WO1999044355A2 - Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution - Google Patents

Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999044355A2
WO1999044355A2 PCT/US1999/004036 US9904036W WO9944355A2 WO 1999044355 A2 WO1999044355 A2 WO 1999044355A2 US 9904036 W US9904036 W US 9904036W WO 9944355 A2 WO9944355 A2 WO 9944355A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pixels
pixel
indicia
comparing
dead
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/004036
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1999044355A3 (en
Inventor
Eric R. Fossum
Nick Doudoumopoulos
Roger Panicacci
Original Assignee
Photobit Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Photobit Corporation filed Critical Photobit Corporation
Priority to AU27869/99A priority Critical patent/AU2786999A/en
Publication of WO1999044355A2 publication Critical patent/WO1999044355A2/en
Publication of WO1999044355A3 publication Critical patent/WO1999044355A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/60Noise processing, e.g. detecting, correcting, reducing or removing noise
    • H04N25/68Noise processing, e.g. detecting, correcting, reducing or removing noise applied to defects

Definitions

  • the present invention describes an operation of compensating for defective pixels in an image sensing device.
  • Any manufactured device has certain defects. Minimization of defects yields a higher quality product. However, it is usually less expensive to make a device using less precise manufacturing techniques. Devices that are produced using less precise manufacturing techniques have a higher probability of defects.
  • Typical semiconductor processing techniques define some tradeoff between the quality and cost of manufacture.
  • the semiconductors are tested for defects, and any semiconductor which has more than a certain percentage of defects is usually discarded.
  • Optical semiconductors, and especially image acquisition semiconductors, are especially sensitive to defects.
  • a bad area in such a semiconductor will show up as a bad area on the image that is acquired by the semiconductor.
  • Optical devices operate on spatially distributed units of picture elements or pixels.
  • a typical defect in such an optical semiconductor is a pixel error --"dead pixel".
  • the dead pixels may not work at all, or alternatively may be brighter or dimmer than desired.
  • a single defective pixel may be sufficient to cause the device containg pixels to be discarded.
  • the inventors recognized the tradeoff between cost of manufacture and percentage of usable product.
  • the present specification defines techniques for compensating for dead pixels in an optical device.
  • the optical devices are usually formed on a semiconductor substrate.
  • the area of that substrate, or "real estate”, is usually quite limited, especially in an image sensing array. Images are acquired by sensing and accumulating incoming optical energy. The available real estate on an image sensing chip is hence predominately consumed by the pixel array.
  • Active pixel sensors use some of the area of the substrate to house control circuitry.
  • An active pxiel sensor is described in US Patent no. 5,471 ,515, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. These new techniques have opened the way for incorporating associated control circuitry on the chip.
  • a tradeoff is determined between the amount of memory and hence real estate which will be dedicated to dead pixel correction, and the expected number of dead pixel areas.
  • a practical upper bound on the number of dead pixel areas is defined. That defined number of dead pixel areas can be corrected.
  • a dead pixel area is hence identified as either a pixel or a group of pixels that includes pixel elements that are in some way defective.
  • Figure 1 shows a flowchart of operation of a preferred embodiment
  • Figure 2 shows an exemplary layout of an optical array on the substrate
  • Figure 3 shows an equivalent circuit of registers and comparison logic. Description of the Preferred Embodiments
  • Figure 1 shows an overall flowchart of the operation of the present invention. Correction of a dead pixel area is accomplished in two stages. First, the location of any dead pixel areas is identified. Next, a processing technique is used to compensate for that dead pixel during image processing.
  • the optical device is tested for dead pixels at step 100. Identification or tagging of dead pixels is preferably carried out at chip start up.
  • One such test can be carried out by activating each of the pixels for a short time in sequence, and monitoring the output for a predefined expected result. Pixels which respond with an optical output that is different than desired by a predetermined amount are identified as dead.
  • the test system is driven by controller which stores a grid of data indicating those bad pixel areas.
  • Defective pixel processing circuits in entire columns must be identified by injecting a voltage into all the column lines through a dummy test row. That voltage on the column line is treated like a reset level. The voltage is stored in A/D converters 202 that are located at the bottom of the rows. Then, the dummy row is deselected in order to allow the column line to drain to zero volts. The resulting voltage is also stored and the difference between the two stored voltage level is A to D converted. If the column circuitry is working properly, the positive voltage differential will be greater than the range of the A/D converter and as a result each digital number should be a maximum value produced by the A/D converter.
  • This technique can be used to determine bad columns which are hence stored in the dead pixel register 204 that is within the control unit 200. Details of the dead pixel register 204 are shown in Figure 3. The process is repeated by showing the injected voltage and zero volts into the A to D converter in the opposite order. In that case, the negative voltage differential should be less than the A to D range. Hence, the output should be all 0's. The information obtained in this way is used to program the dead pixel register to indicate the pixel areas which are actually dead.
  • An alternate test procedure targets screening and tagging during a wafer level test. This process uses an image sensor to acquire and store several frames in the dark. Next, several frames are acquired under illumination. The illumination needs to be uniform and low enough that it will not saturate the array. The pixel noise dark current and relative response can hence be detected.
  • Alternate test schemes can test electrical resistance or the like.
  • the bad pixels which were found in step 100 are investigated to determine the dead pixel areas.
  • Exemplary dead pixel areas are shown in Figure 2- -they include a single dead pixel 200 or a contiguous group of bad pixels that can be identified globally by a single stored information unit.
  • an entire row of pixels 202 could be identified as bad by indicia indicating "ROW X”.
  • An entire column 204 of pixels can be identified as bad by "COLUMN Y"
  • a neighborhood of pixels surrounding a central pixel can all be identified as bad as "5 pixels around x, y”.
  • a single pixel x, y can of course also be identified.
  • Each of these pixel areas can be identified by a single indicia including an address.
  • the preferred indicia is of the form (R, C, T) where R is the row number, C is the column number and T is the indication of the area type.
  • T can be, for example, a three bit code which is a reserved sequence used for identifying the area types. As described above, T can indicate an entire row, entire column, 3 x 3 neighborhood surrounding the row and column value specified, and the 5 x 5 neighborhood surrounding that specified row and column. Other shapes of bad pixel areas could also be defined. This allows tailoring the shape of the bad pixel areas to approximate the geometrical arrangement of manufacturing defects .
  • Step 104 tests to determine if the number of bad pixel groups is greater than the predefined upper limit of bad pixel values P B representing the number of registers 300 in the unit 204. If so, there are more dead pixel groups than can be corrected by the limited number of registers that have been allocated for that purpose. The chip is hence identified as being fatally flawed and is discarded at 105. If not, the indicia of bad pixel groups are formatted and output at step 108.
  • the preferred embodiment is an active pixel sensor.
  • This specific preferred embodiment includes on-chip timing and control circuitry shown generally as 200, which forms a basic part of the active pixel sensor.
  • the present disclosure is not limited to use with such on-chip timing or active pixel sensors; however, some on-chip memory structure is preferable in order to store and process the indicia.
  • the preferred upper limit is four in this embodiment. This requires four memory locations, preferably on the chip.
  • the preferred register architecture is shown in detail in Figure 3. Four register locations: 310, 312, 314, and 316 can store up to four indicia. The registers operate according to either the default prestored routine, user-alterable routine.
  • Each register is associated with comparison logic 320 which operates according to a hard- wired sequence to control each of the pixels to provide their information during processing.
  • Step 110 indicates this operation of determining if the current pixel is dead.
  • T 0 in each register indicates a specific bad row.
  • a row address associated with an active (here "1 ") T 0 bit is compared with the current row R,. by multiple AND gates shown as 332 within comparison logic 320.
  • An active " 1 " output indicates that the rows are the same. If T 0 is also high, and gate 324 outputs a 1.
  • This "1 " is passed by OR gate 336 as an address match flag.
  • bad columns and/or single pixels can be flagged by gates and indicated by the status bits 299. Each of the flagged addresses are flagged and are replaced by other information as described herein.
  • the address match flag generates a command to replace the flagged dead pixel with the previous good pixel as shown at step 112.
  • this uses a single pixel delay line, e.g. a latch 220, before the digital output drivers.
  • the address match flag enables switching in the stored value in the latch that indicates the previous good pixel valve to clock out through the digital output drivers.
  • the pixel substitution can be more complicated than the above.
  • the substituted pixel could be a median of some defined group.
  • This system describes the operations taking place in hardware, defined, for example, using HDL.
  • HDL high definition language
  • other hardware configurations e.g., a FPGA, could alternately be used, or the operation could be software controlled.

Abstract

Bad pixels (200, 202, 204) in an optical device are investigated and corrected. An upper limit of bad areas is defined. Each bad area can be one, or more than one pixel.

Description

DEAD PIXEL CORRECTION BY ROW/COLUMN SUBSTITUTION
Field of the Invention The present invention describes an operation of compensating for defective pixels in an image sensing device.
Background and Summary
Any manufactured device has certain defects. Minimization of defects yields a higher quality product. However, it is usually less expensive to make a device using less precise manufacturing techniques. Devices that are produced using less precise manufacturing techniques have a higher probability of defects.
Typical semiconductor processing techniques define some tradeoff between the quality and cost of manufacture. The semiconductors are tested for defects, and any semiconductor which has more than a certain percentage of defects is usually discarded.
Optical semiconductors, and especially image acquisition semiconductors, are especially sensitive to defects. A bad area in such a semiconductor will show up as a bad area on the image that is acquired by the semiconductor.
Optical devices operate on spatially distributed units of picture elements or pixels. A typical defect in such an optical semiconductor is a pixel error --"dead pixel". The dead pixels may not work at all, or alternatively may be brighter or dimmer than desired. Depending on the desired quality and the intended application, a single defective pixel may be sufficient to cause the device containg pixels to be discarded. The inventors recognized the tradeoff between cost of manufacture and percentage of usable product. The present specification defines techniques for compensating for dead pixels in an optical device.
The optical devices are usually formed on a semiconductor substrate. The area of that substrate, or "real estate", is usually quite limited, especially in an image sensing array. Images are acquired by sensing and accumulating incoming optical energy. The available real estate on an image sensing chip is hence predominately consumed by the pixel array.
Active pixel sensors use some of the area of the substrate to house control circuitry. An active pxiel sensor is described in US Patent no. 5,471 ,515, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. These new techniques have opened the way for incorporating associated control circuitry on the chip. However, the inventors recognized that this other required circuitry limits the amount of real estate that can be allocated to the dead pixel correcting system. A high quality image is often formed of many pixels. Storing a map of an entire 1024 x 1024 array would require 1024 x 1024 = 1 Mb of memory. The inventors recognized that this amount of memory could occupy an impractical percentage of the chip real estate.
According to one aspect, a tradeoff is determined between the amount of memory and hence real estate which will be dedicated to dead pixel correction, and the expected number of dead pixel areas. A practical upper bound on the number of dead pixel areas is defined. That defined number of dead pixel areas can be corrected.
Another aspect of the invention allows a single indication to be stored to represent either a dead pixel or some pre-defined group of dead pixels. A dead pixel area is hence identified as either a pixel or a group of pixels that includes pixel elements that are in some way defective.
Brief Description of the Drawings These and other aspects of the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 shows a flowchart of operation of a preferred embodiment; and Figure 2 shows an exemplary layout of an optical array on the substrate. Figure 3 shows an equivalent circuit of registers and comparison logic. Description of the Preferred Embodiments
Figure 1 shows an overall flowchart of the operation of the present invention. Correction of a dead pixel area is accomplished in two stages. First, the location of any dead pixel areas is identified. Next, a processing technique is used to compensate for that dead pixel during image processing.
The optical device is tested for dead pixels at step 100. Identification or tagging of dead pixels is preferably carried out at chip start up.
One such test can be carried out by activating each of the pixels for a short time in sequence, and monitoring the output for a predefined expected result. Pixels which respond with an optical output that is different than desired by a predetermined amount are identified as dead. The test system is driven by controller which stores a grid of data indicating those bad pixel areas.
Defective pixel processing circuits in entire columns must be identified by injecting a voltage into all the column lines through a dummy test row. That voltage on the column line is treated like a reset level. The voltage is stored in A/D converters 202 that are located at the bottom of the rows. Then, the dummy row is deselected in order to allow the column line to drain to zero volts. The resulting voltage is also stored and the difference between the two stored voltage level is A to D converted. If the column circuitry is working properly, the positive voltage differential will be greater than the range of the A/D converter and as a result each digital number should be a maximum value produced by the A/D converter.
This technique can be used to determine bad columns which are hence stored in the dead pixel register 204 that is within the control unit 200. Details of the dead pixel register 204 are shown in Figure 3. The process is repeated by showing the injected voltage and zero volts into the A to D converter in the opposite order. In that case, the negative voltage differential should be less than the A to D range. Hence, the output should be all 0's. The information obtained in this way is used to program the dead pixel register to indicate the pixel areas which are actually dead. An alternate test procedure targets screening and tagging during a wafer level test. This process uses an image sensor to acquire and store several frames in the dark. Next, several frames are acquired under illumination. The illumination needs to be uniform and low enough that it will not saturate the array. The pixel noise dark current and relative response can hence be detected.
All pixels which do not fall within the specified performance windows are identified and their addresses are stored in the registers 300.
Alternate test schemes can test electrical resistance or the like.
At step 102, the bad pixels which were found in step 100 are investigated to determine the dead pixel areas. Exemplary dead pixel areas are shown in Figure 2- -they include a single dead pixel 200 or a contiguous group of bad pixels that can be identified globally by a single stored information unit. By non-limitive example, an entire row of pixels 202 could be identified as bad by indicia indicating "ROW X". An entire column 204 of pixels can be identified as bad by "COLUMN Y", a neighborhood of pixels surrounding a central pixel can all be identified as bad as "5 pixels around x, y". A single pixel x, y can of course also be identified. Each of these pixel areas can be identified by a single indicia including an address. The preferred indicia is of the form (R, C, T) where R is the row number, C is the column number and T is the indication of the area type. T can be, for example, a three bit code which is a reserved sequence used for identifying the area types. As described above, T can indicate an entire row, entire column, 3 x 3 neighborhood surrounding the row and column value specified, and the 5 x 5 neighborhood surrounding that specified row and column. Other shapes of bad pixel areas could also be defined. This allows tailoring the shape of the bad pixel areas to approximate the geometrical arrangement of manufacturing defects .
Step 104 tests to determine if the number of bad pixel groups is greater than the predefined upper limit of bad pixel values PB representing the number of registers 300 in the unit 204. If so, there are more dead pixel groups than can be corrected by the limited number of registers that have been allocated for that purpose. The chip is hence identified as being fatally flawed and is discarded at 105. If not, the indicia of bad pixel groups are formatted and output at step 108.
The preferred embodiment is an active pixel sensor. This specific preferred embodiment includes on-chip timing and control circuitry shown generally as 200, which forms a basic part of the active pixel sensor. The present disclosure is not limited to use with such on-chip timing or active pixel sensors; however, some on-chip memory structure is preferable in order to store and process the indicia.
The preferred upper limit is four in this embodiment. This requires four memory locations, preferably on the chip. The preferred register architecture is shown in detail in Figure 3. Four register locations: 310, 312, 314, and 316 can store up to four indicia. The registers operate according to either the default prestored routine, user-alterable routine.
Each register is associated with comparison logic 320 which operates according to a hard- wired sequence to control each of the pixels to provide their information during processing. Step 110 indicates this operation of determining if the current pixel is dead.
The embodiment which is now described operates in units of rows and columns: so that a whole row, or a whole column, or a single pixel is identified as dead. In this embodiment, the "T" bit T0 in each register indicates a specific bad row. A row address associated with an active (here "1 ") T0 bit is compared with the current row R,. by multiple AND gates shown as 332 within comparison logic 320. An active " 1 " output indicates that the rows are the same. If T0 is also high, and gate 324 outputs a 1. This "1 " is passed by OR gate 336 as an address match flag. In a similar way, bad columns and/or single pixels can be flagged by gates and indicated by the status bits 299. Each of the flagged addresses are flagged and are replaced by other information as described herein.
This embodiment facilitates substitution using the nearest neighbor technique. The address match flag generates a command to replace the flagged dead pixel with the previous good pixel as shown at step 112. In its simplest form this uses a single pixel delay line, e.g. a latch 220, before the digital output drivers. The address match flag enables switching in the stored value in the latch that indicates the previous good pixel valve to clock out through the digital output drivers.
Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail above, those having ordinary skill in the art will certainly understand that many modifications are possible in the preferred embodiment without departing from the teachings thereof.
All such modifications are intended to be encompassed within the following claims. For example, different shaped neighborhoods can be defined, and the control logic would then use counters or the like to compare the neighborhoods. The "T" values, of course, can be used in combination to enable 2n different combinations, where n is the number of T bits.
The pixel substitution can be more complicated than the above. For example the substituted pixel could be a median of some defined group.
This system describes the operations taking place in hardware, defined, for example, using HDL. Of course, other hardware configurations, e.g., a FPGA, could alternately be used, or the operation could be software controlled.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A pixel correction method, comprising: initially determining pixels within a pixel array which are not operating according to a predetermined criteria; defining an indicia of said pixels, and storing said indicia in a storage element on the same substrate as said pixel array; determining an address of a current pixel; comparing, on the same substrate as said pixel array, said address to said indicia in said storage element; and taking an action to correct said pixels which are not operating according to the criteria based on said comparing.
2. A method as in claim 1 , wherein said indicia represents a specified group of pixels, from the group consisting of a single pixel, a row of pixels, or a column of pixels.
3. A method as in claim 1 , wherein said taking comprises substituting at least one different pixel for said pixels which are not operating according to the criteria.
4. An apparatus for detecting an image in pixel format, comprising: a photosensitive substrate, having an image detection portion operating in pixel units, said substrate including:
- a plurality of photodetecting pixels;
- a plurality of on chip registers, each register having an address storage area;
- a comparing element, comparing current addresses for said pixels with values that are stored in said registers, and producing an output indicative thereof; and a pixel correction element which allows substitution of said different pixel values based on said output from said comparing element.
Correct for dead pixels in an optical image acquisition device.
PCT/US1999/004036 1998-02-26 1999-02-24 Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution WO1999044355A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU27869/99A AU2786999A (en) 1998-02-26 1999-02-24 Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/031,145 1998-02-26
US09/031,145 US6611288B1 (en) 1998-02-26 1998-02-26 Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999044355A2 true WO1999044355A2 (en) 1999-09-02
WO1999044355A3 WO1999044355A3 (en) 2000-04-13

Family

ID=21857875

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/004036 WO1999044355A2 (en) 1998-02-26 1999-02-24 Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US6611288B1 (en)
AU (1) AU2786999A (en)
WO (1) WO1999044355A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6665009B1 (en) * 1998-05-20 2003-12-16 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. On-chip dead pixel correction in a CMOS imaging sensor
JP4199874B2 (en) * 1999-03-30 2008-12-24 富士フイルム株式会社 Image processing apparatus and processing method
JP3825935B2 (en) * 1999-04-08 2006-09-27 キヤノン株式会社 Image processing apparatus, image processing method, recording medium, and image processing system
US6819358B1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2004-11-16 Microsoft Corporation Error calibration for digital image sensors and apparatus using the same
US7126631B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2006-10-24 Intel Corporation Sensing with defective cell detection
US6900836B2 (en) * 2001-02-19 2005-05-31 Eastman Kodak Company Correcting defects in a digital image caused by a pre-existing defect in a pixel of an image sensor
US7034873B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2006-04-25 Vanguard International Semiconductor Corporation Pixel defect correction in a CMOS active pixel image sensor
US6987577B2 (en) * 2001-09-14 2006-01-17 Eastman Kodak Company Providing a partial column defect map for a full frame image sensor
US20040239782A1 (en) * 2003-05-30 2004-12-02 William Equitz System and method for efficient improvement of image quality in cameras
US7812867B2 (en) * 2004-10-29 2010-10-12 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus adapted to correct image signal
US7852391B2 (en) * 2004-12-14 2010-12-14 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Substitution of defective readout circuits in imagers
JP2006345279A (en) * 2005-06-09 2006-12-21 Fujifilm Holdings Corp Method of detecting pixel defect for solid state imaging device
US7710472B2 (en) * 2006-05-01 2010-05-04 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Detection and/or correction of suppressed signal defects in moving images
US20070291145A1 (en) * 2006-06-15 2007-12-20 Doherty C Patrick Methods, devices, and systems for selectable repair of imaging devices
US7649555B2 (en) * 2006-10-02 2010-01-19 Mtekvision Co., Ltd. Apparatus for processing dead pixel
US8228405B2 (en) * 2007-01-16 2012-07-24 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Real-time pixel substitution for thermal imaging systems

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4567525A (en) * 1983-10-18 1986-01-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba CCD Picture element defect compensating apparatus
US4805023A (en) * 1985-10-15 1989-02-14 Texas Instruments Incorporated Programmable CCD imager defect compensator
US5354977A (en) * 1992-02-27 1994-10-11 Alex Roustaei Optical scanning head

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01224881A (en) * 1988-03-04 1989-09-07 Toshiba Mach Co Ltd Pattern inspecting device
US5544256A (en) * 1993-10-22 1996-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Automated defect classification system
WO1997008647A1 (en) * 1995-08-25 1997-03-06 Psc, Inc. Optical reader with condensed cmos circuitry
US5982946A (en) * 1996-09-20 1999-11-09 Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd. Method of identifying defective pixels in digital images, and method of correcting the defective pixels, and apparatus and recording media therefor

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4567525A (en) * 1983-10-18 1986-01-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba CCD Picture element defect compensating apparatus
US4805023A (en) * 1985-10-15 1989-02-14 Texas Instruments Incorporated Programmable CCD imager defect compensator
US5354977A (en) * 1992-02-27 1994-10-11 Alex Roustaei Optical scanning head

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1999044355A3 (en) 2000-04-13
US6611288B1 (en) 2003-08-26
AU2786999A (en) 1999-09-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6611288B1 (en) Dead pixel correction by row/column substitution
US4056716A (en) Defect inspection of objects such as electronic circuits
KR100437434B1 (en) Image signal processing device and method of detecting pixel defect
US6663281B2 (en) X-ray detector monitoring
US7023232B2 (en) Image display device, drive circuit device and defect detection method of light-emitting diode
KR100340052B1 (en) Image sensor
US7027089B2 (en) Image sensor with defective pixel address storage
US20030222995A1 (en) Method and apparatus for real time identification and correction of pixel defects for image sensor arrays
EP1143709A2 (en) Method and apparatus for testing image sensing devices
KR100362178B1 (en) Apparatus for real-time detecting and correcting defect pixels in image sensor
CN101455070B (en) Image sensor and method for reading out pixels of the image sensor
EP1003332A2 (en) Defect correction in electronic imaging system
US5995163A (en) Median filter with embedded analog to digital converter
JPH055866A (en) Method for checking active matrix substrate
CN103369265A (en) Pixel information management apparatus and image capture apparatus using the same
US6529238B1 (en) Method and apparatus for compensation of point noise in CMOS imagers
US8310570B1 (en) Repairing defective pixels
US20020005904A1 (en) Method for pixel correction
CN1833434A (en) Photo diode fuse-id for cmos imagers
US8665353B2 (en) Solid-state image pickup apparatus and method for driving the same
US7173741B1 (en) System and method for handling bad pixels in image sensors
JPH0630425A (en) Solid state image pickup device
JP2002318551A (en) Device and method for inspecting pixel of active matrix type display
US7454676B2 (en) Method for testing semiconductor chips using register sets
US20090110324A1 (en) White/black pixel correction in a digital image sensor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase