WO2001051917A2 - An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices - Google Patents
An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001051917A2 WO2001051917A2 PCT/CA2000/001405 CA0001405W WO0151917A2 WO 2001051917 A2 WO2001051917 A2 WO 2001051917A2 CA 0001405 W CA0001405 W CA 0001405W WO 0151917 A2 WO0151917 A2 WO 0151917A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- ions
- ion
- cell
- mass
- spectrometer apparatus
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/004—Combinations of spectrometers, tandem spectrometers, e.g. MS/MS, MSn
- H01J49/0045—Combinations of spectrometers, tandem spectrometers, e.g. MS/MS, MSn characterised by the fragmentation or other specific reaction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/02—Details
- H01J49/06—Electron- or ion-optical arrangements
- H01J49/061—Ion deflecting means, e.g. ion gates
Definitions
- This invention relates to an apparatus for and a method of detecting ions of interest in a mass spectrometry system while discriminating against ions unwanted for detection, in particular, isobaric interference ions.
- Pressurized ion transmission devices and collision cells are widely used in current mass spectrometry for collision induced dissociation (CID) of polyatomic ions, for reactive removal of unwanted species from the ion beam and for collisional and spatial focusing of an ion beam.
- CID collision induced dissociation
- the number of collisions can range from 1 to 10 6 (McLuckey, S. A., Principles of Collisional Nctivation in Analytical Mass Spectrometry, Journal of American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 1992, 3, 599-614).
- Collisional focusing first described for linear RF pressurized devices by Douglas and French (Douglas, D.J., French, J.B., Collisional Focusing Effects in Radio Frequency Quadrupoles, Journal of American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 1992, 3, 398) requires multiple collisions for the initial kinetic energy of the ions to be damped.
- the preferred way of using pressurized ion transmission devices and collision cells in analytical mass spectrometry is to ensure that there are multiple collisions.
- a high number of collisions necessarily means that, not only the primary particles, but also the products of the collisions experience multiple subsequent collisions with target gas particles or other product particles.
- the band pass m/z range is changed in concert with the mass analyzer. This way for every m/z the sequential reaction chemistry in the cell is intercepted and production of new isobaric interferences is suppressed.
- the bandpass method is very efficient and does not affect duty cycle if a scanning analyzer is used downstream of pressurized cell, as such scanning analyzer is a m/z bandpass filter itself.
- the downstream analyzer is a simultaneous mass analyzer, for example a Time-of-Flight (TOF), Mattauch-Herzog with array detector or multi-collector magnetic sector analyzer
- TOF Time-of-Flight
- Mattauch-Herzog with array detector or multi-collector magnetic sector analyzer the bandpass interference reduction in the cell limits the mass range of the ions detected simultaneously by such analyzer. Therefore, this converts a simultaneous analyzer into a sequential analyzer, diminishing the advantages of simultaneous detection.
- the bandpass should be sufficiently well defined so that the ions that potentially can form new interference ions via sequential ion-molecular gas-phase chemistry, would be unstable and quickly ejected from the cell.
- the quadrupole has better defined boundaries of the stability region and provides the most suitable bandpass.
- the higher order multipoles although not effective in providing a narrow bandpass, generally have larger acceptance ellipse and better transmission efficiency than the quadrupole. Widening the bandpass of a quadrupole cell improves transmission at the expense of poorer or lesser rejection of unwanted ions.
- a potential barrier placed downstream of the cell can allow some resolution of the analyte ions from the product ions, which do not have the residue of the initial kinetic energy the analyte ions have. This method can only work if the number of collisions the analyte ions experience is low, otherwise collisional energy damping will remove the difference in the energy distribution between the analyte ions and the product ions. As the efficiency of reactive removal of isobaric interferences depends on the number of collisions, a compromise is required between the efficiency of interference removal and energy discrimination against product ions. Also, the advantage of collisional energy and spatial focusing is not obtained with a low number of collisions.
- none of the bandpass or energy discrimination methods can discriminate against the ions produced in the cell if they are identical in m/z and /or energy to the analyte ions.
- Such additional analyte ions can be produced by ion sputtering from the surface of the electrodes forming the cell, by ionization of the gas phase impurities in the cell or by collision induced dissociation of the sample ions.
- the ion-molecule reaction chemistry is predetermined by well-defined thermochemistry. If the processes are adiabatic, that is if there is no external supply of energy to the reaction participants, only thermodynamically favorable reactions with ⁇ r H ⁇ 0 can take place, where ⁇ r H is the enthalpy of reaction. A simple comparison of the first ionization potentials of the reaction participants can often give enough information on the probability of a particular reaction. If the reaction gas has a first ionization potential which is higher than that of the analyte but lower than the first ionization potential of the interfering ion, the reaction with the interfering ion will occur and therefore the interference removal by reaction will be effective.
- the basic concept developed by the present inventors is to separate, temporally, the sample ions that are to be detected from interference ions that are not to be detected.
- the ion beam extracted from the ion source comprising sample ions and interference ions, is introduced into a pressurized cell in a pulsed or modulated manner, or any other time dependent manner, such that the ion beam current density or number density varies in time.
- the signal produced by the ions to be detected has a different time dependence than the signal caused by the original interference ions from the ion source or the interference ions generated in the cell, both of which are not desirable for detection.
- the inventors have discovered that, if the detection is performed in a time-dependent manner, then discrimination between the desired sample ions and the interference ions can be effected.
- a spectrometer apparatus comprising: an ion generation means for generating a modulated stream of ions; a pressurized cell for receiving ions from the modulated stream of ions generation means and including a reaction or collision gas whereby ions collide and /or react with the gas; a mass analyzer and a detector for receiving ions from the pressurized reaction cell and for mass analyzing the ions; and a control unit connected to the ion generation means and at least one of the mass analyzer and the detector, for controlling release of ions by the ion generation means and for synchronizing detection of ions by the mass analyzer and the detector in a desired time period set relative to the release of ions by the ion generation means.
- the ion induced signal detection and processing means may provide simply for timing of ion detection relative to the release of the pulse(s). Alternatively, all ions can be detected, and the ion signal detection and processing means then causes that only ion in a desired time period relative to the release of each pulse are used for spectrometry analysis.
- the ion generation means includes an ion gating means between the ion generation means and the pressurized reaction cell, and the control unit then includes a waveform generator connected to the ion gating means, for generating a series of pulses of ions.
- the ion generation means can include an ion source operated in a pulsed manner to produce a series of pulses of ions, or alternatively a sample introduction system operated in a pulsed manner to produce a series of pulses of ions.
- the apparatus includes a time resolved detection means connected to the ion generation means and to at least one of the mass analyzer and the detector.
- An axial field generation means can be provided, connected to the pressurized cell, for generating an axial field along the pressurized cell, for accelerating or decelerating ions.
- the ion generation means can include a sample introduction system, an ion beam forming and modulation means, and an interface provided between the sample introduction system and the ion beam forming and modulation means, for maintaining a pressure differential between the sample introduction system and the ion beam forming and modulation means, while permitting passage of ions through to the ion beam forming and modulation means.
- the mass spectrometer can comprise a scanning mass spectrometer, for example a quadrupole mass filter or a mass analyzer including a magnetic sector, and wherein the detector is provided separately and is connected to the time resolved detection means.
- the mass analyzer and detector comprise a time-of- flight mass analyzer or other instrument capable of scanning and detecting a wide range of masses.
- a method of mass analyzing a stream of ions in a mass spectrometer apparatus comprising:
- the method can include providing a continuous stream and controlling the ion stream with an ion gating means and controlling actuation of the ion gating means by a modulating waveform generator to form pulses of ions.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a spectrometer apparatus in accordance with the present invention.
- Figure 2 is a graph showing variation of an electric signal detected by a detector against time for two different samples, and also showing variation of a voltage applied to a lens;
- Figure 3 is a graph showing the variation of signal to background noise for the data from Figure 2;
- Figure 4 is a graph showing variation of the background equivalent concentration as a function of time from the start of a pulse applied to the lens
- Figure 5 is a graph showing variation of intensity detected for isobaric CaO + and Fe + ions during different variations of time;
- Figure 6a, 6b and 6c show variations of signals detected for isobaric CaO + and Fe + ions with different electrical potential gradient along the axis of the pressurized cell.
- a spectrometer system or apparatus of the present invention is shown schematically in Figure 1, and has a sample introduction system 1 connected to an inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) ion source 2, in which ions are generated.
- ICP inductively-coupled plasma
- the ions are generated in a plasma of sustaining gases, and necessarily the plasma will include interference ions and ions to be detected.
- Other ion sources that operate at atmospheric pressure or at a pressure lower than atmospheric can be utilized in other implementations of the present invention, for example, Laser Ablation, Electrothermal Vaporization, Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption, Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization, Electrospray Ionization, Glow Discharge ion sources.
- the ion source is producing ions in a continuous stream and connected by an interface 3 to an ion beam forming and modulation means 4 that operate at a low pressure suitable for electrostatic ion optics operation and comprise a stack of electrostatic ion - optical elements, one of which is shown as lens 9.
- the ion lens 9 functions in such example as an ion gate, permitting the ions to be transported through it only during a predetermined time and stopping a stream of ions from being transported through during other times, thus producing a modulated stream of ions.
- the modulated stream of ions may be produced by appropriate time-dependant operation of the sample introduction system 1 (for example, by means of flow injection), ion source 2 (for example, by ionization induced by a laser pulse) or interface 3 (for example, by using a vacuum shutter gate to interrupt the stream of ions).
- the main distinguishing feature of the present invention is that the stream of ions acquired a controlled time dependency of the ion current or ion density before being introduced into the pressurized cell 5.
- This controlled time dependency can be acquired in the sample introduction system 1, the ion source 2, the interface 3 or the ion beam forming and modulation means 4, those modules thus carrying a common functionality of the means for generating a modulated stream of ions 15, shown by the dotted box on the Fig.l, and referred to in this specification as an ion generation means.
- the cell 5 can comprise a quadrupole rod set provided with a suitable reaction or collision gas for reactive removal of interferences, collisional focusing or collision induced dissociation. It is important to realize that the interference ions can be produced in the cell, not only in an ion source like ICP. So if the cell is used as a collision cell, i.e. for collision induced dissociation or collisional focusing, the interferences may be produced and need to be discriminated against.
- the pressurized cell 5 is connected to a mass analyzer 6, which can be for example, a scanning mass analyzer such as a quadrupole mass filter, a magnetic sector analyzer or an ion trap. This selects ions of a particular m/z ratio, and these ions are then passed to an ion detector 7 for detection.
- a mass analyzer 6 which can be for example, a scanning mass analyzer such as a quadrupole mass filter, a magnetic sector analyzer or an ion trap. This selects ions of a particular
- mass analyzer 6 and detector 7 could be replaced by some other mass analysis instrument, for example a time-of-flight (TOF) or some other device capable of detecting all ions of a desired range of mass simultaneously or quasi-simultaneously as opposed to sequentially.
- TOF time-of-flight
- the different sections of the instrument would be provided with power supplies for RF and DC signals as required, the pressurized cell 5 would be provided with a gas supply, and appropriate pumps would be provided to maintain the different sections at the desired pressures.
- an axial field generating means 11 for the pressurized cell 5 is indicated.
- a modulating waveform generator 10 is connected to the lens 9, for purposes detailed below. This generator 10 is connected to a time resolved detection means 8, which is connected to the detector 7 as indicated.
- This detection means 8 ensures that only ions in a set time period are detected. For this purpose an ion induced signal detection and processing means then ensures that, for spectrometric analysis, only signals from a desired time period relative to the release of each pulse are used.
- the time detection means 8 forms a control unit.
- a sequence of ion packets each of predetermined duration at is formed with a predetermined frequency /in the ion beam forming and modulation means 4 by supplying a time- dependent voltage of an appropriate waveform from the modulating waveform generator 10 to lens 9.
- the ion packets are then introduced into the pressurized cell 5 where the ion packets propagate and where new interference ions unwanted for detection may be generated.
- a linear RF quadrupole with an axial field from the axial field generation means 11 is used as a pressurized cell 5, although in other embodiments other arrangements can be implemented.
- the ion packets are transformed in shape and duration, the properties of which transformation are made clear by the examples which follow.
- the sample ions to be measured After propagation through the cell 5, the sample ions to be measured, the accompanying interference ions from the ion source 1 and new interferences that might be generated in the pressurized cell 5 enter the mass analyzer 6.
- a quadrupole mass filter was used but any other analyzer such as magnetic sector, time-of- flight, ion trap or ICR mass analyzer can be used, i.e. it is not necessary to use a scanning-type analyzer.
- the mass analyzer 6 disperses or filters ions in accordance to their m/z values, and the detector 7 converts ion current into electric signal that is then detected by the time resolved detection means 8.
- FIG. 2 where there is shown a typical example of measurements performed with the apparatus just described.
- the lens 9 is supplied with a voltage waveform 12 shown at the top of Figure 2, and whose value is indicated on the right hand scale.
- Signals measured by the time resolved detection means 8 for the sample of K at a concentration of 100 ng/mL and for a blank sample were as shown by lines 13 and 14 respectively, with the number of ions detected indicated on the left hand side (note that the left hand and horizontal scales are log scales, while the right hand scale for the lens voltage is a linear scale).
- the time resolved detection means 8 was operated in a pulse-counting mode, and the pulses produced by ions at the ion detector 7 were integrated in 5120 time-locked channels, each of 20.48 microseconds width, thus producing a record of 104.86 ms long.
- the presented data is an integral of 500 records collected consecutively but summed in a channel-by-channel manner, so that the given on figure 2 signals represent 5120 integrated time- locked channels.
- the potential on the lens was set to 4 V that was approximately optimal for transmission of ions of m/z of about 40 from the plasma. Between the pulses, the potential of the lens 9 was kept at +20 V so that none of the ions extracted from plasma could enter the pressurized cell 5.
- ions extracted from the plasma include analyte ( 39 K + ) and dominant plasma ions 0 + , Ar + and ArH + and these ions entered the cell 5, which was pressurized with NH 3 reaction gas used for reactive removal of the Ar + and ArH + ions.
- the entrance aperture not shown
- the base lines of the signals measured for blank sample and for K sample are similar and contain 5860 ions and 5270 ions respectively from 1.5 ms to 100 ms of the recorded scan.
- the segment of the scan from 0 to 1.5 ms contains different number of 46400 ions for K sample and 435 ions for the blank sample (all numbers are integrals of 500 records). That is, the interference ions produced in the cell, after the packet of ions extracted from plasma are introduced in the cell, are more evenly distributed in time than the ions of sample to be detected.
- the signal-to-background ratio ( Figure 3) and background equivalent concentration ( Figure 4) are beneficial for determination of K in the sample. Therefore, if the time resolved detection means 8 detects ions only during the period of the first several milliseconds after the lens pulse, which can be arranged in several different ways, for example by deflecting the ions from the detector at all times except this period, or by setting a data acquisition system time window, the limit of detection of K in the sample is improved.
- Figures 5 and 6 Another example of use of the preferred embodiment of Figure 1, is shown in Figures 5 and 6.
- This shows temporal resolving of ions of 56 Fe + in presence of interfering ions of 40 Ca 16 O + formed in the plasma.
- the axial field generation means 11 was switched off and the ions were introduced into the pressurized cell 5 at a relatively high kinetic energy, the signal caused by the ions of 40 Ca 16 O + for a sample containing 1000 ppm of Ca, is less broadened in time than the signal produced by the ions of 56 Fe + for a sample of Fe at 20 ppm (Figure 5).
- Figure 5 shows levels detected after a pulse of ions is released into the pressurized cell 5, and here the time scale is a linear scale.
- the detection means 8 detect ions only during a time period, say, from 1 ms to 3 ms after the lens pulse. It is evident from Figure 5 that background equivalent concentration is lower during that time.
- the axial field generation means 11 was operative to produce an axial electrostatic field along the axis of the pressurized cell 5 and the ions were introduced in the cell at a relatively low kinetic energy.
- Figures 6a, 6b and 6c indicate different potentials along the length of the pressurized collision cell 5.
- the signals produced by isobaric ions of 56 Fe + and 40 Ca 16 O + can either overlap in time ( Figure 6a) or be partially resolved (Figure 6c) with Figure 6b indicating a lower level of resolution.
- Detection of 56 Fe + in the presence of 1000 ppm of Ca in the sample during the first 200 microseconds after the start of the lens pulse, for the case of 8 V potential difference along the cell, can give better limits of detection than if the detection was done continuously.
- the ion source produces ions in a pulsed manner such that further modulation of the ion beam extracted from the ion source is not required.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP00981104A EP1252648A2 (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2000-11-24 | An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices |
CA002396925A CA2396925A1 (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2000-11-24 | An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices |
JP2001552079A JP2003519899A (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2000-11-24 | Apparatus and method for discriminating unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry by collision and reactor |
AU18466/01A AU1846601A (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2000-11-24 | An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17530500P | 2000-01-10 | 2000-01-10 | |
US60/175,305 | 2000-01-10 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001051917A2 true WO2001051917A2 (en) | 2001-07-19 |
WO2001051917A3 WO2001051917A3 (en) | 2002-04-04 |
Family
ID=22639771
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2000/001405 WO2001051917A2 (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2000-11-24 | An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1252648A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2003519899A (en) |
AU (1) | AU1846601A (en) |
CA (2) | CA2326514A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001051917A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1810315A1 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2007-07-25 | Albert Edward Litherland | Method and apparatus for separation of isobaric interferences |
US8987681B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2015-03-24 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Ionization method, ion producing device and uses of the same in ion mobility spectrometry |
DE102017127189B4 (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2023-11-09 | Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen) Gmbh | Determination of isobaric interferences in a mass spectrometer |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4925797B2 (en) * | 2006-11-28 | 2012-05-09 | 独立行政法人農業環境技術研究所 | Iodine analysis method and apparatus |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0813228A1 (en) * | 1996-06-10 | 1997-12-17 | Micromass Limited | Plasma mass spectrometer |
US5753909A (en) * | 1995-11-17 | 1998-05-19 | Bruker Analytical Systems, Inc. | High resolution postselector for time-of-flight mass spectrometery |
EP0860859A1 (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 1998-08-26 | Nkk Corporation | Laser ionization mass spectroscope and mass spectrometric analysis method |
US5847386A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1998-12-08 | Mds Inc. | Spectrometer with axial field |
WO1998056030A1 (en) * | 1997-06-04 | 1998-12-10 | Mds Inc. | Bandpass reactive collison cell |
WO1999062101A1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 1999-12-02 | Analytica Of Branford, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with multipole ion guides |
-
2000
- 2000-11-23 CA CA 2326514 patent/CA2326514A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-11-24 CA CA002396925A patent/CA2396925A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-11-24 AU AU18466/01A patent/AU1846601A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-11-24 JP JP2001552079A patent/JP2003519899A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-11-24 WO PCT/CA2000/001405 patent/WO2001051917A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2000-11-24 EP EP00981104A patent/EP1252648A2/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5847386A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1998-12-08 | Mds Inc. | Spectrometer with axial field |
US5753909A (en) * | 1995-11-17 | 1998-05-19 | Bruker Analytical Systems, Inc. | High resolution postselector for time-of-flight mass spectrometery |
EP0813228A1 (en) * | 1996-06-10 | 1997-12-17 | Micromass Limited | Plasma mass spectrometer |
EP0860859A1 (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 1998-08-26 | Nkk Corporation | Laser ionization mass spectroscope and mass spectrometric analysis method |
WO1998056030A1 (en) * | 1997-06-04 | 1998-12-10 | Mds Inc. | Bandpass reactive collison cell |
WO1999062101A1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 1999-12-02 | Analytica Of Branford, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with multipole ion guides |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
DOUGLAS D J ET AL: "COLLISIONAL FOCUSING EFFECTS IN RADIO FREQUENCY QUADRUPOLES" JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC., NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 2, 1992, pages 398-408, XP002041216 ISSN: 1044-0305 cited in the application * |
ROWAN J T ET AL: "Attenuation of polyatomic ion interferences in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry by gas-phase collisions" APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, THE SOCIETY FOR APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY. BALTIMORE, US, vol. 43, no. 6, 1989, pages 976-980, XP000032932 ISSN: 0003-7028 cited in the application * |
TANNER S D ET AL: "A dynamic reaction cell for inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-DRC-MS). II. Reduction of interferences produced within the cell" JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC., NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 10, no. 11, November 1999 (1999-11), pages 1083-1094, XP004264742 ISSN: 1044-0305 cited in the application * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1810315A1 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2007-07-25 | Albert Edward Litherland | Method and apparatus for separation of isobaric interferences |
EP1810315A4 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2010-11-10 | Albert Edward Litherland | Method and apparatus for separation of isobaric interferences |
US8987681B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2015-03-24 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Ionization method, ion producing device and uses of the same in ion mobility spectrometry |
DE102017127189B4 (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2023-11-09 | Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen) Gmbh | Determination of isobaric interferences in a mass spectrometer |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2396925A1 (en) | 2001-07-19 |
AU1846601A (en) | 2001-07-24 |
JP2003519899A (en) | 2003-06-24 |
WO2001051917A3 (en) | 2002-04-04 |
CA2326514A1 (en) | 2001-07-10 |
EP1252648A2 (en) | 2002-10-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9406493B2 (en) | Electrostatic mass spectrometer with encoded frequent pulses | |
JP5322385B2 (en) | Control of ion population in a mass spectrometer. | |
US7456388B2 (en) | Ion guide for mass spectrometer | |
US7064319B2 (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
EP1393345B1 (en) | A method of operating a mass spectrometer to suppress unwanted ions | |
CA2312754C (en) | Method of and apparatus for selective collision-induced dissociation of ions in a quadrupole ion guide | |
EP1050061B2 (en) | Spectrometer provided with pulsed ion source and transmission device to damp ion motion and method of use | |
US9916971B2 (en) | Systems and methods of suppressing unwanted ions | |
EP1337827B1 (en) | Method for improving signal-to-noise ratios for atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry | |
EP2204842A1 (en) | Means for removing unwanted ions from an ion transport system and mass spectrometer | |
US8692191B2 (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
EP2390900B1 (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
WO2008059246A2 (en) | Method of operating a multi-reflection ion trap | |
AU2002302228A1 (en) | A method of operating a mass spectrometer to suppress unwanted ions | |
US5464975A (en) | Method and apparatus for charged particle collection, conversion, fragmentation or detection | |
EP1252648A2 (en) | An apparatus for and method of discriminating against unwanted ionized species in mass spectrometry with collision and reaction devices | |
Lemière | Mass analysers for LC-MS | |
JP2007033322A (en) | Mass spectrometry and device thereof | |
WO2023204187A1 (en) | Mass spectrometer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 2001 552079 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10169087 Country of ref document: US Ref document number: 2396925 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 18466/01 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2000981104 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2000981104 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 2000981104 Country of ref document: EP |