USRE35611E - Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings - Google Patents

Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE35611E
USRE35611E US08/558,342 US55834295A USRE35611E US RE35611 E USRE35611 E US RE35611E US 55834295 A US55834295 A US 55834295A US RE35611 E USRE35611 E US RE35611E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
coating
iaddend
iadd
liquid
top coat
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/558,342
Inventor
Charles C. McComas
John W. Appleby, Jr.
Gerard A. Sileo
Herbert R. Barringer
Michael J. Patry
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Waterjet Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Waterjet Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Waterjet Systems Inc filed Critical Waterjet Systems Inc
Priority to US08/558,342 priority Critical patent/USRE35611E/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE35611E publication Critical patent/USRE35611E/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C11/00—Selection of abrasive materials or additives for abrasive blasts
    • B24C11/005—Selection of abrasive materials or additives for abrasive blasts of additives, e.g. anti-corrosive or disinfecting agents in solid, liquid or gaseous form
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08—CLEANING
    • B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B3/00—Cleaning by methods involving the use or presence of liquid or steam
    • B08B3/02—Cleaning by the force of jets or sprays
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08—CLEANING
    • B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B9/00—Cleaning hollow articles by methods or apparatus specially adapted thereto 
    • B08B9/08—Cleaning containers, e.g. tanks
    • B08B9/093—Cleaning containers, e.g. tanks by the force of jets or sprays
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/006—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods using material without particles or pellets for deburring, removal of extended surface areas or jet milling of local recessions, e.g. grooves
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/08—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for polishing surfaces, e.g. smoothing a surface by making use of liquid-borne abrasives
    • B24C1/086—Descaling; Removing coating films
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26F—PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; SEVERING BY MEANS OTHER THAN CUTTING
    • B26F3/00—Severing by means other than cutting; Apparatus therefor
    • B26F3/004—Severing by means other than cutting; Apparatus therefor by means of a fluid jet

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the removal of coating materials .Iadd.utilizing liquid jet erosion.Iaddend., and specifically to the removal of abradable, wear resistant, and thermal barrier coating materials which have been applied by either sintering powder or fibers, or by plasma spraying. ., utilizing liquid jet erosion.!..
  • Various types .Iadd.of .Iaddend.coatings and sintered materials are used in numerous applications, such as in gas turbine engines to increase efficiency and/or protect components from heat and wear.
  • Types of materials include thermal barrier coatings, abrasive coatings, abradable seals, and hard facing; hereafter referred to as coatings.
  • thermal barrier coatings can be utilized to provide protection against high temperatures, while abrasive coatings can be used to prevent detrimental rub interactions and hard facing can be used to reduce wear.
  • Some coatings are applied to plasma or flame spraying; introducing particles (usually powders) into a hot gas stream or flame (respectively) which causes the particles to splat onto the substrate surface where they adhere and build up as a coating.
  • particles i.e. AB-1
  • short wires i.e. Feltmetal TM
  • Bond coats are usually used in plasma spray and vapor deposition applications; a bond coat being a layer of metallic composition applied to the substrate before the coating is applied.
  • a common characteristic of these types of coatings is that the coating strength (cohesive strength) is relatively low; plasma sprayed or partially sintered particles are not well bonded to each other and there is usually porosity present. The strength of the coating is less than that of the substrate.
  • machining machining followed by chemical stripping (see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,339,282, and 4,425,185; incorporated herein by reference), and grit blasting.
  • machining followed by chemical stripping requires that the component be held stationary while a machining tool removes the majority of the coating.
  • a chemical solution usually either a very strong acid or base, in then applied to the coating surface to disintegrate the remaining coating material.
  • abrasive or grit blasting also often results in damaged or destroyed components. This process consists of projecting abrasive particles in a compressed air stream against the coating. Since this technique requires immediate termination upon substrate exposure to prevent damage, it requires skilled operators.
  • Liquid jets above 10,000 psi have not been utilized in the removal of coatings.
  • Relatively low pressure liquid jets 2,000 to 3,000 psi, have been applied in areas such as: cleaning applications, nuclear contamination removal, concrete scarifying, and barnacle and hull fouling removal, but not in an inorganic coating removal process.
  • an objective of this invention is to provide a convenient, cost effective, environmentally safe technique of removing coatings.
  • the present invention involves the removal of coatings utilizing a liquid jet erosion process.
  • the liquid jet while striking the coating at an angle, traverses the region, removing the coating.
  • the liquid stream erodes the abradable seal/thermal barrier with virtually no damage to the bond coat (if present), or can remove both the abradable seal/thermal barrier and bond coat simultaneously without substrate damage.
  • the invention process can be used to remove plasma sprayed and sintered coatings whose cohesive strength is significantly less than that of the substrate.
  • FIG. 1 is a basic embodiment of this invention.
  • FIG. 1A is a cross-section of FIG. 1 which reveals the various layers of the coating.
  • FIG. 2 shows the results of utilizing a liquid jet removal process at varying pressures.
  • the removal of the coating, bond coat, or both without damage to the substrate material can be achieved with a liquid jet erosion technique; making it a viable alternative to the prior art.
  • this invention uses a liquid jet erosion process to remove coatings.
  • Critical parameters include the nozzle distance from the coating, and the liquid pressure. Depending on equipment and pressure constraints, the nozzle can be placed up to approximately 6 or even 12 inches from the coating surface, however, lesser distances are preferred, with 1/4 to 3/4 inch especially preferred.
  • the angle between the liquid jet and similarly the liquid contact and the coating is a matter of preference.
  • An angle of between 20° to 90° can be used, with an angle of between 30° and 90° preferred, and an angle of about 45° especially preferred (see FIG. 1).
  • the angle not a critical parameter, causes the liquid to remove the coating fragments from the region where the jet impacts the coating.
  • the direction of rotation effects the fragment location post-removal. It is preferred to rotate the component such that it causes the liquid stream to move toward the smallest angle formed between the liquid stream and the component. Although this is merely a matter of preference, this rotation . .directions.!. .Iadd.direction.Iaddend.helps to remove the fragments from the interaction zone thereby ensuring that they to do not interfere with the process.
  • FIG. 1 is one embodiment of the invention.
  • the liquid stream (5) contacts the coating (1) at the preferred angle, approximately 45°. Additionally, the component (10) rotates such that the liquid stream (5) moves toward the smallest angle between the liquid stream (5) and the component (10) (see arrows (1A)).
  • the liquid stream can consist of any liquid having a viscosity between 0.25 centipoise and 5.00 centipoise at 25° C. and 1 atm and which will not damage the bond coat or substrate material, including water based liquids.
  • Higher viscosity liquids tend to present flow problems with respect to spraying the liquid at high pressures, while lower viscosity liquids can be difficult to pressurize, possibly increasing equipment costs.
  • Additives, such as wetting agents, or various chemicals which will degrade the coating without damaging the component, may also be useful.
  • a water jet pressure sufficient to remove the top coat and/or the top coat and the bond coat is required. Since pressures greater than about 60,000 psi will damage most gas turbine substrate materials, lower pressures must be used. The optimum liquid pressure ranges from about 20,000 to about 60,000 psi, with about 25,000 to about 40,000 psi preferred. The factors which determine the exact pressure required include the type of top coat and if the coating is to be removed down to the bond coat or to the substrate. (see FIG. 1A; top coat (1) and bond coat (2)). Exact pressure limits are also related to nozzle geometry and spacing, and to the specific substrate involved. In practice, the skilled artisan can readily determine the pressure which causes substrate damage and/or the pressure which causes bond coat removal and reduce this pressure to arrive at a suitable process pressure.
  • FIG. 2 shows the effects of varying pressures when using this invention. As the pressures decreased, from run (A) to (D), the amount of seal removed also decreases, to the point where the abradable seal/thermal barrier is removed with virtually no damage to the bond coat, (D).
  • the following procedure is used to remove a plasma sprayed hard face coating, top coat and bond coat, (consisting of 20 v/o of an 80 nickel, 20 chromium alloy, balance chromium carbide) from a substrate material.
  • the coated substrate material is arranged such that relative motion can be produced between it and the water jet nozzle.
  • the water jet nozzle is placed so that the exit end of the nozzle is about 1/4 inch from the coating and the water stream contacts the coating at an angle of 45° (refer to FIG. 1).
  • the water pressure is 40,000 psi.
  • the removal time is dependant upon the surface area of the coating. The time will range from 5 minutes to 10 minutes for typical gas turbine engine components.
  • a sintered abradable coating (consisting of approximately 65 v/o nickel, 35 v/o chrome, balance aluminum) can be removed by following the specifications set forth in Example 1, while substituting a pressure of 35,000 psi for the 40,000 psi in step 4.
  • This process can be used for any coating which has strength less than that of the substrate, by adjusting the pressure such that it removes the coating without bond coat damage, or the bond coat without substrate damage, allowing reuse of the bond coat and substrate or the substrate respectively.

Abstract

Gas turbine engine coatings must often be removed during engine maintenance and repair. The techniques utilized to accomplish this task, machining, chemical stripping, machining followed by chemical stripping, or grit blasting, frequently result in component damage or destruction. Liquid jet erosion can be utilized to remove seals, coatings, or portions thereof without damaging the engine hardware.

Description

The Government has rights in this invention pursuant to a contract awarded by the Department of the Air Force.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. .Iadd.08/189,860, filed Feb. 1, 1994, now abandoned; which is a reissue application of Ser. No. 07/784,625, filed Dec. 5, 1991, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,721; which is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. .Iaddend.07/441,666, filed Nov. 27, 1989, now abandoned.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to the removal of coating materials .Iadd.utilizing liquid jet erosion.Iaddend., and specifically to the removal of abradable, wear resistant, and thermal barrier coating materials which have been applied by either sintering powder or fibers, or by plasma spraying. ., utilizing liquid jet erosion.!..
BACKGROUND ART
Various types .Iadd.of .Iaddend.coatings and sintered materials are used in numerous applications, such as in gas turbine engines to increase efficiency and/or protect components from heat and wear. Types of materials include thermal barrier coatings, abrasive coatings, abradable seals, and hard facing; hereafter referred to as coatings.
Since excessive blade/case clearances and disc/vane clearances within turbine engines allow the escape of gases which decreases engine efficiency, an abradable seal can be applied to minimize the clearances between the rotating and the stationary components. Thermal barrier coatings can be utilized to provide protection against high temperatures, while abrasive coatings can be used to prevent detrimental rub interactions and hard facing can be used to reduce wear.
Some coatings are applied to plasma or flame spraying; introducing particles (usually powders) into a hot gas stream or flame (respectively) which causes the particles to splat onto the substrate surface where they adhere and build up as a coating. Application of particles (i.e. AB-1) or short wires (i.e. Feltmetal TM) onto a substrate; by pre-sintering or partial sintering and then brazing, can be used to produce abradable coatings comprised of bonded particles, wires, or powders and void spaces; while bond coats can be produced by plasma spraying or vapor deposition. Bond coats are usually used in plasma spray and vapor deposition applications; a bond coat being a layer of metallic composition applied to the substrate before the coating is applied. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,542,530, 3,676,085, 3,754,903, 3,879,831, 3,928,026, and 4,704,332, (incorporated herein by reference) describe various coatings, while U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,413,136, 4,055,705, and 4,321,311 (incorporated herein by reference) describe application techniques.
A common characteristic of these types of coatings is that the coating strength (cohesive strength) is relatively low; plasma sprayed or partially sintered particles are not well bonded to each other and there is usually porosity present. The strength of the coating is less than that of the substrate.
During engine maintenance, these coatings must frequently be removed; a process difficult to .Iadd.perform .Iaddend.reliably . .perform.!. and which frequently results in substrate damage. Various techniques have been employed for the removal of coatings: machining, chemical stripping, machining followed by chemical stripping (see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,339,282, and 4,425,185; incorporated herein by reference), and grit blasting. For example, machining followed by chemical stripping requires that the component be held stationary while a machining tool removes the majority of the coating. A chemical solution, usually either a very strong acid or base, in then applied to the coating surface to disintegrate the remaining coating material. This technique requires extreme precision; without proper hardware alignment during machining.Iadd.,.Iaddend.damage to the substrate material occurs, while the chemical solution used tends to attack the substrate material. This process is also time consuming and labor intensive. Additionally, the chemical step, can produce hazardous waste. The individual processes of chemical stripping and machining also have the above described problems.
Another commonly used method, abrasive or grit blasting, also often results in damaged or destroyed components. This process consists of projecting abrasive particles in a compressed air stream against the coating. Since this technique requires immediate termination upon substrate exposure to prevent damage, it requires skilled operators.
Liquid jets above 10,000 psi, to the best of our knowledge, have not been utilized in the removal of coatings. Relatively low pressure liquid jets, 2,000 to 3,000 psi, have been applied in areas such as: cleaning applications, nuclear contamination removal, concrete scarifying, and barnacle and hull fouling removal, but not in an inorganic coating removal process.
Accordingly, an objective of this invention is to provide a convenient, cost effective, environmentally safe technique of removing coatings.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
The present invention involves the removal of coatings utilizing a liquid jet erosion process. The liquid jet, while striking the coating at an angle, traverses the region, removing the coating. Depending on the liquid pressure, the liquid stream erodes the abradable seal/thermal barrier with virtually no damage to the bond coat (if present), or can remove both the abradable seal/thermal barrier and bond coat simultaneously without substrate damage.
The invention process can be used to remove plasma sprayed and sintered coatings whose cohesive strength is significantly less than that of the substrate.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description and accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a basic embodiment of this invention.
FIG. 1A is a cross-section of FIG. 1 which reveals the various layers of the coating.
FIG. 2 shows the results of utilizing a liquid jet removal process at varying pressures.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
The removal of coatings using current techniques is a difficult, inexact process. It requires skilled technicians, a substantial amount of time, expensive equipment, and frequently, the component is destroyed.
The removal of the coating, bond coat, or both without damage to the substrate material can be achieved with a liquid jet erosion technique; making it a viable alternative to the prior art.
As previously mentioned, this invention uses a liquid jet erosion process to remove coatings. Critical parameters (see FIG. 1) include the nozzle distance from the coating, and the liquid pressure. Depending on equipment and pressure constraints, the nozzle can be placed up to approximately 6 or even 12 inches from the coating surface, however, lesser distances are preferred, with 1/4 to 3/4 inch especially preferred.
The angle between the liquid jet and similarly the liquid contact and the coating is a matter of preference. An angle of between 20° to 90° can be used, with an angle of between 30° and 90° preferred, and an angle of about 45° especially preferred (see FIG. 1). The angle, not a critical parameter, causes the liquid to remove the coating fragments from the region where the jet impacts the coating. The direction of rotation effects the fragment location post-removal. It is preferred to rotate the component such that it causes the liquid stream to move toward the smallest angle formed between the liquid stream and the component. Although this is merely a matter of preference, this rotation . .directions.!. .Iadd.direction.Iaddend.helps to remove the fragments from the interaction zone thereby ensuring that they to do not interfere with the process.
FIG. 1 is one embodiment of the invention. The liquid stream (5) contacts the coating (1) at the preferred angle, approximately 45°. Additionally, the component (10) rotates such that the liquid stream (5) moves toward the smallest angle between the liquid stream (5) and the component (10) (see arrows (1A)).
The liquid stream can consist of any liquid having a viscosity between 0.25 centipoise and 5.00 centipoise at 25° C. and 1 atm and which will not damage the bond coat or substrate material, including water based liquids. Higher viscosity liquids tend to present flow problems with respect to spraying the liquid at high pressures, while lower viscosity liquids can be difficult to pressurize, possibly increasing equipment costs. Water, viscosity approximately 0.95 centipoise at 25° C. and 1 atm, is preferred for reasons of cost and waste disposal. Additives, such as wetting agents, or various chemicals which will degrade the coating without damaging the component, may also be useful.
A water jet pressure sufficient to remove the top coat and/or the top coat and the bond coat is required. Since pressures greater than about 60,000 psi will damage most gas turbine substrate materials, lower pressures must be used. The optimum liquid pressure ranges from about 20,000 to about 60,000 psi, with about 25,000 to about 40,000 psi preferred. The factors which determine the exact pressure required include the type of top coat and if the coating is to be removed down to the bond coat or to the substrate. (see FIG. 1A; top coat (1) and bond coat (2)). Exact pressure limits are also related to nozzle geometry and spacing, and to the specific substrate involved. In practice, the skilled artisan can readily determine the pressure which causes substrate damage and/or the pressure which causes bond coat removal and reduce this pressure to arrive at a suitable process pressure.
FIG. 2 shows the effects of varying pressures when using this invention. As the pressures decreased, from run (A) to (D), the amount of seal removed also decreases, to the point where the abradable seal/thermal barrier is removed with virtually no damage to the bond coat, (D).
This invention will be made clearer with reference to the following illustrative examples.
EXAMPLE 1
The following procedure is used to remove a plasma sprayed hard face coating, top coat and bond coat, (consisting of 20 v/o of an 80 nickel, 20 chromium alloy, balance chromium carbide) from a substrate material.
1. The coated substrate material is arranged such that relative motion can be produced between it and the water jet nozzle.
2. The water jet nozzle is placed so that the exit end of the nozzle is about 1/4 inch from the coating and the water stream contacts the coating at an angle of 45° (refer to FIG. 1).
3. The water pressure is 40,000 psi.
4. Relative motion is created between the water stream and the coating such that as the coating is removed the component advances to the next region to be removed.
5. The removal time is dependant upon the surface area of the coating. The time will range from 5 minutes to 10 minutes for typical gas turbine engine components.
EXAMPLE 2
A sintered abradable coating (consisting of approximately 65 v/o nickel, 35 v/o chrome, balance aluminum) can be removed by following the specifications set forth in Example 1, while substituting a pressure of 35,000 psi for the 40,000 psi in step 4.
This process can be used for any coating which has strength less than that of the substrate, by adjusting the pressure such that it removes the coating without bond coat damage, or the bond coat without substrate damage, allowing reuse of the bond coat and substrate or the substrate respectively.
Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to detailed embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.

Claims (15)

We claim:
1. A method for removing a top coat from a bond . .coating.!. .Iadd.coat .Iaddend.adhered to a substrate, utilizing a liquid jet, said liquid jet having means for directing the liquid jet, means for creating sufficient pressure to remove the . .coating.!. .Iadd.top coat.Iaddend., means to provide the relative motion between the . .coating.!. .Iadd.top coat .Iaddend.and the liquid jet, and means for supplying the liquid, which comprises:
a. creating sufficient pressure to remove the . .coating.!. .Iadd.top coat.Iaddend.;
b. providing relative motion between the . .coating.!. .Iadd.top coat .Iaddend.and the liquid jet;
c. supplying the liquid;
d. causing the liquid to strike the top coat, wherein the liquid striking the top coat causes top coat erosion until the bond coat is exposed;
whereby the bond coat and the substrate suffer essentially no damage and can be reused.
2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the top coat is selected from the group of plasma sprayed, flame sprayed, and sintered coatings.
3. A method as in claim 1 wherein the top coat is an abradable .Iadd.coating.Iaddend..
4. A method as in claim 1 wherein the top coat is a thermal barrier .Iadd.coating.Iaddend..
5. A method as in claim 1 wherein the top coat is an abrasive .Iadd.coating.Iaddend..
6. A method as in claim 1 wherein the . .coating.!. .Iadd.top coat .Iaddend.is a hard facing .Iadd.coating.Iaddend..
7. A method as in claim 1 wherein the liquid pressure is from about 20,000 psi to about 60,000 psi.
8. A method as in claim 1 using a nozzle as the means for directing the liquid flow.
9. A method as in claim 1 wherein the liquid is selected from the group of liquids consisting of all liquid which does not degrade the bond coat, and has a viscosity between about 0.25 centipoise and about 5.00 centipoise at 25° C. and 1 atm.
10. A method as in claim 1 wherein the liquid is selected from the group consisting of water based liquids.
11. A method as in claim 1 wherein the liquid is essentially water.
12. A method as in claim 1 wherein the angle between the liquid stream and the top coat is between 20° and 70°; whereby the angle causes the liquid stream to clean away the . .coating.!. .Iadd.top coat .Iaddend.fragments.
13. A method . .as in claim 1 further comprising the step of removing the bond coating, wherein.!. .Iadd.for removing a coating, said coating comprised of at least a top coat and a bond coat adhered to a substrate, which comprises: directing a pressurized liquid jet at a pressure above about 20,000 psi at the coating such that said liquid jet strikes said coating, thereby removing said coating from the substrate, whereby .Iaddend.the substrate . .material suffers essentially no damage.!. .Iadd.may be reused.Iaddend.. .Iadd.
14. A method as in claim 13, wherein said top coat and said bond coat are removed simultaneously..Iaddend..Iadd.15. A method as in claim 13, wherein said liquid jet pressure is between about 20,000 psi and about 60,000 psi..Iaddend..Iadd.16. A method for removing a protective coating applied to a substrate which comprises: directing a liquid jet at a pressure above approximately 20,000 psi at the protective coating such that the liquid jet strikes the protective coating thereby removing the protective coating from the substrate whereby the substrate may be reused..Iaddend..Iadd.17. A method as in claim 16, wherein the protective coating is a thermal barrier coating..Iaddend..Iadd.18. A method as in claim 16, wherein the protective coating is an abrasive coating..Iaddend..Iadd.19. A method as in claim 16, wherein the protective coating is an abradable seal..Iaddend..Iadd.20. A method as in claim 16, wherein the protective coating is a hard facing..Iaddend..Iadd.21. A method as in claim 16, wherein the liquid jet pressure is between about 20,000 psi and about 60,000 psi..Iaddend..Iadd.22. A method as in claim 16, wherein the protective coating was applied by a pre-sintering and brazing or a partial
sintering and brazing process..Iaddend..Iadd.23. A method as in claim 16, wherein the protective coating was applied by a partial sintering and brazing process..Iaddend.
US08/558,342 1989-11-27 1995-11-16 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings Expired - Lifetime USRE35611E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/558,342 USRE35611E (en) 1989-11-27 1995-11-16 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US44166689A 1989-11-27 1989-11-27
US07/784,625 US5167721A (en) 1989-11-27 1991-12-05 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered
US18986094A 1994-02-01 1994-02-01
US08/558,342 USRE35611E (en) 1989-11-27 1995-11-16 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/784,625 Reissue US5167721A (en) 1989-11-27 1991-12-05 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered
US18986094A Continuation 1989-11-27 1994-02-01

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE35611E true USRE35611E (en) 1997-09-23

Family

ID=23753797

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/784,625 Ceased US5167721A (en) 1989-11-27 1991-12-05 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered
US08/558,342 Expired - Lifetime USRE35611E (en) 1989-11-27 1995-11-16 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/784,625 Ceased US5167721A (en) 1989-11-27 1991-12-05 Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered

Country Status (19)

Country Link
US (2) US5167721A (en)
EP (1) EP0430856B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2742471B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100198896B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1027142C (en)
AU (1) AU642928B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9005984A (en)
CA (1) CA2030936C (en)
DE (1) DE69020507T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2074151T3 (en)
FI (1) FI905836A (en)
HK (1) HK173095A (en)
IE (1) IE68059B1 (en)
IL (1) IL96485A (en)
MX (1) MX172981B (en)
NO (1) NO905116L (en)
PT (1) PT96011A (en)
RU (1) RU2071507C1 (en)
YU (1) YU226390A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6210488B1 (en) 1998-12-30 2001-04-03 General Electric Company Method of removing a thermal barrier coating
US20030068953A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2003-04-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for removing film and method for manufacturing display panel
US20040256504A1 (en) * 2003-06-23 2004-12-23 General Electric Company Process of selectively removing layers of a thermal barrier coating system
US9102014B2 (en) 2010-06-17 2015-08-11 Siemens Energy, Inc. Method of servicing an airfoil assembly for use in a gas turbine engine
DE102007061407B4 (en) * 2006-12-13 2021-03-04 General Electric Co. Waterjet stripping and recontouring of gas turbine guide vanes and blades

Families Citing this family (60)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4341869A1 (en) * 1992-12-08 1994-06-09 Flow Int Corp Removal of hard coatings by ultra high pressure jets - involves nozzle set at certain distance from surface and producing flat pressurised jet
US5380068A (en) * 1992-12-08 1995-01-10 Flow International Corporation Deep kerfing in rocks with ultrahigh-pressure fan jets
DE4341870B4 (en) * 1992-12-08 2008-03-13 Flow International Corp., Kent Ultra high-pressure flat-jet nozzle
US5961053A (en) * 1994-02-18 1999-10-05 Flow International Corporation Ultrahigh-pressure fan jet nozzle
AU1731195A (en) * 1994-01-27 1995-08-15 Engelhard Corporation Process for recovering catalyst supports
US7299732B1 (en) * 1994-10-24 2007-11-27 United Technologies Corporation Honeycomb removal
AU4604196A (en) * 1994-12-29 1996-07-31 Alliant Techsystems Inc. High pressure washout of chemical agents
AU4642796A (en) * 1994-12-29 1996-07-24 Michael S Cypher High pressure washout of explosive agents
US5849099A (en) * 1995-01-18 1998-12-15 Mcguire; Dennis Method for removing coatings from the hulls of vessels using ultra-high pressure water
US5655701A (en) * 1995-07-10 1997-08-12 United Technologies Corporation Method for repairing an abradable seal
JP2881558B2 (en) * 1995-07-12 1999-04-12 本田技研工業株式会社 Removal method of temporary protective coating
DE19529749C2 (en) * 1995-08-12 1997-11-20 Ot Oberflaechentechnik Gmbh Process for the layer-by-layer removal of material from the surface of a workpiece and device for carrying out this process
DE19703104A1 (en) * 1997-01-29 1998-07-30 Walter Schlutius Recycling of the polycarbonate content of compact discs
DE19709052A1 (en) * 1997-03-06 1998-09-10 Spies Klaus Prof Dr Ing Dr H C Method and device for removing a coating adhering to the plastic body of a digital storage disc
US6544346B1 (en) 1997-07-01 2003-04-08 General Electric Company Method for repairing a thermal barrier coating
US6174448B1 (en) 1998-03-02 2001-01-16 General Electric Company Method for stripping aluminum from a diffusion coating
US6207290B1 (en) 1998-04-07 2001-03-27 Burlington Bio-Medical & Scientific Corp. Antifoulant compositions and methods of treating wood
US6042880A (en) * 1998-12-22 2000-03-28 General Electric Company Renewing a thermal barrier coating system
US6203847B1 (en) 1998-12-22 2001-03-20 General Electric Company Coating of a discrete selective surface of an article
US6273788B1 (en) 1999-07-23 2001-08-14 General Electric Company Sustained surface scrubbing
US6199276B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2001-03-13 General Electric Company Method for removing a dense ceramic thermal barrier coating from a surface
US6183347B1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2001-02-06 General Electric Company Sustained surface step scrubbing
US6568994B1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2003-05-27 General Electric Company Shifting edge scrubbing
US6474348B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2002-11-05 Howmet Research Corporation CNC core removal from casting passages
DE10085168B4 (en) 1999-11-04 2008-09-25 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Toyota Process for the formation of surface pits and component with surface pits
CN1172772C (en) 2000-03-22 2004-10-27 西门子公司 Method for removing seal
EP1219728A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2002-07-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for stripping a turbine blade
US6465040B2 (en) 2001-02-06 2002-10-15 General Electric Company Method for refurbishing a coating including a thermally grown oxide
US6659844B2 (en) 2001-05-29 2003-12-09 General Electric Company Pliant coating stripping
US6561872B2 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-05-13 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for stripping coating
US6620457B2 (en) 2001-07-13 2003-09-16 General Electric Company Method for thermal barrier coating and a liner made using said method
DE10153305A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-28 Daimler Chrysler Ag Method for pouring a metallic semifinished product
DE60310168T2 (en) * 2002-08-02 2007-09-13 Alstom Technology Ltd. Method for protecting partial surfaces of a workpiece
US6981906B2 (en) * 2003-06-23 2006-01-03 Flow International Corporation Methods and apparatus for milling grooves with abrasive fluidjets
US6905396B1 (en) 2003-11-20 2005-06-14 Huffman Corporation Method of removing a coating from a substrate
US20070087129A1 (en) * 2005-10-19 2007-04-19 Blankenship Donn R Methods for repairing a workpiece
KR100639277B1 (en) * 2005-04-20 2006-10-27 주식회사 융진 Carrier for removing primer coated with angle
US20070202269A1 (en) * 2006-02-24 2007-08-30 Potter Kenneth B Local repair process of thermal barrier coatings in turbine engine components
US8356409B2 (en) * 2007-11-01 2013-01-22 United Technologies Corporation Repair method for gas turbine engine components
US7875200B2 (en) * 2008-05-20 2011-01-25 United Technologies Corporation Method for a repair process
DE102010007224A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Ford-Werke GmbH, 50735 Method for removing overspray of thermal spray coatings
RU2502567C1 (en) * 2012-07-27 2013-12-27 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Российский Федеральный ядерный центр - Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт экспериментальной физики" - ФГУП "РФЯЦ-ВНИИЭФ" Removal of metal coats from surfaces of parts made of radioactive chemically active metal
CN102766867B (en) * 2012-08-15 2014-08-27 中国南方航空工业(集团)有限公司 Method for removing NiAl/AlSi coatings
US9403259B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-08-02 United Technologies Corporation Removing material from a workpiece with a water jet
EP3033201A4 (en) * 2013-08-14 2016-09-07 United Technologies Corp Honeycomb removal
US10363584B2 (en) 2013-08-30 2019-07-30 General Electric Company Methods for removing barrier coatings, bondcoat and oxide layers from ceramic matrix composites
US20150165569A1 (en) * 2013-12-18 2015-06-18 Petya M. Georgieva Repair of turbine engine components using waterjet ablation process
WO2015130521A2 (en) 2014-02-25 2015-09-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Turbine component cooling hole within a microsurface feature that protects adjoining thermal barrier coating
US8939706B1 (en) 2014-02-25 2015-01-27 Siemens Energy, Inc. Turbine abradable layer with progressive wear zone having a frangible or pixelated nib surface
US9151175B2 (en) 2014-02-25 2015-10-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Turbine abradable layer with progressive wear zone multi level ridge arrays
US9243511B2 (en) 2014-02-25 2016-01-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Turbine abradable layer with zig zag groove pattern
JP5987033B2 (en) * 2014-09-24 2016-09-06 三菱重工業株式会社 Removal device for heat-degraded layer of heat-resistant coating film
WO2016133583A1 (en) 2015-02-18 2016-08-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Turbine shroud with abradable layer having ridges with holes
EP3259452A2 (en) 2015-02-18 2017-12-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Forming cooling passages in combustion turbine superalloy castings
US10858950B2 (en) 2017-07-27 2020-12-08 Rolls-Royce North America Technologies, Inc. Multilayer abradable coatings for high-performance systems
US10900371B2 (en) 2017-07-27 2021-01-26 Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. Abradable coatings for high-performance systems
US10808565B2 (en) * 2018-05-22 2020-10-20 Rolls-Royce Plc Tapered abradable coatings
CN109092802A (en) * 2018-08-06 2018-12-28 山东大学 A kind of minimizing technology of scrap hard alloy surface covering
GB201903484D0 (en) 2019-03-14 2019-05-01 Rolls Royce Plc A method of removing a ceramic coating from a ceramic coated metallic article
EP3969237A1 (en) * 2019-06-28 2022-03-23 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for removing a ceramic coating from a substrate and waterjet machine

Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2653116A (en) * 1949-03-16 1953-09-22 Cee Bee Chemical Co Inc Method of removing sealant from fuel tanks
US3413136A (en) * 1965-03-10 1968-11-26 United Aircraft Corp Abradable coating
US3460296A (en) * 1966-10-24 1969-08-12 Xerox Corp Metalworking
GB1362111A (en) * 1972-03-29 1974-07-30 Ppg Industries Inc Lead deposit removal from a steam still
US4055705A (en) * 1976-05-14 1977-10-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Thermal barrier coating system
GB2042399A (en) * 1979-01-15 1980-09-24 Boc Ltd Method and apparatus for penetrating a body of material or treating a surface
US4285108A (en) * 1979-02-23 1981-08-25 United Technologies Corporation Apparatus and method for refinishing turbine blade airseals
US4339282A (en) * 1981-06-03 1982-07-13 United Technologies Corporation Method and composition for removing aluminide coatings from nickel superalloys
US4425185A (en) * 1982-03-18 1984-01-10 United Technologies Corporation Method and composition for removing nickel aluminide coatings from nickel superalloys
US4508577A (en) * 1983-04-29 1985-04-02 Tracor Hydronautics, Inc. Fluid jet apparatus and method for cleaning tubular components
EP0145988A2 (en) * 1983-12-19 1985-06-26 General Electric Company Method of removing a coating
US4552594A (en) * 1982-09-08 1985-11-12 Voskuilen Dirk F Van Method for removing pipe coatings
US4590026A (en) * 1983-06-20 1986-05-20 Namba Press Works Co. Ltd. Process for making reinforcing layers on inner surfaces of complicated cavities
US4607792A (en) * 1983-12-28 1986-08-26 Young Iii Chapman Oscillating pulsed jet generator
US4726104A (en) * 1986-11-20 1988-02-23 United Technologies Corporation Methods for weld repairing hollow, air cooled turbine blades and vanes
US4859249A (en) * 1988-03-14 1989-08-22 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for cleaning enclosed vessels
DE8907917U1 (en) * 1989-06-29 1989-08-31 Keramchemie Gmbh, 5433 Siershahn, De
GB2217234A (en) * 1988-04-12 1989-10-25 Paul Hammelmann Nozzle head
FR2630667A1 (en) * 1988-04-29 1989-11-03 Breton Reparation Ferrov Method for removing a protective covering from a surface and spray head for implementing the method.
EP0400758B1 (en) * 1989-05-31 1993-07-21 Flow International Corporation Airport runway cleaning method

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA953488A (en) * 1970-06-17 1974-08-27 The Carborundum Company Method of removing wustite scale
FR2471446A1 (en) * 1979-12-13 1981-06-19 Lardeau Henri Water-operated cleaner for playing surface - includes housing on wheels containing jets for water and vacuum line for suds
JPS5741139A (en) * 1980-08-20 1982-03-08 Inoue Japax Res Inc Jet processing device
JPS62113600A (en) * 1985-11-14 1987-05-25 株式会社小松製作所 Method of peeling coated film
JPH01207153A (en) * 1988-02-15 1989-08-21 R D Kosan Kk Small-sized water jet stripping gun and stripping method

Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2653116A (en) * 1949-03-16 1953-09-22 Cee Bee Chemical Co Inc Method of removing sealant from fuel tanks
US3413136A (en) * 1965-03-10 1968-11-26 United Aircraft Corp Abradable coating
US3460296A (en) * 1966-10-24 1969-08-12 Xerox Corp Metalworking
GB1362111A (en) * 1972-03-29 1974-07-30 Ppg Industries Inc Lead deposit removal from a steam still
US4055705A (en) * 1976-05-14 1977-10-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Thermal barrier coating system
GB2042399A (en) * 1979-01-15 1980-09-24 Boc Ltd Method and apparatus for penetrating a body of material or treating a surface
US4285108A (en) * 1979-02-23 1981-08-25 United Technologies Corporation Apparatus and method for refinishing turbine blade airseals
US4339282A (en) * 1981-06-03 1982-07-13 United Technologies Corporation Method and composition for removing aluminide coatings from nickel superalloys
US4425185A (en) * 1982-03-18 1984-01-10 United Technologies Corporation Method and composition for removing nickel aluminide coatings from nickel superalloys
US4552594A (en) * 1982-09-08 1985-11-12 Voskuilen Dirk F Van Method for removing pipe coatings
US4508577A (en) * 1983-04-29 1985-04-02 Tracor Hydronautics, Inc. Fluid jet apparatus and method for cleaning tubular components
US4590026A (en) * 1983-06-20 1986-05-20 Namba Press Works Co. Ltd. Process for making reinforcing layers on inner surfaces of complicated cavities
EP0145988A2 (en) * 1983-12-19 1985-06-26 General Electric Company Method of removing a coating
US4607792A (en) * 1983-12-28 1986-08-26 Young Iii Chapman Oscillating pulsed jet generator
US4726104A (en) * 1986-11-20 1988-02-23 United Technologies Corporation Methods for weld repairing hollow, air cooled turbine blades and vanes
US4859249A (en) * 1988-03-14 1989-08-22 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for cleaning enclosed vessels
GB2217234A (en) * 1988-04-12 1989-10-25 Paul Hammelmann Nozzle head
FR2630667A1 (en) * 1988-04-29 1989-11-03 Breton Reparation Ferrov Method for removing a protective covering from a surface and spray head for implementing the method.
EP0400758B1 (en) * 1989-05-31 1993-07-21 Flow International Corporation Airport runway cleaning method
DE8907917U1 (en) * 1989-06-29 1989-08-31 Keramchemie Gmbh, 5433 Siershahn, De

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Flow Systems, Application Profile: Coke Oven Door Cleaning, Sep. 1988, (2 pgs), Flow Systems, Inc. *
Flow Systems, Application Profile: Monument Restoration, Jul. 1988, (2 pgs), Flow Systems, Inc. *
New Zealand Patent No. 173992 dated Mar. 1976 claims 1 20 and FIGS. 1 3 only. *
New Zealand Patent No. 173992 dated Mar. 1976 claims 1-20 and FIGS. 1-3 only.
New Zealand Patent No. 176547 dated Feb. 1977 claims 1 10 and FIGS. 1 and 2 only. *
New Zealand Patent No. 176547 dated Feb. 1977 claims 1-10 and FIGS. 1 and 2 only.
Smirnov N. S, Prostakov M. E., Process of Cleaning the Surfaces of Steel, Publishing House Metallurgy, 1965, pp. 34 & 36. *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6210488B1 (en) 1998-12-30 2001-04-03 General Electric Company Method of removing a thermal barrier coating
US20030068953A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2003-04-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for removing film and method for manufacturing display panel
EP1302966A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2003-04-16 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for removing film and method for manufacturing display panel
US6800008B2 (en) 2001-10-09 2004-10-05 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for removing film and method for manufacturing display panel
US20040256504A1 (en) * 2003-06-23 2004-12-23 General Electric Company Process of selectively removing layers of a thermal barrier coating system
US6955308B2 (en) 2003-06-23 2005-10-18 General Electric Company Process of selectively removing layers of a thermal barrier coating system
DE102007061407B4 (en) * 2006-12-13 2021-03-04 General Electric Co. Waterjet stripping and recontouring of gas turbine guide vanes and blades
US9102014B2 (en) 2010-06-17 2015-08-11 Siemens Energy, Inc. Method of servicing an airfoil assembly for use in a gas turbine engine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PT96011A (en) 1991-09-13
CN1052264A (en) 1991-06-19
DE69020507T2 (en) 1996-01-04
RU2071507C1 (en) 1997-01-10
CA2030936C (en) 2000-03-28
HK173095A (en) 1995-11-17
US5167721A (en) 1992-12-01
CA2030936A1 (en) 1991-05-28
BR9005984A (en) 1991-09-24
JP2742471B2 (en) 1998-04-22
NO905116L (en) 1991-05-28
EP0430856B1 (en) 1995-06-28
CN1027142C (en) 1994-12-28
DE69020507D1 (en) 1995-08-03
JPH0463635A (en) 1992-02-28
ES2074151T3 (en) 1995-09-01
AU6697290A (en) 1991-05-30
IL96485A (en) 1994-11-11
FI905836A0 (en) 1990-11-27
KR100198896B1 (en) 1999-06-15
AU642928B2 (en) 1993-11-04
IE904268A1 (en) 1991-06-05
YU226390A (en) 1993-10-20
KR910009344A (en) 1991-06-28
MX172981B (en) 1994-01-26
IL96485A0 (en) 1991-08-16
EP0430856A1 (en) 1991-06-05
IE68059B1 (en) 1996-05-15
NO905116D0 (en) 1990-11-27
FI905836A (en) 1991-05-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE35611E (en) Liquid jet removal of plasma sprayed and sintered coatings
Tucker Thermal spray coatings
JP5226184B2 (en) Repair and reclassification of superalloy parts
US7509735B2 (en) In-frame repairing system of gas turbine components
EP1694463B1 (en) Process for removing thermal barrier coatings
US6365222B1 (en) Abradable coating applied with cold spray technique
US6171711B1 (en) Apertured article preconditioned for recoating
US6905396B1 (en) Method of removing a coating from a substrate
Tucker Jr Introduction to coating design and processing
JP2006131997A (en) Method for repairing workpiece
CN100346929C (en) Method and device for polishing the surface of a gas turbine blade
US6887529B2 (en) Method of applying environmental and bond coatings to turbine flowpath parts
RU2062303C1 (en) Method of applying coating on blades of heat turbomachine
US10662517B2 (en) Aluminum fan blade tip prepared for thermal spray deposition of abrasive by laser ablation
Sohr et al. Stripping of thermal spray coatings with ultra high pressure water jet
Knapp et al. Precoating operations
Yang et al. A Review of Removal and Repair Techniques for Thermal Barrier Coatings
Zhang Particle-Based Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Discrete-Element Modeling of Thermal Barrier Coating Removal Processes
Bailey Progress in metal spraying technique and application
Alloy Theoretical erosion responses
Mattox Vacuum and Controlled-Atmosphere Coating and Surface Modification
ENGELHARDT et al. Real scale performance of advanced erosion protection techniques on water turbines
Lane Plastic Media Paint Stripping in Aircraft Maintenance
Frenzel et al. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT OF PROFILE BY WATER JETTING FOR COATINGS REMOVAL

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

SULP Surcharge for late payment

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

SULP Surcharge for late payment

Year of fee payment: 11

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY