WO1992017019A1 - A noise suppressing telephone handset - Google Patents
A noise suppressing telephone handset Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1992017019A1 WO1992017019A1 PCT/DK1992/000091 DK9200091W WO9217019A1 WO 1992017019 A1 WO1992017019 A1 WO 1992017019A1 DK 9200091 W DK9200091 W DK 9200091W WO 9217019 A1 WO9217019 A1 WO 9217019A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- microphone
- handset
- microphones
- noise
- receiver
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M1/00—Substation equipment, e.g. for use by subscribers
- H04M1/02—Constructional features of telephone sets
- H04M1/19—Arrangements of transmitters, receivers, or complete sets to prevent eavesdropping, to attenuate local noise or to prevent undesired transmission; Mouthpieces or receivers specially adapted therefor
Definitions
- the invention concerns a telephone instrument of the type stated in the introductory portion of claim 1.
- the remote field sensitivity is in both cases approximate- ly the same for frequences below 1 kHz, but only with an optimally positioned handset is the signal/noise ratio acceptable.
- JP 1-42966 discloses a telephone instrument of the type stated in the opening paragraph.
- the two microphones are of different types, and precisely because different microphones are used with different direction and frequency characteris ⁇ tics, it is necessary to adjust the substraction means of the microphones, i.e. an additional circuit for the con ⁇ nection of the microphones.
- the object of the invention is to produce a telephone with a handset of the type stated in the opening paragraph, which is better and cheaper than the known noise-reducing handset.
- the second microphone is identical with the first micro ⁇ phone, that the second microphone is negatively fed back to the first microphone, and that it is arranged at a dis ⁇ tance from the first microphone.
- the second microphone is arranged near the receiver and is directed towards the face in the position of use like the first microphone.
- the two microphones are preferably two uniform standard microphones which are mass-produced and are therefore in- expensive .
- the distance a from the mouth opening to the openings in the handset to the first microphone is about 18 mm.
- the distance b from the mouth opening to the openings of the handset to the second microphone is about 120 mm.
- the microphone end of the handset is no longer kept optimally, but is lowered e.g. 50 mm, whereby the distance a from the mouth to the first microphone increases to 53 mm, the distance to the second microphone will still be considerably greater than the distance to the first micro ⁇ phone, so that the microphones will still have speech sen ⁇ sitivity.
- the acoustic impedance of the remote field or the noise signal will be approximately the same for the two microphones since both of them are directed toward the face with the same distance to the skin.
- the noise signal will therefore be well outbalanced to a degree depending upon the type and position of the noise sources.
- the second microphone Since the distance between the microphones corresponds to the halfwave of the acoustic oscillation of 1.5 kHz, the second microphone will be in phase with the first micro- phone at this frequency and will therefore cause a slight increase in sensitivity. This is not desirable, and the input holes to the acoustic volume in front of the second microphone are therefore constructed as an acoustic low- pass filter with a cut-off frequency of about 1.5 kHz.
- the outbalancing of the remote field will therefore be limited to frequences below 1.5 kHz, and it is also in this low frequency range that the most speech recognition disturb ⁇ ing noise generators occur. According to the invention it is possible to outbalance the remote field entirely with ⁇ out using subtraction means, solely because both micro- phones are serially connected in opposition.
- the reduction of the near field sensiti ⁇ vity of the original microphone can easily be kept below 2 dB with a number of alternative positions of the second microphone. It should be mentioned that the smaller the distance between the microphones, the greater the fre ⁇ quency range covered.
- the input openings and the volume in front of the second microphone are arranged such that the cut-off frequency of the acoustic low-pass filter formed thereby reduces the sensitivity of this microphone outside the desired frequency range.
- An additional advantage of the microphone of the invention over the microphone in JP 1-42966 is that because of the two identical microphones there is no need for a connec- tion and disconnection facility like in JP 1-42966, just as the subtraction means in JP 1-42966 adds to the costs. Finally, the two microphones in JP 1-42966 cannot be serially connected because they are different.
- the handset of the inven ⁇ tion does not require additional power supply wires like the Japanese publication. Accordingly, telephone instru ⁇ ments can freely be supplied with one or two microphones without there being any other differences.
- Preferred microphone types are electromagnetic or in par ⁇ ticular electrodynamic ones rather than electret micro ⁇ phones, because it is then possible to manufacture hand ⁇ sets according to the invention which can readily replace existing handsets without noise reducing properties, with ⁇ out having to change the actual telephone instrument.
- fig. 1 shows a handset according to the invention seen from the side facing the user's head
- fig. 2 is a longitudinal section through the handset of fig. 1, and
- fig. 3 shows a measured comparison between noise transfer via a handset according to the invention, curve A, and a known handset, curve B.
- the drawing shows a handset 1 which contains a first, ordinary microphone 2 and a receiver 3. Also a second microphone 4 is mounted near the receiver 3, as shown in fig. 2.
- the microphones are uniform standard moving coil microphones which are directed toward the user's face, the handset being formed with openings 5 and 6 for the first microphone and the second microphone, respectively, and openings 7 for the receiver 3. These openings are shaped so as to form suitable acoustic impedances for the subject three transducers 2, 3 and 4.
- the openings 6 moreover form an acoustic low-pass filter which cuts off frequences above 1.5 kHz.
- Fig. 3 shows a measurement result obtained by letting the handset transfer a random, but constant noise field from its surroundings, i.e. a remote field through a telephone link, the noise being measured in dB at the receiver end, distributed over the actual frequency range.
- the curve A shows the measurement for the handset of the invention
- the curve B shows the measurement for the same handset, but with the openings 6 closed, so that the noise compensating effect of the microphone 4 is can ⁇ celled.
Abstract
The handset (1) of a telephone instrument, which contains a microphone (2) and a receiver (3) arranged in ordinary manner, is additionally provided with a second microphone (4) which is negatively fed back to the first microphone (2). The second microphone (4) is electrically negatively fed back to the first, ordinary microphone (2) and is arranged in the vicinity of the receiver (3), and, like the first microphone (2), it is directed toward the user's face. These two microphones thereby substantially outbalance the remote field and reduce noise, while they affect the speech sensitivity only to an insignificant degree such that improved signal/noise ratios are obtained.
Description
A noise suppressing telephone handset
The invention concerns a telephone instrument of the type stated in the introductory portion of claim 1.
In contrast to older telephone instruments with carbon microphones, modern telephone instruments with electronic speech transmission circuit and with electromagnetic, electrodynamic, piezoelectric or electret microphones are highly sensitive to the acoustic remote noise field.
To remedy this long-known problem numerous variants of said microphone types have been manufactured in the course of time, constructed as a pressure gradient microphone with acoustic passage to both sides of the diaphragm. The advantage of this is that the remote noise field affects the two sides of the diaphragm in the same manner and is thus outbalanced, while the near field, i.e. the direct speech against the front side of the diaphragm affects the rear side of the diaphragm only to a very limited degree. An acceptable total speech sensitivity can therefore be achieved.
However, this applies only in case of direct speech into the microphone. On the other hand, the slightest displace¬ ment of the microphone end from the optimum position close to the mouth will cause a drastic reduction in speech sen¬ sitivity, because the impedances from the mouth to the front side and the rear side, respectively, of the dia¬ phragm approach each other so that also the near field will be outbalanced.
The remote field sensitivity is in both cases approximate- ly the same for frequences below 1 kHz, but only with an optimally positioned handset is the signal/noise ratio
acceptable.
Furthermore, all these previously known solutions have been based on special transducers which are relatively complicated because suitable acoustic impedances are to be obtained at both sides of the diaphragm. These transducers are more expensive to manufacture than standard micro¬ phones, and since they are moreover just produced in a relatively small number, it is clearly a costly solution.
The Patent Abstracts of Japan, JP 1-42966 discloses a telephone instrument of the type stated in the opening paragraph. In this, the two microphones are of different types, and precisely because different microphones are used with different direction and frequency characteris¬ tics, it is necessary to adjust the substraction means of the microphones, i.e. an additional circuit for the con¬ nection of the microphones.
The object of the invention is to produce a telephone with a handset of the type stated in the opening paragraph, which is better and cheaper than the known noise-reducing handset.
This object is achieved according to the invention in that the second microphone is identical with the first micro¬ phone, that the second microphone is negatively fed back to the first microphone, and that it is arranged at a dis¬ tance from the first microphone.
Preferably, the second microphone is arranged near the receiver and is directed towards the face in the position of use like the first microphone.
The two microphones are preferably two uniform standard microphones which are mass-produced and are therefore in-
expensive .
The distance a from the mouth opening to the openings in the handset to the first microphone is about 18 mm. The distance b from the mouth opening to the openings of the handset to the second microphone is about 120 mm.
In the near field the pressure decreases more than propor¬ tionally to the increase in distance, i.e. when inserting the second microphone the sensitivity deterioration is less than:
20 log 1 ■ = 1.4 dB 1 - _1 _ 120
If the microphone end of the handset is no longer kept optimally, but is lowered e.g. 50 mm, whereby the distance a from the mouth to the first microphone increases to 53 mm, the distance to the second microphone will still be considerably greater than the distance to the first micro¬ phone, so that the microphones will still have speech sen¬ sitivity.
In all cases, the acoustic impedance of the remote field or the noise signal will be approximately the same for the two microphones since both of them are directed toward the face with the same distance to the skin. The noise signal will therefore be well outbalanced to a degree depending upon the type and position of the noise sources.
Since the distance between the microphones corresponds to the halfwave of the acoustic oscillation of 1.5 kHz, the second microphone will be in phase with the first micro- phone at this frequency and will therefore cause a slight increase in sensitivity. This is not desirable, and the
input holes to the acoustic volume in front of the second microphone are therefore constructed as an acoustic low- pass filter with a cut-off frequency of about 1.5 kHz. The outbalancing of the remote field will therefore be limited to frequences below 1.5 kHz, and it is also in this low frequency range that the most speech recognition disturb¬ ing noise generators occur. According to the invention it is possible to outbalance the remote field entirely with¬ out using subtraction means, solely because both micro- phones are serially connected in opposition. In this series coupling, the reduction of the near field sensiti¬ vity of the original microphone can easily be kept below 2 dB with a number of alternative positions of the second microphone. It should be mentioned that the smaller the distance between the microphones, the greater the fre¬ quency range covered. The input openings and the volume in front of the second microphone are arranged such that the cut-off frequency of the acoustic low-pass filter formed thereby reduces the sensitivity of this microphone outside the desired frequency range.
An additional advantage of the microphone of the invention over the microphone in JP 1-42966 is that because of the two identical microphones there is no need for a connec- tion and disconnection facility like in JP 1-42966, just as the subtraction means in JP 1-42966 adds to the costs. Finally, the two microphones in JP 1-42966 cannot be serially connected because they are different.
Finally, it is an advantage that the handset of the inven¬ tion does not require additional power supply wires like the Japanese publication. Accordingly, telephone instru¬ ments can freely be supplied with one or two microphones without there being any other differences.
Preferred microphone types are electromagnetic or in par¬ ticular electrodynamic ones rather than electret micro¬ phones, because it is then possible to manufacture hand¬ sets according to the invention which can readily replace existing handsets without noise reducing properties, with¬ out having to change the actual telephone instrument.
It should be mentioned that also noise produced by scratching on the handset is outbalanced by the two micro- phones.
The invention will be described more fully below with reference to the drawing, in which
fig. 1 shows a handset according to the invention seen from the side facing the user's head,
fig. 2 is a longitudinal section through the handset of fig. 1, and
fig. 3 shows a measured comparison between noise transfer via a handset according to the invention, curve A, and a known handset, curve B.
The drawing shows a handset 1 which contains a first, ordinary microphone 2 and a receiver 3. Also a second microphone 4 is mounted near the receiver 3, as shown in fig. 2. The microphones are uniform standard moving coil microphones which are directed toward the user's face, the handset being formed with openings 5 and 6 for the first microphone and the second microphone, respectively, and openings 7 for the receiver 3. These openings are shaped so as to form suitable acoustic impedances for the subject three transducers 2, 3 and 4. The openings 6 moreover form an acoustic low-pass filter which cuts off frequences above 1.5 kHz.
Fig. 3 shows a measurement result obtained by letting the handset transfer a random, but constant noise field from its surroundings, i.e. a remote field through a telephone link, the noise being measured in dB at the receiver end, distributed over the actual frequency range.
The curve A shows the measurement for the handset of the invention, and the curve B shows the measurement for the same handset, but with the openings 6 closed, so that the noise compensating effect of the microphone 4 is can¬ celled.
As appears from fig. 3, there is an improvement of about 5 to 10 dB over the entire essential frequency range from about 300 Hz to 1.5 kHz.
Claims
1. A telephone instrument with a handset containing in ordinary manner a first microphone and a receiver as well as a second microphone for suppressing room noise, c h a ¬ r a c t e r i z e d in that the second microphone is identical with the first microphone, that the second microphone is negatively feed back in series with the first microphone, and that it is arranged at a distance from the first microphone.
2. A telephone instrument with a handset according to claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the second microphone is arranged near the receiver and is directed toward the face in the position of use like the first microphone.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DK0509/91 | 1991-03-21 | ||
DK50991A DK50991A (en) | 1991-03-21 | 1991-03-21 | PHONE DEVICE WITH A MICROPHONE |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1992017019A1 true WO1992017019A1 (en) | 1992-10-01 |
Family
ID=8094370
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK1992/000091 WO1992017019A1 (en) | 1991-03-21 | 1992-03-20 | A noise suppressing telephone handset |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
DK (1) | DK50991A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1992017019A1 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0595457A1 (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1994-05-04 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5625684A (en) * | 1993-02-04 | 1997-04-29 | Local Silence, Inc. | Active noise suppression system for telephone handsets and method |
US5673325A (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1997-09-30 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
DE19852805A1 (en) * | 1998-11-15 | 2000-05-18 | Florian M Koenig | Telephone with improved speech understanding, several microphones, and special speech signal processing |
EP1139337A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | A method of transmitting voice information and an electronic communications device for transmission of voice information |
WO2001075863A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | A method of transmitting voice information and an electronic communications device for transmission of voice information |
WO2005069279A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-07-28 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication Ab | Multi-mode audio processors and methods of operating the same |
GB2413722A (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2005-11-02 | Clarity Technologies Inc | Multi microphone system for hand-held device |
US7309314B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2007-12-18 | U.S. Department Of Veterans Affairs | Method for predicting apnea-hypopnea index from overnight pulse oximetry readings |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4625345A (en) * | 1985-03-26 | 1986-12-02 | Wood Lorin A | Automated sofa bed |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4773091A (en) * | 1986-06-16 | 1988-09-20 | Northern Telecom Limited | Telephone handset for use in noisy locations |
-
1991
- 1991-03-21 DK DK50991A patent/DK50991A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1992
- 1992-03-20 WO PCT/DK1992/000091 patent/WO1992017019A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4773091A (en) * | 1986-06-16 | 1988-09-20 | Northern Telecom Limited | Telephone handset for use in noisy locations |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN, Vol. 13, No. 86, E720; & JP,A,63 263 865, (31.10.1988), NEC CORP. * |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0595457A1 (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1994-05-04 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5381473A (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1995-01-10 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5673325A (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1997-09-30 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
CN1041042C (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1998-12-02 | 安德烈电子公司 | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5625684A (en) * | 1993-02-04 | 1997-04-29 | Local Silence, Inc. | Active noise suppression system for telephone handsets and method |
DE19852805A1 (en) * | 1998-11-15 | 2000-05-18 | Florian M Koenig | Telephone with improved speech understanding, several microphones, and special speech signal processing |
EP1139337A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | A method of transmitting voice information and an electronic communications device for transmission of voice information |
WO2001075863A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | A method of transmitting voice information and an electronic communications device for transmission of voice information |
US7309314B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2007-12-18 | U.S. Department Of Veterans Affairs | Method for predicting apnea-hypopnea index from overnight pulse oximetry readings |
WO2005069279A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-07-28 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication Ab | Multi-mode audio processors and methods of operating the same |
CN100559471C (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2009-11-11 | 索尼爱立信移动通讯股份有限公司 | Multi-mode audio processors and method of operating thereof |
GB2413722A (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2005-11-02 | Clarity Technologies Inc | Multi microphone system for hand-held device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DK50991D0 (en) | 1991-03-21 |
DK50991A (en) | 1992-09-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR0129766B1 (en) | Noise redviding receiver device | |
US9538283B2 (en) | Ear microphone | |
US5606607A (en) | Two-way communications earset | |
US5430803A (en) | Bifunctional earphone set | |
JP2609822B2 (en) | Transmitter | |
KR20050026967A (en) | Electrical impedance based audio compensation in audio devices and methods therefor | |
KR100629033B1 (en) | An electro-acoustic communications unit | |
US20040184623A1 (en) | Speaker unit with active leak compensation | |
US7260364B2 (en) | Reverse mounted micro-speaker assemblies and mobile terminals including the same | |
JP2000261534A (en) | Handset | |
US3995113A (en) | Two-way acoustic communication through the ear with acoustic and electric noise reduction | |
WO1992017019A1 (en) | A noise suppressing telephone handset | |
EP0637187B1 (en) | Two-way communications earset | |
EP1074168B1 (en) | Telephone with means for anhancing the low-frequency response | |
JP4543135B2 (en) | Mobile radio terminal | |
US20020136398A1 (en) | Leak-tolerant handsfree telephone | |
CN1026944C (en) | Communication apparatus | |
JPH06189388A (en) | Ear set type handset | |
KR200228454Y1 (en) | Earphone connected with a sound-transmitting tube | |
JP3317666B2 (en) | Hands-free communication device | |
JP3463063B2 (en) | Mobile phone using one earphone with microphone function | |
JPS59126355A (en) | Acoustic device of loudspeaker telephone set | |
CA2105548A1 (en) | Coupling Apparatus for Telephone Handsets | |
EP1564970B1 (en) | Electro-acoustic transducer for a portable communication device | |
JPS5880997A (en) | Bone-conduction microphone |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CA JP US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LU MC NL SE |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |