WO2000058729A2 - Micromechanical antibody sensor - Google Patents

Micromechanical antibody sensor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000058729A2
WO2000058729A2 PCT/US2000/008256 US0008256W WO0058729A2 WO 2000058729 A2 WO2000058729 A2 WO 2000058729A2 US 0008256 W US0008256 W US 0008256W WO 0058729 A2 WO0058729 A2 WO 0058729A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
spring element
deflection
microcantilever
detector
measuring
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/008256
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2000058729A3 (en
WO2000058729B1 (en
Inventor
Thomas G. Thundat
K. Bruce Jacobson
Mitchel J. Doktycz
Stephen J. Kennel
Robert J. Warmack
Original Assignee
Ut-Battelle, Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ut-Battelle, Llc filed Critical Ut-Battelle, Llc
Priority to AU39281/00A priority Critical patent/AU3928100A/en
Priority to DE60033653T priority patent/DE60033653T2/en
Priority to EP00918480A priority patent/EP1185865B1/en
Publication of WO2000058729A2 publication Critical patent/WO2000058729A2/en
Publication of WO2000058729A3 publication Critical patent/WO2000058729A3/en
Publication of WO2000058729B1 publication Critical patent/WO2000058729B1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/543Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals
    • G01N33/54366Apparatus specially adapted for solid-phase testing
    • G01N33/54373Apparatus specially adapted for solid-phase testing involving physiochemical end-point determination, e.g. wave-guides, FETS, gratings

Definitions

  • the invention relates to U.S. Patent application 09/039707, filed March 16, 1998 entitled “Micromechanical Calorimetric Sensor” and to U.S. Patent application 09/042601, filed March 16, 1998 entitled, “Micromechanical Potentiometric Sensors” the specifications of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • This invention relates to novel methods for the detection of biological and biologically derived materials using micromechanical devices as the detection mechanism.
  • the measurement of small changes in the deflection of a micromechanical device such as a cantilever spring element which has been coated with one member of a specific binding partner provides qualitative and quantitative determination of the presence of the other specific binding partner.
  • a specific binding partner is a member of a pair of biochemical entities which exhibit specific binding, i.e., a high intrinsic affinity or high total avidity ( " q.v. Kabat,
  • Non-limiting examples are Ag-Ab (Antigen- Antibody) complexes, nucleic acid probes and targets, steroid hormone-peptide binding pairs, etc.
  • Microcantilevers can be utilized in biophysical and biochemical studies to determine energy changes as indications of biochemical reactions in a medium. There is a great interest in developing ultra-miniature probes and assays that require very small volumes of sampled media for accurate qualitative and quantitative analysis of biochemical reactions and these assays can be performed using a microcantilever bound substrate.
  • a piezoelectric transducer is disclosed that is fabricated with a cantilever having a spring element treated with a chemical which reacts with a specific vapor phase chemical.
  • An oscillator means maintains a resonant vibrational frequency during detection of a chemical, with changes in resonant frequency indicating amounts of targeted chemical detected in the monitored atmosphere.
  • the rate of cantilever bending is monitored to indicate the target chemical concentration.
  • a mass microsensor is disclosed that is fabricated with a microcantilever that oscillates due to a piezoelectric transducer, with a chemical coating on the microcantilever that absorbs a targeted chemical from the monitored atmosphere.
  • the resonant frequency of the microcantilever is analyzed to determine changes that indicate amounts of targeted chemical detected in the monitored atmosphere.
  • a microprobe in Marcus et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,475,318, a microprobe is disclosed that includes a microcantilever, a base, a probe tip projecting from the base, and a heating element that heats the probe tip, which comes into contact with a material to be investigated.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,963,815 a device and method is provided for determining an analyte by measuring a redox potential-modulated photoinducing electrical signal from an electronically conducting layer on a semiconductor device.
  • a chemical nerve agent detector is disclosed that includes a transducer having two microcantilever oscillators.
  • the active microcantilever of the two microcantilevers has a chemically selective substance that absorbs chemical nerve agents from the atmosphere, with modifications in the oscillation of the active microcantilever, and comparisons are made between the frequency of the active cantilever and the reference cantilever.
  • the above described methods and devices of measuring chemical and micromechanical parameters are not directed towards immunoassays which can detect the binding of a few molecules upon a substrate.
  • the present invention describes a novel and sensitive technique which measures adsorption-induced forces for detecting proteins, other biopolymers, nucleic acid sequences, and micro-organisms in a gas or liquid medium using microcantilever.
  • the present invention provides a cantilever with one of its surfaces coated with specific binding partners such as antibody or antigen molecules, or with specific binding peptides identified from display libraries, while the other surface is covered with a different, possibly inert, material. As long as the amount of adsorption is different on the opposing surfaces, or there are different interactions of monitored molecules on opposing surfaces, there will be a differential stress. Since the cantilever thickness is very small, an antibody-antigen (Ab-Ag) type of interaction is manifested as changes in the differential surface stress of the microcantilever surface.
  • Ab-Ag antibody-antigen
  • This surface stress can originate from changes in volume, or charge,or polarization, or induced polarization due to the formation of chemical interactions. If a specific interaction does not take place, there will not be any change in surface stress when compared to a reference microcantilever. These changes in differential surface stress manifest themselves as changes in cantilever deflection which can be measured with a sub-angstrom sensitivity.
  • the cantilever technique offers more simplicity and higher sensitivity than any currently used techniques.
  • the apparatus and the method provides a means for detection of the changes in deflection of the cantilevered spring element created by the physical binding or biochemical interaction stress. The deflection is measured and provides a basis for quantitative and qualitative analysis.
  • the microcantilever assays provide sensitivities in the sub-nanometer range for deflections in response to stresses on the spring element.
  • FIGURE 1 is a pictorial schematic of a first embodiment of the microcantilever assembly and bending detection assembly of the present invention
  • FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of the present invention having a sample in contact with the microcantilever;
  • FIGURE 3 is a cross-sectional side view of one alternate embodiment of the present invention having two coated surfaces;
  • FIGURE 4 is a side perspective view of one alternate embodiment of the present invention having a coated region at the distal end of the microcantilever; Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
  • a detection method and apparatus can be provided which is extremely sensitive to slight changes in the structural stress associated with a chemical binding to a microcantilever-bound substrate.
  • the invention is capable of measuring deflection in the microcantilever spring element brought about by the specific chemical binding.
  • the invention utilizes a biomaterial coating such as a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody, an antigen, a nucleic acid sequence, a lectin or other molecule which has a highly specific affinity for a target molecule.
  • a method of detecting and quantifying the specific interactions by measuring the movement of a microcantilever spring element is disclosed.
  • the movement of the microcantilever spring element is detected using a detection means that provide detection sensitivities in the sub-nanometer range for deflection measurements.
  • the small size of the spring element and the high sensitivity of the detection means allow very small samples to be tested.
  • a sensor apparatus 1 comprising a base 2 having at least one microcantilever spring element 3 (also referenced as a microcantilever), with or without a separate reference microcantilever spring element 15.
  • Spring element 3 may have the dimensions of approximately 1.0 to approximately 200 ⁇ m long, approximately 1.0 to 50 ⁇ m wide, and approximately 0.1 ⁇ m to 3.0 ⁇ m thick. The alternate dimensions are approximately 50 ⁇ m to approximately 200 ⁇ m long, approximately 10 ⁇ m to approximately 30 ⁇ m wide, and approximately 0.3 ⁇ m to approximately 3.0 ⁇ m in thickness.
  • each of the above dimensions may be varied to configure the spring element 3 in a variety of desired shapes.
  • the size and shape of the spring elements are not a critical limitation.
  • Spring element 3 extends outward from the base 2 as shown in FIG. 1.
  • the sensor apparatus 1 may consist of a plurality of microcantilever spring elements 3 attached to the sensor apparatus 1.
  • Reference microcantilever 15, if utilized, is located in close proximity to spring element 3.
  • Each microcantilever is preferably constructed of materials such as silicon or silicon oxide which provides a useful substrate for the attachment of an antibody. While microcantilevers can be provided from a variety of materials, the present invention benefits from materials which will facilitate binding of an antibody (coating) and responds (deflects) in response to subsequent antibody-antigen binding.
  • ELIS A techniques for coating glass using various linkers are applicable to silicon.
  • the linker chosen is selected from that compatible with the detector molecule used.
  • Linkers such as poly-L-lysine are preferred which also serve as stress transducers.
  • Spring element 3 may be approximately rectangular in cross-section as shown in FIGS . 1 - 5.
  • Surface 5 may be provided by a coating of "detector" molecules, i.e., one member of a binding pair.
  • the coated region 5 may be located at varied locations and sizes and the coating may be placed on either surface 7 or 9 provided that the coating is on one or the other side.
  • the spring constant of microcantilever spring element 3 is designed to produce cantilever deflection at the nanometer level.
  • the low spring constant of the spring element 3 having coating 5 allows the spring element to deflect in response to binding of a target molecule to the detector molecule during reactions which occur when sample 13 is placed on one side of the spring element 3, or having a difference in the number of molecules adsorbed on one side as compared to the other side.
  • the surface coating 5 may include enzymes, peptides, proteins, polysaccharides, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, antibody or antigen molecules, pharmacological agents (i.e.
  • drugs including small organic molecules such as aspirin
  • biopolymers any class of biochemical compounds which react with one or more analytes or other biopolymers in a sample 13 placed on the coating 5.
  • the chemical reactions of one or more biomolecules in sample 13 produce a stress-induced deflection to the spring element 3.
  • the stress induced deflections may be brought about by volume changes due to the formation of chemical interactions.
  • the present assay is extremely sensitive to adsorption-induced forces.
  • the system is well-suited for detecting proteins, other biopolymers, and micro-organisms in a gas or liquid medium using the miniature nature of a microcantilever.
  • microcantilevers have a response time in the range of microseconds to milliseconds. Since the cantilever thickness is very small, an antibody-antigen type of interaction maybe manifested as changes in the differential surface stress. If the specific interaction does not take place, there will not be any change, when compared to control values, in surface stress. These changes in differential surface stress manifest themselves as changes in cantilever deflection which can be measured with a sub-angstrom sensitivity.
  • the cantilever technique offers more simplicity and higher sensitivity than any currently used techniques. Responses to forces as small as approximately a few pico Newtons are possible for the microcantilevers of the present invention, providing an advantage in sensitivity over prior colorimeter devices.
  • Microcantilevers with force constants as small as 0.08 Newton/meter are commercially available from Park Instruments, Sunnyvale, California. Most commercial micro cantilevers are silicon based, but other materials such as GaAs are also useful. As the detector molecules on the first surface 5 undergo interactions with target molecules present in sample 13, the resulting reactions result in a structural change in the shape of spring 3 caused by a change in surface stress. The bending of the microcantilever 3, even though extremely small, can be detected by known laser optical techniques with sub- nanometer sensitivities. If laser detection is used, at least one layer on one surface, or one end of a surface of sensing microcantilever 3, must be reflective of laser light.
  • the laser optical sensing means includes a photo diode generator 17 of laser light focused on the first surface 7 or the second surface 9 of sensor microcantilever 3, with a photodetector 19 positioned to receive the reflected laser light, with analysis of the bending of the sensing microcantilever 3 by microprocessors.
  • Alternative detection means are possible. These include a piezoresistive detection means, a piezoelectric detection means, a capacitive detection means, and an electron tunneling detection means, all of which are conventionally known.
  • Each detection means determines changes in deflection of the microcantilever 3 with sensitivities comparable to the sub-nanometer sensitivity of the laser sensing means.
  • Gimzewski et al. Observation of a chemical reaction using a micromechanical sensor," 217 Chem. Phys. Lett. 589, at 593 (1994)
  • the extent of bending is directly proportional to the amount of target molecule which binds to the sensor.
  • the confinement of the antibody-antigen type of interaction to one side of the cantilever causes a tangential stress in the whole cantilever.
  • R is the radius of curvature for the cantilever
  • v and E are Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus for the substrate respectively
  • t is the thickness of the cantilever
  • ⁇ s is the film stress.
  • This bending can be measured with a sub-nanometer resolution by reflecting a light from a diode laser at the end of a cantilever into a position sensitive detector.
  • the technique described here is a d.c. technique. If the cantilever is coated with or comprises a stress-sensitive material, the stiffness can be changed by bending the cantilever.
  • the stress-sensitive material may preferably be selected from, but not limited to, the group consisting of metals, metal alloys, dielectric materials, polymeric materials and combinations thereof. Specific examples of such polymeric materials include, but are not limited to, such polymers as polycarbonate of bisphenol, poly[N,N'-(p,p'-oxydiphenylene)pyromellitimide], poly (vinyl chloride), and the like. Many other polymers are known to the skilled artisan which perform as described herein. Another way to affect the spring constant of the cantilever is by using a non-uniform force field.
  • the cantilever can be placed in a nonuniform electric field.
  • the cantilever bends the spring constant varies as a function of bending resulting in different resonance frequency.
  • This can be made into a.c. technique by coating the inert side of the cantilever with a stress sensitive film. Differential stress can cause resonance frequency shift.
  • Thundat U.S. patent number 5,719,324 the change in resonance frequency can be amplified by applying a stress sensitive film on one side.
  • the bending of the cantilever can now be converted into an a.c. signal by detecting the variation in resonance frequency of the cantilever.
  • the stiffness of the cantilever changes due to the stress within the sensitive film.
  • ⁇ s] and ⁇ s 2 are the differential stress on the cantilever surfaces and n ⁇ is a geometrical constant.
  • the resonance frequency of the cantilever changes due to changes in resonance frequency caused by static bending of the cantilever.
  • the bending of the spring element 3 can be measured in comparison to an untreated reference microcantilever 15. Plotting the bending of the untreated reference microcantilever
  • the steps of detecting and measuring structural changes within a sensor which corresponds to reactions between target molecules in a sample of monitored media and detector molecules carried on a sensor surface include: providing a base; attaching at least one cantilevered spring element to the base; coating at least one surface on the spring element with a substance which is or may be attached to a detector molecule; exposing the coated region to a liquid or aerosol sample; deflecting the spring element in proportion to the number or concentration of target molecules which bind to the detector molecules; and detecting the deflection by a detector comprising a laser light source directing light at the cantilevered spring element surface.
  • the reflected light from the cantilever surface is captured by a light detector near the cantilevered spring element, the detector receiving reflected light from the cantilever surface before, during, and after bending of the microcantilever.
  • the degree of bending is measured in reference to a neutral position of the cantilever, or a control microcantilever, and a microprocessor is provided for analyzing deflection information from the measuring steps.
  • the changes in deflection are compensated for deflection observed in controls.
  • Control microcantilevers can determine the impact of non-specific binding by target molecules, deflection resulting from temperature changes, pH changes, and other environmental changes which may affect spring element 3.
  • Well known microprocessors and mathematical formulas are used to calculate the deflection changes as a function of specific target and detector molecular binding.
  • the coating 5 carries one binding partner indicated by a "y” and the analyte in the sample is shown as a "delta.”
  • a microcantilever sensor can be provided for determining the level of antigen present in a liquid sample.
  • an antibody layer 5 can be provided on the surface of spring element 3. preferably on one surface only. Binding molecules may be used to make antibody coating uniform and make accessible to antigen.
  • Layer 5 can comprise a polyclonal antibody, a monoclonal antibody, or a mixture of different polyclonal antibodies directed to a common target molecule. The antibodies are conjugated to element 3 as represented by layer
  • BS A bovine serum albumin
  • a solution containing a possible analyte or target molecule is used to incubate layer 5 using temperatures, pH values, time intervals and buffers as are well known within the art of immunoassays. While a standard incubation time of 30 minutes is typical for an ELISA protocol, the sensitivity of the present sensor will enable measurable reactions to occur in a matter of seconds.
  • the deflection of the spring element 3, compared to a control sensor having no target molecules, will indicate the presence of the antigen. Quantification of the target molecule concentration can occur by comparison to controls using a dilution series having a known quantity of the antigen target.
  • the rapid reaction time of the sensor enables a rapid screening protocol for qualitative measurements.
  • rapid screening of monoclonal antibodies can be conducted by using the antigen (or immunogen) as the detector molecule(s) in layer 5.
  • Serum derived from monoclonal producing hybridoma cell cultures can be introduced to the sensor as described above. A positive reaction indicates a specific binding which warrants further investigation of the tested hybridoma line. Since thousands of cell lines may need to be tested per fusion, of which the vast majority produce no antibody of interest, the present sensor offers the ability to greatly streamline the screening process.
  • the small size of the sensor requires only minute concentrations of antigen to be used as the detecting molecule. This ability may be essential to allow screening protocols to be developed for antigens or like detector molecules which are only available in limited supply.
  • a further advantage of the present sensor is that the direct interaction between molecules is measured. Unlike many traditional immunoassays, a separate "visualization" step requiring additional incubation steps is not needed. This results in increased time savings and avoids the need for additional reagents. Because of the binding between partners is reversible, it may be feasible to reverse the detection system, although disposable sensors are more likely for clinical uses such as serum assays.
  • Example 2 The current sensor system is also useful as a detector and/or isolator of single living cells from a liquid sample.
  • the dimensions of the microcantilever spring element 3 are such that a single procaryotic cell (1-1 Oum in length) such as a bacterium, or a single eucaryotic cell (10-1 OOum in length) can be bound to the sensor layer. Given the large size of any living cell, compared to the size of the cantilever, a single cell will result in a significant and measurable deflection of the cantilever spring element 3.
  • a sensor can be provided to detect a target species of bacterium using either a lectin or antibody in layer 5 which is specific for the bacterium of interest.
  • a detector for coliform bacteria, an indicator of fecal or sewage contamination can be provided to monitor water quality in wells, lakes, or pools.
  • the present invention describes a novel and extremely sensitive technique to measure the often overlooked occurrence of adsorption-induced forces for detecting proteins, other biopolymers, and micro-organisms in a gas or liquid medium using the miniature nature of a microcantilever.
  • These microcantilevers have a response time in the range of microseconds to milliseconds. Since the cantilever thickness is very small, the antibody-antigen type of interaction is manifested as changes in the differential surface stress and no additional reagents or steps are required. If specific interactions do not take place, there will not be any change in surface stress. These changes in differential surface stress manifest themselves as changes in cantilever deflection which can be measured with a sub- angstrom sensitivity.
  • the cantilever technique offers more simplicity and higher sensitivity than any currently used techniques.

Abstract

A sensor apparatus is provided using a microcantilevered spring element having a coating of a detector molecule such as an antibody or antigen. A sample containing a target molecule or substrate is provided to the coating. The spring element bends in response to the stress induced by the binding which occurs between the detector and target molecules. Deflections of the cantilever are detected by a variety of detection techniques. The microcantilever may be approximately 1 to 200 νm long, approximately 1 to 50 νm wide, and approximately 0.3 to 3.0 νm thick. A sensitivity for detection of deflections is in the range of 0.01 nanometers.

Description

TITLE OF THE INVENTION
MICROMECHANICAL ANTIBODY SENSOR
STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The United States Government has certain rights in this invention pursuant to contracts number DE-AC05-96OR22464 and DE-AC05-84OR21400, between the U.S. Department of
Energy and Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The invention relates to U.S. Patent application 09/039707, filed March 16, 1998 entitled "Micromechanical Calorimetric Sensor" and to U.S. Patent application 09/042601, filed March 16, 1998 entitled, "Micromechanical Potentiometric Sensors" the specifications of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Brief Summary of the Invention This invention relates to novel methods for the detection of biological and biologically derived materials using micromechanical devices as the detection mechanism. The measurement of small changes in the deflection of a micromechanical device such as a cantilever spring element which has been coated with one member of a specific binding partner provides qualitative and quantitative determination of the presence of the other specific binding partner. A specific binding partner is a member of a pair of biochemical entities which exhibit specific binding, i.e., a high intrinsic affinity or high total avidity ("q.v. Kabat,
E.A., Structural Concepts in Immunology and Immuno Chemistry, 2nd ed. New York; Holt
Rinehart & Winston, 1976). Non-limiting examples are Ag-Ab (Antigen- Antibody) complexes, nucleic acid probes and targets, steroid hormone-peptide binding pairs, etc. Background of the Invention
Microcantilevers can be utilized in biophysical and biochemical studies to determine energy changes as indications of biochemical reactions in a medium. There is a great interest in developing ultra-miniature probes and assays that require very small volumes of sampled media for accurate qualitative and quantitative analysis of biochemical reactions and these assays can be performed using a microcantilever bound substrate.
In Thundat et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,719,324, a piezoelectric transducer is disclosed that is fabricated with a cantilever having a spring element treated with a chemical which reacts with a specific vapor phase chemical. An oscillator means maintains a resonant vibrational frequency during detection of a chemical, with changes in resonant frequency indicating amounts of targeted chemical detected in the monitored atmosphere. Alternatively, the rate of cantilever bending is monitored to indicate the target chemical concentration.
In Wachter et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,445,008, a mass microsensor is disclosed that is fabricated with a microcantilever that oscillates due to a piezoelectric transducer, with a chemical coating on the microcantilever that absorbs a targeted chemical from the monitored atmosphere. The resonant frequency of the microcantilever is analyzed to determine changes that indicate amounts of targeted chemical detected in the monitored atmosphere.
In Marcus et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,475,318, a microprobe is disclosed that includes a microcantilever, a base, a probe tip projecting from the base, and a heating element that heats the probe tip, which comes into contact with a material to be investigated.
In Hafeman, U.S. Patent No. 4,963,815, a device and method is provided for determining an analyte by measuring a redox potential-modulated photoinducing electrical signal from an electronically conducting layer on a semiconductor device. In Kolesar, U.S. Patent No.4,549,427, a chemical nerve agent detector is disclosed that includes a transducer having two microcantilever oscillators. The active microcantilever of the two microcantilevers has a chemically selective substance that absorbs chemical nerve agents from the atmosphere, with modifications in the oscillation of the active microcantilever, and comparisons are made between the frequency of the active cantilever and the reference cantilever.
The above described methods and devices of measuring chemical and micromechanical parameters are not directed towards immunoassays which can detect the binding of a few molecules upon a substrate. The present invention describes a novel and sensitive technique which measures adsorption-induced forces for detecting proteins, other biopolymers, nucleic acid sequences, and micro-organisms in a gas or liquid medium using microcantilever.
Summary of the Invention It is an object of this invention to provide a detection and quantitation method for antibody-antigen binding reactions which are capable of detecting low levels of chemical binding. It is a further object of this invention to provide a microcantilever assay for the detection of reactions involving biomolecules coupled to the microcantilever which results in a stress-induced bending of the cantilever.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide an ultra-miniature assay template which requires reduced sample volumes for operation. It is a further and more particular obj ect of this invention to provide an ultra-miniature microcantilever that provides a sensitivity sufficient to detect a single microorganism from a sample.
These and other objects of the invention are accomplished by an apparatus and a method for detecting and measuring highly specific binding reactions in a sampled media. The present invention provides a cantilever with one of its surfaces coated with specific binding partners such as antibody or antigen molecules, or with specific binding peptides identified from display libraries, while the other surface is covered with a different, possibly inert, material. As long as the amount of adsorption is different on the opposing surfaces, or there are different interactions of monitored molecules on opposing surfaces, there will be a differential stress. Since the cantilever thickness is very small, an antibody-antigen (Ab-Ag) type of interaction is manifested as changes in the differential surface stress of the microcantilever surface. This surface stress, for example, can originate from changes in volume, or charge,or polarization, or induced polarization due to the formation of chemical interactions. If a specific interaction does not take place, there will not be any change in surface stress when compared to a reference microcantilever. These changes in differential surface stress manifest themselves as changes in cantilever deflection which can be measured with a sub-angstrom sensitivity. The cantilever technique offers more simplicity and higher sensitivity than any currently used techniques.
Upon interaction with specific agents a stress is induced which deflects the spring element. The apparatus and the method provides a means for detection of the changes in deflection of the cantilevered spring element created by the physical binding or biochemical interaction stress. The deflection is measured and provides a basis for quantitative and qualitative analysis. The microcantilever assays provide sensitivities in the sub-nanometer range for deflections in response to stresses on the spring element.
Brief Description of the Drawings The invention's features and advantage will become apparent from a reading of the following detailed description, given with reference to the various figure of drawing, in which:
FIGURE 1 is a pictorial schematic of a first embodiment of the microcantilever assembly and bending detection assembly of the present invention;
FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of the present invention having a sample in contact with the microcantilever; FIGURE 3 is a cross-sectional side view of one alternate embodiment of the present invention having two coated surfaces;
FIGURE 4 is a side perspective view of one alternate embodiment of the present invention having a coated region at the distal end of the microcantilever; Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment In accordance with this invention, it has been found that a detection method and apparatus can be provided which is extremely sensitive to slight changes in the structural stress associated with a chemical binding to a microcantilever-bound substrate. The invention is capable of measuring deflection in the microcantilever spring element brought about by the specific chemical binding. The invention utilizes a biomaterial coating such as a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody, an antigen, a nucleic acid sequence, a lectin or other molecule which has a highly specific affinity for a target molecule. A method of detecting and quantifying the specific interactions by measuring the movement of a microcantilever spring element is disclosed. The movement of the microcantilever spring element is detected using a detection means that provide detection sensitivities in the sub-nanometer range for deflection measurements. The small size of the spring element and the high sensitivity of the detection means allow very small samples to be tested. In accordance with FIGS. 1 - 4, preferred embodiments for the present invention is a sensor apparatus 1 comprising a base 2 having at least one microcantilever spring element 3 (also referenced as a microcantilever), with or without a separate reference microcantilever spring element 15. Spring element 3 may have the dimensions of approximately 1.0 to approximately 200 μm long, approximately 1.0 to 50 μm wide, and approximately 0.1 μm to 3.0 μm thick. The alternate dimensions are approximately 50 μm to approximately 200 μm long, approximately 10 μm to approximately 30 μm wide, and approximately 0.3 μm to approximately 3.0 μm in thickness.
Each of the above dimensions may be varied to configure the spring element 3 in a variety of desired shapes. The size and shape of the spring elements are not a critical limitation.
Spring element 3 extends outward from the base 2 as shown in FIG. 1. The sensor apparatus 1 may consist of a plurality of microcantilever spring elements 3 attached to the sensor apparatus 1. Reference microcantilever 15, if utilized, is located in close proximity to spring element 3. Each microcantilever is preferably constructed of materials such as silicon or silicon oxide which provides a useful substrate for the attachment of an antibody. While microcantilevers can be provided from a variety of materials, the present invention benefits from materials which will facilitate binding of an antibody (coating) and responds (deflects) in response to subsequent antibody-antigen binding.
ELIS A techniques for coating glass using various linkers are applicable to silicon. The linker chosen is selected from that compatible with the detector molecule used. Linkers such as poly-L-lysine are preferred which also serve as stress transducers.
Spring element 3 may be approximately rectangular in cross-section as shown in FIGS . 1 - 5. Surface 5 may be provided by a coating of "detector" molecules, i.e., one member of a binding pair. The coated region 5 may be located at varied locations and sizes and the coating may be placed on either surface 7 or 9 provided that the coating is on one or the other side.
The spring constant of microcantilever spring element 3 is designed to produce cantilever deflection at the nanometer level. The low spring constant of the spring element 3 having coating 5 allows the spring element to deflect in response to binding of a target molecule to the detector molecule during reactions which occur when sample 13 is placed on one side of the spring element 3, or having a difference in the number of molecules adsorbed on one side as compared to the other side. The surface coating 5 may include enzymes, peptides, proteins, polysaccharides, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, antibody or antigen molecules, pharmacological agents (i.e. drugs, including small organic molecules such as aspirin), and other biopolymers, and any class of biochemical compounds which react with one or more analytes or other biopolymers in a sample 13 placed on the coating 5. The chemical reactions of one or more biomolecules in sample 13 produce a stress-induced deflection to the spring element 3.
The stress induced deflections may be brought about by volume changes due to the formation of chemical interactions. In addition, the present assay is extremely sensitive to adsorption-induced forces. As a result, the system is well-suited for detecting proteins, other biopolymers, and micro-organisms in a gas or liquid medium using the miniature nature of a microcantilever.
These microcantilevers have a response time in the range of microseconds to milliseconds. Since the cantilever thickness is very small, an antibody-antigen type of interaction maybe manifested as changes in the differential surface stress. If the specific interaction does not take place, there will not be any change, when compared to control values, in surface stress. These changes in differential surface stress manifest themselves as changes in cantilever deflection which can be measured with a sub-angstrom sensitivity. The cantilever technique offers more simplicity and higher sensitivity than any currently used techniques. Responses to forces as small as approximately a few pico Newtons are possible for the microcantilevers of the present invention, providing an advantage in sensitivity over prior colorimeter devices. Microcantilevers with force constants as small as 0.08 Newton/meter are commercially available from Park Instruments, Sunnyvale, California. Most commercial micro cantilevers are silicon based, but other materials such as GaAs are also useful. As the detector molecules on the first surface 5 undergo interactions with target molecules present in sample 13, the resulting reactions result in a structural change in the shape of spring 3 caused by a change in surface stress. The bending of the microcantilever 3, even though extremely small, can be detected by known laser optical techniques with sub- nanometer sensitivities. If laser detection is used, at least one layer on one surface, or one end of a surface of sensing microcantilever 3, must be reflective of laser light. The laser optical sensing means includes a photo diode generator 17 of laser light focused on the first surface 7 or the second surface 9 of sensor microcantilever 3, with a photodetector 19 positioned to receive the reflected laser light, with analysis of the bending of the sensing microcantilever 3 by microprocessors. Alternative detection means are possible. These include a piezoresistive detection means, a piezoelectric detection means, a capacitive detection means, and an electron tunneling detection means, all of which are conventionally known. Each detection means determines changes in deflection of the microcantilever 3 with sensitivities comparable to the sub-nanometer sensitivity of the laser sensing means. A general discussion of deflection detection techniques is provided in Gimzewski et al. ("Observation of a chemical reaction using a micromechanical sensor," 217 Chem. Phys. Lett. 589, at 593 (1994)) which is incorporated herein by reference.
For a monolayer coating, the extent of bending is directly proportional to the amount of target molecule which binds to the sensor. The confinement of the antibody-antigen type of interaction to one side of the cantilever causes a tangential stress in the whole cantilever. One of the unique characteristics of microcantilevers is that they can be made to undergo bending due to changes in differential surface stress by confining the adsorption to one side of the thin cantilever. Using Stoney's formula, the radius of curvature of bending of the cantilever due to adsorption can be written as: l = 6d-v) δs (1)
R Ex2 where R is the radius of curvature for the cantilever, v and E are Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus for the substrate respectively, t is the thickness of the cantilever and δs is the film stress. The radius of curvature due to bending of a cantilever is given by,
1 = 2z (2)
R L2 where z is the displacement at the unsupported end of the cantilever and L is the length of the cantilever beam. Using ( 1 ) and (2), a relationship between the cantilever displacement and the differential surface stress is obtained: z = 3L2(l-v)δs (3)
Ex2 This bending can be measured with a sub-nanometer resolution by reflecting a light from a diode laser at the end of a cantilever into a position sensitive detector.
The technique described here is a d.c. technique. If the cantilever is coated with or comprises a stress-sensitive material, the stiffness can be changed by bending the cantilever. The stress-sensitive material may preferably be selected from, but not limited to, the group consisting of metals, metal alloys, dielectric materials, polymeric materials and combinations thereof. Specific examples of such polymeric materials include, but are not limited to, such polymers as polycarbonate of bisphenol, poly[N,N'-(p,p'-oxydiphenylene)pyromellitimide], poly (vinyl chloride), and the like. Many other polymers are known to the skilled artisan which perform as described herein. Another way to affect the spring constant of the cantilever is by using a non-uniform force field. For example, the cantilever can be placed in a nonuniform electric field. When the cantilever bends the spring constant varies as a function of bending resulting in different resonance frequency. This, however, can be made into a.c. technique by coating the inert side of the cantilever with a stress sensitive film. Differential stress can cause resonance frequency shift. Thundat U.S. patent number 5,719,324, the change in resonance frequency can be amplified by applying a stress sensitive film on one side. The bending of the cantilever can now be converted into an a.c. signal by detecting the variation in resonance frequency of the cantilever. As the cantilever bends, the stiffness of the cantilever changes due to the stress within the sensitive film. The small amplitude resonance frequency of the cantilever varies as the cantilever bends. Therefore, the d.c. variation in cantilever bending can be converted into the a.c. signal. It is also known that the stress-induced changes in spring constant, δk, of the cantilever can be calculated from the bending of the cantilever, δK = π2nfδsl-δs2 (4)
4n, where δs] and δs2 are the differential stress on the cantilever surfaces and n} is a geometrical constant. The resonance frequency of the cantilever changes due to changes in resonance frequency caused by static bending of the cantilever.
The bending of the spring element 3 can be measured in comparison to an untreated reference microcantilever 15. Plotting the bending of the untreated reference microcantilever
15 as a function of deflection between spring element 3 and microcantilever 15 will provide peaks corresponding to the desorption of the analyte from the coating 5 of spring element 3.
Method of Detecting and Measuring The steps of detecting and measuring structural changes within a sensor which corresponds to reactions between target molecules in a sample of monitored media and detector molecules carried on a sensor surface include: providing a base; attaching at least one cantilevered spring element to the base; coating at least one surface on the spring element with a substance which is or may be attached to a detector molecule; exposing the coated region to a liquid or aerosol sample; deflecting the spring element in proportion to the number or concentration of target molecules which bind to the detector molecules; and detecting the deflection by a detector comprising a laser light source directing light at the cantilevered spring element surface. The reflected light from the cantilever surface is captured by a light detector near the cantilevered spring element, the detector receiving reflected light from the cantilever surface before, during, and after bending of the microcantilever. The degree of bending is measured in reference to a neutral position of the cantilever, or a control microcantilever, and a microprocessor is provided for analyzing deflection information from the measuring steps. The changes in deflection are compensated for deflection observed in controls. Control microcantilevers can determine the impact of non-specific binding by target molecules, deflection resulting from temperature changes, pH changes, and other environmental changes which may affect spring element 3. Well known microprocessors and mathematical formulas are used to calculate the deflection changes as a function of specific target and detector molecular binding.
Additional Embodiments In accordance with illustrations used to depict Ag-Ab interactions, the coating 5 carries one binding partner indicated by a "y" and the analyte in the sample is shown as a "delta."
Example 1
A microcantilever sensor can be provided for determining the level of antigen present in a liquid sample. As seen in Figure 1 , an antibody layer 5 can be provided on the surface of spring element 3. preferably on one surface only. Binding molecules may be used to make antibody coating uniform and make accessible to antigen. Layer 5 can comprise a polyclonal antibody, a monoclonal antibody, or a mixture of different polyclonal antibodies directed to a common target molecule. The antibodies are conjugated to element 3 as represented by layer
5. Following standard blocking protocols using bovine serum albumin (BS A) to reduce nonspecific binding interactions (other proteins, detergents, etc., can be used as well), a solution containing a possible analyte or target molecule is used to incubate layer 5 using temperatures, pH values, time intervals and buffers as are well known within the art of immunoassays. While a standard incubation time of 30 minutes is typical for an ELISA protocol, the sensitivity of the present sensor will enable measurable reactions to occur in a matter of seconds.
The deflection of the spring element 3, compared to a control sensor having no target molecules, will indicate the presence of the antigen. Quantification of the target molecule concentration can occur by comparison to controls using a dilution series having a known quantity of the antigen target.
The rapid reaction time of the sensor enables a rapid screening protocol for qualitative measurements. For instance, rapid screening of monoclonal antibodies can be conducted by using the antigen (or immunogen) as the detector molecule(s) in layer 5. Serum derived from monoclonal producing hybridoma cell cultures can be introduced to the sensor as described above. A positive reaction indicates a specific binding which warrants further investigation of the tested hybridoma line. Since thousands of cell lines may need to be tested per fusion, of which the vast majority produce no antibody of interest, the present sensor offers the ability to greatly streamline the screening process.
Further, the small size of the sensor requires only minute concentrations of antigen to be used as the detecting molecule. This ability may be essential to allow screening protocols to be developed for antigens or like detector molecules which are only available in limited supply. A further advantage of the present sensor is that the direct interaction between molecules is measured. Unlike many traditional immunoassays, a separate "visualization" step requiring additional incubation steps is not needed. This results in increased time savings and avoids the need for additional reagents. Because of the binding between partners is reversible, it may be feasible to reverse the detection system, although disposable sensors are more likely for clinical uses such as serum assays.
Example 2 The current sensor system is also useful as a detector and/or isolator of single living cells from a liquid sample. The dimensions of the microcantilever spring element 3 are such that a single procaryotic cell (1-1 Oum in length) such as a bacterium, or a single eucaryotic cell (10-1 OOum in length) can be bound to the sensor layer. Given the large size of any living cell, compared to the size of the cantilever, a single cell will result in a significant and measurable deflection of the cantilever spring element 3.
Accordingly, a sensor can be provided to detect a target species of bacterium using either a lectin or antibody in layer 5 which is specific for the bacterium of interest. For instance, a detector for coliform bacteria, an indicator of fecal or sewage contamination, can be provided to monitor water quality in wells, lakes, or pools.
In summary, the present invention describes a novel and extremely sensitive technique to measure the often overlooked occurrence of adsorption-induced forces for detecting proteins, other biopolymers, and micro-organisms in a gas or liquid medium using the miniature nature of a microcantilever. These microcantilevers have a response time in the range of microseconds to milliseconds. Since the cantilever thickness is very small, the antibody-antigen type of interaction is manifested as changes in the differential surface stress and no additional reagents or steps are required. If specific interactions do not take place, there will not be any change in surface stress. These changes in differential surface stress manifest themselves as changes in cantilever deflection which can be measured with a sub- angstrom sensitivity. The cantilever technique offers more simplicity and higher sensitivity than any currently used techniques.
Many variations will undoubtedly become apparent to one skilled in the art upon a reading of the above specification with reference to the figures. As the foregoing description is exemplary in nature, the spirit and scope of the invention should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the following appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. An apparatus for detecting target molecules from a sample of monitored media, comprising: a base; at least one cantilevered spring element attached to said base, said spring element comprising at least one surface having a coated region comprising at least one detector molecule; a means for measuring a deflection of said spring element resulting from mechanical stresses established by the reaction of said detector molecule with a target molecule.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein at least one cantilevered spring element is composed of a material selected from the group consisting of ceramics, polymers, quartz, silicon nitride, silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, aluminum oxide, tantalum pentoxide, germanium, germanium dioxide, gallium arsenide, and zinc oxide.
3. The apparatus according to claim 1 wherein at least one cantilevered spring element comprises a microcantilever, said microcantilever having a length of about 1 to about 200 μm, a width of about 1 to about 50 μm, and a thickness of about 0.3 to about 3.0 μm.
4. The apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising a reference cantilevered spring element in close proximity to said base, said reference cantilever having a length and a width corresponding to said detector microcantilever.
5. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein said deflection measuring means has a sensitivity of less than about 0.01 nanometers of deflection.
6. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein said deflection measuring means comprises one of a laser detecting means, a piezoresistive detecting means, a piezoelectric detecting means, a capacitive detecting means, and an electron tunneling detecting means.
7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said means for measuring deflection comprises: a reflective region on said spring element; a laser light source positioned to direct light at said reflective region of said spring element; a light sensitive detector positioned to receive reflected light from reflective region of said spring element; and a microprocessor for quantifying the deflection of said spring element.
8. The apparatus as described by claim 1, wherein said at least one cantilevered spring element further comprises: a plurality of cantilevered spring elements attached to said base, each of said spring elements comprising: a surface having at least one region coated with or attached to a detector molecule; and, a plurality of means for measuring deflections, each associated with a respective one of said plurality of cantilevered spring elements.
9. A method for detecting a target molecule from a sample of monitored media, comprising the steps of: providing at least one cantilevered spring element attached to a base and having at least one surface having a coated region comprising a plurality of detector molecules; exposing said coated region to a substrate containing a target molecule, said target molecules binding to said detector molecules, thereby providing a stress induced shape change to said spring element; measuring a deflection of said spring element; and quantifying said deflection of said spring element.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein said step of providing a base comprising at least one cantilevered spring element further comprises providing a microcantilever having a length of about 1 to about 200 μm, a width of about 1 to about 50 μm, and a thickness of about 0.3 to about 3.0 μm.
11. The method according to claim 9, wherein said step of providing said deflection measuring means comprises: providing a reflective area on said spring element; providing a laser light source directing light at said reflective area; positioning a light sensitive detector to receive light from said reflective area; measuring reflected light from said reflective area; providing a microprocessor for analyzing information from said positioning step and said measuring step; estimating deflections of said spring element; and correlating said deflections of said spring element to known standards.
12. A method according to claims 9, wherein said plurality of detector molecules are coated upon said at least one surface through an intermediate molecular bridge which acts as a stress transducer molecule.
13. A method according to claim 12 wherein said intermediate molecular bridge is poly-L-lysine.
PCT/US2000/008256 1999-03-30 2000-03-29 Micromechanical antibody sensor WO2000058729A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU39281/00A AU3928100A (en) 1999-03-30 2000-03-29 Micromechanical antibody sensor
DE60033653T DE60033653T2 (en) 1999-03-30 2000-03-29 DETECTION METHOD USING A MICROMECHANICAL ANTIBODY SENSOR
EP00918480A EP1185865B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2000-03-29 Detection method using a micromechanical antibody sensor

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/281,032 1999-03-30
US09/281,032 US6289717B1 (en) 1999-03-30 1999-03-30 Micromechanical antibody sensor

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000058729A2 true WO2000058729A2 (en) 2000-10-05
WO2000058729A3 WO2000058729A3 (en) 2001-05-17
WO2000058729B1 WO2000058729B1 (en) 2001-10-18

Family

ID=23075680

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/008256 WO2000058729A2 (en) 1999-03-30 2000-03-29 Micromechanical antibody sensor

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6289717B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1185865B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE355523T1 (en)
AU (1) AU3928100A (en)
DE (1) DE60033653T2 (en)
WO (1) WO2000058729A2 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001033226A1 (en) * 1999-11-03 2001-05-10 International Business Machines Corporation Cantilever sensors and transducers
EP1202046A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2002-05-02 Abb Research Ltd. Method and apparatus for determining biological species
EP1325302A2 (en) * 2000-08-09 2003-07-09 California Institute of Technology Active nems arrays for biochemical analyses
EP1342789A2 (en) * 2002-03-04 2003-09-10 Concentris GmbH Cantilever apparatus and method for detecting microorganisms
WO2004029625A2 (en) * 2002-09-24 2004-04-08 Intel Corporation Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
DE102004046685B3 (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-06-29 Concentris Gmbh Measuring cell and method for liquid analysis
US7105301B2 (en) 2002-09-24 2006-09-12 Intel Corporation Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
US7375321B2 (en) 2000-08-09 2008-05-20 California Institute Of Technology Dynamics bionems sensors and arrays of bionems sensor immersed in fluids
WO2011053894A2 (en) * 2009-11-01 2011-05-05 Caerus Molecular Diagnostics Incorporated Methods and apparatus for binding assays
WO2013054311A1 (en) 2011-10-14 2013-04-18 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Nanoscale motion detector
EP2955507A1 (en) 2014-06-12 2015-12-16 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet A substrate, an apparatus and a method of determining the presence of a molecule

Families Citing this family (96)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9819319D0 (en) * 1998-09-05 1998-10-28 Aea Technology Plc Assay of chemical binding
US20030073250A1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2003-04-17 Eric Henderson Method and apparatus for solid state molecular analysis
US6573369B2 (en) * 1999-05-21 2003-06-03 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Method and apparatus for solid state molecular analysis
US20020042081A1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2002-04-11 Eric Henderson Evaluating binding affinities by force stratification and force panning
US20030186311A1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2003-10-02 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Parallel analysis of molecular interactions
WO2001014823A1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2001-03-01 The Regents Of The University Of California Apparatus and method for visually identifying micro-forces with a palette of cantilever array blocks
US6523392B2 (en) * 2000-01-25 2003-02-25 Arizona Board Of Regents Microcantilever sensor
US6897015B2 (en) * 2000-03-07 2005-05-24 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Device and method of use for detection and characterization of pathogens and biological materials
US7008769B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2006-03-07 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Nanoscale molecular arrayer
JP3357914B2 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-12-16 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Method for detecting low molecular compounds in solution
WO2002025630A2 (en) * 2000-09-20 2002-03-28 Molecular Reflections Microfabricated ultrasound array for use as resonant sensors
WO2003008941A2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-01-30 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Combined molecular blinding detection through force microscopy and mass spectrometry
US20030062193A1 (en) * 2001-09-07 2003-04-03 Jacob Thaysen Flexible structure with integrated sensor/actuator
US20030068655A1 (en) * 2001-09-12 2003-04-10 Protiveris, Inc. Microcantilever apparatus and methods for detection of enzymes
US7042488B2 (en) 2001-09-27 2006-05-09 Fujinon Corporation Electronic endoscope for highlighting blood vessel
WO2003044530A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2003-05-30 Cantion A/S Sensor system with a reference surface mimicking the detection surface but with low ligand binding capacity
US6671631B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2003-12-30 General Electric Company Systems and methods for analyzing viscoelastic properties of combinatorial libraries of materials
US20050103097A1 (en) * 2002-01-24 2005-05-19 Carsten Faltum Sensor
WO2003067248A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-08-14 Cantion A/S Scion.Dtu A sensor comprising mechanical amplification of surface stress sensitive cantilever
US20050239193A1 (en) * 2002-05-30 2005-10-27 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Device and method of use for detection and characterization of microorganisms and microparticles
US7395693B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2008-07-08 The Arizona Board of Regents, a body corporate of the state of Arizona acting for Northern Arizona University Embedded piezoelectric microcantilever sensors
JP2005528629A (en) * 2002-06-03 2005-09-22 アリゾナ ボード オブ リージェンツ Hybrid microcantilever sensor
AU2003232165A1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-12-22 Cantion A/S A cantilever sensor with a current shield and a method for its production
US8524488B2 (en) * 2002-09-10 2013-09-03 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and devices for determining a cell characteristic, and applications employing the same
EP1563275A4 (en) * 2002-10-21 2010-10-27 Alegis Microsystems Nanomotion sensing system and method
WO2004046689A2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2004-06-03 The Regents Of The University Of California System and method for multiplexed biomolecular analysis
US7344678B2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2008-03-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Composite sensor membrane
CN1745179A (en) * 2003-01-02 2006-03-08 拜澳富斯毫微科学有限公司 Method and apparatus for molecular analysis in small sample volumes
EP1588168B1 (en) * 2003-01-26 2009-07-08 Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Universitätsklinikum Method for separating and detecting at least one analyte in biological matrices
US7521257B2 (en) * 2003-02-11 2009-04-21 The Board Of Regents Of The Nevada System Of Higher Education On Behalf Of The University Of Nevada, Reno Chemical sensor with oscillating cantilevered probe and mechanical stop
US7260980B2 (en) * 2003-03-11 2007-08-28 Adams Jesse D Liquid cell and passivated probe for atomic force microscopy and chemical sensing
WO2005003821A2 (en) * 2003-06-03 2005-01-13 Bay Materials Llc Phase change sensor
US6763705B1 (en) 2003-06-16 2004-07-20 Ut-Battelle, Llc High throughput microcantilever detector
CA2530607A1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2005-04-07 Purdue Research Foundation Device for detecting biological and chemical particles
KR101214179B1 (en) 2003-08-06 2013-01-10 더 프록터 앤드 갬블 컴퍼니 Bridged element for detection of a target substance
TWI256473B (en) * 2003-08-27 2006-06-11 Ind Tech Res Inst Biosensor and method for bone mineral density measurement
DE10342331A1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2005-05-04 Surface Imaging Systems S I S Method for measuring bending of beam in gas detector comprises directing light from optical fiber on to it and measuring signal produced by interference by reflected light, beam having coating which reacts with component in gas
US20060257286A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2006-11-16 Adams Jesse D Self-sensing array of microcantilevers for chemical detection
US7458265B2 (en) * 2003-10-27 2008-12-02 Drexel University Piezoelectric cantilever sensors
US6978656B2 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-12-27 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Transducer-based sensor system and method
US20090246889A1 (en) * 2003-11-22 2009-10-01 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Substrate having oxide layer, method for detecting target material using the substrate, and optical sensor including the substrate
KR100580631B1 (en) * 2003-11-22 2006-05-16 삼성전자주식회사 A substrate having an oxide layer, method for detecting a target substance using the same and optical sensor containing the same
WO2005052557A1 (en) * 2003-11-28 2005-06-09 Lumiscence A/S An examination system for examination of a specimen; sub-units and units therefore, a sensor and a microscope
US7531002B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2009-05-12 Depuy Spine, Inc. Intervertebral disc with monitoring and adjusting capabilities
US20050255448A1 (en) * 2004-05-13 2005-11-17 Arun Majumdar System for amplifying optical detection of cantilever deflection
US7497133B2 (en) 2004-05-24 2009-03-03 Drexel University All electric piezoelectric finger sensor (PEFS) for soft material stiffness measurement
US20050262943A1 (en) * 2004-05-27 2005-12-01 Glenn Claydon Apparatus, methods, and systems to detect an analyte based on changes in a resonant frequency of a spring element
US7217428B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2007-05-15 Technology Innovations Llc Drug delivery apparatus utilizing cantilever
JP2006039260A (en) * 2004-07-28 2006-02-09 Sii Nanotechnology Inc Method for removing particle of photomask by using atomic force microscope
US7673517B2 (en) 2005-11-10 2010-03-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy System and method for optical interrogation of micro-mechanical sensors using microcavity interferometry
KR100583233B1 (en) * 2004-09-16 2006-05-26 한국과학기술연구원 Method and system for detecting bio-element
US20060059984A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-03-23 Doktycz Mitchel J Coupled spring system for measuring molecular forces
GB2437753B8 (en) 2004-10-01 2009-05-20 Nevada System Of Higher Education Cantilevered probe detector with piezoelectric element
JP2006153831A (en) * 2004-10-27 2006-06-15 Mitsubishi Chemicals Corp Cantilever sensor, sensor system, and method for detecting substance to be detected in specimen liquid
DE102004053261A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2006-05-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Micromechanical sensor for chemical analysis
US7280078B2 (en) 2004-11-20 2007-10-09 Scenterra, Inc. Sensor for detecting high frequency signals
EP1825560A4 (en) * 2004-11-20 2010-09-15 Kenneth E Salsman Device for emission of high frequency signals
ATE384950T1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2008-02-15 Fiat Ricerche MINIATURIZED SENSOR FOR DETECTING PROPERTIES OF A LIQUID, ESPECIALLY A LUBRICANT OIL
EP2818187A3 (en) 2005-02-18 2015-04-15 Zimmer, Inc. Smart joint implant sensors
JP4514639B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2010-07-28 国立大学法人群馬大学 Cantilever type sensor
US20070117217A1 (en) * 2005-06-16 2007-05-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Large scale parallel immuno-based allergy test and device for evanescent field excitation of fluorescence
US7313945B2 (en) * 2005-10-31 2008-01-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Cantilevers for sensing fluid properties
US7429125B2 (en) * 2005-11-09 2008-09-30 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for cantilever based calorimetric analysis
US20070127164A1 (en) * 2005-11-21 2007-06-07 Physical Logic Ag Nanoscale Sensor
CN101371132B (en) * 2006-01-23 2013-05-01 德雷塞尔大学 Self-exciting, self-sensing piezoelectric cantilever sensor
US8171795B1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2012-05-08 Drexel University Self-exciting, self-sensing piezoelectric cantilever sensor for detection of airborne analytes directly in air
US7691130B2 (en) * 2006-01-27 2010-04-06 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal implants including a sensor and methods of use
US20080011058A1 (en) * 2006-03-20 2008-01-17 The Regents Of The University Of California Piezoresistive cantilever based nanoflow and viscosity sensor for microchannels
US7709264B2 (en) * 2006-09-21 2010-05-04 Philip Morris Usa Inc. Handheld microcantilever-based sensor for detecting tobacco-specific nitrosamines
US8481335B2 (en) * 2006-11-27 2013-07-09 Drexel University Specificity and sensitivity enhancement in cantilever sensing
US7992431B2 (en) * 2006-11-28 2011-08-09 Drexel University Piezoelectric microcantilevers and uses in atomic force microscopy
EP2100125A4 (en) 2006-11-28 2012-02-15 Univ Drexel Piezoelectric microcantilever sensors for biosensing
US20080160638A1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2008-07-03 David Lederman Functionalized Microcantilever Sensor and Associated Method For Detection of Targeted Analytes
WO2008086246A1 (en) * 2007-01-05 2008-07-17 Innovative American Technology, Inc. Advanced calorimetric spectroscopy for commercial applications
US8456150B2 (en) * 2007-02-01 2013-06-04 Drexel University Hand-held phase-shift detector for sensor applications
US8168120B1 (en) 2007-03-06 2012-05-01 The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York Reliable switch that is triggered by the detection of a specific gas or substance
US8191403B2 (en) * 2007-03-27 2012-06-05 Richmond Chemical Corporation Petroleum viscosity measurement and communication system and method
WO2009079154A2 (en) 2007-11-23 2009-06-25 Drexel University Lead-free piezoelectric ceramic films and a method for making thereof
US8551407B2 (en) * 2007-11-29 2013-10-08 Michigan Technological University Bacteriorhodopsin-based sensors
US8741663B2 (en) 2008-03-11 2014-06-03 Drexel University Enhanced detection sensitivity with piezoelectric sensors
KR20110049748A (en) * 2008-05-16 2011-05-12 드렉셀유니버시티 System and method for evaluating tissue
US8459123B2 (en) * 2008-06-19 2013-06-11 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Micromechanical chemical sensors with multiple chemoselective resonant elements and frequency division multiplexed readout
WO2010055959A1 (en) * 2008-11-11 2010-05-20 Korea Institute Of Science And Technology System for detecting biomolecule wi th high sensitivity using micro-cant i lever
CN102356315A (en) * 2009-03-20 2012-02-15 安塔纳公司 Analytical method and sensor
US20110086368A1 (en) * 2009-10-08 2011-04-14 Drexel University Method for immune response detection
US8722427B2 (en) * 2009-10-08 2014-05-13 Drexel University Determination of dissociation constants using piezoelectric microcantilevers
KR101118474B1 (en) * 2009-12-15 2012-03-13 한국전기연구원 Apparatus for detecting bio contents using optical coherence
CN102917976B (en) 2010-03-31 2016-06-01 康奈尔大学 Based on the sensor of stress, method and application
US9222867B2 (en) 2011-01-05 2015-12-29 Brian L. Norling Resonant micromachined biochemical sensor
US8740209B2 (en) * 2012-02-22 2014-06-03 Expresslo Llc Method and apparatus for ex-situ lift-out specimen preparation
WO2014003709A1 (en) * 2012-06-25 2014-01-03 Empire Technology Development Llc Ultrasound based antigen binding detection
KR101583470B1 (en) 2014-03-05 2016-01-12 한국과학기술연구원 A cantilever sensor with slit and biosensor having the same
CN105486243B (en) * 2015-12-24 2018-05-11 成都上甲光电科技有限公司 Bridge flexiblity monitor system based on visual light imaging technology
US10191036B1 (en) 2018-03-22 2019-01-29 NUB4U, Inc. System for detecting and removing biological analytes in fluids
DE102020107918B4 (en) * 2020-03-23 2021-11-18 Digital Diagnostics AG DETECTION OF VIRUSES
CN114371124B (en) * 2022-01-14 2024-01-12 安徽理工大学 Drop adhesive force detecting system based on micro-cantilever beam

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997016699A1 (en) * 1995-10-30 1997-05-09 Trustees Of Boston University Piezoelectric force sensing apparatus and methods for biopolymer sequencing
US5807758A (en) * 1995-07-21 1998-09-15 Lee; Gil U. Chemical and biological sensor using an ultra-sensitive force transducer
WO1998050773A2 (en) * 1997-05-08 1998-11-12 University Of Minnesota Microcantilever biosensor
US6016686A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-01-25 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation Micromechanical potentiometric sensors

Family Cites Families (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4242096A (en) 1977-11-14 1980-12-30 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Immunoassay for antigens
US4236893A (en) 1979-04-09 1980-12-02 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method for the assay of classes of antigen-specific antibodies
US4637987A (en) 1984-05-07 1987-01-20 Gould Inc. Gas monitoring device and method
US4596697A (en) 1984-09-04 1986-06-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Chemical sensor matrix
US4735906A (en) 1984-11-28 1988-04-05 Texas A&M University Sensor having piezoelectric crystal for microgravimetric immunoassays
US5595908A (en) 1985-09-26 1997-01-21 University Of Southern Mississipi Piezoelectric device for detection of polynucleotide hybridization
JPH063448B2 (en) 1987-03-31 1994-01-12 日本光電工業株式会社 Method and apparatus for detecting antigen-antibody reaction
US4847193A (en) 1987-06-18 1989-07-11 Gene-Trak Systems Signal amplification in an assay employing a piezoelectric oscillator
US4906840A (en) 1988-01-27 1990-03-06 The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Jr., University Integrated scanning tunneling microscope
US4999284A (en) 1988-04-06 1991-03-12 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Enzymatically amplified piezoelectric specific binding assay
US5501986A (en) 1988-04-06 1996-03-26 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Piezoelectric specific binding assay with mass amplified reagents
US4905701A (en) 1988-06-15 1990-03-06 National Research Development Corporation Apparatus and method for detecting small changes in attached mass of piezoelectric devices used as sensors
US5306644A (en) 1988-09-29 1994-04-26 Hewlett-Packard Company Mass sensor method for measuring analytes in a sample
US5283037A (en) 1988-09-29 1994-02-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Chemical sensor utilizing a surface transverse wave device
US5130257A (en) 1988-09-29 1992-07-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Chemical sensor utilizing a surface transverse wave device
US5221415A (en) 1989-01-17 1993-06-22 Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method of forming microfabricated cantilever stylus with integrated pyramidal tip
US5135852A (en) 1989-07-25 1992-08-04 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Piezoelectric cell growth biosensing method using polymer-metabolic product complex interactions
CA2024548C (en) 1989-09-05 2002-05-28 David Issachar Analyte specific chemical sensor
DE69010506T2 (en) 1989-10-04 1994-12-22 Du Pont DETERMINATION METHOD FOR BIOLOGICAL TARGET COMPLEXES ON THE SURFACE OF A BIOSENSOR.
US5179028A (en) 1990-04-20 1993-01-12 Hughes Aircraft Company Antibody coated crystal chemical sensor
US5445971A (en) 1992-03-20 1995-08-29 Abbott Laboratories Magnetically assisted binding assays using magnetically labeled binding members
US5445970A (en) 1992-03-20 1995-08-29 Abbott Laboratories Magnetically assisted binding assays using magnetically labeled binding members
EP0587408A1 (en) 1992-09-07 1994-03-16 Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha Method for determination of DNA and sensor therefor
US5339675A (en) 1992-10-08 1994-08-23 Millipore Corporation Apparatus for monitoring impurities in a gas stream
USRE35544E (en) 1992-10-08 1997-07-01 Millipore Corporation Apparatus for monitoring moisture in a gas stream
DE4334834A1 (en) 1993-10-13 1995-04-20 Andrzej Dr Ing Grzegorzewski Biosensor for measuring changes in viscosity and / or density
WO1994028372A1 (en) 1993-05-25 1994-12-08 Rosemount Inc. Organic chemical sensor
US5323636A (en) 1993-06-11 1994-06-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Dual-channel flexural acoustic wave chemical sensor
WO1995002180A1 (en) * 1993-07-06 1995-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Calorimetric sensor
US5445008A (en) 1994-03-24 1995-08-29 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Microbar sensor
US5705399A (en) 1994-05-20 1998-01-06 The Cooper Union For Advancement Of Science And Art Sensor and method for detecting predetermined chemical species in solution
US5719324A (en) 1995-06-16 1998-02-17 Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. Microcantilever sensor
GB9522101D0 (en) 1995-10-28 1996-07-17 Aigis Ltd Blast attenuation
US6096559A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-08-01 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation Micromechanical calorimetric sensor

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5807758A (en) * 1995-07-21 1998-09-15 Lee; Gil U. Chemical and biological sensor using an ultra-sensitive force transducer
WO1997016699A1 (en) * 1995-10-30 1997-05-09 Trustees Of Boston University Piezoelectric force sensing apparatus and methods for biopolymer sequencing
WO1998050773A2 (en) * 1997-05-08 1998-11-12 University Of Minnesota Microcantilever biosensor
US6016686A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-01-25 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation Micromechanical potentiometric sensors

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DAVID R. BASELT ET AL.: "A high-sensitivity micromachined biosensor" PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, vol. 85, no. 4, April 1997 (1997-04), pages 672-680, XP002158151 *

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001033226A1 (en) * 1999-11-03 2001-05-10 International Business Machines Corporation Cantilever sensors and transducers
US7560070B1 (en) 1999-11-03 2009-07-14 International Business Machines Corporation Cantilever sensors and transducers
EP1325302A2 (en) * 2000-08-09 2003-07-09 California Institute of Technology Active nems arrays for biochemical analyses
US8329452B2 (en) 2000-08-09 2012-12-11 California Institute Of Technology Active NEMS arrays for biochemical analyses
US7989198B2 (en) 2000-08-09 2011-08-02 California Institute Of Technology Active NEMS arrays for biochemical analyses
US7407814B2 (en) 2000-08-09 2008-08-05 California Institute Of Technology Active NEMS arrays for biochemical analyses
EP1325302A4 (en) * 2000-08-09 2004-08-18 California Inst Of Techn Active nems arrays for biochemical analyses
US7375321B2 (en) 2000-08-09 2008-05-20 California Institute Of Technology Dynamics bionems sensors and arrays of bionems sensor immersed in fluids
EP1202046A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2002-05-02 Abb Research Ltd. Method and apparatus for determining biological species
US7129081B2 (en) 2002-03-04 2006-10-31 Universitat Basel Apparatus and method for detecting microorganisms
EP1342789A3 (en) * 2002-03-04 2004-01-28 Concentris GmbH Cantilever apparatus and method for detecting microorganisms
EP1342789A2 (en) * 2002-03-04 2003-09-10 Concentris GmbH Cantilever apparatus and method for detecting microorganisms
WO2004029625A2 (en) * 2002-09-24 2004-04-08 Intel Corporation Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
US7291466B2 (en) 2002-09-24 2007-11-06 Intel Corporation Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
WO2004029625A3 (en) * 2002-09-24 2004-08-12 Intel Corp Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
US7105301B2 (en) 2002-09-24 2006-09-12 Intel Corporation Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
CN100342235C (en) * 2002-09-24 2007-10-10 英特尔公司 Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
US7270952B2 (en) 2002-09-24 2007-09-18 Intel Corporation Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections
DE102004046685B3 (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-06-29 Concentris Gmbh Measuring cell and method for liquid analysis
WO2011053894A2 (en) * 2009-11-01 2011-05-05 Caerus Molecular Diagnostics Incorporated Methods and apparatus for binding assays
WO2011053894A3 (en) * 2009-11-01 2011-09-29 Caerus Molecular Diagnostics Incorporated Methods and apparatus for binding assays
WO2013054311A1 (en) 2011-10-14 2013-04-18 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Nanoscale motion detector
EP2955507A1 (en) 2014-06-12 2015-12-16 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet A substrate, an apparatus and a method of determining the presence of a molecule

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60033653D1 (en) 2007-04-12
US6289717B1 (en) 2001-09-18
DE60033653T2 (en) 2007-11-15
EP1185865B1 (en) 2007-02-28
EP1185865A2 (en) 2002-03-13
WO2000058729A3 (en) 2001-05-17
AU3928100A (en) 2000-10-16
ATE355523T1 (en) 2006-03-15
WO2000058729B1 (en) 2001-10-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6289717B1 (en) Micromechanical antibody sensor
Luppa et al. Immunosensors—principles and applications to clinical chemistry
US6096559A (en) Micromechanical calorimetric sensor
Raiteri et al. Micromechanical cantilever-based biosensors
Wee et al. Novel electrical detection of label-free disease marker proteins using piezoresistive self-sensing micro-cantilevers
Grogan et al. Characterisation of an antibody coated microcantilever as a potential immuno-based biosensor
Datar et al. Cantilever sensors: nanomechanical tools for diagnostics
Raiteri et al. Micromechanics senses biomolecules
Fritz Cantilever biosensors
North Immunosensors: antibody-based biosensors
US6016686A (en) Micromechanical potentiometric sensors
Mallat et al. Immunosensors for pesticide determination in natural waters
Carrascosa et al. Nanomechanical biosensors: a new sensing tool
Su et al. Quartz tuning fork biosensor
Campbell et al. Detection and quantification of proteins using self-excited PZT-glass millimeter-sized cantilever
US20080247911A1 (en) Measurement of Concentrations and Binding Energetics
US7811831B2 (en) Systems and methods for molecular recognition
Zougagh et al. Micro-electromechanical sensors in the analytical field
Hwang et al. Label-free detection of prostate specific antigen (PSA) using a bridge-shaped PZT resonator
Vashist et al. Microcantilevers for sensing applications
Xu et al. Label-free microcantilever-based immunosensors for highly sensitive determination of avian influenza virus H9
Li et al. Label-free ferrule-top optical fiber micro-cantilever biosensor
Thundat et al. Micromechanical antibody sensor
SENSOR a) United States Patent
Gopinath et al. Design and simulation of high sensitive paddle microcantilever sensor for biosensing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000918480

Country of ref document: EP

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

B Later publication of amended claims
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000918480

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2000918480

Country of ref document: EP