WO1996026621A1 - Mobile-assisted handoff technique - Google Patents

Mobile-assisted handoff technique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996026621A1
WO1996026621A1 PCT/IB1995/000542 IB9500542W WO9626621A1 WO 1996026621 A1 WO1996026621 A1 WO 1996026621A1 IB 9500542 W IB9500542 W IB 9500542W WO 9626621 A1 WO9626621 A1 WO 9626621A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
mobile
signal measurements
base stations
measurements
base station
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB1995/000542
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Paul Solomon Meche
Donald Vincent Hanley
Larry Dean Chrisman
Michael John Mccarthy
Original Assignee
Northern Telecom Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northern Telecom Limited filed Critical Northern Telecom Limited
Priority to CA002213195A priority Critical patent/CA2213195C/en
Priority to EP95922690A priority patent/EP0811299B1/en
Priority to DE69529921T priority patent/DE69529921T2/en
Publication of WO1996026621A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996026621A1/en
Priority to MXPA/A/1997/006070A priority patent/MXPA97006070A/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
    • H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
    • H04W36/302—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data due to low signal strength
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
    • H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/20—Selecting an access point

Definitions

  • This invention relates to handoff techniques for use in a mobile cellular communications system and in particular to a mobile-assisted handoff technique for such a system.
  • a mobile unit roaming through a cellular communications system experiences a varying quality of communications as it moves nearer or further away from a serving base station.
  • the process of 'handoff where a mobile is handed off to an alternative base station that can better serve the mobile, can be divided into three stages: 'trigger', where it is decided that the quality of communications has changed enough to consider handoff; 'selection', where measurements of alternative base stations are made; and 'decision' where a decision is made to handoff a mobile from the presently serving base station to the best available alternative base station.
  • the base station With a digital system such as TDMA the base station must similarly tune to the frequency that the mobile is transmitting on, but additionally must find, and achieve synchronisation with, the particular time-slot that the mobile is using, and then make a measurement of the communications quality - typically RSS or Bit Error Rate (BER).
  • RSS Bit Error Rate
  • Mobile-assisted handoff techniques reduce the amount of monitoring that the network must perform by using measurements made by the mobile to assess potential alternative base stations.
  • a mobile when a mobile begins communication with a base station on a TDMA voice channel the mobile is directed to begin signal strength measurements of the current forward voice channel as well as the control channels of surrounding cells.
  • the mobile averages a number of the most recent measurements and reports this average RSSI measurement to the serving base station every second.
  • a handoff trigger is generated.
  • a target cell is considered from the best candidates reported by the mobile.
  • Each of the best candidate cells are then requested to make a measurement of communications quality from the mobile using their locate receiver.
  • the base station offering the best measurement that also has an available voice channel is selected, and a handoff attempt is made to that base station. This offers the advantage that only a small set of base stations, those identified by the mobile as offering the best signal, need measure the mobile.
  • the raw signal strength measurements made by the mobile are used directly to determine the target cell for handoff.
  • both the base station and the mobile may initiate the 'trigger' stage.
  • the base station takes its own measurements of call quality and triggers handoffs in response to those measurements.
  • a handoff triggered by a base station on cell A may determine that cell B is the best for the mobile, while a handoff triggerd by a mobile in cell B may determine that cell A is the best.
  • This can lead to a 'ping-pong' effect between the mobile and base station This unnecessarily increases the processing burden on the system and degrades the overall call quality.
  • a method of estimating handoff of a mobile in a mobile cellular communications system comprising a mobile communicating with a serving base station, there also being a plurality of adjacent base stations transmitting signals, wherein the method comprises the steps of: measuring by the mobile signals received from the adjacent base stations to give mobile signal measurements; reporting the mobile signal measurements to the serving base station; adjusting the reported mobile signal measurements to predict measurements that the adjacent base stations would make of signals received from the mobile, to give predicted signal measurements and, comparing the predicted signal measurements so as to select a preferred adjacent base station for a possible handoff.
  • Figure 1 shows, in schematic form, the concept of mobile- assisted hand-off in a cellular mobile communications system in accordance with the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a table showing the relationship between a mobile's power class and the maximum mobile power level it can achieve; and, Figure 3 is a table illustrating the calculation of one of the variables used in the invention.
  • a mobile 1 receiving signals on a forward voice channel (VCH) from a serving base station BS1.
  • Mobile 1 also receives signals on the control channels (CCH) 3,4 of adjacent base stations BS2, BS3 in neighbouring cells.
  • CCH control channels
  • Two adjacent base stations are shown as an example although there would usually be more.
  • the mobile measures the quality of communications on the forward voice channel and the quality of the control channels of the adjacent base stations.
  • the mobile may monitor adjacent base stations by tuning to their channels during time-slots when it is not required to transmit or receive with the serving base station. A number of measurements are averaged to compensate for any irregular fluctuations caused for example by fading or momentary obstruction of the mobile.
  • the mobile transmits these averaged measurements 2 to the serving base station BS1. So far this is the same as in a conventional mobile-assisted handoff method.
  • beacon channels i.e. channels that are continuously transmitting solely to allow mobiles to make such measurements.
  • the base station monitors the quality of the mobile to base station (uplink) path and initiates a hand-off trigger when the quality has changed enough to warrant it.
  • the signal quality measurements of adjacent base stations' control channels 3,4 made by the mobile are used to predict the level that an adjacent cell would receive from a mobile if it were on a voice channel on that cell. In effect, this predicts the level that a cell would receive if it were equipped with a locate receiver and made a measurement of the mobile's voice channel, and is equivalent to measurements of signals 5,6 in figure 1.
  • Signal quality may conveniently be measured in terms of received signal strength, so that mobiles report a Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) which is typically expressed in dB or dBm, common units which allow calulation and comparison.
  • RSSI Received Signal Strength Indication
  • the difference in the ERP of the voice and control channels must therefore be considered, a factor which may vary from base station to base station.
  • One particular case where the voice/control channel ERPs will vary considerably is where the cell is sectored, such that the base station has one omni-directional control channel and one directional voice channel per cell sector.
  • a mobile taking a measurement of just the omni-directional control channel will not be properly assessing a potentially valid sector to hand-off to.
  • talk-in/talk-out arises from the imbalance between the level of a mobile as received by a base station (talk-in) and the level of a base station as received by a mobile (talk-out) which normally results from differences in ERP, receive path gain between the base station and the mobile, the lack of diversity ion the mobile, and other factors.
  • One preferred method of adjusting the mobile reported RSSI measurements to predict target cell receive levels is as follows [note that calculations assume proper conversions to common measures of power such as dBm (for absolute measurements) or dB (for relative measurements)]:
  • Adjusted predicted BS Predicted raw BS RX of VCH
  • VCHERP the effective radiated power of the voice channel of the target cell (in dBm)
  • CCHERP the effective radiated power of the control channel of the target cell (in dBm)
  • VCHTITO the difference in dB between the VCH talk-in and talk-out levels for a Class 1 mobile (talk-in - talk-out)
  • PLDIFF the difference between the mobile's maximum power level (MMP) and the maximum power level allowed in the target cell (VMAX), when the mobile is unable to reach VMAX.
  • MMP mobile's maximum power level
  • VMAX the maximum power level allowed in the target cell
  • PLDIFF the maximum of [0 or (MMP - VMAX)]
  • step (iii) is to compensate for the fact that a mobile may not be able to achieve the maximum power allowed in the target cell. Consequently, the predicted signal strength for the target cell must be reduced by the amount that the mobile falls below this maximum allowed power. This will be better understood after a brief explanation of mobile power levels.
  • Mobiles vary in the maximum RF power level that they can achieve; for example a hand-held mobile cannot achieve as high a RF power output as a vehicle-based unit.
  • Mobiles have a power class rating which defines their maximum RF power output, such ratings ranging from 1 (for the most powerful) to 4 (for the least powerful).
  • the power class rating of a mobile can be equated to a Maximum Mobile Power (MMP) that the mobile can achieve.
  • MMP Maximum Mobile Power
  • the power level of a digital mobile can range from 0 to 10 , but its maximum power output (MMP) ranges only from 0 to 2 as defined in figure 2.
  • a change of one step in the MMP produces a 4dB change in the mobile's RSSI.
  • the mobile will be prevented from reaching its maximum power, and is often done to reduce interference in high density RF environments.
  • the maximum power allowed in a cell is greater than the mobile's maximum power (i.e. the value of VMAX is less than MMP) then the mobile will not be able to achieve the maximum power level allowed in the cell. This is the situation that must be accounted for here since the parameters used in this method assume a class 1 mobile (i.e. the most powerful mobile) operating at the maximum power allowed in the cell (VMAX).
  • the calculation of the adjusted measurement level multiplies the difference between
  • VMAX and MMP by 4 to convert to dB.
  • Figure 3 illustrates the calculation of the adjustment PLDIFF for a range of values of VMAX and MMP.
  • the adjustment value PDIFF is the value (MMP - VMAX) or zero, which ever is the greater.
  • Each set of parameters used above will differ for each base station.
  • a table of values corresponding to the adjustment parameters needs to be maintained.
  • a table may be conveniently held at a base station, such that each base station holds a table of parameters corresponding to each of the neighbouring cells that a mobile might report measurements on.
  • BS1 needs parameters for base stations BS2, BS3.
  • a central table may be maintained and accessed when parameters are needed.
  • the parameters needed are VCHERP, CCHERP, VCHTITO and VMAX.
  • a complete set of adjusted mobile measurements may be used, with the mobile being handed-off to the best alternative base station with an available channel.
  • a combined set of adjusted mobile measurements and locate receiver measurements are compared, such that base stations with locate receivers make measurements of the mobile, and those base stations without locate receivers have their corresponding mobile reported measurements adjusted according to the method of the invention.

Abstract

A mobile-assisted handoff technique for a cellular mobile communications system. A mobile makes measurements of adjacent base stations and reports the measurements to the serving base station. The measurements are adjusted to predict signal measurements that the adjacent base stations would make of the mobile. A full set of adjusted measurements, or a combined set of adjusted measurements and true measurements, made by those base stations with locate receivers, may be used in determining the best cell to hand-off the mobile to.

Description

MOBILE-ASSISTED HANDOFF TECHNIQUE
This invention relates to handoff techniques for use in a mobile cellular communications system and in particular to a mobile-assisted handoff technique for such a system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A mobile unit roaming through a cellular communications system experiences a varying quality of communications as it moves nearer or further away from a serving base station. The process of 'handoff, where a mobile is handed off to an alternative base station that can better serve the mobile, can be divided into three stages: 'trigger', where it is decided that the quality of communications has changed enough to consider handoff; 'selection', where measurements of alternative base stations are made; and 'decision' where a decision is made to handoff a mobile from the presently serving base station to the best available alternative base station.
In early cellular systems, all stages of handoff were performed by base stations of the system. In particular, serving and possible alternative base stations measured the quality of communications with a mobile. This clearly places a burden on the network, a burden which increases as the number of mobiles that must be monitored increases. The progression to digital time-division multiple access (TDMA) cellular systems has further increased the monitoring burden of the network. With an analogue cellular system such as AMPS a base station must tune to the frequency that the mobile is transmitting on and make a measurement of communications quality - typically received signal strength (RSS). With a digital system such as TDMA the base station must similarly tune to the frequency that the mobile is transmitting on, but additionally must find, and achieve synchronisation with, the particular time-slot that the mobile is using, and then make a measurement of the communications quality - typically RSS or Bit Error Rate (BER).
Mobile-assisted handoff techniques reduce the amount of monitoring that the network must perform by using measurements made by the mobile to assess potential alternative base stations.
According to one conventional mobile-assisted handoff technique, when a mobile begins communication with a base station on a TDMA voice channel the mobile is directed to begin signal strength measurements of the current forward voice channel as well as the control channels of surrounding cells. The mobile averages a number of the most recent measurements and reports this average RSSI measurement to the serving base station every second. When the averaged RSSI of the forward voice channel drops below a certain threshold and the mobile reports that at least one of the control channels of an adjacent cell is at an acceptable RSSI, a handoff trigger is generated. A target cell is considered from the best candidates reported by the mobile. Each of the best candidate cells are then requested to make a measurement of communications quality from the mobile using their locate receiver. The base station offering the best measurement that also has an available voice channel is selected, and a handoff attempt is made to that base station. This offers the advantage that only a small set of base stations, those identified by the mobile as offering the best signal, need measure the mobile.
However, if any of the candidate base stations or the serving base station does not have a locate receiver then the raw signal strength measurements made by the mobile are used directly to determine the target cell for handoff.
There are a number of disadvantages with the technique just described. Firstly, even the limited use of digital locate receivers to measure mobiles places a significant monitoring demand on the base stations and the supporting signalling network. Secondly, if locate receivers are unavailable, or if it is decided not to use them, then mobile signal measurements of adjacent control channels are used. These measurements do not account for a number of important issues, particularly the differences between control and voice channel powers and the power that a base station is delivering at the moment that a measurement is made.
Accordingly, there is a need to reduce the amount of monitoring that a network must carry out at handoff and a need to make mobile measurements a more reliable basis on which to handoff a mobile.
There is a further problem in conventional mobile-assisted handoff systems that both the base station and the mobile may initiate the 'trigger' stage. The base station takes its own measurements of call quality and triggers handoffs in response to those measurements. In such circumstances, a handoff triggered by a base station on cell A may determine that cell B is the best for the mobile, while a handoff triggerd by a mobile in cell B may determine that cell A is the best. This can lead to a 'ping-pong' effect between the mobile and base station This unnecessarily increases the processing burden on the system and degrades the overall call quality.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved handoff technique that reduces or overcomes these drawbacks.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an improved mobile cellular communications system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention there is provided a method of estimating handoff of a mobile in a mobile cellular communications system, the system comprising a mobile communicating with a serving base station, there also being a plurality of adjacent base stations transmitting signals, wherein the method comprises the steps of: measuring by the mobile signals received from the adjacent base stations to give mobile signal measurements; reporting the mobile signal measurements to the serving base station; adjusting the reported mobile signal measurements to predict measurements that the adjacent base stations would make of signals received from the mobile, to give predicted signal measurements and, comparing the predicted signal measurements so as to select a preferred adjacent base station for a possible handoff.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows, in schematic form, the concept of mobile- assisted hand-off in a cellular mobile communications system in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 2 is a table showing the relationship between a mobile's power class and the maximum mobile power level it can achieve; and, Figure 3 is a table illustrating the calculation of one of the variables used in the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
With reference to figure 1 , there is shown a mobile 1 receiving signals on a forward voice channel (VCH) from a serving base station BS1. Mobile 1 also receives signals on the control channels (CCH) 3,4 of adjacent base stations BS2, BS3 in neighbouring cells. Two adjacent base stations are shown as an example although there would usually be more. The mobile measures the quality of communications on the forward voice channel and the quality of the control channels of the adjacent base stations. In a TDMA system the mobile may monitor adjacent base stations by tuning to their channels during time-slots when it is not required to transmit or receive with the serving base station. A number of measurements are averaged to compensate for any irregular fluctuations caused for example by fading or momentary obstruction of the mobile. The mobile transmits these averaged measurements 2 to the serving base station BS1. So far this is the same as in a conventional mobile-assisted handoff method.
While the invention is described with reference to control channels, these may also be beacon channels, i.e. channels that are continuously transmitting solely to allow mobiles to make such measurements.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the base station monitors the quality of the mobile to base station (uplink) path and initiates a hand-off trigger when the quality has changed enough to warrant it.
At the base station the signal quality measurements of adjacent base stations' control channels 3,4 made by the mobile are used to predict the level that an adjacent cell would receive from a mobile if it were on a voice channel on that cell. In effect, this predicts the level that a cell would receive if it were equipped with a locate receiver and made a measurement of the mobile's voice channel, and is equivalent to measurements of signals 5,6 in figure 1. Signal quality may conveniently be measured in terms of received signal strength, so that mobiles report a Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) which is typically expressed in dB or dBm, common units which allow calulation and comparison.
In converting the raw RSSI measurements of the mobile to predict the level that a target base station's voice channel would report as the mobile's RSSI, a number of factors must be considered. These include: (a) power from base station into the downlink
(b) downlink gain factors
(c) tower heights
(d) the difference of voice and control channel effective radiated powers (ERP) (e) the difference between the voice channel talk-in and talk-out levels Items, (a), (b), (c) and (d) all affect the total Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of the base station as seen by the mobile.
While the mobile measures the strength of an adjacent base station's control channel, it is the strength of a voice channel that is important since this is the main channel that a mobile will use when it is handed off. The difference in the ERP of the voice and control channels must therefore be considered, a factor which may vary from base station to base station. One particular case where the voice/control channel ERPs will vary considerably is where the cell is sectored, such that the base station has one omni-directional control channel and one directional voice channel per cell sector. Clearly, a mobile taking a measurement of just the omni-directional control channel will not be properly assessing a potentially valid sector to hand-off to.
The final factor, talk-in/talk-out, arises from the imbalance between the level of a mobile as received by a base station (talk-in) and the level of a base station as received by a mobile (talk-out) which normally results from differences in ERP, receive path gain between the base station and the mobile, the lack of diversity ion the mobile, and other factors.
One preferred method of adjusting the mobile reported RSSI measurements to predict target cell receive levels is as follows [note that calculations assume proper conversions to common measures of power such as dBm (for absolute measurements) or dB (for relative measurements)]:
(i) Convert a mobile reported RSSI of a target cell's control channel to predict a mobile reported RSSI of a voice channel;
Predicted mobile RX of VCH = Mobile reported RSSI of CCH
+ (VCHERP - CCHERP)
(ii) Predict the raw level of the mobile as received by the target cell on a voice channel by compensating for the talk-in/talk-out difference;
Predicted raw BS RX of VCH = Predicted mobile RX of VCH
+ VCHTITO (iii) Adjust the predicted level of the mobile as received by the target cell on a voice channel by compensating for the maximum power level that the mobile can operate at: Adjusted predicted BS = Predicted raw BS RX of VCH
RX of VCH - (PLDIFF * 4)
where:
VCHERP = the effective radiated power of the voice channel of the target cell (in dBm)
CCHERP = the effective radiated power of the control channel of the target cell (in dBm) VCHTITO = the difference in dB between the VCH talk-in and talk-out levels for a Class 1 mobile (talk-in - talk-out)
PLDIFF = the difference between the mobile's maximum power level (MMP) and the maximum power level allowed in the target cell (VMAX), when the mobile is unable to reach VMAX. = the maximum of [0 or (MMP - VMAX)]
The purpose of step (iii) is to compensate for the fact that a mobile may not be able to achieve the maximum power allowed in the target cell. Consequently, the predicted signal strength for the target cell must be reduced by the amount that the mobile falls below this maximum allowed power. This will be better understood after a brief explanation of mobile power levels.
Mobiles vary in the maximum RF power level that they can achieve; for example a hand-held mobile cannot achieve as high a RF power output as a vehicle-based unit. Mobiles have a power class rating which defines their maximum RF power output, such ratings ranging from 1 (for the most powerful) to 4 (for the least powerful). The power class rating of a mobile can be equated to a Maximum Mobile Power (MMP) that the mobile can achieve. The power level of a digital mobile can range from 0 to 10 , but its maximum power output (MMP) ranges only from 0 to 2 as defined in figure 2. A change of one step in the MMP produces a 4dB change in the mobile's RSSI.
Now, if the maximum power level allowed in a cell is less than the maximum power that a mobile can achieve (i.e. the value of VMAX is greater than MMP), then the mobile will be prevented from reaching its maximum power, and is often done to reduce interference in high density RF environments. Conversely, if the maximum power allowed in a cell is greater than the mobile's maximum power (i.e. the value of VMAX is less than MMP) then the mobile will not be able to achieve the maximum power level allowed in the cell. This is the situation that must be accounted for here since the parameters used in this method assume a class 1 mobile (i.e. the most powerful mobile) operating at the maximum power allowed in the cell (VMAX). The calculation of the adjusted measurement level multiplies the difference between
VMAX and MMP by 4 to convert to dB.
Figure 3 illustrates the calculation of the adjustment PLDIFF for a range of values of VMAX and MMP. Put simply, the adjustment value PDIFF is the value (MMP - VMAX) or zero, which ever is the greater.
Each set of parameters used above will differ for each base station. In order to adjust the measurements received from the mobile, a table of values corresponding to the adjustment parameters needs to be maintained. A table may be conveniently held at a base station, such that each base station holds a table of parameters corresponding to each of the neighbouring cells that a mobile might report measurements on. In the figure BS1 needs parameters for base stations BS2, BS3. Alternatively a central table may be maintained and accessed when parameters are needed. For the algorithm described above, the parameters needed are VCHERP, CCHERP, VCHTITO and VMAX.
In deciding which cell to hand off the mobile to, a complete set of adjusted mobile measurements may be used, with the mobile being handed-off to the best alternative base station with an available channel. In an alternative arrangement, a combined set of adjusted mobile measurements and locate receiver measurements are compared, such that base stations with locate receivers make measurements of the mobile, and those base stations without locate receivers have their corresponding mobile reported measurements adjusted according to the method of the invention.
For those base stations having a locate receiver, it is possible both to make a measurement of a mobile using the locate receiver and to predict a measurement by adjusting the mobile reported measurement. This has a number of benefits that are particularly important during the early stages of using the improved method; the accuracy of a prediction can be checked by comparing predicted and actual measurements and parameters can be adjusted to ensure that further predicted measurements are accurate.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A method of estimating handoff of a mobile in a mobile cellular communications system, the system comprising a mobile communicating with a serving base station, there also being a plurality of adjacent base stations transmitting signals, wherein the method comprises the steps of: measuring by the mobile signals received from the adjacent base stations to give mobile signal measurements; reporting the mobile signal measurements to the serving base station; adjusting the reported mobile signal measurements to predict measurements that the adjacent base stations would make of signals received from the mobile, to give predicted signal measurements and, comparing the predicted signal measurements so as to select a preferred adjacent base station for a possible handoff.
2. A method of estimating handoff as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of measuring by the mobile signals received from the adjacent base stations comprises measuring control channels received from the adjacent base stations.
3. A method of estimating handoff as claimed in claim 2 wherein the step of adjusting the reported mobile signal measurements includes a step of converting the reported mobile signal measurements of control channels received from the adjacent base stations to predict signal measurements of voice channels received from the adjacent base stations.
4. A method of estimating handoff as claimed in claim 3 wherein the step of converting the measurements of control channels received from the adjacent base stations to predict signal measurements of voice channels includes adding a factor to compensate for the difference in the effective radiated power (ERP) of the voice and control channels.
5. A method of estimating handoff as claimed in claim 3 wherein the step of adjusting the reported mobile signal measurements additionally includes a step of compensating for the talk-in/talk-out difference of a signal between the mobile and adjacent base stations.
6. A method of estimating handoff as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of adjusting the reported mobile signal measurements further includes a step of compensating for the maximum power level that the mobile can operate at on the adjacent base stations.
7. A method of performing handoff of a mobile in a mobile cellular communications system, the system comprising a mobile communicating with a serving base station, there also being a plurality of adjacent base stations transmitting signals, wherein the method comprises the steps of: monitoring by the serving base station quality of communication with the mobile; measuring by the mobile signals received from the adjacent base stations to give mobile signal measurements; reporting the mobile signal measurements to the serving base station; adjusting at least some of the reported mobile signal measurements to predict signal measurements that the adjacent base stations would make of signals received from the mobile to give predicted signal measurements; comparing, in response to the quality of communication with the mobile changing, at least the predicted signal measurements so as to select a preferred adjacent base station associated with the best signal measurement and, handing off the mobile to the preferred base station .
8. A method of performing handoff as claimed in claim 7 wherein on the quality of communication with the mobile changing, those adjacent base stations having locate receivers are requested to make actual signal measurements, and to report them.
9. A method of performing handoff as claimed in claim 8 wherein the step of comparing the signal measurements includes comparing both the predicted signal measurements and the actual signal measurements reported by the adjacent base stations.
10. A method of performing handoff as claimed in claim 7 wherein the step of monitoring by the serving base station quality of communication with the mobile comprises the serving base station making signal measurements of the mobile and comparing the measurements with a threshold.
11. A mobile cellular communications system comprising a plurality of mobiles and a network of base stations transmitting signals, wherein: the mobiles include measuring means to measure signals received from the base stations and reporting means to report the signal measurements to the base stations, and the network further includes: computing means to predict, from the signal measurements reported by the mobiles, signal measurements that the base stations would receive from the mobiles to give predicted signal measurements; comparison means to compare at least the predicted signal measurements and to select a preferred base station associated with the best signal measurement.
12. A mobile cellular communications system as claimed in claim 10 wherein the network includes means to handoff the mobile to the preferred base station.
13. A mobile cellular communications system as claimed in claim 10 wherein some of the base stations are equipped with locate receivers to measure signals received from the mobiles.
PCT/IB1995/000542 1995-02-23 1995-06-21 Mobile-assisted handoff technique WO1996026621A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002213195A CA2213195C (en) 1995-02-23 1995-06-21 Mobile-assisted handoff technique
EP95922690A EP0811299B1 (en) 1995-02-23 1995-06-21 Mobile-assisted handoff technique
DE69529921T DE69529921T2 (en) 1995-02-23 1995-06-21 MOTION-AIDED REACHING PROCEDURE
MXPA/A/1997/006070A MXPA97006070A (en) 1995-02-23 1997-08-08 Transfer technology assisted by one unit

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/393,348 1995-02-23
US08/393,348 US5634192A (en) 1995-02-23 1995-02-23 Mobile-assisted handoff technique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996026621A1 true WO1996026621A1 (en) 1996-08-29

Family

ID=23554324

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB1995/000542 WO1996026621A1 (en) 1995-02-23 1995-06-21 Mobile-assisted handoff technique

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5634192A (en)
EP (1) EP0811299B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1085483C (en)
CA (1) CA2213195C (en)
DE (1) DE69529921T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1996026621A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998027779A1 (en) * 1996-12-19 1998-06-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Apparatus and method in a communication network
WO1998030043A2 (en) * 1996-12-31 1998-07-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Compensation for mobile assisted handoff measurement inaccuracies
WO1998037720A1 (en) * 1997-02-18 1998-08-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Handover in a mobile communication system
WO1998037719A1 (en) * 1997-02-18 1998-08-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Handover in a mobile communication system
EP1841245A2 (en) * 1997-04-24 2007-10-03 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Method and system for mobile communications
WO2012074649A1 (en) * 2010-11-30 2012-06-07 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Methods for using effective radiated transmit power of a base station at a wireless communication device to perform an automatic roaming method at the wireless communication device
US8543065B2 (en) 2010-11-30 2013-09-24 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Methods for using effective radiated transmit power of a base station at a wireless communication device to determine uplink transmission range and/or to adjust transmit power

Families Citing this family (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI96557C (en) * 1994-09-27 1996-07-10 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Method for data transmission in a TDMA mobile radio system and a mobile radio system for carrying out the method
US6058289A (en) * 1995-09-26 2000-05-02 Pacific Communication Sciences, Inc. Method and apparatus for low power mobile unit for cellular communications system
DE59609110D1 (en) * 1996-01-04 2002-05-23 Siemens Ag METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR TRANSMITTING DATA IN A CELLULAR RADIO SYSTEM
EP0786917B1 (en) * 1996-01-23 2013-08-21 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Mobile communication system, network and mobile station
US5774809A (en) * 1996-02-12 1998-06-30 Nokia Mobile Phones Limited Simplified mobile assisted handoff of signal between cells
US6006092A (en) * 1996-02-22 1999-12-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Quality driven voice channel selection in a cellular telephone system using idle voice channel signal strength measurements
US5930711A (en) * 1996-06-24 1999-07-27 Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. Handoff test method between mobile communication switching stations
US5799256A (en) * 1996-07-17 1998-08-25 Motorola, Inc. Battery saving method and communication device using prediction of user location, movement and actions
US5999816A (en) * 1997-02-18 1999-12-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for performing mobile assisted hard handoff between communication systems
CA2290517A1 (en) * 1997-05-19 1998-11-26 Nortel Networks Corporation Boundary sector hard handoff trigger
US5974320A (en) * 1997-05-21 1999-10-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Providing a neighborhood zone within a mobile telecommunications network
US6154653A (en) * 1997-05-29 2000-11-28 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Soft swap handoff method in a CDMA cellular system
US5940743A (en) * 1997-06-05 1999-08-17 Nokia Mobile Phones Limited Power control of mobile station transmissions during handoff in a cellular system
US6119002A (en) * 1997-10-06 2000-09-12 Nokia Mobile Phones Limited Mobile station having methods and apparatus for performing neighbor channel measurements from analog control channel
KR100252932B1 (en) * 1997-11-06 2000-04-15 서평원 Method and System for Providing a Inter-frequency Handoff in a CDMA Cellular Telephone System
FI106236B (en) 1998-02-17 2000-12-15 Nokia Networks Oy Measurement reporting in a telecommunication system
FI106285B (en) * 1998-02-17 2000-12-29 Nokia Networks Oy Measurement reporting in a telecommunication system
JPH11262043A (en) * 1998-03-06 1999-09-24 Nec Saitama Ltd Cdma mobile communication system
US6181943B1 (en) * 1998-03-30 2001-01-30 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for inter-frequency hand-off in wireless communication systems
US6324406B1 (en) * 1998-04-27 2001-11-27 Ericsson Inc. Mobile station location determination using radio signal timing values
US6161015A (en) * 1998-05-28 2000-12-12 Motorola, Inc. Method for improving communication coverage in multi-cell communication systems using location information
CA2641978C (en) * 1998-06-26 2015-01-06 Aware, Inc. Multicarrier communication with variable overhead rate
US6522887B2 (en) * 1998-07-27 2003-02-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Identifying starting time for making time of arrival measurements
US6546252B1 (en) * 1998-12-18 2003-04-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) System and method for estimating interfrequency measurements used for radio network function
US6205129B1 (en) * 1999-01-15 2001-03-20 Qualcomm Inc. Method and apparatus for variable and fixed forward link rate control in a mobile radio communications system
US6862447B1 (en) * 1999-02-16 2005-03-01 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of making downlink operational measurements in a wireless communication system
JP2003503922A (en) * 1999-06-24 2003-01-28 テレフオンアクチーボラゲット エル エム エリクソン（パブル） Mobile and base station assisted network-evaluated handover
US6377805B1 (en) 1999-08-04 2002-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining data communication through neighboring mobile units during handoff
EP1081979A1 (en) 1999-08-31 2001-03-07 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (publ) Subscriber station, network control means and method for carrying out inter-frequency measurements in a mobile communication system
US6600917B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2003-07-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Telecommunications network broadcasting of service capabilities
US6760599B1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2004-07-06 Arraycomm, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting a base station
US7181218B2 (en) * 2001-04-10 2007-02-20 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Commanding handover between differing radio access technologies
US7251228B2 (en) * 2002-03-05 2007-07-31 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for cell switching in wireless communication systems
US8861466B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2014-10-14 Interdigital Technology Corporation Mobile communication system and method for providing common channel coverage using beamforming antennas
US8213994B2 (en) * 2002-08-07 2012-07-03 Interdigital Technology Corporation Mobile communications system and method for providing common channel coverage using beamforming antennas
TW200507671A (en) * 2002-09-27 2005-02-16 Interdigital Tech Corp Mobile communications system and method for providing mobile unit handover in wireless communication systems that employ beamforming antennas
FR2875366A1 (en) * 2004-09-13 2006-03-17 France Telecom ATTACHMENT OF A MULTI ACCESS TERMINAL TO A COMMUNICATION NETWORK
US7796966B2 (en) * 2005-03-15 2010-09-14 Polaris Wireless, Inc. Estimating the location of a wireless terminal based on calibrated signal-strength measurements
EP2805544A4 (en) * 2012-01-20 2015-11-25 Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy Cell handovers
US8867397B2 (en) 2012-10-17 2014-10-21 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for uplink power control in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access communication system
US10334465B2 (en) * 2015-01-30 2019-06-25 Qualcomm Incorporated RRM based on signal strength measurements in LTE over unlicensed spectrum
US20190123433A1 (en) * 2017-10-25 2019-04-25 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Beamforming for wireless vehicle communication

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993008655A1 (en) * 1991-10-17 1993-04-29 Motorola, Inc. Improved gsm interference band selection and reduced power handover
WO1993012623A1 (en) * 1991-12-11 1993-06-24 Motorola Inc. Handover decision algorithm using power budget values
US5257408A (en) * 1992-04-30 1993-10-26 Motorola, Inc. Method for seeking a communication system
WO1995001706A1 (en) * 1993-07-02 1995-01-12 Motorola, Inc. A method for determining communication resource handoffs

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5175867A (en) * 1991-03-15 1992-12-29 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Neighbor-assisted handoff in a cellular communications system
WO1994001974A1 (en) * 1992-07-01 1994-01-20 Motorola Inc. A method of performing mobile assisted hand-off in a communication system
US5493563A (en) * 1993-07-26 1996-02-20 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for mobile assisted handoff in a communication system

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993008655A1 (en) * 1991-10-17 1993-04-29 Motorola, Inc. Improved gsm interference band selection and reduced power handover
WO1993012623A1 (en) * 1991-12-11 1993-06-24 Motorola Inc. Handover decision algorithm using power budget values
US5257408A (en) * 1992-04-30 1993-10-26 Motorola, Inc. Method for seeking a communication system
WO1995001706A1 (en) * 1993-07-02 1995-01-12 Motorola, Inc. A method for determining communication resource handoffs

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GRIMLUND ET AL.: "Handoff Strategies in Microcellular Systems", VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERERENCE, 19 May 1991 (1991-05-19) - 22 May 1991 (1991-05-22), ST. LOUIS, US, pages 505 - 510, XP000260230 *

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998027779A1 (en) * 1996-12-19 1998-06-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Apparatus and method in a communication network
KR100537420B1 (en) * 1996-12-19 2005-12-19 텔레폰악티에볼라겟엘엠에릭슨(펍) Apparatus and method in a communication network
CN1113572C (en) * 1996-12-19 2003-07-02 艾利森电话股份有限公司 Apparatus and method in communication network
US6101383A (en) * 1996-12-19 2000-08-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Apparatus and method in a communication network
AU731031B2 (en) * 1996-12-19 2001-03-22 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Apparatus and method in a communication network
WO1998030043A2 (en) * 1996-12-31 1998-07-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Compensation for mobile assisted handoff measurement inaccuracies
WO1998030043A3 (en) * 1996-12-31 1998-10-29 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Compensation for mobile assisted handoff measurement inaccuracies
US5970407A (en) * 1996-12-31 1999-10-19 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Compensation for mobile assisted handoff measurement inaccuracies
US6219550B1 (en) 1997-02-18 2001-04-17 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Handover in a mobile communication system with adjustable error correction
US6493554B1 (en) 1997-02-18 2002-12-10 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Handover in a mobile communication system
WO1998037719A1 (en) * 1997-02-18 1998-08-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Handover in a mobile communication system
WO1998037720A1 (en) * 1997-02-18 1998-08-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Handover in a mobile communication system
EP1841245A2 (en) * 1997-04-24 2007-10-03 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Method and system for mobile communications
EP1841245A3 (en) * 1997-04-24 2014-06-18 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Method and system for mobile communications
WO2012074649A1 (en) * 2010-11-30 2012-06-07 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Methods for using effective radiated transmit power of a base station at a wireless communication device to perform an automatic roaming method at the wireless communication device
US8521158B2 (en) 2010-11-30 2013-08-27 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Wireless communication device using a base station radiated effective transmit power for performing an automatic roaming
US8543065B2 (en) 2010-11-30 2013-09-24 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Methods for using effective radiated transmit power of a base station at a wireless communication device to determine uplink transmission range and/or to adjust transmit power

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5634192A (en) 1997-05-27
EP0811299A1 (en) 1997-12-10
CA2213195C (en) 2000-10-10
DE69529921D1 (en) 2003-04-17
CN1175343A (en) 1998-03-04
CN1085483C (en) 2002-05-22
MX9706070A (en) 1997-10-31
CA2213195A1 (en) 1996-08-29
DE69529921T2 (en) 2003-10-09
EP0811299B1 (en) 2003-03-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5634192A (en) Mobile-assisted handoff technique
US5379447A (en) Method of selecting a handoff target in a cellular communication system
CA2364777C (en) Preservation of cell borders at hand-off within a smart antenna cellular system
KR970002762B1 (en) Directional handover control in digital mobile radio system employing maho
US5499386A (en) Best server selection in layered cellular radio system
US4718081A (en) Method and apparatus for reducing handoff errors in a cellular radio telephone communications system
JP4668489B2 (en) How to reduce interference by placing additional frequencies at hotspots with adjusted reach
US6771963B1 (en) Triggering handdowns and handoffs of mobile stations between bordering cells of cellular wireless communication systems
EP0531374B1 (en) Cellular radio
US5862489A (en) Power control method and arrangement for handover in a mobile communication system
EP1145586B1 (en) Methods and systems for dynamic threshold adjustment for handoffs in radio communication systems
US6539233B1 (en) Call control method in mobile communication and system therefor
US8670415B2 (en) Apparatus and method for performing handoff in a communication system
WO1999027736A1 (en) Cell identification based on distance
WO1995035007A1 (en) Traffic control method in a hierarchical mobile communication system
US8036665B2 (en) Wireless mobile station call handoff
Lal et al. Coverage analysis of handoff algorithm with adaptive hysteresis margin
US6434386B1 (en) Method and system for monitoring power output in transceivers
WO2002030135A2 (en) Adaptive cellular communication handoff hysteresis
MXPA97006070A (en) Transfer technology assisted by one unit
Ruggieri et al. Modeling of handover initiation in a multicell system scenario
WO2002021756A2 (en) System and method of determining signal quality for different frequencies in a mobile telecommunications network
GB2314731A (en) Handover management system for cellular network
CA1275702C (en) Method and apparatus for reducing handoff errors in a cellular radio telephone communications system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 95197703.2

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA CN MX

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1995922690

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: PA/a/1997/006070

Country of ref document: MX

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2213195

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2213195

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1995922690

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1995922690

Country of ref document: EP