|Publication number||US7178384 B2|
|Application number||US 10/772,765|
|Publication date||20 Feb 2007|
|Filing date||4 Feb 2004|
|Priority date||4 Feb 2004|
|Also published as||US20050167598|
|Publication number||10772765, 772765, US 7178384 B2, US 7178384B2, US-B2-7178384, US7178384 B2, US7178384B2|
|Inventors||Roko S. Bujas, Ralf Dunkel|
|Original Assignee||General Atomics|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Referenced by (9), Classifications (6), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention was made with Government support under Army Contract No. DAAD19-02-3-0001. The Government may have certain rights in this invention.
The invention relates to methods and apparatus which allow the measurement of extremely low rates of permeation of water or oxygen, and more particularly to methods and apparatus for measuring an ultralow moisture permeation rate or oxygen permeation rate through an object, such as a sample polymer plastic film composite or other material.
With the development of better and better barrier materials, generally from composites that include plastic films, it has now become very desirable to be able to precisely measure the rate of permeation through such barrier materials in order to properly evaluate them. As barrier materials have improved in their resistance to moisture and oxygen permeation, it has become clear that better, more sophisticated methods and apparatus are required to be able to accurately measure such lower and lower rates of permeation representative of barrier materials presently needed for commercial applications.
Gas permeability measuring devices have generally been known in the art, and some of these have been developed to serve the garment industry where fabrics that are highly resistant to water permeation are often desired. However, more recently, with the development of LCD's, LED's and OLED's, it has become important to develop barrier materials that have an extremely high resistance to moisture permeation and oxygen permeation. Although it has been shown scientifically that there is a relationship between the permeation of moisture and the permeation of oxygen through a barrier, so that by measuring the moisture permeation rate, an assessment can be obtained for the resistance of a barrier film or the like to the permeation of both moisture and oxygen, more precise measurements of oxygen permeation are often desired.
Because many present day products have been found to be highly sensitive to oxygen and moisture, often resulting in significant deterioration of the product, there has been a recent emphasis on developing better barrier materials. Products in the electronics fields, such as OLED's and LCD's, and certain pharmaceuticals are among products for which it is most important to resist such deterioration. The barrier materials that have been developed to protect such materials generally include multilayer composites made of polymeric films and thin layer inorganic materials, and the search has gone on for providing increasingly better multilayer, thin film barrier materials for this purpose. For example U.S. Pat. No. 6,413,645 entitled “Ultrabarrier Substrates” describes the problem and the search for more permeation-resistant materials. However, this patent states that oxygen and water vapor transmission rates even as high as 0.005 cc or gm/m2/day are below the detection limit of current industrial instrumentation.
To measure moisture permeation, efforts have been made to use the amount of change in weight of a suitable desiccant in a closed container where the object closing the container has its opposite face exposed to a humid atmosphere; however, the accuracy such apparatus has been frequently called into question. U.S. Pat. No. 3,580,067 illustrates another effort to use a desiccant in a closed container which is then placed in a chamber wherein a humidity of tritiated water vapor is maintained. The procedure involves batch analysis/counting where a plurality of sealed vials are needed, and the technician performing the procedure would be exposed to radioactive and toxic tritiated water vapor, each time a vial is removed and then handled. One must add a counting solution to dissolve the desiccant and facilitate counting on a liquid scintillation counter; the results are compared with a blank vial, containing the same amount of desiccant and counting solution. This provides a single point on a graph, and multiple points must be plotted before a measured water vapor transmission rate can be obtained. U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,969, issued May 12, 1987, discloses apparatus for testing water vapor transmission which employs a heated water bath; a solution containing a solute is employed along with an electrical conductivity measuring device to measure the change in concentration, which will be indicative of moisture permeation. However, it is felt that such an apparatus is not suitable to measure extremely low rates of moisture permeation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,506 discloses an apparatus that is designed to allow measurement of mass transport. The flux of water vapor through a film or other object being measured is calculated by measuring results for exposure to a dry gas atmosphere, to a water-saturated atmosphere, and to atmospheres of different relative humidities; a computer program is used to determine transmission rate through the object being tested. Humidity probes are used to provide outlet signals that are indicative of the water vapor concentration in nitrogen streams that are flowed through a cell where such testing is occurring. In addition to being somewhat complicated, the apparatus is not felt to be well-suited to measuring extremely low moisture diffusion rates.
An instrument for determining the permeation rate of a gas, such as carbon dioxide, through a membrane is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,590,634, issued Jul. 6, 1971. The instrument flows a gas stream of constant concentration through an upstream chamber while flowing a carrier gas stream, such as helium, through a downstream chamber in order to measure permeation through a film which separates the two chambers. A thermal conductivity cell is provided to measure this characteristic of the carrier gas stream exiting at the downstream chamber, and an involved calibration system is required to interpret the data by comparing it with calibrations using a helium-carbon dioxide mixture of known composition. The arrangement is admittedly inappropriate for calculating very low permeation rates; it is stated that, when a continuous signal of noticeable magnitude is not being produced, it is necessary to isolate the permeation cell (by either halting or diverting the flow of the carrier gas) for a fixed time interval during which vapor is allowed to accumulate in the downstream chamber. After some predetermined time period, the accumulated vapor is allowed to be carried to the chamber, and the recorded peak and the area under the peak must then be graphically analyzed. The arrangement is clearly unsuitable for measuring ultralow permeation rates of oxygen.
In order to be able to effectively evaluate the performance of these new materials and other situations where highly effective barriers are involved, adequate test equipment is required for detecting moisture and/or oxygen permeation at these extremely low levels. Thus, more accurate apparatus and methods have been sought for measurement of such ultralow permeation rates.
It has now been found that a method and apparatus for measuring ultralow water permeation through a sample object, such as a composite film that includes a thin polymer layer, can be effectively created by utilizing a radioactive gas, such as tritiated water vapor (HTO) or carbon14monoxide (14CO). By suitably mounting the sample object so as to provide controlled access to opposite surfaces of the barrier and by supplying HTO or 14CO to its upstream surface, the permeating radioactive gas exiting downstream can be collected in a carefully controlled, dry carrier gas stream and monitored in a manner which can precisely determine even extremely low permeation rates through the sample. The method affords highly accurate measurement of ultralow permeation rates by uniformly controlling the humidity or other concentration at the upstream surface and by using a controlled, very low flow of dry carrier gas, preferably one having a matching molecular weight, downstream thereof in a chamber of only minimal size. Such a slowly flowing stream will collect all the radioactive permeated gas and carry it to a radiation monitor in an ionization chamber of minimal size where the permeation rate is then quickly and accurately calculated.
The invention provides a method and apparatus for accurately measuring even ultralow moisture or oxygen permeation through a thin film composite or other material having a high resistance to such penetration. As earlier mentioned, there has been substantial development of new materials, generally thin film composites, which provide high moisture and oxygen resistance for use as barriers for LCD's, LED's and OLED's that require such barrier protection to assure long term performance, particularly for the cathode components thereof, which are frequently manufactured of calcium and are particularly susceptible to degradation from moisture and attack by oxygen.
The apparatus shown in
Associated with the mounting device 11 are a system 13 for supplying controlled atmospheres upstream and downstream of the sample being tested, and a system 15 for monitoring the beta-particle radioactivity of a gaseous stream exiting the device 11 and interpreting the signals generated to calculate the permeation rate through the film or other sample at chat instant. The arrangement is such that the overall sensitivity is sufficient to detect and measure permeation rates of radioactive gaseous compounds of less than 0.0001 gm/m2/day, for example, of moisture as low as 10−5 to 10−6 gm/m2/day and of oxygen as low as 10−5 to 10−6 cc/m2/day.
The illustrated mounting device 11 includes upper and lower halves or parts 17, 19. These two parts interface with each other to provide a central receptacle or chamber 21, which in the illustrated device is a shallow, generally square region designed for centrally mounting a square, flat, thin sample 23 for which permeation is to be determined. Accordingly, the central receptacle 21 is formed by a pair of facing shallow cavities 25 a, 25 b provided in the undersurface of the upper pan 17 and the top surface of the lower part 19, which are each only about 0.04 in. (0.1 cm) thick. Immediately surrounding each of these cavities is a groove 27 of square outline that defines the surface area of a film that will be exposed to the controlled atmosphere. The groove 27 is preferably rectangular or square in cross section and accommodates a sealing ring 29 of resilient material that extends outward past the respective surface Preferably sealing- or 0-rings 29 of square or rectangular cross section are placed in each of these grooves 27 so that, when the upper and lower parts 17, 19 are clamped or otherwise pressed together. the sealing rings 29 seal against the thin film 23 through which permeation is to be measured. As a result, the flat film then essentially splits the central receptacle 21 horizontally into a lower upstream subchamber 31 and an upper downstream subebamber 33. The square outline of the facing grooves is proportioned to expose a 3.5 inch (9 cm) scpaare of film composite. The size of the downstream subehainber 33 is minimized so as to have a volume of not more than about 10 cc. It has been found that, by minimizing the size of this chamber, by using only a very slow flow of dry gas, such as methane, as a carrier (Le., a flow of not greater than about 1.5 liters/hour) and by confining the beta-particle radiation monitor to a chamber of small volume, high sensitivity of measurement can be achieve.
To align the upper and lower parts 17, 19 of the mounting device, one of the parts is provided with a protrusion and the opposite part is provided with a complementary receptacle to receive the protrusion. In the illustrated embodiment, the upper part 17 is provided with a continuous ridge 35 which is received in a facing groove 37 provided in the upper face of the lower part 19. The ridge 35 is preferably chamfered so as to accommodate an O-rings 39 to assure a tight fit and seal is obtained between the two halves once they are aligned as shown in
The overall gas supply system 13 illustrated in
The HTO supply subsystem 43 includes an HTO reservoir 47 connected through a ball valve 49 to the upstream subchamber 31 that is formed in the lower half 19 of the mounting device. The ball valve 49 is bolted or otherwise suitably secured to the lower half, and the HTO reservoir 47 is connected in turn to the ball valve as by bolts 50. The ball valve 49 includes the usual spherical valve member 51 and a handle 53 for rotating the spherical ball member 90 degrees from the open position shown in
A suitable source of HTO is placed in the reservoir 47 before it is installed on the mounting device. Preferably, a small quantity of liquid HTO is provided in the form of a pool 54; however, a crystalline salt that is saturated with HTO as its water of crystallization may instead be used. It is desired, at ambient temperature, that the closed chamber comprising the reservoir, ball valve and upstream subchamber 31 have a relative humidity of at least about 85%. Anhydrous potassium chloride will form KCl.2HTO when exposed to HTO, and by minimizing the volume of subchamber 31, a relative humidity of at least about 85% can be established throughout the upstream chamber within about 5 minutes with such a reservoir following opening the ball valve. Moreover, only a small amount of HTO vapor is lost when the upstream subchamber is purged before changing the film sample being tested. When 1 or 2 ccs of liquid HTO are used in the reservoir, as is preferred, such will provide close to 100% humidity. Moreover, this amount will provide sufficient HTO for test purposes for as long as one year under normal test conditions and usage, when the upstream chamber region between the ball valve member 51 and the film is no more than about 10 cc.
The upper part of 17 of the mounting device 11 contains a gas flow inlet passageway 55 leading into the subchamber 33 and a gas exit passageway 57 leaving an opposite region of the subchamber. The size of the mounting device and the subchambers can of course be varied; however, it has been found that using a device that exposes about 80 sq. cm of a thin film sample 23 to a controlled atmosphere provides adequate surface area so as to provide representative and accurate test readings for a thin film composite material engineered to serve as a highly resistant barrier layer. Moreover, minimization of the volumes of the subchambers 31, 33 is desired for the reasons discussed herein.
The overall gas supply system 13 includes a tank 61 of gas under pressure and the usual pressure regulator 63 to supply carrier gas to the mounting device at the appropriate pressure. Although various dry gases might be used, including argon, nitrogen, methane and dry air, it has been found that methane and argon have superior properties in the ionization chamber. For measuring moisture permeation, methane is preferred because the molecular weight of methane is very close to the molecular weight of water, as a result of which any potential stratification in the downstream subchamber at a low flow of gas therethrough is positively avoided. A test device such as this utilizing HTO, for general safety considerations, would normally be operated under a standard laboratory hood, and if methane is employed, the tank would normally also be located under the hood. If desired, a second cylinder of argon or the like might be also provided, with a 2-way valve to allow selection of either one for a particular test. For example, one may wish to use argon as a carrier gas when O2 permeation resistance is being tested. Ultradry methane at a tank pressure of 2500 psi may be fed through the pressure regulator 63 to reduce its pressure to about 15 to 20 psia (i.e. just slightly above atmospheric pressure) for the testing/monitoring purposes of this invention. It is preferably passed first through a desiccant dryer 65 to remove any possible moisture that might be present and thus assure its ultradry condition.
The flow of methane leaving the desiccant dryer 65 enters a 4-way crossover connector 67, one leg 69 of which leads through a small ball valve 71 to the gas inlet passageway 55 to the downstream subchamber 33. An exit conduit 73 containing a ball valve 75 is connected to the gas exit passageway 57 from, and it leads to a 4-way connector 77 that contains a more sophisticated ball valve. This ball valve, 4-way connector always allows outward flow (as depicted in
During normal tescing, the ball valve connector 77 direct flows from the exit conduit 73 straight through to the conduit 78 leading to a monitoring chamber 79, which contains a beta-particle monitor, a commercial component that is disposed in a cylindrical chamber of small volume, i.e., preferably not greater than about 2 liters. Tritium emits beta particles, and the ionization detector in such a small chamber will effectively monitor the amount of radioactivity exhibited by the permeated tritium. It has been found that the minimization of the volume of the downstream subehainber, i.e., not more than 10 cc, and the use ofa very low flow of carrier gas, e.g. about 1 L of dry methane per hour, in combination with a small volume radiation monitoring chamber, e.g. about 2 liters, provide sufficient sensitivity to be able to achieve measurement levels less than 0.0001 gm/m2/day, e.g., as low as about 10−6 to 10−5 gm/m2/day. The ionization detector in the chamber 79 creates signals in response to the beta particle radiation and sends these signals to an interconnected counter which in turn sends signals to a CPU conversion unit 95. Such a detector in this small volume cylindrical chamber is effective to detect an amaunt of radiation as low as about 0.1 microcurie per m3 and of course, the size of the chamber is a very small fraction of a cubic meter. The signal processing is described hereinbelow, An outlet 81 from the opposite or exit end of the cylindrical radiation monitoring chamber 97 leads to a conduit network 83 that includes a desiccant dryer 85 which will remove and accumulate all HTO that permeated during the test and found its way into the carrier gas flow through the downstream subehamber 33 of the mounting device 11. Then the methane, stripped of all its radioactivity in the desiccant dryer 85, is vented through a suitable vent line 87. The overall gas supply network 13 also includes a second conduit 89 leading from the pressure regulator 63 to the vent line 87 through a check valve which serves as a safety bypass should, for some unknown reason, undesired high gas pressure reach the downstream side of regulator.
Lower conduits 91 a and 91 b lead, respectively, from the first crossover 67 and to the second valved crossover 77, and they are connected to a pair of ports 93 a, 93 b that lead to and from the subchamber 31 on the upstream side of the sample being tested. This arrangement is provided for purging the upstream subchamber of any residual radioactive gas preparatory to changing the sample 23 that is to be tested. To prepare to change the sample, the ball valve 49 is closed, and then a purge flow of gas is caused to sequentially flow through the subchambers 31 and 33. Initial flow is through the upstream subchamber 31 which is accomplished by setting the valved connector 77 to interconnect the conduit 91 b to the conduit 78; this causes the methane flow from the pressure regulator 63 to become a purge flow through the upstream subchamber 31 via the conduits 91 a, 91 b. Such flow is continued until the radiation monitor 79 indicates there is no longer any radioactivity present in gas stream that is exiting from the subchamber 31 of the mounting device. After the radiation monitor 79 indicates the upstream chamber 31 has been purged, the downstream chamber 33 is purged by flowing carrier gas in its normal pattern.
In addition, the conduit network 83 includes a bypass conduit 97 incorporating a suitable valve which allows a purge flow of dry gas to short circuit the test device 11 and be directed into the network downstream of the radiation chamber 79 so it flows through the dryer 85 and then into a side flow conduit 98 containing a suitable off/on valve that routes the flow exiting the dryer 85 to the connector 77. By so rotating the valve in the connector 77, the flow from the side conduit 98 is sent through the conduit 78 to the radiation chamber. Such a purge flow pattern is used before replacement of conduits or components in this region is undertaken to assure that there is no residual radioactivity in the system itself or to ascertain that the dryer 85 is effectively sequestering all of the HTO. By opening a valve in a second bypass conduit 99, this flow path of purge gas originating in the bypass conduit 97 is sequentially through the dryer 85, then the radiation monitor 79 and then into the conduit 99 leading to the vent 87.
The radiation monitor 79 is electrically connected to the conversion unit 95 which can include a CPU that is programmed to make calculations from the signals received from the radioactivity monitor that are indicative of amount of permeated HTO collected and carried by the flow of methane gas at any time. From such readings during a given period of time, and the knowledge of the rate of gas flow and the length of time during which the test was carried out, the unit 95 is appropriately calibrated and programmed to provide a cumulative readout in the form of the number of grams of water per square meter per day which are permeating through the sample 23 being tested which is being exposed to a controlled humidity under essentially ambient conditions. If desired, the HTO supply system can include a heater so as to test a film at a higher temperature, i.e. 38° C., should such be desired.
As an example of the overall operation, an appropriate sized sample 23 of a barrier film to be tested is carefully installed in the mounting device 11 so that it rests upon the upper surface of the protruding square cross-section O-rings 29 in the lower half 19 of the device, as best seen in
As previously mentioned, when the test has been satisfactorily completed, the ball valve 49 is closed, and the upstream and downstream subchambers 31, 33 are sequentially purged of HTO by flowing dry methane therethrough until no radiation is still being detected by the monitor Then the mounting device 11 is opened, and the sample 23 is removed and replaced with the next one to be tested.
Carbon monoxide is also a beta-particle emitter; therefore, the same radiation monitoring device 79 as described earlier can be employed. Instead of employing a desiccant in the absorption chamber 85, a metal alloy getter material, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,978 may be employed, and the carrier gas stream exiting the radiation chamber is flowed through a pack containing a high surface area alloy material to adsorb the carbon monoxide instead of the desiccant drier 85. The remainder of the carrier gas stream proceeds to vent to the atmosphere as previously described. Accordingly, it can be seen that essentially the same measuring device is useful to measure directly either for moisture permeation or for oxygen permeation.
Glass plates have long been used as protection for OLEDs and the like, as glass is an excellent barrier to both oxygen and moisture. In many cell phones, for example, a pair of thin glass plates are used to sandwich an OLED or other light-emitting display. However, in such an arrangement, a perimeter seal is necessary to prevent moisture and oxygen from otherwise entering from the side edges of the assembled arrangement. As a result, it has become important to be able to determine the effectiveness of a perimeter seal, which will normally be a line or bead of adhesive that completely encircles the usually rectangular perimeter of the device. Whereas the thickness of the seal is determined by the thickness of the light emitting display material being sandwiched between the two plates, the width of the line of adhesive is variable, as is of course the chemical/physical composition of the adhesive itself that is used to create the seal. Accordingly, it is important to monitor the effectiveness of a prospective adhesive seal in order to determine not only the appropriate adhesive to use, but the width of the bead or line of adhesive that should used to effectively seal, for example, a pair of thin glass plates.
When the assembly of plate and disk is mounted in the mounting means 11′, and the system is ready for testing, the ball valve is opened so that the region on the upstream side of the circular disk 125 (the surface facing the plate) will be filled with the humid HTO atmosphere which enters this region through the large oval hole 123.
Thus, this humid atmosphere will be in contact with the upstream, i.e., interior, edge of the circular line of adhesive 127. Accordingly, permeation into and slowly through the line of adhesive will occur, the rate of course depending upon the physical characteristics of the adhesive material; the permeating HTO will be collected by the slow flow of carrier gas through the subchamber 33′ and carried to the radiation monitor as explained hereinbefore. Thus, the apparatus and system described hereinbefore with regard to testing the barrier properties of a thin film is also useful for testing the barrier properties of an edge seal in an accurate manner and in similar instances where the determination of even ultralow rates of permeation of moisture or oxygen through such a seal is of significant importance.
Although it is expected that the primary entry flow of moisture or oxygen that permeates through a composite barrier film will be from the exposed region bordering the large surface area of the barrier film that is in contact with the atmosphere, it has come to the attention of those working in this area that there may also be entry flow through the edge regions of the polymeric film layers in the composite film. It is presently considered important to be able to test a composite film to determine the significance of such permeation via entry through edge surfaces. In this respect, it is been found that a simple modification to the system and apparatus illustrated and described with respect to
In operation, the inlet gas passageway 55 a would be connected via a valved line to a tee (not shown) in the line 69 between the 4-way connector 67 and the inlet passageway 55. Similarly, the exit passageway 57 a would be connected via a line containing a valve to a tee (not shown) placed in the line 73 between the valve 75 and the valved connectors 77.
With this arrangement, once the film sample has been tested for the rate of permeation directly across the upstream surface and out the downstream surface as hereinbefore described, the valves 71 and 75 could be closed and the valves opened in the lines leading to the passageways 55 a, 57 a. This would result in the slow flow of carrier gas thereafter being through the peripheral chamber 38. Once the system stabilized, it would provide an accurate reading of the amount of permeation from the saturated polymeric film out the peripheral edge of the square section of composite film being tested. Although such flow would be in the opposite direction to that of interest from the standpoint of a barrier film, it should be understood that this flow would be representative of the rate at which moisture or oxygen entering a similar film through its edge surfaces would find its way to and permeate from the surface adjacent which the light-emitting device is disposed. Accordingly, with this simple modification, an accurate arrangement is provided for being able to accurately assess ultralow permeation flow in a composite film barrier material that would result from entry through edges of such film.
Although the invention has been described with regard to certain preferred embodiments which constitute the best mode presently known to the inventors to carry out the invention, it should be understood that various changes and modifications as would be obvious to one having ordinary skill in this art can be made without departing from the scope of the invention which is defined by the claims that are appended hereto. Even though the primary working example is directed to testing improved barrier materials suitable for the formation of a flexible OLED or the like, it should be understood that other materials may alternatively be tested by appropriately altering the mounting device should such be found necessary. Likewise, if desired, both sets of valves could be opened and the permeation of radioactive gas exiting the downstream surface and the edge surfaces of a film sample could be simultaneously collected and monitored. Disclosures of all previously enumerated U.S. patents are expressly incorporated herein by reference. Particular features of the invention are enumerated in the claims which follow.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3286509||22 Sep 1964||22 Nov 1966||St Regis Paper Co||Apparatus for measuring water vapor permeability|
|US3498110 *||20 Jul 1967||3 Mar 1970||Sentralinst For Ind Forskning||Method and apparatus for measuring the gas and vapor permeability of films|
|US3580067 *||2 Nov 1967||25 May 1971||Dow Chemical Co||Method of determining the rate of vapor transmission through sheet materials|
|US3590634 *||5 May 1969||6 Jul 1971||Stanford Research Inst||Instrument for determining permeation rates through a membrane|
|US3937649||31 Oct 1973||10 Feb 1976||Ridgely John N||Process and system for removing tritium|
|US3999066 *||11 Dec 1975||21 Dec 1976||Atomic Energy Of Canada Limited||Tritium-in-air monitor|
|US4049405 *||26 Sep 1975||20 Sep 1977||American Air Filter Company, Inc.||Filter material charging apparatus for filter assembly for radioactive contaminants|
|US4656865 *||9 Sep 1985||14 Apr 1987||The Dow Chemical Company||System for analyzing permeation of a gas or vapor through a film or membrane|
|US4663969||21 Aug 1985||12 May 1987||Noel Bibby Limited||Measuring water vapor transmission through materials|
|US4965450||28 Nov 1988||23 Oct 1990||American Cyanamid Company||Radioactive assay for measuring water absorption by humectants|
|US5159829||17 Jan 1992||3 Nov 1992||Modern Controls, Inc.||Device for measuring gas permeation|
|US5390539 *||27 Sep 1993||21 Feb 1995||Modern Controls, Inc.||Device for measuring the permeability of a membrane to water vapor|
|US6119506||4 Aug 1999||19 Sep 2000||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Apparatus and method for determining transport properties of porous materials|
|US6358570||31 Mar 1999||19 Mar 2002||Battelle Memorial Institute||Vacuum deposition and curing of oligomers and resins|
|US6413645||20 Apr 2000||2 Jul 2002||Battelle Memorial Institute||Ultrabarrier substrates|
|US6655192 *||10 Oct 2001||2 Dec 2003||Borgwarner Inc.||Permeameter-porosimeter|
|US6688160 *||21 Feb 2003||10 Feb 2004||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Barrier test apparatus and method|
|US6804989 *||31 Oct 2002||19 Oct 2004||General Atomics||Method and apparatus for measuring ultralow water permeation|
|US6993956 *||26 Mar 2002||7 Feb 2006||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||Method for measuring a permeation rate, a test and an apparatus for measuring and testing|
|US20020152800 *||26 Mar 2002||24 Oct 2002||Bouten Petrus Cornelis Paulus||Method for measuring a permeation rate, a test and an apparatus for measuring and testing|
|US20020162384 *||22 Apr 2002||7 Nov 2002||Sharp Kenneth George||Method for determining gas accumulation rates|
|US20030074954||19 Oct 2001||24 Apr 2003||Engle Frank W.||Precise measurement system for barrier materials|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8024961 *||12 Nov 2008||27 Sep 2011||Schaeffler Technologies Gmbh & Co. Kg||Simultaneous normal and radial liquid permeameter|
|US8424367||4 Mar 2009||23 Apr 2013||University Of South Carolina||Systems and methods for measurement of gas permeation through polymer films|
|US8664963||23 Jul 2010||4 Mar 2014||Alliance For Sustainable Energy, Llc||Test device for measuring permeability of a barrier material|
|US20090139309 *||12 Nov 2008||4 Jun 2009||Luk Lamellen Und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs Kg||Simultaneous normal and radial liquid permeameter|
|US20100223979 *||4 Mar 2009||9 Sep 2010||University Of South Carolina||Systems and Methods for Measurement of Gas Permeation Through Polymer Films|
|US20110018563 *||27 Jan 2011||Alliance For Sustainable Energy, Llc||Test device for measuring permeability of a barrier material|
|US20140013825 *||31 Dec 2011||16 Jan 2014||Shanghai Aircraft Manufacturing Co., Ltd||Testing apparatus for testing air permeability on thickness direction of plastic matrix, and method therefor|
|US20140013826 *||31 Dec 2011||16 Jan 2014||Shanghai aircraft manufacturing co ltd||Testing apparatus for testing gas permeability on thickness direction of plastic matrix|
|CN101246095B||7 Jan 2008||30 Mar 2011||电子科技大学||Device for measuring air permeability of isolation material|
|International Classification||G01F1/00, G01N15/08|
|Cooperative Classification||G01N15/0826, G01N2015/086|
|4 Feb 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GENERAL ATOMICS, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUJAS, ROKO S.;DUNKEL, RALF;REEL/FRAME:014969/0017
Effective date: 20040128
|3 Jul 2007||CC||Certificate of correction|
|20 Aug 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|18 Aug 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8