US6137817A - Quantum cascade laser - Google Patents

Quantum cascade laser Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6137817A
US6137817A US09/096,701 US9670198A US6137817A US 6137817 A US6137817 A US 6137817A US 9670198 A US9670198 A US 9670198A US 6137817 A US6137817 A US 6137817A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
region
active region
laser
injector
energy level
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US09/096,701
Inventor
James Nelson Baillargeon
Federico Capasso
Alfred Yi Cho
Claire F. Gmachl
Albert Lee Hutchinson
Deborah Lee Sivco
Alessandro Tredicucci
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
RPX Corp
Nokia USA Inc
Original Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Lucent Technologies Inc filed Critical Lucent Technologies Inc
Priority to US09/096,701 priority Critical patent/US6137817A/en
Assigned to LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. reassignment LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BAILLARGEON, JAMES NELSON, CAPASSO, FEDERICO, CHO, ALFRED YI, GMACHL,CLAIRE F., HUTCHINSON,ALBERT LEE, SIVCO,DEBORAH LEE, TREDICUCCI,ALESSANDRO
Priority to DE69900427T priority patent/DE69900427T2/en
Priority to EP99304076A priority patent/EP0964488B1/en
Priority to JP16456299A priority patent/JP3717712B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6137817A publication Critical patent/US6137817A/en
Assigned to THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT CONDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF AND SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Assignors: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. (DE CORPORATION)
Assigned to LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. reassignment LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Assignors: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK), AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Assigned to CREDIT SUISSE AG reassignment CREDIT SUISSE AG SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Assigned to ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. reassignment ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Assigned to CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES, LLC reassignment CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES, LLC SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP, LLC
Assigned to NOKIA USA INC. reassignment NOKIA USA INC. SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Assigned to PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC reassignment PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ALCATEL LUCENT SAS, NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS BV, NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC. reassignment NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC. ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT Assignors: NOKIA USA INC.
Assigned to ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. reassignment ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Assigned to PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC reassignment PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
Assigned to PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC, PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC reassignment PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES LLC
Assigned to RPX CORPORATION reassignment RPX CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/30Structure or shape of the active region; Materials used for the active region
    • H01S5/34Structure or shape of the active region; Materials used for the active region comprising quantum well or superlattice structures, e.g. single quantum well [SQW] lasers, multiple quantum well [MQW] lasers or graded index separate confinement heterostructure [GRINSCH] lasers
    • H01S5/3401Structure or shape of the active region; Materials used for the active region comprising quantum well or superlattice structures, e.g. single quantum well [SQW] lasers, multiple quantum well [MQW] lasers or graded index separate confinement heterostructure [GRINSCH] lasers having no PN junction, e.g. unipolar lasers, intersubband lasers, quantum cascade lasers
    • H01S5/3402Structure or shape of the active region; Materials used for the active region comprising quantum well or superlattice structures, e.g. single quantum well [SQW] lasers, multiple quantum well [MQW] lasers or graded index separate confinement heterostructure [GRINSCH] lasers having no PN junction, e.g. unipolar lasers, intersubband lasers, quantum cascade lasers intersubband lasers, e.g. transitions within the conduction or valence bands
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y20/00Nanooptics, e.g. quantum optics or photonic crystals

Definitions

  • This application pertains to quantum cascade (QC) lasers.
  • Quantum cascade (QC) lasers are known. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,457,709 and 5,509,025. See also J. Faist et al, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 68, p. 3680 (1996), all incorporated herein by reference.
  • a prior art QC laser comprises a multiplicity of identical "repeat units", each repeat unit comprising an active region and an injector/relaxation region. With each active region is associated an upper and at least one lower energy level. Under an applied field, charge carriers (typically electrons) migrate from a lower energy level of a given active region through an injector/relaxation region to the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region, followed by a radiative transition from the upper to a lower level of the active region, then proceeding through an injector/relaxation region into the next active region, and so on.
  • charge carriers typically electrons
  • each charge carrier that is introduced into the relevant portion of the QC laser ideally undergoes N transitions (N being the number of repeat units, about 25, for instance), each such transition resulting in emission of a photon of wavelength ⁇ , typically in the midinfrared (exemplarily 3-13 ⁇ m).
  • QC designs have been disclosed.
  • the above referenced '025 patent discloses a design with "vertical" transition, i.e., a transition from an upper to a lower energy level of a given quantum well (QW)
  • QW quantum well
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/744,292 filed Nov. 6, 1996 by Capasso et al. discloses a design with superlattice (SL) active region.
  • I/R region designs have also been disclosed. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,727,010, which discloses a chirped superlattice (SL) I/R region.
  • SL superlattice
  • An energy level in the active region of a given repeat unit is in "resonance" with an energy level of the active region of an adjacent downstream repeat unit if the two energy levels are at substantially the same energy, and the semiconductor region between the two active regions is selected to facilitate high electron transport through the injector region from the energy level of the given repeat unit to the equi-energetic energy level of the adjacent downstream repeat unit.
  • Two energy levels herein have “substantially the same energy” if the levels are aligned such that there is overlap between the broadened energy levels.
  • the broadening of an energy level can be readily determined, and typically is a few meV (e.g., about 3 meV), generally less than 10 meV.
  • the injector region facilitates "high electron transport" through the injector if the average electron transit time through the injector region is less than or equal to the scattering time of the electrons in the injector region.
  • the invention is embodied in an article (e.g., a monitoring or measuring system) that comprises an improved QC laser.
  • the QC laser comprises, in sequence, an upper optical confinement region, a waveguide core region and a lower optical confinement region, and further comprises contacts for electrically contacting the laser.
  • the waveguide core region comprises a multiplicity of essentially identical repeat units, a given repeat unit comprising an injector region and an active region selected to facilitate a radiative carrier transition from an upper to a lower energy level of the active region.
  • the injector comprises a multiplicity of quantum well layers, with barrier layers interleaved between the quantum well (QW) layers.
  • QW quantum well
  • the QW layers and barrier layers are selected such that, under a first applied bias, a lower energy level of the given active region is in resonance with the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region, such that carrier transfer from the lower energy level of the given active region to the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region is facilitated.
  • the QW layers and barrier layers are furthermore selected such that, under an applied second bias larger than the first bias, there is resonant charge carrier injection from the ground state of the injector region of the given repeat unit into the upper energy level of the active region of the adjacent downstream repeat unit.
  • FIG. 1 schematically depicts an exemplary QC laser
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show the conduction band edge of a repeat unit (plus adjacent downstream active region) of an exemplary QC laser according to the invention, under applied field of 45 kV/cm and 65 kV/cm, respectively;
  • FIGS. 4 and 5 show data on light output power vs. drive current, for two exemplary QC lasers according to the invention
  • FIG. 6 shows optical power as a function of wavelength, under different operating conditions, for an exemplary QC laser according to the invention.
  • FIG. 7 schematically depicts an exemplary measuring or monitoring system comprising a QC laser according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 schematically depicts an exemplary QC laser 10.
  • Numerals 11-16 designate, respectively, substrate (e.g., InP), lower optical confinement region, waveguide core region, upper optical confinement region, upper contact and lower contact.
  • substrate e.g., InP
  • the substrate can serve as lower optical confinement region.
  • FIG. 2 schematically shows the conduction band edge of a complete repeat unit and the adjacent downstream active region of an exemplary QC laser according to the invention at a bias corresponding to an electric field of 45 kV/cm.
  • the multilayer waveguide core region is lattice matched with InP, with InGaAs QWs (e.g., 21) and AlInAs barrier layers (e.g., 22).
  • the active regions exemplarily comprise three QWs, closely coupled by thin barrier layers.
  • FIG. 2 also shows the moduli squared of the wavefunctions that are involved in the laser transition, with numeral 1 referring to the ground state of the active region, 2 referring to the lower laser level, and 3 referring to the upper laser level. Above level 3 is shown a further level of the active region that is not involved in the operation of the exemplary QC laser.
  • the wavy arrows from level 3 to level 2 indicate the laser transitions.
  • FIG. 2 also shows the moduli squared of the wavefunctions in the injector.
  • the multiplicity of energy states in the darkened region constitutes a "miniband” that facilitates the transport of electrons (of appropriate energy) through the injector, and the region of reduced density of states (indicated by light shading) is a "minigap” that prevents electron tunneling out of level 3 of the active region.
  • FIG. 2 also shows the essentially complete alignment (in energy) of ground state 1 of the given active region with level 3 of the downstream active region, with the "miniband” facilitating electron transport from the given active region to the downstream active region.
  • the electric field of 45 kV/cm at resonance was deduced from the laser operating voltage at threshold (at low temperatures) under the assumption that the field is homogeneous across the multiplicity of repeat units.
  • the repeat unit had the below listed layer sequence, starting with injection barrier 23, the left-most layer in FIG. 2, and proceeding in the downstream direction.
  • the layer thicknesses are in nanometers.
  • Layers with underlined thickness are Si-doped 2 ⁇ 10 17 cm -3 . All other layers are undoped (i.e., not intentionally doped).
  • the sequence was:
  • the upper laser level (level 3) is separated from the lower laser level (level 2) by E 32 ⁇ 153.6 meV, corresponding to ⁇ ⁇ 8.08 ⁇ m.
  • the longitudinal optical (L0) phonon scattering time ⁇ 32 between the two levels is calculated as 3.1 ps, and the matrix element of the optical transition as d 32 ⁇ 1.9 nm.
  • the lower laser level is closely coupled to the ground state (level 1) of the active material, such that the two levels are strongly anti-crossed. This increases the matrix element d 32 with respect to d 31 , and maximizes ⁇ 32 with respect to ⁇ 31 .
  • the energy difference is E 21 ⁇ 38.3 meV, designed to efficiently deplete the lower laser level of electrons via resonant L0-phonon scattering (E L0 ⁇ 34 meV).
  • the corresponding lifetime is calculated as ⁇ 2 ⁇ 21 ⁇ 0.3 ps ⁇ 32 ⁇ 3.1 ps, so that population inversion between levels 3 and 2 is readily achieved.
  • the L0-phonon scattering time from level 3 to level 1 is ⁇ 31 ⁇ 3.6 ps, and the scattering time into the states of the injector is estimated as ⁇ 31 ⁇ 14.6 ps.
  • the injector "miniband" (that is to say, the manifold of energy levels in the injector region) has been designed as “flat", in contrast to the "funnel" injector of prior art designs.
  • the flat injector is characterized by a symmetric arrangement of the electron wavefunctions (shown as moduli squared in FIG. 2).
  • the ground level of the injector is located about 40 meV in energy below the upper laser level. Even the next higher level of the injector miniband is energetically lower (about 14 meV) than the upper laser level.
  • Doping of the center portion of the injector region provided an electron sheet density of n ⁇ 1.6 ⁇ 10 11 cm -2 per repeat unit, resulting in a quasi-Fermi-level of about 7.5 meV under operating conditions.
  • the above described layer sequence implies that at laser threshold (45 kV/cm), electrons are not injected from the Fermi surface into the upper laser level.
  • level 1 of a given active region is in resonance with level 3 of the adjacent downstream active region, allowing for resonant carrier transport between successive active regions without significant carrier relaxation in the injector.
  • the estimated transit time through a given injector (length 21.9 nm, "width" of the miniband ⁇ 150 meV) of the exemplary QC laser is about 0.5 ps. In comparison, the relaxation time within the injector is long since the energy separation to the adjacent lower energy level is well below the L0-phonon energy, and the ground level of the injector region is partly filled with electrons.
  • the advantages of the above described exemplary QC laser is that it can avoid too early "shut-down" of the laser due to suppression of resonant tunneling.
  • the upper laser level typically is filled with electrons by resonant tunneling only from the injector ground state.
  • these two levels are subject to misalignment and the laser may shut off.
  • the QWs and barriers of the injector are selected such that, at an applied bias field greater (typically significantly greater) than the resonance field at laser threshold, there is resonant injection of electrons from the ground state of the injector into the upper lasing level of the adjacent downstream active region.
  • FIG. 3 shows the conduction band edge of the layer structure of FIG. 2 under an applied field of 65 kV/cm.
  • g refers to the ground state of the injector region. Electrons typically enter the injector region at an energy above that of the ground state but undergo relaxation to the ground state during transport to the adjacent downstream active region, such that the electrons can enter the upper laser state to undergo a further laser transition.
  • the first bias (45 kV/cm) corresponds to the resonance bias (and to the laser threshold)
  • the second bias (65 kV/cm) substantially corresponds to peak optical power.
  • 30 repeat units are disposed between conventional lower and upper optical confinement regions.
  • optical confinement regions see, for instance, J. Faist et al, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 70, p. 2670 (1997); C. Gmachl et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 9, p. 1090 (1997); C. Sirtori et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 9, p. 294 (1997); and J. Faist et al., Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 68, p. 3680 (1996).
  • the optical confinement regions consisted substantially of InP.
  • InP InP
  • the upper optical confinement region consisted substantially of AlInAs and GaInAs.
  • the upper and lower optical confinement layers and contacts were conventional.
  • the wafers were processed in conventional fashion into ridge waveguide lasers, with stripe widths ranging from 11 to 17 ⁇ m.
  • the structure was etched to the bottom of the core region, and in another embodiment (“shallow etched”) the structure was etched only to the bottom of the upper optical confinement region.
  • the wafers After etching, deposition and patterning of an appropriate dielectric layer (e.g., silicon nitride, and deposition and patterning of metal contacts (e.g., Ti/Au for the upper contact and Ge/Au/Ag/Au for the lower contact), all in conventional fashion, the wafers were cleaved into bars, with widths ranging from 0.75-3 mm. The facets were left uncoated. After wire bonding of the lasers, the bars were mounted in a temperature controlled cold finger cryostat, and measurements were carried out.
  • an appropriate dielectric layer e.g., silicon nitride
  • metal contacts e.g., Ti/Au for the upper contact and Ge/Au/Ag/Au for the lower contact
  • FIG. 4 shows continuous wave (cw) light output vs. drive current, at various heat sink temperatures, for two deep-etched lasers of length 2.25 mm.
  • the dashed lines were obtained from a laser with ternary top cladding, and the solid lines from a laser with InP top cladding.
  • the lasers had cw power of about 200 mW/facet at 80K, at 8 ⁇ m wavelength. This output power is closely comparable to the 5 ⁇ m output power of the QC laser described in the above cited paper by Faist et al., IEEE J. Ouantum Electronics, Vol. 34, p. 336 (1998).
  • FIG. 5 shows peak output power vs. drive current, at various heat sink temperatures, for two shallow etched lasers of length 2.25 mm.
  • the dashed lines were obtained from a laser with ternary top cladding, and the solid lines from a laser with InP top cladding.
  • the lasers were operated in pulsed mode.
  • FIG. 6 shows the normalized emission spectra of QC laser as described above (width 13 ⁇ m, length 2.25 mm), measured close to laser threshold, cw and pulsed, respectively, at two different heat sink temperatures.
  • the observed difference in the emission wavelengths reflects the temperature dependence of the gain spectrum of the lasers.
  • the invention is described in detail in terms of a particular embodiment, having a 3-QW active region, with "vertical” laser transition.
  • the lasing transition could be “diagonal”
  • the active region could be a superlattice active region.
  • QC lasers are advantageously used for, inter alia, detection and/or monitoring of trace gases, for example, for pollution monitoring, process control, medical or law-enforcement purposes, since these lasers can have output in one of the so-called atmospheric "windows", i.e., at a wavelength at which the clean atmosphere essentially does not absorb radiation.
  • FIG. 7 schematically depicts an exemplary embodiment 70 of the invention, wherein an emission source 71 emits gas 72.
  • QC laser 73 (advantageously a distributed feedback laser) emits mid-infrared radiation 74 that is directed through the emission gas, and is reflected, by any suitable means (e.g., corner reflector 75), to conventional detector 76.
  • corner reflector 75 any suitable means
  • the reflector could be replaced with a detector, such that the absorption during a single pass is measurable.
  • the emission source is not necessarily a factory or other large-scale installation but could, for instance, be any source of a compound that has one or more absorption lines in the mid-IR.
  • the source could, for instance, be a human subject, and the compound could be ethanol, or some medically significant compound.
  • the gas sample could also be confined in a cell configured such that multi-path absorption is measured. For more detail on measurements, see the above-referenced '646 patent application.

Abstract

A novel quantum cascade (QC) laser comprises a multiplicity of identical repeat units, with each repeat unit comprising an active region and an injector region. The injector region comprises quantum wells and barriers, selected to facilitate, under appropriate bias, resonant carrier transport from a lower energy level of a given active region to an upper energy level of an adjacent downstream active region. Carrier transition from the upper energy level to a lower energy level of an active region results in emission of infrared radiation. The laser is advantageously used in, e.g., a measurement system for detection of trace compounds in air.

Description

GOVERNMENT CONTRACT
This invention was made with Government support under contract No. DAAH04-96-C-0026 with the Army Research Office. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This application pertains to quantum cascade (QC) lasers.
BACKGROUND
Quantum cascade (QC) lasers are known. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,457,709 and 5,509,025. See also J. Faist et al, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 68, p. 3680 (1996), all incorporated herein by reference.
Briefly, a prior art QC laser comprises a multiplicity of identical "repeat units", each repeat unit comprising an active region and an injector/relaxation region. With each active region is associated an upper and at least one lower energy level. Under an applied field, charge carriers (typically electrons) migrate from a lower energy level of a given active region through an injector/relaxation region to the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region, followed by a radiative transition from the upper to a lower level of the active region, then proceeding through an injector/relaxation region into the next active region, and so on. Thus, each charge carrier that is introduced into the relevant portion of the QC laser ideally undergoes N transitions (N being the number of repeat units, about 25, for instance), each such transition resulting in emission of a photon of wavelength λ, typically in the midinfrared (exemplarily 3-13 μm).
A variety of QC designs have been disclosed. For instance, the above referenced '025 patent discloses a design with "vertical" transition, i.e., a transition from an upper to a lower energy level of a given quantum well (QW), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/744,292, filed Nov. 6, 1996 by Capasso et al. discloses a design with superlattice (SL) active region.
A variety of injector/relaxation (I/R) region designs have also been disclosed. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,727,010, which discloses a chirped superlattice (SL) I/R region.
Considerable performance improvement has been achieved since the invention of the QC laser in about 1994. For instance, J. Faist et al., IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Vol. 34, p. 336 (1998), disclose a QC laser emitting at λ˜5 μm with continuous wave output power of 200 mW/facet at 80K. The laser had a modulation-doped "funnel" injector and a three-well vertical transition active region.
In view of the considerable economic and technological potential of QC lasers (e.g., for a variety of sensing and monitoring applications), it would be desirable to find still further ways to improve the performance of QC lasers. This application discloses such a further way.
GLOSSARY AND DEFINITIONS
An energy level in the active region of a given repeat unit is in "resonance" with an energy level of the active region of an adjacent downstream repeat unit if the two energy levels are at substantially the same energy, and the semiconductor region between the two active regions is selected to facilitate high electron transport through the injector region from the energy level of the given repeat unit to the equi-energetic energy level of the adjacent downstream repeat unit.
Two energy levels herein have "substantially the same energy" if the levels are aligned such that there is overlap between the broadened energy levels. The broadening of an energy level can be readily determined, and typically is a few meV (e.g., about 3 meV), generally less than 10 meV.
The injector region facilitates "high electron transport" through the injector if the average electron transit time through the injector region is less than or equal to the scattering time of the electrons in the injector region.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a broad aspect the invention is embodied in an article (e.g., a monitoring or measuring system) that comprises an improved QC laser.
More specifically, the QC laser comprises, in sequence, an upper optical confinement region, a waveguide core region and a lower optical confinement region, and further comprises contacts for electrically contacting the laser. The waveguide core region comprises a multiplicity of essentially identical repeat units, a given repeat unit comprising an injector region and an active region selected to facilitate a radiative carrier transition from an upper to a lower energy level of the active region. The injector comprises a multiplicity of quantum well layers, with barrier layers interleaved between the quantum well (QW) layers. The QW layers and barrier layers of the injector region are selected to facilitate, under appropriate electrical bias, charge carrier passage from a lower energy state of a given active region to the upper energy state of the adjacent downstream active region.
Significantly, the QW layers and barrier layers are selected such that, under a first applied bias, a lower energy level of the given active region is in resonance with the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region, such that carrier transfer from the lower energy level of the given active region to the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region is facilitated.
In a preferred embodiment, the QW layers and barrier layers are furthermore selected such that, under an applied second bias larger than the first bias, there is resonant charge carrier injection from the ground state of the injector region of the given repeat unit into the upper energy level of the active region of the adjacent downstream repeat unit.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OR THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 schematically depicts an exemplary QC laser;
FIGS. 2 and 3 show the conduction band edge of a repeat unit (plus adjacent downstream active region) of an exemplary QC laser according to the invention, under applied field of 45 kV/cm and 65 kV/cm, respectively;
FIGS. 4 and 5 show data on light output power vs. drive current, for two exemplary QC lasers according to the invention;
FIG. 6 shows optical power as a function of wavelength, under different operating conditions, for an exemplary QC laser according to the invention; and
FIG. 7 schematically depicts an exemplary measuring or monitoring system comprising a QC laser according to the invention.
The drawings are not intended to be to scale or in proportion.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 schematically depicts an exemplary QC laser 10. Numerals 11-16 designate, respectively, substrate (e.g., InP), lower optical confinement region, waveguide core region, upper optical confinement region, upper contact and lower contact. Optionally the substrate can serve as lower optical confinement region.
FIG. 2 schematically shows the conduction band edge of a complete repeat unit and the adjacent downstream active region of an exemplary QC laser according to the invention at a bias corresponding to an electric field of 45 kV/cm. The multilayer waveguide core region is lattice matched with InP, with InGaAs QWs (e.g., 21) and AlInAs barrier layers (e.g., 22). The active regions exemplarily comprise three QWs, closely coupled by thin barrier layers. FIG. 2 also shows the moduli squared of the wavefunctions that are involved in the laser transition, with numeral 1 referring to the ground state of the active region, 2 referring to the lower laser level, and 3 referring to the upper laser level. Above level 3 is shown a further level of the active region that is not involved in the operation of the exemplary QC laser. The wavy arrows from level 3 to level 2 indicate the laser transitions.
FIG. 2 also shows the moduli squared of the wavefunctions in the injector. The multiplicity of energy states in the darkened region constitutes a "miniband" that facilitates the transport of electrons (of appropriate energy) through the injector, and the region of reduced density of states (indicated by light shading) is a "minigap" that prevents electron tunneling out of level 3 of the active region. FIG. 2 also shows the essentially complete alignment (in energy) of ground state 1 of the given active region with level 3 of the downstream active region, with the "miniband" facilitating electron transport from the given active region to the downstream active region. The electric field of 45 kV/cm at resonance was deduced from the laser operating voltage at threshold (at low temperatures) under the assumption that the field is homogeneous across the multiplicity of repeat units.
In an exemplary QC laser according to the invention, the repeat unit had the below listed layer sequence, starting with injection barrier 23, the left-most layer in FIG. 2, and proceeding in the downstream direction. The layer thicknesses are in nanometers. Layers with underlined thickness are Si-doped 2×1017 cm-3. All other layers are undoped (i.e., not intentionally doped). The sequence was:
3.8/2.1/1.2/6.5/1.2/5.3/2.3/4.0/1.1/3.6/1.2/3.2/1.2/3.0/1.6/3.0
In the QC laser with the above described repeat unit, under a bias field of 45 kV/cm, the upper laser level (level 3) is separated from the lower laser level (level 2) by E32 ˜153.6 meV, corresponding to λ˜8.08 μm. The longitudinal optical (L0) phonon scattering time τ32 between the two levels is calculated as 3.1 ps, and the matrix element of the optical transition as d32 ˜1.9 nm. The lower laser level is closely coupled to the ground state (level 1) of the active material, such that the two levels are strongly anti-crossed. This increases the matrix element d32 with respect to d31, and maximizes τ32 with respect to τ31. The energy difference is E21 ˜38.3 meV, designed to efficiently deplete the lower laser level of electrons via resonant L0-phonon scattering (EL0 ˜34 meV). The corresponding lifetime is calculated as τ2 ˜τ21 ˜0.3 ps<<τ32 ˜3.1 ps, so that population inversion between levels 3 and 2 is readily achieved. The L0-phonon scattering time from level 3 to level 1 is τ31 ˜3.6 ps, and the scattering time into the states of the injector is estimated as τ31 ˜14.6 ps.
In the exemplary QC laser of FIG. 2, the injector "miniband" (that is to say, the manifold of energy levels in the injector region) has been designed as "flat", in contrast to the "funnel" injector of prior art designs. The flat injector is characterized by a symmetric arrangement of the electron wavefunctions (shown as moduli squared in FIG. 2). The ground level of the injector is located about 40 meV in energy below the upper laser level. Even the next higher level of the injector miniband is energetically lower (about 14 meV) than the upper laser level. Doping of the center portion of the injector region provided an electron sheet density of n˜1.6×1011 cm-2 per repeat unit, resulting in a quasi-Fermi-level of about 7.5 meV under operating conditions. The above described layer sequence implies that at laser threshold (45 kV/cm), electrons are not injected from the Fermi surface into the upper laser level. Furthermore, level 1 of a given active region is in resonance with level 3 of the adjacent downstream active region, allowing for resonant carrier transport between successive active regions without significant carrier relaxation in the injector. The estimated transit time through a given injector (length 21.9 nm, "width" of the miniband ˜150 meV) of the exemplary QC laser is about 0.5 ps. In comparison, the relaxation time within the injector is long since the energy separation to the adjacent lower energy level is well below the L0-phonon energy, and the ground level of the injector region is partly filled with electrons.
Among the advantages of the above described exemplary QC laser is that it can avoid too early "shut-down" of the laser due to suppression of resonant tunneling. In prior art QC lasers (typically having a "funnel" injector) the upper laser level typically is filled with electrons by resonant tunneling only from the injector ground state. As a consequence, with increasing applied electric field (i.e., at high current operation) these two levels are subject to misalignment and the laser may shut off. On the other hand, in QC lasers according to the instant invention, once the applied electric field is increased above the resonance field and the resonance between levels 1 and 3 is thereby destroyed, there typically is still strong injection from the ground state of the injector into the upper lasing level of the adjacent downstream active region, allowing for a relatively wide dynamical range of current and concomitant relatively high optical power. Thus, in preferred embodiments of the invention the QWs and barriers of the injector are selected such that, at an applied bias field greater (typically significantly greater) than the resonance field at laser threshold, there is resonant injection of electrons from the ground state of the injector into the upper lasing level of the adjacent downstream active region. The above features are illustrated in FIG. 3, which shows the conduction band edge of the layer structure of FIG. 2 under an applied field of 65 kV/cm.
In FIG. 3, "g" refers to the ground state of the injector region. Electrons typically enter the injector region at an energy above that of the ground state but undergo relaxation to the ground state during transport to the adjacent downstream active region, such that the electrons can enter the upper laser state to undergo a further laser transition. For the exemplary structure under discussion, the first bias (45 kV/cm) corresponds to the resonance bias (and to the laser threshold), and the second bias (65 kV/cm) substantially corresponds to peak optical power.
In the exemplary QC laser according to the invention, 30 repeat units are disposed between conventional lower and upper optical confinement regions. With regard to examples of optical confinement regions, see, for instance, J. Faist et al, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 70, p. 2670 (1997); C. Gmachl et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 9, p. 1090 (1997); C. Sirtori et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 9, p. 294 (1997); and J. Faist et al., Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 68, p. 3680 (1996).
By way of example, in one embodiment of the invention the optical confinement regions consisted substantially of InP. As is known to those skilled in the art, use of InP in the upper confinement layer can, because of its relatively high thermal conductivity and advantageous other properties, lead to improved device performance (especially at higher cryogenic temperatures and above), as compared to ternary semiconductor material. In another embodiment of the invention the lower optical confinement region consisted substantially of InP and the upper optical confinement region consisted substantially of AlInAs and GaInAs. The upper and lower optical confinement layers and contacts were conventional.
After completion of MBE growth of the above recited layer structure, the wafers were processed in conventional fashion into ridge waveguide lasers, with stripe widths ranging from 11 to 17 μm. In one embodiment ("deep etched") the structure was etched to the bottom of the core region, and in another embodiment ("shallow etched") the structure was etched only to the bottom of the upper optical confinement region. After etching, deposition and patterning of an appropriate dielectric layer (e.g., silicon nitride, and deposition and patterning of metal contacts (e.g., Ti/Au for the upper contact and Ge/Au/Ag/Au for the lower contact), all in conventional fashion, the wafers were cleaved into bars, with widths ranging from 0.75-3 mm. The facets were left uncoated. After wire bonding of the lasers, the bars were mounted in a temperature controlled cold finger cryostat, and measurements were carried out.
FIG. 4 shows continuous wave (cw) light output vs. drive current, at various heat sink temperatures, for two deep-etched lasers of length 2.25 mm. The dashed lines were obtained from a laser with ternary top cladding, and the solid lines from a laser with InP top cladding. As can be seen from FIG. 4, the lasers had cw power of about 200 mW/facet at 80K, at 8 μm wavelength. This output power is closely comparable to the 5 μm output power of the QC laser described in the above cited paper by Faist et al., IEEE J. Ouantum Electronics, Vol. 34, p. 336 (1998).
It was generally observed that QC lasers that emit at longer wavelengths (e.g., in the second atmospheric window that is important for gas sensing applications) have lower output power and power efficiency than QC lasers that emit at shorter wavelengths (e.g., 5 μm), due to the higher waveguide losses in the former. In fact, measurements of waveguide loss in QC lasers have shown that it increases approximately quadratically with wavelength, as is expected from free carrier absorption.
In view of the above discussed experimental facts, it is evident that the instant QC laser with 8 μm wavelength exhibits substantially improved output power, as compared to the prior art 5 μm QC laser.
FIG. 5 shows peak output power vs. drive current, at various heat sink temperatures, for two shallow etched lasers of length 2.25 mm. The dashed lines were obtained from a laser with ternary top cladding, and the solid lines from a laser with InP top cladding. The lasers were operated in pulsed mode.
FIG. 6 shows the normalized emission spectra of QC laser as described above (width 13 μm, length 2.25 mm), measured close to laser threshold, cw and pulsed, respectively, at two different heat sink temperatures. The observed difference in the emission wavelengths reflects the temperature dependence of the gain spectrum of the lasers.
As those skilled in the art know, provision of distributed feedback can result in single mode output, and QC lasers according to the invention with distributed feedback are contemplated. For detail see, for instance, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/852,646, filed May 7, 1997 by J. N. Baillargeon et al., incorporated herein by reference.
Above, the invention is described in detail in terms of a particular embodiment, having a 3-QW active region, with "vertical" laser transition. However, the invention is not thus limited. For instance, the lasing transition could be "diagonal", the active region could be a superlattice active region. Although all such variants are currently not preferred, they are contemplated.
QC lasers are advantageously used for, inter alia, detection and/or monitoring of trace gases, for example, for pollution monitoring, process control, medical or law-enforcement purposes, since these lasers can have output in one of the so-called atmospheric "windows", i.e., at a wavelength at which the clean atmosphere essentially does not absorb radiation.
FIG. 7 schematically depicts an exemplary embodiment 70 of the invention, wherein an emission source 71 emits gas 72. QC laser 73 (advantageously a distributed feedback laser) emits mid-infrared radiation 74 that is directed through the emission gas, and is reflected, by any suitable means (e.g., corner reflector 75), to conventional detector 76. Of course, the reflector could be replaced with a detector, such that the absorption during a single pass is measurable.
The emission source is not necessarily a factory or other large-scale installation but could, for instance, be any source of a compound that has one or more absorption lines in the mid-IR. The source could, for instance, be a human subject, and the compound could be ethanol, or some medically significant compound. The gas sample could also be confined in a cell configured such that multi-path absorption is measured. For more detail on measurements, see the above-referenced '646 patent application.

Claims (8)

The invention claimed is:
1. Article comprising a quantum cascade laser comprising, in sequence, an upper optical confinement region, a waveguide core region and a lower optical confinement region, and further comprising contacts for electrically contacting the laser; said waveguide core region comprising a multiplicity of essentially identical repeat units, a given repeat unit comprising an injector region and an active region selected to facilitate a radiative carrier transition from an upper to a lower energy state of the active region; said injector region comprising a multiplicity of quantum well layers, with barrier layers interleaved between said quantum well layers, said quantum well layers and barrier layers selected to facilitate, under appropriate electrical bias, charge carrier passage from a lower energy state of a given active region to the upper energy state of the immediately adjacent downstream active region;
characterized in that
said quantum well layers and barrier layers are selected such that, under a first applied bias, a lower energy level of a given active region is in resonance with the upper energy level of an adjacent downstream active region, such that carrier transfer from the lower energy level of the given active region to the upper energy level of the adjacent downstream active region is facilitated.
2. Article according to claim 1, wherein said quantum well layers and barrier layers furthermore are selected such that, under a second applied bias larger than the first applied bias, there is resonant charge carrier injection from the ground state of the injector region of the given repeat unit into the upper energy level of the active region of the adjacent downstream repeat unit.
3. Article according to claim 1, wherein said radiative carrier transition results in emission of a photon of wavelength in the wavelength range 3-13 μm.
4. Article according to claim 3, wherein said waveguide core region comprises 10 or more repeat units.
5. Article according to claim 3, wherein said upper optical confinement region comprises InP.
6. Article according to claim 3, wherein only some of the layers of the injector region of the given repeat unit are doped, with the remainder of the layers of the injector region being not intentionally doped.
7. Article according to claim 1, wherein said quantum cascade laser comprises a grating structure.
8. Article according to claim 1, wherein the article is a measurement system for measuring infrared radiation absorption by a measurement species, wherein the measurement system comprises a source of infrared laser radiation comprising
a) a quantum cascade laser of claim 1; and the measurement system further comprises
b) a detector for detecting the infrared laser radiation after passage through a quantity of said measurement species.
US09/096,701 1998-06-12 1998-06-12 Quantum cascade laser Expired - Lifetime US6137817A (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/096,701 US6137817A (en) 1998-06-12 1998-06-12 Quantum cascade laser
DE69900427T DE69900427T2 (en) 1998-06-12 1999-05-26 Improved quantum cascade laser
EP99304076A EP0964488B1 (en) 1998-06-12 1999-05-26 Improved quantum cascade laser
JP16456299A JP3717712B2 (en) 1998-06-12 1999-06-11 Improved quantum cascade laser

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/096,701 US6137817A (en) 1998-06-12 1998-06-12 Quantum cascade laser

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6137817A true US6137817A (en) 2000-10-24

Family

ID=22258659

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/096,701 Expired - Lifetime US6137817A (en) 1998-06-12 1998-06-12 Quantum cascade laser

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US6137817A (en)
EP (1) EP0964488B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3717712B2 (en)
DE (1) DE69900427T2 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001026192A1 (en) * 1999-10-07 2001-04-12 Maxion Technologies, Inc. Parallel cascade quantum well light emitting device
DE10061234A1 (en) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-27 Paul Drude Inst Fuer Festkoerp Electrically pumped unipolar solid body laser comprises an active layer formed by a super lattice structure containing occupied sub-bands
US20030043874A1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2003-03-06 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser with a weakly coupled grating
US6570159B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-05-27 Dragerwerk Aktiengesellschaft Gas-measuring system
US20030174751A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2003-09-18 Jerome Faist Quantum cascade laser with optical phonon excitation
US20040013145A1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2004-01-22 Jerome Faist Quantum cascade laser
US6690699B2 (en) * 2001-03-02 2004-02-10 Lucent Technologies Inc Quantum cascade laser with relaxation-stabilized injection
US20040109692A1 (en) * 2002-12-09 2004-06-10 James Plante FSO communication systems having high performance detectors
US20040161006A1 (en) * 2003-02-18 2004-08-19 Ying-Lan Chang Method and apparatus for improving wavelength stability for InGaAsN devices
US6795467B2 (en) 2001-04-04 2004-09-21 Lucent Technologies Inc. Technique for measuring intersubband electroluminescence in a quantum cascade laser
US6829269B2 (en) 2002-05-21 2004-12-07 University Of Massachusetts Systems and methods using phonon mediated intersubband laser
US20050129084A1 (en) * 2002-03-08 2005-06-16 Martin Kamp Semiconductor laser array with a lattice structure
US20050276298A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Fischer Marc O Tuneable unipolar lasers
US20080273565A1 (en) * 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 Gmachl Claire F Excited state quantum cascade photon source
US20090213890A1 (en) * 2008-02-27 2009-08-27 Patel C Kumar N Quantum cascade laser
US20100067557A1 (en) * 2007-01-19 2010-03-18 Quankui Yang High-efficiency unipolar quantum cascade laser
US20100111127A1 (en) * 2007-01-18 2010-05-06 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Quantum cascade laser
US20110024721A1 (en) * 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Semiconductor light emitting device
US20110310915A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2011-12-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods and apparatus for single-mode selection in quantum cascade lasers
DE102011117278A1 (en) 2011-10-31 2013-05-02 Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Interband cascade laser gain medium
US9088126B2 (en) 2013-10-17 2015-07-21 The Trustees Of Princeton University Single-mode quantum cascade lasers with enhanced tuning range
US9608408B2 (en) 2012-09-26 2017-03-28 Pranalytica, Inc. Long wavelength quantum cascade lasers based on high strain composition
EP3075040A4 (en) * 2013-11-30 2017-08-16 Thorlabs Quantum Electronics, Inc. Quantum cascade laser

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1130724A1 (en) * 2000-03-03 2001-09-05 Alpes Lasers Quantum cascade laser and method of manufacturing the same
CN100373724C (en) * 2005-08-31 2008-03-05 中国科学院上海微系统与信息技术研究所 Indium phosphide arsenic-phosphorus-including quantum cascaded laser structure and uninterrupted growth method
FR2933542B1 (en) * 2008-07-04 2016-03-04 Thales Sa QUANTIC CASCADES DEVICE WITH HIGH INJECTOR
JP5523759B2 (en) * 2009-07-31 2014-06-18 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Quantum cascade laser
JP6467193B2 (en) * 2014-10-30 2019-02-06 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Quantum cascade laser
JP2020123662A (en) * 2019-01-30 2020-08-13 住友電気工業株式会社 Quantum cascade laser

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS63182550A (en) * 1987-01-23 1988-07-27 Fujitsu Ltd Gas sensor
US5457709A (en) * 1994-04-04 1995-10-10 At&T Ipm Corp. Unipolar semiconductor laser
US5509025A (en) * 1994-04-04 1996-04-16 At&T Corp. Unipolar semiconductor laser
EP0797280A1 (en) * 1996-03-20 1997-09-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Article comprising an improved quantum cascade laser
EP0841731A1 (en) * 1996-11-06 1998-05-13 Lucent Technologies Inc. Quantum cascade laser

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS63182550A (en) * 1987-01-23 1988-07-27 Fujitsu Ltd Gas sensor
US5457709A (en) * 1994-04-04 1995-10-10 At&T Ipm Corp. Unipolar semiconductor laser
US5509025A (en) * 1994-04-04 1996-04-16 At&T Corp. Unipolar semiconductor laser
EP0797280A1 (en) * 1996-03-20 1997-09-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Article comprising an improved quantum cascade laser
US5727010A (en) * 1996-03-20 1998-03-10 Lucent Technologies Inc. Article comprising an improved quantum cascade laser
EP0841731A1 (en) * 1996-11-06 1998-05-13 Lucent Technologies Inc. Quantum cascade laser

Non-Patent Citations (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Complex-Coupled Quantum Cascade Distributed-Feedback Laser", by C. Gmachl et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 9, No. 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 1090-1092.
"Distributed Feedback Quantum Cascade Lasers", by J. Faist et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 70 (20), May 19, 1997, pp. 2670-2672.
"High Power Mid-Infrared (λ˜5 μm) Quantum Cascade Lasers Operating Above Room Temperature", by J. Faist et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 68 (26), Jun. 24, 1996, pp. 3680-3682.
"High-Power Continuous-Wave Quantum Cascade Lasers", by J. Faist et al., IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 34, No. 2, Feb. 1998, pp. 336-341.
"Mid-Infrared (8.5 μm) Semiconductor Lasers Operating at Room Temperature", by C. Sirtori et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 9, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 294-296.
Complex Coupled Quantum Cascade Distributed Feedback Laser , by C. Gmachl et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters , vol. 9, No. 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 1090 1092. *
Distributed Feedback Quantum Cascade Lasers , by J. Faist et al., Applied Physics Letters , vol. 70 (20), May 19, 1997, pp. 2670 2672. *
Gmachl, C. et al. Applied Physics Letters , Continuous Wave and High Power Pulsed Operation of Index Coupled Distributed Feedback Quantum Cascade Laser at Lambda 8.5 MUM , vol. 72, No. 12, pp. 1430 1432, Mar. 23, 1998. *
Gmachl, C. et al. Applied Physics Letters , High Power Lambda 8 MUM Quantum Cascade Lasers with Near Optimum Performance , vol. 72, No. 24, pp. 3130 3132, Jun. 15, 1998. *
Gmachl, C. et al. Applied Physics Letters, "Continuous-Wave and High-Power Pulsed Operation of Index-Coupled Distributed Feedback Quantum Cascade Laser at Lambda=8.5 MUM", vol. 72, No. 12, pp. 1430-1432, Mar. 23, 1998.
Gmachl, C. et al. Applied Physics Letters, "High-Power Lambda 8 MUM Quantum Cascade Lasers with Near Optimum Performance", vol. 72, No. 24, pp. 3130-3132, Jun. 15, 1998.
High Power Continuous Wave Quantum Cascade Lasers , by J. Faist et al., IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics , vol. 34, No. 2, Feb. 1998, pp. 336 341. *
High Power Mid Infrared ( 5 m) Quantum Cascade Lasers Operating Above Room Temperature , by J. Faist et al., Applied Physics Letters , vol. 68 (26), Jun. 24, 1996, pp. 3680 3682. *
Li, et al., Electronics Letters , Intersubband Electroluminescence in GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Cascade Structures , vol. 33, No. 22, pp. 1874 1875, Oct. 23, 1997. *
Li, et al., Electronics Letters, "Intersubband Electroluminescence in GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Cascade Structures", vol. 33, No. 22, pp. 1874-1875, Oct. 23, 1997.
Mid Infrared (8.5 m) Semiconductor Lasers Operating at Room Temperature , by C. Sirtori et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters , vol. 9, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 294 296. *
Sirtoit, C. et al., Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro Optics ( CLEO ), Resonant Tunneling Electron Injection in Quantum Cascade Lasers , vol. 6, pp. 241 342, May 3 8, 1998. *
Sirtoit, C. et al., Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), "Resonant Tunneling Electron Injection in Quantum Cascade Lasers", vol. 6, pp. 241-342, May 3-8, 1998.
Tredicucci, A. et al., Applied Physics Letters , High Power Inter Miniband Lasing in Intrinsic Superlattices , vol. 72, No. 19, pp. 2388 2390, May 11, 1998. *
Tredicucci, A. et al., Applied Physics Letters, "High-Power Inter-Miniband Lasing in Intrinsic Superlattices", vol. 72, No. 19, pp. 2388-2390, May 11, 1998.
U.S. Patent application F. Capasso 44 75 8 12 1 9 13, Ser. No. 08/744,292, filed Nov. 6, 1996. *
U.S. Patent application F. Capasso 44-75-8-12-1-9-13, Ser. No. 08/744,292, filed Nov. 6, 1996.
U.S. Patent application J. N. Baillargeon 4 45 77 9 1 10 14, Ser. No. 08/852,646, filed May 7, 1997. *
U.S. Patent application J. N. Baillargeon 4-45-77-9-1-10-14, Ser. No. 08/852,646, filed May 7, 1997.

Cited By (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6404791B1 (en) 1999-10-07 2002-06-11 Maxion Technologies, Inc. Parallel cascade quantum well light emitting device
WO2001026192A1 (en) * 1999-10-07 2001-04-12 Maxion Technologies, Inc. Parallel cascade quantum well light emitting device
US6570159B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-05-27 Dragerwerk Aktiengesellschaft Gas-measuring system
US6922427B2 (en) * 2000-08-31 2005-07-26 Alpes Lasers S.A. Quantum cascade laser
US20040013145A1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2004-01-22 Jerome Faist Quantum cascade laser
US6751244B2 (en) 2000-09-13 2004-06-15 Alpes Lasers S.A. Quantum cascade laser with optical phonon excitation
US20030174751A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2003-09-18 Jerome Faist Quantum cascade laser with optical phonon excitation
DE10061234C2 (en) * 2000-12-08 2003-01-16 Paul Drude Inst Fuer Festkoerp Unipolar semiconductor laser without injection layers
DE10061234A1 (en) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-27 Paul Drude Inst Fuer Festkoerp Electrically pumped unipolar solid body laser comprises an active layer formed by a super lattice structure containing occupied sub-bands
US6690699B2 (en) * 2001-03-02 2004-02-10 Lucent Technologies Inc Quantum cascade laser with relaxation-stabilized injection
US6795467B2 (en) 2001-04-04 2004-09-21 Lucent Technologies Inc. Technique for measuring intersubband electroluminescence in a quantum cascade laser
US20030043874A1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2003-03-06 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser with a weakly coupled grating
US7494836B2 (en) 2001-08-06 2009-02-24 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser with a weakly coupled grating
US7776634B2 (en) 2001-08-06 2010-08-17 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser with a weakly coupled grating
US7061962B2 (en) 2001-08-06 2006-06-13 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser with a weakly coupled grating
US20060172446A1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2006-08-03 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser with a weakly coupled grating
US20050129084A1 (en) * 2002-03-08 2005-06-16 Martin Kamp Semiconductor laser array with a lattice structure
US7177335B2 (en) 2002-03-08 2007-02-13 Nanoplus Gmbh Semiconductor laser array with a lattice structure
US6829269B2 (en) 2002-05-21 2004-12-07 University Of Massachusetts Systems and methods using phonon mediated intersubband laser
US20040109692A1 (en) * 2002-12-09 2004-06-10 James Plante FSO communication systems having high performance detectors
US20040161006A1 (en) * 2003-02-18 2004-08-19 Ying-Lan Chang Method and apparatus for improving wavelength stability for InGaAsN devices
US7301977B2 (en) 2004-06-10 2007-11-27 Nanoplus Gmbh Tuneable unipolar lasers
US20080137704A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2008-06-12 Nanoplus Gmbh Tuneable unipolar lasers
US20050276298A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Fischer Marc O Tuneable unipolar lasers
US7696098B2 (en) 2004-06-10 2010-04-13 Nanoplus Gmbh Tuneable unipolar lasers
US20100111127A1 (en) * 2007-01-18 2010-05-06 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Quantum cascade laser
US8068528B2 (en) * 2007-01-18 2011-11-29 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Quantum cascade laser
US8000367B2 (en) 2007-01-19 2011-08-16 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. High-efficiency unipolar quantum cascade laser
US20100067557A1 (en) * 2007-01-19 2010-03-18 Quankui Yang High-efficiency unipolar quantum cascade laser
US20080273565A1 (en) * 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 Gmachl Claire F Excited state quantum cascade photon source
US8014430B2 (en) * 2008-02-27 2011-09-06 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Quantum cascade laser
US20090213890A1 (en) * 2008-02-27 2009-08-27 Patel C Kumar N Quantum cascade laser
US20110310915A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2011-12-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods and apparatus for single-mode selection in quantum cascade lasers
US8351481B2 (en) * 2008-11-07 2013-01-08 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods and apparatus for single-mode selection in quantum cascade lasers
US20110024721A1 (en) * 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Semiconductor light emitting device
US8330140B2 (en) * 2009-07-31 2012-12-11 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Semiconductor light emitting device
DE102011117278A1 (en) 2011-10-31 2013-05-02 Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Interband cascade laser gain medium
US9608408B2 (en) 2012-09-26 2017-03-28 Pranalytica, Inc. Long wavelength quantum cascade lasers based on high strain composition
US9088126B2 (en) 2013-10-17 2015-07-21 The Trustees Of Princeton University Single-mode quantum cascade lasers with enhanced tuning range
EP3075040A4 (en) * 2013-11-30 2017-08-16 Thorlabs Quantum Electronics, Inc. Quantum cascade laser

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69900427T2 (en) 2002-06-27
EP0964488A2 (en) 1999-12-15
EP0964488A3 (en) 1999-12-22
DE69900427D1 (en) 2001-12-13
JP3717712B2 (en) 2005-11-16
EP0964488B1 (en) 2001-11-07
JP2000012983A (en) 2000-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6137817A (en) Quantum cascade laser
Sirtori et al. GaAs/Al x Ga 1− x As quantum cascade lasers
Gmachl et al. High-power λ≈ 8 μ m quantum cascade lasers with near optimum performance
US6501783B1 (en) Distributed feedback surface plasmon laser
US7386024B2 (en) Quantum cascade laser device
Strasser et al. GaAs/AlGaAs superlattice quantum cascade lasers at λ≈ 13 μ m
US5936989A (en) Quantum cascade laser
EP0867990B1 (en) Article comprising an electric field-tunable semiconductor laser
EP0877454A1 (en) Article comprising an improved QC laser
US6148012A (en) Multiple wavelength quantum cascade light source
US6556604B1 (en) Flat minibands with spatially symmetric wavefunctions in intersubband superlattice light emitters
US7382806B2 (en) THz semiconductor laser incorporating a controlled plasmon confinement waveguide
Yang et al. Improvement of λ≈ 5 μ m quantum cascade lasers by blocking barriers in the active regions
Gmachl et al. Noncascaded intersubband injection lasers at λ≈ 7.7 μ m
EP0841731B1 (en) Quantum cascade laser
EP0932230B1 (en) Article comprising a strain-compensated QC laser
US6091753A (en) Article comprising an improved superlattice quantum cascade laser
Friedrich et al. High performance injectorless quantum-cascade lasers
Tredicucci et al. Terahertz quantum cascade lasers
US7010010B2 (en) Broadband cascade light emitters
Friedrich et al. Quantum-cascade lasers without injector regions operating above room temperature
EP3893341B1 (en) Quantum cascade laser element
Gianordoli et al. Improved performance of GaAs-AlGaAs superlattice quantum cascade lasers beyond/spl lambda/= 13 μm
Strasser et al. Intersubband and interminiband GaAs/AlGaAs quantum cascade lasers
Ohtani et al. Room-temperature InAs/AlSb quantum-cascade laser operating at 8.9 µm

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BAILLARGEON, JAMES NELSON;CAPASSO, FEDERICO;CHO, ALFRED YI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:009254/0407

Effective date: 19980611

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TEX

Free format text: CONDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF AND SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. (DE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:011722/0048

Effective date: 20010222

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK), AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:018590/0287

Effective date: 20061130

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.;REEL/FRAME:030510/0627

Effective date: 20130130

AS Assignment

Owner name: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG;REEL/FRAME:033949/0531

Effective date: 20140819

AS Assignment

Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY;NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS BV;ALCATEL LUCENT SAS;REEL/FRAME:043877/0001

Effective date: 20170912

Owner name: NOKIA USA INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC;PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC;REEL/FRAME:043879/0001

Effective date: 20170913

Owner name: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES, LLC, ILLINOIS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC;PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP, LLC;REEL/FRAME:043967/0001

Effective date: 20170913

AS Assignment

Owner name: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA USA INC.;REEL/FRAME:048370/0682

Effective date: 20181220

AS Assignment

Owner name: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.;REEL/FRAME:048513/0399

Effective date: 20081101

AS Assignment

Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES LLC;REEL/FRAME:058983/0104

Effective date: 20211101

Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES LLC;REEL/FRAME:058983/0104

Effective date: 20211101

Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.;REEL/FRAME:058363/0723

Effective date: 20211129

Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.;REEL/FRAME:058363/0723

Effective date: 20211129

AS Assignment

Owner name: RPX CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC;REEL/FRAME:059352/0001

Effective date: 20211129