Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS6223164 B1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/539,413
Publication date24 Apr 2001
Filing date5 Oct 1995
Priority date23 Jun 1994
Fee statusPaid
Also published asCA2196549A1, EP0786113A1, US5557514, WO1996000423A1
Publication number08539413, 539413, US 6223164 B1, US 6223164B1, US-B1-6223164, US6223164 B1, US6223164B1
InventorsJerry G Seare, Patricia A Smith-Wilson, Kurt VanWagoner, Jean Andrea Mattey, Eileen K. Snyder, Candace C. Wahlstrom, Michelle Willis, Matthew R. Bentley, Steven J. Wenzbauer, Rodney Fredette, Vicki Sue Sennett
Original AssigneeIngenix, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and system for generating statistically-based medical provider utilization profiles
US 6223164 B1
Abstract
A method and system for analyzing historical medical provider billings to statistically establish a normative utilization profile. Comparison of a medical provider's utilization profile with a normative profile is enabled. Based on historical treatment patterns and a fee schedule, an accurate model of the cost of a specific medical episode can be created. Various treatment patterns for a particular diagnosis can be compared by treatment cost and patient outcome to determine the most cost-effective treatment approach. It is also possible to identify those medical providers who provide treatment that does not fall within the statistically established treatment patterns or profiles.
Images(13)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(14)
We claim:
1. A method for generating a medical provider profile using a general purpose computer system wherein said system comprising:
a central processing unit,
memory,
a display device,
an input device,
an output device,
a mass storage device which contains
a number of historical medical provider patient billing records identifiable as patient records,
a grouping of diagnosis codes,
a grouping of qualifying circumstance codes,
a grouping of clear window time periods,
a grouping of preventive codes,
a grouping of complication codes, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) selecting a diagnosis code,
(b) reading a plurality of patient records from the mass storage device into the memory, each of said patient records having at least one relevant diagnosis code and a respective date of procedure and corresponding to a single patient,
(c) comparing each of said read patient records with each qualifying circumstance code in the grouping of qualifying circumstance codes,
(d) identifying each of said patient records having the proper qualifying circumstances for said selected diagnosis code,
(e) reading an indicator corresponding to an identified diagnosis into the memory, and thereby obtaining a clear window time period based on said indicator,
(f) creating a patient specific grouping of patient records, wherein each diagnosis code in said patient specific grouping of patient records corresponds to a diagnosis code in said grouping of diagnosis codes thereby creating a grouping of related patient records,
(g) from said patient records having the proper qualifying circumstances, determining a difference between dates of procedure for consecutive patient records, and if the difference is greater than or equal to said clear window time period, defining an earlier one of said two consecutive records as an ending record of an episode of care and a latter one of said two consecutive records as a beginning of an episode of care, wherein each complete episode of care has both a beginning record and an ending record,
(h) for each identified episode of care, writing said episode of care into a table to create a profile for said selected diagnosis.
2. A system for establishing medical provider profiles, the system comprising:
(a) a receiver for receiving a quantity of historical medical provider patient billing records identifiable as patient claims records,
(b) a data storage coupled to said receiver and configured to store:
a grouping of diagnosis codes,
a grouping of qualifying circumstances,
a grouping of clear window time periods,
a grouping of preventive codes, and
a grouping of complication codes,
(c) a processor coupled to said data storage arrangement and configured to provide:
means for selecting a diagnosis,
means for organizing a grouping of patient claims records, each of said organized patient claims records having at least one diagnosis code and a respective date of procedure and corresponding to a single patient,
means for comparing each of said organized patient records with each qualifying circumstance,
means for pending each of said patient claims records if it fails to qualify,
means for reading an indicator corresponding to said selected diagnosis into memory, and thereby obtaining a clear window time period based on said indicator,
means for creating a grouping of related patient records from the patient records read from each of said organized patient claims records wherein each code in said grouping of related patient records corresponds to said selected diagnosis,
means for determining a difference between dates of procedure for consecutive patient claims records, and if the difference is greater than or equal to said clear window time period, defining the latter of said consecutive patient claims records as a beginning of an episode of care, wherein each episode of care has a beginning record and an ending record,
means for pending said record if said at least one diagnosis code corresponding to said organized patient claims record is not one of the diagnosis codes within said grouping of diagnosis codes related to said selected diagnosis,
means for writing each said valid episode of care generated into a parameter table to create a profile for said selected diagnosis.
3. A method for establishing a medical provider profile using a general purpose computer system wherein said computer system comprising:
a central processing unit,
dynamic memory, and
a mass storage device,
said method comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving a number of medical provider billing records,
(b) selecting patient records that contain specific diagnosis codes from said medical provider billing records,
(c) comparing each record within said patient records selected with a qualifying circumstance table and pending each said patient record compared if it fails to qualify,
(d) selecting from a table containing specific diagnosis codes all specific diagnosis codes related to a general diagnosis code,
(e) selecting from a table containing preventive codes all preventive codes related to said general diagnosis code,
(f) selecting from a table containing aftercare codes all aftercare codes related to said general diagnosis code,
(g) grouping said patient records selected having at least one of said selected specific diagnosis codes, said selected preventive diagnosis codes, and said selected aftercare codes into a group of related records,
(h) determining a clear window time period, said clear widow time period associated with said general diagnosis code,
(i) determining a first occurrence of one of said codes within said group of related codes,
(j) pending said patient records selected from inclusion into said group of related records if a comparison of the dates of procedure for consecutive patient records shows that the difference is greater than or equal to said clear window time period,
(k) pending each said patient record selected if each said diagnosis code within said group of related diagnosis codes fails to appear in at least one of said patient records selected,
(l) if said patient record has not been rejected, entering it into a database of episodes.
4. A method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of identifying the earliest qualifying patient record as the beginning record of an initial episode of care and identifying the last qualifying patient record as the terminating record of a fmal episode of care for a patient history of records.
5. A method as recited in claim 4, wherein said initial episode of care and said final episode care are the same episode of care.
6. A method as recited in claim 4, wherein said initial episode of care and said final episode care are separate episodes of care.
7. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein said earliest qualifying patient record and said last qualifying patient record are the same patient record.
8. A method as recited in claim 4, wherein said earliest qualifying patient record and said last qualifying patient record are separate patient records.
9. A method as recited in claim 2, further including a means for identifying the earliest qualifying patient record as the beginning record of an initial episode of care and identifying the last qualifying patient record as the terminating record of a final episode of care for a patient history of records.
10. A method as recited in claim 9, wherein said initial episode of care and said final episode care are the same episode of care.
11. A method as recited in claim 9, wherein said initial episode of care and said final episode care are separate episodes of care.
12. A method as recited in claim 9, wherein said earliest qualifying patient record and said last qualifying patient record are the same patient record.
13. A method as recited in claim 9, wherein said earliest qualifying patient record and said last qualifying patient record are separate patient records.
14. A method for generating with a data processing system a medical provider profile for a specific diagnosis using patient records from the medical provider, each patient record including a date of procedure and a diagnosis code, the medical provider profile having an associated clear window time period, comprising the steps of:
reading a plurality of records corresponding to a single patient, each of the records having a specific diagnosis code or a related-diagnosis code, and a respective date of procedure;
sorting the patient records by dates of procedure;
removing from further consideration each patient record that fails to satisfy a set of qualifying circumstance rules;
determining differences between dates of procedure for pairs of consecutive patient records, and if a difference for a pair is greater than or equal to the clear window time period, defining an earlier record of the pair as an ending record of an episode of care and a latter record of the pair as a beginning of an episode of care, wherein each episode of care has both a beginning record and an ending record;
generating said episode of care so that it includes a grouping of patient specific records, wherein each said specific diagnosis code associated with each record within said grouping of patient specific records has an association with a general diagnosis; and
writing remaining episodes of care into a table to create a profile for the general diagnosis associated therewith.
Description

This application is a divisional patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/264,795 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,514 which was filed on Jun. 23, 1994 by the inventors and priority is claimed thereto.

MICROFICHE APPENDIX

This specification includes a Microfiche Appendix which includes 1 page of microfiche with a total of 37 frames. The microfiche appendix includes computer source code of one preferred embodiment of the invention. In other embodiments of the invention, the inventive concept may be implemented in other computer code, in computer hardware, in other circuitry, in a combination of these, or otherwise. The Microfiche Appendix is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety and is considered to be a part of the disclosure of this specification.

I. BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

A. Field of the Invention

The invention relates to methods and systems for analyzing medical claims histories and billing patterns to statistically establish treatment utilization patterns for various medical services. Data is validated using statistical and clinically derived methods. Based on historical treatment patterns and a fee schedule, an accurate model of the cost of a specific medical episode can be created. Various treatment patterns for a particular diagnosis can be compared by treatment cost and patient outcome to determine the most effective treatment approach. It is also possible to identify those medical providers who provide treatment that does not fall within the statistically established treatment patterns or profiles.

B. The Background Art

It is desirable to compare claims for reimbursement for medical services against a treatment pattern developed from a large body of accurate medical provider billing history information. Although in the prior art some attempt was made to compare claims for reimbursement for medical services to a normative index, the prior art did not construct the normative index based on actual clinical data. Rather, the prior art based the normative index on a subjective conception (such as the medical consensus of a specialty group) of what the proper or typical course of treatment should be for a given diagnosis. Such prior art normative indices tended to vary from the reality of medical practice. In the prior art, automated medical claims processing systems, systems for detecting submission of a fraudulent medical claims, and systems for providing a medical baseline for the evaluation of ambulatory medical services were known. Documents which may be relevant to the background of the invention, including documents pertaining to medical reimbursement systems, mechanisms for detecting fraudulent medical claims, and related analytical and processing methods, were known. Examples include: U.S. Pat. No. 4,858,121, entitled “Medical Payment System” and issued in the name Barber et al. on Aug. 15, 1989; U.S. Pat. No. 5,253,164, entitled “System and Method for Detecting Fraudulent Medical Claims Via Examination of Service Codes” and issued in the name of Holloway et al. on Oct. 12, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 4,803,641, entitled “Basic Expert System Tool” and issued in the name of Hardy et al. on Feb. 7, 1989; U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,370, entitled “Knowledge Engineering Tool” and issued in the name of Erman et al. on Apr. 14, 1987; U.S. Pat. No. 4,667,292, entitled “Medical Reimbursement Computer System” and issued in the name of Mohlenbrock et al. on May 19, 1987; U.S. Pat. No. 4,858,121, entitled “Medical Payment System” and issued in the name of Barber et al. on Aug. 15, 1989; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,538, entitled “Automated Processing of Provider Billings” and issued in the name of Johnson et al. on Jan. 22, 1991, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for the material disclosed therein.

Additional examples of documents that may be relevant to the background of the invention are: Leape, “Practice Guidelines and Standards: An Overview,” ORB (Feb. 1990); Jollis et al., “Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment versus Clinical Information Systems,” Annals of Internal Medicine (Oct. 15, 1993); Freed et al., “Tracking Quality Assurance Activity,” American College of Utilization Review Physicians (November, 1988); Roberts et al., “Quality and Cost-Efficiency,” American College of Utilization Review Physicians (November, 1988), Rodriguez, “Literature Review,” Quality Assurance and Utilization Review—Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality (Fall 1991); Elden, “The Direction of the Healthcare Marketplace,” Journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians (August 1989); Rodriguez, “Literature Review,” Quality Assurance and Utilization Review—Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality (Fall 1991); Roos et al., “Using Administrative Data to Predict Important Health Outcomes,” Medical Care (March 1988); Burns et al., “The Use of Continuous Quality Improvement Methods in the Development and Dissemination of Medical Practice Guidelines, ORB (December, 1992); Weingarten, “The Case for Intensive Dissemination: Adoption of Practice Guidelines in the Coronary Care Unit,” ORB (December, 1992); Flagle et al., “AHCPR-NLM Joint Initiative for Health Services Research Information: 1992 Update on OHSRI,” ORB (December, 1992); Holzer, “The Advent of Clinical Standards for Professional Liability,” ORB (February, 1990); Gottleib et al., “Clinical Practice Guidelines at an HMO: Development and Implementation in a Quality Improvement Model,” ORB (February, 1990); Borbas et al., “The Minnesota Clinical Comparison and Assessment Project,” ORB (February, 1990); Weiner et al., “Applying Insurance Claims Data to Assess Quality of Care: A Compilation of Potential Indicators,” ORB (December, 1990); Wakefield et al., “Overcoming the Barriers to Implementation of TQM/CQI in Hospitals: Myths and Realities,” ORB (March, 1993); Donabedian, “The Role of Outcomes in Quality Assessment and Assurance,” ORB (November, 1992); Dolan et al., “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Develop and Disseminate Guidelines,” ORB (December, 1992); Hadorn et al., “An Annotated Algorithm Approach to Clinical Guideline Development,” JAMA (Jun. 24, 1992); Falconer et al., “The Critical Path Method in Stroke Rehabilitation: Lessons from an Experiment in Cost Containment and Outcome Improvement,” ORB (January, 1993); Reinertsen, “Outcomes Management and Continuous Quality Improvement: The Compass and the Rudder,” ORB (January, 1993); Mennemeyer, “Downstream Outcomes: Using Insurance Claims Data to Screen for Errors in Clinical Laboratory Testing,” ORB (June, 1991); lezzoni, “Using Severity Information for Quality Assessment: A Review of Three Cases by Five Severity Measures,” ORB (December 1989); Kahn, “Measuring the Clinical Appropriateness of the Use of a Procedure,” Medical Care (April, 1988); Wall, “Practice Guidelines: Promise or Panacea?,” The Journal of Family Practice (1993); Lawless, “A Managed Care Approach to Outpatient Review,” Quality Assurance and Utilization Review —Official Journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians (May, 1990); Dragalin et al., “Institutes for Quality: Prudential's Approach to Outcomes Management for Specialty Procedures,” ORB (March, 1990); Chinsky, “Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Health Care Management, Physician Profiling—The Impact of Physician, Patient, and Market Characteristics On Appropriateness of Physician Practice in the Ambulatory Setting,” (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Michigan, 1991), published by Concurrent Review Concurrent Review Technology, Inc., Shingle Springs, Calif.; “Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Health Care Management, Implementation Guide,” published by Concurrent Review Concurrent Review Technology, Inc., Shingle Springs, Calif.; “Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Health Care Management, Patterns Processing Model,” published by Concurrent Review Concurrent Review Technology, Inc., Shingle Springs, Calif.; Report on Medical Guidelines & Outcome Research, 4 (February 11, 1993); “Practice Guidelines—The Experience of Medical Specialty Societies,” United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Reguestors (GAO/PEMD-91-11 Practice Guideline) (Feb. 21, 1991); “Medicare Intermediary Manual Part 3—Claims Process,” Department of Health and Human Services. Health Care Financing Administration. Transmittal No. 1595 (Apr. 1993); CCH Pulse The Health Care Reform Newsletter (Apr. 19, 1993); Winslow, “Report Card on Quality and Efficiency of HMOs May Provide a Model for Others,” The Wall Street Journal; Jencks et al., “Strategies for Reforming Medicare's Physician Payments,” The New England Journal of Medicine (Jun. 6, 1985); Solon et al., “Delineating Episodes of Medical Care,” A.J.P.H. (March, 1967); Health Care (September, 1986) (the entire issue of Volume 24, Number 9, Supplement); Miller et al., “Physician Charges in the Hospital,” Medical Care (July, 1992); Garnick, “Services and Charges by PPO Physicians for PPO and Indemnity Patients,” Medical Care (October, 1990); Hurwicz et al., “Care Seeking for Musculoskeletal and Respiratory Episodes in a Medicare Population,” Medical Care (November, 1991); Gold, “The Content of Adult Primary Care Episodes,” Public Health Reports (January-February, 1982); Welch et al., “Geographic Variations in Expenditures for Physicians' Services in the United States,” The New England Journal of Medicine (March 4, 1993); Schneeweiss et al., “Diagnosis Clusters: A New Tool for Analyzing the Content of Ambulatory Medical Care,” Medical Care (January, 1983); Showstack, “Episode-of-Care Physician Payment: A Study of Cornorary Arter Bypass Graft Surgery,” Inquiry (Winter, 1987); Schappert, “National Ambulatory Medical Surveys 1989 Summary,” Vital and Health Statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics (April, 1992) (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 92-1771); Graves, “Detailed Diagnoses and Procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1990,” Vital and Health Statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics (June, 1992) (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 92-1774); “National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual Summary, 1990,” Vital and Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics (June, 1992) (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 92-1773); “Prevalence of Selected Chronic Conditions; United States, 1986-88,” Vital and Health Statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics (February, 1993) (Series 10, No. 182); “Current Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 1991,” Vital and Health Statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics (February, 1993) (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 93-1512); Iezzoni et al., “A Description and Clinical Assessment of the Computerized Severity Index,” ORB (February, 1992); Health Care Financing Review, p. 30 (Winter, 1991); Statistical Abstract of the United States (1992); and Health and Prevention Profile—United States (1991) (published by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Studies), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for the material disclosed therein.

Additional background materials to which the reader is directed for both background and to refer to while studying this specification include: Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology CPT '94, published by American Medical Association, Code it Right Techniques for Accurate Medical Coding, published by Medicode Inc., HCPCS 1994 Medicare's National Level II Codes, published by Medicode Inc., Med-Index ICD 9 CM Fourth Edition 1993, published by Med-Index, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for the material disclosed therein.

II. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object to provide a mechanism for assessing medical services utilization patterns. The invention achieves this object by allowing comparison processing to compare an individual treatment or a treatment group against a statistical norm or against a trend.

It is an object of the invention to provide a mechanism for converting raw medical providers billing data into an informative historical database. The invention achieves this object by read, analyze and merge (“RAM”) processing coupled with claims edit processing to achieve a reliable, relevant data set.

It is an object of the invention to provide a mechanism for accurately determining an episode of care. The invention achieves this object by providing a sequence of steps which, when performed, yield an episode of care while filtering out irrelevant and inapplicable data.

It is an object of the invention to provide a method for performing a look-up of information, that is, providing a mechanism for gaining access to different parts of the informational tables maintained in the database. This object is achieved by reviewing the referenced tables for specific codes representing specific diagnoses. The codes are verified for accuracy. Then tables are accessed to display selected profiles. Users are then given the opportunity to select profiles for comparison.

It is an object of the invention to provide a method for comparing profiles. This object is achieved by comparing index codes against historical reference information stored in the parameter tables. Discovered information is checked against defined statistical criteria in the parameter tables. The process is repeated for each index code and its profile developed in the history process as many times as necessary to complete the information gathering.

It is an object of the invention to create, maintain and present to the user a variety of report products. These reports are provided either on-line or in a hard copy format. The process of creating, maintaining and presenting these reports is designed to present relevant information in a complete and useful manner.

It is an object of the invention to provide a mechanism for creating a practice parameter database. This object is achieved in the invention by repetitive episode of care processing and entry of processed episode of care data into a data table until the populated data table becomes the practice parameter database.

III. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts steps performed in the method of the invention to establish a practice parameter or utilization profile for a particular diagnosis.

FIG. 2 depicts an episode of care for a single disease.

FIG. 3 depicts an episode of care for concurrent diseases.

FIG. 4 depicts potential outcomes for an episode of care.

FIG. 5 depicts phases of an episode of care.

FIG. 6-8 depicts processing of data before episode of care processing begins.

FIG. 9 depicts episode of care processing.

FIG. 10 depicts principle elements of the invention and their relationship to each other.

FIG. 11 depicts the process of the preferred embodiment of the Read, Analyze, Merge element of the invention.

FIG. 12 depicts the process of the preferred embodiment of the Episode of Care element of the invention.

FIG. 13 depicts the process of the preferred embodiment of the Look-up element of the invention.

FIG. 14 depicts the process of the preferred embodiment of the Subset Parameter Look-up component of the Look-up element of the invention.

FIG. 15 depicts the process of the preferred embodiment of the Profile Comparison element of the invention.

IV. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The invention includes both a system and a method for analyzing healthcare providers' billing patterns, enabling an assessment of medical services utilization patterns. When the invention is employed, it can readily be seen whether a provider or multiple providers are overutilizing or underutilizing services when compared to a particular historical statistical profile. The statistical profile of the invention is a statically-derived norm based on clinically-validated data which has been edited to eliminate erroneous or misleading information. The profiles may be derived from geographic provider billing data, national provider billing data, the provider billing data of a particular payor entity (such as an insurance company) or various other real data groupings or sets. Twenty informational tables are used in the database of the preferred embodiment of the invention. These include a Procedure Description Table, ICD-9 Description Table, Index Table, Index Global Table, Index Detail Table, Window Table, Procedure Parameter Table, Category Table, Qualifying Master Table, Specialty Table, Zip/Region Table, Family Table, Specialty Statistic Table, Age/Gender Statistic Table, Region Statistic Table, Qualifying Index Table, Qualifying Group Table, Category Parameter Table, Duration Parameter Table and Family Table. ICD 9 codes or ICD (International Classification of Diseases, generically referred to as a disease classification) codes as they are generally referred to herein are used in the preferred embodiment. In other embodiments of the invention other codes could be used, such as: predecessors or successors to ICD codes or substitutes therefor, such as DSM 3 codes, SNOWMED codes, or any other diagnostic coding schemes. These tables are described in detail as follows. It should be noted, however, that these tables describe are used by the inventors in one implementation of the invention, and that the inventive concept described herein may be implemented in a variety of ways.

PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION TABLE

This table identifies and validates five years of both CPT (Current Procedural Terminology, generically referred to as an identifying code for reporting a medical service) and HCPCS level II procedure codes. The lifetime occurrence maximum and follow-up days associated with a procedure code are also located in this table.

Code(Key) Alpha/Numeric  5 Standard CPT or HCPCS (5 Years
including Modifiers)
Sub-Code Character  2 * = Starred Procedures
N = New Codes Current Year
D1 = Deleted Code Current Year
D2 = Deleted Code Previous Year
D3 = Deleted Code Third Year
D4 = Deleted Code Fourth Year
C = Changed Description
Life Time Numeric  2 Number = Count of occurrence in
Occurrence a lifetime
Blank = Not applicable
Follow Up Numeric  3 Number of Follow up Days to
Days procedure.
Description Character 48 Standard abbreviated description
Total 60

USE:

This table can validate CPT and HCPCs codes.

Five years of codes will be kept.

Give a brief description of the code.

Gives the maximum number of occurrences that this code can be done in a lifetime, if applicable. (Programming not addressed, to date)

Give the number of follow up days to a procedure. (Programming not addressed, to date)

Modifiers are stored in this table with a “099” prefix(i.e., the 80 modifier is “09980”) with a description of the modifier.

This table interrelates with:

Parameter Tables

Category Table

Qualifying Tables

Specialty Table

CPT Statistic Table

SOURCE:

This table is taken from the TB_PROC table from gendbs from prod1. The occurrence field is maintained by the Medicode staff.

ICD-9 DESCRIPTION TABLE

This table identifies and validates five years of diagnosis codes. It also contains a risk adjustment factor for each diagnosis.

ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified, assumed decimal
Code(Key) after 3rd position
Sub-Code Character  2 N = New Code
D = Deleted Code
C = Changed Code
Indicator Character  1 * or blank
* = code requires 4th and/or 5th
digits to be specific
Risk Alpha/Numeric  2 Overall Classification of Disease
Description Character 48 Standard abbreviated description
Total 58

USE:

This table can validate ICD codes.

Five years of codes will be kept.

Give a brief description of the code.

Show if the code is incomplete and in need of a fourth or fifth digit. An ICD code which should have a 4th and/or 5th digit is listed with an “*”.

This file interrelates with:

Index Table

Index Detail Table

Index Global Table

Qualifying Master Table

Family Table

All Parameter Tables

SOURCE:

ICD codes and description fields are purchased from HCFA (Health Care Financing Administration located in Baltimore, Md.).

The sub-code is maintained by the clinical staff.

INDEX DETAIL TABLE

This table groups ICD-9 codes into inclusive or exclusive diagnosis codes. This grouping is unique to each index code and is used to drive the search for each episode of care. ICD-9 codes have been classified into categories and given an indicator which determines whether or not the associated CPT code should be included in the episode of care. Also, an indicator may cause exclusion of any specific patient record from an episode of care summary analysis.

ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric or  5 Left justified assumed decimal
Character after 3rd position.
Indicator Character  2 I = Index code
R = Related
s = signs/symptoms
RO = Rule Out
C = complications (exclude)
M = miscoded
V = Vcodes
MI = Miscoded Index
ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric  5 ICD-9 Beginning Range Code
ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric  5 ICD-9 Ending Range Code
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 17

USE:

This table drives the search for the Episode of Care (EOC). Which is keyed off the Index Code.

Other codes to be included in the parameter search are specified in the indicator field. Any one of these ICD codes may or may not appear during the search for the Index code and still have the EOC be valid.

ICD codes with an indicator of “C” when found in a patient history will disqualify the entire patient from the EOC process.

Some Index codes are listed in part with “?” and “??” to exhibit that it does not matter what the trailing 4th and/or 5th digit is, the record is to be accessed for the parameter. For example, the Index code may be 701??, meaning that if the first three digits of the code start with 701 then use the regardless of what the 4th and/or 5th digit may be. This is true for all codes starting with 701.

ICD codes maintained in this table are listed as complete as verified by the ICD description table, with the exception of ICD codes with an indicator of “M”. Programming logic should consider this when using “M” codes in the search process.

This file layout is used for drafting and populating a temporary file built from this table and the Index Global Table based on indicators and keys extrapolated from the Index table.

PROGRAM LOGIC TO ASSIGN EPISODE OF CARE

Any patient history with an ICD from the temp file for the chosen Index code is tagged for possible assignment of Episode of Care.

Perform a search on patient history for any ICD code from temp file with an indicator of “C”. If found, exclude entire patient history from EOC search.

The qualifying tables are accessed to verify if specific qualifying factors apply to determine if patient history meets criteria for determination of valid episode of care. (See Qualifying Tables for further explanation)

The qualifying table is then accessed for further delineation of qualifying circumstances by EOC.

A timeline is tracked, by patient, for all potential Episodes of care that may occur for a given patient history.

The data is arrayed based on profile classes which are eight subsets of Procedure categories. An aggregate of all procedures can also be reported. (See Category Table for further explanation)

This table interrelates with:

ICD Description Table

Index Table

Index Global Table

Parameter Table

CPT Statistic Table

Age/Sex Table

SOURCE:

This table is generated and maintained by the Medicode staff.

INDEX TABLE

This table provides a preliminary filter for assigning and accessing different tables during the Episode of Care process. This table houses the assignment of staging and whether or not the Index Global table should be accessed.

ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position.
Staging Character  2 P = preventive
A = acute
C = chronic
L = life threatening
M = manifestations
Global Key Alpha  2 C = complications
M1 = miscoded medical vcodes
M2 = miscoded surgical vcodes
1 = medical vcodes
2 = surgical vcodes
Indicator Character  2 C = complications
V = vcodes
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 12

USE:

This table is used as a preliminary sort for Index codes before the EOC search.

Once an Index code has been selected, this table is searched for whether or not the global index table needs to be accessed.

This table assigns the staging for the index code which points to the window table.

This table interrelates with:

ICD Description Table

Index Detail Table

Index Global Table

Window Table

SOURCE:

This table is generated and maintained by the Medicode staff.

INDEX GLOBAL TABLE

This table gives a listing of ICD-9 codes common to most Index codes for either inclusion such as preventive or aftercare, or exclusion such as medical complications.

GLOBAL KEY Alpha/Numeric  2 C = complications
M1 = miscoded medical vcodes
M2 = miscoded surgicai vcodes
1 = medical vcodes
2 = surgical vcodes
ICD Beginning Alpha/Numeric  5 ICD-9 Beginning range code
ICD Ending Alpha/Numeric  5 ICD-9 Ending range code
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 13

USE:

This table is used to identify a generic V Code or complication ICD code to be used in an EOC search for any Index code.

It is triggered by the Index table.

The surgical Vcodes include all M1, M2, 1 and 2's.

Medical Vcodes include M1 and 1.

A complication ICD code will negate the use of a patient from the EOC search.

A temporary file for the index code is created based on ICDs extrapolated from this table as well as the Index detail table

This table interrelates with:

ICD Description Table

Index Table

Index Detail Table

SOURCE:

This table is generated and maintained by the Medicode staff.

WINDOW TABLE

This table contains the number of days preceding and following an episode of care that must be present without any services provided to the patient relating to the index code or associated codes. These windows are used to define the beginning and end points of an episode of care. This table is driven from the staging field in the index table.

Staging Character 2 P = Preventive
Indicator C = Chronic, A = Acute
L = Life threatening, M = Manifestation
Beginning Numeric 3 Number of days for no occurrence of
Window ICD for Index Code
Ending Numeric 3 Number of days for no occurrence of
Window ICD for Index Code
Update Character 1 A, C, or Blank
Total 9

USE:

This table is keyed off of the staging and it tells the program how long of a “Clear Window” is needed on both ends of this EOC for it to be valid.

SOURCE: This table is generated and maintained by the PP staff.

PROCEDURE PARAMETER TABLE

This table contains the specific CPT codes identified for each index code listed chronologically with associated percentiles, mode, and average. The end user may populate an identical table with their own unique profiles created by analyzing their claims history data.

ICD-9 Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position.
Proflle Alpha/Numeric  2 Mnemonic
Procedure Alpha/Numeric  5 CPT, HCPCS
timeframe Alpha/Numeric  3 Mnemonic for timeframe or total
50th percentile Numeric  4 Beginning percentile range
50th percentile Numeric  4 ending percentile range
75th percentile Numeric  4 beginning percentile range
75th percentile Numeric  4 ending percentile range
95th percentile Numeric  4 beginning percentile range
95th percentile Numeric  4 ending percentile range
Mode Numeric  3 Numeric Count
Count Numeric  7 Number of EOCs for timeframe
Sum Numeric  7 Number of services for
timeframe
Weighting Numeric  6 Numeric count, assumed
decimal (4.2)
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 63

USE:

This table shows which CPT's are statistically and historically billed and how often based on an index ICD code.

It is keyed off of the index code and the category.

SOURCE:

All of the field elements are obtained from the Procedure Detail Report.

Weighting is to be addressed in Phase II of the product.

CATEGORY PARAMETER TABLE

This table contains a listing of the categories identified for each index code listed chronologically with associated percentiles; mode, and average. The end user may populate an identical table with their own unique profiles created by analyzing their claims history data.

ICD-9 Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justifled assumed decimal
after 3rd position.
Proflle Alpha/Numeric  2 Mnemonic
Category Alpha/Numeric  4 category
timeframe Alpha/Numeric  3 Mnemonic of timeframe or total
50th percentile Numeric  4 beginning percentile range
50th percentile Numeric  4 ending percentile range
75th percentile Numeric  4 beginning percentile range
75th percentile Numeric  4 ending percentile range
95th percentile Numeric  4 beginning percentile range
95th percentile Numeric  4 and ending percentfle range
Mode Numeric  3 Numeric Count, assumed
decimal (4.2)
Count Numeric  7 Number of EOCs for the
timeframe
Sum Numeric  7 Number of services for the
timeframe
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 56

USE:

This table shows which Categories are statistically and historically billed and how often based on an index ICD code.

It is keyed off of the index code and the category.

SOURCE:

All of the field elements are obtained from the Parameter Timeframe report.

DURATION PARAMETER TABLE

This table contains the length of time associated with an episode of care for a given Index code. NOTE: The end user may populate an identical table with their own unique profiles created by analyzing their claims history data.

ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position.
Profile Alpha/Numeric  2 Mnemonic
50th percentile Numeric  4 beginning range
50th percentile Numeric  4 ending range
75th percentile Numeric  4 beginning range
75th percentile Numeric  4 ending range
95th percentile Numeric  4 beginning range
95th percentile Numeric  4 ending range
Mode Numeric  3 beginning and ending range
Update Character  2 A = Add
C = Change
Total 36

USE:

This table stores the projected length of an episode of care for a given index code.

It interrelates with:

Index Detail table

Parameter table

It is populated from the statistical analysis for each Index code.

CATEGORY TABLE

This table provides a grouping of CPT codes into categories of similar services.

Category Alpha/Numeric  4 Mnemonics
CPT Alpha/Numeric  5 Beginning CPT Range
CPT Alpha/Numeric  5 Ending CPT Range
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 15

USE:

Procedure codes have been categorized according to most likely type of service they may represent. It could be characterized as a sorting mechanism for procedure codes.

The mnemonic used for this category is as follows:

E1=Major E and M E2=Minor E and M

L1=Major Laboratory L2=Minor Laboratory

RD1=Major Diagnostic Radiology RD2=Minor Diagnostic Radiology

RT1=Major Therapeutic Radiology RT2=Minor Therapeutic Radiology

O1=Major Oncology Radiology O2=Minor Oncology Radiology

MD1=Major Diagnostic Medicine MD2=Minor Diagnostic Medicine

MT1=Major Therapeutic Medicine MT2=Minor Diagnostic Medicine

SD1=Major Diagnostic Surgery SD2=Minor Diagnostic Surgery

ST1=Major Therapeutic Surgery ST2=Minor Therapeutic Surgery

A1=Major Anesthesia A2=Minor Anesthesia

P1=Pathology J=Adjunct

Categories are also used for arraying Episodes of Care into profile classes or can be reported as an aggregate. The subsets of the aggregate are:

0 Common Profile—A1, A2, P1, E1, E2, L1, L2, RD1, RD2, MD1, MD2, SD1, SD2. (All of these categories are included as part of the other seven profile classes.

1 Surgery/Radiation/Medicine Profile—All Categories

2 Medicine/Radiation Profile—MT1, MT2, RT1, RT2, O1, O2

3 Surgery/Radiation Profile—ST1, ST2, RT1, RT2, O1, O2

4 Surgery/Medicine Profile—ST1, ST2, MT1, MT2

5 Radiation Profile—RT1, RT2, O1, O2

6 Medicine Profile—MT1, MT2

7 Surgery Profile—ST1, ST2

This table interrelates with:

Parameter Table

Qualifying Tables

Procedure Table

SOURCE:

Maintained by the clinical staff

QUALIFYING MASTER TABLE

This table provides a preliminary filter for determining qualifying circumstances that may eliminate a patient history for determination of an Episode of Care. It also provides the initial sort of an episode of care for a specific profile class.

Index Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified, assumed decimal
after 3rd position
Scope Alpha  1 P = Patient
E = Episode of Care
B = Both
Profile Alpha/Numeric  2 Mnemonic or Blank
Group Alpha/Numeric  5 Correlates to group ID in
Qualifying Group Table
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 14

Use:

Preliminary select for where in EOC process qualifying circumstances should apply.

This table interrelates with:

Index Detail Table

Qualifying Group Table

Logic:

The Qualifying Master Table outlines the Index code, where in the data search the qualifying search is to occur and what qualifying groups are associated with the index code. The locations include P=patient search, E=Episode of Care search, or B=search in both.

The Profile field is numbered based on the 8 different profiles outlined under the category table. If blank, a profile is not relevant. They are as follows:

0. Common Profile

1. Surgery/Medicine/Radiation Profile

2. Medicine/Radiation Profile

3. Surgery/Radiation Profile

4. Surgery/Medicine Profile

5. Radiation Profile

6. Medicine Profile

7. Surgery Profile

The Group field assigns a 5 byte mnemonic that establishes a set of qualifying rule sets for a given index code. This field keys directly to the Qualifying Group Table. The majority of the groups relate to profile classes. They are as follows:

ALL (Surgery/Medicine/Radiation Profile)

MRPRO (Medicine/Radiation Profile)

SRPRO (Surgery/Radiation Profile)

SMPRO (Surgery/Medicine Profile)

RPRO (Radiation Profile)

MPRO (Medicine Profile)

SPRO (Surgery Profile)

CPRO (Common Profile)

There are 3 other groups which establish a set of qualifying circumstances based on the occurrence of a particular procedure or diagnosis. These are as follows:

SURG Certain Index codes are commonly associated with an invasive procedure which should be present during the course of treatment.

MED Certain Index codes are commonly associated with an E/M service which should be present during the course of treatment.

ONLY The Index code must occur at least twice on different dates of service over the course of treatment. This group looks only for this occurrence. No specific procedure is to be sought in conjunction with the Index code.

Source:

Table maintained by Clinical staff.

QUALIFYING GROUP TABLE

Table groups certain qualifying circumstances to aid in an efficient search for data meeting the criteria.

Group Alpha/Numeric 5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position
Rule Type Alpha/Numeric 2 II = Index Code specific rule
IS = specific ICD code rule
IC = multiple ICD to category
rule
CC = Multiple code rule
CS = code specific rule
IG = ICD to gender rule
IA = ICD to age rule
Rule Identifier Alpha/Numeric 1 T = True F = False (toggle)
M = Male F = Female if IG
rule type
Number required numeric 2 number value
Update Character 1 A, C, or Blank
Total 15 

USE:

To act as a preliminary qualifying mechanism for determining if claims information can be used in the assignment of a parameter.

This table interrelates with:

Qualifying Index Table

Qualifying Code Table

Qualifying Master Table

A rule type (or rule types) is assigned by group delineating if the rule applies to a single or multiple ICD, single or multiple CPT or category or any combination thereof.

The rule identifier is an assigned mnemonic based on what the rule is to achieve.

The Logical indicates if the rule is positive or negative (inclusionary or exclusionary)

The number required is a count of the number of occurrences for the rule to be valid.

Logic:

The Group Id is driven by the groups assigned in the Qualifying master table. All qualifying rule sets assigned to a given group should be performed to determine the qualifying circumstances for a given index code. See Qualifying Master Table for an explanation of each group.

The Rule Type is a mnemonic which assigns a common type of logic that is to be implemented in the search for the qualifying circumstances. It is possible that the same rule type could be associated with many different rule identifiers. The rule type will also point to either the Qualifying Index Table or the Qualifying Code Table as determined by the first byte of the filed. The following is a listing of the rule types:

Rule Types associated with Qualifying Index Table:

II This related directly to the Index code only.

IC This rule is for any indicated ICD code associated with the Index code as it relates to a category or procedure.

IS This rule is for a specific indicated ICD code associated with the Index code as it relates to a category or procedure.

IG This rule is for any indicated ICD code associated with the Index code as it relates to age. The age ranges to be used are:

0-1=newborn/infant

1-4=early childhood

5-11=late childhood

12-17=adolescence

18-40=early adult

41-64=late adult

65-99=geriatric

12-50=female childbearing age

Rule Types associated with Qualifying Code Table: (Additional rule types may be added when necessary for phase II of the product.)

CC This rule is for a specific procedure or category as it relates to another specific procedure or category for any ICD code associated with the Index code.

CS This is for a specific procedure or category as it relates to a specific ICD code associated with the Index code.

The Rule Identifier is a further break out of the qualifying circumstances for a group. Most of the rule Ids relate directly to components of a given profile to be included or excluded. For example the rule ID of MMR relates directly to the group of MRPRO and delineates that the further breakout is for Radiation. The other 3 major rule Ids relate directly to the remaining 3 groups. These are:

Group Rule ID
ONLY O
SURG S
MED M

The logical is a toggle for whether the rule is true or false. If the rule type is IG, the toggle is for Male or Female.

The number required is a count for the minimum occurrence that the qualifying circumstance can occur.

SOURCE:

To be maintained by clinical staff

QUALIFYING INDEX TABLE

Table houses common qualifying circumstances based on presence or non-existence of given procedures and/or ICD codes that would qualify or disqualify a patient history in the determination of an Episode of Care.

Rule Type Alpha/Numeric  2 II = Index Code specific rule
IS = specific ICD code rule
IC = multiple ICD to category rule
IA = ICD to age rule
EG = ICD to gender
Rule Alpha/Numeric  4 assigned from Qualifying Master
Identifier Table
Indicator Alpha/Numeric  2 I = Index code
R = Related
S = signs/symptoms
RO = Rule out
M = miscoded
V = Vcodes
MI = Miscoded Index
or Blank
Code Alpha/Numeric  5 category, CPT, HCPCS, ICD
or blank
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 14

USE:

To act as a qualifying mechanism for determining if claims information can be used in the assignment of a parameter

This table interrelates with:

Procedure Table

category Table

Qualifying Group Table

ICD Description Table

Index Detail Table

All rules generated from this table deal with an ICD code driven by the indicator, regardless of the Index code. If the rule is ICD only, then the procedure is blank. If the rule is ICD and procedure, then the indicated ICD must correlate with a procedure code or category.

If the indicator is blank, then all indicators should be considered for qualifying circumstances. Listing a specific indicator causes a qualifying search on the associated indicator only.

Logic:

The first two fields of the Qualifying Index Table reiterates the rule type and rule identifier as outlined in the Qualifying Group table. Both of these fields are key.

The indicator correlates to the indicators in the Index Detail table. If the field is blank, all ICDs for the index code should be sought for the rule.

The code filed could be a CPT, HCPCS, category or ICD code. If this field is blank, no specific code or category should be sought for the rule.

SOURCE:

To be maintained by clinical staff

QUALIFYING CODE TABLE

Table houses common qualifying circumstances based on the presence or non-existence of a given combination of procedure codes that would qualify or disqualify a patient history in the determination of an Episode of Care.

Rule Type Alpha/Numeric  2 CC = Multiple code rule
CS = code specific rule
Rule Alpha/Numeric  4 As labeled in Qualifying Master
Identifier Table
Primary code Alpha/Numeric  5 CPT, HCPCS or category or ICD
Secondary Alpha/Numeric  5 CPT, HCPCS or category or ICD
Code
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 14

USE:

To act as a qualifying mechanism for determining if claims information can be used in the assignment of a parameter.

This table interrelates with:

Procedure Table

Category Table

Qualifying Group Table

All rules generated from this table have to do with a procedure or category driven by the qualifying master table. The rule relates to the procedure or category as listed in the primary and secondary fields.

Logic:

The first two fields of the Qualifying Index Table reiterates the rule type and rule identifier as outlined in the Qualifying Group table. Both of these fields are key.

The Primary code is the driving code in the rule search for the qualifying circumstance. It can be a CPT, HCPCS, category or ICD code.

The Secondary code is the code that must be associated with the primary code in the rule search for the qualifying circumstance. It can be a CPT, HCPCS, category or ICD code.

SOURCE:

To be maintained by clinical staff.

SPECIALTY TABLE

Table provides a listing of medical specialties with an assigned numeric identifier. This is standard HCFA information.

Specialty (Key) Alpha/Numeric 3 Medicare specialty indicator
CPT Alpha/Numeric 5 Beginning CPT to include
CPT Alpha/Numeric 5 Ending CPT to include
Update Character 1 A, C, of Blank
Total 14

USE:

This table is used to specify which Specialty is most commonly used with which CPT. A description of the specialty will be in the documentation.

SOURCE:

This table will be taken from the list Med-Index Publications maintains (available from Medicode, Inc. located in Salt Lake City, Utah).

ZIP/REGION TABLE

Table provides a listing of geographical zip codes sorted into 10 regional zones, standard HCFA information.

Region Indicator Alpha/Numeric  2 Medicares Ten Regions
Zip Code Numeric  5 Beginning Zip Code Range
Zip Code Numeric  5 Ending Zip Code Range
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 13

USE:

This table is used to specify which Medicare Region to use for the statistic table.

SOURCE:

This will be generated by Medicode, Inc. staff.

SPECIALTY STATISTIC TABLE

Table provides a listing of medical specialties with an assigned numeric identifier. This is standard HCFA information.

ICD-9 Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position
Specialty Alpha/Numeric  3
CPT Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Beginning Range (Service Area)
CPT Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Ending Range (Service Area)
Category Alpha/Numeric  4 Mnemonic
Multiplier Numeric  6 Implied decimal (4.2)
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 29

USE:

This table is a matrix that is directly tied to the parameter table by the index code. Its purpose is to give a numeric multiplier that is applied to the occurrence field in the parameter table, to vary the parameter by service area and/or sex and/or region. (i.e., if the occurrence is 2 and the multiplier for a specialist is 1.5, the specialist may receive a total of 3.) If multiple multipliers are used, compute the average of them and use that.

SOURCE:

This table will be generated by the computer using the extended data set, and validated clinically by the clinical staff.

AGE/GENDER STATISTIC TABLE

Table provides a listing of each CPT code for an index code with a numerical factor used to adjust the frequency of each code by age and/or gender specific data analysis.

ICD-9 Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position.
Age Alpha/Numeric  2 00-99
Sex Alpha/Numeric  1 M, F or Blank
Category Alpha/Numeric  3 Mnemonic
Multiplier Decimal  6 Implied decimal (4.2)
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 18

USE:

This table is a matrix that is directly tied to the parameter table by the index code. Its purpose is to give a numeric multiplier that is applied to the occurrence field in the parameter table, to vary the parameter by service area and/or sex and/or region. (i.e. if the occurrence is 2 and the multiplier for a male is 1.5, the male may receive a total of 3.) It multipliers are used, compute the average of them and use that.

SOURCE:

This table will be generated by the computer using the extended data set, and validated clinically by the clinical staff.

REGION STATISTIC TABLE

Table provides a listing of CPT code for an index code with a numerical factor used to adjust the frequency of each code by regional data analysis.

ICD-9 Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Left justified assumed decimal
after 3rd position.
Region Alpha/Numeric  2 Medicares Ten Regions
Multiplier Decimal  6 Implied decimal (4.2)
Update Character  1 A, C, or Blank
Total 14

USE:

This table is a matrix that is directly tied to the parameter table by the index code. Its purpose is to give a numeric multiplier that is applied to the occurrence field in the parameter table, to vary the parameter by service area and/or sex and/or region. (i.e., if the occurrence is 2 and the multiplier for a region is 1.5, the region may receive a total of 3.) If multiple multipliers are used, compute the average of them and use that.

SOURCE:

This table will be generated by the computer using the extended data set, and validated clinically by the clinical staff.

FAMILY TABLE

Table provides a listing of ICD-9 codes which have been clustered into family groupings.

Family Description Character 24 Name of Family/Cluster
ICD-9 Code Alpha/Numeric  5 Beginning ICD-9 Range
ICD-9 Alpha/Numeric  5 Ending ICD-9 Range
Total 34

USE:

This table is used for in-house purposes only. It provides a listing of a ICD Family/Cluster with a description of the Family/Cluster.

SOURCE:

This table is generated and maintained by the clinical staff.

FILE LAYOUT FOR CLAIMS DATA CONTRIBUTION

We prefer Electronic Media Claims National Standard Format; however, if you are not using EMC the following is our suggested layout. Please include an exact layout of the format you use with your submission. The record layout that follows is for each line item that appears on a claim. The charge (field 19) should be the non-discounted fee-for-service. There should be no aggregation or fragmentation.

Field Alpha/
Number Description Length Numeric Comments
 1. Rendering 15 A/N Unique provider identifi-
Provider ID cation number or SSN
 2. Billing 15 A/N Unique provider identifi-
Provider ID cation number or SSN
 3. Provider  3 A/N Supply a List of Specialty
Specialty codes used
 4. Patient ID 17 A/N Unique patient ID number
or SSN. May be an encrypt-
ed or encoded format.
 5. DOB  6 N Patient Date of Birth
MMDDYY
 6. Sex  1 A M = Male, F = Female
 7. Subscriber 25 A/N Insured's I.D. No.,
ID Normally SSN
 8. Relationship  1 N Patient to Subscriber,
1 = Self, 2 = Spouse,
3 = Dependent
 9. Bill ID 15 A/N Unique claim/bill identifi-
cation number
10. From Date  6 N MMDDYY
of Service
11. To Date  6 N MMDDYY
of Service
12. Provider Zip  5 N Standard 5 digit Zip Code
13. Place  2 A/N Supply a list of POS codes
of Service used
14. Type  2 A/N Supply a list of TOS codes
of Service used
15. Procedure  5 N Submitted CPT or HCPC
Code code
16. Modifier  2 N Submitted CPT modifier
17. 2nd Modifier  2 N If multiple modifiers are
submitted, show the second
modifier used. Anesthesia
Modifiers (P1-P6)
18. Claim type  3 A/N Payor Class Code- W/C,
HCFA, Medicaid etc.
19. Charge  5 N Billed amount, right justi-
fied, whole dollars
20. Allowed  5 N Right justified, whole
Amount dollars
21. # of  5 N number of days and/or units
days/units
22. Anesthesia  3 N Actual Minutes
time
23. ICD1  5 A/N First diagnostic code
attached to procedure
24. ICD2  5 A/N Second diagnostic code
attached to procedure (Both
ICD1 & ICD2 are left justi-
fied, assumed decimal after
3rd byte)
25. ICD3  5 A/N Third diagnostic code
attached to procedure
26. ICD4  5 A/N Fourth diagnostic code
attached to procedure
27. Out-patient  5 A/N Outpatient facility/out-
facility patient hospital identifier
28. Revenue  3 N Revenue center code
Code

ACCEPTABLE MEDIA TYPES

9 track tapes 1600 or 6250 BPI, ASCII or EBCDIC, Labeled or Unlabeled, Unpacked data, Fixed record lengths

Floppy disk; 3.5″ (1.44Mb or 720K) or 5.25″ (1.2Mb or 3601), Standard MS-DOS formatted disk, ASCII fixed record length or delitted file

DC 600A or DC 6150 cartridge : “TAR” or single ASCII or EBCDIC file, Unpacked data, Fixed record lengths

8 mm Exbyte tapes “TAR” or single ASCII or EBCDIC file, Unpaced data, Fixed record lengths

3480 cartridges Unpacked data, Fixed record lengths, Compressed or Uncompressed

Maximum Block size 64,280

This invention is a process for analyzing healthcare providers' billing patterns to assess utilization patterns of medical services. The method of the invention incorporates a set of statistically derived and clinically validated episode of care data to be used as a paradigm for analyzing and comparing providers' services for specific diagnoses or medical conditions. This invention utilizes a series of processes to analyze the client's healthcare claims history to create unique parameters. In its preferred embodiment, the invention is implemented in software. The invention provides the following functions or tools to the client: creation of local profiles, display of profiles and comparison of profiles.

The creation of local profiles function gives the client the ability to develop unique episode of care profiles utilizing their own claims history data. The process for creating these profiles is identical to the process used in the development of the reference profiles.

The display of profiles function provides a look-up capability for information stored in the reference tables or in client generated profiles tables. This look-up capability may be displayed on the computer screen or viewed as a hard-copy print out.

The comparison of profiles function provides a comparison between any two profile sources with attention to variance between them. This includes comparing client specific profiles to reference tables, comparing a specific subset of the client's data (eg, single provider) against either reference tables or the client's profiles, or comparing different subsets of the client's profiles to subsets of reference tables.

There are four main processes involved in the invention, as depicted in FIG. 10. These are Read, Analyze and Merge (RAM), 1001, further depicted in FIG. 11; Episode of Care analysis (EOC), 1002, further depicted in FIG. 12; Look-up function, 1003, further depicted in FIGS. 13 and 14; and Profile Comparison, 1004, further depicted in FIG. 15. The invention also includes an innovative reporting mechanism. Each of these four main processes and the reporting mechanism is described in detail in the remainder of this section.

A. Transfoming Raw Data Into an Informative Database

Both the RAM and the EOC processes involve healthcare claims history search and analysis. The intent of the RAM and the EOC claims history processing is to enable the end user to establish their own unique profiles based on their existing claims data information. Developing a database of historical provider billing data which will be used to provide the functionality of the invention is the first step in the invention.

1. Read, Analyze and Merge (“RAM”)

In order to define a profile a significant quantity of historical medical provider billing information must be analyzed. As indicated above, the provider billings may come from a variety of sources, with the general guideline that accuracy and completeness of the data and a statistically significant sample of provider billings required to develop a reliable profile. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, no less than two years' of consecutive claims history and about fifty million claims are used to develop the profiles. The RAM process verifies existence and validity of all data elements in a claims history before the data is processed to develop a profile. The reader is directed to FIGS. 1 and 6-8 for pictorial representations of the preferred embodiment of the invention. FIG. 1 depicts the high level steps performed in one embodiment of the invention. The data flow shown in FIG. 1 includes loading client data 101 from tape 100, reordering various fields 103 and performing date of service expansion 104 as necessary. Next, data are merged (combined) 1-5 and sorted 106 to ensure all bill ID's are grouped together. The data 108 is then read, analyzed and merged into an extended data set (EDS) 110. Reporting and any other processing may occur 111 and an Episode of Care database 112 is created. The preferred embodiment of this invention. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the steps of the invention are implemented in a software product referred to as CARE TRENDS available from Medicode, Inc. of Salt Lake City, Utah.

FIG. 6 depicts read, analyze and merge processing that occurs in the preferred embodiment of the invention. First, one claim at a time the data 603 is read 601, cross walked and scrubbed (filtered) 602. Then a claim is analyzed 604 with result output to a log file 605. The results in the log file 605 are then compared 606 to the original claim data and inserted 607 into an extended data set 608.

FIG. 7 depicts an analytical process of the preferred embodiment that includes initializing 701 RVU and line number for each line of the claim and sorting 702 by RVU (descending) and CPT and charge in order to prepare for proper analysis by CES. Then 703 line items are split into two groupings of surgical assistant modifiers and all other modifiers in separate groups. Each of the two groups is then checked 704 against disease classification codes (ICD 9), procedure edits rules 705 (CES tables) and unbundle/rebundle edits 706 are performed.

FIG. 8 depicts the merge process of the preferred embodiment of the invention. It includes reading 802 each line of from the log file for current bill, proceeding with processing if the record read is pertinent 804, determining whether to add the record to the extended data set 805-807, (i.e. not adding denials, adding rebundles and adding other lines that have not been specifically excluded).

FIG. 9 depicts episode of care formation in the preferred embodiment. This processing includes processing the records in teh extended data set that relate to the current index code. This relation is determined by the index tables. Then the records are broken into potential episodes of care based on a period of time specified in a window table. Then the episode of care is qualified based on the rules in a qualifying table. Qualifying episodes of care are inserted into the episode of care table.

The following text includes a written description of the RAM processing that is performed in the preferred embodiment of the invention. FIG. 11 shows the RAM process.

The first step in the RAM process is determination of a patient record, 1101. It is necessary to establish a patient record that can be used in the episode of care extraction process (explained in detail below). In the preferred embodiment, a patient record is identified as a unique patient history involving no less than two years of sequential claims history. Because identifying patient information is often removed from patient records to ensure patient confidentiality, patient information such as subscriber/relationship, patient ID, age, gender, bill ID and claim ID may be useful in positively identifying a particular patient. It should be noted that claims history data from various sources may need to be handled differently to identify patient records due to differences in file organization and level of detail of information provided. The amount of information desired to be captured may vary in different embodiments of the invention, but generally the information to be captured is that on a standard HCFA 1500 billing form, Electronic Media Claims, UB 82 or UB 92 claim forms, all of which are generally known in the industry.

The next step, 1102, is the manipulation of the client file layout to extrapolate or crosswalk the pertinent information in order to conform to the logic of the invention. Examples of this step include: translation of Type of Service or Benefits to Specialty type, modifiers, and/or place of service information.

The next steps involve the validation of claims elements. Each line item of claims history is compared against the Procedure, the Description table, (such as CPT or HCPCS description tables; HCPCS means Health Care Financing Administration Common Procedure Coding System provided by the U.S. Government; such tables generally are referred to as Description Tables and may contain any coding schemes) and the ICD description tables to validate the codes contained in the line item, 1103. Line items with an invalid code are not included in the remainder of RAM processing, though they are counted for future reference. Line items which indicate services being performed over a period of more than one day are expanded into numerous line items, one for each service performed, 1104. This function is also performed only on CPT codes 10000-99999. The services are then each given a unique date of service beginning with the “date of service from” for the first line item and ending with the “date of service to” for the last line item. The last validation step, 1105, is the conversion of old CPT codes to new CPT codes. This step is essential to provide the most accurate statistics relative to physician office and hospital visits (termed Evaluation and Management Services).

The last step of the RAM process is to edit all claims for errors, through an appropriate claims edit tool, 1106. In the preferred embodiment, software known as “CLAIMS EDIT SYSTEM” which is available from Medicode, Inc. located in Salt Lake City, Utah is used to detect and correct any duplicate line items or inappropriately billed services. This results in an appropriately processed set of raw data that is now in a condition for episode of care processing. The reader is directed to the RAN source code in the Microfiche Appendix for all details of this processing performed in the preferred embodiment.

2. Determination of Episode of Care

The next step in transforming raw data into a useful database is to determine episodes of care for the data that has already undergone RAM processing. In the invention, a database is created which contains profiles for various diagnoses, chronic and otherwise, including complications indicators. Creation of the database depends on accurately defining an episode of care (“EOC”) for each diagnosis. An episode of care is generally considered to be all healthcare services provided to a patient for the diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare of a specific medical condition. The episode of care window for a single disease is depicted in FIG. 2. In the simplicity of the figure, it can be seen that for the diagnosis in question, all healthcare services provided between onset and resolution should be incorporated into the database. An example of this would be a patient who has been afflicted with acute appendicitis. The patient's life prior to onset of the acute appendicitis would be considered a disease free state. On some date, the patient would notice symptoms of acute appendicitis (although he may not know the diagnosis) that cause him to seek the attention of a medical provider. That event would be considered the onset. During the disease state, numerous events may occur, such as the patient consulting a family practitioner, consulting a surgeon, laboratory work and surgical services being performed, and follow-up visits with the providers). When further follow-up is no longer required, resolution has been reached. Thus an episode of care has been defined and data from that patient's episode of care is used in the invention to construct a profile for the diagnosis applicable to that patient. Without the use of additional logic, however, the use of that definition of an episode of care would result in erroneous data being entered into the profile database.

For example, in FIG. 3 it can be seen that a patient suffering from a chronic disease who contracts a second disease could be treated both for the chronic disease and for the second disease during the disease state (i.e. between onset and resolution). If all medical provider billing data during the disease state were entered into the database, then the database would contain erroneous historical data for that individual's diagnosis. For example, if a patient who suffers from psoriasis were to be diagnosed with acute appendicitis and received treatment for psoriasis between the time of onset and resolution of his acute appendicitis, then the provider billings would contain both billings for treatment of the psoriasis and the acute appendicitis. Therefore the invention incorporates methods for discerning medical provider billings irrelevant to a particular diagnosis. Further, the disease state could be the active state of a chronic disease, and resolution could be the disease returning to its inactive state. A method for handling this situation is therefore also provided.

Other alternatives in the course of a disease further complicate accurately defining an episode of care. From FIG. 4 it can be seen that for any particular diagnosis, the outcome could be resolution, as described above, return to the chronic state of a disease, or complication of the disease. For example, if a patient has undergone an appendectomy, the patient may contract an infection following the surgical procedure. Because complications of various types and durations and in varying frequencies are associated with various diagnoses, a method for incorporating the complication data into the statistically-derived practice parameter is intended to be provided in the invention.

FIG. 5 depicts the phases of an episode of care, including the sequence of patient workup, treatment, and eventual resolution, return to the chronic state, or complication followed by either resolution or return to the chronic state.

The method for defining an entire episode of care provided in the invention is used to construct a database of profiles based on billing data that has been filtered to eliminate data irrelevant to the diagnosis which would lead to an erroneous profile. Essential to the determination of an EOC are certain qualifying circumstances. These circumstances are managed through the use of four inter-relational qualifying tables, to provide a mechanism for sorting patient history for the occurrence of specific procedures or ICD codes that are requisite for an EOC to be valid.

The steps used in the preferred embodiment to determine an episode of care are shown in FIG. 12 and as follows.

a.) Data Sort by Index Code

First, 1201, the raw data set which has undergone RAM processing is sorted by index code (i.e. general diagnosis) to find all patient records with occurrence of a particular index code on at least two different dates of service. Second, 1202, qualifying ICD codes (specific diagnosis) associated with the index code in question are found by searching patient history for at least one occurrence of the specific category or index code, to be considered in the criteria of an episode of care. Third, 1203, during this step patient history records are searched for qualifying circumstances such as procedures relating to specific medical conditions which may have been indicated as usually requiring an Evaluation and Management (E/M) service during the course of treatment. For example, an occurrence of a qualifying circumstance such as an E/M service during the patient history is considered in the criteria of an episode of care. Fourth, 1204, once the data history has been searched for qualifying circumstances, the valid components of these patient records are then checked against the three inter-relational Index Tables to identify qualifying ICD codes associated with the chosen index code. In addition, the patient records are searched for any comorbidity ICD codes that would disqualify the patient record for inclusion in the EOC (such as diabetes with renal failure). Records then are given a staging indicator (i.e. chronic, acute, life-threatening, etc.) associated with the index code to continue in the EOC process in the determination of windows.

Fifth, 1205, a temporary file is created based on combining the authorized and/or disallowed ICD codes that are associated with a given index code in the Index Global Table (listing preventative and aftercare codes) and the Index Detail tables. The temporary file is created using the Index Table Pointers, which determine whether or not the Index Detail Table only should be accessed or whether the Index Global Table is also necessary for drafting the temporary file. Sixth, 1206, for each unique patient record that has been identified as containing the assigned Index code with its associated staging, the entire data set is searched to find the first occurrence of its index code and the date of that record.

b.) Determination of Clear windows

Clear window processing defines the onset and resolution points of a diagnosis to establish an episode of care. The actual parameters used in clear window processing may vary in various implementations of the invention. Based on the staging indicator, a pre-episode window time period and a post-episode window time period are selected from the table, 1207. Then, 1208, beginning with the first occurrence of an index code in the patient record, a search backward in time is made until no services relating to the diagnosis are found. Then a further search backward in time is made to determine a pre-episode clear window. If any of the ICD codes, V-codes or complications codes found during the data sort by index code processing are found during this search backward in time that fall outside of the pre-episode window time period, there is no clear window and that patient record is rejected and not used. Processing begins again with the sort by index code for a new patient record. If a clear pre-episode window has been found, the patient record continues through post-episode window determination.

Once a clear pre-episode window has been found, a search is made for a clear post-episode window, 1209. This comprises two searches forward in time. The first search is to establish the date of the procedure code in question. Then a further search forward in time is made for the clear post-episode window. If the second search to determine the clear post-episode window reveals any of the ICD codes, V-codes or complications codes found during the data sort by index code processing are found outside of the post-episode window time period (as specified by the staging indicator), there is no clear window and that patient record is rejected and not used. Processing would begin again with the sort by index code for a new patient record. If a clear window has been found the patient record can be analyzed for a valid episode of care.

c.) Valid Episode of Care

The patient record is then checked to determine if the index code in question appears on at least two dates of service. If the index code appears on only one date, the record is rejected. The qualifying tables are then checked to determine if the record meets the minimum criteria for procedure codes (such as surgical services) that are expected to be found within an episode of care for a given index code. If the minimum criteria are not found in an episode of care, the patient record will be rejected and it will not be considered in the profile summary. Processing would then resume with a new patient record and data sort by index code. Once an EOC has been determined for a set of claims history meeting the criteria for an Index code, the information can be sorted by different combinations of treatment patterns that are likely to arise for a given medical condition, 1210. There are eight basic profile classes which outline the common combinations of treatment patterns to statistically analyze and store. These Profile Classes are:

0. Common Profile (diagnostic and E/M services common to all of the above).

1. Surgery/Medicine/Radiation Profile

2. Medicine/Radiation Profile

3. Surgery/Radiation Profile

4. Surgery/Medicine Profile

5. Radiation Profile

6. Medicine Profile

7. Surgery Profile

8. Summary Profile (summary of 0-7 above)

If the patient record contains the minimum criteria for an EOC then processing continues with population of the procedure and category tables.

d.) Populating the Procedure and Category Parameter Tables

Patient records that have not been rejected by this point in the process will be added to the procedure and category tables, 1211. Data from all of the episodes of care for each index code are inserted into the parameter tables to create the summary statistical profiles. In the preferred embodiment these tables are accessed by index code and populated with data from all the episodes of care for each index code to create and provide summary statistics. The information generated is driven by the index code and is sorted chronologically and by category of procedures. The procedure description table and category table are also accessed to determine a description of the procedure codes and the service category in which they fall.

The final step of the EOC process is the generation of output reports, 1212. The output report of this step can be either a on-line look-up report or a hard copy report. Reports are further described below.

The reader is directed to the Microfiche Appendix containing the source code for EOC processing and to FIG. 9 for supplementary information.

At this point, parameter tables have been created which may be accessed for various purposes. A description of these was listed above.

B. Use of the Database

1. Look-up Function

In the preferred embodiment of the invention, a look-up function is provided so that various information available in the database may be accessed. In general, a specific diagnosis may be reviewed in each of the tables of the database based on ICD code. In various embodiments of the invention, other look-up functions may be provided based on nearly any category of information contained in the database. In the preferred embodiment of the invention display of profiles is performed as part of the look-up function. Information in the procedure and category parameter tables are displayed by index code sorted chronologically to show a profile.

The specific steps of the preferred embodiment of the Look-Up function of the invention are shown in FIG. 13 and described as follows.

The first step, 1301, is to review the reference tables for a given Index ICD code. Once a specific diagnosis is chosen for review the process moves to step two. In step two, 1302, the ICD description table is accessed to verify that the ICD-9 code is valid, complete and to provide a description of the diagnosis. It will also indicate a risk adjustment factor assigned to the diagnosis.

In step three, the Index tables are accessed, 1303. Next, step four, 1304, is to determine whether or not the chosen ICD code is an Index code. If it is found as an Index code, any additional ICD codes associated which the selected Index code will be accessed, 1305. If a chosen diagnosis is not listed as an index code, a prompt, 1306, will allow a search for the selected ICD code to list which index code(s) it may be associated with and its indicator, 1307. A word search capability, 1308, is included in the look-up function applicable to the Index code display. A word or words of a diagnosis is entered and a search of possible ICD codes choices would be listed.

The next step, 1309, is to access the Parameter Tables to display selected profiles. The information provided is driven by the index code and is sorted chronologically, by profile class and by category of procedures. The user is then given the opportunity to choose whether the profiles to be accessed are from the reference tables, client developed profiles, or both, 1310. Next the Procedure Description Table, 1311, and the Category Table, 1312, are accessed to ascertain description of procedure codes and categories under which they fall.

The last step of the Look-Up function is the output of report product, 1313. This report may either be on-line look-up process or in the hard copy report format.

The preferred embodiment of the invention also performs subset profile look-up. This permits analysis of profiles based on selected subsets of data such as age, gender, region and provider specialty.

The process for the subset of profiles look-up includes all of the steps necessary for the general profiles look-up and includes the following additional steps shown in FIG. 14 and described below.

The Age/Gender Table is accessed to ascertain the standard age ranges and/or gender selection for a given profile, 1402. This information is stored by index code with an adjustment factor to be multiplied against the occurrence count of each procedure stored in the parameter table. For example, an adjustment factor of 0.6 associated with an age range of 0 to 17 would be calculated against an occurrence count of 10 for CPT code 71021 for Index code 493XX giving an age adjusted occurrence of 6 for that age range.

The Region Statistic Table, 1403, is accessed and used in a similar manner as the Age/Gender Table. This table has adjustment factors based on ten regions throughout the United States.

The Zip/Region Table, 1404, is accessed to identify what region a particular geographic zip code falls within.

The CPT Statistic Table, 1405, is accessed and used in a similar manner as the Age/Gender table. This table has adjustment factors based on different medical specialty groupings.

The Specialty table, 1406, is accessed to ascertain what particular specialty groupings are suggested.

The subset parameter Look-Up function also includes the capability of producing output reports, 1407. These reports can be on-line look-up process reports or hard-copy report format reports.

2. Comparison Processing

In the preferred embodiment of the invention, it is possible to compare profiles developed from a data set against profiles developed from a reference data set. Subsets of profiles may be compared as well. Profiles may be compared for any index code and profile reports may be output. It is also possible to identify those medical providers (whether individuals or institutions) who provide treatment that does not fall within the statistically established treatment patterns or profiles. Further, various treatment patterns for a particular diagnosis can be compared by treatment cost and patient outcome to determine the most effective treatment approach. Based on historical treatment patterns and a fee schedule, an accurate model of the cost of a specific medical episode can be created.

The specific process of Comparison Processing is shown in FIG. 15 and described as follows. The first step, 1501, is the comparison of information developed from the data history search process with reference information stored in the Parameter Tables. The next step, 1502, is to test the services from the history processing to see if it falls within the defined statistical criteria in the Parameter Tables. If it does an indicator is given to this effect, 1504. If the services fall outside the statistical criteria of the reference Parameters Table, a variance alert describing the difference will be given, 1503. The process may be repeated for each index code and its profile developed in the history process, 1505. The final step is to produce output reports, 1506. These reports are either on-line look-up process reports or hard-copy report format reports.

3. Reporting

Reporting of various information contained in the database is provided in the preferred embodiment. Six different types of reports or displays are provided in the preferred embodiment, these are: Provider Practice Profile Report, Profile Comparison Reports, Resident Parameters Display, Local Parameters Display, Parameter Comparison Report and Chronological Forecast. Each of these reports or displays is described as follows.

The Provider Practice Profile Report is a set of reports which provide a tally or summary of total CPT and/or ICD code utilization by a provider or group of providers during a specified time interval and allows comparison against provided reference data or client generated reference data.

The select criteria for running the tally can be any one of the following:

single physician, department, specialty or clinic by CPT and/or ICD

multiple physicians, departments, specialties, or clinics by specialty, region, CPT and/or ICD

period of time being analyzed

Included in the report is the following:

criteria for select

claims analyzed

average lines per bill

invalid CPTs and percent of total for study

invalid ICDs and percent of total for study

incomplete ICDs and percent of total for study

patients in age categories

patients by gender

missing ICDs and percent of total for study

The report includes numerous (up to about 22 in the preferred embodiment) separate procedure (such as CPT) categories which are headers for each page. Each CPT utilized within that category will be reported by:

frequency and percent of total

dollar impact and percent of total for single or multiple fee schedules and/or allowable reimbursement schedules

grand total if more than a single physician report

The report includes a tally by ICD. Each ICD utilized is reported on by:

frequency and percent of total

dollar impact and percent of total for single or multiple fee schedule and/or allowable reimbursement schedules (dollar impact based on each line item CPT correlated to the ICD)

If a report includes region and/or specialty, there are numerous tallies for procedure categories and/or ICD.

The Profile Comparison Reports give the client a comparison of a health care provider's (or group of providers') utilization of CPT and/or ICD-9 codes in a specific episode of care against a reference set of utilization profiles. This includes number, frequency and chronological order of services along with other statistical information (eg, range, mode, confidence interval, etc . .).

The comparison can be against one of the following:

national norms resident in the tables

regional norms resident in the tables

client established norms developed by use of the tally report, outlined above

other

Selection criteria include the following:

single physician, department, clinic or specialty by CPT and/or ICD to be compared against national, regional, specialty, and/or client established norms

multiple physicians, departments, clinics, or specialties by CPT and/or ICD by specialty and/or region, to be compared against national, region, specialty, and/or client established norms

set period of time being analyzed

General information included in the report includes:

criteria for select (i.e., national, regional, specialty, and/or client established)

claims analyzed

average lines per bill

invalid CPTs and percent of total for study and comparison

invalid ICDs and percent of total for study and comparison

incomplete ICDs and percent of total for study and comparison

patients in age categories and comparison

patients by gender and comparison

missing ICDs and percent of total for study and comparison

The report includes numerous separate CPT categories which are headers for each page. Each CPT utilized within that category will be reported by:

frequency and percent of total

dollar impact and percent of total for single or multiple fee schedules and/or allowable reimbursement schedules

grand total if more than a single physician report

The report includes a tally by ICD. Each ICD utilized is reported on by:

frequency and percent of total

dollar impact and percent of total for single or multiple fee schedule and/or allowable reimbursement schedules (dollar impact based on each line item CPT correlated to the ICD)

If a report includes region and/or specialty, there are numerous tallies for CPT categories and/or ICD.

The Resident Parameters Display provides the client a look-up mode for information stored in the Practice Parameter Tables or client generated parameter tables. This look-up should be on the computer screen or as a print out.

The selection criteria is based on the key elements of the Practice Parameter tables. For Example:

Index code for associated CPT codes and/or any other the following:

index code only

index code and indicators (i.e., related, complicating, rule/outs, symptoms, etc)

specialty

region

age

gender

standard length of Episode of Care

based on profile (tally)

based on parameter (timeline)

regional variables

other misc. look-ups

geozips incorporated in a region

CPT for follow up days and/or lifetime occurrence

specialty and associated CPT codes

ICD and Risk Factor

The Local Parameters Display provides the same information as described in the Display of Resident Parameters listed above.

The Parameter Comparison Reports are a set of reports which give the client a comparison of a physician (or group of physicians) utilization of CPT and/or ICD against an existing set of utilization norms over a timeline and in chronological order.

The comparison can be against one of the following:

national norms resident in the tables

regional norms resident in the tables

client established norms developed by use of the tally report, outlined above

other

Selection criteria include the following:

single physician, department, clinic or specialty by CPT and/or ICD to be compared against national, regional, specialty, and/or client established norms

multiple physicians, departments, clinics, or specialties by CPT and/or ICD by specialty and/or region, to be compared against national, region, specialty, and/or client established norms

set period of time being analyzed

General information included in the report includes:

criteria for select (ie, national, regional, specialty, and/or client established)

claims analyzed

average lines per bill

invalid claims due to incomplete Episode of Care

invalid CPTs and percent of total for study and comparison

invalid ICDs and percent of total for study and comparison

incomplete ICDs and percent of total for study and comparison

patients in age categories and comparison

patients by gender and comparison

missing ICDs and percent of total for study and comparison

The report includes numerous separate procedure categories which are headers for each page. Each procedure category utilized within that category will be reported by:

frequency and percent of total

dollar impact and percent of total for single or multiple fee schedules and/or allowable reimbursement schedules

grand total if more than a single physician report

The Chronological Forecast provides statistical trend analysis and tracking of the utilization of billing codes representative of services performed by a physician for a given diagnosis over a set period of time and stored in chronological order. It will provide a summation of billed codes representative of services and diagnoses utilized by an entity over a period of time.

C. System Requirements

The method and system of this invention may be implemented in conjunction with a general purpose or a special purpose computer system. The computer system used will typically have a central processing unit, dynamic memory, static memory, mass storage, a command input mechanism (such as a keyboard), a display mechanism (such as a monitor), and an output device (such as a printer). Variations of such a computer system could be used as well. The computer system could be a personal computer, a minicomputer, a mainframe or otherwise. The computer system will typically run an operating system and a program capable of performing the method of the invention. The database will typically be stored on mass storage (such as a hard disk, CD-ROM, worm drive or otherwise). The method of the invention may be implemented in a variety of programming languages such as COBOL, RPG, C, FORTRAN, PASCAL or any other suitable programming language. The computer system may be part of a local area network and/or part of a wide area network.

It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of numerous and varied other embodiments which may constitute applications of the principles of the invention. Such other embodiments may be readily devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or scope of this invention and it is our intent that they be deemed within the scope of our invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US356636512 Sep 196823 Feb 1971Searle Medidata IncMultiphasic medical screening system
US369795723 Dec 196810 Oct 1972Adaptronics IncSelf-organizing control
US37168401 Jun 197013 Feb 1973Texas Instruments IncMultimodal search
US428633026 Apr 197925 Aug 1981Isaacson Joel DAutonomic string-manipulation system
US42901141 Jul 197615 Sep 1981Sinay Hanon SMedical diagnostic computer
US431430918 Dec 19792 Feb 1982Northern Telecom LimitedElectric test equipment mounting
US431922517 May 19749 Mar 1982The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyMethods and apparatus for compacting digital data
US432625927 Mar 198020 Apr 1982Nestor AssociatesSelf organizing general pattern class separator and identifier
US436087523 Feb 198123 Nov 1982Behnke Robert WAutomated, door-to-door, demand-responsive public transportation system
US436905921 Jan 198118 Jan 1983Metallgesellschaft AktiengesellschaftProcess of directly reducing iron oxide containing materials in a rotary kiln
US443476917 May 19826 Mar 1984Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Deceleration fuel cut device for internal combustion engines
US44544145 Apr 198212 Jun 1984Vericard CorporationFunds transfer system using optically coupled, portable modules
US44791768 Feb 198223 Oct 1984Metalogic Control LimitedAdaptive control of a dynamic system or process
US449172529 Sep 19821 Jan 1985Pritchard Lawrence EMedical insurance verification and processing system
US45532063 Oct 198312 Nov 1985Wang Laboratories, Inc.Image storage and retrieval
US46324286 Feb 198430 Dec 1986Brown Steven PCombination medical data, identification and health insurance card
US464803715 Mar 19843 Mar 1987Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyMethod and apparatus for benefit and financial communication
US46583707 Jun 198414 Apr 1987Teknowledge, Inc.Knowledge engineering tool
US466729216 Feb 198419 May 1987Iameter IncorporatedMedical reimbursement computer system
US470029714 Sep 198413 Oct 1987Merrill Lynch Relocation Management, Inc.Relocation management and reporting system
US473172518 Sep 198615 Mar 1988Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki KaishaData processing system which suggests a pattern of medical tests to reduce the number of tests necessary to confirm or deny a diagnosis
US473335423 Nov 198422 Mar 1988Brian PotterMethod and apparatus for automated medical diagnosis using decision tree analysis
US480364125 Nov 19877 Feb 1989Tecknowledge, Inc.Basic expert system tool
US483982213 Aug 198713 Jun 1989501 Synthes (U.S.A.)Computer system and method for suggesting treatments for physical trauma
US485812112 Dec 198615 Aug 1989Medical Payment Systems, IncorporatedMedical payment system
US486663410 Aug 198712 Sep 1989SyntelligenceData-driven, functional expert system shell
US487212219 Jun 19873 Oct 1989University Of PennsylvaniaInteractive statistical system and method for predicting expert decisions
US491663324 Mar 198710 Apr 1990Wang Laboratories, Inc.Expert system apparatus and methods
US494547626 Feb 198831 Jul 1990Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc.Interactive system and method for creating and editing a knowledge base for use as a computerized aid to the cognitive process of diagnosis
US497584017 Jun 19884 Dec 1990Lincoln National Risk Management, Inc.Method and apparatus for evaluating a potentially insurable risk
US498753827 Apr 198922 Jan 1991Western Medical ConsultantsAutomated processing of provider billings
US500163020 Dec 198819 Mar 1991Wiltfong M JComputerized case history business method
US501806729 Jul 198721 May 1991Iameter IncorporatedApparatus and method for improved estimation of health resource consumption through use of diagnostic and/or procedure grouping and severity of illness indicators
US506531524 Oct 198912 Nov 1991Garcia Angela MSystem and method for scheduling and reporting patient related services including prioritizing services
US507045217 Oct 19893 Dec 1991Ngs American, Inc.Computerized medical insurance system including means to automatically update member eligibility files at pre-established intervals
US522597612 Mar 19916 Jul 1993Research Enterprises, Inc.Automated health benefit processing system
US523570211 Apr 199010 Aug 1993Miller Brent GAutomated posting of medical insurance claims
US525316429 Jan 199112 Oct 1993Hpr, Inc.System and method for detecting fraudulent medical claims via examination of service codes
US52551873 Apr 199019 Oct 1993Sorensen Mark CComputer aided medical diagnostic method and apparatus
US53011058 Apr 19915 Apr 1994Desmond D. CummingsAll care health management system
US530726229 Jan 199226 Apr 1994Applied Medical Data, Inc.Patient data quality review method and system
US532407713 Nov 199228 Jun 1994Kessler Woodrow BMedical data draft for tracking and evaluating medical treatment
US53252393 Sep 199228 Jun 1994U.S. Philips CorporationApparatus for producing recorded tape-like magnetic record carriers, record carrier obtained thereby, and device for reproducing the record carriering device for reproducing the record carrier
US535950931 Oct 199125 Oct 1994United Healthcare CorporationHealth care payment adjudication and review system
US536542522 Apr 199315 Nov 1994The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceMethod and system for measuring management effectiveness
US547138210 Jan 199428 Nov 1995Informed Access Systems, Inc.Medical network management system and process
US548699920 Apr 199423 Jan 1996Mebane; Andrew H.Apparatus and method for categorizing health care utilization
US550891225 Jun 199016 Apr 1996Barry SchneidermanClinical database of classified out-patients for tracking primary care outcome
US551740514 Oct 199314 May 1996Aetna Life And Casualty CompanyExpert system for providing interactive assistance in solving problems such as health care management
US55196076 Jul 199321 May 1996Research Enterprises, Inc.Automated health benefit processing system
US552181418 Oct 199428 May 1996Betz Laboratories, Inc.Process optimization and control system that plots inter-relationships between variables to meet an objective
US55440442 Aug 19916 Aug 1996United Healthcare CorporationMethod for evaluation of health care quality
US557716929 Apr 199419 Nov 1996International Business Machines CorporationFuzzy logic entity behavior profiler
US55837587 Jun 199510 Dec 1996Health Risk Management, Inc.Health care management system for managing medical treatments and comparing user-proposed and recommended resources required for treatment
US559463726 May 199314 Jan 1997Base Ten Systems, Inc.System and method for assessing medical risk
US56130721 Jun 199518 Mar 1997Risk Data CorporationSystem for funding future workers compensation losses
US56447782 Nov 19931 Jul 1997Athena Of North America, Inc.Medical transaction system
US56528421 Mar 199429 Jul 1997Healthshare Technology, Inc.Analysis and reporting of performance of service providers
US566018316 Aug 199526 Aug 1997Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.Interactive probability based expert system for diagnosis of pacemaker related cardiac problems
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"Clinical Classification for Health Policy Research: Discharge Statistics by Principal Diagnosis and Procedure," U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Provider Studies Research Note No. 17 (Aug. 1993).
2"Current Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 1991," Vital and Health Statistics. Dec. 1992, Series 10, #184.
3"IHQ Quality First Health Care Practice Guidelines by Specialty," Institute for Healthcare Quality, 1993.
4"Implementation Guide" Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Health Care Management, Pub. by Concurrent Review Technology Inc.
5"Medicare Intermediary Manual Part 3-Claims Process," Department of H&H's, Health Care Financing Administration Transmittal No. 1595 (Apr., 1993).
6"National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual Summary 1990," Vital and Health Statistics. Jun. 1992, Series 13, #112.
7"Pattern Processing Model," Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Healthcare Management. Pub. by Concurrent Review Technology Inc.
8"Physician Profiling," Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Healthcare Management. Pub. by Concurrent Review Technology Inc.
9"Practice Guidelines-the Experience of Medical Specialty Societies," U.S. Govt O. Report to Congressional Requestors (QAO/PCDM-91-11 Practice Guideline) (Feb. 21, 1991).
10"Press Release," Health Outcomes Institute Feb. 8, 1993.
11"Prevalence of Selected Chronic Conditions: United States 1986-88," Vital and Health Statistics. Feb. 1993, Series 10, #182.
12"Medicare Intermediary Manual Part 3—Claims Process," Department of H&H's, Health Care Financing Administration Transmittal No. 1595 (Apr., 1993).
13"Practice Guidelines—the Experience of Medical Specialty Societies," U.S. Govt O. Report to Congressional Requestors (QAO/PCDM-91-11 Practice Guideline) (Feb. 21, 1991).
14Borbas et al., "The Minnesota Clinical Comparison and Assessment Project," QRB (Feb. 1990).
15Burns et al., "The Use of Continuous Quality Improvements in the Development and Dissemination of Medical Practice Guidelines," QRB (Dec. 1992).
16CCH Pulse The Health Care Reform Newsletter (Apr. 1993).
17Chinsky., Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Health Care Management, Physician Profiling-The Impact of Physician, Patient, and Market Characteristics on Appropriateness of Physician Practice in the Ambulatory Setting (Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Michigan, 1991).
18Chinsky., Patterns of Treatment Ambulatory Health Care Management, Physician Profiling—The Impact of Physician, Patient, and Market Characteristics on Appropriateness of Physician Practice in the Ambulatory Setting (Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Michigan, 1991).
19Couch et al., "Severity of Illness Measures: Opportunities of Clinicians," Annals of Internal Medicine, (Nov. 1988).
20Dialog File 149, Acc. No. 08726638, Bailey, N.C., "how to Control Overcharging By Physicians: Unnecessary Payments to MD's that Were Caused by Inaccurate Coding on Claims That Cost Payers Billions Last Year. Here's a Way to Combat This," Business and Health, V* Issue No. 8, Aug. 1990, p. 13(5).
21Dialog File 149, Acc. No. 09374757, McIlrath, S., "Medicare to Begin Evaluation of Physician Practice Patterns," American Medical News, V33, No. 32. Aug. 24, 1990.
22Dialog File 149, Acc. No. 10475237, Hughes et al., Health Care Financing Review,"Procedure Codes: Potential Modifiers of Diagnosis Related Groups," V12, Issue No. 1, Fall 1990.
23Dialog File 149, Acc. No. 1198663, Journal of Family Practice, "Accuracy of Patient Encounter and Billing Information in Ambulatory Care," V33 Issue No. 6, Dec. 1991.
24Dialog File 149, Acc. No. 13228972, Addiction Letter: V8, Issue No. 11, "The Baltimore County of Substance Abuse Uses a Customized Model for Data Collection and Billing System," Nov. 1992, p. (3).
25Dialog File 149, Acc. No. 15781211, Borzo, G., "Smart-Bombing Fraud; Insurers Turn to Powerful New Computers to Spot Aberrant Claims," American Medical News, V37, No. 38, Oct. 10, 1994, p. 3(4).
26Dialog File 15, Acc. No. 00723419, Chithelen, "A Health Opportunity," Forbes. V14 Issue No. 3, Feb. 3, 1992, pp. 46-47.
27Dialog File 275, Acc. No. 01237169, Steinberg, D., "Whiplash Again? Dr. Database Will Be With You In Just a Moment. (The National Health Care Anti-Fraus Association)," PC Week, V5, Issue No. 2, Jan. 12, 1988, p. 5(1).
28Dialog File 73, Acc. No. 611097, Div. Raidl., Res. Inst. Brain Blood Vessels, Akita, "A Computer Processing System for Patient Records of Cerebro Vascular Disease, Emphasizing the Retrieval of Radiological Examinations," 1975 pp. (563-571).
29Dialog File 751, Acc. No. 00253707, "Medical Records Management System (MRMS)," Information of Florida, Jan. 1992.
30Dolan et al., "Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Develop and Disseminate Guidelines," QRB Dec., 1992.
31Donabedian, "The Role of Outcomes in Quality Assessment and Assurance," QRB (Nov. 1992).
32Dragalin et al., "Institutes for Quality: Prudential's Approach to Outcomes Management for Specialty Procedures," QRB (Mar. 1990).
33Elden, "The Direction of the Healthcare Marketplace." Journal of the American College of Utilization review-official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality (Fall 1991).
34Elden, "The Direction of the Healthcare Marketplace." Journal of the American College of Utilization review—official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality (Fall 1991).
35Falcone, et al., "the Critical Path Method in Stroke Rehabilitation: Lessons From an Experiment in Cost Containment and Outcome Improvement," QRB (Jan. 1993).
36Federal Register. vol. 57 (167) Aug. 27, 1992, pp. 38845-38847.
37Federal Register. vol. 57 (170) Sep. 1, 1992, pp. 39879-39893.
38Flayle et al., "AHCPR-NLM Joint Initiative for the Health Services Research Information: 1992 Update in OHSRI," QRB (Dec. 1992).
39Freed et al., "Tracking Quality Assurance Activity," American College of Utilization Review Physicians (Nov. 1988).
40Freed et al., "Tracking Quality Assurance Activity," American College of Utilization Review Physicians. Nov. 1988.
41Garnick et al., "Services and Charges by PPO Physicians for PPO and Idemnity Patients," Medical Care, Oct. 1990, vol. 28(10).
42Gold et al., "The Content of Adult Primary Care Episodes," Public Health Reports, Jan.-Feb., 1992.
43Gottlieb et al., "Clinical Practice Guidelines at an HMO: Development and Implementation in a Quality Improvement Model," QRB (Feb. 1990).
44Graves, "Detailed Diagnoses and Procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1990," Vital and Health Statistics. Jun., 1992, Series 13, #113.
45Hadorn et al., "An Annotated Algorithm Approach to Clinical Guideline Development," JAMA (Jun. 24, 1992).
46HBO Patient Care Software Article.
47Health and Prevention Profile United States, 1991.
48Healthcare Financing Review, Winter, 1991, vol. 13, #2, p.30.
49Holzer, "The Advent of Clinical Standards for Professional Liability," QRB (Feb. 1990).
50Horner et al., Accuracy of patient encounter and patient billing information in ambulatory care,, Journal of family Practice, vol.: v33, Issue: n6 p. 593(6), Dec. 1991.*
51Hurwicz et al., "Care Seeking for Musculo-Skeletal and Respiratory Episodes in a Medicare Population," Medical Care. Nov. 1991, vol. 29 (11).
52Iezzon et al., "A Description and Clinical Assessment of the Computerized Severity Index." QRB, Feb., 1992.
53Iezzoni., "Using Severity Information for Quality Assessment: A Review of Three Cases by Five Severity Measures," QRB (Dec. 1989).
54Intel: Med Advertisement.
55Jenks., "Strategies for Reforming Medicare's Physician Payments, Physician Diagnosis-Related Groups and Other Approaches," The New England Journal of Medicine (Jun. 6, 1985).
56Jenks., "Strategies for Reforming Medicare's Physician Payments, Physician Diagnosis—Related Groups and Other Approaches," The New England Journal of Medicine (Jun. 6, 1985).
57Jollis et al., "Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment vs. Clinical Information Systems," Annals of Internal Medicine (Oct. 15, 1993).
58Kahn, "Measuring the Clinical Appropriateness of the Use of a Procedure: Promise or Panacea?," The Journal of Family Practice (1993).
59Lawless, "A Managed Care Approach to Outpatient Review," Quality Assurance and Utilization Review-Official Journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians (May 1990).
60Lawless, "A Managed Care Approach to Outpatient Review," Quality Assurance and Utilization Review—Official Journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians (May 1990).
61Leape, "Practice Guidelines and Standards: An Overview," QRB (Feb. 1990).
62Margolis et al., "Profiling Practice Patterns for Clinical Benchmarking," GHAA Institute. Jun. 14, 1993.
63McMahon et al., "Measurement of Severity of Illness and the Medicare Prospective Payment System," Journal of General Internal Medicine. Sep./Oct. 1988, vol. 3.
64MDR Outlook, vol. 4 (3).
65Medical Care, Sep., 1986 vol. 24 #9, Supplement.
66Mennemeyer, "Downstream Outcomes: Using Insurance Claims Data to Screen for Errors in Clinical Laboratory Testing," QRB (Jun. 1991).
67Miller et al., "Physician Charges in the Hospital," Medical Care Jul., 1992, vol. 30, #7.
68Reinertsen. "Outcomes Management and Continuous Quality Improvement: /the Compass and the Rudder," QRB (Jan. 1993).
69Report on Medical Guidelines and Outcomes Research, Feb. 11, 1993.
70Report on Medical Guidelines Outcome Research., 4(Feb. 11, 1993).
71Roberts et al., "Quality and Cost Efficiency," American College of Utilization Review Physicians (Nov. 1988).
72Roberts et al., "Quality and cost Efficiency: The Evidence for Channeling," American College of Utilization Review Physicians. Nov. 1988.
73Rodriguez, "Literature Review," Quality assurance and Utilization Review-Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality (Fall 1991).
74Rodriguez, "Literature Review," Quality assurance and Utilization Review—Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality (Fall 1991).
75Roos et al., "Using Administrative Data to Predict Important Health Outcomes," Medical Care (Mar. 1988).
76Rosko., "DRG's and Severity of Illness Measures: An Analysis of Patient Classification Systems," Journal of Medical Systems. Nov., 1988, vol. 12.
77Schappert, "National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1989 Summary," Vital and Health Statistics. Apr., 1992, Series 13, #110.
78Schneeweiss., "Diagnosis Clusters: A New Tool for Analyzing the Content of Ambulatory Medical Care," Medical Care. Jan., 1983, vol. 21 (1).
79Schowstack et al., "Episode of Care Physician Payment: A Study of Coronary Bypass Care Graft Surgery," Inquiry. vol. 24, 1987.
80Solon et al., "Dilineating Episodes of Medical Care," AJPH (Mar. 1967).
81Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1992.
82Wakefield et al., "Overcoming the Barriers to Implementation of TQM/CQI in Hospitals: Myths and Realities," QRB (Mar. 1993).
83Wall., "The Practice Guidelines: Promise or Panacea," The Journal of Family Practice, vol. 37 (1), 1993.
84Weiner et al., "Applying insurance Claims Data to Assess Quality of Care: A Compilation of Potential Indicators," QRB (Dec. 1990).
85Weingarten et al., "The Case for Intensive Dissemination: Adoption of Practice Guidelines in the Coronary Care Unit," QRB. Dec. 1992.
86Welch et al., "Geographic Variation in expenditures for Physician's Services in the U.S.," New England Journal of Medicine Mar. 4, 1993 vol. 328 (9).
87Winslow, "Report Card on Quality and Efficiency of HMO May Provide a Model for Others," The Wall Street Journal.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6612985 *26 Feb 20012 Sep 2003University Of RochesterMethod and system for monitoring and treating a patient
US6802810 *21 Sep 200112 Oct 2004Active Health ManagementCare engine
US6826536 *22 Jul 200030 Nov 2004Bert FormanHealth care billing monitor system for detecting health care provider fraud
US724904016 Mar 200624 Jul 2007Trurisk, L.L.C.Computerized medical underwriting of group life and disability insurance using medical claims data
US7263492 *15 Feb 200228 Aug 2007Fair Isaac CorporationSequencing models of healthcare related states
US728203116 Feb 200516 Oct 2007Ann Hendrich & AssociatesMethod and system for assessing fall risk
US7337121 *30 Mar 200026 Feb 2008Iso Claims Services, Inc.Claim assessment model
US7353238 *11 Jun 19991 Apr 2008Outcome Sciences, Inc.Apparatus and methods for determining and processing medical outcomes
US7392201 *18 May 200124 Jun 2008Trurisk, LlcInsurance claim forecasting system
US739821719 Mar 20018 Jul 2008The Jasos Group, LlcMethods and systems for healthcare practice management
US7398218 *28 Aug 20008 Jul 2008Accenture LlpInsurance pattern analysis
US740102719 Mar 200115 Jul 2008The Jasos Group, LlcMethods for collecting fees for healthcare management group
US7406428 *3 Jan 200129 Jul 2008Ecom Benefits, Inc.Method of creating a virtual health care network
US743730224 Sep 200214 Oct 2008Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.System for managing healthcare related information supporting operation of a healthcare enterprise
US7444291 *10 Aug 200028 Oct 2008Ingenix, Inc.System and method for modeling of healthcare utilization
US755543821 Jul 200630 Jun 2009Trurisk, LlcComputerized medical modeling of group life insurance using medical claims data
US755543921 Jul 200630 Jun 2009Trurisk, LlcComputerized medical underwriting of group life insurance using medical claims data
US759654215 Feb 200529 Sep 2009Allstate Insurance CompanySystems and methods for creating geographic connection matrices
US762056025 Mar 200217 Nov 2009Ingenix, Inc.Computer-implemented method for grouping medical claims with clinically representative dynamic clean periods
US7657445 *5 Jul 20022 Feb 2010Rise Above Technologies, LLCMethod and system for managing healthcare facility resources
US766466216 Mar 200616 Feb 2010Trurisk LlcComputerized medical modeling of group life and disability insurance using medical claims data
US76823086 Sep 200723 Mar 2010Ahi Of Indiana, Inc.Method and system for assessing fall risk
US7685011 *25 Oct 200323 Mar 2010Wilson Thomas WMethod and system for optimizing resource allocation based on cohort times
US7685012 *30 Dec 200323 Mar 2010Wilson Thomas WMethod and system for analyzing resource allocation based on cohort times
US77115776 Dec 20024 May 2010Dust Larry RMethod of optimizing healthcare services consumption
US77391265 Mar 200415 Jun 2010Cave Consulting GroupMethod, system, and computer program product for physician efficiency measurement and patient health risk stratification
US773912822 Jun 200515 Jun 2010Alex FarrisMedical claims evaluation system
US7769609 *15 Feb 20053 Aug 2010Allstate Insurance CompanySystems and methods for determining territorial rates
US777884623 Jul 200717 Aug 2010Fair Isaac CorporationSequencing models of healthcare related states
US778811123 Sep 200231 Aug 2010Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.System for providing healthcare related information
US7801740 *22 Sep 199821 Sep 2010Ronald Peter LesserSoftware device to facilitate creation of medical records, medical letters, and medical information for billing purposes
US781818129 Mar 200619 Oct 2010Focused Medical Analytics LlcMedical practice pattern tool
US78232071 Apr 200526 Oct 2010Crossix Solutions Inc.Privacy preserving data-mining protocol
US783144316 Dec 20059 Nov 2010Group Health Plan, Inc.Method and computer program product for measuring and utilizing efficiency of medical resource and services providers
US784903031 May 20067 Dec 2010Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyMethod and system for classifying documents
US786537112 May 20034 Jan 2011Shen Michael YManagement of information flow and workflow in medical imaging services
US788211328 Mar 20031 Feb 2011International Business Machines CorporationMethod, apparatus, and system for formatting time data to improve processing in a sort utility
US78903491 Apr 200215 Feb 2011Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.Resource monitoring system for processing location related information in a healthcare enterprise
US79175256 Dec 200629 Mar 2011Ingenix, Inc.Analyzing administrative healthcare claims data and other data sources
US792102013 Jan 20045 Apr 2011Omnicare Inc.Method for generating medical intelligence from patient-specific data
US793019010 Jul 200719 Apr 2011Philip John MilanovichMethods of rating service providers
US793019218 Mar 200819 Apr 2011Philip John MilanovichHealth savings account system
US79337861 Nov 200526 Apr 2011Accenture Global Services LimitedCollaborative intelligent task processor for insurance claims
US794135626 Oct 200710 May 2011Jasos Intellectual Property LlcMethods for collecting fees for healthcare management group
US79707229 Nov 200928 Jun 2011Aloft Media, LlcSystem, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US79749006 Jan 20105 Jul 2011Jasos Intellecutal Property LLCComputer implemented methods to manage the profitability of an insurance network
US79793824 May 199912 Jul 2011Accenture Global Services LimitedComponent based information linking during claim processing
US800577727 Jul 201023 Aug 2011Aloft Media, LlcSystem, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US80151363 Apr 20086 Sep 2011Dynamic Healthcare Systems, Inc.Algorithmic method for generating a medical utilization profile for a patient and to be used for medical risk analysis decisioning
US80369164 May 201011 Oct 2011Key Benefit AdministratorsMethod of optimizing healthcare services consumption
US8050937 *25 Jul 20061 Nov 2011Intuit Inc.Method and system for providing relevant content based on claim analysis
US809538016 Nov 200510 Jan 2012Health Dialog Services CorporationSystems and methods for predicting healthcare related financial risk
US80993066 Feb 200817 Jan 2012The Trizetto Group, Inc.Pharmacy episodes of care
US81218699 Aug 201021 Feb 2012Ingenix, Inc.Computer-implemented method for grouping medical claims based upon changes in patient condition
US81267429 May 200328 Feb 2012Accenture Global Services LimitedAutomated assignment of insurable events
US816098827 Jul 201017 Apr 2012Aloft Media, LlcSystem, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US818066824 Mar 201115 May 2012Accenture Global Services LimitedCollaborative intelligent task processor for insurance claims
US81811871 Dec 200615 May 2012Portico SystemsGateways having localized in-memory databases and business logic execution
US81910537 Feb 200829 May 2012Ingenix, Inc.Computerized data warehousing
US822485911 Jul 201117 Jul 2012Accenture Global Services LimitedComponent based information linking during claim processing
US8249891 *13 Dec 201021 Aug 2012Shen Michael YManagement of information flow and workflow in medical procedures
US825534729 Oct 201028 Aug 2012Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyMethod and system for classifying documents
US827129813 Dec 201118 Sep 2012The Trizetto Group, Inc.Pharmacy episodes of care
US82907897 Dec 201116 Oct 2012Health Dialog Services CorporationSystems and methods for predicting healthcare risk related events
US829616512 Jul 201123 Oct 2012Optuminsight, Inc.Computer-implemented method for grouping medical claims into episode treatment groups
US830146427 May 200930 Oct 2012Cave Consulting Group, Inc.Method and system for producing statistical analysis of medical care information
US832147210 Sep 200927 Nov 2012Allstate Insurance CompanySystems and methods for creating geographic connection matrices
US83322358 Jan 201011 Dec 2012Group Health Plan, Inc.Method and computer program product for measuring and utilizing efficiency of medical resource and services providers
US834098124 Jan 201125 Dec 2012Cave Consulting Group, Inc.Method, system, and computer program product for physician efficiency measurement and patient health risk stratification utilizing variable windows for episode creation
US834657013 Jan 20041 Jan 2013Omnicare, Inc.Method for improving the consistency of processing pharmacy data
US839222121 Sep 20095 Mar 2013Philip John MilanovichMethod of providing health care insurance to consumers
US840189621 Mar 201219 Mar 2013Accenture Global Services LimitedAutomated task processor for insurance claims
US84070665 May 200826 Mar 2013Financial Healthcare Systems, LlcInsurance estimating system
US844284014 Feb 200614 May 2013Tomas G. MenocalTransparent healthcare transaction management system
US844767113 Dec 201021 May 2013Accident Fund Insurance Company of AmericaSystem and method for provider evaluation and claimant direction
US845800126 Apr 20124 Jun 2013Brevium, Inc.Method and apparatus for identifying and contacting customers who are due for a visit but have not scheduled an appointment
US847876922 Feb 20082 Jul 2013Accenture Global Services LimitedConversational question generation system adapted for an insurance claim processing system
US848408514 Sep 20129 Jul 2013Health Dialog Services CorporationSystems and methods for predicting healthcare risk related events
US848941211 Oct 200716 Jul 2013Outcome Sciences, Inc.Apparatus and methods for determining and processing medical outcomes
US84894207 Jul 201116 Jul 2013Quality Healthcare Intermediary, LlcMethod of optimizing healthcare services consumption
US851578622 Feb 200820 Aug 2013Accenture Global Services GmbhRule generation system adapted for an insurance claim processing system
US854342923 May 201124 Sep 2013Philip John MilanovichMethod of providing malpractice insurance
US856035022 Nov 200515 Oct 2013Robert J. NadaiMethod, system and computer program product for generating an electronic bill having optimized insurance claim items
US857793323 Dec 20085 Nov 2013Crossix Solutions Inc.Double blinded privacy-safe distributed data mining protocol
US858345022 Dec 200512 Nov 2013Ims Health IncorporatedDoctor performance evaluation tool for consumers
US861248412 Nov 201217 Dec 2013Allstate Insurance CompanySystems and methods for creating geographic connection matrices
US863513917 Jan 201321 Jan 2014Buymetrics, Inc.System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing
US863952815 Sep 201228 Jan 2014Cave Consulting Group, Inc.Efficiency measurement and patient health risk stratification utilizing variable windows for episode creation
US865004014 May 201011 Feb 2014Brevium, Inc.Method and apparatus for protecting relationships with referring providers within a system that identifies patients overdue for an appointment
US8666757 *15 Nov 20024 Mar 2014Fair Isaac CorporationDetection of upcoding and code gaming fraud and abuse in prospective payment healthcare systems
US8676613 *27 Mar 201318 Mar 2014State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMethods for grid-based insurance rating
US870043312 Sep 201215 Apr 2014Optuminsight, Inc.Computer-implemented method for grouping medical claims into episode treatment groups
US870052118 Mar 201315 Apr 2014Buymetrics, Inc.System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing
US870064928 Mar 201115 Apr 2014Optuminsight, Inc.Analyzing administrative healthcare claims data and other data sources
US871279631 Jul 201329 Apr 2014Jasos Intellectual Property LlcSystems, computer programs, and methods for controlling costs of a healthcare practice
US873855224 Aug 201227 May 2014Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyMethod and system for classifying documents
US875126315 Sep 201210 Jun 2014Cave Consulting Group, Inc.Method and system for producing statistical analysis of medical care information
US876225824 Apr 201324 Jun 2014Buymetrics, Inc.System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing
US876872611 Mar 20131 Jul 2014Cave Consulting Group, Inc.Method, system, and computer program product for physician efficiency measurement and patient health risk stratification utilizing variable windows for episode creation
US8862656 *20 Nov 200114 Oct 2014Chironet, LlcPerformance outcomes benchmarking
US899657615 Nov 201331 Mar 2015Allstate Insurance CompanySystems and methods for creating geographic connection matrices
US905862917 Oct 200316 Jun 2015Optuminsight, Inc.System and method for assessing healthcare risks
US912905419 Sep 20138 Sep 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Systems and methods for surgical and interventional planning, support, post-operative follow-up, and, functional recovery tracking
US912905920 Feb 20148 Sep 2015Optuminsight, Inc.Analyzing administrative healthcare claims data and other data sources
US924791110 Jul 20142 Feb 2016Alivecor, Inc.Devices and methods for real-time denoising of electrocardiograms
US925409217 Mar 20149 Feb 2016Alivecor, Inc.Systems and methods for processing and analyzing medical data
US92540958 Nov 20139 Feb 2016AlivecorElectrocardiogram signal detection
US941211724 Jul 20159 Aug 2016Buymetrics, Inc.Automated system for adapting market data and evaluating the market value of items
US941837116 Jun 201516 Aug 2016Buymetrics, Inc.Automated system for adapting market data and evaluating the market value of items
US952449515 Aug 201620 Dec 2016Buymetrics, Inc.Automated system for adapting market data and evaluating the market value of items
US952964922 Oct 201527 Dec 2016Sas Institute Inc.Techniques to compute attribute relationships utilizing a leveling operation in a computing environment
US95426898 Aug 201610 Jan 2017Buymetrics, Inc.Automated system for adapting market data and evaluating the market value of items
US95762966 Sep 201621 Feb 2017Buymetrics, Inc.Automated system for adapting market data and evaluating performance in transactions
US968181418 Dec 201520 Jun 2017Alivecor, Inc.Devices and methods for real-time denoising of electrocardiograms
US970029220 May 201511 Jul 2017DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Systems and methods for surgical and interventional planning, support, post-operative follow-up, and functional recovery tracking
US971085628 Feb 201718 Jul 2017Buymetrics, Inc.System and method for adapting market data and evaluating unequal offers
US97542442 Dec 20165 Sep 2017Buymetrics, Inc.System and method for adapting market data and evaluating the market value of transactions
US20020038227 *26 Feb 200128 Mar 2002Fey Christopher T.Method for centralized health data management
US20020055858 *29 May 20019 May 2002Jackson Stephen W.Method of financing payments to providers of medical services
US20020103680 *31 Jan 20021 Aug 2002Newman Les A.Systems, methods and computer program products for managing employee benefits
US20020128858 *31 Dec 200112 Sep 2002Fuller Douglas NealMethod and system for population classification
US20020133375 *19 Mar 200119 Sep 2002Terrance MooreMethods for collecting fees for healthcare management group
US20020133379 *19 Mar 200119 Sep 2002Jasos GroupMethod and system for healthcare practice management
US20020165738 *25 Mar 20027 Nov 2002Dang Dennis K.Computer-implemented method for grouping medical claims based upon changes in patient condition
US20020165739 *4 May 19997 Nov 2002George V. GuyanMethod and article of manufacturing for component based information linking during claim processing
US20020173988 *25 Mar 200221 Nov 2002Dang Dennis K.Cluster of correlated medical claims in an episode treatment group
US20020173989 *25 Mar 200221 Nov 2002Dang Dennis K.Computer-implemented method for grouping medical claims into episode treatment groups
US20020173992 *25 Mar 200221 Nov 2002Dang Dennis K.Episode treatment groups of correlated medical claims
US20030023562 *25 Jul 200230 Jan 2003Steven BaileySecure records storage and retrieval system and method
US20030055680 *3 Jul 200220 Mar 2003Skeba Cherise A.Financial analysis of healthcare service agreements
US20030060688 *21 Sep 200127 Mar 2003Active Health ManagementCare engine
US20030078810 *1 Apr 200224 Apr 2003Cole Doulgas J.Resource monitoring and user interface system for processing location related information in a healthcare enterprise
US20030078811 *1 Apr 200224 Apr 2003Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services CorporationResource monitoring system for processing location related information in a healthcare enterprise
US20030078813 *24 Sep 200224 Apr 2003Haskell Robert EmmonsSystem for managing healthcare related information supporting operation of a healthcare enterprise
US20030078911 *23 Sep 200224 Apr 2003Haskell Robert EmmonsSystem for providing healthcare related information
US20030083901 *22 Jun 20011 May 2003Bosch Juan P.Process for providing dialysis and other treatments
US20030149597 *6 Dec 20027 Aug 2003Zaleski John R.System for supporting clinical decision-making
US20030158749 *20 Nov 200121 Aug 2003Vladislav OlchanskiPerformance outcomes benchmarking
US20030158751 *15 Nov 200221 Aug 2003Suresh Nallan C.Fraud and abuse detection and entity profiling in hierarchical coded payment systems
US20030167187 *19 Feb 20034 Sep 2003Bua Robert N.Systems and methods of determining performance ratings of health care facilities and providing user access to performance information
US20030171953 *30 Oct 200211 Sep 2003Suriya NarayananSystem and method for facilitating the exchange of health care transactional information
US20030212580 *12 May 200313 Nov 2003Shen Michael Y.Management of information flow and workflow in medical imaging services
US20040111291 *6 Dec 200210 Jun 2004Key Benefit Administrators, Inc.Method of optimizing healthcare services consumption
US20040143594 *13 Jan 200422 Jul 2004Kalies Ralph F.Method for generating medical intelligence from patient-specific data
US20040148198 *13 Jan 200429 Jul 2004Kalies Ralph F.Method for improving the consistency of processing pharmacy data
US20040153345 *12 Dec 20035 Aug 2004Heckle Mary ArchuletaSystem and method for processing records associated with a healthcare encounter
US20040193450 *8 Oct 200330 Sep 2004Knapp Robert ErnestHealthcare record classification system
US20040225535 *9 May 200311 Nov 2004Bond William E.Automated assignment of insurable events
US20040232980 *7 Jun 200425 Nov 2004Broadcom CorporationApparatus, system, and method for amplifying a signal, and applications thereof
US20040260155 *8 Jul 200423 Dec 2004Active Health ManagementCare engine
US20050027566 *7 Jul 20043 Feb 2005Haskell Robert EmmonsTerminology management system
US20050086076 *17 Oct 200321 Apr 2005Integrated Healthcare Information Services, Inc.System and method for assessing healthcare risks
US20050091094 *25 Oct 200328 Apr 2005Wilson Thomas W.Method and system for optimizing resource allocation
US20050144051 *30 Dec 200330 Jun 2005Wilson Thomas W.Method and system for analyzing resource allocation
US20050182305 *16 Feb 200518 Aug 2005Loretta Ann HendrichMethod and system for assessing fall risk
US20050197862 *28 Jan 20058 Sep 2005Pharmetrics, Inc.Medical data analysis system
US20050261944 *24 May 200524 Nov 2005Rosenberger Ronald LMethod and apparatus for detecting the erroneous processing and adjudication of health care claims
US20050278196 *9 Jun 200415 Dec 2005Potarazu Sreedhar VSystem and method for developing and utilizing member condition groups
US20060020495 *20 Jul 200426 Jan 2006Baker Michael SHealthcare Claims Processing Mechanism for a Transaction System
US20060047539 *31 Aug 20042 Mar 2006Paul HuangHealthcare administration transaction method and system for the same
US20060085222 *14 Oct 200420 Apr 2006Paul HuangHealthcare administration transaction method and system for the same
US20060089862 *25 Oct 200427 Apr 2006Sudhir AnandaraoSystem and method for modeling benefits
US20060089919 *1 Dec 200527 Apr 2006Kidd Samuel RTransaction processing
US20060129427 *16 Nov 200515 Jun 2006Health Dialog Services CorporationSystems and methods for predicting healthcare related risk events
US20060129428 *16 Nov 200515 Jun 2006Health Dialog Services CorporationSystems and methods for predicting healthcare related financial risk
US20060136270 *2 Dec 200522 Jun 2006Morgan John DMedical claim data transfer to medical deposit box and/or medical visit record
US20060161456 *22 Dec 200520 Jul 2006Global Managed Care Solutions, d/b/a Med-VantageŽ , a corporationDoctor performance evaluation tool for consumers
US20060184413 *3 Nov 200517 Aug 2006Delmonego BrianSystem and method to manage resources
US20060277128 *7 Jun 20057 Dec 2006Sudhir AnandaraoSystem and method for managing and monitoring financial performance associated with benefits
US20060293923 *22 Jun 200528 Dec 2006Farris Alex FMedical Claims Evaluation System
US20070005405 *12 Sep 20064 Jan 2007Dust Larry RInsurance system and method
US20070021987 *21 Jul 200625 Jan 2007Trurisk, LlcComputerized medical modeling of group life insurance using medical claims data
US20070021988 *21 Aug 200625 Jan 2007Dang Dennis KComputer-implemented method for grouping medical claims with clinically representative dynamic clean periods
US20070050187 *30 Aug 20051 Mar 2007James CoxMedical billing system and method
US20070061168 *12 Aug 200415 Mar 2007Emily HamiltonMethod and apparatus for evaluating variations between health care service providers
US20070078680 *3 Oct 20065 Apr 2007Wennberg David ESystems and methods for analysis of healthcare provider performance
US20070088579 *15 Aug 200619 Apr 2007Richards John W JrSystems and methods for automated processing and assessment of an insurance disclosure via a network
US20070088580 *15 Aug 200619 Apr 2007Richards John W JrSystems and methods for providing comparative health care information via a network
US20070094133 *20 Oct 200526 Apr 2007Sudhir AnandaraoSystems and methods for managing an expenditure cycle
US20070100669 *1 Nov 20053 May 2007Accenture Global Services GmbhCollaborative intelligent task processor for insurance claims
US20070100697 *28 Oct 20063 May 2007Srinivas KollaMethod and/or system for rendering service providers with relevant advertising and/or marketing information
US20070106533 *29 Mar 200610 May 2007Focused Medical Analytics, LlcMedical practice pattern tool
US20070118410 *22 Nov 200524 May 2007Nadai Robert JMethod, system and computer program product for generating an electronic bill having optimized insurance claim items
US20070143135 *16 Dec 200521 Jun 2007Group Health Plan, Inc., D/B/A HealthpartnersMethod and computer program product for measuring and utilizing efficiency of medical resource and services providers
US20070174252 *6 Dec 200626 Jul 2007Ingenix Inc.Analyzing Administrative Healthcare Claims Data and Other Data Sources
US20070192146 *14 Feb 200616 Aug 2007Menocal Tomas GTransparent healthcare transaction management system
US20070244720 *17 Apr 200618 Oct 2007Saddlepoint Software, LlcFuture care plan costing system and method
US20070271120 *23 Jul 200722 Nov 2007Suresh Nallan CSequencing models of healthcare related states
US20070282796 *1 Apr 20056 Dec 2007Asaf EvenhaimPrivacy Preserving Data-Mining Protocol
US20070282824 *31 May 20066 Dec 2007Ellingsworth Martin EMethod and system for classifying documents
US20070299698 *31 May 200627 Dec 2007Sudhir AnandaraoSystems and methods for optimizing a health benefits process
US20080009686 *6 Sep 200710 Jan 2008Hendrich Loretta AMethod and system for assessing fall risk
US20080051770 *22 Aug 200728 Feb 2008Synergetics, Inc.Multiple Target Laser Probe
US20080059248 *31 Oct 20076 Mar 2008The Jasos Group, LlcMethods, program product, and systems for healthcare practice management
US20080097790 *26 Oct 200724 Apr 2008The Jasos Group, LlcMethods for Collecting Fees For Healthcare Management Group
US20080133537 *1 Dec 20065 Jun 2008Portico SystemsGateways having localized in memory databases and business logic execution
US20080256523 *7 Feb 200816 Oct 2008Nancy GrimaldiComputerized Data Warehousing
US20080275737 *5 May 20086 Nov 2008Gentry Travis WInsurance estimating system
US20080287746 *16 May 200720 Nov 2008Lonny ReismanSystem and method for communicating health care alerts via an interactive personal health record
US20090094060 *28 Aug 20089 Apr 2009WebmdMethod and system for consumer healthcare decisionmaking
US20090150362 *23 Dec 200811 Jun 2009EpasDouble Blinded Privacy-Safe Distributed Data Mining Protocol
US20090198517 *6 Feb 20086 Aug 2009The Trizetto Group, Inc.Pharmacy Episodes of Care
US20090204430 *16 Apr 200913 Aug 2009Gliklich Richard EApparatus and methods for determining and processing medical outcomes
US20090216558 *27 Feb 200827 Aug 2009Active Health Management Inc.System and method for generating real-time health care alerts
US20090216567 *20 Apr 200927 Aug 2009Dust Larry RInsurance system and method
US20090216772 *22 Feb 200827 Aug 2009Eugene GoldfarbConversational question generation system adapted for an insurance claim processing system
US20090228304 *5 Apr 200910 Sep 2009Active Health ManagementCare engine
US20090276249 *7 Jul 20095 Nov 2009Dust Larry RMethod and system for providing healthcare insurance
US20100004945 *30 Jun 20097 Jan 2010Global Health Outcomes, Inc.Computer implemented methods, systems, and apparatus for generating and utilizing health outcomes indices and financial derivative instruments based on the indices
US20100100395 *19 Oct 200922 Apr 2010Ingenix, Inc.Method for high-risk member identification
US20100114611 *8 Jan 20106 May 2010Group Health Plan, Inc. D/B/A HealthpartnersMethod and computer program product for measuring and utilizing efficiency of medical resource and services providers
US20100174561 *6 Jan 20108 Jul 2010The Jasos GroupComputer Implemented Methods To Manage the Profitability of An Insurance Network
US20100205013 *21 Jan 201012 Aug 2010Accenture LlpComponent based interface to handle tasks during claim processing
US20100217625 *4 May 201026 Aug 2010Dust Larry RMethod of optimizing healthcare services consumption
US20100324928 *9 Aug 201023 Dec 2010Dang Dennis KComputer-implemented method for grouping medical claims based upon changes in patient condition
US20110047168 *29 Oct 201024 Feb 2011Ellingsworth Martin EMethod and system for classifying documents
US20110178825 *24 Mar 201121 Jul 2011Accenture Global Services LimitedCollaborative intelligent task processor for insurance claims
US20110213624 *9 May 20111 Sep 2011Terrance MooreComputer Implemented Method and Computer Program Product for Collecting Fees for an Insurance Network
US20110225001 *13 Dec 201015 Sep 2011Shen Michael YManagement of Information Flow and Workflow in Medical Imaging Services
US20110231422 *28 Mar 201122 Sep 2011Ingenix Inc.Analyzing administrative healthcare claims data and other data sources
US20120116807 *23 Sep 201110 May 2012Ingenix Inc.Apparatus, system, and method for comparing healthcare
US20130024124 *22 Jul 201124 Jan 2013The Travelers Companies, Inc.Systems, methods, and apparatus for preventing recidivism
US20130085769 *14 Sep 20124 Apr 2013Risk Management Solutions LlcCharacterizing healthcare provider, claim, beneficiary and healthcare merchant normal behavior using non-parametric statistical outlier detection scoring techniques
US20130211861 *27 Mar 201315 Aug 2013State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMethods for Grid-Based Insurance Rating
US20130246425 *6 Mar 201319 Sep 2013Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Document visualization system
US20140006044 *27 Jun 20132 Jan 2014Infosys LimitedSystem and method for preparing healthcare service bundles
US20150039330 *30 Jul 20145 Feb 2015Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute, Inc.Episode of care builder method and system
USRE425088 Jul 201028 Jun 2011Jasos Intellectual Property LlcMethods and systems for healthcare practice management
USRE4355015 Jul 201024 Jul 2012Jasos Intellectual Property LlcMethods for collecting fees for healthcare management group
EP1271386A2 *21 Jun 20022 Jan 2003Gambro IncApparatus and process for assessing medical facilities
EP1271386A3 *21 Jun 200229 Jan 2003Gambro IncApparatus and process for assessing medical facilities
WO2003060750A2 *16 Dec 200224 Jul 2003Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services CorporationA system for supporting clinical decision-making
WO2003060750A3 *16 Dec 20029 Dec 2004Siemens Med Solutions HealthA system for supporting clinical decision-making
WO2005015451A1 *12 Aug 200417 Feb 2005Lms Medical Systems Ltd.Method and apparatus for evaluating variations between health care service providers
WO2005038695A2 *18 Oct 200428 Apr 2005United Health Group IncorporatedCost projections for diagnoses
WO2005038695A3 *18 Oct 200416 Feb 2006Ted A LyleCost projections for diagnoses
WO2006060626A2 *2 Dec 20058 Jun 2006Healthright, Inc.Medical claim data transfer to medical deposit box and/or medical visit record
WO2006060626A3 *2 Dec 20058 Feb 2007Kenneth E AndamMedical claim data transfer to medical deposit box and/or medical visit record
WO2007041443A2 *3 Oct 200612 Apr 2007Health Dialog Services CorporationSystems and methods for analysis of healthcare provider performance
WO2007041443A3 *3 Oct 200627 Dec 2007Health Dialog Services CorpSystems and methods for analysis of healthcare provider performance
Classifications
U.S. Classification705/2, 705/3
International ClassificationG06Q50/24, G06Q50/22
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q40/02, G06Q50/24, G06Q50/22
European ClassificationG06Q40/02, G06Q50/24, G06Q50/22
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
8 Dec 2000ASAssignment
Owner name: INGENIX, INC., MINNESOTA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MEDICODE (DELAWARE), INC.;REEL/FRAME:011360/0149
Effective date: 20001204
Owner name: MEDICODE (DELAWARE), INC., UTAH
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:MEDICODE, INC. (A UTAH CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:011360/0177
Effective date: 19971117
20 Oct 2004FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
3 Nov 2008REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
11 Dec 2008SULPSurcharge for late payment
Year of fee payment: 7
11 Dec 2008FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
26 Sep 2012FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
28 Jun 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: OPTUMINSIGHT, INC., MINNESOTA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:INGENIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030708/0065
Effective date: 20111130