WO2001050389A2 - System and method for preparing quotes and ordering - Google Patents

System and method for preparing quotes and ordering Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001050389A2
WO2001050389A2 PCT/US2000/035566 US0035566W WO0150389A2 WO 2001050389 A2 WO2001050389 A2 WO 2001050389A2 US 0035566 W US0035566 W US 0035566W WO 0150389 A2 WO0150389 A2 WO 0150389A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
user
information
customized
design
drilling tool
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/035566
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001050389A3 (en
WO2001050389B1 (en
Inventor
Gregory D. Fiegl
Original Assignee
Allied Machine & Engineering
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Allied Machine & Engineering filed Critical Allied Machine & Engineering
Priority to AU30769/01A priority Critical patent/AU3076901A/en
Publication of WO2001050389A2 publication Critical patent/WO2001050389A2/en
Publication of WO2001050389A3 publication Critical patent/WO2001050389A3/en
Publication of WO2001050389B1 publication Critical patent/WO2001050389B1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a system and methods for designing and quoting customized goods, resulting in an offer for purchase of such customized goods. Due to the characteristics of the system and methods according to the invention, the capability also exists to implement the system via a global information network, allowing the user to effectively design the customized product, receive a quote from the manufacturer and order the customized product on-line via the global information network, such as the worldwide web. In such an embodiment, a graphical user interface provides communication with the user to prompt required information for design of the customized product to meet the specific needs of the user. Upon submission of the required information, the system and methods according to the invention will preferably prepare a quote for manufacture of the customized product by analysis of the best manufacturing process for manufacture of the customized product. It is a further aspect of the invention that the user by submitting required information, may be provided with a drawing of the customized product for inspection prior to ordering the product via the system and methods of the invention. It is a further aspect of the invention that depending upon the information submitted by the user, the customized product designed using the information can be assessed as to technical feasibility.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREPARING QUOTES AND ORDERING
Technical Field
This invention relates to a system and methods for quoting and ordering goods tailored to a users specifications, particularly relating to tooling for manufacturing processes. More particularly, the system and methods accordmg to the invention allow a user to design, quote and order custom tooling, and which is particularly adapted to use via a global information network. Background of the Invention Depending on a users requirements with respect to the manufacturing of a variety of parts, components or goods, special tooling may be required to facilitate the manufacturing process. As an example, drilling tools adapted to cut a workpiece in a desired manner must be specifically designed to perform the intended machining process. To form a desired hole configuration using a drilling tool, the tool may be required to have multiple cutting surfaces of desired shape and dimension to result in a given configuration when used. Drilling tools used for machining of workpieces may include the use of drill holders and cutting inserts selectively attached thereto in a manner to form the desired hole configuration in a drilling operation. The cutting inserts provide the ability to selectively change inserts when the cutting surfaces thereon have been worn. In this manner, a drill holder can be reused in successive machining operations simply by changing the cutting inserts. Depending upon the machining operation intended, the drilling holder and cutting insert designs will change, and therefore these components must be tailored to the specific application for which they are to be used.
In the past, the design and manufacture of the drill holder and/or cutting inserts has depended upon a manufacturer of such components to obtain information relating to the machining operation to be performed, and thereafter custom designing a tool to perform such operation. As the information required to facilitate designing tooling for a specific purpose can vary significantly, this process has been prone to errors, and is also resource and/or labor intensive. Further, the effort to design appropriate tooling typically will only result in the ability to provide the user with an estimated cost for manufacturing the tooling, which is submitted to the user as an offer. The manufacturer then must receive acceptance of the offer by the user before a "sale" is made and manufacturing of the tooling commences. Thus, the effort to design and quote the toolmg may not result in a commercial transaction, and the time and effort applied to such activities is not compensated for. Thus, it would be of particular advantage to provide a system and method which would allow a customized product, such as tooling used in manufacturing processes, to be more easily designed and quoted by the manufacturer. It would also be advantageous to minimize the effort and resources applied to develop the design and quote for such a customized product.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention is therefore directed at overcoming the limitations of past practice, and providing a system and methods for designing and quoting customized goods, resulting in an offer for purchase of such customized goods. Due to the characteristics of the system and methods according to the invention, the capability also exists to implement the system via a global information network, allowing the user to effectively design the customized product, receive a quote from the manufacturer and order the customized product on-line via the global information network, such as the worldwide web. In such an embodiment, a graphical user interface provides communication with the user to prompt required information for design of the customized product to meet the specific needs of the user. Upon submission of the required information, the system and methods according to the invention will preferably prepare a quote for manufacture of the customized product by analysis of the best manufacturing process for manufacture of the customized product. It is a further aspect of the invention that the user by submitting required information, may be provided with a drawing of the customized product for inspection prior to ordering the product via the system and methods of the invention. It is a further aspect of the invention that depending upon the information submitted by the user, the customized product designed using the information can be assessed as to technical feasibility. These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon a reading of the detailed description of preferred embodiments, with reference to the accompanying figures.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page associated with an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page allowing the user to select a tool body type for creating a desired tool.
Fig. 3 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page allowing the user to select the length and other specifications of the tool holder associated with a designed tool. Fig. 4 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page allowing the user to select characteristics of a tooling for a particular application.
Fig. 5 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page to allow the user to select characteristics of a tooling for a particular application. Fig. 6 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page allowing the user to select a whole profile in the design of a tool.
Figs. 7-8 are depictions of relationship driven web pages for selection of characteristics for a particular form of tooling designed by the user.
Figs. 9-11 are depictions of relationship driven web pages for selecting and designing tool characteristics for a desired application.
Figs. 12-14 are depictions of relationship driven web pages for selecting and designing tool characteristics for a desired application.
Figs. 15-27 are depictions of relationship driven web pages for selection of other characteristics of a tool for a particular application. Fig. 28 is a depiction of a relationship driven web page which allows a user to select options for quoting, viewing or ordering tooling designed in accordance with the invention.
Fig, 29 is a flow chart relating to assessment of feasibility and creation of drawings related to a tooling designed by a user. . Fig. 30 is an example of a drawing produced by the system according to the invention.
Fig. 31 is a depiction of a quote page produced by the system according to the invention as an example.
Fig. 32 is a flow chart relating to assessment of costs relating to a design tooling for a particular application.
Fig. 33 is a depiction of an order page allowing the user to order a tooling designed in accordance with the invention. Detailed Description of the Invention
The invention will now be described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, and particularly in relation to a class of customized tooling that the system and methods according to the invention may be usefully applied. It should be understood that the system and methods according to the invention may also be useful in the design, quoting and ordering of various other customized products in a manner similar to that described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Additionally, the system and methods according to the invention may be implemented by providing the user with hard copy materials which may be used to submit information required for design, quoting and ordering of the customized product desired by the user.
Figs. 1-33 are directed to a preferred embodiment, and represent a library of relationship driven pages which may be displayed via a global information network to guide a user through a series of interactive operations, wherein information necessary to design a customized product are obtained and analyzed.
Turning to the Figs., the inventive system and methods which allow a user to design, quote and order a customized product may be implemented through use of a graphical user interface (GUI), wherein the user is guided through a series of interactive pages or displays which prompt the user to enter the required mformation relative to customized product they require. More particularly, the Figs, presented herein relating to the preferred embodiment are directed at the design and quoting of drill holders which use one or more cutting inserts in association therewith. The Figs, represent a series of web pages which prompt the user for required information relative to the type of drill holder they would like to design and obtain a quote thereon. The library of relationship driven pages may be implemented via a global information network, such as the worldwide web, wherein the pages would be presented to the user via a common web site which they are selectively enabled to access, h general, the system and methods according to the invention may be directed at particular users, wherein security means may be provided for limiting access only to authorized users. For example, access to the interactive web pages may be password coded or otherwise secured from unauthorized use.
Fig. 1 is directed to an opening page which shows in general the types of drill holders which may be designed by the user. In the preferred embodiment, upon entering the system, the user is provided with an item number as shown in Fig. 2, and the process of customized product design can be initiated. For the drill holders which are the subject of the preferred embodiments, as with a variety of other customized products and tooling, the products may be configured in a wide variety of ways to meet the users requirements. For drill holders which use one or more cutting inserts in association therewith to perform machining operations on workpieces, the tool design may begin with selection of a body type for the tool holder, such as shown in Fig. 2. Such body types may include various categories, which as shown in Fig. 2, may comprise special length, chrome helix, chrome bushing, or ICS body types having various step configurations. Using the interactive page as shown in Fig. 2, the particular body type for the drill holder desired by the user may be selected. Fig. 3 shows an interactive page for use in specifying the characteristics of a special length type of drill holder according to the selection in Fig. 2. If a special length type of drill holder is selected by the user, the information as set forth in Fig. 3 is requested as part of the product specification. Where multiple options are provided for prompting the user, pull down menus such as shown at 10 may be conveniently used in the GUI set up. Further specifications for the drill holder, such as flute style as well as dimensional specifications are then prompted and supplied by the user as shown in Fig. 3. If one of the other body types as prompted in Fig. 2 is selected by the user, particular information relating to these other body types is requested from the user relating to each of the specific body types as shown in Figs. 4-5.
For certain machining applications, a drilling tool is designed to make different hole profiles. If special hole profiles are required, the tooling can be designed to meet these needs. Turning to Fig. 6, the user may be prompted to select a hole profile relating to the machining operation intended to be performed by the tooling being created. For producing a given hole profile, the characteristics of the holder being designed in conjunction with the cutting inserts to be used therewith allow the user to specify the type of ICS drill required for a particular machining operation, h a particular embodiment, ICS drills may be configured to have one or more steps to provide the desired hole form. Figs. 7 and 8 relate to a one-step design, wherein information related to the body for the desired ICS drill is requested. As shown in Fig. 8, as part of the specifications for a particular ICS drill, dimensional specifications are requested which define with particularity the characteristics of the drill holder to form a desired hole configuration, generally indicated at 12. Further, an ICS drill will normally include one or more cutting inserts used in conjunction with a primary blade insert positioned at the forward end of the drill holder. As shown at 14, a pull down menu may be provided to allow the user to select the manufacturer of a desired cutting insert, as well as to select the type of cutting insert at 16. Further, an item number relating to the type of cutting insert may be provided in a pull down menu 18, and the Find Available Numbers button 20 is used to select a given manufacturers cutting insert for use in the designed tooling. Further design specifications for such toolmg are then prompted and input by the user as further shown in Fig. 8.
Alternatively, for, two or three step ICS drills, Figs. 9-14 follow similar requests for information relating to forming other particular hole configurations. As seen in Figs. 11 and 13, a two and three step ICS drill will include two or three cutting inserts respectively in combination with the primary blade insert to be positioned at the forward end of the holder. Consequently, the prompted information requested from the user includes information relating to the plurality of cutting inserts to be used to form the desired hole configuration for the particular machining operation. Turning to Fig. 15, further information relating to the customized tooling desired by the user is requested, more particularly relating to the shank style of the dήll holder, allowing compatibility with the users particular machining apparatus and requirements. Figs. 16 and 17 show information requested for a Morse taper shank if such a shank is selected in the menu of Fig. 15. In addition to information relating to dimensional characteristics of the shank, additional information relating to through shank coolant and
RCA options are requested in Fig. 17. Similarly, for the other shank options which can be selected in the menu of Fig. 15, the particular characteristics of each shank option is requested as shown in Figs. 18-27. For each selected shank option, the required information which would allow design of the particular drill holder desired is requested. Once the information relating to the particular customized tooling, and in the case of the drill holder described in the preferred embodiment, the data can then be saved to a database for future use. The GUI thus provides a library of relationship driven web pages which guide a user through a series of interactive pages. The user is prompted for the necessary part specifications based upon the type of part desired for their particular application or requirements. As shown throughout the Figs., menu items may be provided to allow the user to move within the interactive system in various ways, such as shown at 22 in Fig. 1. The preferred system may also allow the user to create a new item, edit an existing item from saved data via a previous tool selection or creation session, or to copy an existing design via menu options provided in the GUI. These functions simplify the ability of the user to respecify and order the desired customized tooling, or to modify an existing design to desired new parameters.
Once tooling is created, copied or edited, the user is forwarded to a page, the preferred embodiment being shown in Fig. 28, which allows information relating to the user to be acquired, and thereafter to allow the user to generate a quote, to order the generated item or to view a drawing of the generated item by selection of the appropriate menu button shown at 24.
To generate a quote, the system and methods according to the invention preferably use the information acquired through the interactive relationship driven pages described above, which specify the characteristics of the customized tooling desired by the user. As part of the process of preparing a quote from the information provided by the user, the characteristics of the customized toolmg or part are preferably analyzed in terms of feasibility and engineering acceptability, as well as manufacturing acceptability. The invention allows determination of whether the part specified by the user meets standard design criteria or manufacturing feasibility criteria to allow manufacturing using existing manufacturing equipment or resources. In the case of a drill holder as discussed in the preferred embodiment, a feasibility analysis may be conducted by generating a solid model representation of the part to the users input specifications, and thereafter predetermined distances, clearances, surfaces and interrelationship between surfaces, or other characteristics of the part can be analyzed. In the preferred embodiment, the feasibility analysis is conducted automatically via software in conjunction with a solid modeling software package such as a computer aided design (CAD) package. The measured values from the feasibility assessment can then be compared with design requirements specified by the manufacturer or in relation to the resources available to the manufacturer. If the design as specified by the user does not meet design criteria or other critical criteria, the user will be informed of the ρroblem(s) along with suggestions for correction of possible errors. The system may also direct the user to a particular interactive page where a possible error occurred if an on-line system is used. In general, the step of quoting a customized part will not be taken unless the design criteria is verified as being valid.
Assuming that the part design is determined to be valid, the preferred embodiment of the invention allows generation of an engineering drawing of the created part for review by the user.
Turning to Fig. 29, a preferred program which automates the feasibility assessment and creation of a drawing related to a part for which the design criteria has been validated. In Fig. 29, the drawing/feasibility program is implemented at 30 upon implementation of the quotation system or operation of the Quote Item button at 24 in Fig. 28. Item numbers relating to creation of a drawing or feasibility assessment are provided, and a designation as to whether a drawing, feasibility or both are created is made to identify information related to a particular users design. If a drawing is to be created, a retrieve drawing subroutine function is implemented at 32, with an item number passed as an input to the function. The retrieve drawing subroutine is implemented at 34, and functions to read information relating to the customized design input by the user into the data structure for a drawing file, preferably associated with a solid modeling drawing package as previously described. Using the users specific data, a drawing is regenerated using values read as to the customized product specified by the user, and outputs a plot file to the drawing program. Using a base tool configuration, and modifying the base configuration according to the particular design characteristics input by the user allow simplified and fast processing and generation of a specific engineering drawing reflecting the users design criteria.
If a feasibility assessment is to be performed, it is implemented at 32 and calls up a feasibility analysis subroutine function at 36. This function reads part information as supplied by the user for the customized design into a data structure. The subroutine function retrieves a feasibility model for the base product design, and regenerates the design using values read from the user input data. Predetermined design criteria are analyzed in function 36 to verify feasibility and/or manufacturability of the customized product, hi many situations, both of the functions to render a drawing as well as conduct a feasibility assessment of the customized part are performed, and implemented at 32 accordingly. Depending upon the results of the drawing creation function at 34 or feasibility assessment at 36, the results are output at 38 which in turn may be forwarded to the interactive system described above at 40. If any error in the drawing and/or feasibility assessment are found, an error message will be forwarded to the user as previously described. Alternatively, if the design criteria are valid, and a drawing generated, the user may view the drawing using the menu button at 24 (see Fig. 28).
Information may also be output to various databases for creation and keeping of records or other information relating to the customized product at 42 and 44 as examples.
Fig. 30 shows an example of a generated drawing using the program as described with reference to Fig. 29, in conjunction with a solid modeling drawing package. To create the drawing, the part specifications are transferred to a drawing subroutine program working in conjunction with a solid modeling software package. The subroutine program automatically creates a customer drawing reflecting the users specifications. The drawing is created using the solid modeling software package, and then may be converted to a format that is compatible with any standard web browser as an example, and returned to the user.
The drawing may be used to confirm design criteria, and may be provided to the user for approval should the design part be ordered. Such approval may be specified by signing and dating the approved drawing at SO as shown in Fig. 30. Once feasibility of the design criteria has been ascertained, the system and methods according to the invention also desirably generate a specific quote for the customized product created by the user. The information from the quoting program may then be forwarded and displayed on a quote form such as shown in Fig. 31. To generate the quote information, a costing subroutine may be utilized, such as shown in Fig. 32 at
52 by reference to item numbers corresponding to customized items presented by a user as described above. Errors are checked with respect to the information relating to an item submitted for costing at 54, and a costing subroutine function may be implemented at 56. The costing function 56 may read item information related to the customized item into a data structure and reads inputs from another database 58 relating to manufacturing methods potentially used to produce the customized specific item and costing information relating thereto. This process is reiterated for a plurality of possible manufacturing approaches to producing the item, and ultimately the information is output to the interactive system at 60 for preparation of the quote as shown in Fig. 31. As shown in Fig. 33, a purchase order containing the users mformation as well as shipping information and a description of the item as well as quoted pricing and delivery schedules may be generated. The user may place an order for the created item, or reset the form via user buttons 52. The user can specify the quantity at 54 and any shipping instructions at 56. In the preferred embodiment, the automated quoting system determines the prices that will be offered to the customer and interrogates the parts specifications to determine these parameters. In a preferred embodiment, the cost for the specified item is determined by analyzing a plurality of manufacturing methods for the most cost-effective approach, on which offered pricing will be based. The cost for each of a plurality of manufacturing techniques are calculated and compared with each other, and the selected cost and delivery schedule for the item can then be displayed on the purchase order as shown in
Fig. 33.
Although the present invention has been described above in detail, the same is by way of illustration and example only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the present invention. Further, as described above, the system and methods according the invention may be used in conjunction with other types of customized products wherein characteristics of the products are supplied by a user to generate specific information related to design criteria and/or cost and supply information. Accordingly, the scope and content of the present invention are to be defined only by the terms of the appended claims. Other aspects of the invention are included in attached Appendix A and B.

Claims

What is Claimed is:
1. A computer network system for designing a drilling tool and generating a quotation for the purchase of a designed tool comprising a user interface to receive information regarding an application for which a drilling tool is to be designed and characteristics of the drilling tool, a server configured to receive information supplied by a user via the user interface and use the received information to generate a drilling tool design, wherein the server is provided with computer readable program code to generate a quotation for the manufacture and sale of a drilling tool design according to the information received form the user.
2. A method for generating a quotation for a drilling tool comprising the steps of: 1) receiving information from a user via a user interface in a computer network relating to a drilling tool for a predetermined machining operation, 2) using the received information to design the drilling tool according to the users specifications, and
3) generating a quotation for the manufacture and sale of the drilling tool as designed.
3. A computer system having a computer readable program code embodied therein for quotation of tooling for a predetermined machining process comprising a user interface, computer readable program code configured to prompt the input of information relating to the tooling and predetermined machining process via the user interface, computer readable program code configured to use the information input via the user interface and generate a quotation for the manufacture and sale of the tooling.
PCT/US2000/035566 1999-12-31 2000-12-29 System and method for preparing quotes and ordering WO2001050389A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU30769/01A AU3076901A (en) 1999-12-31 2000-12-29 System and method for preparing quotes and ordering

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17414799P 1999-12-31 1999-12-31
US60/174,147 1999-12-31

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001050389A2 true WO2001050389A2 (en) 2001-07-12
WO2001050389A3 WO2001050389A3 (en) 2002-05-30
WO2001050389B1 WO2001050389B1 (en) 2002-09-26

Family

ID=22635029

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/035566 WO2001050389A2 (en) 1999-12-31 2000-12-29 System and method for preparing quotes and ordering

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU3076901A (en)
WO (1) WO2001050389A2 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4887208A (en) * 1987-12-18 1989-12-12 Schneider Bruce H Sales and inventory control system
WO1998052144A1 (en) * 1997-05-12 1998-11-19 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Web-enabled system and method for designing and manufacturing laser scanners
US5844554A (en) * 1996-09-17 1998-12-01 Bt Squared Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for user interfaces and constraint handling configurations software

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4887208A (en) * 1987-12-18 1989-12-12 Schneider Bruce H Sales and inventory control system
US5844554A (en) * 1996-09-17 1998-12-01 Bt Squared Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for user interfaces and constraint handling configurations software
WO1998052144A1 (en) * 1997-05-12 1998-11-19 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Web-enabled system and method for designing and manufacturing laser scanners

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
M[NTYLA, M.; D. NAU; J. SHAH: "Challenges in feature-based manufacturing research" COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, no. 2, 1 February 1996 (1996-02-01), pages 77-85, XP002191918 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU3076901A (en) 2001-07-16
WO2001050389A3 (en) 2002-05-30
WO2001050389B1 (en) 2002-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI249684B (en) A system and method for capturing, managing, and disseminating manufacturing knowledge
Molloy et al. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly: Concepts, architectures and implementation
US7058465B2 (en) Method of preparing estimate for sheet metal working
CN101482895B (en) Electronic component design, buying and manufacture cooperation
US7188072B2 (en) Systems and methods for the collaborative design, construction, and maintenance of fluid processing plants
KR101837473B1 (en) Smart ordering and manufacturing system and method thereof
CN101980260A (en) System and method for designing and manufacturing design object
US20020032611A1 (en) Methods and systems for sourcing bill of material and data handling configurations software
US20170018019A1 (en) System and method for list shopping over a computer network
JP2003535389A (en) Automated method and system for selection and acquisition of electronic components used in circuit and chip design
JP2008052719A (en) Computer implemented method for defining input product
JP2008135002A (en) Method and system for creating tool specifications
Jiang et al. An automatic process planning system for the quick generation of manufacturing process plans directly from CAD drawings
US8626760B2 (en) System and method for document management
US20040039735A1 (en) Computer-implemented method and system for performing searching for products and services
US20060038829A1 (en) Cad system, program for running the system, and recording medium having the program recorded therein
US20060129270A1 (en) Processes and systems for creation of machine control for specialty machines requiring manual input
JP2009288986A (en) High-mix low-volume production support system for electronic equipment, and high-mix low-volume production support program for electronic equipment
CN104275618A (en) System and method for selecting a tool assembly
WO2001050389A2 (en) System and method for preparing quotes and ordering
JP3741983B2 (en) Machining attribute information link system
US11712773B1 (en) Machine tool operations optimization
Gopalakrishnan et al. Design and development of a target‐costing system for turning operation
JP5231175B2 (en) Precut processing data creation support device
EP1467302A2 (en) Method and system for creating and managing engineered time standards

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP