USRE38839E1 - Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations - Google Patents

Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE38839E1
USRE38839E1 US10/192,104 US19210402A USRE38839E US RE38839 E1 USRE38839 E1 US RE38839E1 US 19210402 A US19210402 A US 19210402A US RE38839 E USRE38839 E US RE38839E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
contact lens
eye
grad
equation
optical
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US10/192,104
Inventor
Peter C. Magnante
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/192,104 priority Critical patent/USRE38839E1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE38839E1 publication Critical patent/USRE38839E1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/10Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
    • A61B3/1015Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for wavefront analysis

Definitions

  • the aberroscope which is disclosed by Walsh et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol.1, pp. 987-992 (1984), projects a nearly collimated beam into the eye which is spatially modulated near the pupil by a regular grid pattern. This beam images onto the retina as a small bright disk which is modulated by the dark lines of the grid pattern. Since the eye's pupillary aberrations distort the retinal image of the grid pattern, measurements of the distortions on the retina reveal the pupillary aberrations.
  • the spatially resolved refractometer which is disclosed by Webb et al. in Applied Optics, Vol. 31, pp. 3678-3686 (1992), projects a small diameter collimated beam through the eye's pupil. Instead of being spatially modulated by a physical grid as with the aberroscope, the spatially resolved refractometer's beam is raster-scanned across the entire pupil. A sequence of retinal images of the focused light is recorded with each image associated with a particular location at the pupil. A mapping of the relative locations of these retinal images reveals the aberrations across the pupil.
  • Analyzers of retinal point-spread functions have been disclosed by Artal et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 5, pp. 1201-1206 (1988). Analyzers of retinal line-spread functions have been disclosed by Magnante et al. in Vision Science and Its Applications, Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C.), pp. 76-79 (1997).
  • these spread function analyzers project a small diameter circular beam into the eye at the center of the pupil. This beam focuses onto the retina as a tiny source of light. The light from this tiny retinal source scatters back through the dilated pupil.
  • a small circular aperture (approximately 1 mm diameter) in the imaging section of the analyzer is located conjugate to the pupil plane. This aperture may be translated up/down or side/side to sample specific regions in the pupil plane where wavefront aberration measurements are sought.
  • An imaging lens focuses the light through the small aperture onto the imaging plane of a camera. Measurements of the relative locations of the focal spots for the various locations of the small aperture characterize the pupillary wavefront aberrations.
  • the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor for ordinary lens or mirror testing was disclosed originally by Shack et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 61, p. 656 (1971). This type of wavefront sensor was adapted to measure the wavefront aberrations of the eye by Liang et al., Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 11, pp. 1949-1957 (1994).
  • the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor is similar to point-spread (or line-spread) function analyzers in that: 1) it projects a fine point of light onto the retina through a small diameter pupil of the eye, and 2) the light which is scattered back from the retina through the eye's pupil is imaged onto a camera with a lens that is conjugate to the eye's pupil.
  • the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor utilizes a regular two-dimensional array of small lenses (commonly called a microlens array) which is optically conjugate to the eye's pupil to focus the back scattered light from the retinal image onto the camera.
  • Typical diameters of individual microlenses range from 0.1 to 1.0 millimeter.
  • the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor instead of having a single spot of light corresponding to a single aperture imaged by the camera, there is an array of focused spots imaged by the camera . . . one spot for each lens in the microlens array. Furthermore, each imaged spot of light corresponds to a specific location at the eye's pupil. Measurements of the locations of the array of imaged spots are used to quantify the pupillary aberrations.
  • Device improvements described in the Williams and Liang 1998 Patent include: 1) a wavefront correcting deformable mirror, 2) a method to feedback signals to the deformable mirror to correct the wavefront aberrations, and 3) a polarizer used with a polarizing beamsplitter to reduce unwanted stray light from impinging on the recording camera.
  • the polarizer with polarizing beamsplitter cited in the Williams and Liang patent are not necessary for achieving the purposes of my invention, and those devices are replaced in my invention with a single device called an optical isolator (consisting of a polarizer fused to a quarter-wave plate).
  • the optical isolator achieves the same purpose as the pair of polarizing devices described by Williams and Liang, namely reducing unwanted stray light.
  • a laser is cited as the preferred illumination source in the Williams and Liang patent.
  • a conventional laser is improved upon in my invention through the use of a diode laser operated below threshold.
  • Such a light source is not as coherent as a standard laser operating above threshold, Images formed with such a non-coherent source are less granular (having less “speckle”) than those formed by coherent sources. This improvement results in less noisy granularity in the microlens images and, thereby, improves the accuracy of the image processing which depends on precisely locating the microlens images.
  • the essential data provided by a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor modified to measure the human eye are the directions of the optical rays emerging through the eye's pupil.
  • the method of deriving a mathematical expression for the wavefront from this directional ray information is described by Liang et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 11, pp. 1949-1957 (1994). It is also the method cited in 1998 U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,719 to Williams and Liang.
  • the wavefront is expressed as a series of Zernike polynomials with each term weighted initially by an unknown coefficient. Zernike polynomials are described in Appendix 2 of “Optical Shop Testing” by D.
  • Williams and Liang demonstrate that the eye's aberrations can be corrected by properly modifying the surface of a reflecting mirror. However, they do not demonstrate or provide any description of how aberration-correcting surfaces can be designed on refractive surfaces such as those on contact lenses or on the cornea itself. My invention gives a detailed mathematical description of how to design such refracting optical surfaces that correct the eye's aberrations.
  • the means are available for refractive surgeons to flatten and reshape the surface of the cornea in order to improve vision.
  • the excimer laser selectively removes microscopic layers of corneal tissue allowing light rays to focus more sharply on the retina.
  • PRK photorefractive keratectomy
  • the laser ablates tissue on the surface of the cornea.
  • LASIK laser in-situ keratomileusis
  • the surgeon first creates a flap on the cornea and then uses the laser to reshape tissue below the corneal surface. Layers of tissue as thin as 0.25 microns can be ablated.
  • An objective of the invention is to improve the vision of these patients.
  • a further objective is to provide the best vision possible to individuals with ordinary near and farsightedness and astigmatism.
  • methods and devices are described that are used to design and fabricate modified surfaces on contact lenses or on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism.
  • the objectives of the invention are accomplished by measuring the wavefront aberrations of a subject's eye (either with or without a contact lens on the cornea) using a device that projects a small point of light on the retina near the macula, re-images the light scattered back from the retina that emerges from the pupil onto a microlens array, and records the focal spots formed from this light when it is imaged by a microlens array on the image plane of an electronic camera.
  • the image formed on the camera is conveyed to a computer.
  • the computer utilizes methods to determine the coordinates of the focal spots and then to calculate the wavefront slopes of rays emerging from the subject's eye.
  • the objectives of the invention are further accomplished by mathematical methods which analyze the wavefront slope data as well as the shape of the subject's original contact lens or corneal surface in order to design a modified surface shape for the original contact lens or cornea that corrects the aberrations.
  • the steps in this mathematical method are: 1) determining the normal vectors to the original contact lens or corneal surface, 2) from these normal vectors and the wavefront slope data, determine the partial derivatives of the surface for the modified contact lens or corneal surface that corrects the aberrations, and 3) fitting these partial derivatives of the aberration-correcting surface with the corresponding partial derivatives of a polynomial expression that best represents the aberration-correcting surface. From these methods, a mathematical expression for the aberration-correcting surface is obtained.
  • these fabrication devices and methods include those of diamond point micro-machining, laser ablation, thermal molding, photolithography and etching, thin film deposition, and surface chemistry alteration.
  • these fabrication devices and methods are those associated with laser ablation as used with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
  • FIG. 1 A schematic drawing of a wavefront sensor which has been modified to measure the eye's optical aberrations is shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the design and operating principles of the subassemblies of the wavefront sensor are explained in detail below.
  • source 1 can be anyone of the following: laser diode operating below threshold, light emitting diode, arc source, or incandescent filament lamp.
  • the source beam is deflected by fold mirror 2 , and focused by microscope objective lens 3 onto a small pinhole aperture 4 having a diameter typically in the range from 5 to 15 microns.
  • Another lens 5 collimates the beam which next passes through polarizer 6 and then through aperture stop 7 . Typically this stop restricts the beam diameter to about 2 mm or less.
  • an electronic shutter 8 used to control the light exposure to the patient during measurement to about 1/10 sec.
  • Beamsplitter 9 deviates the collimated beam by 90 degrees.
  • the beam then passes through optical isolator 10 which consists of a quarter-wave plate and polarizer.
  • Lens 11 forms a focused point image at the center of field stop 12 which the subject views through focusing eyepiece 13 .
  • the subject's eye 15 then images the light to a point spot on the retina 16 .
  • the field stop 12 and the optical isolator 10 both serve the important function of blocking bothersome corneal specular reflections and instrument lens reflections from reaching photo-electronic imaging device 20 such as a vidicon camera, a charge-coupled device or CCD camera, or a charge-injection device camera.
  • the retina acts as a diffuse reflector, some of the light from the retinal point image 16 is reflected back out of the eye 15 through the pupil and cornea 14 .
  • the beam emerging from the eye has its polarization randomized due to passage through the eye's birefringent cornea 14 and lens 17 as well due to scattering by the diffuse retina 16 .
  • Passing now in reverse direction through lens 13 , field stop 12 , lens 11 , and optical isolator 10 the beam, which is now aberrated by the eye's optics, is incident from the right side onto beamsplitter 9 which transmits about half its intensity straight through to relay lens pair 18 .
  • lenses 13 , 11 , and relay lens pair 18 serve to re-image subject's pupil 14 onto the plane of the microlens array 19 with unit magnification. In this way the aberrant wavefront emerging from the subject's pupil 14 is mapped exactly onto the microlens array 19 .
  • each tiny lens 23 of the array images a portion of the aberrated wavefront 26 onto its focal plane 21 at or near its axis 25 .
  • the regular array of microlenses 19 produces a corresponding array of focal spots 24 . Deviations of focal spots from the respective microlens axes 25 manifest the wavefront slope error over the entire surface of the microlens array (and, correspondingly, the subject's pupil).
  • the input image plane of CCD camera 21 coincides with the focal plane 21 of the microlens array.
  • Photo-electronic imaging device 20 interfaces with a computer equipped with a “frame-grabber” board (not shown) controlled by appropriate software.
  • An image of the array of focal spots 24 formed by the microlens array 19 appears “live” on the computer's monitor, and is ready for “capture” by the computer when a measurement is taken.
  • the displacement of the centroid of the imaged spot (between the perfect and imperfect wave measurements) divided by the distance between the lens and its focal plane (i.e. the focal length of the lens) equals the angular slope (measured in radians) of the wavefront at the location of the small aperture. Repeating this type of measurement for many locations of the small aperture over the lens surface fully characterizes the wavefront slope errors at the various measurement locations on the lens surface.
  • the moveable small aperture with single large diffraction-limited lens is replaced with an array of identical microlenses 19 where each one samples the wavefront at a particular location. Details of the microlens array and imaging camera used in the wavefront sensor are shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the imaging surface of a photo-electronic imaging device 20 which records the locations of the focal spots 24 for all the microlenses in the array.
  • the displacement of each focal spot 24 from the optical axis of its associated microlens 25 divided by the focal length of the microlens array equals the slope of the wavefront at the microlens's location.
  • the locations of the optical axes of the individual microlenses are determined by a calibration procedure that involves doing a measurement when an unaberrated wavefront 27 (i.e. uniform plane wave) is incident perpendicularly onto microlens array 19 .
  • Such an unaberrated wavefront is obtained by replacing the human eye 15 shown in FIG. 1 with a diffraction-limited lens and imaging screen placed at the diffraction-limited lens's focal plane.
  • field stop 12 is a small hole bored in the direction of the instrument's main optical axis through a mirrored planar substrate oriented at 45 degrees.
  • the field stop is at the focal plane of the subject's eyepiece 13 .
  • Another eyepiece 22 (called the examiner's eyepiece) is oriented at 90 degrees to the instrument's main optical axis so that the examiner can view the subject's pupil 14 by the means provided by lens 13 and the mirrored planar substrate of field stop 12 .
  • a small video camera can be attached to examiner's eyepiece 22 so that a video image of the subject's pupil 14 can be viewed on a monitor.
  • the examiner can accurately position the subject's eye 15 so that the entering beam is accurately centered with respect to the subject's pupil 14 .
  • the positioning of the subject's eye with respect to the instrument beam is controlled by a mechanism (not shown) consisting of an x-y-z translation stage that moves a chin and head rest used by the subject.
  • the subject is asked to look through eyepiece 13 at the point of light formed within field stop 12 , while the examiner adjusts the location of subject's eye 15 so that the beam passes through the center of the pupil 14 .
  • the examiner Prior to taking a measurement, the examiner focuses eyepiece 13 trying to achieve the brightest and best-focused image of the array of focal spots seen on the computer monitor.
  • the operator presses a key which commands the computer to acquire an image of the array of spots.
  • as many as ten successive images may be acquired for subsequent averaging to improve the signal/noise ratio of the data.
  • the image analysis program carries out the following steps: 1) subtracts “background” light from the image, 2) determines the x & y coordinates (in pixels) of the centroid for each of the focal spots, 3) subtracts the x & y pixel coordinate values from a corresponding set of reference values (obtained from a calibration with a diffraction-limited reference lens), 4) multiplies the difference values (in pixel units) by a calibration factor which gives for each location in the pupil the components in the x and y directions of the wavefront slope error measured in radians.
  • the components of the wavefront slope error labeled Bx and By in the following sections, are the essential measurement data of the wavefront sensor.
  • a purpose of the invention is to design modifications to an initially known lens surface, described by z(x,y), which will correct the eye's optical aberrations measured with wavefront sensors through that surface.
  • the mathematical equations needed for this task which leads to a new lens surface described by z′(x,y), are derived.
  • the equations also are applied in an illustrative example.
  • original optical surface is meant the anterior surface of either a contact lens placed on the cornea or, in the absence of a contact lens, the cornea itself.
  • the index of refraction associated with the surface's denser side is n.
  • the original optical surface is represented by z(x,y) which is the distance of the surface from various points in the x-y plane of the pupil.
  • the x & y partial derivatives of the function describing the surface also can be expressed in terms of the components of the surface normal by rearranging the terms of Equa. 1.
  • a and B are vectors of unit length.
  • N surface normal
  • T is a unit vector tangent to the optical surface at the point of conjunction of (and coplanar with) rays A and B.
  • the B-vectors are known quantities representing the wavefront slopes as measured by the wavefront sensor.
  • the known quantities (B, N and n) determine the unknown quantities ( ⁇ , ⁇ , ⁇ and A).
  • N′ the unit normal to the aberration-correcting optical surface.
  • This new surface causes the emerging B′-vectors to lie parallel to the z-axis.
  • B′ (0,0,1).
  • the expression for N′ is obtained by rearranging Equa. 11 to conform with this new situation.
  • Equa. 15 and 16 the partial derivatives expressed by Equa. 15 and 16, which are determined at discrete coordinate locations in the pupil plane, [x k ,y k ], where the wavefront sensor data are obtained.
  • z′(x,y) as a polynomial consisting of linearly independent terms, g,(x,y).
  • z ′ ⁇ ( x , y ) ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ g j ⁇ ( x , y ) ( 17 )
  • the terms, g j (x,y) can be almost any mathematical functions; however, they generally are restricted to products of powers of x and y, such as x 3 ⁇ y 2 , or sums and differences of such products. There is no necessity that the functions be orthogonal over the plane of the pupil as are, for example, Zernike polynomials over a circular domain.
  • the coefficients, a j are constants which are determined by the methods derived below.
  • grad the gradient, as a mathematical operator which transforms a scalar function, f(x,y) to a vector with components in the x and y directions that are, respectively, the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x and y.
  • grad f(x,y) [ ⁇ f(x,y)/ ⁇ x, ⁇ f(x,y)/ ⁇ y] (18)
  • grad ⁇ ⁇ z ′ ⁇ ( x , y ) ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ grad ⁇ ⁇ g j ⁇ ( x , y ) ( 19 )
  • Equa. 15 & 16 To find the a-coefficients which provide the “best fit” to the data (i.e. the grad z′ data expressed by Equa. 15 & 16), define the “ERROR” function as the sum of the squares of the differences between the grad z′(x,y) data from Equas. 15 & 16 (i.e. the left side of Equa. 19) and the estimated value of grad z′(x,y) (i.e. the right side of Equa. 19) for all the measurement points, designated by the index “k”, in the x-y pupil plane.
  • the “method of least squares” determines the a-coefficients by minimizing the ERROR function. This is done by differentiating ERROR with respect to each element a j and setting each resulting equation to zero: ⁇ (ERROR)/ ⁇ a j ⁇ 0. There are as many equations resulting from this process as there are terms in the expansion for z′(x,y) shown in Equa. 17.
  • Equa. 21 appears in the much simpler form which is shown by either Equa. 24 or Equa. 25.
  • M is a symmetric square matrix.
  • b i ⁇ k ⁇ [ grad ⁇ [ g i ] ⁇ grad ⁇ ( z ′ ) ] ( 23 )
  • finding the a-coefficients is equivalent to solving the system of linear equations shown in Equa. 24 where matrix, M, and vector, b, are known quantities.
  • Equa. 24 Using the conventions of standard matrix algebra, Equa. 24 may be written:
  • Equa. 26 The set of a-coefficients found from Equa. 26, using values of M (Equa. 22) and b (Equa. 23), is the final result. With the a-coefficients determined, the explicit “best fit” polynomial expansion for z′(x,y), shown by Equa. 17, is determined.
  • measurements with the wavefront sensor are spaced 1 mm apart in the x and y directions within the domain of a circular pupil having an 8 mm diameter. There are 49 measurement sites. These data, which are the components in x & y of the emerging B-rays (i.e. Bx & By), are given by the two matrices shown below. The x-direction is to the right, and the y-direction is upward. Note that the values of Bx & By are multiplied by 1000 which makes the resulting directional units in milliradians.
  • Bx & By represent the x & y directions of the rays emerging from the contact lens.
  • the centroids of the focal spots of the wavefront sensor pattern are shown in FIG. 4 .
  • Equas. 27 through 16 are used to find ⁇ z′(x,y)/ ⁇ x and ⁇ z′(x,y)/ ⁇ y.
  • Equas. 17 through 16 are used to find ⁇ z′(x,y).
  • Equa. 17 the following third order polynomial expression is used to represent z′(x,y).
  • Equas. 22, 23 and 26 are computed from Equas. 22, 23 and 26.
  • the results of these calculations appear below.
  • the elements of the a-vector are the coefficients of the polynomial expression, Equa. 30, for z′(x,y).
  • the polynomial expression for z′(x,y) used in this example is only of order 3 for ease of illustration, the equations and methods of solution are easily extended to higher order polynomials. Programs to solve the resulting equations can be written using mathematical software available for use with personal computers. Of course, as the order of the polynomial increases, so too do the sizes of the M-matrix, and the b and a-vectors.
  • M [ 49 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 0 0 576 ⁇ 0 192 ⁇ 0 0 ⁇ 49 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 0 0 0 192 ⁇ 0 576 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 768 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 384 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 0 768 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 0 576 ⁇ 0 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 14040 ⁇ 0 1380 ⁇ 0 0 ⁇ 192 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 3400 ⁇ 0 1380 ⁇ 192 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 0 3400 ⁇ 0 1380 ⁇ 192 ⁇ 0 0 0 0 0 1380 ⁇ 192 ⁇
  • Equa. 30 The expression for z′(x,y) defined by Equa. 30 is determined only up to an arbitrary constant.
  • a machining operation generally is employed to reshape surface z(x,y) to the new modified surface z′(x,y) and that the machine has to be programmed to remove “positive” amounts of material
  • the arbitrary constant has to be large enough to shift surface z′(x,y) so that, when shifted, its value can never be greater than z(x,y).
  • z′(x,y) values are shifted in the negative z-direction by 0.011247 mm to satisfy this condition.
  • Equa. 34 The depth of cut to modify z(x,y) to the correcting surface is labelled CUT, and is expressed Equa. 34. Numerical values of 1000*CUT (in microns) at 1 mm spacings in the x & y directions are given in Equa. 35.
  • Equa. 11 In order to realize how well the new surface z′(x,y), described by the polynomial expression (Equa. 30) with the a-coefficients (Equa. 33), corrects the original optical aberrations, the following calculations are done: 1) find ⁇ z′/ ⁇ x and ⁇ z/ ⁇ y from Equa. 30 at all the measurement sites, and 2) use the values just found to find the x, y and z coordinates of N′′ from Equa. 1 & 2 where N′′ represents the normal to z′(x,y) [see Equa. 30].
  • Equa. 11 in the following form which takes into account the labelling for the new correcting surface: B′′ ⁇ n ⁇ A ⁇ ′′ ⁇ N′′ (36)
  • B′′ represents the emerging rays after the surface has been corrected and is the parameter currently being sought.
  • A which is invariant with changes to the optical surface, is already known having been obtained previously by the methods described in the paragraph preceeding Equa. 30.
  • N′′ is known, having been found by the methods outlined in the paragraph just above.
  • ⁇ ′′ is not yet determined; however, it is determined by the following methods.
  • Equa. 36 B′′ can now be found from Equa. 36 by substituting the now known values for n, A, ⁇ ′′ and N′′.
  • Equas. 41 & 42 the x & y components of B′′, which are written as B′′x and B′′y, appear multiplied by 1000 which makes the resulting directional units in milliradians.
  • B′′rms root-mean-square value
  • FIG. 5 shows The centroids of the focal spots of the wavefront sensor pattern for the case of the corrected B′′-rays from the new correcting surface z′(x,y) .
  • FIG. 5 shows rays that are much better collimated.
  • a programmable computer controlled single point diamond turning (SPDT) lathe shown in FIG. 6 , has been used to generate the surfaces of aberration-correcting contact lenses.
  • the lathe 30 has two moving subassemblies: 1) a low vibration air bearing spindle 31 , and 2) x-z positioning slides 32 .
  • Contact lens 33 which is held and centered on the end of spindle 31 , is rotated by the spindle while a fine diamond tool 34 is moved by the positioning slides 32 with sub-micron resolution both perpendicular to (i.e. tool transverse scan in x-direction), and parallel to (i.e. tool cutting depth in z-direction) the direction of the spindle's axis.
  • Smooth tool motion is achieved by the preferred means of using hydrostatic oil-bearing or air-bearing slideways.
  • a preferred means for precise slide positioning is achieved by using computer controlled piezoelectric drivers or precise lead screw drivers (not shown). Since the machine must be completely free of both internal and external vibrations, both lathe 30 and x-z slides 32 are secured to a pneumatically isolated table top 35 which rests on granite base 36 .
  • a computer 37 receives synchronous signals from spindle 31 and controls the movement of the x-z translation slides 32 along a programmed trajectory that is synchronized with the rotational position of the spindle.
  • the motion of the x-translation slide i.e. perpendicular to the spindle axis
  • the motion of the x-translation slide generally is at a uniform speed as with an ordinary lathe.
  • the requirement of forming a non-axially symmetric lens surface (i.e. z′(x,y) shape) when using a high speed lathe, requires a unique control method for positioning the z-translation slide (i.e.
  • the z-translation slide controls cutter movement parallel to the spindle axis and, consequently, the depth of cut on the lens surface which rotates rapidly with respect to the cutter).
  • the z-translation slide must be rapidly and precisely located in accord with both the x-translation slide location, and the rotational position of the spindle.
  • the preferred means of rapid and precise positioning of the z-translation slide is by the utilization of computer controlled piezoelectric drivers.
  • custom contact lenses can also be machined by an x-y-z contour cutting machine.
  • the lens is held stationary and figured by a cutting tool driven in a precise x-y raster scan while the depth of cut in the z-direction is controlled by a computer often with positional feedback provided by an interferometer.
  • Such an x-y-z contour cutting machine is described by Plummer et al. at the 8th International Precision Engineering Seminar (1995), and published in those proceedings by the Journal of American Society of Precision Engineering, pp. 24-29.
  • Laser ablation of corneal tissue currently is used to reshape the anterior corneal surface in order to correct near and farsightedness and astigmatism in the human eye.
  • Laser tissue ablation also can be used to make more subtle corrections to the corneal surface than are now performed. Such corrections are needed to correct the eye's higher order optical aberrations. Therefore, laser surface ablation is a preferred method of contouring corneal tissue in order to correct the eye's higher order optical aberrations.
  • laser machining similar to the laser ablation technique used to reshape the surface of the cornea, is also possible. It is likely that the most useful lasers for this purpose will prove to be those emitting ultra-violet light which ablate material away from surfaces, not by thermal heating or melting, but by rapid disruption of chemical bonds. Excimer lasers and solid state frequency-tripled (or frequency-quadrupled) Nd-YAG lasers are now proving to be useful both for machining plastics and ablating human tissue. These same lasers may be considered for precise surfacing operations needed for the fabrication of aberration correcting contact lenses or advanced refractive surgery.
  • any successful fabrication method must be capable of either precisely forming the lens surface to the required z′(x,y) shape, or meticulously varying the refractive index over the surface in order to bend the light rays to correct the aberrations. Described below are several alternate lens fabrication methods.
  • the lens is a thermoplastic
  • its surface may be formed to match that of a heated die. This method follows from the techniques used to form plastic parts by injection or compression molding. Since the desired topography of the lens surface generally is complex, the surface of the heated die is required to have a corresponding complex shape.
  • the die which determines the shape of the lens is made of a single piece of metal and has a permanent surface shape.
  • variable or “adaptive” surfaces In the field known as “adaptive optics”, such variable surfaces (anecdotally referred to as “rubber mirrors”) have been formed and controlled using computer-derived input signals that drive electromechanical fingers which press against a deformable metal surface.
  • FIG. 7 Such an arrangement, which is called here a variable segmented die, is shown in FIG. 7 .
  • the housing for the die 40 provides a number of channeled holes to hold a corresponding number of mechanical fingers 41 which are moved upwards or downwards in the die housing 40 by electronic drivers or actuators 42 .
  • Mechanical fingers 41 press against a continuous deformable metal surface 43 which contacts the thermoplastic lens surface and establishes its final shape.
  • an arrangement of close-packed, electronically actuated mechanical fingers without a deformable metal surface may be used. With this alternative arrangement, each mechanical finger in the array would press directly on the surface of the thermoplastic lens blank in order to form its surface as required.
  • a layer of photoresist is spun onto the glass or plastic lens substrate, and selectively exposed using either an optical scanner or an electron beam scanner.
  • the exposure extent over regions of the surface of the photoresist is properly matched with the desired surface contour of the finished lens.
  • the photoresist is developed chemically, thereby being selectively prepared for subsequent etching over those areas having previously received the most illumination.
  • the surface of the glass or plastic lens substrate is then etched using reactive ion etching or chemically assisted ion-beam etching where the depth of the etch is determined by the extent of illumination during the previous exposure of the photoresist. It is noted that forms of PMMA (i.e.
  • polymethyl methacrylate which is a widely used optical plastic used for making contact lenses, are used as photoresists. Therefore, one can imagine tailoring the surface of a PMMA lens, in order to correct an eye's higher-order aberrations, directly without needing to use a separate photoresist layer over the lens substrate.
  • Particularly useful could be a method of injecting from a fine nozzle or series of fine nozzles, which are in proximity to a surface, controlled amounts of transparent liquid materials that permanently bond when deposited on the surface. Scanning these controllable material-depositing nozzles over the surface of an optical substrate can result in building up on the optical substrate a custom surface contour that meets the requirements of correcting the higher-order optical aberrations of a subject's eye. Similar to what is conceived above is the operation of ink-jet devices used in computer printers.
  • the methods now used to imbibe dye molecules from solution into plastic surfaces in order to tint ophthalmic lenses may also be effective in changing the index of refraction in subsurface layers.
  • the methods of surface chemistry alteration which are used now to fabricate “gradient index” optical elements, can be refined for both glass and plastic materials in order to make them useful in the fabrication of adaptive optical lenses for correcting the higher-order aberrations of the human eye.

Abstract

Methods and devices are described that are needed to design and fabricate modified surfaces on contact lenses or on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism. The invention provides the means for: 1) measuring the eye's optical aberrations either with or without a contact lens in place on the cornea, 2) performing a mathematical analysis on the eye's optical aberrations in order to design a modified surface shape for the original contact lens or cornea that will correct the optical aberrations, 3) fabricating the aberration-correcting surface on a contact lens by diamond point turning, three dimensional contour cutting, laser ablation, thermal molding, photolithography, thin film deposition, or surface chemistry alteration, and 4) fabricating the aberration-correcting surface on a cornea by laser ablation.

Description

1. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1.1 Measurements of the Eye's Aberrations
There are several objective optical techniques that have been used to measure the wavefront aberrations of the eye. The aberroscope, which is disclosed by Walsh et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol.1, pp. 987-992 (1984), projects a nearly collimated beam into the eye which is spatially modulated near the pupil by a regular grid pattern. This beam images onto the retina as a small bright disk which is modulated by the dark lines of the grid pattern. Since the eye's pupillary aberrations distort the retinal image of the grid pattern, measurements of the distortions on the retina reveal the pupillary aberrations.
The spatially resolved refractometer, which is disclosed by Webb et al. in Applied Optics, Vol. 31, pp. 3678-3686 (1992), projects a small diameter collimated beam through the eye's pupil. Instead of being spatially modulated by a physical grid as with the aberroscope, the spatially resolved refractometer's beam is raster-scanned across the entire pupil. A sequence of retinal images of the focused light is recorded with each image associated with a particular location at the pupil. A mapping of the relative locations of these retinal images reveals the aberrations across the pupil.
Analyzers of retinal point-spread functions have been disclosed by Artal et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 5, pp. 1201-1206 (1988). Analyzers of retinal line-spread functions have been disclosed by Magnante et al. in Vision Science and Its Applications, Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C.), pp. 76-79 (1997). When used to measure the wavefront aberrations of the eye, these spread function analyzers project a small diameter circular beam into the eye at the center of the pupil. This beam focuses onto the retina as a tiny source of light. The light from this tiny retinal source scatters back through the dilated pupil. A small circular aperture (approximately 1 mm diameter) in the imaging section of the analyzer is located conjugate to the pupil plane. This aperture may be translated up/down or side/side to sample specific regions in the pupil plane where wavefront aberration measurements are sought. An imaging lens focuses the light through the small aperture onto the imaging plane of a camera. Measurements of the relative locations of the focal spots for the various locations of the small aperture characterize the pupillary wavefront aberrations.
The Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor for ordinary lens or mirror testing was disclosed originally by Shack et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 61, p. 656 (1971). This type of wavefront sensor was adapted to measure the wavefront aberrations of the eye by Liang et al., Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 11, pp. 1949-1957 (1994). The Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor is similar to point-spread (or line-spread) function analyzers in that: 1) it projects a fine point of light onto the retina through a small diameter pupil of the eye, and 2) the light which is scattered back from the retina through the eye's pupil is imaged onto a camera with a lens that is conjugate to the eye's pupil. However, instead of using a single lens with a moveable small aperture to image the retinal image onto the camera, the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor utilizes a regular two-dimensional array of small lenses (commonly called a microlens array) which is optically conjugate to the eye's pupil to focus the back scattered light from the retinal image onto the camera. Typical diameters of individual microlenses range from 0.1 to 1.0 millimeter. With the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor, instead of having a single spot of light corresponding to a single aperture imaged by the camera, there is an array of focused spots imaged by the camera . . . one spot for each lens in the microlens array. Furthermore, each imaged spot of light corresponds to a specific location at the eye's pupil. Measurements of the locations of the array of imaged spots are used to quantify the pupillary aberrations.
Measurements of the wavefront aberrations of the eye to a high degree of precision using an improved Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor are described in 1998 U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,719 to Williams and Liang. What is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,719 improves upon what was described previously by Liang et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 11, pp. 1949-1957 (1994). Device improvements described in the Williams and Liang 1998 Patent include: 1) a wavefront correcting deformable mirror, 2) a method to feedback signals to the deformable mirror to correct the wavefront aberrations, and 3) a polarizer used with a polarizing beamsplitter to reduce unwanted stray light from impinging on the recording camera.
Although the precision of the resulting wavefront aberration measurements cited by Williams and Liang is impressive, the implementation of a deformable mirror and a feedback loop is very costly and is not necessary for achieving the purposes of my invention.
Furthermore, the polarizer with polarizing beamsplitter cited in the Williams and Liang patent are not necessary for achieving the purposes of my invention, and those devices are replaced in my invention with a single device called an optical isolator (consisting of a polarizer fused to a quarter-wave plate). The optical isolator achieves the same purpose as the pair of polarizing devices described by Williams and Liang, namely reducing unwanted stray light.
Finally, a laser is cited as the preferred illumination source in the Williams and Liang patent. However, a conventional laser is improved upon in my invention through the use of a diode laser operated below threshold. Such a light source is not as coherent as a standard laser operating above threshold, Images formed with such a non-coherent source are less granular (having less “speckle”) than those formed by coherent sources. This improvement results in less noisy granularity in the microlens images and, thereby, improves the accuracy of the image processing which depends on precisely locating the microlens images.
1.2 Analysis of Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Sensor Data to Characterize the Eye's Optical Aberrations
The essential data provided by a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor modified to measure the human eye are the directions of the optical rays emerging through the eye's pupil. The method of deriving a mathematical expression for the wavefront from this directional ray information is described by Liang et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 11, pp. 1949-1957 (1994). It is also the method cited in 1998 U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,719 to Williams and Liang. First, the wavefront is expressed as a series of Zernike polynomials with each term weighted initially by an unknown coefficient. Zernike polynomials are described in Appendix 2 of “Optical Shop Testing” by D. Malacara (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978). Next, partial derivatives (in x & y) are then calculated from the Zernike series expansion. Then, these partial derivative expressions respectively are set equal to the measured wavefront slopes in the x and y directions obtained from the wavefront sensor measurements. Finally, the method of least-squares fitting of polynomial series to the experimental wavefront slope data is employed which results in a matrix expression which, when solved, yields the coefficients of the Zernike polynomials. Consequently, the wavefront, expressed by the Zernike polynomial series, is completely and numerically determined numerically at all points in the pupil plane. The least-squares fitting method is discussed in Chapter 9, Section 11 of “Mathematics of Physics and Modern Engineering” by Sokolnikoff and Redheffer (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958).
Although the above described methods to calculate the aberrated wavefront of the eye are cited in the Williams and Liang patent, it is significant to note that there is not any description in their patent of how to design an aberration-correcting contact lens or corneal surface from the aberrated wavefront data. These details for designing an aberration-correcting contact lens or corneal surface are not obvious, and require a number of complex mathematical steps. These mathematical details for designing aberration correcting surfaces on contact lenses or on the cornea itself are described fully in my invention.
Furthermore, Williams and Liang demonstrate that the eye's aberrations can be corrected by properly modifying the surface of a reflecting mirror. However, they do not demonstrate or provide any description of how aberration-correcting surfaces can be designed on refractive surfaces such as those on contact lenses or on the cornea itself. My invention gives a detailed mathematical description of how to design such refracting optical surfaces that correct the eye's aberrations.
1.3 Fabrication of Conventional Contact Lenses
Conventional contact lenses with spherical or toroidal surface contours are made routinely using a method called single point diamond turning which utilizes very precise vibration-free lathes. The contact lens blank rotates on a spindle while a diamond point tool, moving along a precise path, cuts the desired surface contour. The end result is a surface which does not need additional polishing, and exhibits excellent optical qualities in both figure accuracy and surface finish. Figure accuracy over the lens surface is better than one wavelength of light. Surface finish, which is reported as rms surface roughness, is better than 1 micro-inch. Machines of this type and their use are described by Plummer et al. in the Proceedings of the 8th International Precision Engineering Seminar (American Society of Precision Engineering, pp. 24-29, 1995).
1.4 Corneal Tissue Ablation to Correct Vision
With the advent of the excimer laser, the means are available for refractive surgeons to flatten and reshape the surface of the cornea in order to improve vision. The excimer laser selectively removes microscopic layers of corneal tissue allowing light rays to focus more sharply on the retina. In the procedure known as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), the laser ablates tissue on the surface of the cornea. In the procedure known as laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), the surgeon first creates a flap on the cornea and then uses the laser to reshape tissue below the corneal surface. Layers of tissue as thin as 0.25 microns can be ablated.
With current laser procedures, it is possible only to correct relatively coarse or low order aberrations of the eye, namely high levels of nearsightedness, and moderate amounts of farsightedness and astigmatism. With the analytical methods of my invention, which take into account the corneal shape, and both the low order and higher order aberrations of the eye, a modified corneal shape is found which allows all rays from external point objects to focus sharply on the retina. By the means offered by my invention, refractive surgery procedures to improve vision will be improved greatly.
2. SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Conventional spectacles and contact lenses are able to correct the visual acuity of most people to 20/20 or better. For these individuals, the most significant refractive errors are those caused by the so-called lowest order optical aberrations, namely defocus, astigmatism and prism. However, there are many people with normal retinal function and clear ocular media who cannot be refracted to 20/20 acuity with conventional ophthalmic lenses because their corneal surfaces are extraordinarily irregular. In this group are patients with severe irregular astigmatism, keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, post penetrating keratoplasty, scarring from ulcerative keratitis, corneal trauma with and without surgical repair, and sub-optimal outcome following refractive surgery. The eyes of these people have abnormal amounts of higher order or irregular optical aberrations. An objective of the invention is to improve the vision of these patients. A further objective is to provide the best vision possible to individuals with ordinary near and farsightedness and astigmatism. To achieve these objectives, methods and devices are described that are used to design and fabricate modified surfaces on contact lenses or on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism.
The objectives of the invention are accomplished by measuring the wavefront aberrations of a subject's eye (either with or without a contact lens on the cornea) using a device that projects a small point of light on the retina near the macula, re-images the light scattered back from the retina that emerges from the pupil onto a microlens array, and records the focal spots formed from this light when it is imaged by a microlens array on the image plane of an electronic camera. The image formed on the camera is conveyed to a computer. The computer utilizes methods to determine the coordinates of the focal spots and then to calculate the wavefront slopes of rays emerging from the subject's eye.
The objectives of the invention are further accomplished by mathematical methods which analyze the wavefront slope data as well as the shape of the subject's original contact lens or corneal surface in order to design a modified surface shape for the original contact lens or cornea that corrects the aberrations. The steps in this mathematical method are: 1) determining the normal vectors to the original contact lens or corneal surface, 2) from these normal vectors and the wavefront slope data, determine the partial derivatives of the surface for the modified contact lens or corneal surface that corrects the aberrations, and 3) fitting these partial derivatives of the aberration-correcting surface with the corresponding partial derivatives of a polynomial expression that best represents the aberration-correcting surface. From these methods, a mathematical expression for the aberration-correcting surface is obtained.
The objectives of the invention are accomplished finally by providing devices and methods to fabricate the modified aberration-correcting surfaces designed by the mathematical methods described. For contact lenses, these fabrication devices and methods include those of diamond point micro-machining, laser ablation, thermal molding, photolithography and etching, thin film deposition, and surface chemistry alteration. For corneal tissue resurfacing, these fabrication devices and methods are those associated with laser ablation as used with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
The invention may be more clearly understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, the appended claims, and the attached drawings.
3. DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
!
4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
4.1 Wavefront Sensor for Measuring the Eye's Optical Aberrations
A schematic drawing of a wavefront sensor which has been modified to measure the eye's optical aberrations is shown in FIG. 1. The design and operating principles of the subassemblies of the wavefront sensor are explained in detail below.
4.1.1 Projection System
In order to reduce bothersome “speckle” from coherence effects from conventional laser sources, non-coherent optical sources are preferred. Thus, source 1 can be anyone of the following: laser diode operating below threshold, light emitting diode, arc source, or incandescent filament lamp. The source beam is deflected by fold mirror 2, and focused by microscope objective lens 3 onto a small pinhole aperture 4 having a diameter typically in the range from 5 to 15 microns. Another lens 5 collimates the beam which next passes through polarizer 6 and then through aperture stop 7. Typically this stop restricts the beam diameter to about 2 mm or less. Following the stop is an electronic shutter 8 used to control the light exposure to the patient during measurement to about 1/10 sec. Beamsplitter 9 deviates the collimated beam by 90 degrees. The beam then passes through optical isolator 10 which consists of a quarter-wave plate and polarizer. Lens 11 forms a focused point image at the center of field stop 12 which the subject views through focusing eyepiece 13. The subject's eye 15 then images the light to a point spot on the retina 16. The field stop 12 and the optical isolator 10 both serve the important function of blocking bothersome corneal specular reflections and instrument lens reflections from reaching photo-electronic imaging device 20 such as a vidicon camera, a charge-coupled device or CCD camera, or a charge-injection device camera.
4.1.2 Camera System
Since the retina acts as a diffuse reflector, some of the light from the retinal point image 16 is reflected back out of the eye 15 through the pupil and cornea 14. The beam emerging from the eye has its polarization randomized due to passage through the eye's birefringent cornea 14 and lens 17 as well due to scattering by the diffuse retina 16. Passing now in reverse direction through lens 13, field stop 12, lens 11, and optical isolator 10, the beam, which is now aberrated by the eye's optics, is incident from the right side onto beamsplitter 9 which transmits about half its intensity straight through to relay lens pair 18. Collectively, lenses 13, 11, and relay lens pair 18 serve to re-image subject's pupil 14 onto the plane of the microlens array 19 with unit magnification. In this way the aberrant wavefront emerging from the subject's pupil 14 is mapped exactly onto the microlens array 19. As shown in FIG. 2, each tiny lens 23 of the array images a portion of the aberrated wavefront 26 onto its focal plane 21 at or near its axis 25. The regular array of microlenses 19 produces a corresponding array of focal spots 24. Deviations of focal spots from the respective microlens axes 25 manifest the wavefront slope error over the entire surface of the microlens array (and, correspondingly, the subject's pupil). The input image plane of CCD camera 21 coincides with the focal plane 21 of the microlens array. Photo-electronic imaging device 20 interfaces with a computer equipped with a “frame-grabber” board (not shown) controlled by appropriate software. An image of the array of focal spots 24 formed by the microlens array 19 appears “live” on the computer's monitor, and is ready for “capture” by the computer when a measurement is taken.
4.1.2.1 Wavefront Slope Measurement
The nature of the wavefront slope measurement is explained now in greater detail. If a perfect plane wave is incident normally onto a perfect lens which has a small aperture near its surface, the rays passing through the aperture will be focused by the lens to the lens's focal point located on the lens's axis. Regardless of the location of the small aperture with respect to the lens surface, the imaged point will be at the same location. On the other hand, suppose the wavefront is imperfect (i.e. individual rays randomly directed and not parallel to the perfect lens's optical axis). The rays going through the small aperture now form an image at the lens's focal plane that is displaced from the lens's focal point. The displacement of the centroid of the imaged spot (between the perfect and imperfect wave measurements) divided by the distance between the lens and its focal plane (i.e. the focal length of the lens) equals the angular slope (measured in radians) of the wavefront at the location of the small aperture. Repeating this type of measurement for many locations of the small aperture over the lens surface fully characterizes the wavefront slope errors at the various measurement locations on the lens surface. In a wavefront sensor such as shown in FIG. 1, the moveable small aperture with single large diffraction-limited lens is replaced with an array of identical microlenses 19 where each one samples the wavefront at a particular location. Details of the microlens array and imaging camera used in the wavefront sensor are shown in FIG. 2. At the focal plane 21 of the microlens array 19 is the imaging surface of a photo-electronic imaging device 20 which records the locations of the focal spots 24 for all the microlenses in the array. The displacement of each focal spot 24 from the optical axis of its associated microlens 25 divided by the focal length of the microlens array equals the slope of the wavefront at the microlens's location. The locations of the optical axes of the individual microlenses are determined by a calibration procedure that involves doing a measurement when an unaberrated wavefront 27 (i.e. uniform plane wave) is incident perpendicularly onto microlens array 19. Such an unaberrated wavefront is obtained by replacing the human eye 15 shown in FIG. 1 with a diffraction-limited lens and imaging screen placed at the diffraction-limited lens's focal plane.
4.1.3 Pupil Alignment System
In FIG. 1, field stop 12 is a small hole bored in the direction of the instrument's main optical axis through a mirrored planar substrate oriented at 45 degrees. The field stop is at the focal plane of the subject's eyepiece 13. Another eyepiece 22 (called the examiner's eyepiece) is oriented at 90 degrees to the instrument's main optical axis so that the examiner can view the subject's pupil 14 by the means provided by lens 13 and the mirrored planar substrate of field stop 12. Optionally, a small video camera can be attached to examiner's eyepiece 22 so that a video image of the subject's pupil 14 can be viewed on a monitor. By either of these means, the examiner can accurately position the subject's eye 15 so that the entering beam is accurately centered with respect to the subject's pupil 14. The positioning of the subject's eye with respect to the instrument beam is controlled by a mechanism (not shown) consisting of an x-y-z translation stage that moves a chin and head rest used by the subject.
4.1.4 Data Acquisition and Processing
The subject is asked to look through eyepiece 13 at the point of light formed within field stop 12, while the examiner adjusts the location of subject's eye 15 so that the beam passes through the center of the pupil 14. Prior to taking a measurement, the examiner focuses eyepiece 13 trying to achieve the brightest and best-focused image of the array of focal spots seen on the computer monitor. When the instrument is aligned with respect to the patient's eye and a best-focus image is obtained, the operator presses a key which commands the computer to acquire an image of the array of spots. During a measurement session, as many as ten successive images may be acquired for subsequent averaging to improve the signal/noise ratio of the data. The image analysis program carries out the following steps: 1) subtracts “background” light from the image, 2) determines the x & y coordinates (in pixels) of the centroid for each of the focal spots, 3) subtracts the x & y pixel coordinate values from a corresponding set of reference values (obtained from a calibration with a diffraction-limited reference lens), 4) multiplies the difference values (in pixel units) by a calibration factor which gives for each location in the pupil the components in the x and y directions of the wavefront slope error measured in radians. The components of the wavefront slope error, labeled Bx and By in the following sections, are the essential measurement data of the wavefront sensor.
4.2 Design of Aberration-Correcting Lens from Analysis of Wavefront Sensor Data
A purpose of the invention is to design modifications to an initially known lens surface, described by z(x,y), which will correct the eye's optical aberrations measured with wavefront sensors through that surface. In this section, the mathematical equations needed for this task, which leads to a new lens surface described by z′(x,y), are derived. The equations also are applied in an illustrative example. The mathematical formalism in this section is divided into the following parts: 1) description of original optical surface, 2) obtaining the directional derivatives of z′(x,y) from the wavefront sensor data, 3) obtaining a polynomial expansion representing z′(x,y) using the method of least squares, 4) illustrative example leading to z′(x,y), and 5) demonstration that z′(x,y) corrects the original aberrations. The following is a guide to the mathematical symbols (whether primed or not): a) x & y (and X & Y) are coordinates, b) n, R, Brms, aj & bj are scalars, c) z, δz/δx, δz/δy, MAG, α, β, λ, gj, ERROR and CUT are functions of x & y, d) N, T, A, B, grad gj and grad z are three-dimensional vector functions of x & y, e) a & b are generalized vectors, and f) M and Mare generalized square matrices.
4.2.1 Original Optical Surface
By “original optical surface” is meant the anterior surface of either a contact lens placed on the cornea or, in the absence of a contact lens, the cornea itself. The index of refraction associated with the surface's denser side is n. The original optical surface is represented by z(x,y) which is the distance of the surface from various points in the x-y plane of the pupil. The unit vector perpendicular to the optical surface (called the normal vector N) has components in the x, y and z directions given by N=(Nx,Ny,Nz) where: N x = 1 MAG · [ - δ z ( x , y ) δ x ] , Ny = 1 MAG · [ - δ z ( x , y ) δy ] . and N z = 1 MAG ( 1 ) defining MAG = 1 + [ δ z ( x , y ) δ x ] 2 + [ δ z ( x , y ) δ y ] 2 ( 2 )
The x & y partial derivatives of the function describing the surface also can be expressed in terms of the components of the surface normal by rearranging the terms of Equa. 1. δ z ( x , y ) δ x = - [ Nx Nz ] and δ z ( x , y ) δ y = - [ Ny Nz ] ( 3 )
4.2.2 Obtaining the Partial Derivatives of the Surface Function which Describes the Aberration-Correcting Optical Surface
The light rays, which emanate from the retinal “point source” formed by the wavefront sensor's projection system, emerge from the eye at the original optical surface which is described by z(x,y). Rays striking the surface from the denser side are described as A-vectors, and rays leaving the surface into air are described as B-vectors. Both A and B are vectors of unit length. Refer now to FIG. 3 to express the A and B vectors in terms of their components along N (surface normal) and T. Note that T is a unit vector tangent to the optical surface at the point of conjunction of (and coplanar with) rays A and B.
A≡cos(α)·N+sin(α)·T   (4)
B≡cos(β)·N+sin(β)·T   (5)
Next, substitute the expressions for A and B into n·A−B.
n·A−B≡(n·cos(α)−cos(β))·N+(n·sin)(α)·sin(β))·T   (6)
The second term vanishes due to Snell's Law of Refraction which is:
n·sin(α)≡sin(β)   (7)
From FIG. 3 and the definition of a vector cross product:
sin(β)≡|N·B|  (8)
The upright pair of lines in Equa. 8 indicates the magnitude of the vector enclosed by the pair.
Combining the results above, find the following equations: β = a sin ( N × B ) ( 9 ) α = a sin [ 1 n · sin ( β ) ] ( 10 ) A = 1 n · ( β + λ · N ) ( 11 )
where by definition
λ≡n·cos(α)−cos(β)   (12)
Note that the B-vectors are known quantities representing the wavefront slopes as measured by the wavefront sensor. Using Equas. 9 through 12, the known quantities (B, N and n) determine the unknown quantities (β, α, λ and A).
Next, solutions for the A-vectors are used to find N′, the unit normal to the aberration-correcting optical surface. This new surface causes the emerging B′-vectors to lie parallel to the z-axis. In vector form, B′=(0,0,1). The expression for N′ is obtained by rearranging Equa. 11 to conform with this new situation. N = 1 λ · ( n · A - B ) ( 13 ) where λ = n · A - B ( 14 )
Finally the following partial derivatives of the new aberration-correcting optical surface, described by z′(x,y), are obtained in terms of the components of unit vector N′=(Nx′,Ny′,Nz′) by using Equa. 3 (only adapted to the new surface parameters): δ z ( x , y ) δ x = - [ Nx Nz ] ( 15 ) δ z ( x , y ) δ y = - [ Ny Nz ] ( 16 )
4.2.3 Obtaining a Polynomial Expression to Represent z′(x,y)
The next problem is to find the new optical surface z′(x,y) from the partial derivatives expressed by Equa. 15 and 16, which are determined at discrete coordinate locations in the pupil plane, [xk,yk], where the wavefront sensor data are obtained. Begin by expressing z′(x,y) as a polynomial consisting of linearly independent terms, g,(x,y). z ( x , y ) = j α j · g j ( x , y ) ( 17 )
The terms, gj(x,y) , can be almost any mathematical functions; however, they generally are restricted to products of powers of x and y, such as x3·y2, or sums and differences of such products. There is no necessity that the functions be orthogonal over the plane of the pupil as are, for example, Zernike polynomials over a circular domain. The coefficients, aj, are constants which are determined by the methods derived below. Define “grad”, the gradient, as a mathematical operator which transforms a scalar function, f(x,y) to a vector with components in the x and y directions that are, respectively, the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x and y.
grad f(x,y)=[δf(x,y)/δx, δf(x,y)/δy]  (18)
Applying this operator to both sides of Equa. 17, find grad z ( x , y ) = j α j · grad g j ( x , y ) ( 19 )
To find the a-coefficients which provide the “best fit” to the data (i.e. the grad z′ data expressed by Equa. 15 & 16), define the “ERROR” function as the sum of the squares of the differences between the grad z′(x,y) data from Equas. 15 & 16 (i.e. the left side of Equa. 19) and the estimated value of grad z′(x,y) (i.e. the right side of Equa. 19) for all the measurement points, designated by the index “k”, in the x-y pupil plane. ERROR = k [ j α j · grad [ g j ] - grad ( z ) ] 2 ( 20 )
For brevity sake, the notation for the variables (x,y) has been suppressed when writing the functions, gj(x,y) and z′(x,y), in Equa. 20. This abbreviated notation also is used in the equations which follow.
The “method of least squares” determines the a-coefficients by minimizing the ERROR function. This is done by differentiating ERROR with respect to each element aj and setting each resulting equation to zero: δ(ERROR)/ δaj≡0. There are as many equations resulting from this process as there are terms in the expansion for z′(x,y) shown in Equa. 17. The resulting system of linear equations is written: j [ k [ grad [ g i ] · grad [ g j ] ] ] · α j = k [ grad [ g i ] · grad ( z ) ] ( 21 )
Note that the sums over the index “k” imply a summation over all the (xk,yk) coordinates in the pupil plane for the several g-functions and the grad z′ values. Also, the products indicated in Equa. 21 are vector scalar products or, so-called, “dot products”.
Defining matrix, M, and vector, b, in Equa. 22 & 23 below, Equa. 21 appears in the much simpler form which is shown by either Equa. 24 or Equa. 25. Note that M is a symmetric square matrix. M i , j = k [ grad [ g i ] · grad [ g j ] ] so that M i , j = M j , i ( 22 ) b i = k [ grad [ g i ] · grad ( z ) ] ( 23 )
Thus, finding the a-coefficients is equivalent to solving the system of linear equations shown in Equa. 24 where matrix, M, and vector, b, are known quantities. j M i , j · a j = b i ( 24 )
Using the conventions of standard matrix algebra, Equa. 24 may be written:
 M·a≡b   (25)
The solution for vector, a, follows by using standard methods of linear algebra to obtain the inverse of matrix M which is designated by M−1. Thus, the solution for vector, a, is shown as Equa. 26.
a≡M−1·b   (26)
The set of a-coefficients found from Equa. 26, using values of M (Equa. 22) and b (Equa. 23), is the final result. With the a-coefficients determined, the explicit “best fit” polynomial expansion for z′(x,y), shown by Equa. 17, is determined.
4.2.4 Illustrative Example
Consider, as an example, when the original optical surface is an acrylic contact lens with an index of refraction n=1.49, and with an anterior contour in the shape of a paraboloid described by z ( x , y ) = - [ 1 2 · R · [ x 2 + y 2 ] ] .
The radius of curvature at the apex is 7.8 mm which is the constant R. All linear dimensions in this example, such as those described by x, y and z, are understood to be in millimeters.
The partial derivatives of z(x,y) are readily obtained. When these values are substituted into Equas. 1 and 2, the values for the components of the normal vector N as functions of x & y are readily obtained. Nx = x R 2 + x 2 + y 2 Ny = y R 2 + x 2 + y 2 Nz = R R 2 + x 2 + y 2 ( 27 )
In this example, measurements with the wavefront sensor are spaced 1 mm apart in the x and y directions within the domain of a circular pupil having an 8 mm diameter. There are 49 measurement sites. These data, which are the components in x & y of the emerging B-rays (i.e. Bx & By), are given by the two matrices shown below. The x-direction is to the right, and the y-direction is upward. Note that the values of Bx & By are multiplied by 1000 which makes the resulting directional units in milliradians. 1000 · ( 28 ) Bx = [ 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .76 0 .57 0.2 - 0 .17 - 0 .36 0 0 0 0 .86 0 .95 0 .67 0.2 - 0 .27 - 0 .55 - 0 .46 0 0 0 .95 1 .01 0 .7 0.2 - 0 .3 - 0 .61 - 0 .55 0 0 .2 0 .86 0 .95 0 .67 0.2 - 0 .27 - 0 .55 - 0 .46 0 .2 0 0 .58 0 .76 0 .58 0.2 - 0 .18 - 0 .36 - 0 .18 0 0 0 .11 0 .45 0 .42 0.2 - 0 .02 - 0 .05 0 .29 0 0 0 0 .02 0 .2 0.2 0 .2 0 .38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 ] 1000 · ( 29 ) By = [ 0 0 0 0 - 2 .99 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 2 .24 - 2.43 - 2 .5 - 2 .43 - 2 .24 0 0 0 - 1 .34 - 1 .5 - 1.59 - 1 .62 - 1 .59 - 1 .5 - 1 .34 0 0 - 0 .56 - 0 .56 - 0.56 - 0 .56 - 0 .56 - 0 .56 - 0 .56 0 0 0 .22 0 .38 0.47 0 .5 0 .47 0 .38 0 .22 0 0 0 .82 1 .13 1.31 1 .38 1 .31 1 .13 0 .82 0 0 1 .04 1 .51 1.79 1 .88 1 .79 1 .51 1 .04 0 0 0 1 .32 1.7 1 .82 1 .7 1 .32 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .02 0 0 0 0 ]
Bx & By represent the x & y directions of the rays emerging from the contact lens. The X and Y coordinates of the focal spots resulting from these rays, when imaged by the 1 mm spaced microlens array onto the wavefront sensor's measurement plane, are shifted somewhat from the intersection of the regular 1 mm spaced grid lines. The X & Y coordinate shifts are equal to the product of the focal length of the microlens array and the Bx and By values. In this example f=200 mm. The centroids of the focal spots of the wavefront sensor pattern are shown in FIG. 4.
A measure of the degree of collimation of all the B-rays is its root-mean-square value, labeled Brms. It is found by taking the square root of the average of all 49 values of Bx2+By2 as shown in Equas. 28 & 29. The value is Brms=0.00148 radians.
Continuing with the methods to find the correcting surface, substitute the known numerical data (i.e. N summarized by Equa. 27, Bx and By given explicitly by Equas. 28 and 29, and n=1.49) into Equas. 9 through 12 in order to find the emerging A-rays. Then, Equas. 13 through 16 are used to find δz′(x,y)/δx and δz′(x,y)/δy. Next, like Equa. 17, the following third order polynomial expression is used to represent z′(x,y).
z′(x,y)≡a1x+a2·y+a3·x2+a4·x·y+a5·y2+ . . . +a6·x3+a7·x2·y+a8·x·y2+a9·y3   (30)
where
 g1≡x g2≡y g3≡x2 g4≡x·y g5≡y5 g6≡x3 g7≡x2·y g8≡x·y2 g9≡y3   (31)
Finally, M, b and a are computed from Equas. 22, 23 and 26. The results of these calculations appear below. Note that the elements of the a-vector are the coefficients of the polynomial expression, Equa. 30, for z′(x,y). It is to be noted that, although the polynomial expression for z′(x,y) used in this example is only of order 3 for ease of illustration, the equations and methods of solution are easily extended to higher order polynomials. Programs to solve the resulting equations can be written using mathematical software available for use with personal computers. Of course, as the order of the polynomial increases, so too do the sizes of the M-matrix, and the b and a-vectors. For instance, associated with a polynominal of order 5 is a M-matrix having 20×20 elements, and b and a-vectors each having 20 elements. M = [ 49 0 0 0 0 576 0 192 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 192 0 576 0 0 768 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 768 0 0 0 0 576 0 0 0 0 14040 0 1380 0 0 192 0 0 0 0 3400 0 1380 192 0 0 0 0 1380 0 3400 0 0 576 0 0 0 0 1380 0 14040 ] ( 32 ) b = [ - 0 .02041 - 0 .001126 - 49 .09 0 .000007021 - 48 .69 - 0 .2415 0 .1101 - 0 .08047 0 .4015 ] and a = [ - 0 .0004123 - 0 .001039 - 0 .06392 0 .00000001828 - 0 .0634 - 0 .0000002603 0 .00006473 - 0 .0000002798 0 .00006487 ] ( 33 )
The expression for z′(x,y) defined by Equa. 30 is determined only up to an arbitrary constant. When one considers that a machining operation generally is employed to reshape surface z(x,y) to the new modified surface z′(x,y) and that the machine has to be programmed to remove “positive” amounts of material, one realizes that the arbitrary constant has to be large enough to shift surface z′(x,y) so that, when shifted, its value can never be greater than z(x,y). For the example, z′(x,y) values are shifted in the negative z-direction by 0.011247 mm to satisfy this condition. The depth of cut to modify z(x,y) to the correcting surface is labelled CUT, and is expressed Equa. 34. Numerical values of 1000*CUT (in microns) at 1 mm spacings in the x & y directions are given in Equa. 35.

CUT(x,y)≡z(x, y)−(z′(x, y)−.011247)   (34) 1000 · CUT = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 .5 6 .3 6 .3 5 .6 0 0 0 6 7 .9 9 .3 10 10 .1 9 .6 8 .5 0 0 8 .1 9 .7 10 .9 11 .5 11 .7 11 .4 10 .6 0 6 .7 8 .4 9 .7 10 .7 11 .2 11 .5 11 .4 10 .9 10 .1 0 7 .3 8 .3 9 9 .6 9 .9 9 .9 9 .8 0 0 5 .2 5 .9 6 .4 6 .9 7 .2 7 .5 7 .7 0 0 0 2 .8 3 .2 3 .6 4 4 .5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] ( 35 )
4.2.5 Check that the New Surface Corrects Aberrations
In order to realize how well the new surface z′(x,y), described by the polynomial expression (Equa. 30) with the a-coefficients (Equa. 33), corrects the original optical aberrations, the following calculations are done: 1) find δz′/δx and δz/δy from Equa. 30 at all the measurement sites, and 2) use the values just found to find the x, y and z coordinates of N″ from Equa. 1 & 2 where N″ represents the normal to z′(x,y) [see Equa. 30]. Next rewrite Equa. 11 in the following form which takes into account the labelling for the new correcting surface:
B″≡n·A−λ″·N″  (36)
B″ represents the emerging rays after the surface has been corrected and is the parameter currently being sought. A, which is invariant with changes to the optical surface, is already known having been obtained previously by the methods described in the paragraph preceeding Equa. 30. Likewise N″ is known, having been found by the methods outlined in the paragraph just above. At this stage, λ″ is not yet determined; however, it is determined by the following methods.
First, from Equa. 9 find:
β″=asin(|N″×B″|)   (37)
Since the vector product N″×N″=0, from Equa. 36 find that N″×B″=n*(N″×A). Therefore, Equa. 37 can be rewritten.
β″=asin(|n*(N″×A)|)   (38)
Since n, N″ and A are now known parameters, Equa. 38 gives the solution for β″.
Now that solutions for β″ are found, the corresponding solutions for α″ and λ″ are found from modified forms of Equas. 10 & 12 which appear as . . .
α″=asin(sin(β″)/n)   (39)
λ″=n* cos(α″)−cos(β″)   (40)
B″ can now be found from Equa. 36 by substituting the now known values for n, A, λ″ and N″. In Equas. 41 & 42, the x & y components of B″, which are written as B″x and B″y, appear multiplied by 1000 which makes the resulting directional units in milliradians. 1000 · B x = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0.15 0.02 0 - 0.02 0.15 0 0 0 - 0.22 0.16 0.17 0 - 0.17 - 0.16 0.22 0 0 0.05 0.34 0.26 0 - 0.26 - 0.34 - 0.05 0 - 0.67 0.14 0.4 0.29 0 - 0.3 - 0.41 - 0.14 0.67 0 0.05 0.34 0.26 0 - 0.27 - 0.34 - 0.05 0 0 - 0.23 0.16 0.17 0 - 0.17 - 0.16 0.23 0 0 0 - 0.15 0.02 0 - 0.02 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] ( 41 ) 1000 · B y = [ 0 0 0 0 0.63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.22 - 0.04 - 0.13 - 0.05 0.21 0 0 0 0.15 - 0.15 - 0.33 - 0.39 - 0.33 - 0.15 0.14 0 0 - 0.01 - 0.16 - 0.26 - 0.29 - 0.26 - 0.17 - 0.01 0 0 0 0 - 0.01 - 0.01 - 0.01 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.16 0.25 0.28 0.25 0.16 0.02 0 0 - 0.14 0.15 0.33 0.39 0.33 0.16 - 0.14 0 0 0 - 0.22 0.05 0.14 0.05 - 0.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0.65 0 0 0 0 ] ( 42 )
A measure of the degree of collimation of all the B″-rays is its root-mean-square value, labeled B″rms. It is found by taking the square root of the average of all 49 values of B″x2+B″y2. The value of B″rms=0.00033 radians. That it is considerably less than the rms value for the original rays, which was Brms=0.00148 radians, demonstrates the success of the algorithms and methods.
With polynomial expansions for z′(x,y) having orders higher than 3 as in this current example, the corresponding size of B″rms is even less than the value given above. Furthermore, considering that 20/20 visual acuity implies resolving lines spaced 0.00029 radian apart (i.e. 1 minute of arc), the new correcting surface in this example is shown to improve visual acuity to very nearly 20/20.
The centroids of the focal spots of the wavefront sensor pattern for the case of the corrected B″-rays from the new correcting surface z′(x,y) are shown in FIG. 5. When compared to FIG. 4, which shows the pattern for the original aberrating optical surface, FIG. 5 shows rays that are much better collimated.
4.3 Fabrication of Aberration Correcting Surfaces on Lenses and Corneal Tissue
4.3.1 Diamond Point Machining
Since the surface contours of aberration-correcting contact lenses described by z′(x,y) are more complex than the spherical or toroidal surfaces of conventional contact lenses, the position of a cutting tool needed to generate the z′(x,y) surfaces has to be controlled in a unique way. A programmable computer controlled single point diamond turning (SPDT) lathe, shown in FIG. 6, has been used to generate the surfaces of aberration-correcting contact lenses. The lathe 30 has two moving subassemblies: 1) a low vibration air bearing spindle 31, and 2) x-z positioning slides 32. Contact lens 33, which is held and centered on the end of spindle 31, is rotated by the spindle while a fine diamond tool 34 is moved by the positioning slides 32 with sub-micron resolution both perpendicular to (i.e. tool transverse scan in x-direction), and parallel to (i.e. tool cutting depth in z-direction) the direction of the spindle's axis. Smooth tool motion is achieved by the preferred means of using hydrostatic oil-bearing or air-bearing slideways. A preferred means for precise slide positioning is achieved by using computer controlled piezoelectric drivers or precise lead screw drivers (not shown). Since the machine must be completely free of both internal and external vibrations, both lathe 30 and x-z slides 32 are secured to a pneumatically isolated table top 35 which rests on granite base 36.
During lens machining, a computer 37 receives synchronous signals from spindle 31 and controls the movement of the x-z translation slides 32 along a programmed trajectory that is synchronized with the rotational position of the spindle. The motion of the x-translation slide (i.e. perpendicular to the spindle axis) generally is at a uniform speed as with an ordinary lathe. However, the requirement of forming a non-axially symmetric lens surface (i.e. z′(x,y) shape), when using a high speed lathe, requires a unique control method for positioning the z-translation slide (i.e. controls cutter movement parallel to the spindle axis and, consequently, the depth of cut on the lens surface which rotates rapidly with respect to the cutter). The z-translation slide must be rapidly and precisely located in accord with both the x-translation slide location, and the rotational position of the spindle. The preferred means of rapid and precise positioning of the z-translation slide is by the utilization of computer controlled piezoelectric drivers.
Finally, mounting the optical element firmly on a supporting block before placement on the end of the spindle is extremely important to avoid distorting the optical surface during machining. Care also must be taken to avoid distorting the lens blank when securing it to the supporting block; otherwise, the surface will warp after removing it from the block following final surfacing.
As an alternative to a precision lathe, custom contact lenses can also be machined by an x-y-z contour cutting machine. With a machine of this type, the lens is held stationary and figured by a cutting tool driven in a precise x-y raster scan while the depth of cut in the z-direction is controlled by a computer often with positional feedback provided by an interferometer. Such an x-y-z contour cutting machine is described by Plummer et al. at the 8th International Precision Engineering Seminar (1995), and published in those proceedings by the Journal of American Society of Precision Engineering, pp. 24-29.
4.3.2 Surfacing by Ablation using an Ultraviolet Laser
Laser ablation of corneal tissue currently is used to reshape the anterior corneal surface in order to correct near and farsightedness and astigmatism in the human eye. Laser tissue ablation also can be used to make more subtle corrections to the corneal surface than are now performed. Such corrections are needed to correct the eye's higher order optical aberrations. Therefore, laser surface ablation is a preferred method of contouring corneal tissue in order to correct the eye's higher order optical aberrations.
Also, as an alternative to machining optical plastic contact lenses with a fine diamond point tool, laser machining, similar to the laser ablation technique used to reshape the surface of the cornea, is also possible. It is likely that the most useful lasers for this purpose will prove to be those emitting ultra-violet light which ablate material away from surfaces, not by thermal heating or melting, but by rapid disruption of chemical bonds. Excimer lasers and solid state frequency-tripled (or frequency-quadrupled) Nd-YAG lasers are now proving to be useful both for machining plastics and ablating human tissue. These same lasers may be considered for precise surfacing operations needed for the fabrication of aberration correcting contact lenses or advanced refractive surgery.
4.4 Alternate Methods for Fabrication of Aberration Correcting Lenses
In addition to diamond point machining and laser ablation methods, there are other conceivable ways of fabricating an optical lens that can compensate for the eye's irregular optical aberrations. Any successful fabrication method must be capable of either precisely forming the lens surface to the required z′(x,y) shape, or meticulously varying the refractive index over the surface in order to bend the light rays to correct the aberrations. Described below are several alternate lens fabrication methods.
4.4.1 Mechanical Force Thermal Molding
If the lens is a thermoplastic, its surface may be formed to match that of a heated die. This method follows from the techniques used to form plastic parts by injection or compression molding. Since the desired topography of the lens surface generally is complex, the surface of the heated die is required to have a corresponding complex shape. When normally forming a plastic lens by the methods of injection or compression molding, the die which determines the shape of the lens is made of a single piece of metal and has a permanent surface shape. To form the customized and complex lens surfaces needed to correct the irregular aberrations of the human eye, it is necessary to construct and utilize dies with variable or “adaptive” surfaces. In the field known as “adaptive optics”, such variable surfaces (anecdotally referred to as “rubber mirrors”) have been formed and controlled using computer-derived input signals that drive electromechanical fingers which press against a deformable metal surface.
Such an arrangement, which is called here a variable segmented die, is shown in FIG. 7. The housing for the die 40 provides a number of channeled holes to hold a corresponding number of mechanical fingers 41 which are moved upwards or downwards in the die housing 40 by electronic drivers or actuators 42. Mechanical fingers 41 press against a continuous deformable metal surface 43 which contacts the thermoplastic lens surface and establishes its final shape. As an alternative to using a customized heated die with its surface formed by electromechanical fingers pressing in a controlled way against a deformable metal surface, an arrangement of close-packed, electronically actuated mechanical fingers without a deformable metal surface may be used. With this alternative arrangement, each mechanical finger in the array would press directly on the surface of the thermoplastic lens blank in order to form its surface as required.
4.4.2 Photolithography and Etching
A layer of photoresist is spun onto the glass or plastic lens substrate, and selectively exposed using either an optical scanner or an electron beam scanner. The exposure extent over regions of the surface of the photoresist is properly matched with the desired surface contour of the finished lens. The photoresist is developed chemically, thereby being selectively prepared for subsequent etching over those areas having previously received the most illumination. The surface of the glass or plastic lens substrate is then etched using reactive ion etching or chemically assisted ion-beam etching where the depth of the etch is determined by the extent of illumination during the previous exposure of the photoresist. It is noted that forms of PMMA (i.e. polymethyl methacrylate), which is a widely used optical plastic used for making contact lenses, are used as photoresists. Therefore, one can imagine tailoring the surface of a PMMA lens, in order to correct an eye's higher-order aberrations, directly without needing to use a separate photoresist layer over the lens substrate.
4.4.3 Thin Film Deposition:
There are various techniques now employed to add thin layers of various materials to the surfaces of glass and plastic optical lenses. The current purposes for applying such thin films to lenses are: 1) to limit the transmission of light, 2) to reduce surface reflections, and 3) to protect surfaces from scratching and abrasion. Some of the methods employed include dip coating, spin coating, evaporative coating, spraying, and ion sputtering. To modify these existing methods for the purpose of making a lens useful to correct the higher-order aberrations of the human eye will require refinements that allow the deposition of layers with thicknesses that vary selectively over the surface of the lens substrate in order to achieve the required z′(x,y) shape.
In addition to the methods now used to deposit thin films on optical surfaces, one can imagine other methods that may prove possibly more useful. Particularly useful could be a method of injecting from a fine nozzle or series of fine nozzles, which are in proximity to a surface, controlled amounts of transparent liquid materials that permanently bond when deposited on the surface. Scanning these controllable material-depositing nozzles over the surface of an optical substrate can result in building up on the optical substrate a custom surface contour that meets the requirements of correcting the higher-order optical aberrations of a subject's eye. Similar to what is conceived above is the operation of ink-jet devices used in computer printers.
4.4.4 Surface Chemistry Alteration:
Surfaces of flat glass disks have been implanted with certain ionic impurities that result in index of refraction changes that can vary radially from the center to the edge of the disk, or axially over the depth of the disk. Such methods are utilized in the fabrication of so-called “gradient index” optical elements, and flat disks are available commercially that behave as ordinary positive or negative lenses. Although plastic gradient index lenses have not yet been made, one can imagine altering the refractive index of a plastic subsurface by certain techniques. For example, the exposure of a plastic surface to ultraviolet light can alter the polymerization of subsurface macromolecules and, thereby, change the index of refraction in the subsurface region. For another example, the methods now used to imbibe dye molecules from solution into plastic surfaces in order to tint ophthalmic lenses may also be effective in changing the index of refraction in subsurface layers. In the future, it is conceivable that the methods of surface chemistry alteration, which are used now to fabricate “gradient index” optical elements, can be refined for both glass and plastic materials in order to make them useful in the fabrication of adaptive optical lenses for correcting the higher-order aberrations of the human eye.
REFERENCES CITED
U.S. Patent Documents:
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,719 issued Jul. 7, 1998 to David R. Williams and Junzhong Liang entitled “Method and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images”
Other References:
  • G Walsh, W N Charman, H C Howland. Objective technique for the determination of the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A1, 987-992 (1984)
  • R H Webb, C M Penney, K P Thompson. Measurment of ocular wave-front distortion with a spatially resolved refractometer. Appl. Opt. 31, 3678-3686 (1992)
  • P Artal, J Santamaria, J Bescos. Retrieval of wave aberration of human eyes from actual point-spread-function data. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A5, 1201-1206 (1988)
  • P Magnante, B Fadden. Instrument for MTF measurements of cataractous eyes. Vision Science and its Applications-Opt Soc Am Meeting, 76-79 (1997)
  • R V Shack, B C Platt. Production and Use of Lenticular Hartmann Screen. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 656 (1971)
  • J Liang, B Grimm, S Goetz, J F Billie. Objective measurements of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J. Opt. Soc. Am A11, 1949-1957 (1994)
  • D Malacara. Optical Shop Testing (Appendix 2). John Wiley and Sons, New York (1978)
  • I S Sokolnikoff, R M Redheffer. Mathematics of Physics and Modern Engineering (Chapter 9, Section 11). McGraw-Hill, New York (1958)
  • W T Plummer, J J Mader, J W Roblee, J Van Tassell. Precision Engineering at Polaroid. Reprint from 8th International Precision Engineering Seminar sponsored by J. Am. Soc. Prec. Eng., 24-29

Claims (26)

1. A method for correcting the optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism of an eye fitted with an original contact lens having a known anterior surface shape by providing a modified or new contact lens which has its anterior surface reshaped from said original contact lens's anterior surface, comprising the steps of:
a) measuring said optical aberrations of an eye fitted with an original contact lens,
b) performing a mathematical analysis of said eye's optical aberrations when fitted with original contact lens to determine said modified anterior contact lens surface shape, and
c) fabricating said modified anterior contact lens surface by methods that remove, add or compress material or alter the surface chemistry.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said measuring of the eye's optical aberrations comprises the sub-steps of:
i) optically projecting the image of a small point of incoherent light onto the macular region of the eye's retina,
ii) optically conveying the image of the eye's pupil, through which light scattered back from the macular region emerges, onto a microlens array,
iii) optically conveying the multiple spot images formed by said microlens array onto the image plane of a photo-electronic imaging device,
iv) transforming by means of the photo-electronic imaging device the multiple spot images formed by said microlens array to an electronic signal which represents the images,
v) conveying said electronic signal to a computer for data processing,
vi) processing first the electronic signal with said computer in order to obtain the coordinate locations of the centroids of said multiple spot images formed by said microlens array, and
vii) processing next said coordinate locations with said computer in order to obtain the slopes of optical rays emerging from the subject's pupil at said coordinate locations.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said mathematical analysis comprises the sub-steps of:
i) determining mathematically the normal vectors of said original contact lens's anterior surface,
ii) determining mathematically the directional derivatives of said modified or new contact lens's anterior surface using data of said normal vectors of original contact lens's anterior surface and data of said eye's optical aberrations, and
iii) fitting mathematically by the method of least squares said directional derivatives to the corresponding directional derivatives of a polynomial expression that represents said modified or new contact lens's anterior surface.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said step of fabricating said modified or new contact lens's anterior surface is chosen from the group of methods comprising diamond point machining, laser ablation, thermal molding, photo-lithographic etching, thin film deposition, and surface chemistry alteration.
5. A method for correcting the optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism of an eye with an original anterior corneal surface of known shape by providing a modified anterior corneal surface shape, comprising the steps of:
a) measuring said eye's optical aberrations,
b) performing a mathematical analysis of said eye's optical aberrations to determine said modified anterior corneal surface shape,
c) fabricating said modified anterior corneal surface by laser ablation.
6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein said measuring of the eye's optical aberrations comprises the sub-steps of:
i) optically projecting the image of a small point of incoherent light onto the macular region of the eye's retina,
ii) optically conveying the image of the eye's pupil, through which light scattered back from the macular region emerges, onto a microlens array,
iii) optically conveying the multiple spot images formed by said microlens array onto the image plane of a photo-electronic imaging device,
iv) transforming by means of the photo-electronic imaging device the multiple spot images formed by said microlens array to an electronic signal which represents the images,
v) conveying said electronic signal to a computer for data processmg,
vi) processing first the electronic signal with said computer in order to obtain the coordinate locations of the centroids of said multiple spot images formed by said microlens array, and
vii) processing next said coordinate locations with said computer in order to obtain the slopes of optical rays emerging from the subject's pupil at said coordinate locations.
7. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein said mathematical analysis comprises the sub-steps of:
i) determining mathematically the normal vectors of said original anterior corneal surface,
ii) determining mathematically the directional derivatives of said modified anterior corneal surface using data of said normal vectors of original anterior corneal surface and data of said eye's optical aberrations, and
iii) fitting mathematically by the method of least squares said directional derivatives to the corresponding directional derivatives of a polynomial expression that represents said modified anterior corneal surface.
8. An ophthalmic device for measuring the eye's optical aberrations either with or without a contact lens in place on the cornea, including;
a) an optical projection system for imaging a small point of light onto the macular region of the eye's retina with an improvement provided by use of an incoherent light source chosen from the group comprising laser diodes operated below threshold, light emitting diodes, arc and plasma sources, and incandescent filament lamps,
b) an optical image acquisition system for conveying the image of the eye's pupil, through which light scattered back from the macular region emerges, onto a microlens array,
c) a microlens array to form multiple spot images onto the image plane of a photo-electronic imaging device,
d) a photo-electronic imaging device for transforming said multiple spot images formed by said microlens array to an electronic signal which represents the images,
e) a computer for processing the electronic signal in order, first, to obtain the coordinate locations of the centroids of said multiple spot images formed by said microlens array and, second, to obtain the slopes of optical rays emerging from the subject's pupil at said coordinate locations, and
f) an optical alignment system allowing the entering beam to be accurately centered with respect to the subject's pupil.
9. An ophthalmic device as claimed in claim 8 wherein said optical projection system includes an optical isolator consisting of a quarter-wave plate and polarizer.
10. An ophthalmic device as claimed in claim 8 wherein said optical projection system includes a field stop placed at a location that is optically conjugate to the eye's retina.
11. An ophthalmic device as claimed in claim 8 wherein said optical projection system includes both an optical isolator consisting of a quarter-wave plate and polarizer, and a field stop placed at a location that is optically conjugate to the eye's retina.
12. An ophthalmic device as claimed in claim 8 wherein said photo-electronic imaging device is chosen from the group comprising vidicons, charge-coupled devices, and charge-injection devices.
13. A device for thermally forming surfaces on thermoplastic contact lens blanks that correct eyes' optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism consisting of a die with an adjustable surface shape (either continuous or discontinuous) formed by computer-controlled electromechanical actuators or electromechanical fingers which are known in the field of adaptive optics.
14. A lathe device for machining surfaces on contact lens blanks that correct eyes' optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism consisting of a rotating spindle onto which a contact lens blank is fastened, translation slides for precisely positioning a diamond point cutting tool with respect to the surface of the contact lens blank, and a programmed computer that controls the movement of the translation slides synchronously with the rotational location of the spindle.
15. A contour cutting device for machining surfaces on contact lens blanks that correct eyes'optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism consisting of a means for supporting and holding stationary a contact lens blank, translation slides for precisely positioning in three dimensions a diamond point cutting tool with respect to the surface of the contact lens blank, and a programmed computer that controls the movement of the translation slides.
16. A method for correcting optical aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism of an eye comprising:
a) fitting the eye with a first contact lens having a known anterior surface shape that is corrected for at least focus,
b) measuring the optical aberrations of the eye fitted with the first contact lens,
c) performing a mathematical analysis of the eye's optical aberrations when fitted with the first contact lens to determine a modified anterior contact lens surface shape, and
d) fabricating a second contact lens having the modified anterior contact lens surface.
17. A method as claimed in claim 16 performing the mathematical analysis to at least the eye's 4 th order optical aberrations of the eye when fitted with the first contact lens to determine the second contact lens surface shape, and the anterior surface of the second contact lens to have the modified anterior surface that corrects the eye to at least the 4 th order aberration.
18. A method as claimed in claim 17 wherein the measuring of the eye's optical aberrations comprises the sub-steps of:
i) optically projecting the image of a small point of incoherent light onto the macular region of the eye's retina,
ii) optically conveying the image of the eye's pupil, through which light scattered back from the macular region emerges, onto a microlens array,
iii) optically conveying the multiple spot images formed by the microlens array onto the image plane of a photo-electronic imaging device,
iv) transforming by means of the photo-electronic imaging device the multiple spot images formed by the microlens array to an electronic signal which represents the images,
v) conveying the electronic signal to a computer for data processing,
vi) processing first the electronic signal with the computer in order to obtain the coordinate locations of the centroids of the multiple spot images formed by the microlens array, and
vii) processing next the coordinate locations with the computer in order to obtain the slopes of optical rays emerging from the subject's pupil at the coordinate locations.
19. A method as claimed in claim 17 wherein the mathematical analysis comprises the sub-steps of:
i) determining mathematically the normal vectors of the first contact lens's anterior surface,
ii) determining mathematically the directional derivatives of the second contact lens's anterior surface using data of the normal vectors of the first contact lens's surface and data of the eye's optical aberrations, and
iii) fitting mathematically by the method of least squares the directional derivatives to the corresponding directional derivatives of a polynomial expression that represents the second contact lens's anterior surface.
20. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the original contact lens's anterior surface contour function z (x,y) and the eye's optical aberrations, represented by optical rays emerging from the pupil given by vector function B (x,y), are used to find the surface contour function z′ (x,y) of the modified or new contact lens by the following mathematical procedures:
a) z′(x,y) is approximated by the sum of a series of linearly independent terms in x & y with each term labeled by an index j wherein each term, a j ·g j(x,y), consists of an unknown constant coefficient a j and a known function g j(x,y) as shown in following Equation ( 1 )
z ( x , y ) j a j · g j ( x , y ) ( 1 )
b) following Equation ( 2 ) is obtained by taking vector gradients of both sides of Equation ( 1 ) where grad z′ (x,y) is a two-dimensional vector having components [ δ z ( x , y ) / δ x , δ z ( x , y ) / δ y ] grad z ( x , y ) = j a j · grad g j ( x , y ) ( 2 )
c) the normal vectors of the original contact lens's anterior surface, given by vector function N(x,y), are found by taking the vector gradient of z(x,y) and normalizing it to unity as shown in the following Equations ( 3A) to ( 3D) Nx 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ x , ( 3 A ) Ny 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ y , ( 3 B ) Nz 1 MAG ( 3 C ) MAG≡[1+z(x,y)/δx)2+(δz(x,y)/δy)2] 1/2   ( 3D)
d) the rays incident on the original contact lens coming from within the eye are given by vector function A(x,y) which is found by applying Snell's law of refraction at the air/lens interface which relates A(x,y) to known vector function B(x,y) representing the emerging rays, and vector function N(x,y) given by Equations ( 3A)-( 3D),
e) the normal vectors of the modified or new contact len's anterior surface, given by the vector function N′, are found from the following Equation ( 4 ) where vector function B′ is represented by unit vectors pointed along the positive z-axis, and n is the lens's refractive index N ( n · A - B ) n · A - B ( 4 )
f) the directional derivatives of the modified or new contact lens's anterior surface are obtained from the following Equation ( 5 ) using the components of vector function N′=[N′ x , N′ y , N′ z ] found from Equation ( 4 ) δ z δ x - N x N z and δ z δ y - N y N z ( 5 )
g) apply the method of least squares to minimize the square the difference between the component values of grad z′(x,y) found from Equation ( 5 ) and the component values of grad z′(x,y) given by the approximation series, Equa. ( 2 ), in order to obtain matrix Equation ( 6 )

M·a≡b   ( 6 )
where M ( i , j ) x , y ( grad g i · grad g j ) and b i x , y ( grad g i · grad z ) ( 7 )
h) obtain the inverse of matrix M, and then find the a-coefficients from matrix Equation ( 8 )

a≡M −1 ·b   ( 8 )
i) the a-coefficients determined from Equation ( 8 ) are used in Equation ( 1 ) which defines the modified or new contact lens's anterior surface, z′ (x,y) when it is represented, for example, by a 5 th order Taylor series.
21. A methdo as claimed in claim 19 wherein the first Contact lens's anterior surface contour function z(x,y) and the eye's optical aberrations, represented by optical rays emerging from the pupil given by vector function B(x,y), are used to find the surface contour function z′(x−y) of the second contact lens by the following mathematical procedures:
a) z′ (x,y) is approximated by the sum of a series of linearly independent terms in x & y with each term labeled by an index j wherein each term, a j ·g j(x,y), consists of an unknown constant coefficient a j and a known function g j(x,y) as shown in following Equation ( 1 ) z ( x , y ) j a j · g j ( x , y ) ( 1 )
b) following Equation ( 2 ) is obtained by taking vector gradients of both sides of Equation ( 1 ) where grad z′ (x,y) is a two-dimensional vector having components [ δ z ( x , y ) / δ x , δ z ( x , y ) / δ y ] grad z ( x , y ) = j a j · grad g j ( x , y ) ( 2 )
c) the normal vectors of the first contact lens's anterior surface, given by vector function N(x,y), are found by taking the vector gradient of z(x,y) and normalizing it to unity as shown in the following Equations ( 3A) to ( 3D) Nx 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ x , ( 3 A ) Ny 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ y , ( 3 B ) Nz 1 MAG ( 3 C ) MAG≡[1+z(x,y)/δx)2+(δz(x,y)/δy)2] 1/2   ( 3D)
d) the rays incident on the first contact lens coming from within the eye are given by vector function A(x,y) which is found by applying Snell's law of refraction at the air/lens interface which relates A(x,y) to known vector function B(x,y) representing the emerging rays, and vector function N(x,y) given by Equations ( 3A)-( 3B),
e) the normal vectors of the second contact lens's anterior surface, given by the vector function N′, are found from the following Equation ( 4 ) where vector function B′ is represented by unit vectors pointing along the positive z-axis, and n is the lens's refractive index N = ( n · A - B ) n · A - B ( 4 )
f) the directional derivatives of the second contact lens's anterior surface are obtained from the following Equation ( 5 ) using the components of vector function N′=[N′ x ,N′ y ,N′ z ] found from Equation ( 4 ) δ z δ x - N x N z and δ z δ y - N y N z ( 5 )
g) apply the method of at least squares to minimize the square the difference between the component values of grad z′ (x,y) found from Equation ( 5 ) and the component values of grad z′ (x,y) given by the approximation series, Equa. ( 2 ), in order to obtain matrix Equation ( 6 )

M·a≡b   ( 6 )
where M ( i , j ) x , y ( grad g i · grad g j ) and b i = x , y ( grad g i · grad z ) ( 7 )
h) obtain the inverse of matrix M, and then find the a-coefficient from matrix Equation ( 8 )

a≡M −1 ·b   (8)
i) the a-coefficients determined from Equation ( 8 ) are used in Equation ( 1 ) which defines the second contact lens's anterior surface, z′ (x,y) when it is represented, for example, by a 5 th order Taylor series.
22. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the original cornea's anterior surface contour function z(x,y) and the eye's optical aberrations, represented by optical rays emerging from the pupil given by vector function B(x,y), are used to find the surface contour function z′(x,y) of the modified cornea by the following mathematical procedures:
a) z′ (x,y) is approximated by the sum of a series of linearly independent terms in x & y with each term labeled by an index j wherein each term, a j ·g j(x,y), consists of an unknown constant coefficient a j and a known function g j(x,y) as shown in following Equation ( 1 ) z ( x , y ) j a j · g j ( x , y ) ( 1 )
b) following Equation ( 2 ) is obtained by taking vector gradients of both sides of Equation ( 1 ) where grad z′ (x,y) is a two-dimensional vector having components [ δ z ( x , y ) / δ x , δ z ( x , y ) / δ y ] grad z ( x , y ) = j a j · grad g j ( x , y ) ( 2 )
c) the normal vectors of the original cornea's anterior surface, given by vector function N(x,y), are found by taking the vector gradient of z(x,y) and normalizing it to unity as shown in the following Equations ( 3A) to ( 3D) Nx 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ x , ( 3 A ) Ny 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ y , ( 3 B ) Nz 1 MAG ( 3 C ) MAG≡[1+z(x,y)/δx)2+(δz(x,y)/δy)2] 1/2   ( 30 )
d) the rays incident on the original cornea coming from within the eye are given by vector function A(x,y) which is found by applying Snell's law of reflection at the air/cornea interface which relates A(x,y) to known vector function B(x,y) representing the emerging rays, and vector function N(x,y) given by Equations ( 3A)-( 3B),
e) the normal vectors of the modified cornea's anterior surface, given by the vector function N′, are found from the following Equation ( 4 ) where vector function B′ is represented by unit vectors pointing along the positive z-axis, and n is the cornea's refractive index N ( n · A - B ) n · A - B ( 4 )
f) the directional derivatives of the modified cornea's anterior surface are obtained from the following Equation ( 5 ) using the components of vector function N′=[N′ x , N′ y , N′ z ] found from Equation ( 4 ) δ z δ x - N x N z and δ z δ y - N y N z ( 5 )
g) apply the method of least squares to minimize the square the difference between the component values of grad z′(x,y) found the Equation ( 5 ) and the component values of grad z′ (x,y) given by the approximation series, Equa. ( 2 ), in order to obtain matrix Equation ( 6 )

M·a≡b   ( 6 )
where M ( i , j ) x , y ( grad g i · grad g j ) and b i = x , y ( grad g i · grad z ) ( 7 )
h) obtain the inverse of matrix M, and then find the a-coefficients from matrix Equation ( 8 )

a≡M −1 ·b
i) the a-coefficient determined from Equation ( 8 ) are used in Equation ( 1 ) which defines the modified cornea's anterior surface, z′ (x,y) when it is represented, for example, by a 5 th order Taylor series.
23. A contact lens comprising an anterior surface which is fabricated to correct the optical aberration to at least 4 th order of a person's eye.
24. The contact lens of claim 23 wherein the measuring of the eye's optical aberrations is by steps of:
(i) optically projecting the image of a small point of incoherent light onto the macular region of the eye's retina,
(ii) optically conveying the image of the eye's pupil, through which light scattered back from the macular region emerges onto a microlens array,
(iii) optically conveying the multiple spot images formed by the microlens array onto the image plane of a photo-electronic imaging device,
(iv) transforming by means of the photo-electronic imaging device the multiple spot images formed by the microlens array to an electronic signal which represents the images;
(v) conveying the electronic signal to a computer for data processing,
(vi) processing first the electronic signal with the computer in order to obtain the coordinate locations of the centroids of the multiple spot images formed by the microlens array, and
(vii) processing next the coordinate locations with the computer in order to obtain the slopes of optical rays emerging from the subject's pupil at the coordinate locations.
25. The contact lens of claim 23 wherein the mathematical analysis comprises the sub-steps of:
(a) determining mathematically the normal vectors of a first contact lens anterior surface;
(b) determining mathematically the directional derivatives of the a second contact lens anterior surface using data of the normal vectors of the first contact lens anterior surface and data of the eye's optical aberrations; and
(c) fitting mathematically by the method of least squares the directional derivatives to the corresponding directional derivatives of a polynomial expression that represents the second contact lens anterior surface.
26. The contact lens of claim 23 wherein the first contact lens anterior surface contour function z(x,y) and the eye's optical aberrations, represented by optical rays emerging from the pupil given by vector function B(x,y), are used to find the surface contour function z′(x,y) of the second contact lens by the following mathematical procedures:
(a) z′(x,y) is approximated by the sum of a series of linearly independent terms in x & y with each term labeled by an index j wherein each term, a j ·g j(x,y), consists of an unknown constant coefficient a j and a known function g j (x,y) as shown in following Equation ( 1 ) z ( x , y ) j a j · g j ( x , y ) ( 1 )
b) following Equation ( 2 ) is obtained by taking vector gradients of both sides of Equation ( 1 ) where grad z′ (x,y) is a two-dimensional vector having components [δ z′(x,y)/δx, δz′(x,y)/δy] grad z ( x , y ) = j a j · grad g j ( x , y ) ( 2 )
c) the normal vectors of the first contact lens's anterior surface, given by vector function N (x,y), are found by taking the vector gradient of z(x,y) and normalizing it to unity as shown in the following Equations ( 3A) to ( 3D) Nx 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ x , ( 3 A ) Ny 1 MAG · - δ z ( x , y ) δ y , ( 3 B ) Nz 1 MAG ( 3 C ) MAG≡[1+(δz(x,y)/δx)2+(δz(x,y)/δy)2]½  ( 3D)
d) the rays incident on the first contact lens coming from within the eye are given by vector function A(x,y) which is found by applying Snell's law of refraction at the air/lens interface which relates A(x,y) to known vector function B(x,y) representing the emerging rays, and vector function N(x,y) given by Equations ( 3A)−( 3B),
e) the normal vectors of the second contact lens's anterior surface, given by the vector function N′, are found from the following Equation ( 4 ) where vector function B′ is represented by unit vectors pointing along the positive z-axis, and n is the lens's (or cornea's) refractive index N ( n · A - B ) n · A - B ( 4 )
f) the directional derivatives of the second contact lens's anterior surface are obtained from the following Equation ( 5 ) using the components of vector function N′=[N′ x , N′ y , N′ z ] found from Equation ( 4 ) δ z δ x - N x N z and δ z δ y - N y N z ( 5 )
g) apply the method of least squares to minimize the square the difference between the component values of grad z′ (x,y) found from Equation ( 5 ) and the component values of grad z′(x,y) given by the approximation series, Equa. ( 2 ), in order to obtain matrix Equation ( 6 )

M·a≡b   ( 6 )
where M ( i , j ) x , y ( grad g i · grad g j ) and b i x , y ( grad g i · grad z ) ( 7 )
h) obtain the inverse of matrix M, and then find the a-coefficients from matrix Equation ( 8 )

a≡M ·b   ( 8 )
i) the a-coefficients determined from Equation ( 8 ) are used in Equation ( 1 ) which defines the second contact lens's anterior surface, z′ (x,y) when it is represented, for example, by a 5 th order Taylor series.
US10/192,104 1999-09-20 2002-07-10 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations Expired - Lifetime USRE38839E1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/192,104 USRE38839E1 (en) 1999-09-20 2002-07-10 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/399,022 US6086204A (en) 1999-09-20 1999-09-20 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations
US10/192,104 USRE38839E1 (en) 1999-09-20 2002-07-10 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/399,022 Reissue US6086204A (en) 1999-09-20 1999-09-20 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE38839E1 true USRE38839E1 (en) 2005-10-18

Family

ID=23577804

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/399,022 Ceased US6086204A (en) 1999-09-20 1999-09-20 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations
US10/192,104 Expired - Lifetime USRE38839E1 (en) 1999-09-20 2002-07-10 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/399,022 Ceased US6086204A (en) 1999-09-20 1999-09-20 Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US6086204A (en)
EP (1) EP1215992A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2003509731A (en)
WO (1) WO2001021061A1 (en)

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040135969A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2004-07-15 Masaaki Hanebuchi Keratectomy data determining device and keratectomy data determining program
US20040227932A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2004-11-18 Geunyoung Yoon Large dynamic range shack-hartmann wavefront sensor
US20060287721A1 (en) * 2004-10-05 2006-12-21 David Myung Artificial cornea
US20070179605A1 (en) * 2004-10-05 2007-08-02 David Myung Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel corneal prosthesis
US20070247698A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2007-10-25 University Of Rochester Large dynamic range Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
US20080077238A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2008-03-27 Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Intraocular lenses for managing glare, adhesion, and cell migration
US20080077239A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2008-03-27 Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Intraocular lenses for managing glare, adhesion, and cell migration
US20090002631A1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2009-01-01 Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. System and method for measuring corneal topography
US7857447B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2010-12-28 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel contact lenses
WO2011025846A1 (en) * 2009-08-27 2011-03-03 Novartis Ag Optimizing optical aberrations in ophthalmic lenses
US20110118836A1 (en) * 2009-11-18 2011-05-19 Abbott Medical Optics Inc. Mark for intraocular lenses
US7988290B2 (en) 2007-06-27 2011-08-02 AMO Wavefront Sciences LLC. Systems and methods for measuring the shape and location of an object
US20130182224A1 (en) * 2005-10-27 2013-07-18 The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona Holographic adaptive see-through phoropter
US8497023B2 (en) 2008-08-05 2013-07-30 Biomimedica, Inc. Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels
US8585687B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-11-19 Amo Development, Llc Combined wavefront and topography systems and methods
US8622546B2 (en) 2011-06-08 2014-01-07 Amo Wavefront Sciences, Llc Method of locating valid light spots for optical measurement and optical measurement instrument employing method of locating valid light spots
US8632188B1 (en) 2011-10-19 2014-01-21 Gregory Gemoules Scleral contact lens manufacturing
US8679190B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2014-03-25 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Hydrogel arthroplasty device
US8883915B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2014-11-11 Biomimedica, Inc. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic interpenetrating polymer networks derived from hydrophobic polymers and methods of preparing the same
US9114024B2 (en) 2011-11-21 2015-08-25 Biomimedica, Inc. Systems, devices, and methods for anchoring orthopaedic implants to bone
US10457803B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2019-10-29 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Orthopedic implants having gradient polymer alloys
US10792392B2 (en) 2018-07-17 2020-10-06 Hyalex Orthopedics, Inc. Ionic polymer compositions
US11015016B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2021-05-25 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Polymeric adhesive for anchoring compliant materials to another surface
US11077228B2 (en) 2015-08-10 2021-08-03 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Interpenetrating polymer networks

Families Citing this family (268)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5980513A (en) 1994-04-25 1999-11-09 Autonomous Technologies Corp. Laser beam delivery and eye tracking system
US20050143717A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-06-30 Peyman Gholam A. Method of treatment of refractive errors using subepithelial or intrastromal corneal inlay with bonding coating
US20010027314A1 (en) * 1995-10-20 2001-10-04 Peyman Gholam A. Intrastromal corneal modification via laser
US6989008B2 (en) 2001-03-23 2006-01-24 Minu Llc Adjustable ablatable inlay
US6551307B2 (en) 2001-03-23 2003-04-22 Gholam A. Peyman Vision correction using intrastromal pocket and flap
US20010041884A1 (en) * 1996-11-25 2001-11-15 Frey Rudolph W. Method for determining and correcting vision
US7128737B1 (en) 1997-10-22 2006-10-31 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Object figuring device
US6598975B2 (en) * 1998-08-19 2003-07-29 Alcon, Inc. Apparatus and method for measuring vision defects of a human eye
US6450642B1 (en) 1999-01-12 2002-09-17 California Institute Of Technology Lenses capable of post-fabrication power modification
US20030128336A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-10 Jethmalani Jagdish M. Customized lenses
WO2000052516A2 (en) 1999-03-01 2000-09-08 Boston Innovative Optics, Inc. System and method for increasing the depth of focus of the human eye
US6129722A (en) * 1999-03-10 2000-10-10 Ruiz; Luis Antonio Interactive corrective eye surgery system with topography and laser system interface
US6986579B2 (en) * 1999-07-02 2006-01-17 E-Vision, Llc Method of manufacturing an electro-active lens
US7023594B2 (en) * 2000-06-23 2006-04-04 E-Vision, Llc Electro-optic lens with integrated components
US6857741B2 (en) * 2002-01-16 2005-02-22 E-Vision, Llc Electro-active multi-focal spectacle lens
US6871951B2 (en) * 2000-06-23 2005-03-29 E-Vision, Llc Electro-optic lens with integrated components
US6619799B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2003-09-16 E-Vision, Llc Optical lens system with electro-active lens having alterably different focal lengths
US7290876B2 (en) * 1999-07-02 2007-11-06 E-Vision, Llc Method and system for electro-active spectacle lens design
US7264354B2 (en) 1999-07-02 2007-09-04 E-Vision, Llc Method and apparatus for correcting vision using an electro-active phoropter
US7290875B2 (en) * 2004-11-02 2007-11-06 Blum Ronald D Electro-active spectacles and method of fabricating same
US7775660B2 (en) * 1999-07-02 2010-08-17 E-Vision Llc Electro-active ophthalmic lens having an optical power blending region
US6851805B2 (en) * 1999-07-02 2005-02-08 E-Vision, Llc Stabilized electro-active contact lens
US7988286B2 (en) 1999-07-02 2011-08-02 E-Vision Llc Static progressive surface region in optical communication with a dynamic optic
US7404636B2 (en) * 1999-07-02 2008-07-29 E-Vision, Llc Electro-active spectacle employing modal liquid crystal lenses
DE19938203A1 (en) 1999-08-11 2001-02-15 Aesculap Meditec Gmbh Method and device for correcting visual defects in the human eye
US6886284B2 (en) * 1999-10-08 2005-05-03 Identification Dynamics, Llc Firearm microstamping and micromarking insert for stamping a firearm identification code and serial number into cartridge shell casings and projectiles
US7111423B2 (en) * 1999-10-08 2006-09-26 Identification Dynamics, Llc Method and apparatus for reading firearm microstamping
US6833911B2 (en) 1999-10-08 2004-12-21 Identification Dynamics, Inc. Method and apparatus for reading firearm microstamping
US6653593B2 (en) 1999-10-08 2003-11-25 Nanovia, Lp Control system for ablating high-density array of vias or indentation in surface of object
US6420675B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2002-07-16 Nanovia, Lp Control system for ablating high-density array of vias or indentation in surface of object
WO2001028477A1 (en) * 1999-10-21 2001-04-26 Technolas Gmbh Ophthalmologische Systeme Multi-step laser correction of ophthalmic refractive errors
US6199986B1 (en) * 1999-10-21 2001-03-13 University Of Rochester Rapid, automatic measurement of the eye's wave aberration
JP4610151B2 (en) * 1999-12-30 2011-01-12 ケーエルエー−テンカー・コーポレーション Noise reduction method, noise reduction device, and wafer shape reconstruction method
US7455407B2 (en) * 2000-02-11 2008-11-25 Amo Wavefront Sciences, Llc System and method of measuring and mapping three dimensional structures
US6220707B1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2001-04-24 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete Gmbh Method for programming an active mirror to mimic a wavefront
AU2001245948B2 (en) * 2000-03-20 2004-05-13 Calhoun Vision, Inc. Application of wavefront sensor to lenses capable of post-fabrication power modification
EP1658829A1 (en) * 2000-03-20 2006-05-24 California Institute of Technology Application of wavefront sensor to lenses capable of post-fabrication power modification
US6659613B2 (en) * 2000-03-27 2003-12-09 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Methods and systems for measuring local scattering and aberration properties of optical media
BR0106071A (en) 2000-04-19 2002-04-02 Alcon Universal Ltd Wavefront sensor for objective measurement of an optical system and associated methods
US6338559B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2002-01-15 University Of Rochester Apparatus and method for improving vision and retinal imaging
US6460997B1 (en) 2000-05-08 2002-10-08 Alcon Universal Ltd. Apparatus and method for objective measurements of optical systems using wavefront analysis
US6609793B2 (en) * 2000-05-23 2003-08-26 Pharmacia Groningen Bv Methods of obtaining ophthalmic lenses providing the eye with reduced aberrations
US8020995B2 (en) 2001-05-23 2011-09-20 Amo Groningen Bv Methods of obtaining ophthalmic lenses providing the eye with reduced aberrations
US6830712B1 (en) * 2000-08-28 2004-12-14 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Deformable molds and methods for their use in the manufacture of ophthalmic lenses
US6499843B1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-12-31 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Customized vision correction method and business
MXPA03002436A (en) 2000-09-21 2003-08-19 Visx Inc Enhanced wavefront ablation system.
DE60133656T2 (en) * 2000-09-26 2009-06-25 Calhoun Vision Inc., Pasadena PERFORMANCE ADJUSTMENT FOR ADJUSTABLE LENS
KR20030048431A (en) 2000-10-10 2003-06-19 유니버시티 오브 로체스터 Determination of ocular refraction from wavefront aberration data
EP1325380A2 (en) 2000-10-11 2003-07-09 Calhoun Vision, Inc. Light adjustable aberration conjugator
US6554425B1 (en) * 2000-10-17 2003-04-29 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Ophthalmic lenses for high order aberration correction and processes for production of the lenses
US6695880B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-02-24 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Intraocular lenses and methods for their manufacture
US6595639B1 (en) 2000-11-10 2003-07-22 Ocular Sciences, Inc. Junctionless ophthalmic lenses and methods for making same
US7152975B2 (en) * 2000-11-10 2006-12-26 Cooper Vision, Inc. Junctionless ophthalmic lenses and methods for making same
JP3628250B2 (en) * 2000-11-17 2005-03-09 株式会社東芝 Registration / authentication method used in a wireless communication system
US7293871B2 (en) 2000-11-27 2007-11-13 Ophthonix, Inc. Apparatus and method of correcting higher-order aberrations of the human eye
US6813082B2 (en) * 2000-11-27 2004-11-02 Ophthonix, Inc. Wavefront aberrator and method of manufacturing
US6547391B2 (en) 2000-12-08 2003-04-15 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Ocular aberration correction taking into account fluctuations due to biophysical rhythms
US20020071095A1 (en) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-13 Roffman Jefrey H. Composite surface contact lenses
US6586499B2 (en) * 2000-12-19 2003-07-01 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Water-soluble blocking wax formulation
US7422714B1 (en) 2001-01-24 2008-09-09 Cornerstone Research Group, Inc. Method of using a shape memory material as a mandrel for composite part manufacturing
US6986855B1 (en) 2001-01-24 2006-01-17 Cornerstone Research Group Structural and optical applications for shape memory polymers (SMP)
DE60228940D1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2008-10-30 Amo Wavefront Sciences Llc FIGURES FOR ILLUSTRATING AN OPTICAL SYSTEM
SE0101293D0 (en) * 2001-04-11 2001-04-11 Pharmacia Groningen Bv Technical field of the invention
AU2002307381A1 (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-10-28 Tracey Technologies, Llc Determining clinical refraction of eye
WO2002088830A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-11-07 Novartis Ag Automatic lens design and manufacturing system
US6918904B1 (en) 2001-11-07 2005-07-19 Minu, L.L.C. Method of reshaping the cornea by controlled thermal delivery
US20050182489A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-08-18 Peyman Gholam A. Intraocular lens adapted for adjustment via laser after implantation
US20050222679A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-10-06 Peyman Gholam A Bifocal implant and method for altering the refractive properties of the eye
US20050182488A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-08-18 Peyman Gholam A. Implant and method for altering the refractive properties of the eye
US7645299B2 (en) * 2001-05-11 2010-01-12 Koziol Jeffrey E Intracorneal lens system having connected lenses
US6589280B1 (en) 2001-05-11 2003-07-08 Jeffrey E. Koziol Method for producing a multifocal corneal surface using intracorneal microscopic lenses
US6561648B2 (en) * 2001-05-23 2003-05-13 David E. Thomas System and method for reconstruction of aberrated wavefronts
IL143503A0 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-04-21 Visionix Ltd Aberration correction spectacle lens
US7217375B2 (en) * 2001-06-04 2007-05-15 Ophthonix, Inc. Apparatus and method of fabricating a compensating element for wavefront correction using spatially localized curing of resin mixtures
US6595643B2 (en) * 2001-06-05 2003-07-22 Adaptive Optics Associates,.Inc. Ophthalmic imaging instrument that measures and compensates for phase aberrations in reflections derived from light produced by an imaging light source
FR2828396B1 (en) * 2001-08-12 2004-05-07 Samuel Henri Bucourt DEVICE FOR MEASURING ABERRATIONS OF AN EYE-LIKE SYSTEM
US6669341B2 (en) 2001-08-31 2003-12-30 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Ophthalmic instrument having wavefront sensor with multiple imaging devices that simultaneously capture multiple images of an array of spots produced by a lenslet array
US6575572B2 (en) 2001-09-21 2003-06-10 Carl Zeiss Ophthalmic Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring optical aberrations of an eye
JP2005505789A (en) * 2001-10-05 2005-02-24 イー・ビジョン・エルエルシー Hybrid electroactive lens
JP3921375B2 (en) * 2001-10-12 2007-05-30 株式会社ニデック Ophthalmic device and corneal surgery device
US20030208189A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2003-11-06 Payman Gholam A. Integrated system for correction of vision of the human eye
EP1902672B1 (en) 2001-10-19 2010-04-28 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Presbyopic vision improvement
DE60230173D1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2009-01-15 Bausch & Lomb presbyopia
US6712466B2 (en) * 2001-10-25 2004-03-30 Ophthonix, Inc. Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer
US20070142828A1 (en) * 2001-11-07 2007-06-21 Minu, Llc Method and system for altering the refractive properties of the eye
US20050149006A1 (en) * 2001-11-07 2005-07-07 Peyman Gholam A. Device and method for reshaping the cornea
US20070088415A1 (en) * 2001-11-07 2007-04-19 Minu Llc Method of treating the eye using controlled heat delivery
US20050177149A1 (en) * 2001-11-07 2005-08-11 Peyman Gholam A. Method and apparatus for reshaping the cornea by controlled thermal delivery
US20080039769A1 (en) * 2001-11-07 2008-02-14 Minu Llc Method of medical treatment using controlled heat delivery
US6786926B2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2004-09-07 Minu, L.L.C. Method and apparatus for alignment of intracorneal inlay
AU2002353960A1 (en) * 2001-11-09 2003-05-26 Wavefront Sciences, Inc. System and method for perfoming optical corrective procedure with real-time feedback
US7377647B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2008-05-27 Philadelphia Retina Endowment Fund Clarifying an image of an object to perform a procedure on the object
US6648473B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2003-11-18 Philadelphia Retina Endowment Fund High-resolution retina imaging and eye aberration diagnostics using stochastic parallel perturbation gradient descent optimization adaptive optics
US7775665B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2010-08-17 Dellavecchia Michael A Method for optically scanning objects
US20040165147A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2004-08-26 Della Vecchia Michael A. Determining iris biometric and spatial orientation of an iris in accordance with same
US7226166B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2007-06-05 Philadelphia Retina Endowment Fund Optimizing the properties of electromagnetic energy in a medium using stochastic parallel perturbation gradient descent optimization adaptive optics
JP3978024B2 (en) * 2001-12-03 2007-09-19 株式会社ニデック Ophthalmic device and corneal surgery device
US6781681B2 (en) 2001-12-10 2004-08-24 Ophthonix, Inc. System and method for wavefront measurement
US7034949B2 (en) 2001-12-10 2006-04-25 Ophthonix, Inc. Systems and methods for wavefront measurement
US6755524B2 (en) * 2001-12-12 2004-06-29 Inray Ltd. Ophthalmic optical elements and methods for the design thereof
US6637884B2 (en) * 2001-12-14 2003-10-28 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Aberrometer calibration
ATE369785T1 (en) * 2002-01-10 2007-09-15 Zeiss Carl Meditec Ag ARRANGEMENT FOR ILLUMINATING THE LENS OF A HUMAN EYE
US6682196B2 (en) * 2002-01-14 2004-01-27 Alcon, Inc. Adaptive wavefront modulation system and method for ophthalmic surgery
EP1637101B1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2007-11-21 Alcon, Inc Adaptive wavefront method for ophthalmic surgery
US7115305B2 (en) 2002-02-01 2006-10-03 California Institute Of Technology Method of producing regular arrays of nano-scale objects using nano-structured block-copolymeric materials
AU2003210974A1 (en) * 2002-02-11 2003-09-04 Visx, Inc. Method and device for calibrating an optical wavefront system
US6761454B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2004-07-13 Ophthonix, Inc. Apparatus and method for determining objective refraction using wavefront sensing
US20050174535A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2005-08-11 Lai Shui T. Apparatus and method for determining subjective responses using objective characterization of vision based on wavefront sensing
JP3916482B2 (en) * 2002-02-27 2007-05-16 株式会社ニデック Ophthalmic equipment
US20040030062A1 (en) * 2002-05-02 2004-02-12 Mather Patrick T. Castable shape memory polymers
US7420743B2 (en) * 2002-07-11 2008-09-02 Ophthonix, Inc. Optical elements and methods for making thereof
US6836371B2 (en) * 2002-07-11 2004-12-28 Ophthonix, Inc. Optical elements and methods for making thereof
JP4162450B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2008-10-08 株式会社ニデック Cornea surgery device
US7204419B2 (en) * 2003-05-01 2007-04-17 Identifcation Dynamics, Llc Method and apparatus for reading firearm microstamping
US7163292B2 (en) * 2002-09-06 2007-01-16 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method
EP1546984A1 (en) * 2002-09-06 2005-06-29 Quarter Lambda Technologies Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method
US7104648B2 (en) * 2002-09-06 2006-09-12 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method
US7322694B2 (en) * 2002-09-06 2008-01-29 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method
BR0314266A (en) * 2002-09-13 2005-07-26 Ocular Sciences Inc Vision Improvement Devices and Methods
US7794494B2 (en) * 2002-10-11 2010-09-14 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Implantable medical devices
EP1558671B1 (en) * 2002-10-11 2011-02-16 University of Connecticut Blends of amorphous and semicrystalline polymers having shape memory properties
WO2004033553A1 (en) * 2002-10-11 2004-04-22 University Of Connecticut Crosslinked polycyclooctene
EP2260882B1 (en) * 2002-10-11 2020-03-04 Boston Scientific Limited Implantable medical devices
US7524914B2 (en) * 2002-10-11 2009-04-28 The University Of Connecticut Shape memory polymers based on semicrystalline thermoplastic polyurethanes bearing nanostructured hard segments
US7976936B2 (en) * 2002-10-11 2011-07-12 University Of Connecticut Endoprostheses
ITTO20021007A1 (en) * 2002-11-19 2004-05-20 Franco Bartoli EXCIMER LASER EQUIPMENT AND DRIVING METHOD
AU2002953061A0 (en) * 2002-11-20 2002-12-19 Sola International Holdings Ltd Method for designing progressive lenses
US7896916B2 (en) 2002-11-29 2011-03-01 Amo Groningen B.V. Multifocal ophthalmic lens
SE0203564D0 (en) 2002-11-29 2002-11-29 Pharmacia Groningen Bv Multifocal opthalmic lens
US8911086B2 (en) 2002-12-06 2014-12-16 Amo Manufacturing Usa, Llc Compound modulation transfer function for laser surgery and other optical applications
US6939342B2 (en) * 2002-12-12 2005-09-06 Bausch And Lomb Incorporated System and method for evaluating a secondary LASIK treatment
JP4769711B2 (en) * 2003-04-09 2011-09-07 ヴィズイクス・インコーポレーテッド Wavefront calibration analyzer and method
US7556378B1 (en) 2003-04-10 2009-07-07 Tsontcho Ianchulev Intraoperative estimation of intraocular lens power
US20050241203A1 (en) * 2003-05-01 2005-11-03 Lizotte Todd E Method and apparatus for cartridge identification imprinting in difficult contexts by recess protected indicia
DE10325443A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Interferometric measuring device
US20050046794A1 (en) 2003-06-17 2005-03-03 Silvestrini Thomas A. Method and apparatus for aligning a mask with the visual axis of an eye
CA2529813C (en) * 2003-06-20 2015-11-17 Visx, Incorporated Systems and methods for prediction of objective visual acuity based on wavefront measurements
US8596787B2 (en) 2003-06-20 2013-12-03 Amo Manufacturing Usa, Llc Systems and methods for prediction of objective visual acuity based on wavefront measurements
KR20060038988A (en) * 2003-07-11 2006-05-04 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. A method of manufacturing a mould for producing an optical surface, a method of producing a contact lens and a device for use with these methods
US7195353B2 (en) * 2003-08-15 2007-03-27 E-Vision, Llc Enhanced electro-active lens system
BRPI0416349A (en) * 2003-11-10 2007-04-10 Visx Inc method, test device for testing an alignment measurement between a diagnostic device and a laser refractive system, method of manufacturing a test device, and kit for testing an alignment between a diagnostic device and a laser refractive system
US7018039B2 (en) * 2003-11-14 2006-03-28 Synergeyes,Inc. Contact lens
US20050104240A1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2005-05-19 Jethmalani Jagdish M. Method of manufacturing an optical lens
US20050122473A1 (en) * 2003-11-24 2005-06-09 Curatu Eugene O. Method and apparatus for aberroscope calibration and discrete compensation
FR2865538B1 (en) * 2004-01-22 2007-10-19 Centre Nat Rech Scient DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING FRONT CONTRAST IN A MICHELSON INTERFEROMETER, AND EYE EXAMINATION SYSTEM INCLUDING SUCH A DEVICE
US7343099B2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2008-03-11 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Free space optical (FSO) laser communication system employing fade mitigation measures based on laser beam speckle tracking and locking principles
DE102004014181A1 (en) 2004-03-23 2005-10-06 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Material processing device and method
JP2005294404A (en) * 2004-03-31 2005-10-20 Canon Inc Measuring device, measuring method, aligner and exposure method having the same, and method for manufacturing device using the same
US8816244B2 (en) * 2004-04-13 2014-08-26 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Inverted stent cutting process
EP2444021B8 (en) 2004-04-20 2018-04-18 Alcon Research, Ltd. Integrated surgical microscope and wavefront sensor
US20050237485A1 (en) * 2004-04-21 2005-10-27 Blum Ronald D Method and apparatus for correcting vision
US7491628B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2009-02-17 California Institute Of Technology Method for patterning large scale nano-fibrous surfaces using capillography
CA2566961A1 (en) * 2004-05-20 2005-12-08 Coopervision, Inc. Corneal onlays and wavefront aberration correction to enhance vision
US20050260388A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Lai Shui T Apparatus and method of fabricating an ophthalmic lens for wavefront correction using spatially localized curing of photo-polymerization materials
US20060066808A1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2006-03-30 Blum Ronald D Ophthalmic lenses incorporating a diffractive element
US8007105B2 (en) * 2004-10-01 2011-08-30 Hoya Corporation Lens for intraocular observation and contact lens for vitreous surgery
BRPI0517017A (en) * 2004-10-25 2008-09-30 Advanced Medical Optics Inc ophthalmic lens with multiple phase plates
US7922326B2 (en) 2005-10-25 2011-04-12 Abbott Medical Optics Inc. Ophthalmic lens with multiple phase plates
US8021967B2 (en) 2004-11-01 2011-09-20 California Institute Of Technology Nanoscale wicking methods and devices
US9801709B2 (en) 2004-11-02 2017-10-31 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Electro-active intraocular lenses
US8778022B2 (en) 2004-11-02 2014-07-15 E-Vision Smart Optics Inc. Electro-active intraocular lenses
CA2586235C (en) * 2004-11-02 2014-06-03 E-Vision, Llc Electro-active spectacles and method of fabricating same
US8915588B2 (en) 2004-11-02 2014-12-23 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Eyewear including a heads up display
SE0402769D0 (en) * 2004-11-12 2004-11-12 Amo Groningen Bv Method of selecting intraocular lenses
US8043361B2 (en) * 2004-12-10 2011-10-25 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Implantable medical devices, and methods of delivering the same
US8885139B2 (en) * 2005-01-21 2014-11-11 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Adaptive electro-active lens with variable focal length
US7413689B2 (en) * 2005-03-24 2008-08-19 Syntec Technologies Inc. Lens element from diamond-turned thermoplastic resin
US7401922B2 (en) * 2005-04-13 2008-07-22 Synergeyes, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing or eliminating the progression of myopia
US7543936B2 (en) * 2005-05-06 2009-06-09 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method of fitting
US20060264917A1 (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Visx, Incorporated Scleral lenses for custom optic evaluation and visual performance improvement
DE102005046130A1 (en) * 2005-09-27 2007-03-29 Bausch & Lomb Inc. Excimer laser-eye surgical system, has eye tracing device sending instruction signal to laser device via bidirectional bus to fire shot, when preset position data is same as initial position data of scanning device for shot
US7377637B2 (en) * 2005-10-11 2008-05-27 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method of fitting
DE102005053297A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-10 Bausch & Lomb Inc. System and method for correcting ophthalmic refractive errors
US7883520B2 (en) 2006-04-10 2011-02-08 Forsight Labs, Llc Corneal epithelial pocket formation systems, components and methods
US7639369B2 (en) * 2006-04-13 2009-12-29 Mette Owner-Petersen Multi-object wavefront sensor with spatial filtering
US20080273166A1 (en) 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 William Kokonaski Electronic eyeglass frame
US7656509B2 (en) * 2006-05-24 2010-02-02 Pixeloptics, Inc. Optical rangefinder for an electro-active lens
US7537339B2 (en) * 2006-05-25 2009-05-26 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lens system and method of fitting
MX2008016278A (en) * 2006-06-23 2009-03-26 Pixeloptics Inc Electronic adapter for electro-active spectacle lenses.
DE102006036085A1 (en) 2006-08-02 2008-02-07 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Method and apparatus for calculating a laser shot file for use in an excimer laser
DE102006036086A1 (en) * 2006-08-02 2008-02-07 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Method and apparatus for calculating a laser shot file for use in a refractive excimer laser
US20080062381A1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-03-13 Praful Doshi Tinted lenses and methods of manufacture
US20080074611A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Meyers William E Hybrid contact lens with improved resistance to flexure and method for designing the same
DE102006046370A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Carl Zeiss Meditec Ag Method for preparing a device for processing material by forming optical passages used in eye surgery comprises detecting a back-scattered or reflected beam from the focus of a measuring laser beam and further processing
US20080084541A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Ming Lai Ophthalmic system and method
US20080137030A1 (en) * 2006-11-03 2008-06-12 Hoffman William C Optical devices with reduced chromatic aberration
AR064985A1 (en) 2007-01-22 2009-05-06 E Vision Llc FLEXIBLE ELECTROACTIVE LENS
AU2008218240B2 (en) 2007-02-23 2014-01-30 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Ophthalmic dynamic aperture
WO2008112037A1 (en) 2007-03-07 2008-09-18 Pixeloptics, Inc. Multifocal lens having a progressive optical power region and a discontinuity
US7883207B2 (en) 2007-12-14 2011-02-08 Pixeloptics, Inc. Refractive-diffractive multifocal lens
US20080273169A1 (en) 2007-03-29 2008-11-06 Blum Ronald D Multifocal Lens Having a Progressive Optical Power Region and a Discontinuity
US11061252B2 (en) 2007-05-04 2021-07-13 E-Vision, Llc Hinge for electronic spectacles
US10613355B2 (en) 2007-05-04 2020-04-07 E-Vision, Llc Moisture-resistant eye wear
US7828432B2 (en) 2007-05-25 2010-11-09 Synergeyes, Inc. Hybrid contact lenses prepared with expansion controlled polymeric materials
US8317321B2 (en) 2007-07-03 2012-11-27 Pixeloptics, Inc. Multifocal lens with a diffractive optical power region
US7905594B2 (en) * 2007-08-21 2011-03-15 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Free form ophthalmic lens
US8313828B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2012-11-20 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Ophthalmic lens precursor and lens
US8318055B2 (en) 2007-08-21 2012-11-27 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Methods for formation of an ophthalmic lens precursor and lens
US8317505B2 (en) 2007-08-21 2012-11-27 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Apparatus for formation of an ophthalmic lens precursor and lens
US7614746B2 (en) * 2007-10-27 2009-11-10 LKC Technologies, Inc Macular function tester
US7594729B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-09-29 Wf Systems, Llc Wavefront sensor
US8519500B2 (en) * 2007-11-26 2013-08-27 United Microelectronics Corp. Image sensor with correcting lens and fabrication thereof
US7874674B2 (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-01-25 Allred Lloyd G Aberrometer having reduced noise
JP2011515157A (en) 2008-03-18 2011-05-19 ピクセルオプティクス, インコーポレイテッド Advanced electroactive optical component devices
US8154804B2 (en) 2008-03-25 2012-04-10 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Electro-optic lenses for correction of higher order aberrations
US10254562B2 (en) 2008-04-04 2019-04-09 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods for tailoring the refractive index of lenses
US10018853B2 (en) 2008-04-04 2018-07-10 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods of altering the refractive index of materials
WO2015038614A1 (en) 2013-09-12 2015-03-19 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods of altering the refractive index of materials
WO2009124231A1 (en) 2008-04-04 2009-10-08 Battelle Memorial Institute Adjustable intraocular lens
US8529557B2 (en) * 2008-05-30 2013-09-10 Technolas Perfect Vision Gmbh System and method for stray light compensation of corneal cuts
DE102008028509A1 (en) * 2008-06-16 2009-12-24 Technolas Gmbh Ophthalmologische Systeme Treatment pattern monitoring device
DE102008035995A1 (en) * 2008-08-01 2010-02-04 Technolas Perfect Vision Gmbh Combination of excimer laser ablation and femtosecond laser technique
US9417464B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2016-08-16 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Method and apparatus of forming a translating multifocal contact lens having a lower-lid contact surface
EP2330967A1 (en) * 2008-08-28 2011-06-15 Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH Eye measurement and modeling techniques
DE102008053827A1 (en) 2008-10-30 2010-05-12 Technolas Perfect Vision Gmbh Apparatus and method for providing a laser shot file
US8254724B2 (en) 2008-11-06 2012-08-28 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Method and apparatus for making and processing aberration measurements
US8550624B2 (en) 2008-11-06 2013-10-08 Wavetec Vision Systems, Inc. Optical angular measurement system for ophthalmic applications and method for positioning of a toric intraocular lens with increased accuracy
US7980698B2 (en) 2008-11-19 2011-07-19 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Power-adjusted aberrometer
KR101520453B1 (en) * 2009-02-10 2015-05-20 삼성전자주식회사 Optical apparatus for plasma
US8240849B2 (en) * 2009-03-31 2012-08-14 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Free form lens with refractive index variations
US8876290B2 (en) * 2009-07-06 2014-11-04 Wavetec Vision Systems, Inc. Objective quality metric for ocular wavefront measurements
ES2653970T3 (en) 2009-07-14 2018-02-09 Wavetec Vision Systems, Inc. Determination of the effective position of the lens of an intraocular lens using aphakic refractive power
WO2011008609A1 (en) 2009-07-14 2011-01-20 Wavetec Vision Systems, Inc. Ophthalmic surgery measurement system
US7828435B1 (en) 2010-02-03 2010-11-09 Denis Rehse Method for designing an anterior curve of a contact lens
US8807076B2 (en) * 2010-03-12 2014-08-19 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Apparatus for vapor phase processing ophthalmic devices
FR2966759B1 (en) * 2010-11-02 2014-01-24 Commissariat Energie Atomique OPTIMIZED LASER CUTTING PROCESS FOR AEROSOL QUANTITY
US20140098342A1 (en) * 2011-11-04 2014-04-10 The General Hospital Corporation System and method for corneal irradiation
WO2013082545A1 (en) 2011-12-02 2013-06-06 Acufocus, Inc. Ocular mask having selective spectral transmission
CA3167661A1 (en) 2012-01-06 2013-07-11 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Eyewear docking station and electronic module
JP5888998B2 (en) * 2012-01-18 2016-03-22 キヤノン株式会社 Wavefront slope distribution measuring method and wavefront slope distribution measuring apparatus
US10244936B2 (en) * 2012-07-25 2019-04-02 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Method and apparatus for engaging and providing vision correction options to patients from a remote location
KR20150050588A (en) 2012-08-31 2015-05-08 에이엠오 그로닌겐 비.브이. Multi-ring lens, systems and methods for extended depth of focus
US9072462B2 (en) 2012-09-27 2015-07-07 Wavetec Vision Systems, Inc. Geometric optical power measurement device
US9925621B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2018-03-27 Perfect Ip, Llp Intraocular lens (IOL) fabrication system and method
US9023257B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2015-05-05 Perfect Ip, Llc Hydrophilicity alteration system and method
CN105378547A (en) * 2012-11-28 2016-03-02 完美视觉(香港)有限公司 Methods and systems for automated measurement of the eyes and delivering of sunglasses and eyeglasses
US9204962B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-12-08 Acufocus, Inc. In situ adjustable optical mask
US9427922B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-08-30 Acufocus, Inc. Process for manufacturing an intraocular lens with an embedded mask
TW201443367A (en) * 2013-05-02 2014-11-16 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Design method for lens
EP3088938A4 (en) * 2013-12-26 2017-08-02 Hoya Lens Thailand Ltd. Method, program, and device for manufacturing progressive refractive power lens, progressive refractive power lens manufacturing method, and lens supply system
CN103837981B (en) * 2014-03-19 2016-01-20 中国科学院光电技术研究所 A kind of method improving segmented micro deformable mirror fill factor, curve factor
US9645412B2 (en) 2014-11-05 2017-05-09 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. Customized lens device and method
US10359643B2 (en) 2015-12-18 2019-07-23 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Methods for incorporating lens features and lenses having such features
CA3013856A1 (en) 2016-02-09 2017-08-17 Amo Groningen B.V. Progressive power intraocular lens, and methods of use and manufacture
US10599006B2 (en) 2016-04-12 2020-03-24 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Electro-active lenses with raised resistive bridges
WO2017180184A1 (en) 2016-04-12 2017-10-19 E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc. Electro-active lenses with raised resistive bridges
JP2018061621A (en) * 2016-10-11 2018-04-19 オプトス ピーエルシー Ocular fundus imaging apparatus, ocular fundus imaging method, and ocular fundus imaging program
WO2018167302A1 (en) 2017-03-17 2018-09-20 Amo Groningen B.V. Diffractive intraocular lenses for extended range of vision
US11523897B2 (en) 2017-06-23 2022-12-13 Amo Groningen B.V. Intraocular lenses for presbyopia treatment
CA3067116A1 (en) 2017-06-28 2019-01-03 Amo Groningen B.V. Diffractive lenses and related intraocular lenses for presbyopia treatment
EP3639084A1 (en) 2017-06-28 2020-04-22 Amo Groningen B.V. Extended range and related intraocular lenses for presbyopia treatment
US11327210B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2022-05-10 Amo Groningen B.V. Non-repeating echelettes and related intraocular lenses for presbyopia treatment
US11690511B2 (en) 2017-12-01 2023-07-04 Lutronic Vision Inc. Polarization filtering for improved eye imaging
JP2021531513A (en) 2018-07-26 2021-11-18 オークリー インコーポレイテッド Lenses for eyewear and other head-mounted support means with improved optical properties
JP6896188B2 (en) * 2018-12-27 2021-06-30 三菱電機株式会社 Wavefront measuring device and wavefront measuring method
US11529230B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2022-12-20 Amo Groningen B.V. Systems and methods for correcting power of an intraocular lens using refractive index writing
US11564839B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2023-01-31 Amo Groningen B.V. Systems and methods for vergence matching of an intraocular lens with refractive index writing
US11583388B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2023-02-21 Amo Groningen B.V. Systems and methods for spectacle independence using refractive index writing with an intraocular lens
US11678975B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2023-06-20 Amo Groningen B.V. Systems and methods for treating ocular disease with an intraocular lens and refractive index writing
US11583389B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2023-02-21 Amo Groningen B.V. Systems and methods for correcting photic phenomenon from an intraocular lens and using refractive index writing
US11266495B2 (en) 2019-10-20 2022-03-08 Rxsight, Inc. Light adjustable intraocular lens with a modulable absorption front protection layer
CN111001829B (en) * 2019-10-25 2021-07-02 郑州旅游职业学院 Lathe rotation error detection monitoring device
CN115380239A (en) 2019-12-30 2022-11-22 阿莫格罗宁根私营有限公司 Lens with irregular width diffraction profile for vision treatment
CN115298597A (en) * 2020-03-20 2022-11-04 奇跃公司 System and method for retinal imaging and tracking
US11364696B2 (en) 2020-09-18 2022-06-21 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc Apparatus for forming an ophthalmic lens
CN112415774A (en) * 2020-12-14 2021-02-26 上海美沃精密仪器股份有限公司 Design method of corneal contact lens
US11632179B1 (en) * 2022-03-15 2023-04-18 United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Remotely emitting confined electromagnetic radiation from laser-induced plasma filaments
WO2023250000A1 (en) * 2022-06-21 2023-12-28 University Of Houston System Modification of the optical properties of an existing contact lens with an ophthalmic lens lathe

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4702576A (en) 1985-09-27 1987-10-27 Cambridge Instruments Inc. Ocular scattering analyzer
US4993827A (en) 1987-09-01 1991-02-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method for detecting cataractogenesis
US5068514A (en) 1988-10-25 1991-11-26 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Laser polishing of lens surface
US5396045A (en) 1992-09-29 1995-03-07 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Scanning technique for laser ablation
US5579063A (en) 1994-10-11 1996-11-26 Magnante; Peter C. Methods and devices for the measurement of the degradation of image quality on the retina of the human eye due to cataract
US5777719A (en) 1996-12-23 1998-07-07 University Of Rochester Method and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images
US5861114A (en) 1994-06-10 1999-01-19 Johnson&Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Method of manufacturing complex optical designs in soft contact lenses
US6033075A (en) 1998-03-31 2000-03-07 Nidek Co., Ltd. Ophthalmic apparatus
US6082856A (en) 1998-11-09 2000-07-04 Polyvue Technologies, Inc. Methods for designing and making contact lenses having aberration control and contact lenses made thereby
US6244708B1 (en) 1998-09-28 2001-06-12 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Contact lenses providing improved visual acuity
US6271914B1 (en) 1996-11-25 2001-08-07 Autonomous Technologies Corporation Objective measurement and correction of optical systems using wavefront analysis

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5062702A (en) * 1990-03-16 1991-11-05 Intelligent Surgical Lasers, Inc. Device for mapping corneal topography
DE4222395A1 (en) * 1992-07-08 1994-01-13 Amtech Ges Fuer Angewandte Mic Optical system for measuring refraction of eye with light source - has variable imaging optics adjustable in its power of refraction focussing light emanating from light source on retina of eye
US5941874A (en) * 1997-03-10 1999-08-24 Chiron Technolas Gmbh Opthalmologische Systeme Simulating a laser treatment on the eye by pretreating a contact lens
DE19938203A1 (en) * 1999-08-11 2001-02-15 Aesculap Meditec Gmbh Method and device for correcting visual defects in the human eye

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4702576A (en) 1985-09-27 1987-10-27 Cambridge Instruments Inc. Ocular scattering analyzer
US4993827A (en) 1987-09-01 1991-02-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method for detecting cataractogenesis
US5068514A (en) 1988-10-25 1991-11-26 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Laser polishing of lens surface
US5396045A (en) 1992-09-29 1995-03-07 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Scanning technique for laser ablation
US5861114A (en) 1994-06-10 1999-01-19 Johnson&Johnson Vision Products, Inc. Method of manufacturing complex optical designs in soft contact lenses
US5579063A (en) 1994-10-11 1996-11-26 Magnante; Peter C. Methods and devices for the measurement of the degradation of image quality on the retina of the human eye due to cataract
US6271914B1 (en) 1996-11-25 2001-08-07 Autonomous Technologies Corporation Objective measurement and correction of optical systems using wavefront analysis
US6271915B1 (en) 1996-11-25 2001-08-07 Autonomous Technologies Corporation Objective measurement and correction of optical systems using wavefront analysis
US5777719A (en) 1996-12-23 1998-07-07 University Of Rochester Method and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images
US5949521A (en) 1996-12-23 1999-09-07 University Of Rochester Method and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images
US6095651A (en) 1996-12-23 2000-08-01 University Of Rochester Method and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images
US6033075A (en) 1998-03-31 2000-03-07 Nidek Co., Ltd. Ophthalmic apparatus
US6244708B1 (en) 1998-09-28 2001-06-12 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Contact lenses providing improved visual acuity
US6082856A (en) 1998-11-09 2000-07-04 Polyvue Technologies, Inc. Methods for designing and making contact lenses having aberration control and contact lenses made thereby

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Aberration-Correcting Contact Lenses to Improve Human Vision", Peter C. Magnante, Nancy J. Coletta, and Bruce D. Moore, Brookfield Optical Systems, West Brookfield, MA 01585, New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA 02115.
"Plastic Optics" by Richard F. Weeks, Sep. 1975, Optic News, pp. 5-11.
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/USOO/22466.

Cited By (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040135969A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2004-07-15 Masaaki Hanebuchi Keratectomy data determining device and keratectomy data determining program
US7255440B2 (en) * 2001-06-01 2007-08-14 Nidek Co., Ltd. Keratectomy data determining device and keratectomy data determining program
US20070247698A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2007-10-25 University Of Rochester Large dynamic range Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
US20040227932A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2004-11-18 Geunyoung Yoon Large dynamic range shack-hartmann wavefront sensor
US7414712B2 (en) * 2003-02-13 2008-08-19 University Of Rochester Large dynamic range Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
US9387082B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2016-07-12 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Hydrogel arthroplasty device
US8679190B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2014-03-25 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Hydrogel arthroplasty device
US20070179605A1 (en) * 2004-10-05 2007-08-02 David Myung Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel corneal prosthesis
US7857447B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2010-12-28 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel contact lenses
US7909867B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2011-03-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel corneal prosthesis
US20060287721A1 (en) * 2004-10-05 2006-12-21 David Myung Artificial cornea
US9681800B2 (en) * 2005-10-27 2017-06-20 The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona Holographic adaptive see-through phoropter
US20130182224A1 (en) * 2005-10-27 2013-07-18 The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona Holographic adaptive see-through phoropter
US20080077239A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2008-03-27 Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Intraocular lenses for managing glare, adhesion, and cell migration
US8568478B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2013-10-29 Abbott Medical Optics Inc. Intraocular lenses for managing glare, adhesion, and cell migration
US20080077238A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2008-03-27 Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Intraocular lenses for managing glare, adhesion, and cell migration
US9603702B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2017-03-28 Abbott Medical Optics Inc. Intraocular lenses for managing glare, adhesion, and cell migration
US8585687B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2013-11-19 Amo Development, Llc Combined wavefront and topography systems and methods
US20090002631A1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2009-01-01 Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. System and method for measuring corneal topography
US7988290B2 (en) 2007-06-27 2011-08-02 AMO Wavefront Sciences LLC. Systems and methods for measuring the shape and location of an object
US7976163B2 (en) 2007-06-27 2011-07-12 Amo Wavefront Sciences Llc System and method for measuring corneal topography
US10457803B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2019-10-29 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Orthopedic implants having gradient polymer alloys
US10752768B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2020-08-25 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Orthopedic implants having gradient polymer alloys
US8883915B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2014-11-11 Biomimedica, Inc. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic interpenetrating polymer networks derived from hydrophobic polymers and methods of preparing the same
US8853294B2 (en) 2008-08-05 2014-10-07 Biomimedica, Inc. Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels
US8497023B2 (en) 2008-08-05 2013-07-30 Biomimedica, Inc. Polyurethane-grafted hydrogels
US20110102737A1 (en) * 2009-08-27 2011-05-05 Rick Edward Payor Optimizing optical aberrations in ophthalmic lenses
WO2011025846A1 (en) * 2009-08-27 2011-03-03 Novartis Ag Optimizing optical aberrations in ophthalmic lenses
US8342683B2 (en) 2009-08-27 2013-01-01 Novartis Ag Optimizing optical aberrations in ophthalmic lenses
US20110118836A1 (en) * 2009-11-18 2011-05-19 Abbott Medical Optics Inc. Mark for intraocular lenses
US8357196B2 (en) 2009-11-18 2013-01-22 Abbott Medical Optics Inc. Mark for intraocular lenses
US8622546B2 (en) 2011-06-08 2014-01-07 Amo Wavefront Sciences, Llc Method of locating valid light spots for optical measurement and optical measurement instrument employing method of locating valid light spots
US11015016B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2021-05-25 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Polymeric adhesive for anchoring compliant materials to another surface
US11760830B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2023-09-19 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Polymeric adhesive for anchoring compliant materials to another surface
US9016863B2 (en) 2011-10-19 2015-04-28 Gregory Gemoules Scleral contact lens manufacturing
US8632188B1 (en) 2011-10-19 2014-01-21 Gregory Gemoules Scleral contact lens manufacturing
US9114024B2 (en) 2011-11-21 2015-08-25 Biomimedica, Inc. Systems, devices, and methods for anchoring orthopaedic implants to bone
US11077228B2 (en) 2015-08-10 2021-08-03 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Interpenetrating polymer networks
US10869950B2 (en) 2018-07-17 2020-12-22 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Ionic polymer compositions
US11110200B2 (en) 2018-07-17 2021-09-07 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Ionic polymer compositions
US11364322B2 (en) 2018-07-17 2022-06-21 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Ionic polymer compositions
US10792392B2 (en) 2018-07-17 2020-10-06 Hyalex Orthopedics, Inc. Ionic polymer compositions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1215992A1 (en) 2002-06-26
WO2001021061A9 (en) 2002-07-11
JP2003509731A (en) 2003-03-11
US6086204A (en) 2000-07-11
WO2001021061A1 (en) 2001-03-29
EP1215992A4 (en) 2003-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE38839E1 (en) Methods and devices to design and fabricate surfaces on contact lenses and on corneal tissue that correct the eye's optical aberrations
AU2004210627C1 (en) Opthalmic talbot-moire wavefront sensor
US6566627B2 (en) Laser method for shaping of optical lenses
US6439720B1 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring optical aberrations of the human eye
US7036934B1 (en) Wavefront sensor having multi-power modes, independent adjustment camera, and accommodation range measurement
US5294293A (en) Target domain profiling of target optical surfaces using excimer laser photoablation
US6004314A (en) Optical coherence tomography assisted surgical apparatus
US8790104B2 (en) Apparatus and method of fabricating a compensating element for wavefront correction using spatially localized curing of resin mixtures
KR100797857B1 (en) Customized corneal profiling
US6155684A (en) Method and apparatus for precompensating the refractive properties of the human eye with adaptive optical feedback control
KR101135799B1 (en) Method and system for determining the position and alignment of a surface of an object in relation to a laser beam
US5909270A (en) Conoscopic system for real-time corneal topography
AU5459398A (en) Objective measurement and correction of optical systems using wavefront analysis
JP5763771B2 (en) Apparatus and method for treating matter with focused electromagnetic radiation
TW201344184A (en) Method and apparatus for measuring the wavefront of an ophthalmic device
EP2181647B1 (en) Laser control with phase plate feedback
JPH0194823A (en) Optical apparatus for measurement of curvature
JP2023553475A (en) Ocular image distortion compensation for surgical procedures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12