WO1989000746A1 - Improvements relating to noise reduction systems - Google Patents

Improvements relating to noise reduction systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1989000746A1
WO1989000746A1 PCT/GB1988/000581 GB8800581W WO8900746A1 WO 1989000746 A1 WO1989000746 A1 WO 1989000746A1 GB 8800581 W GB8800581 W GB 8800581W WO 8900746 A1 WO8900746 A1 WO 8900746A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
filter
feedback loop
gain
region
microphone
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1988/000581
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Robert Christopher Twiney
Anthony John Salloway
Original Assignee
Plessey Overseas Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB878717040A external-priority patent/GB8717040D0/en
Priority claimed from GB878717043A external-priority patent/GB8717043D0/en
Priority claimed from GB878717042A external-priority patent/GB8717042D0/en
Application filed by Plessey Overseas Limited filed Critical Plessey Overseas Limited
Priority to AT88905991T priority Critical patent/ATE82083T1/en
Priority to DE8888905991T priority patent/DE3875717T2/en
Publication of WO1989000746A1 publication Critical patent/WO1989000746A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1785Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices
    • G10K11/17853Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices of the filter
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1781Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions
    • G10K11/17821Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions characterised by the analysis of the input signals only
    • G10K11/17825Error signals
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1787General system configurations
    • G10K11/17875General system configurations using an error signal without a reference signal, e.g. pure feedback
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1787General system configurations
    • G10K11/17885General system configurations additionally using a desired external signal, e.g. pass-through audio such as music or speech
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/10Applications
    • G10K2210/108Communication systems, e.g. where useful sound is kept and noise is cancelled
    • G10K2210/1081Earphones, e.g. for telephones, ear protectors or headsets
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3028Filtering, e.g. Kalman filters or special analogue or digital filters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3039Nonlinear, e.g. clipping, numerical truncation, thresholding or variable input and output gain
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3045Multiple acoustic inputs, single acoustic output

Definitions

  • This invention relates to systems for reducing the level of acoustic noise fields within ear-defenders or earphone structures worn by personnel (e.g., pilots, vehicle drivers, military personnel) in high noise environments.
  • personnel e.g., pilots, vehicle drivers, military personnel
  • Known active noise reduction (ANR) systems for reducing the acoustic noise field in ear-defenders comprise noise pick-up microphones and noise-canceling sound generators (usually known as loudspeakers) mounted within the internal cavities or enclosures of the respective ear-defenders.
  • the noise pick-up microphones produce electrical signal outputs in response to the acoustic noise fields within the cavities and these signal outputs are phase inverted, filtered and amplified in a feedback loop and fed to the noise-canceling sound generators which produce noise- canceling acoustic signals of substantially the same amplitude but of opposite phase to the acoustic noise field waveforms.
  • the design considerations underlying such ANR systems are described in "Some design considerations for earphone active noise reduction systems", Twiney et al., Vol. 2, pp.95-102, Proc. Spring Conference, 1985, York, Institute of Acoustics.
  • a further problem which occurs is that due to the imperfect transfer functions of both the microphone and generator, the total bandwidth for feedback signals having an appropriate phase is limited, being bounded by regions in which positive feedback occurs. It is usual to employ in feedback systems in general a lowpass first order filter operating at a high frequency in order to stabilize the loop. However such first order low pass filters are not appropriate for filtering out sound energy frequencies in ANR systems because of the large phase changes which occur in the cut-off regions which give rise to problems of positive feedback and signal enhancement. IT was previously thought, as appears from the article referred to above, that electronic processing to overcome problems in ANR systems had limited application because of the causal relation between amplitude and phase response of electronic filters.
  • the present invention provides in a first aspect an active noise reduction system comprising :- a noise-canceling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, a feedback loop connected between the microphone and the generator, the feedback loop including loop stabilisation means for filtering and inverting the phase of the microphone signal and means for amplifying the microphone signal, and the feedback loop further including high pass frequency filter means for filtering out low frequency sound energy from high pressure sound pulses arising from buffets at low frequency.
  • this aspect of the invention is based on the recognition that the major part of sound energy in high pressure pulses is present at low frequencies say below 100 Hz and thus the provision of low frequency filter means in the feedback loop can reduce a major part of the sound energy in the pulses.
  • Such further filter means is conveniently referred to as an anti-buffet filter (ABF).
  • ABF anti-buffet filter
  • Said further filter means may be used in conjunction with a voltage limiting means, which prevents the generator from being overdriven by amplification of high pressure sound pulses.
  • a voltage limiting means may comprise a non-linear amplifier or zener diode arrangement.
  • the present invention provides an active noise reduction system comprising: - a noise cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, and a feedback loop connected between said microphone and said generator, wherein said feedback loop comprises: loop stabilisation means for inverting the phase of microphone signals and filtering the microphone signals, and means for amplifying the phase inverted and filtered signals; and, further filter means coupled between the phase inverting means and the amplifying means for increasing loop gain and/or adjusting phase shift by predetermined amounts within one or more predetermined frequency bands.
  • the further filter means is conveniently termed an anti-enhancement filter (AEF).
  • AEF anti-enhancement filter
  • This further aspect of the invention is based on our discovery that enhancement problems caused by transducer imperfections arise in a frequency region centred at about 500 Hz where the gain decreases whereas the phase lag in this area increases to about 3 ⁇ /2.
  • a high pass filter which adjusts the gain in this region whilst providing a phase advance compensating phase shift can significantly reduce the problems of signal enhancement.
  • an active noise reduction system comprising:- a noise-cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, a feedback loop connected between the microphone and the generator, the feedback loop including loop stabilisation means for filtering and inverting the phase of the microphone signal and means for amplifying the microphone signal, and the feedback loop further including low pass frequency filter means for filtering out high frequency sound energy, the gain of the filter in the cut-off region having a step shape, decreasing from a relatively high constant gain region to a relatively low constant gain region in a transitional region where the gain decreases continuously from the high region to the low region.
  • phase change will be kept much smaller than that which would occur with a first order low pass filter and by careful application the ANR bandwidth can be increased whilst signal enhancement kept to acceptable levels.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an active noise reduction system according to the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of a preferred anti-buffet (ABF)filter
  • Figure 3 is a graph of the ABF characteristics
  • Figure 4 is a circuit diagram of a preferred anti-enhancement filter (AEF), and Figure 5 is a graph of the filter characteristics;
  • Figure 6 is a circuit diagram of a low pass filter for defining an upper limit of the feedback loop bandwidth
  • Figure 7 is a graph of the low pass filter characteristics
  • Figure 8 is a circuit diagram of an ABEF combining both AEF and ABF characteristics
  • Figure 9 is a graph of the transfer functions of the ABEF of figure 8.
  • the active noise reduction system illustrated comprises a generally cup-shaped circumaural earphone structure 1 arranged to enclose the wearer's ear 2.
  • the rim of the structure 1 is cushioned against the side of the wearer's head 3 by means of a compliant ring cushion 4.
  • the earphone structure 1 embodies a small noise pick-up microphone 5, which detects the noise within the earphone adjacent to the wearer's ear 2 and provides an electrical output dependent upon the detected noise.
  • This output signal from the microphone is passed through an anti-buffet filter 6, a loop stabilisation unit 7,a low-pass filter 8, an anti-enhancement filter 10 and amplifier 12, to a noise cancelling sound generator (loudspeaker) 14 which is mounted on a baffle 16 within structure 1.
  • Loop stabilisation unit 7 includes a phase inverter 72, a loop stabilizing filter 74 for filtering out very high frequencies, and a voltage limiting circuit 76 comprising a zener diode switching arrangement for limiting high amplitude input signals.
  • Filter 6 is placed first in the feedback loop in order to minimise signal values in the loop.
  • the effect of the anti-enhancement filter is to reduce noise effects arising from imperfect transfer functions of microphone 5 and generator 14.
  • a speech signal is injected between anti-enhancement filter 10 and amplifier 12 at an input node 18.
  • the introduction of the speech signal at this point allows the speech signal to be substantially uncoloured by the loop filters.
  • the speech signals may be pre-emphasised by amplification where they may be attenuated by the ANR system.
  • the ABF 6 comprises an amplifier 20 having a negative feedback loop with a resistor Rl connected to its inverting input, which receives an input signal from a resistive/capacitive network R2, R3, Cl.
  • the non-inverting input of the amplifier is connected through a resistor R4 to ground.
  • ABF 6 The characteristics of ABF 6 are shown in Figure 3, whence it may be seen that the filter has a loss factor of about 8db up to about 100 Hz at which frequency the loss reduces continuously until at about 500Hz the filter exhibits a small gain factor.
  • phase shift introduced by the filter rises in the transitional region to a maximum at about 200 Hz. This phase shift must be taken into account when considering the overall loop stability.
  • the effect of the ABF 6 on the overall feedback loop transfer function is to attenuate the low frequency end of the function whereby noise in the frequency range up to 200Hz is severely attenuated.
  • AEF The preferred form of AEF is shown in Figure 4 as comprising two cascaded stages 20, 22, each stage comprising an amplifier 24 with a resistor Rl in a negative feedback loop and with the inverting amplifier input being connected to ground via the series combination of a resistor R2 and capacitor Cl.
  • the filter characteristics are shown in Figure 5 with the gain having an step- form, being roughly Odb up to 100 Hz and then rising to lOdb gain at 1 kHz.
  • the phase shift rises in die region in which the gain changes, having a maximum value of 25° at roughly 500 Hz.
  • the gain reduces to a minimum value at about 500 Hz whereas the phase shift in this area rises to a maximum of about more than 3 ⁇ /2.
  • the transfer functions are modified in this area to reduce phase shift and increase gain, thereby reducing signal enhancement.
  • a circuit diagram of low pass filter 8 is shown in Figure 6 as comprising a transitional second order filter including an amplifier 10 having a non-inverting input connected to a filter input via resistors Rl, R2 and a capacitor Cl coupled between the amplifier input and ground.
  • Two feedback loops are provided from the amplifier output to the non-inverting input: a first loop including a capacitor C2 and a second loop comprising resistors R3, R4, R5 and a capacitor C3 in series with a resistor R9 connected between resistors R4, R5 and ground.
  • a further feedback loop is provided comprising a resistor R7 connected between the amplifier output and the inverting amplifier input.
  • a further resistor R8 is connected between resistor R7 and ground.
  • phase shift across the filter is roughly 150° in the region below 1,000Hz and above 10,000Hz, but decreases to a minimum of about 45° in the centre of the cut-off region.
  • phase change of roughly 105° is acceptable and is much smaller than 180 degrees resulting from a second order low-pass filter.Although a second order filter is shown, the filter could be a higher or lower order if desired.
  • the filter is a second order filter comprising two filter sections connected in cascade, the filter sections being identical, (i f desired a first order filter could be employed).
  • Each filter section comprises an input port 80 coupled to the inverting input of an amplifier 82 through a resistance Rl connected in parallel with a capacitance Cl and a resistance R2.
  • the non-inverting input of the amplifier is connected to ground via a resistance R3, and the output of the amplifier 86 is connected in a negative feedback loop to the inverting input of the amplifier via a resistor R4.
  • the gain is slightly greater than Odb up to about 500 Hz and then rises to about lOdb at a frequency of 2 kHz in a transitional region between 500Hz-2kHz.
  • the phase shift changes from a constant level of about 0° to a maximum value of -30° at about 1 kHz.
  • the filters shown may be replaced by digital filters, and the elements of the feedback loop may be digitised by employing a micro-computer with appropriate routines.
  • the invention claimed is intended to cover both analog and digital systems.

Abstract

Active noise reduction systems. In order to overcome problems in an active noise reduction system of sound buffets at low frequency and signal enhancement caused by imperfect transfer functions of a noise cancelling sound generator and a microphone, one or more high pass filters for reducing low frequency signals are provided in a feedback loop between the sound generator and microphone. A low pass filter is provided for extending the bandwidth of the system but which does not introduce unduly large phase shifts.

Description

IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO NOISE REDUCTION SYSTEMS
This invention relates to systems for reducing the level of acoustic noise fields within ear-defenders or earphone structures worn by personnel (e.g., pilots, vehicle drivers, military personnel) in high noise environments.
Known active noise reduction (ANR) systems for reducing the acoustic noise field in ear-defenders comprise noise pick-up microphones and noise-canceling sound generators (usually known as loudspeakers) mounted within the internal cavities or enclosures of the respective ear-defenders. The noise pick-up microphones produce electrical signal outputs in response to the acoustic noise fields within the cavities and these signal outputs are phase inverted, filtered and amplified in a feedback loop and fed to the noise-canceling sound generators which produce noise- canceling acoustic signals of substantially the same amplitude but of opposite phase to the acoustic noise field waveforms. The design considerations underlying such ANR systems are described in "Some design considerations for earphone active noise reduction systems", Twiney et al., Vol. 2, pp.95-102, Proc. Spring Conference, 1985, York, Institute of Acoustics.
Problems arise through inherent imperfections in the pick-up microphones and sound generators, by way of unwanted phase changes producing'' signal enhancement or by way of failure to cope with large amplitude signals in certain frequency regions.
One problem which occurs is that of large pressure pulses (buffets) which occur inside an ear-defender or earphone structure due to relative movement between the human head and the earphone, or propagate to the earphone from a device that causes a rapid pressure change, e.g. a gun, helicopter, vehicle, explosive device. These pulses are very high in amplitude, and create large signals in the feedback loop as a result of high system loop gain. Due to the inadequacy of the sound generator to produce enough sound output, drive voltages appear at the sound generators which are higher than the maximum input voltage, and may overdrive the sound generator and cause permanent failure.
Another problem which arises is that of signal enhancement at certain frequencies within the bandwidth of the feedback loop wherein due to imperfect transfer functions of the noise pickup microphone and sound generator the ANR will, at certain frequencies be feeding in-phase(i.e. positive feedback) signals rather than anti-phase(i.e. negative feedback) signals to the sound generator.
A further problem which occurs is that due to the imperfect transfer functions of both the microphone and generator, the total bandwidth for feedback signals having an appropriate phase is limited, being bounded by regions in which positive feedback occurs. It is usual to employ in feedback systems in general a lowpass first order filter operating at a high frequency in order to stabilize the loop. However such first order low pass filters are not appropriate for filtering out sound energy frequencies in ANR systems because of the large phase changes which occur in the cut-off regions which give rise to problems of positive feedback and signal enhancement. IT was previously thought, as appears from the article referred to above, that electronic processing to overcome problems in ANR systems had limited application because of the causal relation between amplitude and phase response of electronic filters.
Nevertheless it has now been found as a result of careful investigation into the problems, arising in feedback loops of ANR systems, that electronic processing may be used to advantage.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome one or more of the above problems.
Accordingly the present invention provides in a first aspect an active noise reduction system comprising :- a noise-canceling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, a feedback loop connected between the microphone and the generator, the feedback loop including loop stabilisation means for filtering and inverting the phase of the microphone signal and means for amplifying the microphone signal, and the feedback loop further including high pass frequency filter means for filtering out low frequency sound energy from high pressure sound pulses arising from buffets at low frequency.
Thus this aspect of the invention is based on the recognition that the major part of sound energy in high pressure pulses is present at low frequencies say below 100 Hz and thus the provision of low frequency filter means in the feedback loop can reduce a major part of the sound energy in the pulses. Such further filter means is conveniently referred to as an anti-buffet filter (ABF). The amount of ABF correction is limited because stability of the feedback loop must be maintained, the total loop gain being kept below unity where the total phase shift may cause constructive interference
Said further filter means may be used in conjunction with a voltage limiting means, which prevents the generator from being overdriven by amplification of high pressure sound pulses. Such voltage limiting means may comprise a non-linear amplifier or zener diode arrangement.
It is also an object of the present invention to overcome the problem of signal enhancement with a simple and effective mechanism.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides an active noise reduction system comprising: - a noise cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, and a feedback loop connected between said microphone and said generator, wherein said feedback loop comprises: loop stabilisation means for inverting the phase of microphone signals and filtering the microphone signals, and means for amplifying the phase inverted and filtered signals; and, further filter means coupled between the phase inverting means and the amplifying means for increasing loop gain and/or adjusting phase shift by predetermined amounts within one or more predetermined frequency bands.
Thus in accordance with the invention, the provision of further filter means increasing gain or adjusting phase shift, preferably both, prevents enhancement of the signal in the feedback loop arising from imperfect transfer functions of the microphone and generator. The further filter means is conveniently termed an anti-enhancement filter (AEF). The amount of AEF correction is limited by the need to maintain stability of the feedback loop (the total loop gain must be kept below unity when the total phase shift may cause constructive interference).
This further aspect of the invention is based on our discovery that enhancement problems caused by transducer imperfections arise in a frequency region centred at about 500 Hz where the gain decreases whereas the phase lag in this area increases to about 3π/2. Thus a high pass filter which adjusts the gain in this region whilst providing a phase advance compensating phase shift can significantly reduce the problems of signal enhancement.
In a particularly preferred form of the invention, it has been discovered as a result of careful investigation into the operability of ANR systems that the functions of the ABF and AEF , which operate at different frequencies and with different transfer functions can be accomplished by the use of a single high pass filter (ABEF) for attenuating frequencies below a predetermined frequency, the ABEF having appropriate transfer characteristics to prevent phase shifts harmful to loop stability.
As mentioned above, it is normal to employ in ANR systems loop stabilisation filters which include low pass filters for reducing the gain at high frequencies to prevent loop instability. It has now been discovered that the problem of low pass filters producing unduly large phase changes at the high end of the feedback loop bandwidth can be avoided and the present invention provides in a further aspect an active noise reduction system comprising:- a noise-cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, a feedback loop connected between the microphone and the generator, the feedback loop including loop stabilisation means for filtering and inverting the phase of the microphone signal and means for amplifying the microphone signal, and the feedback loop further including low pass frequency filter means for filtering out high frequency sound energy, the gain of the filter in the cut-off region having a step shape, decreasing from a relatively high constant gain region to a relatively low constant gain region in a transitional region where the gain decreases continuously from the high region to the low region.
By providing a cut-off filter characteristic having a step function in the cut-off region, the phase change will be kept much smaller than that which would occur with a first order low pass filter and by careful application the ANR bandwidth can be increased whilst signal enhancement kept to acceptable levels.
As preferred speech signals are injected at a single point in the feedback loop between the AEF and the amplifying means, in order that the speech signals are substantially uncoloured by the AEF and other filters.lt will be understood that the speech signals are in a frequency range which is for the most part above the frequency range in which the ANR is operative and the speech signals are not therefore reduced. They may however be affected by higher frequency filters in the feedback loop. A preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawing wherein :-
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an active noise reduction system according to the present invention;
Figure 2 is a circuit diagram of a preferred anti-buffet (ABF)filter;
Figure 3 is a graph of the ABF characteristics;
Figure 4 is a circuit diagram of a preferred anti-enhancement filter (AEF), and Figure 5 is a graph of the filter characteristics;
Figure 6 is a circuit diagram of a low pass filter for defining an upper limit of the feedback loop bandwidth;
Figure 7 is a graph of the low pass filter characteristics;
Figure 8 is a circuit diagram of an ABEF combining both AEF and ABF characteristics;
Figure 9 is a graph of the transfer functions of the ABEF of figure 8.
Referring to Figure 1 of the Drawings, the active noise reduction system illustrated comprises a generally cup-shaped circumaural earphone structure 1 arranged to enclose the wearer's ear 2. The rim of the structure 1 is cushioned against the side of the wearer's head 3 by means of a compliant ring cushion 4. The earphone structure 1 embodies a small noise pick-up microphone 5, which detects the noise within the earphone adjacent to the wearer's ear 2 and provides an electrical output dependent upon the detected noise. This output signal from the microphone is passed through an anti-buffet filter 6, a loop stabilisation unit 7,a low-pass filter 8, an anti-enhancement filter 10 and amplifier 12, to a noise cancelling sound generator (loudspeaker) 14 which is mounted on a baffle 16 within structure 1. Loop stabilisation unit 7 includes a phase inverter 72, a loop stabilizing filter 74 for filtering out very high frequencies, and a voltage limiting circuit 76 comprising a zener diode switching arrangement for limiting high amplitude input signals. Filter 6 is placed first in the feedback loop in order to minimise signal values in the loop. The effect of the anti-enhancement filter is to reduce noise effects arising from imperfect transfer functions of microphone 5 and generator 14.
A speech signal is injected between anti-enhancement filter 10 and amplifier 12 at an input node 18. The introduction of the speech signal at this point allows the speech signal to be substantially uncoloured by the loop filters. If desired the speech signals may be pre-emphasised by amplification where they may be attenuated by the ANR system.
Referring to Figure 2, the ABF 6 comprises an amplifier 20 having a negative feedback loop with a resistor Rl connected to its inverting input, which receives an input signal from a resistive/capacitive network R2, R3, Cl. The non-inverting input of the amplifier is connected through a resistor R4 to ground.
The characteristics of ABF 6 are shown in Figure 3, whence it may be seen that the filter has a loss factor of about 8db up to about 100 Hz at which frequency the loss reduces continuously until at about 500Hz the filter exhibits a small gain factor.
The phase shift introduced by the filter rises in the transitional region to a maximum at about 200 Hz. This phase shift must be taken into account when considering the overall loop stability. The effect of the ABF 6 on the overall feedback loop transfer function is to attenuate the low frequency end of the function whereby noise in the frequency range up to 200Hz is severely attenuated.
The preferred form of AEF is shown in Figure 4 as comprising two cascaded stages 20, 22, each stage comprising an amplifier 24 with a resistor Rl in a negative feedback loop and with the inverting amplifier input being connected to ground via the series combination of a resistor R2 and capacitor Cl. The filter characteristics are shown in Figure 5 with the gain having an step- form, being roughly Odb up to 100 Hz and then rising to lOdb gain at 1 kHz. The phase shift rises in die region in which the gain changes, having a maximum value of 25° at roughly 500 Hz.
Because of the precise transfer functions of the microphone and generator, the gain reduces to a minimum value at about 500 Hz whereas the phase shift in this area rises to a maximum of about more than 3π/2. By providing AEF, the transfer functions are modified in this area to reduce phase shift and increase gain, thereby reducing signal enhancement.
A circuit diagram of low pass filter 8 is shown in Figure 6 as comprising a transitional second order filter including an amplifier 10 having a non-inverting input connected to a filter input via resistors Rl, R2 and a capacitor Cl coupled between the amplifier input and ground. Two feedback loops are provided from the amplifier output to the non-inverting input: a first loop including a capacitor C2 and a second loop comprising resistors R3, R4, R5 and a capacitor C3 in series with a resistor R9 connected between resistors R4, R5 and ground. A further feedback loop is provided comprising a resistor R7 connected between the amplifier output and the inverting amplifier input. A further resistor R8 is connected between resistor R7 and ground.
The characteristics of the filter are shown in Figure 7 where the gain is close to Odb up to about 1000Hz and is about -30db around 10,000Hz. The gain decreases between these regions relatively quickly in a cut-off region.
The phase shift across the filter is roughly 150° in the region below 1,000Hz and above 10,000Hz, but decreases to a minimum of about 45° in the centre of the cut-off region. Such a phase change of roughly 105° is acceptable and is much smaller than 180 degrees resulting from a second order low-pass filter.Although a second order filter is shown, the filter could be a higher or lower order if desired.
Referring now to Figure 8, there is shown a high pass filter which combines the functions of the AEF and ABF and is herein referred to as an ABEF. The filter is a second order filter comprising two filter sections connected in cascade, the filter sections being identical, (i f desired a first order filter could be employed). Each filter section comprises an input port 80 coupled to the inverting input of an amplifier 82 through a resistance Rl connected in parallel with a capacitance Cl and a resistance R2.The non-inverting input of the amplifier is connected to ground via a resistance R3, and the output of the amplifier 86 is connected in a negative feedback loop to the inverting input of the amplifier via a resistor R4.
Referring now to Figure 9, the characteristics of the filter of Figure 8 are shown where the gain is slightly greater than Odb up to about 500 Hz and then rises to about lOdb at a frequency of 2 kHz in a transitional region between 500Hz-2kHz. The phase shift changes from a constant level of about 0° to a maximum value of -30° at about 1 kHz.
It will be appreciated that although the particular embodiment specifically described is applied to a circumaural earphone structure, the invention may also be applied to other earphone structures such as the supra-aural type.
It will also be appreciated that the filters shown may be replaced by digital filters, and the elements of the feedback loop may be digitised by employing a micro-computer with appropriate routines. The invention claimed is intended to cover both analog and digital systems.

Claims

1. An active noise reduction system comprising:- a noise-cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, and a feedback loop connected between said microphone and said generator, wherein said feedback loop comprises: loop stabilisation means for inverting the phase of microphone signals and filtering the microphone signals, and means for amplifying the phase inverted and filtered signals; and, the feedback loop further including first high pass frequency filter means for filtering out sound energy from high pressure sound pulses arising from low frequency buffets.
2. A system according to claim 1 wherein the further filter means is connected between the microphone and said loop stabilisation means .
3. A system according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the further filter means comprises an amplifier with a negative feedback loop with the input of the filter connected to an inverting amplifier input through a resistive-capacitive combination and with the non- inverting amplifier input connected to reference potential via a resistive connection.
4. A system as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the first filter means has a gain characteristic which is relatively low in a first frequency band and then rises continuously to a relatively high value in a second frequency band, the phase shift introduced by the filter rising to a maximum value in the transitional region of filter gain.
5. A system according to any preceding claim, wherein said loop stabilisation means includes means for limiting the amplitude of the signals in the feedback loop.
6. A system as claimed in any preceding claim, including second high pass filter means coupled between the loop stabilisation means and the amplifying means for increasing loop gain and/or adjusting phase shift by predetermined amounts within one or more predetermined frequency bands to compensate for transfer characteristics of the microphone and generator.
7. A system as claimed in Claim 6 wherein the second filter means has a gain characteristic which is relatively low in a first frequency band and then rises continuously to a relatively high value in a second frequency band, the phase shift introduced by the filter rising to a maximum value in the transitional region of filter gain.
8. A system as claimed in Claim 7 wherein the second filter means includes one or more stages, each stage comprising an amplifier with a negative resistive feedback loop, and a resistive capacitive path to ground connected to the amplifier input.
9. A system as claimed in any of claims 6 to 8 wherein the functions of the first and second filters are provided by a single high pass filter means , with the transfer characteristics selected to filter out sound energy from high pressure sound pulses and to increase loop gain and/or adjust phase shift to compensate for transfer characteristics of the microphone and generator.
10. A system according to any preceding claim wherein a speech signal is injected into the feedback loop between the filters referred to above and the amplifying means.
11. A system according to any preceding claim including a low- pass frequency filter means, the gain of the filter in the cut-off region having a step-shape decreasing from a relatively high constant gain region to a second relatively low constant gain region in a transitional region where the gain decreases continuously from the high region to the low region.
12. A system as claimed in claim 11, wherein the low pass frequency filter means comprises a second order transitional filter comprising an operational amplifier with a resistive-capacitive feedback loop connected between the output and non-inverting amplifier input, and a resistive feedback loop connected between the amplifier output and inverting input.
13. Active noise reduction systems substantially as described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
14. An active noise reduction system comprising:- a noise-cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, and a feedback loop connected between said microphone and said generator, wherein said feedback loop comprises: loop stabilisation means for inverting the phase of microphone signals and filtering the microphone signals, and means for amplifying the phase inverted and filtered signals; and, further filter means coupled between the phase inverting means and the amplifying means for increasing loop gain and/or adjusting phase shift by predetermined amounts within one or more predetermined frequency bands.
15. A system as claimed in Claim 14 wherein the further filter means has a gain characteristic which is relatively low in a first frequency band and then rises continuously to a relatively high value in a second frequency band, the phase shift introduced by the filter rising to a maximum value in the transitional region of filter gain.
16. A system as claimed in Claim 15 wherein the further filter means includes one or more stages, each stage comprising an amplifier with a negative resistive feedback loop, and a resistive capacitive path to ground connected to the amplifier input.
17. A system as claimed in any of claims 14 to 16 wherein a , speech signal is injected into the feedback loop between the further filter means and the amplifying means.
18. A system according to any of claims 14 to 17 including a low pass frequency filter means, the gain of the filter in the cut-off region having a step shape, decreasing from a relatively high constant gain region to a relatively low constant gain region in a transitional region where the gain decreases continuously from the high region to the low region.
19. A system according to claim 18, wherein the low pass filter frequency filter means comprises a second order transitional filter comprising an operational amplifier with a resistive-capacitive feedback loop connected between the output and the non- inverting amplifier input, and a resistive feedback loop connected between the amplifier output and inverting input.
20. An active noise reduction system comprising :- a noise-cancelling sound generator, a microphone acoustically coupled to said generator, and a feedback loop connected between said microphone and said generator, wherein said feedback loop comprises: loop stabilisation means for inverting the phase of microphone signals and filtering the microphone signals, and means for amplifying the phase inverted and filtered signals; and a low pass frequency filter means for defining the upper limit of the feedback loop frequency pass band, the gain of the filter in the cut-off region having a step shape, decreasing from a relatively high constant gain region to a relatively low constant gain region in a transitional region where the gain decreases continuously from the high region to the low region.
21. A system according to claim 20, wherein the low pass filter frequency filter means comprises a second order transitional filter comprising an operational amplifier with a resistive-capacitive feedback loop connected between the output and the non- inverting amplifier input, and a resistive feedback loop connected between the amplifier output and inverting input.
PCT/GB1988/000581 1987-07-20 1988-07-20 Improvements relating to noise reduction systems WO1989000746A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT88905991T ATE82083T1 (en) 1987-07-20 1988-07-20 ARRANGEMENTS FOR NOISE REDUCTION.
DE8888905991T DE3875717T2 (en) 1987-07-20 1988-07-20 EMISSION REDUCTION ARRANGEMENTS.

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8717040 1987-07-20
GB878717040A GB8717040D0 (en) 1987-07-20 1987-07-20 Noise reduction systems
GB878717043A GB8717043D0 (en) 1987-07-20 1987-07-20 Noise reduction systems
GB878717042A GB8717042D0 (en) 1987-07-20 1987-07-20 Noise reduction systems
GB8717043 1987-07-20
GB8717042 1987-07-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1989000746A1 true WO1989000746A1 (en) 1989-01-26

Family

ID=27263515

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1988/000581 WO1989000746A1 (en) 1987-07-20 1988-07-20 Improvements relating to noise reduction systems

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0327617B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE82083T1 (en)
AU (1) AU608041B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1299725C (en)
DE (1) DE3875717T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1989000746A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0385713A2 (en) * 1989-03-01 1990-09-05 Sony Corporation Noise reducing receiver device
EP0464220A1 (en) * 1990-01-19 1992-01-08 Sony Corporation Earphone device
US5224168A (en) * 1991-05-08 1993-06-29 Sri International Method and apparatus for the active reduction of compression waves
US5276740A (en) * 1990-01-19 1994-01-04 Sony Corporation Earphone device
WO1994017513A1 (en) * 1993-01-29 1994-08-04 Active Noise And Vibration Technologies, Inc. Earpiece for active noise cancelling headset
WO1995000946A1 (en) * 1993-06-23 1995-01-05 Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. Variable gain active noise cancellation system with improved residual noise sensing
US5675658A (en) * 1995-07-27 1997-10-07 Brittain; Thomas Paige Active noise reduction headset
AT403417B (en) * 1995-04-25 1998-02-25 Fritz Dr Paschke SOUND FILTER DEVICE
WO2001067434A1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2001-09-13 Slab Dsp Limited Active noise reduction system
EP1850631A2 (en) * 2006-04-24 2007-10-31 Bose Corporation High frequency compensating
WO2010129226A3 (en) * 2009-04-28 2011-01-20 Bose Corporation Anr signal processing enhancements
US8077874B2 (en) 2006-04-24 2011-12-13 Bose Corporation Active noise reduction microphone placing
US8085946B2 (en) 2009-04-28 2011-12-27 Bose Corporation ANR analysis side-chain data support
WO2021178646A1 (en) * 2020-03-06 2021-09-10 Bose Corporation Wearable active noise reduction (anr) device having low frequency feedback loop modulation

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009005302B4 (en) 2009-01-16 2022-01-05 Sennheiser Electronic Gmbh & Co. Kg Protective helmet and device for active noise suppression
US8553900B2 (en) * 2010-05-14 2013-10-08 Creative Technology Ltd Noise reduction circuit with monitoring functionality

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4061875A (en) * 1977-02-22 1977-12-06 Stephen Freifeld Audio processor for use in high noise environments
DE3133107A1 (en) * 1981-08-21 1983-03-10 Michael 5440 Mayen Hofmann Personal sound protection
GB2172769A (en) * 1985-03-21 1986-09-24 Topexpress Ltd Ear defender
EP0212840B1 (en) * 1985-07-13 1991-10-23 Siemens Plessey Electronic Systems Limited Noise reduction device

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0081516B1 (en) * 1981-06-12 1986-01-08 Sound Attenuators Limited Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear
ZA825676B (en) * 1981-08-11 1983-06-29 Sound Attenuators Ltd Method and apparatus for low frequency active attennuation

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4061875A (en) * 1977-02-22 1977-12-06 Stephen Freifeld Audio processor for use in high noise environments
DE3133107A1 (en) * 1981-08-21 1983-03-10 Michael 5440 Mayen Hofmann Personal sound protection
GB2172769A (en) * 1985-03-21 1986-09-24 Topexpress Ltd Ear defender
EP0212840B1 (en) * 1985-07-13 1991-10-23 Siemens Plessey Electronic Systems Limited Noise reduction device

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0629995A1 (en) * 1989-03-01 1994-12-21 Sony Corporation Noise reducing receiver device
EP0385713A3 (en) * 1989-03-01 1991-08-21 Sony Corporation Noise reducing receiver device
EP0385713A2 (en) * 1989-03-01 1990-09-05 Sony Corporation Noise reducing receiver device
US5091954A (en) * 1989-03-01 1992-02-25 Sony Corporation Noise reducing receiver device
US5276740A (en) * 1990-01-19 1994-01-04 Sony Corporation Earphone device
EP0464220A4 (en) * 1990-01-19 1992-10-21 Sony Corporation Earphone device
EP0464220A1 (en) * 1990-01-19 1992-01-08 Sony Corporation Earphone device
US5224168A (en) * 1991-05-08 1993-06-29 Sri International Method and apparatus for the active reduction of compression waves
US5363451A (en) * 1991-05-08 1994-11-08 Sri International Method and apparatus for the active reduction of compression waves
WO1994017513A1 (en) * 1993-01-29 1994-08-04 Active Noise And Vibration Technologies, Inc. Earpiece for active noise cancelling headset
WO1995000946A1 (en) * 1993-06-23 1995-01-05 Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. Variable gain active noise cancellation system with improved residual noise sensing
AT403417B (en) * 1995-04-25 1998-02-25 Fritz Dr Paschke SOUND FILTER DEVICE
US5675658A (en) * 1995-07-27 1997-10-07 Brittain; Thomas Paige Active noise reduction headset
WO2001067434A1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2001-09-13 Slab Dsp Limited Active noise reduction system
EP1850631A2 (en) * 2006-04-24 2007-10-31 Bose Corporation High frequency compensating
US8077874B2 (en) 2006-04-24 2011-12-13 Bose Corporation Active noise reduction microphone placing
EP1850631A3 (en) * 2006-04-24 2009-06-24 Bose Corporation High frequency compensating
US8054992B2 (en) 2006-04-24 2011-11-08 Bose Corporation High frequency compensating
US8345888B2 (en) 2009-04-28 2013-01-01 Bose Corporation Digital high frequency phase compensation
US8085946B2 (en) 2009-04-28 2011-12-27 Bose Corporation ANR analysis side-chain data support
CN102460566A (en) * 2009-04-28 2012-05-16 伯斯有限公司 Anr signal processing enhancements
WO2010129226A3 (en) * 2009-04-28 2011-01-20 Bose Corporation Anr signal processing enhancements
CN105825846A (en) * 2009-04-28 2016-08-03 伯斯有限公司 ANR signal processing enhancement
CN105825846B (en) * 2009-04-28 2019-07-12 伯斯有限公司 The enhancing of ANR signal processing
WO2021178646A1 (en) * 2020-03-06 2021-09-10 Bose Corporation Wearable active noise reduction (anr) device having low frequency feedback loop modulation
US11164554B2 (en) 2020-03-06 2021-11-02 Bose Corporation Wearable active noise reduction (ANR) device having low frequency feedback loop modulation
US11568849B2 (en) 2020-03-06 2023-01-31 Bose Corporation Wearable active noise reduction (ANR) device having low frequency feedback loop modulation
US11875768B2 (en) 2020-03-06 2024-01-16 Bose Corporation Wearable active noise reduction (ANR) device having low frequency feedback loop modulation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0327617B1 (en) 1992-11-04
EP0327617A1 (en) 1989-08-16
DE3875717D1 (en) 1992-12-10
ATE82083T1 (en) 1992-11-15
AU608041B2 (en) 1991-03-21
CA1299725C (en) 1992-04-28
DE3875717T2 (en) 1993-03-18
AU2071688A (en) 1989-02-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4953217A (en) Noise reduction system
EP0327617B1 (en) Improvements relating to noise reduction systems
US5452361A (en) Reduced VLF overload susceptibility active noise cancellation headset
JP2989843B2 (en) Active noise reduction system
US6278786B1 (en) Active noise cancellation aircraft headset system
JP3754067B2 (en) Ear Defender Using Active Noise Control
GB2465064A (en) Active noise cancellation system with split digital filter
JP5792141B2 (en) Active noise reduction
GB2455828A (en) Noise cancellation system with adaptive filter and two different sample rates
JPH06503897A (en) Noise cancellation system
JP2015219527A (en) Anc noise active control audio head set preventing influence of saturation of feedback microphone signal
JP2013029834A (en) Noise reducing sound reproduction
US6069959A (en) Active headset
US5440642A (en) Analog noise cancellation system using digital optimizing of variable parameters
JPH03157098A (en) Hearing aid equipped with compensation of acoustic feedback
EP0195641A2 (en) Improvements relating to noise reduction arrangements
GB2172470A (en) Improvements relating to noise reduction arrangements
US20170127171A1 (en) Noise reduction system
US7174027B2 (en) Feedback compensation device and method, and hearing aid device employing same
GB2234881A (en) Noise reduction system
US20050226439A1 (en) Noise cancellation using virtually lossless sensing method
WO1993025167A1 (en) Active selective headset
US20240046910A1 (en) Real-time detection of feedback instability
JPS60220698A (en) Headphone device
EP0643571A1 (en) Active selective headset

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LU NL SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1988905991

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1988905991

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1988905991

Country of ref document: EP