WO2001055806A1 - Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur - Google Patents
Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001055806A1 WO2001055806A1 PCT/EP2000/000714 EP0000714W WO0155806A1 WO 2001055806 A1 WO2001055806 A1 WO 2001055806A1 EP 0000714 W EP0000714 W EP 0000714W WO 0155806 A1 WO0155806 A1 WO 0155806A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- error
- data
- fault
- tree structure
- fault tree
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0275—Fault isolation and identification, e.g. classify fault; estimate cause or root of failure
- G05B23/0278—Qualitative, e.g. if-then rules; Fuzzy logic; Lookup tables; Symptomatic search; FMEA
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
- G05B23/0245—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model based on a qualitative model, e.g. rule based; if-then decisions
- G05B23/0248—Causal models, e.g. fault tree; digraphs; qualitative physics
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for the automated generation of an expanded fault tree structure which is adapted to a type of production plant or to a specific production plant.
- the method is suitable for use in the context of a system for determining the effectiveness (Overall Equipment Effectiveness OEE) and in particular for analyzing the causes of errors.
- Effectiveness is understood here to mean the term “overall equipment effectiveness, OEE”, which is described, for example, in Robert Hansen: Learning the Power of Overall Equipment Effectiveness, in the conference report 1999 Machinery Reliability Conference and Exposition, “The Meeting of Machinery Reliability Minds”, April 12-14, Chincinnati, Ohio, pages 19 through 30, edited by Industrial Communications, Inc., 1704 Natalie Nehs Dr., Knoxville, TN 37931.
- OEE all equipment effectiveness
- OEE is a method for determining a percentage that indicates the extent to which the actual productivity approaches a planned, i.e. predetermined, productivity.
- FMEA Feilure Modes and Effects Analysis
- fault tree analysis or statistical evaluation methods, such as the para- to-analysis [John Moubray, RCM2, Butterworth-Heinemann, Second Edition 1997].
- the fault tree analysis is generally well suited for use in the context of fault cause analysis.
- an error tree with a structure that is well adapted to the production plant should be available.
- Such an adapted fault tree structure can be created by evaluating historical data from the production plant.
- information is usually stored in history databases over longer periods of time, so that the required data are available.
- Data is either collected directly from the associated production and machine control or from the control system. It is also possible for the machine operator to enter information about the state of production or machine using a data acquisition system (terminal, barcode reader). This makes it possible to save special information about errors in a database.
- the invention is therefore based on the object of specifying a method which makes it possible, based on a general, non-adapted fault tree structure, to automatically generate an expanded structure which is adapted to a specific production plant.
- This object is achieved by a method for the automated generation of an extended fault tree structure which is adapted to a production plant type or to a specific production plant and which has the features specified in claim 1.
- An advantageous embodiment is specified in claim 2.
- verification scripts are created and stored on the basis of predefined error hypotheses, according to the requirements of which data are retrieved from a data server in order to derive error events.
- the derived error events are stored in an error database, if appropriate together with additionally entered error events.
- a fault data classifier carries out a statistical evaluation of the stored fault events at predetermined time intervals and maps its results as weighted fault causes to a stored fault tree structure.
- a major advantage is that by using the method a system capable of learning is created, which brings about a continuous adaptation of a fault tree structure to the respective production conditions.
- 1 is a block diagram of a system for performing the method
- the block diagram according to FIG. 1 shows components of a data processing device 20 which can be part of a system for determining the effectiveness of the production plant and for analyzing the causes of errors.
- An error data bank 31, an error tree memory 32, and a verification script memory 33 are available as data memories.
- Error event data can be entered via a data input 11.
- a display device 12 enables results to be displayed.
- An output 40 enables the output or forwarding of the generated fault tree structure. Error hypotheses can be entered by means of a hypothesis editor 13.
- a weighted fault tree with a simple basic structure is previously stored in the fault tree memory 32.
- the structure of the error tree and the weighting of the individual error causes are automatically changed by the result of the program sequences.
- the hypothesis configurator 23 is set up to create a verification script on the basis of input fault hypotheses and to store it in the verification script memory 33.
- the hypothesis verifier 21 is set up to access data from a data server 30 of the control system of the production plant and to derive error events from it in accordance with the requirements of the verification script, additional information about error events that can be entered via the data input 11 being taken into account. It stores determined error events in the error database 31.
- the fault data classifier 22 is set up to call up the fault events from the fault database 31 at predeterminable time intervals, to classify them and to map them to the fault tree structure as weighted fault causes.
- step 100 the criteria for verifying error hypotheses are entered.
- An executable script is generated based on the criteria.
- 3 shows an example of a script for three error hypotheses.
- step 200 the script is applied cyclically to data from the control system or control system. 4 shows a typical data set. This data is checked according to the criteria of the verification script. Detected error events are stored in the error database 31 — if appropriate in addition to additionally entered error events.
- Step 300 classifies the error events. This either happens automatically at fixed time intervals, for example once a month, or the user initiates the classification. The error events are classified according to the frequency of occurrence.
- Step 400 maps the error events to a logical tree structure.
- FIG. 6 shows a basic structure of an error tree and
- FIG. 7 shows an expanded error tree.
- FIG. 3 shows a script for verifying error hypotheses of a paper machine. These are the fault hypotheses for a pump fault, fiber break and creep speed. If an error is detected, the script writes status information to the error database 31.
- a data record consists of an identifier (ID) for the signal and its value.
- ID identifier
- additional information such as data type, description data and system time may be accessible.
- signals about the status of the machine, meter readings and engine speeds are often queried. Measured values of physical quantities and error status signals are also helpful for documenting faults.
- a data record consists of a so-called time stamp (date and time), the production area where the error event occurred, the description of the error event and the corresponding event category as well as the duration of the event.
- the operator can specify an error cause for the error event.
- 6 shows the simple basic structure of the weighted fault tree for a paper machine.
- the paper machine error has the causes of fiber breakage, standstill and creep.
- the cause of downtime in turn is caused by washing and maintenance. After a classification, the frequency of the occurrence of an error cause can be output as a weight.
- Fig. 7 shows the automatically expanded fault tree.
- the basic structure is provided by the fault tree from FIG. 6.
- a separate verification script was generated for the fiber breakage cause.
- the error events identified in this script are automatically inserted into the error tree structure as error causes for fiber breakage.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP00918736A EP1252556B1 (de) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur |
AU2000239591A AU2000239591A1 (en) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Method for automatic fault tree synthesis |
PCT/EP2000/000714 WO2001055806A1 (de) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur |
AT00918736T ATE242499T1 (de) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur |
CN00818685.5A CN1433535A (zh) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | 用于自动生成故障树结构的方法 |
DE50002501T DE50002501D1 (de) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur |
US10/209,384 US7013411B2 (en) | 2000-01-29 | 2002-07-29 | Method for the automated generation of a fault tree structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2000/000714 WO2001055806A1 (de) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/209,384 Continuation US7013411B2 (en) | 2000-01-29 | 2002-07-29 | Method for the automated generation of a fault tree structure |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001055806A1 true WO2001055806A1 (de) | 2001-08-02 |
Family
ID=8163813
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2000/000714 WO2001055806A1 (de) | 2000-01-29 | 2000-01-29 | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7013411B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1252556B1 (de) |
CN (1) | CN1433535A (de) |
AT (1) | ATE242499T1 (de) |
AU (1) | AU2000239591A1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE50002501D1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2001055806A1 (de) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003060618A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-07-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for retrieving event data related to an activity |
DE10210565A1 (de) * | 2002-03-09 | 2003-09-18 | Abb Research Ltd | System und Verfahren zur Vorhersage von Störungsauswirkungen |
CN100459462C (zh) * | 2002-08-29 | 2009-02-04 | 华为技术有限公司 | 通讯系统故障诊断方法和系统 |
CN104683129A (zh) * | 2013-11-28 | 2015-06-03 | 富士通株式会社 | 诊断树建立方法、网络故障诊断方法及其节点 |
CN106411579A (zh) * | 2016-09-13 | 2017-02-15 | 深圳市金立通信设备有限公司 | 一种运行错误信息的处理方法及终端和系统 |
Families Citing this family (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2000264369A1 (en) * | 2000-07-22 | 2002-02-05 | Abb Research Ltd | System and method for generating an xml-based error model |
GB2373607B (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2003-02-12 | Sun Microsystems Inc | A computer system |
US7447742B1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2008-11-04 | Mirapoint Software, Inc. | Dual-frame user interface on generic client software |
DE10146901A1 (de) * | 2001-09-24 | 2003-05-15 | Abb Research Ltd | Verfahren und System zur Bearbeitung von Fehlerhypothesen |
US7131032B2 (en) * | 2003-03-13 | 2006-10-31 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method, system, and article of manufacture for fault determination |
US20050038697A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2005-02-17 | Aaron Jeffrey A. | Automatically facilitated marketing and provision of electronic services |
US7237266B2 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2007-06-26 | At&T Intellectual Property, Inc. | Electronic vulnerability and reliability assessment |
US7409593B2 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2008-08-05 | At&T Delaware Intellectual Property, Inc. | Automated diagnosis for computer networks |
US7231550B1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2007-06-12 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Event protocol and resource naming scheme |
US7249283B2 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2007-07-24 | Xerox Corporation | Dynamic control system diagnostics for modular architectures |
WO2006035931A1 (ja) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-06 | Toshiba Solutions Corporation | 情報システムの信頼性評価システム、信頼性評価方法、信頼性評価プログラム |
US20060095230A1 (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2006-05-04 | Jeff Grier | Method and system for enhancing machine diagnostics aids using statistical feedback |
US7600200B2 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2009-10-06 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display of historical information related to field devices used in process control plants |
US8219917B2 (en) * | 2005-07-26 | 2012-07-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Bubbling up task severity indicators within a hierarchical tree control |
US7500142B1 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2009-03-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Preliminary classification of events to facilitate cause-based analysis |
JP2007226398A (ja) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-09-06 | Hitachi Ltd | データベース接続管理方法及び計算機システム |
US7770052B2 (en) * | 2006-05-18 | 2010-08-03 | The Boeing Company | Collaborative web-based airplane level failure effects analysis tool |
US7643916B2 (en) | 2006-06-14 | 2010-01-05 | Spx Corporation | Vehicle state tracking method and apparatus for diagnostic testing |
US9081883B2 (en) | 2006-06-14 | 2015-07-14 | Bosch Automotive Service Solutions Inc. | Dynamic decision sequencing method and apparatus for optimizing a diagnostic test plan |
US8762165B2 (en) | 2006-06-14 | 2014-06-24 | Bosch Automotive Service Solutions Llc | Optimizing test procedures for a subject under test |
US8423226B2 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2013-04-16 | Service Solutions U.S. Llc | Dynamic decision sequencing method and apparatus for optimizing a diagnostic test plan |
US8428813B2 (en) | 2006-06-14 | 2013-04-23 | Service Solutions Us Llc | Dynamic decision sequencing method and apparatus for optimizing a diagnostic test plan |
US20070293998A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2007-12-20 | Underdal Olav M | Information object creation based on an optimized test procedure method and apparatus |
US20100324376A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-12-23 | Spx Corporation | Diagnostics Data Collection and Analysis Method and Apparatus |
US7958407B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2011-06-07 | Spx Corporation | Conversion of static diagnostic procedure to dynamic test plan method and apparatus |
US7954008B2 (en) * | 2007-01-15 | 2011-05-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Objective assessment of application crashes from a customer environment |
JP5075465B2 (ja) * | 2007-04-20 | 2012-11-21 | 株式会社東芝 | インシデント・アクシデントレポート分析装置、方法、およびプログラム |
US7694192B2 (en) * | 2007-05-21 | 2010-04-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Assisted problem remediation |
US9442620B2 (en) * | 2007-08-21 | 2016-09-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Navigation systems with event notification |
US7681086B2 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2010-03-16 | Embraer- Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica S.A. | Fault tree map generation |
US20090216584A1 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2009-08-27 | Fountain Gregory J | Repair diagnostics based on replacement parts inventory |
US20090216401A1 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2009-08-27 | Underdal Olav M | Feedback loop on diagnostic procedure |
US8239094B2 (en) * | 2008-04-23 | 2012-08-07 | Spx Corporation | Test requirement list for diagnostic tests |
US8648700B2 (en) * | 2009-06-23 | 2014-02-11 | Bosch Automotive Service Solutions Llc | Alerts issued upon component detection failure |
CN101788395B (zh) * | 2010-01-22 | 2011-10-26 | 西南交通大学 | 地源热泵中央空调系统房间过热故障诊断检测方法及设备 |
JP5880866B2 (ja) * | 2010-04-22 | 2016-03-09 | 日本電気株式会社 | ランタイムシステムの故障の木解析の方法、システム及びプログラム |
US8464102B2 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2013-06-11 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Methods and systems for diagnosing hardware and software faults using time-stamped events |
KR101599160B1 (ko) * | 2011-10-19 | 2016-03-02 | 쟈트코 가부시키가이샤 | Ft도 작성 지원 장치 및 ft도 작성 지원 방법 |
TWI453665B (zh) * | 2012-06-15 | 2014-09-21 | Univ Nat Kaohsiung 1St Univ Sc | Event Analysis System of Mystery Tree and Its Analytical Method |
US8583659B1 (en) * | 2012-07-09 | 2013-11-12 | Facebook, Inc. | Labeling samples in a similarity graph |
CN103577672B (zh) * | 2012-08-01 | 2016-12-21 | 王振华 | 故障事件分析系统及其分析方法 |
CN102955715A (zh) * | 2012-11-20 | 2013-03-06 | 中国兵器工业计算机应用技术研究所 | 一种故障树的建立方法 |
US9417628B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2016-08-16 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Production failure analysis system |
US9430311B2 (en) | 2013-07-23 | 2016-08-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Cause and effect mapping for failure mode effect analysis creation and risk management |
CN104932428A (zh) * | 2014-03-18 | 2015-09-23 | 中芯国际集成电路制造(上海)有限公司 | 硬件早期故障探测方法和装置 |
US10796315B2 (en) * | 2014-12-15 | 2020-10-06 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Automated recertification of a safety critical system |
US10241852B2 (en) * | 2015-03-10 | 2019-03-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Automated qualification of a safety critical system |
US20160327607A1 (en) * | 2015-05-06 | 2016-11-10 | Airbus Operations Limited | Methods and systems for transforming fault tree diagrams of engineering systems |
US10061670B2 (en) * | 2015-12-28 | 2018-08-28 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for automatically generating a component fault tree of a safety-critical system |
CN108700873B (zh) * | 2016-03-09 | 2022-02-11 | 西门子股份公司 | 用于自动化系统的现场设备的智能嵌入式控制系统 |
US9940235B2 (en) | 2016-06-29 | 2018-04-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for valid memory module configuration and verification |
CN106292583B (zh) * | 2016-08-16 | 2018-08-31 | 苏州朋泰智能科技有限公司 | 基于分布式mes的柔性制造系统的纠错方法及装置 |
CN106354118B (zh) * | 2016-08-25 | 2019-08-09 | 株洲中车时代电气股份有限公司 | 一种基于故障树的列车故障诊断系统及方法 |
CN107065819B (zh) * | 2016-12-28 | 2019-05-21 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | 一种结合功能流程图的故障树建立方法 |
US11361237B2 (en) | 2018-07-27 | 2022-06-14 | Conduent Business Services, Llc | Methods and systems for performing predictive maintenance on vehicle components to prevent cascading failure in a transportation system |
CN110045712B (zh) * | 2019-03-06 | 2020-10-16 | 吉利汽车研究院(宁波)有限公司 | 一种控制器故障处理方法、装置及终端 |
CN111736568A (zh) * | 2020-05-20 | 2020-10-02 | 天津市天锻压力机有限公司 | 一种实时数据库的故障快速诊断方法及系统 |
CN111830931B (zh) * | 2020-07-15 | 2021-08-20 | 中国科学院微电子研究所 | 一种dcs系统的故障诊断方法 |
CN116992958B (zh) * | 2023-09-27 | 2024-03-12 | 中国长江电力股份有限公司 | 基于故障知识库自动生成fta实时动态树的方法 |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5305426A (en) * | 1991-05-15 | 1994-04-19 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Plant operation support system for diagnosing malfunction of plant |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4632802A (en) * | 1982-09-16 | 1986-12-30 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Nuclear plant safety evaluation system |
US5067099A (en) * | 1988-11-03 | 1991-11-19 | Allied-Signal Inc. | Methods and apparatus for monitoring system performance |
JPH0816956B2 (ja) * | 1990-01-18 | 1996-02-21 | 株式会社日立製作所 | フォールト・トリー表示方法、フォールト・トリー表示装置およびプロセス診断支援システム |
JP2985505B2 (ja) * | 1991-07-08 | 1999-12-06 | 株式会社日立製作所 | 品質情報収集診断システム及びその方法 |
US5566092A (en) * | 1993-12-30 | 1996-10-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | Machine fault diagnostics system and method |
WO1995027236A1 (de) * | 1994-03-31 | 1995-10-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur automatischen diagnose von störungsfällen |
US5544308A (en) * | 1994-08-02 | 1996-08-06 | Giordano Automation Corp. | Method for automating the development and execution of diagnostic reasoning software in products and processes |
US7823015B2 (en) * | 2001-02-20 | 2010-10-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for determining a full error description for at least on part of a technical system computer program element and computer-readable storage medium |
US6907545B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2005-06-14 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | System and method for recognizing faults in machines |
US6820044B2 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2004-11-16 | University Of Maryland | Method and apparatus for a common-cause failure module for probabilistic risk assessment tools |
GB0127551D0 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2002-01-09 | Abb Ab | Analysing events |
-
2000
- 2000-01-29 DE DE50002501T patent/DE50002501D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-01-29 CN CN00818685.5A patent/CN1433535A/zh active Pending
- 2000-01-29 AT AT00918736T patent/ATE242499T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2000-01-29 AU AU2000239591A patent/AU2000239591A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-01-29 WO PCT/EP2000/000714 patent/WO2001055806A1/de active IP Right Grant
- 2000-01-29 EP EP00918736A patent/EP1252556B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-07-29 US US10/209,384 patent/US7013411B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5305426A (en) * | 1991-05-15 | 1994-04-19 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Plant operation support system for diagnosing malfunction of plant |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
CAMARINOPOULOS L ET AL: "EINE METHODE ZUR AUTOMATISCHEN FEHLERBAUMENTWICKLUNG. A METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC FAULT TREE SYNTHESIS", ANGEWANDTE INFORMATIK. APPLIED INFORMATICS,DE,VIEWEG UND SOHN VERLAG GMBH. BRAUNSCHWEIG, vol. 27, no. 9, 1 September 1985 (1985-09-01), pages 389 - 399, XP000715927, ISSN: 0013-5704 * |
SURYAPRAKASA RAO KAVURI ET AL: "AN INTERRUPTION TREE MODEL TO EVALUATE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING COMPLEX", PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS,US,NEW YORK, IEEE, vol. -, 14 November 1989 (1989-11-14), pages 1224 - 1225, XP000129962 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003060618A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-07-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for retrieving event data related to an activity |
DE10210565A1 (de) * | 2002-03-09 | 2003-09-18 | Abb Research Ltd | System und Verfahren zur Vorhersage von Störungsauswirkungen |
CN100459462C (zh) * | 2002-08-29 | 2009-02-04 | 华为技术有限公司 | 通讯系统故障诊断方法和系统 |
CN104683129A (zh) * | 2013-11-28 | 2015-06-03 | 富士通株式会社 | 诊断树建立方法、网络故障诊断方法及其节点 |
CN104683129B (zh) * | 2013-11-28 | 2019-02-15 | 富士通株式会社 | 诊断树建立方法、网络故障诊断方法及其节点 |
CN106411579A (zh) * | 2016-09-13 | 2017-02-15 | 深圳市金立通信设备有限公司 | 一种运行错误信息的处理方法及终端和系统 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE50002501D1 (de) | 2003-07-10 |
EP1252556A1 (de) | 2002-10-30 |
US7013411B2 (en) | 2006-03-14 |
EP1252556B1 (de) | 2003-06-04 |
CN1433535A (zh) | 2003-07-30 |
AU2000239591A1 (en) | 2001-08-07 |
ATE242499T1 (de) | 2003-06-15 |
US20030028823A1 (en) | 2003-02-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1252556B1 (de) | Verfahren zum automatisierten generieren einer fehlerbaumstruktur | |
EP1250632B1 (de) | System und verfahren zur ermittlung der produktionsanlagen-effektivität, von fehlerereignissen und der fehlerursachen | |
EP2122428B1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur ermittlung von zuverlässigkeitsparametern einer technischen anlage | |
EP0789861B1 (de) | Verfahren zur analyse von prozessdaten einer technischen anlage | |
WO2002013015A1 (de) | System zur ermittlung von fehlerursachen | |
DE69930501T2 (de) | Ultrasensitive überwachung von sensoren und prozessen | |
DE69910800T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung des Betriebszustandes einer einzelnen Maschine | |
DE102010052998A1 (de) | Software-zentrierte Methodik für die Überprüfung und Bestätigung von Fehlermodellen | |
DE102009024101A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Aufbereiten von Prozesszustandsdaten und/oder Maschinenzustandsdaten einer Werkzeugmaschine | |
DE19758077A1 (de) | Einrichtung zum Steuern des Prüfens von integrierten Schaltkreisen | |
DE102004024262A1 (de) | Wissensbasiertes Diagnosesystem für ein komplexes technisches System mit zwei getrennten Wissensbasen zur Verarbeitung technischer Systemdaten und zur Verarbeitung von Kundenbeanstandungen | |
DE60219821T2 (de) | Verfahren und gerät zum wiedergewinnen von zeitreihedaten, die mit einer aktivität in beziehung stehen | |
EP0789864B1 (de) | Überwachungssystem für eine technische anlage | |
EP3210088B1 (de) | Verfahren und assistenzsystem zur erkennung einer störung in einer anlage | |
DE102007039531A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Beschaffen von instandhaltungsrelevanten Informationen zu einer Anlage | |
EP1657670A1 (de) | System und Verfahren zur Status- und Fortschriftskontrolle eines technischen Prozesses oder eines technischen Projektes | |
DE102004015503A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Korrigieren diagnostischer Analysekonzepte in komplexen Systemen | |
DE102004029222A1 (de) | Verbesserungsunterstützungssystem | |
EP1250666B1 (de) | Verfahren zum automatisierten ermitteln von fehlerereignissen | |
DE10238831A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prozessoptimierung | |
DE112020003659T5 (de) | Verfahren zur diagnose von anomalien, vorrichtung zur diagnose von anomalienund programm zur diagnose von anomalien | |
DE10146901A1 (de) | Verfahren und System zur Bearbeitung von Fehlerhypothesen | |
EP3340250B1 (de) | Bauteilidentifikation bei der fehlerbehandlung von medizinischen geräten | |
EP3812949A1 (de) | Konfigurierbarer digitaler zwilling | |
DE19742448C1 (de) | Diagnosemodul zum Erstellen einer Diagnose für elektrisch ansteuerbare Systeme und Diagnoseeinrichtung zum Erstellen einer Gesamtsystemdiagnose |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AL AM AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CN CR CU CZ DM EE GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL RO RU SD SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2000918736 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 008186855 Country of ref document: CN Ref document number: 10209384 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2000918736 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 2000918736 Country of ref document: EP |