|Publication number||US5900675 A|
|Application number||US 08/840,518|
|Publication date||4 May 1999|
|Filing date||21 Apr 1997|
|Priority date||21 Apr 1997|
|Publication number||08840518, 840518, US 5900675 A, US 5900675A, US-A-5900675, US5900675 A, US5900675A|
|Inventors||Bernd Karl-Heinz Appelt, Donald Seton Farquhar, Robert Maynard Japp, Konstantinos I. Papathomas|
|Original Assignee||International Business Machines Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Non-Patent Citations (14), Referenced by (89), Classifications (26), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits and, more particularly, to an integrated circuit (chip) carrier with zones in the x-y plane of controlled coefficients of thermal expansion.
2. Background of the Invention
The reliability and performance of integrated circuit packages is enhanced by matching the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the printed circuit board and the semiconductor chip. Such a structure prevents discontinuous expansion during thermal cycling and its resultant stresses on the chip package components. Generally, however, a chip has a CTE of 2.7 ppm/C° and the printed circuit board has a CTE of 10 to 25 ppm/C°. This mismatch is especially a problem where ball grid array (BGA) interconnections and controlled collapse chip connector (C4, or "flip chip") technologies are used. Often, chip carriers are interposed between the chip and the circuit board; the CTE of the chip carrier is itself chosen as some intermediate value to provide a reasonable match to both the chip and to the printed circuit board.
In the progression of chip package technology development, as chip input-output (I/O) increased beyond the capabilities of peripheral lead devices, BGA interconnections and other soldered interfaces emerged as the solution. Where the CTE of the chip does not match the CTE of the circuit board, however, the footprint size of the BGA and C4 interconnections is limited because of stress-induced fatigue on the solder joints during thermal cycling.
Thermal cycling is encountered during normal circuit operation and, where the CTEs of the package components do not match, movement of the chip with respect to the circuit board results. The use of standard area array soldering to join the carrier to the board often provides an insufficient mechanical fatigue strength to mediate a significantly different expansion of the two materials. Consequently, under conditions of thermal cycling, the solder joints break, disrupting the circuit operation and necessitating repair.
To strengthen the carrier-to-substrate bond, attempts were made to increase the diameter of the connection, thus rendering the bond connection more compliant. When this is done, however, pin out density is decreased dramatically. For example, when similar materials are used for the carrier and board, a contact area of 0.25 mm (10 mils) with a gap between contacts of 0.25 mm (10 mils) provides a contact array having a 0.50 mm (20 mils) pitch. When dissimilar materials are used for the carrier and board, a 1.0 mm (40 mils) contact must be provided which results in a contact array having a 1.25 mm (50 mils) pitch. Such a decrease in pin out density is undesirable.
The use of heatsinks was another proposed solution to the problems with organic chip carriers and the related poor thermal conductivity associated with BGA technology. Heatsinks were employed to manage the thermal and power performance requirements of these packages, but the CTE mismatch still remained. Thus, although heat accumulation was decreased, mechanical failure within the chip due to stress and cracking still existed.
Some partial solutions to the above problems eventually emerged. One solution was to provide a separate connection system to relieve the CTE mismatch. Such connection systems included flex cables or sockets. Most of the past solutions employed some type of interface between the chip and the printed circuit board. The material for the interface was selected such that it had an intermediate CTE within the CTE range of both the chip and board.
Thus, FIG. 1A depicts a wirebond BGA package, where a baseplate 10 (CTE of 17 ppm/C°) would be provided with a CTE near that of the printed circuit board 20 (CTE of 20 to 25 ppm/C°). The chip 30 has a CTE of about 2 ppm/C°. Thus, the baseplate 10 would provide an intermediate match to the printed circuit board 20 and the chip 30. It is more important that the baseplate 10 come close to matching the printed circuit board, because the thermally induced stresses increase directly with the overall size of the mismatched interface. For this type of structure, the overall size of the BGA array is always larger than the chip size. Furthermore, the wirebond interconnections 26 are somewhat compliant, as is the adhesive 36 connecting the chip to the baseplate. Also illustrated in FIG. 1A are the solder balls 22, which connect the circuitry (not shown in FIG. 1A) on the surface of the baseplate 10 to the printed circuit board 20 and the molding compound or encapsulant 24 which encapsulates chip 30.
FIG. 1B shows a C4 flip chip BGA package, where a chip 30 (about 2 ppm/C°) is connected using C4 solder balls 42 to a baseplate 10. The C4 interconnections are reinforced with an encapsulant 36. The C4's are connected to the BGA balls 22 with circuitry (not shown) on the baseplate 10. The BGA balls 22 connect to the printed circuit board 20. This type of package offers more dense interconnections than the package shown in FIG. 1A, but the C4 connections are less compliant than wirebond connections, thus requiring a closer match in CTE between the chip 30 and the baseplate 10.
The partial solutions illustred in FIGS. 1A and 1B can be optimized to provide the best possible compromise of CTEs among the various components. When the temperature of the package increases during operation, however, the printed circuit board 20 expands the most, the chip 30 expands the least, and the baseplate 10 expands at some intermediate value. Although it is intended for intermediate expansion of the baseplate 10 to reduce the thermal stress, it is not eliminated. As the array size of the BGA interconnections grows, and as the chip size increases, the CTE mismatch becomes increasingly problematic, resulting in reliability and performance problems.
Another proposed solution is to have a carrier with a CTE varying in the z-plane (where z is the thickness). This proposed solution matches the CTE of the chip on one side of the baseplate and the CTE of the printed circuit board on the other side of the baseplate. This layered baseplate, however, causes warping during processing because each layer expands at a different rate. Thus, the problem of preventing BGA and C4-ball shear and chip cracking remains unsolved.
Other alternatives include full compensation planes and chip encapsulation. These alternatives tend, however, to restrict the size of the chip carrier. Still another proposed solution is to incorporate low CTE materials such as INVAR (INVAR is a registered trademark of Creusot-Loire used in connection with a steel alloy containing 36% nickel) or quartz into the laminate. If the overall CTE is lowered too much, however, BGA failure results. And chip cracking and C4 failure can result if the CTE is not lowered enough. Therefore, this proposed solution also has drawbacks and there remains a need for a chip package which removes the stresses caused by inconsistent expansion during thermal cycling.
To overcome the CTE shortcomings of conventional integrated circuit chip packages, a new integrated circuit chip package is provided. An object of the present invention is to provide a package with improved CTE matches between the chip and carrier and between the carrier and the printed circuit board. A related object is to improve these CTE matches in BGA applications. Another object is to reduce thermal stress, and resulting defects, without limiting the size of the chip or chip carrier. Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a package which minimizes warping.
To achieve these and other objects, and in view of its purposes, the present invention provides an integrated circuit chip package wherein the chip carrier is an integrated piece with differing coefficients of thermal expansion in the x-y plane. The carrier has two main regions. One region is a core region which has a CTE approximately equal to the semiconductor chip. This region is approximately the same size as the chip, and is effectively the chip footprint. The second region surrounds the core region in the x-y plane and has a CTE approximately equal to the printed circuit board. Because the CTE varies in the x-y plane, and not the z-plane as in some layered carriers of the past, warping is minimized. The core region has a CTE <5 ppm/C°, and is comprised of INVAR, or of any other related material which provides the necessary properties. The surrounding region is copper or a suitable similar metal, and has a CTE of 15-25 ppm/C° or, alternatively, a printed circuit board laminate.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary, but are not restrictive, of the invention.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawing are not to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawing are the following figures:
FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of a chip package according to the prior art;
FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view of an alternative chip package according to the prior art;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a chip package according to the present invention where the chip is mounted to the baseplate via C4 interconnections;
FIG. 3A is a cross-sectional view of a chip package according to the present invention where the chip is mounted via wire bonding in a cavity in the baseplate;
FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of a chip package according to the present invention where the chip is mounted via wire bonding in a cavity in a discontinuous baseplate;
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention in which a controlled transition region is provided;
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a chip package according to the present invention in which there is an insulating layer separating the BGA and the baseplate;
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention in which a laminate chip carrier is provided between a chip and a printed circuit board; and
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention in which a material of low thermal expansion is disposed within an organic carrier.
The present invention utilizes a baseplate that has an in-plane variation of its thermal expansion. Specifically, the baseplate has low expansion (<5 ppm/C°) under the chip and high expansion (about 17 ppm/C°) away from the chip. The low expansion area of this carrier minimizes the stresses in the bondline of back bonded chips, and minimizes the shear stress on the C4-balls (ball shear) and prevents chip cracking. The high expansion area minimizes the stresses on the BGA solder balls in the connection to the printed circuit board.
FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the present invention. This figure shows that the x-y plane variation of thermal expansion is accomplished by using a baseplate constructed of two metals, each having a different CTE. In FIG. 2, the baseplate 200 is copper having a CTE of about 17 ppm/C°. A printed circuit board 220 has a CTE of 15-25 ppm/C°. A semiconductor chip 230 has a CTE of approximately 2 ppm/C°. Baseplate 200 is reinforced by a piece of INVAR material 210, having a CTE <5 ppm/C° and typically about 3 ppm/C°, only in the core region of asplate 200 directly above chip 230 INVAR reinforcement 210, with its CTE close to that of chip 230, lowers the composite CTE of the integral baseplate 200 and reinforcement 210 and restrains baseplate 200 from moving in this core region during thermal cycling and, therefore, prevents stresses on the C4 interconnections 240. INVAR reinforcement 210 contacts baseplate 200 continuously along their mutual interface and forms an integral carrier. Thus, other than in the transition region, there is no variation of CTE along the z-axis.
Away from the footprint of chip 230 on baseplate 200, where the BGA solder balls 250 connect baseplate 200 to printed circuit board 220, baseplate 200 is free to expand and contract during thermal cycling without applying stress on chip 230 or its mounting components. On the perimeter of baseplate 200, without reinforcement 210, the CTE of baseplate 200 approximates the CTE of printed circuit board 220. A step or tapered transition may exist from the core region to the surrounding perimeter region, where the CTE varies between the core region CTE and the surrounding region CTE. Chip 230 and C4 interconnections 240 (typically solder balls having a diameter of 0.05-0.15 mm (2-6 mils)) are surrounded by a molding compound 260 which acts as an encapsulating material for chip 230 and C4 interconnections 240. Molding compound 260 has a CTE of approximately 20-25 ppm/C°, nearly matching the CTE of C4 interconnections 240. The circuit pattern providing the fan out from the C4 balls to the solder balls is not shown, nor is the circuit pattern on the printed circuit board.
An additional advantage to the present invention concerns warping during thermal cycling. Because the INVAR layer can be incorporated symmetrically with respect to the z-axis (not shown in FIG. 2), little or no warping will occur during temperature fluctuations. As a result, because no compromise is required between the CTE of chip 230 and printed circuit board 220, the carrier will exhibit enhanced reliability.
The present invention applies equally well whether the interconnection between the circuitry on baseplate 200 and chip 230 is made using wire bond (as shown in FIG. 1) or C4 technology (as shown in FIG. 2). The C4 interconnection permits denser placement of components, which is advantageous, but presents a greater thermal expansion mismatch problem than does the wire bond interconnection.
FIG. 3A is a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention. A cavity 300 is provided in baseplate 310. Cavity 300 provides increased area for chip 320 and overmold 330. Such increased area is important because chip 320 must not extend too far away from baseplate 310 and toward printed circuit board 360; certainly, neither chip 320, nor wirebonds, nor overmold can contact printed circuit board 360 because of interference with the BGA solder connection to the board. In addition, it is desirable to have chip 320 in the same plane as the surrounding baseplate 310. Cavity 300 provides the necessary space for chip 320 and adhesive layer 390, while allowing the in-plane placement of chip 320. Cavity 300 also facilitates assembly because it provides ample clearance for cleaning.
Cavity 300 can be etched into the carrier. Alternatively, baseplate 310 can be stamped or coined to distort the baseplate and form cavity 300. A result of the stamping or coining technique is illustrated in FIG. 3A. Baseplate 310 is continuous and is restrained in the area of the footprint of chip 320 by the INVAR reinforcement 340. FIG. 3A also shows an embodiment in which chip 320 is connected to the circuitry on baseplate 310 using wire bonding (note wires 370 and 380), and mounted on an adhesive layer 390. BGA solder balls 350 connect baseplate 310 to printed circuit board 360.
FIG. 3B illustrates baseplate 310 which has been etched to form cavity 300. Baseplate 310 is not continuous. Rather, in the embodiment of FIG. 3B, cavity 300 is covered for most of its inner surface by INVAR reinforcement 340. The same low CTE area at the footprint of chip 320 is accomplished in this embodiment.
There are additional considerations that one of ordinary skill in the art would consider in utilizing this invention. For example, in developing the carrier, stress concentrations in the transition region may best be avoided by tapering the INVAR reinforcement or by having fingers of INVAR material protrude into the baseplate in the chip footprint area. One such configuration is shown in FIG. 4.
In FIG. 4, a cavity 400 is provided in baseplate 410. Cavity 400 provides increased area for chip 420 and overmold 430. BGA solder balls 450 connect baseplate 410 to printed circuit board 460. Wires 470 and 480 connect chip 420 to the circuitry on baseplate 410, and chip 420 is mounted on an adhesive layer 490. INVAR reinforcement 440 is tapered in the transition area between the core region of the footprint of chip 420 and the peripheral region. Thus, unlike the step transition which exists from the core region to the surrounding perimeter region in the embodiments discussed above, the CTE gradually varies between the core region CTE and the surrounding region CTE for the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4.
FIG. 5 is yet another embodiment of the present invention. Here, the circuit lines 515 on the surface of baseplate 510 are illustrated. Circuit lines 515 are typically made of a copper--chromium composite. An insulating layer 505 is provided between baseplate 510 and circuit lines 515. Polyimide or other similar materials may be used for insulating layer 505. Cavity 500 provides increased area for chip 520 and underfill 530 or overmold 535. BGA solder balls 550 connect baseplate 510 to printed circuit board 560. INVAR reinforcement 540 is provided in the core region of the footprint of chip 520. C4 interconnections 525 (typically solder balls) connect circuit lines 515 to chip 520. By using a laser direct write tool in conjunction with ED-resist, circuitization over the sloped step of cavity 500 can be achieved providing an escape pattern for C4 mounted chip 520.
FIG. 6 is yet another embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, a laminate chip carrier 610 is disposed between the printed circuit board 620 and the chip 630. Moreover, the laminate chip carrier 610 and the printed circuit board 620 are on the same side of chip 630. Additionally, INVAR reinforcement 640 is provided within the laminate chip carrier 610, again forming the core region having approximate dimensions defined by the footprint of chip 630. FIG. 6 also shows BGA contact pads, examples being BGA contact pads 602 and 603, between the BGA solder balls, examples being BGA solder balls 612 and 613, and the laminate chip carrier 610. Similarly, C4 interconnection contact pads 621, 622, 623, and 624 are shown disposed between C4 interconnections 631, 632, 633, and 634, respectively, and the laminate chip carrier 610. The INVAR reinforcement 640 may be tapered on its edges to form a transition region providing varying thermal expansion control in the x-y plane. As an alternative to INVAR, silica fabric may be used to provide the local reduction in CTE.
FIG. 7 is yet another embodiment of the present invention. Here, the INVAR reinforcement 740 is provided within the laminate chip carrier 710, and the chip 730 is provided between the laminate chip carrier 710 and the printed circuit board 720. BGA contact pads 701, 702, 703, and 704 are shown between BGA solder balls 711, 712, 713, and 714, respectively, and chip carrier 710. FIG. 7 shows an embodiment where no internal circuitry is required. All circuitry can be on the surface of laminate chip carrier 710 where BGA contact pads contact the BGA solder balls. Again, the INVAR reinforcement 740 may be tapered on its edges to form a transition region providing varying thermal expansion control in the x-y plane. Note that the use of circuitized cores with plated through holes to form a multi-layer printed circuit board is possible as long as at least one layer has an INVAR reinforcement.
Alternative materials may be used in place of INVAR to form the integral carrier and to control CTE mismatch. Some examples of alternative materials include polyimide e-glass, polyimide quartz, quartz, aramid, molybdenum, s-glass, liquid crystal polymers, and combinations thereof. The CTE of quartz, for example, is about 5 ppm/C°. The material selected must satisfy the necessary CTE requirements and form a continuous bond with the baseplate, thereby creating an integral carrier. In the core region of the baseplate directly above the chip, the CTE can be tailored to match that of a ceramic, such as Al2 O3 (of about 7 ppm/C°), typically used as a substrate. The reliability of large C4 chips on such substrates has been proven.
Beyond the region of the chip footprint, the reinforcement material (quartz, INVAR, or the like) is reduced or completely eliminated. The outer, peripheral region corresponds to the high DNP BGA sites and can be matched to the printed circuit board. The high-CTE region minimizes the stresses on the BGA solder balls in the connection to the printed circuit board. Directly under the chip, where the CTE is low, the BGAs are close to the neutral position so the mismatch to the printed circuit board is largely irrelevant. The low-CTE region of the carrier minimizes the stresses in the bondline of back-bonded chips and the C4 balls (ball shear) and the stresses that can cause chip cracking. Should the BGA stresses be excessive in the low-CTE region of the carrier, the BGA grid can be depopulated in this region.
Although the invention is quite general and would work with a variety of material sets, two specific processes of fabrication will be described. The first fabrication process begins with a piece of copper-INVAR-copper (CIC) or any other suitable metal composite such as SILVAR™ (a nickel-iron-cobalt alloy) or KOVAR™ (a related alloy). CIC is a standard material and is simply a layered laminate with a layer of copper on each side of a layer of INVAR material. The carrier is built by removing one layer of copper and further selectively removing the INVAR material from areas outside the chip footprint. The result is a carrier that has variations of CTE only in the x-y plane, with a transition region between the inner core and outer periphery. Such a construction technique could be used in multiple layers within the same carrier, following standard circuit board construction techniques. A dielectric would be required to fill areas where the CIC was thinner (e.g., prepunched prepreg may be used), and this would further enhance the x-y plane CTE variation that is accomplished by the invention. Vias under the chip may be etched into the CIC (or drilled) Employing a grid pattern of holes may also moderate the expansion of the CIC block.
An alternative fabrication process is to incorporate pre-cut pieces of quartz glass cloth, either woven or non-woven, or some other low-CTE reinforcement, in the footprint area directly beneath the chip. This additional layer of material could be impregnated with epoxy, or might rely on adjacent pre-preg for epoxy. Outside of this footprint region, normal e-glass pre-preg could be used. It may or may not be necessary to cut corresponding holes in the glass pre-preg to match the quartz inserts. One of ordinary skill in the art could determine this based on the final CTE design parameters.
Although illustrated and described herein with reference to certain specific embodiments, the present invention is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the spirit of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3290564 *||26 Feb 1963||6 Dec 1966||Texas Instruments Inc||Semiconductor device|
|US4654248 *||16 Dec 1985||31 Mar 1987||Gte Communication Systems Corporation||Printed wiring board with zones of controlled thermal coefficient of expansion|
|US4893172 *||13 Jan 1988||9 Jan 1990||Hitachi, Ltd.||Connecting structure for electronic part and method of manufacturing the same|
|US4914551 *||13 Jul 1988||3 Apr 1990||International Business Machines Corporation||Electronic package with heat spreader member|
|US4942076 *||3 Nov 1988||17 Jul 1990||Micro Substrates, Inc.||Ceramic substrate with metal filled via holes for hybrid microcircuits and method of making the same|
|US5086337 *||13 Sep 1988||4 Feb 1992||Hitachi, Ltd.||Connecting structure of electronic part and electronic device using the structure|
|US5216278 *||2 Mar 1992||1 Jun 1993||Motorola, Inc.||Semiconductor device having a pad array carrier package|
|US5325265 *||7 Jan 1992||28 Jun 1994||Mcnc||High performance integrated circuit chip package|
|US5338967 *||6 May 1993||16 Aug 1994||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Semiconductor device structure with plated heat sink and supporting substrate|
|US5473119 *||30 Dec 1994||5 Dec 1995||W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Stress-resistant circuit board|
|US5481136 *||11 Apr 1995||2 Jan 1996||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Semiconductor element-mounting composite heat-sink base|
|US5493153 *||26 Nov 1993||20 Feb 1996||Tokyo Tungsten Co., Ltd.||Plastic-packaged semiconductor device having a heat sink matched with a plastic package|
|US5572070 *||6 Feb 1995||5 Nov 1996||Rjr Polymers, Inc.||Integrated circuit packages with heat dissipation for high current load|
|US5574630 *||11 May 1995||12 Nov 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Laminated electronic package including a power/ground assembly|
|US5610442 *||27 Mar 1995||11 Mar 1997||Lsi Logic Corporation||Semiconductor device package fabrication method and apparatus|
|US5714803 *||28 Jul 1995||3 Feb 1998||Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc.||Low-profile removable ball-grid-array integrated circuit package|
|US5744863 *||7 Jun 1995||28 Apr 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Chip carrier modules with heat sinks attached by flexible-epoxy|
|US5777386 *||16 Aug 1996||7 Jul 1998||Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd.||Semiconductor device and mount structure thereof|
|US5786635 *||16 Dec 1996||28 Jul 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Electronic package with compressible heatsink structure|
|1||"Localized Control of Thermal Expansion in Electronic Assembly", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 39, No. 2, Feb. 1996.|
|2||C.N. Liu, "Matching the Thermal Coefficients of Expansion of Chips to Module Substrate," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 4666-4667 (May 1977).|
|3||*||C.N. Liu, Matching the Thermal Coefficients of Expansion of Chips to Module Substrate, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 4666 4667 (May 1977).|
|4||Dessauer, B., et al. "Copper-Clad Invar Heatsink", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985.|
|5||*||Dessauer, B., et al. Copper Clad Invar Heatsink , IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985.|
|6||Dietsch, H.E., et al., "Film on Metal Leaded Chip Carrier", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. Jun. 1988.|
|7||*||Dietsch, H.E., et al., Film on Metal Leaded Chip Carrier , IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. Jun. 1988.|
|8||Gazdik, C.E., et al., "Multilayer Polymer Substrate for Direct Chip Attachment", IBM Technical Bulletin, vol. 32, No. 3B, Aug. 1989.|
|9||*||Gazdik, C.E., et al., Multilayer Polymer Substrate for Direct Chip Attachment , IBM Technical Bulletin, vol. 32, No. 3B, Aug. 1989.|
|10||*||Localized Control of Thermal Expansion in Electronic Assembly , IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 39, No. 2, Feb. 1996.|
|11||Mok, L.S., "Thermal Management of Silicon-based Multichip Modules", Thomas J. Watson Research IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.|
|12||*||Mok, L.S., Thermal Management of Silicon based Multichip Modules , Thomas J. Watson Research IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.|
|13||Wilson, J.W., "A Low-Cost Metal Ball Grid Array for Flip Chip Die", IBM Microelectronics, Endicott, IEEE, 1995.|
|14||*||Wilson, J.W., A Low Cost Metal Ball Grid Array for Flip Chip Die , IBM Microelectronics, Endicott, IEEE, 1995.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6034425 *||17 Mar 1999||7 Mar 2000||Chipmos Technologies Inc.||Flat multiple-chip module micro ball grid array packaging|
|US6084300 *||8 Dec 1997||4 Jul 2000||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Compact resin-sealed semiconductor device|
|US6194782 *||24 Jun 1998||27 Feb 2001||Nortel Networks Limited||Mechanically-stabilized area-array device package|
|US6281592 *||4 Mar 1999||28 Aug 2001||Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd.||Package structure for semiconductor chip|
|US6291899 *||16 Feb 1999||18 Sep 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for reducing BGA warpage caused by encapsulation|
|US6329603||7 Apr 1999||11 Dec 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Low CTE power and ground planes|
|US6351393 *||2 Jul 1999||26 Feb 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Electronic package for electronic components and method of making same|
|US6373717 *||31 Mar 2000||16 Apr 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Electronic package with high density interconnect layer|
|US6380620 *||13 Aug 1999||30 Apr 2002||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Tape ball grid array semiconductor|
|US6387731||15 Jun 1999||14 May 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for reducing BGA warpage caused by encapsulation|
|US6472732 *||21 Mar 2000||29 Oct 2002||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||BGA package and method for fabricating the same|
|US6488405 *||8 Mar 2000||3 Dec 2002||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Flip chip defect analysis using liquid crystal|
|US6502926||30 Jan 2001||7 Jan 2003||Lexmark International, Inc.||Ink jet semiconductor chip structure|
|US6538213||18 Feb 2000||25 Mar 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||High density design for organic chip carriers|
|US6720502||15 May 2000||13 Apr 2004||International Business Machine Corporation||Integrated circuit structure|
|US6722031||7 Dec 2001||20 Apr 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for making printed circuit board having low coefficient of thermal expansion power/ground plane|
|US6759329||8 May 2003||6 Jul 2004||Ali Corporation||Internal circuit structure of semiconductor chip with array-type bonding pads and method of fabricating the same|
|US6762507||8 May 2003||13 Jul 2004||Ali Corporation||Internal circuit structure of semiconductor chip with array-type bonding pads and method of fabricating the same|
|US6816385 *||16 Nov 2000||9 Nov 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Compliant laminate connector|
|US6822320 *||25 Sep 2002||23 Nov 2004||Tessera, Inc.||Microelectronic connection components utilizing conductive cores and polymeric coatings|
|US6829823||5 Feb 2002||14 Dec 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of making a multi-layered interconnect structure|
|US6855574 *||6 Aug 2003||15 Feb 2005||Micron Technology, Inc.||Stress balanced semiconductor packages, method of fabrication and modified mold segment|
|US6887779||21 Nov 2003||3 May 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Integrated circuit structure|
|US6949880||17 Dec 1999||27 Sep 2005||Osram Opto Semiconductors Gmbh||Encapsulation for organic LED device|
|US6952078||17 Dec 1999||4 Oct 2005||Osram Opto Semiconductord Gmbh||Encapsulation for organic LED device|
|US6982491 *||20 Jan 2004||3 Jan 2006||Asat Ltd.||Sensor semiconductor package and method of manufacturing the same|
|US6992896||15 Sep 2003||31 Jan 2006||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Stacked chip electronic package having laminate carrier and method of making same|
|US7023707||24 Mar 2003||4 Apr 2006||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Information handling system|
|US7024764||7 Jan 2002||11 Apr 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of making an electronic package|
|US7035113||24 Mar 2003||25 Apr 2006||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Multi-chip electronic package having laminate carrier and method of making same|
|US7061102||11 Jun 2001||13 Jun 2006||Xilinx, Inc.||High performance flipchip package that incorporates heat removal with minimal thermal mismatch|
|US7084489||18 Aug 2004||1 Aug 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Computer system including at least one stress balanced semiconductor package|
|US7094975 *||20 Nov 2003||22 Aug 2006||Delphi Technologies, Inc.||Circuit board with localized stiffener for enhanced circuit component reliability|
|US7161810||30 Sep 2005||9 Jan 2007||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Stacked chip electronic package having laminate carrier and method of making same|
|US7166007||4 Nov 2004||23 Jan 2007||Osram Opto Semiconductors Gmbh||Encapsulation of electronic devices|
|US7253504||13 Dec 2004||7 Aug 2007||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Integrated circuit package and method|
|US7332818||12 May 2005||19 Feb 2008||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Multi-chip electronic package with reduced line skew and circuitized substrate for use therein|
|US7394153 *||20 Nov 2001||1 Jul 2008||Osram Opto Semiconductors Gmbh||Encapsulation of electronic devices|
|US7419842||12 Feb 2007||2 Sep 2008||Osram Gmbh||Encapsulation of electroluminescent devices with shaped spacers|
|US7432533||30 Sep 2002||7 Oct 2008||Osram Gmbh||Encapsulation of electronic devices with shaped spacers|
|US7473618||22 Apr 2008||6 Jan 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Temporary structure to reduce stress and warpage in a flip chip organic package|
|US7538432||18 Sep 2008||26 May 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Temporary structure to reduce stress and warpage in a flip chip organic package|
|US7622384||21 Dec 2007||24 Nov 2009||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Method of making multi-chip electronic package with reduced line skew|
|US7663248||14 Oct 2005||16 Feb 2010||Infineon Technologies Ag||Flip-chip component|
|US7665207||19 Jun 2006||23 Feb 2010||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Method of making a multi-chip electronic package having laminate carrier|
|US7670877||16 Oct 2007||2 Mar 2010||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Reliability enhancement process|
|US7719108||10 Jan 2005||18 May 2010||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Enhanced reliability semiconductor package|
|US7719109 *||29 Sep 2006||18 May 2010||Intel Corporation||Embedded capacitors for reducing package cracking|
|US8093714||10 Dec 2009||10 Jan 2012||Semtech Corporation||Chip assembly with chip-scale packaging|
|US8344360||17 Dec 1999||1 Jan 2013||Osram Opto Semiconductor Gmbh||Organic electronic devices with an encapsulation|
|US8367469||10 Jan 2012||5 Feb 2013||Semtech Corporation||Chip-scale semiconductor die packaging method|
|US8642896 *||17 Jun 2010||4 Feb 2014||Fujitsu Limited||Printed circuit board, printed circuit board fabrication method, and electronic device including printed circuit board|
|US8703540||15 Jan 2013||22 Apr 2014||Semtech Corporation||Chip-scale semiconductor die packaging method|
|US9041180||4 Jun 2014||26 May 2015||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Semiconductor package and method of manufacturing the semiconductor package|
|US20030025192 *||25 Sep 2002||6 Feb 2003||Tessera, Inc.||Forming microelectronic connection components by electrophoretic deposition|
|US20030062518 *||28 Sep 2001||3 Apr 2003||Mark Auch||Method for encapsulation of electronic devices|
|US20030160318 *||30 Sep 2002||28 Aug 2003||Ewald Guenther||Encapsulation of electronic devices with shaped spacers|
|US20040004278 *||8 May 2003||8 Jan 2004||Wen-Lung Cheng||Internal circuit structure of semiconductor chip with array-type bonding pads and method of fabricating the same|
|US20040004296 *||8 May 2003||8 Jan 2004||Wen-Lung Cheng|
|US20040038457 *||6 Aug 2003||26 Feb 2004||Thurgood Blaine J.||Stress balanced semiconductor packages, method of fabrication and modified mold segment|
|US20040099939 *||21 Nov 2003||27 May 2004||Alcoe David J.||Integrated circuit structure|
|US20040104463 *||23 Sep 2003||3 Jun 2004||Gorrell Robin E.||Crack resistant interconnect module|
|US20040150095 *||15 Sep 2003||5 Aug 2004||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Stacked chip electronic package having laminate carrier and method of making same|
|US20040150101 *||24 Mar 2003||5 Aug 2004||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Information handling system|
|US20040150114 *||24 Mar 2003||5 Aug 2004||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Multi-chip electronic package having laminate carrier and method of making same|
|US20040217471 *||27 Feb 2004||4 Nov 2004||Tessera, Inc.||Component and assemblies with ends offset downwardly|
|US20050018515 *||18 Aug 2004||27 Jan 2005||Thurgood Blaine J.||Stress balanced semiconductor packages, method of fabrication and modified mold segment|
|US20050064780 *||4 Nov 2004||24 Mar 2005||Osram Opto Semiconductors Gmbh, A German Corporation||Encapsulation of electronic devices|
|US20050109534 *||20 Nov 2003||26 May 2005||Chengalva Suresh K.||Circuit board with localized stiffener for enhanced circuit component reliability|
|US20060023439 *||30 Sep 2005||2 Feb 2006||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Stacked chip electronic package having laminate carrier and method of making same|
|US20060151581 *||10 Jan 2005||13 Jul 2006||Murphy William E||Reliability enhancement process|
|US20060240594 *||19 Jun 2006||26 Oct 2006||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Method of making stacked chip electronic package having laminate carrier|
|US20060255460 *||12 May 2005||16 Nov 2006||Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.||Multi-chip electronic package with reduced line skew, method of making same and information handling system utilizing same|
|US20070128765 *||12 Feb 2007||7 Jun 2007||Osram Gmbh||Encapsulation of electroluminescent devices with shaped spacers|
|US20080032455 *||16 Oct 2007||7 Feb 2008||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Reliability enhancement process|
|US20080096310 *||29 Sep 2006||24 Apr 2008||Mitul Modi||Embedded capacitors for reducing package cracking|
|US20080102562 *||21 Dec 2007||1 May 2008||Endicott Interconnect Tehnologies, Inc.||Method of making multi-chip electronic package with reduced line skew|
|US20090032913 *||24 Sep 2008||5 Feb 2009||Tessera, Inc.||Component and assemblies with ends offset downwardly|
|US20100326714 *||17 Jun 2010||30 Dec 2010||Fujitsu Limited||Printed circuit board, printed circuit board fabrication method, and electronic device including printed circuit board|
|US20110049702 *||23 Aug 2010||3 Mar 2011||Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd.||Semiconductor package and method of producing the same|
|US20110140260 *||10 Dec 2009||16 Jun 2011||Sierra Monolithics, Inc.||Chip assembly with chip-scale packaging|
|DE19931004A1 *||5 Jul 1999||1 Feb 2001||Tyco Electronics Logistics Ag||Chipmodul, insbesondere BGA-Package, mit einem Interconnect zur stressfreien Lötverbindung mit einer Leiterplatte|
|DE19931004C2 *||5 Jul 1999||7 Feb 2002||Tyco Electronics Logistics Ag||Chipmodul, insbesondere BGA-Package, mit einem Interconnect zur stressfreien Lötverbindung mit einer Leiterplatte|
|DE102004050178B3 *||14 Oct 2004||4 May 2006||Infineon Technologies Ag||Flip-Chip-Bauelement|
|DE102014008838A1||20 Jun 2014||24 Dec 2015||Kunststoff-Zentrum In Leipzig Gemeinnützige Gmbh||Spannungsreduzierendes Verbindungselement für ein Mikroelektroniksystem|
|DE102014008839A1||20 Jun 2014||24 Dec 2015||Kunststoff-Zentrum In Leipzig Gemeinnützige Gmbh||Dehnungskompensierendes Verbindungselement für ein Mikroelektroniksystem|
|EP1067601A1 *||5 Jul 2000||10 Jan 2001||Tyco Electronics Logistics AG||Chip module, in particular BGA package, with chip carrier for stress free solder connection to printed wiring board|
|EP1207727A2||12 Nov 2001||22 May 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Compliant laminate connector|
|WO2011071780A1 *||3 Dec 2010||16 Jun 2011||Semtech Corporation||Chip assembly with chip-scale packaging|
|U.S. Classification||257/778, 257/713, 257/338, 257/737, 257/780, 257/E23.006, 257/712, 257/E23.004|
|International Classification||H01L23/14, H01L23/13|
|Cooperative Classification||H01L2924/181, H01L2924/14, H01L2924/00014, H01L2924/12042, H01L24/48, H01L2224/48091, H01L2224/16225, H01L2224/73204, H01L2924/1532, H01L2924/01039, H01L2224/32225, H01L23/13, H01L2224/48227, H01L2924/15311, H01L2224/73265, H01L23/142|
|21 Apr 1997||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:APPELT, BERND KARL-HEINZ;FARQUHAR, DONALD SETON;JAPP, ROBERT MAYNARD;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:008504/0436;SIGNING DATES FROM 19970411 TO 19970416
|16 Nov 1999||CC||Certificate of correction|
|19 Sep 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|26 Sep 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|27 Sep 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|3 Sep 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036550/0001
Effective date: 20150629
|5 Oct 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC., CAYMAN ISLANDS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC;GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.;REEL/FRAME:036779/0001
Effective date: 20150910