US8201266B2 - Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade - Google Patents

Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8201266B2
US8201266B2 US12/124,245 US12424508A US8201266B2 US 8201266 B2 US8201266 B2 US 8201266B2 US 12424508 A US12424508 A US 12424508A US 8201266 B2 US8201266 B2 US 8201266B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
servers
chassis
rack
intrusion event
lock
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/124,245
Other versions
US20090293136A1 (en
Inventor
Keith Manders Campbell
Raymond Todd Greggs
James Gordon McLean
Caroline Magdy Metry
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Lenovo International Ltd
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Priority to US12/124,245 priority Critical patent/US8201266B2/en
Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MCLEAN, JAMES GORDON, CAMPBELL, KEITH MANDERS, GREGGS, RAYMOND TODD, METRY, CAROLINE MAGDY
Publication of US20090293136A1 publication Critical patent/US20090293136A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8201266B2 publication Critical patent/US8201266B2/en
Assigned to LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED reassignment LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/18Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
    • G08B13/189Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
    • G08B13/19Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using infrared-radiation detection systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/18Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
    • G08B13/189Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to security of server blades, and more specifically to preventing unauthorized physical interaction with a server blade.
  • Each chassis or rack can hold a device (also referred to herein as a blade or server blade) on which one or more general purpose processors and/or memory devices are attached.
  • the chassis or server blades are vertically spaced within the rack according to an industry standard displacement (the “U”).
  • Chassis and racks are characterized in terms of this dimension such that, for example, a 42 U rack is capable of receiving 42 1 U rack-mounted devices, 21 2 U devices, or similar combinations of devices.
  • a server chassis may provide shared components, such as power supplies, fans, or media access devices which can be shared among all of the blades in the server blade chassis.
  • Hot plugging refers to the ability to install and remove a blade without turning off power to the chassis or rack in which the blade is received.
  • the blade When a new server blade is initially installed into a rack, the blade generally contains no operating system and no persistent data. Making a newly added blade functional requires deployment software that is capable of recognizing that a new blade has been added, determining the blade characteristics to uniquely identify the blade, powering the blade on, and assigning a functional boot image to the blade.
  • a boot image refers generally to software stored in persistent storage that is executed following a power-on or system reset event. The boot image may execute a self test (commonly referred to as a power on self test or POST), load a basic I/O system (BIOS) into memory, and install a functional operating system.
  • POST power on self test
  • BIOS basic I/O system
  • chassis, rack or both can beneficially facilitate the easy configuration and expansion of server systems, it also allows server blades to be moved about quickly and easily.
  • the mobility of rack-mounted server blades can increase the difficulty of monitoring the exact location of blades within a system or group of systems.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for securing a server against an unauthorized intrusion event.
  • the method comprises detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis including a plurality of servers, communicating the detected unauthorized intrusion event to a management module that manages the plurality of servers, and automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal.
  • the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more front panel controls on the plurality of servers, such as a physical power switch.
  • the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more external ports on the plurality of servers, such as a keyboard-video-mouse port.
  • a preferred method allows the one or more physically secured servers to continue to operate.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention provides a computer program product embodied on a computer readable medium, wherein the computer program product including computer usable instructions.
  • the computer program product comprises instructions for detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis housing a plurality of servers, and instructions for automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal in response to detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event.
  • the computer program product may further comprise instructions for implementing any one or more steps or aspects of the presently disclosed methods.
  • a further embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus comprising a chassis including a plurality of servers, a sensor for detecting an unauthorized intrusion event, an electronically controllable lock secured to the chassis, and a management module.
  • the management module is in communication with the plurality of servers for managing the operation of the plurality of servers, in communication with the sensor for receiving an electronic signal from the sensor in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event, and in communication with the electronically controllable lock for selectively locking the at least one of the plurality of servers against physical removal from the chassis in response to receiving an electronic signal from the sensor.
  • each of the plurality of servers may include a baseboard management controller in communication with the management module, wherein the management module instructs the baseboard management controller to disable one or more input/output devices of one or more of the plurality of servers in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation view of a data center having two racks supporting numerous chassis filled with server blades.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of a data center having a security system.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of a server blade installed in a chassis supported by the rack, wherein the security of the server blade is protected by the security system.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for securing a server against an unauthorized intrusion event.
  • the method comprises detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis including a plurality of servers, communicating the detected unauthorized intrusion event to a management module that manages the plurality of servers, and automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal.
  • the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more front panel controls on the plurality of servers, such as a physical power switch.
  • the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more external ports on the plurality of servers, such as a keyboard-video-mouse port.
  • the step of detecting the unauthorized intrusion event may include receiving an electronic signal from one or more sensor, such as a sensor that is external to the server blade that is being secured.
  • the sensor may be an electronic keypad lock on a door to the data center or rack that can sense tampering or entry of successive incorrect codes.
  • the sensor could also be a motion sensor in the data center.
  • the sensor could be an accelerometer mounted to the rack or chassis that is sensitive to bumping, rocking or general physical manipulation of the rack or chassis.
  • a plurality of sensors, sensor types and/or sensor locations are used in order to detect unauthorized intrusion events. These sensors may each send electronic signals that give the management module additional information about the intrusion event. For example, tampering with a data center door lock would indicate a possible intrusion to the data center, but a subsequent detection of motion within the data center would indicate that the intruder had actually entered the data center. Subsequent opening of a rack door would further suggest that the intruder plans to physically or electronically access a server blade. Accordingly, the method may further comprise determining a threat level on the basis of the electronic signals received from the one or more sensors. A different threat level may cause the management module to take different steps to physically secure one or more of the plurality of servers.
  • Non-limiting examples of sensors that might be used in the present invention include motion sensors, proximity sensors, limit switches, and accelerometers.
  • a motion sensor can detect that something or someone has moved within the environment of the datacenter, at least within a line of sight.
  • Proximity sensors and limit switches can detect whether there has been a change in the physical relationship between two adjacent components, such as the opening of a door.
  • An accelerometer detects sudden movement of the component attached to the accelerometer, such as the bumping of a rack.
  • the step of physically securing includes locking the plurality of servers in place within a chassis or rack.
  • an electronically controllable lock may be secured to the chassis frame and includes an actuator for moving a pin between a retracted position (server unlocked) and an extended position (server locked). In the extended position, the pin has a first end secured to the actuator and a second end that extends into a hole or indentation in the server blade casing so that the server cannot be removed.
  • the chassis may include an individual lock for one or more server blade or a collective lock that secures each of the servers present in the chassis. However, a lock may be provided for certain critical server blades and not for others.
  • the lock is preferably failsafe in a locked condition so that the lock automatically engages when there is a loss of power to the chassis.
  • an alert may be sent to a remote user device in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event.
  • the alert may include a description of the sensors that detected the intrusion and/or a description of the steps taken to physically secure the one or more servers.
  • the computer program product comprises instructions for detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis housing a plurality of servers, and instructions for automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal in response to detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event.
  • the computer program product may further comprise instructions for implementing any one or more steps or aspects of the presently disclosed methods.
  • the computer program product may further comprise instructions for allowing the plurality of servers to continue operating, even through the servers may be physically locked and the front panel controls and inputs may be disabled. If it is determined that the intrusion event has cleared or that the threat level has been reduced to an acceptable level, then one or more of the steps taken to physically secure the servers may be reversed or reduced.
  • a further embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus comprising a chassis including a plurality of servers, a sensor for detecting an unauthorized intrusion event, an electronically controllable lock secured to the chassis, and a management module.
  • the management module is in communication with the plurality of servers for managing the operation of the plurality of servers, in communication with the sensor for receiving an electronic signal from the sensor in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event, and in communication with the electronically controllable lock for selectively locking the at least one of the plurality of servers against physical removal from the chassis in response to receiving an electronic signal from the sensor.
  • each of the plurality of servers may include a baseboard management controller in communication with the management module, wherein the management module instructs the baseboard management controller to disable one or more input/output devices of one or more of the plurality of servers in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event.
  • the baseboard management controller disables one or more input/output devices, such as a power switch or a KVM port, by instructing the operating system to temporarily ignore input from components on the front panel of the server, such as a USB interface.
  • the apparatus further comprises a plurality of sensors, sensor types and/or sensor locations that are used in order to detect unauthorized intrusion events. These sensors may each send electronic signals that give the management module additional information about the intrusion event, as previously described. It should be recognized that the sensors may communicate with the management module indirectly, such as through one or more system input/output cards. Furthermore, the sensors may be coupled to one or more system input/output cards of a remote computer that is networked with the chassis management module or multiple chassis management modules.
  • the remote computer may be a system management workstation running system management software that can be user customized to identify the available sensors, associate sensor signals with threat levels, and indicate the security steps that will be taken in response to a given threat level.
  • the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, various embodiments of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in any tangible medium of expression having computer-usable program code embodied in the medium.
  • the computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium.
  • the computer-readable medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a transmission media such as those supporting the Internet or an intranet, or a magnetic storage device.
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • EPROM or Flash memory erasable programmable read-only memory
  • CD-ROM compact disc read-only memory
  • CD-ROM compact disc read-only memory
  • a transmission media such as those supporting the Internet or an intranet, or a magnetic storage device.
  • a computer-usable or computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via, for instance, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.
  • a computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • the computer-usable medium may include a propagated data signal with the computer-usable program code embodied therewith, either in baseband or as part of a carrier wave.
  • the computer usable program code may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc.
  • Computer program code for carrying out operations of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
  • the program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
  • the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • Internet Service Provider for example, AT&T, MCI, Sprint, EarthLink, MSN, GTE, etc.
  • These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable medium that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • the computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation view of a data center 10 having two racks 12 supporting numerous chassis 14 filled with server blades 16 .
  • the data center 10 provides electrical power, external communication lines, and cool air circulation to support the operation of the server blades 16 and other components such power supplies, fans, network switches, and management modules.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of the data center 10 having one example of a security system.
  • the security system includes a data center door assembly 17 having a key lock or cipher lock with a lock sensor 18 providing output if there is tampering with the lock or if a successive number of incorrect codes are entered.
  • the output of the lock sensor 18 is provided to a chassis management module (MM) 20 .
  • the security system also includes a motion detector 22 directed to detect motion within the data center 10 .
  • the rack 12 and chassis 14 are each equipped with an accelerometer 24 , 26 , and the rack 12 also includes a limit switch 28 for detecting that the rack door 30 has been opened.
  • the management module 20 controls the operation of locks 32 that are secured to the chassis 14 in alignment with the individual server blades 16 .
  • the management module 20 is also preferably in communication with a baseboard management controller (not shown) in each server blade 16 so that the management module 20 can disable the front panel controls 34 of each server blade.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of a single server blade 16 installed in the chassis 14 supported by the rack 12 , wherein the security of the server blade 16 is protected by the security system.
  • Sensors 36 such as the lock sensor 18 ( FIG. 2 ), motion sensor 22 ( FIG. 2 ), rack accelerometer 24 or chassis accelerometer 26 , provide input to the management module 20 .
  • the management module 20 may then send output to the electronically controllable lock 32 , which may include an actuator 38 and pin 40 .
  • the actuator 38 operates to actively withdraw the pin 40 (upward in FIG. 3 ) from the aligned hole 42 in the casing of the server blade 16 . As shown, the pin 40 engages the hole 42 and prevents the removal of the server blade 16 from the chassis 14 .
  • the management module 20 is also in communication, for example through a mid-plane 43 with a baseboard management controller (BMC) 44 that forms part of the motherboard 46 within the server blade 16 .
  • the management module 20 can provide instructions to the BMC 44 , such as using intelligent platform management interface (IPMI) codes.
  • IPMI intelligent platform management interface
  • the management module 20 may instruct the BMC 44 to disable controls on the front panel 47 of the server blade 16 , including the power switch 48 and the KVM port 50 .
  • the BMC 44 may instruct the operating system that is loaded from memory 54 and running in the processor 52 to ignore any input received from the KVM port 50 .
  • the BMC 44 may disable the power switch 48 from communicating with a power supply (not shown) that supplies power to the server blade 16 , such as by sending an instruction over a power management bus to a power management controller (not shown).

Abstract

Method, computer program product and apparatus for physically securing a server in response to detecting an unauthorized intrusion event. The method comprises detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis including a plurality of servers, communicating the detected unauthorized intrusion event to a management module that manages the plurality of servers, and automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal. Optionally, the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more front panel controls on the plurality of servers, such as a physical power switch. In a further option, the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more external ports on the plurality of servers, such as a keyboard-video-mouse port. A preferred method allows the one or more physically secured servers to continue to operate.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to security of server blades, and more specifically to preventing unauthorized physical interaction with a server blade.
2. Background of the Related Art
Data processing systems in general and server-class systems in particular are frequently implemented within a server chassis or rack. Each chassis or rack can hold a device (also referred to herein as a blade or server blade) on which one or more general purpose processors and/or memory devices are attached. The chassis or server blades are vertically spaced within the rack according to an industry standard displacement (the “U”). Chassis and racks are characterized in terms of this dimension such that, for example, a 42 U rack is capable of receiving 42 1 U rack-mounted devices, 21 2 U devices, or similar combinations of devices. In some instances, a server chassis may provide shared components, such as power supplies, fans, or media access devices which can be shared among all of the blades in the server blade chassis.
In a server blade environment, the ability to hot plug server blades into a chassis or rack is a standard feature. Hot plugging refers to the ability to install and remove a blade without turning off power to the chassis or rack in which the blade is received. When a new server blade is initially installed into a rack, the blade generally contains no operating system and no persistent data. Making a newly added blade functional requires deployment software that is capable of recognizing that a new blade has been added, determining the blade characteristics to uniquely identify the blade, powering the blade on, and assigning a functional boot image to the blade. For purposes of this disclosure, a boot image refers generally to software stored in persistent storage that is executed following a power-on or system reset event. The boot image may execute a self test (commonly referred to as a power on self test or POST), load a basic I/O system (BIOS) into memory, and install a functional operating system.
While the use of a chassis, rack or both can beneficially facilitate the easy configuration and expansion of server systems, it also allows server blades to be moved about quickly and easily. The mobility of rack-mounted server blades can increase the difficulty of monitoring the exact location of blades within a system or group of systems.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for securing a server against an unauthorized intrusion event. The method comprises detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis including a plurality of servers, communicating the detected unauthorized intrusion event to a management module that manages the plurality of servers, and automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal. Optionally, the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more front panel controls on the plurality of servers, such as a physical power switch. In a further option, the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more external ports on the plurality of servers, such as a keyboard-video-mouse port. A preferred method allows the one or more physically secured servers to continue to operate.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a computer program product embodied on a computer readable medium, wherein the computer program product including computer usable instructions. The computer program product comprises instructions for detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis housing a plurality of servers, and instructions for automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal in response to detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event. Optionally, the computer program product may further comprise instructions for implementing any one or more steps or aspects of the presently disclosed methods.
A further embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus comprising a chassis including a plurality of servers, a sensor for detecting an unauthorized intrusion event, an electronically controllable lock secured to the chassis, and a management module. The management module is in communication with the plurality of servers for managing the operation of the plurality of servers, in communication with the sensor for receiving an electronic signal from the sensor in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event, and in communication with the electronically controllable lock for selectively locking the at least one of the plurality of servers against physical removal from the chassis in response to receiving an electronic signal from the sensor. Optionally, each of the plurality of servers may include a baseboard management controller in communication with the management module, wherein the management module instructs the baseboard management controller to disable one or more input/output devices of one or more of the plurality of servers in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation view of a data center having two racks supporting numerous chassis filled with server blades.
FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of a data center having a security system.
FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of a server blade installed in a chassis supported by the rack, wherein the security of the server blade is protected by the security system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for securing a server against an unauthorized intrusion event. The method comprises detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis including a plurality of servers, communicating the detected unauthorized intrusion event to a management module that manages the plurality of servers, and automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal.
Optionally, the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more front panel controls on the plurality of servers, such as a physical power switch. In a further option, the step of physically securing may include disabling one or more external ports on the plurality of servers, such as a keyboard-video-mouse port. These steps may be beneficially used to prevent loss of the server's performance and/or unauthorized electronic access to the server. Although it would be possible to shutdown the server in order to thwart unauthorized access, this would cause an inconvenient or damaging outage to those presently using the server. Physically securing the server and disabling external controls and ports allows the one or more physically secured servers to continue to operate.
In a further option, the step of detecting the unauthorized intrusion event may include receiving an electronic signal from one or more sensor, such as a sensor that is external to the server blade that is being secured. For example, the sensor may be an electronic keypad lock on a door to the data center or rack that can sense tampering or entry of successive incorrect codes. The sensor could also be a motion sensor in the data center. Furthermore, the sensor could be an accelerometer mounted to the rack or chassis that is sensitive to bumping, rocking or general physical manipulation of the rack or chassis.
In another embodiment, a plurality of sensors, sensor types and/or sensor locations are used in order to detect unauthorized intrusion events. These sensors may each send electronic signals that give the management module additional information about the intrusion event. For example, tampering with a data center door lock would indicate a possible intrusion to the data center, but a subsequent detection of motion within the data center would indicate that the intruder had actually entered the data center. Subsequent opening of a rack door would further suggest that the intruder plans to physically or electronically access a server blade. Accordingly, the method may further comprise determining a threat level on the basis of the electronic signals received from the one or more sensors. A different threat level may cause the management module to take different steps to physically secure one or more of the plurality of servers.
Non-limiting examples of sensors that might be used in the present invention include motion sensors, proximity sensors, limit switches, and accelerometers. A motion sensor can detect that something or someone has moved within the environment of the datacenter, at least within a line of sight. Proximity sensors and limit switches can detect whether there has been a change in the physical relationship between two adjacent components, such as the opening of a door. An accelerometer detects sudden movement of the component attached to the accelerometer, such as the bumping of a rack.
In yet another embodiment, the step of physically securing includes locking the plurality of servers in place within a chassis or rack. For example, an electronically controllable lock may be secured to the chassis frame and includes an actuator for moving a pin between a retracted position (server unlocked) and an extended position (server locked). In the extended position, the pin has a first end secured to the actuator and a second end that extends into a hole or indentation in the server blade casing so that the server cannot be removed. The chassis may include an individual lock for one or more server blade or a collective lock that secures each of the servers present in the chassis. However, a lock may be provided for certain critical server blades and not for others. The lock is preferably failsafe in a locked condition so that the lock automatically engages when there is a loss of power to the chassis.
In a still further embodiment, an alert may be sent to a remote user device in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event. For example, the alert may include a description of the sensors that detected the intrusion and/or a description of the steps taken to physically secure the one or more servers.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a computer program product embodied on a computer readable medium, wherein the computer program product including computer usable instructions. The computer program product comprises instructions for detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis housing a plurality of servers, and instructions for automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal in response to detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event. Optionally, the computer program product may further comprise instructions for implementing any one or more steps or aspects of the presently disclosed methods. For example, the computer program product may further comprise instructions for allowing the plurality of servers to continue operating, even through the servers may be physically locked and the front panel controls and inputs may be disabled. If it is determined that the intrusion event has cleared or that the threat level has been reduced to an acceptable level, then one or more of the steps taken to physically secure the servers may be reversed or reduced.
A further embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus comprising a chassis including a plurality of servers, a sensor for detecting an unauthorized intrusion event, an electronically controllable lock secured to the chassis, and a management module. The management module is in communication with the plurality of servers for managing the operation of the plurality of servers, in communication with the sensor for receiving an electronic signal from the sensor in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event, and in communication with the electronically controllable lock for selectively locking the at least one of the plurality of servers against physical removal from the chassis in response to receiving an electronic signal from the sensor. Optionally, each of the plurality of servers may include a baseboard management controller in communication with the management module, wherein the management module instructs the baseboard management controller to disable one or more input/output devices of one or more of the plurality of servers in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event. In one embodiment, the baseboard management controller disables one or more input/output devices, such as a power switch or a KVM port, by instructing the operating system to temporarily ignore input from components on the front panel of the server, such as a USB interface.
Another embodiment of the apparatus further comprises a plurality of sensors, sensor types and/or sensor locations that are used in order to detect unauthorized intrusion events. These sensors may each send electronic signals that give the management module additional information about the intrusion event, as previously described. It should be recognized that the sensors may communicate with the management module indirectly, such as through one or more system input/output cards. Furthermore, the sensors may be coupled to one or more system input/output cards of a remote computer that is networked with the chassis management module or multiple chassis management modules. Optionally, the remote computer may be a system management workstation running system management software that can be user customized to identify the available sensors, associate sensor signals with threat levels, and indicate the security steps that will be taken in response to a given threat level.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, various embodiments of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in any tangible medium of expression having computer-usable program code embodied in the medium.
Any combination of one or more computer usable or computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer-readable medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a transmission media such as those supporting the Internet or an intranet, or a magnetic storage device. Note that the computer-usable or computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via, for instance, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory. In the context of this document, a computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The computer-usable medium may include a propagated data signal with the computer-usable program code embodied therewith, either in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. The computer usable program code may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc.
Computer program code for carrying out operations of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
The present invention is described below with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable medium that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation view of a data center 10 having two racks 12 supporting numerous chassis 14 filled with server blades 16. The data center 10 provides electrical power, external communication lines, and cool air circulation to support the operation of the server blades 16 and other components such power supplies, fans, network switches, and management modules.
FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of the data center 10 having one example of a security system. The security system includes a data center door assembly 17 having a key lock or cipher lock with a lock sensor 18 providing output if there is tampering with the lock or if a successive number of incorrect codes are entered. The output of the lock sensor 18 is provided to a chassis management module (MM) 20. The security system also includes a motion detector 22 directed to detect motion within the data center 10. Furthermore, the rack 12 and chassis 14 are each equipped with an accelerometer 24, 26, and the rack 12 also includes a limit switch 28 for detecting that the rack door 30 has been opened. In accordance with one or more of the previously described embodiments of the methods, computer program products and systems of the present invention, the management module 20 controls the operation of locks 32 that are secured to the chassis 14 in alignment with the individual server blades 16. The management module 20 is also preferably in communication with a baseboard management controller (not shown) in each server blade 16 so that the management module 20 can disable the front panel controls 34 of each server blade.
FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of a single server blade 16 installed in the chassis 14 supported by the rack 12, wherein the security of the server blade 16 is protected by the security system. Sensors 36, such as the lock sensor 18 (FIG. 2), motion sensor 22 (FIG. 2), rack accelerometer 24 or chassis accelerometer 26, provide input to the management module 20. The management module 20 may then send output to the electronically controllable lock 32, which may include an actuator 38 and pin 40. Preferably, the actuator 38 operates to actively withdraw the pin 40 (upward in FIG. 3) from the aligned hole 42 in the casing of the server blade 16. As shown, the pin 40 engages the hole 42 and prevents the removal of the server blade 16 from the chassis 14.
The management module 20 is also in communication, for example through a mid-plane 43 with a baseboard management controller (BMC) 44 that forms part of the motherboard 46 within the server blade 16. The management module 20 can provide instructions to the BMC 44, such as using intelligent platform management interface (IPMI) codes. Accordingly, when the management module 20 determines that a sufficient threat level exists, it may instruct the BMC 44 to disable controls on the front panel 47 of the server blade 16, including the power switch 48 and the KVM port 50. For example, the BMC 44 may instruct the operating system that is loaded from memory 54 and running in the processor 52 to ignore any input received from the KVM port 50. Furthermore, the BMC 44 may disable the power switch 48 from communicating with a power supply (not shown) that supplies power to the server blade 16, such as by sending an instruction over a power management bus to a power management controller (not shown).
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and/or groups, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. The terms “preferably,” “preferred,” “prefer,” “optionally,” “may,” and similar terms are used to indicate that an item, condition or step being referred to is an optional (not required) feature of the invention.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or steps plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but it not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.

Claims (19)

1. A method comprising:
detecting an unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, a rack or a chassis housing a plurality of servers using at least one of a motion sensor to sense movement within the data center, an electronic keypad lock on at least one of a door to the data center and a door on the rack, a limit switch on the door to the rack, and one or more accelerometers coupled to at least one of the rack and one of the plurality of servers, wherein detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event includes receiving an electronic signal from one or more of the motion sensor, the electronic keypad lock, the limit switch and the one or more accelerometers;
communicating the detected unauthorized physical intrusion event to a management module that manages the plurality of servers; and
automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal by engaging a lock member to physically secure at least one of the plurality of servers against unauthorized removal from the rack.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of detecting the unauthorized intrusion event includes receiving electronic signals from two or more of the motion sensor, the electronic keypad lock, the limit switch and the one or more accelerometers.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the two or more sensors include the motion sensor and the electronic keypad lock.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the two or more sensors include an accelerometer mounted to at least one of the rack and chassis.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of physically securing includes disabling one or more front panel controls on the plurality of servers.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more disabled front panel controls includes a physical power switch.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of physically securing includes disabling one or more external ports on the plurality of servers.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
continuing to operate the one or more physically secured servers.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more servers are not physically secured in the absence of detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of physically securing includes engaging a lock member to lock the plurality of servers in place within at least one of the chassis and rack.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of engaging a lock member includes engaging a lock member between the chassis and a plurality of casings of the one or more servers.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the lock member automatically engages in response to a loss of power to the chassis.
13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
sending an alert to a remote user device in response to detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event.
14. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
determining a threat level on the basis of the electronic signals received from the one or more sensors.
15. The method of claim 13, further comprising:
selecting steps for physically securing the one or more of the plurality of servers on the basis of the determined threat level.
16. A computer program product embodied on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, the computer program product including computer usable instructions, comprising:
instructions for detecting unauthorized physical intrusion event to a data center, rack or chassis housing a plurality of servers using at least one of a motion sensor to detect movement within the data center, an electronic keypad lock on at least one of a door to the data center and a door to the rack, a limit switch on at least one of the rack and the chassis, and an accelerometer on at least one of a server and the chassis, wherein the unauthorized physical intrusion event is detected by receiving an electronic signal from one or more of the motion sensor, the electronic keypad lock, the limit switch and the one or more accelerometers; and
instructions for at least one of:
automatically physically securing one or more of the plurality of servers against manual removal using an electronically controllable lock; and
disabling a front display panel;
in response to detecting the unauthorized physical intrusion event.
17. The computer program product of claim 16, further comprising:
instructions for allowing the plurality of servers to continue operating.
18. An apparatus comprising:
a chassis housing a plurality of servers;
a plurality of sensors for detecting an unauthorized intrusion event;
an electronically controllable lock secured to the chassis; and
a management module in communication with the plurality of servers for managing the operation of the plurality of servers, in communication with the plurality of sensors for receiving an electronic signal from the plurality of sensors in response to detecting the unauthorized intrusion event, and in communication with the electronically controllable lock for selectively locking the at least one of the plurality of servers against removal from the chassis in response to receiving the electronic signal from two or more of the plurality of sensors;
wherein the plurality of sensors comprises at least two of a motion sensor, an electronic keypad lock, a limit switch coupled to a door to the chassis and an accelerometer.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein each of the plurality of servers includes a baseboard management controller in communication with the management module, wherein the management module instructs the baseboard management controller to disable one or more input/output devices of one or more of the plurality of servers.
US12/124,245 2008-05-21 2008-05-21 Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade Active 2030-05-24 US8201266B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/124,245 US8201266B2 (en) 2008-05-21 2008-05-21 Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/124,245 US8201266B2 (en) 2008-05-21 2008-05-21 Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090293136A1 US20090293136A1 (en) 2009-11-26
US8201266B2 true US8201266B2 (en) 2012-06-12

Family

ID=41343087

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/124,245 Active 2030-05-24 US8201266B2 (en) 2008-05-21 2008-05-21 Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8201266B2 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9251346B2 (en) 2013-02-27 2016-02-02 Lenovo Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Preventing propagation of hardware viruses in a computing system
US20160080359A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2016-03-17 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Authentication using lights-out management credentials
US20160378981A1 (en) * 2015-06-26 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intrusion detection for submerged datacenters
US10459499B2 (en) * 2017-05-26 2019-10-29 Dell Products L.P. Systems and methods for management of liquid cooling upgrades with liquid cooling adapter card
US10524395B2 (en) 2015-06-26 2019-12-31 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Artificial reef datacenter
US10853460B2 (en) 2017-12-04 2020-12-01 Vapor IO Inc. Modular data center
US10916889B1 (en) 2019-07-29 2021-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US10964180B2 (en) 2018-05-30 2021-03-30 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Intrustion detection and notification device
US11210427B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2021-12-28 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11341279B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2022-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11341278B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2022-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11531787B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2022-12-20 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11669602B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2023-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8473651B1 (en) 2009-04-29 2013-06-25 Clisertec Corporation Isolated protected access device
US20110208963A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2011-08-25 Aviv Soffer Secured kvm system having remote controller-indicator
US8109780B2 (en) 2010-06-17 2012-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Tamper prevention and detection apparatus for an electronic device
CN103429116B (en) 2011-04-27 2016-03-02 惠普发展公司,有限责任合伙企业 Unit is inserted and is connected to the device and method of shell
TWI528134B (en) * 2012-12-17 2016-04-01 鴻海精密工業股份有限公司 Baffle control device and server rack having the baffle control devcie
US20140344431A1 (en) * 2013-05-16 2014-11-20 Aspeed Technology Inc. Baseboard management system architecture
DE102013112730B4 (en) * 2013-11-19 2020-03-19 Martin Schwab Computer center and method for operating a computer center
US9923766B2 (en) * 2014-03-06 2018-03-20 Dell Products, Lp System and method for providing a data center management controller
EP3353980A1 (en) * 2015-09-24 2018-08-01 Sicpa Holding SA Remote security document analysis
US20180117945A1 (en) * 2015-09-24 2018-05-03 Sicpa Holding Sa Remote passport and security document marking
WO2017131980A1 (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-08-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intrusion detection for submerged datacenters
CN111095370A (en) * 2017-06-28 2020-05-01 施耐德电气It公司 System and method for intrusion detection for rack-mounted chassis
US11483946B2 (en) * 2017-12-20 2022-10-25 Switch, Ltd. Security panels for use in data centers
EP3648430B1 (en) * 2018-11-05 2021-06-02 Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH Hardware security module
US11443036B2 (en) 2019-07-30 2022-09-13 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Facial recognition based security by a management controller
US11647049B2 (en) 2020-04-14 2023-05-09 Google Llc Dynamic application security posture change based on physical vulnerability
US10922246B1 (en) 2020-07-13 2021-02-16 High Sec Labs Ltd. System and method of polychromatic identification for a KVM switch
US11334173B2 (en) 2020-07-13 2022-05-17 High Sec Labs Ltd. System and method of polychromatic identification for a KVM switch
WO2022109137A1 (en) * 2020-11-20 2022-05-27 Invue Security Products Inc. Data center security system
CN113260211B (en) * 2021-03-31 2023-03-14 深圳市智微智能科技股份有限公司 Easily-maintained super high-rise server installation frame and maintenance method
WO2022226295A1 (en) * 2021-04-23 2022-10-27 Invue Security Products Inc. Data center security system
US20230004682A1 (en) * 2021-06-30 2023-01-05 Lenovo (United States) Inc. Tamper detection systems and methods for electronic devices carried by mobile equipment

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4820103A (en) * 1987-11-09 1989-04-11 Dorner Mfg. Corp. Apparatus for vertically stacking and storing articles
US4982106A (en) * 1988-01-27 1991-01-01 La Telemacanique Device for detecting at least one variable relating to the movement of a movable body
US5069597A (en) * 1990-01-16 1991-12-03 Doctor Louis J Automatically loading and unloading mechanism for flat removable storage elements
US5791867A (en) * 1997-01-21 1998-08-11 Kuhl; Jeffrey B. Apparatus for automatically unstacking of trays from a vertically extending interlocking stack thereof
US6138194A (en) * 1998-06-08 2000-10-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for sensing movement of a bus card and automatically removing power from the bus card
US6262493B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2001-07-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Providing standby power to field replaceable units for electronic systems
US6381146B1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-04-30 Hewlett-Packard Company Module removal system
US20030105904A1 (en) * 2001-12-04 2003-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Monitoring insertion/removal of server blades in a data processing system
US6661671B1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2003-12-09 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, method and article of manufacture for determining power permission for a blade spanning power back planes
US20040052046A1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2004-03-18 Regimbal Laurent A. Method and system for mounting an information handling system storage device
US20050081074A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2005-04-14 Chheda Sachin Navin Server card power switch
US6928504B2 (en) * 2002-01-02 2005-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation PC card motion detector
US20050208809A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-22 Yuan-Chen Liang Foolproof mechanism for server
US20060136704A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selectively installing an operating system to be remotely booted within a storage area network
US20060167886A1 (en) * 2004-11-22 2006-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for transmitting data from a storage medium to a user-defined cluster of local and remote server blades
US20070192604A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2007-08-16 Dell Products L.P. Self-authenticating blade server in a secure environment
US20070204332A1 (en) 2006-02-24 2007-08-30 Dell Products L.P. Authentication of baseboard management controller users in a blade server system
US20070245162A1 (en) * 2006-04-18 2007-10-18 Loffink John S System and method for blade information handling system power inventory
US7307837B2 (en) 2005-08-23 2007-12-11 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for enforcing of power control in a blade center chassis
US20080272887A1 (en) * 2007-05-01 2008-11-06 International Business Machines Corporation Rack Position Determination Using Active Acoustics
US7898397B2 (en) * 2007-06-12 2011-03-01 Apple Inc. Selectively adjustable icons for assisting users of an electronic device

Patent Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4820103A (en) * 1987-11-09 1989-04-11 Dorner Mfg. Corp. Apparatus for vertically stacking and storing articles
US4982106A (en) * 1988-01-27 1991-01-01 La Telemacanique Device for detecting at least one variable relating to the movement of a movable body
US5069597A (en) * 1990-01-16 1991-12-03 Doctor Louis J Automatically loading and unloading mechanism for flat removable storage elements
US5791867A (en) * 1997-01-21 1998-08-11 Kuhl; Jeffrey B. Apparatus for automatically unstacking of trays from a vertically extending interlocking stack thereof
US6138194A (en) * 1998-06-08 2000-10-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for sensing movement of a bus card and automatically removing power from the bus card
US6262493B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2001-07-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Providing standby power to field replaceable units for electronic systems
US6381146B1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-04-30 Hewlett-Packard Company Module removal system
US6968414B2 (en) 2001-12-04 2005-11-22 International Business Machines Corporation Monitoring insertion/removal of server blades in a data processing system
US20030105904A1 (en) * 2001-12-04 2003-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Monitoring insertion/removal of server blades in a data processing system
US6928504B2 (en) * 2002-01-02 2005-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation PC card motion detector
US20040052046A1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2004-03-18 Regimbal Laurent A. Method and system for mounting an information handling system storage device
US6661671B1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2003-12-09 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, method and article of manufacture for determining power permission for a blade spanning power back planes
US20050081074A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2005-04-14 Chheda Sachin Navin Server card power switch
US20050208809A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-22 Yuan-Chen Liang Foolproof mechanism for server
US20060167886A1 (en) * 2004-11-22 2006-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for transmitting data from a storage medium to a user-defined cluster of local and remote server blades
US20060136704A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selectively installing an operating system to be remotely booted within a storage area network
US7307837B2 (en) 2005-08-23 2007-12-11 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for enforcing of power control in a blade center chassis
US20070192604A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2007-08-16 Dell Products L.P. Self-authenticating blade server in a secure environment
US20070204332A1 (en) 2006-02-24 2007-08-30 Dell Products L.P. Authentication of baseboard management controller users in a blade server system
US20070245162A1 (en) * 2006-04-18 2007-10-18 Loffink John S System and method for blade information handling system power inventory
US20080272887A1 (en) * 2007-05-01 2008-11-06 International Business Machines Corporation Rack Position Determination Using Active Acoustics
US7898397B2 (en) * 2007-06-12 2011-03-01 Apple Inc. Selectively adjustable icons for assisting users of an electronic device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center|http://www.lamdahellix.com/%5CUserFiles%5CFile%5Cdownloads%5C102-whitepaper.pdf|Christian Cowan & Chris Gaskins|pp. 1-15|2006. *

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160080359A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2016-03-17 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Authentication using lights-out management credentials
US9251346B2 (en) 2013-02-27 2016-02-02 Lenovo Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Preventing propagation of hardware viruses in a computing system
US20160378981A1 (en) * 2015-06-26 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intrusion detection for submerged datacenters
US9913409B2 (en) * 2015-06-26 2018-03-06 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intrusion detection for submerged datacenters
US10524395B2 (en) 2015-06-26 2019-12-31 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Artificial reef datacenter
US10459499B2 (en) * 2017-05-26 2019-10-29 Dell Products L.P. Systems and methods for management of liquid cooling upgrades with liquid cooling adapter card
US20210334344A1 (en) * 2017-12-04 2021-10-28 Vapor IO Inc. Selective-access data-center racks
US10853460B2 (en) 2017-12-04 2020-12-01 Vapor IO Inc. Modular data center
US11698951B2 (en) * 2017-12-04 2023-07-11 Vapor IO Inc. Modular data center
US11030285B2 (en) * 2017-12-04 2021-06-08 Vapor IO Inc. Selective-access data-center racks
US10964180B2 (en) 2018-05-30 2021-03-30 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Intrustion detection and notification device
US11210427B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2021-12-28 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11341279B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2022-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11341278B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2022-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11531787B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2022-12-20 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US11669602B2 (en) 2019-07-29 2023-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources
US10916889B1 (en) 2019-07-29 2021-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Management of securable computing resources

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090293136A1 (en) 2009-11-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8201266B2 (en) Security system to prevent tampering with a server blade
US7993414B2 (en) Portable computing system docking security system and method
US6111505A (en) Security system
US20200320193A1 (en) Baseboard management controller to perform security action based on digital signature comparison in response to trigger
US9152826B2 (en) Damage detection for an anti-theft interface
US10964180B2 (en) Intrustion detection and notification device
CN101271411B (en) Hot-plug protection system and method
WO2017196319A1 (en) Electronic device access control
JP2007265023A (en) Information processor, its management method and management program
CN112231781A (en) Anti-theft method for edge computing server and server
US10657290B2 (en) Authentication using optically sensed relative position
US10721253B2 (en) Power circuitry for security circuitry
US20070001827A1 (en) Remote asset management of computer systems
JP2983210B1 (en) Anti-theft devices for computers and computer equipment
JP3206560B2 (en) HUB device with theft monitoring function
KR101977953B1 (en) Remote fault recovery system
KR101577306B1 (en) USB port controlling method through USB port monitoring
JP2004220221A (en) Information processor, monitoring control method for information processor, and information processing system
KR20150108240A (en) Protection apparatus from invasion for energy storage system
CN116467705B (en) Full-time monitoring system and server for preventing server from invading
KR101646965B1 (en) Computer having enhanced security function and computer security system using the same
CN109614796A (en) A kind of network safety system
CN110610107A (en) Network interface, interface device, physical intrusion prevention method, device and storage medium
US11647049B2 (en) Dynamic application security posture change based on physical vulnerability
US20230376619A1 (en) Tamper and zeroization response unit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAMPBELL, KEITH MANDERS;GREGGS, RAYMOND TODD;MCLEAN, JAMES GORDON;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020975/0879;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080512 TO 20080519

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAMPBELL, KEITH MANDERS;GREGGS, RAYMOND TODD;MCLEAN, JAMES GORDON;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080512 TO 20080519;REEL/FRAME:020975/0879

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: LENOVO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, HONG KONG

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034194/0291

Effective date: 20140926

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12