US8669087B1 - Luciferase mutant - Google Patents

Luciferase mutant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8669087B1
US8669087B1 US10/111,723 US11172300A US8669087B1 US 8669087 B1 US8669087 B1 US 8669087B1 US 11172300 A US11172300 A US 11172300A US 8669087 B1 US8669087 B1 US 8669087B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
luciferase
amino acid
luciola
residue
photinus pyralis
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US10/111,723
Inventor
David James Squirrell
Melenie Jane Murphy
Rachel Louise Price
Peter John White
Tara Louise Willey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Promega Corp
Original Assignee
Promega Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Promega Corp filed Critical Promega Corp
Priority claimed from PCT/GB2000/004133 external-priority patent/WO2001031028A2/en
Assigned to SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE, THE reassignment SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE, THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WILLEY, TARA LOUISE, WHITE, PETER JOHN, MURPHY, MELENIE JANE, PRICE, RACHEL LOUISE, SQUIRRELL, DAVID JAMES
Assigned to 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY reassignment 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE IN HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Assigned to PROMEGA CORPORATION reassignment PROMEGA CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8669087B1 publication Critical patent/US8669087B1/en
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ORION SEVEN, LLC, PROMEGA AVIATION LLC, PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, LLC, PROMEGA CORPORATION, TERSO SOLUTIONS, INC.
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/0004Oxidoreductases (1.)
    • C12N9/0069Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen, i.e. oxygenases (1.13)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y113/00Oxidoreductases acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen (oxygenases) (1.13)
    • C12Y113/12Oxidoreductases acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen (oxygenases) (1.13) with incorporation of one atom of oxygen (internal monooxygenases or internal mixed function oxidases)(1.13.12)
    • C12Y113/12007Photinus-luciferin 4-monooxygenase (ATP-hydrolysing) (1.13.12.7), i.e. firefly-luciferase
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2333/00Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature
    • G01N2333/90Enzymes; Proenzymes
    • G01N2333/902Oxidoreductases (1.)
    • G01N2333/90241Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen, i.e. oxygenases (1.13)

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a novel protein, in particular mutant luciferase enzymes which show distinctive properties as compared to corresponding wild type enzyme, to DNA encoding these proteins, to the use of these enzyme in assays and to test kits containing them.
  • Firefly luciferase catalyses the oxidation of luciferin in the presence of ATP, Mg 2+ and molecular oxygen with the resultant production of light. This reaction has a quantum yield of about 0.88.
  • the light emitting property has led to its use in a wide variety of luminometric assays where ATP levels are being measured. Examples of such assays include those which are based upon the described in EP-B-680515 and WO 96/02665 but many others are used routinely in laboratories.
  • Luciferase is obtainable directly from the bodies of insects, in particular beetles such as fireflies or glow-worms.
  • Particular species from which luciferases have been obtained include the Japanese GENJI or KEIKE fireflies, Luciola cruciata and Luciola lateralis , the East European firefly Luciola mingrelica , the North American firefly Photinus pyralis and the glow-worm Lampyris noctiluca.
  • the colour of the light emitted by these enzymes when used in assays in the laboratory are broadly similar. It would be helpful if the wavelength could be altered, either to be more easily read by the specific detector, or for use in systems where multiple reporters are required, for example to monitor different events within the same sample.
  • One way of distinguishing reporter molecules is to utilise luciferase molecules which emit light at distinct wavelengths. This may be achieved by using reporter molecules comprising luciferases derived from different species of beetle or glow-worm.
  • An alternative strategy however is to produce mutant luciferases using recombinant DNA technology, so as to produce a variation in the wavelength of the signal. Examples of such mutants are provided in WO 95/18853.
  • the heat stability of wild and recombinant type luciferases is such that they lose activity quite rapidly when exposed to temperatures in excess of about 30° C., particularly over 35° C. This instability causes problems when the enzyme is used or stored at high ambient temperature, or if the assay is effected under high temperature reaction conditions, for example in order to increase reaction rate.
  • Mutant luciferases having increased thermostability are known from EP-A-524448 and WO/95/25798. The first of these describes a mutant luciferase having a mutation at position 217 in the Japanese firefly luciferase, in particular by replacing a threonine residue with an isoleucine residue.
  • mutant luciferases having over 60% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis but in which the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 354 of Photinus pyralis or 356 of the Luciola species is mutated such that it is other than glutamate, and in particular is other than glutamate, aspartate, proline or glycine.
  • proteins which have luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to wild-type luciferase such as those from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme, but which include mutations at various positions in the protein, including amongst others, (a) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; or
  • the applicants have found that by mutating (or introducing) an amino acid at a different position within the luciferase protein, large shifts in the wavelength of the emitted light may be achieved and/or the enzyme has improved thermostability. Furthermore, the proton flux of emitted light may be improved, making the enzyme better suited to in vivo assays where glow kinetics are precluded or in vitro assays where CoA or other ‘glow kinetic inducing’ compounds are not present.
  • the present invention provides a recombinant protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to a wild-type luciferase wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is mutated as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase, such that the luciferase enzyme is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase and/or has enhanced thermostability as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase.
  • Wild-type luciferase sequences which can form the basis of the recombinant forms of the invention include Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca, Pyrocoelia nayako, Photinus pennsylvanica or Phrixothrix (railroad-worms—see Biochem. 38 (1999) 8271-8279).
  • Bioluminescent enzymes from species that can use the substrate D-luciferin (4,5-dihydro-2-[6-hydroxy-2-benzothiazolyl]-4-thiazole carboxylic acid) to produce light emission may form the basis of the mutant enzymes of the invention.
  • Particular wild-type luciferase sequences which can form the basis of the recombinant forms of the invention include Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca, Pyrocoelia nayako and Photinus pennsylvanica.
  • amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase most wild-type sequences have an acid residue (aspartic acid or glutamic acid) at this position.
  • the exception to this is some forms of the luciferase of Photinus pennsylvanica in which the corresponding residue (355) is the non-polar residue, valine or some forms of Phrixothrix luciferase where the corresponding position is V354 in Pv GR or in Ph RE , where it is L354 leucine.
  • the amino acid used as a substitute amino acid at this position is other than aspartic acid, glutamic acid, valine or leucine.
  • an acidic amino acid residue is replaced with a non-acidic residue, including basic amino acids such as lysine or arginine, non-polar amino acids such as leucine, valine or isoleucine, uncharged polar amino acids such as tyrosine, asparagine, glutamine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan or threonine.
  • a non-acidic residue including basic amino acids such as lysine or arginine, non-polar amino acids such as leucine, valine or isoleucine, uncharged polar amino acids such as tyrosine, asparagine, glutamine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan or threonine.
  • it may be replaced with an uncharged polar amino acid such as tyrosine, asparagine, serine or threonine.
  • Particularly preferred amino acid residues for substitution at this position are tyrosine, phenylalanine or trypto
  • wild-type sequences include non-acidic amino acid residues at this position, they are suitably mutated into different non-acidic residues.
  • D357Y mutant Photinus pyralis luciferase emits light at a wavelength of some 612 nm as compared to the wild-type enzyme which emits light at a wavelength of 562 nm.
  • a wavelength shift of 50 nm has considerable potential for use in assay applications as a shift of this magnitude can be readily defined spectrally.
  • Different coloured luciferases could be employed as reporter molecules in gene expression studies, enabling the simultaneous monitoring of more than one gene, for example as described in WO 95/18853. Multiple analyte testing could also be performed with luciferase as labels.
  • red in colour is particularly useful in assay methodology.
  • a red mutant could be useful when analysing a solution for ATP which contained pigments or other compounds which may absorb shorter wavelengths of light.
  • a red coloured solution would not absorb red light.
  • red coloured solutions which are frequently the subject of such analysis include blood samples or a solution of eukaryotic cell culture medium which may contain a red coloured pH indicator.
  • a photomultiplier tube used in photocathode spectral analysis can be set to detect either one or both peaks generated in a single sample. In other words, it is possible to distinguish between photon flux from a red and green emitter in the same sample.
  • an assay for determining the presence in a sample of CoA comprises adding to a sample suspected of containing CoA, luciferase as described above together with other reagents which are required to bring about a luciferase/luciferin reaction, measuring the wavelength of light emitted from the sample and relating this to the presence or absence of CoA.
  • Such an assay may be useful in the detection of the state of growth or activity of cells, for example microorganisms or eukaryotic cells.
  • the concentration of CoA in E. coli cells is relatively high, and varies considerably with metabolic status.
  • the mutant enzymes of the invention can be used to monitor the metabolic status of an organism, particularly the in vivo concentration of the CoA, since the wavelength of the emission varies depending upon the CoA concentration.
  • Such assays may be particularly useful in situations where CoA is an important primary metabolite in the production of antibiotics (e.g. in streptomycetes).
  • Cellular CoA concentrations are also an important indicator of fatty acid biosynthesis and vary with the starvation status of the cell.
  • a number of metabolic disorders such as carcinogenesis and diabetes, show abnormalities in the fatty acid metabolites and consequently unusual CoA levels.
  • Assays of the invention may be used in the diagnosis of such conditions.
  • the CoA levels from within a cell sample may be determined by measuring the wavelength of light emitted from a luciferase of the invention, used in the assay. This result may be compared with that obtained from a sample of healthy cells to determine whether the wavelength has changed and thus that a modified CoA level is present. This may be indicative of a disease state in the patient.
  • Cells are suitably lysed prior to assay using a known lytic agent.
  • the bridging residues may be flexible enough to disengage when the enzyme is in solution to provide a larger pocket ( ⁇ 12 ⁇ deep and ⁇ 8 ⁇ wide) which allows CoA binding. This is consistent with the energy calculations.
  • the proteins may contain further mutations in the sequence provided the luciferase activity of the protein is not unduly compromised.
  • the mutations suitably enhance the properties of the enzyme or better suit it for the intended purpose in some way. This may mean that they result in enhanced thermostability and/or colour shift properties, and/or the K m for ATP of the enzymes. Examples of mutations which give rise to colour shifts are described in WO95/18853. Mutations which affect K m values are described for example in WO 96/22376 and International Patent Application No. PCT/GB98/01026.
  • mutant luciferases of the invention may include other specific mutations which enhance thermostability as compared to wild-type luciferase.
  • amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or (217 in Luciola luciferase) is a different hydrophobic amino acid
  • (k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis ; is different to the amino acid which appears in the corresponding wild type sequence and wherein the luciferase enzyme has increased thermostability as compared to an enzyme having the amino acid of the corresponding wild-type luciferase at this position.
  • proteins of the invention are mutated wild-type luciferases where more than one amino acid, for example up to 100 amino acid residues, preferably no more than 40 amino acids, and more preferably up to 30 amino acids, are different to the amino acid at the corresponding position in the appropriate wild-type enzyme.
  • the protein of the invention comprises luciferase of Photinus pyralis , wherein, in addition to the mutation at the 357 position as described above, at least one of;
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than glutamate;
  • amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than phenylalanine;
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than phenylalanine
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than leucine
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 105 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than alanine
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 234 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than aspartic acid
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 420 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than serine;
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than histidine.
  • the protein of the invention comprises protein the luciferase sequence of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme, and wherein, in addition to the mutation at position 359 as described above, at least one of
  • amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 356 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than glutamate;
  • thermostability The particular substituted amino acids in any case which give rise to enhanced thermostability can be determined by routine methods as illustrated hereinafter. In each case, different substitutions may result in enhanced thermostability. Substitution may be effected by site-directed mutagenesis of DNA encoding native or suitable mutant proteins as would be understood by the skilled person. The invention in this case is associated with the identification of the positions which are associated with thermostability.
  • hydrophilic amino acid residues may, in some cases be preferably substituted with hydrophobic amino acid residues and vice versa.
  • acidic amino acid residues may be substituted with basic residues.
  • the protein may comprise a protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, at least one of;
  • the polar amino acid threonine is suitably replaced with a non polar amino acid such as alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine.
  • a particularly preferred substitution for the threonine residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis is alanine.
  • a more preferred substitution is cysteine.
  • different polar residues such as asparagine at this position may also enhance the thermostability of the corresponding enzyme having threonine at this position.
  • luciferase enzymes include glycine ( Luciola mingrelica, Hotaria paroula ), asparagine ( Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus , GR, YG, YE and OR, Luciola cruciata, Luciola lateralis, Lampyris noctiluca, Pyrocelia nayako Photinus pennsylvanica LY, KW, J19) and serine ( Phrixothix ). These may advantageously be substituted with non-polar or different non-polar side chains such as alanine and cysteine.
  • the nonpolar amino acid isoleucine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid such as alanine, glycine, valine, lecine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine.
  • alanine glycine
  • valine valine
  • lecine proline
  • phenylalanine methionine
  • tryptophan cysteine.
  • Other amino acids appearing at this position in wild type sequences include serine and asparagine.
  • these polar residues are substituted by non-polar residues such as those outlined above.
  • a particularly preferred substitution for the residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase at group is alanine.
  • the non-polar amino acid phenylalanine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid, such as alanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine.
  • a particularly preferred substitution for the phenylalanine residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is leucine.
  • Mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to amino acid 16 in Luciola luciferase (13 in Phrixothrix luciferase ) is also possible.
  • This amino acid residue (which is usually phenylalanine, but may also be leucine, serine, arginine or in some instances tyrosine) is suitably changed to a different amino acid, in particular to a different nonpolar amino acid such as alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan, preferably alanine.
  • Mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to amino acid residue 37 in Luciola mingrelica luciferase (38 in other Luciola spp.) may also be effective.
  • This amino acid varies amongst wild type enzymes, which may include leucine ( Photinus pyralis ) but also lysine, histidine, glycine, alanine, glutamine and aspartic acid at this position.
  • amino residue at this position is substituted with a non-polar amino acid residue or a different non-polar amino acid such as alanine, valine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan.
  • a preferred amino acid at this position is alanine, where this is different to the wild-type enzyme.
  • Mutations at the amino acid corresponding to position 14 of the Photinus pyralis sequence and/or mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase are preferably not the only mutation in the enzyme.
  • Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 105 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase, (102 in Phrixothrix ) may also affect the thermostability of the protein.
  • the amino acid at this position is a non-polar amino acid alanine or glycine, or serine in Phrixothrix . These are suitably changed for different non-polar amino acids.
  • the non-polar amino acid alanine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid, such as phenylalanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan.
  • a particularly preferred substitution for the alanine residue corresponding to residue 105 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is valine.
  • the amino acid at this position is aspartic acid or glycine and in some cases, glutamine or threonine. These are suitably changed for non-polar or different non-polar amino acids as appropriate.
  • the amino acid residue is aspartic acid is suitably replaced with a non polar amino acid, such as alanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan.
  • a particularly preferred substitution for the phenylalanine residue corresponding to residue 234 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is glycine.
  • a non-polar amino acid residue such as glycine is present at this position (for example in Luciola luciferase )
  • this may be substituted with a different non-polar amino acid.
  • the amino acid at this position is an uncharged polar amino acid serine or threonine or glycine. These are suitably changed for different uncharged polar amino acids.
  • the serine may be replaced with asparagine, glutamine, threonine or tyrosine, and in particular threonine.
  • the amino acid residue at this position varies amongst the known luciferase proteins, being histidine in Photinus pyralis, Pyrocelia nayako, Lampyris noctiluca and some forms of Photinus pennsylanvanica luciferase, threonine in Luciola mingrelica, Hotaria paroula and Phrixothix (where it is amino acid 307) luciferase, valine in Luciola cruciata and Luciola lateralis , and asparagine in some Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus luciferase.
  • the amino acid at this position is hydrophilic amino acid which may be changed for a different amino acid residue which increases thermostability of the enzyme.
  • a particularly preferred substitution for the histidine residue corresponding to residue 310 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is arginine.
  • the protein also has the amino acid at position corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase ) changed from glutamate, in particular to an amino acid other than glycine, proline or aspartic acid.
  • the amino acid at this position is tryptophan, valine, leucine, isoleucine are asparagine, but most preferably is lysine or arginine.
  • This mutation is described in WO 95/25798. It has been found that hydrophobic residues at this position enhance the wavelength shift of the enzyme, Furthermore, the presence of a large hydrophobic (V or I), polar (N) or positively charged (K or R) amino acid at position 354 enhances thermostability.
  • the protein also has the amino acid at the position corresponding to amino acid 217 in Luciola luciferase (215 in Photinus pyralis ) changed to a hydrophobic amino acid in particular to isoleucine, leucine or valine as described in EP-A-052448.
  • Proteins of the invention include both wild-type and recombinant luciferase enzymes. They have at least 60% similarity to wild sequences such as those of Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme in the sense that at least 60% of the amino acids present in the wild-type enzymes are present in the proteins of the invention. Such proteins can have a greater degree of similarity, in particular at least 70%, more preferably at least 80% and most preferably at least 90% to the wild-type enzymes listed above. Similar proteins are of this type include allelic variants, proteins from other insect species as well as recombinantly produced enzymes.
  • low stringency conditions can be defined as 3 ⁇ SCC at about ambient temperature to about 65° C.
  • high stringency conditions as 0.1 ⁇ SSC at about 65° C.
  • SSC is the name of a buffer of 0.15M NaCl, 0.015M trisodium citrate. 3 ⁇ SSC is three times as strong as SSC and so on.
  • the similarity of a particular sequence to the sequences of the invention may be assessed using the multiple alignment method described by Lipman and Pearson, (Lipman, D. J. & Pearson, W. R. (1985) Rapid and Sensitive Protein Similarity Searches, Science, vol 227, pp 1435-1441).
  • the sequences for which similarity is to be assessed should be used as the “test sequence” which means that the base sequence for the comparison, such as the sequence of Photinus pyralis or any of the other sequences as recorded in Ye et al., supra., should be entered first into the algorithm.
  • proteins of the invention are wild-type luciferase sequence with one or more of the mutations as outlined above.
  • the invention further provides nucleic acids which encode the luciferases as described above.
  • the nucleic acids are based upon wild-type sequences which are well known in the art. Suitable mutation to effect the desired mutation in the amino acid sequence would be readily apparent, based upon a knowledge of the genetic code.
  • the nucleic acid is a synthetic gene.
  • the synthetic gene is engineered to remove codons rarely found in highly expressed genes from common expression hosts such as E. coli and, at the same time, avoid the introduction of codons rarely found in genes coding for beetle luciferases. This approach ensures that the new gene has a codon utilisation that is optimal for both E. coli and insect expression systems.
  • the codons for the amino acids arg, leu, ile, gly and pro were changed to CGT or CGC (arg), CTG, CTT or CTC (leu), ATC or ATT (ile), GGT or GGC (gly), and CCG CCA or CCT (pro), thus eliminating rare codons.
  • SEQ ID NO 1 the synthetic gene illustrated below
  • FIG. 14 this resulted in a total of 139 silent mutations creating 62 new non-rare codons (11% of the total).
  • the first 8 nucleotides shown in FIG. 14 form part of the ribosome binding site and thus do not code.
  • the coding sequence begins with the methionine residue indicated by an up arrow. This coding sequence and closely similar sequences, for example sequences which have at least 90% similarity or preferably at least 95% similarity form a preferred aspect of the invention.
  • Another useful feature which may be employed when producing a synthetic assembly is the incorporation of new unique restriction sites. These sites make mutagenesis, in particular combinatorial cassette mutagenesis, of the gene simpler and more efficient. In particular, it may be desirable to create unique restriction sites within the cDNA coding for subdomain B in the enzyme. Additionally creation of a unique restriction site at the extreme 3′ end of the gene to allow simple fusions and/or removal of the peroxisome targeting sequence may be advantageous.
  • thermostabilising amino acid changes T214C, E354K and D357F were engineered to introduce the thermostabilising amino acid changes T214C, E354K and D357F into the polypeptide.
  • the nucleic acids of the invention are suitably incorporated into an expression vector such as a plasmid under the control of control elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators etc.
  • a host cell for example a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell such as a plant or animal cell, but in particular a prokaryotic cell such as E. coli so that the cell expresses the desired luciferase enzyme.
  • Culture of the thus transformed cells using conditions which are well known in the art will result in the production of the luciferase enzyme which can then be separated from the culture medium.
  • the cells are plant or animal cells, plants or animals may be propagated from said cells.
  • the protein may then be extracted from the plants, or in the case of transgenic animals, the proteins may be recovered from milk.
  • Vectors, transformed cells, transgenic plants and animals and methods of producing enzyme by culturing these cells all form further aspects of the invention.
  • the Photinus pyralis D357Y mutant luciferase was created by random mutagenesis as described hereinafter. It was found that the D357Y single point mutation produces a large colour shift in the wavelength of light emitted and also has greater thermostability than wild type luciferase. Further investigations have revealed that a range of substitutions at this position give rise to good thermostability and/or to large colour shifts.
  • mutant enzymes of Photinus pyralis which fall within the scope of the invention include the following:
  • the mutations for the creation of the above mutants were introduced to the luciferase gene on plasmid pET23 by site-directed mutagenesis, (PCR) or combinatorial cassette mutagenesis.
  • PCR site-directed mutagenesis
  • the oligonucleotides added to the PCR reaction in order to effect the relevant mutations are given below.
  • Luciferase proteins of the invention will advantageously be employed in any bioluminescent assay which utilises the luciferase/luciferin reaction as a signalling means. There are many such assays known in the literature. The proteins may therefore be included in kits prepared with a view to performing such assays, optionally with luciferin and any other reagents required to perform the particular assay.
  • FIG. 1 is a log graph showing percent % remaining activity versus time of 45° C. incubation of several mutant enzymes in accordance with the invention
  • FIG. 2 shows the spectral peaks obtained by incubating E. coli cells expressing luciferase enzymes in a citrate buffer with D-luciferin where the enzyme used is (a) recombinant wild-type Photinus pyralis luciferase, (b) a D357K mutant, (c) a D357N mutant, (d) a D357W mutant, (e) a D357I mutant, (f) a D357F mutant, (g) a D357Y mutant and (h) a double mutant E354I+D357Y;
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the % remaining activity versus time of three mutant enzymes, E354I, D357Y and the double mutant (DM) E354I/D357Y;
  • FIG. 4 shows the emission spectra of (a) recombinant wild type enzyme and (b) the double mutant (DM) E354I/D357Y;
  • FIG. 5 is a graph showing the rate decay of photon emissions of recombinant wild-type ( ⁇ ) r-wt and a D357K mutant enzyme (:)
  • FIG. 6 shows molecular modelling diagram, illustrating a potential CoA binding pocket within the luciferase enzyme
  • FIG. 7 shows the in vivo bioluminescent spectra emitted by E. coli cells expressing mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y (a) growth on LB; (b) growth on minimal medium and sodium acetate; (c) growth on minimal medium and glucose;
  • FIG. 8 shows the in vivo bioluminescent spectra emitted by E. coli cells expressing mutant P. pyralis luciferase E354K/D357M (a) growth on LB; (b) growth on minimal medium and sodium acetate; (c) growth on minimal medium and glucose;
  • FIG. 9 is a graph showing the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y;
  • FIG. 10 is a graph showing the normalised data of the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y;
  • FIG. 11 is a graph showing the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase E354I/D357Y ( FIG. 11 a ) and normalised data ( FIG. 11 b );
  • FIG. 12 illustrates the restriction sites modifications utilised in the construction of a synthetic luciferase gene
  • FIG. 13 illustrates constructs used in the synthesis of a luciferase gene
  • FIG. 14 shows the cDNA sequence (SEQ ID NO 1) of the synthetic luciferase gene (including nucleotides 1-8 which form part of the ribosome binding site but are not coding) and the encoded amino acid sequence which starts at the methionine residue indicated by the up arrow (SEQ ID NO 2); and
  • FIG. 15 illustrates the thermostability of mutants including the mutant encoded by the synthetic gene at 50° C.
  • Two libraries of firefly ( Photinus pyralis ) luciferase created used error-prone PCR [M. Fromant et al., Anal. Biochem. (1995) 224, 347-353], were prepared.
  • One library comprised of error-prone PCR products of the full length luc gene, cloned into the T7 expression system pET23a, (Novagen Inc., Madison, Wis., U.S.A.).
  • a second library consisted of the error-prone PCR products of a short section of the luc gene, covering amino acids 199-352, cloned in the vector pBSK(+), (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., U.S.A.).
  • the pET23a library was expressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3), ( E. coli B F dcm ompT hsdS(r s ⁇ m s ⁇ ) gala (DE3)).
  • the pBSK(+) library was expressed in HB101 E. coli cells, (supE44 ara14 galK2 lacY1 ⁇ (gpt-proA) 62 rpsL20 (Str r ) xyl-5 mtl-1 recA13 ⁇ (mrcC-nmr) HsdS ⁇ (r ⁇ m ⁇ ).
  • pET23a and pBSK(+) both carry the gene for ⁇ -lactamase and confer ampicillin resistance to E. coli cells harbouring the plasmid.
  • An E. coli strain was transformed with the prepared library by electroporation, using a BIORAD E. coli Pulser, and grown overnight at 37° C. on LB agar, containing ampicillin at a concentration of 50 ⁇ g/ml.
  • the cells were transferred to nylon membranes, (Osmonics, Minnetonka, Minn., U.S.A.), and sprayed with luciferin solution (500 ⁇ m D-luciferin, potassium salt, in 100 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.0).
  • the colonies were viewed using an ALPHAIMAGERTM 1200 documentation and analysis system (Flowgen, Lichfield, Staffordshire, UK). This integrated the bioluminescence emitted over a specified period of time to produce an image of the light emitted by the colonies. The brightness of luminescence was taken as an indication of the thermostability of luciferase.
  • thermostability Colonies were selected on the basis of brightness of light emitted and were isolated for further characterisation. In some screens, the E. coli colonies were incubated at 42° C. for 2 hours prior to screening so that the thermostable mutants could be selected. Colonies isolated from the primary screen were patched onto nylon membranes and also grown overnight in LB medium containing ampicillin. The patches were sprayed with luciferin solution and viewed in the ALPHAIMAGERTM. This secondary screen helped to positively identify clones for in vitro analysis of luciferase activity. E. coli clones expressing possible thermostable enzymes were assayed in vitro for luciferase activity and thermostability.
  • the luciferase reaction was initiated by the addition of 10 ⁇ l crude cell extract to 100 ⁇ l Promega Luciferase Assay Cocktail (1 in 2 dilution). The resultant bioluminescence was measured using a Biotrace M3 luminometer.
  • Crude cell extracts were prepared as described in the Promega technical bulletin no. 101. Aliquots of E. coli overnight cultures were lysed in cell culture lysis reagent, (25 mM Tris-phosphate pH7.8, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 2 mM 1,2-diaminocyclohexame-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.25 mg/ml hen lysozyme) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Crude lysate were then stored on ice prior to assay.
  • DTT dithiothreitol
  • Triton X-100 1.25 mg/ml hen lysozyme
  • T 1/2 is the time taken for the enzyme to lose 50% of its original activity after incubation at a given temperature. T 1/2 values, (time for activity to reduce to 50% of original activity), were determined in crude extracts at 37° C. from log graphs of % remaining activity versus time (not shown).
  • Plasmid DNA was prepared using the QIAGEN QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit, (QIAGEN Ltd, Crawley, W.shire, UK), following the protocol for using a microcentrifuge (QIAprep Miniprep Handbook 04/98).
  • D357Y is a particularly thermostable mutant, being the most thermostable luciferase, with a single amino acid change.
  • site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the Stratagene QUIKCHANGETM Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit, (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., U.S.A.).
  • the plasmid pPW601a J54, (PJW, MOD report, 3/96) was used in all site-directed mutagenesis. All products of the mutagenesis reactions were transformed into E.
  • Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys Ltd., Cambridge, UK and were designed using an intelligent doping system (A. R. Arkin et al., Bio-technology, (1992) 10, 297-300, W., Huang et al., Anal. Biochem. 218, 454-457] were used to design degenerate oligonucleotide primers to produce groups of possible mutations rather than using individual primers for each amino acid substitution.
  • N is the number of colonies to be screened
  • n is the number of possible codons at the target position
  • the mutants obtained from site-directed mutagenesis were assayed for luciferase activity and characterised in time-dependent thermoinactivation studies.
  • Mutants identified as desirable in this way were grown in 400 ml LB medium, containing ampicillin, to A 260 ⁇ 0.5. Luciferase expression was then induced by addition of isopropyl ⁇ -thiogalactoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1 mM. The cells were then incubated at 30° C., with shaking, for 3 hours prior to harvesting by centrifugation. The resultant cell pellet was resuspended in 10 ml B-PERTM Protein Extraction Reagent, (Pierce Chemical Company, Rochford, U.S.A.), 1 mM DTT to produce a crude extract, following the B-PERTM protocol for Maxi-Scale Bacterial Protein Extraction.
  • Reconstituted Sigma Protease Inhibitor Cocktail 500 ⁇ l, (Product No. P8465, Sigma, Saint Louis, Mo., U.S.A.), was added to the BPERTM solution to inhibit endogenous proteases. The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 30 000 g for 30 minutes.
  • the supernatant of the crude extract was subjected to fractionation with ammonium sulphate.
  • the fraction that precipitated between 30% and 55% saturation contained luciferase activity.
  • This material was resuspended in 0.5 ml Tris HCl pH8.0, 1 mM DTT and used for thermoinactivation and spectral studies.
  • thermoinactivation buffer 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH7.8 containing 10% saturated ammonium sulphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol and 0.2% BSA.
  • the in vivo luminescence of the mutants was assessed by eye in a dark room.
  • the D357 mutants displayed a variety of colours in their luminescence spectra.
  • D357Y, F and I showed significant shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light.
  • the change in colour of light emission appeared to be due, not only to a shift in ⁇ max , but to a difference in contributions to the spectra from different wavelengths of visible light.
  • Recombinant wild type (r-wt) enzyme was used for comparison of ⁇ max of in vivo light emission of some of the 357 mutants.
  • D357Y, F and I display considerable shifts in their wavelength maxima.
  • D357Y was partially purified by ammonium sulphate precipitation, as described in the Example 1. This partially purified D357Y enzyme (5 ⁇ l) was mixed with 150 ⁇ l Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent. Another aliquot was mixed with an equivalent assay buffer in which CoA is absent, (25 mM Tris Tricine pH7.8, 5.0 mM MgSO 4 , 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 470 ⁇ M D-luciferin, 530 ⁇ M ATP). The emission spectra of the two reactions were measured and are shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 .
  • the double mutant displayed a marked increase in thermostability in comparison to the single mutants E354I and D357Y individually, (see FIG. 3 ).
  • Thermoinactivation studies of partially purified double mutant confirmed the increased thermostability of the mutant, giving a t 1/2 value of 7.7 min when inactivated at 45° C.
  • the double mutant displays a much deeper red colour of luminescence than the individual mutants of E354I and D357Y, displaying additivity of colour of luminescence.
  • Emission spectra measured in vivo give a ⁇ max of 611 nm. However, the spectrum has a greater contribution of luminescence from the red region of wavelengths, leading to its deeper red appearance when visualised by eye.
  • Emission spectra in crude extracts displayed a definite change in spectral shape and a wavelength shift of 44 nm, relative to rWT, (see FIG. 4 ).
  • the in vivo emission spectrum of the double mutant shows both a sharpening of the bandwidth for the peak wavelength of emitted light (613 nm) and a decrease in the contribution from wavelengths of light in the region 540-560 nm.
  • the in vivo bioluminescence of E. coli cells expressing the mutant D357K was observed to be very bright relative to the other mutants at this position.
  • the flash kinetics of this enzyme was analysed using a luminometer, which could measure the rate of photon emission over time. Aliquots of E. coli cell free extracts containing recombinant wild type enzyme or the mutant D357 were added to a luciferase assay cocktail, which did not contain any reagents that would promote glow kinetics, e.g. coenzymeA.
  • the rate of decay of photon emission measured over time (15s) for both enzymes was observed to be significantly slower for the mutant D357K ( FIG. 5 ).
  • the mutant enzyme has reaction kinetics, which are inhibited to a lesser degree; over at least the first 15 seconds of the reaction, than the recombinant wild type enzyme.
  • Two new unique restriction sites were introduced into the luc gene, in the plasmid pPW601a/J54, using two pairs of synthetic oligonucleotides (see below).
  • a total of six silent mutations introduced a SpeI and a KpnI restriction site, 63 base pairs apart, within the gene. Plasmid containing these new sites was called pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI.
  • the presence and proximity of these restriction sites makes it possible to use combinatorial cassette mutagenesis to explore the effects of random substitutions at amino acid positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence of firefly luciferase.
  • a pair of synthetic oligonucleotides was synthesised which when annealed created a double stranded cassette which could be ligated directly into plasmid pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI digested at the new restriction sites.
  • the cassette was designed to introduce all possible combinations of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids at positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence.
  • Looplib2A 5′-ctagtgctattctgattacacccNNG/CggggatNNG/Caaaccgggc gcggtcggtaaagtggta-3′(SEQ ID NO 12)
  • Looplib2B 5′-cactttaccgaccgcgcccggtttG/CNNatccccG/CNNgggtgtaa tcagaatagca-3′ (SEQ ID NO 13)
  • each of the loop library oligonucleotides was mixed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 25 mM NaCl, and heated to 100° C. for 3 min. This solution was then cooled slowly in a heating block to ⁇ 50° C. to anneal the complimentary sequences. The annealed oligonucleotides were then ligated into plasmid pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI, which had been digested with SpeI and KpnI. Aliquots of the ligation reaction were then used to transform E. coli HB101 cells using electroporation.
  • Plasmid DNA was prepared from the 25 clones selected by in vivo screening and sequenced using gene specific sequencing primers. Mutations resulting in amino acid changes at positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence were identified. One mutant, also contained an additional mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution at position I351 (Table 5).
  • mutant luciferases were selected from the in vivo assays for thermostability. The majority of these luciferases also show large changes in the in vivo spectrum of emitted light with many showing greater contributions from longer wavelengths of light (>580 nm). A number of spectra also showed a significant narrowing of bandwidth around a single peak of 610-614 nm.
  • E354 and D357 with a hydrophobic and an aromatic amino acid respectively e.g. E354V, D357Y results in the largest change in the in vivo spectrum which shows a single peak, of narrow bandwidth, around 612 nm.
  • Cell free extracts of the selected clones were prepared by lysis and the thermostability of the luciferase from each extract was determined in a thermal inactivation experiment. 50 ⁇ l of each extract was placed in an eppendorf tube and incubated in a waterbath heated to 45° C. for 4, 9 and 16 minutes. At the appropriate timepoint the aliquot was removed and the remaining luciferase activity measured. Table 6 shows the percent remaining activity versus time for all mutant enzymes as well as recombinant wild type.
  • thermostable luciferases were those with an aromatic amino acid at position 357 (Y, F or W) and a large hydrophobic (V or I), polar (N) or positively charged (K or R) amino acid at position 354.
  • a 50 ml culture of cells was grown to mid log phase on LB medium and then harvested by centrifugation.
  • the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of sterile distilled water and a 100 ul aliquot of this suspension was then used to inoculate 5 ml of fresh LB, M9 minimal medium+2 mM sodium acetate or M9 minimal medium+2 mM glucose in a 25 ml Sterilin tube.
  • the cultures were allowed to continue growing, at 37° C.
  • Recombinant wild type Photinus pyralis enzyme and the mutant luciferases D357Y and E354I+D357Y were purified to homogeneity in order to analyse the effect of the cofactor coenzyme A on the spectrum of the bioluminescent reaction.
  • All three luciferases were purified as fusions to a 143 amino acid carbohydrate binding module (CBM) from the anaerobic fungus Piromyces equii .
  • CBM carbohydrate binding module
  • This CBM has been shown to bind selectively to acid swollen cellulose and the soluble carbohydrates galactomannan and glucomannan, forming the basis for a simple single step affinity purification scheme.
  • Luciferases fused to the CBM can be bound to cellulose in crude cell free extracts, washed, and then eluted selectively using soluble polysaccharides. Fusion proteins purified this way were used in assays to measure the wavelengths of emitted light in reactions containing different amounts of coenzyme A.
  • Enzyme (5 ⁇ l) was added to 100 ⁇ l of assay reagent, 25 mM Tris-Tricine pH 7.8, 5.0 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 530 ⁇ M ATP and 470 ⁇ M D-luciferin, containing different amounts of coenzyme A.
  • FIGS. 9-11 show the effect of increasing concentrations of coenzyme A on the spectrum of light emitted by the purified luciferases D357 and E354I+D357Y.
  • a synthetic luc gene was designed and assembled from oligonucleotide pairs using the synthesis strategy outlined above.
  • the gene sequence was engineered to create a luciferase with the amino acids 214C, 354K and 357F.
  • oligonucleotides Twenty-nine pairs of overlapping synthetic oligonucleotides were synthesised by Sigma-Genosys Ltd, purified by PAGE and ligated in three assemblies of approximately 550 bp (IDRIS 1, 2 & 3, FIG. 13 ). Each assembly was then ligated separately into the vector pBSK(+) and the resulting constructs were used to transform E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Plasmid DNA was prepared from clones containing the assembled inserts and sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the ORFs. The presence of n-1 oligonucleotides (by-products of the oligosynthesis) in the assemblies complicated the build process.
  • the synthetic gene was assembled into the vector pBSK(+) between the BamH I and Sal I sites in the polylinker. In this position the gene is not in frame with the alpha peptide and is a significant distance from the lac promoter. However, enough luciferase is produced to enable preliminary characterisation of the enzyme. Crude cell free extracts of E. coli XL1-Blue cells expressing IDRIS (FA) were prepared, from overnight cultures, using the Promega lysis method.
  • thermostability of the enzyme in the extract was then tested at 50° C. over 20 minutes and compared with the thermostable mutant E354I+D357Y.
  • the new codon optimised triple mutant was significantly more thermostable than the mutant E354I+D357Y ( FIG. 15 ).

Abstract

A recombinant protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to a wild-type luciferase wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is mutated as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase, such that the luciferase enzyme is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase and/or has enhanced thermostability as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase. In general, the residue corresponding to 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is changed from an acidic amino acid to a non-acidic amino acid and preferably an uncharged polar amino acid such as tyrosine. Mutant luciferases in accordance with the invention can produce a large (50 nm) wavelength shift in emitted light and have good thermostability. The resultant colour shift can be reversed by addition of coenzyme A. These properties make the mutant particularly useful in a variety of assays.

Description

This application claims priority to Great Britain Application No. 9925161.3 filed on Oct. 26, 1999; Great Britain Application No. 0016744.5 filed on Jul. 10, 2000 and International Application No. PCT/GB00/04133 filed on Oct. 26, 2000 and published in English as International Publication Number WO 01/31028 A2 on May 3, 2001, the entire contents of each are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a novel protein, in particular mutant luciferase enzymes which show distinctive properties as compared to corresponding wild type enzyme, to DNA encoding these proteins, to the use of these enzyme in assays and to test kits containing them.
Firefly luciferase catalyses the oxidation of luciferin in the presence of ATP, Mg2+ and molecular oxygen with the resultant production of light. This reaction has a quantum yield of about 0.88. The light emitting property has led to its use in a wide variety of luminometric assays where ATP levels are being measured. Examples of such assays include those which are based upon the described in EP-B-680515 and WO 96/02665 but many others are used routinely in laboratories.
Luciferase is obtainable directly from the bodies of insects, in particular beetles such as fireflies or glow-worms. Particular species from which luciferases have been obtained include the Japanese GENJI or KEIKE fireflies, Luciola cruciata and Luciola lateralis, the East European firefly Luciola mingrelica, the North American firefly Photinus pyralis and the glow-worm Lampyris noctiluca.
However, since many of the genes encoding these enzymes have been cloned and sequenced, they may also be produced using recombinant DNA technology. Recombinant DNA sequences encoding the enzymes are used to transform microorganisms such as E. coli which then express the desired enzyme product.
The colour of the light emitted by these enzymes when used in assays in the laboratory are broadly similar. It would be helpful if the wavelength could be altered, either to be more easily read by the specific detector, or for use in systems where multiple reporters are required, for example to monitor different events within the same sample. One way of distinguishing reporter molecules is to utilise luciferase molecules which emit light at distinct wavelengths. This may be achieved by using reporter molecules comprising luciferases derived from different species of beetle or glow-worm. An alternative strategy however is to produce mutant luciferases using recombinant DNA technology, so as to produce a variation in the wavelength of the signal. Examples of such mutants are provided in WO 95/18853.
Furthermore, the heat stability of wild and recombinant type luciferases is such that they lose activity quite rapidly when exposed to temperatures in excess of about 30° C., particularly over 35° C. This instability causes problems when the enzyme is used or stored at high ambient temperature, or if the assay is effected under high temperature reaction conditions, for example in order to increase reaction rate.
Mutant luciferases having increased thermostability are known from EP-A-524448 and WO/95/25798. The first of these describes a mutant luciferase having a mutation at position 217 in the Japanese firefly luciferase, in particular by replacing a threonine residue with an isoleucine residue. The latter describes mutant luciferases having over 60% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis but in which the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 354 of Photinus pyralis or 356 of the Luciola species is mutated such that it is other than glutamate, and in particular is other than glutamate, aspartate, proline or glycine.
Co-pending British Patent Application No. 9823468.5 and the International Patent Application derived from it, describes further such mutants. In this case, proteins are described which have luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to wild-type luciferase such as those from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme, but which include mutations at various positions in the protein, including amongst others, (a) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; or
(b) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase; or
(c) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase.
The applicants have found that by mutating (or introducing) an amino acid at a different position within the luciferase protein, large shifts in the wavelength of the emitted light may be achieved and/or the enzyme has improved thermostability. Furthermore, the proton flux of emitted light may be improved, making the enzyme better suited to in vivo assays where glow kinetics are precluded or in vitro assays where CoA or other ‘glow kinetic inducing’ compounds are not present.
The present invention provides a recombinant protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to a wild-type luciferase wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is mutated as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase, such that the luciferase enzyme is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase and/or has enhanced thermostability as compared to the corresponding wild-type luciferase.
Wild-type luciferase sequences which can form the basis of the recombinant forms of the invention include Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca, Pyrocoelia nayako, Photinus pennsylvanica or Phrixothrix (railroad-worms—see Biochem. 38 (1999) 8271-8279).
Bioluminescent enzymes from species that can use the substrate D-luciferin (4,5-dihydro-2-[6-hydroxy-2-benzothiazolyl]-4-thiazole carboxylic acid) to produce light emission may form the basis of the mutant enzymes of the invention.
Particular wild-type luciferase sequences which can form the basis of the recombinant forms of the invention include Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis, Hotaria paroula, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus Lampyris noctiluca, Pyrocoelia nayako and Photinus pennsylvanica.
In particular, the luciferases are enzymes obtainable from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme. In Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzymes, the appropriate amino acid residue is at position 359 in the sequence.
The sequences of all the various luciferases show that they are highly conserved having a significant degree of similarity between them. This means that corresponding regions among the enzyme sequences are readily determinable by examination of the sequences to detect the most similar regions, although if necessary commercially available software (e.g. “Bestfit” from the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group; see Devereux et al (1984) Nucleic Acid Research 12: 387-395) can be used in order to determine corresponding regions or particular amino acids between the various sequences. Alternatively or additionally, corresponding acids can be determined by reference to L. Ye et al., Biochim. Biophys Acta 1339 (1997) 39-52 which shows the sequences of the enzymes, together with the numbering, which numbering system is to be used in connection with the present application.
As regards the possible change of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 in Photinus pyralis luciferase, most wild-type sequences have an acid residue (aspartic acid or glutamic acid) at this position. The exception to this is some forms of the luciferase of Photinus pennsylvanica in which the corresponding residue (355) is the non-polar residue, valine or some forms of Phrixothrix luciferase where the corresponding position is V354 in PvGR or in PhRE, where it is L354 leucine. Thus in general, the amino acid used as a substitute amino acid at this position is other than aspartic acid, glutamic acid, valine or leucine.
In most cases, therefore, an acidic amino acid residue is replaced with a non-acidic residue, including basic amino acids such as lysine or arginine, non-polar amino acids such as leucine, valine or isoleucine, uncharged polar amino acids such as tyrosine, asparagine, glutamine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan or threonine. In particular, it may be replaced with an uncharged polar amino acid such as tyrosine, asparagine, serine or threonine. Particularly preferred amino acid residues for substitution at this position are tyrosine, phenylalanine or tryptophan and most preferably tyrosine. Generally speaking, aromatic residues at this position give rise to the largest shifts and may also assist thermostability.
Where wild-type sequences include non-acidic amino acid residues at this position, they are suitably mutated into different non-acidic residues.
It has been found that by mutating the enzyme in this way, the wavelength of light emitted by the luciferase is shifted, in some cases up to 50 nm towards the red end of the spectrum. Thus, D357Y mutant Photinus pyralis luciferase emits light at a wavelength of some 612 nm as compared to the wild-type enzyme which emits light at a wavelength of 562 nm.
A wavelength shift of 50 nm has considerable potential for use in assay applications as a shift of this magnitude can be readily defined spectrally. Different coloured luciferases could be employed as reporter molecules in gene expression studies, enabling the simultaneous monitoring of more than one gene, for example as described in WO 95/18853. Multiple analyte testing could also be performed with luciferase as labels.
The fact that the light in this case is a deep red in colour is particularly useful in assay methodology. A red mutant could be useful when analysing a solution for ATP which contained pigments or other compounds which may absorb shorter wavelengths of light. For example, a red coloured solution would not absorb red light. Examples of red coloured solutions which are frequently the subject of such analysis include blood samples or a solution of eukaryotic cell culture medium which may contain a red coloured pH indicator.
When using a mixture of colourimetric agents such as luciferases, the ability to generate a deep red signal may be helpful, particularly where another agent in the sample generates a green signal. A photomultiplier tube used in photocathode spectral analysis can be set to detect either one or both peaks generated in a single sample. In other words, it is possible to distinguish between photon flux from a red and green emitter in the same sample.
Furthermore, it has been found that the wavelength shift can be affected by the presence of the cofactor coenzyme A (CoA). This feature gives rise to the possibility that this enzyme could be used in an assay for the cofactor.
As described below, the effect the cofactor coenzyme A on the in vitro spectrum of emitted light was investigated. As the concentration of coenzyme A increases the spectral distribution alters and at the highest concentrations of CoA the spectrum is dominated by wavelengths in the region 590-630 nm with a pronounced peak at 610 nm.
Thus in accordance with a further aspect of the invention, there is provided an assay for determining the presence in a sample of CoA, which assay comprises adding to a sample suspected of containing CoA, luciferase as described above together with other reagents which are required to bring about a luciferase/luciferin reaction, measuring the wavelength of light emitted from the sample and relating this to the presence or absence of CoA.
Such an assay may be useful in the detection of the state of growth or activity of cells, for example microorganisms or eukaryotic cells.
For example, the concentration of CoA in E. coli cells is relatively high, and varies considerably with metabolic status. The mutant enzymes of the invention can be used to monitor the metabolic status of an organism, particularly the in vivo concentration of the CoA, since the wavelength of the emission varies depending upon the CoA concentration. Such assays may be particularly useful in situations where CoA is an important primary metabolite in the production of antibiotics (e.g. in streptomycetes). Cellular CoA concentrations are also an important indicator of fatty acid biosynthesis and vary with the starvation status of the cell. A number of metabolic disorders such as carcinogenesis and diabetes, show abnormalities in the fatty acid metabolites and consequently unusual CoA levels. Assays of the invention may be used in the diagnosis of such conditions. For example, the CoA levels from within a cell sample, such as a blood sample, from a patient, may be determined by measuring the wavelength of light emitted from a luciferase of the invention, used in the assay. This result may be compared with that obtained from a sample of healthy cells to determine whether the wavelength has changed and thus that a modified CoA level is present. This may be indicative of a disease state in the patient. Cells are suitably lysed prior to assay using a known lytic agent.
It is believed that the amino acid residue at position 357 is critically associated with the binding site of coenzyme A. When the surface of the luciferase enzyme was contoured (using SYBL protein modeling software, Tripos Ltd.) to a resolution of 1 Angstrom (Å), a small polar pocket was noted. This pocket appears to be lined by residues H310, E354 and D357 and measured between 8-10 Å. When viewed from the top of the molecule, this pocket appears as part of a larger pocket, lined by residues H310, E354, D357 and 1232. Residues H310 and E354 appear to form a bridge across the cleft giving the appearance of two smaller pockets (See FIG. 6).
Without being bound by theory, it seems possible that the bridging residues may be flexible enough to disengage when the enzyme is in solution to provide a larger pocket (˜12 Å deep and ˜8 Å wide) which allows CoA binding. This is consistent with the energy calculations.
When E. coli cells expressing mutants of firefly luciferase of the invention were grown on different carbon sources changes in the in vivo spectrum of emitted light were observed. Switching from a rich medium (LB) to a defined minimal medium with either acetate or glucose as the sole carbon source resulted in shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light and a reduction in the contribution from shorter wavelengths. This may provide yet a further means of controlling the wavelength of light emitted for assay purposes.
Mutation of the 357 position of in the protein has been found to result in enhanced thermostability.
The proteins may contain further mutations in the sequence provided the luciferase activity of the protein is not unduly compromised. The mutations suitably enhance the properties of the enzyme or better suit it for the intended purpose in some way. This may mean that they result in enhanced thermostability and/or colour shift properties, and/or the Km for ATP of the enzymes. Examples of mutations which give rise to colour shifts are described in WO95/18853. Mutations which affect Km values are described for example in WO 96/22376 and International Patent Application No. PCT/GB98/01026.
In general, effects of mutations have been found to be additive in terms of alterations in the properties.
The mutant luciferases of the invention may include other specific mutations which enhance thermostability as compared to wild-type luciferase. In particular, at least one of
(a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase) is mutated;
(b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or (217 in Luciola luciferase) is a different hydrophobic amino acid; or
(c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase;
(d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase;
(e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase;
(f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 16 of Luciola mingrelica, or 17 in Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis;
(g) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 37 of Luciola mingrelica, or to residue 38 of Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis;
(h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 105 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica, 107 of Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis or 108 of Luciola lateralis gene;
(i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 234 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis;
(j) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 420 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis;
(k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis; is different to the amino acid which appears in the corresponding wild type sequence and wherein the luciferase enzyme has increased thermostability as compared to an enzyme having the amino acid of the corresponding wild-type luciferase at this position.
Thus preferred examples of proteins of the invention are mutated wild-type luciferases where more than one amino acid, for example up to 100 amino acid residues, preferably no more than 40 amino acids, and more preferably up to 30 amino acids, are different to the amino acid at the corresponding position in the appropriate wild-type enzyme.
Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the protein of the invention comprises luciferase of Photinus pyralis, wherein, in addition to the mutation at the 357 position as described above, at least one of;
a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than glutamate;
(b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or is a hydrophobic amino acid other than alanine;
(c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than threonine;
(d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than isoleucine;
(e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than phenylalanine;
(f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than phenylalanine;
(g) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than leucine;
(h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 105 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than alanine;
(i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 234 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than aspartic acid;
(j) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 420 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than serine;
(k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 310 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than histidine.
Alternatively, the protein of the invention comprises protein the luciferase sequence of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme, and wherein, in addition to the mutation at position 359 as described above, at least one of
a) the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 356 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase is other than glutamate;
(b) the amino acid residue corresponding to position 215 in Photinus pyralis luciferase or is a hydrophobic amino acid other than alanine or threonine;
(c) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is other than glycine (for Luciola mingrelica based sequences) or aparagine (for Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis) based sequences;
(d) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is other than serine;
(e) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is other than leucine;
(f) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 16 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis is other than phenylalanine;
(g) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 37 of Luciola mingrelica, or 38 in Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis is other than lysine;
(h) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis is other than glycine;
(i) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis is other than glycine;
(j) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis is other than threonine;
(k) amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis is other than threonine (for Luciola mingrelica based sequences) or valine (for Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis) based sequences.
The particular substituted amino acids in any case which give rise to enhanced thermostability can be determined by routine methods as illustrated hereinafter. In each case, different substitutions may result in enhanced thermostability. Substitution may be effected by site-directed mutagenesis of DNA encoding native or suitable mutant proteins as would be understood by the skilled person. The invention in this case is associated with the identification of the positions which are associated with thermostability.
In general however, it may be desirable to consider substituting an amino acid of different properties for the wild type amino acid. Thus hydrophilic amino acid residues may, in some cases be preferably substituted with hydrophobic amino acid residues and vice versa. Similarly, acidic amino acid residues may be substituted with basic residues.
For instance, the protein may comprise a protein having luciferase activity and at least 60% similarity to luciferase from Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme wherein in the sequence of the enzyme, at least one of;
(a) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 216 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is mutated and is other than threonine in the case of Photinus pyralis luciferase; or
(b) the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is mutated and is other than isoleucine in the case of Photinus pyralis luciferase; or
(c) amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase is mutated and is for example, other than phenylalanine in the case of Photinus pyralis luciferase; and the luciferase enzyme has increased thermostability as compared to the wild-type luciferase.
The sequences of all the various luciferases show that they are highly conserved having a significant degree of similarity between them. This means that corresponding regions among the enzyme sequences are readily determinable by examination of the sequences to detect the most similar regions, although if necessary commercially available software (e.g. “Bestfit” from the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group; see Devereux et al (1984) Nucleic Acid Research 12: 387-395) can be used in order to determine corresponding regions or particular amino acids between the various sequences. Alternatively or additionally, corresponding acids can be determined by reference to L. Ye et al., Biochim. Biophys Acta 1339 (1997) 39-52.
With respect to the possible change of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase, the polar amino acid threonine is suitably replaced with a non polar amino acid such as alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine. A particularly preferred substitution for the threonine residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis is alanine. A more preferred substitution is cysteine. However, different polar residues such as asparagine at this position may also enhance the thermostability of the corresponding enzyme having threonine at this position. Other amino acids which appear at this position in wild-type luciferase enzymes include glycine (Luciola mingrelica, Hotaria paroula), asparagine (Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus, GR, YG, YE and OR, Luciola cruciata, Luciola lateralis, Lampyris noctiluca, Pyrocelia nayako Photinus pennsylvanica LY, KW, J19) and serine (Phrixothix). These may advantageously be substituted with non-polar or different non-polar side chains such as alanine and cysteine.
As regards the possible change of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase, the nonpolar amino acid isoleucine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid such as alanine, glycine, valine, lecine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine. Other amino acids appearing at this position in wild type sequences include serine and asparagine. Suitably, these polar residues are substituted by non-polar residues such as those outlined above. A particularly preferred substitution for the residue corresponding to residue 232 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 234 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase at group is alanine.
Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 295 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 297 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase, may also affect the thermostability of the protein. (This corresponds to position 292 in Phrixothix luciferase.) In general, the amino acid at this position is a non-polar amino acid phenylalanine or leucine. These are suitably changed for different non-polar amino acids. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the non-polar amino acid phenylalanine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid, such as alanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine, tryptophan or cysteine. A particularly preferred substitution for the phenylalanine residue corresponding to residue 214 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is leucine.
Mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 14 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to amino acid 16 in Luciola luciferase (13 in Phrixothrix luciferase) is also possible. This amino acid residue (which is usually phenylalanine, but may also be leucine, serine, arginine or in some instances tyrosine) is suitably changed to a different amino acid, in particular to a different nonpolar amino acid such as alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan, preferably alanine.
Mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase or to amino acid residue 37 in Luciola mingrelica luciferase (38 in other Luciola spp.) may also be effective. This amino acid varies amongst wild type enzymes, which may include leucine (Photinus pyralis) but also lysine, histidine, glycine, alanine, glutamine and aspartic acid at this position. Suitably the amino residue at this position is substituted with a non-polar amino acid residue or a different non-polar amino acid such as alanine, valine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan. A preferred amino acid at this position is alanine, where this is different to the wild-type enzyme.
Mutations at the amino acid corresponding to position 14 of the Photinus pyralis sequence and/or mutation at the amino acid residue corresponding to amino acid 35 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase are preferably not the only mutation in the enzyme.
They are suitably accompanied by others of the mutations defined above, in particular those at positions corresponding to positions 214, 395 or 232 of Photinus pyralis luciferase.
Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 105 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 106 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase, (102 in Phrixothrix) may also affect the thermostability of the protein. In general, the amino acid at this position is a non-polar amino acid alanine or glycine, or serine in Phrixothrix. These are suitably changed for different non-polar amino acids. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the non-polar amino acid alanine is suitably replaced with a different non polar amino acid, such as phenylalanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan. A particularly preferred substitution for the alanine residue corresponding to residue 105 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is valine.
Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 234 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 236 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase (231 in Phrixothrix), may also affect the thermostability of the protein. In general, the amino acid at this position is aspartic acid or glycine and in some cases, glutamine or threonine. These are suitably changed for non-polar or different non-polar amino acids as appropriate. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the amino acid residue is aspartic acid is suitably replaced with a non polar amino acid, such as alanine, leucine, glycine, valine, isoleucine, proline, methionine or tryptophan. A particularly preferred substitution for the phenylalanine residue corresponding to residue 234 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is glycine. Where a non-polar amino acid residue such as glycine is present at this position (for example in Luciola luciferase), this may be substituted with a different non-polar amino acid.
Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 420 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 422 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase (417 in Phrixothrix green and 418 in Phrixothrix red), may also affect the thermostability of the protein. In general, the amino acid at this position is an uncharged polar amino acid serine or threonine or glycine. These are suitably changed for different uncharged polar amino acids. For example, in Photinus pyralis, the serine may be replaced with asparagine, glutamine, threonine or tyrosine, and in particular threonine.
Changes of the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 310 in Photinus pyralis luciferase and to residue 312 of Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis luciferase, may also affect the thermostability of the protein. The amino acid residue at this position varies amongst the known luciferase proteins, being histidine in Photinus pyralis, Pyrocelia nayako, Lampyris noctiluca and some forms of Photinus pennsylanvanica luciferase, threonine in Luciola mingrelica, Hotaria paroula and Phrixothix (where it is amino acid 307) luciferase, valine in Luciola cruciata and Luciola lateralis, and asparagine in some Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus luciferase. Thus, in general, the amino acid at this position is hydrophilic amino acid which may be changed for a different amino acid residue which increases thermostability of the enzyme. A particularly preferred substitution for the histidine residue corresponding to residue 310 in Photinus pyralis luciferase is arginine.
Other mutations may also be present in the enzyme. For example, in a preferred embodiment, the protein also has the amino acid at position corresponding to amino acid 354 of the Photinus pyralis luciferase (356 in Luciola luciferase) changed from glutamate, in particular to an amino acid other than glycine, proline or aspartic acid. Suitably, the amino acid at this position is tryptophan, valine, leucine, isoleucine are asparagine, but most preferably is lysine or arginine. This mutation is described in WO 95/25798. It has been found that hydrophobic residues at this position enhance the wavelength shift of the enzyme, Furthermore, the presence of a large hydrophobic (V or I), polar (N) or positively charged (K or R) amino acid at position 354 enhances thermostability.
In an alternative preferred embodiment, the protein also has the amino acid at the position corresponding to amino acid 217 in Luciola luciferase (215 in Photinus pyralis) changed to a hydrophobic amino acid in particular to isoleucine, leucine or valine as described in EP-A-052448.
Proteins of the invention include both wild-type and recombinant luciferase enzymes. They have at least 60% similarity to wild sequences such as those of Photinus pyralis, Luciola mingrelica, Luciola cruciata or Luciola lateralis enzyme in the sense that at least 60% of the amino acids present in the wild-type enzymes are present in the proteins of the invention. Such proteins can have a greater degree of similarity, in particular at least 70%, more preferably at least 80% and most preferably at least 90% to the wild-type enzymes listed above. Similar proteins are of this type include allelic variants, proteins from other insect species as well as recombinantly produced enzymes. They can be readily identified in that they are encoded by nucleic acids which hybridise with sequences which encode wild-type enzymes under stringent hybridisation conditions. Such conditions would be well understood by the person skilled in the art, and are exemplified for example in Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press). In general terms, low stringency conditions can be defined as 3×SCC at about ambient temperature to about 65° C., and high stringency conditions as 0.1×SSC at about 65° C. SSC is the name of a buffer of 0.15M NaCl, 0.015M trisodium citrate. 3×SSC is three times as strong as SSC and so on.
In particular, the similarity of a particular sequence to the sequences of the invention may be assessed using the multiple alignment method described by Lipman and Pearson, (Lipman, D. J. & Pearson, W. R. (1985) Rapid and Sensitive Protein Similarity Searches, Science, vol 227, pp 1435-1441). The “optimised” percentage score should be calculated with the following parameters for the Lipman-Pearson algorithm:ktup=1, gap penalty=4 and gap penalty length=12. The sequences for which similarity is to be assessed should be used as the “test sequence” which means that the base sequence for the comparison, such as the sequence of Photinus pyralis or any of the other sequences as recorded in Ye et al., supra., should be entered first into the algorithm.
Particular examples of proteins of the invention are wild-type luciferase sequence with one or more of the mutations as outlined above.
The invention further provides nucleic acids which encode the luciferases as described above. Suitably, the nucleic acids are based upon wild-type sequences which are well known in the art. Suitable mutation to effect the desired mutation in the amino acid sequence would be readily apparent, based upon a knowledge of the genetic code.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the nucleic acid is a synthetic gene. Suitably, the synthetic gene is engineered to remove codons rarely found in highly expressed genes from common expression hosts such as E. coli and, at the same time, avoid the introduction of codons rarely found in genes coding for beetle luciferases. This approach ensures that the new gene has a codon utilisation that is optimal for both E. coli and insect expression systems.
For example, wherever possible the codons for the amino acids arg, leu, ile, gly and pro were changed to CGT or CGC (arg), CTG, CTT or CTC (leu), ATC or ATT (ile), GGT or GGC (gly), and CCG CCA or CCT (pro), thus eliminating rare codons. In the case of the synthetic gene illustrated below (SEQ ID NO 1) and in FIG. 14, this resulted in a total of 139 silent mutations creating 62 new non-rare codons (11% of the total). The first 8 nucleotides shown in FIG. 14 form part of the ribosome binding site and thus do not code. The coding sequence begins with the methionine residue indicated by an up arrow. This coding sequence and closely similar sequences, for example sequences which have at least 90% similarity or preferably at least 95% similarity form a preferred aspect of the invention.
Another useful feature which may be employed when producing a synthetic assembly is the incorporation of new unique restriction sites. These sites make mutagenesis, in particular combinatorial cassette mutagenesis, of the gene simpler and more efficient. In particular, it may be desirable to create unique restriction sites within the cDNA coding for subdomain B in the enzyme. Additionally creation of a unique restriction site at the extreme 3′ end of the gene to allow simple fusions and/or removal of the peroxisome targeting sequence may be advantageous.
In the example illustrated hereinafter, nine new unique restriction sites were engineered, mostly in the central third of the gene, and a unique Hind III site was generated at the extreme 3′ end of the gene to allow for simple C-terminal fusions (FIG. 12).
Finally, use of a synthetic gene allows for the introduction of mutations to increase the thermostablilty of the gene product, or to otherwise modify the properties of the product as desired. In the Example illustrated hereinafter for instance, three non-silent mutations were engineered to introduce the thermostabilising amino acid changes T214C, E354K and D357F into the polypeptide.
The nucleic acids of the invention are suitably incorporated into an expression vector such as a plasmid under the control of control elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators etc. These vectors can then be used to transform a host cell, for example a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell such as a plant or animal cell, but in particular a prokaryotic cell such as E. coli so that the cell expresses the desired luciferase enzyme. Culture of the thus transformed cells using conditions which are well known in the art will result in the production of the luciferase enzyme which can then be separated from the culture medium. Where the cells are plant or animal cells, plants or animals may be propagated from said cells. The protein may then be extracted from the plants, or in the case of transgenic animals, the proteins may be recovered from milk. Vectors, transformed cells, transgenic plants and animals and methods of producing enzyme by culturing these cells all form further aspects of the invention.
The Photinus pyralis D357Y mutant luciferase was created by random mutagenesis as described hereinafter. It was found that the D357Y single point mutation produces a large colour shift in the wavelength of light emitted and also has greater thermostability than wild type luciferase. Further investigations have revealed that a range of substitutions at this position give rise to good thermostability and/or to large colour shifts.
Particular examples of mutant enzymes of Photinus pyralis which fall within the scope of the invention include the following:
D357Y
D357F
D357W
D357K
D357N
D357I
E354I/D357Y
E354V/D357Y
E354C/D357Y
E354R/D357Y
E354S/D357Y
E354N/D357Y
E354K/D357M
E354R/D357L
E354W/D357W
E354H/D357W
E354R/D357F
E354K/D357F
E354S/D357F
E354M/D357F
E354A/D357R
E354A/D357F
E354T/D357Y
E354A/D357N
I351M/E354R/D357V
E354S/D357V
E354R/D357W
E354R/D357M
E354R/D357S
E354N/D357S
or equivalents of any of these when derived from the luciferases of other species.
The mutations for the creation of the above mutants were introduced to the luciferase gene on plasmid pET23 by site-directed mutagenesis, (PCR) or combinatorial cassette mutagenesis. The oligonucleotides added to the PCR reaction in order to effect the relevant mutations are given below.
It has been reported previously that the effect of point mutations at the 354 and 215 positions are additive. This invention provides the possibility of combining three or more such mutations to provide high thermostability in a mutant enzyme which has a large colour shift.
Luciferase proteins of the invention will advantageously be employed in any bioluminescent assay which utilises the luciferase/luciferin reaction as a signalling means. There are many such assays known in the literature. The proteins may therefore be included in kits prepared with a view to performing such assays, optionally with luciferin and any other reagents required to perform the particular assay.
The invention will now be particularly described by way of example with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings in which:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a log graph showing percent % remaining activity versus time of 45° C. incubation of several mutant enzymes in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 shows the spectral peaks obtained by incubating E. coli cells expressing luciferase enzymes in a citrate buffer with D-luciferin where the enzyme used is (a) recombinant wild-type Photinus pyralis luciferase, (b) a D357K mutant, (c) a D357N mutant, (d) a D357W mutant, (e) a D357I mutant, (f) a D357F mutant, (g) a D357Y mutant and (h) a double mutant E354I+D357Y;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the % remaining activity versus time of three mutant enzymes, E354I, D357Y and the double mutant (DM) E354I/D357Y;
FIG. 4 shows the emission spectra of (a) recombinant wild type enzyme and (b) the double mutant (DM) E354I/D357Y;
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the rate decay of photon emissions of recombinant wild-type (♦) r-wt and a D357K mutant enzyme (:)
FIG. 6 shows molecular modelling diagram, illustrating a potential CoA binding pocket within the luciferase enzyme;
FIG. 7 shows the in vivo bioluminescent spectra emitted by E. coli cells expressing mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y (a) growth on LB; (b) growth on minimal medium and sodium acetate; (c) growth on minimal medium and glucose;
FIG. 8 shows the in vivo bioluminescent spectra emitted by E. coli cells expressing mutant P. pyralis luciferase E354K/D357M (a) growth on LB; (b) growth on minimal medium and sodium acetate; (c) growth on minimal medium and glucose;
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y;
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the normalised data of the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase D357Y;
FIG. 11 is a graph showing the effect of CoA on spectral distribution of light emitted by mutant P. pyralis luciferase E354I/D357Y (FIG. 11 a) and normalised data (FIG. 11 b);
FIG. 12 illustrates the restriction sites modifications utilised in the construction of a synthetic luciferase gene;
FIG. 13 illustrates constructs used in the synthesis of a luciferase gene;
FIG. 14 shows the cDNA sequence (SEQ ID NO 1) of the synthetic luciferase gene (including nucleotides 1-8 which form part of the ribosome binding site but are not coding) and the encoded amino acid sequence which starts at the methionine residue indicated by the up arrow (SEQ ID NO 2); and
FIG. 15 illustrates the thermostability of mutants including the mutant encoded by the synthetic gene at 50° C.
EXAMPLE 1 Identification and Characterisation of Mutant Luciferase
Two libraries of firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase, created used error-prone PCR [M. Fromant et al., Anal. Biochem. (1995) 224, 347-353], were prepared. One library comprised of error-prone PCR products of the full length luc gene, cloned into the T7 expression system pET23a, (Novagen Inc., Madison, Wis., U.S.A.). A second library consisted of the error-prone PCR products of a short section of the luc gene, covering amino acids 199-352, cloned in the vector pBSK(+), (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., U.S.A.).
The pET23a library was expressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3), (E. coli B F dcm ompT hsdS(rs ms ) gala (DE3)).
The pBSK(+) library was expressed in HB101 E. coli cells, (supE44 ara14 galK2 lacY1 Δ(gpt-proA) 62 rpsL20 (Strr) xyl-5 mtl-1 recA13 Δ(mrcC-nmr) HsdS (rm). pET23a and pBSK(+) both carry the gene for β-lactamase and confer ampicillin resistance to E. coli cells harbouring the plasmid.
An E. coli strain was transformed with the prepared library by electroporation, using a BIORAD E. coli Pulser, and grown overnight at 37° C. on LB agar, containing ampicillin at a concentration of 50 μg/ml. The cells were transferred to nylon membranes, (Osmonics, Minnetonka, Minn., U.S.A.), and sprayed with luciferin solution (500 μm D-luciferin, potassium salt, in 100 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.0). The colonies were viewed using an ALPHAIMAGER™ 1200 documentation and analysis system (Flowgen, Lichfield, Staffordshire, UK). This integrated the bioluminescence emitted over a specified period of time to produce an image of the light emitted by the colonies. The brightness of luminescence was taken as an indication of the thermostability of luciferase.
The colonies were then screened for thermostability. Colonies were selected on the basis of brightness of light emitted and were isolated for further characterisation. In some screens, the E. coli colonies were incubated at 42° C. for 2 hours prior to screening so that the thermostable mutants could be selected. Colonies isolated from the primary screen were patched onto nylon membranes and also grown overnight in LB medium containing ampicillin. The patches were sprayed with luciferin solution and viewed in the ALPHAIMAGER™. This secondary screen helped to positively identify clones for in vitro analysis of luciferase activity. E. coli clones expressing possible thermostable enzymes were assayed in vitro for luciferase activity and thermostability.
In vitro assays for luciferase activity were performed at room temperature using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis., U.S.A.).
The luciferase reaction was initiated by the addition of 10 μl crude cell extract to 100 μl Promega Luciferase Assay Cocktail (1 in 2 dilution). The resultant bioluminescence was measured using a Biotrace M3 luminometer.
Crude cell extracts were prepared as described in the Promega technical bulletin no. 101. Aliquots of E. coli overnight cultures were lysed in cell culture lysis reagent, (25 mM Tris-phosphate pH7.8, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 2 mM 1,2-diaminocyclohexame-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.25 mg/ml hen lysozyme) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Crude lysate were then stored on ice prior to assay.
The properties of the enzymes were further tested in time-dependent inactivation studies. Eppendorf tubes containing 50 μl aliquots of crude cell extract were incubated in a water bath at a given temperature. At set time points tubes were removed and cooled on ice prior to assay. Remaining luciferase activity was expressed as a percentage of the original activity.
Log graphs of percentage remaining activity versus time of incubation were plotted and used to calculate t1/2 values. T1/2 is the time taken for the enzyme to lose 50% of its original activity after incubation at a given temperature. T1/2 values, (time for activity to reduce to 50% of original activity), were determined in crude extracts at 37° C. from log graphs of % remaining activity versus time (not shown).
Plasmid DNA from E. coli clones expressing the most thermostable luciferase as determined above, was sequenced in order to determine the mutations responsible for the thermostability of the enzyme.
Plasmid DNA was prepared using the QIAGEN QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit, (QIAGEN Ltd, Crawley, W. Sussex, UK), following the protocol for using a microcentrifuge (QIAprep Miniprep Handbook 04/98).
All DNA sequencing was undertaken by Babraham Technix, Cambridge, UK, using an ABI PRISM™ 377 DNA sequencer and the ABI PRISM™ BIGDYE™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems) which is based upon the dideoxy chain termination method [F. Sanger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, (1977) 5463-5467].
As a result of this work, the novel mutant D357Y was identified.
The crystal structure of luciferase [E. Conti et al., Structure, 4 (1996) 287-298] shows that position 357 is situated on the surface of the protein and is close to position 354, which can affect both thermostability and spectral properties. This indicates that this region could be important in terms of the thermostability of the enzyme.
D357Y is a particularly thermostable mutant, being the most thermostable luciferase, with a single amino acid change.
EXAMPLE 2 Site-Directed Mutagenesis to Create Other 357 Mutants
In order to evaluate different mutations at the 357 position, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the Stratagene QUIKCHANGE™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit, (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., U.S.A.). The plasmid pPW601a J54, (PJW, MOD report, 3/96), was used in all site-directed mutagenesis. All products of the mutagenesis reactions were transformed into E. coli strain XL1-Blue, [e14(mcrA) Δ(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)171 endA1 supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 lac recB recJ sbcC umuC::Tn5 (Kanr) uvrC [F′ proAB laclqZΔM15 Tn 10 (Tetr) Amy Camr]]
Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys Ltd., Cambridge, UK and were designed using an intelligent doping system (A. R. Arkin et al., Bio-technology, (1992) 10, 297-300, W., Huang et al., Anal. Biochem. 218, 454-457] were used to design degenerate oligonucleotide primers to produce groups of possible mutations rather than using individual primers for each amino acid substitution.
In this way, libraries of amino acid substituted luciferase mutants were produced.
The following oligonucleotides (and their complementary partners) were used:
Amino Acid
Oligonucleotide Primer (5′→3′) Substitution
cacccgagggggat[tat]aaaccgggcgcgg Y
(SEQ ID NO 4)
cacccgagggggat[(gac)(tc)(c)]aaaccgggcgcggtcgg A, I, L, T, V, P
(SEQ ID NO 5)
cacccgagggggat[(t)(gat)(gc)]aaaccgggcgcggtcgg C, F, L, W, Y, X
(SEQ ID NO 6)
cacccgagggggat[(ac)(ga)(gc)]aaaccgggcgcggtcgg R, S, K, N, H, Q
(SEQ ID NO 7)
The libraries of mutants were screened as previously for thermostability. The number of colonies to be screened was calculated using the equation [S. Climie et al., J. Biol. Chem. 265 (1990) 18776-18779]
N=[1n(1−P)]/[1n((n−1)/n)]
Where N is the number of colonies to be screened, n is the number of possible codons at the target position and P is the probability that every codon in the mixture is sampled for screening at least once. The calculation was based on P=0.95. The mutants obtained from site-directed mutagenesis were assayed for luciferase activity and characterised in time-dependent thermoinactivation studies.
Mutants identified as desirable in this way were grown in 400 ml LB medium, containing ampicillin, to A260≈0.5. Luciferase expression was then induced by addition of isopropyl β-thiogalactoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1 mM. The cells were then incubated at 30° C., with shaking, for 3 hours prior to harvesting by centrifugation. The resultant cell pellet was resuspended in 10 ml B-PER™ Protein Extraction Reagent, (Pierce Chemical Company, Rochford, U.S.A.), 1 mM DTT to produce a crude extract, following the B-PER™ protocol for Maxi-Scale Bacterial Protein Extraction. Reconstituted Sigma Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, 500 μl, (Product No. P8465, Sigma, Saint Louis, Mo., U.S.A.), was added to the BPER™ solution to inhibit endogenous proteases. The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 30 000 g for 30 minutes.
The supernatant of the crude extract was subjected to fractionation with ammonium sulphate. The fraction that precipitated between 30% and 55% saturation contained luciferase activity. This material was resuspended in 0.5 ml Tris HCl pH8.0, 1 mM DTT and used for thermoinactivation and spectral studies.
The replacements D357L, T, V, W, R, I, S, K, N and F were introduced. These mutants were characterised in in vitro thermoinactivation studies of crude extracts.
The partially purified extracts were diluted, 1 in 11, into a thermoinactivation buffer: 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH7.8 containing 10% saturated ammonium sulphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol and 0.2% BSA.
110 μl aliquots of protein solution were incubated at 40° C. or 45° C. for set periods of time and cooled on ice prior to assay. Luciferase activity was then measured as described in Example 1, using Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent (1 in 2 dilution).
The results are shown in Tables 2 & 3 and in FIG. 1. T1/2 values were determined in crude extracts at 40° C. (Table 2) and 45° C. (Table 3).
TABLE 2
Mutant T½
D357K 2.2
D357R 4.2
D357S 4.6
D357N 4.8
D357V 5.9
D357T 7.3
D357L 11.3
D357I 18.0
rWT <1.0
TABLE 3
Mutant T½
D357W 2.5
D357F 6.5
D357Y 10.4
RWT <1.0
All the substitutions displayed enhanced thermostability in comparison to recombinant wild type.
EXAMPLE 3 Changes in Wavelength of Emitted Light
Amino acid replacements at position 357 were also observed to affect the in vivo spectra of light emitted by the enzyme. An aliquot, (250 μl), of E. coli cell cultures, as described in Example 2 were grown overnight at 37° C., was spun down in a microcentrifuge and the supernatant removed. Cells expressing different mutant luciferases were incubated in a citrate buffer (pH5.0) containing 150 μl D-luciferin and the light emitted from the in vivo reaction was analysed by measuring the emission spectra using a SPECTRAMAX® Microplate Spectrofluorometer, (Molecular Devices Corp. California, U.S.A.). Large changes in the spectral peak as well as the distribution of wavelengths was observed for the mutants D357Y, F and I (FIG. 2( a)-(g)). These results are summarised in Table 4 below.
In addition, the in vivo luminescence of the mutants was assessed by eye in a dark room. The D357 mutants displayed a variety of colours in their luminescence spectra. In particular, D357Y, F and I showed significant shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light.
In some cases, (e.g. D357F), the change in colour of light emission appeared to be due, not only to a shift in λmax, but to a difference in contributions to the spectra from different wavelengths of visible light.
TABLE 4
Mutant λmax (nm) Deviation from rWT (nm)
rWT 558
D357K 556 −2
D357N 558 0
D357W 558 0
D357I 606 +48
D357F 611 +53
D357Y 613 +55
Recombinant wild type (r-wt) enzyme was used for comparison of λmax of in vivo light emission of some of the 357 mutants. D357Y, F and I display considerable shifts in their wavelength maxima.
EXAMPLE 4 Enzyme Properties in the Presence or Absence of CoA
D357Y was partially purified by ammonium sulphate precipitation, as described in the Example 1. This partially purified D357Y enzyme (5 μl) was mixed with 150 μl Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent. Another aliquot was mixed with an equivalent assay buffer in which CoA is absent, (25 mM Tris Tricine pH7.8, 5.0 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 470 μM D-luciferin, 530 μM ATP). The emission spectra of the two reactions were measured and are shown in FIGS. 9 and 10.
The spectra display a marked difference in bioluminescent emission in the absence and presence of CoA, with dramatic shift in λmax. The effect of CoA on the kinetics of the luciferase reaction can also be seen by in the difference in RLU scales. (RLU—Relative Light Units).
This difference in emission gives rise to the possibility of using the enzyme in an assay to detect the presence of CoA.
EXAMPLE 5 Preparation and Properties of Double Mutant
Using site-directed mutagensis as described in Example 2, a double mutant of E354I+D357Y was engineered in order to study any cumulative effects upon thermostability and colour of light emission.
The partially purified double mutant, E354I+D357Y, was diluted, 1 in 11, into a thermoinactivation buffer: 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH7.8 containing 10% saturated ammonium sulphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol and 0.2% BSA.
110 μl aliquots of protein solution were incubated at 45° C. for set periods of time and cooled on ice prior to assay. Luciferase activity was then measured as previously, using Promega Luciferase Assay Reagent (1 in 2 dilution).
The double mutant displayed a marked increase in thermostability in comparison to the single mutants E354I and D357Y individually, (see FIG. 3). Thermoinactivation studies of partially purified double mutant confirmed the increased thermostability of the mutant, giving a t1/2 value of 7.7 min when inactivated at 45° C.
It was noted that the double mutant displays a much deeper red colour of luminescence than the individual mutants of E354I and D357Y, displaying additivity of colour of luminescence.
The emission spectra of recombinant wild type and the crude extract of the double mutant E354I+D357Y were also measured using the assay buffer described in Example 3.
Emission spectra measured in vivo give a λmax of 611 nm. However, the spectrum has a greater contribution of luminescence from the red region of wavelengths, leading to its deeper red appearance when visualised by eye. Emission spectra in crude extracts displayed a definite change in spectral shape and a wavelength shift of 44 nm, relative to rWT, (see FIG. 4).
The in vivo emission spectrum of the double mutant shows both a sharpening of the bandwidth for the peak wavelength of emitted light (613 nm) and a decrease in the contribution from wavelengths of light in the region 540-560 nm.
The dramatic effect of these mutations indicates the importance of this region of the enzyme to the colour of bioluminescent light.
EXAMPLE 6 Improved Photon Flux
The in vivo bioluminescence of E. coli cells expressing the mutant D357K was observed to be very bright relative to the other mutants at this position. The flash kinetics of this enzyme was analysed using a luminometer, which could measure the rate of photon emission over time. Aliquots of E. coli cell free extracts containing recombinant wild type enzyme or the mutant D357 were added to a luciferase assay cocktail, which did not contain any reagents that would promote glow kinetics, e.g. coenzymeA. The rate of decay of photon emission measured over time (15s) for both enzymes was observed to be significantly slower for the mutant D357K (FIG. 5). In other words, the mutant enzyme has reaction kinetics, which are inhibited to a lesser degree; over at least the first 15 seconds of the reaction, than the recombinant wild type enzyme.
EXAMPLE 7 Combinatorial Cassette Mutagenesis at Positions E354 and D357
Step 1
Engineering Plasmid pPW601aJ54 for Cassette Mutagenesis
Two new unique restriction sites were introduced into the luc gene, in the plasmid pPW601a/J54, using two pairs of synthetic oligonucleotides (see below). A total of six silent mutations introduced a SpeI and a KpnI restriction site, 63 base pairs apart, within the gene. Plasmid containing these new sites was called pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI. The presence and proximity of these restriction sites makes it possible to use combinatorial cassette mutagenesis to explore the effects of random substitutions at amino acid positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence of firefly luciferase.
SpeI (a) 5′-gggctcactgagactacTAGTgctattatgattacacc
cg-3′ nt1021- nt1060 (SEQ ID NO 8)
SpeI (b) 5′-cgggtgtaatcagaatagcACTAgtagtctcagtgagc
cc-3′ (SEQ ID NO 9)
KpnI (a) 5′-ggcgcggtcggtaaagtGgtAccattttttgaagcg-3′
nt1078-nt1113 (SEQ ID NO 10)
KpnI (b) 5′-cgcttcaaaaaatggTacCactttaccgaccgcgcc-3′
(SEQ ID NO 11)
Nucleotides highlighted in bold form the endonuclease recognition site and those in upper case the position of the point mutations necessary to create the site.
Step 2
Cassette Design and Library Construction
A pair of synthetic oligonucleotides was synthesised which when annealed created a double stranded cassette which could be ligated directly into plasmid pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI digested at the new restriction sites. The cassette was designed to introduce all possible combinations of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids at positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence.
Looplib2A
5′-ctagtgctattctgattacacccNNG/CggggatNNG/Caaaccgggc
gcggtcggtaaagtggta-3′(SEQ ID NO 12)
Looplib2B
5′-cactttaccgaccgcgcccggtttG/CNNatccccG/CNNgggtgtaa
tcagaatagca-3′
(SEQ ID NO 13)
2 μg of each of the loop library oligonucleotides was mixed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 25 mM NaCl, and heated to 100° C. for 3 min. This solution was then cooled slowly in a heating block to <50° C. to anneal the complimentary sequences. The annealed oligonucleotides were then ligated into plasmid pPW601aJ54SpeI/KpnI, which had been digested with SpeI and KpnI. Aliquots of the ligation reaction were then used to transform E. coli HB101 cells using electroporation. After electroporation transformed cells were plated out on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin and grown overnight at 37° C. The following day 869 colonies were picked at random from the plates and used to inoculate 1 ml of LB containing ampicillin in 96 square-well plates (Beckman). The plates were covered and the cells grown overnight at 37° C. with shaking.
Step 3
In Vivo Screening the Randomly Selected Clones
The next morning 50 μl aliquots of the stationary phase overnight cultures were transferred to two clear plastic round bottom 96 well microtitre plates (Dynex). One plate was covered and incubated on a heated block for 8 minutes (block surface temperature 45° C.) whilst the other was kept at 37° C. The in vivo luciferase activity in the cells from both plates was then detected and recorded, at room temperature, by adding 50 μl of a 100 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.5 mM D-luciferin to the wells and then transferring the plate to a video camera imager capture system (Alpha Imager). The light emitted by the heated and control cultures was integrated over 1 or 2 minutes and the image recorded on thermal paper film.
Seventy-nine cultures exhibiting the greatest bioluminescence, as determined by the brightness of the image recorded on film, were selected for a second round of screening. This time the cultures were incubated for 16 minutes on the heating block prior to being assayed. Of the 55 clones selected from the in vivo thermostability screens 25 were chosen for in vivo spectral analysis. These clones were grown overnight in LB at 37° C. and the next morning 200 ul of the overnight cultures was centrifuged and the E. coli cell pellets were resuspended in 150 μl of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.5 mM D-luciferin. The resuspended cells were then placed in a white plastic microtitre plate and the in vivo bioluminescent emission spectrum emitted by each of the mutant luciferases was analysed using a Molecular Devices Spectramax 96 well plate fluorimeter. The results are summarised in the Table 1 below.
Step 4
Identification of Mutations
Plasmid DNA was prepared from the 25 clones selected by in vivo screening and sequenced using gene specific sequencing primers. Mutations resulting in amino acid changes at positions 354 and 357 in the primary sequence were identified. One mutant, also contained an additional mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution at position I351 (Table 5).
TABLE 5
Mutant Peak
Enzyme Mutations Wavelengths (nm)
1 E354V/D357Y 614
2 E354I/D357Y 612
3 E354C/D357Y 612
4 E354R/D357Y 600
5 E354S/D357Y 612
6 E354N/D357Y 608
7 E354K/D357M 556, 606
8 E354R/D357L 588
9 E354W/D357W 610
10 E354H/D357W 606
11 E354R/D357F 596
12 E354K/D357F 608
13 E354S/D357F 610
14 E354M/D357F 610
15 E354A/D357R 556
16 E354A/D357F 610
17 E354T/D357Y 612
18 E354A/D357N 560
19 I351M/E354R/D357V 606
20 E354S/D357V 556, 608
21 E354R/D357W 600
22 E354R/D357M 596
23 E354R/D357S 592
24 E354N/D357S 600
rWT E354/D357 552

where rWT signifies recombinant wild-type.
A number of mutant luciferases were selected from the in vivo assays for thermostability. The majority of these luciferases also show large changes in the in vivo spectrum of emitted light with many showing greater contributions from longer wavelengths of light (>580 nm). A number of spectra also showed a significant narrowing of bandwidth around a single peak of 610-614 nm.
Replacements of E354 and D357 with a hydrophobic and an aromatic amino acid respectively e.g. E354V, D357Y results in the largest change in the in vivo spectrum which shows a single peak, of narrow bandwidth, around 612 nm.
EXAMPLE 8 In Vitro Screening for Thermostability
Cell free extracts of the selected clones were prepared by lysis and the thermostability of the luciferase from each extract was determined in a thermal inactivation experiment. 50 μl of each extract was placed in an eppendorf tube and incubated in a waterbath heated to 45° C. for 4, 9 and 16 minutes. At the appropriate timepoint the aliquot was removed and the remaining luciferase activity measured. Table 6 shows the percent remaining activity versus time for all mutant enzymes as well as recombinant wild type.
TABLE 6
Enzyme Percentage activity remaining after incubation at
No. (see 45° C.
Table 5) 0 min 4 min 9 min 16 min
 1 100 95 87 75.4
 2 100 99 84.7 67.7
 3 100 92 73 53.3
 4 100 94 89 71.4
 5 100 85 72.2 53
 6 100 93 84.8 71
 7 100 63.7 31 11.7
 8 100 58.6 19 4.9
 9 100 85.4 65.3 42.3
10 100 65.5 27.8 10.6
11 100 88.6 70 54
12 100 90 69 52
13 100 83 60.5 39
14 100 80 61 39
15 100 1.7 0.1 nd
16 100 90 76 63
17 100 91 78 60
18 100 19 1.8 nd
19 100 17 1.4 nd
20 100 17 1.1 nd
21 100 71 63 34
22 100 80 40 21
23 100 29 4 0.6
24 100 28 4 0.4
25 (D357K) 100 0.1 nd nd
rWT
100 0.05 nd nd
where “nd” indicates not done.
The results indicate that the most thermostable luciferases were those with an aromatic amino acid at position 357 (Y, F or W) and a large hydrophobic (V or I), polar (N) or positively charged (K or R) amino acid at position 354.
EXAMPLE 9 Effect of Growth Conditions on the In Vivo Spectrum of Emitted Light
The effect of different carbon sources on the spectrum of emitted light from E. coli BL21(DE3) cells expressing mutant luciferases D357Y or E354K+ D357M (7 above) was investigated.
A 50 ml culture of cells was grown to mid log phase on LB medium and then harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of sterile distilled water and a 100 ul aliquot of this suspension was then used to inoculate 5 ml of fresh LB, M9 minimal medium+2 mM sodium acetate or M9 minimal medium+2 mM glucose in a 25 ml Sterilin tube. The cultures were allowed to continue growing, at 37° C. with shaking, and after 90 minutes (D357Y) or 120 minutes (enzyme 7) a 200 μl aliquot of cells was removed centrifuged and resuspended in 150 ul of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.5 mM D-luciferin. The resuspended cells were then placed in a microtitre plate and the in vivo bioluminescent emission spectrum emitted by each of the mutant luciferases was analysed using a Molecular Devices Spectramax 96 well plate fluorimeter. The results are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8.
The results show that switching from a rich medium (LB) (FIG. 7 a, 8a) to a defined minimal medium with either acetate (FIG. 7 b, 8b) or glucose (FIG. 7 c, 8c) as the sole carbon source resulted in shifts to longer wavelengths of emitted light and a reduction in the contribution from shorter wavelengths.
EXAMPLE 10 Purification and Spectral Characterisation of Recombinant Wild Type, and Mutant Luciferases
Recombinant wild type Photinus pyralis enzyme and the mutant luciferases D357Y and E354I+D357Y were purified to homogeneity in order to analyse the effect of the cofactor coenzyme A on the spectrum of the bioluminescent reaction. All three luciferases were purified as fusions to a 143 amino acid carbohydrate binding module (CBM) from the anaerobic fungus Piromyces equii. This CBM has been shown to bind selectively to acid swollen cellulose and the soluble carbohydrates galactomannan and glucomannan, forming the basis for a simple single step affinity purification scheme.
Luciferases fused to the CBM can be bound to cellulose in crude cell free extracts, washed, and then eluted selectively using soluble polysaccharides. Fusion proteins purified this way were used in assays to measure the wavelengths of emitted light in reactions containing different amounts of coenzyme A. Enzyme (5 μl) was added to 100 μl of assay reagent, 25 mM Tris-Tricine pH 7.8, 5.0 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 530 μM ATP and 470 μM D-luciferin, containing different amounts of coenzyme A. FIGS. 9-11 show the effect of increasing concentrations of coenzyme A on the spectrum of light emitted by the purified luciferases D357 and E354I+D357Y.
In vivo assays of the spectrum of bioluminescent light emitted by E. coli cells expressing firefly luciferase fused to the C-terminus of the fungal CBM did not show any significant differences from cells expressing the native luciferase Similarly, in vitro assays of the spectrum of bioluminescent light emitted by a commercial source of purified recombinant luciferase (Promega) were identical to the spectrum emitted by the fusion protein.
The observed differences are therefore associated with the concentrations of CoA. As the concentration of coenzyme A increases the spectral distribution alters and at the highest concentrations of CoA the spectrum is dominated by wavelengths in the region 590-630 nm with a pronounced peak at 610 nm. The spectral shift is most marked for the double mutant where there is a significant narrowing of bandwidth around a single peak of wavelength 610 nm (FIG. 11).
EXAMPLE 12 Production of Synthetic Photinus pyralis Luciferase Mutated Such that it has 214C/354K/357F
A synthetic luc gene was designed and assembled from oligonucleotide pairs using the synthesis strategy outlined above. The gene sequence was engineered to create a luciferase with the amino acids 214C, 354K and 357F.
Twenty-nine pairs of overlapping synthetic oligonucleotides were synthesised by Sigma-Genosys Ltd, purified by PAGE and ligated in three assemblies of approximately 550 bp ( IDRIS 1, 2 & 3, FIG. 13). Each assembly was then ligated separately into the vector pBSK(+) and the resulting constructs were used to transform E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Plasmid DNA was prepared from clones containing the assembled inserts and sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the ORFs. The presence of n-1 oligonucleotides (by-products of the oligosynthesis) in the assemblies complicated the build process. DNA sequencing identified a single correct assembly of IDRIS 2 and the PCR was used to correct one assembly of IDRIS 3 which contained a single base pair deletion at the 5′ end of the construct. Assembly of the complete ORF was achieved by ligating a mixture of plasmids containing IDRIS 1 with IDRIS 2 and 3.
The ligated DNA was then used to transform E. coli XL1-Blue cells and clones expressing active enzyme were selected using an in vivo assay. Several clones were selected and sequenced to confirm the presence and fidelity of the synthetic luc gene having the sequence shown in FIG. 14. The complete ORF was called IDRIS (FA).
The synthetic gene was assembled into the vector pBSK(+) between the BamH I and Sal I sites in the polylinker. In this position the gene is not in frame with the alpha peptide and is a significant distance from the lac promoter. However, enough luciferase is produced to enable preliminary characterisation of the enzyme. Crude cell free extracts of E. coli XL1-Blue cells expressing IDRIS (FA) were prepared, from overnight cultures, using the Promega lysis method.
The thermostability of the enzyme in the extract was then tested at 50° C. over 20 minutes and compared with the thermostable mutant E354I+D357Y. The new codon optimised triple mutant was significantly more thermostable than the mutant E354I+D357Y (FIG. 15).

Claims (15)

The invention claimed is:
1. A recombinant protein having luciferase activity and having an amino acid sequence with at least 90% sequence similarity to SEQ ID NO: 2, wherein, in the sequence of the recombinant protein, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 of SEQ ID NO: 2 is tyrosine or phenylalanine, such that the recombinant protein is able to emit light at a different wavelength as compared to wild-type Photinus pyralis luciferase.
2. A nucleic acid which encodes the recombinant luciferase protein of claim 1.
3. The nucleic acid of claim 2 which comprises a synthetic gene.
4. The nucleic acid of claim 2 wherein the codon usage has been optimized for an Escherichia coli expression host and/or unique restriction sites have been introduced.
5. The nucleic acid of claim 2 which comprises nucleotides 9-1661 of SEQ ID NO: 1.
6. A vector comprising the nucleic acid of claim 2.
7. An isolated cell transformed with the vector of claim 6.
8. The recombinant protein of claim 1 wherein the recombinant protein has enhanced thermostability as compared to wild-type Photinus pyralis luciferase.
9. A recombinant protein having luciferase activity and having an amino acid sequence with at least 90% sequence similarity to SEQ ID NO: 2, wherein, in the sequence of the recombinant protein, the amino acid residue corresponding to residue 357 of SEQ ID NO: 2 is tyrosine or phenylalanine and the amino acid residue of the recombinant luciferase corresponding to residue 354 of SEQ ID NO:2 is cysteine, serine, methionine, alanine or threonine.
10. The recombinant protein of claim 9, wherein the recombinant protein has enhanced thermostability as compared to wild-type Photinus pyralis luciferase.
11. A nucleic acid which encodes the recombinant luciferase protein of claim 9.
12. The nucleic acid of claim 11 which comprises a synthetic gene.
13. The nucleic acid of claim 11 wherein the codon usage has been optimized for an Escherichia coli expression host and/or unique restriction sites have been introduced.
14. A vector comprising the nucleic acid of claim 11.
15. An isolated cell transformed with the vector of claim 14.
US10/111,723 1999-10-26 2000-10-26 Luciferase mutant Expired - Lifetime US8669087B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9925161.3 1999-10-26
GBGB9925161.3A GB9925161D0 (en) 1999-10-26 1999-10-26 Novel enzyme
GB0016744.5 2000-07-10
GBGB0016744.5A GB0016744D0 (en) 1999-10-26 2000-07-10 Novel enzyme
PCT/GB2000/004133 WO2001031028A2 (en) 1999-10-26 2000-10-26 Mutant luciferase

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2000/004133 A-371-Of-International WO2001031028A2 (en) 1999-10-26 2000-10-26 Mutant luciferase

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/180,505 Division US20140186918A1 (en) 1999-10-26 2014-02-14 Luciferase mutant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US8669087B1 true US8669087B1 (en) 2014-03-11

Family

ID=10863292

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/111,723 Expired - Lifetime US8669087B1 (en) 1999-10-26 2000-10-26 Luciferase mutant
US14/180,505 Abandoned US20140186918A1 (en) 1999-10-26 2014-02-14 Luciferase mutant

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/180,505 Abandoned US20140186918A1 (en) 1999-10-26 2014-02-14 Luciferase mutant

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US8669087B1 (en)
EP (2) EP1935980B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2011083289A (en)
GB (2) GB9925161D0 (en)
HK (1) HK1055443A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200203170B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8822170B2 (en) 1997-09-19 2014-09-02 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US9732373B2 (en) 2014-09-11 2017-08-15 Promega Corporation Luciferase sequences utilizing infrared-emitting substrates to produce enhanced luminescence
CN111315875A (en) * 2017-10-25 2020-06-19 豪夫迈·罗氏有限公司 Improved modified/mutated bacterial luciferases

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101968475B1 (en) 2010-11-02 2019-04-15 프로메가 코포레이션 Coelenterazine derivatives and methods of using same
CA2817102C (en) 2010-11-02 2020-07-28 Promega Corporation Oplophorus-derived luciferases, novel coelenterazine substrates, and methods of use
CN102191213B (en) * 2011-04-14 2012-10-03 中国科学院武汉病毒研究所 Gene encoding of firefly luciferase, its preparation method and application
EP3099691B1 (en) 2014-01-29 2019-11-20 Promega Corporation Pro-substrates for live cell applications
WO2015116867A1 (en) 2014-01-29 2015-08-06 Promega Corporation Quinone-masked probes as labeling reagents for cell uptake measurements
JP6412718B2 (en) * 2014-05-27 2018-10-24 オリンパス株式会社 Promoter assay
JP6493316B2 (en) * 2016-06-21 2019-04-03 東亜ディーケーケー株式会社 Mutant beetle luciferase, gene, recombinant vector, transformant, and method for producing mutant beetle luciferase

Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0337349A2 (en) 1988-04-12 1989-10-18 Kikkoman Corporation Luciferase
US5049358A (en) 1988-09-30 1991-09-17 Miles Inc. Composition and test device for assaying for proteins
EP0449621A1 (en) 1990-03-27 1991-10-02 Kikkoman Corporation Mutant luciferase of a firefly, mutant luciferase genes, novel recombinant DNAS containing the genes and a method of producing mutant luciferase
EP0524448A1 (en) 1991-06-27 1993-01-27 Kikkoman Corporation Thermostable luciferase of a firefly, gene of a thermostable luciferase of a firefly, novel recombinant DNA, and process for the preparation of a thermostable luciferase of a firefly
US5196524A (en) 1989-01-06 1993-03-23 Eli Lilly And Company Fusion reporter gene for bacterial luciferase
JPH05244942A (en) 1991-06-27 1993-09-24 Kikkoman Corp Heat-stable firefly luciferase, heat-stable firefly luciferase gene, new recombinant dna and production of heat-stable firefly luciferase
WO1995018853A1 (en) 1994-01-03 1995-07-13 Promega Corporation Mutant luciferases
WO1995025798A1 (en) 1994-03-23 1995-09-28 The Secretary Of State Of Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Luciferases
EP0680515A1 (en) 1993-01-21 1995-11-08 The Secretary of State for Defence in Her Britannic Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Microbiological test method and reagents
US5480789A (en) 1991-04-01 1996-01-02 Florigene Europe B.V. Genetically transformed rose plants and methods for their production
WO1996002665A1 (en) 1994-07-13 1996-02-01 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Microbiological test method and reagents
WO1996022376A1 (en) 1995-01-20 1996-07-25 The Secretary Of State For Defence Mutant luciferases
GB2301592A (en) 1994-03-23 1996-12-11 Secr Defence Luciferases
US5605793A (en) 1994-02-17 1997-02-25 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for in vitro recombination
US5670356A (en) 1994-12-12 1997-09-23 Promega Corporation Modified luciferase
US5674713A (en) 1985-12-02 1997-10-07 The Regents Of The University Of California DNA sequences encoding coleoptera luciferase activity
JPH09294600A (en) 1996-04-26 1997-11-18 Kikkoman Corp Determination of activity of a plurality of promoters
US5716851A (en) 1996-01-16 1998-02-10 Bayer Corporation Glass/cellulose as protein reagent
WO1998013487A1 (en) 1996-09-27 1998-04-02 Maxygen, Inc. Methods for optimization of gene therapy by recursive sequence shuffling and selection
WO1998046729A2 (en) 1997-04-11 1998-10-22 The Secretary Of State For Defence Enzyme assay for mutant firefly luciferase
WO1999014336A2 (en) 1997-09-19 1999-03-25 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
WO2000024878A2 (en) 1998-10-28 2000-05-04 The Secretary Of State For Defence Mutant luciferase having increased thermostability
US6074859A (en) 1997-07-08 2000-06-13 Kikkoman Corporation Mutant-type bioluminescent protein, and process for producing the mutant-type bioluminescent protein
WO2001020002A1 (en) 1999-09-15 2001-03-22 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases from photuris pennsylvanica and pyrophorus plagiophthalamus and methods of production
WO2001031028A2 (en) 1999-10-26 2001-05-03 The Secretary Of State For Defence Mutant luciferase
US6387675B1 (en) 1994-01-03 2002-05-14 Promega Corporation Mutant luciferases
US20050048592A1 (en) 2001-02-16 2005-03-03 Keith Wood Kits for detection of ATP
US7183092B2 (en) * 2003-10-03 2007-02-27 Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University Modified luciferase
JP5244942B2 (en) 2011-04-25 2013-07-24 株式会社グレイプ Bracing attachment structure

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5782879A (en) 1980-11-12 1982-05-24 Mita Ind Co Ltd Photosensitive drum of electrostatic copier

Patent Citations (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5700673A (en) 1985-12-02 1997-12-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Recombinantly produced Coleoptera luciferase and fusion proteins thereof
US5674713A (en) 1985-12-02 1997-10-07 The Regents Of The University Of California DNA sequences encoding coleoptera luciferase activity
EP0337349A2 (en) 1988-04-12 1989-10-18 Kikkoman Corporation Luciferase
US5049358A (en) 1988-09-30 1991-09-17 Miles Inc. Composition and test device for assaying for proteins
US5196524A (en) 1989-01-06 1993-03-23 Eli Lilly And Company Fusion reporter gene for bacterial luciferase
EP0449621A1 (en) 1990-03-27 1991-10-02 Kikkoman Corporation Mutant luciferase of a firefly, mutant luciferase genes, novel recombinant DNAS containing the genes and a method of producing mutant luciferase
US5219737A (en) 1990-03-27 1993-06-15 Kikkoman Corporation Mutant luciferase of a firefly, mutant luciferase genes, recombinant dnas containing the genes and a method of producing mutant luciferase
US5480789A (en) 1991-04-01 1996-01-02 Florigene Europe B.V. Genetically transformed rose plants and methods for their production
US5229285A (en) 1991-06-27 1993-07-20 Kikkoman Corporation Thermostable luciferase of firefly, thermostable luciferase gene of firefly, novel recombinant dna, and process for the preparation of thermostable luciferase of firefly
JPH05244942A (en) 1991-06-27 1993-09-24 Kikkoman Corp Heat-stable firefly luciferase, heat-stable firefly luciferase gene, new recombinant dna and production of heat-stable firefly luciferase
EP0524448A1 (en) 1991-06-27 1993-01-27 Kikkoman Corporation Thermostable luciferase of a firefly, gene of a thermostable luciferase of a firefly, novel recombinant DNA, and process for the preparation of a thermostable luciferase of a firefly
EP0680515A1 (en) 1993-01-21 1995-11-08 The Secretary of State for Defence in Her Britannic Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Microbiological test method and reagents
WO1995018853A1 (en) 1994-01-03 1995-07-13 Promega Corporation Mutant luciferases
US6387675B1 (en) 1994-01-03 2002-05-14 Promega Corporation Mutant luciferases
JPH08510387A (en) 1994-01-03 1996-11-05 プロメガ・コーポレイシヨン Mutant luciferase
US5605793A (en) 1994-02-17 1997-02-25 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for in vitro recombination
US6132983A (en) 1994-03-23 2000-10-17 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Luciferases
GB2301592A (en) 1994-03-23 1996-12-11 Secr Defence Luciferases
WO1995025798A1 (en) 1994-03-23 1995-09-28 The Secretary Of State Of Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Luciferases
JPH09510610A (en) 1994-03-23 1997-10-28 イギリス国 Luciferase
WO1996002665A1 (en) 1994-07-13 1996-02-01 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Microbiological test method and reagents
US5670356A (en) 1994-12-12 1997-09-23 Promega Corporation Modified luciferase
WO1996022376A1 (en) 1995-01-20 1996-07-25 The Secretary Of State For Defence Mutant luciferases
US6171808B1 (en) 1995-01-20 2001-01-09 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Mutant luciferases
US5716851A (en) 1996-01-16 1998-02-10 Bayer Corporation Glass/cellulose as protein reagent
JPH09294600A (en) 1996-04-26 1997-11-18 Kikkoman Corp Determination of activity of a plurality of promoters
WO1998013487A1 (en) 1996-09-27 1998-04-02 Maxygen, Inc. Methods for optimization of gene therapy by recursive sequence shuffling and selection
WO1998046729A2 (en) 1997-04-11 1998-10-22 The Secretary Of State For Defence Enzyme assay for mutant firefly luciferase
US6265177B1 (en) 1997-04-11 2001-07-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The State Of Defence Enzyme assay for mutant firefly luciferase
US6074859A (en) 1997-07-08 2000-06-13 Kikkoman Corporation Mutant-type bioluminescent protein, and process for producing the mutant-type bioluminescent protein
US20090137019A1 (en) 1997-09-19 2009-05-28 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US20060183212A1 (en) 1997-09-19 2006-08-17 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US20120009647A1 (en) 1997-09-19 2012-01-12 Wood Keith V Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US20090311769A1 (en) 1997-09-19 2009-12-17 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
WO1999014336A2 (en) 1997-09-19 1999-03-25 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US20030068801A1 (en) * 1997-09-19 2003-04-10 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US6602677B1 (en) 1997-09-19 2003-08-05 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US20030232404A1 (en) * 1997-09-19 2003-12-18 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US7241584B2 (en) 1997-09-19 2007-07-10 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
GB2345913A (en) 1998-10-28 2000-07-26 Secr Defence Mutant luciferase enzyme with increased thermostability
WO2000024878A2 (en) 1998-10-28 2000-05-04 The Secretary Of State For Defence Mutant luciferase having increased thermostability
EP2366778A1 (en) 1998-10-28 2011-09-21 Promega Corporation Mutant luciferase having increased thermostability
JP2012161325A (en) 1998-10-28 2012-08-30 Promega Corp New enzyme
WO2001020002A1 (en) 1999-09-15 2001-03-22 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases from photuris pennsylvanica and pyrophorus plagiophthalamus and methods of production
EP1224294B1 (en) 1999-10-26 2007-10-03 The Secretary of State for Defence Mutant luciferase
WO2001031028A2 (en) 1999-10-26 2001-05-03 The Secretary Of State For Defence Mutant luciferase
US20050048592A1 (en) 2001-02-16 2005-03-03 Keith Wood Kits for detection of ATP
US7183092B2 (en) * 2003-10-03 2007-02-27 Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University Modified luciferase
JP5244942B2 (en) 2011-04-25 2013-07-24 株式会社グレイプ Bracing attachment structure

Non-Patent Citations (153)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Alberts, et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, Third Edition, Garland Publishing, Inc., New York and London, pp. 56-57 (1997).
Amendment and Response and Request for Extension of Time e-filed on Dec. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824, filed Feb. 27, 2001 (30 pgs.).
Arkin, et al., "Optimizing Nucleotide Mixtures to Encode Specific Subsets of Amino Acids for Semi-random Mutagenesis," Bio-technology, 10:297-300 (1992).
Arnold, F.H., "Directed evolution: creating biocatalysts for the future," Chem. Eng. Sci. (1996) 51:5091-5102.
Arslan, T. et al., "Structurally modified firefly luciferase. Effects of amino acid substitution at position 286," J. Amer. Chem. Soc. (1997) 119(45):10877-10887.
Australian Patent Office Action for Application No. 10425/10 dated Feb. 28, 2003 (2 pages).
Barnes, Wayne M.; "Variable patterns of expression of luciferase in transgenic tobacco leaves"; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci; vol. 87; Dec. 1990; pp. 9183-9187.
Bowie et al., "Deciphering the message in protein sequences tolerance to amino acid substitutions," Science (1990) 247:1306-1310.
Branden et al. "Introduction to Protein Structure", Garland Publishing Inc., New York, 1991. *
Cadwell, R.C. et al., "Randomization of genes by PCR mutagenesis," PCR Methods and Applications (1992) 2:28-33.
Canadian Patent Office Examination Report for Application No. 2387691 dated Sep. 15, 2008 (2 pages).
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 00817736.8 dated Apr. 6, 2007 (12 pages) with English translation.
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 00817736.8 dated Apr. 8, 2005 (12 pages) with English translation.
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 00817736.8 dated May 9, 2007 (8 pages) with English translation.
Climie, et al., "Saturation Site-directed Mutagenesis of Thymidylate Synthase, "J. Biol Chem., 265:18776-18779 (1990).
Conti, et al., Structure, 4:287-298 (1996).
Database EMBL-Dbfetch; EMBL Accession No. D25415 www.ebi.ac.uk/cgi-bin/dbfetch (Nov. 15, 1996) (2 pgs.).
De Wet, J.R. et al., "Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells," Mol. Cell. Biol. (1987) 7(2):725-737.
Dementieva, E.I. et al., "Assay of ATP in intact Escherichia coli cells expressing recombinant firefly luciferase," Biochem. (1996) 61(7):915-920.
Dementieva, E.I., "Physiocochemical properties of recombinant Luciolo mingrelica luciferase and its mutant forms," Biochem. (1996) 61(1):115-119.
Devereux, et al., "A Comprehensive Set of Sequence Analysis Programs for the VAX," Nucleic Acid Research, 12:387-395 (1984).
Devine, J.H. et al., "Luciferase from the East European firefly Luciola mingrelica: cloning and nucleotide sequence of the cDNA, overexpression in escherichia coli and purification of the enzyme," Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (1993) 1173:121-132.
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 00971589.7 dated Dec. 30, 2005 (11 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 00971589.7 dated Jan. 30, 2004 (12 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 00971589.7 dated Jun. 25, 2003 (9 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 00971589.7 dated Mar. 30, 2005 (8 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 00971589.7 dated May 17, 2004 (7 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 00971589.7 dated Oct. 13, 2006 (6 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 07017621.9 dated Nov. 9, 2011 (7 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 10178711.7 dated Feb. 7, 2012 (17 pages).
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 10178711.7 dated Sep. 27, 2012 (11 pages).
European Patent Office Seach Report for Application No. 07017621.9 dated May 20, 2008 (21 pages).
Fromant, et al., "Direct Random Mutagenesis of Gene-sized DNA Fragments Using Polymerase Chain Reaction," Anal. Biochem., 224:347-353 (1995).
GenBank Accession No. Q26076, Oct. 2006, 2 pages. *
Hanahan, "Techniques for transformation of E. coli," In: DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach, Glover, D.W. editor, IRL Press, Oxford (1985) 1(6):109-135.
Huang, et al., "Identification of biologically Active Mutants by Combinatorial Cassette Mutagenesis Exclusion of Wild-type Codon from Degenerate Codons," Anal. Biochem., 218:454-457 (1994).
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/GB00/004133 dated May 30, 2002 (11 pages).
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/GB1995/000629 dated Jul. 12, 1996 (4 pages).
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/GB96/00099 dated Apr. 10, 1997 (5 pages).
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/GB98/01026 dated Jun. 29, 1999 (5 pages).
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/GB99/003538 dated Aug. 14, 2000 (4 pages).
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US98/19494 dated Jan. 11, 2000 (8 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB00/004133 dated Aug. 1, 2001 (4 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB1995/000629 dated Aug. 1, 1995 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB96/00099 dated May 9, 1996 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB98/01026 dated Oct. 13, 1998 (4 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB99/003538 dated May 23, 2000 (5 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US95/00108 dated Apr. 17, 1995 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US98/19494 dated Apr. 16, 1999 (5 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US99/30925 dated Aug. 14, 2000 (10 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB99/003538 dated Mar. 20, 2000 (5 pages).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search Report for Application No. PCT/US99/30925 dated Jun. 2, 2000 (12 pages).
J. Sambrook, et al., "Molecular Cloning," 2nd Ed., pp. 17.37-17.39 (1989).
Janowski, M., "Ras proteins and the Ras-related signal transduction pathway," Radiation & Env. Biophys. (1991) 30(3):185-189.
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2001-533163 dated Jul. 5, 2010 (12 pages) with English translation.
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2001-533163 dated Mar. 26, 2012 (English Translation and Original, 9 pages).
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2001-533163 dated Nov. 7, 2011 (12 pages) with English translation.
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2011-000791 dated Apr. 3, 2013 (14 pages).
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2011-000791 dated Sep. 13, 2012 (5 pages) with English translation.
Kajiyama, N. et al., "Enhancement of thermostability of forefly luciferase from Luciola lateralis by a single amino acid substitution," Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. (1994) 58(6):1170-1171.
Kajiyama, N. et al., "Isolation and characterization of mutants of firefly luciferase which produce different colors of light," Protein Eng. (1991) 4(6):691-693.
Kajiyama, N. et al., "Thermo stabilization of firefly luciferase by a single amino acid substitution at position 217," Biochem. (1993) 32(50):13795-13799.
Klock, C., "Cloning vector pGEM-luc," Promega Corporation, Accession No. X65316 (Apr. 7, 1992) 5 pages.
Kutuzova et al., "Bioluminescence color variation and kinetic behavior relationships among beetle luciferases," Bioluminescence & Chemiluminescence, Molecular Reporting with Photons, J.W. Hastings et al. editors, John Wiley & Sons (1996) 248-252.
L. Ye, et al., "Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA for firefly luciferase from Photuris pennsylvanica," Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1339, pp. 39-52 (1997).
Law, G.H. et al.; "Mutagenesis of solvent-exposed amino acids in Photinus pyralis luciferase improves thermostability and pH-tolerance"; Biochem. J. (2006) 397; pp. 305-312.
Lipman, et al, Rapid and Sensitive Protein Similarity Searches, Science, 22:1435-1441 (1985).
Liu, Y. et al., "Factors influencing the efficiency of cationic liposome-mediated intravenous gene delivery," Nature Biotech. (1997) 15:167-173.
Manukhov et al., "Cloning of the vibrio harveyi luxA and luxB genes and the expression fo bioluminescence in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtillis," Russian Biotech. (1996) 1:1-6.
New Zealand Patent Office Action for Application No. 518413 dated Apr. 29, 2004 (2 pages).
New Zealand Patent Office Action for Application No. 518413 dated Dec. 23, 2003 (2 pages).
New Zealand Patent Office Action for Application No. 518413 dated May 30, 2003 (2 pages).
New Zealand Patent Office Action for Application No. 518413 dated Sep. 2, 2004 (2 pages).
P. White, et al., "Improved thermostability of the North American firefly luciferase: saturation mutagenesis at position 354," Biochem J. 319, pp. 343-350 (1996).
Purdy et al., "Heterologous gene expression in Campylobacter coli: the use of bacterial luciferase in a promoter probe vector," FEMS Microbiology Letters (1993) 111:233-237.
QIAprep Miniprep Handbook (Apr. 1998).
Reeck, G.R. et al., "'Homology' in proteins and nucleic acids: a terminology muddle and a way out of it," Cell (1987) 50:667.
Rommens, J.M. et al., "cAMP-inducible chloride conductance in mouse fibroblast lines stably expressing the human cystic fibrosis transmembrance conductance regulator," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1991) 88:7500-7504.
Russian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2002113653 dated Feb. 2, 2004 (11 pages) with English translation.
Russian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2002113653 dated Jul. 15, 2003 (7 pages) with English translation.
Russian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2002113653 dated Jul. 2, 2004 (3 pages) no English translation.
Saiki, R.K. et al., "Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase," Science (1988) 239:487-491.
Sala-Newby, G.B. et al., "Engineering a bioluminescent indicator for cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase," Biochem. J. (1991) 279:727-732.
Sala-Newby, G.B. et al., "Engineering firefly luciferase as an indicator of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in living cells," FEBS Lett. (1992) 307(2):241-244.
Sala-Newby, G.B., "Sequence and biochemical similarities between the luciferases of the glow-worm Lampyris noctiluca and the firefly Photinus pyralis," Biochem. J. (1996) 313:761-767.
Sanger, et al., "DNA Sequencing with Chain-terminating Inhibitors," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 74:5463-5467 (1977).
Stemmer, W.P.C., "DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1994) 91:10747-10751.
Strause, L.G. et al., "Characteristics of luciferases from a variety of firefly species: evidence for the presence of luciferase isozymes," Insect Biochem. (1981) 11(4):417-422.
Sung, Deukyong et al.; "The N-Terminal Amino Acid Sequences of the Firefly Luciferase Are Important for the Stability of the Enzyme"; Photochemistry and Photobiology; 1998; 68(5); pp. 749-753.
Szittner et al., "Nucleotide sequence, expression, and properties of luciferase coded by lux genes froma terrestrial bacterium," J. Biol. Chem. (1990) 265(27):16581-16587.
Thompson, J. F. et al.; "Modulation of firefly luciferase stability and impact on studies of gene regulation"; Gene. 103 (1991) pp. 171-177.
Thompson, John F. et al.; "Mutation of a Protease-sensitive Region in Firefly Luciferase Alters Light Emission Properties"; The Journal of Biological Chemistry vol. 272, No. 30, Jul. 25, 1997; pp. 18766-18771.
Tisi, L.C. et al.; "The Basis of the Bathochromic Shift in the Luciferase From Photinus Pyralis"; 12th International Symposium on Bioluminescence & Chemiluminescence: Progress & Current Applications (2002); pp. 57-60.
Tisi, L.C., "Development of a thermostable firefly luciferase," Anal. Chim. Acta (2002) 457:115-123.
United States Patent Office Action and Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/875,277 dated Jul. 3, 2000 (4 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/718,425 dated Apr. 15, 1997 (10 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/718,425 dated Jun. 18, 1997 (10 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/718,425 dated Jun. 7, 1999 (8 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/718,425 dated Mar. 13, 1998 (8 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/875,277 dated Dec. 17, 1999 (8 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/875,277 dated Dec. 7, 1998 (9 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/875,277 dated Jul. 6, 1998 (10 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/156,946 dated Apr. 26, 2000 (10 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/156,946 dated Oct. 24, 2000 (8 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/396,154 dated Jan. 2, 2002 (9 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/396,154 dated Jul. 16, 2002 (4 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/396,154 dated Jul. 3, 2001 (10 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Apr. 3, 2007 (16 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Dec. 15, 2004 (27 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Jul. 22, 2010 (9 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Jun. 24, 2008 (15 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated May 16, 2006 (14 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Nov. 28, 2007 (20 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Nov. 9, 2009 (9 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Sep. 19, 2005 (18 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Sep. 30, 2010 (3 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/838,469 dated Sep. 10, 2002 (9 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/378,168 dated Feb. 9, 2006 (18 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/378,168 dated Oct. 12, 2006 (13 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,644 dated Jan. 26, 2009 (13 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,644 dated Jul. 8, 2008 (18 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,898 dated Sep. 17, 2009 (23 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/462,320 dated Feb. 2, 2011 (22 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/462,320 dated Jun. 9, 2011 (4 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,704 dated Jul. 14, 2011 (27 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,704 dated Jun. 30, 2011 (4 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,704 dated May 7, 2013 (15 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,704 dated Nov. 9, 2011 (25 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/213,457 dated Jun. 21, 2012 (21 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/213,457 dated Mar. 7, 2013 (18 pages).
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/213,457 dated Oct. 16, 2013 (19 pages).
United States Patent Office Action/Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/380,061 dated Mar. 5, 2001 (5 pages).
United States Patent Office Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/156,946 dated May 2, 2001 (5 pages).
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/718,425 dated Nov. 12, 1999 (6 pages).
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/763,824 dated Nov. 8, 2010 (5 pages).
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,704 dated Sep. 27, 2013 (15 pages).
V. Viviani, et al., "Cloning, Sequence Analysis, and Expression of Active Phrixothrix Railroad-Worms Luciferases: Relationship between Bioluminescence Spectra and Primary Structures," Biochemistry 38, pp. 8271-8279 (1999).
Watson, et al., Molecular Bilology of the Gene, The Benjamin/cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, California, Fourth Edition, p. 43 (1991).
White, P.J. et al., "Generation and characterisation of a thermostable mutant of luciferase from Photinus pyralis," Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Bioluminescence & Chemiluminescence, Sep. 1994, Biolum. Chemilum. (1994) 419-422.
Witkowski et al. Biochemistry 38:11643-11650, 1999. *
Wood, K.V. et al., "Bioluminescent click beetles revisited," J. Biolumin. Chemilumin. (1989) 4:31-39.
Wood, K.V. et al., "Complementary DNA coding click beetle luciferases can elicit bioluminescence of different colors," Science (1989) 244:700-702.
Wood, K.V. et al., "Introduction to beetle luciferases and their applications," J. Biolum. Chemilum. (1989) 4:289-301.
Wood, K.V. et al., "Photographic detection of luminescence in Escherichia coli containing the gene for firefly luciferase," Anal. Biochem. (1987) 161:501-507.
Wood, K.V., "Luc genes: introduction of colour into bioluminescence assays," J. Biolumin. Chemilumin. (1990) 5:107-114.
Wood, K.V., "The chemical mechanism and evolutionary development of beetle bioluminescence," Photochem. Photobiol. (1995) 62(4):662-673.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB00/004133 dated Apr. 11, 2002 (10 pages).
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB1995/000629 dated Dec. 15, 1995 (3 pages).
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB96/00099 dated Oct. 24, 1996 (3 pages) excerpts (all that is in file).
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB98/01026 dated Feb. 5, 1999 (6 pages).
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US98/19494 dated Sep. 14, 1999 (9 pages).
Zenno, S. et al., "Firefly mRNA for luciferase, complete cds, clone pPFL17," Database EMBL Accession No. D25416 (1997) 2 pages).
Zhang, J. et al., "Directed evolution of a fucosidase from a galactosidase by DNA shuffling and screening," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (1997) 94(9):4504-4509.

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8822170B2 (en) 1997-09-19 2014-09-02 Promega Corporation Thermostable luciferases and methods of production
US9732373B2 (en) 2014-09-11 2017-08-15 Promega Corporation Luciferase sequences utilizing infrared-emitting substrates to produce enhanced luminescence
US10550420B2 (en) 2014-09-11 2020-02-04 Promega Corporation Luciferase sequences utilizing infrared-emitting substrates to produce enhanced luminescence
US11293047B2 (en) 2014-09-11 2022-04-05 Promega Corporation Luciferase sequences utilizing infrared-emitting substrates to produce enhanced luminescence
CN111315875A (en) * 2017-10-25 2020-06-19 豪夫迈·罗氏有限公司 Improved modified/mutated bacterial luciferases
US11788068B2 (en) 2017-10-25 2023-10-17 Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Modified/mutant bacterial luciferases
CN111315875B (en) * 2017-10-25 2024-02-20 豪夫迈·罗氏有限公司 Improved modified/mutated bacterial luciferases

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2284271B1 (en) 2013-09-11
HK1055443A1 (en) 2004-01-09
EP1935980A1 (en) 2008-06-25
US20140186918A1 (en) 2014-07-03
ZA200203170B (en) 2003-09-23
GB9925161D0 (en) 1999-12-22
GB0016744D0 (en) 2000-08-30
EP1935980B1 (en) 2013-07-17
EP2284271A3 (en) 2012-03-07
JP2011083289A (en) 2011-04-28
EP2284271A2 (en) 2011-02-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1224294B1 (en) Mutant luciferase
US20140186918A1 (en) Luciferase mutant
White et al. Improved thermostability of the North American firefly luciferase: saturation mutagenesis at position 354
CA2283287C (en) Enzyme assays
EP1281762A2 (en) Luciferases
US10006009B2 (en) Codon-optimized gene for mutated shrimp luciferase and method for use thereof
Tafreshi et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of firefly luciferase: implication of conserved residue (s) in bioluminescence emission spectra among firefly luciferases
TW200846469A (en) Secreted MLuc7 luciferase and use thereof
US9765381B2 (en) Mutated genes for the catalytic protein of oplophorus luciferase and use thereof
US10988741B2 (en) Mutated genes for the catalytic protein of Oplophorus luciferase and use thereof
WO2007017684A2 (en) Ph tolerant luciferase
US7807429B2 (en) Isolated luciferase gene of L. italica
TWI239353B (en) Thermostable luciferase mutant enzymes, nucleic acids encoding them and the use thereof
US10907134B2 (en) Mutated genes for the catalytic protein of oplophorus luciferase and use thereof
MXPA96004194A (en) Lucifera

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE, THE, UNITED KINGDO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SQUIRRELL, DAVID JAMES;MURPHY, MELENIE JANE;PRICE, RACHEL LOUISE;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020402 TO 20020405;REEL/FRAME:012987/0743

AS Assignment

Owner name: 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY, MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE IN HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND;REEL/FRAME:020252/0067

Effective date: 20071024

AS Assignment

Owner name: PROMEGA CORPORATION, WISCONSIN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:023649/0599

Effective date: 20090330

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551)

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PROMEGA CORPORATION;PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, LLC;TERSO SOLUTIONS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:048790/0259

Effective date: 20190328

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IL

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PROMEGA CORPORATION;PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, LLC;TERSO SOLUTIONS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:048790/0259

Effective date: 20190328

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8