WO2001067423A1 - A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization - Google Patents
A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001067423A1 WO2001067423A1 PCT/DK2001/000161 DK0100161W WO0167423A1 WO 2001067423 A1 WO2001067423 A1 WO 2001067423A1 DK 0100161 W DK0100161 W DK 0100161W WO 0167423 A1 WO0167423 A1 WO 0167423A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- individual
- parameters
- index
- computer system
- data
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
Definitions
- a further purpose is to enable an organization to set goals for various parameters for the individual to achieve, in order to align individual goals with the organization's goals
- the method After subjecting the individual to training, and re-evaluating the parameters mentioned above, the method creates at least one measurement index which can be used to compare the individuals against, e g , their prior state, their colleagues within an organization or similar individuals on a global basis
- the purpose is to subject the individual to additional relevant training or recognize when a goal has been met
- Summary data for organizations also can be compared in order to provide valuable information to administrators, management and/or researchers
- the overall advantage of the method is that an individual's behavior and/or well-being and/or performance can be aligned with their organization s goals, and these can be compared to other individuals and organizations on a global basis When applied to an ergonomic field of computer-related injuries, as an example, it should reduce the incidence of injury and shorten the healing time while at the same time enable an organization to optimize its investment and efforts
- the invention relates to a method for interactively monitoring and optionally changing the behavior state(s) and/or attitude state(s) and/or educational state(s) of an individual, comprising
- the reference measure quantifying characteristics relating to the same state(s),
- Fig 1 shows the process of the method in a general form
- the individual may be classified for example the individual may be categorized in predetermined categories dependent on the quantitative relationship between the index and the reference measure
- the ergonomic field it may be important to include one or more sets of parameters P2 relating to a physical state of the individual in the processing to provide the at least one index
- parameters P2 relating to a physical state of the individual in the processing to provide the at least one index
- parameters are sex, age, weight, fitness rating, blood pressure, heart rate, etc , since these parameters may influence the capability of the individual to adapt and/or perform in connection with the information, training routines and/or questions, and since these parameters may be desired and important constituents in the index or indices to be provided
- characteristics of the room in which the individual works such as size, temperature, light conditions, etc , characteristics of furniture used by the individual, characteristics of tools and instruments used by the individual, transportation means, noise, and pollution of chemical or microbiological type, etc , since these parameters may influence the health and
- the sets of parameters P2 and P3 may be pre-stored in a database or a memory or storage of the computer system, typically by the organization and/or by the individual Alternatively, the one or more sets of parameters P2 and/or P3 may be recorded as a result of subjecting the individual to the series A e g by manual entry by the individual
- the recording of parameters relevant to the individual's use or configuration of a device may be performed at least in part by the individual inputting parameter-relevant data into the computer system, or, where possible, by the device directly or indirectly communicating with the computer system
- Important examples of devices that may communicate directly or indirectly with the computer system are of course computers or computer peripherals, but it is also contemplated that it will become important in connection with the method of the invention to provide relevant sensing/measuring devices connected to or integrated in a number of ergonomically important devices such as furniture, including tables and chairs where the sensing/measuring devices can communicate the configuration and use thereof directly or indirectly to the computer system
- the index is normally a quantified index
- a very useful type of index is an index which simply quantifies one or several parameters on a scale from a low number to a high number as this is a type of indication which is easy to understand and remember by humans and suitable for graphical representation as well as for comparison between individuals, between organizations etc
- the reference measure - or the part of the reference measure which is to be compared with a particular index - has been quantified in the same manner as the index in question, allowing a direct quantitative comparison, e g "is the individual performing better or worse than indicated by the reference measure?"
- An index may be determined by accurate measurable objective data, such as number of days lost through sickness over a particular period or an amount paid in sick pay, or an index may be a value indicated by the individual as a response to an invitation to indicate a subjective opinion as a value on a scale
- a particular feature of the present invention is the establishment of complex indices that is, combinations of values from fields that cannot directly be added or subtracted and which, in combination, define a new field which has a higher information complexity and content than the individual fields
- one field of a complex index may be related to physical well-being of the individual (subjectively stated), and another field may be related to the age and height of the individual (objectively obtainable values) and the combined, more complex field of a complex index may be related to the statistical likelihood that the individual may develop a sore back or back injury
- Complex indices may be constructed in many ways, but the most valuable complex indices are, of course, complex indices having a high correlation between the value of the index and the degree or state of the condition related to the more complex field in question
- the determination of the result space of at least some of the parameters may be performed based on consolidated data from a number of individuals, such as sum data or average data from a number of individuals
- An interesting possibility is to increase the quality of the method by adjusting the reference measure periodically to take into account an increased quality in prediction based on an increased number of relevant parameter data which have been gathered and optionally additional relevant data, such as statistical data and correlations obtained in other contexts, e g reported in the literature or reflecting new scientific observations or hypotheses
- the reference measure will normally have been explicitly input into the database as an initial data, but it is also within the scope of the invention to have a reference measure which is derived from data input, e g , historical data
- the reference measure may consist of one or a group of indices, such the latest index or the latest group of indices, or the reference measure may be constructed from one or several indices and/or parameters according to predefined criteria
- references measures, parameters or indices between several individuals, groups of individuals, organizations, and even societies, etc it is, of course, important that any changes in the establishment of reference measures, parameters or indices are performed in parallel and simultaneously for the individuals, groups, organizations or societies, or that differences are compensated for by suitable adjustment factors or algorithms
- the individual may be informed about its progress relative to the desired end status or the average status expressed by the reference measure
- the individual may be informed based on the value of one or more of the parameters or based on one or more simple or complex index
- the individual may be alerted if the set of parameters P1 and/or P2 and/or P3 results in an index which indicates a lower standard than expressed by the reference measure
- Such alerting may, in special cases be given in the form of an interruption of a job routine related to the alerting given
- relevant indices and relevant parameters are indices and parameters for which a relation to the adverse condition is available directly or derivable from the database, including data for the individual
- relevant indices and relevant parameters are indices and parameters for which a relation to the adverse condition is available directly or derivable from the database, including data for the individual
- e g data indicating that the individual worked stressfully and in a tobacco smoke-filled environment for many hours on the previous day
- part of the value of this possibility is that it may reveal causal relationships which are difficult to obtain for, e g , the individual's medical doctor, and/or that complex causal relationships may be revealed by analyses based on relevant complex indices
- the behavior and/or attitude state relevant to the organization may refer to environmentally reasonable conduct of the individual and the educational state of the individual may refer to the knowledge of the individual with respect to the environmental issues in question, or the behavior and/or attitude state relevant to the organization may refer to economically reasonable conduct of the individual and the educational state of the individual may refer to the knowledge of the individual with respect to the economical issues in question, or the behavior and/or attitude state relevant to the organization may refers to socially reasonable conduct of the individual and the educational state of the individual may refer to the knowledge of the individual with respect to the social issues in question It is also possible to combine two or more of the above fields with each other or with other fields, etc etc , resulting in highly complex indices which could make it possible explore highly complex relationships and correspondingly improve performance quality of life, etc of individuals or groups of individuals or improve the performance or quality of organizations or societies In
- An often suitable and easily understandable way of representing an index is to represent the index graphically by means of the interface in which
- the index is represented as a function of the reference measure and/or
- the index is represented as a function of one of the sets of parameters P1 and P2 and P3
- this embodiment of the invention comprises further processing at least one of the indices or at least one of the parameters P1 , P2 and P3 by processing means using a simulation algorithm for forecasting data relevant to the organization or the individual Simulation algorithms useful for this purpose are well-known in the art
- a complex index found to have or proved to have a relevant information value may be used as the basis for a prediction or forecast, and that such a complex index established in one and the same manner for several individuals and/or organizations may be used for standardized and generally acceptable comparisons between individuals and/or organizations and/or societies
- the computer system used in the method according to the invention may be any computer system comprising the appropriate processor means, memory means storage means and input-output means It is normally preferred that the computer system is a computer system which communicates through a network with a computer at the site of the individual and optionally with at least one more computer and normally several other computers, thereby establishing a true network capable of serving, e g the needs of an organization (where normally both connection to computers at the sites of the individuals and access to computers of other organizations through a direct or indirect network are necessary)
- One of the advantages of the method of the invention is that it provides unique possibilities for defining groups or one or more individuals according to relevant and partly hitherto unavailable criteria
- one or more sets of data each containing at least one of the following types of data
- Data for the individual groups thus defined may then be compared or analyzed
- the data for individual groups which are compared are data will normally be data which are not identical to the sets of data according to which the groups were defined
- the data which is compared or analyzed will often be data pertaining to the types of data defined above, by it may also be different types of data, such as, e g , geographic or demographic data
- the data may be accumulated over a period of time, and the accumulated data may be used or processed
- the methodical and/or statistical surveillance/observation or analysis of the group may be particularly valuable for discovering or reveal desired or undesired developments at an early stage of such developments
- the above-mentioned group of data may be defined for a group of one or more individuals and may be compared to the same data of another group of one or more individuals, such other group being defined based on respective other data of the above-mentioned types, or being based on criteria which are outside the above-mentioned group of data e g geographic or demographic data
- reference measure series A set of parameters P1 , set of parameters P2, - set of parameters P3, at least one index and/or forecast data relevant to the organization or the individual,
- an individual may be compared between one individual and at least one other individual of the organization or of another organization As an example, an individual can see that he/she has a higher incidence of injury than other employees in similar positions in other companies
- a telephone call-center company with many employees who use computers all day can see that compared other similar companies who use this system they have a higher incidence of eye strain among their employees, and they thus may decide to invest in better e g glasses/lamps/screens for their employees
- the present invention relates to a computer system for interactively monitoring and optionally changing the behavior state(s) and/or attitude state(s) and/or educational state(s) of an individual, said computer system having first processing means, input means for user provided input, output means and first storage means having stored therein a first computer program said processing means being adapted, in response to commands from said computer program, to perform the above described method
- the processing means may preferably be adapted, in response to commands from said computer program, to interactively monitor and optionally change the behavior state(s) and/or attitude state(s) and/or educational state(s) of an individual over a computer being used by the individual, the computer being connected to the computer system and cooperating herewith
- the computer could as an example be connected to the computer system over a regular LAN connection, a phone line connection, over the Internet etc
- the computer could as an example be the computer of the individuals regular working environment
- the computer could be the regular PC being a typical part of most offices and for worker in a factory the computer could be comprised e g in a machine such as in an numerically controlled mill, a robot, a lathe etc
- Such NC or CNC machines are typically operated by a wide variety of operating systems and it is therefore preferred that the cooperation between the computer system and the computer is independent on the operating system of the computer system respectively the operating system of the computer
- the computer at least has means for user interaction, e g a screen and a keyboard
- the second program is preferably automatically initiated by second processing means upon activation of the computer, e g when the computer is turned on The program could then be running in the background throughout the working day for the monitoring of the individual during the daily working routines and work with the computer
- the monitored behavior data may either by the first and/or by the second processing means be compared with reference data for the behavior of the specific individual or with reference data for individuals of a specific group As an example, it may be monitored how many percent of the day the individual uses the keyboard and/or the mouse of the computer The monitored data may be compared with an average value for the use of computers or be compared with an average value for the specific individuals regular use of the computer If it turns out that the individual has been using the mouse more frequently than either recommended or usual, the computer may provide an indication to the user on having a break, doing some exercises etc
- the computer is operated by the WindowsTM operating system
- the second processing means may be adapted to monitor the behavior of the user by monitoring a WindowsTM messaging queue of the WindowsTM operating system
- the queue may either be communicated to the computer system and monitored by the first processing means or be monitored directly from the computer by the second processing means
- either the first or the second processing means may be adapted to provide an index representing the behavior of the user, e g a number on a scale representing average of a society, an organization or the individual The index can then be compared with reference indexes
- the second processing means may be adapted, in response to commands from the second computer program, to generate user instructions based on the comparison of the index with a reference index and the user instructions being provided to the user via the means for user interaction
- the user may be instructed to go through educational sessions to stop using the mouse, to adjust the height of the screen or chair etc
- These instructions could be based on the comparison between the index of the user and reference indexes
- the computer could be connected to sensor means for determining a first electrical signal indicative of a physiologic factor of the individual and for transferring the first electrical signal to the second processing means
- the mouse buttons of the computer mouse could be adapted to measure the temperature or the pulse of the user, or the user could have an wristband capable of measuring blood pressure, pulse and/or temperature and to transmit the measured data to the computer
- Other sensors may also be applied, e g sensors capable of determining a second electric signal indicative of ergonomically relevant conditions of the individual's working surroundings and for transferring the second electrical signal to the second processing means Examples are sensors for registering the settings of a chair (height, bag position etc ), sensors for registering the light intensity of the office, the height of the tables, the angle and height of the computer screen, the temperature and/or humidity of the office etc
- the sensor means for determining the first electrical signal or the sensor means for determining the second electrical signal may be comprised in regular computer peripheral device, e g comprised in the mouse as before mentioned or be comprised in the screen As an example stress
- the user profile could as an example be generated based on a pre-test program with a questionnaire for the user
- Fig 1 shows the process of the method according to the invention in a general form
- Fig 2 shows an input screen for selection of reference measures important for a company
- Fig 3 shows a user log-on screen
- Fig 4 shows a user interface screen of the pre-test
- Fig 5 shows another user interface screen of the pre-test
- Fig 7 shows a user interface screen for presenting a user classification and an action plan for the user
- Fig 8 shows a user interface screen for workstation setup
- Fig 9 shows a user interface screen for a training module
- Fig 10 shows a user interface screen for a test module
- Fig 12 shows a membership function for the fuzzy variables
- the user's computer is typically an "IBM-compatible PC" with an Intel Pentium processor or a similar unit or a further development thereof, at least 32 MB of RAM, graphics card and modem or network card to connect to the Internet or another network used by the computer system.
- Devices attached to the user's computer can collect data and send it to the server These are typically a keyboard and mouse, but could also, as indicated above be devices which measure data from physical sources, like a thermometer, light sensor, desk-position indicator, etc These devices may even be connected to a user's body for example a heart-rate monitor
- the Action Plan may recommend a training module, (i e another Series A) which gives information to the user and may also collect information from the user (further parameters P1 , P2 P3) - see F ⁇ g 8
- the fuzzy variable (fact type) "age” has two related sets low and high For a given value of "age”, the membership function of "low” defines the degree to which the value of ' age'
- the Fig 13 shows how to represent fuzzy variables (FVAR), membership functions (MF) rules and facts in a relational database
- T_RuleElement [not], T_Fvar mm, T_Fvar max, T_Fact answer, T_T ⁇ ps label FROM T_T ⁇ ps INNER JOIN (T_Rule INNER JOIN (((T_Fvar INNER JOIN T_Fact ON
- T_Fvar fvarlD T_Fact fvarlD
- INNER JOIN T_MF ON T_Fvar fvarlD T_MF fvarlD
- sqlStatement "SELECT DISTINCT T_Rule . rulelD, T_Rule . tiplD, T_MF. width, T_MF. slope, T_MF . center, T_RuleElemen . [not] , T_Fvar.m ⁇ n, T_Fvar.max, T_Fact . answer , T___T ⁇ ps . label" & _
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2001239212A AU2001239212A1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2001-03-09 | A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization |
EP01913737A EP1279152A1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2001-03-09 | A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DKPA200000396 | 2000-03-10 | ||
DKPA200000396 | 2000-03-10 | ||
US19504600P | 2000-04-06 | 2000-04-06 | |
US60/195,046 | 2000-04-06 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001067423A1 true WO2001067423A1 (en) | 2001-09-13 |
Family
ID=26068788
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK2001/000161 WO2001067423A1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2001-03-09 | A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1279152A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2001239212A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001067423A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113507601A (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2021-10-15 | 广东睿住智能科技有限公司 | Pressure testing method and system of intelligent screen |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4332566A (en) * | 1979-09-04 | 1982-06-01 | Mazeski Conrad A | Monitoring attention and cognition and the effect of sensory motor, nutritional, and other biochemical factors thereon |
US4337048A (en) * | 1979-04-04 | 1982-06-29 | The Singer Company | Career occupation basic skills training system |
US4459114A (en) * | 1982-10-25 | 1984-07-10 | Barwick John H | Simulation system trainer |
GB2174529A (en) * | 1985-05-29 | 1986-11-05 | Sony Corp | Interactive teaching apparatus |
US4789339A (en) * | 1986-01-28 | 1988-12-06 | Barr & Stroud Limited | Gunnery training system |
US5597312A (en) * | 1994-05-04 | 1997-01-28 | U S West Technologies, Inc. | Intelligent tutoring method and system |
US5711671A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1998-01-27 | The Board Of Regents Of Oklahoma State University | Automated cognitive rehabilitation system and method for treating brain injured patients |
US5722418A (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 1998-03-03 | Bro; L. William | Method for mediating social and behavioral processes in medicine and business through an interactive telecommunications guidance system |
EP0838798A1 (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 1998-04-29 | National Education Corporation | Interactive learning systems |
US5779486A (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 1998-07-14 | Ho; Chi Fai | Methods and apparatus to assess and enhance a student's understanding in a subject |
US5813863A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1998-09-29 | Sloane; Sharon R. | Interactive behavior modification system |
US5879163A (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 1999-03-09 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | On-line health education and feedback system using motivational driver profile coding and automated content fulfillment |
US5954516A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1999-09-21 | Relational Technologies, Llc | Method of using question writing to test mastery of a body of knowledge |
US5957699A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-09-28 | Scientific Learning Corporation | Remote computer-assisted professionally supervised teaching system |
US6033226A (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 2000-03-07 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Machining tool operator training system |
EP1003142A1 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2000-05-24 | Alcatel | Method for automatic monitoring of the achievment of teaching goals by a computer |
GB2346585A (en) * | 1998-10-21 | 2000-08-16 | Jennifer Elspeth Sladden | Method of teaching computer keyboarding involving a series of typing exercises undertaken by a user |
-
2001
- 2001-03-09 WO PCT/DK2001/000161 patent/WO2001067423A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2001-03-09 EP EP01913737A patent/EP1279152A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-03-09 AU AU2001239212A patent/AU2001239212A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4337048A (en) * | 1979-04-04 | 1982-06-29 | The Singer Company | Career occupation basic skills training system |
US4332566A (en) * | 1979-09-04 | 1982-06-01 | Mazeski Conrad A | Monitoring attention and cognition and the effect of sensory motor, nutritional, and other biochemical factors thereon |
US4459114A (en) * | 1982-10-25 | 1984-07-10 | Barwick John H | Simulation system trainer |
GB2174529A (en) * | 1985-05-29 | 1986-11-05 | Sony Corp | Interactive teaching apparatus |
US4789339A (en) * | 1986-01-28 | 1988-12-06 | Barr & Stroud Limited | Gunnery training system |
US5722418A (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 1998-03-03 | Bro; L. William | Method for mediating social and behavioral processes in medicine and business through an interactive telecommunications guidance system |
US5597312A (en) * | 1994-05-04 | 1997-01-28 | U S West Technologies, Inc. | Intelligent tutoring method and system |
US5711671A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1998-01-27 | The Board Of Regents Of Oklahoma State University | Automated cognitive rehabilitation system and method for treating brain injured patients |
US5779486A (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 1998-07-14 | Ho; Chi Fai | Methods and apparatus to assess and enhance a student's understanding in a subject |
US5813863A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1998-09-29 | Sloane; Sharon R. | Interactive behavior modification system |
US5879163A (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 1999-03-09 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | On-line health education and feedback system using motivational driver profile coding and automated content fulfillment |
EP0838798A1 (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 1998-04-29 | National Education Corporation | Interactive learning systems |
US5954516A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1999-09-21 | Relational Technologies, Llc | Method of using question writing to test mastery of a body of knowledge |
US6033226A (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 2000-03-07 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Machining tool operator training system |
US5957699A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-09-28 | Scientific Learning Corporation | Remote computer-assisted professionally supervised teaching system |
GB2346585A (en) * | 1998-10-21 | 2000-08-16 | Jennifer Elspeth Sladden | Method of teaching computer keyboarding involving a series of typing exercises undertaken by a user |
EP1003142A1 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2000-05-24 | Alcatel | Method for automatic monitoring of the achievment of teaching goals by a computer |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113507601A (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2021-10-15 | 广东睿住智能科技有限公司 | Pressure testing method and system of intelligent screen |
CN113507601B (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2024-03-29 | 广东睿住智能科技有限公司 | Pressure testing method and system for intelligent screen |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2001239212A1 (en) | 2001-09-17 |
EP1279152A1 (en) | 2003-01-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20010031451A1 (en) | Method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization | |
CN108922623B (en) | Health risk assessment and disease early warning information system | |
US6921268B2 (en) | Method and system for knowledge assessment and learning incorporating feedbacks | |
Street Jr | Analyzing communication in medical consultations: do behavioral measures correspond to patients' perceptions? | |
US20230325691A1 (en) | Systems and methods of processing personality information | |
US6341267B1 (en) | Methods, systems and apparatuses for matching individuals with behavioral requirements and for managing providers of services to evaluate or increase individuals' behavioral capabilities | |
US6878111B2 (en) | System for measuring subjective well being | |
Marcinkiewicz | Differences in computer use of practicing versus preservice teachers | |
EP0687988A2 (en) | A method for measuring the usability of a system | |
Waller et al. | Using disability data to estimate design exclusion | |
Baker-Eveleth et al. | Expectancy theory and behavioral intentions to use computer applications | |
WO2011142999A1 (en) | Method of matching employers with job seekers | |
KR20170137514A (en) | Personal credit rating device, method and computer programs based on psychometric data | |
Peterson et al. | Job analysis: Overview and description of deductive methods | |
Bacon et al. | Nonresponse bias in student evaluations of teaching | |
CA2425166C (en) | Method and system for knowledge assessment and learning | |
Li et al. | Linking objective and subjective job demands and resources in the JD-R model: A multilevel design | |
Lapolice et al. | Linking O* NET descriptors to occupational literacy requirements using job component validation | |
Schalock et al. | Assessing the goodness-of-fit between persons and their environments | |
KR101894536B1 (en) | Language training method for improving communication ability of patients with neuro-linguistic disorder | |
Cook et al. | Job enrichment and mental workload in computer-based work: Implications for adaptive job design | |
Peterson et al. | Measurement of teacher performance: A study in instrument development | |
Riggs et al. | Handbook for applied modeling: non-Gaussian and correlated data | |
JP2010257031A (en) | Organization power diagnostic system, organization power diagnostic method and server program | |
US20030046305A1 (en) | Method and system for assisting a professional person to advise a client |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ CZ DE DE DK DK DM DZ EE EE ES FI FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2001913737 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2001239212 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2001913737 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 2001913737 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |