US9271240B2 - Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station - Google Patents
Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9271240B2 US9271240B2 US14/669,805 US201514669805A US9271240B2 US 9271240 B2 US9271240 B2 US 9271240B2 US 201514669805 A US201514669805 A US 201514669805A US 9271240 B2 US9271240 B2 US 9271240B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- wtru
- transmit power
- psd
- grant
- open loop
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
- H04W52/08—Closed loop power control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/005—Control of transmission; Equalising
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
- H04L1/1812—Hybrid protocols; Hybrid automatic repeat request [HARQ]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
- H04W52/10—Open loop power control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
- H04W52/14—Separate analysis of uplink or downlink
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
- H04W52/14—Separate analysis of uplink or downlink
- H04W52/146—Uplink power control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/18—TPC being performed according to specific parameters
- H04W52/24—TPC being performed according to specific parameters using SIR [Signal to Interference Ratio] or other wireless path parameters
- H04W52/242—TPC being performed according to specific parameters using SIR [Signal to Interference Ratio] or other wireless path parameters taking into account path loss
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W76/00—Connection management
- H04W76/20—Manipulation of established connections
- H04W76/28—Discontinuous transmission [DTX]; Discontinuous reception [DRX]
Abstract
A method and apparatus are disclosed comprising a combined open loop/closed loop uplink power control scheme for E-UTRA. The combined open and closed loop method for UL intra-cell PC controls the wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) transmit power spectral density (PSD), PSDTx, (e.g. power per RB).
Description
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/329,165, filed Jul. 11, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/936,846, filed Jul. 8, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,812,048, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/044,569, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,509,836, filed on Mar. 7, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/893,575, filed on Mar. 7, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/895,561, filed Mar. 19, 2007 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/945,286, filed Jun. 20, 2007. Each of the foregoing applications are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
The present invention is related to wireless communication systems.
For the evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA) uplink (UL), there are several transmit power control (TPC) proposals that were submitted to third generation partnership project (3GPP) long term evolution (LTE) Work Group 1 (WG1). These proposals can be generally divided into (slow) open loop TPC and slow closed loop or channel quality information (CQI)-based TPC.
Open loop TPC is based on pathloss measurement and system parameters where the pathloss measurement is performed at a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and the system parameters are provided by an evolved Node-B (eNodeB).
Closed loop TPC is typically based on TPC feedback information, (such as a TPC command), that is periodically sent from the eNodeB where the feedback information is generally derived using signal-to-interference noise ratio (SINR) measured at the eNodeB.
Open loop TPC can compensate for long-term channel variations, (e.g. pathloss and shadowing), in an effective way, for instance, without the history of the transmit power. However, open loop TPC typically results in pathloss measurement errors and transmit power setting errors. On the other hand, slow closed loop or CQI-based TPC is less sensitive to errors in measurement and transmit power setting, because it is based on feedback signaled from the eNodeB. However, slow closed loop or CQI-based TPC degrades performance when there is no available feedback due to UL transmission pause, or pauses in the feedback transmission or channel variations are severely dynamic.
For the UL E-UTRA, there are several intra-cell PC proposals, which have been submitted to third generation partnership project (3GPP) long term evolution (LTE) work group (WG)#1. These proposals can be generally divided into slow open loop PC and slow closed loop, (or CQI based PC). Open loop PC can compensate for long-term channel variations, (e.g., pathloss and shadowing), in an effective way, for instance, without the history of the transmit power, but it typically suffers from errors in pathloss measurement and transmit power setting. On the other hand, slow closed loop or CQI based PC is less sensitive to errors in measurement and transmit power setting, because it is based on feedback signaled from the eNodeB. However, it degrades performance when there is no available feedback due to UL transmission pause or pauses in the feedback transmission.
As such there exists a need for an improved method of transmission power control.
A method and apparatus are disclosed comprising a combined open loop/closed loop uplink power control scheme for E-UTRA. The combined open and closed loop method for UL intra-cell PC controls the wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) transmit power spectral density (PSD), PSDTx, (e.g. power per RB).
A more detailed understanding of the invention may be had from the following description of a preferred embodiment, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
When referred to hereafter, the terminology “wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU)” includes but is not limited to a user equipment (UE), a mobile station, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, a pager, a cellular telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a computer, or any other type of user device capable of operating in a wireless environment. When referred to hereafter, the terminology “base station” includes but is not limited to a Node-B, a site controller, an access point (AP), or any other type of interfacing device capable of operating in a wireless environment.
The disclosed method of TPC comprises a combined open loop and closed loop scheme for uplink (UL) intra-cell power control. The method comprises controlling the WTRU transmit power spectral density (PSD) or PSD transmit (PSDTX), e.g., power per resource block (RB), or the WTRU transmit power using open loop and a-periodic closed loop power control (PC) for both UL data channel control channels and sound reference symbols (SRS). UL channel quality indicator (CQI) (or Modulation Coding Set (MCS)/grant information) is used at the WTRU to correct open loop and/or measurement errors, assuming the UL MCS/grant represents the signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR) received at the Node-B. If no CQI is available, then only the open loop is conducted. Implicit command signaling, e.g. no signaling overhead, for the closed loop component can be used. Alternatively, exploit TPC command signaling in DL control channel can be used for the closed loop component. Additionally, the disclosed method is capable of correcting open loop errors quickly, resulting in good performance.
The disclosed method, as indicated above, comprises controlling the WTRU transmit power spectral density (PSD) or PSD transmit (PSDTx), e.g., power per resource block (RB) or transmit power. It should be noted that although the disclosed method includes controlling the transmit PSD, it is equivalent to controlling the transmit power. PSDTx is defined as:
PSDTx=PSDopen+α·Δclosed+ΔMCS; Equation (1)
where PSDopen represents pathloss based open loop PSD in dBm; Δclosed is a power correction factor which is determined based on the closed loop component, to be disclosed in detail hereinafter; ΔMCS is a power offset per granted MCS; and α is a weighting factor to enable (α=1) or disable (α=0) the closed loop component, depending on the availability of the downlink (DL) control channel, which embeds closed loop PC (correction) command signaling (explicitly or implicitly). The weighting factor may be determined by WTRU 20 via autonomously detecting the presence of the closed loop PC command signaling. Alternatively,WTRU 20 is informed via higher signaling from eNodeB 30 with regard to where the command signaling exists. The transmit PSD should not exceed the maximum transmit PSD, PSDmax, where PSDmax is derived based on the maximum allowed power, Pmax, that depends on the UE power class, such as PSDmax=Pmax/M where M is the size of the UL channel resource assignment expressed in number of resource blocks valid for a given subframe.
PSDTx=PSDopen+α·Δclosed+ΔMCS; Equation (1)
where PSDopen represents pathloss based open loop PSD in dBm; Δclosed is a power correction factor which is determined based on the closed loop component, to be disclosed in detail hereinafter; ΔMCS is a power offset per granted MCS; and α is a weighting factor to enable (α=1) or disable (α=0) the closed loop component, depending on the availability of the downlink (DL) control channel, which embeds closed loop PC (correction) command signaling (explicitly or implicitly). The weighting factor may be determined by WTRU 20 via autonomously detecting the presence of the closed loop PC command signaling. Alternatively,
The proposed intra-cell PC scheme in Equation (1) may use an absolute power correction factor compared to the open loop based PSD. From Equation (1), the WTRU Tx PSD at the nth update instance can be expressed as:
where PSD′Tx(n−1) represents the (n−1)th Tx PSD without the power offset per granted MCS, which is given by PSD′Tx(n−1)=PSDTx(n−1)−ΔMCS(n−1).
Typically, the power offsets for the individual granted MCS are known by both the WTRU and the eNodeB.
PSDopen=PSDtarget +
where
-
- PSDtarget is a target PSD received at serving
eNodeB 30, which is preferably a WTRU (or a sub-group of WTRUs)-specific parameter. The target PSD may be adjusted through an outer loop mechanism according to Quality of Service (QoS) (e.g., target block error rate (BLER)), and also a function of the pathloss measurement, to compensate for a fraction of the pathloss. The signaling of the target PSD target is done via higher layer signaling fromNode B 30 to WTRU 20 upon adjustment on a slow rate basis; and -
L is the filtered pathloss in dB, including shadowing, from servingeNodeB 30 to WTRU 20, whereWTRU 20 first measures the instantaneous pathloss based on the DL reference signal (RS) whose transmit power is known.WTRU 20 then applies a filtering method to the pathloss. For example, the filtered pathloss at the k-th instance,L k, can be calculated as
L k =ρ·L k−1+(1−ρ)·L k; Equation (4) - where
L k−1 and Lk represent the filtered pathloss at the (k−1)-th instance and instantaneous pathloss at the k-th instance; ρ is a filter coefficient, 0≦ρ≦1, which is generally determined byWTRU 20, depending on pathloss variation, fast fading rate, the time of UL transmission, and others, for example. The filtering for pathloss can be done in PHY layer and/orL 2/3 layer.
- PSDtarget is a target PSD received at serving
Once WTRU 20 determines the open loop component, processor 115 calculates the closed loop component. As those having skill in the art know, there are open loop related errors, including the pathloss estimation error due to non-perfect reciprocity in UL and DL in FDD and the WTRU Tx impairment due to non-linear power amplifier. To compensate for such errors and to maintain the quality of the power controlled channel along with the target quality, the WTRU applies a correction to the open loop based PSD in a form of closed loop PC as in Equation (1), (or Equation (2)).
Serving eNodeB 30 determines a WTRU specific (absolute and/or accumulated) PC correction command for each UL scheduled WTRU (or a sub-group of scheduled WTRUs). Preferably, eNodeB 30 uses the power controlled data channel as a reference for the correction command. The resulting correction command is signaled to WTRU 20 (or a sub-group of the scheduled WTRUs) through the UL grant, and/or the DL scheduling channel, sent in the DL Layer 1 or Layer 2 control channels. The correction command may be signaled only in the UL grant associated with a particular (predefined) HARQ, such as every HARQ process 1.
Upon receiving the correction command(s) at WTRU 20, processor 115 of WTRU 20 determines the correction factor, Δclosed, based on the correction command (or accumulated correction commands) set forth as:
Δclosed =f(PC correction command(s)); Equation (5)
where Δclosed may take on a set of multiple step levels, for example, {+/−4, +/−1 dB} using 3 bits of the command.
Δclosed =f(PC correction command(s)); Equation (5)
where Δclosed may take on a set of multiple step levels, for example, {+/−4, +/−1 dB} using 3 bits of the command.
Alternatively, eNodeB 30 sends to each scheduled WTRU 20 (or a sub-group of scheduled WTRUs) a power correction factor using multiple command bits, such as 3 bits, in the UL grant and possibly in the DL scheduling in the DL control channel, where the correction command is preferably determined based on link quality (such as received PSD or SINR) of the UL power controlled data channel (and possibly UL sounding reference symbol, if available). For example, assuming a set of power correction factor values to be {−7, +/−5, +/−3, +/−1, 0 dB} with 3 bits, the correction factor may be determined as follow
Δclosed=└ESINRest−SINRtarget┘; Equation (6)
where ESINRest and SINRtarget denotes the effective SINR (ESINR) estimate at the receiver and target SINR, respectively, of the power controlled channel(s) in dB. [x] denotes a correction value in the correction set, which is nearest to x. The observed samples at the eNodeB for the ESINR estimation include (some of or all) SC-FDMA symbols of the UL power controlled channel(s), which have been received since the last correction command signaling in DL.
Δclosed=└ESINRest−SINRtarget┘; Equation (6)
where ESINRest and SINRtarget denotes the effective SINR (ESINR) estimate at the receiver and target SINR, respectively, of the power controlled channel(s) in dB. [x] denotes a correction value in the correction set, which is nearest to x. The observed samples at the eNodeB for the ESINR estimation include (some of or all) SC-FDMA symbols of the UL power controlled channel(s), which have been received since the last correction command signaling in DL.
To reduce the command signaling overhead, the correction command is not required in every UL grant (and every DL scheduling if used). That is, the correction command can be sent on a pre-configured signaling time (e.g., in every N grant channel or every N Transmission Time Interval (TTI) where N is a configurable parameter being less than or equal to the minimum UL PC update period).
A correction command signaling timing is configured at eNodeB 30 (or on a RRC level) per WTRU basis and is then known at both eNodeB 30 and WTRU 20 via higher layer signaling.
When the correction command is signaled in the UL grant, assuming that UL HARQ is synchronous, the signaling timing configuration can be simplified such that the command signaling is done in particular UL grants such as the UL grant associated with a pre-defined HARQ process, for example, HARQ process # 1. But, even in this case, it is not necessary to signal the correction commands in all the associated UL grant channels. For example, the signaling may occur in every N associated grant channel for N>=1, which would be equivalent to one command signaling in every N HARQ cycle period. The signaling timing (or associated parameters) may be reconfigured on a semi static rate.
When WTRU 20 receives one correction command from the serving eNodeB 30 in an UL grant (or possibly accumulated correction commands in multiple UL grants) since the last Tx PSD adjustment, it shall derive a correction factor, Δclosed, from the received correction command (or after combining multiple correction commands if more than one command is received) for the next PSD adjustment.
As illustrated in FIG. 4 , in the initial UL transmission, since there may be no PC correct command available, WTRU 20 sets its transmit power based only on the open loop component (i.e., the weighting factor, α, is zero in Equation (1)). Before the next HARQ transmission time (one HARQ cycle time), eNodeB 30 sends a correction command in the grant channel in the HARQ process 1 associated DL control channel, where the command was determined based on the link quality (power or SINR) of the first two HARQ processes. If WTRU 20 correctly receives the correction command, WTRU 20 then calculates its transmit PSDTX based on the combined open loop and closed loop scheme and applies the PSDTX to the following HARQ processes.
When there is no recent closed loop correction command (for example, due to recent scheduled UL data transmission, say, UL DTX), WTRU 20 may set its Tx PSD by relying on the open loop. In this case, the weighting factor, α, in Equation (1) is set to zero as in the case of initial Tx PSD setting.
Alternatively, WTRU 20 may set the Tx PSD based on the pathloss variation between the time before the DTX and the time before resuming the UL transmission. If the UL DTX is short, the WTRU may use Equation (2) by setting α to zero, such that
PSDTx(n)=PSDTx(n−1)+(PSDopen(n)−PSDopen(n−1))+ΔMCS(n) Equation (7)
where n is the Tx PSD setting time before resuming the UL transmission and (n−1) is the PSD setting time before the DTX. An example of the timing of this case is shown inFIG. 6 .
PSDTx(n)=PSDTx(n−1)+(PSDopen(n)−PSDopen(n−1))+ΔMCS(n) Equation (7)
where n is the Tx PSD setting time before resuming the UL transmission and (n−1) is the PSD setting time before the DTX. An example of the timing of this case is shown in
In another alternative, WTRU 20 may apply a power offset relative to the most recent PSD for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), if available. Even though there was no UL data transmission, there may be UL control signaling (such as CQI and ACK/NACK) for DL. In this case, since the UL control channel is also power controlled based on Equation (1), (but using different parameters and update rate), the UL control channel Tx PSD for the data channel Tx PSD may be used as follows:
PSDTx(data)=PSDTx(control)+Δcontrol(data,control) Equation (8)
where PSDTx(control) is the most recent PSD (or PSD averaged over the recent updates) for the UL control channel and Δcontrol(data,control) represent the control channel power offset relative to the Tx PSD for data.
PSDTx(data)=PSDTx(control)+Δcontrol(data,control) Equation (8)
where PSDTx(control) is the most recent PSD (or PSD averaged over the recent updates) for the UL control channel and Δcontrol(data,control) represent the control channel power offset relative to the Tx PSD for data.
If the DTX period is long, then WTRU 20 PSDTX may be determined right after the DTX based on open loop only as is the case of the initial PSDTX setting.
Typically, the UL grant assignment (e.g. assigned MCS and TBS) in the DL control channel is tied up with the link quality (such as received PSD or SINR) of the UL data transmission. Another method is disclosed wherein an eNodeB 30 processor 125 may assign the UL grant (MCS and TBS) for WTRU 20 such that the grant assignment represents the link quality (e.g. SINR) received at eNodeB 30. In this case, WTRU 20 may derive its Tx PSD as follows:
PSDTx=PSDopen +α·f(UL grant assignment,SINRT)+ΔMCS(dBm); Equation (9)
where PSDopen, α, and, ΔMCS, respectively, are the same as defined above. f (UL grant assignment, SINRT) is a correction factor in dB which replaces the power correction factor, Δclosed, in Equation (1). SINRT is the target SINR in dB. The grant based correction factor, f (UL grant assignment, SINRT), can be expressed by the following:
f(UL grant assignment,SINTT)=SINRT −E{SINRest(UL grant assignment)}; Equation (10)
where SINRest(UL grant assignment) represents the eNodeB received SINR estimate whichWTRU 20 derives from the UL grant assignment. E{SINRest} denotes the estimated SINR average over time such as
E{SINRest(grantk)}=ρ·E{SINRest(grantk−1)}+(1−ρ)·E{SINRest(grantk)} Equation (11)
where grantk represents the k-th received UL grant assignment and ρ is the averaging filter coefficient, 0≦ρ≦1. The estimation of SINRest (UL grant assignment) at the WTRU can be based on a grant (MCS, TBS) mapping table, which is configurable by the network through higher layer signaling on a semi-static basis.
PSDTx=PSDopen +α·f(UL grant assignment,SINRT)+ΔMCS(dBm); Equation (9)
where PSDopen, α, and, ΔMCS, respectively, are the same as defined above. f (UL grant assignment, SINRT) is a correction factor in dB which replaces the power correction factor, Δclosed, in Equation (1). SINRT is the target SINR in dB. The grant based correction factor, f (UL grant assignment, SINRT), can be expressed by the following:
f(UL grant assignment,SINTT)=SINRT −E{SINRest(UL grant assignment)}; Equation (10)
where SINRest(UL grant assignment) represents the eNodeB received SINR estimate which
E{SINRest(grantk)}=ρ·E{SINRest(grantk−1)}+(1−ρ)·E{SINRest(grantk)} Equation (11)
where grantk represents the k-th received UL grant assignment and ρ is the averaging filter coefficient, 0≦ρ≦1. The estimation of SINRest (UL grant assignment) at the WTRU can be based on a grant (MCS, TBS) mapping table, which is configurable by the network through higher layer signaling on a semi-static basis.
Similar to Equation (1), the correction factor in Equation (8) may be used to compensate for open loop errors. The main advantage to using Equation (8) is that it does not require explicit correction command signaling in the UL grant in the DL L1/L2 control channel (resulting in reduced signaling overhead), while Equation (1) (and Equation (2)) needs the explicit command to be signaled in the UL grant (and/or the DL scheduling). Using Equation (3), the closed loop component may be based on the UL grant assignment (e.g., MCS and/or TBS), without the explicit correction command signaling in the UL grant in the DL L1/L2 control channel.
However, Equation (9) may not be applicable for some cases such as persistent scheduling and grant (e.g. MCS) mismatching (i.e., the assigned MCS does not accurately represent the received SINR). Accordingly, the WTRU Tx PSD setting may be switched between Equation (1) and Equation (8).
Through higher layer correction factor type signaling, wherein eNodeB 30 (or the network 10) signals to WTRU 20 which one (Equation (1) or Equation (8)) is to be used for the WTRU Tx power setting. In this case, it is preferable that the correction factor type signal is configurable by network 10 on a semi-static basis and per WTRU basis.
Alternatively, a one-bit MCS mismatching indicator may be introduced in the DL L1/2 control signaling. For example, bit-1 may indicate to use Equation (1), and bit-0 may be used to indicate Equation (8).
In another alternative, one of the explicit correction command levels may be used to indicate the use of Equation (8). This alternative assumes Equation (1) is the default PC method. As such, eNodeB 30 sets one of the correction command levels in the UL grant to indicate the use of Equation (8). For example, when the correction command in Equation (8) is three-bits long, one of the 8 command level, e.g., ‘000’, is set for WTRU 20 to use Equation (8).
A flow diagram of the disclosed combined open-loop and closed method of determining the TPC is shown in FIG. 8 . Processor 115 of WTRU 20 performs open loop power control based on path loss measurement, by determining a target power spectral density PSD Target (Step 800) and a filtered pathloss (L) (Step 801). WTRU 20 then determines a closed loop component using a power control correction command received at receiver 116 through the UL grant channel (Step 802). Upon receiving the correction command, receiver 116 forwards the correction command to processor 115 for determining a correction factor Δclosed (Step 803). Processor 115 then calculates a correction factor Δclosed. (Step 804). Processor 115 then combines the open loop PC with the closed loop component to determine the transmit power control. (Step 805).
In a disclosed method of TPC for non-scheduled data (e.g., VoIP), there are several options for the WTRU to set its TX PSD: i) relying on the open loop PSD only, ii) for the closed loop part, the eNodeB transmits UL grants in particular instants (in time) where the UL grant conveys the correction command. In this case, the UL grant format (and/or the correction command format) may be different than that for scheduled data; or iii) applying a power offset relative to the most recent PSD (or PSD averaged over the recent updates) for PUCCH, if available.
where P0 is a cell-specific parameter (in dBm) including UL interference level etc., which is signaled by the eNodeB via higher layer signaling.
-
- SINRTarget is a WTRU (or a subset of WTRUs) specific parameter (in dB), allowing the eNodeB to set classes of service for the UE (or subset of UEs). SINRTarget may be a function of pathloss to the serving cell and some neighboring cells. SINRTarget can be configured by the serving eNodeB on a semi-static basis and then signaled to the UE (or subset of UEs) via higher layer signaling;
- PL is the downlink pathloss (in dB);
- λ is a cell specific pathloss compensation factor for fractional power control where 0<α<=1. α can be configured by the eNodeB on a semi-static basis and signaled via higher layer signaling;
- Δclosed is a power correction factor in dB which is determined based on a closed loop mechanism;
- ∝ is a weighting factor to enable (∝=1) or disable (∝=0) the closed loop component, depending on the availability of the DL control channel carrying the closed loop correction command. The weighting factor is determined autonomously by the WTRU via detecting the presence of the PC correction command. It is assumed that the WTRU is informed via higher layer signaling from the eNodeB with regard to where and when the command signaling exists. For instance, in the initial UL transmission, since there may be no correct command available from the eNodeB, the WTRU sets ∝=0;
- ΔMCS is a power offset per granted MCS. Typically, the power offsets for the individual granted MCS are known by both the WTRU and the eNodeB.
Since eNodeB 30 knows the ΔMCS in use at a given instance, eNodeB 30 may take out the value of ΔMCS from the received PSD when it determines a correction command by comparing a resulting received PSD (or SINR) with a target level determined by network 10.
As set forth above, this disclosed method uses an absolute power correction factor compared to the open loop based PSD. As such, from Equation (12), the WTRU Tx PSD at the nth update instance is expressed as follows:
where PSD′Tx(n−1) represents the (n−1)th Tx PSD without the power offset per granted MCS, which is given by PSD′Tx(n−1)=PSDTx(n−1)−ΔMCS(n−1).
Since the total WTRU transmit power is constrained by the maximum transmit power level, denoted by Pmax, of the WTRU, the total WTRU transmit power, denoted by PTx, is expressed as:
P Tx=min{P max(10·log10(M)+PSDTx)}(dBm); Equation (14)
where M is the number of assigned RBs.
P Tx=min{P max(10·log10(M)+PSDTx)}(dBm); Equation (14)
where M is the number of assigned RBs.
Accordingly, the actual WTRU transmit PSD may be represented as:
PSDTx actual =P Tx−10·log10(M)(dBm) Equation (15)
PSDTx actual =P Tx−10·log10(M)(dBm) Equation (15)
It should be noted that the UL PC in Equation (15) is implemented by processor 115 of WTRU 20.
In accordance with the disclosed PC method for non-scheduled data, WTRU 20 calculates the open loop PSD as follows:
PSDopen =P 0+SINRTarget +λ·PL(dBm) Equation (16)
where
PSDopen =P 0+SINRTarget +λ·PL(dBm) Equation (16)
where
-
- The target SINR, SINRTarget, may be adjusted through an outer loop mechanism at serving
eNodeB 30 according to Quality of Service (QoS) (like target BLER) and be also a function of the pathloss measurements to the serving cell and neighboring cells; and - PL is the filtered pathloss in dB, including shadowing, from the serving eNodeB to the WTRU. The WTRU continuously (or periodically) measures the instantaneous pathloss based on the DL RS whose transmit power is known at the WTRU. A filtering method is then applied to the pathloss measurements, such as
PL k =ρ·PL k−1+(1−ρ)·PL k Equation (17)
where PLk and PLk−1 represent the filtered pathloss at the k-th instance and (k−1)-th instant, respectively. Lk is the instantaneous pathloss at the k-th instant. ρ is a filter coefficient, 0≦ρ≦1, which is generally determined byWTRU 20, depending on pathloss variation, fast fading rate, the time of UL transmission, etc. Alternatively, a moving averaging method may be considered for the pathloss filtering.
- The target SINR, SINRTarget, may be adjusted through an outer loop mechanism at serving
The closed loop component is determined by processor 115 similar to that which is disclosed above.
Δclosed=└ESINRest−SINRtarget┘ Equation (18)
where ESINRest and SINRtarget denotes the effective SINR (ESINR) estimate at the receiver and target SINR, respectively, of the power controlled channel(s) in dB. [x] denotes a correction value in the correction set, which is nearest to x.
Δclosed=└ESINRest−SINRtarget┘ Equation (18)
where ESINRest and SINRtarget denotes the effective SINR (ESINR) estimate at the receiver and target SINR, respectively, of the power controlled channel(s) in dB. [x] denotes a correction value in the correction set, which is nearest to x.
Similar to the methods disclosed above, when the correction command is signaled in the UL grant, assuming that UL HARQ is synchronous, the signaling timing configuration can be simplified such that the command signaling is done in particular UL grants such as the UL grant associated with a pre-defined HARQ process.
For non-scheduled data (e.g., VOIP), when there is no recent closed loop correction command (for example, due to recent scheduled UL data transmission, say, UL DTX), WTRU 20 may set its Tx PSD by relying on the open loop: in this case, the weighting factor, ∝, in Equation (13) is set to zero as in the case of initial Tx PSD setting. WTRU 20 may alternatively set its TX PSD based on the pathloss variation between the time before the DTX and the time before resuming the UL transmission: if the UL DTX is short, the WTRU may use Equation (2) by setting β to zero, such that
PSDTx(n)=PSD′Tx(n−1)+(PSDopen(n)−PSDopen(n−1))+ΔMCS(n); Equation (19)
where n is the Tx PSD setting time before resuming the UL transmission and (n−1) is the PSD setting time before the DTX. An example of this case is shown inFIG. 4 .
PSDTx(n)=PSD′Tx(n−1)+(PSDopen(n)−PSDopen(n−1))+ΔMCS(n); Equation (19)
where n is the Tx PSD setting time before resuming the UL transmission and (n−1) is the PSD setting time before the DTX. An example of this case is shown in
Alternatively, WTRU 20 may apply a power offset relative to the most recent PSD for PUCCH, if available. Even though there was no UL data transmission, there may be UL control signaling (such as CQI and ACK/NACK) for DL. In this case, since the UL control channel (PUCCH) is also power controlled based on Equation (12), (but using different parameters and update rate), the UL control channel (PUCCH) Tx PSD may be used for the data channel (PUSCH) Tx PSD as follows:
PSDTx(PUSCH)=PSDTx(PUCCH)+Δcontrol(PUSCH,PUCCH); Equation (20)
where PSDTx(PUCCH) is the most recent PSD (or PSD averaged over the recent updates) for the UL control channel (PUCCH) and Δcontrol(PUSCH,PUSCH) represent the control channel (PUCCH) power offset relative to the Tx PSD for PUSCH.
PSDTx(PUSCH)=PSDTx(PUCCH)+Δcontrol(PUSCH,PUCCH); Equation (20)
where PSDTx(PUCCH) is the most recent PSD (or PSD averaged over the recent updates) for the UL control channel (PUCCH) and Δcontrol(PUSCH,PUSCH) represent the control channel (PUCCH) power offset relative to the Tx PSD for PUSCH.
For a sounding pilot, its Tx PSD, PSDTx(pilot), may be biased by a pilot power offset relative to the data TX PSD, PSDTx(data), such that
PSDTx(pilot)=PSDTx(data)+Δpilot(data,pilot) Equation (21)
where Δpilot(data, pilot) represent the pilot power offset which may be a WTRU-specific parameter configured by the eNodeB on a semi-static basis.
PSDTx(pilot)=PSDTx(data)+Δpilot(data,pilot) Equation (21)
where Δpilot(data, pilot) represent the pilot power offset which may be a WTRU-specific parameter configured by the eNodeB on a semi-static basis.
For control signaling in UL, it is preferred to use different parameters (such as target PSD) and a faster update rate than for data. In addition, we prefer that the reference channel measured for correction commands for control signaling is the control channel itself and the correction command for control is conveyed in the DL scheduling. The number of bits for the correction command for control may be different than for data, where the number of command bits may be a semi-static configurable parameter per WTRU basis. However, we may maintain a relative average power offset between the data and control channels such as
E(PSDTx(data))=E(PSDTx(control))+Δcontrol(data,control) Equation (22)
where
E(PSDTx(data))=E(PSDTx(control))+Δcontrol(data,control) Equation (22)
where
-
- E(PSDTx(data)) represents the average PSD for data channel in dBm;
- E(PSDTx(control)) represents the average PSD for control channel in dBm; and
- Δcontrol(data, control) is a power offset between the data channel and the control channel.
In another disclosed method of UL PC, a combined Open Loop/Closed Loop UL PC with Interference Mitigation for Shared Data Channel is used. In accordance with this method, WTRU 20 controls its transmitted PSD for UL channels. If the bandwidth allocation (e.g., RB allocation) of WTRU 20 varies, then the WTRU total transmit power varies such that the PSD is kept constant.
As described in the disclosed methods above, WTRU 20 performs open loop PC based on pathloss measurement and system parameters. WTRU 20 then corrects its PSD using some form of closed loop PC to compensate for the open loop errors. It should be noted that for each UL scheduled WTRU, CQI information is periodically signaled from eNodeB 30 for AMC and scheduling. Hence, the closed loop PC component of this disclosed method does not need any additional PC command signaled by eNodeB. In order to mitigate inter-cell interference in the neighboring cell(s), WTRU 20 incorporates an interference load indicator from the strongest neighboring cell.
In accordance with this method, for the UL shared data channel, in the initial transmission phase, WTRU 20 derives its transmitted PSD, PSDTx, based on DL reference signal (RS) as follows:
PSDTx=SINRT +PL+IN 0 +K+Δ(IoT S)−10·log 10(BW RU ·N RU); Equation (23)
where SINRT is the target SINR in dB at servingeNodeB 30. PL is the pathloss in dB, including shadowing, from serving eNodeB 30 to WTRU 20, where WTRU 20 measures the pathloss based on the DL RS whose transmit power is known at WTRU 20 via DL Layer 2/Layer 3 signaling, IN0 is the UL interference and noise power in dBm, measured at serving eNodeB 30. K is a power control margin set by serving eNodeB 30.
PSDTx=SINRT +PL+IN 0 +K+Δ(IoT S)−10·log 10(BW RU ·N RU); Equation (23)
where SINRT is the target SINR in dB at serving
It is preferable that the target SINR for WTRU 20 (or a sub-group of WTRUs) is adjustable using an outer loop PC scheme according to a link quality metric (such as BLER) at serving eNodeB 30. In addition, in the case of UL Multiple In Multiple Out (MIMO), the target SINR depends also on the selected MIMO mode, which takes into account the fact that different MIMO modes require different SINR for a given link quality. Δ(IoTS) represents the UL load control step size, which is a function of the UL interference load (e.g. interference over thermal) indicator of the strongest neighboring cell, IoTS, where the strongest neighboring cell is determined at WTRU 20, based on pathloss measurements from the individual neighboring cell to WTRU 20. It is assumed that each cell 40 broadcasts an UL interference load bit periodically (similar to the relative grant in HSUPA), so that WTRU 20 can decode the indicator bit from the selected strongest neighboring cell.
For example, Δ(IoTS) may have values as follows:
where δ is a predefined system parameter, for example, δ=−1 or −2 dB. With the use of Δ(IoTS), inter-cell interference in neighboring cells can be mitigated.
Since WTRUs at cell center inject less interference into other cells than those at cell edge, a fraction of the load control step size is considered as follows:
If (pathloss_serving_cell−pathloss_strongest_neighboring_cell)<R (dB), x=4; where R represents the virtual boundary layer between the cell interior zone and cell edge zone. The parameter R may be broadcast by eNodeB 30 semi-statically.
After the initial transmission phase, WTRU 20 PSDTX is calculated as follows:
PSDTx=SINRT +PL+IN 0 +K+Δ(IoT S)+α·f(CQI,SINRT)−10·log 10(BW RU ·N RU) Equation (24)
where f (CQI, SINRT) is a correction factor based on the UL CQI, and the corresponding target SINR where both the CQI and the target SINR are signaled from servingeNodeB 30; α, where 0≦α≦1, is a weighting factor which may be determined according to channel conditions and CQI availability (or UL transmission pause). For instance, in the case where there is no UL CQI (UL MCS or grant information) available from eNodeB 30 due to no scheduled UL data transmission, the weighting factor, α, is set to zero, meaning that WTRU 20 relies on open loop PC only (such as PC for the random access channel (RACH)); otherwise, it is set to be less than or equal to one (1).
PSDTx=SINRT +PL+IN 0 +K+Δ(IoT S)+α·f(CQI,SINRT)−10·log 10(BW RU ·N RU) Equation (24)
where f (CQI, SINRT) is a correction factor based on the UL CQI, and the corresponding target SINR where both the CQI and the target SINR are signaled from serving
The correction factor, f (CQI, SINRT), in Equation 24, is used to compensate for open loop PC related errors, including the pathloss measurement error due to non-perfect reciprocity in UL and DL in FDD and WTRU 20 transmitter impairment due to non-linear WTRU transmitter power amplification. In addition, the correction factor is used to compensate for target quality mismatch due to different channel conditions. Hence, the quality of the power controlled channel(s) is maintained along with a given target quality (like target SINR).
Taking into account the fact that the UL CQI (UL MCS or grant information) represents the SINR received at eNodeB 30, the correction factor can be calculated such as,
f(CQI,SINTT)=SINRT −E{SINRest(CQI)}(dB); Equation (25)
where SINRest(CQI) represents the eNodeB received SINR estimate, which the WTRU derives from the UL CQI feedback. E{SINRest(CQI)} denotes the estimated SINR average over time such as by the following:
E{SINRest(CQIk)}=ρ·E{SINRest(CQIk−1)}+(1−ρ)·E{SINRest(CQIk)}; Equation (26)
where CQIk represents the k-th received CQI and ρ is the averaging filter coefficient, 0≦ρ≦1.
f(CQI,SINTT)=SINRT −E{SINRest(CQI)}(dB); Equation (25)
where SINRest(CQI) represents the eNodeB received SINR estimate, which the WTRU derives from the UL CQI feedback. E{SINRest(CQI)} denotes the estimated SINR average over time such as by the following:
E{SINRest(CQIk)}=ρ·E{SINRest(CQIk−1)}+(1−ρ)·E{SINRest(CQIk)}; Equation (26)
where CQIk represents the k-th received CQI and ρ is the averaging filter coefficient, 0≦ρ≦1.
The correction factor, given above, in Equation (25), by the difference between the target SINR and the estimated SINR (derived from the reported CQIs), represents the open loop PC related errors which need to be compensated.
The WTRU total transmit power should be within the maximum power level, Pmax, and the minimum power level, Pmin, in dBm, respectively, where the maximum and minimum power levels are determined based on WTRU class.
A UL channel quality indicator, CQI (e.g. UL MCS or grant information), which is signaled originally for the purpose of UL AMC (with a maximum signaling rate of once per TTI, e.g. 1000 Hz).
A CQI mapping rule (or bias between CQI and measured SINR), which the eNodeB uses for CQI feedback generation. This rule or parameter may be combined into the target SINR. In this case, explicit signaling of the rule (or parameter) is not required.
An UL interference load indicator from each eNodeB.
The semi-static parameter R which represents the virtual boundary layer between the cell interior zone and cell edge zone.
The disclosed PC method do not require additional feedback PC commands other than the above listed system parameters including the target SINR, cell interference/noise level, and reference signal transmit power and constant value, which can be broadcast (or directly signaled) to WTRUs on a slow rate basis.
It is designed to be flexible and adaptive to dynamic system/link parameters (target SINR and inter-cell interference loading condition) and channel conditions (path loss and shadowing), in order to achieve the E-UTRA requirements.
Further, this disclosed method is compatible with other link adaptation schemes such as AMC, HARQ, and adaptive MIMO.
In an alternative method of inter-cell interference mitigation, instead of broadcasting an interference load indicator from each eNodeB, serving eNodeB 30 may co-ordinate inter-cell interference levels with other cells 40 and incorporate them through adjusting the target SIR, power control margin K or possibly Pmax accordingly.
Although features and elements are described above in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements or in various combinations with or without other features and elements. The methods or flow charts provided herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable storage medium for execution by a general purpose computer or a processor. Examples of computer-readable storage mediums include a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a register, cache memory, semiconductor memory devices, magnetic media such as internal hard disks and removable disks, magneto-optical media, and optical media such as CD-ROM disks, and digital versatile disks (DVDs).
Suitable processors include, by way of example, a general purpose processor, a special purpose processor, a conventional processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in association with a DSP core, a controller, a microcontroller, Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) circuits, any other type of integrated circuit (IC), and/or a state machine.
A processor in association with software may be used to implement a radio frequency transceiver for use in a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU), user equipment (UE), terminal, base station, radio network controller (RNC), or any host computer. The WTRU may be used in conjunction with modules, implemented in hardware and/or software, such as a camera, a video camera module, a videophone, a speakerphone, a vibration device, a speaker, a microphone, a television transceiver, a hands free headset, a keyboard, a Bluetooth® module, a frequency modulated (FM) radio unit, a liquid crystal display (LCD) display unit, an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display unit, a digital music player, a media player, a video game player module, an Internet browser, and/or any wireless local area network (WLAN) or Ultra Wide Band (UWB) module.
Claims (26)
1. A method implemented by an eNode-B, the method comprising:
transmitting, to a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) via higher layer signaling, open loop uplink (UL) power control (PC) parameters including a cell-specific parameter and a WTRU-specific parameter;
transmitting a PC correction command; and
receiving, from the WTRU, a transmission having an applied transmit power, wherein:
the transmission comprises a number of resource blocks;
the applied transmit power is based on a transmit power spectral density and the number of resource blocks;
the transmit power spectral density comprises a combination of an open loop UL PC component, a closed loop PC component and a delta factor related to an offset value;
the offset value is related to a modulation coding set (MCS);
the open loop UL PC component is based on pathloss, the cell-specific parameter and the WTRU-specific parameter;
the closed loop PC component includes a correction factor; and
the correction factor is based on the PC correction command.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the PC correction command is transmitted in an UL grant associated with a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the received transmission with applied transmission power is received in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the PC correction command is transmitted at a pre-configured signaling time.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: signaling the MCS to the WTRU in an UL grant associated with a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process.
6. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: signaling the MCS to the WTRU in the UL grant.
7. An eNode-B comprising:
a transmitter configured to:
transmit, to a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) via higher layer signaling, open loop uplink (UL) power control (PC) parameters including a cell-specific parameter and a WTRU-specific parameter; and
transmit a PC correction command; and
a receiver configured to receive, from the WTRU, a transmission having an applied transmit power, wherein:
the transmission comprises a number of resource blocks;
the applied transmit power is based on a transmit power spectral density and the number of resource blocks;
the transmit power spectral density comprises a combination of an open loop UL PC component, a closed loop PC component and a delta factor related to an offset value;
the offset value is related to a modulation coding set (MCS);
the open loop UL PC component is based on pathloss, the cell-specific parameter and the WTRU-specific parameter;
the closed loop PC component includes a correction factor; and
the correction factor is based on the PC correction command.
8. The eNode-B of claim 7 , wherein the transmitter is configured to transmit the PC correction command in an UL grant associated with a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process.
9. The eNode-B of claim 8 , wherein the receiver is configured to receive the transmission with applied transmission power in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process.
10. The eNode-B of claim 7 , wherein the transmitter is configured to transmit the PC correction command at a pre-configured signaling time.
11. The eNode-B of claim 7 , wherein the transmitter is configured to signal the MCS to the WTRU in an UL grant associated with a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process.
12. The eNode-B of claim 8 , wherein the transmitter is configured to signal the MCS to the WTRU in an UL grant.
13. A method for controlling transmit power of a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) comprising:
determining a transmit power spectral density, wherein:
the transmit power spectral density comprises a combination of an open loop uplink (UL) power control (PC) component, a closed loop PC component and a delta factor related to an offset value;
the open loop UL PC component is based on pathloss and open loop UL PC parameters including a cell-specific parameter and a WTRU-specific parameter provided from higher layers;
the closed loop PC component includes a correction factor;
the correction factor is based on a PC correction command signaled in a UL grant associated with a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process; and
the offset value is related to an assigned modulation coding set (MCS) signaled in the UL grant;
determining a transmit power based on the determined transmit power spectral density and a number of assigned resource blocks; and
applying the transmit power in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein applying the transmit power in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process comprises: applying the transmit power at a next transmission time of the associated HARQ process following reception of the UL grant.
15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the PC correction command includes multiple command bits.
16. The method of claim 13 , wherein applying the transmit power in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process comprises: applying the transmit power on condition that the transmit power is less than a maximum transmit power level.
17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising: receiving signaling including the maximum transmit power level.
18. The method of claim 16 , further comprising applying the maximum transmit power level in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process on condition that the transmit power is greater than or equal to the maximum transmit power level.
19. The method of claim 16 , wherein the maximum transmit power level is based on at least one of (i) a power class of the WTRU, and (ii) a capability of the WTRU.
20. A wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) comprising a processor, wherein the processor is configured to:
determine a transmit power spectral density, wherein:
the transmit power spectral density comprises a combination of an open loop uplink (UL) power control (PC) component, a closed loop PC component and a delta factor related to an offset value;
the open loop UL PC component is based on pathloss and open loop UL PC parameters including a cell-specific parameter and a WTRU-specific parameter provided from higher layers;
the closed loop PC component includes a correction factor;
the correction factor is based on a PC correction command signaled in a UL grant associated with a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process; and
the offset value is related to an assigned modulation coding set (MCS) signaled in the UL grant;
determine a transmit power based on the determined transmit power spectral density and a number of assigned resource blocks; and
apply the transmit power in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process.
21. The WTRU of claim 20 , wherein the processor is configured to apply the transmit power at a next transmission time of the associated HARQ process following reception of the UL grant.
22. The WTRU of claim 20 , wherein the PC correction command includes multiple command bits.
23. The WTRU of claim 20 , wherein the processor is configured to apply the transmit power in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process on condition that the transmit power is less than a maximum transmit power level.
24. The WTRU of claim 23 , further comprising a receiver, wherein the receiver is configured to receive signaling including the maximum transmit power level, and wherein the processor is configured to obtain the maximum transmit power level signaled in the received signaling.
25. The WTRU of claim 23 , wherein the processor is configured to apply the maximum transmit power level in accordance with a timing of the HARQ process on condition that the transmit power is greater than or equal to the maximum transmit power level.
26. The WTRU of claim 23 , wherein the maximum transmit power level is based on at least one of (i) a power class of the WTRU, and (ii) a capability of the WTRU.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/669,805 US9271240B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2015-03-26 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US15/004,244 US9572112B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2016-01-22 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US15/415,289 US10091740B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2017-01-25 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US16/142,659 US10375650B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2018-09-26 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US89357507P | 2007-03-07 | 2007-03-07 | |
US89556107P | 2007-03-19 | 2007-03-19 | |
US94528607P | 2007-06-20 | 2007-06-20 | |
US12/044,569 US8509836B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2008-03-07 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US13/936,846 US8812048B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2013-07-08 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US14/329,165 US9026169B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2014-07-11 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US14/669,805 US9271240B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2015-03-26 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/329,165 Continuation US9026169B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2014-07-11 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/004,244 Continuation US9572112B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2016-01-22 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150201381A1 US20150201381A1 (en) | 2015-07-16 |
US9271240B2 true US9271240B2 (en) | 2016-02-23 |
Family
ID=39736998
Family Applications (7)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/044,569 Active 2030-03-24 US8509836B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2008-03-07 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US13/936,846 Active US8812048B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2013-07-08 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US14/329,165 Active US9026169B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2014-07-11 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US14/669,805 Active US9271240B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2015-03-26 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US15/004,244 Expired - Fee Related US9572112B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2016-01-22 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US15/415,289 Active US10091740B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2017-01-25 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US16/142,659 Active US10375650B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2018-09-26 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/044,569 Active 2030-03-24 US8509836B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2008-03-07 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US13/936,846 Active US8812048B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2013-07-08 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US14/329,165 Active US9026169B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2014-07-11 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Family Applications After (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/004,244 Expired - Fee Related US9572112B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2016-01-22 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US15/415,289 Active US10091740B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2017-01-25 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US16/142,659 Active US10375650B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2018-09-26 | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
Country Status (18)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (7) | US8509836B2 (en) |
EP (3) | EP2119033B1 (en) |
JP (4) | JP5280377B2 (en) |
KR (6) | KR101397135B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103974399B (en) |
AR (1) | AR065637A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2008223333B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0808251B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2680153C (en) |
DK (2) | DK2119033T3 (en) |
ES (2) | ES2592276T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1137086A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL200725A0 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2009009504A (en) |
MY (1) | MY151945A (en) |
PL (2) | PL2464176T3 (en) |
TW (4) | TWI493911B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008109162A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160135131A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2016-05-12 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US10070397B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2018-09-04 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (CQI-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for E-UTRA |
US11916396B2 (en) | 2021-06-08 | 2024-02-27 | GE Grid GmbH | Systems and methods for control of power generation assets |
Families Citing this family (107)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB0511058D0 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2005-07-06 | Nokia Corp | A method of controlling power |
NZ578806A (en) | 2007-03-19 | 2012-05-25 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Using an uplink grant as trigger of first or second type of cqi report |
US9161315B2 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2015-10-13 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Wireless transmission power control method and system |
KR101329872B1 (en) | 2007-06-08 | 2013-11-15 | 샤프 가부시키가이샤 | Mobile communication system, base station apparatus, and mobile station apparatus |
WO2008155743A2 (en) * | 2007-06-20 | 2008-12-24 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus, method and computer program memory medium providing efficient signaling of rach response |
EP2503717B1 (en) | 2007-09-06 | 2019-08-14 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Communication apparatus and communication method |
CN101904123B (en) * | 2008-01-04 | 2015-01-07 | 知识产权之桥一号有限责任公司 | Radio transmitting device and radio transmitting method |
US8644874B2 (en) * | 2008-01-07 | 2014-02-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Uplink power control for power limited terminals |
CN102197689B (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2015-02-25 | 诺基亚通信公司 | Multiple power control parameter sets for wireless uplink data transmission |
US8548383B2 (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2013-10-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Power spectrum density control for wireless communications |
US8625539B2 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2014-01-07 | Blackberry Limited | Method and system for supplemental channel request messages in a wireless network |
US8331975B2 (en) * | 2008-12-03 | 2012-12-11 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Uplink power control for distributed wireless communication |
TWI487416B (en) | 2008-12-03 | 2015-06-01 | Interdigital Patent Holdings | Uplink power headroom reporting for carrier aggregation |
CN101754339B (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2012-02-01 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Power control method and device of high-speed shared indication channel |
WO2010073290A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-07-01 | Nec Corporation | Communication system, user equipment, base station, transmit power deciding method, and program |
US8817769B2 (en) | 2009-01-26 | 2014-08-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Power decision pilot for wireless communication |
RU2565030C2 (en) | 2009-02-09 | 2015-10-10 | Интердиджитал Пэйтент Холдингз, Инк. | Device and method of controlling uplink power for wireless transmit/receive unit using multiple carriers |
KR101295276B1 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2013-08-08 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | A method for controling a transmission power in uplink transmission |
JP5650668B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2015-01-07 | エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド | Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in uplink transmission |
AR075864A1 (en) * | 2009-03-17 | 2011-05-04 | Interdigital Patent Holdings | METHOD AND APPLIANCE FOR POWER CONTROL ASCENDING IN MULTIPLE INPUTS MULTIPLE OUTPUTS |
CN101873657B (en) * | 2009-04-23 | 2014-12-10 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method for estimating quality of uplink signal in neighboring area and switching and optimizing method |
US9137815B2 (en) * | 2009-06-17 | 2015-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multi-user multiple input multiple output wireless communications |
CN101605358B (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2011-11-30 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Uplink rate control method and system |
US8976729B2 (en) * | 2009-08-19 | 2015-03-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Maximum power spectral density reporting in response to overload indications |
KR101225928B1 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2013-01-24 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for controlling transmit power in wireless communication system |
US8559325B2 (en) * | 2009-09-15 | 2013-10-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for over the air load indicator for wireless scheduling |
CN102026352B (en) * | 2009-09-22 | 2013-06-05 | 鼎桥通信技术有限公司 | Uplink united power control method and downlink united power control method in high speed packet access |
US8565699B1 (en) | 2009-09-23 | 2013-10-22 | Marvell International Ltd. | Setting of power amplifier control voltage |
US8346162B1 (en) * | 2009-09-25 | 2013-01-01 | Emc Satcom Technologies | System and method for reducing VSAT apertures via satellite MIMO |
WO2011041666A2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2011-04-07 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Power control methods and apparatus |
US20120190359A1 (en) * | 2009-10-01 | 2012-07-26 | Nec Corporation | Mobile communication system, base station apparatus, control apparatus, control method, and computer readable medium |
US9059749B2 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2015-06-16 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Antenna port mode and transmission mode transitions |
CN102577529B (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2016-11-09 | 瑞典爱立信有限公司 | Up-link power in wireless communication system controls |
JP5555325B2 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2014-07-23 | インターデイジタル パテント ホールディングス インコーポレイテッド | Power control for devices with multiple antennas |
WO2011049286A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling uplink power in a wireless communication system |
US8417198B1 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2013-04-09 | Marvell International Ltd. | Selection of closed-loop/open-loop power control in user equipment |
US8260226B1 (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2012-09-04 | Marvell International Ltd. | High-accuracy transmit power control with high-efficiency power amplifier operation |
US8340593B2 (en) * | 2009-11-10 | 2012-12-25 | Intel Corporation | Techniques to control uplink power |
US9031599B2 (en) * | 2009-12-08 | 2015-05-12 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and method for power control |
WO2011084032A2 (en) * | 2010-01-11 | 2011-07-14 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Data transmission method and apparatus in wireless communication system using plural frequencies in wireless communication system |
US8868091B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2014-10-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for facilitating inter-cell interference coordination via over the air load indicator and relative narrowband transmit power |
US8437794B2 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2013-05-07 | Alcatel Lucent | Methods of determining uplink target signal-to-interfence-and-noise ratios and systems thereof |
EP3393047B1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2020-11-18 | Sun Patent Trust | Wireless communication device and method for controlling transmission power |
JP4812887B1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-09 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Mobile communication method and mobile station |
CN102271389B (en) * | 2010-06-04 | 2014-03-19 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Uplink power control method and system |
CN102281592B (en) * | 2010-06-12 | 2013-10-23 | 中国普天信息产业股份有限公司 | Method and device for transmitting transmission power control command |
JP2012004924A (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2012-01-05 | Hitachi Ltd | Resource allocation method of radio communication system and radio base station device |
US8422446B2 (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2013-04-16 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Controlling power for contention based uplink transmissions |
US8621308B2 (en) * | 2010-06-30 | 2013-12-31 | Alcatel Lucent | HARQ operating point adaptation in communications |
CN102143568B (en) | 2010-11-26 | 2015-02-04 | 华为技术有限公司 | Power control method and base station |
US9237459B1 (en) * | 2010-12-10 | 2016-01-12 | Marvell International Ltd | System and method for measuring characteristics of neighbor cells using a synthesized composite antenna pattern |
JP5573965B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2014-08-20 | 富士通株式会社 | Wireless communication system, mobile station, base station, and wireless communication method |
CN102056306B (en) * | 2011-01-14 | 2013-10-16 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Method and device for allocating uplink shared channel resources and communication system |
CN102685894B (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2014-11-05 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) self-adaptive transmission method and device |
US9288773B2 (en) * | 2011-04-22 | 2016-03-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for controlling interference from peer discovery in WWAN |
EP2719230B1 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2023-05-10 | InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Method for controlling transmit power of a mobile station |
WO2012159364A1 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2012-11-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | Uplink power control method, base station and user equipment |
CN103891166A (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2014-06-25 | 交互数字专利控股公司 | Multipoint transmission in wireless communication |
US9900849B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2018-02-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | SRS optimization for coordinated multi-point transmission and reception |
CN103959868B (en) * | 2011-11-12 | 2018-04-06 | Lg电子株式会社 | For allowing terminal to determine the method and its device of uplink transmission power in a wireless communication system |
CN103139889B (en) * | 2011-11-28 | 2015-09-09 | 华为技术有限公司 | The Poewr control method of D2D, subscriber equipment, base station and communication system |
US10506450B2 (en) * | 2012-01-16 | 2019-12-10 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and arrangement for relaying |
CN103379604B (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2018-04-27 | 北京三星通信技术研究有限公司 | Ascending power control method in dynamic TDD cell |
KR102136434B1 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2020-07-22 | 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 | Device-to-device (d2d) cross link power control |
US9300431B2 (en) * | 2012-06-04 | 2016-03-29 | Alcatel Lucent | Apparatus, method and computer readable medium for payload segmentation of wireless packet data transmissions |
US9185661B2 (en) * | 2012-06-04 | 2015-11-10 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Performing power control based on nominal packet size |
CN102761920B (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2016-05-25 | 华为技术有限公司 | Communication means, equipment and system |
KR20140091686A (en) * | 2012-10-02 | 2014-07-22 | 퀄컴 인코포레이티드 | Srs optimization for coordinated multi-point transmission and reception |
US9503216B2 (en) * | 2012-11-02 | 2016-11-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Methods and devices related to effective measurements |
US9398480B2 (en) | 2012-11-02 | 2016-07-19 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Methods of obtaining measurements in the presence of strong and/or highly varying interference |
US9425946B2 (en) | 2013-02-21 | 2016-08-23 | Blackberry Limited | Interference measurement methods for advanced receiver in LTE/LTE-A |
US9369253B2 (en) | 2013-02-21 | 2016-06-14 | Blackberry Limited | Methods of interference measurement for advanced receiver in LTE/LTE-A |
US8989755B2 (en) | 2013-02-26 | 2015-03-24 | Blackberry Limited | Methods of inter-cell resource sharing |
US10588036B2 (en) | 2013-04-03 | 2020-03-10 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling uplink transmission power based on accumulated transmit power control commands and corresponding uplink subframe sets |
US10512064B1 (en) * | 2013-07-09 | 2019-12-17 | Sprint Spectrum L.P. | Allocating wireless communication link resources in a control channel |
US9706421B2 (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2017-07-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and method for sire bias compensation |
CN104869655B (en) * | 2014-02-21 | 2019-07-23 | 株式会社Ntt都科摩 | Uplink resource dispatching method, wireless base station and mobile station |
EP3148259B1 (en) * | 2014-06-13 | 2020-05-13 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and user equipment for determining transmission power |
US9967827B2 (en) | 2014-10-02 | 2018-05-08 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and method for power control |
KR101659692B1 (en) * | 2015-07-28 | 2016-09-30 | 인하대학교 산학협력단 | Method for System Interference-Aware Uplink Power Control in 3GPP LTE-A HetNet |
US10244482B2 (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2019-03-26 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method for transmitting or receiving V2X signal in wireless communication system and device for performing same |
CN117336839A (en) | 2015-09-10 | 2024-01-02 | 交互数字专利控股公司 | Multi-user power control method and process |
CN105307254B (en) * | 2015-09-21 | 2018-11-02 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | A kind of user equipment transmitting power control system and its control method |
US10616869B2 (en) * | 2016-02-12 | 2020-04-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Uplink channel design for slot-based transmission time interval (TTI) |
US10447352B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2019-10-15 | National Instruments Corporation | UE-aided channel reciprocity compensation for radio access in MIMO wireless communication systems |
US11153827B2 (en) * | 2016-11-02 | 2021-10-19 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | User terminal and radio communication method |
WO2018107358A1 (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2018-06-21 | 广东欧珀移动通信有限公司 | Uplink power control method and device |
KR102428257B1 (en) * | 2017-01-04 | 2022-08-02 | 노키아 테크놀로지스 오와이 | Sounding Reference Signal Power Control for Multi-Input Multi-Output Wireless Systems |
US10548096B2 (en) * | 2017-04-21 | 2020-01-28 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Information type multiplexing and power control |
US10425900B2 (en) * | 2017-05-15 | 2019-09-24 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and method for wireless power control |
CN108934064B (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2022-02-01 | 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 | Random access method and device, communication equipment and storage medium |
CN108990139B (en) * | 2017-06-02 | 2021-01-12 | 维沃移动通信有限公司 | Transmission power calculation method, related equipment and system |
CN107333336B (en) * | 2017-06-19 | 2020-11-10 | 上海华为技术有限公司 | Method, base station and terminal for sending leader sequence on random access channel |
US10312978B2 (en) * | 2017-07-18 | 2019-06-04 | National Instruments Corporation | Wireless transceiver station with performs multi-path reciprocity calibration with multiple reference antennas |
WO2019019186A1 (en) * | 2017-07-28 | 2019-01-31 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and device for uplink power control |
CN111316715B (en) | 2017-09-26 | 2024-02-20 | 苹果公司 | Beam-specific power control |
US10602453B2 (en) * | 2017-10-20 | 2020-03-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Uplink power control in wireless systems |
CN111466140B (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2021-12-03 | 华为技术有限公司 | Parameter adjusting method and related equipment |
KR20190114871A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-10-10 | 주식회사 케이티 | Methods for controlling uplink data channel trasmission power and Apparatus thereof |
CN110149128B (en) * | 2019-05-09 | 2021-01-15 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | Power adjustment method and device in MIMO-NOMA system |
US11277800B1 (en) | 2020-03-19 | 2022-03-15 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Wireless access node uplink power control based on uplink error rate |
US11166194B1 (en) * | 2020-04-02 | 2021-11-02 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Location-based error correction for wireless data communications |
US11172451B1 (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2021-11-09 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Uplink power control mechanism for dual connectivity networks |
WO2022054968A1 (en) * | 2020-09-08 | 2022-03-17 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method of transmitting and receiving data in wireless communication system, and apparatus therefor |
CN114745768A (en) * | 2021-01-07 | 2022-07-12 | 展讯通信(上海)有限公司 | Power control method and related equipment |
WO2022269920A1 (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2022-12-29 | 株式会社Nttドコモ | Terminal, wireless communication method, and base station |
US11838876B2 (en) * | 2022-02-15 | 2023-12-05 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Power spectral density aware uplink scheduling |
Citations (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0972359A1 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2000-01-19 | Ericsson, Inc. | Power control for a mobile terminal in a satellite communication system |
WO2000003499A1 (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2000-01-20 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Power control device and method for reverse link common channel in mobile communication system |
WO2000057574A1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2000-09-28 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined closed loop/open loop power control in a time division duplex communication system |
US20030002452A1 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2003-01-02 | Sahota Gurkanwal Singh | System and method for power control calibration and a wireless communication device |
JP2003008507A (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2003-01-10 | Denso Corp | Radio communication system |
US6600772B1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2003-07-29 | Interdigital Communications Corporation | Combined closed loop/open loop power control in a time division duplex communication system |
WO2004019543A1 (en) | 2002-08-13 | 2004-03-04 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. | Method of process configuration for multiple harq processes |
JP2004186969A (en) | 2002-12-03 | 2004-07-02 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Control station device, base station device, communication terminal device, and report value correction method |
US20040253955A1 (en) * | 2003-06-10 | 2004-12-16 | Love Robert T. | Diversity control in wireless communications devices and methods |
US20050025254A1 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2005-02-03 | Awad Yassin Aden | Adaptive modulation and coding |
EP1551112A2 (en) | 2003-12-29 | 2005-07-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for adaptive open-loop power control in mobile communication system using TDD |
US20050215276A1 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-29 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Adjustment of target signal-to-interference in outer loop power control for wireless communication systems |
WO2006015983A1 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2006-02-16 | Ipwireless Inc | Combined open loop/closed loop power control in a wireless communication system |
US20060040619A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-02-23 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for adaptively changing uplink power control scheme according to mobile status in a TDD mobile communication system |
US20060046763A1 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2006-03-02 | Schwent Dale G | Method and apparatus for dual mode power control |
US20060073791A1 (en) | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Nimal Senarath | Power management and distributed scheduling for uplink transmissions in wireless systems |
EP1710960A2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2006-10-11 | Fujitsu Limited | A new scheme for operating a wireless station having directional antennas |
WO2007020070A2 (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2007-02-22 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for reconfiguring the mac layer in a mobile communication system13 |
US7205842B2 (en) * | 2005-01-13 | 2007-04-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Continuous alternating closed-open loop power control |
US7269436B2 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2007-09-11 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus of allocating power in multiple-input multiple-output communication system |
EP1855391A1 (en) | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Uplink (UL) power control apparatus and method in broadband wireless communication system |
US20080081655A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-04-03 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (cqi-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for e-utra |
US20080212701A1 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2008-09-04 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmitting control signaling for mimo transmission |
US20080220806A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2008-09-11 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US20080240208A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2008-10-02 | Cisco Technology Inc. | Adaptive Switching Techniques for Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request Systems |
US20110096760A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in wlan system |
Family Cites Families (54)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2974274B2 (en) * | 1994-05-12 | 1999-11-10 | エヌ・ティ・ティ移動通信網株式会社 | Transmission power control method and transmission power control device |
US5689815A (en) | 1995-05-04 | 1997-11-18 | Oki Telecom, Inc. | Saturation prevention system for radio telephone with open and closed loop power control systems |
US6831910B1 (en) | 1998-03-23 | 2004-12-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Power control device and method for controlling a reverse link common channel in a CDMA communication system |
US6597723B1 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2003-07-22 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Weighted open loop power control in a time division duplex communication system |
TW520587B (en) * | 2001-01-13 | 2003-02-11 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Radio communication system |
US7010319B2 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2006-03-07 | Denso Corporation | Open-loop power control enhancement for blind rescue channel operation |
WO2002071771A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2002-09-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus of multi-carrier power control of base station in broad-band digital mobile communication system |
US6587697B2 (en) | 2001-05-14 | 2003-07-01 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Common control channel uplink power control for adaptive modulation and coding techniques |
US6850500B2 (en) | 2001-05-15 | 2005-02-01 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Transmission power level estimation |
US6983166B2 (en) | 2001-08-20 | 2006-01-03 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Power control for a channel with multiple formats in a communication system |
US7209517B2 (en) | 2002-03-04 | 2007-04-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for estimating a maximum rate of data and for estimating power required for transmission of data at a rate of data in a communication system |
US7340267B2 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2008-03-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Uplink power control algorithm |
US6754475B1 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2004-06-22 | Motorola, Inc. | Transmission performance measurement and use thereof |
JP3629017B2 (en) | 2002-08-20 | 2005-03-16 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Outer loop transmission power control method and wireless communication apparatus |
US7477920B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2009-01-13 | Intel Corporation | System and method for automatically configuring and integrating a radio base station into an existing wireless cellular communication network with full bi-directional roaming and handover capability |
US6748235B1 (en) | 2002-11-12 | 2004-06-08 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Power control during a transmission pause |
US7372898B2 (en) * | 2002-12-11 | 2008-05-13 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Path loss measurements in wireless communications |
KR100595584B1 (en) | 2003-02-12 | 2006-07-03 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Wireless transceiver |
US20040165128A1 (en) * | 2003-02-26 | 2004-08-26 | Three-Five Systems, Inc. | Vertically aligned nematic mode liquid crystal display having large tilt angles and high contrast |
CN1322767C (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2007-06-20 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Power control method for mobile communication system |
JP3895361B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-03-22 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Communication method |
JP4269159B2 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2009-05-27 | 日本電気株式会社 | Transmission power control method and mobile station apparatus |
CN1943152B (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2011-07-27 | 桥扬科技有限公司 | Methods and apparatus for multi-carrier communication systems with adaptive transmission and feedback |
JP4604545B2 (en) | 2004-05-10 | 2011-01-05 | ソニー株式会社 | Wireless communication system, wireless communication apparatus, and wireless communication method |
CN102711233B (en) | 2004-06-10 | 2016-06-01 | 知识产权之桥一号有限责任公司 | Communication terminal, base station apparatus and communication means |
JP2006054617A (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2006-02-23 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Communication device, base station device and signaling method |
KR20060016042A (en) | 2004-08-16 | 2006-02-21 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for controlling uplink power control in a mobile communication system using time division duplexing scheme |
JP4249108B2 (en) * | 2004-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | 富士通株式会社 | Wireless system |
KR100790115B1 (en) | 2004-10-29 | 2007-12-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for controlling transmit power of a preamble sequence for an adaptive antenna system in communication system |
JP2006140650A (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-06-01 | Ntt Docomo Inc | Mobile communication system, mobile station, and radio base station |
US20070041322A1 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2007-02-22 | Won-Joon Choi | Rate adaptation using semi-open loop technique |
WO2006082627A1 (en) * | 2005-02-01 | 2006-08-10 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Transmission control method, mobile station and communication system |
FI20050114A0 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2005-02-01 | Nokia Corp | Processing of data from an uplink in a communication system |
JP2006217173A (en) | 2005-02-02 | 2006-08-17 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Base station device and resource allocating method |
US7512412B2 (en) | 2005-03-15 | 2009-03-31 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Power control and overlapping control for a quasi-orthogonal communication system |
US8942639B2 (en) | 2005-03-15 | 2015-01-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference control in a wireless communication system |
US7349504B2 (en) | 2005-03-18 | 2008-03-25 | Navini Networks, Inc. | Method and system for mitigating interference in communication system |
JP2007221178A (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2007-08-30 | Ntt Docomo Inc | Transmitting apparatus and method |
KR20060117056A (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-16 | 삼성전자주식회사 | System and method for performing handover in a mobile communication system |
US7724813B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2010-05-25 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus for transmit power control |
JP4834352B2 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2011-12-14 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Base station, mobile station, and power control method |
JP4891389B2 (en) | 2006-03-17 | 2012-03-07 | エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド | Data conversion method and data transmission / reception method using the same |
US7830977B2 (en) | 2006-05-01 | 2010-11-09 | Intel Corporation | Providing CQI feedback with common code rate to a transmitter station |
TWI343200B (en) | 2006-05-26 | 2011-06-01 | Lg Electronics Inc | Method and apparatus for signal generation using phase-shift based pre-coding |
JP4189410B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2008-12-03 | 株式会社東芝 | Wireless communication apparatus and transmission control method |
US20080045260A1 (en) | 2006-08-15 | 2008-02-21 | Tarik Muharemovic | Power Settings for the Sounding Reference signal and the Scheduled Transmission in Multi-Channel Scheduled Systems |
US8407769B2 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2013-03-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Methods and apparatus for wireless device registration |
US8737989B2 (en) | 2008-08-29 | 2014-05-27 | Apple Inc. | Methods and apparatus for machine-to-machine based communication service classes |
RU2565030C2 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2015-10-10 | Интердиджитал Пэйтент Холдингз, Инк. | Device and method of controlling uplink power for wireless transmit/receive unit using multiple carriers |
JP5555325B2 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2014-07-23 | インターデイジタル パテント ホールディングス インコーポレイテッド | Power control for devices with multiple antennas |
US8942191B2 (en) | 2010-05-03 | 2015-01-27 | Mformation Software Technologies Llc | Providing dynamic group subscriptions for M2M device communication |
CN103891166A (en) * | 2011-09-30 | 2014-06-25 | 交互数字专利控股公司 | Multipoint transmission in wireless communication |
KR102136434B1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2020-07-22 | 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 | Device-to-device (d2d) cross link power control |
CN104938021B (en) * | 2013-01-16 | 2019-01-08 | 交互数字专利控股公司 | It was found that signal is generated and is received |
-
2008
- 2008-03-07 MY MYPI20093657 patent/MY151945A/en unknown
- 2008-03-07 EP EP08726594.8A patent/EP2119033B1/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 TW TW097108213A patent/TWI493911B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2008-03-07 PL PL12158263T patent/PL2464176T3/en unknown
- 2008-03-07 KR KR1020097021064A patent/KR101397135B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 CA CA2680153A patent/CA2680153C/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 EP EP12158263.9A patent/EP2464176B1/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 BR BRPI0808251A patent/BRPI0808251B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 TW TW097203954U patent/TWM350187U/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2008-03-07 CN CN201410171692.6A patent/CN103974399B/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 EP EP19201275.5A patent/EP3621364B1/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 KR KR1020137005883A patent/KR101475636B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 AU AU2008223333A patent/AU2008223333B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2008-03-07 PL PL08726594.8T patent/PL2119033T3/en unknown
- 2008-03-07 US US12/044,569 patent/US8509836B2/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 WO PCT/US2008/003085 patent/WO2008109162A2/en active Application Filing
- 2008-03-07 TW TW103105971A patent/TWI536761B/en active
- 2008-03-07 KR KR1020137032013A patent/KR101505357B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 MX MX2009009504A patent/MX2009009504A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 DK DK08726594.8T patent/DK2119033T3/en active
- 2008-03-07 TW TW100109789A patent/TWI462509B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2008-03-07 ES ES08726594.8T patent/ES2592276T3/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 KR KR1020147029995A patent/KR101588158B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 JP JP2009552754A patent/JP5280377B2/en active Active
- 2008-03-07 KR KR1020147011512A patent/KR101584466B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 DK DK12158263T patent/DK2464176T3/en active
- 2008-03-07 KR KR1020097020571A patent/KR101131669B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 AR ARP080100945A patent/AR065637A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-03-07 ES ES12158263T patent/ES2762183T3/en active Active
-
2009
- 2009-09-03 IL IL200725A patent/IL200725A0/en unknown
-
2010
- 2010-05-17 HK HK10104794.8A patent/HK1137086A1/en unknown
-
2012
- 2012-12-10 JP JP2012269239A patent/JP5457537B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2013
- 2013-07-08 US US13/936,846 patent/US8812048B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-01-09 JP JP2014002436A patent/JP5864626B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2014-07-11 US US14/329,165 patent/US9026169B2/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-03-26 US US14/669,805 patent/US9271240B2/en active Active
- 2015-12-24 JP JP2015251968A patent/JP6219916B2/en active Active
-
2016
- 2016-01-22 US US15/004,244 patent/US9572112B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-01-25 US US15/415,289 patent/US10091740B2/en active Active
-
2018
- 2018-09-26 US US16/142,659 patent/US10375650B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0972359A1 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2000-01-19 | Ericsson, Inc. | Power control for a mobile terminal in a satellite communication system |
WO2000003499A1 (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2000-01-20 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Power control device and method for reverse link common channel in mobile communication system |
WO2000057574A1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2000-09-28 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined closed loop/open loop power control in a time division duplex communication system |
JP2004538665A (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2004-12-24 | インターデイジタル テクノロジー コーポレーション | Combined closed loop / open loop transmission power control in time division duplex communication system |
US20040196890A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2004-10-07 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | User equipment using combined closed loop/open loop power control |
US20050213636A1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2005-09-29 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | user equipment using combined closed loop/open loop power control |
US6600772B1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2003-07-29 | Interdigital Communications Corporation | Combined closed loop/open loop power control in a time division duplex communication system |
JP2003008507A (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2003-01-10 | Denso Corp | Radio communication system |
JP2005502233A (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2005-01-20 | クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | System and method for calibration of power control in a wireless communication device |
WO2003001701A2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2003-01-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for power control calibration in a wireless communication device |
US20030002452A1 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2003-01-02 | Sahota Gurkanwal Singh | System and method for power control calibration and a wireless communication device |
US7269436B2 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2007-09-11 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus of allocating power in multiple-input multiple-output communication system |
WO2004019543A1 (en) | 2002-08-13 | 2004-03-04 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. | Method of process configuration for multiple harq processes |
JP2005536159A (en) | 2002-08-13 | 2005-11-24 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Process setting method for multiple HARQ processes |
JP2004186969A (en) | 2002-12-03 | 2004-07-02 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Control station device, base station device, communication terminal device, and report value correction method |
US20040253955A1 (en) * | 2003-06-10 | 2004-12-16 | Love Robert T. | Diversity control in wireless communications devices and methods |
US20050025254A1 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2005-02-03 | Awad Yassin Aden | Adaptive modulation and coding |
US7590181B2 (en) * | 2003-07-31 | 2009-09-15 | Fujitsu Limited | Adaptive modulation and coding |
EP1551112A2 (en) | 2003-12-29 | 2005-07-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for adaptive open-loop power control in mobile communication system using TDD |
US7738908B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2010-06-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Method and apparatus for adaptive open-loop power control in mobile communication system using TDD |
US7570968B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2009-08-04 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Method and apparatus for adaptive open-loop power control in mobile communication system using TDD |
US20050215276A1 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-29 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Adjustment of target signal-to-interference in outer loop power control for wireless communication systems |
WO2006015983A1 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2006-02-16 | Ipwireless Inc | Combined open loop/closed loop power control in a wireless communication system |
US20060040619A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-02-23 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for adaptively changing uplink power control scheme according to mobile status in a TDD mobile communication system |
US20060046763A1 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2006-03-02 | Schwent Dale G | Method and apparatus for dual mode power control |
US7580723B2 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2009-08-25 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dual mode power control |
US20060073791A1 (en) | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Nimal Senarath | Power management and distributed scheduling for uplink transmissions in wireless systems |
US7205842B2 (en) * | 2005-01-13 | 2007-04-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Continuous alternating closed-open loop power control |
EP1710960A2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2006-10-11 | Fujitsu Limited | A new scheme for operating a wireless station having directional antennas |
JP2007053747A (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2007-03-01 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Resetting of mac layer in mobile communication system |
WO2007020070A2 (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2007-02-22 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for reconfiguring the mac layer in a mobile communication system13 |
US20100331036A1 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2010-12-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Uplink (ul) power control apparatus and method in broadband wireless communication system |
US20070265026A1 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Uplink (UL) power control apparatus and method in broadband wireless communication system |
EP1855391A1 (en) | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Uplink (UL) power control apparatus and method in broadband wireless communication system |
US7885678B2 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2011-02-08 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Uplink (UL) power control apparatus and method in broadband wireless communication system |
US7899486B2 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2011-03-01 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Uplink (UL) power control apparatus and method in broadband wireless communication system |
WO2008042187A2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2008-04-10 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (cqi-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for e-utra |
US20080081655A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-04-03 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (cqi-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for e-utra |
US20080212701A1 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2008-09-04 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmitting control signaling for mimo transmission |
US20080220806A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2008-09-11 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US8509836B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2013-08-13 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US8812048B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2014-08-19 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US20080240208A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2008-10-02 | Cisco Technology Inc. | Adaptive Switching Techniques for Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request Systems |
US20110096760A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in wlan system |
Non-Patent Citations (34)
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10070397B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2018-09-04 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (CQI-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for E-UTRA |
US10548094B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2020-01-28 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (CQI-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for E-UTRA |
US10880842B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2020-12-29 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop (CQI-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for E-UTRA |
US20160135131A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2016-05-12 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US9572112B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2017-02-14 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US20170135047A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2017-05-11 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US10091740B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2018-10-02 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US10375650B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2019-08-06 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station |
US11916396B2 (en) | 2021-06-08 | 2024-02-27 | GE Grid GmbH | Systems and methods for control of power generation assets |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10375650B2 (en) | Combined open loop/closed loop method for controlling uplink power of a mobile station | |
US10880842B2 (en) | Combined open loop/closed loop (CQI-based) uplink transmit power control with interference mitigation for E-UTRA |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |