WO1999046646A1 - Optimization method and device - Google Patents

Optimization method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999046646A1
WO1999046646A1 PCT/IL1999/000119 IL9900119W WO9946646A1 WO 1999046646 A1 WO1999046646 A1 WO 1999046646A1 IL 9900119 W IL9900119 W IL 9900119W WO 9946646 A1 WO9946646 A1 WO 9946646A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
parameters
desired conditions
condition
certain
values
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IL1999/000119
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Oded Berkooz
Original Assignee
Oded Berkooz
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oded Berkooz filed Critical Oded Berkooz
Priority to AU26379/99A priority Critical patent/AU2637999A/en
Priority to EP99906434A priority patent/EP1062549A1/en
Publication of WO1999046646A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999046646A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Definitions

  • the present invention is in the field of optimization techniques .and relates to a method and a device for designing .an optimized process and/or associated processing system for manufacturing a certain product.
  • Methods for designing a system and/or a process used for manufacturing a certain product are in great demand for a variety of industries, for example, chemical, biotechnological, food, cutting tools, microelectronics, electronics design, structure design, etc.
  • the need for optimized technological processes is more essential when mass production of products is required.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a block diagram showing the main principles of such a conventional method for designing a "supposedly optimized” process and/or device to be used for manufacturing a certain product.
  • Data required for performing the design, so-called “reference data”, is representative of the following particulars:
  • working conditions used herein signifies those conditions inside the processing device or environment which affect the end product parameters and should be maintained within predetermined ranges during the process.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,587,897 discloses an optimization method and device for determining an optimal solution by means of detecting a search start point for st.arting the se.arch of the optimal solution. More specifically, objective function, search region and required precision are set. Then, the objective function is made into a convex function and its maximum value is detected using a local search method.
  • this approach brings to complex objective functions or procedures, as well as to the need for an experienced engineer who would combine his knowledge of the process to be optimized with his deep knowledge of the optimization mathematics and procedures.
  • a method for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product within a system wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, such that at least one of said M OT Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the method comprising the steps of:
  • process for manufacturing used herein signifies a technological or scientific process, structure, effect or the like for producing or preparing a certain product, wherein the term “product” signifies a desired result of a process, structure or effect.
  • system used herein signifies a specific environment, which may include an apparatus.
  • the parameter(s) depending variably on the another parameter(s), as well as the .another parameter(s), may be representative of process or system, or both of them.
  • the concept of the invention is based on the idea that an optimization - 5 -
  • a starting point of the optimization method is specified in the form of a certain initial condition of at least one parameter of either the system or process, under which all the product parameters and the other process and system parameters satisfy their desired conditions.
  • the initial condition is in the form of a certain value (or range of values) of at least one process or system parameter. This value is specified in accordance with symmetry and/or order of magnitudes considerations that may not be achievable in reality.
  • the starting point of the optimization method represents such a condition of at least one of the system or process parameters, under which the goals of the optimization procedure related to all the other parameters are supposed to be satisfied. At least one of the goals of the optimization procedure, a so-called
  • OPG optimization goals condition
  • OPG objective functions of the conventional approach are replaced here by OPG in the form of the desired condition of at least one of the end product parameters.
  • This parameter represents real and measurable data used as reference data to which the current results of the optimization method are compared. Owing to the fact that the starting point of the optimization procedure may include values that are not feasible, such an optimization procedure strives for appropriate feasible values that can be - 6 -
  • the concept of the invention is simple and easy to understand.
  • Mathematical tools used for the optimization procedure according to the invention can be chosen by engineers involved in a certain manufacturing or preparation process to be optimized, or by engineers involved in the optimization procedure. Such engineers may input their experience and intuition and the optimization method can leverage creativity, or may apply any known mathematical routines within their personal skills.
  • One of the advantages of the invention is that the optimization procedure brings-up directly to a design engineer the "feel", behavior and insight into the systems and processes to be optimized without complex action of the mathematical functions.
  • the idea of the present invention is based on that the system and/or process to be optimized are defined by N parameters of the end product, M parameters of the system and Q parameters of the process which depend variably on each other.
  • the whole reference data one should have in his ⁇ er disposal in order to perform the optimization method includes the following:
  • processor equipped by memory for storing the above reference data and by input and output interfaces;
  • At least one of the end product desired conditions should be selected to specify OPG, and such an initial condition of the optimization method should be set, under which the end product and other process and system desired conditions are satisfied.
  • the initial condition may be represented by the value(s) of at least one of the M parameters and/or at least one of the Q parameters which is defined by symmetry, order of magnitude and/or other engineering or scientific considerations that may not be achievable in reality.
  • the initial condition is defined by an infinite value of one of the system's parameters. In this case, the simulation procedure begins with reducing this initial value.
  • the process or system parameter which should be adjusted is detected by means of determining and analyzing the behavior, for example, gradients of that at least one product's par.ameter which defines the optimum condition, depending on each of the changes of the process and/or system parameters.
  • the above optimization method may be applied to any product manufactured by a process, structure or effect that can be defined by specific mathematical, scientific or statistical relations between the product, process (structure, effect) .and system for its m.anufacturing.
  • a chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or other physical, chemical, biochemical electrochemical, electromagnetic, etc. processes may be optimized by this method.
  • a device for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product within a system wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, so that at least one of said Mor Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the device - 8 -
  • a memory for storing reference data which is generated by an operator and is representative of said desired conditions of N, M and Q parameters, predetermined mathematical model, and an optimum condition and a starting point of the optimization procedure,, the starting point being in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of said N par,ameters and of the other M .and Q p.arameters satisfies the respective desired condition, the optimum condition being such that at least one of said desired conditions of the N parameters is satisfied; ii. input interface coupled to said memory for inputting said reference data and said data generated by the operator; iii.
  • a processing unit interconnected between said memory and input interface for performing said simulation procedure and producing data indicative of simulation results; and iv. an output interface for displaying said produced data indicative of the simulation results.
  • the present invention is used for designing an apparatus employed in a CVD manufacturing process and is therefore described below with respect to this application.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating the main principles of a conventional optimization method of the kind specified
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating the main principles of an optimization method according to the invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of the main components of a system for manufacturing a product within a processing apparatus, which process and apparatus has to be optimized;
  • Figs. 4a and 4b illustrate a flow diagram of the main steps of a method for optimizing the process and apparatus used in the system of Fig. 3.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates the main principles of a conventional approach for optimizing a processing apparatus used for manufacturing a certain product. As shown, this approach is based on the existing models of an apparatus of the kind and employs the capability and intuition of designers to compile the data manually, or by using design-rules and objective function of the earlier kind, for performing numerous simulation and trial-and-error procedures.
  • Total reference data required for performing the design, includes solely the end product's parameters, working conditions of the process and design-rules.
  • the other reference data representative for example, of existing models' parameters, may help but is not necessary.
  • engineers' capability and intuition . are replaced here by a certain sequence of steps, which should be performed prior to and concurrently with the simulation, and on which the simulation procedures are based. Similarly, the engineers' capability and intuition may help but are not necessary.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates a system 10 for chemical vapor deposition of silicon on a silicon wafer 12 within a reactor 14.
  • the reactor 14 is in the form of a cylinder having its diameter Do and height h.
  • the reactor 14 is provided with inlet, top and outlet, bottom openings 16a and 16b having diameters D; and D2, respectively.
  • the wafer 12 is supported on a susceptor 18 appropriately accommodated inside the reactor 14 and is coupled to a heating element 20 so as to be heated up to a desired temperature T°.
  • a stream of a reactant gas SiH 4 is supplied under a certain pressure into the reactor 14 through the opening 16a.
  • the end product i.e. the silicon deposition on the wafer 12
  • the end product can be characterized by the following main parameters:
  • (Q 2 ) the pressure P inside the reactor 14 should be within the following range: 0.9 Atm - 1.1 Atm; What has actually to be designed is the structure of the reactor 14, which is characterized by the following parameters: (M the exact shape and geometry of the reactor, including its diameter Do and height h; (M 2 ) top inlet diameter Df, (M 3 ) bottom outlet diameter D ,
  • (Mi) materials MT t of the reactor including their engineering parameters such as, for example, heat capacity and thermal conductivity;
  • the working conditions of the process are those affecting the end product parameters. It is appreciated that the above conditions Qi and Q2 of the process vary during the manufacturing process according to the following partial differential equations (constituting a mathematical model):
  • P is the gas density (of the ideal gas); Fis the gas velocity vector; (2) "Momentum Equation"
  • GR is a current growth rate
  • Co(R c w,Yw,Z w ) is a coefficient relating to the reactant gas SiH 4 and the wafer surface points
  • R c is a concentration of the reactant gas SiH in a - 13 -
  • X W , Y W ,Z W are space coordinates of the wafer's surface; E a is the activation energy.
  • OPG optical goals condition
  • the OPG represents a specific condition of at least one parameter of the end product.
  • the OPG may simply include the desired value (or range of values) of one of the product parameters, for l o example N 2 , that is :
  • OPG is specified in accordance with the requirements of a manufacturer so as to be one of the real goals of the manufacturing process and/or indicative of the effectiveness of the manufacturing process. It will be
  • OPG may represent specific conditions of more than one of the end product parameters and one or more process conditions.
  • Another essential feature of the present invention is the provision of a starting point of the optimization procedure, which represents a so-called "ideal condition", under which the goals of the optimization method are 0 substantially achieved. More specifically, the ideal condition provides such a value of at least one of the process or apparatus parameters, that all the other product, process and apparatus conditions are satisfied.
  • the initial condition is in the form of infinite dimension of the reactor 14, that is: 5 Do ⁇ ⁇ h ⁇ ⁇
  • the above expressions together define the start point for performing the whole method of designing the optimized reactor 14.
  • the ideal condition is in the form of such a value of at least - 14 -
  • the reactor is such that the process' conditions thereinside are symmetrical relative to the end product.
  • each of the parameters included in the OPG depends variably, either directly or indirectly, on at least some of the other parameters related to the reactor 14, process and product.
  • the OPG defining parameter of the product N is a function of all the above listed parameters as follows:
  • N 2 N ⁇ , Qj, Q 2 , Mi, M 2 , M 3 , M 4> M 5 , M 6 , M 7 ) or more specifically: A/Do, h, D D 2 , M it T, T h T 2 , P, P,, P u R, I, X w , Y w , Z w , A)
  • the OPG is selected (step 22), for example, as described above.
  • the start point in the form of the ideal condition is specified (step 24), for example, by assuming that the reactor 14 is of infinite dimensions.
  • An initial simulation procedure begins (step 26) with changing (reducing) these dimensions (step 27) and proceeds with calculating current values of the OPG defining parameter, i.e. N 2 (step 28). These current values correspond to the changed, reduced values of the reactor's parameters Do and ft.
  • this parameter is considered to be changed when its value is out of the desired range.
  • steps 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 are sequentially repeated until changes in at least some of the parameters PR], ... , PRu, for example par.ameters, .are detected (step 32). These changes are caused by the act of reducing the dimensions of the reactor 14.
  • the above data is analyzed so as to determine that/those parameter(s) whose change(s) affect(s) significantly, in comparison to the others, the changes of the OPG.
  • the gradients of the OPG depending on the changes of each of the detected parameters are separately determined (step
  • At least one of those detected parameters is changed accordingly (step
  • step 36 The detected parameters or those previously changed so as to cause the changes of these detected parameters are adjusted (step 36) in order to maintain the "ideal condition" as specified above. It is appreciated that this adjustment procedure is followed by continuously repeating the steps 26-36.
  • step 38 Upon detecting that the OPG is maintained, i.e. the flatness Af of the silicon is of the desired value d (step 38), current parameters of the reactor 14 (Mj-M ⁇ ) and working conditions of the process (Q1-Q2), which correspond to the current "ideal" value of the product parameter N2, are analyzed (step 40). If the current parameters are found to be of the desired values (step 42), the design is completed. It should be noted that the desired values may be feasible values (or range of values) suitable for the specific manufacturing process. If the current parameters are found to be out of the desired range of values , the design is performed again starting from the step 26. It is understood that now the reactor's dimensions will be either reduced or increased depending on those current values previously received.
  • the processor operated by suitable software, based on the mathematical model capable of solving the above equations and analyzing the received solutions.
  • the processor includes a memory for storing reference data representative of all the relevant parameters and the mathematical equations to be solved.
  • Appropriate input and output interfaces are provided and coupled to or incorporated with the processor for, respectively, inputting the reference and other relevant data and indicating the calculated values and the design's results.
  • Such processor and software may be of any known kind and do not form a part of the present invention. Advantages of the method according to the invention are thus evident.
  • the optimization procedure starts from such a scientific "ideal" initial point, at which the specific conditions representing the goals of the optimization procedure are substantially satisfied.
  • One of these goals is selected to represent the final result's criteria of the optimization procedure to which the current results are compared.
  • OPG is selected to represent the final result's criteria of the optimization procedure to which the current results are compared.
  • the optimization procedure begins from such a start point when the desired conditions are substantially satisfied and proceeds so as to maintain the OPG condition, rather th.an start with an undesirable condition and try to reach a specific desired one.
  • the desired condition to be maintained or OPG is in the form of a certain measurable parameter and, on the other hand, represents a certain goal of a certain manufacturer aimed at increasing the effectiveness of the manufacturing process. Therefore, specifying this measurable parameter to be maintained which has a physical sense of an optimum condition for a specific technological process, enables to make the design physically realizable.

Abstract

A method and a device for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product with a certain system are presented. The end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters. The system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters. The manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters. At least one of these M or Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of these M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model. Initially, a starting point and an optimum condition of the optimization are specified. The starting point is in the form of such an initial value of at least one of the Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of the N parameters and of the other M and Q parameters satisfies the respective desired condition. The optimum condition is such that at least one of the desired conditions of the N parameters is satisfied. Then, simulation procedures are performed by changing the at least one initial specified value of the Q or M parameters, so as to cause changes of the initial value of at least one of the N parameters that defines the specified optimum condition. Concurrently, the mathematical model is operated for calculating current values of the M and Q parameters. The calculated current values are analyzed for adjusting at least one of them so as to satisfy the optimum condition.

Description

Optimization Method and Device
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is in the field of optimization techniques .and relates to a method and a device for designing .an optimized process and/or associated processing system for manufacturing a certain product.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Methods for designing a system and/or a process used for manufacturing a certain product are in great demand for a variety of industries, for example, chemical, biotechnological, food, cutting tools, microelectronics, electronics design, structure design, etc. The need for optimized technological processes is more essential when mass production of products is required.
Earlier methods of the kind specified are typically based on simulation procedures performing so-called 'trial-and-error' adjustments of earlier models, if any, laboratory data, or other complicated mathematical formulation or optimization procedures. The procedures based on laboratory data deal with significantly different parameters of the end product obtained in the laboratory than that expected to be manufactured by suitable mass production techniques or to be structured. To this end, teams of engineers are - 2 -
involved in designing procedures and perform the optimization methods of earlier models. They can rely only on their experience and intuition for reaching a "right design" or use complicated mathematical formulation or optimization procedures, their experience and intuition being based solely on the engineers' knowledge of the existing processes .and devices.
Fig. 1 illustrates a block diagram showing the main principles of such a conventional method for designing a "supposedly optimized" process and/or device to be used for manufacturing a certain product. Data required for performing the design, so-called "reference data", is representative of the following particulars:
(1) the parameters of an end product to be manufactured, prepared or built;
(2) the parameters of existing manufacturing or preparation processes and/or devices of the kind, i.e. for manufacturing a simile product;
(3) 'working' conditions of the manufacturing process, if known; and
(4) design rule features.
The term "working conditions " used herein signifies those conditions inside the processing device or environment which affect the end product parameters and should be maintained within predetermined ranges during the process.
The above data is analyzed by the engineers so as to perform numerous simulation procedures for estimating, based solely on their capabilities and intuition, the optimized parameters of a designed apparatus or environment. However, such a method lacks any effective leverage and vital assistance of the engineers capable of creating new concepts and ideas, beyond the engineers' capabilities and intuition. This results in wasted efforts, longer time consumption, higher costs of experiments and sometimes even leads the design to a dead end after having all the expenditures. - 3 -
Methods .and systems for optimizing technological processes have recently been developed, being based on a common feature of specifying a so-called "objective function" which should be minimized or maximized under defined conditions. However, these minimized or maximized values of the objective function depend on a way of selecting a point for starting the search and, therefore, represent local minimum or maximum of the objective function .and not the global value. Again, the knowledge .and experience of engineers .are required for determining either the global minimum/maximum of a specified objective function from a plurality of local minimums/ maximums, or an optimal solution for positioning a search starting point.
U.S. Patent No. 5,587,897 discloses an optimization method and device for determining an optimal solution by means of detecting a search start point for st.arting the se.arch of the optimal solution. More specifically, objective function, search region and required precision are set. Then, the objective function is made into a convex function and its maximum value is detected using a local search method. However, this approach brings to complex objective functions or procedures, as well as to the need for an experienced engineer who would combine his knowledge of the process to be optimized with his deep knowledge of the optimization mathematics and procedures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to overcome the above listed and other disadvantages of the conventional approach and provide a novel method and device for optimizing a process and/or a processing apparatus used for manufacturing a certain product.
There is thus provided according to one aspect of the present invention a method for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product within a system, wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, such that at least one of said M OT Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the method comprising the steps of:
(a) specifying a starting point in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of said N parameters and of the other M and Q parameters satisfies the respective desired condition;
(b) specifying an optimum condition under which at least one of said desired conditions of the TV parameters is satisfied;
(c) providing simulation procedures by changing said at least one initial specified value of the Q or M parameters so as to cause changes of the initial value of at least one of the N parameters that defines said optimum condition and concurrently operating said mathematical model for calculating current values of the M and Q parameters;
(d) analyzing the calculated current values for adjusting at least one of them so as to satisfy said optimum condition.
The term "process for manufacturing" used herein signifies a technological or scientific process, structure, effect or the like for producing or preparing a certain product, wherein the term "product" signifies a desired result of a process, structure or effect. The term "system " used herein signifies a specific environment, which may include an apparatus. The parameter(s) depending variably on the another parameter(s), as well as the .another parameter(s), may be representative of process or system, or both of them.
The concept of the invention is based on the idea that an optimization - 5 -
procedure, aimed at optimizing a manufacturing or preparation process and/or an associated system, always has certain goals. These goals are typically in the form of desired values (or ranges of values) of the parameters of end product, process and/or processing system. To this end, a starting point of the optimization method is specified in the form of a certain initial condition of at least one parameter of either the system or process, under which all the product parameters and the other process and system parameters satisfy their desired conditions. The initial condition is in the form of a certain value (or range of values) of at least one process or system parameter. This value is specified in accordance with symmetry and/or order of magnitudes considerations that may not be achievable in reality. Hence, the starting point of the optimization method represents such a condition of at least one of the system or process parameters, under which the goals of the optimization procedure related to all the other parameters are supposed to be satisfied. At least one of the goals of the optimization procedure, a so-called
"optimization goals condition" (OPG), is selected so as to define an optimum condition of the optimization method to which the current results of the optimization are compared. The OPG may be representative of at least one of the desired conditions of the end product. Additionally, it may also be representative of at least one of the desired process conditions. It will be readily understood that the optimum condition is satisfied at the starting point of the optimization method.
It is thus evident that objective functions of the conventional approach are replaced here by OPG in the form of the desired condition of at least one of the end product parameters. This parameter represents real and measurable data used as reference data to which the current results of the optimization method are compared. Owing to the fact that the starting point of the optimization procedure may include values that are not feasible, such an optimization procedure strives for appropriate feasible values that can be - 6 -
realized while being compared to the OPG values.
The concept of the invention is simple and easy to understand. Mathematical tools used for the optimization procedure according to the invention can be chosen by engineers involved in a certain manufacturing or preparation process to be optimized, or by engineers involved in the optimization procedure. Such engineers may input their experience and intuition and the optimization method can leverage creativity, or may apply any known mathematical routines within their personal skills. One of the advantages of the invention is that the optimization procedure brings-up directly to a design engineer the "feel", behavior and insight into the systems and processes to be optimized without complex action of the mathematical functions.
More specifically, the idea of the present invention is based on that the system and/or process to be optimized are defined by N parameters of the end product, M parameters of the system and Q parameters of the process which depend variably on each other. The whole reference data one should have in his^er disposal in order to perform the optimization method includes the following:
- desired values of the end product parameters; - desired or at least feasible values of the system' and/or process' parameters; and
- mathematical model representing the relationship between the product, process system parameters and design-rules.
The minimum requirements for carrying out the optimization method are as follows:
- a processor equipped by memory for storing the above reference data and by input and output interfaces; and
- suitable software for operating the processor so as to conduct simulation procedures based on the mathematical model. - 7 -
Thus, in order to st∑irt the optimization procedure, at least one of the end product desired conditions should be selected to specify OPG, and such an initial condition of the optimization method should be set, under which the end product and other process and system desired conditions are satisfied. The initial condition may be represented by the value(s) of at least one of the M parameters and/or at least one of the Q parameters which is defined by symmetry, order of magnitude and/or other engineering or scientific considerations that may not be achievable in reality. For example, the initial condition is defined by an infinite value of one of the system's parameters. In this case, the simulation procedure begins with reducing this initial value. The process or system parameter which should be adjusted is detected by means of determining and analyzing the behavior, for example, gradients of that at least one product's par.ameter which defines the optimum condition, depending on each of the changes of the process and/or system parameters. The above optimization method may be applied to any product manufactured by a process, structure or effect that can be defined by specific mathematical, scientific or statistical relations between the product, process (structure, effect) .and system for its m.anufacturing. For example, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or other physical, chemical, biochemical electrochemical, electromagnetic, etc. processes may be optimized by this method.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a device for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product within a system, wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, so that at least one of said Mor Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the device - 8 -
comprising: i. a memory for storing reference data which is generated by an operator and is representative of said desired conditions of N, M and Q parameters, predetermined mathematical model, and an optimum condition and a starting point of the optimization procedure,, the starting point being in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of said N par,ameters and of the other M .and Q p.arameters satisfies the respective desired condition, the optimum condition being such that at least one of said desired conditions of the N parameters is satisfied; ii. input interface coupled to said memory for inputting said reference data and said data generated by the operator; iii. a processing unit interconnected between said memory and input interface for performing said simulation procedure and producing data indicative of simulation results; and iv. an output interface for displaying said produced data indicative of the simulation results. According to yet another aspects of the present invention there are provided a method and a device for optimizing a system used in a manufacturing process for manufacturing a certain end product.
More specifically the present invention is used for designing an apparatus employed in a CVD manufacturing process and is therefore described below with respect to this application.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order to understand the invention and to see how the same may be carried out in practice, several preferred embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating the main principles of a conventional optimization method of the kind specified;
Fig. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating the main principles of an optimization method according to the invention;
Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of the main components of a system for manufacturing a product within a processing apparatus, which process and apparatus has to be optimized; and
Figs. 4a and 4b illustrate a flow diagram of the main steps of a method for optimizing the process and apparatus used in the system of Fig. 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Fig. 1 illustrates the main principles of a conventional approach for optimizing a processing apparatus used for manufacturing a certain product. As shown, this approach is based on the existing models of an apparatus of the kind and employs the capability and intuition of designers to compile the data manually, or by using design-rules and objective function of the earlier kind, for performing numerous simulation and trial-and-error procedures.
Reference is now made to Fig. 2, illustrating the main principles of a new approach according to the invention. The illustration is similar to that of Fig. 1, in order to facilitate the understanding of essential features of the present invention. Total reference data, required for performing the design, includes solely the end product's parameters, working conditions of the process and design-rules. The other reference data representative, for example, of existing models' parameters, may help but is not necessary. Additionally, engineers' capability and intuition .are replaced here by a certain sequence of steps, which should be performed prior to and concurrently with the simulation, and on which the simulation procedures are based. Similarly, the engineers' capability and intuition may help but are not necessary. The - 10 -
term "OPG" or "optimization goals condition " signifies the results' criteria of the design, which should be specified and on which the sequence of steps is based. The principles and purposes of OPG will be described more specifically further below. In order to illustrate more specifically the main principles of the invention, the following example of optimizing a process and apparatus for manufacturing a certain product will now be described with reference to Figs. 3 and 4a-4b. Fig. 3 illustrates a system 10 for chemical vapor deposition of silicon on a silicon wafer 12 within a reactor 14. The reactor 14 is in the form of a cylinder having its diameter Do and height h. The reactor 14 is provided with inlet, top and outlet, bottom openings 16a and 16b having diameters D; and D2, respectively. The wafer 12 is supported on a susceptor 18 appropriately accommodated inside the reactor 14 and is coupled to a heating element 20 so as to be heated up to a desired temperature T°. A stream of a reactant gas SiH4 is supplied under a certain pressure into the reactor 14 through the opening 16a.
As a result of a chemical process of decomposition of SiH , that is: SiH4 →Si + 2H2 the silicon atoms continuously precipitate on a heated surface 12a of the wafer 12, while the hydrogen is exhausted through the outlet opening 16b (together with other undesirable products). The above process of silicon deposition on wafers is known per se and, therefore, need not be described in more detail.
The end product, i.e. the silicon deposition on the wafer 12, can be characterized by the following main parameters:
(Ni) thickness A of the silicon deposition on the wafer; (N2) subst-antially homogeneous distribution of the silicon atoms on the wafer, or a so-called "flatness criterion factor", such that the flatness of the silicon A/ is of a desired value !/ . - 11 -
The CVD process is characterized by the following main working conditions:
(Qi) temperature T° of the wafer's surface 12a should satisfy the following condition: 550 °C ≤T° <555 CC
(Q2) the pressure P inside the reactor 14 should be within the following range: 0.9 Atm - 1.1 Atm; What has actually to be designed is the structure of the reactor 14, which is characterized by the following parameters: (M the exact shape and geometry of the reactor, including its diameter Do and height h; (M2) top inlet diameter Df, (M3) bottom outlet diameter D ,
(Mi) materials MTt of the reactor (aluminum, copper, stainless steel, etc.) including their engineering parameters such as, for example, heat capacity and thermal conductivity; (M5) gas inlet and outlet pressures Pi and 2 .and temperature Tj and
T2, respectively; (M6) resistance R .and current / of the heating element 20. The above parameters Nι-N2, Q1-Q2 .and Mi-Mβ of the product, process and apparatus actually define the total goals of the optimization method.
As indicated above, the working conditions of the process are those affecting the end product parameters. It is appreciated that the above conditions Qi and Q2 of the process vary during the manufacturing process according to the following partial differential equations (constituting a mathematical model):
(1) "Continuity Equation" relating to the gas behavior inside the reactor - 12 -
dp
+ V (pV) = 0 dt
wherein P is the gas density (of the ideal gas); Fis the gas velocity vector; (2) "Momentum Equation"
(— + V* VV) + Vp = μ(AV + - V(VV) - pg dt 3
wherein is the gas viscosity; (3) "Energy Equation"
,dT_ pCA — + V VT) + /?VV = V (KVT) dt
wherein Cp is the gas heat capacity; κ is the gas thermal conductivity
(5) definitions of the appropriate boundary conditions;
(6) amount of heat supplied to the wafer and vicinity due to the heater; and according to the characteristic behavior of the growth of the silicon p-articles:
(6) "Growth Rate"
Gβ = C0(Rc,Nw,7w,Zw) * exp(- kT
wherein GR is a current growth rate; Co(Rc w,Yw,Zw) is a coefficient relating to the reactant gas SiH4 and the wafer surface points;
Rc is a concentration of the reactant gas SiH in a - 13 -
vicinity of the surface of the wafer;
XW, YW,ZW are space coordinates of the wafer's surface; Ea is the activation energy.
5 One of the essential features of the present invention consists of specifying .an "optimization goals condition" (OPG) defining the results' criteria of the design. The OPG represents a specific condition of at least one parameter of the end product. In other words, the OPG may simply include the desired value (or range of values) of one of the product parameters, for l o example N2, that is :
ArAf
Generally, OPG is specified in accordance with the requirements of a manufacturer so as to be one of the real goals of the manufacturing process and/or indicative of the effectiveness of the manufacturing process. It will be
15 readily understood that OPG may represent specific conditions of more than one of the end product parameters and one or more process conditions.
Another essential feature of the present invention is the provision of a starting point of the optimization procedure, which represents a so-called "ideal condition", under which the goals of the optimization method are 0 substantially achieved. More specifically, the ideal condition provides such a value of at least one of the process or apparatus parameters, that all the other product, process and apparatus conditions are satisfied. According to the present example, the initial condition is in the form of infinite dimension of the reactor 14, that is: 5 Do → ∞ h → ∞ The above expressions together define the start point for performing the whole method of designing the optimized reactor 14.
Generally, the ideal condition is in the form of such a value of at least - 14 -
one of the reactor or process parameters which is defined by an order of magnitude and/or symmetry considerations, even as a so-called "wishful" condition that may not be achievable in reality. Alternatively and additionally, although not specifically exemplified, the ideal condition may be in the form of such a reactor's parameter that is defined by the consideration of symmetry. In other words, the reactor is such that the process' conditions thereinside are symmetrical relative to the end product.
It is also appreciated that each of the parameters included in the OPG depends variably, either directly or indirectly, on at least some of the other parameters related to the reactor 14, process and product. According to the present example, the OPG defining parameter of the product N is a function of all the above listed parameters as follows:
N2(Nι, Qj, Q2, Mi, M2, M3, M4> M5, M6, M7) or more specifically: A/Do, h, D D2, Mit T, Th T2, P, P,, Pu R, I, Xw, Yw, Zw, A)
The method of optimizing such an apparatus used in CVD manufacturing process will now be described with reference to Figs. 4a-4b. Initially, the OPG is selected (step 22), for example, as described above. Then, the start point in the form of the ideal condition is specified (step 24), for example, by assuming that the reactor 14 is of infinite dimensions. An initial simulation procedure begins (step 26) with changing (reducing) these dimensions (step 27) and proceeds with calculating current values of the OPG defining parameter, i.e. N2 (step 28). These current values correspond to the changed, reduced values of the reactor's parameters Do and ft. Upon detecting that the OPG has changed (step 29), all the relevant parameters, namely those related to the end product, manufacturing process and reactor, generally designated PR (17 parameters PRi, ... , PRn in the present example) .are calculated (step 30) using the above equations. It should be noted that if OPG represents the desired range of values of the parameter - 15 -
N2, then this parameter is considered to be changed when its value is out of the desired range.
The steps 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 are sequentially repeated until changes in at least some of the parameters PR], ... , PRu, for example par.ameters, .are detected (step 32). These changes are caused by the act of reducing the dimensions of the reactor 14.
The above data is analyzed so as to determine that/those parameter(s) whose change(s) affect(s) significantly, in comparison to the others, the changes of the OPG. To this end, the gradients of the OPG depending on the changes of each of the detected parameters are separately determined (step
34), that is: dN/dPR,, .... , dNydPRi-i, dN dPRi
At least one of those detected parameters is changed accordingly (step
35). The detected parameters or those previously changed so as to cause the changes of these detected parameters are adjusted (step 36) in order to maintain the "ideal condition" as specified above. It is appreciated that this adjustment procedure is followed by continuously repeating the steps 26-36.
Upon detecting that the OPG is maintained, i.e. the flatness Af of the silicon is of the desired value d (step 38), current parameters of the reactor 14 (Mj-Mβ) and working conditions of the process (Q1-Q2), which correspond to the current "ideal" value of the product parameter N2, are analyzed (step 40). If the current parameters are found to be of the desired values (step 42), the design is completed. It should be noted that the desired values may be feasible values (or range of values) suitable for the specific manufacturing process. If the current parameters are found to be out of the desired range of values , the design is performed again starting from the step 26. It is understood that now the reactor's dimensions will be either reduced or increased depending on those current values previously received.
It is appreciated that all the above operational steps are carried out by a - 16 -
processor operated by suitable software, based on the mathematical model capable of solving the above equations and analyzing the received solutions. The processor includes a memory for storing reference data representative of all the relevant parameters and the mathematical equations to be solved. Appropriate input and output interfaces are provided and coupled to or incorporated with the processor for, respectively, inputting the reference and other relevant data and indicating the calculated values and the design's results. Such processor and software may be of any known kind and do not form a part of the present invention. Advantages of the method according to the invention are thus evident.
Indeed, the optimization procedure starts from such a scientific "ideal" initial point, at which the specific conditions representing the goals of the optimization procedure are substantially satisfied. One of these goals (OPG) is selected to represent the final result's criteria of the optimization procedure to which the current results are compared. In other words, the optimization procedure begins from such a start point when the desired conditions are substantially satisfied and proceeds so as to maintain the OPG condition, rather th.an start with an undesirable condition and try to reach a specific desired one. Additionally, the desired condition to be maintained or OPG, on the one hand, is in the form of a certain measurable parameter and, on the other hand, represents a certain goal of a certain manufacturer aimed at increasing the effectiveness of the manufacturing process. Therefore, specifying this measurable parameter to be maintained which has a physical sense of an optimum condition for a specific technological process, enables to make the design physically realizable.
Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various modifications and changes may be applied to the preferred embodiment of the invention as hereinbefore exemplified without dep.arting from its scope as defined in and by the appended claims. In the method claims that follow - 17 -
characters, which are used to designate claim steps, are provided for convenience only and do not apply any particular order of performing the steps.

Claims

- 18 -CLAIMS:
1. A method for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product within a system, wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, such that at least one of said M or Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the method comprising the steps of: a) specifying a starting point in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of said N parameters and of the other M and Q parameters satisfies the respective desired condition; b) specifying an optimum condition under which at least one of said desired conditions of the N parameters is satisfied; c) providing simulation procedures by changing said at least one initial specified value of the Q or M parameters so as to cause changes of the initial value of at least one of the N parameters that defines said optimum condition and concurrently operating said mathematical model for calculating current values of the M and Q parameters; d) analyzing the calculated current values for adjusting at least one of them so as to satisfy said optimum condition.
2. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the desired condition of each of said Q parameters is in the form of a range of feasible values.
3. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the desired condition of each of said M parameters is in the form of a range of feasible values.
4. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the initial condition represents such a value of at least one of the M or Q parameters that is - 19 -
defined by a symmetry considerations.
5. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the initial condition represents such a value of at least one of the M or Q parameters that is defined by an order of magnitude considerations.
6. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the initial condition is defined by an infinite value of at least one of the parameters of the system.
7. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the initial condition is defined by scientific and technological considerations.
8. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the step of analyzing the calculated current values comprises: determining the changed values of said at least one of the N parameters depending on the changes of said M and Q parameters, so as to detect at least one of the changed M and Q parameters that has to be adjusted, the at least one detected value corresponding to the greatest changed value of said at least one of the N parameters in comparison to the other determined changed values.
9. The method according to Claim 6, wherein the simulation procedure includes reducing said initial value of at least one of the M parameters.
10. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the process to be optimized is a chemical process
11. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the process to be optimized is a biochemical process.
12. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the process to be optimized is an electromechanical or electromagnetic process.
13. A method for optimizing a system used in a manufacturing process for manufacturing a certain end product, wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the - 20 -
manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, such that at least one of said M o Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the method comprising the steps of: (1) specifying a starting point in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M par.ameters that each of corresponding initial values of said N parameters and of the other M and Q parameters satisfies the respective desired condition;
(2) specifying an optimum condition under which at least one of said desired conditions of the .V parameters is satisfied;
(3) providing simulation procedures by changing said at least one initial specified value of the Q or M parameters so as to cause changes of the initial value of at least one of the JV parameters that defines said optimum condition and concurrently operating said mathematical model for calculating current values of the M and Q parameters;
(4) analyzing the calculated current values for adjusting at least one of them so as to satisfy said optimum condition.
14. A device for optimizing a process for manufacturing a certain end product within a system, wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its N parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, such that at least one of said M or Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical model, the device comprising: i. a memory for storing reference data which is generated by an operator and is representative of said desired conditions of N, M and Q parameters, predetermined mathematical model and an - 21 -
optimum condition .and a starting point of the optimization procedure, the starting point being in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of said TV parameters and of the other M and Q parameters satisfies the respective desired condition, the optimum condition being such that at least one of said desired conditions of the N parameters is satisfied; ii. input interface coupled to said memory for inputting said reference data and said data generated by the operator; iϋ. a processing unit interconnected between said memory and input interface for performing said simulation procedure and producing data indicative of simulation results; and iv. an output interface for displaying said produced data indicative of the simulation results.
15. The device according to Claim 14, wherein said desired result of the simulation procedure is in the form of at least one of said desired conditions of the product such that at least one of said N parameters is within its desired range of values.
16. The device according to Claim 14, wherein said starting point is in the form of an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters such that corresponding initial values of said N parameters and of the other M and Q parameters satisfy their corresponding desired conditions.
17. A device for optimizing a system used in a manufacturing process for manufacturing a certain end product, wherein the end product is defined by certain desired conditions of its TV parameters, the system is defined by certain desired conditions of its M parameters and the manufacturing process is defined by certain desired conditions of its Q working parameters, such that at least one of said M or Q parameters depends variably on at least another one of said M or Q parameters according to a predetermined mathematical - 22 -
model, the device comprising: a memory for storing reference data which is generated by an operator and is representative of said conditions of TV, M and Q parameters, predetermined mathematical model and an optimum condition and a starting point of the optimization procedure, the starting point being in the form of such an initial value of at least one of said Q or M parameters that each of corresponding initial values of said TV parameters and of the other M .and Q parameters satisfies the respective desired condition, the optimum condition being such that at least one of said desired conditions of the TV parameters is satisfied; input interface coupled to said memory for inputting said reference data and said data generated by the operator; a processing unit interconnected between said memory and input interface for performing said simulation procedure and producing data indicative of simulation results; and an output interface for displaying said produced data indicative of the simulation results.
PCT/IL1999/000119 1998-03-10 1999-03-02 Optimization method and device WO1999046646A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU26379/99A AU2637999A (en) 1998-03-10 1999-03-02 Optimization method and device
EP99906434A EP1062549A1 (en) 1998-03-10 1999-03-02 Optimization method and device

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL123607 1998-03-10
IL12360798A IL123607A0 (en) 1998-03-10 1998-03-10 Optimization method and apparatus

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999046646A1 true WO1999046646A1 (en) 1999-09-16

Family

ID=11071319

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IL1999/000119 WO1999046646A1 (en) 1998-03-10 1999-03-02 Optimization method and device

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1062549A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2637999A (en)
IL (1) IL123607A0 (en)
WO (1) WO1999046646A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10110268A1 (en) * 2001-03-02 2002-09-19 Siemens Ag Circuit board manufacturing method selection, using computer program structure for identifying manufacturing method with minimum complexity
SG100710A1 (en) * 2000-05-24 2003-12-26 Rohm & Haas Computer-based product formulation
EP1164522A3 (en) * 2000-05-31 2004-01-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Electronic commerce method for semiconductor products, electronic commerce thereof, production system, production method, production equipment design system, production equipment design method, and production equipment manufacturing method
WO2004072746A2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2004-08-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for optimizing the operation of a metallurgical engineering system using a mathematical model
EP1901214A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-19 ABB Oy A method for optimization of subsequent treatment processes in production planning
US8404714B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2013-03-26 Novus International, Inc. Combinations to improve animal health and performance

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995002213A1 (en) * 1993-07-05 1995-01-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for determining the optimum values of the correcting variables of a technical system
WO1996027824A1 (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-09-12 Continental Controls, Inc. Multivariable process control method and apparatus
US5587897A (en) * 1993-12-27 1996-12-24 Nec Corporation Optimization device
US5724239A (en) * 1994-10-27 1998-03-03 Fujitsu Limited Robust control system for designing logic for imperfect model
US5784596A (en) * 1994-09-23 1998-07-21 Nec Usa, Inc. Algorithmic modeling of TES processes for simulation analysis

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995002213A1 (en) * 1993-07-05 1995-01-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for determining the optimum values of the correcting variables of a technical system
US5587897A (en) * 1993-12-27 1996-12-24 Nec Corporation Optimization device
US5784596A (en) * 1994-09-23 1998-07-21 Nec Usa, Inc. Algorithmic modeling of TES processes for simulation analysis
US5724239A (en) * 1994-10-27 1998-03-03 Fujitsu Limited Robust control system for designing logic for imperfect model
WO1996027824A1 (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-09-12 Continental Controls, Inc. Multivariable process control method and apparatus

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SG100710A1 (en) * 2000-05-24 2003-12-26 Rohm & Haas Computer-based product formulation
EP1164522A3 (en) * 2000-05-31 2004-01-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Electronic commerce method for semiconductor products, electronic commerce thereof, production system, production method, production equipment design system, production equipment design method, and production equipment manufacturing method
US6788985B2 (en) 2000-05-31 2004-09-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Electronic commerce method for semiconductor products, electronic commerce thereof, production system, production method, production equipment design system, production equipment design method, and production equipment manufacturing method
DE10110268A1 (en) * 2001-03-02 2002-09-19 Siemens Ag Circuit board manufacturing method selection, using computer program structure for identifying manufacturing method with minimum complexity
WO2004072746A2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2004-08-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for optimizing the operation of a metallurgical engineering system using a mathematical model
WO2004072746A3 (en) * 2003-02-14 2004-10-28 Siemens Ag Method for optimizing the operation of a metallurgical engineering system using a mathematical model
US7720653B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2010-05-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Mathematical model for a metallurgical plant, and method for optimizing the operation of a metallurgical plant using a model
EP1901214A1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-03-19 ABB Oy A method for optimization of subsequent treatment processes in production planning
US7987016B2 (en) 2006-09-18 2011-07-26 Abb Oy Method for optimization of subsequent treatment processes in production planning
US8404714B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2013-03-26 Novus International, Inc. Combinations to improve animal health and performance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1062549A1 (en) 2000-12-27
AU2637999A (en) 1999-09-27
IL123607A0 (en) 1998-10-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8014991B2 (en) System and method for using first-principles simulation to characterize a semiconductor manufacturing process
Theodoropoulou et al. Model reduction for optimization of rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition systems
US8296687B2 (en) System and method for using first-principles simulation to analyze a process performed by a semiconductor processing tool
US8036869B2 (en) System and method for using first-principles simulation to control a semiconductor manufacturing process via a simulation result or a derived empirical model
Banerjee et al. Nonlinear model reduction strategies for rapid thermal processing systems
US8032348B2 (en) System and method for using first-principles simulation to facilitate a semiconductor manufacturing process
US20050071038A1 (en) System and method for using first-principles simulation to control a semiconductor manufacturing process
Merchant et al. Multiple scale integrated modeling of deposition processes
Rasoulian et al. A robust nonlinear model predictive controller for a multiscale thin film deposition process
Meldi et al. Quantification of errors in large-eddy simulations of a spatially evolving mixing layer using polynomial chaos
Tang et al. Melt pool temperature control for laser metal deposition processes—Part II: Layer-to-layer temperature control
Theodoropoulou et al. Inverse model-based real-time control for temperature uniformity of RTCVD
US6289255B1 (en) Method for computer-aided design of a product or process
EP1062549A1 (en) Optimization method and device
Lin et al. Parametric modeling and optimization of chemical vapor deposition process
Ryoo et al. Control of convergence in a computational fluid dynamics simulation using ANFIS
Chiu et al. Control of thin film growth in chemical vapor deposition manufacturing systems: A feasibility study
McKernan et al. A linear state-space representation of plane Poiseuille flow for control design: a tutorial
KR20020082219A (en) Method for finding optimal set-points for machines and processes
Dutta et al. Transfer function based optimization of film hole sizes with conjugate heat transfer analysis
Lee et al. Long wavelength instability for uniform shear flow
Salam et al. Modeling of a plasma processing machine for semiconductor wafer etching using energy-functions-based neural networks
George et al. Optimization of chemical vapor deposition process
Tuntas A neural network based controller design for temperature control in heat exchanger
George et al. Reliability-based optimisation of chemical vapour deposition process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999906434

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09623857

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1999906434

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWR Wipo information: refused in national office

Ref document number: 1999906434

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1999906434

Country of ref document: EP