WO2001098914A1 - Automated claims fulfillment system - Google Patents

Automated claims fulfillment system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001098914A1
WO2001098914A1 PCT/US2001/040859 US0140859W WO0198914A1 WO 2001098914 A1 WO2001098914 A1 WO 2001098914A1 US 0140859 W US0140859 W US 0140859W WO 0198914 A1 WO0198914 A1 WO 0198914A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
claimant
automatically
suppliers
bids
mfillment
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/040859
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Peter Edward Richardson
John Charles Harvie
Original Assignee
American Management Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by American Management Systems, Inc. filed Critical American Management Systems, Inc.
Priority to AU2001267033A priority Critical patent/AU2001267033A1/en
Priority to EP01944645A priority patent/EP1292896A4/en
Publication of WO2001098914A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001098914A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/08—Insurance

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an automated claims fulfillment system which automatically coordinates activities between a claimant, an insurer and suppliers, to fulfill an insurance claim.
  • a conventional claims settlement process includes a "claims agreement" phase during which the insurer makes a decision to settle the claim, and then a " fulfillment" phase during which the insurer takes steps to mdeinnify the claimant.
  • a conventional fulfillment phase is highly ineffective and inefficient due to a number of key factors.
  • claimant satisfaction is often low because confusion over market values causes claimants to perceive that insurers "don't pay up in full.” Also, claimant satisfaction is often low because claimants are expected to complete the fulfilment phase themselves, and because the fulfillment phase takes too long.
  • insurers are not often able to use a claim as a springboard for selling other products and services because there is little or no "after fulfillment" follow-up service.
  • an apparatus which includes an automated claims fillment system, and communication channels which connect a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to the claims fulfillment system.
  • the claims fulfillment system automatically coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to fulfill the insurance claim.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a claims fulfillment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 are flowcharts illustrating the operation of a claims fulfillment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a claims fulfillment system, according to an additional embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram j lusttating an example of an overall architecture for implementing a claims system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a claims fulfillment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • an insurer 10 offers insurance.
  • a representative 12 acts on behalf of an insurer 10 and would typically be an employee of insurer 10 or a contractor working on behalf of insurer 10.
  • a claimant 14 has insurance with insurer 10, and submits a claim for loss of an insured item.
  • a plurality of suppliers 16 are available to replace, re-manufacture or repair the insured item in fulfillment of the claim.
  • Communication channels 17 connect insurer 10, claimant 14 and suppliers 16 to claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Communication channels 17 might comprise public and/or private networks, the Internet, local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), optical communication networks, wireless conMnunication networks, other types of electronic networks, etc.
  • different types of communication channels 17 can be used to connect insurer 10, claimant 14 and/or suppliers 16 to claims fulfillment system 18.
  • a respective communication channel 17 connecting insurer 10 to claims fulfillment system 18 might be a different type than the respective communication channel 17 connecting claimant 14 to claims fulfillment system 18.
  • different suppliers 16 may be connected to claims fulfillment system 18 via different types of communication channels 17.
  • the same communication channel 17 might be used to connect insurer 10, claimant 14 and/or suppliers 16 to claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Claims fulfillment system 18 automatically coordinates activities between insurer 10
  • claimant 14 (typically through representative 12), claimant 14 and suppliers 16 so that claimant 14 is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of suppliers 16.
  • claims fulfillment system 18 would typically have the ability to manage various types of products and/or services.
  • claims fulfillment system 18 preferably has the ability to manage on-catalog and non-catalog products, bespoke products/services, and specialized services.
  • On-catalog and non-catalog -products are products which are held on a catalog against a contract with suppliers 16, or that have a similar replacement to those held on the catalog. If the insured product is this type of product, the insured product would typically be replaced in fulfillment of the claim.
  • Bespoke products/services are products/services that are made specifically for a claimant or products that are made in limited numbers. If the insured item is this type of product, the insured product will typically have to be replaced by re-manufacture or replacement with an item that is similar.
  • Specialized services refers to repair/rebuild services required to essentially "fix" the insured item. Such specialized services are sometimes required to fulfill a claim.
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 are flowcharts illustrating the operation of claims fulfillment system 18. Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, the following is a description of each step:
  • Step 4.1.1 Can the claim be fulfilled through claims fulfillment system 18 ?
  • Input Details of the claim are received from insurer 10 (potentially manually or automatically).
  • Activity Determine whether the procurement required to meet a claim can be processed through claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Step 4.1.2 Representative 12 initiates procurement through claims fulfillment system 18
  • Activity Send a description of the required goods or services (typically including service level agreements) to claims fulfillment system 18 and typically pursue multiple procurement methods if necessary.
  • Step 4.2 Replace (On-catalog and non-catalog products).
  • Step 4.2.1 Claims fulfillment system 18 searches for the product/service in the catalog.
  • Input Product /service description from representative 12 (and, typically, service level, stock availability requirements if necessary).
  • Activity Claims fulfillment system 18 searches supplier catalog to match the description of the product/service.
  • Input A list of options for replacement products/services, typically including associated pricing, service levels and stock availability as retrieved by search.
  • Activity Representative 12 selects the best solution to meet the needs, typically based on a combination of price, availability, service level etc.
  • Output The best source for the replacement of that product according to required service level.
  • Step 4.2.3 Claims fulfillment system 18 asks representative 12 whether to search again using a more detailed product specification.
  • Activity Claims fulfillment system 18 asks representative 12 whether to search again and if so requests a more specific product description (typically via preferred technology).
  • Output Typically, e-mail, web-page, WAP phone, SMS message etc. to representative 12 (and returned to claims fulfillment system 18) containing more specific product detail and whether to search again.
  • Step 4.2.4 Representative 12 instructs claims fulfillment system 18 to search for best fit.
  • Input Search string for replacement product/service (enabled by "advanced” search).
  • Activity Representative 12 instructs claims fMfillment system 18 to search for similar options to that of the product/service required.
  • Output A list of best fit options .
  • Step 4.3 Remanufacture product (bespoke product/service).
  • claims fulfillment system 18 Details of the bespoke product or service are entered into claims fulfillment system 18.
  • claims fulfillment system 18 allows drawings, photographic images etc, to be entered.
  • Step 4.3.2 Representative 12 sets up business rules for auction, and would typically select suppliers 16 and update claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Representative 12 sets up an auction and establishes business rules (e.g. closed auction, open auction), and, typically, also establishes duration, etc.
  • representative 12 would also select suppliers 16 to be involved in the auction from, for example, an insurer's panel (based, for . example, on ability, past performance, geography).
  • Output A set of suppliers 16 to be involved in the auction and all information necessary to begin the auction.
  • Step 4.3.3 Claims fulfillment system 18 issues instructions to bid to suppliers 16.
  • Input A set of chosen suppliers 16 to be involved in the auction and the business rules set-up for that auction. (Can preferably be enhanced by additional instructions issued by representative 12).
  • Activity Claims fulfillment system 18 sends instructions to bid to suppliers 16, typically by their preferred technology.
  • Output Information about the auction and how to bid are received by each of suppliers 16 involved in the auction.
  • Step 4.3.4 Suppliers 16 ascertain whether they have enough information to bid.
  • Prior Step: 4.3.3 Instructions to bid.
  • Input Supplier 16 receive an invitation to bid.
  • Activity Supplier 16 receiving the invitation analyze the information (specification) contained in the instruction to bid.
  • Step 4.3.5 Suppliers 16 gather more detail about the service required.
  • a supplier 16 receives an invitation to bid, but doesn't have a detailed enough specification with which to compile a bid.
  • the supplier 16 gathers more information about the service required, e.g. through an on-site visit or through a more detailed discussions with representative 12 and/or claimant 14.
  • Step 4.3.4 (Supplier survey).
  • Input Business rules are set up for auction and participants are informed.
  • Output A list of options and prices.
  • Step 4.4 Services (Repair/rebuild, professional and other services).
  • Step 4.4.1 Representative 12 decides whether it is an on-catalog service based on the type of claim and service required.
  • a service is required to fulfill or partly fulfill a claim.
  • Activity Representative 12 decides whether the service required is one that is likely to be on-catalog.
  • Step 4.5.1 Options are typically collated, representative 12 would typically refine options, selects and approves and updates claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Input An option or list of options for a replacement product/service.
  • Claims fulfillment system 18 would typically collate options to resolve the claim by replacement, rebuild, remanufacture or by providing a service.
  • representative 12 further refines the list of options and selects and approves only those options that insurer 10 would consider acceptable as a replacement for the claimed product/service.
  • Output An option or sub-set of options, from which claimant 14 can select (or confirm, whereby confirming could also be considered to be "selecting" by the claimant).
  • Owner Claims fulfillment system 18, representative 12.
  • Step 4.5.2 Claims fulfillment system 18 "white-labels" and sends choice to claimant.
  • Input An option or sub-set of options, from which claimant 14 can select (or confirm).
  • Claims fulfillment system 18 sends the option or set of options to claimant 14.
  • claims fulfillment system 18 would "white-label" the option or set of options, where white-labeling refers to claims fulfillment system 18 presenting information to claimant 14 in the colors and logo of insurer 10.
  • Output Typically, a web-view (or e-mail, WAP message, letter etc), typically formatted in the style of insurer 10 displaying the choice(s) available to claimant 14.
  • Step 4.5.3 Claimant 14 selects the option (or from a list of options) and responds to claims fulfillment system 18 (typically white labeled).
  • Input Typically, a web-view (or e-mail, WAP message, letter etc), typically formatted in the style of insurer 10, displaying the choice(s) available to claimant 14 for the replacement of their product/service.
  • Claimant 14 decides which option to select and informs claims fulfillment system 18, typically via their preferred technology.
  • Output An order for a replacement product/service as selected (confirmed) by claimant 14.
  • Owner Claimant 14
  • Step 4.5.4 If the logistics are not acceptable to claimant 14. a different option would typically be arranged by representative 12.
  • Claimant 14 confirms that they accept one of the options available, but they can not accept delivery of the product/service at the time assigned by the service providers.
  • Activity Representative 12 selects the same option, but with a different delivery date (and possibly supplier, depending on availability).
  • Output The same product/service, but with a different delivery date (and possibly supplier).
  • Step 4.5.3 (claimant 14 selects option).
  • Step 4.5.5 Claim is handled manually and procurement is tracked through claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Claimant 14 refuses all options offered by representative 12.
  • Activity The claim is processed manually. Procurement would typically be tracked through claims fulfillment system 18 (for analysis and reporting) although procurement may be for a non-catalog product or service.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 would typically obtain authorization to proceed from insurer 10.
  • Output An agreement from insurer 10 to proceed with the procurement; or the need to obtain more senior authority from insurer 10.
  • Input The need to obtain more senior authority from insurer 10 to approve the level of procurement.
  • Insurer 10 obtains the approval from a higher authority.
  • Output The approval from insurer 10 to procure a particular level of product/service.
  • Step 4.5.8 Claims fulfillment system 18 (typically white-labeled) instructs supplier 16 to proceed.
  • Input The order for the service to be supplied.
  • Activity Claims fulfillment system 18 send a message, typically white-labeled, to supplier 16 to proceed with the delivery of the service.
  • white- labeling refers to claims fulfillment system 18 presenting information to supplier 16 in the colors and logo of insurer 10.
  • Output The order, typically white-labeled, is sent to the supplier 16 to proceed.
  • Owner Claims fulfillment system 18. .
  • Step: 4.5.9 (Supplier decides whether to procure).
  • Step 4.5.9 Supplier 16 ascertains if they have a need to procure goods or services -themselves, in order to fulfill the delivery of their good or service.
  • Input The supplier 16 has been sent an order to proceed with the execution of the service.
  • the supplier 16 compiles a list of goods or services that they require in order to carry out the work, e.g., a builder might require the services of an electrician and raw materials from a merchant.
  • Output A list containing goods or services that need to be procured to deliver the service.
  • Step 4.5.10 (Supplier procure), 4.5.11 (Place order)!
  • Step 4.5.10 Supplier 16 carries out procurement through claims fulfillment system 18 (as if representative 12).
  • Input A list containing goods or services that need to be procured, as a sub-set of the service to be supplied by the supplier 16.
  • Step 4.5.11 Claims fulfillment system 18 aggregates and places orders with suppliers 16.
  • Activity Claims fulfillment system 18 aggregates and places orders with suppliers 16.
  • Output An instruction to place an order.
  • Owner Claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Input A list of line items to be procured from a particular supplier 16.
  • the supplier 16 confirms the delivery date for the particular line item associated with the claim.
  • Step 4.6.2 Claims fulfillment system 18 (typically white-labeled) updates claimant 14 and insurer 10 on fulfillment route.
  • Input A confirmed delivery date for a particular item associated with a claim.
  • Claims fulfillment system 18 passes information on delivery back to insurer 10 and then onto claimant 14 (typically after white-labeling) through, preferably, the technology of choice (e.g. the insurers web page, e-mail, phone (via call center etc.)).
  • the technology of choice e.g. the insurers web page, e-mail, phone (via call center etc.)
  • Representative 12 and claimant 14 have the ability to track on-line the status of the fulfillment of goods/services ordered through claims fulfillment system 18.
  • Input A confirmed delivery date for the good or service.
  • Claimant 14 or representative 12 inquires about the status of their claim through, for example, either call center, web page, e-mail etc.
  • Step 4.6.4 Supplier 16 fulfills order and delivers goods/service to claimant 14.
  • Input A confirmed delivery date for the good or service.
  • Output The goods or service are delivered to claimant 14.
  • Step 4.6.5 Supplier updates claims fulfillment system 18 when claim is fulfilled.
  • Input The good or service has been delivered.
  • Output A confirmation to claims Mfillment system 18 that the order has been completed and a message from claims Mfillment system 18 to insurer 10 that the claim has been Mfilled.
  • Owner Supplier 16, claims Mfillment system 18.
  • Input The good or service has been delivered.
  • Supplier 16 typically submits an electronic bill for the aggregated total of the goods or services procured from them, typically including the line item for this particular good or service.
  • Step 4.7.2 Claims Mfillment system 18 aggregates and reconciles invoices across suppliers 16 before forwarding to insurer 10.
  • Claims Mfillment system 18 typically checks that the good or service has been satisfactorily received or executed and typically creates a line item on an aggregated electronic bill, across suppliers 16, for a particular insurer to settle (according to the settlement terms in individual supplier contracts).
  • Output An aggregated electronic bill due for settlement, typically presented to insurer 10.
  • Step 4.7.3 Insurer 10 issues instruction to theh bank for settlement of the electronic bill and updates claims Mfillment system 18.
  • Insurer 10 issues an instruction (typically via secure transmission), typically to their bank, to release funds to supplier 16 for the value of the aggregated line items on the order, against contract.
  • instruction typically via secure transmission
  • Output An instruction to release funds to supplier 16 is received, typically by the insurer's bank. The bank then releases the funds to supplier 16.
  • Step 4.7.4 Supplier's bank receives funds and notifies supplier of paid bill, and claims Mfillment system 18 is updated to reflect payment.
  • Input The insurer's bank releases funds to the supplier.
  • Step 4.8.1 Claims Mfillment system 18 provides "after Mfillment" service, typically white-labeled as insurer 10. to determine claimant satisfaction.
  • Input The good or service for the claim are delivered.
  • Activity Claims Mfilhnent system 18 would typically contact claimant 14.
  • Claimant 14 is typically contacted on behalf of insurer 10 and typically answers questions about the level of service received in the execution of the claim. (This can also lead to the offer of sell-on products and services.)
  • Step 4.8.1 would typically be an optional step. It could happen in parallel with step 4.7.1, and not necessarily after step 4.7.1 as shown in the figure.
  • a set of quantitative ratings about the service can typically be compiled and used for management reporting. Also a set of qualitative comments on suggestions for improving the service can typically be prepared. The ratings and comments can then be added to the supplier knowledge base.
  • Owner Claims Mfillment system 18, insurer 10.
  • Input Preferably all data captured though out the claims process.
  • Output A set of reports that can be used to negotiate improved contracts with suppliers 16, monitor activity and productivity etc.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 keeps a record of the state of each of the goods or services (including goods or services procured through claims Mfillment system 18 as part of a sub-set of an overall service) to be procured in relation to the respective supplier 16, the claim, claimant 14 and insurer 10.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 might provide only retail price information to claimant 14, but provide both retail and wholesale price information to insurer 10.
  • the present invention is not limited to providing pricing information in this manner. .
  • Claims Mf ⁇ Timent system 18 would comprise a processor (not illustrated) running software which implements the steps in FIGS. 2 and 3.
  • the specific steps in FIGS. 2 and 3 are examples, and not all of the steps, or all of the operations in each respective step, are necessary in all embodiments of the present invention.
  • many obvious variations of the flow chart in FIGS. 2 and 3 can easily be made, and it is intended for the present invention to encompass such obvious variations.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 can typically check with claimant 14 to ensure that the claim has been Mfilled (see, for example, step 4.8.1 in FIG. 3). By doing so, claim Mfillment system 18 can improve satisfaction of claimant 14.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 can typically allow for the use of an advanced search (see, for example, step 4.2.4 in FIG. 2).
  • an advanced search could be a search that uses pattern recognition and not only use word recognition to find "hits.”
  • the present invention is not limited to any particular way.
  • various embodiments of the present invention relate to non-catalog products/services, on-catalog products/services and on-contract products.
  • on-catalog products/services are those for which an exact match exists in a supplier catalog and for which there is a contract governing their procurement.
  • non-catalog products/services are those for which an exact match does not exist in a supplier catalog and for which there is no contract governing their procurement.
  • On-contract products are products that exists in a supplier catalog (meaning a contract exists for their procurement) or a supplier with whom contract or discounted rates have been agreed.
  • claimant 14 is provided with a product and/or service in. Mfillment of a claim.
  • claimant 14 could be provided with cash, or preferably an electronic voucher that can be used to purchase goods and/or services from suppliers 16.
  • claimant 14 in step 4.5.5 in FIG. 2, claimant 14 has refused the presented options for goods and/or services. Therefore, in this case, claimant 14 might be given an electronic voucher in Mfillment of the claim.
  • the electronic voucher might allow claimant 14 to purchase any goods and/or services from suppliers 16 that are offered.
  • claimant 14 would be restricted to purchasing only specific goods or services offered by suppliers 16 and that have some relationship to the type of item that was insured.
  • Various embodiments of the present invention relate to "white-labeling," which refers to presenting information to a third party using the colors and logo of, and the branding of, the party that the third party is being contacted on behalf of.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 “white labels" information presented by claims Mfillment system 18 to claimant 14
  • claims fulfillment system 18 presents the information using the colors and logo of, and branding of, insurer 10.
  • the present invention is not limited to the use of white- labeling. Instead, there are many different manners and formats in which information can be presented.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 provides significant benefits. For example, claims Mfillment system 18 enables control over Mfillment of the claim to be taken at an early stage by insurer 10. This has the effect of reducing claims leakage and reducing fraud potential. Moreover, claims Mfillment system 18 automates the procurement process, to thereby reduce procurement processing costs. Further, claims Mfillment system 18
  • Mfillment system 18 enforces more on-contract procurement, thereby increasing procurement leverage (across the community) and reducing procurement spending.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 makes significant improvements to cost, efficiency, customer service and delivery in MfMling an insurance claims.
  • the above embodiments of the present invention relate to an insurer which insures an item.
  • the insurer would typically be an insurance company.
  • the present invention is not limited to the insurer being an insurance company. Instead, the insurer could be virtually any type of company, organization, financial institution or entity winch provides insurance.
  • the above embodiments of the present invention relate to a representative of the insurer, such as representative 12 in FIG. 1.
  • a representative refers to an entity which acts on behalf of the insurer.
  • the representative would be an employee of the insurer, but the present invention is not limited to being an employee of the insurer.
  • the representative might be, for example, a contractor hired by the insurer. In some embodiments, it might be possible for the representative to be a software agent working on behalf of the insurer.
  • communication channels connect a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to a claims Mfillment system.
  • the claims Mfillment system automatically coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to MfiU the insurance claim.
  • the claimant confirms, selects or agrees that a specific product or service can be used to MfiU the insurance claims, the claimant's actions should be considered as "selecting" the product or service.
  • the claims Mfillment system "automatically" coordinates activities between the representative, the suppliers and the claimant.
  • the term “automaticaUy” indicates performance by a computer in an automated manner.
  • the claims Mfillment system coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant via computer processing in accordance with data received from, and provided to, the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant by the claims Mfillment system.
  • the present invention relates to the use and management of electronic catalogs.
  • Electronic catalogs are known, and there are various known systems for using and managing electronic catalogs.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 could allow parties other than claimant 14 or insurer 10 to purchase goods or services from suppliers 16.
  • all insurance policy holders of insurer 10 might be allowed to purchase goods or services from suppliers 16, to thereby allow the policy holders to take advantage of the buying power provided by claims Mfillment system 18.
  • the filing of a claim by a policy holder would draw the policy holder to claims Mfillment system 18, and may be a catalyst for additional purchases, or future purchases by the policy holder through claims Mfillment system 18.
  • parties other than policy holders might be allowed to purchase goods or services through claims fulfillment system 18.
  • such other parties would be customers of insurer 10, or might be members of a community of users provided access to claims Mfillment system 18.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating other parties 19 connected to claims Mfillment system 18 through a communication channel 17, according to an embodiment of the present invention. As indicated above, other parties 19 are allowed to electronically purchase goods or services from suppliers 16 through claims Mfillment system 18.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an overall architecture for implementing claims Mfillment system 18, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • claimant 14 a plurality of insurers 10 and a plurality of suppliers 16 are connected to claims fulfillment system 18 via the Internet 20.
  • claimant 14 accesses the Internet 20 via an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 22.
  • ISP Internet Service Provider
  • a loss adjuster 24 is shown as accessing claims Mfillment system 18 via a Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) or an ISP 26.
  • WAP Wireless Application Protocol
  • various insurers 10 might have a local catalog 28, while some suppfiers 16 might have a supplier private catalog 30. External hosted catalog services 31 might also be provided.
  • An insurer 10 might provide the capability for internal e-procurement 32. External hosted e-procurement 34 might also be provided.
  • Claims Mfillment system 18 could typically provide central services 36, such as hosted catalog services 36a, trading relationships 36b, routing 36c, data management 36d, hosted e- procurement 36e and translation 36f. Settlement services 37 might also be provided.
  • central services 36 such as hosted catalog services 36a, trading relationships 36b, routing 36c, data management 36d, hosted e- procurement 36e and translation 36f.
  • Settlement services 37 might also be provided.
  • claims Mfillment system 18 might also provide external services (added value) 38, trust service 40 and/or general directory services 42.
  • External services 38 might be, for example, logistics information, consumer information (i.e., comparisons of consumer goods), jewelry valuation services.
  • FIG. 5 represents only one of the many possible architectures and different types of services which might be implemented, and the present invention is not limited to this specific example.
  • various embodiments of the present invention wiU reduce claims leakage, reduce fraud and reduce procurement processing costs, as compared to traditional approaches to claims Mfillment.

Abstract

An automated claims fulfillment system for use in the insurance industry. Communication channels (17) connect a claimant (14) submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer (10) and suppliers (16), to the claims fulfillment system. The claims fulfillment system automatically coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to fulfill the insurance claim.

Description

AUTOMATED CLAIMS FULFILLMENT SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an automated claims fulfillment system which automatically coordinates activities between a claimant, an insurer and suppliers, to fulfill an insurance claim.
2. Description of the Related Art In the insurance industry, when a claimant submits a claim to an insurer for loss of an insured item, the claim must typically be settled in accordance with a conventional claims settlement process. Generally, a conventional claims settlement process includes a "claims agreement" phase during which the insurer makes a decision to settle the claim, and then a " fulfillment" phase during which the insurer takes steps to mdeinnify the claimant. A conventional fulfillment phase is highly ineffective and inefficient due to a number of key factors.
For example, with a conventional fulfillment phase, claims are often settled in cash (at an equivalent retail value) rather than mdemmfying by providing replacement goods. This has the potential to increase fraud (that is, the claimant inventing entirely invalid claims) and claims leakage (that is, the claimant inflating the value of valid claims).
Sometimes, replacement goods are provided instead of cash. In such cases, the insurer often relinquishes control to the claimant over the sourcing of the replacement goods, thereby increasing the potential for fraud and claims leakage.
Moreover, many insurers often have decentralized areas of operations (for example, regional claims centers, branch offices, etc). As a result, with a conventional fulfillment phase, "on-contract" procurement (that is, procurement for products that exist in a supplier catalog or from a supplier with whom contract or discounted rates have been agreed) is not maximized. Consequently, procurement leverage available to buyers over suppliers is relatively low, and the ability to disintermediate and reshape existing supply chains is limited.
In addition, with a conventional fulfillment phase, claimant satisfaction is often low because confusion over market values causes claimants to perceive that insurers "don't pay up in full." Also, claimant satisfaction is often low because claimants are expected to complete the fulfilment phase themselves, and because the fulfillment phase takes too long.
Further, with a conventional fulfillment phase, claims processing costs are increased as a consequence of delay. Moreover, with a conventional fulfillment phase, supplier performance can be relatively poor because there is little or no after sales feedback on supplier performance, and because suppliers are not effectively integrated into the process.
Further, with a conventional fulfillment phase, procurement processing is manual. As a result, procurement processing costs are increased for both buyers and suppliers, and management information required to benchmark and improve processes or procurement leverage is not available.
Also, with a conventional fulfillment phase, insurers are not often able to use a claim as a springboard for selling other products and services because there is little or no "after fulfillment" follow-up service.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to automate the fulfillment phase of a claims settlement process, to thereby improve effectiveness and efficiency of the fulfillment phase. More specifically, it is an object of the present invention, in the fulfillment phase of a claims settlement process, to reduce claims leakage, reduce fraud, reduce procurement costs, increase leverage of buyers over suppliers, improve the ability to disintermediate and reshape existing supply chains, improve supplier performance, improve claimant satisfaction and use a claim as a springboard for selling other products and services.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and, in part, will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The foregoing objects of the present invention are achieved by providing an apparatus which includes an automated claims fillment system, and communication channels which connect a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to the claims fulfillment system. The claims fulfillment system automatically coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to fulfill the insurance claim.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a claims fulfillment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIGS. 2 and 3 are flowcharts illustrating the operation of a claims fulfillment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a claims fulfillment system, according to an additional embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a diagram j lusttating an example of an overall architecture for implementing a claims system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a claims fulfillment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring now to FIG. 1, an insurer 10 offers insurance. A representative 12 acts on behalf of an insurer 10 and would typically be an employee of insurer 10 or a contractor working on behalf of insurer 10. A claimant 14 has insurance with insurer 10, and submits a claim for loss of an insured item. To fulfill the insurance claim, a plurality of suppliers 16 are available to replace, re-manufacture or repair the insured item in fulfillment of the claim.
Communication channels 17 connect insurer 10, claimant 14 and suppliers 16 to claims fulfillment system 18. Communication channels 17 might comprise public and/or private networks, the Internet, local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), optical communication networks, wireless conMnunication networks, other types of electronic networks, etc. Moreover, different types of communication channels 17 can be used to connect insurer 10, claimant 14 and/or suppliers 16 to claims fulfillment system 18. For example, a respective communication channel 17 connecting insurer 10 to claims fulfillment system 18 might be a different type than the respective communication channel 17 connecting claimant 14 to claims fulfillment system 18. Moreover, different suppliers 16 may be connected to claims fulfillment system 18 via different types of communication channels 17. In some embodiments, the same communication channel 17 might be used to connect insurer 10, claimant 14 and/or suppliers 16 to claims fulfillment system 18. Claims fulfillment system 18 automatically coordinates activities between insurer 10
(typically through representative 12), claimant 14 and suppliers 16 so that claimant 14 is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of suppliers 16.
In a typical embodiment, claims fulfillment system 18 would typically have the ability to manage various types of products and/or services. For example, claims fulfillment system 18 preferably has the ability to manage on-catalog and non-catalog products, bespoke products/services, and specialized services.
On-catalog and non-catalog -products are products which are held on a catalog against a contract with suppliers 16, or that have a similar replacement to those held on the catalog. If the insured product is this type of product, the insured product would typically be replaced in fulfillment of the claim.
Bespoke products/services are products/services that are made specifically for a claimant or products that are made in limited numbers. If the insured item is this type of product, the insured product will typically have to be replaced by re-manufacture or replacement with an item that is similar.
Specialized services refers to repair/rebuild services required to essentially "fix" the insured item. Such specialized services are sometimes required to fulfill a claim.
FIGS. 2 and 3 are flowcharts illustrating the operation of claims fulfillment system 18. Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, the following is a description of each step:
Step 4.1.1: Can the claim be fulfilled through claims fulfillment system 18 ?
Input: Details of the claim are received from insurer 10 (potentially manually or automatically).
Activity: Determine whether the procurement required to meet a claim can be processed through claims fulfillment system 18.
Output: N/A.
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.1.2.
Step 4.1.2: Representative 12 initiates procurement through claims fulfillment system 18
(pursuing multiple paths if necessary).
Prior Step: 4.1.1. Input: A description of the goods damaged or stolen and/or services required to fulfil the claim.
Activity: Send a description of the required goods or services (typically including service level agreements) to claims fulfillment system 18 and typically pursue multiple procurement methods if necessary.
Output: N/A.
Owner Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.2 (Replace), 4.3 (Remanufacture), 4.4 (Service).
Step 4.2 Replace (On-catalog and non-catalog products).
Step 4.2.1. Claims fulfillment system 18 searches for the product/service in the catalog.
Prior Step : 4.2 (Replace) , 4.4.1 (On-catalog service) .
Input: Product /service description from representative 12 (and, typically, service level, stock availability requirements if necessary).
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 searches supplier catalog to match the description of the product/service.
Output: N/A.
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18. Next Step: 4.2.2 (Found), 4.2.3 (Not found).
Step 4.2,2 Claims fulfillment system 18 enables selection of best on-catalog option by representative.
Prior Step: 4.2.1 (Search).
Input: A list of options for replacement products/services, typically including associated pricing, service levels and stock availability as retrieved by search.
Activity: Representative 12 selects the best solution to meet the needs, typically based on a combination of price, availability, service level etc.
Output: The best source for the replacement of that product according to required service level.
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step : 4.5.1 (Collate options) .
Step 4.2.3 Claims fulfillment system 18 asks representative 12 whether to search again using a more detailed product specification.
Prior Step: 4.2.1 (Search).
Input: Product/service can not be found in the catalog.
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 asks representative 12 whether to search again and if so requests a more specific product description (typically via preferred technology).
Output: Typically, e-mail, web-page, WAP phone, SMS message etc. to representative 12 (and returned to claims fulfillment system 18) containing more specific product detail and whether to search again.
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.2.1 (Search again), 4.2.4 (Product/service not on catalog).
Step 4.2.4 Representative 12 instructs claims fulfillment system 18 to search for best fit.
Prior Step: 4.2.3 (More detail).
Input: Search string for replacement product/service (enabled by "advanced" search).
Activity: Representative 12 instructs claims fMfillment system 18 to search for similar options to that of the product/service required.
Output: A list of best fit options .
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.5.1 (best fit found), 4.3.1 (no best fit).
Step 4.3 Remanufacture product (bespoke product/service). Step 4.3.1: Claims fulfillment system 18 facilitates representative 12 to establish > auction. '
Prior Step: 4.3 (Remanufacture), 4.4.1 (Non-catalog service), 4.2.4 (product service not on catalog).
Input: Details of the bespoke product or service are entered into claims fulfillment system 18. Preferably, claims fulfillment system 18 allows drawings, photographic images etc, to be entered.
Activity: Details of product or service to be acquired are stored.
Output: N/A.
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.3.2 (Set up rules).
Step 4.3.2 Representative 12 sets up business rules for auction, and would typically select suppliers 16 and update claims fulfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.3.1 (Establish auction).
Input: Details of the bespoke product or service are entered into the claims fulfillment system 18. Preferably, claims fulfillment system 18 allows drawings, photographic images etc., to be entered.
Activity: Representative 12 sets up an auction and establishes business rules (e.g. closed auction, open auction), and, typically, also establishes duration, etc. Typically, representative 12 would also select suppliers 16 to be involved in the auction from, for example, an insurer's panel (based, for . example, on ability, past performance, geography).
Output: A set of suppliers 16 to be involved in the auction and all information necessary to begin the auction.
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.3.3 (issue instructions to bid).
Step 4.3.3 Claims fulfillment system 18 issues instructions to bid to suppliers 16.
Prior Step: 4.3.2 (Set up rules).
Input: A set of chosen suppliers 16 to be involved in the auction and the business rules set-up for that auction. (Can preferably be enhanced by additional instructions issued by representative 12).
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 sends instructions to bid to suppliers 16, typically by their preferred technology.
Output: Information about the auction and how to bid are received by each of suppliers 16 involved in the auction.
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.3.4 (Supplier survey).
Step 4.3.4 Suppliers 16 ascertain whether they have enough information to bid. Prior Step: 4.3.3 (Instructions to bid).
Input: Supplier 16 receive an invitation to bid.
Activity: Supplier 16 receiving the invitation analyze the information (specification) contained in the instruction to bid.
Output: N/A.
Owner: Supplier 16.
Next Step: 4.3.6 (Auction), 4.3.5 (More detail) .
Step 4.3.5 Suppliers 16 gather more detail about the service required.
Prior Step: 4.3.4 (Supplier survey).
Input: A supplier 16 receives an invitation to bid, but doesn't have a detailed enough specification with which to compile a bid.
Activity: The supplier 16 gathers more information about the service required, e.g. through an on-site visit or through a more detailed discussions with representative 12 and/or claimant 14.
Output: A detailed specification that the supplier 16 can bid against.
Owner: Supplier.
Next Step: 4.3.4 (Supplier survey). Step 4.3.6 Auction happens according to insurer =s business rules and bids are received.
Prior Step: 4.3.4. (Supplier Survey).
Input: Business rules are set up for auction and participants are informed.
Activity: Bids are submitted over the duration set by representative 12.
Output: A list of options and prices.
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.5.1 (Options collated).
Step 4.4 Services (Repair/rebuild, professional and other services).
Step 4.4.1 Representative 12 decides whether it is an on-catalog service based on the type of claim and service required.
Prior Step: 4.4 (Services).
Input: A service is required to fulfill or partly fulfill a claim.
Activity: Representative 12 decides whether the service required is one that is likely to be on-catalog.
Output: N/A. Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.2.1 (On-catalog service), 4.3.1 (Non-catalog service).
Step 4.5.1 Options are typically collated, representative 12 would typically refine options, selects and approves and updates claims fulfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.2.2 (On-catalog), 4.2.4 (Best fit), 4.3.6 (Auction bids).
Input: An option or list of options for a replacement product/service.
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 would typically collate options to resolve the claim by replacement, rebuild, remanufacture or by providing a service.
Typically, representative 12 further refines the list of options and selects and approves only those options that insurer 10 would consider acceptable as a replacement for the claimed product/service.
Output: An option or sub-set of options, from which claimant 14 can select (or confirm, whereby confirming could also be considered to be "selecting" by the claimant).
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18, representative 12.
Next Step: 4.5.2 (Claimant options).
Step 4.5.2 Claims fulfillment system 18 "white-labels" and sends choice to claimant. Prior Step : 4.5.1 (Collate options) .
Input: An option or sub-set of options, from which claimant 14 can select (or confirm).
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 sends the option or set of options to claimant 14. In a typical embodiment, claims fulfillment system 18 would "white-label" the option or set of options, where white-labeling refers to claims fulfillment system 18 presenting information to claimant 14 in the colors and logo of insurer 10.
Output: Typically, a web-view (or e-mail, WAP message, letter etc), typically formatted in the style of insurer 10 displaying the choice(s) available to claimant 14.
Owner: Claims Mfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.5.3 (Claimant 14 selects option).
Step 4.5.3 Claimant 14 selects the option (or from a list of options) and responds to claims fulfillment system 18 (typically white labeled).
Prior Step: 4.5.2 (Claimant options).
Input: Typically, a web-view (or e-mail, WAP message, letter etc), typically formatted in the style of insurer 10, displaying the choice(s) available to claimant 14 for the replacement of their product/service. Activity: Claimant 14 decides which option to select and informs claims fulfillment system 18, typically via their preferred technology.
Output: An order for a replacement product/service as selected (confirmed) by claimant 14. Owner: Claimant 14
Next Step: 4.5.4 (Logistics options), 4.5.5 (Claimant refuses options), 4.5.6 (Claimant selects option).
Step 4.5.4 If the logistics are not acceptable to claimant 14. a different option would typically be arranged by representative 12.
Prior Step: 4.5.3 (Claimant selects option).
Input: Claimant 14 confirms that they accept one of the options available, but they can not accept delivery of the product/service at the time assigned by the service providers.
Activity: Representative 12 selects the same option, but with a different delivery date (and possibly supplier, depending on availability).
Output: The same product/service, but with a different delivery date (and possibly supplier).
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: 4.5.3 (claimant 14 selects option). Step 4.5.5 Claim is handled manually and procurement is tracked through claims fulfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.5.3 (Claimant selects option).
Input: Claimant 14 refuses all options offered by representative 12.
Activity: The claim is processed manually. Procurement would typically be tracked through claims fulfillment system 18 (for analysis and reporting) although procurement may be for a non-catalog product or service.
Output: The manual fulfillment of a claim.
Owner: Representative 12.
Next Step: N/A.
Step 4.5.6 Claims fulfillment system 18 receives authorization from insurer 10 to proceed.
Prior Step: 4.5.3 (Claimant selects option).
Input: The product/service to be procured has been agreed by claimant 14.
Activity: If required, claims Mfillment system 18 would typically obtain authorization to proceed from insurer 10.
Output: An agreement from insurer 10 to proceed with the procurement; or the need to obtain more senior authority from insurer 10. Owner: Insurer 10.
Next Step: 4.5.7 (Insurer authorization), 4.5.8 (Instruct supplier).
Step 4.5.7 Authorization process.
Prior Step: 4.5.6 (Request authorization).
Input: The need to obtain more senior authority from insurer 10 to approve the level of procurement.
Activity: Insurer 10 obtains the approval from a higher authority.
Output: The approval from insurer 10 to procure a particular level of product/service.
Owner: Insurer 10.
Next Step : 4.5.6 (Receive authorization) .
Step 4.5.8 Claims fulfillment system 18 (typically white-labeled) instructs supplier 16 to proceed.
Prior Step: 4.5.6 (Receive authorization).
Input: The order for the service to be supplied.
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 send a message, typically white-labeled, to supplier 16 to proceed with the delivery of the service. Here, white- labeling refers to claims fulfillment system 18 presenting information to supplier 16 in the colors and logo of insurer 10.
Output: The order, typically white-labeled, is sent to the supplier 16 to proceed.
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18. .
Next Step: 4.5.9 (Supplier decides whether to procure).
Step 4.5.9 Supplier 16 ascertains if they have a need to procure goods or services -themselves, in order to fulfill the delivery of their good or service.
Prior Step: 4.5.8 (Instruct supplier).
Input: The supplier 16 has been sent an order to proceed with the execution of the service.
Activity: The supplier 16 compiles a list of goods or services that they require in order to carry out the work, e.g., a builder might require the services of an electrician and raw materials from a merchant.
Output: A list containing goods or services that need to be procured to deliver the service.
Owner: Supplier 16.
Next Step: 4.5.10 (Supplier procure), 4.5.11 (Place order)! Step 4.5.10 Supplier 16 carries out procurement through claims fulfillment system 18 (as if representative 12).
Prior Step: 4.5.9 (Supplier 16 decides whether to procure).
Input: A list containing goods or services that need to be procured, as a sub-set of the service to be supplied by the supplier 16.
Activity: Supplier 16 has access to an appropriate sub-set of the insurer =s negotiated contracts and procures the goods or services that they require. Preferably, all goods or services that can be procured on-contract though the insurer =s suppliers are handled this way.
Output: Claims fulfillment system 18.
Owner: Supplier 16, representative 12.
Next Step: 4.1.2 (Initiate procurement).
Step 4.5.11 Claims fulfillment system 18 aggregates and places orders with suppliers 16.
Prior Step: 4.5.9 (Suppler 16 decides whether to procure).
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 aggregates and places orders with suppliers 16.
Output: An instruction to place an order. Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.6.1 (Confirm delivery date).
Step 4.6.1 Supplier 16 confirms delivery date to claims fulfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.5.11 (Place order).
Input: A list of line items to be procured from a particular supplier 16.
Activity: The supplier 16 confirms the delivery date for the particular line item associated with the claim.
Output: A confirmed delivery date.
Owner: Supplier 16.
Next Step: 4.6.2 (Route update).
Step 4.6.2 Claims fulfillment system 18 (typically white-labeled) updates claimant 14 and insurer 10 on fulfillment route.
Prior Step: 4.6.1 (Confirm delivery date).
Input: A confirmed delivery date for a particular item associated with a claim.
Activity: Claims fulfillment system 18 passes information on delivery back to insurer 10 and then onto claimant 14 (typically after white-labeling) through, preferably, the technology of choice (e.g. the insurers web page, e-mail, phone (via call center etc.)).
Output: Insurer 10 is informed about the delivery date and a message is received
(or is accessible - in the case of the web page) by claimant 14 about the time of delivery.
Owner: Claims fulfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.6.3 (Tracking), 4.6.4 (Delivery).
Step 4.6. 3 Representative 12 and claimant 14 have the ability to track on-line the status of the fulfillment of goods/services ordered through claims fulfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.6.2 (Route update), 4.6.4 (Delivery), 4.6.5 (Delivery update).
Input: A confirmed delivery date for the good or service.
Activity: Claimant 14 or representative 12 inquires about the status of their claim through, for example, either call center, web page, e-mail etc.
Output: Based on information received from logistics and/or supplier 16, claims fulfillment system 18 allows claimant 14 or representative 12 to check the status of the claim.
Owner: Claimant 14, insurer 10, logistics claims, claims fulfillment system 18. Next Step: The Prior Step.
Step 4.6.4 Supplier 16 fulfills order and delivers goods/service to claimant 14.
Prior Step: 4.6.2 (Route update).
Input: A confirmed delivery date for the good or service.
Activity: Supplier 16 delivers the good or the service.
Output: The goods or service are delivered to claimant 14.
Owner: Supplier 16.
Next Step : 4.6.5 (Delivery update) .
Step 4.6.5 Supplier updates claims fulfillment system 18 when claim is fulfilled.
Prior Step: 4.6.4 (Delivery update).
Input: The good or service has been delivered.
Activity: Supplier 16 updates claims Mfillment system 18 and informs it that the order has been completed.
Output: A confirmation to claims Mfillment system 18 that the order has been completed and a message from claims Mfillment system 18 to insurer 10 that the claim has been Mfilled. Owner: Supplier 16, claims Mfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.7.1 (E-bill), and optionally 4.8.1 (Apres claim).
Step 4.7.1 Supplier 16 submits electronic bill to claims Mfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.6.5 (Delivery update).
Input: The good or service has been delivered.
Activity: Supplier 16 typically submits an electronic bill for the aggregated total of the goods or services procured from them, typically including the line item for this particular good or service.
hitput: An electronic bill, typically including a break down of the line items, is sent to claims Mfillment system 18.
)wner: Supplier 16.
Text Step: 4.7.2 (Aggregate).
Step 4.7.2 Claims Mfillment system 18 aggregates and reconciles invoices across suppliers 16 before forwarding to insurer 10.
Prior Step: 4.7.1 (E-bill).
Input: An electronic bill, typically including a break down of the line items, is sent to claims Mfillment system 18.
Activity: Claims Mfillment system 18 typically checks that the good or service has been satisfactorily received or executed and typically creates a line item on an aggregated electronic bill, across suppliers 16, for a particular insurer to settle (according to the settlement terms in individual supplier contracts).
Output: An aggregated electronic bill due for settlement, typically presented to insurer 10.
Owner: Claims Mfillment system 18.
Next Step: 4.7.3 (Settlement).
Step 4.7.3 Insurer 10 issues instruction to theh bank for settlement of the electronic bill and updates claims Mfillment system 18.
Prior Step: 4.7.2 (Aggregate).
Input: Confirmation from claims Mfillment system 18 typically that a line item on an electronic bill is ready for settlement.
Activity: Insurer 10 issues an instruction (typically via secure transmission), typically to their bank, to release funds to supplier 16 for the value of the aggregated line items on the order, against contract.
Output: An instruction to release funds to supplier 16 is received, typically by the insurer's bank. The bank then releases the funds to supplier 16.
Owner: Insurer 10, Bank.
Next Step: 4.7.4 (Receive funds), 4.8.3. (Metrics).
Step 4.7.4 Supplier's bank receives funds and notifies supplier of paid bill, and claims Mfillment system 18 is updated to reflect payment.
Prior Step: 4.7,3 (Settlement).
Input: The insurer's bank releases funds to the supplier.
Activity: Supplier's bank typically notifies supplier 16 that funds have been received.
Output: A notification from the supplier =s bank.
Owner: Suppliers 16, bank.
Next Step: N/A.
Step 4.8.1 Claims Mfillment system 18 provides "after Mfillment" service, typically white-labeled as insurer 10. to determine claimant satisfaction.
Prior Step: 4.6.5 (Delivery update).
Input: The good or service for the claim are delivered. Activity: Claims Mfilhnent system 18 would typically contact claimant 14.
Claimant 14 is typically contacted on behalf of insurer 10 and typically answers questions about the level of service received in the execution of the claim. (This can also lead to the offer of sell-on products and services.)
Step 4.8.1 would typically be an optional step. It could happen in parallel with step 4.7.1, and not necessarily after step 4.7.1 as shown in the figure.
Output: A set of quantitative ratings about the service can typically be compiled and used for management reporting. Also a set of qualitative comments on suggestions for improving the service can typically be prepared. The ratings and comments can then be added to the supplier knowledge base.
Owner: Claims Mfillment system 18, insurer 10.
Next Step : 4.8.2 (Metrics) .
Step 4.8.2 Claims Mfilhnent system 18 would typically compile metrics for insurer 10. supplier etc.
Prior Step: 4.7.3 (Settlement), 4.8.1 (Apres Claim).
Input: Preferably all data captured though out the claims process.
Activity: Claims Mfillment system 18 compiles reports and metrics for insurer
10, suppliers 16 etc. (including a number of other value added services). Output: A set of reports that can be used to negotiate improved contracts with suppliers 16, monitor activity and productivity etc.
Owner: Claims Mfilhnent system 18.
Next Step: N/A.
Preferably, through the claims Mfillment process, claims Mfillment system 18 keeps a record of the state of each of the goods or services (including goods or services procured through claims Mfillment system 18 as part of a sub-set of an overall service) to be procured in relation to the respective supplier 16, the claim, claimant 14 and insurer 10.
In some embodiments of the present invention, claims Mfillment system 18 might provide only retail price information to claimant 14, but provide both retail and wholesale price information to insurer 10. However, the present invention is not limited to providing pricing information in this manner. .
Claims MfϊTiment system 18 would comprise a processor (not illustrated) running software which implements the steps in FIGS. 2 and 3. The specific steps in FIGS. 2 and 3 are examples, and not all of the steps, or all of the operations in each respective step, are necessary in all embodiments of the present invention. For example, many obvious variations of the flow chart in FIGS. 2 and 3 can easily be made, and it is intended for the present invention to encompass such obvious variations.
According to various embodiments of the present invention, claims Mfillment system 18 can typically check with claimant 14 to ensure that the claim has been Mfilled (see, for example, step 4.8.1 in FIG. 3). By doing so, claim Mfillment system 18 can improve satisfaction of claimant 14.
Further, according to various embodiments of the present invention, claims Mfillment system 18 can typically allow for the use of an advanced search (see, for example, step 4.2.4 in FIG. 2). For example, an advanced search could be a search that uses pattern recognition and not only use word recognition to find "hits." There are many other ways to perform an advanced search, and the present invention is not limited to any particular way.
As indicated above, various embodiments of the present invention relate to non-catalog products/services, on-catalog products/services and on-contract products. Generally, on-catalog products/services are those for which an exact match exists in a supplier catalog and for which there is a contract governing their procurement. By contrast, non-catalog products/services are those for which an exact match does not exist in a supplier catalog and for which there is no contract governing their procurement. On-contract products are products that exists in a supplier catalog (meaning a contract exists for their procurement) or a supplier with whom contract or discounted rates have been agreed.
In the above embodiments of the present invention, claimant 14 is provided with a product and/or service in. Mfillment of a claim. However, in some cases, claimant 14 could be provided with cash, or preferably an electronic voucher that can be used to purchase goods and/or services from suppliers 16. For example, in step 4.5.5 in FIG. 2, claimant 14 has refused the presented options for goods and/or services. Therefore, in this case, claimant 14 might be given an electronic voucher in Mfillment of the claim. The electronic voucher might allow claimant 14 to purchase any goods and/or services from suppliers 16 that are offered. However, in a typical embodiment, claimant 14 would be restricted to purchasing only specific goods or services offered by suppliers 16 and that have some relationship to the type of item that was insured.
Various embodiments of the present invention relate to "white-labeling," which refers to presenting information to a third party using the colors and logo of, and the branding of, the party that the third party is being contacted on behalf of. For example, when claims Mfillment system 18 "white labels" information presented by claims Mfillment system 18 to claimant 14, claims fulfillment system 18 presents the information using the colors and logo of, and branding of, insurer 10. However, the present invention is not limited to the use of white- labeling. Instead, there are many different manners and formats in which information can be presented. As can be seen from the above, claims Mfillment system 18 provides significant benefits. For example, claims Mfillment system 18 enables control over Mfillment of the claim to be taken at an early stage by insurer 10. This has the effect of reducing claims leakage and reducing fraud potential. Moreover, claims Mfillment system 18 automates the procurement process, to thereby reduce procurement processing costs. Further, claims
Mfillment system 18 enforces more on-contract procurement, thereby increasing procurement leverage (across the community) and reducing procurement spending. Generally, claims Mfillment system 18 makes significant improvements to cost, efficiency, customer service and delivery in MfMling an insurance claims. The above embodiments of the present invention relate to an insurer which insures an item. Here, the insurer would typically be an insurance company. However, the present invention is not limited to the insurer being an insurance company. Instead, the insurer could be virtually any type of company, organization, financial institution or entity winch provides insurance. Moreover, the above embodiments of the present invention relate to a representative of the insurer, such as representative 12 in FIG. 1. Here, a representative refers to an entity which acts on behalf of the insurer. Typically, the representative would be an employee of the insurer, but the present invention is not limited to being an employee of the insurer. The representative might be, for example, a contractor hired by the insurer. In some embodiments, it might be possible for the representative to be a software agent working on behalf of the insurer.
According to the above embodiments of the present invention, communication channels connect a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to a claims Mfillment system. The claims Mfillment system automatically coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to MfiU the insurance claim. Here, whether the claimant confirms, selects or agrees that a specific product or service can be used to MfiU the insurance claims, the claimant's actions should be considered as "selecting" the product or service.
Thus, the claims Mfillment system "automatically" coordinates activities between the representative, the suppliers and the claimant. Here, the term "automaticaUy" indicates performance by a computer in an automated manner. Thus, the claims Mfillment system coordinates activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant via computer processing in accordance with data received from, and provided to, the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant by the claims Mfillment system.
The present invention relates to the use and management of electronic catalogs. Electronic catalogs are known, and there are various known systems for using and managing electronic catalogs.
In some embodiments, claims Mfillment system 18 could allow parties other than claimant 14 or insurer 10 to purchase goods or services from suppliers 16. For example, generally, all insurance policy holders of insurer 10 might be allowed to purchase goods or services from suppliers 16, to thereby allow the policy holders to take advantage of the buying power provided by claims Mfillment system 18. Typically, the filing of a claim by a policy holder would draw the policy holder to claims Mfillment system 18, and may be a catalyst for additional purchases, or future purchases by the policy holder through claims Mfillment system 18. Of course, parties other than policy holders might be allowed to purchase goods or services through claims fulfillment system 18. Typically, such other parties would be customers of insurer 10, or might be members of a community of users provided access to claims Mfillment system 18.
As an example, FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating other parties 19 connected to claims Mfillment system 18 through a communication channel 17, according to an embodiment of the present invention. As indicated above, other parties 19 are allowed to electronically purchase goods or services from suppliers 16 through claims Mfillment system 18.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an overall architecture for implementing claims Mfillment system 18, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring now to FIG. 5, claimant 14, a plurality of insurers 10 and a plurality of suppliers 16 are connected to claims fulfillment system 18 via the Internet 20. In the example of FIG. 5, claimant 14 accesses the Internet 20 via an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 22. A loss adjuster 24 is shown as accessing claims Mfillment system 18 via a Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) or an ISP 26. As iUustrated in FIG. 5, various insurers 10 might have a local catalog 28, while some suppfiers 16 might have a supplier private catalog 30. External hosted catalog services 31 might also be provided.
An insurer 10 might provide the capability for internal e-procurement 32. External hosted e-procurement 34 might also be provided.
Claims Mfillment system 18 could typically provide central services 36, such as hosted catalog services 36a, trading relationships 36b, routing 36c, data management 36d, hosted e- procurement 36e and translation 36f. Settlement services 37 might also be provided.
Further, claims Mfillment system 18 might also provide external services (added value) 38, trust service 40 and/or general directory services 42. External services 38 might be, for example, logistics information, consumer information (i.e., comparisons of consumer goods), jewelry valuation services.
Of course FIG. 5 represents only one of the many possible architectures and different types of services which might be implemented, and the present invention is not limited to this specific example.
As can be seen from the above, various embodiments of the present invention wiU reduce claims leakage, reduce fraud and reduce procurement processing costs, as compared to traditional approaches to claims Mfillment.
Although a few preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the claims and their equivalents.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus comprising: an automated claims Mfillment system; and conimunication channels connecting a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to the claims Mfillment system, the claims Mfilhnent system automatically coordinating activities between the insurer, the suppliers and the claimant so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to MfiU the insurance claim.
2. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automaticaUy coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automatically presents bids from the suppliers to the claimant for providing a product or service to MfiU the claim, provides for the claimant to electronicaUy select at least one bid of the presented bids, and automaticaUy places orders with the suppliers in accordance with the selected at least one bid.
3. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system allows the insurer to electronically input information into the claims Mfillment system relating to the insured item, automatically transmits the information to the suppliers, receives electronically submitted bids from the suppliers for providing a product or service in accordance with the information to MfiU the claim, automaticaUy transmits the bids to the claimant, provides for the claimant to electronically select at least one bid of the electronically transmitted bids, and- automatically places an order with a supplier in accordance with the selected at least one bid.
4. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automatically transmits information relating to the insured item to the suppliers, receives bids from the suppliers for replacing, re-manufacturing or repairing the insured item in accordance with the transmitted information, automatically transmits the bids to the claimant, and provides for the claimant to electronicaUy select a bid from the bids transmitted to the claimant.
5. An apparatus as in claim 4, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfilhnent system automaticaUy places an order with a respective supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
6. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automaticaUy coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system receives bids from the suppliers for replacing, re-manufacturing or repairing the insured item, automatically transmits the bids to the claimant, and provides for the claimant to electronicaUy select a bid from the bids transmitted to the claimant.
7. An apparatus as in claim 6, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automatically places an order with a respective supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
8. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system receives information from the insurer relating to the insured item, automatically transmits the information to the suppliers to bid on providing a product or service to compensate the claimant for loss of the insured item, receives the bids from the suppliers, automatically transmits the received bids to the insurer, allows the insurer to manage the bids, automatically transmits the managed bids to the claimant, provides for the claimant to electronically select a bid from the managed bids transmitted to the claimant, and automatically places an order with a supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
9. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automaticaUy searches catalogs provided by the suppliers to propose a replacement item from the catalogs to compensate the claimant for loss of the insured item.
10. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automatically searches catalogs provided by the suppliers to propose a replacement item from the catalogs to compensate the claimant for loss of the insured item, automatically transmits information regarding the proposed replacement item to the claimant, and provides for the claimant to accept the proposed replacement item.
11. An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims fulfillment system automatically places an order for the accepted replacement item with an appropriate supplier.
12. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automatically searches catalogs provided by the suppliers to propose a plurality of replacement items from the catalogs for the insured item, automatically transmits information regarding the proposed replacement items to the claimant, and provides for the claimant to select a respective proposed replacement item.
13. An apparatus as in claim 12, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automaticaUy places an order for the selected replacement item with an appropriate supplier.
14. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system conducts an automated auction with the suppliers to obtain bids from the suppliers for re-manufacturing the insured item or for providing services to repair the insured item; automatically transmits the bids from the suppliers to the claimant, and provides for the claimant to select a bid of the transmitted bids.
15. An apparatus as in claim 14, wherein, in automatically coordinating activities, the claims Mfillment system automatically places an order with a supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
16. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein the claims Mfillment system provides status information to at least one of the insurer and the claimant on Mfillment activities being performed by said at least one supplier.
17. An apparatus as in claim 7, wherein the claims Mfillment system provides status information to at least one of the insurer and the claimant on Mfillment activities being performed by said respective supplier.
18. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein the claims Mfillment system performs automatic payment processing between the insurer and said at least one supplier for Mfillment activities performed by said at least one supplier.
19. An apparatus as in claim 4, wherein the claims Mfillment system performs automatic payment processing between the insurer and said at least one supplier for Mfillment activities performed by said at least one supplier.
20. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein a communication channel connecting the claimant to the claims Mfillment system is the Internet.
21. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein the claims Mfillment system allows parties other than the claimant and the insurer to electronically purchase products or services from the suppliers via the claims Mfillment system.
22. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, if a product or service that is to the satisfaction of the claimant is not currently available from the suppliers, the claims Mfillment system provides the claimant with an electronic voucher for purchasing goods or services from the suppliers at a later date.
23. An apparatus as in claim 1, wherein, after the claimant selects said claimant-selected product or service, the claims Mfillment system transmits an electronic bill from said at least one supplier to the insurer.
24. A method comprising: providing information relating to an insurance claim for loss of an insured item; and automatically coordinating, via automatic computer processing, activities between a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of the insured item, a insurer acting on behalf of an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, so that the claimant is provided with a claimant- selected product or service by at least one of the suppliers to MfiU the insurance claim.
25. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automatically coordinating comprises: automatically presenting, via automatic computer processing, bids from the suppliers to the claimant for providing a product or service to MfiU the claim, providing for the claimant to electronicaUy select at least one bid of the presented bids, and automaticaUy placing, via automatic computer processing, orders with the suppliers in accordance with the selected at least one bid.
26. A method as in claim 24, wherein said providing information comprises electronically providing the information by the insurer, and said automatically coordinating comprises automatically transmitting, via automatic computer processing, the information to the suppliers, receiving electronically submitted bids from the suppliers for providing a product or service in accordance with the information to MfiU the claim, automaticaUy fransnritting, via automatic computer processing, the bids to the claimant, providing for the claimant to electronically select at least one bid of the electronically transmitted bids, and automatically placing an order, via automatic computer processing, with a supplier in accordance with the selected at least one bid.
27. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automatically coordinating comprises: automatically transmitting, via automatic computer processing, information relating to the insured item to the suppliers, - receiving bids from the suppliers for replacing, re-manufacturing or repairing the insured item in accordance with the transmitted information, automaticaUy transmitting, via automatic computer processing, the bids to the claimant, and providing for the claimant to electronically select a bid from the bids transmitted to the claimant.
28. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automaticaUy coordinating comprises: automatically placing an order, via automatic computer processing, with a respective supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
29. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automaticaUy coordinating comprises: receiving bids from the suppliers for replacing, re-manufacturing or repairing the insured item, automatically transmitting the bids to the claimant, and providing for the claimant to electronically select a bid from the bids transmitted to the claimant.
30. A method as in claim 29, wherein said automaticaUy coordinating Mther comprises: automatically placing an order, via automatic computer processing, with a respective supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
31. A method as in claim 24, wherein said providing information comprises providing the information by the insurer, and said automatically coordinating comprises automatically transmitting, via automatic computer processing, the information to the suppliers to bid on providing a product or service to compensate the claimant for loss of the insured item, receiving the bids from the suppUers, automatically transmitting the received bids to the insurer, allowing the insurer to manage the bids , automatically transmitting the managed bids to the claimant, providing for the claimant to electronically select a bid from the managed bids transmitted to the claimant, and automatically placing an order with a suppfier in accordance with the selected bid.
32. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automatically coordinating comprises: automatically managing, via automatic computer processing, catalogs provided by the suppliers to propose a replacement item from the catalogs to compensate the claimant for loss of the insured item.
33. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automatically coordinating comprises: automatically managing, via automatic computer processing, catalogs provided by the suppliers to propose a replacement item from the catalogs to compensate the claimant for loss of the insured item, automatically transmitting information, via automatic computer processing, regarding the proposed replacement item to the claimant, and providing for the claimant to accept the proposed replacement item.
34. . A method as in claim 33, wherein said automatically coordinating further comprises: automatically placing an order for the accepted replacement item with an appropriate supplier.
35. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automaticaUy coordinating further comprises: automaticaUy managing, via automatic computer processing, catalogs provided by the suppliers to propose a plurality of replacement items from the catalogs for the insured item, automatically transmitting, via automatic computer processing, hiformation regarding the proposed replacement items to the claimant, and providing for the claimant to select a respective proposed replacement item.
36. A method as in claim 35, wherein said automatically coordinating further comprises: automatically placing, via automatic computer processing, an order for the selected replacement item with an appropriate suppfier.
37. A method as in claim 24, wherein said automatically coordinating comprises: conducting an automated auction, via automated computer processing, with the suppliers to obtain bids from the suppliers for re-manufacturing the insured item or for providing services to repair the insured item; automaticaUy transmitting, via automatic computer processing, the bids from the suppliers to the claimant, and providing for the claimant to select a bid of the transmitted bids.
38. A method as in claim 37, wherein said automatically coordinating further comprises: automatically placing an order with a supplier in accordance with the selected bid.
39. A method as in claim 24, further comprising: 2 automatically providing, via automatic computer processing, status information to at
3 least one of the insurer and the claimant on Mfillment activities being performed by said at
4 least one supplier.
1 40. A method as in claim 24, Mther comprising:
2 performing, via automatic computer processing, payment processing between the
3 insurer and said at least one supplier for fulfillment activities performed by said at least one
4 supplier.
1 41. A method as in claim 24, Mther comprising:
2 if a product or service that is to the satisfaction of the claimant is not currently avaUable
3 from the suppliers, providing the claimant with an electronic voucher for purchasing goods or
4 services from the suppliers at a later date.
1 42. An apparatus comprising:
2 an information input device receiving information relating to an insurance claim for loss
3 of an insured item; and
4 means for automatically coordinating, via automatic computer processing, activities
5 between a claimant subMtting an insurance claim for loss of the insured item, an insurer
6 insuring the item, and suppliers, so that the claimant is provided with a claimant-selected
7 product or service by at least one of the suppliers to MfiU the insurance claim.
1 43. An apparatus comprising:
2 an automated claims Mfilhnent system; and
3. communication channels connecting a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss
4 of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to the claims Mfillment
5 system, wherein the claims Mfillment system
6 receives information from the insurer relating to the insured item, automatically transmits the information to the suppliers to bid on providing a product or service to MfiU the claim, receives the bids from the suppliers, automatically transmits the received bids to the insurer, allows the insurer to manage the bids, automatically transMts the managed bids to the claimant, provides for the claimant to electronicaUy select a bid from the managed bids transmitted to the claimant, and automaticaUy places an order with a supplier in accordance with the selected bid, to MfiU the claim.
44. An apparatus comprising: an automated claims Mfillment system; and communication channels connecting a claimant submitting an insurance claim for loss of an insured item, an insurer insuring the item, and suppliers, to the claims Mfillment system, wherein the claims MfiUment system receives information from the insurer relating to the insured item, automaticaUy searches electronic catalogs of the suppUers to find a product or service to MfiU the claim, automaticaUy transMts information of found products or services to the insurer, allows the insurer to manage the information of the found products or services, automatically transMts the managed information to the claimant, provides for the claimant to electronically select a product or service from the managed information transMtted to the claimant, and automaticaUy places an order with a supplier in accordance with the selection by the claimant, to MfiU the claim.
PCT/US2001/040859 2000-06-21 2001-06-07 Automated claims fulfillment system WO2001098914A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001267033A AU2001267033A1 (en) 2000-06-21 2001-06-07 Automated claims fulfillment system
EP01944645A EP1292896A4 (en) 2000-06-21 2001-06-07 Automated claims fulfillment system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59869300A 2000-06-21 2000-06-21
US09/598,693 2000-06-21

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001098914A1 true WO2001098914A1 (en) 2001-12-27

Family

ID=24396545

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/040859 WO2001098914A1 (en) 2000-06-21 2001-06-07 Automated claims fulfillment system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1292896A4 (en)
AU (1) AU2001267033A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001098914A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1220131A2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-07-03 ScalePoint Technologies Limited System and method of providing a replacement of a replaceable product of an insurance claim
US20120232935A1 (en) * 2011-03-08 2012-09-13 Voccola Frederick J Apparatus and method for optimizing insurance policies
US10672080B1 (en) 2016-02-12 2020-06-02 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11699191B2 (en) * 2018-12-27 2023-07-11 Futurity Group, Inc. Systems, methods, and platforms for automated quality management and identification of errors, omissions and/or deviations in coordinating services and/or payments responsive to requests for coverage under a policy

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4858121A (en) * 1986-12-12 1989-08-15 Medical Payment Systems, Incorporated Medical payment system
US5128859A (en) * 1990-09-12 1992-07-07 Carbone Albert R Electronic accident estimating system
US5950169A (en) * 1993-05-19 1999-09-07 Ccc Information Services, Inc. System and method for managing insurance claim processing

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4799156A (en) * 1986-10-01 1989-01-17 Strategic Processing Corporation Interactive market management system
AU9140691A (en) * 1990-11-27 1992-07-08 Automatic Data Processing, Inc. Method and apparatus for stand alone appraisals and estimations
US7698240B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2010-04-13 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. System and method for providing electronic financial transaction services

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4858121A (en) * 1986-12-12 1989-08-15 Medical Payment Systems, Incorporated Medical payment system
US5128859A (en) * 1990-09-12 1992-07-07 Carbone Albert R Electronic accident estimating system
US5950169A (en) * 1993-05-19 1999-09-07 Ccc Information Services, Inc. System and method for managing insurance claim processing

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1292896A4 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1220131A2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-07-03 ScalePoint Technologies Limited System and method of providing a replacement of a replaceable product of an insurance claim
EP1220131A3 (en) * 2000-12-07 2003-06-11 ScalePoint Technologies Limited System and method of providing a replacement of a replaceable product of an insurance claim
US20120232935A1 (en) * 2011-03-08 2012-09-13 Voccola Frederick J Apparatus and method for optimizing insurance policies
US8615414B2 (en) * 2011-03-08 2013-12-24 T.R.U.S.T. Technology Solutions Llc Apparatus and method for optimizing insurance policies
US10672080B1 (en) 2016-02-12 2020-06-02 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US10672079B1 (en) 2016-02-12 2020-06-02 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11288752B1 (en) 2016-02-12 2022-03-29 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11295392B1 (en) 2016-02-12 2022-04-05 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11620717B2 (en) 2016-02-12 2023-04-04 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11636552B2 (en) 2016-02-12 2023-04-25 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11915322B2 (en) 2016-02-12 2024-02-27 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for enhanced personal property replacement
US11699191B2 (en) * 2018-12-27 2023-07-11 Futurity Group, Inc. Systems, methods, and platforms for automated quality management and identification of errors, omissions and/or deviations in coordinating services and/or payments responsive to requests for coverage under a policy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1292896A1 (en) 2003-03-19
AU2001267033A1 (en) 2002-01-02
EP1292896A4 (en) 2005-09-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20020077867A1 (en) Automated claims fulfillment system
US8396790B2 (en) System and method for financing commercial transactions
US10282767B2 (en) System and method for negotiating improved terms for products and services being purchased through the internet
Puschmann et al. Successful use of e‐procurement in supply chains
CA1281417C (en) Interactive market management system
US7082412B1 (en) Electronic factoring
US8392285B2 (en) Multi-supplier transaction and payment programmed processing approach with at least one supplier
US20010041988A1 (en) Customer renders seller issued incentive-voucher to after-sales service providers to enhance service quality
US8825549B2 (en) Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations
US20080027836A1 (en) Inventory Equalization System
US20120259671A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Professional Services Procurement
US20090287590A1 (en) Multi-Supplier Transaction and Payment Programmed Processing System and Approach
US20080162347A1 (en) System and method for effecting auction item payments through a network portal
US20020046125A1 (en) Systems and methods for correcting supply/demand imbalances in multi-tier exchanges
US20070226131A1 (en) Data processing method and apparatus for mitigating risk in financing purchases of goods including but not limited to automobiles
US20060149668A1 (en) System and method for financing commercial transactions
US20090171808A1 (en) Networking system for referrals
US20100153277A1 (en) System and method for network-based electronic trading platform for goods
JP2005510789A (en) Management, funding and supply methods and equipment in an integrated supply chain system
CA2351626A1 (en) Electronic factoring
US20080243600A1 (en) Distributed open customer relationship management and care (CRMC) programs implemented with online vouchers
US20050114258A1 (en) Fix-enabled order management method and apparatus
KR100805864B1 (en) A method for on, offline selling and managing unitedly using order system
KR20160099288A (en) Prepayment financial assistance system for cooperation business for co-prosperity of large and small firms and method thereof
US20190370895A1 (en) Systems and methods for providing seller-initiated financing in private sales

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2001944645

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2001944645

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2001944645

Country of ref document: EP