WO2000061361A1 - Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same - Google Patents

Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000061361A1
WO2000061361A1 PCT/US2000/009586 US0009586W WO0061361A1 WO 2000061361 A1 WO2000061361 A1 WO 2000061361A1 US 0009586 W US0009586 W US 0009586W WO 0061361 A1 WO0061361 A1 WO 0061361A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
barium sulfate
silicon
surface treated
polysiloxane
sulfate particles
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/009586
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Thomas J. Lynch
Gary M. Freeman
Christina D. Prowell
Dwayne E. Outlaw
Original Assignee
J.M. Huber Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by J.M. Huber Corporation filed Critical J.M. Huber Corporation
Priority to DE60033798T priority Critical patent/DE60033798D1/en
Priority to CA002368021A priority patent/CA2368021A1/en
Priority to JP2000610670A priority patent/JP2002541051A/en
Priority to EP00923226A priority patent/EP1177093B1/en
Priority to KR1020017012905A priority patent/KR20020006701A/en
Publication of WO2000061361A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000061361A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F11/00Compounds of calcium, strontium, or barium
    • C01F11/46Sulfates
    • C01F11/462Sulfates of Sr or Ba
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09CTREATMENT OF INORGANIC MATERIALS, OTHER THAN FIBROUS FILLERS, TO ENHANCE THEIR PIGMENTING OR FILLING PROPERTIES ; PREPARATION OF CARBON BLACK  ; PREPARATION OF INORGANIC MATERIALS WHICH ARE NO SINGLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS AND WHICH ARE MAINLY USED AS PIGMENTS OR FILLERS
    • C09C1/00Treatment of specific inorganic materials other than fibrous fillers; Preparation of carbon black
    • C09C1/02Compounds of alkaline earth metals or magnesium
    • C09C1/027Barium sulfates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K9/00Use of pretreated ingredients
    • C08K9/08Ingredients agglomerated by treatment with a binding agent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C24/00Coating starting from inorganic powder
    • C23C24/08Coating starting from inorganic powder by application of heat or pressure and heat
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C26/00Coating not provided for in groups C23C2/00 - C23C24/00
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C30/00Coating with metallic material characterised only by the composition of the metallic material, i.e. not characterised by the coating process
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/50Agglomerated particles
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/60Particles characterised by their size
    • C01P2004/61Micrometer sized, i.e. from 1-100 micrometer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/60Particles characterised by their size
    • C01P2004/62Submicrometer sized, i.e. from 0.1-1 micrometer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/10Solid density
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/22Rheological behaviour as dispersion, e.g. viscosity, sedimentation stability
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/60Optical properties, e.g. expressed in CIELAB-values
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K3/00Use of inorganic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K3/30Sulfur-, selenium- or tellurium-containing compounds
    • C08K2003/3045Sulfates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K9/00Use of pretreated ingredients
    • C08K9/04Ingredients treated with organic substances
    • C08K9/06Ingredients treated with organic substances with silicon-containing compounds
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/29Coated or structually defined flake, particle, cell, strand, strand portion, rod, filament, macroscopic fiber or mass thereof
    • Y10T428/2982Particulate matter [e.g., sphere, flake, etc.]
    • Y10T428/2991Coated
    • Y10T428/2993Silicic or refractory material containing [e.g., tungsten oxide, glass, cement, etc.]
    • Y10T428/2995Silane, siloxane or silicone coating

Definitions

  • This invention relates to surface treated barium sulfate and, more particularly, to a surface treated barium sulfate product that provides desirable performance properties and improved processing in polymeric end use applications.
  • the invention also relates to a method of preparing such a surface treated barium sulfate product.
  • Natural barium sulfate (also commonly referred to as barite or barytes) is frequently used as an extender pigment and/or filler due to its chemical inertness (in both acid and alkali environments), high refractive index, low abrasiveness, low oil absorption, and resistance to corrosion. Barium sulfate is also known to promote flame retardancy and smoke suppression in polymeric end use applications. Given their high refractive index, barium sulfates of high brightness are desirable to use as a replacement for titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) in certain compositions such as pigmented polymeric compounds. Barite can be utilized to replace a portion of the more expensive TiO 2 pigment without having a deleterious impact on the compound's brightness and whiteness properties.
  • TiO 2 titanium dioxide
  • Synthetic, precipitated barium sulfate pigments are used in a like fashion, but are typically available in finer particle size grades versus the mechanically ground, natural barites. Precipitated barium sulfate is commonly referred to as blanc fixe.
  • the present invention is designed to overcome the deficiencies discussed above. It is an object of the invention to provide a surface treated barium sulfate product that is adapted to be readily dispersed in end use applications such as polymeric formulations. Good wet out and dispersion in polymers is important to the inventive product yielding improved processability during compounding and improved extension/spacing of TiO 2 .
  • Such hydrogen reactive polysiloxanes contain silicon-hydride groups as the reactive moiety.
  • a surface treated barium sulfate product particularly suited for use in polymeric compositions such as those derived from a polyvinyl chloride or a polyolefin.
  • the product comprises a plurality of barium sulfate particles and a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane.
  • This hydrogen reactive polysiloxane is deposited on the surface of the barium sulfate particles and bonds to this surface through means of a chemical reaction involving its reactive Si-H groups.
  • the treatment level of the silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane can range from about 0.1% to about 2.0% by weight, but is preferably from about 0.5% to about 1.5% by weight on an active weight basis.
  • FIG. 1 is a graphical representation displaying the effect of replacing titanium dioxide with a surface treated barium sulfate product of the present invention on the whiteness index of a pigmented PVC compound
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical representation displaying the effect of replacing titanium dioxide with a surface treated barium sulfate product of the present invention on the percent brightness of a pigmented PVC compound.
  • the present invention is directed toward a surface treated barium sulfate product that provides improved dispersibility in polymeric end use applications resulting in reduced processing times.
  • a dry ground natural barite is subsequently surface treated in the manner more fully described below.
  • precipitated barium sulfates or wet ground barites can also be surface treated by the inventive method to yield similar benefits.
  • Table I sets forth some mineral properties of a typical dry ground barium sulfate.
  • Table II sets forth some physical properties of four different, dry ground barite products available under the mark Huberbrite® from J.M. Huber Corporation.
  • Barite pH values were determined using a standard pH meter on a 28% solids (by weight) mixture of the barite with deionized water in accordance with the ASTM D-1208, E-70 procedure. Dry pigment brightness values in Table II were measured at 530 run with a magnesium oxide standard equal to 100%, following the ASTM C-110 procedure.
  • the whiteness index and % brightness values shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are standard TAPPI brightness numbers as determined by reading the PVC test plaques with a Technidyne Micro TB-1C brightness meter in accordance with the TAPPI Method T646 om-86 procedure. Hegman grind values were determined following the standard ASTM D-1210 procedure.
  • the average Stokes equivalent particle diameters in microns were determined by an x-ray sedimentation method based on Stokes Law using a Micromeritics 5100 Sedigraph particle size instrument.
  • the average Stokes equivalent particle diameter is the median particle size (MPS) value determined by the x-ray Sedigraph.
  • Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate is surface treated in accordance with the method of the present invention. The fine particle size of Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate is well suited when utilized in thermoplastic compounds since the fineness of the particles is important to the resultant physical properties and/or effective spacing of the titanium dioxide pigment.
  • the ground barite is surface modified with a hydrogen reactive silicone fluid (commonly referred to as a H-siloxane, a hydrogen reactive polysiloxane, or a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane).
  • a hydrogen reactive silicone fluid commonly referred to as a H-siloxane, a hydrogen reactive polysiloxane, or a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane.
  • the presence of the reactive silicon- hydride (Si-H) groups is essential to the siloxane's effectiveness as a surface treatment agent for the barite.
  • a preferred H-siloxane fluid utilized for surface modification of barium sulfate is a methyl hydrogen polysiloxane (denoted hereafter as Me H polysiloxane).
  • Me H polysiloxanes of low molecular weight (MW ⁇ 10,000) are particularly preferred as treatment agents. It should be noted that other alkyl hydrogen polysiloxanes and siloxanes
  • n an integer greater than 1 ;
  • X H or R';
  • n an integer greater than 1 ;
  • R a C, - C 20 alkyl
  • Y and Z silicon-containing terminating end groups.
  • n about 50-80 ;
  • R methyl
  • the surface treated barite of the present invention is prepared by treating either dry, finely divided barite powder or a barite slurry with the H-reactive silicone fluid. Effective surface treatments on the barium sulfate particles can be carried out on either physical form (dry or slurry) by using a neat H-siloxane fluid or by adding an aqueous emulsion of the H-siloxane fluid as more fully described below. Initially, 98 to 99.9 parts by weight of a quantity of barium sulfate (e.g., Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate) is added to a solids/liquid batch blender.
  • a quantity of barium sulfate e.g., Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate
  • the blender is turned on and 0.1 to 2.0 parts by weight (on an active basis) of the Me H polysiloxane is added respectively over approximately 0.1 to 3 minutes so as to yield a total of 100 parts by weight.
  • the total mixing time is preferably 5 to 40 minutes.
  • the preferred treatment level of the Me H polysiloxane is from about 0.5%) to about 1.5% by weight.
  • the barite may be heated during the dry treatment and subsequent mixing steps. In the case of surface treating a dry barite powder with Me H polysiloxane at room temperature, the treated barite product should be allowed to sit for a period of about 24 - 48 hours prior to its use to insure that the surface reaction is complete. Increasing treated product hydrophobicity and small amounts of H 2 gas evolution are typically observed over this time period.
  • the dry treatment process can be carried out continuously by adding the H-siloxane (neat or as an aqueous emulsion) via a chemical metering pump that is used in combination with a pin mixer, a Bepex turbulizer unit or a similar continuous blending device.
  • a barite starting material is to be treated in slurry form
  • the Me H polysiloxane is added slowly to the slurry with good mixing and then mixed for an additional 5 to 30 minutes.
  • the treated barite slurry is then vacuum filtered and subsequently oven dried or flash-dried under conventional drying conditions.
  • the treated barite product can be optionally post- pulverized to reduce treated particle agglomeration thereby improving its Hegman grind properties.
  • an aqueous emulsion of a Me H polysiloxane is used to surface treat the barium sulfate.
  • the aqueous emulsion is preferably prepared from a high-speed dispersion of the Me H polysiloxane in water in the presence of a surfactant.
  • the aqueous emulsion comprises Me H polysiloxane in an amount of from about 30% to about 70%, and a nonionic surfactant in an amount of from about 1.0% to about 3.0% of the total formulation (percentages are on an active weight basis).
  • nonionic surfactant used in preparing the emulsion formulation described above is about 4.0% by weight of the H-siloxane component.
  • preferred nonionic surfactants have a hydrophilic lypophilic balance (HLB) value of greater than 9.
  • HLB hydrophilic lypophilic balance
  • a nonionic surfactant particularly suited for emulsifying the Me H polysiloxane is a polysorbitan monolaurate with 20 moles of ethoxylation available under the trade name Alkamuls PSML-20 from Rhodia.
  • the emulsions are optimally prepared at a 50% by weight concentration of Me H polysiloxane whereby the corresponding weight concentration of Alkamuls PSML-20 utilized therein would optimally be 2%.
  • Table III sets forth some variable physical properties of the treated barium sulfate product that was produced by surface treating Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate with 1% by weight of the preferred Me H polysiloxane.
  • Table IV lists a number of barite test samples and their corresponding descriptions.
  • Emery 873 f Dimethyl siloxane available from Dow Corning under the trade name
  • Silicone Fluid 2-5084 (has about 50% less Si-H content than Dow Corning
  • a poly vinyl chloride compound was prepared from 100 parts by weight of a polyvinyl chloride resin (Vista 5385 resin available from Vista Chemical Co.), 50 phr (parts per hundred resin) of a plasticizer (diisodecyl phthalate, Jayflex DIDP available from Exxon Chemical Co.), 5 phr of a heat stabilizer (lead sulfophthalate, Lectro 90 available from Synthetic Products Co.), 1 phr of stearic acid (available from Synthetic Products Co.) and 15 phr of total pigment which consisted of either barite, titanium dioxide or a blend of barite and titanium dioxide.
  • the PVC formulation was prepared in a Brabender mixer using the following mixing procedure.
  • the PVC formulation was prepared by adding the PVC resin to a Brabender Plasti-corder PL-2100 blender which was heated to 340 deg. F and stirred at 60 rpm. Once the PVC resin was heated, the plasticizer and heat stabilizer were added followed by stearic acid addition. Mixing and heating was continued until the mixture was uniform at which time either barite or titanium dioxide or a blend of these pigments was added. Torque measurements were taken after 3 minutes. The composite PVC material was then cooled and compression molded at 340 deg. F and 5,000 psi to form test plaques which were used for optical brightness and color measurements using a Technidyne Micro TB-1C brightness meter.
  • Table V compares the mixing characteristics of the PVC test recipe described in Example 1 using three sample pigments from Table IV. Table V sets forth the impact on mixing torque when the TiO 2 pigment is replaced with various percentages of the barium sulfate test samples.
  • FIG. 1 is graphical representation displaying the effect of replacing titanium dioxide with a surface treated barium sulfate product of the present invention on
  • FIG. 1 correspond to samples A, B and C in Table IV.
  • FIG. 2 displays a similar representation with respect to % brightness, measured as TAPPI brightness. The whiteness index and % brightness values were both measured on
  • Table VI displays average % caking values for each of the test samples described in Table IV, all of which are based on a 1 micron barium sulfate (Huberbrite® 1). For comparison, all the treated barite samples were tested for % caking in a non post-pulverized form. Post-pulverization after surface treatment can affect a treated barite product's relative Hegman grind and caking properties.
  • the test procedure utilized for determining average % caking is as follows: A 12 gram test sample of barite powder was placed inside a 1 inch high by 1 5/8 inch inner diameter stainless steel ring which is located on a glass plate. Using a stainless steel plunger, the powder test sample was hand pressed into a firm plaque using 20 pounds of applied pressure for 10 seconds.
  • test plaque was then transferred onto the top of a 40 mesh US sieve screen that was then vibrated for about 2 minutes using a Sepor Inc. screen shaker unit.
  • the sample was partially disintegrated by this vibrating action with the clumps of material still remaining on the screen representing the amount of product caking on a weight % basis.
  • the screen residue retained was weighed and the % caking value was determined by the following formula:
  • % caking (wt. of residue material/original sample wt.) x 100 For a given powder sample, the % caking is determined three times and the average value was reported.
  • Table VI demonstrates that the surface treatment of a barium sulfate with Me H polysiloxane in accordance with the methods of the present invention results in a product which exhibits a significant reduction in % caking as compared to either an untreated barium sulfate or barium sulfate treated with other surface- modifying materials.
  • the noted reduction in caking reflects improved dry powder flow and bulk dry handling characteristics as well as improved dispersibility of the treated barium sulfate in polymeric end use applications.
  • post-pulverization of the treated product is an optional process step that can be practiced to provide particle deagglomeration so as to improve the product's dispersibility in organic resin or polymer systems as reflected by an improved Hegman grind value.
  • Treated barite test samples B and C of Table IV were checked for Hegman grind and both were then subsequently pulverized through a micro-pulverizer unit twice using a 0.020 inch screen.
  • the pulverized test samples are hereafter designated as samples B-P and C-P, respectively.
  • the resultant Hegman grind properties and % caking values of B-P and C-P were determined and the data are reported in Table VII.
  • Table VII clearly demonstrates that pulverization after surface treatment can significantly improve the Hegman grind properties of the treated barite products of this invention but this improvement often comes at the expense of decreasing dry flow properties some as reflected by an increase in the % caking values.
  • barite test sample C of Table IV was prepared again except that the treatment process with Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate and the Me H polysiloxane as a 50% active emulsion was carried out in a continuos fashion using a Bepex turbilizer unit rather than batch wise in a Henschel mixer. No heating was utilized.
  • the treated barite product so produced at a 1% treatment level by this continuous treatment process is designated hereafter as sample C-C.
  • sample C-C was evaluated in non-pulverized form for average % caking and was re-checked again after 24 hours.
  • the initial % caking value for C-C was determined to be 43%, while the same product tested 24 hours later yielded a % caking value of 9.4 .

Abstract

A method of preparing a surface treated barium sulfate product is disclosed which has improved dispersibility in end use applications such as polymeric formulations. The method includes mixing a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane, in neat or in aqueous emulsion form, with a quantity of barium sulfate particles and then optionally drying the resultant mixture. The silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is deposited on and chemically bonded to the surface of the barium sulfate particles.

Description

DESCRIPTION SURFACE TREATED BARIUM SULFATE AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME Technical Field
This invention relates to surface treated barium sulfate and, more particularly, to a surface treated barium sulfate product that provides desirable performance properties and improved processing in polymeric end use applications. The invention also relates to a method of preparing such a surface treated barium sulfate product. Background Art
Natural barium sulfate (also commonly referred to as barite or barytes) is frequently used as an extender pigment and/or filler due to its chemical inertness (in both acid and alkali environments), high refractive index, low abrasiveness, low oil absorption, and resistance to corrosion. Barium sulfate is also known to promote flame retardancy and smoke suppression in polymeric end use applications. Given their high refractive index, barium sulfates of high brightness are desirable to use as a replacement for titanium dioxide (TiO2) in certain compositions such as pigmented polymeric compounds. Barite can be utilized to replace a portion of the more expensive TiO2 pigment without having a deleterious impact on the compound's brightness and whiteness properties. Synthetic, precipitated barium sulfate pigments are used in a like fashion, but are typically available in finer particle size grades versus the mechanically ground, natural barites. Precipitated barium sulfate is commonly referred to as blanc fixe.
Despite barium sulfate's many end use advantages, it is not readily wetted or dispersed in organic based formulations such as polymeric compounds given its inert inorganic surface. Accordingly, lengthy processing times are typically required to obtain desired levels of dispersibility of the barite in such compounds. Further, fine and ultrafine particle barites in dry form tend to cake when stored and/or transported. Caking creates processing problems when the barite particles are added to end use formulations via automated dry feeders and the like. Disclosure of the Invention
The present invention is designed to overcome the deficiencies discussed above. It is an object of the invention to provide a surface treated barium sulfate product that is adapted to be readily dispersed in end use applications such as polymeric formulations. Good wet out and dispersion in polymers is important to the inventive product yielding improved processability during compounding and improved extension/spacing of TiO2.
It is a further object of the invention to provide such a treated barium sulfate product which when added to a polymeric compound does not have a deleterious impact on the physical properties of such compound.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method of treating a barium sulfate product with a hydrogen reactive polysiloxane that promotes improved manufacturing quality and consistency. Such hydrogen reactive polysiloxanes contain silicon-hydride groups as the reactive moiety.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiments and demonstrating features of the present invention, there is provided a surface treated barium sulfate product particularly suited for use in polymeric compositions such as those derived from a polyvinyl chloride or a polyolefin. The product comprises a plurality of barium sulfate particles and a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane. This hydrogen reactive polysiloxane is deposited on the surface of the barium sulfate particles and bonds to this surface through means of a chemical reaction involving its reactive Si-H groups. The treatment level of the silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane can range from about 0.1% to about 2.0% by weight, but is preferably from about 0.5% to about 1.5% by weight on an active weight basis. Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a graphical representation displaying the effect of replacing titanium dioxide with a surface treated barium sulfate product of the present invention on the whiteness index of a pigmented PVC compound, and FIG. 2 is a graphical representation displaying the effect of replacing titanium dioxide with a surface treated barium sulfate product of the present invention on the percent brightness of a pigmented PVC compound. Best Mode of Carrying Out the Invention
In accordance with the preceding summary, the present invention is directed toward a surface treated barium sulfate product that provides improved dispersibility in polymeric end use applications resulting in reduced processing times.
In the preferred embodiment a dry ground natural barite is subsequently surface treated in the manner more fully described below. However, it should be noted that precipitated barium sulfates or wet ground barites can also be surface treated by the inventive method to yield similar benefits. Table I sets forth some mineral properties of a typical dry ground barium sulfate. Table II sets forth some physical properties of four different, dry ground barite products available under the mark Huberbrite® from J.M. Huber Corporation.
Table I
Figure imgf000005_0001
Table II
Figure imgf000006_0001
The physical and chemical data reported herein were determined as follows. Specific gravities were determined by helium gas displacement using a Quantachrome 1000 automated pycnometer unit. The moisture content on the barite in wt. % was determined by drying test samples in a forced air oven at 105 deg. C. for approximately 2 hours in accordance with the TAPPI Method T671 cm 85 procedure. Screen residue values for an untreated barite were measured by pouring a well-mixed slurry of the barite through a 325 mesh screen, rinsing, drying and weighing the residue, following the ASTM D-185 procedure. Barite pH values were determined using a standard pH meter on a 28% solids (by weight) mixture of the barite with deionized water in accordance with the ASTM D-1208, E-70 procedure. Dry pigment brightness values in Table II were measured at 530 run with a magnesium oxide standard equal to 100%, following the ASTM C-110 procedure. The whiteness index and % brightness values shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are standard TAPPI brightness numbers as determined by reading the PVC test plaques with a Technidyne Micro TB-1C brightness meter in accordance with the TAPPI Method T646 om-86 procedure. Hegman grind values were determined following the standard ASTM D-1210 procedure. The average Stokes equivalent particle diameters in microns were determined by an x-ray sedimentation method based on Stokes Law using a Micromeritics 5100 Sedigraph particle size instrument. The average Stokes equivalent particle diameter is the median particle size (MPS) value determined by the x-ray Sedigraph. The median particle size values, measured by the laser light scattering (LLS) method and reported in microns, were determined using a Malvern Mastersizer/E instrument which is based on Fraunhofer diffraction as generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,707, incorporated herein by reference, and references cited therein. BET surface areas were determined by the nitrogen absorption method described by Brunauer, Emett, and Teller in the "Journal of the American Chemical Society," Volume 60, page 309, published in 1938. A multi-point surface area determination was made on the barite test samples after outgassing them at 130 deg. C. using a Micromeritics Gemini III 2375 instrument. Oil absorbance values were determined from the grams of linseed oil absorbed per 100 grams of pigment by the rub-out method of ASTM-D.281. Loose and tapped bulk densities were determined by the procedures described in ASTM D-1895. In the preferred embodiment, Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate is surface treated in accordance with the method of the present invention. The fine particle size of Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate is well suited when utilized in thermoplastic compounds since the fineness of the particles is important to the resultant physical properties and/or effective spacing of the titanium dioxide pigment.
The ground barite is surface modified with a hydrogen reactive silicone fluid (commonly referred to as a H-siloxane, a hydrogen reactive polysiloxane, or a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane). The presence of the reactive silicon- hydride (Si-H) groups is essential to the siloxane's effectiveness as a surface treatment agent for the barite. A preferred H-siloxane fluid utilized for surface modification of barium sulfate is a methyl hydrogen polysiloxane (denoted hereafter as Me H polysiloxane). Me H polysiloxanes of low molecular weight (MW < 10,000) are particularly preferred as treatment agents. It should be noted that other alkyl hydrogen polysiloxanes and siloxanes of lower reactive hydrogen content can also be utilized.
An illustrative example of the chemical structure of a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane useful in preparing the surface treated barite products of this invention is set forth immediately below:
Figure imgf000008_0001
wherein n = an integer greater than 1 ; X = H or R';
R or R' = an organic substituent comprising 1 to 20 carbon atoms whereby R and R' are not necessarily the same; and Y and Z = silicon-containing terminating end groups.
In the case where the silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane used for surface treatment is an alkyl hydrogen polysiloxane then in reference to the above chemical structure: n = an integer greater than 1 ;
X = H ;
R = a C, - C20 alkyl ; and
Y and Z = silicon-containing terminating end groups.
Finally, in the preferred embodiment where the silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane used for surface treatment is a Me H polysiloxane of low molecular weight, then in reference to the above chemical structure: n = about 50-80 ;
X = H ;
R = methyl ;
Y = (CH3)3SiO- ; Z = -Si(CH3)3 .
The surface treated barite of the present invention is prepared by treating either dry, finely divided barite powder or a barite slurry with the H-reactive silicone fluid. Effective surface treatments on the barium sulfate particles can be carried out on either physical form (dry or slurry) by using a neat H-siloxane fluid or by adding an aqueous emulsion of the H-siloxane fluid as more fully described below. Initially, 98 to 99.9 parts by weight of a quantity of barium sulfate (e.g., Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate) is added to a solids/liquid batch blender. The blender is turned on and 0.1 to 2.0 parts by weight (on an active basis) of the Me H polysiloxane is added respectively over approximately 0.1 to 3 minutes so as to yield a total of 100 parts by weight. The total mixing time is preferably 5 to 40 minutes. The preferred treatment level of the Me H polysiloxane is from about 0.5%) to about 1.5% by weight. Optionally, the barite may be heated during the dry treatment and subsequent mixing steps. In the case of surface treating a dry barite powder with Me H polysiloxane at room temperature, the treated barite product should be allowed to sit for a period of about 24 - 48 hours prior to its use to insure that the surface reaction is complete. Increasing treated product hydrophobicity and small amounts of H2 gas evolution are typically observed over this time period.
Alternatively, the dry treatment process can be carried out continuously by adding the H-siloxane (neat or as an aqueous emulsion) via a chemical metering pump that is used in combination with a pin mixer, a Bepex turbulizer unit or a similar continuous blending device. If a barite starting material is to be treated in slurry form, the Me H polysiloxane is added slowly to the slurry with good mixing and then mixed for an additional 5 to 30 minutes. The treated barite slurry is then vacuum filtered and subsequently oven dried or flash-dried under conventional drying conditions. Whether surface treated in dry particulate form or in slurry form followed by drying, the treated barite product can be optionally post- pulverized to reduce treated particle agglomeration thereby improving its Hegman grind properties.
In an alternative method, an aqueous emulsion of a Me H polysiloxane is used to surface treat the barium sulfate. The aqueous emulsion is preferably prepared from a high-speed dispersion of the Me H polysiloxane in water in the presence of a surfactant. In a preferred embodiment, the aqueous emulsion comprises Me H polysiloxane in an amount of from about 30% to about 70%, and a nonionic surfactant in an amount of from about 1.0% to about 3.0% of the total formulation (percentages are on an active weight basis).
It has been found that the optimum amount of nonionic surfactant used in preparing the emulsion formulation described above is about 4.0% by weight of the H-siloxane component. Further, preferred nonionic surfactants have a hydrophilic lypophilic balance (HLB) value of greater than 9. A nonionic surfactant particularly suited for emulsifying the Me H polysiloxane is a polysorbitan monolaurate with 20 moles of ethoxylation available under the trade name Alkamuls PSML-20 from Rhodia. In order to obtain sufficient stability, the emulsions are optimally prepared at a 50% by weight concentration of Me H polysiloxane whereby the corresponding weight concentration of Alkamuls PSML-20 utilized therein would optimally be 2%.
Table III sets forth some variable physical properties of the treated barium sulfate product that was produced by surface treating Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate with 1% by weight of the preferred Me H polysiloxane.
Table HI
Figure imgf000011_0001
* Given their very hydrophobic nature, a modified test procedure was used for determining the % screen residue of a treated barite product, as follows:
Using 100.0 grams of pigment, a 38% solids dispersion in ethanol was produced and poured through a 325 mesh sieve screen. After washing with an additional 100 gm quantity of ethanol, the residue was dried, collected and then weighed.
Table IV lists a number of barite test samples and their corresponding descriptions.
Table IV
Figure imgf000011_0002
D 1 micron MPS, dry ground barite treated with 1.0% isostearic acid"* (neat addition)
E 1 micron MPS, dry ground barite treated with 1.0% dimethyl siloxane, hydroxy terminated (neat addition)
F~ 1 micron MPS, dry ground barite* treated with 1.0% Si-H functional alkyl siloxanetf (neat addition)
G~ 1 micron MPS, dry ground barite treated with 1.0% phenyltrimethoxysilane^
H" 1 micron MPS, dry ground barite treated with 1.0% isobutyltrimethoxysilanetttt
* Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate available from J.M. Huber Corporation
" Me H polysiloxane available from Dow Corning under the trade name
Silicone Fluid 1 107
"* Isostearic Acid available from Henkel Corporation under the trade name
Emery 873 f Dimethyl siloxane available from Dow Corning under the trade name
Silicone Fluid 4-2797
+t Alkyl siloxane available from Dow Corning under the trade name
Silicone Fluid 2-5084 (has about 50% less Si-H content than Dow Corning
Silicone Fluid No. 1107)
+++ Phenyltrimethoxysilane available from Sivento Inc.
+ttt Isobutyltrimethoxysilane available from Sivento Inc.
EXAMPLE 1
PVC Test Recipe
A poly vinyl chloride compound was prepared from 100 parts by weight of a polyvinyl chloride resin (Vista 5385 resin available from Vista Chemical Co.), 50 phr (parts per hundred resin) of a plasticizer (diisodecyl phthalate, Jayflex DIDP available from Exxon Chemical Co.), 5 phr of a heat stabilizer (lead sulfophthalate, Lectro 90 available from Synthetic Products Co.), 1 phr of stearic acid (available from Synthetic Products Co.) and 15 phr of total pigment which consisted of either barite, titanium dioxide or a blend of barite and titanium dioxide. The PVC formulation was prepared in a Brabender mixer using the following mixing procedure.
The PVC formulation was prepared by adding the PVC resin to a Brabender Plasti-corder PL-2100 blender which was heated to 340 deg. F and stirred at 60 rpm. Once the PVC resin was heated, the plasticizer and heat stabilizer were added followed by stearic acid addition. Mixing and heating was continued until the mixture was uniform at which time either barite or titanium dioxide or a blend of these pigments was added. Torque measurements were taken after 3 minutes. The composite PVC material was then cooled and compression molded at 340 deg. F and 5,000 psi to form test plaques which were used for optical brightness and color measurements using a Technidyne Micro TB-1C brightness meter.
Table V compares the mixing characteristics of the PVC test recipe described in Example 1 using three sample pigments from Table IV. Table V sets forth the impact on mixing torque when the TiO2 pigment is replaced with various percentages of the barium sulfate test samples.
Table V
Figure imgf000013_0001
* % values above indicate percent TiO2 replacement with barite; initial loading of TiO2 in PVC compound was 15 phr. As can be seen in Table V, the processing viscosity of the PVC compounds containing treated barium sulfate (Samples B and C) is significantly lower than the
viscosity of the PVC compounds containing untreated barium sulfate at various %
replacement levels (as represented by the mixing torque). The lower viscosity results in reduced processing times.
FIG. 1 is graphical representation displaying the effect of replacing titanium dioxide with a surface treated barium sulfate product of the present invention on
the whiteness index of the pigmented PVC compound described in Example 1.
The samples in FIG. 1 correspond to samples A, B and C in Table IV. FIG. 2 displays a similar representation with respect to % brightness, measured as TAPPI brightness. The whiteness index and % brightness values were both measured on
PVC test plaques using the Technidyne Micro TB-1C instrument as previously described.
As is readily apparent from the figures, the replacement of TiO2 (at various percentages) with barium sulfate treated in accordance with the present invention yields higher whiteness and brightness values as compared to TiO2 replaced with
untreated barium sulfate in PVC compounds. The improvements in the PVC
compound's brightness and whiteness properties can likely be attributed to
improved barite pigment dispersion wherein better extension/spacing of the TiO2 is
achieved.
Table VI displays average % caking values for each of the test samples described in Table IV, all of which are based on a 1 micron barium sulfate (Huberbrite® 1). For comparison, all the treated barite samples were tested for % caking in a non post-pulverized form. Post-pulverization after surface treatment can affect a treated barite product's relative Hegman grind and caking properties. The test procedure utilized for determining average % caking is as follows: A 12 gram test sample of barite powder was placed inside a 1 inch high by 1 5/8 inch inner diameter stainless steel ring which is located on a glass plate. Using a stainless steel plunger, the powder test sample was hand pressed into a firm plaque using 20 pounds of applied pressure for 10 seconds. The test plaque was then transferred onto the top of a 40 mesh US sieve screen that was then vibrated for about 2 minutes using a Sepor Inc. screen shaker unit. The sample was partially disintegrated by this vibrating action with the clumps of material still remaining on the screen representing the amount of product caking on a weight % basis. The screen residue retained was weighed and the % caking value was determined by the following formula:
% caking = (wt. of residue material/original sample wt.) x 100 For a given powder sample, the % caking is determined three times and the average value was reported.
Table VI
Figure imgf000015_0001
* All treated barite samples were tested in non post-pulverized form at least 48 hours after having been prepared. Table VI demonstrates that the surface treatment of a barium sulfate with Me H polysiloxane in accordance with the methods of the present invention results in a product which exhibits a significant reduction in % caking as compared to either an untreated barium sulfate or barium sulfate treated with other surface- modifying materials. The noted reduction in caking reflects improved dry powder flow and bulk dry handling characteristics as well as improved dispersibility of the treated barium sulfate in polymeric end use applications.
EXAMPLE 2
In this example, the effect of post-pulverization on resultant Hegman grind properties and % caking values for the surface treated barite product of this invention is demonstrated. After surface treatment of a barite with a Me H Polysiloxane, post-pulverization of the treated product is an optional process step that can be practiced to provide particle deagglomeration so as to improve the product's dispersibility in organic resin or polymer systems as reflected by an improved Hegman grind value. Treated barite test samples B and C of Table IV were checked for Hegman grind and both were then subsequently pulverized through a micro-pulverizer unit twice using a 0.020 inch screen. The pulverized test samples are hereafter designated as samples B-P and C-P, respectively. The resultant Hegman grind properties and % caking values of B-P and C-P were determined and the data are reported in Table VII.
Table VII
Figure imgf000016_0001
Figure imgf000017_0001
Table VII clearly demonstrates that pulverization after surface treatment can significantly improve the Hegman grind properties of the treated barite products of this invention but this improvement often comes at the expense of decreasing dry flow properties some as reflected by an increase in the % caking values.
EXAMPLE 3
In this example, barite test sample C of Table IV was prepared again except that the treatment process with Huberbrite® 1 barium sulfate and the Me H polysiloxane as a 50% active emulsion was carried out in a continuos fashion using a Bepex turbilizer unit rather than batch wise in a Henschel mixer. No heating was utilized. The treated barite product so produced at a 1% treatment level by this continuous treatment process is designated hereafter as sample C-C. Immediately after its production, sample C-C was evaluated in non-pulverized form for average % caking and was re-checked again after 24 hours. The initial % caking value for C-C was determined to be 43%, while the same product tested 24 hours later yielded a % caking value of 9.4 . These data suggest that the surface reaction between the silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane and the barite particles continues over a period of about 24 hours. Optimum dry flow properties for a treated barite product of this invention are not achieved until this surface reaction is complete.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof and accordingly reference should be made to the appended claims rather than the foregoing specification as indicating the scope of the invention.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A surface treated barium sulfate product comprising a plurality of barium sulfate particles and a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane, said barium sulfate particles being surface treated by said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane.
2. The surface treated barium sulfate product of claim 1 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is represented by the general formula
Figure imgf000018_0001
wherein n = an integer greater than 1 ;
X = H or R';
R or R' = an organic substituent comprising 1 to 20 carbon atoms; and
Y and Z = silicon-containing terminating end groups.
3. The surface treated barium sulfate product of claim 1 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is an alkyl hydrogen polysiloxane of the formula
Figure imgf000018_0002
wherein n = an integer greater than 1 ; X = H ; R = a C, - C20 alkyl ; and Y and Z = silicon-containing terminating end groups.
4. The surface treated barium sulfate product of claim 1 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is a methyl hydrogen polysiloxane of the formula
Figure imgf000019_0001
wherein n = about 50-80 ;
X = H ; R = methyl ; Y = (CH3)3SiO- ;
Z = -Si(CH3)3 .
5. The surface treated barium sulfate product of claim 1 wherein said barium sulfate particles are selected from a group consisting of dry ground barium sulfate, a slurry of ground barium sulfate and precipitated barium sulfate.
6. The surface treated barium sulfate product of claim 1 wherein said barium sulfate particles have a median particle size of approximately 0.1 to 10 microns.
7. The surface treated barium sulfate product of claim 1 wherein said barium sulfate particles have a median particle size of approximately 1 micron.
8. A method of preparing a surface treated barium sulfate product comprising the steps of: a) providing a quantity of barium sulfate particles; and b) mixing a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane with said barium sulfate particles in an amount of from about 0.1 % to about 2.0% by weight based on the weight of said barium sulfate particles in order to deposit said polysiloxane on the surface of said barium sulfate particles.
9. The method of claim 8 further including the step of drying said surface treated barium sulfate particles.
10. The method of claim 8 further including the step of pulverizing said surface treated barium sulfate particles.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is mixed with said barium sulfate particles in an amount from about 0.5% to about 1.5% by weight based on the weight of said barium sulfate particles.
12. The method of claim 9 further including the step of filtering said surface treated barium sulfate particles prior to the step of drying.
13. The method of claim 8 wherein said barium sulfate particles have an average particle size of from about 0.1 to about 10 microns.
14. The method of claim 8 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is an alkyl hydrogen polysiloxane of the formula
Figure imgf000020_0001
wherein n = an integer greater than 1 X = H ;
R = a C, - C20 alkyl and Y and Z = silicon-containing terminating end groups.
15. The method of claim 8 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane is a methyl hydrogen polysiloxane of the formula
wherein
Figure imgf000021_0001
n = about 50-80 ;
X = H ; R = methyl ; Y = (CH3)3SiO- ;
Z = -Si(CH3)3 .
16. A method of preparing a surface treated barium sulfate product comprising the steps of: a) providing a quantity of barium sulfate particles; and b) mixing an aqueous emulsion of a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane with said barium sulfate particles in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 2.0% (on an active weight basis of said polysiloxane) as based on the weight of said barium sulfate particles in order to deposit said polysiloxane on the surface of said barium sulfate particles.
17. The method of claim 16 further including the step of drying said surface treated particles.
18. The method of claim 16 further including the step of pulverizing said surface treated particles.
19. The method of claim 16 wherein said aqueous emulsion includes a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane in an active basis amount of from about 30 to about 70% by weight and a surfactant in an active basis amount of from about 1.0% to about 3.0% by weight.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane in said emulsion is a methyl hydrogen polysiloxane of the formula
wherein
Figure imgf000022_0001
n = about 50-80 ; X = H ;
R = methyl ; Y = (CH3)3SiO- ;
Z = -Si(CH3)3 .
21. The method of claim 19 wherein said surfactant is nonionic.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein said nonionic surfactant has a hydrophilic lypophilic balance of at least about 9.
23. The method of claim 16 wherein said barium sulfate particles have a median particle size from about 0.1 to about 10 microns.
24. The method of claim 19 wherein said aqueous emulsion includes approximately 50% of a Me H polysiloxane on an active weight basis.
25. The method of claim 19 wherein said aqueous emulsion is mixed with said barium sulfate particles in an active basis amount of from about 0.5% to about 1.5% by weight of said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane as based on the weight of said barium sulfate particles.
26. A polymeric composition comprising: a polymeric resin; a surface treated barium sulfate product including a plurality of barium sulfate particles and a silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane, said barium sulfate particles being surface treated by said silicon-hydride containing polysiloxane.
27. The polymeric composition of claim 26 wherein said polymeric resin is selected from the group consisting of a polyolefm and a poly vinyl chloride.
PCT/US2000/009586 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same WO2000061361A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE60033798T DE60033798D1 (en) 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 SURFACE TREATED BARIUM SULFATE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
CA002368021A CA2368021A1 (en) 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same
JP2000610670A JP2002541051A (en) 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 Surface-treated barium sulfate and method for preparing the same
EP00923226A EP1177093B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same
KR1020017012905A KR20020006701A (en) 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/288,903 1999-04-09
US09/288,903 US6194070B1 (en) 1999-04-09 1999-04-09 Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000061361A1 true WO2000061361A1 (en) 2000-10-19

Family

ID=23109153

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/009586 WO2000061361A1 (en) 1999-04-09 2000-04-10 Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US6194070B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1177093B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002541051A (en)
KR (1) KR20020006701A (en)
AT (1) ATE356173T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2368021A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60033798D1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000061361A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008023074A1 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Sachtleben Chemie Gmbh Barium sulfate-containing composite

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4211217B2 (en) * 1999-12-01 2009-01-21 味の素株式会社 Edible oil and fat substitute
TWI227719B (en) * 2002-11-22 2005-02-11 Far Eastern Textile Ltd Method of preparing a surface modifier for nanoparticles dispersion of inorganic oxide nanoparticles
US6838495B2 (en) 2003-01-17 2005-01-04 Louis Frank Gatti Rubber composition comprising composite pigment
US6866711B2 (en) 2003-01-17 2005-03-15 Fitzgerald Alphanso Sinclair Composite pigment composition containing silica
US6849673B2 (en) * 2003-07-02 2005-02-01 J. M. Huber Corporation Film forming coating composition containing surface treated barium sulfate, and methods of use
US7645334B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2010-01-12 Sachtleben Chemie Gmbh Barium sulfate
JP6176422B1 (en) * 2015-12-25 2017-08-09 堺化学工業株式会社 Low α-dose barium sulfate particles, their use and production method
KR102571371B1 (en) * 2015-12-25 2023-08-25 사까이가가꾸고오교가부시끼가이샤 Low α-dose barium sulfate particles and their use and manufacturing method
JP6390756B2 (en) * 2017-02-24 2018-09-19 堺化学工業株式会社 Barium sulfate spherical composite powder and method for producing the same
CN115350336B (en) * 2022-08-12 2023-12-15 深圳市骏鼎达新材料股份有限公司 Developing catheter

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3944705A (en) * 1973-07-26 1976-03-16 Kanzaki Paper Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Electrostatic recording material and manufacture thereof
US4818614A (en) * 1985-07-29 1989-04-04 Shiseido Company Ltd. Modified powder

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4263051A (en) * 1978-06-12 1981-04-21 Ppg Industries, Inc. Soft-settling silica flatting agent
US4505755A (en) 1982-12-28 1985-03-19 Onahama Sakai Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha Method of producing surface-treated barium sulfate
JPH05112430A (en) * 1991-10-18 1993-05-07 Kanebo Ltd Cosmetic
US5401570A (en) * 1993-08-02 1995-03-28 Xerox Corporation Coated fuser members
US5393437A (en) 1994-05-31 1995-02-28 Chemguard, Inc. Fire extinguishing material
FI956324A (en) * 1995-02-01 1996-08-02 Goldschmidt Ag Th Use of organofunctional polysiloxanes to modify the surfaces of fine particles
JPH08268840A (en) 1995-03-30 1996-10-15 Kao Corp Covering powder and cosmetic containing the same
JPH093211A (en) 1995-04-18 1997-01-07 Sakai Chem Ind Co Ltd Resin composition
JP3524281B2 (en) 1996-08-06 2004-05-10 カネボウ株式会社 Cosmetics

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3944705A (en) * 1973-07-26 1976-03-16 Kanzaki Paper Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Electrostatic recording material and manufacture thereof
US4818614A (en) * 1985-07-29 1989-04-04 Shiseido Company Ltd. Modified powder

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008023074A1 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Sachtleben Chemie Gmbh Barium sulfate-containing composite

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE356173T1 (en) 2007-03-15
CA2368021A1 (en) 2000-10-19
JP2002541051A (en) 2002-12-03
EP1177093A4 (en) 2002-06-12
US6194070B1 (en) 2001-02-27
EP1177093A1 (en) 2002-02-06
EP1177093B1 (en) 2007-03-07
KR20020006701A (en) 2002-01-24
DE60033798D1 (en) 2007-04-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108473789B (en) Wet surface treatment of surface modified calcium carbonate
US9567229B2 (en) Fumed silica
US5486631A (en) Silicone polymers for the modification of zinc oxide
US7816442B2 (en) Surface-modified precipitated silicas
KR101421871B1 (en) Process for the preparation of surface treated mineral filler products and uses of same
EP3192839B1 (en) Alkoxysilane treatment of a calcium carbonate-comprising material
US8552107B2 (en) Fumed silanized silica
US6194070B1 (en) Surface treated barium sulfate and method of preparing the same
CN112236397B (en) Development of surface-treated magnesium hydroxide-containing material
CA2181232A1 (en) Silanized titanium dioxide pigments resistant to discoloration when incorporated in polymers
KR20100041736A (en) Cyclic-treated metal oxide
KR100954073B1 (en) Structurally coated silica
CN113365941A (en) Titanium phosphate powder and white pigment for cosmetics
US5536492A (en) Cosmetic compositions containing hydrophobized zinc oxide
MXPA05000173A (en) Unusually narrow particle size distribution calcined kaolins.
WO1999032554A1 (en) Modified mineral filler for thermosets
CN107922197A (en) The dispersion of containing metal oxide with high salt-stable
JPH08231760A (en) Surface-modified ground calcium carbonate and vinyl chloride resin composition compounded with the calcium carbonate
WO2004067646A1 (en) Composite pigment composition containing silica
WO2009074438A1 (en) Coating systems
US20230064513A1 (en) Finely divided aqueous particle-stabilized pickering emulsion and particles produced therefrom
CN106433281A (en) Application of silica powder and titanium dioxide composition in paint

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2368021

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2368021

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000923226

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2000 610670

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020017012905

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000923226

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2000923226

Country of ref document: EP