WO1992005503A1 - Means for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and troubleshooting in technical equipment - Google Patents

Means for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and troubleshooting in technical equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1992005503A1
WO1992005503A1 PCT/SE1991/000625 SE9100625W WO9205503A1 WO 1992005503 A1 WO1992005503 A1 WO 1992005503A1 SE 9100625 W SE9100625 W SE 9100625W WO 9205503 A1 WO9205503 A1 WO 9205503A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
node
knowledge base
equipment
information
nodes
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE1991/000625
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Hans Becker
Original Assignee
Televerket
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Televerket filed Critical Televerket
Priority to US08/030,068 priority Critical patent/US5548714A/en
Publication of WO1992005503A1 publication Critical patent/WO1992005503A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/22Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
    • G06F11/2257Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing using expert systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
    • G06N5/02Knowledge representation; Symbolic representation
    • G06N5/022Knowledge engineering; Knowledge acquisition
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S706/00Data processing: artificial intelligence
    • Y10S706/902Application using ai with detail of the ai system
    • Y10S706/911Nonmedical diagnostics

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a means and a method for structuring technical information and is an development en ⁇ vironment designed to enable construction of an intelligent, electronic document in the quickest and most efficient way for troubleshooting, guidance and teaching in a complex technical equipment.
  • On a computer screen is shown what pre ⁇ viously has been in manuals: block diagrams, circuit dia ⁇ grams, photographs and instructions.
  • An experienced techni- cian uses the invention to find information about measurement results or sources of failures. A technician without computer experience can quickly learn to develop advanced systems. In troubleshooting an unexperienced technician is guided by the invention through the technical equipment until the fault is located.
  • the present invention pro- vides a general method of structuring a knowledge base and of helping users without specific previous knowledge.
  • the present invention provides a means and a method for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base for handling troubleshooting, guidance or teaching in technical equipment.
  • the required concepts are defined capable of describing states in the knowledge base.
  • Node types are defined indi- eating what type of information/instruction a node is to con- tain. Views are read containing pictures or graphic descrip ⁇ tions of the equipment.
  • Nodes are inserted in the views to provide access points of various parts of the equipment, at least one of the nodes being a so-called rule node containing at least one rule having a condition part and a conclusion part .
  • the condition part consists of conditions of the equip ⁇ ment and the conclusion part contains measures to be taken if the conditions are fulfilled.
  • the knowledge base is divided into blocks, if necessary, a base block containing informa- tion common to all the blocks and information about linking of the blocks.
  • the starting block is opened, whereupon a starting view is shown. Then it is possible to choose a new block, a new starting view being shown, choose a new view within the block in question and/or to choose a new node in the view in question to proceed.
  • a rule node is chosen to obtain instructions about what measures are to be taken, the instructions being followed until a conclusion is reached. If further information is desired a new text node or picture node is chosen.
  • Figure 1 shows the general structure of the invention with external and internal communication.
  • Figure 2 shows an example of a view with nodes
  • Figures 3A and B show symbols for picture nodes and text nodes, respectively.
  • the invention provides an expert system structure for diagnosis, in other words a tool especially designed to build expert systems.
  • a person without any experience of programming or expert systems can build a diag ⁇ nostic system.
  • the system is useful for technicians per ⁇ forming troubleshooting in complex technical equipment.
  • the diagnostic system collects knowledge from one or several experienced technicians.
  • the knowledge is represented in rules guiding the troubleshooter to the source of the problem.
  • the invention shows graphic circuit diagrams, block diagrams and photographs of the test equipment to provide the user with other relevant information.
  • the invention is in principle constructed like ordinary expert system structures. However, in contrast to these, con ⁇ siderable effort has been invested in making the user and expert interfaces user friendly. Besides these two interfaces there is a knowledge base with rules and facts .
  • An inference machine draws conclusions based on the contents of the know ⁇ ledge base.
  • Figure 1 shows schematically the structure of the system in accordance with the invention.
  • developers enter diagnostic knowledge through the expert interface into the knowledge base.
  • the troubleshooter has access to the knowledge base by means of the user interface and the inference machine.
  • the interfaces present views to the users to give access to the information.
  • An example of such a view is shown in Figure 2.
  • a view is a description of the object being diag ⁇ nosed.
  • Typical views are photographs, block diagrams and cir ⁇ cuits schematics.
  • Attached to views are nodes which contain rules.
  • When troubleshooting the service engineers navigate between test points before they arrive at the source of failure.
  • the test points are often documented in service manuals.
  • nodes are used instead of test points.
  • a node can be a test point but also a physical object like a button or a fuse. Every node contains rules which lead the troubleshooter closer to the source of failure.
  • the trouble ⁇ shooter studies the view and selects a node suitable for in- spection. When the node is selected further information or instructions are obtained, as is explained in detail below.
  • Some nodes contain only information and may be of the types picture nodes or text nodes .
  • Figures 3A and 3B the symbols are shown for picture nodes and text nodes, respecti- vely. These can be placed in views in the same way.
  • the user selects a picture node he gets a graphical display on the screen, and when he selects a text node a text window is displayed.
  • the text window allows for editing text.
  • the information should be structured in the following way.
  • Concepts are objects defined globally in the knowledge base and are used to define attributes, see below. From one and the same concept several different attributes can be defined. Each concept has a name and a domaine and may have different settings, which is explained below. The concept may also be associated with a picture and a question.
  • the domaine contains elements of the same type.
  • the concept voltage can be defined and given a domaine floating point number.
  • the domaine of the concept then contains every floating point number and each floating point number is an element of the domaine.
  • a domaine may be defined in three ways. It is possible to use a predefined domaine, define a closed interval or define a set. Two domaines are predefined according to the invention, integers and floating point numbers. The intervals may be integer intervals or floating point number intervals.
  • a set is a list of elements and is usually designated x, y, z, where x, y and z are the elements of the set. For instance, it is possible to define the concept pulse with the domaine long, short, correct. When a set is defined as a domaine of a concept one should state if the set is to be single or multiple. This is described below in connection with the section about attri ⁇ butes.
  • Unit, factor and tolerance are the settings of the con- cept.
  • the domaine of a concept is an interval
  • an integer domaine or a floating point number domaine a tole ⁇ rance may be associated with the concept.
  • the tolerance can be relative or absolute.
  • voltage the unit Volt and the factor 0.001 may be associated. If a user thereafter during a search gives the answer 2.3, the knowledge base will interpret this as 0.0023 Volts, i.e. 2.3 mVolt.
  • the voltage is for instance allowed to vary within an interval. To continue the investigation it is sufficient if the voltage is between 1.5 mVolt and 2.5 mVolt. Then there is a tolerance of 0.5 mVolt.
  • Attributes express states in the knowledge base by assigning to them values or sets of values. Each attribute has a domaine and only values included in this can be assigned to it. When an attribute is defined from a concept the attribute automatically gets the same domaine as the con ⁇ cept. When a value has been assigned to an attribute a fact has been added to the knowledge base. Attributes exist in rule conditions, see below, and are of three types - local, global and internal. A local attri ⁇ bute is an attribute defined in a rule node. A global attri ⁇ bute is an attribute defined in the base block, see below, and, thus, not in any special node. Internal attributes are predefined and may assume values expressing certain states of nodes in the knowledge base. Examples of such states are if nodes are untouched or dead.
  • An attribute gets the same domaine as the concept from which the attribute is defined. If the domaine is a simple set the attribute defined from the concept can only assume one value at a time. If the set is multiple the attributes defined from the concept may assume several values. It is also possible to associate a tolerance, a unit and a factor with an attribute. If unit, factor and tolerance are indi- cated in the concept from which the attribute is defined these will be preselected in the attribute.
  • a relation expresses the relationship between two terms, right-hand and left-hand terms. Their values or sets of values have to be of the same type, for instance integers. There are two kinds of terms - left-hand terms and right-hand terms . Left-hand terms are classified in three categories: global, local and internal attributes. Right-hand terms are classified in three categories: constants, local attributes and sets. Example. In the rule IF ' voltage ⁇ 2.5 Volts, THEN write the message "check C12", voltage is an attribute, 2.5 Volts is a constant and ⁇ is a relation. During an investigation a value is assigned to the attribute voltage, in this case being a left-hand term. The system will then investigate the relationship between this value and the value of the con ⁇ stant, i.e. investigate if the value assigned is less than 2.5 Volts. Here the right hand term is a constant.
  • Commands are calls to the system and are of three kinds - predefined, self-defined and external.
  • a self-defined command is a sequence of external, predefined and self- defined commands. The sequence may not call itself.
  • External commands are procedures compiled externally and inputted into the resource part of the base block. Command sequences can be combined into methods. Methods occur in nodes and rules .
  • a rule contains a condition part and a conclusion part.
  • the condition part consists of an arranged set of conditions. The conditions are created using terms and relations and may be true or false. The condition is fulfilled when it is true.
  • Two methods belong to each rule. One of these methods is associated with the condition part and contains commands "Check conditions", which is a command to the system to in ⁇ vestigate if the conditions of the rule can be fulfilled.
  • the other method belongs to the conclusion part of the rule and is called if the conditions of the rule are fulfilled.
  • the method always includes the command "Perform conclusion" .
  • nodes When navigating in a knowledge base a sequence of nodes is treated. When a node is treated the method of the node is called.
  • Base nodes do not contain any information but are used to mark a certain location on the screen picture.
  • the rule node con ⁇ tains a number of rules .
  • Text nodes and picture nodes contain text and picture information, respectively.
  • Self-defined nodes are instances of node types created by oneself.
  • the node types are type descriptions of nodes and belong to the base block. When a node type is created it is possible to create one or more instances of this. An instance of a node type is a node given the content of the node type. If the content of the node type is changed each instance of it will automatically be changed.
  • the system has three predefined node types used to create common rule nodes, text nodes and picture nodes. It is also possible to create new node types to facilitate the development work.
  • a rule node type created can for instance contain a number of attributes and commands.
  • the user is to indicate the voltage and current in a transistor in several rule nodes it is suitable first to define a node type - transistor voltage - with the attributes used. Thereafter the node type can be used to readily create instances of this. Then these instances are of the rule node type "Transistor voltage”.
  • node types There are four categories of self-defined node types: rule node types, text node types, picture node types and base node types.
  • the node types contain various methods.
  • a picture node type for instance always contains the command "Show picture” causing the showing of the content of a picture node.
  • Each node type is represented by a symbol, see for in ⁇ stance Figure 2.
  • a node type is created also a symbol has to be selected therefor. The symbol will then be in the Tool menu and it is then possible to create instances of the node type created in the same way as with predefined node types.
  • a block is a document of its own containing views and nodes .
  • the knowledge base can be divided into separate blocks, each block describing a defined part of the knowledge base.
  • a knowledge base often consists of several blocks linked together. Each block has a starting view initially shown when a block is opened.
  • Each knowledge base has a base block.
  • the base block is a special block containing information about how the blocks are linked together.
  • In the base block is also information common to all blocks belonging to the base block.
  • Such infor ⁇ mation is node types, concepts, commands, pictures and text.
  • Each navigation in the knowledge base starts in the base block.
  • the system according to the invention is primarily in- tended for three types of users: beginners : they can use the system as a conventional expert system, in other words, the system will ask the user about information as required; experienced users: they can direct the system between a restricted number of nodes to state where the trouble ⁇ shooting is to continue; experts: the expert can move freely between the nodes. The system does not direct at all. The user himself can decide which one of the above modes he wants to use.
  • the service engineer complements the knowledge base developed by the manufacturer with the experience he obtains in his usual work. This knowledge is often called rules of thumb. The service engineer's practical knowledge often results in short cuts in finding faults . This contributes to a more efficient system.
  • the final user group of the system is the most impor- tant, the end users. It is they who really exploit the system for troubleshooting in technical equipment. They can not directly change the knowledge base.
  • the advantages of the invention are several in trouble shooting and developing diagnostic systems, for instance: service engineers locate failures quicker, reducing the repair time, time-consuming search through manuals can be avoided while information is gathered at one place, personnel with little experience can troubleshoot inde- • pendently, the system reduces the training period for new service engineers, it will be easier to distribute and hold knowledge about technical equipment, diagnostic systems can be complemented and modified directly in connection with new discoveries and experiences, it will be easier for manufacturers to get feedback about problems, the development of expert systems for troubleshooting becomes faster, diagnostic equipment gets a uniform appearance, people who are not trained programmers can develop diag ⁇ nostic systems.

Abstract

The invention relates to a means and a method for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and trouble shooting in technical equipment. By means of the invention an intelligent, electronical document is created in the quickest and most efficient way for troubleshooting, guidance and training in a complex technical equipment. According to the invention the required concepts are defined which are capable of describing states in the knowledge base, node types are defined indicating what type of information/instruction a node is to contain, views are read containing pictures or graphic descriptions of the equipment, nodes are inserted into the views to provide access points to various parts of the equipment, at least one of the nodes being a rule node containing at least one rule. The rule contains a condition part and a conclusion part, the condition part consisting of conditions on the equipment and the conclusion part containing measures to be taken if the conditions are fulfilled. The invention is primarily used by developers and troubleshooters. The developers contribute with knowledge about technical equipment and with practical knowledge, such as rules of thumb. The troubleshooters can use the system without specific previous knowledge to perform troubleshooting, being systematically guided by the system to the source of failure.

Description

TITLE OF THE INVENTION: MEANS FOR STRUCTURING TECHNICAL
INFORMATION IN ESTABLISHING A KNOW¬ LEDGE BASE AND TROUBLESHOOTING IN TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT
Field of the invention
The invention relates to a means and a method for structuring technical information and is an development en¬ vironment designed to enable construction of an intelligent, electronic document in the quickest and most efficient way for troubleshooting, guidance and teaching in a complex technical equipment. On a computer screen is shown what pre¬ viously has been in manuals: block diagrams, circuit dia¬ grams, photographs and instructions. An experienced techni- cian uses the invention to find information about measurement results or sources of failures. A technician without computer experience can quickly learn to develop advanced systems. In troubleshooting an unexperienced technician is guided by the invention through the technical equipment until the fault is located.
State of the art
Expert systems have been custom-designed for specific technical objects. In contrast, the present invention pro- vides a general method of structuring a knowledge base and of helping users without specific previous knowledge.
Summary of the invention
Thus, the present invention provides a means and a method for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base for handling troubleshooting, guidance or teaching in technical equipment. According to the invention the required concepts are defined capable of describing states in the knowledge base. Node types are defined indi- eating what type of information/instruction a node is to con- tain. Views are read containing pictures or graphic descrip¬ tions of the equipment. Nodes are inserted in the views to provide access points of various parts of the equipment, at least one of the nodes being a so-called rule node containing at least one rule having a condition part and a conclusion part . The condition part consists of conditions of the equip¬ ment and the conclusion part contains measures to be taken if the conditions are fulfilled. The knowledge base is divided into blocks, if necessary, a base block containing informa- tion common to all the blocks and information about linking of the blocks.
When troubleshooting in a knowledge base in accordance with the invention first the starting block is opened, whereupon a starting view is shown. Then it is possible to choose a new block, a new starting view being shown, choose a new view within the block in question and/or to choose a new node in the view in question to proceed. A rule node is chosen to obtain instructions about what measures are to be taken, the instructions being followed until a conclusion is reached. If further information is desired a new text node or picture node is chosen.
Brief description of the drawings
The invention will now be described in detail with refe- rence to the accompanying drawings, in which
Figure 1 shows the general structure of the invention with external and internal communication.
Figure 2 shows an example of a view with nodes, and
Figures 3A and B show symbols for picture nodes and text nodes, respectively.
Detailed description of the invention The invention provides an expert system structure for diagnosis, in other words a tool especially designed to build expert systems. Using the invention a person without any experience of programming or expert systems can build a diag¬ nostic system. The system is useful for technicians per¬ forming troubleshooting in complex technical equipment. The diagnostic system collects knowledge from one or several experienced technicians. The knowledge is represented in rules guiding the troubleshooter to the source of the problem. The invention shows graphic circuit diagrams, block diagrams and photographs of the test equipment to provide the user with other relevant information. The invention is in principle constructed like ordinary expert system structures. However, in contrast to these, con¬ siderable effort has been invested in making the user and expert interfaces user friendly. Besides these two interfaces there is a knowledge base with rules and facts . An inference machine draws conclusions based on the contents of the know¬ ledge base.
Figure 1 shows schematically the structure of the system in accordance with the invention. There are two main groups using the invention, developers and troubleshooters . The developers enter diagnostic knowledge through the expert interface into the knowledge base. The troubleshooter has access to the knowledge base by means of the user interface and the inference machine.
The interfaces present views to the users to give access to the information. An example of such a view is shown in Figure 2. A view is a description of the object being diag¬ nosed. Typical views are photographs, block diagrams and cir¬ cuits schematics. Attached to views are nodes which contain rules. When troubleshooting the service engineers navigate between test points before they arrive at the source of failure. The test points are often documented in service manuals. The manual states which value a test point should have when the equipment is functioning correctly. According to the invention nodes are used instead of test points. A node can be a test point but also a physical object like a button or a fuse. Every node contains rules which lead the troubleshooter closer to the source of failure. The trouble¬ shooter studies the view and selects a node suitable for in- spection. When the node is selected further information or instructions are obtained, as is explained in detail below.
Some nodes contain only information and may be of the types picture nodes or text nodes . In Figures 3A and 3B the symbols are shown for picture nodes and text nodes, respecti- vely. These can be placed in views in the same way. When the user selects a picture node he gets a graphical display on the screen, and when he selects a text node a text window is displayed. The text window allows for editing text.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the information should be structured in the following way.
Concepts are objects defined globally in the knowledge base and are used to define attributes, see below. From one and the same concept several different attributes can be defined. Each concept has a name and a domaine and may have different settings, which is explained below. The concept may also be associated with a picture and a question.
The domaine contains elements of the same type. For instance, the concept voltage can be defined and given a domaine floating point number. The domaine of the concept then contains every floating point number and each floating point number is an element of the domaine. A domaine may be defined in three ways. It is possible to use a predefined domaine, define a closed interval or define a set. Two domaines are predefined according to the invention, integers and floating point numbers. The intervals may be integer intervals or floating point number intervals. A set is a list of elements and is usually designated x, y, z, where x, y and z are the elements of the set. For instance, it is possible to define the concept pulse with the domaine long, short, correct. When a set is defined as a domaine of a concept one should state if the set is to be single or multiple. This is described below in connection with the section about attri¬ butes.
Unit, factor and tolerance are the settings of the con- cept. In case the domaine of a concept is an interval, an integer domaine or a floating point number domaine a tole¬ rance may be associated with the concept. The tolerance can be relative or absolute. It is also possible to state a unit for the elements in the domaine of concept and it is also possible to state a factor. For instance, to the concept voltage the unit Volt and the factor 0.001 may be associated. If a user thereafter during a search gives the answer 2.3, the knowledge base will interpret this as 0.0023 Volts, i.e. 2.3 mVolt. In a rule node the voltage is for instance allowed to vary within an interval. To continue the investigation it is sufficient if the voltage is between 1.5 mVolt and 2.5 mVolt. Then there is a tolerance of 0.5 mVolt.
Attributes express states in the knowledge base by assigning to them values or sets of values. Each attribute has a domaine and only values included in this can be assigned to it. When an attribute is defined from a concept the attribute automatically gets the same domaine as the con¬ cept. When a value has been assigned to an attribute a fact has been added to the knowledge base. Attributes exist in rule conditions, see below, and are of three types - local, global and internal. A local attri¬ bute is an attribute defined in a rule node. A global attri¬ bute is an attribute defined in the base block, see below, and, thus, not in any special node. Internal attributes are predefined and may assume values expressing certain states of nodes in the knowledge base. Examples of such states are if nodes are untouched or dead.
An attribute gets the same domaine as the concept from which the attribute is defined. If the domaine is a simple set the attribute defined from the concept can only assume one value at a time. If the set is multiple the attributes defined from the concept may assume several values. It is also possible to associate a tolerance, a unit and a factor with an attribute. If unit, factor and tolerance are indi- cated in the concept from which the attribute is defined these will be preselected in the attribute.
It is also possible to associate a relation with an attribute - a set relation. It is also possible to state a value or a set of values - set points. Set points and set relations are preselected in those conditions where the attribute is used, see below. Unit, factor, tolerance, set relation and set points are the settings of the attribute.
A relation expresses the relationship between two terms, right-hand and left-hand terms. Their values or sets of values have to be of the same type, for instance integers. There are two kinds of terms - left-hand terms and right-hand terms . Left-hand terms are classified in three categories: global, local and internal attributes. Right-hand terms are classified in three categories: constants, local attributes and sets. Example. In the rule IF' voltage <2.5 Volts, THEN write the message "check C12", voltage is an attribute, 2.5 Volts is a constant and < is a relation. During an investigation a value is assigned to the attribute voltage, in this case being a left-hand term. The system will then investigate the relationship between this value and the value of the con¬ stant, i.e. investigate if the value assigned is less than 2.5 Volts. Here the right hand term is a constant.
Commands are calls to the system and are of three kinds - predefined, self-defined and external. A self-defined command is a sequence of external, predefined and self- defined commands. The sequence may not call itself. External commands are procedures compiled externally and inputted into the resource part of the base block. Command sequences can be combined into methods. Methods occur in nodes and rules .
A rule contains a condition part and a conclusion part. The condition part consists of an arranged set of conditions. The conditions are created using terms and relations and may be true or false. The condition is fulfilled when it is true. Two methods belong to each rule. One of these methods is associated with the condition part and contains commands "Check conditions", which is a command to the system to in¬ vestigate if the conditions of the rule can be fulfilled. The other method belongs to the conclusion part of the rule and is called if the conditions of the rule are fulfilled. The method always includes the command "Perform conclusion" .
When navigating in a knowledge base a sequence of nodes is treated. When a node is treated the method of the node is called. There are several types of nodes: base nodes, rule nodes, text nodes, picture nodes and self-defined nodes. Base nodes do not contain any information but are used to mark a certain location on the screen picture. The rule node con¬ tains a number of rules . Text nodes and picture nodes contain text and picture information, respectively. Self-defined nodes are instances of node types created by oneself.
The node types are type descriptions of nodes and belong to the base block. When a node type is created it is possible to create one or more instances of this. An instance of a node type is a node given the content of the node type. If the content of the node type is changed each instance of it will automatically be changed.
The system has three predefined node types used to create common rule nodes, text nodes and picture nodes. It is also possible to create new node types to facilitate the development work. A rule node type created can for instance contain a number of attributes and commands.
If for instance the user is to indicate the voltage and current in a transistor in several rule nodes it is suitable first to define a node type - transistor voltage - with the attributes used. Thereafter the node type can be used to readily create instances of this. Then these instances are of the rule node type "Transistor voltage".
There are four categories of self-defined node types: rule node types, text node types, picture node types and base node types. The node types contain various methods. A picture node type for instance always contains the command "Show picture" causing the showing of the content of a picture node. Each node type is represented by a symbol, see for in¬ stance Figure 2. When a node type is created also a symbol has to be selected therefor. The symbol will then be in the Tool menu and it is then possible to create instances of the node type created in the same way as with predefined node types.
All information in a knowledge base is in blocks . A block is a document of its own containing views and nodes . The knowledge base can be divided into separate blocks, each block describing a defined part of the knowledge base. A knowledge base often consists of several blocks linked together. Each block has a starting view initially shown when a block is opened.
Each knowledge base has a base block. The base block is a special block containing information about how the blocks are linked together. In the base block is also information common to all blocks belonging to the base block. Such infor¬ mation is node types, concepts, commands, pictures and text. Each navigation in the knowledge base starts in the base block. The system according to the invention is primarily in- tended for three types of users: beginners : they can use the system as a conventional expert system, in other words, the system will ask the user about information as required; experienced users: they can direct the system between a restricted number of nodes to state where the trouble¬ shooting is to continue; experts: the expert can move freely between the nodes. The system does not direct at all. The user himself can decide which one of the above modes he wants to use.
As mentioned above there are two main user groups, deve¬ lopers and troubleshooters. Two categories of developers are intended, viz. manufacturers of test equipment and expe- rienced service engineers. The manufacturers contribute with the profound knowledge about the test instruments. They in¬ troduce knowledge about which values are expected at test points, how failures should be discovered, which schematics should be presented etc. A manufacturer will work in a way similar to that when producing a manual, except now he makes an electronic information system including a frame work of rules for troubleshooting.
The service engineer complements the knowledge base developed by the manufacturer with the experience he obtains in his usual work. This knowledge is often called rules of thumb. The service engineer's practical knowledge often results in short cuts in finding faults . This contributes to a more efficient system.
The final user group of the system is the most impor- tant, the end users. It is they who really exploit the system for troubleshooting in technical equipment. They can not directly change the knowledge base.
The advantages of the invention are several in trouble shooting and developing diagnostic systems, for instance: service engineers locate failures quicker, reducing the repair time, time-consuming search through manuals can be avoided while information is gathered at one place, personnel with little experience can troubleshoot inde- pendently, the system reduces the training period for new service engineers, it will be easier to distribute and hold knowledge about technical equipment, diagnostic systems can be complemented and modified directly in connection with new discoveries and experiences, it will be easier for manufacturers to get feedback about problems, the development of expert systems for troubleshooting becomes faster, diagnostic equipment gets a uniform appearance, people who are not trained programmers can develop diag¬ nostic systems.
The invention is only limited by the claims below.

Claims

1. Means for structuring technical and other information in establishing a knowledge base in order to handle trouble¬ shooting in computer equipment, directions and training with technical equipment, characterized by including means for storing the knowledge base, means for defining required con¬ cepts describing states in the knowledge base arranged for definition function, the definition function including node types indicating what type of information/instruction a node is to contain, reading means arranged for reading views containing pictures or graphic descriptions of the technical equipment, input means arranged for allowing inputting of nodes into the views to constitute access points to various parts of the equipment, the input means allowing input of at least one node of said nodes being a rule node containing at least one rule having a condition part and a conclusion part, the condition part consisting of conditions on the equipment and the conclusion part containing measures to be taken if the condi¬ tions are fulfilled, and the means storing the knowledge base being arranged, if required, to divide the knowledge base into blocks, a base block containing information common to all the blocks and information about the linking of the blocks.
2. Means for troubleshooting in a knowledge base in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that initiation means for opening the base block are arranged to allow dis¬ play of a starting view, the initiation means being arranged to select a new block, whereupon another new starting view is shown, and/or a new view is selected within the current block, and/or a node is selected in the current view, the initiation means allowing selection of a text node if text information is desired, the initiation means allowing selection of a picture node if picture information is desired, and the initiation means allowing selection of a rule node to obtain instructions about what measures to be taken, the instructions being followed by means of the initiation means until a conclusion can be drawn.
PCT/SE1991/000625 1990-09-21 1991-09-18 Means for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and troubleshooting in technical equipment WO1992005503A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/030,068 US5548714A (en) 1990-09-21 1991-09-18 Means for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and troubleshooting in technical equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE9003009-9 1990-09-21
SE9003009A SE467026B (en) 1990-09-21 1990-09-21 DEVICE FOR STRUCTURING TECHNICAL INFORMATION WHEN CREATING A KNOWLEDGE DATABASE AND TROUBLESHOOTING IN TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1992005503A1 true WO1992005503A1 (en) 1992-04-02

Family

ID=20380416

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE1991/000625 WO1992005503A1 (en) 1990-09-21 1991-09-18 Means for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and troubleshooting in technical equipment

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US5548714A (en)
EP (1) EP0549697A1 (en)
SE (1) SE467026B (en)
WO (1) WO1992005503A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6728343B1 (en) 1998-03-16 2004-04-27 Conair Corporation User appliance with voice help guide
JP3159165B2 (en) * 1998-03-31 2001-04-23 日本電気株式会社 Method and apparatus for managing estimated logical state in failure diagnosis and machine-readable recording medium recording program
DE19850122A1 (en) * 1998-04-17 1999-10-28 Siemens Ag Automatic configuration arrangement for technical object testing arrangement e.g. for electric motors
US6240329B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2001-05-29 Chin-Yang Sun Method and apparatus for a semiconductor wafer inspection system using a knowledge-based system
FR2789502B1 (en) * 1999-02-08 2001-08-10 Bull Sa METHOD AND TOOL FOR ANALYZING AND LOCATING HARDWARE FAULTS IN A COMPUTER MACHINE
US6970885B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2005-11-29 General Electric Company Method and system for enabling training of field service personnel and field service of machines
US6829734B1 (en) 2000-04-04 2004-12-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method for discovering problem resolutions in a free form computer helpdesk data set
WO2001082136A2 (en) 2000-04-20 2001-11-01 General Electric Company Method and system for graphically identifying replacement parts for generally complex equipment
US6625770B1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2003-09-23 Lsi Logic Corporation Method of automatically generating schematic and waveform diagrams for relevant logic cells of a circuit using input signal predictors and transition times
MXPA03001692A (en) * 2000-08-23 2004-06-22 Gen Electric Method for training service personnel to service selected equipment.
US6745195B1 (en) 2000-09-15 2004-06-01 General Electric Company System, method and computer program product for generating software cards that summarize and index information
WO2002054239A2 (en) 2000-12-29 2002-07-11 General Electric Company Method and system for identifying repeatedly malfunctioning equipment
US20020156692A1 (en) * 2001-04-20 2002-10-24 Squeglia Mark R. Method and system for managing supply of replacement parts of a piece of equipment
US7035770B2 (en) * 2003-12-18 2006-04-25 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Fuzzy reasoning model for semiconductor process fault detection using wafer acceptance test data
JP5521807B2 (en) * 2010-06-16 2014-06-18 富士通株式会社 Failure cause estimation apparatus, failure cause estimation program, and failure cause estimation method
US9239991B2 (en) 2013-09-05 2016-01-19 General Electric Company Services support system and method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2190772A (en) * 1986-05-05 1987-11-25 David Martin Menne Data storage/retrieval
WO1990000776A1 (en) * 1988-07-07 1990-01-25 Abb Atom Ab A method and a presentation system for linking of information presented by means of a presentation unit

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4964125A (en) * 1988-08-19 1990-10-16 Hughes Aircraft Company Method and apparatus for diagnosing faults
US4954964A (en) * 1988-11-09 1990-09-04 Singh Gurvinder P Apparatus and method for expert analysis of metal failure with automated visual aide
US5107497A (en) * 1989-07-28 1992-04-21 At&T Bell Laboratories Technique for producing an expert system for system fault diagnosis
US5107499A (en) * 1990-04-30 1992-04-21 At&T Bell Laboratories Arrangement for automated troubleshooting using selective advice and a learning knowledge base

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2190772A (en) * 1986-05-05 1987-11-25 David Martin Menne Data storage/retrieval
WO1990000776A1 (en) * 1988-07-07 1990-01-25 Abb Atom Ab A method and a presentation system for linking of information presented by means of a presentation unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE9003009L (en) 1992-03-22
SE9003009D0 (en) 1990-09-21
US5548714A (en) 1996-08-20
SE467026B (en) 1992-05-11
EP0549697A1 (en) 1993-07-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5548714A (en) Means for structuring technical information in establishing a knowledge base and troubleshooting in technical equipment
Paas et al. Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks
Riley A general model of mixed-initiative human-machine systems
Dawid Influence diagrams for causal modelling and inference
US4752889A (en) Dynamic, interactive display system for a knowledge base
JP3400193B2 (en) Method and apparatus for displaying tree structure list with window-related identification icon
Kay Accretion representation for scrutable student modelling
Rosenman et al. An expert system for design codes and design rules
Ford Artificial intelligence and software engineering: a tutorial introduction to their relationship
Alferes et al. A compilation of updates plus preferences
Hormann Programs for machine learning. Part II
Nakatani et al. Tuning rules by cases
Ebrahimi VPCL: A visual language for teaching and learning programming.(A picture is worth a thousand words)
JPS63284641A (en) Expert trouble diagnosis system
JPH05342004A (en) Diagnostic device
JPH06242718A (en) Educational assistance device
Hoffmann On the visualization of design notions, of notion instantiations, and of structural relationships in a design data base realized as a semantic net
Schröder et al. A Cognitive Model of Design Processes for Modelling Distributed Systems
Marzi et al. Design and evaluation of a competence promoting decision support system
JPH01228009A (en) Command parameter setting system
Dourson et al. Building an expert system to diagnose noise in automotive engine cooling systems
Chehayeb A framework for engineering knowledge representation and problem solving
JPH05313900A (en) Support system for diagnostic expert system development
Groen et al. Supporting model building
Matsuda et al. An Instructional System for Behavior-Based Recursive Programming

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LU NL SE

WR Later publication of a revised version of an international search report
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1991917325

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1991917325

Country of ref document: EP

WWR Wipo information: refused in national office

Ref document number: 1991917325

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1991917325

Country of ref document: EP