USRE28777E - Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide - Google Patents

Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE28777E
USRE28777E US05/484,082 US48408274A USRE28777E US RE28777 E USRE28777 E US RE28777E US 48408274 A US48408274 A US 48408274A US RE28777 E USRE28777 E US RE28777E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
chlorine dioxide
vegetable matter
pulp
prepulping
iaddend
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US05/484,082
Inventor
Harry D. Wilder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ethyl Corp
Original Assignee
Ethyl Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ethyl Corp filed Critical Ethyl Corp
Priority to US05/484,082 priority Critical patent/USRE28777E/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE28777E publication Critical patent/USRE28777E/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C9/00—After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
    • D21C9/10—Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor
    • D21C9/12—Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor with halogens or halogen-containing compounds
    • D21C9/14—Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor with halogens or halogen-containing compounds with ClO2 or chlorites
    • D21C9/142—Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor with halogens or halogen-containing compounds with ClO2 or chlorites with ClO2/Cl2 in a multistage process involving ClO2/Cl2 exclusively

Definitions

  • Vegetable materials such as wood, reed, bamboo, cane and the like which are or can be used for the preparation of fibrous materials are composed of several basic parts.
  • fibrous vegetable matter is made up of about 15 to 30 percent lignins and extractives, such as resins and the like, with the remainder of the about 70 to 80 percent being carbohydrates.
  • the carbohydrate portion of the fibrous vegetable matter is about 10 to 30 percent hemicellulose with the remainder being cellulose, and the cellulose portion of the carbohydrate is about 45 to 55 percent alpha cellulose and about 5 percent other celluloses, all percentages being expressed on a wood basis.
  • one of the first steps in conventionally converting fibrous vegetable materials to fibers for use in the preparation of paper or paper-like materials is a pulping process.
  • the primary goal of the process is to remove most of the lignins from the fibrous vegetable material and separate the remaining carbohydrate fibers into individual fibers.
  • pulping processes such as kraft, sulfite and others
  • when efforts are made to remove substantially all of the lignin from the vegetable fiber mass a major part of the hemicellulose is lost, and the remaining cellulose and hemicellulose fibers are chemically and/or mechanically damaged.
  • the normal yield known in the art is about 45 percent by weight. But, if only the lignins and extractives were removed from the fibrous vegetable material, the yield obtained would be 70-80 percent.
  • This invention is directed toward a new and novel pulping process and the pulp and paper products resulting therefrom.
  • the pulping process removes substantially only lignins and extractives from fibrous vegetable materials and leaves the cellulose and hemicellulose part of the material substantially undamaged, thereby resulting in pulp and paper products having new and unusual properties and exceptionally high strengths. Since the pulping process is reasonably selective and substantially only the lignins and extractives are removed, yields are exceptionally high and in the 55 to 85 percent range.
  • the pulping process includes a basic sequential unit of a chlorine dioxide treatment, caustic extraction and a chlorine dioxide treatment, and this basic unit is preceded by a chemical or mechanical pretreatment of prepared vegetable fiber chips. Each step of the basic sequential unit is followed by a water washing, which may be with process liquids obtained elsewhere in the process, as by countercurrent washing which has attendant conservation advantages.
  • a more preferred embodiment of the process is one including a chemical and/or mechanical pretreatment of prepared vegetable fiber chips followed by the sequential processing of the pretreated chips in a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction, a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction and a final chlorine dioxide treatment.
  • a water washing or its equivalent follows each chlorine dioxide treatment and each caustic extraction.
  • An even more preferred embodiment of the process is one in which the water wash for the final chlorine dioxide treatment is used as the water wash for the preceding caustic extraction and so on countercurrently to the flow of fiber material through the process to the first water wash following the first chlorine dioxide treatment; from this point the wash water may then be sent to waste or treated for recovery of chemicals contained therein.
  • Another preferred embodiment of the process involves the chemical pretreatment of prepared vegetable fiber chips followed sequentially by a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction, a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction and a final chlorine dioxide treatment with countercurrent water washing and extraction after each treatment; the most preferred chemical pretreatment is a neutral sulfite pretreatment at a specified concentration of chemicals and cooking cycle.
  • the pulp produced by the process of the present invention has a higher degree of polymerization, a higher hemicellulose content, a higher carboxyl content, and a lower carbonyl content than conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture.
  • it requires less energy to refine than a conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture.
  • laboratory handsheets prepared from the pulp have superior tensile strength and tear strength when compared to sheets of conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture.
  • the above pulp properties relate directly to paper made from the pulp.
  • Such paper has higher tensile, tear, burst, fold, pick, and delamination strengths.
  • FIGS. 1 and 3 are block diagrams and FIGS. 4 to 13 are graphs.
  • FIG. 1 describes the basic process of this invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a more preferred embodiment of the process of this invention, and
  • FIG. 3 discloses a highly preferred chemical pretreatment step for the process of this invention.
  • FIG. 4 compares yield of pretreated material with caustic utilized in each stage.
  • FIG. 5 compares G.E. brightness with caustic utilized in each stage.
  • FIG. 6 compares percent rejects with caustic utilized.
  • FIG. 7 shows final yield compared with pretreatment yield.
  • FIG. 8 compares chlorine dioxide consumption with pretreatment yield.
  • FIG. 9 shows a comparison of freeness with beating time.
  • FIG. 10 compares Schopper fold with effect of cation treatment.
  • FIG. 11 provides a comparison of MIT fold with Schopper fold.
  • FIG. 12 relates to Schopper fold to days of aging, and,
  • FIG. 13 relates Schopper fold to years of aging.
  • fiber chips of any fibrous vegetable matter are fed first to a pretreatment step 10 which may be either mechanical, chemical or a combination thereof.
  • the pretreated chips are then fed to a first chlorine dioxide treatment 11 where they are contacted with chlorine dioxide in either aqueous solution or as a gas.
  • the chlorine dioxide treated material is washed with water 12 to return the mixture to substantially neutral pH; following washing, the washed chlorine dioxide treated material is subjected to caustic extraction 13 for a period of about one-half to one hour.
  • the extracted material is washed again with water to return to substantially neutral pH, as indicated at 14, and to remove the water soluble materials produced in the extraction step.
  • Prepared vegetable fiber chips are fed to a pretreatment step 20 where they are subjected to a chemical, mechanical or a combined chemical-mechanical pretreatment to make the lignin and extractives more readily available for removal.
  • the pretreated material is subjected sequentially to a chlorine dioxide treatment 21, water washing 22, caustic extraction 23, water washing 24, chlorine dioxide treatment 25, water washing 26, caustic extraction 27, water washing 28, chlorine dioxide treatment 29, and water washing 30.
  • fresh water is fed only to the last water washing 30 by line 40 and then circulated countercurrently to the flow of the material through the process as indicated by line 41 to the next to last water washing step 28, and from there as indicated by line 42 to the next preceding water washing step 26, then by line 43 to water washing step 24, and from that wash to the first water washing 22 as indicated by line 44, and then to waste or chemical recovery as indicated by line 45.
  • fresh or make-up water may be added to any one of the water washing steps as indicated by lines 46, 47, 48, 49 and that water may be sent to waste or chemical recovery from any or all of the water washing steps as indicated by lines 50, 51, 52 and 53.
  • Chlorine dioxide either in aqueous solution or in gaseous form, may be fed to each of the chlorine dioxide steps as indicated by lines 60, 61 and 62 and an aqueous solution of caustic may be fed to each of the caustic extraction steps as indicated by lines 63 and 64.
  • the novel pulp of this invention is recovered from the process, as indicated at 70, in a high yield of about 55 to about 85 percent and at a G.E. brightness of approximately 80 to 90.
  • a more preferred embodiment of the invention is a five stage process that comprises the sequential steps of chlorine dioxide treatment, caustic extraction, chlorine dioxide treatment, caustic extraction, and chlorine dioxide treatment, with a water wash between each step, and having first chlorine dioxide treatment preceded by chemical or a chemical-mechanical pretreatment.
  • FIG. 3 a block diagram of a preferred chemical-mechanical pretreatment is shown.
  • Prepared vegetable fiber chips are fed to a chemical treatment step 70 where a prepulping treatment is given.
  • This prepulping treatment may be in the nature of a weak pulping to a high yield by a kraft, nitric acid, neutral sulfite process, or other.
  • the fiber chips are prepulped to a yield at least greater than 64 percent by weight based upon the dry weight of the chips of the vegetable matter.
  • the prepulped material is refined in step 71, washed in step 72, then dewatered as indicated at 73 to prepare a combined chemically-mechanically pretreated material ready for processing in the first chlorine dioxide treatment as indicated at 21 in FIG. 2.
  • the novel process of this invention is suitable for preparing a novel pulp and paper product from any fibrous vegetable matter containing lignin.
  • the vegetable matter should have extraneous materials removed before being subjected to the process.
  • wood in the case of wood, it must be debarked in a prior operation.
  • wood will be referred to as the fibrous vegetable material; however, it should be understood that the process of the invention is applicable to all fibrous vegetable materials.
  • Debarked wood either hard or soft, may be converted into chips by a Carthage multiknife chipper or other equivalent apparatus.
  • the chips should be approximately 15 to 75 millimeters in length, 10 to 40 millimeters in width and have a thickness of 0.5 to 20 millimeters. When chemical or chemical-mechanical pretreatment is used it is preferred that chips have an approximate length and width as described and that the thickness be from about 2 to about 5 millimeters. Following chipping, prepared chips are then subjected to the pretreatment step.
  • the pretreatment step can be either mechanical, chemical or a combination of chemical and mechanical.
  • mechanical pretreatment the vegetable fiber chips are subjected to a shredding, refining, or flaking operation, such as is well known in the art, by a Pallman knife ring flaker, which by slicing reduces conventionally sized chips to thin flakes while maintaining chip length and width, or a standard disc refiner, or the equivalent.
  • the chips may be subjected to water or steam treatment prior to flaking or refining, either under vacuum or pressure, and following either flaking or refining the resulting fibers or fiber bundles should be as small as possible without significant damage to the fibers. The optimum size depends upon the flaking or refining equipment employed.
  • the vegetable fiber chips are subjected to a chemical treatment followed by a refining operation and then a water washing.
  • the chemical pretreatment results in a yield of at least about 64 percent or greater and may be a mild prepulping by a neutral sulfite, nitric acid, kraft or other known pulping process (e.g., bisulfite, acid sulfite, cold soda, soda, sodium xylene sulfonate, polysulfide).
  • a more preferred chemical pretreatment is a mild neutral sulfite prepulping under particular conditions of chemical concentrations; the heating and cooking cycles are .[.defines.]. .Iadd.defined .Iaddend.infra.
  • the refining step may be performed by standard disc refiner or other equivalent apparatus and conducted to yield minimum particle size without significant fiber damage.
  • a dewatering step may be necessary prior to subjecting the pretreated fibers to the novel pulping process of this invention.
  • the pretreated material enters the first chlorine dioxide treatment step.
  • the shredded mass of fiber bundles resulting from the pretreatment has a consistency of from about 5 percent to about 50 percent by weight, based on the total weight of shredded mass and water.
  • Chlorine dioxide if used as an aqueous solution, may be fed as an approximately 1 percent by weight aqueous solution, and depending upon the desired concentration of chlorine dioxide, which is defined infra, additional water may be added to prepare the mixture to the desired consistency. If gaseous chlorine dioxide is used, an inert diluent such as air may be necessary to prevent explosion hazards.
  • Any conventional treating tower such as is well known in the art may be used for the chlorine dioxide treatment stage and heat may be added if and as necessary. Also, additional heat may be supplied to reduce the time of contact between the shredded mass and the chlorine dioxide, which time is from about 10 minutes to 2 hours depending upon the consistency, the temperature, and the yield of product resulting from the pretreatment step.
  • the shredded mass of fibers is permitted to remain in contact with the chlorine dioxide until the chlorine dioxide charged is substantially consumed.
  • the pH of this system at the beginning may vary from about 4.0 to about 8.0, and upon consumption of the chlorine dioxide the pH of the treated solution will be approximately 0.5 to 3.0. Following the chlorine dioxide treatment, the resulting mass is then water washed in a conventional vacuum drum washer or the equivalent.
  • the washed material is subjected to a first alkali extraction in a conventional treating tower such as is well known in the art.
  • a first alkali extraction any water soluble caustic material may be used such as sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, ammonia gas or other or mixtures of these or others; howeer, an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide is preferred.
  • the alkali application should be approximately 4 percent based on the oven dry weight of the fibrous material, and sufficient water may be added or removed to prepare an aqueous fiber mass having a consistency of from about 5 percent to about 50 percent by weight based on the total weight of shredded mass present and water.
  • the alkali extraction should continue for at least about one-half hour at a temperature of from about 50° C. to about 75° C. with a preferred temperature of about 65° C.
  • the alkali extracted material is subjected to another water washing under substantially the same conditions as the first water wash to remove extracted materials and residual chemicals.
  • the second chlorine dioxide treatment may be carried out in a conventional treating tower such as described for the first chlorine dioxide treatment, whereby the desired consistency of material within the tower is substantially the same for the second chlorine dioxide treatment as for the first.
  • Either gaseous chlorine dioxide or an aqueous, approximately one percent by weight, solution may be fed to this second treatment stage.
  • the pH is initially from about 4.0 to about 8.0 and ends at about 2.0; the chlorine dioxide treatment is permitted to continue until substantially all the chlorine dioxide charged to the treating stage is consumed.
  • the temperatures for the second chlorine dioxide treatment are adjusted to from about 40° C. to about 60° C. to keep contact times to a minimum of from about 30 minutes to about 4 hours to consume the chlorine dioxide charged.
  • the treated material is subjected to a third water washing under substantially the same conditions as the first and second water washings.
  • a second alkali extraction is conducted, followed by a water wash under substantially the same conditions as the first alkali extraction and wash.
  • the washed material at this stage in the process may be screened, if desired, to remove any shives of fibrous material which may remain, and these shives are discarded or returned to the first chlorine dioxide treatment stage for recycle.
  • the treated material is then subjected to a third chlorine dioxide treatment under the same conditions of consistency and chlorine dioxide concentraton as the first and second chlorine dioxide treatment stages for a period of from about 2 hours to about 6 hours, depending upon the desired brightness for the product produced.
  • the temperature for this third chlorine dioxide treatment stage is from about 40° C. to about 80° C., and following the third chlorine dioxide treatment, the treated material is subjected to a fifth and final water wash under the same conditions as the preceding water washings.
  • the total concentration of chlorine dioxide used in the multistage process is dependent upon the yield of product obtained from the pretreatment step and the desired brightness of the product resulting from the final treatment stage.
  • the total chlorine dioxide consumed in the multiple stages is from about 1.0 to about 15.0 percent by weight based on the total dry weight of fibrous material being fed to the pretreatment stage. It has been found and is preferred that the total concentration of chlorine dioxide used is from about .[.4.0.]. .Iadd.2.0 .Iaddend.to about 13.0 percent by weight, based upon the total weight of dry fibrous material being fed to the pretreatment stage.
  • the amount of chlorine dioxide fed to each chlorine dioxide stage is dependent upon the number of chlorine dioxide stages used and on the pretreatment yield. For any given total amount of chlorine dioxide to be used, it has been found that approximately two times the amount used in the last stage should be fed to the chlorine dioxide stage preceding the last and two times the amount used in the preceding stage fed to the next preceding stage, and so on. For example, in a three chlorine dioxide stage process, this means that approximately four-sevenths of the total chlorine dioxide will be fed to the first stage, approximately two-sevenths of the total chlorine dioxide will be fed to the second stage, and approximately one-seventh to the third stage.
  • the preferred pretreatment for the process of this inventioni is a chemical pretreatment, and of the chemical pretreatments available such as kraft, bisulfite, neutral sulfite, nitric acid, etc., a neutral sulfite pretreatment is preferred. And, among the neutral sulfite pretreatments available, a sodium based neutral sulfite pretreatment is preferred.
  • a standard neutral sulfite pulping treatment includes cooking fibrous vegetable material for a period of 10 to 15 minutes at about 350° F. in a concentration of approximately 10 percent sodium sulfite and approximately 3 percent sodium carbonate, chemical charges being based on the wood weight charged to the process.
  • This standard neutral sulfite pretreatment has advantages, in the process of this invention it is even more preferred that a specific and novel neutral sulfite pretreatment be used.
  • This novel chemical pretreatment includes preparing an aqueous solution of a fibrous vegetable material, which has been chipped as described previously, with a concentration of from about 5 to about 30 percent sodium sulfite and from about 3 to about 25 percent sodium carbonate to provide a sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate ratio of about 1.2 or greater. More preferred concentrations are from about 7 to about 20 percent sodium sulfite and from about 5 to about 18 percent sodium carbonate, all percentages being based upon the dry weight of the vegetable matter.
  • a more preferred sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate ratio is from about 1.2 to about 1.5
  • the time-temperature relationship employed is designed to give adequate impregnation of liquor into chips prior to reaching a temperature of about 300° F. This relationship is dependent upon wood species and chip size, as well as previous chip history.
  • a chemical predetermined is performed in accordance with the described recipe, higher final yields and higher quality product are obtained as compared with other mechanical or chemical pretreatments.
  • the pulp of the present invention is chemically unique in that it has a higher degree of polymerization, a higher hemicellulose content, a higher carboxyl content, and a lower carbonyl content than pulp conventionally produced from the same wood. Due it its higher final yield as compared to conventionally bleached kraft pulp, it contains more hemicellulose. At the same time, however, the viscosity average degree of polymerization of the pulp is higher than that of conventionally bleached kraft pulp. The inescapable conclusion is that the process of the present invention degrades wood cellulose less than conventional processes in going from wood to purified pulp.
  • the carboxyl content of the pulp produced by the present invention is at least twice as great as the carboxyl content of conventionally bleached pulps and has a carboxyl number (TAPPI Standard T237su-63) greater than about 6, preferably greater than about 9, and more preferably greater than about 12, and as high as, for example, 20, and even higher.
  • the carbonyl content is only one-half to one-third as great as the carbonyl content of conventionally bleached pulp from the same wood.
  • the mechanical properties of the pulp of the present invention which are affected by its unique chemical properties are ease of refining, fiber tensile strength, and ability to form fiber-fiber bonds when made into sheets and dried.
  • the pulp of the present invention consumes only one-third to one-fourth of the energy required to beat a conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture to the same freeness level.
  • the rate of beating of the pulp of the present invention is 4.2 times as great as the rate for the corresponding bleached kraft pulp when prepared from a northern hardwood mixture and 3 times as great using the southern hardwood mixture. Since the time required to beat a pulp is directly proportional to the energy required to beat that pulp, the pulp of the present invention exhibits a substantial savings in refining energy input required to reach a given freeness level.
  • the rate of mechanical refining (ml. Canadian St. per minute of beating carried out according to TAPPI Standard T200ts-66) can be greater than about 15, preferably greater than about 20, more preferably greater than about 25, and may extend up to, for example, 50 and even higher.
  • the pulp of the present invention is formed into paper on a paper machine, more rapid drainage, increased ability to retain fibers, increased wet web strength, and increased drying rate are observed relative to conventional pulp prepared from the same wood.
  • Strips of handsheets from the pulp of the present invention possess superior tensile strength and tear strength when compared to conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture. This is unusal since pulps with higher tensile strength usually possess lower tear strength.
  • the fact that the present pulp possesses both a superior tear strength and superior tensile strength indicates another unique physical property of the pulp of this invention; it also possesses superior individual fiber tensile strength.
  • the properties of these pulps relate directly to papers made from them.
  • Machine made paper from pulp of the present invention produces higher tensile, tear, burst, fold pick and delamination strengths.
  • the grease proofness (TAPPI Standard T454ts-66) of the paper of this invention can be greater than about 500 sec., preferably greater than about 1000 sec., and can extend up to, for example, 1800 sec.
  • tensile strength (TAPPI Standard T404ts-66) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 80 percent, preferably greater than about 100 percent, more preferably greater than about 120 percent and may extend up to, for example, 200 percent and even higher, and for paper from softwood pulp it can be greater than about 120 percent, preferably greater than about 140 percent, more preferably greater than about 160 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 250 percent and even higher;
  • bursting strength (TAPPI Standard T403ts-63) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 140 percent, preferably greater than about 160 percent, more preferably greater than about 190 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 250 percent and even higher, and for paper from softwood pulp it can be greater than about 160 percent, preferably greater than about 190 percent, more preferably greater than about 230 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 300 percent and even higher; tearing resistance (TAPPI Standard T414ts-65) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 160 percent, preferably greater
  • the resultant product is not of as high a brightness as it is possible to achieve.
  • the resulting pulp contains some shives or fiber bundles.
  • Use of more chlorine dioxide in each of the two stages as well as use of a more severe extraction stage improves results. However, this leads to an increase in chlorine dioxide consumption and a decrease in R.
  • the preferred method of producing a bleached pulp with a negligible quantity of shives is conducted by expanding the sequence to five stages of intermittent chlorine dioxide-extraction (with intermediate washing). The additional stages give the caustic an additional opportunity to soften and disperse the fiber bundles, and also to remove further alkali-soluble lignin materials and thereby reduce the overall chlorine dioxide consumption.
  • hardwood chips were pretreated chemically by a sodium base neutral sulfite reaction to approximately 85 percent yield, followed by mechanical refining in an eight inch laboratory disc refiner and thorough water washing.
  • Representative samples of the resultant pretreated material were subjected to various chlorine dioxide extraction sequences. The following conditions were held constant during these tests.
  • sodium hydroxide rather than sodium carbonate or ammonium hydroxide in the extraction stages, the following comparisons were made, demonstrating that sodium hydroxide is more effective in extracting lignin reaction products than either sodium carbonate or ammonium hydroxide. At the same time, sodium hydroxide is at least as effective as the other two extractants in preserving pulp carbohydrate content.
  • the first runs below compare sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate as extractants.
  • Mixed southern hardwood chips were pretreated chemically by a neutral sulfite treatment and mechanically in a laboratory disc refiner to a final pretreatment yield of 84 percent.
  • the pretreated material was pulped with 5.5 percent chlorine dioxide (wood basis), extractions were carried out at 10 percent consistency and 65° C., and the effect of variable extraction conditions was determined through yield and lignin content measurements on the washed pulp.
  • the extraction conditions used and experimental results were as follows:
  • ammonium hydroxide extraction even at the higher level of chemical application, is less efficient in lignin extraction. Also, ammonium hydroxide offers no advantage in .[.carbonhydrate.]. .Iadd.carbohydrate .Iaddend.preservation.
  • a pretreated wood such as produced in Example X was delignified using the following four-stage sequence.
  • FIGS. 4 and 5 show that yield losses and brightness are relatively little affected by temperature. However, while yield loss is approximately proportional to alkali applied, there is little advantage in either brightness increase or rejects reduction in using more than about 4 percent sodium hydroxide at 12 percent consistency. Therefore, to conserve yield while achieving maximum brightness and minimum rejects, about 4 percent applied caustic is employed at 12 percent consistency.
  • FIG. 6 clearly shows that a higher temperature (65° C.) is advantageous in reducing rejects. Since this does not adversely affect yield, preferred temperature conditions for extraction are above ambient, in the vicinity of 65° C.
  • the yield data, strength data of standard laboratory handsheets, and some data on the degree of polymerization (D.P.) of the final bleached pulp is summarized in the following table.
  • FIG. 8 shows the pretreatment yield-chlorine dioxide consumption relationship for neutral sulfite pretreatment, with the no-chemical pretreatment point corresponding to 100 percent pretreatment yield.
  • the neutral sulfite line is followed until a pretreatment yield of 95 percent is approached; at this point the consumption rises rapidly from this line and passes through the no-chemical pretreatment point.
  • a disproportionately large amount of chlorine dioxide is consumed. This is, of course, very undesirable.
  • FIG. 7 shows a parallel behavior for bleached yields. At pretreatment yields above about 95 percent, the bleached yield actually decreases to the point corresponding to mechanical pretreatment only. Since maximum yield is desirable, this decrease is undesirable.
  • Example IX Further reason for maintaining pretreatment yield below 95 percent is found in Example IX, in which it is shown that 100 percent pretreatment yield produces inferior paper strength properties as compared with papers in the below 95 percent pretreatment yield range.
  • Runs were made using two extremes of liquor impregnation prior to chemical pretreatment, and with a range of ratios of sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate in the pretreatment liquor. In all cases sufficient pretreatment chemical was applied so that the final liquor pH was above 7. If allowed to drop below this value, a weak pulp resulted.
  • the raw material was a southern hardwood chip mixture.
  • the materials produced were refined under constant conditions in a laboratory eight-inch disc refiner, thoroughly water washed, and subjected to the five-stage chlorine dioxide-caustic sequence for pulping and bleaching to 80 G.E. brightness (TAPPI Standard T 217m-48). The total chlorine dioxide required to achieve this brightness was determined together with standard handsheet physical tests on the bleached pulp.
  • Runs 1 and 2 at equal pretreatment yield, show the effect of variations in applied chemicals.
  • pulping chemical chlorine dioxide
  • pulp handsheet strengths results when the sulfite/carbonate ratio is reduced from about five to slightly more than one.
  • Runs 3 and 4 show the effect of still further reduction in this base ratio from 1.2 to 1.0.
  • a very significant decrease in pulp handsheet strengths results, along with a large increase (about 25 percent based on the normal chemical application) in chlorine dioxide consumption.
  • a sulfite/carbonate ratio of slightly above unit it is critical that this ratio not be allowed to drop below about 1.2 because of detrimental effects on both pulp physical properties and pulping chemical consumption.
  • Runs 1, 3 and 5 show the importance of adequate pretreatment liquor impregnation of the chipped raw material. Since the chemical ratio of Run 5 is intermediate between those of Runs 1 and 3, the observed marked decrease in handsheet physical properties is attributable to the lack of adequate chip impregnation. Optimum impregnation conditions depend upon the type (wood species) and chip dimensions of the raw material. Sufficient pretreatment chemical must be added to maintain the pH at 7 or above during the pretreatment.
  • the ratio of sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate applied should be held in the vicinity of about 1.5 for highest pulp strength. Higher values result in reduced strengths; values below about 1.2 give weaker pulps and increased pulping chemical (chlorine dioxide) consumption.
  • Adequate pretreatment liquor penetration into the raw material must be achieved, or strength properties suffer and shive content increases. Optimum conditions depend upon raw material structure and particle dimensions.
  • chlorine in any proportion in the present invention offers no advantages in terms of pulp quality, certain amounts of chlorine can be used in the initial chlorine dioxide stage without adverse effects.
  • the upper limit to chlorine substitution is about 25 to 30 percent of the total chlorine dioxide requirement on an equivalent oxidant basis; this maximum corresponds to a weight proportion of about 50 percent chlorine and 50 percent chlorine dioxide.
  • sodium base neutral sulfite sodium sulfite and sodium carbonate
  • the three chemical-mechanical pretreatments were achieved using the chemical conditions shown below using mixed southern hardwood chips as raw material. In all cases, the chemical pretreatment was followed by refining in a laboratory eight-inch disc refiner, thorough washing, and pulping and bleaching using the chlorine dioxide-caustic-chlorine dioxide-caustic-chlorine dioxide treatment sequence. Conditions and results are in the table below.
  • nitric acid pretreatment results in both lower bleached yield and lower handsheet strength, indicating excessive carbohydrate degradation during this pretreatment.
  • Sodium base neutral sulfite produces a stronger pulp than ammonia base pretreatment.
  • ammonia base pretreatment it is more difficult to delignify and bleach, and the pulp contains somewhat more shives and fiber bundles.
  • the raw material was a mixture of southern hardwood chips (approximately one-third oak, one-third yellow poplar, and one-third gum).
  • chemical pretreatments kraft and neutral sulfite
  • sufficient time for liquor impregnation was allowed prior to heating to maximum temperature.
  • the chemically pretreated material (and the hardwood chips following presteaming in the case of mechanical pretreatment only) was then refined in an eight-inch laboratory disc refiner to give a starting material for the chlorine dioxide pulping/bleaching sequence.
  • Pretreatment was analyzed through the following: ##EQU2##
  • the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment is preferred over either high-yield kraft or mechanical pretreatment, since it results in higher final bleached yield, lower chlorine dioxide consumption, and higher pulp handsheet strengths.
  • pulp samples were prepared using two processes: the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment-chlorine dioxide pulping sequence of the present invention and a conventionally pulped and bleached kraft pulp. These pulps were refined to 300 degrees Canadian Standard Freeness (TAPPI Standard T227 m-58) and formed into paper on a small twelve-inch paper machine, so that the results would be more indicative of the properties of machine-made papers.
  • TAPPI Standard T227 m-58 The physical and surface smoothness properties of these two papers are compared in the following tables:
  • the pulp exhibits certain unique properties related to its processing before and during the papermaking operation, such as great ease of refining, increased ease of drainage during paper formation, ability to retain fillers more efficiently, superior wet web strength on the paper machine, and increased ease of paper machine drying, the following comparisons were made.
  • the carboxyl content of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide sequence pulp is at least twice as great as the carboxyl content of conventionally bleached pulps. At the same time, the carbonyl content is only 1/2 to 1/3 as great as the carbonyl content of conventionally bleached pulp from the same wood.
  • the neutral sulfite pretreatment portion of the sequence is necessary to keep the carbonyl content low as is seen by comparison of the data for pulps with and without the neutral sulfite pretreatment.
  • the carboxyl content of the chlorine dioxide sequence pulp is so high that it can behave as an ion exchange material. If this pulp is treated with a salt solution, the resulting pulp will retain the metal atoms. This results in higher ash content and many unique chemical properties. Brightness and opacity as well as brightness stability are strongly affected by the nature of the cation bound to the pulp.
  • the table below shows the effects of trace amounts of zinc, sodium, aluminum, and potassium ions on pulp optical properties. It is apparent that significant changes result, which do not occur when conventional kraft pulp is subjected to similar treatments.
  • the pulp used was produced from a southern hardwood species mixture.
  • the wood mixture was given a neutral sulfite cook, and refined in a high pressure refiner for a 85.5 percent yield.
  • the pulp was then washed and bleached by a five-stage chlorine dioxide-extraction sequence. All chlorine dioxide stages were conducted with gaseous chlorine dioxide.
  • the pulp was tumbled in a 3 gallon polyethylene reactor during the reaction period. A total of 8.4 percent chlorine dioxide (wood basis) was consumed by the pulp. All chlorine dioxide stages were conducted at room temperature without addition of buffer.
  • the processed pulp was beaten 11 minutes to 300 ml. Canadian Standard Freeness (TAPPI Standard T227 m-58) in a Valley beater. Three cation treated series of handsheets were made and one series was made with just distilled water. The treated handsheets were made by applying 1.2 gram of the salt or base of interest to a slurry containing 12 grams of pulp (oven dry basis). Sufficient slurry was then added to the handsheet mold (using distilled water) to make a standard 1.2 gram handsheet. Cations selected were sodium in the form of sodium hydroxide, lead in the form of lead acetate, aluminum in the form of aluminum sulfate, and the control which was made from distilled water.
  • Pairs of handsheets from the four groups were aged at 105° C. for zero days, one day, two days, three days and seven days. Each handsheet was then cut into four strips and tested to failure in the Schopper fold tester. All strips were, of course, conditioned in the test laboratory prior to testing. The data obtained is presented in the table below and in FIG. 10.
  • FIG. 11 develops the relationship between M.I.T. and Schopper folds, based on data on pulp of the present invention tested according to both methods.
  • FIG. 13 of the drawings the same pulps are compared with respect to their fold durability on the basis of years at standard conditions.
  • the half life (the time in years required to decrease the fold to one half of its original value) of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulps is very high compared to conventional book.
  • the half life of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide alum treated pulp is about 18 years.
  • the typical modern book paper has a half life of about 6 years.
  • neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp of the present invention without special treatment or with lead or sodium treatment is very durable.
  • Alum treated neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp is less durable than the lead, sodium or no-treatment pulps but is more durable than typical alum treated book paper.

Abstract

.[.A process for the delignification of chips of vegetable matter by pretreating the chips to obtain at least 64 percent by weight refined vegetable matter, and delignifying the refine vegetable matter with chlorine dioxide. A pulp produced in high yield by the process which refines easier, dries more readily on a paper machine, exhibits higher on-machine filler retention, and possesses greater strength than conventionally bleached kraft pulp made from the same wood mixture. A paper produced from said pulp which has higher tensile, tear, burst, fold, pick and delamination strengths and greater brightness stability that paper produced from conventionally bleached kraft pulp made from the same wood mixture..]. .Iadd.A process of delignifying lignocellulosic vegetable matter wherein the vegetable matter is pretreated to obtain a refined vegetable matter which is thereafter delignified by reacting it in at least two stages with chlorine dioxide, each successive stage using less chlorine dioxide than the preceding stage and the total chlorine dioxide used being from about 1% to about 15% based upon the dry weight of the vegetable matter, and wherein the vegetable matter is extracted between successive chlorine dioxide stages with a caustic material, pulp produced from said process and paper prepared from said pulp..Iaddend.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Vegetable materials such as wood, reed, bamboo, cane and the like which are or can be used for the preparation of fibrous materials are composed of several basic parts. In general, fibrous vegetable matter is made up of about 15 to 30 percent lignins and extractives, such as resins and the like, with the remainder of the about 70 to 80 percent being carbohydrates. The carbohydrate portion of the fibrous vegetable matter is about 10 to 30 percent hemicellulose with the remainder being cellulose, and the cellulose portion of the carbohydrate is about 45 to 55 percent alpha cellulose and about 5 percent other celluloses, all percentages being expressed on a wood basis.
As is well known, one of the first steps in conventionally converting fibrous vegetable materials to fibers for use in the preparation of paper or paper-like materials is a pulping process. The primary goal of the process is to remove most of the lignins from the fibrous vegetable material and separate the remaining carbohydrate fibers into individual fibers. In all known pulping processes, such as kraft, sulfite and others, when efforts are made to remove substantially all of the lignin from the vegetable fiber mass, a major part of the hemicellulose is lost, and the remaining cellulose and hemicellulose fibers are chemically and/or mechanically damaged. This results in a significant loss of yield and a major reduction in strength of paper or paper-like products due to fiber damage. For example, in a kraft pulping process, the normal yield known in the art is about 45 percent by weight. But, if only the lignins and extractives were removed from the fibrous vegetable material, the yield obtained would be 70-80 percent.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed toward a new and novel pulping process and the pulp and paper products resulting therefrom. The pulping process removes substantially only lignins and extractives from fibrous vegetable materials and leaves the cellulose and hemicellulose part of the material substantially undamaged, thereby resulting in pulp and paper products having new and unusual properties and exceptionally high strengths. Since the pulping process is reasonably selective and substantially only the lignins and extractives are removed, yields are exceptionally high and in the 55 to 85 percent range. The pulping process includes a basic sequential unit of a chlorine dioxide treatment, caustic extraction and a chlorine dioxide treatment, and this basic unit is preceded by a chemical or mechanical pretreatment of prepared vegetable fiber chips. Each step of the basic sequential unit is followed by a water washing, which may be with process liquids obtained elsewhere in the process, as by countercurrent washing which has attendant conservation advantages.
A more preferred embodiment of the process is one including a chemical and/or mechanical pretreatment of prepared vegetable fiber chips followed by the sequential processing of the pretreated chips in a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction, a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction and a final chlorine dioxide treatment. A water washing or its equivalent follows each chlorine dioxide treatment and each caustic extraction.
An even more preferred embodiment of the process is one in which the water wash for the final chlorine dioxide treatment is used as the water wash for the preceding caustic extraction and so on countercurrently to the flow of fiber material through the process to the first water wash following the first chlorine dioxide treatment; from this point the wash water may then be sent to waste or treated for recovery of chemicals contained therein.
Another preferred embodiment of the process involves the chemical pretreatment of prepared vegetable fiber chips followed sequentially by a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction, a chlorine dioxide treatment, a caustic extraction and a final chlorine dioxide treatment with countercurrent water washing and extraction after each treatment; the most preferred chemical pretreatment is a neutral sulfite pretreatment at a specified concentration of chemicals and cooking cycle.
The pulp produced by the process of the present invention has a higher degree of polymerization, a higher hemicellulose content, a higher carboxyl content, and a lower carbonyl content than conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture. In addition, it requires less energy to refine than a conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture. Also, laboratory handsheets prepared from the pulp have superior tensile strength and tear strength when compared to sheets of conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture.
The above pulp properties relate directly to paper made from the pulp. Such paper has higher tensile, tear, burst, fold, pick, and delamination strengths.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
In the drawing, FIGS. 1 and 3 are block diagrams and FIGS. 4 to 13 are graphs. FIG. 1 describes the basic process of this invention. FIG. 2 shows a more preferred embodiment of the process of this invention, and FIG. 3 discloses a highly preferred chemical pretreatment step for the process of this invention. FIG. 4 compares yield of pretreated material with caustic utilized in each stage. FIG. 5 compares G.E. brightness with caustic utilized in each stage. FIG. 6 compares percent rejects with caustic utilized. FIG. 7 shows final yield compared with pretreatment yield. FIG. 8 compares chlorine dioxide consumption with pretreatment yield. FIG. 9 shows a comparison of freeness with beating time. FIG. 10 compares Schopper fold with effect of cation treatment. FIG. 11 provides a comparison of MIT fold with Schopper fold. FIG. 12 relates to Schopper fold to days of aging, and, FIG. 13 relates Schopper fold to years of aging.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to FIG. 1, fiber chips of any fibrous vegetable matter are fed first to a pretreatment step 10 which may be either mechanical, chemical or a combination thereof. Following pretreatment, the pretreated chips are then fed to a first chlorine dioxide treatment 11 where they are contacted with chlorine dioxide in either aqueous solution or as a gas. Following this, the chlorine dioxide treated material is washed with water 12 to return the mixture to substantially neutral pH; following washing, the washed chlorine dioxide treated material is subjected to caustic extraction 13 for a period of about one-half to one hour. The extracted material is washed again with water to return to substantially neutral pH, as indicated at 14, and to remove the water soluble materials produced in the extraction step. Then this second washed, extracted fibrous material is subjected to a second chlorine dioxide treatment 15, either aqueous or gaseous, and the second chlorine dioxide treated material is water washed, 16, to produce a pulp in high yield with good brightness. Yields from this basic process range from about 55 to about 85 percent at a G.E. color brightness (TAPPI Standard T 217m-48) of approximately 80 to 90.
Referring now to FIG. 2, a more preferred embodiment of the invention is shown. Prepared vegetable fiber chips are fed to a pretreatment step 20 where they are subjected to a chemical, mechanical or a combined chemical-mechanical pretreatment to make the lignin and extractives more readily available for removal. Following the pretreatment step, the pretreated material is subjected sequentially to a chlorine dioxide treatment 21, water washing 22, caustic extraction 23, water washing 24, chlorine dioxide treatment 25, water washing 26, caustic extraction 27, water washing 28, chlorine dioxide treatment 29, and water washing 30.
In a more preferred embodiment, fresh water is fed only to the last water washing 30 by line 40 and then circulated countercurrently to the flow of the material through the process as indicated by line 41 to the next to last water washing step 28, and from there as indicated by line 42 to the next preceding water washing step 26, then by line 43 to water washing step 24, and from that wash to the first water washing 22 as indicated by line 44, and then to waste or chemical recovery as indicated by line 45. It is clear, of course, that fresh or make-up water may be added to any one of the water washing steps as indicated by lines 46, 47, 48, 49 and that water may be sent to waste or chemical recovery from any or all of the water washing steps as indicated by lines 50, 51, 52 and 53.
Chlorine dioxide, either in aqueous solution or in gaseous form, may be fed to each of the chlorine dioxide steps as indicated by lines 60, 61 and 62 and an aqueous solution of caustic may be fed to each of the caustic extraction steps as indicated by lines 63 and 64. The novel pulp of this invention is recovered from the process, as indicated at 70, in a high yield of about 55 to about 85 percent and at a G.E. brightness of approximately 80 to 90.
A more preferred embodiment of the invention is a five stage process that comprises the sequential steps of chlorine dioxide treatment, caustic extraction, chlorine dioxide treatment, caustic extraction, and chlorine dioxide treatment, with a water wash between each step, and having first chlorine dioxide treatment preceded by chemical or a chemical-mechanical pretreatment.
Referring now to FIG. 3, a block diagram of a preferred chemical-mechanical pretreatment is shown. Prepared vegetable fiber chips are fed to a chemical treatment step 70 where a prepulping treatment is given. This prepulping treatment may be in the nature of a weak pulping to a high yield by a kraft, nitric acid, neutral sulfite process, or other. In the pre-pulping treatment, the fiber chips are prepulped to a yield at least greater than 64 percent by weight based upon the dry weight of the chips of the vegetable matter. Following the chemical treatment, the prepulped material is refined in step 71, washed in step 72, then dewatered as indicated at 73 to prepare a combined chemically-mechanically pretreated material ready for processing in the first chlorine dioxide treatment as indicated at 21 in FIG. 2.
The novel process of this invention is suitable for preparing a novel pulp and paper product from any fibrous vegetable matter containing lignin. As is necessary with all pulping processes, the vegetable matter should have extraneous materials removed before being subjected to the process. For example, in the case of wood, it must be debarked in a prior operation. In the following description, wood will be referred to as the fibrous vegetable material; however, it should be understood that the process of the invention is applicable to all fibrous vegetable materials.
Debarked wood, either hard or soft, may be converted into chips by a Carthage multiknife chipper or other equivalent apparatus. The chips should be approximately 15 to 75 millimeters in length, 10 to 40 millimeters in width and have a thickness of 0.5 to 20 millimeters. When chemical or chemical-mechanical pretreatment is used it is preferred that chips have an approximate length and width as described and that the thickness be from about 2 to about 5 millimeters. Following chipping, prepared chips are then subjected to the pretreatment step.
The pretreatment step can be either mechanical, chemical or a combination of chemical and mechanical. In mechanical pretreatment, the vegetable fiber chips are subjected to a shredding, refining, or flaking operation, such as is well known in the art, by a Pallman knife ring flaker, which by slicing reduces conventionally sized chips to thin flakes while maintaining chip length and width, or a standard disc refiner, or the equivalent. As is also known, the chips may be subjected to water or steam treatment prior to flaking or refining, either under vacuum or pressure, and following either flaking or refining the resulting fibers or fiber bundles should be as small as possible without significant damage to the fibers. The optimum size depends upon the flaking or refining equipment employed. When chemical pretreatment is used, the vegetable fiber chips are subjected to a chemical treatment followed by a refining operation and then a water washing. The chemical pretreatment results in a yield of at least about 64 percent or greater and may be a mild prepulping by a neutral sulfite, nitric acid, kraft or other known pulping process (e.g., bisulfite, acid sulfite, cold soda, soda, sodium xylene sulfonate, polysulfide). A more preferred chemical pretreatment is a mild neutral sulfite prepulping under particular conditions of chemical concentrations; the heating and cooking cycles are .[.defines.]. .Iadd.defined .Iaddend.infra.
The refining step may be performed by standard disc refiner or other equivalent apparatus and conducted to yield minimum particle size without significant fiber damage. After either the chemical or mechanical pretreatment, a dewatering step may be necessary prior to subjecting the pretreated fibers to the novel pulping process of this invention.
It has been found that when using a chemical pretreatment in preference to only a mechanical pretreatment, the amount of fines produced in the refining is reduced, the optimum diameter of the fiber bundles produced is reduced, the energy input to the refining operation is reduced, the quantity of chlorine dioxide necessary for pulping to a desired brightness is reduced, the quality of the final pulp from the novel process is improved, and the yield of the pulp from the final process is increased.
Following pretreatment, either mechanical or chemical, as the case may be, the pretreated material enters the first chlorine dioxide treatment step. In this step the shredded mass of fiber bundles resulting from the pretreatment has a consistency of from about 5 percent to about 50 percent by weight, based on the total weight of shredded mass and water. Chlorine dioxide, if used as an aqueous solution, may be fed as an approximately 1 percent by weight aqueous solution, and depending upon the desired concentration of chlorine dioxide, which is defined infra, additional water may be added to prepare the mixture to the desired consistency. If gaseous chlorine dioxide is used, an inert diluent such as air may be necessary to prevent explosion hazards.
Any conventional treating tower such as is well known in the art may be used for the chlorine dioxide treatment stage and heat may be added if and as necessary. Also, additional heat may be supplied to reduce the time of contact between the shredded mass and the chlorine dioxide, which time is from about 10 minutes to 2 hours depending upon the consistency, the temperature, and the yield of product resulting from the pretreatment step. In general, the shredded mass of fibers is permitted to remain in contact with the chlorine dioxide until the chlorine dioxide charged is substantially consumed. The pH of this system at the beginning may vary from about 4.0 to about 8.0, and upon consumption of the chlorine dioxide the pH of the treated solution will be approximately 0.5 to 3.0. Following the chlorine dioxide treatment, the resulting mass is then water washed in a conventional vacuum drum washer or the equivalent.
Following the first water washing, and when the material has a substantially neutral pH, the washed material is subjected to a first alkali extraction in a conventional treating tower such as is well known in the art. In the alkali extraction, any water soluble caustic material may be used such as sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, ammonia gas or other or mixtures of these or others; howeer, an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide is preferred. In the extraction, the alkali application should be approximately 4 percent based on the oven dry weight of the fibrous material, and sufficient water may be added or removed to prepare an aqueous fiber mass having a consistency of from about 5 percent to about 50 percent by weight based on the total weight of shredded mass present and water. The alkali extraction should continue for at least about one-half hour at a temperature of from about 50° C. to about 75° C. with a preferred temperature of about 65° C. Following alkali extraction, the alkali extracted material is subjected to another water washing under substantially the same conditions as the first water wash to remove extracted materials and residual chemicals.
The second chlorine dioxide treatment may be carried out in a conventional treating tower such as described for the first chlorine dioxide treatment, whereby the desired consistency of material within the tower is substantially the same for the second chlorine dioxide treatment as for the first. Either gaseous chlorine dioxide or an aqueous, approximately one percent by weight, solution may be fed to this second treatment stage. In this stage the pH is initially from about 4.0 to about 8.0 and ends at about 2.0; the chlorine dioxide treatment is permitted to continue until substantially all the chlorine dioxide charged to the treating stage is consumed. The temperatures for the second chlorine dioxide treatment are adjusted to from about 40° C. to about 60° C. to keep contact times to a minimum of from about 30 minutes to about 4 hours to consume the chlorine dioxide charged. Following the second chlorine dioxide treatment, the treated material is subjected to a third water washing under substantially the same conditions as the first and second water washings. After the third water wash, a second alkali extraction is conducted, followed by a water wash under substantially the same conditions as the first alkali extraction and wash. The washed material at this stage in the process may be screened, if desired, to remove any shives of fibrous material which may remain, and these shives are discarded or returned to the first chlorine dioxide treatment stage for recycle.
The treated material, whether screened or not, is then subjected to a third chlorine dioxide treatment under the same conditions of consistency and chlorine dioxide concentraton as the first and second chlorine dioxide treatment stages for a period of from about 2 hours to about 6 hours, depending upon the desired brightness for the product produced. The temperature for this third chlorine dioxide treatment stage is from about 40° C. to about 80° C., and following the third chlorine dioxide treatment, the treated material is subjected to a fifth and final water wash under the same conditions as the preceding water washings.
The total concentration of chlorine dioxide used in the multistage process, whether two, three or more chlorine dioxide stages, is dependent upon the yield of product obtained from the pretreatment step and the desired brightness of the product resulting from the final treatment stage. In general, the total chlorine dioxide consumed in the multiple stages, regardless of the number of stages used, is from about 1.0 to about 15.0 percent by weight based on the total dry weight of fibrous material being fed to the pretreatment stage. It has been found and is preferred that the total concentration of chlorine dioxide used is from about .[.4.0.]. .Iadd.2.0 .Iaddend.to about 13.0 percent by weight, based upon the total weight of dry fibrous material being fed to the pretreatment stage.
The amount of chlorine dioxide fed to each chlorine dioxide stage is dependent upon the number of chlorine dioxide stages used and on the pretreatment yield. For any given total amount of chlorine dioxide to be used, it has been found that approximately two times the amount used in the last stage should be fed to the chlorine dioxide stage preceding the last and two times the amount used in the preceding stage fed to the next preceding stage, and so on. For example, in a three chlorine dioxide stage process, this means that approximately four-sevenths of the total chlorine dioxide will be fed to the first stage, approximately two-sevenths of the total chlorine dioxide will be fed to the second stage, and approximately one-seventh to the third stage.
As mentioned previously, the preferred pretreatment for the process of this inventioni is a chemical pretreatment, and of the chemical pretreatments available such as kraft, bisulfite, neutral sulfite, nitric acid, etc., a neutral sulfite pretreatment is preferred. And, among the neutral sulfite pretreatments available, a sodium based neutral sulfite pretreatment is preferred. As well known in the art, a standard neutral sulfite pulping treatment includes cooking fibrous vegetable material for a period of 10 to 15 minutes at about 350° F. in a concentration of approximately 10 percent sodium sulfite and approximately 3 percent sodium carbonate, chemical charges being based on the wood weight charged to the process. Although this standard neutral sulfite pretreatment has advantages, in the process of this invention it is even more preferred that a specific and novel neutral sulfite pretreatment be used. This novel chemical pretreatment includes preparing an aqueous solution of a fibrous vegetable material, which has been chipped as described previously, with a concentration of from about 5 to about 30 percent sodium sulfite and from about 3 to about 25 percent sodium carbonate to provide a sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate ratio of about 1.2 or greater. More preferred concentrations are from about 7 to about 20 percent sodium sulfite and from about 5 to about 18 percent sodium carbonate, all percentages being based upon the dry weight of the vegetable matter. A more preferred sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate ratio is from about 1.2 to about 1.5 The time-temperature relationship employed is designed to give adequate impregnation of liquor into chips prior to reaching a temperature of about 300° F. This relationship is dependent upon wood species and chip size, as well as previous chip history. When a chemical predetermined is performed in accordance with the described recipe, higher final yields and higher quality product are obtained as compared with other mechanical or chemical pretreatments.
In the following description, all evaluations of paper and pulp products were made, unless otherwise indicated, at a standard basis weight of 40 pounds per 3000 square feet.
The pulp of the present invention is chemically unique in that it has a higher degree of polymerization, a higher hemicellulose content, a higher carboxyl content, and a lower carbonyl content than pulp conventionally produced from the same wood. Due it its higher final yield as compared to conventionally bleached kraft pulp, it contains more hemicellulose. At the same time, however, the viscosity average degree of polymerization of the pulp is higher than that of conventionally bleached kraft pulp. The inescapable conclusion is that the process of the present invention degrades wood cellulose less than conventional processes in going from wood to purified pulp. Thus, the carboxyl content of the pulp produced by the present invention is at least twice as great as the carboxyl content of conventionally bleached pulps and has a carboxyl number (TAPPI Standard T237su-63) greater than about 6, preferably greater than about 9, and more preferably greater than about 12, and as high as, for example, 20, and even higher. At the same time, the carbonyl content is only one-half to one-third as great as the carbonyl content of conventionally bleached pulp from the same wood.
It is well established that the brightness stability of a pulp is related to the carbonyl content of the pulp. The higher the carbonyl content, the greater the brightness loss during aging. Since the product of the present invention possesses a very low pulp carbonyl content, it is quite stable and loses little brightness with aging. By comparison, the higher carbonyl content of pulps not produced by the present invention result in rather poor brightness stability.
The mechanical properties of the pulp of the present invention which are affected by its unique chemical properties are ease of refining, fiber tensile strength, and ability to form fiber-fiber bonds when made into sheets and dried. The pulp of the present invention consumes only one-third to one-fourth of the energy required to beat a conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture to the same freeness level. The rate of beating of the pulp of the present invention is 4.2 times as great as the rate for the corresponding bleached kraft pulp when prepared from a northern hardwood mixture and 3 times as great using the southern hardwood mixture. Since the time required to beat a pulp is directly proportional to the energy required to beat that pulp, the pulp of the present invention exhibits a substantial savings in refining energy input required to reach a given freeness level. The rate of mechanical refining (ml. Canadian St. per minute of beating carried out according to TAPPI Standard T200ts-66) can be greater than about 15, preferably greater than about 20, more preferably greater than about 25, and may extend up to, for example, 50 and even higher. When the pulp of the present invention is formed into paper on a paper machine, more rapid drainage, increased ability to retain fibers, increased wet web strength, and increased drying rate are observed relative to conventional pulp prepared from the same wood.
Strips of handsheets from the pulp of the present invention possess superior tensile strength and tear strength when compared to conventionally bleached kraft pulp from the same wood mixture. This is unusal since pulps with higher tensile strength usually possess lower tear strength. The fact that the present pulp possesses both a superior tear strength and superior tensile strength indicates another unique physical property of the pulp of this invention; it also possesses superior individual fiber tensile strength.
The properties of these pulps relate directly to papers made from them. Machine made paper from pulp of the present invention produces higher tensile, tear, burst, fold pick and delamination strengths. The grease proofness (TAPPI Standard T454ts-66) of the paper of this invention can be greater than about 500 sec., preferably greater than about 1000 sec., and can extend up to, for example, 1800 sec. and even higher; tensile strength (TAPPI Standard T404ts-66) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 80 percent, preferably greater than about 100 percent, more preferably greater than about 120 percent and may extend up to, for example, 200 percent and even higher, and for paper from softwood pulp it can be greater than about 120 percent, preferably greater than about 140 percent, more preferably greater than about 160 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 250 percent and even higher; bursting strength (TAPPI Standard T403ts-63) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 140 percent, preferably greater than about 160 percent, more preferably greater than about 190 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 250 percent and even higher, and for paper from softwood pulp it can be greater than about 160 percent, preferably greater than about 190 percent, more preferably greater than about 230 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 300 percent and even higher; tearing resistance (TAPPI Standard T414ts-65) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 160 percent, preferably greater than about 220 percent, more preferably greater than about 300 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 400 percent and even higher, and for paper from softwood pulp it can be greater than about 320 percent, preferably greater than about 370 percent, more preferably greater than about 420 percent, and may extend up to, for example, 600 percent and even higher; folding endurance (MIT fold, TAPPI Standard T423su-68) for paper from hardwood pulp can be greater than about 500, preferably greater than about 1000, more preferably greater than the about 1500, and may extend up to, for example, 3000 and even higher, and for paper from softwood pulp it can be greater than about 1000, more preferably greater than about 2000, and preferably greater than about 4000, and may extend up to, for example, 6000 and even higher.
The novel process of this invention may be understood better by reference to the following examples; however, it should be understood that these examples are intended to be descriptive rather than restrictive.
EXAMPLE I
To demonstrate the advantage of using multiple chloride dioxide-caustic extraction stages in delignification as opposed to a single chlorine dioxide stage, experiments were carried out using finely ground southern hardwood meal, which was then reacted with aqueous chlorine dioxide solutions at an initial pH 4 and at 70° C. for a reaction time of one hour, which led to complete consumption of the clorine dioxide.
Following the reaction-extraction sequence, overall yield and lignin content (Klason) were determined in relation to each sample. Carbohydrate content was calculated by difference. Two factors were then defined: ##EQU1##
Optimum conditions result with a high value of E, while maintaining an R value as close to unity as possible. By comparison, a bleached hardwood kraft pulp would have an R value of approximately 0.55.
The table below shows the results of these experiments for a single chlorine dioxide stage, a single stage followed by an extraction, and a three-stage sequence. It will be noted that the inclusion of the extraction stage (second case) more than doubles the efficiency while not greatly reducing the retention or selectivity factor. Since the product following any extraction stage is very dark, a final chlorine dioxide stage is requried to produce a bleached product. The high E and relatively high R values are maintained through this second chlorine dioxide stage, demonstrating the superiority of the multistage approach.
______________________________________                                    
                        Overall                                           
                        yield,                                            
Reaction sequence       percent E     R                                   
______________________________________                                    
5% chlorine dioxide     94      1.0   0.99                                
5% chlorine dioxide-0.05 normal sodium                                    
 hydroxide extraction   77      2.5   0.87                                
5% chlorine dioxide-0.05 normal sodium                                    
 hydroxide extraction-5% chlorine dioxide                                 
                        72      2.0   0.89                                
______________________________________
With the chlorine dioxide-extraction-chlorine dioxide sequences shown above, the resultant product is not of as high a brightness as it is possible to achieve. Also, when a three-stage sequence is applied to a fibrous material obtained from either a mechanical or chemical-mechanical pretreatment of wood (as opposed to the fine wood meal referred to above), the resulting pulp contains some shives or fiber bundles. Use of more chlorine dioxide in each of the two stages as well as use of a more severe extraction stage improves results. However, this leads to an increase in chlorine dioxide consumption and a decrease in R. Thus, the preferred method of producing a bleached pulp with a negligible quantity of shives is conducted by expanding the sequence to five stages of intermittent chlorine dioxide-extraction (with intermediate washing). The additional stages give the caustic an additional opportunity to soften and disperse the fiber bundles, and also to remove further alkali-soluble lignin materials and thereby reduce the overall chlorine dioxide consumption.
EXAMPLE II
To demonstrate the preferred distribution of chlorine dioxide between stages, hardwood chips were pretreated chemically by a sodium base neutral sulfite reaction to approximately 85 percent yield, followed by mechanical refining in an eight inch laboratory disc refiner and thorough water washing.
Representative samples of the resultant pretreated material were subjected to various chlorine dioxide extraction sequences. The following conditions were held constant during these tests.
First chlorine dioxide stage:
10% consistency; reaction to exhaustion;
First caustic stage:
4% sodium hydroxide based on pulp; 12% consistency; 65° C. extraction for one hour;
Second chlorine dioxide stage:
10% consistency; 65° C. reaction to chlorine dioxide exhaustion;
Second caustic stage:
Same conditions as in first caustic stage;
Third chlorine dioxide stage:
Same conditions as in second chlorine dioxide stage.
Water wash was employed after all stages. First the distribution between the first two chlorine dioxide stages was studied by five combinations of chlorine dioxide in these stages, holding the total amount applied constant at five percent, based on starting pretreated material, eliminating the final (third) chlorine dioxide stage and making yield and lignin determinations. The results are shown below:
______________________________________                                    
     Chlorine     Chlorine                                                
     dioxide      dioxide                                                 
     applied,     applied,                                                
     first        second   Percent    Percent                             
Run  stage        stage    yield      lignin.sup.1                        
______________________________________                                    
1    1.0          4.0      85.4       14.2                                
2    2.0          3.0      86.0       10.6                                
3    2.5          2.5      86.4       8.7                                 
4    3.0          2.0      86.8       8.8                                 
5    4.0          1.0      86.3       8.9                                 
Base 0            0        100        18.7                                
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 TAPPI Standard T 222 m-54.
From the above table, it is apparent that maximum delignification is achieved with at least half of the applied chlorine dioxide being used in the first stage. A maximum yield is indicated with about twice as much chlorine dioxide in the first stage as in the second.
This type of experiment was repeated using the five-stage sequence (chlorine dioxide-extraction-chlorine dioxide-extraction-chlorine dioxide), with a constant application of four percent chlorine dioxide in the first stage and five percent distributed between the second and third chlorine dioxide stages as shown below. In all cases, chlorine dioxide application percentages are based on starting pretreated material.
______________________________________                                    
     Chlorine     Chlorine                                                
     dioxide      dioxide                                                 
     applied,     applied,                                                
     second       third                                                   
     chlorine     chlorine                                                
     dioxide      dioxide  Percent    Percent                             
Run  stage        stage    yield      lignin.sup.1                        
______________________________________                                    
1    1.0          4.0      82.0       10.8                                
2    2.0          3.0      81.2       5.0                                 
3    2.5          2.5      79.0       4.1                                 
4    3.0          2.0      78.0       3.2                                 
5    4.0          1.0      77.9       3.6                                 
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 TAPPI Standard T 222 m-54.
The lignin data from the above table again show conclusively that optimum practice calls for more than one-half the five percent chlorine dioxide to be applied in the second chlorine dioxide stage; there is no significant change in lignin free yield between Runs 4 and 5.
From these two comparisons, it is apparent that from the standpoint of minimizing chlorine dioxide consumption and maximizing lignin-free (bleached) yield, the total chlorine dioxide application should be distributed between stages in the approximate proportions of four-sevenths in stage one, two-sevenths in stage two, and one-seventh in stage three.
EXAMPLE III
To demonstrate the advantage of using sodium hydroxide rather than sodium carbonate or ammonium hydroxide in the extraction stages, the following comparisons were made, demonstrating that sodium hydroxide is more effective in extracting lignin reaction products than either sodium carbonate or ammonium hydroxide. At the same time, sodium hydroxide is at least as effective as the other two extractants in preserving pulp carbohydrate content.
The first runs below compare sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate as extractants. Mixed southern hardwood chips were pretreated chemically by a neutral sulfite treatment and mechanically in a laboratory disc refiner to a final pretreatment yield of 84 percent. Following thorough water washing, the pretreated material was pulped with 5.5 percent chlorine dioxide (wood basis), extractions were carried out at 10 percent consistency and 65° C., and the effect of variable extraction conditions was determined through yield and lignin content measurements on the washed pulp. The extraction conditions used and experimental results were as follows:
__________________________________________________________________________
                                 Carbo-                                   
          Equiv.                                                          
                Extrac-                                                   
                     Yield,                                               
                           Lignin,.sup.1                                  
                                 hydrate,                                 
     Amt.,                                                                
          amt. of                                                         
                tion percent                                              
                           percent                                        
                                 percent                                  
     percent                                                              
          sodium                                                          
                time,                                                     
                     pretreated                                           
                           pretreated                                     
                                 pretreated                               
Chemical                                                                  
     of pulp                                                              
          hydroxide                                                       
                hrs. material                                             
                           material                                       
                                 material                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
NaOH 4    4     1    79.8  2.1   77.7                                     
Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3                                                         
     5.6  4.2   1    83.3  5.3   78.0                                     
Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3                                                         
     5.6  4.2   4    80.4  4.1   76.3                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 TAPPI Standard T 222 m-54.
It is evident that equal extraction time results in a much lower lignin extraction efficiency with the carbonate than with the hydroxide. Also, the hydroxide removes no more carbohydrate than does the carbonate. An increase in carbonate extraction time increases the lignin extraction efficiency, but does not give results equivalent to hydroxide. Longer carbonate extractions result in increased carbohydrate extraction, which is undesirable.
Similar runs were made using ammonium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide. The starting material was a 73 percent neutral sulfite-disc refiner pretreated hardwood mixture, with a 4 percent chlorine dioxide pulping stage preceding the extractions. The extraction conditions and results are shown below.
______________________________________                                    
             Sodium  Ammonium  Ammonium                                   
             hydroxide                                                    
                     hydroxide hydroxide                                  
             extraction                                                   
                     extraction                                           
                               extraction                                 
______________________________________                                    
Extraction consistency,                                                   
 percent       12        20        20                                     
Extraction time, minutes                                                  
               .sup.1    5         5                                      
Extraction temperature,                                                   
 °C     65        100       100                                    
Extractant applied, per-                                                  
 cent of pretreated                                                       
 material      4         8         4                                      
Extractant applied,                                                       
 equivalent sodium                                                        
 sodium hydroxide,                                                        
 percent       4         9         4.5                                    
Yield, percent pretreated                                                 
 material      86.2      87.2      87.7                                   
Lignin, percent pre-                                                      
 treated material.sup.2                                                   
               3.0       3.8       4.6                                    
Carbohydrate, percent                                                     
 pretreated material                                                      
               83.2      83.4      83.1                                   
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 1 hour.                                                           
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T 222 m-54.
It is apparent from these results that ammonium hydroxide extraction, even at the higher level of chemical application, is less efficient in lignin extraction. Also, ammonium hydroxide offers no advantage in .[.carbonhydrate.]. .Iadd.carbohydrate .Iaddend.preservation.
EXAMPLE IV
To demonstrate the preferred conditions of temperature and applied alkali to be used in the caustic extraction stages of the chlorine dioxide-extraction sequence, a pretreated wood such as produced in Example X was delignified using the following four-stage sequence.
First chlorine dioxide stage:
5% chlorine dioxide (wood basis), 10% consistency, one hour;
First extraction stage:
12% consistency; temperature and sodium hydroxide applied to be optimized;
Second chlorine dioxide stage:
2.5% chlorine dioxide (wood basis), 10% consistency, one hour at 65° C.;
Second extraction stage:
Same conditions as used in first extraction stage.
Water wash was employed after each of the above. The resulting pulps were analyzed for yield, G.E. brightness (TAPPI Standard T 217m-48), and screen rejects (amount retained on a 0.006-inch laboratory vibratory flat screen). The results for two extraction temperatures (20° and 65° C.) and an applied alkali ranging from one to six percent (pulp basis) are shown in the drawing in FIG. 4 (yield), FIG. 5 (brightness), and FIG. 6 (rejects).
FIGS. 4 and 5 show that yield losses and brightness are relatively little affected by temperature. However, while yield loss is approximately proportional to alkali applied, there is little advantage in either brightness increase or rejects reduction in using more than about 4 percent sodium hydroxide at 12 percent consistency. Therefore, to conserve yield while achieving maximum brightness and minimum rejects, about 4 percent applied caustic is employed at 12 percent consistency. FIG. 6 clearly shows that a higher temperature (65° C.) is advantageous in reducing rejects. Since this does not adversely affect yield, preferred temperature conditions for extraction are above ambient, in the vicinity of 65° C.
EXAMPLE V
To show the preferred range of sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment yield, a series of sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatments was carried out. In all cases, sufficient (and constant between runs) liquid impregnation of the southern hardwood chips was allowed before the pretreatment temperature was raised to its maximum of 335° F. Following the chemical pretreatment, the hardwood materials were refined in an eight-inch laboratory disc refiner and thoroughly washed. The materials were then pulped and bleached to 80 G.E. brightness (TAPPI Standard T 217m-48) by the preferred five-stage chlorine dioxide-caustic extraction sequence, using the total amounts of chlorine dioxide corresponding to the level of pretreatment yield involved and shown in Example IX. The pretreatment yield range covered was 61 percent to 86 percent.
The yield data, strength data of standard laboratory handsheets, and some data on the degree of polymerization (D.P.) of the final bleached pulp is summarized in the following table.
__________________________________________________________________________
                    At 600/300 degrees Canadian                           
Neutral sulfite                                                           
         Final      Standard Freeness                                     
pretreatment                                                              
         yield,                                                           
yield, percent                                                            
         percent of                                                       
                   Percent                                                
                         Percent                                          
                               Percent                                    
of wood  wood  DP.sup.1                                                   
                   tensile.sup.2                                          
                         burst.sup.3                                      
                               tear.sup.4                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
61       53    1,680                                                      
                   46/78  78/150                                          
                               --/160                                     
62       53        50/83  98/152                                          
                               --/165                                     
63       54        56/78 100/152                                          
                               --/174                                     
70       57    2,000                                                      
                   61/85 105/160                                          
                               --/173                                     
71       57        70/89 115/159                                          
                               ---175                                     
86       65    2,100                                                      
                   55/90  96/178                                          
                               --/176                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.1 DP (polymerization) estimated from Cuene viscosity measurement     
performed according to TAPPI Standard T 230 su-66 (pipet method).         
.sup.2                                                                    
 Lbs. to rupture 1 inch wide strip                                        
 Lbs. per 3,000 sq. ft.                                                   
.sup.3                                                                    
  P.s.i. to rupture 1.2 inch disc                                         
 Lbs. per 3,000 sq. ft.                                                   
.sup.4                                                                    
  Grams of force to tear 137.6 cm.                                        
 Lbs. per 3,000 sq. ft.
It is evident from these data that there is a trend toward increasing (all) strength properties as pretreatment yield is increased. Also, it is evident that this increase generally is most pronounced over the yield range of 61 to 70 percent, and then a reasonably constant, high strength level is maintained with further yield increases.
This same trend is borne out by the degree of polymerization (DP) data. As bleached yield decreases (other things remaining constant), a pulp contains less low-DP hemicellulose and (proportionately) more high-DP cellulose. Therefore, if there were no undesirable chemical degradation occurring, a steady increase in DP would be expected as pretreatment yield decreases. Actually, just the opposite occurs, showing that the chemical pretreatment (particularly in the pretreatment yield range below 70%) is having a chemically degrading effect on the retained pulp carbohydrates.
From both the test results and the measurements of pulp DP or molecular length, it is apprent that maximum pulp strengths are favored at higher chemical pretreatment yields. Further, this effect is most pronounced at the low end of the pretreatment yield scale, and suggests that the preferred conditions would involve pretreatment yields above approximately 64 percent.
An upper limit on pretreatment yield is fixed by considering the pretreatment yield-final bleached yield-chlorine dioxide consumption relationships. FIG. 8 shows the pretreatment yield-chlorine dioxide consumption relationship for neutral sulfite pretreatment, with the no-chemical pretreatment point corresponding to 100 percent pretreatment yield. In reality, the neutral sulfite line is followed until a pretreatment yield of 95 percent is approached; at this point the consumption rises rapidly from this line and passes through the no-chemical pretreatment point. Thus, at pretreatment yields above 95 percent, a disproportionately large amount of chlorine dioxide is consumed. This is, of course, very undesirable.
FIG. 7 shows a parallel behavior for bleached yields. At pretreatment yields above about 95 percent, the bleached yield actually decreases to the point corresponding to mechanical pretreatment only. Since maximum yield is desirable, this decrease is undesirable.
Further reason for maintaining pretreatment yield below 95 percent is found in Example IX, in which it is shown that 100 percent pretreatment yield produces inferior paper strength properties as compared with papers in the below 95 percent pretreatment yield range.
EXAMPLE VI
To demonstrate the preferred conditions for the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment, it is shown below that proper pretreatment liquor impregnation of the chips prior to heating is necessary to maximize handsheet strength and minimize fiber bundle or shive content. It is also shown that proper ratio of pretreatment chemicals is necessary to provide maximum strength and ease of pulping and bleaching with the subsequent chlorine dioxide-caustic sequence.
Runs were made using two extremes of liquor impregnation prior to chemical pretreatment, and with a range of ratios of sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate in the pretreatment liquor. In all cases sufficient pretreatment chemical was applied so that the final liquor pH was above 7. If allowed to drop below this value, a weak pulp resulted. The raw material was a southern hardwood chip mixture. Following chemical pretreatment, the materials produced were refined under constant conditions in a laboratory eight-inch disc refiner, thoroughly water washed, and subjected to the five-stage chlorine dioxide-caustic sequence for pulping and bleaching to 80 G.E. brightness (TAPPI Standard T 217m-48). The total chlorine dioxide required to achieve this brightness was determined together with standard handsheet physical tests on the bleached pulp.
The critical experimental conditions, together with the indicated results, are shown below. Runs 1 and 2, at equal pretreatment yield, show the effect of variations in applied chemicals.
__________________________________________________________________________
               Pretreatment liquor  Percent                               
               Percent                                                    
                   Percent                                                
                        Sodium      chlorine                              
                                         Std.                             
Pretreatment   sodium                                                     
                   sodium                                                 
                        sulfite/    dioxide                               
                                         percent                          
                                               Handsheet properties at    
                                               600°                
impreg. time                                                              
          Max. pre-                                                       
               sulfite                                                    
                   carbonate                                              
                        sodium                                            
                              Pre-  required                              
                                         chlorine                         
                                               CSF/300°CSF.sup.5   
   before max.                                                            
          treatment                                                       
               wood                                                       
                   wood carbonate                                         
                              treatment                                   
                                    wood dioxide                          
                                               Tensile,.sup.2             
                                                     Burst,.sup.3         
                                                          Tear,.sup.4     
Run                                                                       
   temp., min.                                                            
          temp., °F.                                               
               basis                                                      
                   basis                                                  
                        ratio yield basis                                 
                                         required.sup.1                   
                                               percent                    
                                                     percent              
                                                          percent         
__________________________________________________________________________
1  120    335  24  5    4.8   74    6.0  6.2   56/76 89/133               
                                                          175/136         
2  120    335  12  10   1.2   73    6.3  6.0   55/82 93/165               
                                                          208/152         
3  120    335  12  10   1.2   86    8.0  8.5   55/90 96/178               
                                                          208/176         
4  120    335  9   9    1.0   84    10.1 8.1   49/71 78/132               
                                                          156/128         
5   30    345  14.2                                                       
                   5.2  2.7   85    8.3  8.3   35/74 62/135               
                                                          210/175         
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 Values taken from the chlorine dioxide consumption-pretreatment   
 yield curve, Example IX, FIG. 8.                                         
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T404 ts-66.?                                       
 .sup.3 TAPPI Standard T403 ts-63.?                                       
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T414 ts-65.                                        
 .sup.5 Canadian Standard Freeness, TAPPI Standard T227 m-58.
While pulping chemical (chlorine dioxide) consumption is constant, a significant increase in pulp handsheet strengths results when the sulfite/carbonate ratio is reduced from about five to slightly more than one.
Runs 3 and 4 show the effect of still further reduction in this base ratio from 1.2 to 1.0. A very significant decrease in pulp handsheet strengths results, along with a large increase (about 25 percent based on the normal chemical application) in chlorine dioxide consumption. Thus, while optimum conditions exist at a sulfite/carbonate ratio of slightly above unit, it is critical that this ratio not be allowed to drop below about 1.2 because of detrimental effects on both pulp physical properties and pulping chemical consumption.
Runs 1, 3 and 5 show the importance of adequate pretreatment liquor impregnation of the chipped raw material. Since the chemical ratio of Run 5 is intermediate between those of Runs 1 and 3, the observed marked decrease in handsheet physical properties is attributable to the lack of adequate chip impregnation. Optimum impregnation conditions depend upon the type (wood species) and chip dimensions of the raw material. Sufficient pretreatment chemical must be added to maintain the pH at 7 or above during the pretreatment.
The ratio of sodium sulfite to sodium carbonate applied should be held in the vicinity of about 1.5 for highest pulp strength. Higher values result in reduced strengths; values below about 1.2 give weaker pulps and increased pulping chemical (chlorine dioxide) consumption.
Adequate pretreatment liquor penetration into the raw material must be achieved, or strength properties suffer and shive content increases. Optimum conditions depend upon raw material structure and particle dimensions.
EXAMPLE VII
To demonstrate the extent to which chlorine can be substituted for chlorine dioxide in the present pulping-bleaching sequence, and because of potential economics, the desirabilty of substituting other selective delignifying agents for at least a portion of this chlorine dioxide was investigated.
In general, with equivalent additions of bleaching chemicals, a higher bleached brightness is obtained using mixtures than with either chlorine or chlorine dioxide alone when bleaching kraft pulps. However, since the starting material with a bleachable kraft pulp is much different from the neutral sulfite-pretreated material presently under consideration, and since the desired action with chlorine and chlorine dioxide additions to conventional kraft pulp is largely one of bleaching (initial pulp lignin contents of perhaps two percent), while the chlorine dioxide in the present case is used to remove a large quantity of chemically different lignin (pretreated pulp lignin content approximately fifteen percent) as well as to bleach, prior art results are not directly translatable to the present invention.
Since some systems for chlorine dioxide generation result in the simultaneous generation of chlorine, and since efficient use of this chlorine is essential to sound chlorine dioxide generation economics, runs were made to determine the feasibility of substituting chlorine for chlorine dioxide at various points in the pulping sequence. Sodium base neutral sulfite pretreated southern hardwood chips were mechanically refined in a laboratory disc refiner and thoroughly water washed prior to the pulping-bleaching sequence. In one run all chlorine was substituted for the normally used chlorine dioxide. The chemical application and results in terms of pulp pentosan content, brightness, screen rejects (amount retained on a laboratory vibratory flat screen using a 0.008-inch cut screen) and handsheet brightness are summarized below:
__________________________________________________________________________
              Pulping                                                     
              chemical                                                    
   Neutral    applied,                                                    
   sulfite    percent (wood                                               
   pretreat-  basis)  Final pulp                                          
   ment  Pulping                                                          
              equivalent                                                  
                      G.E.  Final pulp                                    
                                   Final pulp                             
                                         Screening                        
   yield,                                                                 
         sequence                                                         
              chlorine                                                    
                      bright-                                             
                            pentosans,.sup.3                              
                                   viscosity,.sup.4                       
                                         rejects,                         
Case                                                                      
   percent                                                                
         used.sup.1                                                       
              dioxide ness.sup.2                                          
                            percent                                       
                                   DP    percent                          
__________________________________________________________________________
1   88   DEDED 8.8    86    19.8   2,310 0.4                              
2   88   CECEC 8.8    69    8.1    1,290 25                               
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 D=chlorine dioxide, C=chlorine, E=caustic extraction.             
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T217 m-48.                                         
 .sup.3 Measure of amount of hemicellulose, TAPPI Standard T19 m-50.      
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T230 su-66: DP is degree of polymerization.
It is apparent from the extremely low brightness, low pentosan content, low DP, and high screen rejects that chlorine cannot be substituted for all chlorine dioxide.
Next a series of runs was conducted in which all and half of the chlorine dioxide normally applied in the first stage (equivalent oxidizing basis) was substituted by chlorine. The raw material again was a neutral sulfite pretreated southern hardwood chip mixture, mechanically refined in an eight-inch laboratory disc refiner; the pretreatment yield was 85 percent. The conditions employed, together with the brightness and strength results of handsheets prepared from the final pulps, are shown below:
__________________________________________________________________________
                         First First stage                                
                         stage all                                        
                               1/2 chlorine                               
                                      First                               
                         chlorine                                         
                               plus 1/2 chlo-                             
                                      stage all                           
                         dioxide                                          
                               rine dioxide                               
                                      chlorine                            
__________________________________________________________________________
Percent chlorine dioxide in 1st stage                                     
(wood basis)             4.7   2.35   0                                   
Percent chlorine in 1st stage (wood                                       
basis)                   0     6.15   12.3                                
Percent sodium hydroxide in each of                                       
the 1st and 2d extraction stages                                          
                         8     8      8                                   
Percent chlorine dioxide in 2d chlorine                                   
dioxide stage (wood basis)                                                
                         2.4   2.4    2.4                                 
Percent chlorine dioxide in 3d chlorine                                   
dioxide stage (wood basis)                                                
                         1.2   1.2    1.2                                 
G.E. bleached brightness.sup.1                                            
                         80.6  78.5   66.2                                
Shives                   No    No     Yes                                 
Percent tensile strength.sup.2 :                                          
600°C.S.F..sup.4  59    59     43                                  
300°C.S.F.        85    78     69                                  
Percent bursting strength.sup.3 :                                         
600°C.S.F.        102   102    58                                  
300°C.S.F.        148   148    128                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 TAPPI Standard T217 m-48.                                         
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T404 ts-66.                                        
 .sup.3 TAPPI Standard T403 ts-63.                                        
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T227 m-58.
From the above results it was concluded that there is to synergistic effect of chlorine-chlorine dioxide mixtures, as has been reported in the art for such mixtures when bleaching kraft pulps; brightness is somewhat lowered by 50 percent chlorine substitution (oxidizing equivalent basis), and is very significantly harmed by use of all chlorine in the first stage of the pulping sequence; substitution of all chlorine in the first stage results in unbleached, undefibered shives or fiber bundles; and strength properties are not greatly affected by the half-substitution case, but are very significantly reduced when all chlorine is used in the first stage.
While the use of chlorine in any proportion in the present invention offers no advantages in terms of pulp quality, certain amounts of chlorine can be used in the initial chlorine dioxide stage without adverse effects. The upper limit to chlorine substitution is about 25 to 30 percent of the total chlorine dioxide requirement on an equivalent oxidant basis; this maximum corresponds to a weight proportion of about 50 percent chlorine and 50 percent chlorine dioxide.
EXAMPLE VIII
To demonstrate the advantages of using sodium base neutral sulfite (sodium sulfite and sodium carbonate) chemical pretreatment in preference to either nitric acid or ammonia base neutral sulfite, these three pretreatment combinations were evaluated.
The three chemical-mechanical pretreatments were achieved using the chemical conditions shown below using mixed southern hardwood chips as raw material. In all cases, the chemical pretreatment was followed by refining in a laboratory eight-inch disc refiner, thorough washing, and pulping and bleaching using the chlorine dioxide-caustic-chlorine dioxide-caustic-chlorine dioxide treatment sequence. Conditions and results are in the table below.
It is apparent that nitric acid pretreatment results in both lower bleached yield and lower handsheet strength, indicating excessive carbohydrate degradation during this pretreatment. Sodium base neutral sulfite produces a stronger pulp than ammonia base pretreatment. Also, with the ammonia base pretreatment it is more difficult to delignify and bleach, and the pulp contains somewhat more shives and fiber bundles.
From this comparison, it is apparent that either of the neutral sulfite bases gives a better pretreatment than does nitric acid. Also, sodium base is superior to ammonia base neutral sulfite, other factors not considered. The ammonia base does give a very acceptable, high yield bleached pulp, and where factors such as pollution considerations are controlling, the ammonia base is exceptionally attractive.
__________________________________________________________________________
             Sulfite,                                                     
                   Carbonate,       Percent                               
             percent                                                      
                   percent          chlorine      At 300° Canadian 
                                                  1                       
             equivalent                                                   
                   equivalent                                             
                         Percent                                          
                               Pre-               Standard                
                                                  Freeness.sup.5          
             sodium                                                       
                   sodium                                                 
                         nitric                                           
                               treatment                                  
                                    dioxide                               
                                         Bleached                         
                                              G.E.                        
             sulfite                                                      
                   carbonate                                              
                         acid  yield,                                     
                                    (wood                                 
                                         yield,                           
                                              bright-                     
                                                  Tensile,.sup.3          
                                                       Burst,.sup.4       
                                                           Tear,.sup.5    
Pretreatment Chemical.sup.1                                               
             (on wood)                                                    
                   (on wood)                                              
                         (on wood)                                        
                               percent                                    
                                    basis)                                
                                         percent                          
                                              ness.sup.2                  
                                                  percent                 
                                                       percent            
                                                           percent        
__________________________________________________________________________
Sodium base neutral                                                       
sulfite      12    10    --    73   6.0  58   80  82   152 165            
Ammonia base neutral                                                      
sulfite      13.2  11.1  --    72   6.0  58   80  73   143 148            
Nitric acid              25    73   6.1  54   80  70   121 112            
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 The neutral sulfite pretreatment cycle for both sodium and ammonia
 base involved 30 min. to and 60 min. at 273°F. plus 30 min. to and
 120 min. at 335°F.                                                
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T217 m-48.                                         
 .sup.3 TAPPI Standard T404 ts-66.                                        
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T403 ts-63.                                        
 .sup.5 TAPPI Standard T414 ts-65.                                        
 .sup.6 TAPPI Standard T227 m-58.
EXAMPLE IX
To demonstrate the advantages of using a neutral sulfite pretreatment in preference to a high-yield kraft pretreatment or an entirely mechanical pretreatment, the following runs were made.
The raw material was a mixture of southern hardwood chips (approximately one-third oak, one-third yellow poplar, and one-third gum). In the case of the chemical pretreatments (kraft and neutral sulfite), sufficient time for liquor impregnation was allowed prior to heating to maximum temperature. The chemically pretreated material (and the hardwood chips following presteaming in the case of mechanical pretreatment only) was then refined in an eight-inch laboratory disc refiner to give a starting material for the chlorine dioxide pulping/bleaching sequence. Pretreatment was analyzed through the following: ##EQU2##
Selectivity of various chemical pretreatment yields was determined as follows:
                  Pretreatment                                            
                              S (pretreat-                                
Pretreatment      yield       ment only)                                  
______________________________________                                    
                  60          0.38                                        
Sodium base neutral sulfite                                               
                  70          0.43                                        
                  80          0.47                                        
                  90          0.52                                        
                  60          0.39                                        
Kraft             70          0.32                                        
                  80          0.24                                        
______________________________________
The above table shows that, for a high-yield pulping process, the neutral sulfite pretreatment offers the greatest selectivity and therefore the greatest potential for final bleached or semibleached pulp yield. As the pretreatment yield approaches that normally achieved during the pulping portion of a pulp-bleach sequence, the selectivities approach each other.
By pulping and bleaching this pretreated material to 80 G.E. brightness (TAPPI Standard T217m-48) using the chlorine dioxide-caustic-chlorine dioxide-caustic-chlorine dioxide treatment sequence, the selectivities shown below are obtained:
______________________________________                                    
                   Final                                                  
                   bleached    Overall                                    
                   yield,      selec-                                     
Pretreatment       percent     tivity, S                                  
______________________________________                                    
                   50          0.46                                       
Sodium base neutral sulfite                                               
                   55          0.53                                       
                   60          0.61                                       
                   65          0.69                                       
                   50          0.53                                       
                   55          0.54                                       
Kraft              60          0.56                                       
                   65          0.58                                       
Mechanical only    63          0.64                                       
______________________________________
Again, it is apparent that at the higher bleached yields (above 55 percent), the neutral sulfite pretreatment is more selective than kraft.
Since the chlorine dioxide pulping sequence itself is quite selective, use of a mechanical pretreatment only, followed by the chlorine dioxide sequence, might be expected to give a very high selectivity value. However, the data show that a high-yield neutral sulfite pretreatment followed by the chlorine dioxide sequence is more selective than the no-pretreatment case.
These results are shown graphically in FIG. 7. For any given pretreatment yield, the neutral sulfite pretreatment gives a significantly higher final bleached yield, indicating its increased selectivity. The mechanically pretreated case (shown at 100 percent pretreatment yield) lies far below the extrapolated chemical pretreatment cases, indicating the relatively low degree of selectivity achieved.
The relatively lower selectivity of kraft pretreatment suggests more lignin remaining at any given pretreatment yield, and therefore a higher pulping chemical (chlorine dioxide) requirement. The table below shows this to be true. Thus, neutral sulfite pretreatment gives a higher bleached yield and lower chlorine dioxide consumption than does kraft pretreatment; chlorine dioxide savings up to 24 percent are possible at higher pretreatment yields.
______________________________________                                    
                       Chlorine                                           
           Pretreat-   dioxide                                            
           ment        consumption  Chlorine                              
           yield,      (percent of  dioxide                               
Pretreatment                                                              
           percent     wood)        savings.sup.1                         
______________________________________                                    
Kraft      50          1.8                                                
Neutral sulfite                                                           
           50          1.7           6                                    
Kraft      60          4.2          17                                    
Neutral sulfite                                                           
           60          3.6                                                
Kraft      70          6.6          20                                    
Neutral sulfite                                                           
           70          5.5                                                
Kraft      80          9.0          23                                    
Neutral sulfite                                                           
           80          7.3                                                
Kraft      90          11.4         24                                    
Neutral sulfite                                                           
           90          9.2                                                
Mechanical only                                                           
           100         14.0         --                                    
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Neutral sulfite vs. kraft (percent of neutral sulfite-chlorine    
 dioxide requirement).
These results, as well as the relatively high consumption of chlorine dioxide by the mechanical pretreatment case, are also shown graphically by FIG. 8 of the drawings.
From these comparisons, it is clear that the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment gives higher bleached yield and lower pulping chemical (chlorine dioxide) cost than does kraft. Also, pure mechanical pretreatment yields higher chlorine dioxide consumption and lower yield than extrapolated neutral sulfite data. From yield and chemical economy standpoints, neutral sulfite is preferred over these two alternates.
For consideration of the resultant plup properties, as measured by physical properties of standard handsheets, the table below shows the standard strength properties for neutral sulfite, kraft and mechanically pretreated cases, each pulping and bleaching using the chlorine dioxide-extraction five-stage sequence:
______________________________________                                    
          Pretreat-                                                       
                  Values at 600/300 Canadian                              
          ment    Standard Freeness.sup.5                                 
          yield,                                                          
            percent of                                                    
                      Tensile, Burst, Tear,                               
Pretreatment                                                              
            wood.sup.1                                                    
                      percent.sup.2                                       
                               percent.sup.3                              
                                      percent.sup.4                       
______________________________________                                    
Sodium base neutral                                                       
 sulfite    85        54/91    96/179 207/180                             
Kraft       86        43/81    83/180 180/165                             
Mechanical only                                                           
            100       55/72    90/133 165/134                             
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Southern hardwood chips.?                                         
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T404 ts-66.                                        
 .sup.3 TAPPI Standard T403 ts-63.                                        
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T414 ts-65.                                        
 .sup.5 TAPPI Standard T227 m-58.
It is apparent that the kraft pretreatment results in lower tensile and tear than neutral sulfite pretreatment, and that the mechanical pretreatment is also inferior in strength.
Overall, it can be concluded that the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment is preferred over either high-yield kraft or mechanical pretreatment, since it results in higher final bleached yield, lower chlorine dioxide consumption, and higher pulp handsheet strengths.
EXAMPLE X
To demonstrate the uniqueness of the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment-chlorine dioxide pulping sequence compared to conventional bleaching of neutral sulfite pulps, the strength properties of paper prepared from southern hardwood chips via the process of the present invention were compared with the properties of a bleached pulp prepared by a conventional neutral sulfite pulping step followed by a conventional bleaching sequence of chlorination-caustic extraction-hydrochlorite bleaching, the latter case being typical of present state of the art bleached neutral sulfite pulps. The differences obtained were as follows:
__________________________________________________________________________
                      Neutral                                             
                 Conven-                                                  
                      sulfite pre-                                        
                 tional                                                   
                      treatment-                                          
                 bleached                                                 
                      chlorine                                            
                 hardwood                                                 
                      dioxide Percent                                     
                 neutral                                                  
                      pulping improve-                                    
                 sulfite                                                  
                      case    ment                                        
__________________________________________________________________________
Neutral sulfite (pretreatment                                             
yield, percent of wood)                                                   
                 ˜60                                                
                      80                                                  
Final bleached yield, percent of                                          
wood             52   62      19                                          
At 300 Canadian Standard                                                  
Freeness.sup.6                                                            
Tensile strength, kilometers.sup.2                                        
                 7.2  9.1     38                                          
Burst, percent.sup.3                                                      
                 98   137     40                                          
Tear, percent.sup.4                                                       
                 110  125     14                                          
M.I.T. fold.sup.5                                                         
                 120  880     630                                         
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 Improvement calculated relative to the conventional case.         
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T404 ts-66.                                        
 .sup.3 TAPPI Standard T403 ts-63.                                        
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T414 ts-65.                                        
 .sup.5 TAPPI Standard T511.                                              
 .sup.6 TAPPI Standard T227 m-58.
From these comparisons, it is very apparent that the present invention produces a pulp of much higher yield, while at the same time giving paper of much higher physical strengths. The difference in folding endurance is particularly noteworthy, since this is the most important paper physical property of most book and publication papers.
EXAMPLE XI
To demonstrate the superiority of the sodium base neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide sequence relative to conventionally bleached kraft pulps, the below tests were conducted. Previous examples have demonstrated the superiority of the product of the sodium base neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide process relative to conventionally bleached neutral sulfite as well as relative to pretreatment-chlorine dioxide sequence pulps in which the pretreatment is any of the following: mechanical, ammonia-base neutral sulfite, high-yield kraft, and nitric acid.
Using a constant raw material source of mixed southern hardwood chips, pulp samples were prepared using two processes: the sodium base neutral sulfite pretreatment-chlorine dioxide pulping sequence of the present invention and a conventionally pulped and bleached kraft pulp. These pulps were refined to 300 degrees Canadian Standard Freeness (TAPPI Standard T227 m-58) and formed into paper on a small twelve-inch paper machine, so that the results would be more indicative of the properties of machine-made papers. The physical and surface smoothness properties of these two papers are compared in the following tables:
______________________________________                                    
                               Neutral                                    
                     Conven-   sulfite-                                   
                     tional    chlorine                                   
                     bleached  dioxide                                    
Physical property tested                                                  
                     kraft pulp                                           
                               pulp                                       
______________________________________                                    
Burst, percent.sup.1 43.8      91.6                                       
Tear, percent.sup.2 MD/CD.sup.3                                           
                     86/104    124/197                                    
Tensile, percent.sup.4 MD/CD                                              
                     33/14     93/35                                      
Stretch, percent.sup.5 MD/CD                                              
                     1.5/2.6   2.1/3.4                                    
Tensile energy absorption,.sup.6 MD/CD                                    
                     1.65/1.52 4.73/3.56                                  
Fold (M.I.T.),.sup.7 MD/CD                                                
                     27/6      1,019/92                                   
Wax pick, felt/wire.sup.8                                                 
                     6/2       13/6                                       
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 TAPPI Standard T403 ts-63.                                        
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T414 ts-65.                                        
 .sup.3 MD and CD refer to machine direction and cross-machine direction  
 set properties.                                                          
 .sup.4 TAPPI Standard T404 ts-66.                                        
 .sup.5 TAPPI Standard T457 m-46.                                         
 .sup.6 TAPPI Standard T494 su-64.                                        
 .sup.7 TAPPI Standard T-511.                                             
 .sup.8 TAPPI Standard T-459 su-65.                                       

______________________________________                                    
               Gurley.sup.2                                               
                         Bekk.sup.3                                       
                                   Sheffield.sup.4                        
Pulp.sup.1     porosity  smoothness                                       
                                   smoothness                             
______________________________________                                    
Conv. bleached kraft pulp                                                 
                5        17        276                                    
Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                                  
dioxide pulp   15        50        194                                    
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Both pulps from the same hardwood mixture.                        
 .sup.2 Gurley porosity is the time interval required to pass a constant  
 volume of air through the sheet, thus high values indicate low porosity. 
 .sup.3 Bekk smoothness is the time required to leak a constant volume of 
 air between the sheet and a polished glass surface, thus higher values   
 indicate greater sheet smoothness.                                       
 .sup.4 Sheffield smoothness is the rate at which air leaks between two   
 rings which are in contact with the sheet. Thus, high values indicate low
 smoothness.
It is apparent that the paper made from the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide process is greatly superior in the physical properties of burst, tear, tensile, stretch, and M.I.T. fold. The wax pick test shows the new pulp to be very superior in internal bond strength, a property of great importance for papers which are to be printed. The smoothness measurements show the new pulp to be of greater smoothness, which is advantageous for printing papers and various other applications.
The superiority of the new pulp in terms of both handsheet tensile and tear suggests that the new process gives a pulp of very superior fiber strength; if bonding alone were involved, a high tensile would result in a low tear and vice versa. To confirm the superiority of fiber strength, zero-span tensile tests were run on handsheets prepared from the two pulps. These results are shown below:
                        Zero-span                                         
Pulp:                   value, percent.sup.1                              
______________________________________                                    
Conventional bleached kraft                                               
                        89                                                
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                        150                                               
______________________________________
TAPPI Standard T231 sm-60. Values expressed as percent calculated as: ##EQU3##
Since this test, run on standard sheets of constant basis weight, gives a direct means of comparing fiber strengths, it is concluded that a very unique fiber, having a strength per unit fiber mass of over sixty percent greater than that of a conventionally prepared fiber, is produced by the pulping process of the present invention.
EXAMPLE XII
To demonstrate that, in addition to the superior properties of the pulp of the present invention when made into laboratory handsheets or paper on a paper machine, the pulp exhibits certain unique properties related to its processing before and during the papermaking operation, such as great ease of refining, increased ease of drainage during paper formation, ability to retain fillers more efficiently, superior wet web strength on the paper machine, and increased ease of paper machine drying, the following comparisons were made.
The ease of refining is shown by the data in the table below, as well as in FIG. 9. A comparison is made of the response of pulps to refining in a standard TAPPI beating test. Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulps are compared to conventional bleached kraft, in one case with the pulps prepared from a southern hardwood chip mixture and in the second case using northern hardwood chips. The slopes of the curves in FIG. 9 indicate that the relative beating rate, new pulp versus kraft, is 3.0 for pulps from the southern woods and 4.2 for pulps from the northern woods. Since the time required to beat a pulp under these standard conditions is directly proportional to the energy required to refine to any given degree, it is apparent that refining energy requirement for the new pulp is only 1/3 to 1/4 that required with kraft.
______________________________________                                    
                           Beating Freeness,                              
                           time,   ml.                                    
Wood      Process          min..sup.1                                     
                                   (C.S.F.).sup.2                         
______________________________________                                    
Southern hard-                                                            
          Conventionally bleached                                         
                           0       650                                    
woods.    kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           0       740                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           14      600                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           8       600                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           25      500                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           11      500                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           34      400                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           14      400                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           41      300                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           15      300                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Northern hard-                                                            
          Conventionally bleached                                         
                           0       600                                    
woods.    kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           0       600                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           0       600                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           5       600                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           36      500                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           10      500                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           59      400                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           14      400                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
Do.       Conventionally bleached                                         
                           80      300                                    
          kraft.                                                          
Do.       Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                        
                           18      300                                    
          dioxide sequence.                                               
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Beaten in Vally Beater according to TAPPI Standard T200 ts-66.    
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T 227 m-58.
When making small scale paper machine trials, it was observed that, at a constant freeness of 300 degrees Canadian Standard, only one-half as much vacuum applied to the drainage area of the paper machine wire was required to drain the free water from the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp as was required with the corresponding bleached kraft pulp (when in both cases the drainage was forced to occur over a constant distance on the paper machine wire). This illustrates the potential for increased machine speeds with the new pulp.
During these same paper machine trails, filler .[.wa.]. .Iadd.was .Iaddend.added to the fiber furnish and the retention of this filler during the sheet forming process was measured. These results, shown below, illustrate the very marked superior retention exhibited by the new pulp compared to conventional bleached kraft. Actually, the effect is even more dramatic than the percent retention numbers indicate, since fifty percent more filler was added in the case of the new pulp. It is well known that percent retention decreases as the applied amount of filler increases, other factors remaining constant.
__________________________________________________________________________
                 Filler, percent applied                                  
                              Percent of the filler applied               
                 (pulp basis) which was retained                          
                    Titanium      Titanium                                
Pulp             Clay                                                     
                    dioxide                                               
                          Total                                           
                              Clay                                        
                                  dioxide Total                           
__________________________________________________________________________
Conventional bleached kraft                                               
                 32  8.0  40  8.7 9.6     8.8                             
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                 43   12  60   19  28      21                             
__________________________________________________________________________
When the wet sheet is lifted from the paper machine wire and passes to the first press, there is a danger of the sheet rupturing while in a wet, tender condition. This tendency for breaks is controlled by the wet web strength of the sheet. On the small paper machine trials, with the machine running under identical conditions, it was observed that the kraft sheet was very prone to frequent breaks, while the new pulp sheet ran trouble free. While these results are not quantitive, they do show the superior wet web strength possessed by this new pulp.
During these same paper machine trials, and with the machine operating at a constant speed, it was observed that only one-half as great a temperature differential was required in the drier section to dry the new pulp sheet as was required with conventional kraft. In other words, the new pulp sheet possessed double the drying rate of the conventional kraft.
The ease of refining, coupled with more rapid drainage, higher wet web strength and ease of drying, all indicate the ability to increase paper production relative to that obtainable with conventional pulp. The greatly increased filler retention characteristics also leads to significantly improved economics, especialy in the case of highly filled sheets.
EXAMPLE XIII
To demonstrate the chemical uniqueness of the pulp, comparisons of the degree of polymerization and hemicellulose content of various pulps from the same wood mixture were made as follows:
__________________________________________________________________________
                        Hemi-                                             
                   Final                                                  
                        cellulose,                                        
                   bleached                                               
                        percent                                           
                              Degree of                                   
                   yield,                                                 
                        (wood polymeri-                                   
Pulping process    percent                                                
                        basis)                                            
                              zation                                      
__________________________________________________________________________
Conventional kraft-conventional                                           
bleach             42.3 7.1    650                                        
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide se-                                      
quence             53.0 9.6   1,770                                       
Do.                57.3 10.7  2,000                                       
Do.                65.3 12.9  2,100                                       
__________________________________________________________________________
The carboxyl content of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide sequence pulp is at least twice as great as the carboxyl content of conventionally bleached pulps. At the same time, the carbonyl content is only 1/2 to 1/3 as great as the carbonyl content of conventionally bleached pulp from the same wood. The neutral sulfite pretreatment portion of the sequence is necessary to keep the carbonyl content low as is seen by comparison of the data for pulps with and without the neutral sulfite pretreatment.
______________________________________                                    
                       Carbonyl Carboxyl                                  
Pulping process        number.sup.1                                       
                                number.sup.2                              
______________________________________                                    
Conventional bleached kraft                                               
                       0.67      4.9                                      
Mechanical pretreatment-chlorine                                          
dioxide sequence       1.2      18.8                                      
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                       0.24     14.2                                      
sequence                                                                  
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 TAPPI Standard T215 m-50                                          
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T237 su-63
EXAMPLE XIV
to demonstrate the effort of pulp chemical properties on brightness stability and ion exchange capacity, two chlorine dioxide-sequence pulps are compared to conventional bleached kraft in the table below. In all cases the raw material was a mixture of sourthern hardwoods. It is apparent that the pulps rank: neutral sulfite> mechanical pretreatment>chlorine dioxide>conventional kraft in terms of brightness stability with kraft being poorest even though it is of intermediate carbonyl content (high percent reversion or high post color number indicates low brightness stability).
__________________________________________________________________________
                       Aged.sup.2                                         
                             Rever-                                       
                                   Post                                   
                Original.sup.1                                            
                       bright-                                            
                             sion,.sup.3                                  
                                   color                                  
Pulp identification                                                       
                brightness                                                
                       ness  percent                                      
                                   number.sup.4                           
__________________________________________________________________________
Conventionally bleached                                                   
kraft           79.8   74.9  6.1   .[.1.6.]. .Iadd.4.1 .Iaddend.          
Mechanical pretreatment                                                   
chlorine dioxide sequence                                                 
                80.8   77.4  4.2   2.7                                    
Neutral sulfite-chlorine                                                  
dioxide sequence                                                          
                80.5   78.6  2.4   .[.0.55.]. .Iadd.1.5.Iaddend.          
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.1 Brightness before aging, percent General Electric, TAPPI Standard  
T217 m-48.                                                                
.sup.2 Brightness after aging for 4 hours at 105°.                 
.sup.3 Reversion, percent defined as:                                     
        Brightness before- brightness after                               
100 ×                                                               
        Brightness before                                                 
.sup.4 Post color number, defined as:                                     
     100-percent brightness                                               
                     100-percent brightness                               
     after aging     before aging                                         
100 ×       -                                                       
     2×(percent brightness                                          
                     2×(percent brightness                          
     after aging)    before aging)
The carboxyl content of the chlorine dioxide sequence pulp is so high that it can behave as an ion exchange material. If this pulp is treated with a salt solution, the resulting pulp will retain the metal atoms. This results in higher ash content and many unique chemical properties. Brightness and opacity as well as brightness stability are strongly affected by the nature of the cation bound to the pulp. The table below shows the effects of trace amounts of zinc, sodium, aluminum, and potassium ions on pulp optical properties. It is apparent that significant changes result, which do not occur when conventional kraft pulp is subjected to similar treatments.
__________________________________________________________________________
                       Percent                                            
                              Percent                                     
                       change in                                          
                              change                                      
Pulp             Cation.sup.1                                             
                       brightness.sup.2                                   
                              in opacity.sup.3                            
__________________________________________________________________________
Kraft conventional bleach                                                 
                 Zinc  +1     +3                                          
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                 do.   +2     +14                                         
Kraft conventional bleach                                                 
                 Sodium                                                   
                       -1     0                                           
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                 do.   +3     +14                                         
Kraft conventional bleach                                                 
                 Aluminum                                                 
                       0      0                                           
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                 do.   +4.0   +20                                         
Kraft conventional bleach                                                 
                 Potassium                                                
                       +1     0                                           
Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide                                          
                 do.   +5     +9                                          
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 These cations were removed from dilute salt solutions by the ion  
 exchange phenomena of the pulp.                                          
 .sup.2 TAPPI Standard T217 m-48.                                         
 .sup.3 TAPPI Standard T425 m-60.
EXAMPLE XV
To demonstrate the durability of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp, fold tests were run on four cation treated neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulps after zero, one, two, three, and seven days of aging at 105° C. The results were compared to typical book paper and to a special alkaline treated softwood paper.
It was found that hand sheets made of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp that had been treated with either sodium, lead, or no cations were very durable. Handsheets made from pulp of the present invention treated with alum were less durable although they were more durable that typical rosin alum sized book paper.
The pulp used was produced from a southern hardwood species mixture. The wood mixture was given a neutral sulfite cook, and refined in a high pressure refiner for a 85.5 percent yield. The pulp was then washed and bleached by a five-stage chlorine dioxide-extraction sequence. All chlorine dioxide stages were conducted with gaseous chlorine dioxide. The pulp was tumbled in a 3 gallon polyethylene reactor during the reaction period. A total of 8.4 percent chlorine dioxide (wood basis) was consumed by the pulp. All chlorine dioxide stages were conducted at room temperature without addition of buffer.
The processed pulp was beaten 11 minutes to 300 ml. Canadian Standard Freeness (TAPPI Standard T227 m-58) in a Valley beater. Three cation treated series of handsheets were made and one series was made with just distilled water. The treated handsheets were made by applying 1.2 gram of the salt or base of interest to a slurry containing 12 grams of pulp (oven dry basis). Sufficient slurry was then added to the handsheet mold (using distilled water) to make a standard 1.2 gram handsheet. Cations selected were sodium in the form of sodium hydroxide, lead in the form of lead acetate, aluminum in the form of aluminum sulfate, and the control which was made from distilled water.
Pairs of handsheets from the four groups were aged at 105° C. for zero days, one day, two days, three days and seven days. Each handsheet was then cut into four strips and tested to failure in the Schopper fold tester. All strips were, of course, conditioned in the test laboratory prior to testing. The data obtained is presented in the table below and in FIG. 10.
______________________________________                                    
         Schopper fold values                                             
               Chemical treatment                                         
           No                                                             
Aging, days at                                                            
           chemical  Sodium    Lead   Aluminum                            
105°C.                                                             
           treatment hydroxide acetate                                    
                                      sulfate                             
______________________________________                                    
Zero                 864       643    557                                 
One        675       779       593    391                                 
Two        659       713       505    .sup.1 685                          
Three      535       .sup.1 988                                           
                               507    128                                 
Seven      406       492       401    89                                  
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 These values out of line with other values.
FIG. 11 develops the relationship between M.I.T. and Schopper folds, based on data on pulp of the present invention tested according to both methods.
From FIG. 12 of the drawings it is evident that typical book paper which has been treated with alum degrades most rapidly. Neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp which has been exchanged with aluminum ions from alum degrades less rapidly. The neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp which has been exchanged with sodium is very resistant to fold loss. The last curve represents the behavior of a special long fiber softwood pulp treated with alkali to develope its high degree of permanence. The neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp with sodium treatment (or no treatment) is almost as durable as the special pulp. Even with alum treatment the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp is much more durable than modern book paper.
In FIG. 13 of the drawings the same pulps are compared with respect to their fold durability on the basis of years at standard conditions. The half life (the time in years required to decrease the fold to one half of its original value) of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulps is very high compared to conventional book. The half life of the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide alum treated pulp is about 18 years. The typical modern book paper has a half life of about 6 years.
From the above data it is concluded that the neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp of the present invention without special treatment or with lead or sodium treatment is very durable. Alum treated neutral sulfite-chlorine dioxide pulp is less durable than the lead, sodium or no-treatment pulps but is more durable than typical alum treated book paper.

Claims (23)

What is claimed is:
1. A process for the delignification of .Iadd.lignocellulosic .Iaddend.vegetable matter comprising, in combination, the steps of:
(a) pretreating said vegetable matter to obtain a refined vegetable matter in a yield of about 64% to about 100% by weight, based upon the dry weight of said vegetable matter,
(b) .Iadd.delignifying .Iaddend. .[.reacting.]. said refined vegetable matter .Iadd.by reacting it in at least two stages .Iaddend.with .[.at least about 2% to about 15%.]. .Iadd.preformed .Iaddend.chlorine dioxide.Iadd. , each successive stage using less chlorine dioxide than its preceding stage, and the total chlorine dioxide used being from about 1% to about 15% based upon said dry weight.Iaddend.; .Iadd.and .Iaddend.
(c) .[.treating.]. .Iadd.extracting .Iaddend.said vegetable matter .Iadd.between successive chlorine dioxide stages .Iaddend.with a water-soluble caustic material at a temperature of from about 50° C. to about 75° C; wherein said water soluble material is an alkali metal hydroxide, alkali metal carbonate, ammonium hydroxide or ammonia gas.[.; and
(d) reacting said vegetable matter with chlorine dioxide.]..
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said reacting following said pretreatment comprises, sequentially, chlorine dioxide treatment, water wash, caustic extraction, water wash, chlorine dioxide treatment, water wash, caustic extraction, water wash, chlorine dioxide treatment, and water wash.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein said water-soluble caustic material is sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate.
4. The process of claim 2 wherein said caustic material is sodium hyroxide in aqueous solution.
5. The process of claim 2 wherein said pretreating is substantially a mechanical operation.
6. The process of claim 2 wherein said pretreating is a chemical prepulping treatment selected from the group consisting of sodium sulfide prepulping, acid sulfite prepulping, cold soda prepulping, soda prepulping, sodium xylene sulfonate prepulping, bisulfite prepulping, kraft prepulping, .Iadd.neutral sulfite prepulping .Iaddend.and nitric acid prepulping.
7. The process of claim 2 wherein said pretreating includes, in combination, the steps of:
(i) prepulping prepared vegetable matter chips by a kraft, nitric acid, bisulfite, or neutral sulfite process;
(ii) refining said prepulped vegetable matter;
(ii) washing said prepulped vegetable matter; and
(iv) dewatering said prepulped vegetable matter.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein said chips of vegetable matter are prepulped by a process comprising contacting said vegetable matter with from about 5% to about 30% sodium sulfite by weight and from about 5% to about 25% sodium carbonate by weight, both percentages being based upon the dry weight of said vegetable matter.
9. The process of claim 2 wherein the pH of the mixture of vegetable matter and chlorine dioxide of step (b) varies up to about 8.0.
10. The process of claim 2 wherein said vegetable matter is treated with about 4% of said water-soluble caustic material and the total .[.concentration.]. .Iadd.amount .Iaddend.of chlorine dioxide used is from about .[.1.]. .Iadd.2.Iaddend.% to about .[.15.]. .Iadd.13.Iaddend.% by weight, all percentages being based on the total dry weight of said vegetable matter fed to the pretreating stage.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature of the mixture of said vegetable matter and said chlorine dioxide of step (d) is adjusted to from about 40° C. to about 60° C.
12. The process of claim 2 wherein fresh water is fed only to the last water washing step and then circulated countercurrently to the flow of said vegetable matter to the next to last water washing, to the next preceding washing, and finally to the first water washing.
13. The process of claim 2 wherein said chlorine dioxide .[.is a mixture of chlorine dioxide and.]. .Iadd.contains .Iaddend.chlorine .[.wherein.]. .Iadd.and .Iaddend.said chlorine is less than about 30% .[.by weight.]. of the total chlorine dioxide requirement on equivalent oxidant basis.
14. A process for the delignification of vegetable matter comprising, in combination, the steps of:
(a) pretreating said vegetable matter to obtain a refined vegetable matter in a yield of about 64% to about 95% by weight, based upon the dry weight of said vegetable matter, said pretreating comprising, in combination, the steps of:
(i) prepulping prepared vegetable matter chips by kraft, nitric acid, bisulfite, or neutral sulfite process,
(ii) refining said prepulped vegetable matter,
(iii) washing said prepulped vegetable matter;
(b) reacting said refined vegetable matter with from about 2% to about 7% chlorine dioxide, based upon the total weight of dry fibrous material fed to said pretreating step until all of said chlorine dioxide is substantially consumed;
(c) water washing said reacted vegetable matter;
(d) treating said washed vegetable matter with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide for at least about one-half hour at a temperature of from about 50° C. to about 75° C.;
(e) water washing said treated vegetable matter;
(f) reacting said washed vegetable matter with about one-half the amount of chlorine dioxide used in step (b) at a temperature of from about 40° C. to about 60° C. for about 30 minutes to about 4 hours;
(g) water washing said reacted vegetable matter;
(h) treating said washed vegetable matter with sodium hydroxide in aqueous solution for at least about one-half hour at a temperature of from about 50° C. to about 75° C.;
(i) water washing said caustic treated vegetable matter;
(j) reacting said washed vegetable matter with about one-half the amount of chlorine dioxide used in step (f) for a period of from about 2 hours to about 6 hours at a temperature of from about 40° C. to about 80° C.; and
(k) water washing said reacted vegetable matter.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein said chips of vegetable matter are prepulped by a process comprising contacting said vegetable matter with from about 5% to about 30% sodium sulfite by weight and from about 3% to about 25% sodium carbonate by weight, both percentages being based upon the dry weight of said vegetable matter.
16. The process of claim 15 wherein said washed vegetable matter is treated with about 4% of said watersoluble caustic material and the total concentration of said chlorine dioxide used is from about 1% to about 15% by weight, all percentages being based on the total dry weight of said vegetable matter fed to the pretreating stage.
17. The process of claim 16 wherein the pH of said mixture of vegetable matter and chlorine dioxide of step (b) varies up to about 8.0.
18. The process of claim 17 wherein the pH of said mixture of vegetable matter and chlorine dioxide of step (f) varies from about 4.0 to about 8.0 at the beginning of the reaction and is about 2.0 upon consumption of said chlorine dioxide.
19. A pulp produced by the process of claim 1.
20. A paper prepared from the pulp of claim 19.
21. A paper made predominantly from softwood pulp produced by the process of claim 14 wherein the grease-proofness is greater than 500, the tensile strength is greater than 120%, the bursting strength is greater than 160%, the tear resistance is greater than 320%, and the folding endurance is greater than 1000.
22. A paper made prodominantly from hardwood pulp produced by the process of claim 14 wherein the grease-proofness is greater than 500, the tensile strength is greater than 80%, the bursting strength is greater than 140%, the tear resistance is greater than 160%, and the folding endurance is greater than 500. .Iadd. 23. The process of claim 1 in which the delignification with chlorine dioxide is effected in at least three
chlorine dioxide reaction stages. .Iaddend..Iadd. 24. A process for the delignification of wood chips comprising, in combination, the steps of:
(a) pretreating said chips to obtain a refined vegetable matter in a yield of about 64% to about 100% by weight, based upon the dry weight of said chips;
(b) delignifying said refined vegetable matter by reacting it in three stages with preformed chlorine dioxide, each successive stage using less chlorine dioxide than its preceding stage, and the total chlorine dioxide used being from about 2% to about 13% based upon said dry weight; and
(c) extracting said vegetable matter after the first two of the three chlorine dioxide stages with a water solution of caustic material at a temperature of from about 50°C. to about 75°C; wherein said caustic material is an alkali metal hydroxide, alkali metal carbonate, ammonium hydroxide or ammonia gas. .Iaddend..Iadd. 25. The process of claim 24 wherein the pretreating is a chemical prepulping treatment followed by a refining treatment, the chemical prepulping treatment being selected from the group consisting of sodium sulfide prepulping, acid sulfite prepulping, cold soda prepulping, soda prepulping, sodium xylene sulfonate prepulping, bisulfite prepulping, kraft prepulping, neutral sulfite prepulping and nitric acid prepulping. .Iaddend..Iadd. 26. The process of claim 25 in which the chemical prepulping treatment is a Kraft or neutral sulfite prepulping and the total amount of chlorine dioxide used is not more than 9% based on the dry weight of the chips. .Iaddend. .Iadd. 27. The process of claim 25 in which the caustic material is caustic soda. .Iaddend..Iadd. 28. The process of claim 27 in which the first chlorine dioxide treating stage is conducted so that its pH begins at from about 4.0 to about 8.0 and ends at a pH of about 0.5 to about 3.0, and the second chlorine dioxide treating stage is conducted so that its pH begins at a pH of about 4.0 to about 8.0 and ends at a pH of about 2.0. .Iaddend..Iadd. 29. A pulp produced by the process of claim 25. .Iaddend..Iadd. 30. A paper prepared from the pulp of claim 29. .Iaddend.
US05/484,082 1969-02-06 1974-06-28 Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide Expired - Lifetime USRE28777E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US05/484,082 USRE28777E (en) 1969-02-06 1974-06-28 Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US79720969A 1969-02-06 1969-02-06
US88966269A 1969-12-31 1969-12-31
US05/484,082 USRE28777E (en) 1969-02-06 1974-06-28 Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US79720969A Reissue 1969-02-06 1969-02-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE28777E true USRE28777E (en) 1976-04-20

Family

ID=27413672

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US05/484,082 Expired - Lifetime USRE28777E (en) 1969-02-06 1974-06-28 Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USRE28777E (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5267655A (en) * 1990-08-14 1993-12-07 A. Ahlstrom Corporation Method and apparatus for treating a gas containing aqueous fiber suspension
US6752904B2 (en) * 2000-02-09 2004-06-22 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for removal of lignin from lignocellulosic material
US20040244925A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2004-12-09 David Tarasenko Method for producing pulp and lignin
US20080142175A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-19 Caifang Yin Process in a (D) stage bleaching of hardwood pulps in a presence of Mg (OH)2
US20080142174A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-19 Caifang Yin Process in a (D) stage bleaching of softwood pulps in a presence of Mg (OH) 2
US20080190573A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2008-08-14 Novozymes A/S Chlorine Dioxide Treatment Compositions and Processes

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA553129A (en) * 1958-02-11 Haas Heinz Process for the production of bleached semi-chemical pulp
US2882965A (en) * 1955-02-23 1959-04-21 Columbia Cellulose Company Ltd High viscosity, high percentage alpha cellulose from sulfite pulp
US3020197A (en) * 1960-08-05 1962-02-06 Allied Chem Method for production of high brightness high strength wood pulps
US3433702A (en) * 1965-06-28 1969-03-18 Hooker Chemical Corp Woodpulp bleaching process
US3501374A (en) * 1968-12-26 1970-03-17 Hooker Chemical Corp Sequential bleaching of kraft pulp with chlorine dioxide and chlorine
US3829357A (en) * 1968-11-20 1974-08-13 Inst Paper Chem Oxidative manufacture of pulp with chlorine dioxide

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA553129A (en) * 1958-02-11 Haas Heinz Process for the production of bleached semi-chemical pulp
US2882965A (en) * 1955-02-23 1959-04-21 Columbia Cellulose Company Ltd High viscosity, high percentage alpha cellulose from sulfite pulp
US3020197A (en) * 1960-08-05 1962-02-06 Allied Chem Method for production of high brightness high strength wood pulps
US3433702A (en) * 1965-06-28 1969-03-18 Hooker Chemical Corp Woodpulp bleaching process
US3829357A (en) * 1968-11-20 1974-08-13 Inst Paper Chem Oxidative manufacture of pulp with chlorine dioxide
US3501374A (en) * 1968-12-26 1970-03-17 Hooker Chemical Corp Sequential bleaching of kraft pulp with chlorine dioxide and chlorine

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Casey, Pulp & Papers, 2nd ed., vol. I, 1960, p. 102.
Casey, Pulp & Papers, 2nd ed., vol. I, 1960, p. 102. *
Levitin and Schwartz, "Delignification of Spruce Sawdust with Chlorine Dioxide" in Pulp and Paper Magazine of Canada, vol. 55 (Jan. 1954) pp. 92-98. *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5267655A (en) * 1990-08-14 1993-12-07 A. Ahlstrom Corporation Method and apparatus for treating a gas containing aqueous fiber suspension
US6752904B2 (en) * 2000-02-09 2004-06-22 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for removal of lignin from lignocellulosic material
US20040244925A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2004-12-09 David Tarasenko Method for producing pulp and lignin
US20060169430A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2006-08-03 Pacific Pulp Resources Inc. Method for producing pulp and lignin
US20080190573A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2008-08-14 Novozymes A/S Chlorine Dioxide Treatment Compositions and Processes
US20080142175A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-19 Caifang Yin Process in a (D) stage bleaching of hardwood pulps in a presence of Mg (OH)2
US20080142174A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-19 Caifang Yin Process in a (D) stage bleaching of softwood pulps in a presence of Mg (OH) 2
US7976676B2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2011-07-12 International Paper Company Process of bleaching softwood pulps in a D1 or D2 stage in a presence of a weak base
US7976677B2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2011-07-12 International Paper Company Process of bleaching hardwood pulps in a D1 or D2 stage in a presence of a weak base

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4431479A (en) Process for improving and retaining pulp properties
US6267841B1 (en) Low energy thermomechanical pulping process using an enzyme treatment between refining zones
CA1080911A (en) Process for making high-strength, high-yield sulfite-modified thermomechanical pulp and a linerboard composition produced therefrom
US3707436A (en) Exploding of ammonia impregnated wood chips
US4260452A (en) Production of paper pulp from sugar mill bagasse
US4502918A (en) Two-stage chemical treatment of mechanical wood pulp with sodium sulfite
WO2006127880A2 (en) Modified kraft fibers
US20110168345A1 (en) Method of producing paper and cardboard
CA2634202C (en) Wood-based lignocellulosic fibrous material
US4211605A (en) High yield chemimechanical pulping processes
WO1994004745A1 (en) Algal pulps and pre-puls and paper products made therefrom
US3919041A (en) Multi-stage chlorine dioxide delignification of wood pulp
Paszner et al. Beating behaviour and sheet strength development of coniferous organosolv fibers
USRE28777E (en) Refining of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chlorine dioxide
US3591451A (en) Pretreatment of vegetable matter and delignification of the refined matter with chloring dioxide
Veisi et al. Mixing bleached white poplar and wheat straw chemimechanical pulps to improve the mechanical and optical characteristics
US3013931A (en) Printing paper and process of making the same
US3981765A (en) Treatment of wood chips with an alkali metal borohydride solution followed by mechanical defibration
US3737369A (en) Alkaline digestion of a mixture of cotton linters and fibrous vegetable material and product thereof
US3013932A (en) Printing paper and process of making the same
Dutt et al. Studies on Hibiscus Cannabinus, Hibiscus Sabdariffa, and Cannabinus Sativa pulp to be a substitute for softwood pulp-part 2: SAS-AQ and NSSC-AQ delignification processes
US3445329A (en) Storage of high consistency refined pulp
EP0030778A1 (en) Process for the formation of refiner pulp
El‐Taraboulsi et al. A modified method of nitric acid pulping of bagasse
EP0096460B1 (en) Process for improving and retaining pulp properties