WO1992002103A1 - Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems - Google Patents

Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1992002103A1
WO1992002103A1 PCT/US1991/004970 US9104970W WO9202103A1 WO 1992002103 A1 WO1992002103 A1 WO 1992002103A1 US 9104970 W US9104970 W US 9104970W WO 9202103 A1 WO9202103 A1 WO 9202103A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
communication unit
unit
subscriber
subscriber unit
central communication
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1991/004970
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Mary Beth Flanders
Louis D. Finkelstein
Larry C. Puhl
Original Assignee
Motorola, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=27070739&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO1992002103(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Motorola, Inc. filed Critical Motorola, Inc.
Publication of WO1992002103A1 publication Critical patent/WO1992002103A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/06Authentication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/32Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3226Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials using a predetermined code, e.g. password, passphrase or PIN
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/32Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3271Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials using challenge-response
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/03Protecting confidentiality, e.g. by encryption
    • H04W12/033Protecting confidentiality, e.g. by encryption of the user plane, e.g. user's traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L2209/00Additional information or applications relating to cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication H04L9/00
    • H04L2209/80Wireless
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/60Context-dependent security
    • H04W12/69Identity-dependent
    • H04W12/72Subscriber identity

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to communication systems and more particularly to radio frequency (RF) cellular telecommunication systems.
  • RF radio frequency
  • Cellular radio telephone systems typically include subscriber units (such as mobile or portable units) which communicate with a fixed network communication unit via RF transmissions.
  • a typical fixed communication network includes at least a base station and a switching center.
  • the switching center a subscriber unit accesses may not be his "home” switching center. In this case, the subscriber unit is termed a roamer.
  • the switching center he accessed (termed the "visited” switching center) will communicate with his "home" switching center via the public switched telephone network (PSTN).
  • PSTN public switched telephone network
  • One responsibility of the fixed network communication unit is to grant use of the communication system to the subscriber unit after the requesting subscriber unit meets the authentication requirements of the system.
  • each subscriber unit is assigned a telephone number (mobile identification number) (MIN) and an identification number (or serial number) (SN) which uniquely identifies the subscriber to any fixed network communication unit.
  • MIN mobile identification number
  • SN identification number
  • Each subscriber unit has a unique identification number that distinguishes it from other subscriber units.
  • the fixed network communication unit has access to these identification numbers through a database. Often these numbers are used by the fixed network communication units to bill subscribers for the time the subscriber uses the system.
  • the "visited" switching center In the case of a roaming subscriber unit, the "visited" switching center must communicate with the subscriber's "home” system database to authenticate and bill the subscriber unit. If this communication is required for each call a subscriber unit makes, significant call setup delays will occur.
  • the dialed phone number becomes the data to be sent to the fixed network communication unit.
  • Data may also include other information regarding a third communication unit such as a unit's location. Detection of a legitimate subscriber's identification number may be accomplished by RF eavesdropping or by purposeful or inadvertent divulgence of the MIN/SN combination by the radio telephone installer. Once the subscriber's telephone number and identification number is known (stolen), a thief may reprogram another subscriber unit with the stolen identification number causing two or more subscriber units to have the same MIN/SN combination.
  • Cellular radio telephone systems have authentication procedures to deny access to subscribers not having legitimate identification numbers, but do not have the capability to detect multiple users or effectively neutralize the effect of an installer leaking subscriber identification numbers. Therefore, the legitimate user is billed for both the thief s use and his own use.
  • ElA-553 section 2.3 specifies that each subscriber shall have a MIN and a factory set SN.
  • the telephone number which the subscriber is attempting to contact is the data that is transmitted by the subscriber to the fixed network communication unit. Authentication is granted by this system if the MIN and corresponding SN are found in the fixed network communication unit database.
  • EIA-553 does not require the encipherment of the MIN or SN before transmission to the fixed network communication unit thereby permitting direct RF detection of any MIN or SN.
  • this technique fails to provide protection against a thief that acquires a MIN/SN from an installer.
  • GSM Groupe Special Mobile
  • This method additionally requires the subscriber to openly transmit a temporary mobile subscriber ID (TMSI) to the fixed network communication unit; the fixed network communication unit generates and sends a random number (RAND) to the subscriber.
  • TMSI temporary mobile subscriber ID
  • RAND random number
  • the enciphering technique requires the subscriber unit to autonomous retrieve at least three enciphering elements from its memory: a predetermined ciphering key, an SN (individual subscriber authentication key) and a MIN (international mobile subscriber identification number - IMSI).
  • the subscriber then enciphers its SN and MIN using the cipher to construct the RAND into a signed response (SRES).
  • the subscriber unit transmits this signed response back to the fixed network communication unit where the fixed network communication unit checks the SN, MIN, and ciphering key against its database using the subscriber's temporary ID (TMSI).
  • TMSI subscriber's temporary ID
  • the fixed network communication unit generates its response to the same random number using the information retrieved from the database and compares the subscriber signed response to the fixed network communication unit generated response. If the responses are substantially equivalent, authentication is confirmed.
  • the dialed telephone number is only allowed to be transmitted after authentication is granted. This system affords some protection against a thief that acquires the MIN/SN from an installer by enciphering the SN and reassigning a temporary TMSI each time the subscriber enters a different cell area.
  • Secure cellular systems also offer protection of conversations after authentication is granted. As is typical for cellular systems, the process of handing off a subscriber unit to another channel is needed for various reasons. These include maintaining communication link quality, minimizing co-channel interference between subscriber units, and managing traffic distributions.
  • a handoff involves the transfer of communication between channels. Channelization may be in the form of time slots, frequencies, codes (as in spread spectrum type systems) and various combinations of these medium divisions.
  • Handoffs include intracell handoffs, intercell handoffs, and intercluster handoffs. Intracell handoffs are those transfers between channels (voice or data) in the same cell; intercell handoffs are those transfers between channels in different cells, and intercluster handoffs are those transfers between channels in cells parented from different cell control units.
  • an intruder monitoring the channel at any point in the conversation should not be able to gain sufficient information to aid in any cryptanalysis effort.
  • One solution involves operating the encryption algorithm with a common mask that is reused for each slot of speech. However, this severely compromises the security of the encryption process since the same crypto-mask is repeated for each time slot thereby affording an intruder repeated chances for analyzing the same encyption process and consequently increasing the probability of decryption.
  • this involves passing this mask from the source basesite (current serving basesite to the target basesite. This allows the encryption process to remain synchronized to the handoff channel. Also, since the speech coder continues to generate it's output sequence during pauses in the conversation (quiet periods) an intruder has a good chance of determining the encryption process during these pauses.
  • Another solution involves using a continuous stream encryption process wherein the process must maintain its continuity during all handoffs for the same conversation. For example, the exact starting point would have to be agreed upon by the subscriber unit and source basesite. At handoff, the current contents of the encryption process as well as the exact point of transfer is agreed upon by the source basesite and the target basesite. This method does not readily lend itself to a non-synchronous system since the target site may not know the current stage of the encryption process. Also, the length of messages between basesites would increase since a large number of memory elements may be needed to define the history of the encryption algorithm as started by the subscriber unit so that the target site can generate the current state of the encryption process.
  • an adequate level of security resulting from encipherment should not require additional transmission processes or inject higher error levels during the authentication process:
  • an encryption process for use in a synchronous channel or a non- synchronous channel system that provides encryption integrity during handoffs between channels such that an intruder is substantially prevented from decoding the encryption process.
  • This method describes an authentication technique for use between a first communication unit, such as a subscriber unit, and a second communication unit, such as a fixed network communication unit, wherein the first communication unit modifies an ID, known to both the first communication unit and the second communication unit (such as a serial number), using data as one enciphering key and a second ID (such as a Personal Identification Number - PIN) as a second enciphering key as well as a network issued random number (RAND) as a third enciphering key.
  • an ID known to both the first communication unit and the second communication unit (such as a serial number)
  • a second ID such as a Personal Identification Number - PIN
  • RAND network issued random number
  • An historic non- arbitrary value of predetermined communication events such as a count of the number of telephone calls made by a subscriber or a count of the number of handoffs that have occurred for the subscriber unit, is maintained in both the first and second communication units.
  • This value (count) is historic because it represents past telephone calls attributed to a communication unit, and it is non-arbitrary because this history of transactions (i.e., number of calls made) serves to identify an out-of-sync communication unit.
  • the first communication unit transmits (via RF signals) the modified ID and count to a second communication unit.
  • the second communication unit compares the count maintained by the first communication unit to the count maintained by the second unit.
  • a count discrepancy indicates a different number of calls on one unit indicating a multiple user whose count is out of sequence.
  • the second communication unit performs the same enciphering method on the known serial number using the data received and a known second ID.
  • the second communication unit compares the received modified serial number and the serial number generated by the fixed network communication unit to determine if the serial number is valid.
  • the invention is designed to substantially decrease unauthorized use of a first ID of a communication unit.
  • the authentication method does not require the second ID to ever be transmitted by RF.
  • This invention provides a means for detecting multiple subscribers using the same serial numbers and telephone numbers. Moreover, if a multiple user copies the information transmitted and uses the same information to access the system, the multiple user will be limited to only calling the telephone number that is in the authentication message; not a telephone number of his own choice.
  • This authentication invention also reduces authentication errors by making more efficient use of the data transmitted and a second ID, by using them as a part of the cipher; the enciphering means does not require an additional RAND stream to be sent by a fixed network communication unit to be used as the common enciphering base and thereby eliminates this additional transmission and therefore decreases the probability of errors.
  • This authentication scheme permits efficient roaming by allowing authentication variables for multiple calls to be sent from the- "home” system to the "visited” system. These authentication variables can be stored by the "visited” switching center and used on subsequent calls. This storing allows the "visited” switching center to authenticate all subsequent calls without requiring real-time communication to the "home” system and without the associated call setup delays. It is also essential to retain the subscriber's secret keys (PIN) in the "home” switching center and not share this private information with the "visited” switching centers.
  • PIN subscriber's secret keys
  • a method of stealing cellular service is to flash from a fraudulent mobile and take over an existing call.
  • This flash message would tell the fixed network that the legitimate user is making a third party call.
  • One possible solution to this problem is for the fixed network to initiate an authentication procedure on the traffic channel.
  • the fraudulent mobile can allow the legitimate mobile to complete the authentication process.
  • Another solution to this problem is to force the authenticating mobile to use information that only it has available to itself.
  • a particular embodiment to this solution would be to exclusive-or (XOR) the dialed digits of the flash message with the output of the authentication algorr n and then send this response to the fixed network for verification that tr ;: legitimate mobile is really making a third party call.
  • XOR exclusive-or
  • the method for preserving encryption integrity during a handoff includes: also maintaining a record of pseudo random events associated with a subscriber unit, such as the number of handoffs the subscriber unit has undergone during a given conversation with any number of source radio communication units; communicating the record, such as over a landiine medium to prevent detection by an intruder, to a target radio communication unit; and restarting another encryption process for the subscriber unit using the record as an encryption variable.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a typical subscriber communication unit and fixed network communication unit.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the identification enciphering method used by a subscriber communication unit.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the authentication method used by a fixed network communication unit in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart generally depicting the method of preserving encryption integrity during handoffs in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram generally depicting the encryption elements in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG 6. is a flowchart of an alternative authentication method used by a fixed network communication unit.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram depicting a method of stealing cellular communication service which is eliminated by the authentication method shown in FIG. 6.
  • FIG. 1 generally depicts a subscriber communication unit (10) such as a subscriber telephone and a fixed network communication unit (20) such as a cellular telephone basesite.and switching center.
  • the subscriber communication unit (10) is comprised of a microprocessing stage (12), a non-volatile memory unit (11), a radio frequency (RF) stage (13), all as well understood in the art.
  • Additional elements include a data input stage (14) such as a key entry pad on a telephone (to enter a telephone number - data), a subscriber call sequence counter (15), and an output from an enciphering stage referred to as the enciphered serial number (16).
  • the serial number such as a subscriber telephone and a fixed network communication unit (20) such as a cellular telephone basesite.and switching center.
  • the subscriber communication unit (10) is comprised of a microprocessing stage (12), a non-volatile memory unit (11), a radio frequency (RF) stage (13), all as well understood in the art.
  • the PIN is a second ID known only to the subscriber unit and the fixed network unit. For example, it should not be available to an installer of the subscriber unit, it should only be available to a legitimate user of a subscriber unit and a fixed network communication unit database. The subscriber need only enter the PIN one time to activate it. The PIN may be changed by the subscriber, but the change must also be made known to the fixed network unit. These identifiers need not necessarily be numbers but may correspond to any attribute capable of being identified by the fixed network communications unit.
  • An alternative embodiment for example, in a cellular system, may include a stored look up table containing multiple sets of serial numbers, PIN's, and telephone numbers with each set of identifiers corresponding to a specific cellular area or fixed network communication unit.
  • the fixed network communication unit (20) includes a switching center which is comprised of a microprocessing stage (22), a database (23), and a link to a basesite radio frequency stage (21), all as well understood in the art. Additional elements include a fixed network unit call sequence counter (24) and an enciphered serial number generated by the fixed network unit (25). Additionally, the switching center has an interface to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) (60). The PSTN link can be used for "visited" switching center to "home" switching center communications as required for authentication and billing of roaming subscriber units.
  • PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network
  • the database includes information regarding the subscriber unit's: serial number (18), PIN (19), and subscriber telephone number(17); the information is a copy of these ID's.
  • the serial number (18), PIN (19), and telephone number (17) of the subscriber communication unit (10) correspond to the serial number (28), PIN (27), and telephone number (26) as stored in the fixed network communication unit (20).
  • Communication between the subscriber communication unit (10) and the fixed network communication unit (20) is accomplished via RF transmissions between the two units in accordance with well understood cellular system techniques.
  • the subscriber unit enciphers its serial number (18) and increments its call sequence counter (15).
  • the subscriber unit depicts the method used by a subscriber communication unit to encipher its serial number before transmission to a fixed network communication unit during an authentication request (29).
  • This method requires use of at least two enciphering keys.
  • the subscriber unit obtains the called telephone number (data)(30) and obtains PIN (31 ) from memory and uses at least parts of these two components as the enciphering keys to encipher its serial number (32).
  • the subscriber unit obtains the called telephone number (DATA), a network issued random number (RAND) (30), a current subscriber's system number (historical data) as well as PIN (31) and uses at least parts of these components as the enciphering keys for enciphering its serial number (32).
  • PIN and the called telephone number are comprised of bits
  • the parts of these keys to be used are the contents of the bits and the bit length of each key.
  • an enciphered serial number may have a different bit length than the unenciphered serial number, or unmodified first ID, depending on the contents of the PIN or the data. Varying the enciphered SN bit length may also be a function of another event known to both the subscriber and fixed network unit such as the time of day.
  • the algorithm to integrate the enciphering keys may be varied to accommodate various levels of security depending upon the requirement of the system.
  • the final step prior to transmission of the Authentication Response Message is to logically transform the enciphered message using the telephone number (data). This transformation is essential in assuring that a "visited" switching center can use the stored authentication variables it received previously from the subscriber's "home” switching center.
  • the authentication variables issued by the "home” system make no assumptions about the telephone number (data) that the subscriber will use.
  • the "visited” system can compute the ARM based on the authentication variables it received from the "home” system and the received telephone number (data).
  • the subscriber identification enciphering method does not require authentication to be confirmed by the fixed network communication unit before data is transmitted. Combining -i i-
  • PIN with data adds the ability of the system to encipher a serial number into a complex code to an extent sufficient to substantially eliminate unauthorized detection by RF eavesdropping and unauthorized divulgence by installers.
  • the modified serial number (enciphered SN) becomes a component of the Authentication Request Message (ARM) (35) that is transmitted via RF (36) to the fixed network communication unit.
  • ARM Authentication Request Message
  • the assigned telephone number is obtained (33) from memory. This number is not enciphered as part of the authentication procedure.
  • This identifier is a component of the ARM (35) that informs the fixed network unit that the authentication request is coming from a valid subscriber unit.
  • the call sequence count is then obtained (34) and also used in the ARM (35).
  • the call sequence count is updated (incremented or decremented) each time a predetermined event occurs such as when the authentication procedure is initiated or when a call is completed.
  • the count may be maintained by the subscriber and fixed network unit using a rollover type counter such as a ring counter. This count is used by the fixed network communication unit as a means to count the number of calls made by each subscriber. Another suitable count to be used in conjunction with, or instead of, the call sequence count is the number of handoffs associated with the subscriber unit. Because a record of the number of calls made by each subscriber is maintained by both the subscriber unit and the fixed network communication unit, another subscriber trying to use the same serial number will be detected because it will not have made the exact same number of calls as the legitimate subscriber.
  • the call sequence count information is communicated to the fixed network unit as one component of the Authentication Request Message.
  • the ARM can be communicated in any acceptable format or in any number of stages. Components of a typical ARM (35) include data, the enciphered serial number, the call sequence count, and the assigned telephone number.
  • An alternative embodiment would include modifying the call sequence count using the same enciphering method that is used to modify the SN. This would further enhance the protection because the count is also disguised using the PIN and data; each subscriber would generate a different value for the same count (number of calls made).
  • a fixed network communication unit receives a transmitted ARM and uses this information to determine whether authentication should be granted to the subscriber unit.
  • FIG. 3 depicts the authentication method performed by a fixed network unit.
  • the ARM is received (37) by the fixed network unit by means of the base RF unit (21).
  • the fixed network unit has access to assigned telephone number's, serial number's and PIN's of valid subscriber units through its database.
  • the fixed network unit determines if the assigned telephone number received in the ARM is valid (39) by obtaining from the fixed network unit database the same assigned telephone number (38). A comparison is made between the received telephone number from the subscriber unit and the valid number found in the database (39). If the assigned telephone number is not recognized by the fixed network unit, authentication is denied (or some other action taken) (40).
  • the fixed network unit retrieves from the database the serial number and PIN corresponding to that particular assigned telephone number.
  • the fixed network unit uses the PIN from the database and the data received in the ARM as enciphering keys as elements of its enciphering method (44), which is the same method used in the subscriber unit, and generates its own enciphered serial number.
  • the fixed network unit compares this enciphered serial number to the serial number enciphered by the subscriber unit(46). If they are not substantially the same, then the system denies access or takes some other predetermined course of action (47).
  • the received call sequence count is obtained (48) and compared (50) to the call count maintained by the fixed network communication unit (49). If the counts are substantially equal, authentication may be confirmed (52) which is the first predetermined course of action. At this point, the subscriber may be allowed to communicate with the third communication unit associated with the dialed number. This third unit may more generally be termed a requested communication resource. If the count is not within the acceptable tolerance, authentication may be denied or the authorities may be notified that a multiple user is attempting to access the system (51).
  • the fixed network unit call counter maintains the number of times authentication is granted to a subscriber. Each subscriber has its own call counter. Having a continuous call counting scheme between a subscriber and a fixed network communication unit prevents another subscriber from using some other subscriber's identification number because the thief would not have made the identical number of calls that the legitimate subscriber made. This discrepancy is flagged by the fixed network unit when it compares the two counts. Protection against illegitimate users is further enhanced by the encipherment method's use of the enciphered dialed telephone number and the PIN (which is not transmitted).
  • a thief is limited to merely copying the authentication message of a subscriber and repeating this message. Each time a subscriber dials a different telephone number, a different authentication request message is generated because each subscriber has a different PIN; each subscriber generates a different authentication request message for the same telephone number. Although a thief may detect the call sequence count (because it is not enciphered in the ARM) and update it, a correct count would only allow the thief to gain authentication for the enciphered dialed telephone number he intercepted. Therefore the illegitimate user can only communicate to the subscriber whose enciphered telephone number matches that copied from the ARM.
  • An alternative embodiment comprising the call sequence count may allow each subscriber to maintain more than one call counter where a separate call counter is required for each fixed network communication unit. This embodiment would find use in a cellular communication system which allowed a subscriber to use multiple fixed network communication units.
  • Another alternative embodiment to the flow in FIG. 3 may require the step of comparing the call sequence counts (50) to occur before the step involving the comparison of enciphered serial numbers (46).
  • an illegitimate user waits until a legitimate user (702) makes a valid call.
  • the illegitimate user then overpowers the traffic channel between the legitimate user (702) and a base site (700) with a third party flash call.
  • the illegitimate user (704) drops off of the traffic channel while the base site (700) sends an authentication request message to the legitimate user (702).
  • the legitimate user (702) responds to the authentication request, correctly.
  • the base site connects the third party call.
  • the illegitimate user (704) overpowers the traffic channel and takes control.
  • the original call between the legitimate user (702) and the base site (700) is lost and the legitimate user (702) drops out of the traffic channel.
  • the illegitimate user (704) continues the call with the third party that was called and the filling for the call is sent to the legitimate user (702).
  • FIG. 6 a method of eliminating this form of stealing cellular service is shown. This elimination is accomplished by requiring the authentication response message from a mobile unit to contain an exclusive-or of at least part of the response message with the dialed digits. Since the legitimate mobile unit does not know the illegitimate mobile units dialed digits, the legitimate mobile unit authenticates incorrectly and the third party call of the illegitimate mobile unit does not go through.
  • FIG. 6 depicts an alternative authentication method used by a fixed network communication unit which supports authentication of roaming mobile units.
  • an Authentication Request Message (ARM) is received from a subscriber communication unit (10) (mobile unit) by the fixed network unit (20) through a base unit RF stage (21).
  • the ARM preferably includes a Mobile Identification Number (MIN), the Dialed Digits (Data) and a Call Sequence Count. From the received ARM the fixed network unit (20) determines whether the received ARM comes from a mobile in its home network (602).
  • MIN Mobile Identification Number
  • Data Dialed Digits
  • Count Call Sequence Count
  • the fixed network unit (20) determines if the assigned MIN (preferably telephone number) in its database (23) is the same as the MIN received in the ARM (604). A comparison is made between the received MIN from the mobile unit (10) and the valid MIN found in the database (23). If the received MIN is not recognized by the fixed network unit (20), service is denied (or some other action is taken) (606). Otherwise, if the received MIN is determined to be valid (it is found in the database), then the fixed network unit (20) retrieves a Personal Identification Number (PIN) from the database (23) and generates a particular random/response pair (RAND/RESP) from this PIN (608).
  • PIN Personal Identification Number
  • RAND/RESP random/response pair
  • the RAND preferably is a random number and the RESP preferably is a number which is generated as a function of the RAND and the particular subscriber's PIN. In alternative embodiments it will be appreciate that the RESP may be generated as a function of additional elements such as a MIN, Electronic Serial Number, and/or rolling key. Subsequently, the authentication method continues at step (622).
  • the fixed network (20) checks its database (23) for RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit (610). If the database (23) contains RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit, then the fixed network (20) retrieves a particular RAND/RESP pair for use in this particular authentication process (612) and continues the authentication process at step (622). Otherwise, if the fixed network unit's database (23) does not contain RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit, the fixed network unit (20) preferably accesses the visiting mobile unit's home network via a PSTN link (60). The home network det ⁇ -mines if the assigned MIN (preferably telephone number) in its database is the same as the MIN received in the ARM (614).
  • the assigned MIN preferably telephone number
  • a comparison is made between the received MIN from the visiting mobile unit and the valid MIN found in the home network's database. If the received MIN is not recognized by the home network, service is denied (or some other action is taken) (616). Otherwise, if the received MIN is determined to be valid (it is found in the database), then the home network provides RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit to the visited network unit (20) preferably via the PSTN link (60) (618). The fixed network unit (20) stores these received RAND/RESP pairs in database (23) (620). Subsequently, the fixed network (20) retrieves a particular RAND/RESP pair for use in this particular authentication process (612) and continues the authentication process at step (622). At authentication step (622), the fixed network unit (20) generates a
  • the fixed network unit (20) issues the particular RAND to the mobile unit (10) (624).
  • the mobile unit (10) generates a RESP from this particular RAND using a particular method which is the same method as the one used by the network unit (either home or visited network unit).
  • the mobile unit (10) generates a RESPD which is a logical function of the mobile generated RESP and the Dialed Digits sent in the ARM (preferably an XOR function or other non ⁇ destructive logical function) and provides the mobile generated RESPD to the fixed network unit (626).
  • the fixed network unit (20) compares this received RESPD to the network unit generated RESPD (628). If they are not substantially similar, then service is denied (br some other action is taken) (630).
  • the Call Sequence Count received in the ARM is compared to the Call Sequence Count maintained by the fixed network unit (10) (632). If the counts are not within an acceptable tolerance, then the service is denied, the authorities may be notified that a multiple user is attempting to access the system (634) and/or some other appropriate action is taken. Otherwise, if the counts are substantially equal, authentication may be confirmed and service issued (636). At this point, the mobile unit (10) may be allowed to communicate with the third communication unit associated with the Dialed Digits received in the ARM and the authentication process is done (638).
  • Figure 4 begins with block 400 wherein the source basesite is currently using a first encryption process to secure the traffic channel over which speech is being communicated between the subscriber unit and the source station.
  • a handoff is required (405) both the subscriber unit and neighboring base sites are used in determining the proper target site using well known cell selection techniques.
  • the current handoff count and the session key are communicated over the landiine network to the target site (410).
  • the subscriber unit is given the new handoff channel over which it will communicate with the target unit (415).
  • the subscriber unit and target site then modify their handoff count registers (420).
  • the target site will broadcast a frame count over an RF link to the subscriber unit for a short period of time after a channel has been assigned (425).
  • the target basesite will cease the broadcast once the subscriber unit has acquired the correct frame count.
  • the handoff count is therefore maintained by the subscriber unit and source basesite, updated for each handoff, and is typically unique for each call.
  • the combination of the handoff count and the frame count serves as a pseudo-secret crypto-sync variable.
  • the target site continues communication with the subscriber unit on the target channel by restarting the encryption process using the received handoff count as a new encryption variable (430).
  • the target unit and the source unit may be the same communication unit as in the case of a channel handoff between time slots from the same carrier frequency or a transfer to another code in the same time slot as in a code division multiplexed system.
  • This method of preserving encryption integrity uses a substantially random variable as a new encryption variable for the time slot from which the target site continues communication each time a handoff occurs. It also forces the encryption process to start again after each handoff thereby not requiring continuous encryption process synchronization between voice coders from differing sites or channels.
  • Such an encryption scheme uses the pseudo random events of handoffs associated with a subscriber unit, such as between subscribers and various channels, to ensure adequate protection from unauthorized listeners.
  • the degree of randomness of the number of handoffs that may occur during any given conversation depends on such factors as cell size, propagation medium characteristics, receiver sensitivities of the subscriber unit and base sites, handoff thresholds as set by the system operator, and various other factors.
  • the handoff count in microcellular systems and in-building systems may vary substantially more than a rural system having large cells.
  • predictable events such as the time of day or absolute frame number (as in a synchronous TDMA system)
  • the intruder can readily predict an amount of elapsed time since the last call or handoff or can readily determine the absolute frame number since it is generally broadcast over the RF medium.
  • the target site may determine proper frame count synchronization from the switch, source site, or other suitable means.
  • FIG. 5 shows an bit map for a typical initialization vector (500) and key field (505) for carrying out the method of preserving encryption integrity during handoffs.
  • the encryption key field is termed the session key field since it is unique for each session or call and changes on a per call basis.
  • the initialization vector (500) includes the pseudo random encyption variable and is maintained by both the subscriber unit and the basesite and changes for each slot.
  • the initialization vector (500) contains 32 bits and these 32 bits are combined with the session crypto-key (505) to produce 159 bits needed for each slot.
  • the 32 bits are divided between three counters: an eight bit handoff counter, a nine bit speech slot counter, and a fifteen bit speech slot overflow counter.
  • the handoff counter is updated as previously described.
  • the slot counter is given the slot count of the target unit and overflow counter is started from a count of zero at the beginning of a call and at every handoff thereafter.
  • the basesite establishes synchronization with the subscriber unit by sending, via RF, the nine bits of the slot counter during every slot, for a predetermined time, at the beginning of its transmission until the target site correctly decrypts speech, which may be generated using VSELP coding or other suitable speech coding method, from the subscriber unit or until the predetermined time elapses.
  • the session key field in combination with the initialization vector are used in an encryption algorithm (510) to generate an output mask (515) which is exclusive ORed (518) with the speech (520) or data. This output is then further error coded using known error protection techniques (525).
  • the session key and the handoff counts are communicated over the landiine network between base sites to prevent detection by RF intruders. Since the subscriber itself maintains a handoff count and the fixed network also maintains the count, there is no need to broadcast this information over an RF channel thereby keeping the handoff count a pseudo-secret crypto-variable.
  • the above method provides synchronization for speech encryption in a system that does not have an absolute frame synchronization scheme between base sites.
  • the method for preserving encryption integrity during handoff may be readily applied to any suitable secure cellular system.
  • a count of channel handoffs is the preferred pseudo random event, other suitable pseudo random events may also be used including the number of calls made by a given subscriber unit, or the number of power changes a subscriber unit undergoes.
  • a record of pseudo random events may include other representations of the events other than a count of such events. Maintaining a count is only one way of representing events.

Abstract

Radio frequency based cellular telecommunication systems often require a subscriber (10) to maintain a proprietary identifier (19) or serial number (18) which is transmitted to a fixed network communication unit (20) to verify the authenticity of the subscriber (10). An enciphering and call sequencing method is provided which can decrease unauthorized detection of these proprietary ID's (18, 19). This method permits efficient roaming by allowing authentication variables for multiple calls to be sent from the 'home' system (20) to the 'visited' system and stored by the 'visited' system for use with subsequent calls. Further, a method is provided which forces the authenticating mobile (10) to use information that only it has available to itself. Furthermore, a method is provided which allows continued encryption integrity during handoffs by maintaining a record of pseudo random events between a subscriber unit (10) and any source radio communication unit (20) (e.g., the number of handoffs that the subscriber (10) has undergone during a given conversation).

Description

METHOD FOR AUTHENTICATION AND PROTECTION OF SUBSCRIBERS IN TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates generally to communication systems and more particularly to radio frequency (RF) cellular telecommunication systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Cellular radio telephone systems typically include subscriber units (such as mobile or portable units) which communicate with a fixed network communication unit via RF transmissions. A typical fixed communication network includes at least a base station and a switching center. The switching center a subscriber unit accesses may not be his "home" switching center. In this case, the subscriber unit is termed a roamer. The switching center he accessed (termed the "visited" switching center) will communicate with his "home" switching center via the public switched telephone network (PSTN). One responsibility of the fixed network communication unit is to grant use of the communication system to the subscriber unit after the requesting subscriber unit meets the authentication requirements of the system. In a typical cellular telephone communication system, each subscriber unit is assigned a telephone number (mobile identification number) (MIN) and an identification number (or serial number) (SN) which uniquely identifies the subscriber to any fixed network communication unit. Each subscriber unit has a unique identification number that distinguishes it from other subscriber units. The fixed network communication unit has access to these identification numbers through a database. Often these numbers are used by the fixed network communication units to bill subscribers for the time the subscriber uses the system. In the case of a roaming subscriber unit, the "visited" switching center must communicate with the subscriber's "home" system database to authenticate and bill the subscriber unit. If this communication is required for each call a subscriber unit makes, significant call setup delays will occur. When the subscriber calls another unit, he enters the phone number he wishes to call. The dialed phone number becomes the data to be sent to the fixed network communication unit. Data may also include other information regarding a third communication unit such as a unit's location. Detection of a legitimate subscriber's identification number may be accomplished by RF eavesdropping or by purposeful or inadvertent divulgence of the MIN/SN combination by the radio telephone installer. Once the subscriber's telephone number and identification number is known (stolen), a thief may reprogram another subscriber unit with the stolen identification number causing two or more subscriber units to have the same MIN/SN combination. Cellular radio telephone systems have authentication procedures to deny access to subscribers not having legitimate identification numbers, but do not have the capability to detect multiple users or effectively neutralize the effect of an installer leaking subscriber identification numbers. Therefore, the legitimate user is billed for both the thief s use and his own use.
Several authentication techniques are known. ElA-553 section 2.3 specifies that each subscriber shall have a MIN and a factory set SN. The telephone number which the subscriber is attempting to contact is the data that is transmitted by the subscriber to the fixed network communication unit. Authentication is granted by this system if the MIN and corresponding SN are found in the fixed network communication unit database. Unfortunately, EIA-553 does not require the encipherment of the MIN or SN before transmission to the fixed network communication unit thereby permitting direct RF detection of any MIN or SN. In addition, this technique fails to provide protection against a thief that acquires a MIN/SN from an installer.
Another authentication technique is described in European cellular communication system recommendations generated by the Groupe Special Mobile (GSM); see sections: 02.09, 02.17, 03.20, and 12.03. This method additionally requires the subscriber to openly transmit a temporary mobile subscriber ID (TMSI) to the fixed network communication unit; the fixed network communication unit generates and sends a random number (RAND) to the subscriber. The enciphering technique requires the subscriber unit to autonomous retrieve at least three enciphering elements from its memory: a predetermined ciphering key, an SN (individual subscriber authentication key) and a MIN (international mobile subscriber identification number - IMSI). The subscriber then enciphers its SN and MIN using the cipher to construct the RAND into a signed response (SRES). The subscriber unit transmits this signed response back to the fixed network communication unit where the fixed network communication unit checks the SN, MIN, and ciphering key against its database using the subscriber's temporary ID (TMSI).
The fixed network communication unit generates its response to the same random number using the information retrieved from the database and compares the subscriber signed response to the fixed network communication unit generated response. If the responses are substantially equivalent, authentication is confirmed. The dialed telephone number is only allowed to be transmitted after authentication is granted. This system affords some protection against a thief that acquires the MIN/SN from an installer by enciphering the SN and reassigning a temporary TMSI each time the subscriber enters a different cell area.
Although one technique enciphers the subscriber's serial number before transmission, neither system detects multiple users. Detection of thieves once they acquire access is important to maintaining a secure system. Moreover, the random number transmission (required for encipherment) necessitates additional communication between the subscriber unit and the fixed network communication unit each time a call is made which increases the probability of transmission error and adds a transmission step to the fixed network communication unit's authentication protocol routine. In addition, authentication must be verified before the system will allow data to be accepted. Therefore data must be sent after the steps of the authentication procedure are complete.
Secure cellular systems also offer protection of conversations after authentication is granted. As is typical for cellular systems, the process of handing off a subscriber unit to another channel is needed for various reasons. These include maintaining communication link quality, minimizing co-channel interference between subscriber units, and managing traffic distributions. A handoff involves the transfer of communication between channels. Channelization may be in the form of time slots, frequencies, codes (as in spread spectrum type systems) and various combinations of these medium divisions. Handoffs include intracell handoffs, intercell handoffs, and intercluster handoffs. Intracell handoffs are those transfers between channels (voice or data) in the same cell; intercell handoffs are those transfers between channels in different cells, and intercluster handoffs are those transfers between channels in cells parented from different cell control units. In secure cellular systems wherein voice and/or data information is encrypted to avoid unauthorized detection of such information, handoffs introduce additional complications to maintaining encryption integrity. In systems where absolute frame synchronization between base sites is not required, such as the proposed TDMA U.S. Digital Cellular system, subscriber units are only told which slots within a frame they must synchronize to after they are handed off. In a secure system however, voice encryption between the subscriber unit and any source basesite transceiver, typically requires an agreed starting point and must continue through the length of the call irrespective of the number of handoffs. At handoff, a conversation is already in progress, therefore lengthy gaps required to establish encryption synchronization must be avoided. Also, an intruder monitoring the channel at any point in the conversation should not be able to gain sufficient information to aid in any cryptanalysis effort. One solution involves operating the encryption algorithm with a common mask that is reused for each slot of speech. However, this severely compromises the security of the encryption process since the same crypto-mask is repeated for each time slot thereby affording an intruder repeated chances for analyzing the same encyption process and consequently increasing the probability of decryption. At handoff this involves passing this mask from the source basesite (current serving basesite to the target basesite. This allows the encryption process to remain synchronized to the handoff channel. Also, since the speech coder continues to generate it's output sequence during pauses in the conversation (quiet periods) an intruder has a good chance of determining the encryption process during these pauses.
Another solution involves restarting the encryption process at each handoff. However, this requires the repetition of the exact cipher stream after each handoff. An intruder's probability of decoding the cipher stream each time a handoff occurs is greatly increased; particularly in microcellular systems. The method of encryption must allow for a high degree of variability to make decryption more difficult. As during the authentication process, any variable used in the encryption process should not be communicated over the airwaves.
Another solution involves using a continuous stream encryption process wherein the process must maintain its continuity during all handoffs for the same conversation. For example, the exact starting point would have to be agreed upon by the subscriber unit and source basesite. At handoff, the current contents of the encryption process as well as the exact point of transfer is agreed upon by the source basesite and the target basesite. This method does not readily lend itself to a non-synchronous system since the target site may not know the current stage of the encryption process. Also, the length of messages between basesites would increase since a large number of memory elements may be needed to define the history of the encryption algorithm as started by the subscriber unit so that the target site can generate the current state of the encryption process.
There exists a need for a substantially enhanced authentication technique for a cellular telecommunication system that detects fraudulent users and efficiently protects identification numbers from unauthorized detection. This technique should permit roamers to access "visited" systems in an efficient and timely manner, while enabling the "visited" system to determine the legitimacy of the subscriber unit. The authentication method should restrict an illegitimate user's capacity to utilize the system in the case where access is inadvertently granted. Further, an adequate level of security resulting from encipherment should not require additional transmission processes or inject higher error levels during the authentication process: There also exists a need for an encryption process for use in a synchronous channel or a non- synchronous channel system that provides encryption integrity during handoffs between channels such that an intruder is substantially prevented from decoding the encryption process.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
These needs and others are substantially met through provision of the method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems disclosed below. This method describes an authentication technique for use between a first communication unit, such as a subscriber unit, and a second communication unit, such as a fixed network communication unit, wherein the first communication unit modifies an ID, known to both the first communication unit and the second communication unit (such as a serial number), using data as one enciphering key and a second ID (such as a Personal Identification Number - PIN) as a second enciphering key as well as a network issued random number (RAND) as a third enciphering key. An historic non- arbitrary value of predetermined communication events, such as a count of the number of telephone calls made by a subscriber or a count of the number of handoffs that have occurred for the subscriber unit, is maintained in both the first and second communication units. This value (count) is historic because it represents past telephone calls attributed to a communication unit, and it is non-arbitrary because this history of transactions (i.e., number of calls made) serves to identify an out-of-sync communication unit.
The first communication unit transmits (via RF signals) the modified ID and count to a second communication unit. The second communication unit compares the count maintained by the first communication unit to the count maintained by the second unit. A count discrepancy indicates a different number of calls on one unit indicating a multiple user whose count is out of sequence. The second communication unit performs the same enciphering method on the known serial number using the data received and a known second ID. The second communication unit compares the received modified serial number and the serial number generated by the fixed network communication unit to determine if the serial number is valid. The invention is designed to substantially decrease unauthorized use of a first ID of a communication unit. The authentication method does not require the second ID to ever be transmitted by RF.
This invention provides a means for detecting multiple subscribers using the same serial numbers and telephone numbers. Moreover, if a multiple user copies the information transmitted and uses the same information to access the system, the multiple user will be limited to only calling the telephone number that is in the authentication message; not a telephone number of his own choice. This authentication invention also reduces authentication errors by making more efficient use of the data transmitted and a second ID, by using them as a part of the cipher; the enciphering means does not require an additional RAND stream to be sent by a fixed network communication unit to be used as the common enciphering base and thereby eliminates this additional transmission and therefore decreases the probability of errors. This authentication scheme permits efficient roaming by allowing authentication variables for multiple calls to be sent from the- "home" system to the "visited" system. These authentication variables can be stored by the "visited" switching center and used on subsequent calls. This storing allows the "visited" switching center to authenticate all subsequent calls without requiring real-time communication to the "home" system and without the associated call setup delays. It is also essential to retain the subscriber's secret keys (PIN) in the "home" switching center and not share this private information with the "visited" switching centers.
A method of stealing cellular service is to flash from a fraudulent mobile and take over an existing call. This flash message would tell the fixed network that the legitimate user is making a third party call. One possible solution to this problem is for the fixed network to initiate an authentication procedure on the traffic channel. However, the fraudulent mobile can allow the legitimate mobile to complete the authentication process. Another solution to this problem is to force the authenticating mobile to use information that only it has available to itself. A particular embodiment to this solution would be to exclusive-or (XOR) the dialed digits of the flash message with the output of the authentication algorr n and then send this response to the fixed network for verification that tr ;: legitimate mobile is really making a third party call. In the above scenam, since only the fraudulent mobile has the dialed digits that it is sending, ne legitimate mobile cannot correctly authenticate the flash message. Thus the fixed network would not complete the call from the fraudulent mobile.
In a secure cellular communication system using an encryption process utilizing at least one encryption key for encrypting information communicated over a channel, the method for preserving encryption integrity during a handoff includes: also maintaining a record of pseudo random events associated with a subscriber unit, such as the number of handoffs the subscriber unit has undergone during a given conversation with any number of source radio communication units; communicating the record, such as over a landiine medium to prevent detection by an intruder, to a target radio communication unit; and restarting another encryption process for the subscriber unit using the record as an encryption variable.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION QFTHE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a typical subscriber communication unit and fixed network communication unit.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the identification enciphering method used by a subscriber communication unit. FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the authentication method used by a fixed network communication unit in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 4 is a flow chart generally depicting the method of preserving encryption integrity during handoffs in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 5 is a diagram generally depicting the encryption elements in accordance with the invention.
FIG 6. is a flowchart of an alternative authentication method used by a fixed network communication unit.
FIG. 7 is a diagram depicting a method of stealing cellular communication service which is eliminated by the authentication method shown in FIG. 6.
BEST MODE OF OPERATION
FIG. 1 generally depicts a subscriber communication unit (10) such as a subscriber telephone and a fixed network communication unit (20) such as a cellular telephone basesite.and switching center. The subscriber communication unit (10) is comprised of a microprocessing stage (12), a non-volatile memory unit (11), a radio frequency (RF) stage (13), all as well understood in the art. Additional elements include a data input stage (14) such as a key entry pad on a telephone (to enter a telephone number - data), a subscriber call sequence counter (15), and an output from an enciphering stage referred to as the enciphered serial number (16). Within the non-volatile memory unit (11) resides the serial number
(18) (for the subscriber unit), the PIN (19), and the subscriber telephone number (17) (which can have, for example, characteristics of a Mobile Identification Number (MIN)). The PIN is a second ID known only to the subscriber unit and the fixed network unit. For example, it should not be available to an installer of the subscriber unit, it should only be available to a legitimate user of a subscriber unit and a fixed network communication unit database. The subscriber need only enter the PIN one time to activate it. The PIN may be changed by the subscriber, but the change must also be made known to the fixed network unit. These identifiers need not necessarily be numbers but may correspond to any attribute capable of being identified by the fixed network communications unit. An alternative embodiment, for example, in a cellular system, may include a stored look up table containing multiple sets of serial numbers, PIN's, and telephone numbers with each set of identifiers corresponding to a specific cellular area or fixed network communication unit.
The fixed network communication unit (20) includes a switching center which is comprised of a microprocessing stage (22), a database (23), and a link to a basesite radio frequency stage (21), all as well understood in the art. Additional elements include a fixed network unit call sequence counter (24) and an enciphered serial number generated by the fixed network unit (25). Additionally, the switching center has an interface to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) (60). The PSTN link can be used for "visited" switching center to "home" switching center communications as required for authentication and billing of roaming subscriber units.
The database includes information regarding the subscriber unit's: serial number (18), PIN (19), and subscriber telephone number(17); the information is a copy of these ID's. The serial number (18), PIN (19), and telephone number (17) of the subscriber communication unit (10) correspond to the serial number (28), PIN (27), and telephone number (26) as stored in the fixed network communication unit (20). Communication between the subscriber communication unit (10) and the fixed network communication unit (20) is accomplished via RF transmissions between the two units in accordance with well understood cellular system techniques. When authentication is required of the subscriber communication unit (10), the subscriber unit enciphers its serial number (18) and increments its call sequence counter (15). FIG. 2 depicts the method used by a subscriber communication unit to encipher its serial number before transmission to a fixed network communication unit during an authentication request (29). This method requires use of at least two enciphering keys. The subscriber unit obtains the called telephone number (data)(30) and obtains PIN (31 ) from memory and uses at least parts of these two components as the enciphering keys to encipher its serial number (32). Alternatively, the subscriber unit obtains the called telephone number (DATA), a network issued random number (RAND) (30), a current subscriber's system number (historical data) as well as PIN (31) and uses at least parts of these components as the enciphering keys for enciphering its serial number (32). If PIN and the called telephone number are comprised of bits, the parts of these keys to be used are the contents of the bits and the bit length of each key. For example, an enciphered serial number may have a different bit length than the unenciphered serial number, or unmodified first ID, depending on the contents of the PIN or the data. Varying the enciphered SN bit length may also be a function of another event known to both the subscriber and fixed network unit such as the time of day.
The algorithm to integrate the enciphering keys may be varied to accommodate various levels of security depending upon the requirement of the system. The final step prior to transmission of the Authentication Response Message is to logically transform the enciphered message using the telephone number (data). This transformation is essential in assuring that a "visited" switching center can use the stored authentication variables it received previously from the subscriber's "home" switching center. The authentication variables issued by the "home" system make no assumptions about the telephone number (data) that the subscriber will use. Thus the "visited" system can compute the ARM based on the authentication variables it received from the "home" system and the received telephone number (data). The subscriber identification enciphering method does not require authentication to be confirmed by the fixed network communication unit before data is transmitted. Combining -i i-
PIN with data adds the ability of the system to encipher a serial number into a complex code to an extent sufficient to substantially eliminate unauthorized detection by RF eavesdropping and unauthorized divulgence by installers. The modified serial number (enciphered SN) becomes a component of the Authentication Request Message (ARM) (35) that is transmitted via RF (36) to the fixed network communication unit. Once encipherment is complete, the assigned telephone number is obtained (33) from memory. This number is not enciphered as part of the authentication procedure. This identifier is a component of the ARM (35) that informs the fixed network unit that the authentication request is coming from a valid subscriber unit. The call sequence count is then obtained (34) and also used in the ARM (35). The call sequence count is updated (incremented or decremented) each time a predetermined event occurs such as when the authentication procedure is initiated or when a call is completed. The count may be maintained by the subscriber and fixed network unit using a rollover type counter such as a ring counter. This count is used by the fixed network communication unit as a means to count the number of calls made by each subscriber. Another suitable count to be used in conjunction with, or instead of, the call sequence count is the number of handoffs associated with the subscriber unit. Because a record of the number of calls made by each subscriber is maintained by both the subscriber unit and the fixed network communication unit, another subscriber trying to use the same serial number will be detected because it will not have made the exact same number of calls as the legitimate subscriber. The call sequence count information is communicated to the fixed network unit as one component of the Authentication Request Message. The ARM can be communicated in any acceptable format or in any number of stages. Components of a typical ARM (35) include data, the enciphered serial number, the call sequence count, and the assigned telephone number. An alternative embodiment would include modifying the call sequence count using the same enciphering method that is used to modify the SN. This would further enhance the protection because the count is also disguised using the PIN and data; each subscriber would generate a different value for the same count (number of calls made).
A fixed network communication unit receives a transmitted ARM and uses this information to determine whether authentication should be granted to the subscriber unit. FIG. 3 depicts the authentication method performed by a fixed network unit. The ARM is received (37) by the fixed network unit by means of the base RF unit (21). The fixed network unit has access to assigned telephone number's, serial number's and PIN's of valid subscriber units through its database. The fixed network unit determines if the assigned telephone number received in the ARM is valid (39) by obtaining from the fixed network unit database the same assigned telephone number (38). A comparison is made between the received telephone number from the subscriber unit and the valid number found in the database (39). If the assigned telephone number is not recognized by the fixed network unit, authentication is denied (or some other action taken) (40).
If the assigned telephone number is determined to be valid (it is found in the database), the fixed network unit then retrieves from the database the serial number and PIN corresponding to that particular assigned telephone number. The fixed network unit then, uses the PIN from the database and the data received in the ARM as enciphering keys as elements of its enciphering method (44), which is the same method used in the subscriber unit, and generates its own enciphered serial number. The fixed network unit compares this enciphered serial number to the serial number enciphered by the subscriber unit(46). If they are not substantially the same, then the system denies access or takes some other predetermined course of action (47). If they are within the acceptable tolerance, the received call sequence count is obtained (48) and compared (50) to the call count maintained by the fixed network communication unit (49). If the counts are substantially equal, authentication may be confirmed (52) which is the first predetermined course of action. At this point, the subscriber may be allowed to communicate with the third communication unit associated with the dialed number. This third unit may more generally be termed a requested communication resource. If the count is not within the acceptable tolerance, authentication may be denied or the authorities may be notified that a multiple user is attempting to access the system (51).
The fixed network unit call counter maintains the number of times authentication is granted to a subscriber. Each subscriber has its own call counter. Having a continuous call counting scheme between a subscriber and a fixed network communication unit prevents another subscriber from using some other subscriber's identification number because the thief would not have made the identical number of calls that the legitimate subscriber made. This discrepancy is flagged by the fixed network unit when it compares the two counts. Protection against illegitimate users is further enhanced by the encipherment method's use of the enciphered dialed telephone number and the PIN (which is not transmitted). Without an illegitimate user knowing a subscriber's PIN and the exact algorithm that enciphers the serial number, a thief is limited to merely copying the authentication message of a subscriber and repeating this message. Each time a subscriber dials a different telephone number, a different authentication request message is generated because each subscriber has a different PIN; each subscriber generates a different authentication request message for the same telephone number. Although a thief may detect the call sequence count (because it is not enciphered in the ARM) and update it, a correct count would only allow the thief to gain authentication for the enciphered dialed telephone number he intercepted. Therefore the illegitimate user can only communicate to the subscriber whose enciphered telephone number matches that copied from the ARM.
An alternative embodiment comprising the call sequence count may allow each subscriber to maintain more than one call counter where a separate call counter is required for each fixed network communication unit. This embodiment would find use in a cellular communication system which allowed a subscriber to use multiple fixed network communication units. Another alternative embodiment to the flow in FIG. 3 may require the step of comparing the call sequence counts (50) to occur before the step involving the comparison of enciphered serial numbers (46).
In FIG. 7, a method of stealing cellular service is shown. In particular, an illegitimate user (704) waits until a legitimate user (702) makes a valid call. The illegitimate user then overpowers the traffic channel between the legitimate user (702) and a base site (700) with a third party flash call. The illegitimate user (704) drops off of the traffic channel while the base site (700) sends an authentication request message to the legitimate user (702). The legitimate user (702) responds to the authentication request, correctly. Thus, the base site connects the third party call. Meanwhile, the illegitimate user (704) overpowers the traffic channel and takes control. The original call between the legitimate user (702) and the base site (700) is lost and the legitimate user (702) drops out of the traffic channel. As a result, the illegitimate user (704) continues the call with the third party that was called and the filling for the call is sent to the legitimate user (702).
In FIG. 6, a method of eliminating this form of stealing cellular service is shown. This elimination is accomplished by requiring the authentication response message from a mobile unit to contain an exclusive-or of at least part of the response message with the dialed digits. Since the legitimate mobile unit does not know the illegitimate mobile units dialed digits, the legitimate mobile unit authenticates incorrectly and the third party call of the illegitimate mobile unit does not go through.
Referring now to FIG.2 and FIG. 6, in particular, FIG. 6 depicts an alternative authentication method used by a fixed network communication unit which supports authentication of roaming mobile units. In this embodiment an Authentication Request Message (ARM) is received from a subscriber communication unit (10) (mobile unit) by the fixed network unit (20) through a base unit RF stage (21). The ARM preferably includes a Mobile Identification Number (MIN), the Dialed Digits (Data) and a Call Sequence Count. From the received ARM the fixed network unit (20) determines whether the received ARM comes from a mobile in its home network (602).
If the received ARM is from a home mobile unit, then the fixed network unit (20) determines if the assigned MIN (preferably telephone number) in its database (23) is the same as the MIN received in the ARM (604). A comparison is made between the received MIN from the mobile unit (10) and the valid MIN found in the database (23). If the received MIN is not recognized by the fixed network unit (20), service is denied (or some other action is taken) (606). Otherwise, if the received MIN is determined to be valid (it is found in the database), then the fixed network unit (20) retrieves a Personal Identification Number (PIN) from the database (23) and generates a particular random/response pair (RAND/RESP) from this PIN (608). The RAND preferably is a random number and the RESP preferably is a number which is generated as a function of the RAND and the particular subscriber's PIN. In alternative embodiments it will be appreciate that the RESP may be generated as a function of additional elements such as a MIN, Electronic Serial Number, and/or rolling key. Subsequently, the authentication method continues at step (622).
Otherwise, if the received ARM is not from a home mobile, then the fixed network (20) checks its database (23) for RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit (610). If the database (23) contains RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit, then the fixed network (20) retrieves a particular RAND/RESP pair for use in this particular authentication process (612) and continues the authentication process at step (622). Otherwise, if the fixed network unit's database (23) does not contain RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit, the fixed network unit (20) preferably accesses the visiting mobile unit's home network via a PSTN link (60). The home network detε -mines if the assigned MIN (preferably telephone number) in its database is the same as the MIN received in the ARM (614). A comparison is made between the received MIN from the visiting mobile unit and the valid MIN found in the home network's database. If the received MIN is not recognized by the home network, service is denied (or some other action is taken) (616). Otherwise, if the received MIN is determined to be valid (it is found in the database), then the home network provides RAND/RESP pairs for this visiting mobile unit to the visited network unit (20) preferably via the PSTN link (60) (618). The fixed network unit (20) stores these received RAND/RESP pairs in database (23) (620). Subsequently, the fixed network (20) retrieves a particular RAND/RESP pair for use in this particular authentication process (612) and continues the authentication process at step (622). At authentication step (622), the fixed network unit (20) generates a
RESPD which is a logical function of the RESP associated with the particular RAND for this authentication process and the Dialed Digits received in the ARM (preferably an XOR function or other non-destructive logical function). Subsequently, the fixed network unit (20) issues the particular RAND to the mobile unit (10) (624). The mobile unit (10) generates a RESP from this particular RAND using a particular method which is the same method as the one used by the network unit (either home or visited network unit). Then, the mobile unit (10) generates a RESPD which is a logical function of the mobile generated RESP and the Dialed Digits sent in the ARM (preferably an XOR function or other non¬ destructive logical function) and provides the mobile generated RESPD to the fixed network unit (626). The fixed network unit (20) compares this received RESPD to the network unit generated RESPD (628). If they are not substantially similar, then service is denied (br some other action is taken) (630).
Otherwise, if the two RESPQ'S are substantially similar, then the Call Sequence Count received in the ARM is compared to the Call Sequence Count maintained by the fixed network unit (10) (632). If the counts are not within an acceptable tolerance, then the service is denied, the authorities may be notified that a multiple user is attempting to access the system (634) and/or some other appropriate action is taken. Otherwise, if the counts are substantially equal, authentication may be confirmed and service issued (636). At this point, the mobile unit (10) may be allowed to communicate with the third communication unit associated with the Dialed Digits received in the ARM and the authentication process is done (638). Figure 4 begins with block 400 wherein the source basesite is currently using a first encryption process to secure the traffic channel over which speech is being communicated between the subscriber unit and the source station. Once a handoff is required (405) both the subscriber unit and neighboring base sites are used in determining the proper target site using well known cell selection techniques. After the proper channel and target site are identified, the current handoff count and the session key are communicated over the landiine network to the target site (410). The subscriber unit is given the new handoff channel over which it will communicate with the target unit (415). The subscriber unit and target site then modify their handoff count registers (420). The target site will broadcast a frame count over an RF link to the subscriber unit for a short period of time after a channel has been assigned (425). The target basesite will cease the broadcast once the subscriber unit has acquired the correct frame count. The handoff count is therefore maintained by the subscriber unit and source basesite, updated for each handoff, and is typically unique for each call. The combination of the handoff count and the frame count serves as a pseudo-secret crypto-sync variable. The target site continues communication with the subscriber unit on the target channel by restarting the encryption process using the received handoff count as a new encryption variable (430). As appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the target unit and the source unit may be the same communication unit as in the case of a channel handoff between time slots from the same carrier frequency or a transfer to another code in the same time slot as in a code division multiplexed system.
This method of preserving encryption integrity uses a substantially random variable as a new encryption variable for the time slot from which the target site continues communication each time a handoff occurs. It also forces the encryption process to start again after each handoff thereby not requiring continuous encryption process synchronization between voice coders from differing sites or channels. Such an encryption scheme uses the pseudo random events of handoffs associated with a subscriber unit, such as between subscribers and various channels, to ensure adequate protection from unauthorized listeners. The degree of randomness of the number of handoffs that may occur during any given conversation depends on such factors as cell size, propagation medium characteristics, receiver sensitivities of the subscriber unit and base sites, handoff thresholds as set by the system operator, and various other factors. Consequently, the handoff count in microcellular systems and in-building systems may vary substantially more than a rural system having large cells. Unlike these pseudo random events, predictable events such as the time of day or absolute frame number (as in a synchronous TDMA system), do represent adequate encryption variables since they do not offer same degree of randomness. The intruder can readily predict an amount of elapsed time since the last call or handoff or can readily determine the absolute frame number since it is generally broadcast over the RF medium. In the case of a synchronous TDMA system, the target site may determine proper frame count synchronization from the switch, source site, or other suitable means. FIG. 5 shows an bit map for a typical initialization vector (500) and key field (505) for carrying out the method of preserving encryption integrity during handoffs. The encryption key field is termed the session key field since it is unique for each session or call and changes on a per call basis. The initialization vector (500) includes the pseudo random encyption variable and is maintained by both the subscriber unit and the basesite and changes for each slot. The initialization vector (500) contains 32 bits and these 32 bits are combined with the session crypto-key (505) to produce 159 bits needed for each slot. The 32 bits are divided between three counters: an eight bit handoff counter, a nine bit speech slot counter, and a fifteen bit speech slot overflow counter. The handoff counter is updated as previously described. The slot counter is given the slot count of the target unit and overflow counter is started from a count of zero at the beginning of a call and at every handoff thereafter. The basesite establishes synchronization with the subscriber unit by sending, via RF, the nine bits of the slot counter during every slot, for a predetermined time, at the beginning of its transmission until the target site correctly decrypts speech, which may be generated using VSELP coding or other suitable speech coding method, from the subscriber unit or until the predetermined time elapses.
The session key field in combination with the initialization vector are used in an encryption algorithm (510) to generate an output mask (515) which is exclusive ORed (518) with the speech (520) or data. This output is then further error coded using known error protection techniques (525).
The session key and the handoff counts are communicated over the landiine network between base sites to prevent detection by RF intruders. Since the subscriber itself maintains a handoff count and the fixed network also maintains the count, there is no need to broadcast this information over an RF channel thereby keeping the handoff count a pseudo-secret crypto-variable.
The above method provides synchronization for speech encryption in a system that does not have an absolute frame synchronization scheme between base sites. However, as obvious to those of ordinary skill in the ' art, the method for preserving encryption integrity during handoff may be readily applied to any suitable secure cellular system. Although a count of channel handoffs is the preferred pseudo random event, other suitable pseudo random events may also be used including the number of calls made by a given subscriber unit, or the number of power changes a subscriber unit undergoes. As appreciated by those skilled in the art, a record of pseudo random events may include other representations of the events other than a count of such events. Maintaining a count is only one way of representing events.
As appreciated by those skilled in the art, numerous alternative embodiments may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. In a telecommunication system using an encryption process, a method of subscriber protection comprising: (a) maintaining a record of pseudo random events associated with a subscriber unit; '(b) communicating the record to a target radio communication unit; and
(c) utilizing another encryption process as between the subscriber unit and the target radio communication unit using the record as an encryption variable.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the record of pseudo random events comprises the record of a number of channel handoffs attributed to the subscriber unit.
-20-
3. A method of authentication and protection between a subscriber unit and a central communication unit in a radiotelephone communication system, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing the subscriber unit with a first ID and a terminal endpoint identifier which uniquely identifies a target communication unit other than the central communication unit;
(b) generating a modified first ID in the subscriber unit by modifying the first ID as a function of a random number received from the central communication unit;
(c) modifying the modified first ID in the subscriber unit as a function of the terminal endpoint identifier; and
(d) transmitting via a radio communication link the modified first ID from the subscriber unit to the central communication unit.
4. The method according to claim 3 wherein:
(a) the subscriber unit is provided with a second ID; and
(b) the modified first ID is generated in the subscriber unit by modifying the first ID as a function of the received random number and the second ID.
-21-
5. A method of authentication and protection between a subscriber unit and a central communication unit in a radiotelephone communication system, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing the central communication unit with information regarding a first ID;
(b) receiving a request for service at the central communication unit from the subscriber unit, the request for service comprising a terminal endpoint identifier which uniquely identifies a target communication unit other than the central communication unit;
(c) transmitting via a radio communication link a random number from the central communication unit to the subscriber unit in response to receiving the request for service;
(d) receiving a modified first ID at the central communication unit, the modified first ID being derived from the first ID, transmitted random number and the terminal endpoint identifier; and
(e) determining in the central communication unit, through the use of the received modified first ID, the received terminal endpoint identifier, the transmitted random number and the information regarding the first ID, if the received service request is authentic.
6. The method according to claim 5 wherein :
(a) the central communication unit is provided with a second ID; and
(b) the determining if the received service request is authentic further includes the use of the second ID.
7. The method according to claim 5 wherein: (a) the central communication unit is a home communication unit for the subscriber unit; and (b) the information regarding the first ID is substantially similar to the first ID.
8. The method according to claim 5 wherein:
(a) the central communication unit is a visited communication unit for the subscriber unit;
(b) the step of providing the central communication unit with information regarding a first ID, comprises the steps of:
(i) determining if the visited communication unit has information regarding the first ID; (ii) retrieving the information regarding the first ID, if the visited communication unit has the information regarding the first ID ; and
(iii) communicating with a home communication unit for the subscriber unit, subsequently retrieving the information regarding the first ID, and subsequently storing the information regarding the first ID in the visited communication unit, if the visited communication unit does not have the information regarding the first ID.
-23-
9. A method of authentication and protβc on between a subscriber unit and a central communication unit in a radiotelephone communication system, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing the subscriber unit with a first ID and a terminal endpoint identifier which uniquely identifies a target communication unit other than the central communication unit;
(b) providing the central communication unit with information regarding the first ID; (c) transmitting via a radio communication link a request for service from the subscriber unit to the central unit, the request for service comprising the terminal endpoint identifier; (d) receiving the request for service at the central communication unit; (e) transmitting via a radio communication link a random number from the central communication unit to the subscriber unit;
(f) receiving the random number at the subscriber unit;
(g) generating a modified first ID in the subscriber unit by modifying the first ID as a function of the received random number;
(h) modifying the modified first ID in the subscriber unit as a function of the terminal endpoint identifier; (i) transmitting via a radio communication link the modified first ID from the subscriber unit to the central communication unit; 0) receiving the modified first ID at the central communication unit; and (k) determining in the central communication unit, through the use of the n eived modified first ID, the received terminal endpoint identifier, the transmitted random number and the information regarding the first ID, if the received service request is authentic.
10. The method according to claim 9 wherein:
(a) the subscriber unit is provided with a second ID;
(b) the central communication unit is provided with the second ID;
(c) the modified first ID is generated in the subscriber unit by modifying the first ID as a function of the received random number and the second ID; and
(d) the determining if the received service request is authentic further includes the use of the second ID.
PCT/US1991/004970 1990-07-16 1991-07-15 Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems WO1992002103A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55495190A 1990-07-16 1990-07-16
US554,951 1990-07-16
US07/626,227 US5239294A (en) 1989-07-12 1990-12-07 Method and apparatus for authenication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems
US626,227 1990-12-07

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1992002103A1 true WO1992002103A1 (en) 1992-02-06

Family

ID=27070739

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1991/004970 WO1992002103A1 (en) 1990-07-16 1991-07-15 Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US5239294A (en)
JP (1) JP2750638B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2087433C (en)
MX (1) MX9100231A (en)
WO (1) WO1992002103A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0584725A1 (en) * 1992-08-19 1994-03-02 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method of authentication with improved security for secrecy of authentication key
US5524135A (en) * 1994-02-14 1996-06-04 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for secure downloading of operational information into a wireless communications device
WO1998032306A2 (en) * 1997-01-15 1998-07-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for providing authentication security in a wireless communication system
GB2322998A (en) * 1997-02-20 1998-09-09 Vodafone Ltd Method of Interconnecting Communication Networks
EP0933957A1 (en) * 1998-01-05 1999-08-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Effective use of dialed digits in call origination
WO2000027156A1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2000-05-11 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method of authenticating a mobile station handing-off from an anchor exchange to a serving exchange
GB2359464A (en) * 1999-09-27 2001-08-22 Simoco Int Ltd Handover of a mobile station between base stations without passing of the air interface encryption key over the air interface
EP1341392A1 (en) * 1998-07-08 2003-09-03 Intel Corporation A method for maintaining an authenticated virtual connection to a network node
EP1534042A1 (en) * 2003-11-20 2005-05-25 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for global authentication with continuity during handoff to a neighboring mobile switching center
USRE40791E1 (en) 1999-06-15 2009-06-23 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and system for verifying the authenticity of a first communication participants in a communications network

Families Citing this family (145)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5448764A (en) * 1989-06-08 1995-09-05 U.S. Philips Corporation Cordless telephone set with secure communication protocol
US5572193A (en) * 1990-12-07 1996-11-05 Motorola, Inc. Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunications systems
US5546444A (en) * 1994-03-11 1996-08-13 Bellsouth Corporation Methods and apparatus for communicating data via a cellular network control channel
US5794144A (en) * 1994-03-11 1998-08-11 Bellsouth Corporation Methods and apparatus for communicating data via a cellular mobile radiotelephone system
EP0506234B1 (en) * 1991-02-27 1998-06-10 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for detecting improper rewriting of stored data
DE69227051T2 (en) * 1991-02-27 1999-03-11 Canon Kk Procedure for discovering incorrect overwriting of stored data
DE4119573A1 (en) * 1991-06-14 1992-12-17 Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag METHOD FOR DETERMINING A TEMPORARY NUMBER (TMSI) IN A SUBSCRIBER DATABASE FOR A SUBSCRIBER
US6295449B1 (en) 1992-01-27 2001-09-25 @Track Communications, Inc. Data messaging in a communications network using a feature request
US5983108A (en) * 1992-01-27 1999-11-09 Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for a nation-wide cellular telephone network
US5539810A (en) 1992-01-27 1996-07-23 Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. Data messaging in a communications network
US5760700A (en) * 1992-05-02 1998-06-02 Electronics Research And Design Uk Ltd. Security system with succession of codes
US6144859A (en) * 1993-08-27 2000-11-07 Aeris Communications, Inc. Wireless cellular communicator system and apparatus
US5889474A (en) * 1992-05-18 1999-03-30 Aeris Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting subject status information over a wireless communications network
US5551073A (en) * 1993-02-25 1996-08-27 Ericsson Inc. Authentication key entry in cellular radio system
US5483658A (en) * 1993-02-26 1996-01-09 Grube; Gary W. Detection of unauthorized use of software applications in processing devices
US5420908A (en) * 1993-03-11 1995-05-30 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for preventing wireless fraud
US5420910B1 (en) * 1993-06-29 1998-02-17 Airtouch Communications Inc Method and apparatus for fraud control in cellular telephone systems utilizing rf signature comparison
JP2531354B2 (en) * 1993-06-29 1996-09-04 日本電気株式会社 Authentication method
US5455863A (en) * 1993-06-29 1995-10-03 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient real-time authentication and encryption in a communication system
US5950121A (en) 1993-06-29 1999-09-07 Airtouch Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for fraud control in cellular telephone systems
US5490203A (en) * 1993-07-26 1996-02-06 Bell Communications Research Inc. Method and system utilizing a location caching strategy to locate nomadic users in a communication services system
US5507009A (en) * 1993-08-13 1996-04-09 Motorola, Inc. Method for reprogramming a communication unit's access to a wireless communication system
US5745677A (en) * 1993-08-13 1998-04-28 Motorola, Inc. Method for reprogramming a communicaton unit's access to a wireless communication system
US5594740A (en) * 1993-08-27 1997-01-14 Axion Logistics Corporation Wireless communications application specific enabling method and apparatus
US5365585A (en) * 1993-08-30 1994-11-15 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for encryption having a feedback register with selectable taps
US5410602A (en) * 1993-09-27 1995-04-25 Motorola, Inc. Method for key management of point-to-point communications
JP2786092B2 (en) * 1993-10-18 1998-08-13 日本電気株式会社 Mobile communication terminal authentication method
US5594429A (en) * 1993-10-27 1997-01-14 Alps Electric Co., Ltd. Transmission and reception system and signal generation method for same
US5440559A (en) * 1993-11-10 1995-08-08 Seiko Communications Holding N.V. Portable wireless communication device
US5457737A (en) * 1993-12-28 1995-10-10 At&T Corp. Methods and apparatus to verify the identity of a cellular mobile phone
US5488649A (en) * 1994-05-06 1996-01-30 Motorola, Inc. Method for validating a communication link
BR9506894B1 (en) * 1994-02-24 2010-08-10 method of operating a cellular telecommunications system, method of activating a cellular mobile station and a mobile station in a radio cellular telecommunications system.
FI96155C (en) * 1994-03-24 1996-05-10 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Method for providing ambient listening and a radio unit
US5440758A (en) * 1994-04-12 1995-08-08 Motorola, Inc. Method of preventing unauthorized access to a wireless communication system
US5638423A (en) * 1994-04-12 1997-06-10 Motorola, Inc. Method of detecting use of a stolen communication unit
AU2193395A (en) * 1994-05-06 1995-11-29 Motorola, Inc. A method for establishing a communication link
US5625870A (en) * 1994-06-10 1997-04-29 Uniden America Corporation Fraud control for radio fleets in a land mobile radio system
US5537474A (en) * 1994-07-29 1996-07-16 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for authentication in a communication system
US6044265A (en) * 1995-06-05 2000-03-28 Bellsouth Corporation Methods and apparatus for cellular set programming
US5633914A (en) * 1995-08-22 1997-05-27 Rosa; Stephen P. Method for foiling cellular telephone cloning
US5819171A (en) * 1995-08-31 1998-10-06 Cellular Technical Services Co., Inc. Automated forced call disruption for use with wireless telephone systems
US5999808A (en) * 1995-12-12 1999-12-07 Aeris Communications, Inc. Wireless gaming method
US5661724A (en) * 1995-12-18 1997-08-26 Ericsson Inc. Satellite diversity scheme
IT1278543B1 (en) * 1995-12-20 1997-11-24 Abba Anna Maria MOBILE PHONE EQUIPPED WITH MEANS FOR THE LEGAL IDENTIFICATION OF THE MOBILE PHONE HOLDER
US5878036A (en) * 1995-12-20 1999-03-02 Spartz; Michael K. Wireless telecommunications system utilizing CDMA radio frequency signal modulation in conjunction with the GSM A-interface telecommunications network protocol
US5974307A (en) * 1995-12-21 1999-10-26 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system communicating with a voice response unit over a cellular telephone network
US5740247A (en) * 1995-12-22 1998-04-14 Pitney Bowes Inc. Authorized cellular telephone communication payment refill system
US5765106A (en) * 1995-12-22 1998-06-09 Pitney Bowes Inc. Authorized cellular telephone communication access and verification control system
US5812945A (en) * 1995-12-22 1998-09-22 Pitney Bowes Inc. Metered payment cellular telephone communication system
US6035043A (en) * 1995-12-22 2000-03-07 Pitney Bowes Inc. Cellular telephone manifest system
US6023619A (en) * 1995-12-22 2000-02-08 Airtouch Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for exchanging RF signatures between cellular telephone systems
US5768383A (en) * 1995-12-22 1998-06-16 Pitney Bowes Inc. Authorized cellular voice messaging and/or analog or digital data communication access and verification control system
US5845203A (en) * 1996-01-25 1998-12-01 Aertis Cormmunications Remote access application messaging wireless method
US5715518A (en) * 1996-03-06 1998-02-03 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. Adaptive waveform matching for use in transmitter identification
US6085085A (en) * 1996-03-27 2000-07-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for performing preferred system selection
US5870674A (en) * 1996-03-27 1999-02-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for performing preferred system selection
JPH09271066A (en) * 1996-03-29 1997-10-14 Sony Corp Communication method, communication system, communication terminal equipment and communication management equipment
US5950114A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-09-07 Ericsson Inc. Apparatus and method for deriving a random reference number from paging and originating signals
JP2877199B2 (en) * 1996-06-21 1999-03-31 日本電気株式会社 Roaming method
US5940751A (en) * 1996-06-27 1999-08-17 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. System and method for detection of fraud in a wireless telephone system
US5893031A (en) * 1996-06-27 1999-04-06 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. System and method for collection of transmission characteristics
US5956635A (en) * 1996-07-16 1999-09-21 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. Detection and prevention of channel grabbing in a wireless communications system
US5745559A (en) * 1996-07-24 1998-04-28 Weir; Earline Madsen Restricted access telephones for logical telephone networks
US6039624A (en) * 1996-07-29 2000-03-21 At&T Wireless Services Inc. Method for allocating a mobile station TMSI
CA2214911C (en) * 1996-09-11 2001-12-25 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Contents transmission control method with user authentication functions and recording medium with the method recorded thereon
US5884158A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-03-16 Pitney Bowes Inc. Cellular telephone authentication system using a digital certificate
US5924025A (en) * 1996-10-25 1999-07-13 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. System and method for detection of redial fraud in a cellular telephone system
US5946618A (en) * 1996-11-04 1999-08-31 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for performing position-based call processing in a mobile telephone system using multiple location mapping schemes
US6073013A (en) * 1996-11-04 2000-06-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for performing position-based call processing in a mobile telephone system
US6208857B1 (en) 1996-11-04 2001-03-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for performing position-and preference-based service selection in a mobile telephone system
US6058301A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-05-02 Airtouch Communications, Inc. Cellular fraud prevention using selective roaming
US7054271B2 (en) 1996-12-06 2006-05-30 Ipco, Llc Wireless network system and method for providing same
US8982856B2 (en) 1996-12-06 2015-03-17 Ipco, Llc Systems and methods for facilitating wireless network communication, satellite-based wireless network systems, and aircraft-based wireless network systems, and related methods
SE9604601L (en) * 1996-12-16 1998-06-17 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Device, system and method of access to and control of telecommunications
US5873043A (en) * 1996-12-18 1999-02-16 Cellemetry Llc System for communicating messages via a forward overhead control channel
US6108424A (en) * 1997-01-09 2000-08-22 U.S. Philips Corporation Mobile radio telephone station comprising a protection system for at least one authentication number and method of protecting an authentication number
US6111955A (en) * 1997-02-07 2000-08-29 Lucent Technologies Inc. Security in cellular telephones
US5999807A (en) * 1997-02-28 1999-12-07 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. System and method for the verification of authentic telephone numbers in a wireless telephone system
US5956634A (en) * 1997-02-28 1999-09-21 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. System and method for detection of fraud in a wireless telephone system
US5970405A (en) * 1997-02-28 1999-10-19 Cellular Technical Services Co., Inc. Apparatus and method for preventing fraudulent calls in a wireless telephone system using destination and fingerprint analysis
US5999806A (en) * 1997-02-28 1999-12-07 Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. Waveform collection for use in wireless telephone identification
US5983093A (en) * 1997-08-06 1999-11-09 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Wireless terminal and wireless telecommunications system adapted to prevent the theft of wireless service
DE19740560B4 (en) * 1997-09-15 2004-02-19 Siemens Ag Method for controlling the access authorizations of telecommunication devices at remote stations in telecommunication systems with wireless telecommunication between the telecommunication devices and the remote stations
US6222440B1 (en) * 1998-02-23 2001-04-24 Freshloc Technologies, Inc. Location, identification and telemetry system using strobed signals at predetermined intervals
US6223290B1 (en) * 1998-05-07 2001-04-24 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for preventing the fraudulent use of a cellular telephone
US6311056B1 (en) 1998-05-21 2001-10-30 Cellemetry Llc Method and system for expanding the data capacity of a cellular network control channel
US6724895B1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2004-04-20 Supersensor (Proprietary) Limited Electronic identification system and method with source authenticity verification
US8410931B2 (en) 1998-06-22 2013-04-02 Sipco, Llc Mobile inventory unit monitoring systems and methods
US6914893B2 (en) 1998-06-22 2005-07-05 Statsignal Ipc, Llc System and method for monitoring and controlling remote devices
US6437692B1 (en) 1998-06-22 2002-08-20 Statsignal Systems, Inc. System and method for monitoring and controlling remote devices
US6891838B1 (en) 1998-06-22 2005-05-10 Statsignal Ipc, Llc System and method for monitoring and controlling residential devices
US6665530B1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2003-12-16 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for preventing replay attacks in wireless communication
US6320873B1 (en) 1998-08-27 2001-11-20 Qualcomm Incorporated CDMA transmission of packet-switched data
US6145084A (en) * 1998-10-08 2000-11-07 Net I Trust Adaptive communication system enabling dissimilar devices to exchange information over a network
US6236852B1 (en) * 1998-12-11 2001-05-22 Nortel Networks Limited Authentication failure trigger method and apparatus
JP2000244655A (en) * 1999-02-18 2000-09-08 Fujitsu Ltd Network system having secrecy service function
US7650425B2 (en) 1999-03-18 2010-01-19 Sipco, Llc System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system
US6738647B1 (en) 1999-04-23 2004-05-18 Numerex Corporation Method and system for expanding the data payload of data messages transported via a cellular network control channel
FI112315B (en) * 1999-05-11 2003-11-14 Nokia Corp Integrity protection method for radio network signaling
US6718177B1 (en) 1999-09-20 2004-04-06 Cellemetry, Llc System for communicating messages via a forward overhead control channel for a programmable logic control device
US7783508B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2010-08-24 Numerex Corp. Method and system for refining vending operations based on wireless data
US6708038B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2004-03-16 General Electric Company Vehicle communications system
US6856808B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2005-02-15 Cellmetry, Llc Interconnect system and method for multiple protocol short message services
US6771776B1 (en) * 1999-11-11 2004-08-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for re-synchronization of a stream cipher during handoff
US7131006B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2006-10-31 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Cryptographic techniques for a communications network
US7409543B1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2008-08-05 Digitalpersona, Inc. Method and apparatus for using a third party authentication server
FI109864B (en) * 2000-03-30 2002-10-15 Nokia Corp Subscriber authentication
IL135992A (en) * 2000-05-05 2006-08-20 Diversinet Corp Method for adding a communication device in a secure communication system
US7546141B2 (en) * 2000-05-23 2009-06-09 Robert Leon Hybrid communication system and method
US7197563B2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2007-03-27 Invicta Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for distributed network protection
KR100405757B1 (en) * 2000-10-20 2003-11-14 블루솔텍(주) Control system for door and indoor appliances by using radio communication
US7245928B2 (en) 2000-10-27 2007-07-17 Cellemetry, Llc Method and system for improved short message services
US7023995B2 (en) * 2000-12-08 2006-04-04 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Secure location-based services system and method
US6985587B2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2006-01-10 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Method and system for calling line authenticated key distribution
US20020087875A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-07-04 Adams Thomas Lee Method and system for calling line authentication
US7289623B2 (en) * 2001-01-16 2007-10-30 Utbk, Inc. System and method for an online speaker patch-through
US8554617B2 (en) 2007-10-02 2013-10-08 Ingenio Llc Systems and methods to provide alternative connections for real time communications
CA2331558A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-07-18 Frank E. Bunn System and method for multiplexing wireless devices
US7137000B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2006-11-14 Zih Corp. Method and apparatus for article authentication
CA2464622C (en) * 2001-10-24 2014-08-12 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for authenticated access of a station to local data networks, in particular radio data networks
US7480501B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2009-01-20 Statsignal Ipc, Llc System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network
US8489063B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2013-07-16 Sipco, Llc Systems and methods for providing emergency messages to a mobile device
US7424527B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2008-09-09 Sipco, Llc System and method for transmitting pollution information over an integrated wireless network
EP1313335A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2003-05-21 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method, apparatus and program for determining and checking a permission to set up a connection
US6718237B1 (en) 2002-03-28 2004-04-06 Numerex Investment Corp. Method for reducing capacity demands for conveying geographic location information over capacity constrained wireless systems
US20030216987A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-11-20 Cassandra Mollett Systems and methods for accessing and using phone number validation information
US20030225686A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-12-04 Cassandra Mollett Systems and methods for selective validation of phone numbers
US20030216988A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-11-20 Cassandra Mollett Systems and methods for using phone number validation in a risk assessment
US20070013547A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2007-01-18 Boaz Jon A Automated meter reading system, communication and control network from automated meter reading, meter data collector, and associated methods
US7400264B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2008-07-15 Energy Technology Group, Inc. Automated meter reading system, communication and control network for automated meter reading, meter data collector, and associated methods
US7304587B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2007-12-04 Energy Technology Group, Inc. Automated meter reading system, communication and control network for automated meter reading, meter data collector program product, and associated methods
US7302570B2 (en) * 2003-08-19 2007-11-27 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, system, and method for authorized remote access to a target system
US8160580B2 (en) * 2003-09-15 2012-04-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for home carrier determination using a centralized server
US7323970B1 (en) 2004-01-21 2008-01-29 Numerex Corporation Method and system for remote interaction with a vehicle via wireless communication
US7756086B2 (en) 2004-03-03 2010-07-13 Sipco, Llc Method for communicating in dual-modes
US8031650B2 (en) 2004-03-03 2011-10-04 Sipco, Llc System and method for monitoring remote devices with a dual-mode wireless communication protocol
US8522039B2 (en) * 2004-06-09 2013-08-27 Apple Inc. Method and apparatus for establishing a federated identity using a personal wireless device
KR100813822B1 (en) * 2004-07-01 2008-03-17 모토로라 인코포레이티드 A method and a system for operating an ambiance listening mode in a wireless communication system
GB2415862B (en) * 2004-07-01 2007-03-28 Motorola Inc A method and a system for operating an ambience listening mode in a wireless communication system
WO2006081206A1 (en) 2005-01-25 2006-08-03 Sipco, Llc Wireless network protocol systems and methods
US8028039B1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2011-09-27 Reflexis Systems, Inc. System and method for communicating data between wireless mobile hand-held computer and a back-end computer system
WO2007136723A2 (en) 2006-05-17 2007-11-29 Numerex Corp. System and method for prolonging wireless data product's life
EP2118858A4 (en) 2007-02-06 2010-03-31 Numerex Corp Service escrowed transportable wireless event reporting system
JP5423916B2 (en) * 2013-02-25 2014-02-19 富士通株式会社 Communication method
US9832646B2 (en) * 2013-09-13 2017-11-28 Network Kinetix, LLC System and method for an automated system for continuous observation, audit and control of user activities as they occur within a mobile network

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4023012A (en) * 1974-07-08 1977-05-10 Omron Tateisi Electronics Co. System for verifying the user of a card
US4315101A (en) * 1979-02-05 1982-02-09 Atalla Technovations Method and apparatus for securing data transmissions
US4814741A (en) * 1986-04-30 1989-03-21 Mitsubishi Denki K.K. Digital remote control device

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4048475A (en) * 1974-03-07 1977-09-13 Omron Tateisi Electronics Company Apparatus for checking the user of a card in card-actuated machines
US4034013A (en) * 1975-11-13 1977-07-05 Rohm And Haas Company Impact and melt strength improvement of poly(alkylene terephthalate)
US4281215A (en) * 1978-05-03 1981-07-28 Atalla Technovations Method and apparatus for securing data transmissions
GB2020513B (en) * 1978-05-03 1982-12-22 Atalla Technovations Method and apparatus for securing data transmissions
US4535333A (en) * 1982-09-23 1985-08-13 Chamberlain Manufacturing Corporation Transmitter and receiver for controlling remote elements
DE3410937A1 (en) * 1984-03-24 1985-10-03 Philips Patentverwaltung Gmbh, 2000 Hamburg Method for identifying the unauthorised use of an identifier
DE3420460A1 (en) * 1984-06-01 1985-12-05 Philips Patentverwaltung Gmbh, 2000 Hamburg METHOD FOR DETECTING THE UNAUTHORIZED USE OF AN IDENTIFICATION ASSIGNED TO A MOVABLE RADIO STATION IN A RADIO TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
DE3439120A1 (en) * 1984-10-25 1986-05-07 Philips Kommunikations Industrie AG, 8500 Nürnberg Method for identifying a subscriber station of a telecommunications network
US4998279A (en) * 1984-11-30 1991-03-05 Weiss Kenneth P Method and apparatus for personal verification utilizing nonpredictable codes and biocharacteristics
JPS61199342A (en) * 1985-02-28 1986-09-03 Tamura Electric Works Ltd Cordless telephone set
US4761808A (en) * 1987-03-18 1988-08-02 Sheldon Howard Time code telephone security access system
US4992783A (en) * 1988-04-04 1991-02-12 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling access to a communication system
SE465797B (en) * 1990-03-07 1991-10-28 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M PROCEDURE TO TRANSFER SYNCHRONIZATION INFORMATION FOR CRYPED TRANSFER IN A MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM
SE465800B (en) * 1990-03-09 1991-10-28 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M PROCEDURE TO PERFORM PROPERTY CHECKING BETWEEN A BASE STATION AND A MOBILE STATION IN A MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM
NZ238651A (en) * 1990-07-20 1994-04-27 Ericsson Ge Mobile Communicat Encryption system for digital cellular communications
US5091942A (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-02-25 Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Holding, Inc. Authentication system for digital cellular communications
US5081679A (en) * 1990-07-20 1992-01-14 Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Holding Inc. Resynchronization of encryption systems upon handoff

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4023012A (en) * 1974-07-08 1977-05-10 Omron Tateisi Electronics Co. System for verifying the user of a card
US4315101A (en) * 1979-02-05 1982-02-09 Atalla Technovations Method and apparatus for securing data transmissions
US4814741A (en) * 1986-04-30 1989-03-21 Mitsubishi Denki K.K. Digital remote control device

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0584725A1 (en) * 1992-08-19 1994-03-02 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method of authentication with improved security for secrecy of authentication key
US5524135A (en) * 1994-02-14 1996-06-04 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for secure downloading of operational information into a wireless communications device
CN1071532C (en) * 1994-02-14 2001-09-19 索尼电子有限公司 Method and apparatus for secure downloading of operational information into a wireless communications device
WO1998032306A2 (en) * 1997-01-15 1998-07-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for providing authentication security in a wireless communication system
WO1998032306A3 (en) * 1997-01-15 1998-11-26 Qualcomm Inc Method and apparatus for providing authentication security in a wireless communication system
US5943615A (en) * 1997-01-15 1999-08-24 Qualcomm, Incorpoarated Method and apparatus for providing authentication security in a wireless communication system
GB2322998A (en) * 1997-02-20 1998-09-09 Vodafone Ltd Method of Interconnecting Communication Networks
US6118993A (en) * 1998-01-05 2000-09-12 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Effective use of dialed digits in call origination
EP0933957A1 (en) * 1998-01-05 1999-08-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Effective use of dialed digits in call origination
KR100665946B1 (en) * 1998-01-05 2007-01-10 루센트 테크놀러지스 인크 Effective use of dialed digits in call origination
EP1341392A1 (en) * 1998-07-08 2003-09-03 Intel Corporation A method for maintaining an authenticated virtual connection to a network node
WO2000027156A1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2000-05-11 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method of authenticating a mobile station handing-off from an anchor exchange to a serving exchange
USRE40791E1 (en) 1999-06-15 2009-06-23 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and system for verifying the authenticity of a first communication participants in a communications network
US8565429B2 (en) 1999-06-15 2013-10-22 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and system for veryfying the authenticity of a first communication participants in a communications network
GB2359464A (en) * 1999-09-27 2001-08-22 Simoco Int Ltd Handover of a mobile station between base stations without passing of the air interface encryption key over the air interface
EP1534042A1 (en) * 2003-11-20 2005-05-25 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for global authentication with continuity during handoff to a neighboring mobile switching center

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5239294A (en) 1993-08-24
JPH05508274A (en) 1993-11-18
JP2750638B2 (en) 1998-05-13
MX9100231A (en) 1992-02-28
CA2087433C (en) 1998-11-17
CA2087433A1 (en) 1992-01-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5239294A (en) Method and apparatus for authenication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems
CA2141318C (en) Method and apparatus for efficient real-time authentication and encryption in a communication system
US5572193A (en) Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunications systems
EP1168870B1 (en) An improved method for an authentication of a user subscription identity module
EP0506637B1 (en) Cellular verification and validation system
US5241598A (en) Rolling key resynchronization in cellular verification and validation system
US6023689A (en) Method for secure communication in a telecommunications system
US5513245A (en) Automatic generation of private authentication key for wireless communication systems
EP1603361B1 (en) A self-synchronizing authentication and key agreement protocol
US6532290B1 (en) Authentication methods
JP2012110009A (en) Methods and arrangements for secure linking of entity authentication and ciphering key generation
CA2063447C (en) Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunication systems
JPH07264668A (en) Authenticating method for mobile communication
Zheng Enhancing Security in GSM
Duraiappan Security issues in mobile communications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2087433

Country of ref document: CA