WO1999067946A1 - Hdtv channel equalizer - Google Patents

Hdtv channel equalizer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999067946A1
WO1999067946A1 PCT/US1999/012143 US9912143W WO9967946A1 WO 1999067946 A1 WO1999067946 A1 WO 1999067946A1 US 9912143 W US9912143 W US 9912143W WO 9967946 A1 WO9967946 A1 WO 9967946A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signal
dff
decision
equalizer
fff
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/012143
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Dong-Chang Shiue
Kumar Ramaswamy
Paul Gothard Knutson
Original Assignee
Thomson Licensing S.A.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thomson Licensing S.A. filed Critical Thomson Licensing S.A.
Priority to JP2000556498A priority Critical patent/JP2002519895A/en
Priority to AU42270/99A priority patent/AU4227099A/en
Publication of WO1999067946A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999067946A1/en
Priority to HK02100669A priority patent/HK1039014A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/015High-definition television systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N5/00Details of television systems
    • H04N5/14Picture signal circuitry for video frequency region
    • H04N5/21Circuitry for suppressing or minimising disturbance, e.g. moiré or halo
    • H04N5/211Ghost signal cancellation

Definitions

  • This invention concerns adaptive equalization of a video signal transmission channel which may contain high definition television information.
  • Timing recovery is a process by which a receiver clock (timebase) is synchronized to a transmitter clock. This permits the received signal to be sampled at the optimum point in time to reduce the chance of a slicing error associated with decision-directed processing of received symbol values.
  • Carrier recovery is a process by which a received RF signal, after being frequency down converted to a lower intermediate frequency passband (eg., near baseband), is frequency shifted to baseband to permit recovery of the modulating baseband information.
  • ISI baseband intersymbol interference
  • An adaptive equalizer is essentially an adaptive digital filter. In systems using an adaptive equalizer, it is necessary to provide a method of adapting the filter response so as to adequately compensate for channel distortions.
  • Several algorithms are available for adapting the filter coefficients and thereby the filter response.
  • One widely used method employs the Least Mean Squares (LMS) algorithm.
  • LMS Least Mean Squares
  • the equalizer output signal is forced to approximate a reference data sequence. This error signal is formed by subtracting the equalizer output signal from the reference data sequence. As the error signal approaches zero, the equalizer approaches convergence whereby the equalizer output signal and the reference data sequence are approximately equal.
  • the coefficient values are usually not set at values which produce adequate compensation of channel distortions.
  • a known "training” signal may be used as the reference signal. This signal is programmed at both the transmitter and receiver. The error signal is formed at the receiver by subtracting a locally generated copy of the training signal from the output of the adaptive equalizer. The training signal helps to open the initially occluded "eye" of the received signal, as known. After adaption with the training signal, the "eye" has opened considerably and the equalizer is switched to a decision-directed operating mode. In this mode final convergence of the filter tap weights is achieved by using the actual values of symbols from the output of the equalizer instead of using the training signal.
  • the decision directed equalizing mode is capable of tracking and cancelling time varying channel distortions more rapidly than methods using periodically transmitted training signals.
  • decision directed equalization In order for decision directed equalization to provide reliable convergence and stable coefficient values, approximately 90% of the decisions must be correct.
  • the training signal helps the equalizer achieve this 90% correct decision level.
  • blind equalization is often used to provide initial convergence of the equalizer coefficient values and to force the eye to open.
  • filter coefficients are coarsely adjusted in response to an error signal which is calculated by employing a known function, or algorithm.
  • CMA Constant Modulus Algorithm
  • RCA Reduced Constellation Algorithm
  • the CMA relies on the fact that, at the decision instants, the modulus of the detected data symbols should lie on a locus of points defining one of several (constellation) circles of different diameters.
  • the RCA relies on forming "super constellations" within the main transmitted constellation. The data signal is first forced to fit into a super constellation, then the super constellation is subdivided to include the entire constellation.
  • the FFF In a conventional system using a feed forward filter (FFF) and a decision feedback filter (DFF) as equalizers, the FFF typically performs adaptive blind equalization (not decision-directed) during the initial signal acquisition interval. The DFF does not provide equalization at this time. At the end of the blind equalization interval, the DFF is activated for decision- directed equalization. In the decision-directed mode, filter coefficients are updated to finer values by using a decision error signal which is calculated by using a known decision function. At this time both the FFF and the DFF have their coefficients adapted (updated) in response to locally generated control signals in a decision-directed mode, eg., based on differences between symbol samples appearing at the input and the output of a slicer network. This approach has disadvantages.
  • FFF feed forward filter
  • DFF decision feedback filter
  • a digital signal processor includes a decision feedback filter (DFF) which exhibits different operating modes before and during decision-directed equalization. Specifically, the DFF operates as a linear feedback filter during blind equalization, and as a nonlinear filter in the decision-directed mode after blind equalization.
  • DFF decision feedback filter
  • a digital channel equalizer for processing a demodulated VSB signal containing high definition video information comprises a feed forward filter (FFF) and a decision feedback filter (DFF). Both the FFF and DFF operate adaptively in both blind and decision-directed modes.
  • FFF feed forward filter
  • DFF decision feedback filter
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portion of an advanced television receiver, such as a high definition television (HDTV) receiver, including an adaptive equalizer system according to the principles of the present invention.
  • an advanced television receiver such as a high definition television (HDTV) receiver
  • HDTV high definition television
  • Figure 2 depicts a data frame format for a VSB signal according to the Grand Alliance HDTV system.
  • a modulated analog HDTV signal received by an antenna 10 is processed by an input network 14 including RF tuning circuits, a double conversion tuner for producing an intermediate frequency passband output signal, and appropriate gain control circuits, for example.
  • the received signal is a VSB modulated signal as proposed for use by the Grand Alliance HDTV system in the United States.
  • Such a VSB signal is represented by a one- dimensional data symbol constellation wherein only one axis contains quantized data to be recovered by the receiver.
  • each data frame comprises two fields with each field including 313 segments of 832 multilevel symbols.
  • the first segment of each field is referred to as a field segment, and the remaining 312 segments are data segments.
  • the data segments contain MPEG compatible data packets.
  • Each data segment comprises a four symbol segment sync character followed by 828 data symbols.
  • Each field segment comprises a four symbol segment sync character followed by a field sync component comprising a predetermined 511 symbol pseudorandom number (PN) sequence and three predetermined 63 symbol PN sequences, the middle one of which is inverted in successive fields.
  • PN pseudorandom number
  • a VSB mode control signal (defining the VSB symbol constellation size follows the last 63 PN sequence, which is in turn followed by 96 reserved symbols and 12 symbols copied from the previous field.
  • the passband output signal from unit 14 is converted to a baseband signal by VSB demodulator and carrier recovery network 18.
  • network 18 contains circuits arranged as described in the Grand Alliance HDTV System Specification, and in an article by W. Bretl et al., "VSB Modem Subsystem Design for Grand Alliance Digital Television Receivers," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, August 1995. Briefly, carrier recovery may be performed by a frequency and phase locked loop using the small pilot signal component included in the broadcast HDTV VSB signal.
  • the output baseband signal from network 18 contains only recovered I-channel data symbols along a real axis.
  • the demodulated symbol information from network 18 is converted to a digital datastream by an analog to digital converter 19.
  • Data segment synchronization recovery and clock (timing) recovery are performed by unit 15, which may include networks as described in the Grand Alliance HDTV System Specification and in the Bretl et al. article mentioned previously.
  • a Segment Sync Detect Signal is provided when data segment synchronization and timing recovery have been achieved.
  • the output of analog to digital converter 19 is also applied to a data field (frame) sync component detector 17.
  • Detector 17 provides a Field Sync Detect output signal to microprocessor 66 when the data field sync component has been detected.
  • the digital data from unit 19 is processed by an adaptive equalizer network 50 as will be discussed.
  • An equalized baseband output signal from network 50 is decoded by unit 60 and processed by output network 64.
  • Decoder 60 includes, for example, trellis decoding, data de-interleaver, Reed-Solomon error correction and audio/video decoder networks as known and described, for example, in the Bretl article mentioned above.
  • Output processor 64 includes audio/video processors and audio/video reproduction devices.
  • the segment sync and field sync detection circuits in units 15 and 17 provide output Segment Sync Detect and Field Sync Detect input signals to control signal generator 66 (eg., including a microprocessor) when these sync components of the received signal are detected.
  • Microprocessor 66 responds to these signals for providing output Control signals and an output reference PN (pseudorandom number sequence) signal to equalizer 50 as will be discussed.
  • the PN training signal sequence is a fixed repetitive pattern of binary data as specified by the Grand Alliance HDTV specification, and is a preprogrammed reference signal acquired by control signal generator 66 from memory 70.
  • Control signals control the switching of Multiplexers 26, 28 and 29 in the blind, training and decision-directed operating modes as will be discussed.
  • the output signal from unit 19 contains digital data as well as inter- symbol interference (ISI) caused by transmission channel disturbances and artifacts.
  • ISI inter- symbol interference
  • This signal is applied to a real (in contrast to a complex) feedforward filter (FFF) 20 operating as an equalizer, eg., a symbol rate spaced (“T-spaced") equalizer, which in this case is implemented as a digital FIR filter.
  • FFF feedforward filter
  • the coefficient values (tap weights) of equalizer filter 20 are adaptively controlled by a Coefficient Control signal from multiplexer 26 as will be discussed.
  • the equalized signal from filter 20 is combined by an adder 24 with an equalized signal from a decision feedback filter 30 operating as an equalizer.
  • DFF 30 removes intersymbol interference not removed by FFF 20.
  • the coefficient values (tap weights), of equalizer filter 30 also are adaptively controlled by the Coefficient Control signal (i.e., the switched Error signal) from multiplexer 26.
  • the input signal to be equalized by DFF 30 is provided from multiplexer 28.
  • Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 have coefficient values adapted (updated) in response to the Coefficient Control signal during blind and decision directed operation modes.
  • Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 are digital FIR filters which individually perform equalizing functions. When considered together, these filters represent an aggregate equalizer 50 for equalizing the input signal to decoder 60.
  • FFF 20 equalizes pre-ghost components
  • DFF 30 equalizes post-ghost components
  • FFF 20 and DFF 30 operate in a linear infinite impulse response (IIR) mode from the time the input signal is initially received. Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 are FIR devices, but feedback operation causes DFF 30 to operate as an IIR device.
  • IIR infinite impulse response
  • the output signal from adder 24 is the output signal of equalizer 50.
  • the output of adder 24 is coupled to a network including multiplexers 26 and 28, a slicer 40, a subtractive combiner 21 and a source 25 which provides a CMA blind adaption algorithm.
  • Mux 26 provides either of two signals to coefficient control inputs of
  • FFF 20 and DFF 30 in response to a Control signal produced by microprocessor 66 for various operating modes when field sync and segment sync components are detected, as will be explained.
  • These signals from Mux 26 include the CMA blind adaption algorithm from unit 25 which responds to the Equalizer Output signal, and an Error signal from the output of subtractive combiner 21.
  • the Error signal represents the difference between the input signal of slicer 40 and the output of a third multiplexer 29.
  • Mux 28 provides either of three input signals to a signal input of DFF
  • Mux 28 in response to a Control signal from microprocessor 66.
  • These signals include the equalizer 50 output signal as applied via a direct connection to a first input (1) of Mux 28, the output signal from slicer 40 applied to a second input (2) of Mux 28, and the stored PN reference signal from memory 70 and unit 66 applied to a third input (3) of Mux 28.
  • Multiplexer 29 responds to a switching Control signal from microprocessor 66 and receives as inputs the reference PN training signal sequence during field sync intervals, and the output signal from slicer 40 at other times.
  • the output of Mux 29 is applied to subtractive combiner 21 where it is differenced with the output signal from equalizer 50 to produce the Error signal.
  • the Error signal represents either the difference between the slicer 40 and the equalizer 50 output signals, or the difference between the reference PN signal and the PN signal component of the received datastream as contained in the equalizer 50 output signal.
  • equalizer 50 exhibits an initial condition, a blind operating mode, a data-directed training mode, a decision-directed mode, and a steady-state equalized condition.
  • the blind mode occurs when the characteristic eight level "eye" pattern of the received 8-VSB signal exhibits a closed eye pattern. Training and decision-directed operation occur afterwards, when the "eye" exhibits an open eye pattern. It is noted that it is not necessary for the "eye” pattern to open if the received training signal component is detected immediately. In such case the training signal component is used as soon as it is detected, even before the "eye” pattern opens.
  • the process of blind equalization using the CMA algorithm begins next, after coarse timing is achieved. This occurs when the segment sync component of the received signal is detected. Carrier lock and AGC lock are present. At such time the Segment Sync Detect signal is conveyed to microprocessor 66, which in turn generates appropriate Control signals.
  • the process of blind equalization involves the use of the CMA algorithm before the field sync component of the received signal is detected. Specifically, a Control signal applied to Mux 26 causes Mux 26 to convey the CMA algorithm from its input (1) to the coefficient control inputs of FFF 20 and DFF 30, and a Control signal applied to Mux 28 causes Mux 28 to convey the equalizer output signal from its input (1) to the signal input of DFF 30.
  • the output of Mux 29 is a "don't care" condition during the blind equalizing interval.
  • the processes of training and decision-directed equalization occur next, when timing lock is achieved after the field sync component is detected.
  • the training mode occurs when the received PN signal component is available during the field sync interval of each data frame.
  • the decision-directed mode occurs at other times during each data frame.
  • the presence of the field sync component initiates the start of the PN sequence training mode.
  • the Field Sync Detect signal is conveyed to microprocessor 66, which in turn generates appropriate Control signals.
  • the Control signals respectively applied to Mux 26, 28 and 29 cause (a) a training Error signal to be coupled to the coefficient control inputs of FFF 20 and DFF 30 via Mux 26, (b) the reference PN signal to be conveyed to the signal input of DFF 30 via Mux 28, and (c) the reference PN signal to be coupled to combiner 21 via Mux 29.
  • the Control signals respectively applied to Mux 26, 28 and 29 cause (a) a slice Error signal to be coupled to the coefficient control inputs of FFF 20 and DFF 30 via Mux 26, (b) the output of slicer 40 to be conveyed to the signal input of DFF 30 via Mux 28, and (c) the output of slicer 40 to be coupled to combiner 21 via Mux 29.
  • equalizer 50 The operation of equalizer 50 described above is summarized by the following table.
  • Equalizer 50 comprises real rather than complex filters 20 and 30, and does not require the use of rotator or de-rotator circuits (eg., in the equalizer control loop).
  • a rotator/derotator is basically a circuit for circularly translating a data symbol constellation to compensate for unwanted frequency and phase offsets in a received signal.
  • Adaptive equalizer 50 operates as a linear IIR filter, thereby improving the equalizer capabilities since DFF 30 provides some equalization even in the blind mode when DFF 30 operates as a linear feedback filter, before operating as a non-linear filter in the decision-directed mode following blind equalization.
  • the initial operation of DFF 30 as a linear feedback filter produces some convergence which facilitates system equalization, particularly in the presence of significant signal ghosts. In particular, at this time DFF 30 exhibits the ability of a feedback filter to cancel distant ghost components.
  • the disclosed system exhibits a smoother transition from a linear operating mode to a non-linear decision-directed mode after blind equalization, compared to a conventional system using FFF and DFF equalization. This is because DFF 30 begins operation in the non-linear mode after having been pre-conditioned by operating in the linear mode, i.e., many of its coefficients have been adapted in the direction of final values.
  • Equalizer 50 is essentially a hardware and data efficient adaptive recursive linear filter that takes advantage of all available data to achieve equalization for a high definition VSB modulated signal as soon as possible.
  • Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 operate at the symbol rate, and a PN sequence is used to facilitate fast equalization.
  • Data processing occurs continuously online in real time, and advantageously uses a direct connection from the output of equalizer 50 to DFF 30 via Mux 28 to allow DFF 30 to facilitate coarse signal acquisition during the blind operating mode.
  • decision feedback filter 30 is advantageously used in a linear mode during blind equalization, then responds to a PN signal in the training mode, and to the slicer output during the decision-directed mode, as discussed.

Abstract

An adaptive channel equalizer (50) for processing a demodulated VSB signal containing terrestrial broadcast high definition television information includes an adaptive feed forward filter (FFF 20) and an adaptive decision feedback filter (DFF 30). The equalizer is preceded by a demodulator/carrier recovery network (18) and does not include a carrier recovery function in the equalizer control loop. The equalizer FFF and DFF elements operate adaptively in blind, training, and decision-directed modes. A direct connection provided from the equalizer output to the DFF facilitates coarse signal acquisition and equalization during the blind operating mode.

Description

HDTV CHANNEL EQUALIZER
This invention concerns adaptive equalization of a video signal transmission channel which may contain high definition television information.
The recovery of data from modulated signals conveying digital information in symbol form usually requires three functions at a receiver: timing recovery for symbol synchronization, carrier recovery (frequency demodulation to baseband), and channel equalization. Timing recovery is a process by which a receiver clock (timebase) is synchronized to a transmitter clock. This permits the received signal to be sampled at the optimum point in time to reduce the chance of a slicing error associated with decision-directed processing of received symbol values. Carrier recovery is a process by which a received RF signal, after being frequency down converted to a lower intermediate frequency passband (eg., near baseband), is frequency shifted to baseband to permit recovery of the modulating baseband information.
Many digital data communications systems employ adaptive equalization to compensate for the effects of changing channel conditions and disturbances on the signal transmission channel. The equalization process estimates the transfer function of the transmission channel and applies the inverse of the transfer function to the received signal so as to reduce or eliminate the distortion effects. Channel equalization typically employs filters that remove from a received signal amplitude and phase distortions resulting from a frequency dependent time variant response of the transmission channel, for example, to thereby provide improved_symbol decision capability. Equalization removes baseband intersymbol interference (ISI) caused by transmission channel disturbances including the low pass filtering effect of the transmission channel. ISI causes the value of a given symbol to be distorted by the values of preceding and following symbols, and essentially represents symbol "ghosts" since ISI includes advanced and delayed symbols with respect to a reference symbol location in a given decision region.
An adaptive equalizer is essentially an adaptive digital filter. In systems using an adaptive equalizer, it is necessary to provide a method of adapting the filter response so as to adequately compensate for channel distortions. Several algorithms are available for adapting the filter coefficients and thereby the filter response. One widely used method employs the Least Mean Squares (LMS) algorithm. In this algorithm, by varying coefficient values as a function of a representative error signal, the equalizer output signal is forced to approximate a reference data sequence. This error signal is formed by subtracting the equalizer output signal from the reference data sequence. As the error signal approaches zero, the equalizer approaches convergence whereby the equalizer output signal and the reference data sequence are approximately equal.
When the equalizer operation is initiated, the coefficient values (filter tap weights) are usually not set at values which produce adequate compensation of channel distortions. In order to force initial convergence of the equalizer coefficients, a known "training" signal may be used as the reference signal. This signal is programmed at both the transmitter and receiver. The error signal is formed at the receiver by subtracting a locally generated copy of the training signal from the output of the adaptive equalizer. The training signal helps to open the initially occluded "eye" of the received signal, as known. After adaption with the training signal, the "eye" has opened considerably and the equalizer is switched to a decision-directed operating mode. In this mode final convergence of the filter tap weights is achieved by using the actual values of symbols from the output of the equalizer instead of using the training signal. The decision directed equalizing mode is capable of tracking and cancelling time varying channel distortions more rapidly than methods using periodically transmitted training signals. In order for decision directed equalization to provide reliable convergence and stable coefficient values, approximately 90% of the decisions must be correct. The training signal helps the equalizer achieve this 90% correct decision level.
In some systems, however, a training signal is not available. In such case "blind" equalization is often used to provide initial convergence of the equalizer coefficient values and to force the eye to open. In the blind mode, filter coefficients are coarsely adjusted in response to an error signal which is calculated by employing a known function, or algorithm. Among the most popular blind equalization algorithms are the Constant Modulus Algorithm (CMA) and the Reduced Constellation Algorithm (RCA). These algorithms are discussed, for example, in Proakis, Digital Communications, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1989 and in Godard, Self-Recovering Equalization and Carrier Tracking in Two Dimensional Data Communication Systems," IEEE Transactions on Communications, Nov. 1980. Briefly, the CMA relies on the fact that, at the decision instants, the modulus of the detected data symbols should lie on a locus of points defining one of several (constellation) circles of different diameters. The RCA relies on forming "super constellations" within the main transmitted constellation. The data signal is first forced to fit into a super constellation, then the super constellation is subdivided to include the entire constellation.
In a conventional system using a feed forward filter (FFF) and a decision feedback filter (DFF) as equalizers, the FFF typically performs adaptive blind equalization (not decision-directed) during the initial signal acquisition interval. The DFF does not provide equalization at this time. At the end of the blind equalization interval, the DFF is activated for decision- directed equalization. In the decision-directed mode, filter coefficients are updated to finer values by using a decision error signal which is calculated by using a known decision function. At this time both the FFF and the DFF have their coefficients adapted (updated) in response to locally generated control signals in a decision-directed mode, eg., based on differences between symbol samples appearing at the input and the output of a slicer network. This approach has disadvantages. If significant ISI and ghost effects are present, it will be difficult for the FFF to achieve equalization since the filter center tap will be contaminated by symbol "ghosts." To equalize pre- and post-ghosts, the FFF employs both pre-cursor and post-cursor taps. The post-cursor taps of the FFF overlap with the post-cursor taps of the DFF, which is not an efficient use of filter taps. This limitation is avoided by a system of the type described in US Patent 5,712,873-Shiue et al. In that system, a digital signal processor includes a decision feedback filter (DFF) which exhibits different operating modes before and during decision-directed equalization. Specifically, the DFF operates as a linear feedback filter during blind equalization, and as a nonlinear filter in the decision-directed mode after blind equalization.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a digital channel equalizer for processing a demodulated VSB signal containing high definition video information comprises a feed forward filter (FFF) and a decision feedback filter (DFF). Both the FFF and DFF operate adaptively in both blind and decision-directed modes.
Brief Description of the Drawing
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a portion of an advanced television receiver, such as a high definition television (HDTV) receiver, including an adaptive equalizer system according to the principles of the present invention.
Figure 2 depicts a data frame format for a VSB signal according to the Grand Alliance HDTV system.
In Figure 1, a modulated analog HDTV signal received by an antenna 10 is processed by an input network 14 including RF tuning circuits, a double conversion tuner for producing an intermediate frequency passband output signal, and appropriate gain control circuits, for example. The received signal is a VSB modulated signal as proposed for use by the Grand Alliance HDTV system in the United States. Such a VSB signal is represented by a one- dimensional data symbol constellation wherein only one axis contains quantized data to be recovered by the receiver. To simplify Figure 1, not shown are signals for clocking the illustrated functional blocks or a timing recovery network (as known) for deriving timing and clock signals from the received signal.
As described in the Grand Alliance HDTV System Specification dated April 14, 1994, the VSB transmission system transmits data with a prescribed data frame format as shown in Figure 2. A small pilot signal at the suppressed carrier frequency is added to the transmitted signal to help achieve carrier lock at a VSB receiver. Referring to Figure 2, each data frame comprises two fields with each field including 313 segments of 832 multilevel symbols. The first segment of each field is referred to as a field segment, and the remaining 312 segments are data segments. The data segments contain MPEG compatible data packets. Each data segment comprises a four symbol segment sync character followed by 828 data symbols. Each field segment comprises a four symbol segment sync character followed by a field sync component comprising a predetermined 511 symbol pseudorandom number (PN) sequence and three predetermined 63 symbol PN sequences, the middle one of which is inverted in successive fields. A VSB mode control signal (defining the VSB symbol constellation size follows the last 63 PN sequence, which is in turn followed by 96 reserved symbols and 12 symbols copied from the previous field.
The passband output signal from unit 14 is converted to a baseband signal by VSB demodulator and carrier recovery network 18. In this example network 18 contains circuits arranged as described in the Grand Alliance HDTV System Specification, and in an article by W. Bretl et al., "VSB Modem Subsystem Design for Grand Alliance Digital Television Receivers," IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, August 1995. Briefly, carrier recovery may be performed by a frequency and phase locked loop using the small pilot signal component included in the broadcast HDTV VSB signal. The output baseband signal from network 18 contains only recovered I-channel data symbols along a real axis. The demodulated symbol information from network 18 is converted to a digital datastream by an analog to digital converter 19.
Data segment synchronization recovery and clock (timing) recovery are performed by unit 15, which may include networks as described in the Grand Alliance HDTV System Specification and in the Bretl et al. article mentioned previously. A Segment Sync Detect Signal is provided when data segment synchronization and timing recovery have been achieved.
The output of analog to digital converter 19 is also applied to a data field (frame) sync component detector 17. Networks suitable for providing data field (frame) sync component detection also are discussed in the Grand Alliance HDTV specification and in the Bretl et al. article. Detector 17 provides a Field Sync Detect output signal to microprocessor 66 when the data field sync component has been detected. The digital data from unit 19 is processed by an adaptive equalizer network 50 as will be discussed. An equalized baseband output signal from network 50 is decoded by unit 60 and processed by output network 64. Decoder 60 includes, for example, trellis decoding, data de-interleaver, Reed-Solomon error correction and audio/video decoder networks as known and described, for example, in the Bretl article mentioned above. Output processor 64 includes audio/video processors and audio/video reproduction devices.
The segment sync and field sync detection circuits in units 15 and 17 provide output Segment Sync Detect and Field Sync Detect input signals to control signal generator 66 (eg., including a microprocessor) when these sync components of the received signal are detected. Microprocessor 66 responds to these signals for providing output Control signals and an output reference PN (pseudorandom number sequence) signal to equalizer 50 as will be discussed. The PN training signal sequence is a fixed repetitive pattern of binary data as specified by the Grand Alliance HDTV specification, and is a preprogrammed reference signal acquired by control signal generator 66 from memory 70. Since the data pattern of the stored PN signal is known, an exact error is generated by obtaining the difference between the stored reference PN signal and the PN training signal component of the received datastream during the field sync interval. The Control signals control the switching of Multiplexers 26, 28 and 29 in the blind, training and decision-directed operating modes as will be discussed.
The output signal from unit 19 contains digital data as well as inter- symbol interference (ISI) caused by transmission channel disturbances and artifacts. This signal is applied to a real (in contrast to a complex) feedforward filter (FFF) 20 operating as an equalizer, eg., a symbol rate spaced ("T-spaced") equalizer, which in this case is implemented as a digital FIR filter. The coefficient values (tap weights) of equalizer filter 20 are adaptively controlled by a Coefficient Control signal from multiplexer 26 as will be discussed.
The equalized signal from filter 20 is combined by an adder 24 with an equalized signal from a decision feedback filter 30 operating as an equalizer. DFF 30 removes intersymbol interference not removed by FFF 20. The coefficient values (tap weights), of equalizer filter 30 also are adaptively controlled by the Coefficient Control signal (i.e., the switched Error signal) from multiplexer 26. The input signal to be equalized by DFF 30 is provided from multiplexer 28. Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 have coefficient values adapted (updated) in response to the Coefficient Control signal during blind and decision directed operation modes. Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 are digital FIR filters which individually perform equalizing functions. When considered together, these filters represent an aggregate equalizer 50 for equalizing the input signal to decoder 60. FFF 20 equalizes pre-ghost components, while DFF 30 equalizes post-ghost components. FFF 20 and DFF 30 operate in a linear infinite impulse response (IIR) mode from the time the input signal is initially received. Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 are FIR devices, but feedback operation causes DFF 30 to operate as an IIR device.
The output signal from adder 24 is the output signal of equalizer 50.
The output of adder 24 is coupled to a network including multiplexers 26 and 28, a slicer 40, a subtractive combiner 21 and a source 25 which provides a CMA blind adaption algorithm.
Mux 26 provides either of two signals to coefficient control inputs of
FFF 20 and DFF 30 in response to a Control signal produced by microprocessor 66 for various operating modes when field sync and segment sync components are detected, as will be explained. These signals from Mux 26 include the CMA blind adaption algorithm from unit 25 which responds to the Equalizer Output signal, and an Error signal from the output of subtractive combiner 21. The Error signal represents the difference between the input signal of slicer 40 and the output of a third multiplexer 29. The output of combiner 21 is either a slice Error signal or a training Error signal, where slice Error = output of slicer 40 - equalizer output training Error = PN reference signal - equalizer output When generating the training Error signal, the equalizer output is the PN component of the received datastream.
Mux 28 provides either of three input signals to a signal input of DFF
30 in response to a Control signal from microprocessor 66. These signals include the equalizer 50 output signal as applied via a direct connection to a first input (1) of Mux 28, the output signal from slicer 40 applied to a second input (2) of Mux 28, and the stored PN reference signal from memory 70 and unit 66 applied to a third input (3) of Mux 28. Multiplexer 29 responds to a switching Control signal from microprocessor 66 and receives as inputs the reference PN training signal sequence during field sync intervals, and the output signal from slicer 40 at other times. The output of Mux 29 is applied to subtractive combiner 21 where it is differenced with the output signal from equalizer 50 to produce the Error signal. The Error signal represents either the difference between the slicer 40 and the equalizer 50 output signals, or the difference between the reference PN signal and the PN signal component of the received datastream as contained in the equalizer 50 output signal.
In operation, equalizer 50 exhibits an initial condition, a blind operating mode, a data-directed training mode, a decision-directed mode, and a steady-state equalized condition. The blind mode occurs when the characteristic eight level "eye" pattern of the received 8-VSB signal exhibits a closed eye pattern. Training and decision-directed operation occur afterwards, when the "eye" exhibits an open eye pattern. It is noted that it is not necessary for the "eye" pattern to open if the received training signal component is detected immediately. In such case the training signal component is used as soon as it is detected, even before the "eye" pattern opens.
In the initial condition, before timing lock (timing synchronism) is achieved, FFF 20 and DFF 30 idle while demodulator 18 attempts to lock the received signal with respect to automatic gain control (AGO, timing and carrier. At this time Control signals applied to Mux 26 and 28 cause the coefficient values of all taps of FFF 20 and DFF 30 to be reset and held at a zero value, except for one tap value which is reset to a predetermined non-zero initial value. This action of the Control signals freezes the filter coefficient values to prevent unwanted random changes in coefficient values before the actual useful equalization process begins. Alternatively, FFF 20 and DFF 30 can be pre-loaded with the last-known valid coefficient values. In this initial state both Mux 26 and 28 exhibit a zero output. The output of Mux 29 is a "don't care" condition at this time.
The process of blind equalization using the CMA algorithm begins next, after coarse timing is achieved. This occurs when the segment sync component of the received signal is detected. Carrier lock and AGC lock are present. At such time the Segment Sync Detect signal is conveyed to microprocessor 66, which in turn generates appropriate Control signals. The process of blind equalization involves the use of the CMA algorithm before the field sync component of the received signal is detected. Specifically, a Control signal applied to Mux 26 causes Mux 26 to convey the CMA algorithm from its input (1) to the coefficient control inputs of FFF 20 and DFF 30, and a Control signal applied to Mux 28 causes Mux 28 to convey the equalizer output signal from its input (1) to the signal input of DFF 30. The output of Mux 29 is a "don't care" condition during the blind equalizing interval.
The processes of training and decision-directed equalization occur next, when timing lock is achieved after the field sync component is detected. The training mode occurs when the received PN signal component is available during the field sync interval of each data frame. The decision-directed mode occurs at other times during each data frame. The presence of the field sync component initiates the start of the PN sequence training mode. At such time the Field Sync Detect signal is conveyed to microprocessor 66, which in turn generates appropriate Control signals. During field sync intervals when the received PN training component is available and the reference PN signal is acquired from memory 70, the Control signals respectively applied to Mux 26, 28 and 29 cause (a) a training Error signal to be coupled to the coefficient control inputs of FFF 20 and DFF 30 via Mux 26, (b) the reference PN signal to be conveyed to the signal input of DFF 30 via Mux 28, and (c) the reference PN signal to be coupled to combiner 21 via Mux 29. During non-field sync intervals of each data frame when slicer-based decision-directed equalization is being performed, the Control signals respectively applied to Mux 26, 28 and 29 cause (a) a slice Error signal to be coupled to the coefficient control inputs of FFF 20 and DFF 30 via Mux 26, (b) the output of slicer 40 to be conveyed to the signal input of DFF 30 via Mux 28, and (c) the output of slicer 40 to be coupled to combiner 21 via Mux 29.
During steady state operation after equalization has been achieved, the signal conditions described above for decision-directed operation prevail.
The operation of equalizer 50 described above is summarized by the following table.
Operating Mux 26 to FFF, DFF Mux 28 to DFF Mux 29 Mode Coefficient Control Signal input output
Initial state 0
Blind Eq. CMA Equal. Output
Training training Error ref. PN signal ref. PN
(field sync interval)
Decision Dir. slice Error slicer out. slicer out. (non-field sync int.)
The disclosed system including adaptive equalizer 50 advantageously exhibits reduced cost and hardware complexity. Equalizer 50 comprises real rather than complex filters 20 and 30, and does not require the use of rotator or de-rotator circuits (eg., in the equalizer control loop). A rotator/derotator is basically a circuit for circularly translating a data symbol constellation to compensate for unwanted frequency and phase offsets in a received signal. Adaptive equalizer 50 operates as a linear IIR filter, thereby improving the equalizer capabilities since DFF 30 provides some equalization even in the blind mode when DFF 30 operates as a linear feedback filter, before operating as a non-linear filter in the decision-directed mode following blind equalization. The initial operation of DFF 30 as a linear feedback filter produces some convergence which facilitates system equalization, particularly in the presence of significant signal ghosts. In particular, at this time DFF 30 exhibits the ability of a feedback filter to cancel distant ghost components.
In addition, the disclosed system exhibits a smoother transition from a linear operating mode to a non-linear decision-directed mode after blind equalization, compared to a conventional system using FFF and DFF equalization. This is because DFF 30 begins operation in the non-linear mode after having been pre-conditioned by operating in the linear mode, i.e., many of its coefficients have been adapted in the direction of final values.
Equalizer 50 is essentially a hardware and data efficient adaptive recursive linear filter that takes advantage of all available data to achieve equalization for a high definition VSB modulated signal as soon as possible. Both FFF 20 and DFF 30 operate at the symbol rate, and a PN sequence is used to facilitate fast equalization. Data processing occurs continuously online in real time, and advantageously uses a direct connection from the output of equalizer 50 to DFF 30 via Mux 28 to allow DFF 30 to facilitate coarse signal acquisition during the blind operating mode. Thus decision feedback filter 30 is advantageously used in a linear mode during blind equalization, then responds to a PN signal in the training mode, and to the slicer output during the decision-directed mode, as discussed.

Claims

1. A system for processing a received Vestigial Sideband (VSB) modulated signal containing high definition video information represented by a VSB constellation of symbols and subject to exhibiting unwanted perturbations, comprising: a demodulator (18) responsive to said received VSB modulated signal for producing a demodulated signal; and an adaptive equalizer (50) having an input for receiving said demodulated signal and an output at which an equalized signal is produced, said adaptive equalizer including
(a) an adaptive feed forward filter (20 FFF) for equalizing said demodulated signal, said FFF exhibiting
(1) linear, non-decision directed blind operation in a first operating mode, and
(2) decision-directed operation in a subsequent second operating mode; and
(b) an adaptive decision feedback filter (30 DFF) for equalizing said demodulated signal, said DFF exhibiting (1) linear, non-decision directed blind operation in a first operating mode, and (2) non-linear decision-directed operation in said second operating mode.
2. A system according to claim 1, wherein said demodulator includes a carrier recovery network; and said FFF and said DFF do not perform carrier derotation.
3. A system according to claim 1, wherein said signal input of said DFF is directly connected (DIRECT
CONNECTION)to said equalized signal at said equalizer output during said blind operation in said first mode.
4. A system according to claim 3, wherein said signal input of said DFF receives a slicer (40) output signal during said decision-directed operation in said second mode.
5. A system according to claim 1, wherein said feed forward filter and said decision feedback filter operate at a symbol rate, on-line in real time.
6. A system according to claim 1, wherein said signal having a data frame format (FIG. 2) constituted by a succession of data frames comprising a field sync component prefacing a plurality of data segments having an associated segment sync component.
7. A system according to claim 6, wherein in said blind mode said signal input of said DFF is directly connected to said equalized signal at said equalizer output, and coefficient control inputs of said FFF and DFF respond to a blind adaption algorithm (CMA25); and in said decision mode said DFF signal input responds to a slicer (40) output signal (ERROR), and coefficient control inputs of said FFF and DFF respond to an error signal representing the difference between said slicer output signal and said equalizer output signal.
8. A system according to claim 7, wherein said DFF responds to a training signal (PN) during field sync intervals and responds to said slicer output signal during non-field sync intervals; during non-field sync intervals of a data frame, coefficient control inputs of said FFF and DFF respond to a slice error signal representing the difference between a slicer output signal and said equalizer output signal; and during field sync intervals of a data frame, coefficient control inputs of said FFF and DFF respond to a training error signal representing the difference between a training signal component of said equalizer output signal and a reference training signal.
9. A system according to claim 8, wherein said training signal is a PN sequence.
10. A system according to claim 6, wherein said feed forward filter and said decision feedback filter operate at a symbol rate, on-line in real time.
11. In a system for processing a received Vestigial Sideband (VSB) modulated signal containing high definition video information represented by a VSB constellation of symbols and subject to exhibiting unwanted perturbations, said system including a channel equalizer comprising a feedforward filter (FFF) and a decision-feedback filter (DFF) for producing an equalized output signal, a signal processing method comprising the steps of: demodulating said VSB modulated signal to produce a demodulated signal; conveying said demodulated signal to said equalizer; linearly adapting said FFF during a blind first operating mode; linearly adapting said DFF during said blind operating mode; non-linearly adapting said FFF in a subsequent decision-directed operating mode; and non-linearly adapting said DFF in a subsequent decision-directed operating mode.
12. A method according to claim 11, wherein said step of linearly adapting said DFF during said blind operating mode includes the step of directly connecting said equalized output signal to a signal input of said
DFF during said blind operating mode to permit coarse equalization by said DFF during said blind mode.
13. A method according to claim 11, wherein said signal having a data frame format constituted by a succession of data frames comprising a field sync component prefacing a plurality of data segments having an associated segment sync component.
14. A method according to claim 13, comprising the further steps of: generating a slicer output signal in response to said equalizer output signal; coupling said slicer output signal to a signal input of said DFF in said decision-directed mode; and coupling an error signal representing the difference between said slicer output signal and said equalizer output signal to coefficient control inputs of said FFF and DFF during said decision-directed mode.
15. In a system for processing a received Vestigial Sideband (VSB) modulated signal containing high definition video data represented by a VSB constellation of symbols and subject to exhibiting unwanted perturbations, said data having a data frame format (FIG.2) constituted by a succession of data frames comprising a field sync component prefacing a plurality of data segments having an associated segment sync component, said system including a feedforward filter (20) (FFF) and a decision-feedback filter (30)(DFF) constituting a channel equalizer (50) for producing an equalized output signal, a signal processing method comprising the steps of: demodulating said VSB modulated signal to produce a demodulated signal; applying said demodulated signal to said channel equalizer constituted by said FFF and said DFF;
(a) during a blind, non-decision directed equalizing interval, (1) applying said equalizer output signal to a signal input of said DFF; (2) adapting said FFF in a linear manner; (3) adapting said DFF in a linear manner; (b) during a subsequent training equalizing interval during field sync component intervals,
(1) applying a training signal to said signal input of said DFF;
(2) adapting said FFF and said DFF in response to a training error signal representing the difference between a reference training signal and a training signal component of said equalizer output signal; (c) during a decision-directed equalizing interval following said training interval and comprising non-field sync component intervals,
(1) applying a symbol slicer output signal to said signal input of said DFF; and
(2) adapting said FFF and said DFF in response to a slice error signal representing the difference between a symbol slicer output signal and said equalizer output signal.
PCT/US1999/012143 1998-06-23 1999-06-02 Hdtv channel equalizer WO1999067946A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000556498A JP2002519895A (en) 1998-06-23 1999-06-02 HDTV channel equalizer
AU42270/99A AU4227099A (en) 1998-06-23 1999-06-02 Hdtv channel equalizer
HK02100669A HK1039014A1 (en) 1998-06-23 2002-01-29 Hdtv channel equalizer

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/102,885 1998-06-23
US09/102,885 US6816548B1 (en) 1998-06-23 1998-06-23 HDTV channel equalizer

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999067946A1 true WO1999067946A1 (en) 1999-12-29

Family

ID=22292194

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/012143 WO1999067946A1 (en) 1998-06-23 1999-06-02 Hdtv channel equalizer

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US6816548B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002519895A (en)
KR (1) KR100601207B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1255983C (en)
AU (1) AU4227099A (en)
HK (1) HK1039014A1 (en)
MY (1) MY124051A (en)
TW (1) TW416245B (en)
WO (1) WO1999067946A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1158376A2 (en) * 2000-05-16 2001-11-28 Philips Corporate Intellectual Property GmbH Apparatus with a control circuit
EP1251690A2 (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-10-23 Thomson Licensing S.A. A method for equalizing a VSB high definition television signal in the presence of CO-channel interference
KR100424496B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2004-03-26 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for controlling equalizer using sync signal in digital vestigial sideband system
KR100451750B1 (en) * 2002-10-31 2004-10-08 엘지전자 주식회사 Equalizer for digital television receiver
EP1495538A1 (en) * 2002-04-17 2005-01-12 Thomson Licensing S.A. Equalizer mode switch
CN100450172C (en) * 2002-08-16 2009-01-07 三星电子株式会社 High clarity TV balancer and its balancing method
JP2013150350A (en) * 2002-04-16 2013-08-01 Thomson Licensing Concatenated equalizer/trellis decoder architecture for hdtv receiver

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6438164B2 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-08-20 Broadcom Corporation Technique for minimizing decision feedback equalizer wordlength in the presence of a DC component
US6775334B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2004-08-10 Broadcom Corporation Equalization and decision-directed loops with trellis demodulation in high definition TV
KR100452860B1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2004-10-14 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for adjusting filter tap length of adaptive equalizer by using training sequence
US7027500B1 (en) * 2000-12-12 2006-04-11 Ati Research, Inc. Linear prediction based initialization of a single-axis blind equalizer for VSB signals
US6829297B2 (en) * 2001-06-06 2004-12-07 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Adaptive equalizer having a variable step size influenced by output from a trellis decoder
US7127019B2 (en) * 2001-06-21 2006-10-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Methods and apparatus for implementing multi-tone receivers
EP1440539A4 (en) * 2001-09-27 2009-08-26 Broadcom Corp Highly integrated media access control
US7092438B2 (en) * 2002-01-22 2006-08-15 Siemens Communications, Inc. Multilevel decision feedback equalizer
JP3916480B2 (en) * 2002-02-22 2007-05-16 松下電器産業株式会社 Digital demodulator and synchronization detection method
KR100442255B1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2004-07-30 엘지전자 주식회사 Apparatus for equalizing channel
KR20040025516A (en) * 2002-09-19 2004-03-24 삼성전자주식회사 Channel Equalizer of Single carrier Receiver and a method equalizing thereof
TWI231673B (en) * 2002-11-07 2005-04-21 Realtek Semiconductor Corp A modulator used for network transceiver and method thereof
WO2004075469A2 (en) 2003-02-19 2004-09-02 Dotcast Inc. Joint, adaptive control of equalization, synchronization, and gain in a digital communications receiver
US20040230997A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2004-11-18 Broadcom Corporation Single-chip cable set-top box
KR100505703B1 (en) * 2003-08-21 2005-08-03 삼성전자주식회사 Channel equalizer and channel equalizing method using the same
US20050232347A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-10-20 Mediatek Incorporation Apparatus and method for noise enhancement reduction in an adaptive equalizer
WO2005112582A2 (en) * 2004-05-12 2005-12-01 Thomson Licensing Dual-mode equalizer in an atsc-dtv receiver
US8239914B2 (en) * 2004-07-22 2012-08-07 Broadcom Corporation Highly integrated single chip set-top box
US7983354B2 (en) * 2005-11-25 2011-07-19 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Digital broadcast transmitter/receiver having an improved receiving performance and signal processing method thereof
US7944964B2 (en) * 2005-12-09 2011-05-17 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for stable DEF using selective FBF
US7599449B2 (en) * 2006-04-10 2009-10-06 Montage Technology Group, Ltd Hybrid modulus blind equalization for quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) receivers
US20070294738A1 (en) * 2006-06-16 2007-12-20 Broadcom Corporation Single chip cable set-top box supporting DOCSIS set-top Gateway (DSG) protocol and high definition advanced video codec (HD AVC) decode
WO2012092890A2 (en) * 2012-01-21 2012-07-12 华为技术有限公司 Adaptive equalization method and adaptive equalizer
WO2015077759A2 (en) * 2013-11-25 2015-05-28 University Of Utah Research Foundation A multiple user communication network
US10374844B1 (en) * 2018-03-08 2019-08-06 Nxp B.V. Signal-equalization with noise-whitening filter

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5712873A (en) * 1996-06-04 1998-01-27 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Multi-mode equalizer in a digital video signal processing system

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5602602A (en) * 1994-02-10 1997-02-11 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Method and apparatus for combating co-channel NTSC interference for digital TV transmission having a simplified rejection filter
US5706057A (en) 1994-03-21 1998-01-06 Rca Thomson Licensing Corporation Phase detector in a carrier recovery network for a vestigial sideband signal
KR970008417B1 (en) 1994-04-12 1997-05-23 엘지전자 주식회사 A channel equalizer for hdtv
KR0124597B1 (en) 1994-04-12 1997-12-01 구자홍 Channel equalizer for hdtv
KR0165507B1 (en) 1996-01-09 1999-03-20 김광호 Equalizing method and equalizer using standard signal
US5898731A (en) * 1996-02-03 1999-04-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Auto-coefficient renewal digital channel equalizer
US5799037A (en) * 1996-02-16 1998-08-25 David Sarnoff Research Center Inc. Receiver capable of demodulating multiple digital modulation formats
US6069917A (en) * 1997-05-23 2000-05-30 Lucent Technologies Inc. Blind training of a decision feedback equalizer

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5712873A (en) * 1996-06-04 1998-01-27 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Multi-mode equalizer in a digital video signal processing system

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1158376A2 (en) * 2000-05-16 2001-11-28 Philips Corporate Intellectual Property GmbH Apparatus with a control circuit
EP1158376A3 (en) * 2000-05-16 2002-06-12 Philips Corporate Intellectual Property GmbH Apparatus with a control circuit
KR100424496B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2004-03-26 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for controlling equalizer using sync signal in digital vestigial sideband system
EP1251690A2 (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-10-23 Thomson Licensing S.A. A method for equalizing a VSB high definition television signal in the presence of CO-channel interference
EP1251690A3 (en) * 2001-04-16 2004-08-11 Thomson Licensing S.A. A method for equalizing a VSB high definition television signal in the presence of CO-channel interference
US6894728B2 (en) 2001-04-16 2005-05-17 Thomas Licensing S.A. Method for equalizing a VSB high definition television signal in the presence of co-channel interference
KR100887681B1 (en) * 2001-04-16 2009-03-11 톰슨 라이센싱 Method and apparatus for equalizing a vsb high definition television signal in the presence of co-channel interference
JP2013150350A (en) * 2002-04-16 2013-08-01 Thomson Licensing Concatenated equalizer/trellis decoder architecture for hdtv receiver
EP1495538A1 (en) * 2002-04-17 2005-01-12 Thomson Licensing S.A. Equalizer mode switch
EP1495538A4 (en) * 2002-04-17 2009-04-08 Thomson Licensing Equalizer mode switch
CN100450172C (en) * 2002-08-16 2009-01-07 三星电子株式会社 High clarity TV balancer and its balancing method
KR100451750B1 (en) * 2002-10-31 2004-10-08 엘지전자 주식회사 Equalizer for digital television receiver

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1255983C (en) 2006-05-10
AU4227099A (en) 2000-01-10
MY124051A (en) 2006-06-30
KR100601207B1 (en) 2006-07-13
US6816548B1 (en) 2004-11-09
KR20010053055A (en) 2001-06-25
TW416245B (en) 2000-12-21
HK1039014A1 (en) 2002-04-04
JP2002519895A (en) 2002-07-02
CN1309865A (en) 2001-08-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6816548B1 (en) HDTV channel equalizer
US6693958B1 (en) Adaptive channel equalizer having a training mode
EP0812105B1 (en) Multi-mode equalizer in a digital video signal processing system
US5835532A (en) Blind equalizer for a vestigial sideband signal
EP1152602B1 (en) Adaptative channel equalizer
EP0752173B1 (en) Blind equalizer for a vestigial sideband signal
US6005640A (en) Multiple modulation format television signal receiver system
EP1759476B1 (en) Dual-mode equalizer in an atsc-dtv receiver
US7167215B2 (en) Gain control for a high definition television demodulator
JP4425520B2 (en) Blind equalizer for high-definition television signals
MXPA00012800A (en) Hdtv channel equalizer
MXPA97004115A (en) Multimodal equalizer in a digi video signal processing system
KR20000034434A (en) Digital terrestrial broadcasting and cable broadcasting receiver

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 99808654.1

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: PA/a/2000/012800

Country of ref document: MX

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020007014516

Country of ref document: KR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2000 556498

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020007014516

Country of ref document: KR

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1020007014516

Country of ref document: KR