that it permits the separation of the covariance matrix C into positive and negative fluctuations enabling independent control of the sensitivity of positive and negative errors in calculating the optimum value of the portfolio w.
- ⁇ ⁇ and ⁇ 7 are positive 'slack variables' that measure the positive and negative errors.
- the constants C + and C " determine how hard we penalise positive (resp. negative) errors in the optimisation.
- the solution of this quadratic optimisation problem can be achieved through a number of well known algorithms.
- the methods of the invention are conveniently executed by a suitably configured computer program comprising computer readable code for operating a computer to perform one or more of the methods of the invention when installed in a suitable computing apparatus.
- the computer program may optionally be accessible on-line via a local network or via the Internet or may optionally be provided on a data carrier such as a computer readable magnetic or optical disk.
- the methods of the invention may further comprise the steps of displaying the portfolio which has been calculated and/or accepting payment for purchasing the portfolio.
- the invention provides a system for performing the aforementioned methods, the system comprising;
- a database accessible by the computer and comprising data including prices p ; of a plurality of assets and a history of returns on those assets over a known time period T+l at time intervals i interface means for permitting a user to access the computer and to input data selecting N assets from the data base;
- the computer is a server and comprises the database.
- the database may be provided on a server separate from the computer but accessible by the computer via a telecommunications network.
- the interface means is conveniently provided in the form of conventional computer peripherals which may include any or all of; a keyboard; a computer mouse, tracker ball or touch sensitive panel; a graphical user interface, a touch sensitive display screen or voice recognition technology.
- the means for providing a visual representation may be provided in the form of conventional computer peripherals which may include, without limitation a printer and/or a display monitor.
- FIG. 1 A representation of an embodiment of system in accordance with the invention is shown in Figure 1.
- the system comprises a plurality of personal computer apparatus PC one of which is shown in more detail and comprises a computer processor (1), a keyboard (2) for interfacing with the processor, a display monitor (3) for displaying data from the processor (1) and a printer (4) for printing data from the processor (1).
- Each PC has access via telecommunication links (represented schematically in the figure by split lines) to a database server which contains the price data and historic returns data for a plurality of assets from which the user can select a quantity N, via his user interface (1,2,3,4) .
- Data relating to the N assets is downloaded from the server to a computer processor (1) which is programmed by software to define a portfolio w according to one or more of the previously described methods. Once defined, the portfolio can be displayed on the monitor (3) and/or a hard copy of the portfolio definition can be printed from printer (4)
- Synthetic data was generated for 10 correlated financial assets.
- the weighting coefficients were adjusted so that they summed to zero. For each time series 10 5 samples were generated. An example of part of the time-series due to one of these assets is shown below.
- the assets were then combined into portfolios using the Markowitz algorithm and algorithm 1.
- the time series for the combined portfolio was generated (over the whole data set) and histograms of the price increments of the portfolio obtained as a numerical approximation to its probability density function. These histograms are shown below using a logarithmic y-axis (probability) in order to show the differences in the tails of the distributions - which are most important for risk control.
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP02740908A EP1407402A1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2002-06-25 | Financial portfolio risk management |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0115443A GB2377040A (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2001-06-25 | Financial portfolio risk management |
GB0115443.4 | 2001-06-25 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003001420A2 true WO2003001420A2 (en) | 2003-01-03 |
Family
ID=9917265
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2002/002906 WO2003001420A2 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2002-06-25 | Financial portfolio risk management |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20030055765A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1407402A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2377040A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003001420A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7024388B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2006-04-04 | Barra Inc. | Method and apparatus for an integrative model of multiple asset classes |
US7720738B2 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2010-05-18 | Thompson James R | Methods and apparatus for determining a return distribution for an investment portfolio |
WO2004114095A2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2004-12-29 | Strategic Capital Network Llc | Improved resource allocation technique |
US7454377B1 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2008-11-18 | Perry H. Beaumont | Computer method and apparatus for aggregating and segmenting probabilistic distributions |
US7685047B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2010-03-23 | Morgan Stanley | Portable alpha-plus products having a private equity component |
US7509275B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2009-03-24 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for asymmetric offsets in a risk management system |
US7426487B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2008-09-16 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | System and method for efficiently using collateral for risk offset |
US8849711B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2014-09-30 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for displaying a combined trading and risk management GUI display |
US7428508B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2008-09-23 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange | System and method for hybrid spreading for risk management |
US7593877B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2009-09-22 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | System and method for hybrid spreading for flexible spread participation |
US7769667B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2010-08-03 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for activity based margining |
US7430539B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2008-09-30 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange | System and method of margining fixed payoff products |
US8069109B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2011-11-29 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for using diversification spreading for risk offset |
US8108281B2 (en) * | 2005-01-07 | 2012-01-31 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for multi-factor modeling, analysis and margining of credit default swaps for risk offset |
US20070294158A1 (en) * | 2005-01-07 | 2007-12-20 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange | Asymmetric and volatility margining for risk offset |
US8738490B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2014-05-27 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for multi-factor modeling, analysis and margining of credit default swaps for risk offset |
US7593879B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2009-09-22 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | System and method for using diversification spreading for risk offset |
US8103578B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2012-01-24 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for multi-factor modeling, analysis and margining of credit default swaps for risk offset |
US7630930B2 (en) * | 2005-02-24 | 2009-12-08 | Robert Frederick Almgren | Method and system for portfolio optimization from ordering information |
US7689492B2 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2010-03-30 | Morgan Stanley | Products, systems and methods for scale-in principal protection |
ITMI20052438A1 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2007-06-22 | Gamma Croma Spa | METHOD FOR REALIZING A COMPOSITE ARTICLE INCLUDING A COSMETIC PRODUCT AND A DECORATIVE ELEMENT |
US7502756B2 (en) * | 2006-06-15 | 2009-03-10 | Unnikrishna Sreedharan Pillai | Matched filter approach to portfolio optimization |
US20090171824A1 (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2009-07-02 | Dmitriy Glinberg | Margin offsets across portfolios |
US7991671B2 (en) | 2008-03-27 | 2011-08-02 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Scanning based spreads using a hedge ratio non-linear optimization model |
US8452841B2 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2013-05-28 | Bank Of America Corporation | Text chat for at-risk customers |
US8131634B1 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2012-03-06 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for determining the market risk margin requirements associated with a credit default swap |
US8321333B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2012-11-27 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for determining the market risk margin requirements associated with a credit default swap |
US10192243B1 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2019-01-29 | Groupon, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining promotion pricing parameters |
US10304093B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2019-05-28 | Groupon, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and computer readable medium for providing a self-service interface |
US10255620B1 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2019-04-09 | Groupon, Inc. | Fine print builder |
US9996859B1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2018-06-12 | Groupon, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and computer readable medium for providing a self-service interface |
US10147130B2 (en) | 2012-09-27 | 2018-12-04 | Groupon, Inc. | Online ordering for in-shop service |
US10664876B1 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2020-05-26 | Groupon, Inc. | Method and apparatus for promotion template generation |
US10304091B1 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2019-05-28 | Groupon, Inc. | Deal generation using point-of-sale systems and related methods |
US10664861B1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2020-05-26 | Groupon, Inc. | Generating promotion offers and providing analytics data |
US11386461B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2022-07-12 | Groupon, Inc. | Deal generation using point-of-sale systems and related methods |
US20140081889A1 (en) * | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Axioma, Inc. | Purifying Portfolios Using Orthogonal Non-Target Factor Constraints |
US20140108295A1 (en) * | 2012-10-11 | 2014-04-17 | Axioma, Inc. | Methods and Apparatus for Generating Purified Minimum Risk Portfolios |
US20160110811A1 (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2016-04-21 | Axioma, Inc. | Methods and Apparatus for Implementing Improved Notional-free Asset Liquidity Rules |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5946666A (en) * | 1996-05-21 | 1999-08-31 | Albert Einstein Healthcare Network | Monitoring device for financial securities |
US6061662A (en) * | 1997-08-15 | 2000-05-09 | Options Technology Company, Inc. | Simulation method and system for the valuation of derivative financial instruments |
WO2000062225A1 (en) * | 1999-04-08 | 2000-10-19 | Kay Alan F | Marketplace system fees enhancing market share and participation |
AU2001246268A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2001-10-23 | Andrey Feuerverger | Method and device for calculating value at risk |
-
2001
- 2001-06-25 GB GB0115443A patent/GB2377040A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2002
- 2002-06-25 EP EP02740908A patent/EP1407402A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-06-25 US US10/178,784 patent/US20030055765A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-06-25 WO PCT/GB2002/002906 patent/WO2003001420A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2377040A (en) | 2002-12-31 |
US20030055765A1 (en) | 2003-03-20 |
GB0115443D0 (en) | 2001-08-15 |
EP1407402A1 (en) | 2004-04-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1407402A1 (en) | Financial portfolio risk management | |
Hotz‐Behofsits et al. | Predicting crypto‐currencies using sparse non‐Gaussian state space models | |
US8706599B1 (en) | System and method of generating investment criteria for an investment vehicle that includes a pool of escrow deposits from a plurality of merger and acquisition transactions | |
US7761360B1 (en) | Method and system for simulating implied volatility surfaces for use in option pricing simulations | |
US7536329B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for an incomplete information model of credit risk | |
Hautsch et al. | Bayesian inference in a stochastic volatility Nelson–Siegel model | |
CA2312730A1 (en) | Pricing module for financial advisory system | |
Kara et al. | A hybrid approach for generating investor views in Black–Litterman model | |
JP2003510688A (en) | System and method for predicting operation of a complex system | |
Cohen et al. | European option pricing with stochastic volatility models under parameter uncertainty | |
Gruber et al. | Bayesian online variable selection and scalable multivariate volatility forecasting in simultaneous graphical dynamic linear models | |
US20040103052A1 (en) | System and method for valuing investment opportunities using real options, creating heuristics to approximately represent value, and maximizing a portfolio of investment opportunities within specified objectives and constraints | |
Lux | Approximate Bayesian inference for agent-based models in economics: a case study | |
Salas-Molina et al. | Empowering cash managers through compromise programming | |
Dombrovskii et al. | Feedback predictive control strategies for investment in the financial market with serially correlated returns subject to constraints and trading costs | |
JP2001067409A (en) | Price risk evaluation system for financial commodities or its derivatives, and storage medium | |
Dai et al. | Forecasting equity risk premium: A new method based on wavelet de‐noising | |
CA3160715A1 (en) | Systems and methods for business analytics model scoring and selection | |
Chen et al. | Particle swarm optimization approach to portfolio construction | |
Liu et al. | LSTM-based cross-prediction price model for gold and bitcoin | |
Bohdalová et al. | Value at risk with filtered historical simulation | |
Karim et al. | Forecasting Value at Risk of Foreign Exchange Rate by Integrating Geometric Brownian Motion | |
Ming et al. | Modeling the Dynamics of the Value of Digital Financial Assets Using the Example of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple | |
Kumaria et al. | Forecasting the Indian Financial Markets with LSTM and Price Indicators | |
Rahayu et al. | IMPLEMENTATION OF LONG SHORT TERM MEMORY (LSTM) ALGORITHM FOR PREDICTING STOCK PRICE MOVEMENTS OF LQ45 INDEX (CASE STUDY: BBCA 2017–2023 STOCK PRICE) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002740908 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2002740908 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 2002740908 Country of ref document: EP |