LIGHT HYDROCARBON SEPARATION USING 8-MEMBER RING ZEOLITES
David H. Olson
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This Application is a continuation-in-part of my co-pending Application
Serial No. 09/768,943, filed on January 23,2001, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by specific reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to a process for the adsorptive separation
of low molecular weight hydrocarbons. In a preferred embodiment, the invention relates to the kinetic separation of propylene from other hydrocarbons, in particular, from propane. The process employs at least one substantially acid- free
zeolite having an 8-member ring channel system. Preferred zeolite structure
types are CHA and ITE.
RELATED ART
It has long been known that certain porous substances such as zeolites
which have certain selective adsorption characteristics are useful in separating a
hydrocarbon mixture into its component parts. Similarly, it is well known in the
separation art that certain crystalline zeolites can be used to separate certain hydrocarbons from feed mixtures.
The separation of propylene-propane mixtures is one of the most
important operations in the petrochemical industry. Such mixtures usually result
from the thermal or catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons, and the majority of them
represent coproducts with ethylene. Their separation is of great economic
consequence, since the separated propylene has many uses, one of the most important being s monomer feedstock for polypropylene elastomer production.
For most end uses the propylene must have a high purity. The propane fraction
can be recycled to the cracking step or used separately, e.g., as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for heating.
The conventional method for separating the propylene-propane mixture is fractional distillation. The relative volatility for the mixture is in the range of
1.09-1.15 (Laurance and Swift, 1972), depending on composition and pressure of operation. A large number of contacting stages are required (over 100), and
the associated high reflux ratio requires a large input of energy. The U.S. Department of Energy has reported that the propylene/propane separation is the
most energy-intensive single distillation practiced commercially (Wiley, 1992).
A significant amount of the light olefins produced during the refining of
crude oil is used as refinery fuel. Cost-effective separation technologies will be required that can withstand the harsh operating environment of a petroleum
refinery. In addition to traditional refinery and olefin plant applications, paraffin
dehydrogenation units for the production of olefins from natural gas liquids (NGL) have recently been brought on stream. For these small units, typically less
than 5,000 bbl/day of olefin production, novel separation technologies may be
more competitive with more traditional unit operations.
Recent federal regulations, such as the Clean Air Act, mandate that
hydrocarbon emissions from refineries and chemical plants be reduced to low
levels. To reduce the economic penalty of environmental compliance, low-cost
hydrocarbon separation technologies are required. For facilities located in
nonattainment areas, the need to reduce hydrocarbon losses is especially critical.
Facilities can no longer afford to dispose of waste hydrocarbon streams in their flare systems. Purge streams from polyolefin reactors and vents from polymer
storage facilities, which were once flared, must be redirected to recovery systems.
For streams containing a mixture of paraffinic and olefinic material, economic and process considerations may dictate that the olefin be recovered and recycled.
Propylene is obtained by recovery from petroleum feed stocks which
include mixtures of olefins and paraffins. Although propylene can be separated
without difficulty from certain olefins and paraffins by fractional distillation, that separation technique is less useful for olefins and paraffins having similar boiling
points and similar volatilities, in particular propylene and propane. For this reason, the separation of propylene in highly purified form from a mixture containing propylene and propane is difficult and, as noted above, consumes a
large amount of energy.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide a zeolite adsorbent material that
will separate propylene from propylene/propane and propylene/olefin mixtures
in a cost efficient manner. To that end, the zeolites used in practicing this
invention are relatively inexpensive. The zeolites also have a high adsorption
capacity for propylene and a high degree of selectivity for propylene over propane
and other olefins. These zeolites are, therefore, suitable for large scale
commercial operations.
It is another object of this invention to provide a more environmentally
acceptable process for obtaining highly purified propylene from a propylene/
propane mixture.
It is yet another object of the invention to carry out a separation of other
light hydrocarbons using the kinetic based process of this invention in an energy- efficient manner. It is a further objective of the invention to provide a separation process that is highly efficient in having high diffusion rates for propylene
relative to propane.
The invention can be summarized as encompassing certain zeolite adsorbents, methods for preparation of such zeolites, and their use in methods of
separating a mixture containing at least two hydrocarbons.
The zeolites of the invention comprise or consist of zeolites having a
channel structure that has 8 -member rings of tetrahedra defining diffusion in the
channels. The zeolites are also substantially acid-free. Zeolites containing as constituents both aluminum and silicon must have an Si: Al molar ratio of at least about 200. Low silicon zeolites such as aluminophosphate-type zeolites are also
suitable, provided they satisfy the other requirements stated herein. Examples of
suitable aluminophosphate-type zeolites and zeolites containing as constituents
aluminum and silicon are set forth below.
The zeolites of the invention are also characterized as having a
propylene/propane diffusion ratio of greater than about 50 (at 80°C and 600 torr
hydrocarbon pressure) and having a propylene absorption capacity greater than
40 mg/g at 80 °C and 600 torr propylene pressure. Suitable zeolites are those
having an 8-member ring channel structure and a molar ratio of silica to
aluminum of at least about 200: 1 and may have at least one low activity metal
cation to minimize the acid activity of the zeolite so that it does not result in
significant polymerization of the olefins. Preferred zeolites are those having
CHA and ITE-type structures.
The invention also provides a process for separating hydrocarbons from a hydrocarbon mixture and, in particular, propylene from a propane/propylene
mixture using the above-described zeolite adsorbent. The process comprises the steps of contacting the hydrocarbon mixture with at least one of the zeolites to effect separation of propylene. In a preferred embodiment, the zeolite adsorbent
separates propylene from propylene/propane and propylene/propane/ethylene mixtures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGURE 1 shows the amounts of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
per gram of zeolite Si-CHA over time and under
conditions of 600 torr propylene and 80°C.
FIGURE 2 shows the amounts of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
per gram of zeolite Si-CHA over time and under conditions of 600 torr propylene and 30°C.
FIGURE 3 shows adsorption isotherms for propylene adsorbed, in
milligrams per gram of zeolite, on Si-CHA at 30°, 45°,
60°, 80° and 100°C.
FIGURE 4 shows the amount of propane adsorbed,' in milligrams per
gram of zeolite, on Si-CHA zeolites over time and under
conditions of 80°C and 600 torr propane.
FIGURE 5 shows the temperature dependence of diffusion rates for
propylene and propane in a zeolite Si-CHA.
FIGURE 6 shows the amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
per gram of zeolite ITQ-3 over time and under conditions of 600 torr propylene and 80°C.
FIGURE 7 shows the amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
per gram of zeolite ITQ-3 over time and under conditions of 600 torr propylene and 30 °C.
FIGURE 8 shows adsorption isotherms for propylene adsorbed, in
milligrams propylene per gram of zeolite, on ITQ-3 zeolite at pressures of about 0 to 700 torr and
temperatures of 40°C, 60°C, 80°C, 100°C, 120°C and
140°C.
FIGURE 9 shows the rates of adsorption of propylene and propane in
milligrams propylene/propane per gram of zeolite ITQ-3
structure type over time and under conditions of 80°C and
650 torr hydrocarbon.
FIGURE 10 shows the amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
propylene per gram of zeolite ZSM-58/DD3R over time
and under conditions of 600 torr propylene and 80°C.
FIGURE 11 shows the amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
propylene per gram of zeolite ZSM-58/DD3R over time and under conditions of 600 torr propylene and 30°C.
FIGURE 12 shows the amount of propane adsorbed in milligrams
propane per gram of zeolite ZSM-58/DD3R over time and under conditions of 600 torr propane and 80 °C.
FIGURE 13 shows the amount of propane adsorbed in milligrams
propane per gram of zeolite ZSM-58/DD3R over time and
under conditions of 600 torr propane and 30°C.
FIGURE 14 shows the amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams
propylene per gram 10-member ring zeolite HZSM-5 over
time and under conditions of 600 torr propylene and 30°C.
FIGURE 15 shows the amount of propane adsorbed in milligrams
propane per gram 10-member ring zeolite HZSM-5 over
time and under conditions of 600 torr propane and 30°C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Zeolites are commonly classified as large-pore, medium-pore and small-
pore and in most cases the channel system of such zeolites are accessed via 12-
member rings (or larger), 10-member rings, or 8-member rings (or smaller),
respectively.
The zeolites of this invention have 8-member rings of tetrahedra as the
largest ring size, thereby limiting access to the pore system by larger
hydrocarbons. A large number of zeolites have 8-member rings of tetrahedra as the largest ring size. These zeolites are referred to as 8-member ring or small
pore zeolites.
The Structure Commission of the International Zeolite Association has assigned three letter structure type codes to all zeolites of known structure. Frequently, different names have been assigned to materials having the same
structure type, such materials being referred to as isotypes. This may occur in cases where the materials have a composition different from the material which
was the basis for the original assignment of the structure type code. As an example, the structure type code CHA is derived from the zeolite mineral
chabazite. The CHA structure type has the following isotypes: AlPO4-(CHA),
CaAPO-44, CaAPO-47, GaPO4-34, LZ-218, Linde D, Linde R, MeAPO-47,
MeAPSO-47, Phi, SAPO-34, SAPO-47, Si-CHA, SSZ-13, Wilhendersonite, ZK-
14 and ZYT-6, in addition to the material chabazite. A description of these structures, their type codes, and a listing of their isotypes are given in Atlas of
Zeolite Structure Types by W.M. Meier, D.H. Olson and Ch. Baerlocher,
Elsevier, 1996, which is incorporated by reference herein.
A partial listing of such 8-member ring structures, taken from Atlas of Zeolite Structure Types, is given below:
8-Member Ring Structures
ABW Li-A (Barrer and White)
AEI AIPO4-18
AFX SAPO-56
APC AIPO4-C
ATN MAPO-39
ATT AIPO4-12-TAMU
AW AIPO4-25
AWW AIPO4-22
CHA Chabazite, SSZ-13
DDR Deca-dodecasil 3R
EAB TMA-E
ERI Erionite
JBW NaJ (Barrer and White)
KFI ZK-5
LEV Levyne
LTA Linde Type A
MER Merlinoite
PAU Paulingite
PHI Phillilpsite
RHO Rho
RTE RUB-3
RTH RUB-13
ZON ZAPO-M1
ITE ITE-3
Zeolites of the ITE structure type include ITQ-3. Zeolites of the DDR structure type include DD3R, ZSM-58 and Sigma 1. The zeolite structure types that are the most preferred adsorbents are zeolites of the CHA (Chabazite), ITE and DDR (Deca-Dodecasil-R) structure types and preferably CHA and ITE types. Descriptions of zeolites of CHA and DDR structure types including identifications of structure and chemical compositions are set forth in W. M. Meier, et al. , referenced hereabove. A description of ITQ-3 structure type zeolite
is set forth in Published International Application WO/98/54091 to M. Camblor
et al., which is incorporated herein by reference. A description of the CHA type
zeolite, SSZ-13, is set forth in United States Patent No. 4,544,538 to Zones, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Other preferred adsorbents are zeolites having 8-member rings that have
a high Si: Al mole ratio and are substantially acid free. High Si:Al ratio is
defined as a ratio of at least about 200, more preferably at least 300 and most preferably at least 500. For efficient, long-term operation of the adsorption
process, it is critical that the adsorbent have either essentially no acidity or acid
activity that does not polymerize olefins. Acidic sites in the adsorbent will result in polymerization of the desired olefins that would require thermal activation to remove. Accordingly, the term "substantially acid-free" is used herein to
encompass zeolites that do not polymerize olefins in a manner that would prevent long-term operation of the adsorption process. In addition to the cost of the
thermal treatment there is a substantial time requirement, as well, both of which would significantly reduce operating efficiency. Equilibrium should be reached
in 60 minutes, more preferably in 30 minutes, and even more preferably in less
than 15 minutes.
Control of acidity can be done in several ways. One method of reducing
acidity is to subject the zeolite to ion exchange with low activity metal cations.
Preferred cations for this purpose are alkali metal cations, such as sodium,
potassium or cesium. The larger cations have the advantage of weaker
interactions with olefins and hence lower temperature and or faster desorption of
the desired olefin. The preferred method of avoiding acidity and ensuring the
desired Si: Al ratio is to synthesize the zeolite adsorbent with the lowest possible aluminum content. Practical considerations may preclude reaching the low levels
achievable at the laboratory scale. Tetramethyl- and tetraethyl-orthosilicate will
produce the lowest alumina content zeolites; materials having SiO2/Al2O3 ratios above about 50,000 should be achievable. Using fumed silica as the silica source
should result in zeolite products having SiO2/Al2O3 ratios above about 20,000. Colloidal silica sol, available in bulk commercial scale quantities, will yield
zeolites having SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of about 3,000. Sodium waterglass, also available in bulk quantities, is a widely used silica source and can produce zeolites having SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of about 600 (see G.H. Kuehl, in Verified
Synthesis of Zeolitic Materials, H. Robson, editor, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 22 (1998)).
As noted above, the zeolites or molecular sieves can also be of the
aluminophosphate-type. Aluminophosphate-type zeolites having a channel
structure that has 8-member rings of tetrahedra defining diffusion in the channels
includes those having AEI, AET, AFT, AFX, ACL, APD, ATN, ATT, ATV,
AWW, and ZON structure types. These zeolites must also be substantially acid
free, have a propylene/propane diffusion ratio of greater than about 50 (at 80° C and 600 torr hydrocarbon pressure) and a propylene adsorption capacity greater
than 40 mg/g at 80°C and 600 torr pressure propylene.
The discovery that substantially acid- free zeolites having 8-member rings
and Si: Al mole ratios of at least about 200 or 8-member ring aluminophosphate- based zeolites make good adsorbents for separation of propylene from
hydrocarbon mixture is of considerable practical importance. While pure zeolites
of the CHA and ITE structure types are operable, specific zeolites of this type may currently be very expensive to prepare in small quantities, let alone the large
amounts of zeolite that would be required for industrial application. The ability
to select well-known and relatively inexpensive 8-member zeolites which can then be made suitable for use by routine treatment steps is an essential prerequisite for the commercial application of an industrial process for separation of propylene by zeolite adsorbents.
The zeolites of the present invention are characterized by their unexpectedly high diffusional distinction between propylene and propane. This distinction can be quantified in terms of the ratio of the diffusion coefficients for
these two hydrocarbons, e.g., the ratio of Dpropyiene/Dpropane. The effectiveness
of an adsorbent for separation increases with the magnitude of this ratio, which
is referred to herein as RD. It is well accepted in the art that an adsorbent having
an RD greater than about 50 would be an effective separation adsorbent for a two-
component system.
Where the RD value for propane/propylene approaches unity, there is no
kinetic based preferential adsorption of one component over the other. As the
value of RD becomes less or greater than unity, there is a preferential selectivity
by the adsorbent for one of the two components. When comparing a RD value of
propylene relative to propane, a selectivity larger than unity indicates preferential
adsorption of propylene within the adsorbent, while a RD value less than unity
would indicate that propane is preferentially adsorbed by the adsorbent.
The zeolites of the present invention have a RD ratio (propylene/propane diffusion ratio) of greater than fifty (50), preferably greater than one hundred
(100), more preferably greater than two hundred (200) and most preferably greater than five hundred (500).
Another important adsorbent property of a zeolite is its adsorption
capacity, for example as measured by the weight of hydrocarbon adsorbed per
unit weight of adsorbent. A zeolite's capacity to adsorb propylene is defined as
the number of milligrams of propylene adsorbed per gram of zeolite at equilibrium. Equilibrium condition is defined as no change in amount of propylene adsorbed by the zeolite. In principle, the higher the adsorption capacity
the less the adsorbent that will be required to separate a given quantity of
hydrocarbon, e.g., propylene, for an adsorbent having a given RD. The zeolites
of this invention are also characterized by their high adsorption capacity.
Specifically, the zeolite of the present invention has a propylene adsorption
capacity of greater than 40 milligrams (mg) propylene per gram (gm) zeolite
measured at 80° and a propylene pressure of 600 torr. The zeolite's propylene
adsorption capacity at that temperature and pressure is preferably at least 60 mg/g
and more preferably 100 mg/g.
A high RD value is required to achieve effective kinetic separation, and a
moderate to high adsorption capacity is required to make the separation process practical.
In the description that follows, unless otherwise stated, adsoφtion capacities will be the values determined when the feed is at 600 torr pressure and
the adsoφtion chamber is at 80°C. Several different modes of making these
measurements are feasible.
Another method of controlling a zeolite's behavior as an adsorbent for use in practicing this invention is by controlling the size of the zeolite crystal.
Adjusting this size, typically achieved during the zeolite synthesis step, will allow the attainment of practical cycle times, as in a pressure swing adsoφtion process
(PSA process). The adsoφtion rate varies as the inverse square of the radius of the crystal. Thus a change in the average crystal size by a factor of 10 will produce a factor of 100 difference in the adsoφtion and desoφtion step times.
Accordingly, careful attention must be given to the control of the size of the
zeolite crystals employed. It is preferable that the size of the zeolite crystal is no
larger than 1.0 microns and more preferably no larger than 0.1. microns.
The novel separation process of the instant invention involves contacting
a mixture containing propylene and one or more hydrocarbons, in particular,
propane, that exists either as a gas, liquid or mixed phase with at least one of the class of zeolites described above for a period of time to selectively adsorb
propylene within the internal pore structure of the zeolite. The components of the
hydrocarbon mixtures that are not adsorbed are thus carried off. The propylene
is thereafter recovered from the internal pore structure of the zeolite by conventional desorbing techniques such as stripping with another gas, pressure
change, temperature change or a combination of these methods. A single or
multistage pressure swing adsoφtion process (PSA process) is typical of the type
of configuration in which this invention may be practiced. Similarly, a single or multistage membrane-based process may be employed. The processes of this invention can also be conducted in flow type (continuous) systems, e.g., a
continuous chromatographic type operation. In such a flow type system, a hydrocarbon mixture is passed through a bed containing at least one of the class
of zeolites described above. Because of the high selectivity of the zeolites used in practicing this invention, the desired propylene is adsorbed or retained in the bed, while the remaining hydrocarbons are removed. By this process, a highly
purified propylene product can be obtained.
The exact temperature at which the novel processes of this invention are
conducted will depend upon the type of separation method employed. The temperature, however, must be maintained below that required for a chemical
reaction to occur, e.g. below the cracking temperature. The temperature should
thus be maintained below about 250°C. Preferably, the processes of this
invention can be conducted in the temperature range between -100°C and about
250°C and preferably between -20°C and +100°C.
In the above, materials are described that are useful for the separation of
propylene from propane. In this embodiment, propylene is the gas phase
component preferentially adsorbed. In the subsequent desoφtion step, separation
and recovery of high purity propylene is achieved. It should be understood that for a different pair of light hydrocarbons, the gas phase component not
preferentially adsorbed maybe the desired hydrocarbon. In this instance, the non- adsorbed or slowly adsorbed hydrocarbon is separated in high purity and
subsequently the adsorbed component is desorbed before this process is repeated.
Thus, the detailed discussion concerning propylene/propane separation
illustrates the potential of 8-member ring zeolites for kinetic based separation. These teachings may in turn be applied to other light hydrocarbon pairs, or mixtures, and cases where either the fast adsorbing or the slow adsorbing
component is the desired higher value product.
The following examples are presented for illustration puφoses only and
are not to be taken as limiting the present invention in any way.
Examples
Preparation of Zeolite Adsorbents Tested
The Si-CHA (a pure silica version of the zeolite chabazite) and ITQ-3
structure type zeolite used in the following examples were obtained from M.
Chamblor, who is identified as a joint inventor in Published International
Application No. WO 98/54091. A synthesis of Si-CHA is reported in M. J. Diaz-
Cabras, P. A. Barrett and M.A. Camblor, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1881. A
process for preparing ITQ-3 is disclosed in Published International Application
No. WO 98/54091. A synthesis of DD3-R is reported in United States Patent No.
4,698,217. A synthesis of SSZ-13 is reported in United States Patent No.
4,544,538.
Measurement of Adsorption Capacities and Rates
Adsoφtion measurements were made using a computer controlled
thermogravimetric balance consisting of a TA51 thermobalance and associated
TA-2000/PC control system. This one atmosphere gas flow through electrobalance system was controlled via Macintosh based LabView control
software, Kinetic Systems interface, mass flow controllers and Eurotherm
temperature controller. Typically, adsoφtion capacities and rates were measured at 600 torr hydrocarbon pressure and 30° and/or 80°C.
The relative diffusion parameters were obtained as follows. The diffusion parameter D/r2, where D is the diffusion coefficient and r is the crystal radius,
were derived from the soφtion measurements with the assumption that the plane
sheet model describes the diffusion process. Thus, for a given sorbate loading,
Q, the value Q/Q
M where
related to (Dt/r
2) '
Λ where t is the time (sec.) required to reach the sorbate loading
Q. Graphical solutions for the plane sheet model are given by J. Crank in The
Mathematics of Diffusion, Oxford University Press, Ely House, London, 1967.
The ratio of the diffusions coefficients, D, for propylene and propane is taken as
the ratio of the respective D/r2 values and given the name RD.
EXAMPLE 1
Si-CHA zeolite having an 8-member ring CHA type structure, having
substantially equidimensional crystals ranging in size from 1 to 12 microns and having a dry composition of 100% SiO2 was employed. The Si-CHA zeolite was contacted with propylene at a pressure of 600 torr at 80°C until equilibrium was
obtained. At equilibrium, this zeolite adsorbed 90 milligrams propylene per gram
of zeolite. The rate of adsoφtion, defined as D/r2 (wherein D is diffusion and r is radius of zeolite crystal), was measured over time and calculated as 1.5 x 10 "3 sec "' . The amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams per gram of zeolite over time is shown in FIGURE 1.
EXAMPLE 2
The Si-CHA zeolite employed in EXAMPLE 1 was contacted with propylene at 600 torr pressure at 30 °C until an equilibrium was obtained. At equilibrium, the zeolite adsorbed 120 milligrams propylene per gram of zeolite.
The rate of adsoφtion, D/r2, was 4.6 x 10 ^ sec"1. The adsoφtion rate for
propylene in milligrams per gram of zeolite, is shown in FIGURE 2.
EXAMPLE 2A
Isotherms for the adsoφtion of propylene by the Si-CHA zeolite at 30 °C,
45°C, 60°C, 80°C and 100°C, were measured. The results are shown in FIGURE
3.
EXAMPLE 3
The Si-CHA zeolite employed in Example 1 was contacted with propane
at 600 torr pressure and at 80 °C for about 600 minutes as shown in FIGURE 4.
The rate of adsoφtion, D/r,2 was 9.4 x 10 "7 sec. Accordingly, the relative
adsoφtion rates of propylene to propane for this zeolite at 80°C, also referred to as RD is 1,550.
EXAMPLE 4
The Si-CHA zeolite employed in EXAMPLE 1 was contacted with propane
at 600 torr pressure at 30°C. The rate of adsoφtion was 1.0 x 10'8 sec "'. The relative propylene/propane diffusion rates for this zeolite at 30°C is 43,600.
The results set forth in the previous examples were analyzed to determine
the temperature dependence of diffusion rates for propane and propylene with
zeolite Si-CHA. That result is set forth in FIGURE 5. The relative diffusion rates of propylene to propane in Si-CHA structure type zeolite range from 1,550 to
43,600 over the temperature range of 80° to 30°C. These diffusion rates for
propylene and propane in Si-CHA structure type zeolite at the temperatures tested
are set forth below in TABLE 1.
TABLE 1
Diffusion Rates of C :, Hydrocarbons in Si -CHA
Hydrocarbon Temperature > (°C). Diffusion Parameter D/r2 RD
Propylene 30 4.6 x 10"4
Propane 30 1.0 X 10"8 43,600
Propylene 45 8.4 X 10"4
Propane 45 8.9 x 10"8 9,500
Propylene 60 1.1 x 10"3
Propane 60 2.7 x 107 3,900
Propylene 80 1.5 x 10"3
Propane 80 9.4 x 107 1,500
EXAMPLE 5
An ITQ-3 zeolite material having an 8-member ring channel system of the ITE structure type with elongated crystals of about 0.2 to 15 microns in length
and the shortest dimension for diffusion from about 0.1 to about 1.0 micron and
having a dry composition of 100% Si02 was employed. This ITQ-3 zeolite was
contacted with propylene at a pressure of 600 torr at 80 °C until equilibrium was obtained. At equilibrium, this zeolite adsorbed 46 milligrams propylene per gram
zeolite. The rate of adsoφtion , D/r2, was 3.8 x 10'3 sec. "'. The amount of
propylene adsorbed in milligrams per gram zeolite over time is shown in FIGURE
6.
EXAMPLE 6
The ITQ-3 zeolite employed in Example 5 was contacted with propylene at 600 torr pressure at 30°C until equilibrium was reached. At equilibrium, this zeolite adsorbed 63 milligrams propylene per gram of zeolite. The rate of
adsoφtion, D/r,2 was 1.5 x 10 '3 sec "'. The amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams propylene per gram of zeolite over time is shown in FIGURE 7.
EXAMPLE 6A
Adsoφtion isotherms for the adsoφtion of propylene by the ITQ-3 zeolite were carried out. Isotherms for 40°C, 60°C, 80°C, 100°C, 120°C and 140°C are set forth in FIGURE 8.
EXAMPLE 7
The ITQ-3 zeolite employed in EXAMPLE 5 was contacted with propane at 650 torr pressure at 80°C. The rate of adsoφtion, D/r2, was 7.4 x 10"6sec "'.
The relative propylene/propane diffusion rates , RD, at 80 °C for this ITQ-3 zeolite
was 510. These data are set forth in FIGURE 9.
EXAMPLE 8
The ITQ-3 structure employed in EXAMPLE 5 was contacted with propane
at 600 torr pressure at 30°C. The rate of adsoφtion, D/r2, was 2.2 x 10 "6 sec "'.
The relative propvlene/propane diffusion rates, RD, at30°C for this ITQ-3 zeolite
was 690.
The results from EXAMPLES 5, 6, 7 and 8 for ITQ-3 zeolite in terms of propylene diffusion parameter, D/r2, and the ratio of adsoφtion of propylene to
propane adsoφtion rates, RD, are set forth in TABLE 2. A comparison of the relative diffusion parameters of ITQ-3 for light hydrocarbons is set forth in TABLE 3. The RD results come within the limitations for the invention.
TABLE 2
Diffusion Rates of C, Hydrocarbons in ITQ-3
Hydrocarbon Temperature (°C) Diffusion Parameter D/R2 Rn
Propylene 30 1.5 X 10"3
Propane 30 2.2 x lO"6 690
Propylene 80 3.8 X 10"3
Propane 80 7.4 X 10"6 510
TABLE 3
Hydrocarbon Diffusion Parameter D/r2 (sec-1, 80°C)
Ethane 1.4 x 10"2
Ethylene 1.1 x 10"2
Propane 7.4 X 10"6
Propylene 3.8 x 10"3
Hexane 5.0 x 10"7
EXAMPLE 9
A ZSM-58 zeolite material having an 8-member ring channel system and of the DDR type structure was contacted with propylene at 600 torr pressure at 80°C until equilibrium was obtained. At equilibrium, this zeolite adsorbed 34 milligrams propylene per gram of zeolite. The rate of adsoφtion, D/r2, was 2.6 x 10"4 sec "'. The amount of propylene adsorbed in milligrams per gram of this zeolite over time is shown in FIGURE 10.
EXAMPLE 9A
The ZSM-58 zeolite material of EXAMPLE 9 was contacted with propylene
at 30 °C and 600 torr propylene pressure. The rate of adsoφtion curve is set forth in FIGURE 11 At equilibrium, 44 mg of propylene are adsorbed per gram of zeolite. The adsoφtion rate, D/r2, was 1.2 x 10"4 sec. "'.
EXAMPLE 10
The ZSM-58/DD3R zeolite employed in EXAMPLE 9 was contacted with propane at 600 lorr pressure at 30°C and 80°C. For each experiment, two
adsoφtion steps are observed, the fast step being completed at about - 15 min Λ (for 30°C) and ~ 7 min 'Λ (for 80°C). The rates of adsoφtion for the fast
adsoφtion process are respectively 2.8 x 10"4 sec"1 at 80°C and 1.1 x 10"4 sec "' at 30°C. The rates of adsoφtion for the slow adsoφtion step or process are
respectively 1.8 x 10"7 sec "' at 80°C and 9.6 x 10"9 sec"1 at 30°C. The amount of propane adsorbed in milligrams per gram of this zeolite over time, and at 600 torr
pressure as shown in FIGURE 12 for 80°C and in FIGURE 13 for 30°C. The results
for the fast and slow adsoφtion steps or processes at 30°C and 80°C are also set
forth in TABLE 4 herebelow.
A summary of results obtained in the above-referenced examples for Si-
CHA, ITQ-3 and ZSM-58/DD3R zeolites is set forth in TABLE 4.
TABLE 4
ProDVlene Adsorption Capacities and Relative Diffusion Rates
Adsorption Re l ative
D's RD
Zeolite Pore System Caoacitv (mα/α)" (C3 = /C3°.
80°C
80°C 30°C
Si-CHA 3-d 90 120" 1,500(43,600 @ 30°C)
ITQ-3 1-dc 46 63 510
ZSM-58/DD3R 2-d 30 42 1.0 @ 30°C and 0.9 @ 80°C (fast step)
12,400 @ 30°C (slow step) 1 ,410 @ 80°C ( slow step) a) Hydrocarbon pressure = 600 torr. P/P° = 0.023 at 80°C and 0.063 at 30°C. b) Simulated propylene pore capacity is 117 mg/g. c) Multifile diffusion.
While the results for Si-CHA and ITQ-3 zeolites show excellent separation parameters, the results for ZSM-58/DD3R zeolites indicate inadequate separation parameters. In TABLE 4, for zeolite ZSM-58/DD3R, the term "fast step" is used to describe the result obtained for the fast adsoφtion process which dominates the adsoφtion during the early times on stream, e.g. 7- 15 min m. For the fast step the RD value is 1.0, meaning that the propylene and propane have essentially equal adsoφtion rates. The slow adsoφtion step, clearly observable at longer adsoφtion times, gives RD values of 12,400 and 1 ,410, at 30° and 80 °C,
respectively. In a separation process using this adsorbent, the adsoφtion
associated with the "fast step" would dominate and this adsorbent would be ineffective in bringing about propylene/propane separation. This ZSM-58/DD3R
is thus an unacceptable adsorbent for this process.
EXAMPLE 11
HZSM-5 zeolite having a silica to alumina ratio of 3,300 was contacted with propylene at 30 °C and 600 torr propylene pressure. At equilibrium 72 mg/g of propylene was adsorbed. The D/r2 was 0.15 sec"1. These data are shown in
FIGURE 14.
EXAMPLE 12
HZSM-5 zeolite having a silica to alumina ratio of 3,300 was contacted with propane at 30°C and 600 torr propane pressure. At equilibrium, 74 mg/g of
propane was adsorbed. The D/r2 was 0.10 sec"1. These data are shown in FIGURE 15. The RD ratio is 1.4, demonstrating that 10-ring zeolites are not effective for
the kinetic separation of propylene from propane.
While certain embodiments of the present invention have been described
and/or exemplified above, various other embodiments will be apparent to those
skilled in the art from the foregoing disclosure. The present invention is,
therefore, not limited to the particular embodiments described and or
exemplified, but is capable of considerable variation and modification without
departure from the scope of the appended claims.