WO1996023229A1 - Etchants for use in micromachining of cmos microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same - Google Patents

Etchants for use in micromachining of cmos microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996023229A1
WO1996023229A1 PCT/US1996/001343 US9601343W WO9623229A1 WO 1996023229 A1 WO1996023229 A1 WO 1996023229A1 US 9601343 W US9601343 W US 9601343W WO 9623229 A1 WO9623229 A1 WO 9623229A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
substrate
mem
improvement
accelerometer
proof mass
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1996/001343
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1996023229A9 (en
Inventor
Kristofer S. J. Pister
Original Assignee
The Regents Of The University Of California
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Regents Of The University Of California filed Critical The Regents Of The University Of California
Publication of WO1996023229A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996023229A1/en
Publication of WO1996023229A9 publication Critical patent/WO1996023229A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • G01P15/08Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values
    • G01P15/12Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values by alteration of electrical resistance
    • G01P15/123Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values by alteration of electrical resistance by piezo-resistive elements, e.g. semiconductor strain gauges
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • G01P15/08Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values
    • G01P15/0802Details
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • G01P15/08Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values
    • G01P2015/0805Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration
    • G01P2015/0822Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration for defining out-of-plane movement of the mass
    • G01P2015/0825Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration for defining out-of-plane movement of the mass for one single degree of freedom of movement of the mass
    • G01P2015/0828Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration for defining out-of-plane movement of the mass for one single degree of freedom of movement of the mass the mass being of the paddle type being suspended at one of its longitudinal ends

Definitions

  • the invention relates to the field of three-dimensional microstructures, and in particular, to accelerometers compatible with CMOS technology.
  • MEMS micro electromechanical systems
  • CMOS design rules so that digital circuits can be designed and fabricated using standardized design assumptions and so that the design can be translated and used with substantially different design rules and hence device parameters.
  • CMOS wafers using maskless post processing. This is done by stacking an active area, both metal contact cuts, and over-glass cuts, to leave bare silicon exposed when the chips are returned from the foundry. See for example J. Marshall et
  • thermopile converters M. Gaitan et al., "Performance of Commercial CMOS Foundry Compatible Multifunction Thermal Converters, " in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Solid State Sensors and Actuators (Transducers '93) Yokohama, June 7-10, 1993. at
  • CMOS foundry has been used to make high voltage devices.
  • Z. Parpia et al. "Modeling with CMOS Compatible High Voltage Device Structures, " in Proc. Symp. High Voltage and Smart Power Devices at 41-50 (1987), Absolute Temperature Sensors.
  • the invention is an improvement in a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices.
  • the improvement comprises the steps of providing a substantially completed MEM device except for the need of at least one unmasked etch to complete the device.
  • the MEM device is etched with a generally isotropic etchant selected from the group of noble gas flourides and tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide. Xenon difluoride is the preferred gas phase etchant, but other flourides of xenon and of other noble gases could be equivalently substituted.
  • the etching of the MEM device is performed with a gas phase xenon difluoride, the etching the MEM device is at ambient temperature without external heating, and is performed under a partial vacuum.
  • the etching the MEM device is performed in a aqueous solution of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide with silicic acid.
  • the invention is a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices, using a standard integrated circuit (IC) process. comprised of the steps of providing a substantially completed MEM device except for the need of a single unmasked etch to complete the device, and etching the MEM device with xenon difluoride in a gas phase.
  • the invention is also a microelectromechanical (MEM) accelerometer defined in a semiconductor substrate comprising a proof mass fabricated on the substrate using integrated circuit processes. At least one and preferably two oxide beams couple the proof mass to the substrate. The oxide beam is at least in part unsupported and extending from the proof mass to the substrate. At least one polysilicon piezoresistor is disposed in the oxide beam.
  • the MEM accelerometer is inexpensively manufactured using standard integrated circ technology.
  • the accelerometer comprises at least two unsupported oxide beams coupli the proof mass to the substrate.
  • Each of the oxide beams has at least one polysilic piezoresistor disposed therein.
  • the invention also includes a method of making three dimensional structures usi aluminum micro hinges.
  • the hinge is used to create accelerometers wi sensitivity along orthogonal axes.
  • the substrate is generally planar and the hinge is deform so that the proof mass is oriented in a predetermined position out of the plane of the substrat
  • the accelerometer further comprises at least three of the proof mass fabricated from the substrate using integrated circuit processes and at one hinge.
  • Each of t hinges couples a proof mass, support bean and peixoresistor to the substrate. At least one a possibly all three of the proof masses are oriented in a different plane relative to the substrate.
  • the hinges are comprised of aluminum.
  • the hinges are fabricated using xen difluoride as a gas-phase ambient temperature etchant to define the hinges apart from t substrate and proof mass.
  • the hinges are fabricated using a tetrameth ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution with silicic acid to define the hinges apart from t substrate and proof mass.
  • the proof mass, hinges, and polysilicon piezoresistor a formed using CMOS processes.
  • the invention is also an improvement in a method of mass fabricating microelectromechanical device.
  • the improvement comprises providing a device havi portions which must be oriented to predetermined three dimensional positions in order assume final configuration for said device, selected portions of said device having electrically isolat structures for receiving and holding charge for at least a temporary period. Selected amounts electric charge are selectively deposited on said electrically isolated structures to genera electrostatic forces therebetween to move selected portions of said device to assume said fin configuration according to well understood principles of mechanics and electrostati specifically applied to each device topology.
  • a scanning electron microscope is used to deposit electron charges on the electrically isolated structures.
  • the invention can still further be defined as an improvement in a microelectromechanical (MEM) device having a substrate and a movable part separate from the substrate comprising a derformable hinge coupling the substrate and part.
  • the hinge is deformed so that the substrate and separate part form a three dimensional structure.
  • the improvement further comprises a sensing element for generating a position signal indicative of the spatial orientation of the part, such as a piezoresistor, capacitive, magnetic or electron tunneling device.
  • the improvement further comprises source of a force disposed on the substrate and part for deforming the hinge to form the three dimensional structure, such as a source of electrostatic charge, magnetic fields or thermally generated forces.
  • the improvement further comprises a circuit disposed either on the substrate, part or both, which circuit is coupled to the sensing element for processing the position signal, such as sensing, amplifying, filtering controlling or otherwise interfacing to the sensing element or an actuator.
  • a circuit disposed either on the substrate, part or both, which circuit is coupled to the sensing element for processing the position signal, such as sensing, amplifying, filtering controlling or otherwise interfacing to the sensing element or an actuator.
  • the part is fabricated in a form or out of a substance so that it interacts with electromagnetic radiation, such as particle or x-ray radiation, visible, infrared, ultraviolet or other portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, to achieve a defined function.
  • electromagnetic radiation such as particle or x-ray radiation, visible, infrared, ultraviolet or other portions of the electromagnetic spectrum
  • Figure 1 is a simplified plan view of a first embodiment of a two beam accelerometer made according to the invention.
  • Figure la is a longitudinal cross-sectional of the two beam accelerometer of Figure 1.
  • Figure 2 is a schematic of the circuit for the accelerometer shown in Figure 1.
  • Figure 3 is a simplified plan view of a second embodiment of a two beam acceleromete including aluminum hinges, made according to the invention.
  • Figure 4 is a graph of the percentage change in resistance of the polysilicon strai gauges as a function of the vertical displacement of the surface of the accelerometer of Figure 1 and 3.
  • Figure 5 is a graph of the percentage change in resistance of the polysilicon strai gauges as a function of the horizontal displacement of the surface of the accelerometer of Figur 3 after rotation to a plane orthogonal to the substrate.
  • Figure 6 is an idealized perspective view of an MEM three dimensional accelerometer.
  • Figure 7 is an idealized diagram showing one etching system in which the etchant of th invention is used.
  • Figure 8 is an enlarged view of a plurality of plates supported by aluminum hinges mad according to the invention.
  • Figure 9 is a side cross-sectional view of an aluminum hinge running between oxid plates and a polysilicon piezoresistor.
  • the accelerometers are fabricated using a standard CMO foundry, such as 2 micron double poly, double metal p-well service, provided by Orb Semiconductor from MOSIS service.
  • a standard CMO foundry such as 2 micron double poly, double metal p-well service, provided by Orb Semiconductor from MOSIS service.
  • a typically accelerometer is shown diagrammatically in Figure 1 with piezoresistors 34 and each support beam 32.
  • piezoresistors 34 typically perform two opposing arms of wheatstone bridge in combination with on chip resistors 46.
  • the wheatstone bridge circuit typically provides low temperature sensitivity and good power supply rejection.
  • the change in resistance is given by the product of the gauge factor of the piezoresistive polysilicon and the strain which the gauge experiences. The result is that the percentage change in output voltage for the wheatstone bridge is one-half the gauge factor times the strain in the gauges.
  • the strain at any point in the beam is given by the equation below where M is the bending moment which is being sensed, X is the position along the beam, z is the vertical distance from the center axis, E the modulas elasticity and I the moment inertia of a rectangular cross section.
  • An an n-type polysilicon piezoresistor has a gauge factor of roughly -20 with a p-type polysilicon piezoresistor having a gauge factor of between 20 and 30 depending upon grain size and doping.
  • Polysilicon gauges are preferred because they are easy to protect during the sensor release etch. The polysilicon is protected by the surrounding oxides. It would also be possible to use the p+ or n+ regions of a type which are typically used as a source drain of FET's for the piezoresistive sensing elements.
  • the gauge factor of p+ single crystal silicon is much higher than that of polysilicon by a factor of about 5 depending upon the orientation of the sensor.
  • the p+ region is further from the neutral axis of the beam, thereby giving additional sensitivity.
  • a dopant sensitive etchant such as EDP or TMAH must be used.
  • a electrochemical etch stop could be used by biasing the p+ regions relative to the etcha solution during the etch. Acceleration is turned into a bending moment which in turn is turned into a materi strain, then a resistance change, and then finally a voltage change in the bridge.
  • the resultin expression for the output voltage is given by the following equation where W is the width of t proof mass, Lp the length of the proof mass, a the support beam thickness, B the support bea width and A is the acceleration.
  • Figure la is a longitudinal cross sectional view taken through sectional lines 4a-4a Figure 1.
  • Proof mass 30 is shown as being formed of a sandwich of alternating layers of gla or oxide 47 and metalization 48 and passivated by glass encapsulation 50.
  • Proof mass 30 coupled then through a glass and oxide connection 52 to the cantilever beam 32 which also i turn is made of a plurality of glass and oxide layers 47 in which a silicon piezoresistive eleme
  • Figures 1 and 3 show designs of two variations of an accelerometer.
  • the basic design each includes a proof mass 30 comprised of an oxide plate typically with etch holes and one more support beams 32 into which polysilicon piezoresistors 34 have been disposed.
  • Metal a poly layers can also be used to increase the mass of the proof plate.
  • the resistance change of the piezoresistors 34 was measured as a function of the ti displacement of these devices. Micromanipulators were used to deflect the tip of the plate a deflection was visually measured using microscope focus for the vertical displacement. T resistance change versus vertical deflection is shown in Figure 4 and the resistance change versus horizontal deflection for a rotated accelerometer is shown in Figure 5.
  • electrical connection to the piezoresistor is measured through aluminum hinges 36.
  • the resistance of the accelerometer strain gauges shown in Figures 1 and 3 as measured in Figures 4 and 5 was measured using a digital volt meter connected to a wire-wrapped amplifier board built with a gain of 1 ,000 and a bandwidth of DC to 10 Hertz.
  • the external amplifier showed a 20 millivolt change when the accelerometer was rolled over from +lg to - lg.
  • the 10 millivolt per g output signal corresponds to the deflection in the tens of nanometers per g.
  • Polysilicon strain gauges were characterized using several different beam and plate geometries.
  • An n-type gauge factor, G was found to vary between -10 and -20 over several tested runs.
  • FIG. 6 diagrammatically shows an integrated circuit wafer and substrate in which three accelerometers generally denoted by reference numerals 38a-c are coupled via aluminum hinges 40a-c to an integrated circuit wafer 42 into which an on chip amplifier 44 and other signal conditioning circuitry has been formed.
  • the circuitry of chip 44 may also include CMOS amplifiers, filters, analog-to-digital converters, temperature compensation circuitry, calibration circuitry, and digital processing circuitry of any type desired.
  • the three axis version of the accelerometer design uses one planar accelerometer and two orthogonal hinged accelerometers, each with an integrated low noise CMOS amplifier 44.
  • Each proof mass 30 is composed of a stack of all oxides and conductors for a total mass of 2.5 micrograms.
  • the support hinges 40a-c extend to form or are coupled to a beam which contains a 1 kilo-ohm polysilicon piezoresistor 34.
  • the total area of the three axis system was 4 square millimeters. Substantially better performance is expected to be realized with an integrated CMOS amplifier than an off chip amplified accelerometer.
  • FIG. 6 With no external loading, the structures shown in Figure 6 could stand on their own held in place by aluminum hinges 40a-c. A micromanipulator or other external force is used to bend the hinges into the desired position.
  • Rotated structures such as shown in Figure 6 can be mad with interlocking braces to keep the structure in the desired position by technique similar t those used with polysilicon structures as described by Pister, "Hinged Polysilicon Structure with Integrated Thin Film Transistors, " in Proc. IEEE Solid State Sensor and Actuato Workshop, Hiltonhead, South Carolina, June 22-25, 1992, at 136-39. Mass assembly of device as shown in Figure 6 can be achieved with the assistance of scanning electro microscopes.
  • a beam of high energy electrons are used to deposit a specific amount of charg on an electrically isolated structure to electrostatically bend the hinges so that the structur assumes the final configuration.
  • sensors and actuators have previously been demonstrated usin simple post-processing of standard CMOS technology. According to the invention, it is als now possible to assemble simple three-dimensional structures and integral piezoresistiv deflection for sensors. Additionally, a simple new gas-phase approach to CMOS proces etching can be used to fabricate the micromachined structures. With this extensive set o microelectromechanical elements, coupled with a tremendous library of electrical capabilitie available in CMOS technologies, it is possible to design and fabricate sophisticated systems in wide variety of applications with very rapid turnaround time.
  • the hinged piezoresistive three-dimensional sensor or accelerometer of the illustrate embodiement can find applications immediately in many devices including but not limited to profilometer, an anemometer, magnetometer, hygrometer, electron tunneling sensors, and i cases where sensitivity is high enough in gyroscopic equipment.
  • a new system has been developed which etches silicon highly selectively at moderat temperatures and without hydrodynamic forces potentially damaging to small structures an features. The system is based on the use of the gas phase etchant xenon diflouride, which is a unremarkable white solid at standard temperature and pressure.
  • Aluminum hinges and polysilicon piezoresistors have been fabricated using a standard commercial CMOS process with one maskless post-processing step.
  • the hinges and piezoresistors have been formed using the metal interconnect and transistor gate layers with CMOS processes.
  • Surface machining with xenon diflouride (XeF2) is a simple and effective alternative to standard bulk etchings for this process because of its extreme selectivity and gentle gas-phase etch.
  • Xenon diflouride has been synthesized since the early 1960's and is commercially available.
  • xenon difluoride is different from the prior art in three major ways. The most significant of which is the highly selective nature of the etch. Semiconductor processing requires a great deal of etching done with as much selectivity and control as possible to produce useful patterns and structures. Xenon diflouride etches silicon preferentially over almost all tested materials which one could encounter in semiconductor processing.
  • the second highly distinct feature of xenon diflouride is the gas phase nature of the etch.
  • Gas phase etching allows for very gentle processing with no hydrodynamic forces. This gentle processing allows for the construction of thin oxide and metal structures by established processes which would otherwise be totally inaccessible using liquid phase etchants. Hydrodynamic forces in the liquid phase could damage even the grossest of such structures or at least many of the structures described here.
  • This technique was originally conceived as a way to selectively etch silicon from standard CMOS technology chips to create microelectromechanical devices. In order to do this 12
  • xenon difluoride and tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide hav been developed as extremely effective etchants for MEMS applications.
  • One apparatus 10 f using the etchant is shown in Figure 7 where a chamber 12 connected by a valve 16 to a sourc 18 of xenon diflouride. Gas or nitrogen purging is also provided to chamber 12 through valv 20.
  • valve 16 is opened and small amounts of xenon diflouride vaporize in the lo pressure and enter the vessel.
  • the etch is performed in vapor phase at room temperature wit no external energy sources at a partial pressure of 1-4 Torr. Under these conditions, etch rat as high as 10 microns per minute have been observed with 1 to 3 microns per minute bein typical.
  • the etch is isotropic and independent of silicon doping compounds as well as highl selective.
  • this etching system introduces no hydrodynamic forces. It has been used by us to release microscopic mechanical structures hooked directly into accompanying electronics. The gentle nature of this etching system allows the researchers to etch silicon out from underneath silicon dioxide or metal hinges only a few microns wide and hundreds of microns long. This technique of etching allows for the construction of complicated micromechanical structures directly integrated on chip with analog and digital electronics; all at relatively low cost as the CMOS technological infrastructure is well established.
  • TMAH tetramethyl ammonia hydroxide
  • the etch is nearly isotropic.
  • the primary differen between structures etched in liquid TMAH silicic acid solutions and structures etched in g phase xenon difluoride is the drying induced bending of the support beams.
  • the aluminum hinge acts as a plastical deformable flexural hinge similar in function to the polyimide hinges described by Suzuki al., "Creation of an Insect Base Microrobot with an External Skeleton and Elastic Joints, " Proc. IEEE Microelectronic Mechanical Systems Workshop, Travemunde, Germany, Februa 4-7, 1992 at 190-95.
  • the hinge is created by running a line of metal over bare silicon.
  • T strain gauge is comprised of a polysilicon resistor protected from the etchant by surroundi oxides.
  • a typical CMOS process will have an additional layer of metal and polysilicon shown in Figure 9 which is a simplified cross section of aluminum trace 22 running betwe oxide plates 24 and a contacting polysilicon piezoresistor 26.
  • the oxide and first metal over-etch into silicon substrate 28 causes aluminum trace 22 be lower than oxides 24.
  • all of the metal layers can be used make hinges, separately or in combination.
  • much of the silicon substrate in the op areas is removed by the over-etch of the oxide and metal layers, resulting in metal traces whi are recessed into the substrate after fabrication as shown in Figure 9.
  • the oxide plates and aluminum hinges will suspended over silicon pits.
  • the multilayer structures are generally surprisingly fl considering the heterogeneity of the thin films. Strain gradient induced deflections are typica less than 10 microns for cantilevers with lengths less than 300 microns. On a recent r however, the tip deflection of a 300-micron oxide cantilever was over 100 microns. General this excessive curvature is undesirable.
  • the resistance of loops of aluminum as shown in Figure 8 is between 1 and 2 oh before and after the etch. Aluminum can be deformed elastically over small range of moti 15
  • An accelerometer is comprised of a proof mass and a force detection system.
  • Existing silicon micromachined accelerometers are typically made from custom bulk micromachining processes which are designed to yield proof masses in the order of magnitude of milligrams.
  • High performance accelerometers are typically either used for capacity of position sensing or force feedback sensing. Virtually all accelerometers use off-chip electronics to detect a condition the measured electrical signal.
  • etchants of the invention and in particular, xenon difluoride are particularly advantageous when used to fabricate microelectromechanical devices using a polymer layer.
  • Traditionally it has been difficult to integrate polymer layers into MEMS processes because of the tendancy of bulk and surface etchants to destroy the polymers. Because of the extreme selectivity of xenon difluoride, uses of many if not most of these polymers should now be possible.

Abstract

What is described in the present specification are accelerometers using tiny proff masses (30) and piezoresistive force detection. The devices may include deformable hinges (40a-c) to allow the fabrication of three dimensional structures. A new system has been developed which etches silicon highly selectively at moderate temperature and without hydrodynamic forces potentially damaging to small structures and features. The system is based on the use of the gas phase etchant xenon difluouride, which is an unremarkable white solid at standard temperature and pressure.

Description

ETCHANTS FOR USE IN MICROMACHINING OF CMOS MICROACCELEROMETERS
AND MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES
AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
Background of the Invention
/. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the field of three-dimensional microstructures, and in particular, to accelerometers compatible with CMOS technology.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The marriage of semiconductor fabrication technology with electromechanical microstructures has given rise to the theoretical possibility of a vast array of microsensors, microtransducers and microactuators that can potentially be made in large numbers at low cost to perform a wide variety of functions, particularly when integrally combined with integrated circuits.
However, the development of an application in micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) is often restricted by process-related barriers. Even conceptual designs can take a substantial amount of process development time. The development of a design for a device is typically coupled to process parameters, so that the process designer and the application designer must be in close communication, if not in fact, be the same person.
This is sharply contrasted with the state of integrated circuit design, in which it is possible to design good circuits without expert knowledge of the fabrication processes. Integrated circuit fabrication has produced scaleable CMOS design rules so that digital circuits can be designed and fabricated using standardized design assumptions and so that the design can be translated and used with substantially different design rules and hence device parameters. Several research groups in Europe and North America have demonstrated that it is possible to micromachine commercial CMOS wafers using maskless post processing. This is done by stacking an active area, both metal contact cuts, and over-glass cuts, to leave bare silicon exposed when the chips are returned from the foundry. See for example J. Marshall et
5 al.. "Realizing Suspended Structures on Chips Fabricated by CMOS Foundry Processes Through MOS1S Service, " NISTIR 5402, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technolog\ . Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899 (1994). The chips are then etched in EDP or some other anisotropic etchant. This technique was demonstrated in the late 1980's and has been used to produce a variety of micromachined components, including: infrared emitting arrays for thermal 0 scene simulation, M. Parameswaran et al., "Commercial CMOS Fabricated Integrated Dynamic Thermal Scene Simulator, " IEEE Int. Elec. Dev. Mtg., San Francisco. California, December 13-16, 1991, at 753-56; thermopile converters, M. Gaitan et al., "Performance of Commercial CMOS Foundry Compatible Multifunction Thermal Converters, " in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Solid State Sensors and Actuators (Transducers '93) Yokohama, June 7-10, 1993. at
15 1012-14; thermal actuators. M. Parameswaran et al., "CMOS Electrothermal Microactuator, " in Proc. IEEE Microelectro Mechanical Systems Workshop, Napa. California. February 1 1-14. 1990, at 128-31, flow sensors. D. Moser, "CMOS Flow Sensors, " Ph.D. Thesis ETH Zurich. Physical Electronics Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, and resonant hygrometers, T. Boltshauser et al., "Piezoresistive Membrane Hygrometers
20 Based on IC Technology, " Sensors and Materials, 5(3): 125-34 (1993) and H. Baltes, "CMOS as a Sensor Technology, " Sensors and Actuators A37-38.51-6 (1993).
Additionally, CMOS foundry has been used to make high voltage devices. Z. Parpia et al., "Modeling with CMOS Compatible High Voltage Device Structures, " in Proc. Symp. High Voltage and Smart Power Devices at 41-50 (1987), Absolute Temperature Sensors. P.
25 Krummenacher et al., "Smart Temperature Sensor in CMOS Technology, " Sensors and Actuators. A21-23:636-38 (1990). Invisible Light Imaging Arrays. This impressive list of sensors and actuators comes packaged along with all the analog and digital electronics available in the foundry process. Nevertheless, two limitations of this approach has been the constraints imposed by etching and limited structural components.
Therefore, what is needed is a micromachining process useful in a wide variety of applications and devices, including but not limited to accelerometers, that will allow engineers and scientists from many different disciplines to create new micro electromechancial systems and applications, particularly using post process foundry CMOS wafers.
Brief Summary of the Invention
The invention is an improvement in a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices. The improvement comprises the steps of providing a substantially completed MEM device except for the need of at least one unmasked etch to complete the device. The MEM device is etched with a generally isotropic etchant selected from the group of noble gas flourides and tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide. Xenon difluoride is the preferred gas phase etchant, but other flourides of xenon and of other noble gases could be equivalently substituted. In the embodiment where the etching of the MEM device is performed with a gas phase xenon difluoride, the etching the MEM device is at ambient temperature without external heating, and is performed under a partial vacuum.
In an alternative embodiment the etching the MEM device is performed in a aqueous solution of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide with silicic acid. Somewhat more specifically the invention is a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices, using a standard integrated circuit (IC) process. comprised of the steps of providing a substantially completed MEM device except for the need of a single unmasked etch to complete the device, and etching the MEM device with xenon difluoride in a gas phase. The invention is also a microelectromechanical (MEM) accelerometer defined in a semiconductor substrate comprising a proof mass fabricated on the substrate using integrated circuit processes. At least one and preferably two oxide beams couple the proof mass to the substrate. The oxide beam is at least in part unsupported and extending from the proof mass to the substrate. At least one polysilicon piezoresistor is disposed in the oxide beam. As a resu the MEM accelerometer is inexpensively manufactured using standard integrated circ technology.
Preferably the accelerometer comprises at least two unsupported oxide beams coupli the proof mass to the substrate. Each of the oxide beams has at least one polysilic piezoresistor disposed therein.
The invention also includes a method of making three dimensional structures usi aluminum micro hinges. In one embodiment, the hinge is used to create accelerometers wi sensitivity along orthogonal axes. The substrate is generally planar and the hinge is deform so that the proof mass is oriented in a predetermined position out of the plane of the substrat In one embodiment the accelerometer further comprises at least three of the proof mass fabricated from the substrate using integrated circuit processes and at one hinge. Each of t hinges couples a proof mass, support bean and peixoresistor to the substrate. At least one a possibly all three of the proof masses are oriented in a different plane relative to the substrate. The hinges are comprised of aluminum. The hinges are fabricated using xen difluoride as a gas-phase ambient temperature etchant to define the hinges apart from t substrate and proof mass. Alternatively, the hinges are fabricated using a tetrameth ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution with silicic acid to define the hinges apart from t substrate and proof mass. Specifically, the proof mass, hinges, and polysilicon piezoresistor a formed using CMOS processes.
The invention is also an improvement in a method of mass fabricating microelectromechanical device. The improvement comprises providing a device havi portions which must be oriented to predetermined three dimensional positions in order assume final configuration for said device, selected portions of said device having electrically isolat structures for receiving and holding charge for at least a temporary period. Selected amounts electric charge are selectively deposited on said electrically isolated structures to genera electrostatic forces therebetween to move selected portions of said device to assume said fin configuration according to well understood principles of mechanics and electrostati specifically applied to each device topology. In the illustrated embodiment a scanning electron microscope is used to deposit electron charges on the electrically isolated structures.
The invention can still further be defined as an improvement in a microelectromechanical (MEM) device having a substrate and a movable part separate from the substrate comprising a derformable hinge coupling the substrate and part. The hinge is deformed so that the substrate and separate part form a three dimensional structure.
The improvement further comprises a sensing element for generating a position signal indicative of the spatial orientation of the part, such as a piezoresistor, capacitive, magnetic or electron tunneling device. The improvement further comprises source of a force disposed on the substrate and part for deforming the hinge to form the three dimensional structure, such as a source of electrostatic charge, magnetic fields or thermally generated forces.
The improvement further comprises a circuit disposed either on the substrate, part or both, which circuit is coupled to the sensing element for processing the position signal, such as sensing, amplifying, filtering controlling or otherwise interfacing to the sensing element or an actuator.
In some embodiments the part is fabricated in a form or out of a substance so that it interacts with electromagnetic radiation, such as particle or x-ray radiation, visible, infrared, ultraviolet or other portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, to achieve a defined function. The invention may be better visualized by now turning to the following drawings wherein like elements are referenced by like numerals.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a simplified plan view of a first embodiment of a two beam accelerometer made according to the invention.
Figure la is a longitudinal cross-sectional of the two beam accelerometer of Figure 1. Figure 2 is a schematic of the circuit for the accelerometer shown in Figure 1. Figure 3 is a simplified plan view of a second embodiment of a two beam acceleromete including aluminum hinges, made according to the invention.
Figure 4 is a graph of the percentage change in resistance of the polysilicon strai gauges as a function of the vertical displacement of the surface of the accelerometer of Figure 1 and 3.
Figure 5 is a graph of the percentage change in resistance of the polysilicon strai gauges as a function of the horizontal displacement of the surface of the accelerometer of Figur 3 after rotation to a plane orthogonal to the substrate.
Figure 6 is an idealized perspective view of an MEM three dimensional accelerometer. Figure 7 is an idealized diagram showing one etching system in which the etchant of th invention is used.
Figure 8 is an enlarged view of a plurality of plates supported by aluminum hinges mad according to the invention.
Figure 9 is a side cross-sectional view of an aluminum hinge running between oxid plates and a polysilicon piezoresistor.
The invention as described in the context of the illustrated embodiment as well various other embodiments can now be understood by turning to the following detaile description.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
What is described in the present specification are accelerometers using tiny pro masses and piezoresistive force detection. Conventional wisdom would indicate that th approach would not yield useful sensors. However, in fact, according to the invention, suc devices are suitable in a wide range of applications. In the illustrated embodiment, the accelerometers are fabricated using a standard CMO foundry, such as 2 micron double poly, double metal p-well service, provided by Orb Semiconductor from MOSIS service. When an additional etching step is performed on th chips after they are received from the CMOS fabricator to free the acceleration sensing element without harming the existing electronics on the chip. Using standard process and existing fabrication facilities, fabrication costs for tested chips is well below one dollar in comparison to currently existing accelerometers having a comparable performance, which accelerometers typically cost between 30 and 300 dollars.
A typically accelerometer is shown diagrammatically in Figure 1 with piezoresistors 34 and each support beam 32. As shown in the schematic of Figure 2, piezoresistors 34 typically perform two opposing arms of wheatstone bridge in combination with on chip resistors 46. The wheatstone bridge circuit typically provides low temperature sensitivity and good power supply rejection. The change in resistance is given by the product of the gauge factor of the piezoresistive polysilicon and the strain which the gauge experiences. The result is that the percentage change in output voltage for the wheatstone bridge is one-half the gauge factor times the strain in the gauges. In a simplified model, the strain at any point in the beam is given by the equation below where M is the bending moment which is being sensed, X is the position along the beam, z is the vertical distance from the center axis, E the modulas elasticity and I the moment inertia of a rectangular cross section.
An an n-type polysilicon piezoresistor has a gauge factor of roughly -20 with a p-type polysilicon piezoresistor having a gauge factor of between 20 and 30 depending upon grain size and doping. Polysilicon gauges are preferred because they are easy to protect during the sensor release etch. The polysilicon is protected by the surrounding oxides. It would also be possible to use the p+ or n+ regions of a type which are typically used as a source drain of FET's for the piezoresistive sensing elements. The gauge factor of p+ single crystal silicon is much higher than that of polysilicon by a factor of about 5 depending upon the orientation of the sensor. In addition, the p+ region is further from the neutral axis of the beam, thereby giving additional sensitivity. To release the structure while preserving the p region, a dopant sensitive etchant such as EDP or TMAH must be used. Alternatively, a electrochemical etch stop could be used by biasing the p+ regions relative to the etcha solution during the etch. Acceleration is turned into a bending moment which in turn is turned into a materi strain, then a resistance change, and then finally a voltage change in the bridge. The resultin expression for the output voltage is given by the following equation where W is the width of t proof mass, Lp the length of the proof mass, a the support beam thickness, B the support bea width and A is the acceleration. L
V . -b 2 W f
^ A
Figure la is a longitudinal cross sectional view taken through sectional lines 4a-4a Figure 1. Proof mass 30 is shown as being formed of a sandwich of alternating layers of gla or oxide 47 and metalization 48 and passivated by glass encapsulation 50. Proof mass 30 coupled then through a glass and oxide connection 52 to the cantilever beam 32 which also i turn is made of a plurality of glass and oxide layers 47 in which a silicon piezoresistive eleme
34 has been embedded at a distance z off the center or neutral axis of beam 32. Figures 1 and 3 show designs of two variations of an accelerometer. The basic design each includes a proof mass 30 comprised of an oxide plate typically with etch holes and one more support beams 32 into which polysilicon piezoresistors 34 have been disposed. Metal a poly layers can also be used to increase the mass of the proof plate. By adding a support pla and aluminum hinges 36, the design of Figure 1 can be rotated out of the plane of the wafer shown in the design of Figure 3.
The resistance change of the piezoresistors 34 was measured as a function of the ti displacement of these devices. Micromanipulators were used to deflect the tip of the plate a deflection was visually measured using microscope focus for the vertical displacement. T resistance change versus vertical deflection is shown in Figure 4 and the resistance change versus horizontal deflection for a rotated accelerometer is shown in Figure 5.
In the embodiment of Figure 3, electrical connection to the piezoresistor is measured through aluminum hinges 36. The resistance of the accelerometer strain gauges shown in Figures 1 and 3 as measured in Figures 4 and 5 was measured using a digital volt meter connected to a wire-wrapped amplifier board built with a gain of 1 ,000 and a bandwidth of DC to 10 Hertz. Using a wheatstone bridge configuration with a half bridge on chip, the external amplifier showed a 20 millivolt change when the accelerometer was rolled over from +lg to - lg. The 10 millivolt per g output signal corresponds to the deflection in the tens of nanometers per g.
Polysilicon strain gauges were characterized using several different beam and plate geometries. An n-type gauge factor, G, was found to vary between -10 and -20 over several tested runs.
Figure 6 diagrammatically shows an integrated circuit wafer and substrate in which three accelerometers generally denoted by reference numerals 38a-c are coupled via aluminum hinges 40a-c to an integrated circuit wafer 42 into which an on chip amplifier 44 and other signal conditioning circuitry has been formed. The circuitry of chip 44 may also include CMOS amplifiers, filters, analog-to-digital converters, temperature compensation circuitry, calibration circuitry, and digital processing circuitry of any type desired. The three axis version of the accelerometer design uses one planar accelerometer and two orthogonal hinged accelerometers, each with an integrated low noise CMOS amplifier 44. Each proof mass 30 is composed of a stack of all oxides and conductors for a total mass of 2.5 micrograms. The support hinges 40a-c extend to form or are coupled to a beam which contains a 1 kilo-ohm polysilicon piezoresistor 34. The total area of the three axis system was 4 square millimeters. Substantially better performance is expected to be realized with an integrated CMOS amplifier than an off chip amplified accelerometer.
With no external loading, the structures shown in Figure 6 could stand on their own held in place by aluminum hinges 40a-c. A micromanipulator or other external force is used to bend the hinges into the desired position. Rotated structures such as shown in Figure 6 can be mad with interlocking braces to keep the structure in the desired position by technique similar t those used with polysilicon structures as described by Pister, "Hinged Polysilicon Structure with Integrated Thin Film Transistors, " in Proc. IEEE Solid State Sensor and Actuato Workshop, Hiltonhead, South Carolina, June 22-25, 1992, at 136-39. Mass assembly of device as shown in Figure 6 can be achieved with the assistance of scanning electro microscopes. A beam of high energy electrons are used to deposit a specific amount of charg on an electrically isolated structure to electrostatically bend the hinges so that the structur assumes the final configuration. A wide variety of sensors and actuators have previously been demonstrated usin simple post-processing of standard CMOS technology. According to the invention, it is als now possible to assemble simple three-dimensional structures and integral piezoresistiv deflection for sensors. Additionally, a simple new gas-phase approach to CMOS proces etching can be used to fabricate the micromachined structures. With this extensive set o microelectromechanical elements, coupled with a tremendous library of electrical capabilitie available in CMOS technologies, it is possible to design and fabricate sophisticated systems in wide variety of applications with very rapid turnaround time.
The hinged piezoresistive three-dimensional sensor or accelerometer of the illustrate embodiement can find applications immediately in many devices including but not limited to profilometer, an anemometer, magnetometer, hygrometer, electron tunneling sensors, and i cases where sensitivity is high enough in gyroscopic equipment. Other applications where suc devices can be anticipated as having immediate application automotive crash sensing wher requirements of 1 kHz bandwidth and +/-50 g range sensitivity is needed and disk drive shoc sensing, in smart packages and in sporting equipment. A new system has been developed which etches silicon highly selectively at moderat temperatures and without hydrodynamic forces potentially damaging to small structures an features. The system is based on the use of the gas phase etchant xenon diflouride, which is a unremarkable white solid at standard temperature and pressure. 11
Aluminum hinges and polysilicon piezoresistors have been fabricated using a standard commercial CMOS process with one maskless post-processing step. The hinges and piezoresistors have been formed using the metal interconnect and transistor gate layers with CMOS processes. Surface machining with xenon diflouride (XeF2) is a simple and effective alternative to standard bulk etchings for this process because of its extreme selectivity and gentle gas-phase etch. Xenon diflouride has been synthesized since the early 1960's and is commercially available.
The use of xenon difluoride is different from the prior art in three major ways. The most significant of which is the highly selective nature of the etch. Semiconductor processing requires a great deal of etching done with as much selectivity and control as possible to produce useful patterns and structures. Xenon diflouride etches silicon preferentially over almost all tested materials which one could encounter in semiconductor processing.
The second highly distinct feature of xenon diflouride is the gas phase nature of the etch. Gas phase etching allows for very gentle processing with no hydrodynamic forces. This gentle processing allows for the construction of thin oxide and metal structures by established processes which would otherwise be totally inaccessible using liquid phase etchants. Hydrodynamic forces in the liquid phase could damage even the grossest of such structures or at least many of the structures described here.
Lastly the process is run without externally input heat. Although there may be some slight heat output from the actual etching itself the fact that the processing is done in a low temperature environment allows for silicon etching masked by uncured photoresist or other low temperature materials.
The problem which prompted development of this technique was the fabrication of micromechanical structures with integrated electronics. No other currently available technique allows for the use of standard CMOS to build satisfactory micromechanical structures with integrated electronics.
This technique was originally conceived as a way to selectively etch silicon from standard CMOS technology chips to create microelectromechanical devices. In order to do this 12
we needed a highly selective, but minimally damaging system for etching silicon. Xeno diflouride had previously been used to etch the silicon away from the back side of a aluminum-silicon dioxide interface.
The illustrated embodiment is shown in the context of a piezoresistive acceleromete but it is to be specifically understood that any type of MEM device could be made consiste with the teachings of the invention.
When the chips return from the foundry, they require a single unmasked etch f finishing prior to die separation. The traditional EDP etch is useful for etching pits in structure with dimensions on the order of 100 microns, but for longer etches, the aluminum metalizatio in the bonding pads is destroyed. Hydrazene monohydrate has been proposed as a mor selective etchant but the health hazards of this material are substantially worse than EDP, whic itself is a fairly toxic substance.
According to the invention xenon difluoride and tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide hav been developed as extremely effective etchants for MEMS applications. One apparatus 10 f using the etchant is shown in Figure 7 where a chamber 12 connected by a valve 16 to a sourc 18 of xenon diflouride. Gas or nitrogen purging is also provided to chamber 12 through valv 20. Once chamber 12, with samples inside, has been pumped down to a moderate vacuum b pump 14, valve 16 is opened and small amounts of xenon diflouride vaporize in the lo pressure and enter the vessel. The etch is performed in vapor phase at room temperature wit no external energy sources at a partial pressure of 1-4 Torr. Under these conditions, etch rat as high as 10 microns per minute have been observed with 1 to 3 microns per minute bein typical. The etch is isotropic and independent of silicon doping compounds as well as highl selective.
This system has been used to etch a number of CMOS chips containing MOSFETs an other circuit elements, all of which were unaffected. Not only are aluminum and oxide pro against this etch, and thus candidates for masking, but photoresist and other polymer coatin also work as well. Unfortunately the gas phase etchant does attack chromium so certain for of stainless steel must be avoided in the design of chamber 12. Inconel, monel, and other suc alloys designed for use in fluorine based etching systems may be used, however, and no problems have been encountered from a system designed using components derived from commercial reactive ion etching systems.
In addition to its highly selective and CMOS compatible nature this etching system introduces no hydrodynamic forces. It has been used by us to release microscopic mechanical structures hooked directly into accompanying electronics. The gentle nature of this etching system allows the researchers to etch silicon out from underneath silicon dioxide or metal hinges only a few microns wide and hundreds of microns long. This technique of etching allows for the construction of complicated micromechanical structures directly integrated on chip with analog and digital electronics; all at relatively low cost as the CMOS technological infrastructure is well established.
The extreme selectivity of xenon difluoride to silicon dioxide and silicon nitride has previously been known, D. E. Ibbotson et al., "Comparison of Xenon Difluoride in F-Atom Reactions with Silicon and Silicon Dioxide, " Appl. Physics Phys. Lett. 44(12):1 129-31 (1984), and H.F. Winters et al., "The Etching of Silicon with Xenon Difluoride Vapor, " Applied Physics Letters 34(1): 70-3 (1979). For example, 40 nanometer gate oxide is sufficient to protect the polysilicon gate from underside etch. We have also shown that xenon difluoride is extremely selectively to aluminum and photoresist. Simple mask test structure is made from 50 nanometer thick aluminum have been successfully released. A single layer of hard baked photoresist makes excellent etched mask. Chips bonded in standard ceramic chip carriers have been etched and tested successfully.
Silicon doping of tetramethyl ammonia hydroxide (TMAH) solutions have also been demonstrated as a method for improving the selectivity of TMAH to aluminum. C U Schnakenberg et al, "TMAH W Etchants for Silicon Micromachining, " in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Solid State Sensors and Actuators (Transducers '91) San Francisco, June 1991 at 815-18. By adding silicic acid directly, we have seen similar results. Cantilevered or end structure such as shown in Figure 8 have been produced using an etch solution of 80 milliliters of 25 percent TMAH, 16 grams of silicic acid, and balanced deionized water in a 250 milliliter beaker. The chip was etched at 70 degrees for 24 hours, with the resulting etch depth of between 50 to 1 microns varying upon the surface pattern.
As can be seen from Figure 8, the etch is nearly isotropic. The primary differen between structures etched in liquid TMAH silicic acid solutions and structures etched in g phase xenon difluoride is the drying induced bending of the support beams.
Consider for example the use of the disclosed etchants for the fabrication of aluminum hinge and a polysilicon strain gauge. The aluminum hinge acts as a plastical deformable flexural hinge similar in function to the polyimide hinges described by Suzuki al., "Creation of an Insect Base Microrobot with an External Skeleton and Elastic Joints, " Proc. IEEE Microelectronic Mechanical Systems Workshop, Travemunde, Germany, Februa 4-7, 1992 at 190-95. The hinge is created by running a line of metal over bare silicon. T strain gauge is comprised of a polysilicon resistor protected from the etchant by surroundi oxides. A typical CMOS process will have an additional layer of metal and polysilicon shown in Figure 9 which is a simplified cross section of aluminum trace 22 running betwe oxide plates 24 and a contacting polysilicon piezoresistor 26.
The oxide and first metal over-etch into silicon substrate 28 causes aluminum trace 22 be lower than oxides 24. In a two or more metal process, all of the metal layers can be used make hinges, separately or in combination. Similarly, much of the silicon substrate in the op areas is removed by the over-etch of the oxide and metal layers, resulting in metal traces whi are recessed into the substrate after fabrication as shown in Figure 9.
Once the structure has been etched, the oxide plates and aluminum hinges will suspended over silicon pits. The multilayer structures are generally surprisingly fl considering the heterogeneity of the thin films. Strain gradient induced deflections are typica less than 10 microns for cantilevers with lengths less than 300 microns. On a recent r however, the tip deflection of a 300-micron oxide cantilever was over 100 microns. General this excessive curvature is undesirable.
The resistance of loops of aluminum as shown in Figure 8 is between 1 and 2 oh before and after the etch. Aluminum can be deformed elastically over small range of moti 15
and thereafter deforms plastically. Hinges are rotated using mechanical probes and can be rotated well past 90 degrees. The resistance of the plastically deformed aluminum lines also remains constant at between 1 to 2 ohms even after several deformations. Aluminum lines fail at current densities above 10 microamps per square micron before and after the etch. An accelerometer is comprised of a proof mass and a force detection system. Existing silicon micromachined accelerometers are typically made from custom bulk micromachining processes which are designed to yield proof masses in the order of magnitude of milligrams. High performance accelerometers are typically either used for capacity of position sensing or force feedback sensing. Virtually all accelerometers use off-chip electronics to detect a condition the measured electrical signal.
The etchants of the invention, and in particular, xenon difluoride are particularly advantageous when used to fabricate microelectromechanical devices using a polymer layer. Traditionally it has been difficult to integrate polymer layers into MEMS processes because of the tendancy of bulk and surface etchants to destroy the polymers. Because of the extreme selectivity of xenon difluoride, uses of many if not most of these polymers should now be possible.
It should now be readily appreciated that the advantages of the invention is that surface micromachining techniques instead of bulk techniques can be used, that piezoresistive sensing instead of capacitive sensing will be possible, that integrated circuits instead of off-chip electronics can be integrally fabricated with the sensing device, and that the entire device can be made from standard CMOS or equivalently substitutable technologies instead of requiring a customized fabrication technique or processes.
Many alterations and modifications may be made by those having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it must be understood that the illustrated embodiment has been set forth only for the purposes of example and that it should not be taken as limiting the invention as defined by the following claims.
The words used in this specification to describe the invention and its various embodiments are to be understood not only in the sense of their commonly defined meanings, but to include by special definition in this specification structure, material or acts beyond t scope of the commonly defined meanings. Thus if an element can be understood in the conte of this specification as including more than one meaning, then its use in a claim must understood as being generic to all possible meanings supported by the specification and by t word itself.
The definitions of the words or elements of the following claims are, therefore, defin in this specification to include not only the combination of elements which are literally forth, but all equivalent structure, material or acts for performing substantially the sa function in substantially the same way to obtain substantially the same result. In addition to the equivalents of the claimed elements, obvious substitutions now or lat known to one with ordinary skill in the art are defined to be within the scope of the defin elements.
The claims are thus to be understood to include what is specifically illustrated a described above, what is conceptionally equivalent, what can be obviously substituted and al what essentially incorporates the essential idea of the invention.

Claims

I claim:
1. In a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices, an improvement comprising:
providing a substantially completed MEM device through standard IC processing except for the need of at least one unmasked etch to complete said device; and
etching said MEM device with a generally isotropic etchant selected from the group of noble gas flourides and tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide.
2. The improvement of Claim 1 wherein etching said MEM device is performed with a gas phase xenon difluoride.
3. The improvement of Claim 2 wherein etching said MEM device is at ambient temperature without external heating.
4. The improvement of Claim 3 wherein etching said MEM device is performed under a partial vacuum.
5. The improvement of Claim 1 wherein etching said MEM device is performed in a aqueous solution of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide with silicic acid.
6. In a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices, an improvement comprising:
providing a substantially completed MEM device except for the need of a single unmasked etch to complete said device; and
etching said MEM device with xenon difluoride in a gas phase.
7. A microelectromechanical (MEM) accelerometer defined in a semiconductor substrate comprising:
a proof mass fabricated from said substrate using integrated circuit processes;
at least one beam coupling said proof mass to said substrate, said beam being at least in part unsupported and extending from said proof mass to said substrate; and
at least one polysilicon piezoresistor disposed in said beam,
whereby said MEM accelerometer is inexpensively manufactured using standard integrated circuit technology.
8. The accelerometer of Claim 7 further comprising at least two unsupported beams coupling said proof mass to said substrate, each of said beams having at least one polysilicon piezoresistor disposed therein.
9. The accelerometer of Claim 7 wherein said substrate is generally planar and further comprising a hinge which is deformed so that said proof mass is oriented in a predetermined position out of the plane of said substrate.
10. The accelerometer of Claim 9 further comprising:
at least three of said proof masses fabricated from said substrate using integrated circuit processes;
at least three hinges, each of said hinges coupling one of said three proof masses to said substrate,
at least three beams coupled to corresponding ones of said three hinges, each of said beams being at least in part unsupported and extending from said proof mass to said substrate; and
at least three polysilicon piezoresistors, one of three polysilicon piezoresistors being disposed in each of said three beams,
wherein said proof masses are each oriented in a different plane relative to said substrate so that a three-axis accelerometer is provided.
11. The accelerometer of Claim 7 wherein said hinges are comprised of aluminum.
12. The accelerometer of Claim 11 wherein said beams are fabricated using xenon difluoride as a gas-phase ambient temperature etchant to define said beams apart from said substrate and proof mass.
13. The accelerometer of Claim 11 wherein said beams are fabricated using a tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution with silicic acid to define said beams apart from said substrate and proof mass.
14. The accelerometer of Claim 7 wherein said proof mass and polysilicon piezoresistor are formed using CMOS processes.
15. The accelerometer of Claim 14 wherein said beams are fabricated using xenon difluoride as a gas-phase ambient temperature etchant to define said beams apart from said substrate and proof mass.
16. The MEMS device of Claim 14 wherein said beam is defined and separated from said substrate through use of solution of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide in silicic acid.
17. The MEMS device of Claim 9 wherein said proof mass, hinge and polysilicon piezoresistor are formed using CMOS processes.
18. In a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM) devices, an improvement comprising:
providing a substantially completed MEM device except for the need of a single unmasked etch to complete said device; and 5 etching said MEM device with a substantially isotropic etchant selected from
6 the group of xenon difluoride and an aqueous solution of tetramethyl ammonium
7 hydroxide and silicic acid.
1 19. In a method for fabricating microelectromechanical (MEM)
2 devices, an improvement comprising:
3 providing a substantially completed MEM CMOS device except for the need
4 of at least one unmasked etch to complete said device; and
5 etching said MEM CMOS device with a generally isotropic etchant selected
6 from the group of xenon difluoride and tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide.
1 20. The improvement of Claim 19 wherein said substantially
2 completed MEM CMOS device is an accelerometer having an integrated circuit
3 substrate, a proof mass and a piezoresistive sensing element coupling said substrate to
4 said proof mass, but remaining undefined from them, wherein said etching defines
5 said sensing element by a single etch step by said generally isotropic etchant.
l
21. In a method of mass fabricating a microelectromechanical device,
"> an improvement comprising:
3 providing a device having portions which must be oriented to predetermined
4 three dimensional positions in order assume a final configuration for said device,
5 selected portions of said device having electrically isolated structures for receiving
6 and holding charge for at least a temporary period; and selectively depositing selected amounts of electric charge on said electrically isolated structures to generate electrostatic forces therebetween to move selected portions of said device to assume said final configuration.
22. The improvement of Claim 21 where selectively depositing selected amounts of electric charge on said electrically isolated structures is performed by selective control of a scanning electron microscope which is directed to deposit electron charges on said electrically isolated structures.
23. An improvement in a microelectromechanical (MEM) device having a substrate and a movable part separate from said substrate comprising a conductive derformable hinge coupling said substrate and part.
24. The improvement of claim 23 wherein said hinge is deformed so that said substrate and separate part form a three dimensional structure.
1 25. The improvement of claim 24 further comprising a sensing means for generating a position signal indicative of the spatial orientation of said part.
ι
26. The improvement of claim 24 further comprising force means disposed on said substrate and part for deforming said hinge to form said three
3 dimensional structure.
27. The improvement of claim 25 further comprising circuit means disposed on said substrate or part and coupled to said sensing means for processing said position signal.
28. The improvement of claim 23 wherein said part is interacts with electromagnetic radiation.
PCT/US1996/001343 1995-01-27 1996-01-26 Etchants for use in micromachining of cmos microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same WO1996023229A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/379,751 US5726480A (en) 1995-01-27 1995-01-27 Etchants for use in micromachining of CMOS Microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same
US08/379,751 1995-01-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996023229A1 true WO1996023229A1 (en) 1996-08-01
WO1996023229A9 WO1996023229A9 (en) 1996-10-17

Family

ID=23498532

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1996/001343 WO1996023229A1 (en) 1995-01-27 1996-01-26 Etchants for use in micromachining of cmos microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US5726480A (en)
WO (1) WO1996023229A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0870170A2 (en) * 1995-12-24 1998-10-14 Dan Haronian Micro-electro-mechanics systems (mems)
US5998816A (en) * 1997-01-31 1999-12-07 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Sensor element with removal resistance region
US6355181B1 (en) 1998-03-20 2002-03-12 Surface Technology Systems Plc Method and apparatus for manufacturing a micromechanical device
US6409876B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-06-25 Surface Technology Systems, Plc Apparatus for etching a workpiece
US7670203B2 (en) * 2000-08-30 2010-03-02 Agere Systems Inc. Process for making an on-chip vacuum tube device

Families Citing this family (221)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6674562B1 (en) * 1994-05-05 2004-01-06 Iridigm Display Corporation Interferometric modulation of radiation
US20010003487A1 (en) * 1996-11-05 2001-06-14 Mark W. Miles Visible spectrum modulator arrays
US7297471B1 (en) * 2003-04-15 2007-11-20 Idc, Llc Method for manufacturing an array of interferometric modulators
US6680792B2 (en) * 1994-05-05 2004-01-20 Iridigm Display Corporation Interferometric modulation of radiation
US8014059B2 (en) * 1994-05-05 2011-09-06 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. System and method for charge control in a MEMS device
US7123216B1 (en) * 1994-05-05 2006-10-17 Idc, Llc Photonic MEMS and structures
US6710908B2 (en) 1994-05-05 2004-03-23 Iridigm Display Corporation Controlling micro-electro-mechanical cavities
US7550794B2 (en) * 2002-09-20 2009-06-23 Idc, Llc Micromechanical systems device comprising a displaceable electrode and a charge-trapping layer
US7898722B2 (en) * 1995-05-01 2011-03-01 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Microelectromechanical device with restoring electrode
US6969635B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2005-11-29 Reflectivity, Inc. Methods for depositing, releasing and packaging micro-electromechanical devices on wafer substrates
US6849471B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2005-02-01 Reflectivity, Inc. Barrier layers for microelectromechanical systems
US5942791A (en) * 1996-03-06 1999-08-24 Gec-Marconi Limited Micromachined devices having microbridge structure
US7929197B2 (en) * 1996-11-05 2011-04-19 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. System and method for a MEMS device
US7830588B2 (en) * 1996-12-19 2010-11-09 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method of making a light modulating display device and associated transistor circuitry and structures thereof
CH691559A5 (en) * 1997-04-21 2001-08-15 Asulab Sa magnetic micro-switch and its production process.
US5912094A (en) * 1997-05-15 1999-06-15 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for making a micro device
US5955771A (en) * 1997-11-12 1999-09-21 Kulite Semiconductor Products, Inc. Sensors for use in high vibrational applications and methods for fabricating same
US8928967B2 (en) 1998-04-08 2015-01-06 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method and device for modulating light
KR100703140B1 (en) * 1998-04-08 2007-04-05 이리다임 디스플레이 코포레이션 Interferometric modulation and its manufacturing method
US6303986B1 (en) 1998-07-29 2001-10-16 Silicon Light Machines Method of and apparatus for sealing an hermetic lid to a semiconductor die
US6350657B1 (en) * 1998-08-03 2002-02-26 Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. Inexpensive method of manufacturing an SOI wafer
JP2000091818A (en) * 1998-09-11 2000-03-31 Toyota Motor Corp Manufacture of film-type transmission line and method for connecting the same line
US6261494B1 (en) * 1998-10-22 2001-07-17 Northeastern University Method of forming plastically deformable microstructures
US6618217B2 (en) * 1999-02-23 2003-09-09 Texas Instruments Incorporated System and method for determining the position of a device
JP4270647B2 (en) 1999-05-31 2009-06-03 ボールセミコンダクター株式会社 Inclinometer
JP4316050B2 (en) 1999-05-31 2009-08-19 ボールセミコンダクター株式会社 Micromachine manufacturing method
US6057520A (en) * 1999-06-30 2000-05-02 Mcnc Arc resistant high voltage micromachined electrostatic switch
US6229683B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2001-05-08 Mcnc High voltage micromachined electrostatic switch
WO2003007049A1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2003-01-23 Iridigm Display Corporation Photonic mems and structures
US7041224B2 (en) * 1999-10-26 2006-05-09 Reflectivity, Inc. Method for vapor phase etching of silicon
US6290864B1 (en) 1999-10-26 2001-09-18 Reflectivity, Inc. Fluoride gas etching of silicon with improved selectivity
US6942811B2 (en) * 1999-10-26 2005-09-13 Reflectivity, Inc Method for achieving improved selectivity in an etching process
US6949202B1 (en) 1999-10-26 2005-09-27 Reflectivity, Inc Apparatus and method for flow of process gas in an ultra-clean environment
US6960305B2 (en) * 1999-10-26 2005-11-01 Reflectivity, Inc Methods for forming and releasing microelectromechanical structures
US6359374B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2002-03-19 Mcnc Miniature electrical relays using a piezoelectric thin film as an actuating element
US6197610B1 (en) 2000-01-14 2001-03-06 Ball Semiconductor, Inc. Method of making small gaps for small electrical/mechanical devices
US6444135B1 (en) 2000-01-14 2002-09-03 Ball Semiconductor, Inc. Method to make gas permeable shell for MEMS devices with controlled porosity
US20020132113A1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2002-09-19 Ball Semiconductor, Inc. Method and system for making a micromachine device with a gas permeable enclosure
US6521477B1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2003-02-18 Raytheon Company Vacuum package fabrication of integrated circuit components
US6479320B1 (en) 2000-02-02 2002-11-12 Raytheon Company Vacuum package fabrication of microelectromechanical system devices with integrated circuit components
US7010332B1 (en) 2000-02-21 2006-03-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson(Publ) Wireless headset with automatic power control
US6500356B2 (en) * 2000-03-27 2002-12-31 Applied Materials, Inc. Selectively etching silicon using fluorine without plasma
US20030010354A1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2003-01-16 Applied Materials, Inc. Fluorine process for cleaning semiconductor process chamber
US6690014B1 (en) 2000-04-25 2004-02-10 Raytheon Company Microbolometer and method for forming
US7019376B2 (en) * 2000-08-11 2006-03-28 Reflectivity, Inc Micromirror array device with a small pitch size
US6708491B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2004-03-23 3M Innovative Properties Company Direct acting vertical thermal actuator
US6483419B1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-11-19 3M Innovative Properties Company Combination horizontal and vertical thermal actuator
US6531947B1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2003-03-11 3M Innovative Properties Company Direct acting vertical thermal actuator with controlled bending
US6887337B2 (en) 2000-09-19 2005-05-03 Xactix, Inc. Apparatus for etching semiconductor samples and a source for providing a gas by sublimation thereto
US6576556B2 (en) 2000-09-21 2003-06-10 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Method of manufacturing semiconductor device and method of manufacturing infrared image sensor
US6908793B2 (en) 2000-11-22 2005-06-21 The Johns Hopkins University Method for fabricating a semiconductor device
US6707591B2 (en) 2001-04-10 2004-03-16 Silicon Light Machines Angled illumination for a single order light modulator based projection system
US6777681B1 (en) 2001-04-25 2004-08-17 Raytheon Company Infrared detector with amorphous silicon detector elements, and a method of making it
AU2002303842A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2002-12-03 Reflectivity, Inc. A method for making a micromechanical device by removing a sacrificial layer with multiple sequential etchants
US6747781B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2004-06-08 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Method, apparatus, and diffuser for reducing laser speckle
US6782205B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2004-08-24 Silicon Light Machines Method and apparatus for dynamic equalization in wavelength division multiplexing
US6632698B2 (en) * 2001-08-07 2003-10-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Microelectromechanical device having a stiffened support beam, and methods of forming stiffened support beams in MEMS
US6829092B2 (en) 2001-08-15 2004-12-07 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Blazed grating light valve
WO2003027002A2 (en) * 2001-09-01 2003-04-03 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for the production of a micromechanical structure
US6930364B2 (en) * 2001-09-13 2005-08-16 Silicon Light Machines Corporation Microelectronic mechanical system and methods
US7189332B2 (en) * 2001-09-17 2007-03-13 Texas Instruments Incorporated Apparatus and method for detecting an endpoint in a vapor phase etch
US6933933B2 (en) 2001-10-02 2005-08-23 Harris Corporation Pen cartridge that transmits acceleration signal for recreating handwritten signatures and communications
US20030073302A1 (en) * 2001-10-12 2003-04-17 Reflectivity, Inc., A California Corporation Methods for formation of air gap interconnects
US7009180B2 (en) * 2001-12-14 2006-03-07 Optiscan Biomedical Corp. Pathlength-independent methods for optically determining material composition
US6800238B1 (en) 2002-01-15 2004-10-05 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Method for domain patterning in low coercive field ferroelectrics
US6835616B1 (en) 2002-01-29 2004-12-28 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Method of forming a floating metal structure in an integrated circuit
US7026235B1 (en) 2002-02-07 2006-04-11 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Dual-damascene process and associated floating metal structures
US6794119B2 (en) * 2002-02-12 2004-09-21 Iridigm Display Corporation Method for fabricating a structure for a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device
US6574033B1 (en) 2002-02-27 2003-06-03 Iridigm Display Corporation Microelectromechanical systems device and method for fabricating same
US7027200B2 (en) * 2002-03-22 2006-04-11 Reflectivity, Inc Etching method used in fabrications of microstructures
US6965468B2 (en) * 2003-07-03 2005-11-15 Reflectivity, Inc Micromirror array having reduced gap between adjacent micromirrors of the micromirror array
US20030183916A1 (en) * 2002-03-27 2003-10-02 John Heck Packaging microelectromechanical systems
US6652644B1 (en) 2002-03-29 2003-11-25 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Adjusting lithium oxide concentration in wafers using a two-phase lithium-rich source
US6893498B1 (en) 2002-03-29 2005-05-17 Silicon Light Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for adjusting lithium oxide concentration in wafers
US6808563B1 (en) 2002-03-29 2004-10-26 Silicon Light Machines Corporation Controlled partial pressure technique for adjusting lithium oxide concentration in wafers
KR100461787B1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2004-12-14 학교법인 포항공과대학교 Accelerometers using mems technology and method for manufacturing the same
US6728023B1 (en) 2002-05-28 2004-04-27 Silicon Light Machines Optical device arrays with optimized image resolution
US6767751B2 (en) * 2002-05-28 2004-07-27 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Integrated driver process flow
US6822797B1 (en) 2002-05-31 2004-11-23 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Light modulator structure for producing high-contrast operation using zero-order light
US6829258B1 (en) 2002-06-26 2004-12-07 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Rapidly tunable external cavity laser
US6777258B1 (en) 2002-06-28 2004-08-17 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Conductive etch stop for etching a sacrificial layer
US6813059B2 (en) 2002-06-28 2004-11-02 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Reduced formation of asperities in contact micro-structures
US6714337B1 (en) 2002-06-28 2004-03-30 Silicon Light Machines Method and device for modulating a light beam and having an improved gamma response
JP2004062938A (en) * 2002-07-25 2004-02-26 Pioneer Electronic Corp Spherical aberration correcting device and spherical aberration correcting method
TW593125B (en) * 2002-08-09 2004-06-21 Ind Tech Res Inst MEMS type differential actuator
US6801354B1 (en) 2002-08-20 2004-10-05 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. 2-D diffraction grating for substantially eliminating polarization dependent losses
US7781850B2 (en) * 2002-09-20 2010-08-24 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Controlling electromechanical behavior of structures within a microelectromechanical systems device
US7803536B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2010-09-28 Integrated Dna Technologies, Inc. Methods of detecting fluorescence with anthraquinone quencher dyes
US6712480B1 (en) 2002-09-27 2004-03-30 Silicon Light Machines Controlled curvature of stressed micro-structures
US6810883B2 (en) * 2002-11-08 2004-11-02 Philip Morris Usa Inc. Electrically heated cigarette smoking system with internal manifolding for puff detection
US7105361B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2006-09-12 Applied Materials, Inc. Method of etching a magnetic material
US6806997B1 (en) 2003-02-28 2004-10-19 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Patterned diffractive light modulator ribbon for PDL reduction
US6829077B1 (en) 2003-02-28 2004-12-07 Silicon Light Machines, Inc. Diffractive light modulator with dynamically rotatable diffraction plane
US6913942B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2005-07-05 Reflectvity, Inc Sacrificial layers for use in fabrications of microelectromechanical devices
WO2004089814A2 (en) * 2003-04-08 2004-10-21 Bookham Technology Plc Thermal actuator
TW594360B (en) * 2003-04-21 2004-06-21 Prime View Int Corp Ltd A method for fabricating an interference display cell
US7005193B2 (en) * 2003-04-29 2006-02-28 Motorola, Inc. Method of adding mass to MEMS structures
TW570896B (en) 2003-05-26 2004-01-11 Prime View Int Co Ltd A method for fabricating an interference display cell
TW589752B (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-06-01 Au Optronics Corp Semiconductor acceleration sensor
WO2005001422A2 (en) * 2003-06-06 2005-01-06 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Sensor chip and apparatus for tactile and/or flow
US6927146B2 (en) * 2003-06-17 2005-08-09 Intel Corporation Chemical thinning of epitaxial silicon layer over buried oxide
US7221495B2 (en) * 2003-06-24 2007-05-22 Idc Llc Thin film precursor stack for MEMS manufacturing
US6980347B2 (en) * 2003-07-03 2005-12-27 Reflectivity, Inc Micromirror having reduced space between hinge and mirror plate of the micromirror
JP4247554B2 (en) * 2003-07-30 2009-04-02 独立行政法人理化学研究所 Mechanochemical sensor
TW200506479A (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-16 Prime View Int Co Ltd Color changeable pixel for an interference display
TWI231865B (en) * 2003-08-26 2005-05-01 Prime View Int Co Ltd An interference display cell and fabrication method thereof
US7094622B1 (en) 2003-08-27 2006-08-22 Louisiana Tech University Foundation, Inc. Polymer based tunneling sensor
TWI232333B (en) * 2003-09-03 2005-05-11 Prime View Int Co Ltd Display unit using interferometric modulation and manufacturing method thereof
US6939472B2 (en) * 2003-09-17 2005-09-06 Reflectivity, Inc. Etching method in fabrications of microstructures
US7645704B2 (en) * 2003-09-17 2010-01-12 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods and apparatus of etch process control in fabrications of microstructures
US7161728B2 (en) * 2003-12-09 2007-01-09 Idc, Llc Area array modulation and lead reduction in interferometric modulators
US7532194B2 (en) * 2004-02-03 2009-05-12 Idc, Llc Driver voltage adjuster
US7119945B2 (en) * 2004-03-03 2006-10-10 Idc, Llc Altering temporal response of microelectromechanical elements
US7706050B2 (en) * 2004-03-05 2010-04-27 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Integrated modulator illumination
US7720148B2 (en) * 2004-03-26 2010-05-18 The Hong Kong University Of Science And Technology Efficient multi-frame motion estimation for video compression
US7476327B2 (en) * 2004-05-04 2009-01-13 Idc, Llc Method of manufacture for microelectromechanical devices
US7644624B2 (en) 2004-06-04 2010-01-12 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Artificial lateral line
GB0413554D0 (en) * 2004-06-17 2004-07-21 Point 35 Microstructures Ltd Improved method and apparartus for the etching of microstructures
US7256922B2 (en) * 2004-07-02 2007-08-14 Idc, Llc Interferometric modulators with thin film transistors
TWI233916B (en) * 2004-07-09 2005-06-11 Prime View Int Co Ltd A structure of a micro electro mechanical system
EP1855142A3 (en) * 2004-07-29 2008-07-30 Idc, Llc System and method for micro-electromechanical operating of an interferometric modulator
US7684104B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2010-03-23 Idc, Llc MEMS using filler material and method
US20060067650A1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-03-30 Clarence Chui Method of making a reflective display device using thin film transistor production techniques
US20060065622A1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-03-30 Floyd Philip D Method and system for xenon fluoride etching with enhanced efficiency
US7553684B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-06-30 Idc, Llc Method of fabricating interferometric devices using lift-off processing techniques
US7813026B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2010-10-12 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. System and method of reducing color shift in a display
US7920135B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2011-04-05 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method and system for driving a bi-stable display
US20060065366A1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-03-30 Cummings William J Portable etch chamber
US7719500B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2010-05-18 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Reflective display pixels arranged in non-rectangular arrays
US7369296B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-05-06 Idc, Llc Device and method for modifying actuation voltage thresholds of a deformable membrane in an interferometric modulator
US7373026B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-05-13 Idc, Llc MEMS device fabricated on a pre-patterned substrate
US7369294B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-05-06 Idc, Llc Ornamental display device
US7372613B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2008-05-13 Idc, Llc Method and device for multistate interferometric light modulation
US7808703B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2010-10-05 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. System and method for implementation of interferometric modulator displays
US7535466B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-05-19 Idc, Llc System with server based control of client device display features
US20060176241A1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-08-10 Sampsell Jeffrey B System and method of transmitting video data
US7586484B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-09-08 Idc, Llc Controller and driver features for bi-stable display
US7554714B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-06-30 Idc, Llc Device and method for manipulation of thermal response in a modulator
US7527995B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-05-05 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method of making prestructure for MEMS systems
US7630119B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-12-08 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for reducing slippage between structures in an interferometric modulator
US20060066596A1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-03-30 Sampsell Jeffrey B System and method of transmitting video data
US7653371B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2010-01-26 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Selectable capacitance circuit
US7893919B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2011-02-22 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Display region architectures
US8008736B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2011-08-30 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Analog interferometric modulator device
US7492502B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-02-17 Idc, Llc Method of fabricating a free-standing microstructure
US7321456B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-01-22 Idc, Llc Method and device for corner interferometric modulation
US7460246B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-12-02 Idc, Llc Method and system for sensing light using interferometric elements
US7420728B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-09-02 Idc, Llc Methods of fabricating interferometric modulators by selectively removing a material
US7936497B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2011-05-03 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. MEMS device having deformable membrane characterized by mechanical persistence
US7420725B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2008-09-02 Idc, Llc Device having a conductive light absorbing mask and method for fabricating same
US7417783B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-08-26 Idc, Llc Mirror and mirror layer for optical modulator and method
US7349136B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-03-25 Idc, Llc Method and device for a display having transparent components integrated therein
US7317568B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-01-08 Idc, Llc System and method of implementation of interferometric modulators for display mirrors
US7405861B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-07-29 Idc, Llc Method and device for protecting interferometric modulators from electrostatic discharge
US7944599B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2011-05-17 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Electromechanical device with optical function separated from mechanical and electrical function
US7355780B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2008-04-08 Idc, Llc System and method of illuminating interferometric modulators using backlighting
US7289259B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2007-10-30 Idc, Llc Conductive bus structure for interferometric modulator array
US7304784B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2007-12-04 Idc, Llc Reflective display device having viewable display on both sides
US7583429B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2009-09-01 Idc, Llc Ornamental display device
US7130104B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-10-31 Idc, Llc Methods and devices for inhibiting tilting of a mirror in an interferometric modulator
US7302157B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2007-11-27 Idc, Llc System and method for multi-level brightness in interferometric modulation
US7616013B2 (en) * 2004-11-11 2009-11-10 Brigham Young University Micromechanical positional state sensing apparatus method and system
US8109149B2 (en) 2004-11-17 2012-02-07 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Contact stress sensor
US7311009B2 (en) * 2004-11-17 2007-12-25 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Microelectromechanical systems contact stress sensor
TW200628877A (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-16 Prime View Int Co Ltd Method of manufacturing optical interference type color display
US7258010B2 (en) * 2005-03-09 2007-08-21 Honeywell International Inc. MEMS device with thinned comb fingers
WO2007013992A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-02-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Support structure for mems device and methods therefor
EP2495212A3 (en) * 2005-07-22 2012-10-31 QUALCOMM MEMS Technologies, Inc. Mems devices having support structures and methods of fabricating the same
WO2007013939A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-02-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Support structure for mems device and methods therefor
US7630114B2 (en) * 2005-10-28 2009-12-08 Idc, Llc Diffusion barrier layer for MEMS devices
US7795061B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2010-09-14 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method of creating MEMS device cavities by a non-etching process
US7916980B2 (en) 2006-01-13 2011-03-29 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Interconnect structure for MEMS device
US7382515B2 (en) * 2006-01-18 2008-06-03 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Silicon-rich silicon nitrides as etch stops in MEMS manufacture
US7459686B2 (en) * 2006-01-26 2008-12-02 L-3 Communications Corporation Systems and methods for integrating focal plane arrays
US7462831B2 (en) * 2006-01-26 2008-12-09 L-3 Communications Corporation Systems and methods for bonding
US7655909B2 (en) * 2006-01-26 2010-02-02 L-3 Communications Corporation Infrared detector elements and methods of forming same
US7582952B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2009-09-01 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method for providing and removing discharging interconnect for chip-on-glass output leads and structures thereof
US7547568B2 (en) * 2006-02-22 2009-06-16 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Electrical conditioning of MEMS device and insulating layer thereof
US7550810B2 (en) * 2006-02-23 2009-06-23 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. MEMS device having a layer movable at asymmetric rates
US7450295B2 (en) * 2006-03-02 2008-11-11 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Methods for producing MEMS with protective coatings using multi-component sacrificial layers
US7903047B2 (en) * 2006-04-17 2011-03-08 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Mode indicator for interferometric modulator displays
US7527996B2 (en) * 2006-04-19 2009-05-05 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Non-planar surface structures and process for microelectromechanical systems
US20070249078A1 (en) * 2006-04-19 2007-10-25 Ming-Hau Tung Non-planar surface structures and process for microelectromechanical systems
US7417784B2 (en) * 2006-04-19 2008-08-26 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Microelectromechanical device and method utilizing a porous surface
US7711239B2 (en) 2006-04-19 2010-05-04 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Microelectromechanical device and method utilizing nanoparticles
US7369292B2 (en) * 2006-05-03 2008-05-06 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Electrode and interconnect materials for MEMS devices
US7405863B2 (en) * 2006-06-01 2008-07-29 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Patterning of mechanical layer in MEMS to reduce stresses at supports
US7649671B2 (en) * 2006-06-01 2010-01-19 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Analog interferometric modulator device with electrostatic actuation and release
US7321457B2 (en) 2006-06-01 2008-01-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Process and structure for fabrication of MEMS device having isolated edge posts
AU2007293476B2 (en) 2006-06-02 2011-07-07 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Soft mems
US7661319B2 (en) * 2006-06-02 2010-02-16 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Micromachined artificial haircell
US7824943B2 (en) * 2006-06-04 2010-11-02 Akustica, Inc. Methods for trapping charge in a microelectromechanical system and microelectromechanical system employing same
US7471442B2 (en) * 2006-06-15 2008-12-30 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for low range bit depth enhancements for MEMS display architectures
US7835061B2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2010-11-16 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Support structures for free-standing electromechanical devices
US7385744B2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-06-10 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Support structure for free-standing MEMS device and methods for forming the same
US7527998B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-05-05 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Method of manufacturing MEMS devices providing air gap control
JP4327183B2 (en) * 2006-07-31 2009-09-09 株式会社日立製作所 High pressure fuel pump control device for internal combustion engine
US7763546B2 (en) 2006-08-02 2010-07-27 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Methods for reducing surface charges during the manufacture of microelectromechanical systems devices
US7566664B2 (en) * 2006-08-02 2009-07-28 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Selective etching of MEMS using gaseous halides and reactive co-etchants
US7718965B1 (en) 2006-08-03 2010-05-18 L-3 Communications Corporation Microbolometer infrared detector elements and methods for forming same
US20080043315A1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-02-21 Cummings William J High profile contacts for microelectromechanical systems
US8153980B1 (en) 2006-11-30 2012-04-10 L-3 Communications Corp. Color correction for radiation detectors
US7733552B2 (en) * 2007-03-21 2010-06-08 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc MEMS cavity-coating layers and methods
US7719752B2 (en) * 2007-05-11 2010-05-18 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. MEMS structures, methods of fabricating MEMS components on separate substrates and assembly of same
US7569488B2 (en) * 2007-06-22 2009-08-04 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Methods of making a MEMS device by monitoring a process parameter
US7851239B2 (en) * 2008-06-05 2010-12-14 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Low temperature amorphous silicon sacrificial layer for controlled adhesion in MEMS devices
US8187902B2 (en) * 2008-07-09 2012-05-29 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. High performance sensors and methods for forming the same
US7719754B2 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-05-18 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Multi-thickness layers for MEMS and mask-saving sequence for same
US7864403B2 (en) * 2009-03-27 2011-01-04 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Post-release adjustment of interferometric modulator reflectivity
US8581679B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2013-11-12 Stmicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. Switch with increased magnetic sensitivity
KR20130100232A (en) 2010-04-09 2013-09-10 퀄컴 엠이엠에스 테크놀로지스, 인크. Mechanical layer of an electromechanical device and methods of forming the same
CN101905857B (en) * 2010-07-21 2012-07-25 中国科学院半导体研究所 Method for preventing structural layer materials of MEMS (Micro-Electromechanical System) devices from being electrochemically corroded on large scale
CN101905858B (en) * 2010-07-21 2012-07-25 中国科学院半导体研究所 Method for preventing MEMS (Micro-Electromechanical System) device structural layer material from being electrochemically corroded
US8765514B1 (en) 2010-11-12 2014-07-01 L-3 Communications Corp. Transitioned film growth for conductive semiconductor materials
US8963159B2 (en) 2011-04-04 2015-02-24 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Pixel via and methods of forming the same
US9134527B2 (en) 2011-04-04 2015-09-15 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Pixel via and methods of forming the same
US8659816B2 (en) 2011-04-25 2014-02-25 Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. Mechanical layer and methods of making the same
US9091647B2 (en) * 2012-09-08 2015-07-28 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Direct sensing bioFETs and methods of manufacture
EP2966454B1 (en) * 2014-07-07 2017-08-30 EM Microelectronic-Marin SA Method for measuring a physical parameter, and electronic circuit for implementing same
US9927786B2 (en) 2014-10-02 2018-03-27 Anne Dewitte Expandable and collapsible shape element for a programmable shape surface
EP3904846A1 (en) * 2020-04-29 2021-11-03 Infineon Technologies AG Thermal emitter with embedded heating element

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4945773A (en) * 1989-03-06 1990-08-07 Ford Motor Company Force transducer etched from silicon
US5357803A (en) * 1992-04-08 1994-10-25 Rochester Institute Of Technology Micromachined microaccelerometer for measuring acceleration along three axes

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4487677A (en) * 1983-04-11 1984-12-11 Metals Production Research, Inc. Electrolytic recovery system for obtaining titanium metal from its ore
US5354416A (en) * 1986-09-05 1994-10-11 Sadayuki Okudaira Dry etching method
US4765865A (en) * 1987-05-04 1988-08-23 Ford Motor Company Silicon etch rate enhancement
US4893509A (en) * 1988-12-27 1990-01-16 General Motors Corporation Method and product for fabricating a resonant-bridge microaccelerometer
US4930043A (en) * 1989-02-28 1990-05-29 United Technologies Closed-loop capacitive accelerometer with spring constraint
DE4000903C1 (en) * 1990-01-15 1990-08-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh, 7000 Stuttgart, De
US5126812A (en) * 1990-02-14 1992-06-30 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Monolithic micromechanical accelerometer
US5221400A (en) * 1990-12-11 1993-06-22 Delco Electronics Corporation Method of making a microaccelerometer having low stress bonds and means for preventing excessive z-axis deflection
US5233874A (en) * 1991-08-19 1993-08-10 General Motors Corporation Active microaccelerometer
US5313835A (en) * 1991-12-19 1994-05-24 Motorola, Inc. Integrated monolithic gyroscopes/accelerometers with logic circuits
US5534107A (en) * 1994-06-14 1996-07-09 Fsi International UV-enhanced dry stripping of silicon nitride films

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4945773A (en) * 1989-03-06 1990-08-07 Ford Motor Company Force transducer etched from silicon
US5357803A (en) * 1992-04-08 1994-10-25 Rochester Institute Of Technology Micromachined microaccelerometer for measuring acceleration along three axes

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0870170A2 (en) * 1995-12-24 1998-10-14 Dan Haronian Micro-electro-mechanics systems (mems)
EP0870170A4 (en) * 1995-12-24 2000-01-12 Dan Haronian Micro-electro-mechanics systems (mems)
US5998816A (en) * 1997-01-31 1999-12-07 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Sensor element with removal resistance region
US6409876B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-06-25 Surface Technology Systems, Plc Apparatus for etching a workpiece
US6355181B1 (en) 1998-03-20 2002-03-12 Surface Technology Systems Plc Method and apparatus for manufacturing a micromechanical device
US7670203B2 (en) * 2000-08-30 2010-03-02 Agere Systems Inc. Process for making an on-chip vacuum tube device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5726480A (en) 1998-03-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5726480A (en) Etchants for use in micromachining of CMOS Microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same
WO1996023229A9 (en) Etchants for use in micromachining of cmos microaccelerometers and microelectromechanical devices and method of making the same
Rai-Choudhury MEMS and MOEMS Technology and Applications
Polla Microelectromechanical systems based on ferroelectric thin films
Bustillo et al. Surface micromachining for microelectromechanical systems
Elwenspoek et al. Mechanical microsensors
US6816301B1 (en) Micro-electromechanical devices and methods of manufacture
Hoffman et al. 3D structures with piezoresistive sensors in standard CMOS
Linder et al. Surface micromachining
Zhang et al. A lateral capacitive CMOS accelerometer with structural curl compensation
Enikov et al. Three-dimensional microfabrication for a multi-degree-of-freedom capacitive force sensor using fibre-chip coupling
Lin Selective encapsulations of MEMS: Micro channels, needles, resonators and electromechanical filters
Tay et al. A differential capacitive low-g microaccelerometer with mg resolution
Song et al. Micromachined inertial sensors
Tien Silicon micromachined thermal sensors and actuators
CA2377189A1 (en) Micro-electromechanical devices and methods of manufacture
Mokwa Advanced sensors and microsystems on SOI
Gebhard et al. Microtechnologies for microscaled robots and components
Schneider et al. Integrated micromachined decoupled CMOS chip on chip
Sridhar et al. Trench oxide isolated single crystal silicon micromachined accelerometer
Moore et al. Silicon-on-insulator material for sensors and accelerometers
Smith et al. Micromachined sensor and actuator research at the microelectronics development laboratory
Usenko et al. SOI technology for MEMS applications
Lehto SOI Microsensors and MEMS
Balan et al. Platinum silicide as electrode material of microfabricated quantum electron tunneling transducers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP KR SG

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 17-23,CLAIMS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 17-22;AFTER RECTIFICATION OF OBVIOUS ERRORS AS AUTHORIZED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase