|Publication number||WO1994001883 A1|
|Publication date||20 Jan 1994|
|Filing date||1 Jul 1992|
|Priority date||1 Jul 1992|
|Publication number||PCT/1992/5438, PCT/US/1992/005438, PCT/US/1992/05438, PCT/US/92/005438, PCT/US/92/05438, PCT/US1992/005438, PCT/US1992/05438, PCT/US1992005438, PCT/US199205438, PCT/US92/005438, PCT/US92/05438, PCT/US92005438, PCT/US9205438, WO 1994/001883 A1, WO 1994001883 A1, WO 1994001883A1, WO 9401883 A1, WO 9401883A1, WO-A1-1994001883, WO-A1-9401883, WO1994/001883A1, WO1994001883 A1, WO1994001883A1, WO9401883 A1, WO9401883A1|
|Inventors||Orchard Freeman Post|
|Applicant||United States Department Of Energy|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (13), Classifications (3), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: Patentscope, Espacenet|
A METHOD FOR DISCRIMINATIVE PARTICLE SEPARATION
The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. -7405-ENG-48 between the U.S. Department of Energy and the University of California, for the operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for separating ions of chosen charge-to-masε ratios from other ions with a different charge-to-mass ratio. The precision obtained by the invention allows the invention to be used for isotope separation. In addition, the invention may be used to provide an ion source. By contrast to other, more specialized, techniques of isotope separation the subject invention is tunable to a wide spectrum of atomic species that are of commercial interest There exist many areas in modern technology where the the separation of specific isotopes of certain atomic species is useful but where the cost of present separation technology is prohibitively high. An example is the separation of mercury isotopes. Here the intent is to change the normal isotopic mixture of mercury to an isotopic mixture of mercury with a higher concentration of rare mercury isotopes to provide a fluorescent lamp which requires less power and provides a brighter light. Though it is possible in principle to accomplish such a change through existing separator technology the cost is too high to make this approach attractive economically. There are also other examples where the existence of a flexible and relatively inexpensive technique for isotope separation would be valuable for commercial applications. One of the first processes used to accomplish such isotope separations used a mass spectrometer or mass spectrograph. Such processes are typically expensive, and therefore they are not used for producing large quantities of separated isotopes.
Another method of separating isotopes is gaseous diffusion. Gaseous diffusion separation provides only a small change in concentration of the isotopes which are to be separated. For this reason, some gaseous diffusion facilities require several thousand individual stages cascaded together. Since so many stages are required, for many years approximately 10% of the total electric power output of the United States was required to operate three gaseous diffusion plants. Another method of separating isotopes is chemical exchange. This process is based on the fact that if an equilibrium is established between two media, for example a substance in liquid phase and a substance in gaseous phase, the ratio between isotopes is different in one media than in another. One drawback of chemical exchange is that an isotope process using chemical exchange would be specific for a particular element. A chemical exchange process, in gejeral, is not be useful for separating a variety of isotopes of a variety of elements. The operation of the invention can be understood in terms of an analogy, the interaction of a lighter particle with the potential field of a moving much heavier particle. This circumstance is one of the classic problems in physics. A familiar example is the "slingshot" maneuver of a satellite directed to make a close encounter with the moon or another planet. In such an encounter the lighter particle (the satellite) gains (or loses) energy by interacting with the potential field of the heavier particle (the moon or a planet) . This process is most easily understood by conceptually going to the frame of reference of the potential field of the moving heavier particle. In this frame of reference the lighter particle approaches the potential field of the heavier particle, is turned around, and moves away with the same speed as it had before.
Viewed now from a frame at rest we see that the lighter particle is now moving with a different velocity from what it had before the encounter. If the encounter is a colinear one (i.e. in 1-D), the new velocity will be given by the vector equation
= 2v Eq. (1)
where v is the velocity of the lighter particle after reflection, v is the velocity of the moving potential field, which moves with the heavier particle which generates the potential field, thus the heavier particle is also moving ' with a velocity vo, and v1. is the incident velocity of the lighter particle (all being referred to the "laboratory" frame of reference, which is the frame at rest). For example, if the lighter particle is initially at rest in the lab frame, it will be flung away following its encounter with the moving potential field of the moving heavier particle at exactly twice the velocity of that field. If the lighter particle is in motion parallel to the heavier particle at the time of its encounter with the potential field of the heavier particle, as indicated by equation (1), its velocity after the encounter will be 2vo less its initial velocity. If overtaken by the heavier particle, its final energy will be greater than its initial energy, i.e. it will extract energy from the potential field of the heavier particle. On the other hand, if it overtakes the heavier particle from the rear it will be slowed down, i.e. it will deliver energy to the potential field of the heavier particle.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has as one of its objectives to enhance the applicability of isotope separation to a wide spectrum of atomic species, while at the same time reducing the capital and operating cost of the separator.
Another object of the invention is to provide an apparatus which is tunable to separate isotopes of a variety of elements.
Another object of the invention is to improve the electrical efficiency of the process of isotope separation, as a means of reducing its cost.
Another object of the invention is to provide an isotope separation device which utilizes "modular" separators, so as better to accommodate to the design and fabrication of separator plants of a variety of sizes and overall capital costs
Another object of the invention is to provide ion sources within which the separation principle operates to select and extract a particular ion species, for example negatively charged ions, from a background containing electrons or other types of ions that are not of interest for the application at hand. Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The invention provides a method and apparatus for changing the percentage of a first plurality of molecules having a mass <_ M. in a gas which has an initial percentage of a first plurality of molecules and an initial percentage of a second plurality of molecules of molecules having a mass ∑ M? where M_ > M . The term "molecules" in the specification and claims also includes atoms. The invention ionizes molecules of the first plurality and the second plurality to the same charge. The invention induces among the ionized molecules at least one traveling electric potential hill wherein the amplitude and the velocity of the traveling electric potential hill is adjusted to be sufficient to provide a net positive or negative acceleration to some of the molecules of the first plurality while being insufficient provide a net positive or negative acceleration to some of the molecules of the second plurality so that the number of the first plurality of molecules which have a net acceleration divided by the total number of molecules of the gas which have a net acceleration make a percentage that is greater than the initial percentage of the first plurality of molecules. In the specification and claims, accelerating means to provide a net change in velocity which may be positive or negative, unless clearly expressed otherwise.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a graph of the voltage versus distance of a quasi static electric potential hill at time
Figure 2 is a graph of the voltage versus distance of a quasi static electric potential hill at time
V Figure 3 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the invention, which uses a plasma source.
Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the invention, which uses an ion source and accelerator.
Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the invention using a mirrortron.
Figure 6 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the invention using conducting rods.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Figure 1 illustrates an electric potential hill 9 with a voltage potential amplitude of <I> at an instant of time t, . At t, the inventive device is used to establish an electric field which causes the electric potential hill 9. At t, the electric potential hill 9 has a voltage potential near zero at a distance d=0, a voltage potential = Φ„ at d,=2, and a voltage potential approaching zero at d=4.
Figure 2 illustrates the electric potential hill 10 imposed by the inventive device at time t_. At t_ the electric potential hill 10 has a voltage potential near zero at d=l, a voltage potential = <£> at d_=3 and a voltage potential approaching zero at d=5. - 9 -
Figures 1 and 2 illustrate how two quasi-static electric potential hills 9 and 10 can be made to simulate a traveling electric potential hill with a velocity v such that:
The inventive apparatus continues to induce a series of localized electrical potentials which simulate a traveling electrical potential hill traveling at a velocity with a magnitude v . At location d=13 an ion with a charge Ze and a mass M is located with an incident velocity v 1. of approximately zero. When the traveling electrical potential hill reaches the ion, it will interact with the ion according to equation 1 with the traveling electrical potential hill acting as the potential field of a moving heavier particle and the ion acting as the lighter particle. If the potential hill has a sufficiently high amplitude <£>i, the ion will gain a reflected velocity v =2v , since in this example the ion was initially at rest. In that instance, the ion which had an initial kinetic energy of approximately zero, after interacting with the traveling potential hill would have a resulting kinetic energy Wf=(l/2)Mv^ in the frame of - 10 -
reference of the traveling electric potential hill. The amount of energy that the traveling electrical potential hill can put into the ion from the electrical potential hill placing an electrostatic push on the ion is W =ZeΦE, wherein the charge Ze of the ion is determined by the ionic charge Z times the charge of an electron e. If
2 (l/2)Mvo>ZeΦ_ bx, then the amplitude of the electrical potential Φ„ bx is not high enough for the traveling electrical potential hill to impart the kinetic energy Wf to the ion. Therefore, instead of the ion being reflected with a velocity with a magnitude v =2v , the ion goes over the electrical barrier, leaving the ion unaffected by the traveling electric potential hill with a final velocity which is approximately zero.
From the above a ratio T is set as
If r < 1, then the ion will not be reflected and will have a velocity equal to approximately zero. If T > 1, then the ion will be reflected and will have a reflected velocity: vr=2vo in the frame at rest,
In accordance with Equation 2, for a traveling electric potential hill with a selected amplitude Φ traveling at a set velocity v , the ratio of Z/M is what will determine whether or not T is greater than one, and therefore whether or not a reflected velocity with a mag^nitude vr=2vo will be imparted to the ion.
Therefore in a system with a plurality of ions or charged particles at rest when a traveling electric potential hill passes through the system, for some constant
2 k=(2eΦτ b-.,)/(vO), ions with a charge to mass ratio
Z/M>k will be accelerated to a velocity twice the velocity of the traveling electric potential hill while ions with a charge to mass ratio Z/M<k will not be accelerated. Therefore when an traveling potential hill is applied, an ion or charged particle beam is created of ions or charged particles with a charge to mass ratio greater than k. By carefully choosing the charge to mass ratio (Z/M) and the potential Φ-x it is possible to create specialized ion beams or to separate isotopes of ions, since different isotopes of an ion could have the same charge, but would have different masses.
Consider two isotopes with masses H. and M_, with Mη being less massive than π . Assume also that both isotopes are ionized to the same charge state, Z=Z1=Z_, and are initially "at rest" (i.e. have a low kinetic temperature) within a low density plasma through which a traveling potential hill is propagated. If the speed of the hill and the height of the potential
(relative to its value far from the peak) are adjusted so as to be just great enough to reflect and accelerate M.. , then the more massive particle, M_ , will pass over the electric potential hill as the electric potential hill passes and will be left behind (provided the precision of control over the amplitude and speed of the wave is sufficiently good for the mass-ratio involved) . In such a situation the moving potential wave will "strip" the plasma of those ions for which T > 1, and leave behind those ions for which T < 1.
Furthermore, since the speed of the reflected particle will be approximately equal to 2v , this fact can be used to improve the efficiency of separation process by collecting the selected ions at end of the system in a collector cup at a potential, Φ , that is chosen so that the quantity ZeΦ is nearly equal to the kinetic energy of the selected ions. This technique can also be used to discriminate against the collection of any ions of higher charge state (but of closely similar or equal mass) than that of the desired particles. Ions "of higher charge and closely similar masses will not have sufficient energy to penetrate the end-stopping potential. Even if their kinetic energy is close to, or equal to, that of the desired particles, their charge is too high, so that they cannot reach the collector. Figure 3 illustrates an embodiment of the invention, showing a cross-sectional view from the side of a single module of the invention. Inside a vacuum chamber 11 an array of short hollow cylindrical electrodes 12 with a central axis A-A are supported on insulated electrical feed-throughs 13. At a first end of the array is located a hollow cylindrical electrode 14 and a collector cup 15 which together comprise the collector assembly. At a second end of the array is located a means 16 for providing and maintaining a plasma along the center of the cylindrical electrodes 12. Connected to each coil 12 through the feed-through connections 13 is an electrical cable 19 coming from an electronic pulser chassis 17 that generates a repetitive sequence of pulses, which when applied to the electrodes 12 produces a traveling potential hill within the cylindrical volume formed by the interior of the aligned short cylindrical electrodes 12. Connected to electrode 14, collector cup 15, and plasma source 16 is power supply 18, which provides the various required operating voltages to those electrodes and to* the plasma source 16. In operation of this embodiment, plasma source 16 generates a plasma of ions with preferably very little velocity thus having a low kinetic temperature. In an example of the operation of this embodiment the ions are ions of Mercury Hg+. The approximate percentages of natural abundance for mercury are 198Hg at 10%, 199Hg at 17%, 200Hg at 23%, 201Hg at 13%, 202Hg at 30%, and 204Hg at 7%. To separate out and collect 198Hg, the electronic pulse chassis 17 sequentially pulses the cylindrical electrodes 12 to create a moving electronic potential hill with a velocity of magnitude v with a direction along a first direction parallel to axis A-A.
In this example M=198 atomic mass units, Z=l, and
—19 e=-l.602x10 coulombs. Therefore, T=l, when 2(198
—19 2 amu)/(-l.602x10 coulombs)=Φ /v . By choosing an electric potential hill amplitude Φ. b,-x, and hill velocity vo so that for M=198 amu T>1 and for
M=199 amu T<1, the only singly charged mercury ions that will be accelerated by the traveling electric potential
198 hill will be the Hg isotopes. Mercury ions that have a +2 or greater charge will also be accelerated, since for these ions T>1. Therefore the traveling electric potential hill caused by the sequential pulsing of the cylindrical electrodes 12 will accelerate all singly
198 charged ions of Hg and all higher charged mercury ions to a velocity with a magnitude of approximately 2v and a direction towards the collector cup 15 in the first direction. The steady state cylinder electrode 14 is positively charged to create a potential that will turn back any ion with a mass less than 210 amu and traveling at a velocity with a magnitude < v or having a charge equal to or greater than +2 and traveling at a velocity with a magnitude of approximately 2v or less. Since the only singly charged ions that are accelerated to a
198 198 velocity of 2v are Hg isotopes, only Hg isotopes will pass by the steady state electrodes 14 and be collected by the collection cup 15.
In the above embodiment there is a measure of resolution, which is how precise must be to
Here resolution will be defined as R=Φ /Φ , where
1>M2- In this embodiment R=M, /M_ , since all other factors are equal and cancel out. In the above mentioned
199 example, particle one would be Hg and particle two would be 198Hg giving a resolution of R=199/198=l.005. This means the resolution of ΦE needs to be about five parts in a thousand to provide the best separation between these particles. In addition higher thermal velocities tend to also diminish resolution.
Figure 4 illustrates another preferred embodiment of the invention, showing a cross-sectional view from the side of a single module of the invention. A vacuum chamber 21 contains an array of short hollow cylindrical electrodes 22 supported on insulated electrical feed-throughs 23. At a first end of the array is located a hollow cylindrical electrode 24 and a collector cup 25 which together comprise the collector assembly. At a second end of the array is located an ion source and accelerator 26. The ion source and accelerator 26 contains the means to provide ions of an atomic species and accelerate the ions into the vacuum chamber 21.
Connected to each short hollow cylindrical electrode 22 through the feed-through connections 23 is an electrical cable 20 coming from an electronic pulser chassis 27 that generates a repetitive sequence of pulses which, when applied to the electrodes 22, produces a traveling potential hill within the cylindrical volume formed by the interior of the short electrodes 22. Connected to electrode 24, collector cup 25, and ion source 26 is power supply 28, which provides the various required operating voltages to those electrodes 24,25 and to the ion source and accelerator 26. A vacuum system 29 is provided to maintain a vacuum in the vacuum chamber 21.
In the working of this embodiment of the invention, the ion source and accelerator 26 provides ions to the apparatus by accelerating the ions with an accelerating potential V. As a result, the ions of a charge Z enter the vacuum chamber 21 with an average initial kinetic energy W.=ZeV, where e is the charge of an electron. The the magnitude of the average initial velocity for each isotope v. can be calculated by the kinetic energy equation:
where Mn is the mass of isotope n. The direction of the average initial velocities is along a first direction parallel to the axis B-B. In separating two particles with masses M, and M , with M, >M_, since the ions are injected with an average initial velocity parallel to the velocity of the traveling electric potential hill, the amplitude of the electric potential hill can be reduced to and merely be in the range where ΦE would be the
amplitude of the electric potential hill if the initial average velocities of the molecules were approximately zero as in the previous embodiment. Reducing the amplitude of the electric potential hill decreases the demands on the inventive apparatus, allowing for a simpler system. The resulting kinetic energy of the particles accelerated by the traveling electronic potential hill is
W =(l/2)Mv . o ' o
In determining the resolution for separating two particles with masses M. and M_ , with M. M„ ,
2 defining α=ZeV/( (l/2)M,v ) and presuming that the velocity from the thermal kinetic energy is negligible, the resolution is:
R=Φ1/Φ2=(M1/M2)((l- 1/2)2/(l-((M]/M2)α)2)) Eq. (4) When the accelerating potential V of the ion source and accelerator 26 is zero, α=0. In that case this embodiment becomes like the previous embodiment and R=M, /M„ . In this embodiment α=0.80, for example. This means that the energy ZeV imparted to the particles by the ion source and accelerator 26 is 80% of the kinetic
2 energy (l/2)Mv imparted to the particles by a traveling electric potential hill as described in the previous embodiment. Using the example of particles in the previous embodiment where M /M~=1.005, R=1.049.
Where in the previous embodiment the resolution of ΦF had to be five parts in a thousand, in this embodiment the resolution of Φ needs to be approximately five parts in a hundred. This difference in resolution provides a greater tolerance. This tolerance is important because an increase in thermal energy requires a greater tolerance. Thermal movement will diminish resolution, making the second embodiment more desirable in some instances.
In this embodiment since the magnitudes of the velocities of the particles as they are accelerated from the ion source and accelerator 26 are less than the magnitude of the velocity of the traveling electric potential hill v , the traveling electric potential hill overtakes the particle. Thus this is called the hill overtaking mode. When pre-acceleration is used, two distinct modes of separation may be employed in the same type of apparatus. These are: (1) the "hill overtaking" (H-O) mode, in which the magnitudes of the velocities of the pre-accelerated ions is less than that of the hill, and (2) the "particle overtaking" (P-O) mode in which the opposite is true. The differences between these two modes of operation appear in the details of the mass resolution and the energy efficiency. Both modes may, however, have the potential for better mass-resolving power and higher efficiency than the case of no pre-acceleration as in the first embodiment.
As the ions are continually added to the system, and the desired isotopes are stripped from the plasma, the remainder of the ions leak into the outer parts of the vacuum chamber 21 around the outside of the cylindrical electrodes 22 and are removed by the vacuum system 29. There are also applications where it would be desirable to create the traveling potential within a plasma where the use of electrodes might be ineffective because of the screening effect of the plasma on externally applied electric fields. One technique would be to utilize the "Mirrortron" principle (U.S. Patent Number 4,899,084 incorporated by reference) where a traveling electrical potential is generated by the application, from outside the plasma, of a traveling magnetic field. The effect of this traveling magnetic field is to cause a relative displacement of the plasma electrons relative to the ions, thus creating a local region of positive potential moving through the plasma. This moving potential could then either be used to "strip" the plasma of selected ions in situ, or ion beams could be injected into the end of the plasma to be selectively sorted by the moving space-charge field.
Figure 5 is an illustration of one embodiment of the invention, which utilizes a Mirrortron. In this embodiment, magnetic mirrors 40, which are magnetic coils in a ring, are used to create dc mirror cells in a magnetic mirror type magnetic field, which will be used to hold a hot electron plasma. Since this requires that the magnetic field created by the magnetic mirrors 40 be a continuous magnetic field the magnetic mirrors 40 are powered by a continuous power source 50. These magnetic mirrors 40 may have a mirror ratio on the order of two. A mirror ratio is defined as the ratio between the strongest point of the magnetic field along the magnetic mirror axis C-C and the weakest point of the magnetic field between the magnetic mirrors 40 and along the axis C-C. Microwave source 42 is positioned to create and heat a plasma of high energy electrons and lower energy ions held in the magnetic field. Since the microwave source 42 continuously provides energy to the plasma, the microwave source 42 is powered by a continuous power source 52. Additional heating could be accomplished by slow adiabatic magnetic compression of a pre-heated plasma using the magnetic mirrors 40 (or additional coils) in addition to or in place of the microwave source 42. Power source 44 adds a slowly increasing voltage to the dc component provided by power source 50 of the magnetic mirrors 40. The slowly increasing voltage slowly increases the magnetic field of the magnetic mirrors and the magnetic field between them, causing adiabatic compression. The plasma electrons would be heated to high temperatures and would typically be allowed to approach a collisional state such that its electron distribution function would attain a quasi-static loss-cone shape. The plasma density and electron temperature would be such as to cause only a minor perturbation of the confining fields.
The mirrortron also includes local coils 48, where each local coil is a magnetic coil in a ring shape. The local coils 48 are positioned between the magnetic mirrors 40 so that plasma confined by the magnetic mirrors 40 will pass through the center of the ring shaped local coils 48.
An ion or particle beam source and accelerator 46, located along the axis C-C, introduces a beam of ions or charged particles on a path along the axis C-C of the magnetic mirror at an average initial velocities v. . Each local coil 48 is sequentially and rapidly pulsed up in current. The local coils 48 produce a local mirror, the height of which is comparable to, or larger than, that of the magnetic mirrors 40. As the local coil's field increases, hot electrons begin to be expelled from the region by the increasing field. On a sufficiently rapid time scale, however, the plasma ions would be essentially motionless, because of their heavy mass and low kinetic temperature. At this point the plasma quasineutrality constraint would step in; i.e., a positive potential would arise within the plasma of just such a magnitude as to preserve near equality between the electron and plasma ion density. The resulting positive space charge, which creates the positive potential, thereby accelerates the positively charged ions or charged particles in the injected beam. To selectively accelerate a specific type of ions or charged particles, the local coils 48 are pulsed sequentially to create a traveling electric potential hill with a velocity vo. The local coils 48 are pulsed in order at a set speed, and the power source or switch 56 for the ion or particle beam source 46 is governed by a timer 54 which also controls the power sources or switches 58 for the local coils 48. An electrode 60 is charged and used to turn back ions that lack a threshold kinetic energy.
Timer or switch 62 controls timer 54 and power supplies 44, 50 and 52 to allow a cyclicly generated adiabatically compressed plasma. A vacuum chamber 64 surrounds the magnetic mirrors 40 and local coils 48, and a vacuum system 66 maintains the vacuum in the chamber 64 and removes the remaining ions as they leak through the magnetic bottle created by the magnetic mirrors 40. To illustrate the operation of this embodiment and to illustrate the particle overtaking mode, this embodiment will be described as it is used in a particle overtaking mode. In the operation of this embodiment of the invention, ion source and accelerator 46 provides ions to the apparatus accelerated to an average initial velocities with components along axis C-C of v. . To compare this embodiment with the previous embodiments the ions are also ions of Mercury Hg . To separate out
204 Hg, the local coils are pulsed sequentially at a set rate so that the distance Δd between adjacent local coils 48 and the time difference Δt between the pulsing of adjacent coils is set so that vo=Δd/Δt . In this example M=203 atomic mass units, Z=l, and e=-l.602x10 -19
coulombs. Therefore, r=l, when 2(203 amu)/(-l.602x10 19 coulombs)=ΦE/v2
By choosing a value ΦF and hill velocity of magnitude v so that for M=203 amu T>1 and for M=204 amu T<1, o the only singly charged mercury ions that will be accelerated by the traveling electric potential hill will be the mercury isotopes with atomic masses less than 204.
Mercury ions that have a +2 or greater charge will also be accelerated, since for these ions T>1. The actual amplitude of the electric potential hill will be the reduced potential Φ , since the average initial velocities are substantial, where Φr falls within the range
In the particle overtaking mode vo<v1.. Therefore the particles overtake the traveling electric potential hill. Mercury ions where T> 1 will be decelerated according to Equation 1, thus they will experience a negative acceleration. Mercury ions where T<1 will be unaffected by the traveling potential hill and will maintain a velocity with a component parallel to axis C-C of approximately v. . Since v and Φ, are chosen so r<1 only for singly charged Hg , only Hg will exit the separator and pass electrode 60 with an average velocity with a component along the axis C-C substantially eq^ual to or qrreater than vi.n. Since all other ions will have a velocities with components along the axis C-C much smaller than v. , the electrode 60 will turn back all in other ions. Only 204Hg will pass through the electrode
60. This embodiment is designed with a port 63 to pass these ions to another system.
In the case where thermal energy is not neglected for two particles of mass . and M_ , we define ε.=kT/ZeV, with kT being the kinetic temperature for particles M., and ε2=kT/ZeV, with kT being the kinetic temperature for particles M_ .
The invention is not critically dependent on the particular method used to generate a traveling potential hill. Some of the more important parameters are: (1) that the hill should be limited in range (i.e. it should fall off with distance from its peak to a small fraction of its peak value in a distance short compared to the length of the separator column), and, (2) that the amplitude and velocity of the electric potential hill should be sufficiently constant to not compromise the degree of mass resolution that is desired. In the specification and claims a potential hill is defined as having a magnitude which falls off with distance from its peak to a small fraction of its peak value (or amplitude) in a distance which is short compared to the length of the separator column.
Because thermal energy diminishes resolution and amplitude and velocity of the electric potential hill cannot be kept completely constant, separation will not be
100%. In the first embodiment, instead of yielding 100% 198 Hg, the system need only enough resolution to increase the concentration of 198Hg from 10% to 20% and possibly slightly increasing the concentration of 199Hg from 17% to 20%. This would result in a diminished concentration of 204Hg to less than 30%. In naturally occurring concentrations of mercury, 30% of the photons generated in a mercury lamp can be self absorbed by 30% of the mercury gas, since 204Hg makes up 30% of the mercury gas in naturally occurring concentrations. By lowering concentrations of the highest concentration of isotopes, self absorption is lowered allowing for a more energy efficient light bulb.
Another method of practicing the invention would be to use the embodiment illustrated in Figure 5 in the particle overtaking mode to significantly increase the
204 concentration of Hg to 50%, and then as the selectee) ions pass through the port 63 they pass to the embodiment illustrated in Figure 2 with an average initial velocities with magnitudes of approximately v. . The embodiment illustrated in Figure 4 is set to wave overtaking mode to increase the concentration of 198Hg to 18% and diminishing concentrations of 204Hg and 202Hg to 18%.
Figure 6 illustrates another preferred embodiment of the invention, showing a cross-sectional view from the side of a single module of the invention. A vacuum chamber 72 contains an array of conducting rods 74a-j,
76a-j supported on insulated electrical feed-throughs 78. At a first end of the array are located a pair of parallel plate electrodes 80 and a collector cup 82 which together comprise the collector assembly. At a second end of the array is located an ion source and accelerator 84. This ion source and accelerator 84 contains the means to provide ions of an atomic species and accelerate the ions into the vacuum chamber 72. Connected to each electrode 74, 76 through the feed-through connections 78 is an electrical cable 86 coming from an electronic pulser chassis 88 that generates a repetitive sequence of pulses which, when applied to the electrodes 74, 76 produces a traveling potential hill within the space formed between the electrodes 74,76. The cabling from pulser chassis 88 to conducting rods 74a-j is not shown for clarity. The traveling hill is formed by first charging a first set of electrodes 74a and 76a to a set positive charge. After the first set of electrodes 74a, 76a begin to charge, a second set of electrodes 74b, 76b begins to charge. After the first set of electrodes 74a, 76a reaches a maximum charge the first set of electrodes 74a, 76a begins to discharge. During this time a third set of electrodes 74c, 76c begins to charge. The sum of the charges of the electrodes form a traveling electric potential hill as shown in Figure 1 but with an amplitude Φ . Connected to the parallel plate electrodes 80, the collector cup 82, and the ion source 84 is a power supply 90, which provides the various required operating voltages to those electrodes and to the ion source. A vacuum system 92 is provided to maintain a vacuum in the vacuum chamber. In the operation of this embodiment of the invention, ion source and accelerator 84 provides ions to the apparatus by accelerating the ions with an accelerating potential V and injecting them into the vacuum chamber with an average initial kinetic energy
W.=ZeV, producing a thin plasma sheet between electrodes 74 and 76. In this example, the two isotope to be separated are Neon 22 ( Ne) and Neon 20 ( Ne) . For an accelerating potential V= 600 eV, the magnitude of the averag ~~e initial velocities vi.n can be calculated from the equation ZeV=W. =(l/2) nv2 n. For 22Ne, (600eV)(1.602xl0"19)=(l/2)(22/(6.02472xl0~23))(vi22)2. Therefore, for 22Ne vi22=7.256xl06 cm/s. Using the same equation for Neon 20, v. =7.610x10 cm/s. The amplitude of the traveling potential hill is set to accelerate both isotopes. The direction of the average initial velocities is along a first direction from the ion source and accelerator 72 and substantially parallel to axis D-D. In this example the magnitude of the velocity
7 of the travelingr potential hill vo=10 cm/s. The direction of the velocity of the traveling potential hill is parallel to the first direction. For 20Ne, we find
W =1.03605 keV. For 22Ne, W =1.13966 keV. Using o o the equation Wfn=4Wo(l-(l/2)(vin/vo))2, for
20Ne, Wf2Q=1.590 keV. For 22Ne, Wf22«1.851 keV.
By applying a charge on the parallel plate electrodes 80 so that singly charged particles with a final kinetic energy less than 1.750 keV are turned back, only 22Ne ions will pass to the collector cup 82.
In this embodiment, pairs of conducting rods are used as electrodes 74, 76 instead of the hollow cylindrical electrodes. The rods have a length into and out of the page of Figure 6. Such rods provide an even potential through the thickness of a thin plasma sheet which may have any desired length in the direction of the length of the rod.
The separation of krypton isotopes is used in another method of using the embodiment illustrated in Figure 6. Naturally occurring krypton isotopes are
78Kr, 80Kr, 82Kr, 83Kr, 84Kr, and 86Kr. This
80 preferred method allows the collection of Kr.
In this embodiment, ion source and accelerator 84 provides singly ionized krypton isotopes accelerated to 10
78 keV into the vacuum chamber 72. For Kr,
7 78 74, 76, has a velocity v =2x10 cm/s. For Kr,
Kr, W OooSU16.578 keV. The minimum amplitude of the
R0 potential hill for accelerating singly charged Kr ions Φ =0.82663 kV. For 82Kr, W =16.992 82 keV. For isotopes heavier than Kr, W >16.992 keV. The minimum amplitude of the potential hill for accelerating singly charged ions Krypton isotopes of atomic mass 80 or greater is Φr80< X 0.91971 kV. In this embodiment the amplitude of the traveling potential hill is set as
™T.he remai•ni•ng i•sot■opes 82τK,r, 83τK,r, 8 τK.r, and, 86.K.r are not accelerated by the traveling potential hill and maintain their initial kinetic energy of 10 keV.
In this example, the parallel plate electrodes 80 are charged with a potential of +15 keV. Since isotopes with a mass equal to or greater than Kr are unaccelerated by the traveling potential hill, they have a kinetic energy of 10 keV and therefore are turned back by the +15 keV potential created by the parallel plate
78 80 electrodes 80. Since Kr and Kr have a final energy greater than 15 keV, these isotopes will pass between the parallel conducting plates 80. They will first be negatively accelerated by the potential from the plates and then positively accelerated back to their final kinetic energy Wf yielding a zero net acceleration from the parallel plate electrodes 80. The collector cup 82 is charged with a potential +24.5 keV. Since for 78Kr 78 -.0 < +24.5 keV, Kr isotopes will not have enough r /o kinetic energy to reach the collector cup 82 and will not
80 be collected at the collector cup 82. Since for Kr
W_on > +24.5 keV, Kr isotopes will have enough toU kinetic energy to reach the collector cup 82 and will be collected at the collector cup 82. By using a combination of methods described in the previous embodiments, an isotope which is neither the heaviest or lightest can be selectively collected. The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|SU368674A1 *||Title not available|
|US5140158 *||5 Oct 1990||18 Aug 1992||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Method for discriminative particle selection|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|DE10328599B4 *||25 Jun 2003||17 Apr 2008||Micromass Uk Ltd.||Verfahren zur Trennung von Ionen aufgrund ihrer Beweglichkeit|
|EP1367632A2 *||30 May 2003||3 Dec 2003||Micromass Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|EP1367632A3 *||30 May 2003||29 Sep 2004||Micromass UK Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6791078||26 Jun 2003||14 Sep 2004||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6794641||30 May 2003||21 Sep 2004||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6800846||30 May 2003||5 Oct 2004||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6812453||25 Jun 2002||2 Nov 2004||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6838662||28 Oct 2003||4 Jan 2005||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6884995||2 Jul 2003||26 Apr 2005||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US6914241||17 Jun 2004||5 Jul 2005||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US7071467||5 Aug 2003||4 Jul 2006||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US7095013||30 May 2003||22 Aug 2006||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|US7205538||22 Jun 2006||17 Apr 2007||Micromass Uk Limited||Mass spectrometer|
|20 Jan 1994||AK||Designated states|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): CA JP
|20 Jan 1994||AL||Designated countries for regional patents|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LU MC NL SE
|20 Apr 1994||121||Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application|
|21 Dec 1994||122||Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase|
|1 May 1995||NENP||Non-entry into the national phase in:|
Ref country code: CA