WO2000037056A2 - Composition and method for treating glaucoma - Google Patents

Composition and method for treating glaucoma Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000037056A2
WO2000037056A2 PCT/US1999/030872 US9930872W WO0037056A2 WO 2000037056 A2 WO2000037056 A2 WO 2000037056A2 US 9930872 W US9930872 W US 9930872W WO 0037056 A2 WO0037056 A2 WO 0037056A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
implant
release
active agent
therapeutically active
release modulator
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/030872
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2000037056A3 (en
Inventor
Vernon Wong
Lin Peng
Original Assignee
Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed Critical Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Priority to AU25939/00A priority Critical patent/AU2593900A/en
Publication of WO2000037056A2 publication Critical patent/WO2000037056A2/en
Publication of WO2000037056A3 publication Critical patent/WO2000037056A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/2004Excipients; Inactive ingredients
    • A61K9/2013Organic compounds, e.g. phospholipids, fats
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0019Injectable compositions; Intramuscular, intravenous, arterial, subcutaneous administration; Compositions to be administered through the skin in an invasive manner
    • A61K9/0024Solid, semi-solid or solidifying implants, which are implanted or injected in body tissue
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0048Eye, e.g. artificial tears
    • A61K9/0051Ocular inserts, ocular implants
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/2004Excipients; Inactive ingredients
    • A61K9/2022Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/2031Organic macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, poloxamers
    • A61K9/204Polyesters, e.g. poly(lactide-co-glycolide)
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/2004Excipients; Inactive ingredients
    • A61K9/2022Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/205Polysaccharides, e.g. alginate, gums; Cyclodextrin
    • A61K9/2054Cellulose; Cellulose derivatives, e.g. hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P29/00Non-central analgesic, antipyretic or antiinflammatory agents, e.g. antirheumatic agents; Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAID]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to controlled-release biodegradable implants for use in glaucoma filtration surgery.
  • Glaucoma filtration surgery is the mainstay of surgical intervention for patients whose glaucoma remains progressive after medical therapy.
  • a sclerectomy is performed to create a permanent fistula between the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space.
  • the procedure is designed to create a filtering bleb which provides an alternative passageway for the drainage of aqueous humor from the eye, thereby easing intraocular pressure and helping to improve the patient's vision.
  • the failure rate of GFS can be as high as 25%, depending on preoperative risk factors, and even higher for more complicated cases. Shields, A Study Guide for Glaucoma, 2nd Edition, pp. 463-77 (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1987).
  • Post-operative administration of a variety of therapeutically active agents has been investigated in the prior art to inhibit the inflammatory response, and in particular to help prevent fibroblast proliferation at the surgical site and the consequent formation of collagenous scar tissue.
  • anti-inflammatory agents such as corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NS ATDs), thrombolytic agents, antimetabolites and/or anti-proliferative agents.
  • NS ATDs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • thrombolytic agents antimetabolites and/or anti-proliferative agents.
  • the desired active agent is administered via subconjunctival injection several times after the conclusion of GFS.
  • the disadvantage of patient discomfort with these repeated subconjunctival injections is obvious.
  • frequent subconjunctival injections of certain useful active agents such as 5-flourouracil (5-FU) can cause additional complications.
  • 5-flourouracil 5-FU
  • a single subconjunctival injection of the desired active agent can be followed by topical eyedrops for up to three months post-operatively.
  • This alternative procedure is equally unsatisfactory, however, since both the amount of active agent contacting the surgical site and the duration of exposure to the agent are very limited, typically resulting in bursts of drug delivery at each administration with nothing in between. Further, strict adherence to the eyedrop regime is crucial to the success of the procedure, and often neglected by many patients once beyond the constant oversight of medical professionals. Thus, a sustained- and controlled-release form of these active agents would be highly desirable.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,997,652 and No. 4,853,224 disclose biocompatible implants for introducing into an anterior chamber or posterior segment of an eye for the treatment of an ocular condition.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,501,856 describes biodegradable intra-ocular implants to be applied to the interior of the eye for treatment of disorders in retina/vitreous body or for glaucoma.
  • Biodegradable implants comprising a biocompatible, biodegradable polymer and one or more active agents configured for placement extrinsic to the vitreous either episclerally or intrasclerally.
  • the implant provides a substantially constant rate of release of the desired active agent or agents to the surgical site for an extended period of time.
  • Figure 1 A shows the release profile of a hydrophobic drug from an extended release drug delivery system.
  • Figure IB shows the release profile of the same drug when formulated in a drug delivery system with a release modulator.
  • Figure 2 A shows the release profile of dexamethasone in the absence or presence of the release modifier, ciprofloxacin HC1.
  • Figure 2B shows the release of ciprofloxacin in the presence of dexamethasone.
  • Figure 2C shows the release of ciprofloxacin in the absence of a release modifier.
  • Figure 2D shows the release profile from a drug delivery system having combined hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs, and further having a pharmaceutically inactive release modifier.
  • Figure 3 is a front view of an eye illustrating the scleral flap and fistula created during glaucoma filtration surgery.
  • Figure 4 shows the release profile of dexamethasone from a disc-shaped drug delivery system.
  • Figure 5 shows the release profile of 5-flourouracil from a disc-shaped drug delivery system.
  • the success rate of GFS can be improved dramatically by the controlled and sustained administration of appropriate therapeutic agents to the episcleral- subconjunctival interface proximal to the surgical site, using an improved formulation of biodegradable implants.
  • the implants comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable polymeric composition and are formulated to release one or more pharmaceutically active agents over an extended period of time and at a substantially constant rate of release, to provide a therapeutically effective dosage of the agent or agents directly to the surgical site to inhibit the inflammatory response.
  • therapeutic agents will be made available at the site where they are needed and will be maintained for an extended period of time, rather than subjecting the patient to repeated injections or, in the case of self-administered drops, ineffective treatment with only limited bursts of exposure to the active agent or agents.
  • biodegradable polymeric compositions that may be employed in the implants of the present invention may be polymers of hydroxyaliphatic carboxylic acids, either homo- or copolymers, and polysaccharides. Included among the polyesters of interest are polymers of D-lactic acid, L-lactic acid, racemic lactic acid, glycolic acid, polycaprolactone, and combinations thereof. By employing the L-lactate or D-lactate, a slowly biodegrading polymer is achieved, while degradation is substantially enhanced with the racemate. In a particularly preferred embodiment, copolymers of glycolic and lactic acid are used, where the rate of biodegradation is controlled by the ratio of glycolic to lactic acid. The most rapidly degraded copolymer has roughly equal amounts of glycolic and lactic acid. Homopolymers, or copolymers having ratios other than equal, are more resistant to degradation.
  • the relative average molecular weight of the polymeric composition employed in the implant is the relative average molecular weight of the polymeric composition employed in the implant. Different molecular weights of the same or different polymeric compositions may be included in the implant to modulate the release profile. In the preferred embodiment, the relative average molecular weight of the polymer will range from about 9 to about 60 kD, usually from about 10 to about 54 kD, more usually from about 12 to about 45 kD, and most preferably from about 15 to about 40 kD.
  • the implant is formulated to release the active agent(s) over a period of at least about three weeks, more usually at least about four to six weeks, and usually not more than about one year, more usually not more than about three to six months.
  • the formulation also provides for a substantially constant and uniform rate of release, which will usually not vary by more than about 100% over the desired period of time, more usually by not more than about 50%.
  • the release of drug from the implant can also be modulated by the addition of a release modulator.
  • the release modulator is an agent that alters the release of a drug from a biodegradable implant in a defined manner. Release of a hydrophobic agent is increased by inclusion of an accelerator in the implant, while retardants are included to decrease the release rate of hydrophilic agents. Hydrophilic agents are those compounds which have at least about 100 ⁇ g/ml solubility in water at ambient temperature. Hydrophobic agents are those compounds which have less than about 100 ⁇ g/ml solubility in water at ambient temperature.
  • the release modulator may be physiologically inert, or may also be a therapeutically active agent.
  • the rate of release of the therapeutically active agent is controlled by the rate of transport through the polymeric matrix of the implant, and by the action of the modulator.
  • the transport of drug through the polymer barrier is also affected by drug solubility, polymer hydrophilicity, extent of polymer cross- linking, expansion of the polymer upon water absorption so as to make the polymer barrier more permeable to the drug, geometry of the implant, and the like.
  • percolation theory predicts the potential for drug leaching from the drug delivery system matrix.” In such cases release modulators are useful to slow down the leaching process.
  • Active agents which may find use in the present invention to improve the postoperative success of glaucoma filtration surgery include, but are not limited to, the following therapeutic classes: Ace-inhibitor; endogenous cytokines that influence basement membrane; agents that influence growth of endothelial cells; adrenergic agonist or blocker; aldose reductose inhibitor; analgesic; anesthetic; antiallergic; antibacterial; antifibrotic; antifungal, e.g. amphoteracin B; antiglaucoma; antihyper- or hypotensive; anti-inflammatory; antineoplastic; antiprotozoal; antitumor; antimetabolites, e.g.
  • folic acid analogs purine analogs, and pyrimidine analogs; antiviral; carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; chelating agents; cholinergic; cholinesterase inhibitor; CNS stimulant; contraceptive; dopamine receptor agonist or antagonist; estrogen; glucocorticoid; glucosidase inhibitor; releasing factor; growth hormone inhibitor; growth stimulant; hemolytic; heparin antagonist; immunomodulator; immunosuppressant; LH-RH agonist; antimitotics; NS ALD; anti-glaucoma agents, e.g.
  • acetozolamide (dimox), befunolol, ⁇ -blockers, Ca-blockers, etc.; anti-neoplasties, e.g., vinblastine, vincristine, interferons ⁇ , ⁇ and ⁇ ; progesterone; thrombolytic; vasodilator; vasopressor; and vitamin.
  • hydrophobic drugs which typically have a slow release profile and therefore benefit from formulation with a release accelerator, are cyclosporines, e.g. cyclosporin A, cyclosporin G, etc.; vinca alkaloids, e.g. vincristine and vinblastine, methotrexate; retinoic acid; certain antibiotics, e.g. ansamycins such as rifampin; nitrofurans such as nifuroxazide; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g. diclofenac, keterolac, flurbiprofen, naproxen, suprofen, ibuprofen, aspirin; etc.
  • Steroids are of specific interest, in particular steroidal compounds with anti-inflammatory activity, i.e. glucocorticoids.
  • Glucocorticoids include the following:
  • hydrocortisone derivatives have been recognized as having significant therapeutic effects that are beneficial in the treatment of ocular inflammatory diseases, varying in their potency and biotolerability as a function of their chemical substitutions.
  • dexamethasone sodium phosphate prednisolone sodium phosphate
  • prednisolone acetate fluorometholone acetate
  • dexamethasone fluoromethalone
  • medrysone glucocorticoids that have been used in the treatment of ocular inflammation
  • dexamethasone sodium phosphate prednisolone sodium phosphate
  • prednisolone acetate prednisolone acetate
  • fluorometholone acetate dexamethasone
  • fluoromethalone fluoromethalone
  • medrysone medrysone.
  • dexamethasone is thought to be the most potent, and is therefore a good candidate for use in a GFS drug delivery system, because a small drug release rate is sufficient to establish therapeutic concentration levels at the surgical site.
  • Accelerators may be physiologically inert, water soluble polymers, e.g.
  • methyl cellulose or hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose HPMC
  • sugars e.g. monosaccharides such as fructose and glucose, disaccharides such as lactose, sucrose, or polysaccharides, usually neutral or uncharged, such as cellulose, amylose, dextran, etc.
  • the accelerator may be a physiologically active agent, allowing for a combined therapeutic formulation. The choice of accelerator in such a case will be determined by the desired combination of therapeutic activities.
  • Hydrophilic drugs of interest which may benefit from release modulation include water soluble antibiotics, e.g. aminoglycosides such as gentamycin, kanamycin, neomycin, and vancomycin; amphenicols such as chloramphenicol; cephalosporins such as cefazolin HC1; penicillins such as ampicillin, penicillin, carbenicillin, oxycillin, methicillin; lincosamides such as licomycin; polypeptide antibiotics such as polymixin and bacitracin; tetracyclines such as tetracycline; quinolones such as ciprofloxacin, etc.
  • water soluble antibiotics e.g. aminoglycosides such as gentamycin, kanamycin, neomycin, and vancomycin
  • amphenicols such as chloramphenicol
  • cephalosporins such as cefazolin HC1
  • penicillins such as ampicillin,
  • sulfonamides such as chloramine T
  • sulfones such as sulfanilic acid.
  • nucleotide analogs e.g. acyclovir, gancyclovir, vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine, dideoxycytosine; epinephrine; isoflurphate; adriamycin; bleomycin; mitomycin; ara-C; actinomycin D; scopolamine; and the like.
  • Agents of interest as release retardants include non-water soluble polymers, e.g. high molecular weight methylcellulose and ethylcellulose, etc., low water soluble organic compounds, and pharmaceutically active hydrophobic agents, as previously described.
  • Co-delivery of therapeutic agents from two different therapeutic classes may be particularly beneficial for the post-operative care of GFS patients.
  • Combinations of interest include anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative, e.g. glucocorticoid and methotrexate, glucocorticoid and 5-fluorouracil, NSALD and methotrexate; anti-inflammatory and antiviral; e.g. glucocorticoid or NSAID in combination with vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine, dideoxycytosine, acyclovir, foscarnet, or gancyclovir; anti-inflammatory and antibacterial, e.g.
  • the implant comprises dexamethasone and 5-flourouracil or dexamethasone and ciprofloxacin.
  • Other more specific combinations of interest include the NSALD diclofenac combined with an antibacterial such as gentamicin or vancomycin.
  • Antibacterial drug classes that may be advantageously combined with a suitable anti-inflammatory to improve the post-operative success of GFS include: aminoglycosides, amphenicols, ansamycins, lactams, lincosamides, macrolides, polypeptides, tetracyclines, diaminopyrimidines, nitrofurans, quinolones and analogs, sulfonamides, sulfones, etc. Where one compound does not cover the range of the bacterial infection, products may combine several antibacterial drugs in one combination product.
  • antibiotics useful in treating ocular infections include: chloramphenicol; polymyxin b, neomycin, gramicidin; neomycin; bacitracin; sulfacetamide sodium; gentamicin; tobramycin; trimethprim sulfate; erythromycin; vancomycin; tetracycline; and chlortetracycline.
  • quinolones which are very potent, broad spectrum antibiotics. The high activity of these drugs allows a therapeutic concentration to be reached at low levels of the drug. Examples include ciprofloxacin; norfloxacin; ofloxacin; enoxacin, lomefloxacin; fleroxacin; temafloxacin, tosufloxacin and perfloxacin.
  • Combinations of anti-inflammatory agents with antiviral drugs are also of interest. These include a number of water soluble nucleotide analogs, e.g. acyclovir, gancyclovir, vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine and dideoxycytosine.
  • water soluble nucleotide analogs e.g. acyclovir, gancyclovir, vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine and dideoxycytosine.
  • a combined anti-inflammatory drug, and antibiotic or antiviral may be further combined with an additional therapeutic agent.
  • the additional agent may be an analgesic, e.g. codeine, morphine, keterolac, naproxen, etc., an anesthetic, e.g. lidocaine; b- adrenergic blocker or b-adrenergic agonist, e.g. ephidrine, epinephrine, etc.; aldose reductase inhibitor, e.g. epalrestat, ponalrestat, sorbinil, tolrestat; antiallergic, e.g.
  • Antihelminthic agents e.g. ivermectin and suramin sodium
  • antiamebic agents e.g. chloroquine and chlortetracycline
  • antifungal agents e.g. amphotericin, etc.
  • Immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, cyclosporine and mizoribine are also of interest in combinations.
  • the amount of active agent employed in the implant will vary widely depending on the effective dosage required and the desired rate of release from the implant. Usually the agent will be at least about 1, more usually at least about 10 weight percent of the implant, and usually not more than about 80, more usually not more than about 40 weight percent of the implant.
  • the amount employed will be dependent on the desired release profile, the activity of the modulator, and on the release profile of the active agent in the absence of modulator. An agent that is released very slowly or very quickly will require relatively high amounts of the modulator. Generally, the modulator will be at least about 10, more usually at least about 20 weight percent of the implant, and usually not more than about 50, more usually not more than about 40 weight percent of the implant. Where a combination of active agents is to be employed, the desired release profile of each active agent is determined. If necessary, a physiologically inert modulator is added to precisely control the release profile. The drug release will provide a therapeutic level of each active agent.
  • the exact proportion of modulator and active agent is empirically determined by formulating several implants having varying amounts of modulator.
  • a USP approved method for dissolution or release test will be used to measure the rate of release (USP 23; NF 18 (1995) pp. 1790-1798).
  • USP 23; NF 18 (1995) pp. 1790-1798 For example, using the infinite sink method, a weighed sample of the drug delivery device is added to a measured volume of a solution containing four parts by weight of ethanol and six parts by weight of deionized water, where the solution volume will be such that the drug concentration after release is less than 5% of saturation. The mixture is maintained at 37 ° C and stirred slowly to maintain the implants in suspension.
  • the appearance of the dissolved drug as a function of time may be followed by various methods known in the art, such as spectrophotometrically, HPLC, mass spectroscopy, etc.
  • the drug concentration after 1 h in the medium is indicative of the amount of free unencapsulated drug in the dose, while the time required for 90% drug to be released is related to the expected duration of action of the dose in vivo. Normally the release will be free of larger fluctuations from some average value which allows for a relatively uniform release.
  • the implants may be monolithic, i.e. having the active agent or agents homogenously distributed through the polymeric matrix, or encapsulated, where a reservoir of active agent is encapsulated by the polymeric matrix. Due to ease of manufacture, monolithic implants are usually preferred over encapsulated forms. However, the greater control afforded by the encapsulated, reservoir-type implant may be of benefit in some circumstances, where the therapeutic level of the drug falls within a narrow window.
  • the implants may be substantially homogeneous as to composition and physical characteristics or heterogeneous.
  • implants can be prepared where the center may be of one material and the surface may have one or more layers of the same or a different composition, where the layers may be cross-linked, or of a different molecular weight, different density or porosity, or the like.
  • the center may be a polylactate coated with a polylactate- polyglycolate copolymer, so as to enhance the rate of initial degradation.
  • the center may be polyvinyl alcohol coated with polylactate, so that upon degradation of the polylactate exterior the center would dissolve and be rapidly washed out of the eye.
  • agents may be employed in the formulation for a variety of purposes.
  • buffering agents and preservatives may be employed.
  • Water soluble preservatives which may be employed include sodium bisulfite, sodium bisulfate, sodium thiosulfate, benzalkonium chloride, chlorobutanol, thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercuric nitrate, methylparaben, polyvinyl alcohol and phenylethyl alcohol. These agents may be present in individual amounts of from about 0.001 to about 5% by weight and preferably about 0.01 to about 2%.
  • Suitable water soluble buffering agents that may be employed are sodium carbonate, sodium borate, sodium phosphate, sodium acetate, sodium bicarbonate, etc., as approved by the FDA for the desired route of administration. These agents may be present in amounts sufficient to maintain a pH of the system of between 2 to 9 and preferably 4 to 8. As such the buffering agent may be as much as 5% on a weight to weight basis of the total composition. Where the buffering agent or enhancer is hydrophilic, it may also act as a release accelerator, and will have a cumulative effect with other modulator(s). Similarly, a hydrophilic buffering agent may act as a release retardant.
  • the implants may be of any geometry including fibers, sheets, films, microspheres, spheres, circular discs, plaques and the like.
  • the upper limit for the implant size will be determined by factors such as toleration for the implant, size limitations on insertion, ease of handling, etc.
  • the sheets or films will be in the range of at least about 0.5 mm x 0.5 mm, usually about 3-10 mm x 5-10 mm with a thickness of about 0 1-1 0 mm for ease of handling
  • the fiber diameter will generally be in the range of about 0 05 to 3 mm and the fiber length will generally be in the range of about 0 5-10 mm Spheres will be in the range of 2 ⁇ m to 4 mm in diameter, with comparable volumes for other shaped particles
  • the size and form of the implant can also be used to control the rate of release, period of treatment, and drug concentration at the site of implantation Larger implants will deliver a proportionately larger dose, but depending on the surface to mass ratio, may have a slower release rate
  • the particular size and geometry of the implant are chosen to suit the site of implantation In the methods of the present invention, wafers, rods and sheets are preferable for intrascleral or episcleral implantation
  • mixtures of implants may be utilized employing the same or different pharmacological agents In this way, a cocktail of release profiles, giving a biphasic or triphasic release with a single administration is achieved, where the pattern of release may be greatly varied
  • Various techniques may be employed to produce the implants
  • Useful techniques include solvent evaporation methods, phase separation methods, interfacial methods, extrusion methods, molding methods, injection molding methods, heat press methods and the like Specific methods are discussed in U.S Patent 4,997,652, herein incorporated by reference
  • extrusion methods are used to avoid the need for solvents in manufacturing
  • the polymer and drug are chosen so as to be stable at the temperatures required for manufacturing, usually at least about 85°C
  • FIG. 3 a basic description of the surgical procedure is provided to better illustrate the sites for implantation in accordance with the methods of the present invention
  • the transparent conjunctiva 1 is cut and reflected forward and a superficial or partial-thickness scleral flap 2 formed in the sclera 3 of the eye
  • the area between the conjunctiva 1 and the sclera 3 represents the episcleral-conjunctival interface
  • a fistula or osteum 4 is created through the underlying sclera 3 to communicate with the anterior chamber 5, after which the scleral flap 2 is sutured closed over the osteum 4
  • the osteum 4 provides for leakage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber 5 to the subconjunctival space, thereby easing intraocular pressure and helping to improve the patient's vision.
  • an implant comprising a therapeutically active agent as described above is placed intralammellarly or intrasclerally 6 and proximal to the surgical site beneath the partial-thickness scleral flap 2.
  • the implant may be either completely or partially covered by the flap 2 once the flap 2 is sutured closed.
  • the implant is placed so that the flap 2 partially covers the implant, which serves to secure the implant from migrating beneath the flap 2 after closure.
  • the implant is placed episclerally and proximal to the surgical site, either next to or on top of the sutured partial-thickness scleral flap 2 and underneath the conjunctiva 1.
  • the hydrophobic drug dexamethasone from an extended release drug delivery system was measured.
  • the drug delivery system was made with dexamethasone and polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer.
  • Dexamethasone powder and a powder of polylactic acid polyglycolic acid (PLGA) copolymer having a relative average molecular weight of 15-20 kD were mixed thoroughly at a ratio of 50/50.
  • the well-mixed powder was filled into an extruder, and heated for 1 hour at 95°C, then extruded through a 20 gauge orifice. Six implants of approximately 100-120 ⁇ g were cut from the extruded filaments for drug release assessment.
  • each individual implant was placed in a glass vial filled with receptor medium (9% NaCl in water). To allow for "infinite sink” conditions, the receptor medium volume was chosen so that the concentration would never exceed 5% of saturation. To minimize secondary transport phenomena, e.g. concentration polarization in the stagnant boundary layer, each of the glass vials was placed into a shaking water bath at 37°C. Samples were taken for HPLC analysis from each vial at defined time points. The HPLC method was as described in USP 23 (1995) pp. 1791-1798. The concentration values were used to calculate the cumulative release profiles. The release profile is shown in Figure 1 A. It is seen that drug release is very slow with this implant. Appreciable drug release begins in the fourth week after initiation, at approximately the time of polymer disintegration.
  • a second implant was manufactured as described above, except that varying concentrations of hydrophilic hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) were included as a release modifier.
  • HPMC hydrophilic hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
  • a drug delivery system was manufactured as described in Example 1, except that ciprofloxacin, a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound, was included as the release modifier.
  • ciprofloxacin a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound
  • the combinations of dexamethasone, polymer and ciprofloxacin shown in Table 2 were used
  • a drug delivery system was formulated with hydroxymethylcellulose, ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone, according to Table 3 below.
  • a drug delivery system having a disc-shaped configuration was prepared with dexamethasone and polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer as described in Example 1 above, except that the implants comprised a 50:50 ratio of drug to polymer.
  • the mixture of drug and PLGA was pressed into a sheet of pre-determined thickness, and wafers were cut to size with a trephine.
  • the completed discs were approximately 2.5 mm in diameter and 0.15 to 0.16 mm thick.
  • DDS provided nearly zero-order release characteristics even without the incorporation of a release modifier
  • the geometry of the implant may also be varied to modify the release characteristics of the implant.
  • Implants comprising dexamethasone and a polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer were administered to patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery to control post-operative inflammation and to modulate wound healing. Implants of varying geometries were implanted episclerally and intrasclerally beneath a partial-thickness scleral flap.
  • a rod-shaped implant with 50% dexamethasone and having HPMC as a release modifier (approximately 70:30 ratio of PLGA to HPMC) provided the following results: Table 4
  • An implant having a disc-shaped configuration was prepared with 40% 5- fiourouracil and a combination of two different molecular weight homo- and copolymers.
  • Polylactic acid having a molecular weight of approximately 40 kD was combined with polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer having a molecular weight of approximately 15 kD at a 2.3 ratio.
  • the polymer/drug mixture was pressed into a sheet of pre-determined thickness, and wafers were cut to size with a trephine.
  • the final measurements of the implants tested in this example were approximately 2.5 mm in diameter and approximately 0.15 to 0.16 mm thick.
  • An implant is manufactured as described in Example 1, except that 5-fluorouracil, a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound, is included as a release modifier
  • 5-fluorouracil a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound
  • 5-fluorouracil The release of dexamethasone is increased with the addition of 5-fluorouracil.
  • 5-fluorouracil In addition to the benefits of increased drug delivery, there are significant therapeutic benefits introduced with the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil.
  • 5-FU has also proven to be effective in reducing fibroblast proliferation after glaucoma filtration surgery, and thus its combination with an anti-inflammatory agent will further enhance the long- term success of the procedure.
  • An implant is manufactured as described in Example 1, except that ganciclovir, a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound, is included as a release modifier.
  • ganciclovir a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound
  • the combinations of drugs and polymer are as follows:
  • dexamethasone is increased with the addition of ganciclovir.
  • ganciclovir In addition to the benefits of increased drug delivery, there are therapeutic benefits introduced with the antiviral activity of ganciclovir.
  • An implant is manufactured as described in Example 1, combining the ciprofloxacin with the NSAID naproxen.
  • the combinations of drugs and polymer are as follows:
  • biodegradable implants formulated with an active agent and release modulator provide for release kinetics where the drug is released at a constant rate over long periods of time, avoiding the need of a patient to administer drugs in much less effective ways, such as topically.
  • the implants provide an improved method of treating ocular and other conditions, by avoiding peaks and troughs of drug release.
  • the implants find particular use in post-operative care of patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery, and can be used to delivery one or more therapeutically active agents to modulate wound healing and protect against infection.

Abstract

Implants and methods are provided for modulating wound healing and controlling infection to improve the succes of glaucoma filtration surgery. Formulations of one or more therapeutically active agents and a biodegradable polymer provide a substantially constant rate of release for an extended period of time.

Description

COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR TREATING GLAUCOMA
INTRODUCTION Technical Field The present invention relates to controlled-release biodegradable implants for use in glaucoma filtration surgery.
Background of the Invention
Glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) is the mainstay of surgical intervention for patients whose glaucoma remains progressive after medical therapy. In this procedure, a sclerectomy is performed to create a permanent fistula between the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space. The procedure is designed to create a filtering bleb which provides an alternative passageway for the drainage of aqueous humor from the eye, thereby easing intraocular pressure and helping to improve the patient's vision. * Unfortunately, the failure rate of GFS can be as high as 25%, depending on preoperative risk factors, and even higher for more complicated cases. Shields, A Study Guide for Glaucoma, 2nd Edition, pp. 463-77 (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1987). The most significant cause of these failures is the formation of excessive scar tissue by fibroblasts at the episcleral-conjunctival interface, which obstructs the release of fluid from the anterior chamber of the eye via the filtering bleb. Without the benefit of the alternative passageway created by the surgery, the intraocular pressure eventually returns to its pre- surgical elevated level.
Post-operative administration of a variety of therapeutically active agents has been investigated in the prior art to inhibit the inflammatory response, and in particular to help prevent fibroblast proliferation at the surgical site and the consequent formation of collagenous scar tissue. These include anti-inflammatory agents such as corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NS ATDs), thrombolytic agents, antimetabolites and/or anti-proliferative agents. Chang, J. Ocular Pharm. Ther. 14:75-95 (1998). Typically, the desired active agent is administered via subconjunctival injection several times after the conclusion of GFS. The disadvantage of patient discomfort with these repeated subconjunctival injections, however, is obvious. Moreover, frequent subconjunctival injections of certain useful active agents such as 5-flourouracil (5-FU) can cause additional complications. Lee et al., Ophthalmic Surg 18: 187 (1987).
Alternatively, a single subconjunctival injection of the desired active agent can be followed by topical eyedrops for up to three months post-operatively. This alternative procedure is equally unsatisfactory, however, since both the amount of active agent contacting the surgical site and the duration of exposure to the agent are very limited, typically resulting in bursts of drug delivery at each administration with nothing in between. Further, strict adherence to the eyedrop regime is crucial to the success of the procedure, and often neglected by many patients once beyond the constant oversight of medical professionals. Thus, a sustained- and controlled-release form of these active agents would be highly desirable.
Prior art attempts to formulate drug delivery systems suitable for the GFS procedure have failed to meet this need. Repeated investigations using bioerodible polyanhydride discs impregnated with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) achieved only limited success, had greatly varying release rates, and resulted in unacceptable ocular toxicity. Jampel, Arch. Ophthalmol. 705:430-435 (1990). Accordingly, a need still exists for an effective, pharmaceutically-acceptable implant which can provide both sustained and controlled release of the active agent directly to the surgical site.
Relevant Literature
U.S. Patent No. 4,997,652 and No. 4,853,224 disclose biocompatible implants for introducing into an anterior chamber or posterior segment of an eye for the treatment of an ocular condition. U.S. Patent No. 5,164,188, No. 5,443,505, No. 5,766,242 and No.
5,824,072 describe methods of treating ocular conditions by introduction of biocompatible implants comprising drugs of interest into the suprachoroidal space or pars plana of the eye. U.S. Patent No. 5,501,856 describes biodegradable intra-ocular implants to be applied to the interior of the eye for treatment of disorders in retina/vitreous body or for glaucoma.
Heller, Biodegradable Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery, in: CRC Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, Vol. 1 , CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1987, pp. 39-90, describes encapsulation for controlled drug delivery. Heller in: Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy, N. A. Peppes ed., Vol. Ill, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1987, pp 137-149, further describes bioerodible polymers.
Anderson et ai, Contraception 73:375 (1976) and Miller et ai, J. Biomed. Materials Res. 77:711 (1977), describe various properties of poly(dL-lactic acid). U.S. Patent 5,075, 115 discloses sustained release formulations with lactic acid polymers and co- polymers. Di Colo, Biomaterials 73:850-856 (1992) describes controlled drug release from hydrophobic polymers.
Charles et ai, Ophthalmology 95:503-508 (1991); Jampel et al, Arch. Ophthalmol. 705:430-435 (1990); Lee etal, Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 29:1692-1697 (1988); and Lee et al., Ophthalmology 72:1523-1530 (1987) describe the use of bioerodible polyanhydride delivery systems in glaucoma filtration surgery. Smith and Ashton, Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers 27:763-767 (1996) describe a non-biodegradable reservoir system for delivery of 5-FU in high-risk glaucoma surgical patients.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Methods and compositions are provided for improving the success of glaucoma filtration surgery, through the sustained and controlled release of one or more therapeutically active agents directly to the surgical site. Biodegradable implants are provided comprising a biocompatible, biodegradable polymer and one or more active agents configured for placement extrinsic to the vitreous either episclerally or intrasclerally. The implant provides a substantially constant rate of release of the desired active agent or agents to the surgical site for an extended period of time.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 A shows the release profile of a hydrophobic drug from an extended release drug delivery system. Figure IB shows the release profile of the same drug when formulated in a drug delivery system with a release modulator.
Figure 2 A shows the release profile of dexamethasone in the absence or presence of the release modifier, ciprofloxacin HC1. Figure 2B shows the release of ciprofloxacin in the presence of dexamethasone. Figure 2C shows the release of ciprofloxacin in the absence of a release modifier. Figure 2D shows the release profile from a drug delivery system having combined hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs, and further having a pharmaceutically inactive release modifier.
Figure 3 is a front view of an eye illustrating the scleral flap and fistula created during glaucoma filtration surgery. Figure 4 shows the release profile of dexamethasone from a disc-shaped drug delivery system.
Figure 5 shows the release profile of 5-flourouracil from a disc-shaped drug delivery system.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
As shown herein, the success rate of GFS can be improved dramatically by the controlled and sustained administration of appropriate therapeutic agents to the episcleral- subconjunctival interface proximal to the surgical site, using an improved formulation of biodegradable implants. The implants comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable polymeric composition and are formulated to release one or more pharmaceutically active agents over an extended period of time and at a substantially constant rate of release, to provide a therapeutically effective dosage of the agent or agents directly to the surgical site to inhibit the inflammatory response. Thus, with a single administration therapeutic agents will be made available at the site where they are needed and will be maintained for an extended period of time, rather than subjecting the patient to repeated injections or, in the case of self-administered drops, ineffective treatment with only limited bursts of exposure to the active agent or agents.
Pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable polymeric compositions that may be employed in the implants of the present invention may be polymers of hydroxyaliphatic carboxylic acids, either homo- or copolymers, and polysaccharides. Included among the polyesters of interest are polymers of D-lactic acid, L-lactic acid, racemic lactic acid, glycolic acid, polycaprolactone, and combinations thereof. By employing the L-lactate or D-lactate, a slowly biodegrading polymer is achieved, while degradation is substantially enhanced with the racemate. In a particularly preferred embodiment, copolymers of glycolic and lactic acid are used, where the rate of biodegradation is controlled by the ratio of glycolic to lactic acid. The most rapidly degraded copolymer has roughly equal amounts of glycolic and lactic acid. Homopolymers, or copolymers having ratios other than equal, are more resistant to degradation.
Equally important to controlling the biodegradation of the polymer and hence the extended release profile of the implant is the relative average molecular weight of the polymeric composition employed in the implant. Different molecular weights of the same or different polymeric compositions may be included in the implant to modulate the release profile. In the preferred embodiment, the relative average molecular weight of the polymer will range from about 9 to about 60 kD, usually from about 10 to about 54 kD, more usually from about 12 to about 45 kD, and most preferably from about 15 to about 40 kD. The implant is formulated to release the active agent(s) over a period of at least about three weeks, more usually at least about four to six weeks, and usually not more than about one year, more usually not more than about three to six months. The formulation also provides for a substantially constant and uniform rate of release, which will usually not vary by more than about 100% over the desired period of time, more usually by not more than about 50%.
The release of drug from the implant can also be modulated by the addition of a release modulator. The release modulator is an agent that alters the release of a drug from a biodegradable implant in a defined manner. Release of a hydrophobic agent is increased by inclusion of an accelerator in the implant, while retardants are included to decrease the release rate of hydrophilic agents. Hydrophilic agents are those compounds which have at least about 100 μg/ml solubility in water at ambient temperature. Hydrophobic agents are those compounds which have less than about 100 μg/ml solubility in water at ambient temperature. The release modulator may be physiologically inert, or may also be a therapeutically active agent. With this embodiment of the invention, the rate of release of the therapeutically active agent is controlled by the rate of transport through the polymeric matrix of the implant, and by the action of the modulator. The transport of drug through the polymer barrier is also affected by drug solubility, polymer hydrophilicity, extent of polymer cross- linking, expansion of the polymer upon water absorption so as to make the polymer barrier more permeable to the drug, geometry of the implant, and the like. At high drug loadings, i.e. at a loading concentration above the theoretical percolation threshold, percolation theory predicts the potential for drug leaching from the drug delivery system matrix." In such cases release modulators are useful to slow down the leaching process.
Active agents which may find use in the present invention to improve the postoperative success of glaucoma filtration surgery include, but are not limited to, the following therapeutic classes: Ace-inhibitor; endogenous cytokines that influence basement membrane; agents that influence growth of endothelial cells; adrenergic agonist or blocker; aldose reductose inhibitor; analgesic; anesthetic; antiallergic; antibacterial; antifibrotic; antifungal, e.g. amphoteracin B; antiglaucoma; antihyper- or hypotensive; anti-inflammatory; antineoplastic; antiprotozoal; antitumor; antimetabolites, e.g. , folic acid analogs, purine analogs, and pyrimidine analogs; antiviral; carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; chelating agents; cholinergic; cholinesterase inhibitor; CNS stimulant; contraceptive; dopamine receptor agonist or antagonist; estrogen; glucocorticoid; glucosidase inhibitor; releasing factor; growth hormone inhibitor; growth stimulant; hemolytic; heparin antagonist; immunomodulator; immunosuppressant; LH-RH agonist; antimitotics; NS ALD; anti-glaucoma agents, e.g. acetozolamide (dimox), befunolol, β-blockers, Ca-blockers, etc.; anti-neoplasties, e.g., vinblastine, vincristine, interferons α, β and γ; progesterone; thrombolytic; vasodilator; vasopressor; and vitamin.
Among hydrophobic drugs, which typically have a slow release profile and therefore benefit from formulation with a release accelerator, are cyclosporines, e.g. cyclosporin A, cyclosporin G, etc.; vinca alkaloids, e.g. vincristine and vinblastine, methotrexate; retinoic acid; certain antibiotics, e.g. ansamycins such as rifampin; nitrofurans such as nifuroxazide; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g. diclofenac, keterolac, flurbiprofen, naproxen, suprofen, ibuprofen, aspirin; etc. Steroids are of specific interest, in particular steroidal compounds with anti-inflammatory activity, i.e. glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids include the following:
Figure imgf000008_0001
Figure imgf000009_0001
These hydrocortisone derivatives have been recognized as having significant therapeutic effects that are beneficial in the treatment of ocular inflammatory diseases, varying in their potency and biotolerability as a function of their chemical substitutions.
The following are examples of glucocorticoids that have been used in the treatment of ocular inflammation, and are of interest for use in the subject invention: dexamethasone sodium phosphate; prednisolone sodium phosphate; prednisolone acetate; fluorometholone acetate; dexamethasone; fluoromethalone; and medrysone. Of these, dexamethasone is thought to be the most potent, and is therefore a good candidate for use in a GFS drug delivery system, because a small drug release rate is sufficient to establish therapeutic concentration levels at the surgical site. Accelerators may be physiologically inert, water soluble polymers, e.g. low molecular weight methyl cellulose or hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC); sugars, e.g. monosaccharides such as fructose and glucose, disaccharides such as lactose, sucrose, or polysaccharides, usually neutral or uncharged, such as cellulose, amylose, dextran, etc. Alternatively, the accelerator may be a physiologically active agent, allowing for a combined therapeutic formulation. The choice of accelerator in such a case will be determined by the desired combination of therapeutic activities.
Release retardants are hydrophobic compounds that slow the rate of release of hydrophilic drugs, allowing for a more extended release profile. Hydrophilic drugs of interest which may benefit from release modulation include water soluble antibiotics, e.g. aminoglycosides such as gentamycin, kanamycin, neomycin, and vancomycin; amphenicols such as chloramphenicol; cephalosporins such as cefazolin HC1; penicillins such as ampicillin, penicillin, carbenicillin, oxycillin, methicillin; lincosamides such as licomycin; polypeptide antibiotics such as polymixin and bacitracin; tetracyclines such as tetracycline; quinolones such as ciprofloxacin, etc. ; sulfonamides such as chloramine T; and sulfones such as sulfanilic acid. Also of interest as active hydrophilic agents are nucleotide analogs, e.g. acyclovir, gancyclovir, vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine, dideoxycytosine; epinephrine; isoflurphate; adriamycin; bleomycin; mitomycin; ara-C; actinomycin D; scopolamine; and the like. Agents of interest as release retardants include non-water soluble polymers, e.g. high molecular weight methylcellulose and ethylcellulose, etc., low water soluble organic compounds, and pharmaceutically active hydrophobic agents, as previously described.
Co-delivery of therapeutic agents from two different therapeutic classes may be particularly beneficial for the post-operative care of GFS patients. Combinations of interest include anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative, e.g. glucocorticoid and methotrexate, glucocorticoid and 5-fluorouracil, NSALD and methotrexate; anti-inflammatory and antiviral; e.g. glucocorticoid or NSAID in combination with vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine, dideoxycytosine, acyclovir, foscarnet, or gancyclovir; anti-inflammatory and antibacterial, e.g. glucocorticoid and quinolone, NSA D and quinolone. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the implant comprises dexamethasone and 5-flourouracil or dexamethasone and ciprofloxacin. Other more specific combinations of interest include the NSALD diclofenac combined with an antibacterial such as gentamicin or vancomycin.
Antibacterial drug classes that may be advantageously combined with a suitable anti-inflammatory to improve the post-operative success of GFS include: aminoglycosides, amphenicols, ansamycins, lactams, lincosamides, macrolides, polypeptides, tetracyclines, diaminopyrimidines, nitrofurans, quinolones and analogs, sulfonamides, sulfones, etc. Where one compound does not cover the range of the bacterial infection, products may combine several antibacterial drugs in one combination product. Examples of antibiotics useful in treating ocular infections include: chloramphenicol; polymyxin b, neomycin, gramicidin; neomycin; bacitracin; sulfacetamide sodium; gentamicin; tobramycin; trimethprim sulfate; erythromycin; vancomycin; tetracycline; and chlortetracycline. Of particular interest are the quinolones, which are very potent, broad spectrum antibiotics. The high activity of these drugs allows a therapeutic concentration to be reached at low levels of the drug. Examples include ciprofloxacin; norfloxacin; ofloxacin; enoxacin, lomefloxacin; fleroxacin; temafloxacin, tosufloxacin and perfloxacin.
Combinations of anti-inflammatory agents with antiviral drugs are also of interest. These include a number of water soluble nucleotide analogs, e.g. acyclovir, gancyclovir, vidarabine, azidothymidine, dideoxyinosine and dideoxycytosine.
A combined anti-inflammatory drug, and antibiotic or antiviral, may be further combined with an additional therapeutic agent. The additional agent may be an analgesic, e.g. codeine, morphine, keterolac, naproxen, etc., an anesthetic, e.g. lidocaine; b- adrenergic blocker or b-adrenergic agonist, e.g. ephidrine, epinephrine, etc.; aldose reductase inhibitor, e.g. epalrestat, ponalrestat, sorbinil, tolrestat; antiallergic, e.g. cromolyn, beclomethasone, dexamethasone, and flunisolide; colchicine. Antihelminthic agents, e.g. ivermectin and suramin sodium; antiamebic agents, e.g. chloroquine and chlortetracycline; and antifungal agents, e.g. amphotericin, etc. maybe co-formulated with an antibiotic and an anti-inflammatory drug. Immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, cyclosporine and mizoribine are also of interest in combinations.
The amount of active agent employed in the implant, individually or in combination, will vary widely depending on the effective dosage required and the desired rate of release from the implant. Usually the agent will be at least about 1, more usually at least about 10 weight percent of the implant, and usually not more than about 80, more usually not more than about 40 weight percent of the implant.
Where a release modulator is included, the amount employed will be dependent on the desired release profile, the activity of the modulator, and on the release profile of the active agent in the absence of modulator. An agent that is released very slowly or very quickly will require relatively high amounts of the modulator. Generally, the modulator will be at least about 10, more usually at least about 20 weight percent of the implant, and usually not more than about 50, more usually not more than about 40 weight percent of the implant. Where a combination of active agents is to be employed, the desired release profile of each active agent is determined. If necessary, a physiologically inert modulator is added to precisely control the release profile. The drug release will provide a therapeutic level of each active agent.
The exact proportion of modulator and active agent is empirically determined by formulating several implants having varying amounts of modulator. A USP approved method for dissolution or release test will be used to measure the rate of release (USP 23; NF 18 (1995) pp. 1790-1798). For example, using the infinite sink method, a weighed sample of the drug delivery device is added to a measured volume of a solution containing four parts by weight of ethanol and six parts by weight of deionized water, where the solution volume will be such that the drug concentration after release is less than 5% of saturation. The mixture is maintained at 37°C and stirred slowly to maintain the implants in suspension. The appearance of the dissolved drug as a function of time may be followed by various methods known in the art, such as spectrophotometrically, HPLC, mass spectroscopy, etc. The drug concentration after 1 h in the medium is indicative of the amount of free unencapsulated drug in the dose, while the time required for 90% drug to be released is related to the expected duration of action of the dose in vivo. Normally the release will be free of larger fluctuations from some average value which allows for a relatively uniform release.
The implants may be monolithic, i.e. having the active agent or agents homogenously distributed through the polymeric matrix, or encapsulated, where a reservoir of active agent is encapsulated by the polymeric matrix. Due to ease of manufacture, monolithic implants are usually preferred over encapsulated forms. However, the greater control afforded by the encapsulated, reservoir-type implant may be of benefit in some circumstances, where the therapeutic level of the drug falls within a narrow window.
The implants may be substantially homogeneous as to composition and physical characteristics or heterogeneous. Thus, implants can be prepared where the center may be of one material and the surface may have one or more layers of the same or a different composition, where the layers may be cross-linked, or of a different molecular weight, different density or porosity, or the like. For example, where it is desirable to quickly release an initial bolus of drug, the center may be a polylactate coated with a polylactate- polyglycolate copolymer, so as to enhance the rate of initial degradation. Alternatively, the center may be polyvinyl alcohol coated with polylactate, so that upon degradation of the polylactate exterior the center would dissolve and be rapidly washed out of the eye.
Other agents may be employed in the formulation for a variety of purposes. For example, buffering agents and preservatives may be employed. Water soluble preservatives which may be employed include sodium bisulfite, sodium bisulfate, sodium thiosulfate, benzalkonium chloride, chlorobutanol, thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercuric nitrate, methylparaben, polyvinyl alcohol and phenylethyl alcohol. These agents may be present in individual amounts of from about 0.001 to about 5% by weight and preferably about 0.01 to about 2%. Suitable water soluble buffering agents that may be employed are sodium carbonate, sodium borate, sodium phosphate, sodium acetate, sodium bicarbonate, etc., as approved by the FDA for the desired route of administration. These agents may be present in amounts sufficient to maintain a pH of the system of between 2 to 9 and preferably 4 to 8. As such the buffering agent may be as much as 5% on a weight to weight basis of the total composition. Where the buffering agent or enhancer is hydrophilic, it may also act as a release accelerator, and will have a cumulative effect with other modulator(s). Similarly, a hydrophilic buffering agent may act as a release retardant.
The implants may be of any geometry including fibers, sheets, films, microspheres, spheres, circular discs, plaques and the like. The upper limit for the implant size will be determined by factors such as toleration for the implant, size limitations on insertion, ease of handling, etc. Where sheets or films are employed, the sheets or films will be in the range of at least about 0.5 mm x 0.5 mm, usually about 3-10 mm x 5-10 mm with a thickness of about 0 1-1 0 mm for ease of handling Where fibers are employed, the fiber diameter will generally be in the range of about 0 05 to 3 mm and the fiber length will generally be in the range of about 0 5-10 mm Spheres will be in the range of 2 μm to 4 mm in diameter, with comparable volumes for other shaped particles The size and form of the implant can also be used to control the rate of release, period of treatment, and drug concentration at the site of implantation Larger implants will deliver a proportionately larger dose, but depending on the surface to mass ratio, may have a slower release rate The particular size and geometry of the implant are chosen to suit the site of implantation In the methods of the present invention, wafers, rods and sheets are preferable for intrascleral or episcleral implantation
In some situations mixtures of implants may be utilized employing the same or different pharmacological agents In this way, a cocktail of release profiles, giving a biphasic or triphasic release with a single administration is achieved, where the pattern of release may be greatly varied Various techniques may be employed to produce the implants Useful techniques include solvent evaporation methods, phase separation methods, interfacial methods, extrusion methods, molding methods, injection molding methods, heat press methods and the like Specific methods are discussed in U.S Patent 4,997,652, herein incorporated by reference In a preferred embodiment, extrusion methods are used to avoid the need for solvents in manufacturing When using extrusion methods, the polymer and drug are chosen so as to be stable at the temperatures required for manufacturing, usually at least about 85°C
Turning now to Figure 3, a basic description of the surgical procedure is provided to better illustrate the sites for implantation in accordance with the methods of the present invention The transparent conjunctiva 1 is cut and reflected forward and a superficial or partial-thickness scleral flap 2 formed in the sclera 3 of the eye The area between the conjunctiva 1 and the sclera 3 represents the episcleral-conjunctival interface A fistula or osteum 4 is created through the underlying sclera 3 to communicate with the anterior chamber 5, after which the scleral flap 2 is sutured closed over the osteum 4 Ideally, after scleral healing the osteum 4 provides for leakage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber 5 to the subconjunctival space, thereby easing intraocular pressure and helping to improve the patient's vision. As noted previously, a frequent complication arises due to the formation of excessive scar tissue at or near the surgical site, which can block the filtering mechanism and deprive the patient of the benefit of the procedure. According to one embodiment of the present invention, then, an implant comprising a therapeutically active agent as described above is placed intralammellarly or intrasclerally 6 and proximal to the surgical site beneath the partial-thickness scleral flap 2. The implant may be either completely or partially covered by the flap 2 once the flap 2 is sutured closed. In a preferred embodiment, the implant is placed so that the flap 2 partially covers the implant, which serves to secure the implant from migrating beneath the flap 2 after closure. Alternatively, the implant is placed episclerally and proximal to the surgical site, either next to or on top of the sutured partial-thickness scleral flap 2 and underneath the conjunctiva 1.
EXPERIMENTAL
The following examples serve to illustrate certain preferred embodiments and aspects of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the scope thereof.
In the experimental disclosure which follows, the following abbreviations apply: eq (equivalents); M (Molar); μM (micromolar); N (Normal); mol (moles); mmol (millimoles); μmol (micromoles); nmol (nanomoles); g (grams); mg (milligrams); kg (kilograms); μg (micrograms); L (liters); ml (milliliters); μl (microliters); cm (centimeters); mm (millimeters); μm (micrometers); nm (nanometers); °C (degrees Centigrade); h (hours); min (minutes); sec (seconds); msec (milliseconds); kD (kiloDaltons); mmHg (millimeters of Mercury); IOP (intra-ocular pressure).
EXAMPLE 1
Manufacture and Testing of a Drug Delivery System with Dexamethasone
Release of the hydrophobic drug dexamethasone from an extended release drug delivery system was measured. The drug delivery system was made with dexamethasone and polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer. Dexamethasone powder and a powder of polylactic acid polyglycolic acid (PLGA) copolymer having a relative average molecular weight of 15-20 kD were mixed thoroughly at a ratio of 50/50. The well-mixed powder was filled into an extruder, and heated for 1 hour at 95°C, then extruded through a 20 gauge orifice. Six implants of approximately 100-120 μg were cut from the extruded filaments for drug release assessment.
Each individual implant was placed in a glass vial filled with receptor medium (9% NaCl in water). To allow for "infinite sink" conditions, the receptor medium volume was chosen so that the concentration would never exceed 5% of saturation. To minimize secondary transport phenomena, e.g. concentration polarization in the stagnant boundary layer, each of the glass vials was placed into a shaking water bath at 37°C. Samples were taken for HPLC analysis from each vial at defined time points. The HPLC method was as described in USP 23 (1995) pp. 1791-1798. The concentration values were used to calculate the cumulative release profiles. The release profile is shown in Figure 1 A. It is seen that drug release is very slow with this implant. Appreciable drug release begins in the fourth week after initiation, at approximately the time of polymer disintegration.
A second implant was manufactured as described above, except that varying concentrations of hydrophilic hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) were included as a release modifier. The combinations of drug, polymer and HPMC shown in Table 1 were used.
Table 1
Figure imgf000016_0001
The release of drug was tested as described above The data is shown in Figure IB. It is seen that with the addition of HPMC, there is a pronounced increase in the rate of release. Close to zero order release is observed for XT014 and XT015, where the ratio of release modulator to drug is 0.3 to 0.4. By selection of the appropriate polymer and release modifier, the drug release and delivery interval can be custom-tailored to provide a release profile that is accelerated or retarded.
EXAMPLE 2 Manufacture and Testing of a Drug Delivery System with a Pharmaceutically Active Release Modifier
A drug delivery system was manufactured as described in Example 1, except that ciprofloxacin, a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound, was included as the release modifier. The combinations of dexamethasone, polymer and ciprofloxacin shown in Table 2 were used
Table 2
Figure imgf000017_0001
The release of dexamethasone is increased with the addition of ciprofloxacin, as shown by the data in Figure 2A. The actual drug release is almost doubled when compared to the system without a modifier. In addition to the benefits of increased drug delivery, there are therapeutic benefits introduced with the antibiotic activity of ciprofloxacin. The release of ciprofloxacin from the same system is shown in Figure 2B. The release rate is higher than that of dexamethasone. However, the overall release of ciprofloxacin is slower when co-formulated with dexamethasone than it is without dexamethasone, as shown in Figure 2C.
EXAMPLE 3
Manufacture and Testing of A Drug Delivery System with Multiple Release Modifiers
A drug delivery system was formulated with hydroxymethylcellulose, ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone, according to Table 3 below.
Table 3 Lot # I PLGA HPMC Ciprofloxacin Dexamethasoαe
XT035 3.4 0.4 2.4 3.8
The data in Figure 2D show that after an initial higher release in the first day, an almost zero-order release thereafter can be observed. The overall release characteristic would be therapeutically acceptable from a therapeutic efficiency aspect.
EXAMPLE 4
Effect of Implant Geometry on Drug Release
A drug delivery system having a disc-shaped configuration was prepared with dexamethasone and polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer as described in Example 1 above, except that the implants comprised a 50:50 ratio of drug to polymer. The mixture of drug and PLGA was pressed into a sheet of pre-determined thickness, and wafers were cut to size with a trephine. The completed discs were approximately 2.5 mm in diameter and 0.15 to 0.16 mm thick.
The release of drug was tested as described in Example 1 above. As illustrated by the data in Figure 4, in contrast to the rod-shaped system of Example 1 the disc-shaped
DDS provided nearly zero-order release characteristics even without the incorporation of a release modifier Thus, the geometry of the implant may also be varied to modify the release characteristics of the implant.
EXAMPLE 5
Post-Operative Use of Implants After Glaucoma Filtration Surgery
Implants comprising dexamethasone and a polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer were administered to patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery to control post-operative inflammation and to modulate wound healing. Implants of varying geometries were implanted episclerally and intrasclerally beneath a partial-thickness scleral flap. In the first study, a rod-shaped implant with 50% dexamethasone and having HPMC as a release modifier (approximately 70:30 ratio of PLGA to HPMC) provided the following results: Table 4
Figure imgf000019_0001
( 1 ) one leak, one overfϊltration, (2) one CD, one overfiltration, (3) one overfiltration; ( ) one cataract
Similarly, a disc-shaped implant having 20% dexamethasone and no release modifier was implanted episclerally with the following results: Table 5
Figure imgf000019_0002
( 1 ) one overfiltration, ( ) one overfiltration
As can be seen, in patients receiving the dexamethasone implants the intraocular pressure was maintained at levels significantly below the pre-surgical levels for an extended period of time. EXAMPLE 6
Manufacture and Testing of a Mixed Polymer Implant With 5-Flourouracil
An implant having a disc-shaped configuration was prepared with 40% 5- fiourouracil and a combination of two different molecular weight homo- and copolymers. Polylactic acid having a molecular weight of approximately 40 kD was combined with polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer having a molecular weight of approximately 15 kD at a 2.3 ratio. The polymer/drug mixture was pressed into a sheet of pre-determined thickness, and wafers were cut to size with a trephine. The final measurements of the implants tested in this example were approximately 2.5 mm in diameter and approximately 0.15 to 0.16 mm thick.
The release of drug was tested as described in Example 1 above. As illustrated by the data in Figure 5, this disc-shaped implant also provided near zero-order release of the active agent, 5-flourouracil, over an extended period of time.
EXAMPLE 7 Manufacture and Testing of an Implant with a Glucocorticoid and 5-Fluorouracil
An implant is manufactured as described in Example 1, except that 5-fluorouracil, a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound, is included as a release modifier The combinations of drugs and polymer are as follows:
Table 6
Figure imgf000020_0001
The release of dexamethasone is increased with the addition of 5-fluorouracil. In addition to the benefits of increased drug delivery, there are significant therapeutic benefits introduced with the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil. In particular, 5-FU has also proven to be effective in reducing fibroblast proliferation after glaucoma filtration surgery, and thus its combination with an anti-inflammatory agent will further enhance the long- term success of the procedure.
EXAMPLE 8
Manufacture and Testing of an Implant with a Glucocorticoid and Ganciclovir
An implant is manufactured as described in Example 1, except that ganciclovir, a pharmaceutically active, hydrophilic compound, is included as a release modifier. The combinations of drugs and polymer are as follows:
Table 7
Figure imgf000021_0001
The release of dexamethasone is increased with the addition of ganciclovir. In addition to the benefits of increased drug delivery, there are therapeutic benefits introduced with the antiviral activity of ganciclovir.
EXAMPLE 9
Manufacture and Testing of an Implant with an NSAID and a Quinolone
An implant is manufactured as described in Example 1, combining the ciprofloxacin with the NSAID naproxen. The combinations of drugs and polymer are as follows:
Table 8
Figure imgf000022_0001
The release of ciprofloxacin is decreased with the addition of naproxen. In addition to the benefits of increased drug delivery, there are therapeutic benefits introduced with the combined formulation.
It is evident from the above results that biodegradable implants formulated with an active agent and release modulator provide for release kinetics where the drug is released at a constant rate over long periods of time, avoiding the need of a patient to administer drugs in much less effective ways, such as topically. The implants provide an improved method of treating ocular and other conditions, by avoiding peaks and troughs of drug release. The implants find particular use in post-operative care of patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery, and can be used to delivery one or more therapeutically active agents to modulate wound healing and protect against infection.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

C L A I M S
1. A method for improving the post-operative success of glaucoma filtration surgery, said method comprising the steps of: introducing proximal to the surgical site an implant comprising a therapeutically active agent at a concentration from about 10 to 80 weight percent of the implant and poly-lactate glycolic acid copolymer at a concentration of at least about 20 weight percent of the implant; wherein said therapeutically active agent is released within a therapeutic dosage which does not vary by more than about 100% for a period of at least about 3 days.
2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said implant further comprises a release modulator.
3. A method according to Claim 2, wherein said release modulator is a hydrophilic entity and said therapeutically active agent is a hydrophobic entity.
4. A method according to Claim 2, wherein said release modulator is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose.
5. A method according to Claim 2, wherein said release modulator is a hydrophobic entity and said therapeutically active agent is a hydrophilic entity.
6. A method according to Claim 2, wherein said release modulator is a therapeutically active agent.
7. A method according to Claim 6, wherein said therapeutically active agent is an antiinflammatory drug and said release modulator is a water soluble antibiotic.
8. A method according to Claim 7, wherein said antiinflammatory drug is dexamethasone and said release modulator is ciprofloxacin.
9. A method according to Claim 6, wherein said therapeutically active agent is an antiinflammatory drug and said release modulator is an anti-proliferative agent.
10. An implant according to Claim 9, wherein said antiinflammatory drug is dexamethasone and said release modulator is 5-fluorouracil.
11. A method according to Claim 1 , wherein said poly-lactate glycolic acid copolymer has a relative average molecular weight between about 10 and about 60 kD.
12. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said implant is introduced intrasclerally beneath a partical-thickness scleral flap created during glaucoma filtration surgery.
13. A method according to Claim 12, comprising the additional step of positioning said implant upon introduction beneath said partial-thickness scleral flap such that said flap partially covers said implant when closed.
14. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said implant is introduced episclerally.
15. A method for improving the post-operative success of glaucoma filtration surgery, said method comprising the steps of: introducing proximal to the surgical site an implant comprising a therapeutically active agent at a concentration from about 10 to 80 weight percent of the implant and a poly-lactate glycolic acid copolymer having a relative average molecular weight between about 10 and about 60 kD at a concentration of at least about 20 weight percent of the implant; wherein said therapeutically active agent is released within a therapeutic dosage which does not vary by more than about 100% for a period of at least about 3 days.
16. A method according to Claim 15, wherein said implant further comprises a release modulator.
17. A method according to Claim 16, wherein said release modulator is a therapeutically active agent.
18. A method according to Claim 17, wherein said therapeutically active agent is an antiinflammatory drug and said release modulator is an anti-proliferative drug.
19. A method for improving the post-operative success of glaucoma filtration surgery, said method comprising the steps of: introducing proximal to the surgical site an implant comprising a therapeutically active agent at a concentration from about 10 to 50 weight percent of the implant, a release modulator at a concentration from about 10 to 50 weight percent of the implant, and at least one pharmacologically acceptable biodegradable polymer having a relative average molecular weight between about 10 and 60 kD at a concentration of at least about 20 weight percent of the implant; wherein said therapeutically active agent is released within a therapeutic dosage which does not vary by more than about 100% for a period of at least about 3 days.
20. A method according to Claim 19, wherein said pharmacologically acceptable biodegradabe polymer comprises a poly-lactate glycolic acid copolymer.
PCT/US1999/030872 1998-12-23 1999-12-22 Composition and method for treating glaucoma WO2000037056A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU25939/00A AU2593900A (en) 1998-12-23 1999-12-22 Composition and method for treating glaucoma

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/221,002 US6369116B1 (en) 1995-06-02 1998-12-23 Composition and method for treating glaucoma
US09/221,002 1998-12-23

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000037056A2 true WO2000037056A2 (en) 2000-06-29
WO2000037056A3 WO2000037056A3 (en) 2000-09-14

Family

ID=22825924

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/030872 WO2000037056A2 (en) 1998-12-23 1999-12-22 Composition and method for treating glaucoma

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US6369116B1 (en)
AU (1) AU2593900A (en)
WO (1) WO2000037056A2 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002002076A2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-10 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
WO2002043785A2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-06-06 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
WO2004112748A2 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-29 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Rate controlled release of a pharmaceutical agent in a biodegradable device
EP1550471A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2005-07-06 Allergan Inc. Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
WO2005110380A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-24 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants comprising a beta adrenergic receptor antagonist and methods for treating ocular neuropathies
EP1917957A2 (en) 2003-01-09 2008-05-07 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implant
AU2007200122B2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2008-05-15 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye II
EP2329811A1 (en) 2004-08-13 2011-06-08 Allergan, Inc. Ocular implant obtained by multiple extrusion process
US8846073B2 (en) 2006-12-19 2014-09-30 Allergan, Inc. Low temperature processes for making cyclic lipid implants for intraocular use
RU2548795C1 (en) * 2013-12-05 2015-04-20 федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение "Межотраслевой научно-технический комплекс "Микрохирургия глаза" имени академика С.Н. Федорова" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации Method for performing minimally invasive deep sclerectomy
EP1637126B1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2016-12-14 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation of the eye
US9669039B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-06-06 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-oil emulsified polymeric implants containing a hypotensive lipid and related methods
US9707238B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-07-18 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-water method for making polymeric implants containing a hypotensive lipid
US9750751B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-09-05 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related methods
US9775846B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-10-03 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related implants
US9980974B2 (en) 2013-10-31 2018-05-29 Allergan, Inc. Prostamide-containing intraocular implants and methods of use thereof
US10406029B2 (en) 2001-04-07 2019-09-10 Glaukos Corporation Ocular system with anchoring implant and therapeutic agent
EP3539597A1 (en) 2018-03-16 2019-09-18 AMW GmbH Applicator
US10959941B2 (en) 2014-05-29 2021-03-30 Glaukos Corporation Implants with controlled drug delivery features and methods of using same
US11253394B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2022-02-22 Dose Medical Corporation Controlled drug delivery ocular implants and methods of using same
US11318043B2 (en) 2016-04-20 2022-05-03 Dose Medical Corporation Bioresorbable ocular drug delivery device
US11564833B2 (en) 2015-09-25 2023-01-31 Glaukos Corporation Punctal implants with controlled drug delivery features and methods of using same
US11925578B2 (en) 2015-09-02 2024-03-12 Glaukos Corporation Drug delivery implants with bi-directional delivery capacity

Families Citing this family (102)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5869079A (en) * 1995-06-02 1999-02-09 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Formulation for controlled release of drugs by combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic agents
EP1154691A4 (en) * 1999-01-05 2004-07-07 Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm Targeted transscleral controlled release drug delivery to the retina and choroid
US6824822B2 (en) * 2001-08-31 2004-11-30 Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics Inc. Ii Residual solvent extraction method and microparticles produced thereby
TWI241531B (en) * 2001-05-22 2005-10-11 Atrua Technologies Inc Improved connection assembly for integrated circuit sensors
WO2003092665A2 (en) * 2002-05-02 2003-11-13 Massachusetts Eye And Ear Infirmary Ocular drug delivery systems and use thereof
ES2321083T3 (en) * 2002-07-15 2009-06-02 Alcon, Inc. BIOEROSIONABLE FILM FOR THE OPHTHALMIC ADMINISTRATION OF PHARMACOS.
WO2004036182A2 (en) * 2002-10-17 2004-04-29 Control Delivery Systems, Inc. Methods for monitoring treatment of disease
AU2003277446A1 (en) 2002-10-17 2004-05-04 Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Inc. Ii Microencapsulation and sustained release of biologically active polypeptides
WO2004073551A2 (en) * 2003-02-18 2004-09-02 Massachusetts Eye And Ear Infirmary Transscleral drug delivery device and related methods
US7090433B2 (en) * 2003-10-07 2006-08-15 Steve Searby Underground cable laying apparatus
US20060141049A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2006-06-29 Allergan, Inc. Triamcinolone compositions for intravitreal administration to treat ocular conditions
US20050101582A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-12 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating a posterior segment of an eye
US20050250737A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-11-10 Allergan, Inc. Therapeutic ophthalmic compositions containing retinal friendly excipients and related methods
US20070224278A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2007-09-27 Lyons Robert T Low immunogenicity corticosteroid compositions
US20080220049A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2008-09-11 Adnexus, A Bristol-Myers Squibb R&D Company Compositions and methods for intraocular delivery of fibronectin scaffold domain proteins
KR20060129246A (en) 2003-12-05 2006-12-15 컴파운드 쎄라퓨틱스, 인크. Inhibitors of type 2 vascular endothelial growth factor receptors
TWI244174B (en) * 2003-12-31 2005-11-21 Siliconware Precision Industries Co Ltd Photosensitive semiconductor package and method for fabricating the same
BRPI0506983A (en) 2004-01-20 2007-07-03 Allergan Inc localized eye therapy compositions, preferably comprising triamcinolone acetonide and hyaluronic acid
MXPA06011924A (en) * 2004-04-15 2007-06-11 Alkermes Inc Polymer-based sustained release device.
US7456254B2 (en) * 2004-04-15 2008-11-25 Alkermes, Inc. Polymer-based sustained release device
WO2006033020A2 (en) * 2004-04-26 2006-03-30 Rosetta Genomics Ltd. Methods and apparatus for the detection and validation of micrornas
US8673341B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2014-03-18 Allergan, Inc. Intraocular pressure reduction with intracameral bimatoprost implants
US20070212395A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2007-09-13 Allergan, Inc. Ocular therapy using sirtuin-activating agents
US20060182783A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2006-08-17 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular drug delivery systems
US8685435B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2014-04-01 Allergan, Inc. Extended release biodegradable ocular implants
US20050244471A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Estradiol derivative and estratopone containing sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
US8591885B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2013-11-26 Allergan, Inc. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor sustained release intraocular drug delivery systems
AU2011213904B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2014-06-05 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants comprising a beta adrenergic receptor antagonist and methods for treating ocular neuropathies
US8119154B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2012-02-21 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
US8425929B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2013-04-23 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants and methods for preventing retinal dysfunction
WO2005110374A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-24 Allergan, Inc. Intraocular drug delivery systems containing a therapeutic component, a cyclodextrin, and a polymeric component
US8147865B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2012-04-03 Allergan, Inc. Steroid-containing sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
US7589057B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2009-09-15 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-water method for making alpha-2 agonist polymeric drug delivery systems
US20050244478A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Anti-excititoxic sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
US7771742B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2010-08-10 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants containing tyrosine kinase inhibitors and related methods
US20070059336A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2007-03-15 Allergan, Inc. Anti-angiogenic sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
US20050244469A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Extended therapeutic effect ocular implant treatments
US20050244466A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Photodynamic therapy in conjunction with intraocular implants
US20050244500A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Intravitreal implants in conjuction with photodynamic therapy to improve vision
US20050244462A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Devices and methods for treating a mammalian eye
US20060182781A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2006-08-17 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating ocular conditions with cyclic lipid contraining microparticles
US8529927B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2013-09-10 Allergan, Inc. Alpha-2 agonist polymeric drug delivery systems
US8512738B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2013-08-20 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable intravitreal tyrosine kinase implants
US20050244463A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants and methods for treating ocular vasculopathies
AU2005249966A1 (en) * 2004-05-27 2005-12-15 Clarity Corporation Glaucoma shunt
WO2006017347A2 (en) * 2004-07-12 2006-02-16 Allergan, Inc. Opthalmic compositions and methods for treating ophthalmic conditions
US8541413B2 (en) * 2004-10-01 2013-09-24 Ramscor, Inc. Sustained release eye drop formulations
US20080038316A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2008-02-14 Wong Vernon G Conveniently implantable sustained release drug compositions
EP3173072A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2017-05-31 Ramscor, Inc. Conveniently implantable sustained release drug compositions
US9993558B2 (en) 2004-10-01 2018-06-12 Ramscor, Inc. Sustained release eye drop formulations
US20060204548A1 (en) * 2005-03-01 2006-09-14 Allergan, Inc. Microimplants for ocular administration
US20060233858A1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2006-10-19 Allergan, Inc. Systems and methods providing targeted intraocular drug delivery
US7931909B2 (en) * 2005-05-10 2011-04-26 Allergan, Inc. Ocular therapy using alpha-2 adrenergic receptor compounds having enhanced anterior clearance rates
JP5122460B2 (en) * 2005-09-16 2013-01-16 アラーガン、インコーポレイテッド Compositions and methods for intraocular delivery of therapeutic agents
WO2007047607A2 (en) 2005-10-18 2007-04-26 Allergan, Inc. Ocular therapy using glucocorticoid derivatives selectively penetrating posterior segment tissues
NZ568694A (en) * 2005-11-09 2011-09-30 Zalicus Inc Method, compositions, and kits for the treatment of medical conditions
US20070178138A1 (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-02 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable non-opthalmic implants and related methods
EP1993584B1 (en) 2006-02-02 2012-05-30 Allergan, Inc. Inhibitors of CXCR4 activity for use in the treatment of ocular disorders
US20070260203A1 (en) * 2006-05-04 2007-11-08 Allergan, Inc. Vasoactive agent intraocular implant
US8802128B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2014-08-12 Allergan, Inc. Steroid-containing sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
US20070298073A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2007-12-27 Allergan, Inc. Steroid-containing sustained release intraocular implants and related methods
EP1905466B1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2017-05-31 Brainlab AG Identification of an infusion region in the heterogeneous tissue
EP2068828A2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2009-06-17 SurModics, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implants and methods for treating ocular conditions
TW200831497A (en) * 2006-10-12 2008-08-01 Epix Delaware Inc Carboxamide compounds and their use
US8586556B2 (en) 2006-11-03 2013-11-19 Allergan, Inc. Methods, compositions and drug delivery systems for intraocular delivery of siRNA molecules
US8039010B2 (en) 2006-11-03 2011-10-18 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular drug delivery systems comprising a water soluble therapeutic agent and a release modifier
KR20090110295A (en) 2006-11-22 2009-10-21 에드넥서스, 어 브리스톨-마이어스 스퀴브 알&디 컴파니 Targeted therapeutics based on engineered proteins for tyrosine kinases receptors, including igf-ir
WO2008070479A2 (en) 2006-12-01 2008-06-12 Allergan, Inc. Method for determining optimum intraocular locations for drug delivery systems
US8969415B2 (en) * 2006-12-01 2015-03-03 Allergan, Inc. Intraocular drug delivery systems
JP2010522196A (en) * 2007-03-22 2010-07-01 アルカームズ,インコーポレイテッド Coacervation process
SI2142186T1 (en) 2007-03-30 2014-08-29 Laccure Ab Use of oligomers of lactic acid in the treatment of gynaecological infections
US7911053B2 (en) * 2007-04-19 2011-03-22 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Semiconductor packaging with internal wiring bus
US8231892B2 (en) 2007-05-24 2012-07-31 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable drug delivery system
WO2008157540A1 (en) * 2007-06-20 2008-12-24 Alkermes, Inc. Quench liquids and washing systems for production of microparticles
KR20100102646A (en) 2007-12-11 2010-09-24 가부시키가이샤 사이토파스파인더 Carboxamide compounds and their use as chemokine receptor agonists
AU2009213141A1 (en) 2008-02-14 2009-08-20 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Targeted therapeutics based on engineered proteins that bind EGFR
US8524267B2 (en) * 2008-04-18 2013-09-03 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Dexamethasone formulations in a biodegradable material
US20090264478A1 (en) * 2008-04-18 2009-10-22 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Sulfasalazine formulations in a biodegradable polymer carrier
US9877973B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2018-01-30 University Of Utah Research Foundation Intraocular drug delivery device and associated methods
WO2009140246A2 (en) 2008-05-12 2009-11-19 University Of Utah Research Foundation Intraocular drug delivery device and associated methods
US9095404B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2015-08-04 University Of Utah Research Foundation Intraocular drug delivery device and associated methods
US10064819B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2018-09-04 University Of Utah Research Foundation Intraocular drug delivery device and associated methods
PE20091931A1 (en) 2008-05-22 2009-12-31 Bristol Myers Squibb Co MULTIVALENT FIBRONECTIN-BASED FRAME DOMAIN PROTEINS
US8591961B2 (en) 2008-09-04 2013-11-26 Allergan, Inc. Aesthetic treatment of scars and aging skin
US9095506B2 (en) 2008-11-17 2015-08-04 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable alpha-2 agonist polymeric implants and therapeutic uses thereof
US8034813B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2011-10-11 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Polymorphs of brimonidine pamoate
TWI496582B (en) 2008-11-24 2015-08-21 必治妥美雅史谷比公司 Bispecific egfr/igfir binding molecules
US20110105990A1 (en) * 2009-11-04 2011-05-05 Silvestrini Thomas A Zonal drug delivery device and method
EP2498783B1 (en) 2009-11-09 2018-08-22 Allergan, Inc. Compositions and methods for stimulating hair growth
US8529492B2 (en) 2009-12-23 2013-09-10 Trascend Medical, Inc. Drug delivery devices and methods
AU2011207281B2 (en) 2010-01-22 2016-10-20 Allergan, Inc. Intracameral sustained release therapeutic agent implants
WO2011150133A2 (en) 2010-05-26 2011-12-01 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Fibronectin based scaffold proteins having improved stability
US10245178B1 (en) 2011-06-07 2019-04-02 Glaukos Corporation Anterior chamber drug-eluting ocular implant
US8945214B2 (en) 2011-12-19 2015-02-03 Allergan, Inc. Intravitreal applicator
CA2901280A1 (en) 2013-02-15 2014-08-21 Allergan, Inc. Sustained drug delivery implant
US20170106047A1 (en) * 2014-06-12 2017-04-20 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York Methods of using gap junctions as therapeutic targets for the treatment of degenerative disorders of the retina
WO2017173327A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Inc. Endomucin inhibitor as an anti-angiogenic agent
WO2018093797A1 (en) 2016-11-15 2018-05-24 The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Inc. Compositions and methods for the treatment of aberrant angiogenesis
US11260048B2 (en) 2017-10-03 2022-03-01 The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Inc. Compounds and compositions for inhibiting retinal pigment epithelium degeneration and methods using the same
CA3082643A1 (en) 2017-11-14 2019-05-23 The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Inc. Runx1 inhibition for treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and conditions associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition
WO2023105417A1 (en) 2021-12-06 2023-06-15 Breye Therapeutics Aps Danegaptide formulation for applicatoin in the eye
CN114158738A (en) * 2021-12-07 2022-03-11 喜园(广东)生物科技有限公司 Antioxidant beautifying cubilose collagen peptide composition and preparation method thereof

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996013286A2 (en) * 1994-10-26 1996-05-09 Houston Biotechnology Incorporated Modulation of cell proliferation and wound healing
WO1996038174A1 (en) * 1995-06-02 1996-12-05 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Improved formulation for controlled release of drugs by combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic agents

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4478818A (en) 1982-12-27 1984-10-23 Alza Corporation Ocular preparation housing steroid in two different therapeutic forms
US4863457A (en) * 1986-11-24 1989-09-05 Lee David A Drug delivery device
US4997652A (en) 1987-12-22 1991-03-05 Visionex Biodegradable ocular implants
US4865846A (en) * 1988-06-03 1989-09-12 Kaufman Herbert E Drug delivery system
US5268178A (en) * 1989-09-25 1993-12-07 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Biodegradable antibiotic implants and methods of their use in treating and preventing infections
US5164188A (en) 1989-11-22 1992-11-17 Visionex, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implants
US5075115A (en) 1990-04-02 1991-12-24 Fmc Corporation Process for polymerizing poly(lactic acid)
KR0185215B1 (en) 1990-11-30 1999-05-01 요시다 쇼오지 A controlled-release pharmaceutical preparation for intra-ocular implant
US5356629A (en) 1991-07-12 1994-10-18 United States Surgical Corporation Composition for effecting bone repair
US5656297A (en) * 1992-03-12 1997-08-12 Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Incorporated Modulated release from biocompatible polymers
US5707643A (en) * 1993-02-26 1998-01-13 Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Biodegradable scleral plug
US5385887A (en) 1993-09-10 1995-01-31 Genetics Institute, Inc. Formulations for delivery of osteogenic proteins

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996013286A2 (en) * 1994-10-26 1996-05-09 Houston Biotechnology Incorporated Modulation of cell proliferation and wound healing
WO1996038174A1 (en) * 1995-06-02 1996-12-05 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Improved formulation for controlled release of drugs by combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic agents

Cited By (52)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2001273166B2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2005-10-27 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
EP3167872A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2017-05-17 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
WO2002002076A3 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-07-04 Oculex Pharm Inc Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
AU2007200122B2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2008-05-15 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye II
EP1637126B1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2016-12-14 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation of the eye
WO2002002076A2 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-10 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
US10206934B2 (en) 2000-07-05 2019-02-19 Allergan, Inc. Implants and methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
US9775849B2 (en) 2000-07-05 2017-10-03 Allergan, Inc. Implants and methods for treating inflammation-mediated conditions of the eye
US6699493B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2004-03-02 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor
EP1550471A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2005-07-06 Allergan Inc. Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
EP1621219A2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2006-02-01 Allergan, Inc. Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
EP1621219A3 (en) * 2000-11-29 2006-03-22 Allergan, Inc. Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
US7033605B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2006-04-25 Allergan, Inc. Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor
WO2002043785A3 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-11-21 Oculex Pharm Inc Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
US20170182064A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2017-06-29 Allergan, Inc. Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor
WO2002043785A2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-06-06 Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Intraocular implants for preventing transplant rejection in the eye
US10406029B2 (en) 2001-04-07 2019-09-10 Glaukos Corporation Ocular system with anchoring implant and therapeutic agent
EP3187177A1 (en) 2003-01-09 2017-07-05 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implant
US10076526B2 (en) 2003-01-09 2018-09-18 Allergan, Inc. Ocular implant made by a double extrusion process
EP2799064A1 (en) 2003-01-09 2014-11-05 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implant
US10702539B2 (en) 2003-01-09 2020-07-07 Allergan, Inc. Ocular implant made by a double extrusion process
EP3563839A1 (en) 2003-01-09 2019-11-06 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implant
US8048445B2 (en) 2003-01-09 2011-11-01 Allergan, Inc. Ocular implant made by a double extrusion process
EP3305284A1 (en) 2003-01-09 2018-04-11 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implant
EP1917957A2 (en) 2003-01-09 2008-05-07 Allergan, Inc. Biodegradable ocular implant
WO2004112748A3 (en) * 2003-06-16 2005-02-10 Bausch & Lomb Rate controlled release of a pharmaceutical agent in a biodegradable device
WO2004112748A2 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-29 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Rate controlled release of a pharmaceutical agent in a biodegradable device
US10398707B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2019-09-03 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related implants
EP2361617A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2011-08-31 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants comprising a beta adrenergic receptor antagonist and methods for treating ocular neuropathies
US10406168B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2019-09-10 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-oil emulsified polymeric implants containing a hypotensive lipid and related methods
US9775846B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-10-03 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related implants
US10864218B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2020-12-15 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related methods
US9750751B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-09-05 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related methods
US10064872B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2018-09-04 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-water method for making polymeric implants containing a hypotensive lipid
WO2005110380A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2005-11-24 Allergan, Inc. Sustained release intraocular implants comprising a beta adrenergic receptor antagonist and methods for treating ocular neuropathies
US9707238B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-07-18 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-water method for making polymeric implants containing a hypotensive lipid
US10328086B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2019-06-25 Allergan, Inc. Hypotensive lipid-containing biodegradable intraocular implants and related methods
US9669039B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2017-06-06 Allergan, Inc. Oil-in-oil emulsified polymeric implants containing a hypotensive lipid and related methods
EP2329811A1 (en) 2004-08-13 2011-06-08 Allergan, Inc. Ocular implant obtained by multiple extrusion process
US8846073B2 (en) 2006-12-19 2014-09-30 Allergan, Inc. Low temperature processes for making cyclic lipid implants for intraocular use
US10441543B2 (en) 2006-12-19 2019-10-15 Allergan, Inc. Processes for making cyclic lipid implants for intraocular use
US9149428B2 (en) 2006-12-19 2015-10-06 Allergan, Inc. Processes for making cyclic lipid implants for intraocular use
US11426306B2 (en) 2009-05-18 2022-08-30 Dose Medical Corporation Implants with controlled drug delivery features and methods of using same
US11253394B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2022-02-22 Dose Medical Corporation Controlled drug delivery ocular implants and methods of using same
US9980974B2 (en) 2013-10-31 2018-05-29 Allergan, Inc. Prostamide-containing intraocular implants and methods of use thereof
RU2548795C1 (en) * 2013-12-05 2015-04-20 федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение "Межотраслевой научно-технический комплекс "Микрохирургия глаза" имени академика С.Н. Федорова" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации Method for performing minimally invasive deep sclerectomy
US10959941B2 (en) 2014-05-29 2021-03-30 Glaukos Corporation Implants with controlled drug delivery features and methods of using same
US11925578B2 (en) 2015-09-02 2024-03-12 Glaukos Corporation Drug delivery implants with bi-directional delivery capacity
US11564833B2 (en) 2015-09-25 2023-01-31 Glaukos Corporation Punctal implants with controlled drug delivery features and methods of using same
US11318043B2 (en) 2016-04-20 2022-05-03 Dose Medical Corporation Bioresorbable ocular drug delivery device
DE102018106217A1 (en) 2018-03-16 2019-09-19 Amw Gmbh applicator
EP3539597A1 (en) 2018-03-16 2019-09-18 AMW GmbH Applicator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2000037056A3 (en) 2000-09-14
US6369116B1 (en) 2002-04-09
AU2593900A (en) 2000-07-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6369116B1 (en) Composition and method for treating glaucoma
CA2222889C (en) Improved formulation for controlled release of drugs by combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic agents
US5766242A (en) Biocompatible ocular implants
KR101511481B1 (en) Intraocular drug delivery systems
US20050244465A1 (en) Drug delivery systems and methods for treatment of an eye
US20060280774A1 (en) Compositions and methods for treating glaucoma
JP2004516889A (en) Sustained release drug delivery device with multiple drugs
Deshpande et al. Bioerodible polymers for ocular drug delivery
CA2176145C (en) Biocompatible ocular implants
MXPA97009218A (en) Improved formulation to control the release of drugs by the combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic agents
AU731486B2 (en) Biocompatible ocular implants

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase