US5876452A - Biodegradable implant - Google Patents

Biodegradable implant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5876452A
US5876452A US08/452,796 US45279695A US5876452A US 5876452 A US5876452 A US 5876452A US 45279695 A US45279695 A US 45279695A US 5876452 A US5876452 A US 5876452A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
implant
bone
polymer
cartilage
release
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/452,796
Inventor
Kyriacos A. Athanasiou
Barbara D. Boyan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Texas System
Original Assignee
University of Texas System
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/123,812 external-priority patent/US5607474A/en
Priority claimed from US08/196,970 external-priority patent/US6013853A/en
Application filed by University of Texas System filed Critical University of Texas System
Priority to US08/452,796 priority Critical patent/US5876452A/en
Assigned to BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM reassignment BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ATHANASIOU, KYRIACOS A., BOYAN, BARBARA D.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5876452A publication Critical patent/US5876452A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/14Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • A61L31/148Materials at least partially resorbable by the body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/28Bones
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/30756Cartilage endoprostheses
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/14Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/14Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • A61L31/146Porous materials, e.g. foams or sponges
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/3094Designing or manufacturing processes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/0077Special surfaces of prostheses, e.g. for improving ingrowth
    • A61F2002/0086Special surfaces of prostheses, e.g. for improving ingrowth for preferentially controlling or promoting the growth of specific types of cells or tissues
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/28Bones
    • A61F2002/2817Bone stimulation by chemical reactions or by osteogenic or biological products for enhancing ossification, e.g. by bone morphogenetic or morphogenic proteins [BMP] or by transforming growth factors [TGF]
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/28Bones
    • A61F2002/2835Bone graft implants for filling a bony defect or an endoprosthesis cavity, e.g. by synthetic material or biological material
    • A61F2002/2839Bone plugs or bone graft dowels
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2002/30001Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
    • A61F2002/30003Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30004Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis the prosthesis being made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30011Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis the prosthesis being made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in porosity
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2002/30001Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
    • A61F2002/30003Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30004Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis the prosthesis being made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30014Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis the prosthesis being made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in elasticity, stiffness or compressibility
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2002/30001Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
    • A61F2002/30003Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30004Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis the prosthesis being made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30032Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis the prosthesis being made from materials having different values of a given property at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in absorbability or resorbability, i.e. in absorption or resorption time
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2002/30001Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
    • A61F2002/30003Material related properties of the prosthesis or of a coating on the prosthesis
    • A61F2002/3006Properties of materials and coating materials
    • A61F2002/30062(bio)absorbable, biodegradable, bioerodable, (bio)resorbable, resorptive
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2002/30001Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
    • A61F2002/30108Shapes
    • A61F2002/30199Three-dimensional shapes
    • A61F2002/30224Three-dimensional shapes cylindrical
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2002/30001Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
    • A61F2002/30667Features concerning an interaction with the environment or a particular use of the prosthesis
    • A61F2002/30677Means for introducing or releasing pharmaceutical products, e.g. antibiotics, into the body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/30767Special external or bone-contacting surface, e.g. coating for improving bone ingrowth
    • A61F2002/3093Special external or bone-contacting surface, e.g. coating for improving bone ingrowth for promoting ingrowth of bone tissue
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/3094Designing or manufacturing processes
    • A61F2002/30971Laminates, i.e. layered products
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2210/00Particular material properties of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2210/0004Particular material properties of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof bioabsorbable
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2230/00Geometry of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2230/0063Three-dimensional shapes
    • A61F2230/0069Three-dimensional shapes cylindrical
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2240/00Manufacturing or designing of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2240/001Designing or manufacturing processes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2250/00Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2250/0014Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis
    • A61F2250/0018Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in elasticity, stiffness or compressibility
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2250/00Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2250/0014Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis
    • A61F2250/0023Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in porosity
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2250/00Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
    • A61F2250/0014Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis
    • A61F2250/003Special features of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof having different values of a given property or geometrical feature, e.g. mechanical property or material property, at different locations within the same prosthesis differing in adsorbability or resorbability, i.e. in adsorption or resorption time

Definitions

  • This invention is in the field of biodegradable polymeric tissue implant materials used as carriers for bioactive agents.
  • the implants of this invention provide a smooth, continuous release profile for such agents, and are especially useful for delivering growth factors for enhancing healing of bone and cartilage tissue.
  • biodegradable polymers have been used for controlled release of drugs including polyanhydrides (Mathiowitz, E., et al. (1988), "Polyanhydride Microspheres as Drug Carriers,” J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 35:755-774; Lucas, P. A. et al. (1990), "Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water-soluble proteins from bovine bone using a polyanhydride delivery vehicle," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 24:901-911; Masters, D. B., et al.
  • Aliphatic polyesters comprise another important class of biodegradable polymers.
  • Polymers of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) have been used as biodegradable implants for tissue repair for several decades.
  • PLA polylactic acid
  • PGA polyglycolic acid
  • Drug release in both cases appears to occur by essentially the same mechanism in vivo as in vitro, that is, by hydrolysis in an aqueous environment, and although one report appears to indicate that in the in vivo environment initiation of the degradation process is enhanced (Williams, D. F. (1979), "Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In-Vivo Degradation of Polymers," in Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials, ASTM STP 684, Syrett, B. C. and Acharya, A., eds., American Soc. for Testing and Materials 61-75), later reports appear to indicate that the in vivo degradation rate may be simulated in vitro using phosphate buffer solution.
  • Macroscopic devices such as cylinders about 3 ⁇ 20 mm of polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid copolymers may degrade at the same rate in vivo as in vitro and cleavage may be due to simple hydrolysis with no enzymatic contributions.
  • Aliphatic polyesters such as polymers based on lactic acid, glycolic acid and their copolymers appear to degrade by a bulk erosion process, so that rate of drug release from monolithic devices may not be either linear or predictable.
  • These copolymers displaying bulk or homogenous erosion may display significant degradation in the matrix interior, which may result in "dose-dumping" in contrast to surface eroding systems such as those composed of polyanhydrides.
  • Laser, R. (1990) "New Methods of Drug Delivery," Science 249:1527-1533.
  • glycolic acid:lactic acid copolymers appear to be described as inherently hydrophilic and useful for release of more hydrophobic drugs.
  • Gilding, D. K. (1981) "Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery--poly(glycolic)/poly(lactic acid) homo and copolymers: 2. In vitro degradation," Polymer 22:494-498.
  • Microspheres made of 75/25 polylactic/polyglycolic acid copolymers and molecular weights of 14 kDa or less appear to have released proteins over a four to six week period.
  • PCT Publication WO 91/09079 published Jun. 27, 1991 by Farmitalia Carlo Erba S.R.L. for "Use of Supercritical Fluids to Obtain Porous Sponges of Biodegradable Polymers” appears to describe the use of supercritical fluids to manufacture porous microspheres for drug delivery.
  • PCT Publication WO 92/11844 published Jul. 23, 1992 by Enzytech, Inc. for "Stabilization of Proteins by Cationic Biopolymers” appears to describe a method for incorporation of proteins in the form of specific noncovalent complexes with polycationic reagents into sustained release systems which are polymeric microcapsules.
  • U.K. Patent Application No. 2 209 937 A published Jun. 1, 1989 appears to disclose the use of ground polymers as continuous drug release agents.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,883,666 to Sabel et al. issued Nov. 28, 1989 for "Controlled Drug Delivery System for Treatment of Neural Disorders” appears to disclose the use of 3 mm diameter discs with pinholes therein for linear release of drugs.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,962,091 to Eppstein et al. issued Oct. 9, 1990 for "Controlled Release of Macromolecular Polypeptides” appears to disclose polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymeric films and coated wires which release growth factors including TGF- ⁇ over a period of up to 100 days.
  • the polymers appear to comprise a microsuspension of polypeptide and other water-soluble components in which the particles have a diameter of 10 microns or less.
  • Polymeric implants used for drug release appear to include those formed from polylactic and polyglycolic acid polymers and copolymers.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,312 to Reuter et al. issued Mar. 8, 1977 for "Prolonged Release Drug Form for the Treatment of Bovine Mastitis” appears to disclose a cylindrical bougie for insertion into the teat canal of a polymer and an antimicrobial agent dispersed therein.
  • Implants of polylactic or polyglycolic acid polymers or copolymers appears to have been used in bone healing applications.
  • the sodium fluoride appears to have been released in a high initial burst followed by a decrease over a period of several days to a steady state. It appears that best healing was shown in rabbits having the sodium fluoride implants after eight weeks.
  • Biodegradable polymeric scaffold systems seeded with cells appear to be useful for culture of specific types of cells in vitro.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,489 to Naughton et al. issued Oct. 16, 1990 for "Three-Dimensional Cell and Tissue Culture System,” appear to disclose the use of a polymeric matrix which may be made of polyglycolic acid polymers, for culture of cells such as skin, liver, pancreas, bone marrow, osteoblasts and chondrocytes, etc. in vitro.
  • the seeded matrix may be transplanted in vivo.
  • Polymeric scaffolds seeded with cells for cellular growth and implantation for cartilage regeneration made from polyglycolic acid/polylactic acid copolymers appear to be disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,041,138 to Vacanti, et al. issued Aug. 20, 1991 for "Neomorphogenesis of Cartilage in Vivo from Cell Culture.” This patent appears to teach that growth factors may be incorporated into the polymers but does not appear to provide any methods for doing so. The patent also appears to teach that implantation of the polymeric scaffolding alone without chondrocytes does not result in cartilage formation. Freed, L. E., et al.
  • BMP bone morphogenic protein
  • PDGF platelet-derived growth factor
  • EGF epidermal growth factor
  • IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor-1
  • bFGF basic fibroblast growth factor
  • TGF- ⁇ transforming growth factor- ⁇
  • basic fibroblast growth factor appears to be a mitogen for many different cells. However, this growth factor appears to lose most of its activity when subjected to organic solvents and heat in making controlled release implants.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,100,668 to Edelman et al. issued Mar. 31, 1992 appears to discuss systems for controlled release of bFGF, and apparently reveals a high initial release.
  • Thyroid-derived chondrocyte stimulating factor appears to be described in PCT Publication WO 92/14749 by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University Sep. 3, 1992, as useful for the culture of chondrocytes in vivo and for developing cartilage implants in vitro and for in vivo use in cartilage and bone defect repair. It does not appear that any methods for making implants or release kinetics are taught.
  • PCT Publication WO 93/15767 by Merck & Co, Inc. Aug. 19, 1993 appears to disclose implants made of bioerodible polymers selected from poly(orthoester) or polyacetal and a prostaglandin or ⁇ -estradiol implanted at the site of desired bone growth as useful in bone healing.
  • TGF- ⁇ Transforming Growth Factor ⁇
  • compositions for Repair of Cartilage and Bone appear to disclose a biodegradable viscoelastic matrix dipped in a solution comprising chondrocytes or osteoblasts which have been cultured in a medium containing TGF- ⁇ used for bone and cartilage repair.
  • the growth factor does not appear to be incorporated into the polymer.
  • TGF- ⁇ is released in a latent form at a fracture site, and activated by proteolytic enzymes.
  • TGF- ⁇ may be involved in bone remodeling, promote conversion of mesenchymal cells into cartilage cells and enhance production of collagen, fibronectin and plasminogen activating factor in osteoblasts.
  • TGF- ⁇ belongs to a family of factors, including two cartilage induction factors previously known as CIF-A and CIF-B, now known as TGF- ⁇ 1 and TGF- ⁇ 2 , inhibin, and the BMP's.
  • TGF- ⁇ is known for its antiproliferative effects on cells, particularly epithelial cells, but inhibition is also common for mesenchymal cells such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells. In some cases such effects correlate with augmented cellular differentiation. TGF- ⁇ has been shown to have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on proliferation of cultured osteoblasts in different studies. It has been shown to be crucial for wound healing, and is transformed to its active form under acidic conditions such as those produced by bone resorption or macrophages.
  • U.S. patent application 07/914,992 filed Jul. 16, 1992 discloses a resorbable implant based on independently gelling polymers of a single enantiomeric lactide. Said implant is capable of carrying a bioactive compound; however, said bioactive material is not released in a continuous manner over a period as long as eight weeks.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a two-phase layered structure/material
  • FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view along plane A--A of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view along plane B--B of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an example of a physiological system prepared for implantation of a tissue structure/material.
  • FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an example of a physiological system implanted with a tissue structure/material.
  • FIG. 4 is a cumulative release profile of polypeptide from an implant over a ten-week period. The release kinetics follow a sigmoidal pattern and more than 95% of the original polypeptide is released.
  • FIG. 5 shows changes in average molecular weight over 10 weeks. A 34% reduction in molecular weight is seen in both experimental and control implants in the first week. The molecular weight then decreases gradually until it has decreased to 1 kD by four weeks.
  • FIG. 6 displays changes in surface axial strain measured one hour after application of a 0.87N step load under conditions of creep indentation.
  • a biodegradable, porous, polymeric implant structural material which includes a bioactive agent which is preferably uniformly incorporated therein.
  • the implant material provides continuous, smooth release of the bioactive agent over all or some of the degradation period of the polymer.
  • the bioactive agent is released at all times during which the polymer remains undegraded.
  • the bioactive agent may be any substance, such as a therapeutic agent or enzyme, whose controlled, continuous release over a prolonged period (e.g., some or all of the degradation period of the polymer) is desired.
  • the bioactive agent is preferably hydrophobic, i.e. does not readily dissolve in water.
  • the bioactive agent is a protein, such as a degradation enzyme, cytokine or cytokine inhibitor, and more preferably a growth factor. Osteochondral growth factors are preferred.
  • Preferred growth factors include platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), thyroid-derived chondrocyte stimulating factor (TDCSF), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF- ⁇ ). TGF- ⁇ and growth factors having similar properties are more preferred.
  • PDGF platelet-derived growth factor
  • EGF epidermal growth factor
  • IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor-1
  • bFGF basic fibroblast growth factor
  • TDCSF thyroid-derived chondrocyte stimulating factor
  • BMP bone morphogenetic protein
  • TGF- ⁇ and growth factors having similar properties are more preferred.
  • combinations of bioactive agents may be used.
  • the bioactive agents may be derived from a variety of sources, synthetic and natural, and include recombinant polypeptides.
  • the amount of bioactive material in the implant structural material may be adjusted to achieve the desired dosage.
  • the implant material contains between about 0.01 ng and about 1 mg of the bioactive agent per milliliter of polymer or polymeric implant material.
  • continuous means that bioactive agent is released constantly without substantial interruption.
  • implant material referring to the implant material and "uniformly incorporated,” referring to the bioactive agent, means that the chemical makeup of the implant material is substantially uniform throughout.
  • the implant material preferably does not contain pockets of encapsulated bioactive agents or other materials. Its microporosity is also preferably substantially uniform.
  • smooth means that the graph of the cumulative amount of bioactive agent released over time rises smoothly without substantial and sudden changes in the slope of the curve (see e.g., FIG. 4, which shows a “smooth” graph of the cumulative amount of bioactive agent released over time).
  • the implant material preferably has a micropore size between about 50 and about 200 micrometers. More preferably the porosity of the implant matches the porosity of the tissue into which the implant material is intended to be placed. Preferably the porosity of the implant material accounts for more than 50% of the implant material's volume.
  • the implant material may also comprise a plurality of passages (macropores) having a preferred diameter between about 1.0 and about 2.0 mm. The pores and passages are preferably designed to facilitate ingrowth of tissue into the implant in the in vivo environment.
  • the implant material may contain cells seeded into the implant or cultured therein in an in vitro environment prior to implantation.
  • the implant structure/material is preferably composed. of an aliphatic polyester, more preferably comprising polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and mixtures thereof, and most preferably is composed of a 50:50 mixture of copolymer of PLA and PGA.
  • the polymer preferably has an average molecular weight between about 10,000 daltons and about 100,000 daltons prior to use, preferably between about 40,000 daltons and about 70,000 daltons.
  • the polymeric implant structure/material may be manufactured so as to have mechanical properties, e.g. stiffness and compressibility, matching those of the surrounding tissue.
  • Implant materials having mechanical properties matching those of bone, cartilage, tendon, skin, ligament, cementum, etc. may be manufactured by the processes of this invention.
  • the implant structure/material may be used to make various types of implants.
  • the implants are used for tissue healing, more preferably healing of osteochondral defects.
  • the implant structure/material of this invention may be used in combination with other phases, layers, or supporting structures.
  • Preferred implants of this invention are the two-phase layered biodegradable polymeric implants described in U.S. Ser. No. 08/123,812 filed Sep. 20, 1993, incorporated herein by reference. Most preferred are two-phase implants having one phase with mechanical properties and/or porosity matching those of bone and a second phase with mechanical properties and/or porosity matching those of cartilage.
  • the bioactive agent may be incorporated into both phases or, preferably, only into the bone or cartilage phase.
  • Another preferred embodiment of this invention is a single-phase implant having the mechanical properties and porosity of cartilage or bone and incorporating one or more bioactive agents.
  • the polymeric implant may be any size or shape.
  • a preferable shape is cylindrical.
  • a preferable size is less than or equal to about 1 cm ⁇ 1 cm for an implant to be inserted at a bone/cartilage juncture.
  • first bioerodible polymeric structure/material 14 and a second bioerodible polymeric structure/material 12 are preferably made from a copolymer-based material of polyglycolic acid (PLG) and polylactic acid (PLA) in a 50/50 concentration of each. Also present in the PLA/PLG copolymer material may be an enzyme homogeneously dispersed within the copolymer which may enhance the degradation of the polymeric substance.
  • PLA polyglycolic acid
  • PLA polylactic acid
  • Also present in the PLA/PLG copolymer material may be an enzyme homogeneously dispersed within the copolymer which may enhance the degradation of the polymeric substance.
  • first structure/material 14 is bonded to second structure/material 12, wherein structure/material 14 includes a body having dissimilar mechanical and porosity properties from material 12.
  • Materials 14 and 12 may both include enzymes and therapeutic agents in addition to numerous pores 16 and 18 formed within first structure/material 14 and second structure/material 12, respectively.
  • Pore size varies depending upon the process by which structures/materials 12 and 14 are processed. Preferably, porosity within each structure/material 12 or structure/material 14 is more than 50% of the respective structure/material volumetric area.
  • pore size can range between 50 and 200 ⁇ m. However, it is to be appreciated that pore density as well as pore size can vary outside these ranges depending upon the particular manufacturing process chosen, as described herein below.
  • structure/material 12 is manufactured having a porosity which generally matches the porosity of the surrounding tissue into which carrier/implant 10 is placed.
  • structure/material 14 can be manufactured to a porosity substantially equal to its surrounding tissue.
  • the method of manufacturing carrier/implant 10 can be quickly and easily altered to contain pores of varying size and density.
  • Carrier/implant 10 can also be perforated with a plurality of passages 20 extending partially or completely through carrier/implant 10. Passages 20 are suitably placed to provide additional sites or locations into or onto which surrounding tissue can enter and/or temporarily bond. Passages 20 are generally larger in diameter than pores 16 or 18 and can be mechanically placed as described below.
  • structure/material 12 is shown having numerous access sites or locations formed by pores 16 and passages 20.
  • structure/material 14 is less porous than structure/material 12 to substantially match a less porous tissue surrounding structure/material 14 than the tissue surrounding structure/material 12.
  • structure/material 12 and 14 can be manufactured having porosity and mechanical properties (such as stiffness and compressibility) to substantially match the porosity and/or mechanical properties of surrounding tissue into which structure/material 12 and 14 is placed.
  • Tissue carrier/implant 10 having structure/materials 12 and 14 of possibly different porosity and/or mechanical properties, is particularly adapted for placement into a juncture region adjoining tissue areas having dissimilar porosity and/or mechanical properties. Structure/materials within carrier/implant 10 correspondingly can be processed to have porosity and mechanical properties such as stiffness, compressibility etc. to substantially match the properties of the tissue juncture region after implantation.
  • a physiological environment into which carrier/implant 10 can be placed includes, but is not limited to, a human or animal articular cartilage and underlying bone. Carrier/implant 10 is shown insertable into a bore 22 through skin 24, through underlying cartilage 26 and into bone 28.
  • carrier/implant 10 can be placed entirely within bone 28 to provide structural support to the juncture region between cortical bone and cancellous bone. Accordingly, bore 22 and implantable carrier/implant 10 can be placed into any physiological system having a juncture between dissimilar types of tissue.
  • tissue includes cellular structure/material found subdermally anywhere within an animal or human anatomy. Any region joining two dissimilar types of tissue (i.e., bone, cartilage, tendon, skin, ligament, cementum, etc.) can be implanted with the bonded dissimilar structure/materials 12 and 14 of carrier/implant 10. By bonding each structure/material together and implanting the combination within a tissue juncture, carrier/implant 10 ensures the tissue juncture remains together during the repair process, which may help to promote rapid healing.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates carrier/implant 10 fully implanted within dissimilar tissue regions, e.g., cartilage 26 and bone 28. After inserting carrier/implant 10 through hole 22, outer skin 24 is sutured over the bore passage to prevent infection from entering the underlying region.
  • carrier/implant 10 is produced in any desired shape with differing porosity and/or mechanical characteristics depending upon the size and composition of the target area.
  • carrier/implant 10 is cylindrical in shape having an outer diameter generally matching the inner diameter of a bore or hole 22 created in the region of interest.
  • other shapes can be produced and inserted into the hole. Regardless of the shape used, the carrier/implant can expand to match the internal cavity or bore size prior to or during the bioerodible process.
  • the proportionate sizes of structure/material 12 and 14 can be varied depending upon the relative location of carrier/implant 10 in relation to the interface region.
  • cartilage 26 may be thicker than that indicated in FIG. 3 such that its thickness would be equal to or greater than the bore 22 depth into bone 28. Consequently, structure/material 14 can be made larger or thicker than structure/material 12 to correspond with the relative shift in boundary between cartilage 26 and bone 28.
  • Bone 28 generally presents a less porous and stiffer structure/material than overlying cartilage 26. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 3, pores 18 can be made relatively smaller than pores 16. Accorded access sites or locations into pores 18 and 16 are dissimilar to generally match surrounding bone 28 and tissue 26, respectively. During the time in which bone 28 and cartilage 26 tissue regenerate and grow into the damaged region partially replaced with carrier/implant 10 and pores 18 and 16, respectively, carrier/implant 10 maintains a somewhat rigid support structure. As the structure of carrier/implant 10 gradually erodes or dissolves, regeneration of tissue takes place which replaces the structural support lost during erosion.
  • the present invention serves to provide better anchorage of regenerated tissue in the damaged or defective region and also provides a temporary support structure which need not be subsequently removed as in conventional rods and pins.
  • the bioerodible carrier/implant 10 is particularly useful in juncture regions where slow healing occurs due to lack of vasculature or cell population.
  • carrier/implant 10 is insertable as a press-fit in the osteochondral defect region.
  • the swelling characteristics of the bioerodible structure/material 14 and 12 is expected to improve retention of carrier/implant 10 within the defect region.
  • Comparable porosity and/or mechanical properties of structure/materials 14 and 12 to that of surrounding tissue avoids stress concentrations during joint articulation.
  • Confocal laser scanning micrographs of carrier/implant 10 may illustrate carrier/implant 10 having pores 16 and 18 of varying sizes.
  • the carrier/implant 10 is generally microporous and its pores are preferably interconnected throughout the cross-sectional area of the structure/material.
  • the polymeric implant material of this invention may comprise other additives such as surfactants, solubilization enhancers and the like.
  • SA Serum Albumin
  • BSA Bovine Serum Albumin
  • HSA Human Serum Albumin
  • Some commercial preparations of desired bioactive agents is contain HSA, e.g., TGF- ⁇ of R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn. 55413, which contains 50 ⁇ g HSA/ ⁇ g recombinant human TGF- ⁇ 1 . It is preferred that the amount of serum albumin be kept to less than about 100 ⁇ g SA/ ⁇ g bioactive agent.
  • serum albumin may prevent uptake of polypeptides by the polymer during implant manufacture and may alter in vivo release kinetics (such as causing an initial large burst of polypeptide to be released after implantation).
  • serum albumin When serum albumin is kept to a minimum, the polypeptide may be incorporated into and onto the polymer so that it is continuously and smoothly released over some or all of the degradation period of the implant.
  • the implant material of this invention is capable of releasing the bioactive agent over its entire period of degradation.
  • this release period is at least about six weeks up to about twelve weeks and more preferably, at least about eight weeks up to about ten weeks.
  • superior cartilage healing occurs when the growth factor is released over such a period of time.
  • the invention also relates to a method of making a biodegradable, porous, polymeric implant material having a biologically active agent incorporated therein, which during use in an in vivo environment preferably provides substantially continuous release of the bioactive agent over some or all of the degradation period of the polymer, comprising:
  • a. solubilization of said polymer in a suitable organic solvent to form a first solution Any organic material capable of solubilizing the polymer may be used so long as evaporation of the solvent does not leave residues which cannot be removed and which would deleteriously alter the bioactive agent or polymer.
  • Any organic material capable of solubilizing the polymer may be used so long as evaporation of the solvent does not leave residues which cannot be removed and which would deleteriously alter the bioactive agent or polymer.
  • Acetone and methylene chloride are preferred solvents with acetone being most preferred.
  • a second solution or suspension preferably an aqueous solution or suspension
  • said bioactive agent preferably an aqueous solution or suspension
  • Solubility enhancers such as surfactants as known to the art may be included as required.
  • Bis phosphate which retards or inhibits osteoclasts may be included, for example in patients suffering from osteoporosis, where bone formation is difficult to achieve, in part because osteoclasts are overactive. Otherwise bis phosphate would not be a desirable additive. It is preferred that less than about 100 ⁇ g serum albumin per ⁇ g bioactive agent be used.
  • the above steps are preferably performed at a temperature below the degradation temperature of the bioactive agent, e.g. preferably not more than about 42° C. when TGF- ⁇ is the bioactive agent. It is preferred that the completed implants be stored at low temperatures, e.g., about -50° C., prior to use so as to inhibit degradation of bioactive agents such as TGF- ⁇ which tend to degrade when stored at room temperature.
  • the solid mass is subjected to vacuum in a lyophilizer at room temperature for at least about twenty hours.
  • the polymer prior to this step, is subjected to vacuum via vacuum pump, e.g., about 20 millibars in a desiccator and rolled flat in several stages.
  • the vacuum treatments help cause the polymer to achieve the desired porosity.
  • a uniform porosity with an average pore size between about 50 and about 200 micrometers with pores accounting for more than about 50% of the implant volume is achieved.
  • the viscosity of the polymer and the magnitude and duration of vacuum, as well as temperature conditions can be varied to vary the porosity.
  • Uniform incorporation of the bioactive agent into the polymeric implant material may be achieved by solubilizing the polymer and mixing therewith a uniform solution or suspension of the bioactive agent such that the agent is substantially evenly distributed in the solution. Thereafter, the solvent may be removed, preferably by precipitation followed by treatment with low vacuum, and the polymer may be pressed into a mold and subjected to relatively high vacuum, e.g. about 8-20 ⁇ bars, until an implant material having the desired porosity and/or mechanical properties is achieved.
  • relatively high vacuum e.g. about 8-20 ⁇ bars
  • the method may also be varied in order to produce an implant material having mechanical properties and porosity matching those of the target tissues as described above.
  • the implant material is to have the properties of bone, it is preferably subjected to oven curing, preferably at a temperature of between about 40° and about 47° C. for a period of up to about 48 hours.
  • the temperature is preferably kept below temperatures which would cause substantial degradation of the bioactive agent.
  • the preferred method also involves piercing the polymer inside the mold with pins or other sharp implements prior to vacuum treatment in the lyophilizer so as to form passages through the implant having an average diameter of about 1.0 to about 2.0 mm.
  • the pins or other sharp implements are placed inside the mold and left there during the curing process to form the passages.
  • such passages are placed substantially parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the implant and are spaced apart from each other a distance of about 1 to about 2 mm.
  • a method for using the implant material of this invention allows continuous in vivo delivery to a patient of a regulated amount of a bioactive agent for a desired time period and includes implanting into tissue of said patient a porous implant material including a biodegradable polymer with a bioactive agent incorporated therein, said bioactive agent being present in an amount sufficient to provide a therapeutically effective dosage, and said implant material being present in an amount sufficient to degrade over the desired time period.
  • a "regulated amount" of bioactive agent is an amount with a defined and predictable dosage at any given time.
  • the implant materials of this invention are capable of delivering bioactive agents in slowly increasing amounts, rising to a predictable maximum peak, and slowly descending to a minimum amount. This predictability of release allows for the design of implants for delivering effective, non-toxic amounts of bioactive agents over a desired time period. This predictability of release also allows for the design of implants for delivering substantially low amounts of bioactive agents during the first weeks of use.
  • an implant composed of the biodegradable implant material of this invention is used for healing osteochondral defects and the bioactive agent is a growth factor, such as TGF- ⁇ 1 .
  • the implant material of this invention is preferably present in an amount sufficient to provide a release period of eight weeks.
  • the implant materials of this invention are especially well-suited to promote healing of osteochondral tissue, and in particular articular cartilage defects.
  • superior cartilage healing may be achieved using an implant made with the materials of this invention capable of controlled, smooth release of TGF- ⁇ over a period of at least about eight weeks.
  • the implant material of a preferred embodiment has an average pore size between about 50 and about 200 ⁇ m and its porosity accounts for more than 50% of its total volume. In addition, it has passages or macropores having a diameter of between about 1.0 and about 2.0 mm.
  • the implant thus forms a scaffolding which promotes the flow of body fluids and allows ingrowth of cartilage cells during the healing process.
  • TGF- ⁇ is uniformly incorporated in the polymer by the method disclosed herein, it has a chemotactic effect in promoting cell ingrowth and, in the in vivo environment surrounding the newly ingrowing cells, becomes released, in turn stimulating differentiation of the cartilage cells. Meanwhile, the polymer biodegrades by hydrolysis and the healing tissue fills the space.
  • the growth factor be continuously available over the entire healing period. Moreover, it is preferred that a reduced amount of growth factor be initially released. Furthermore, such a reduced amount of growth factor is preferably released while the implant is degrading at a substantially higher rate (on a percentage basis) than the growth factor is being released. If a relatively large amount of growth factor were to be released within the first few days of the healing process it is possible that such an initial burst might prevent migration of relatively undifferentiated mesenchymal cells throughout the defect by causing too early cell differentiation of chondrocytes. In tissues such as cartilage, where a surplus of mesenchymal cells is typically not available to migrate into the defect, it is preferable to ensure that those which are available are able to do so. Comparative data show improved migration of cells into the implant material when TGF- ⁇ is present.
  • the bioactive material is intimately associated with the polymer. Tests of polymer fragments broken off during the degradation process have shown that they have growth factor attached. Thus, a continuous smooth release of growth factor may be provided over the entire degradation period of the polymer.
  • the implant materials of this invention preferably mimic the mechanical properties and porosity of the tissues in which they are placed.
  • the methods of this invention allow the stiffness and compressibility as well as the porosity of the material to be varied as desired. Methods of testing such properties are well-known to the art, for example via measurements of creep deformation and stress relaxation as described in co-pending U.S. patent application 07/837,401 incorporated herein by reference. Numerical values for various mechanical properties of tissues are also known to the art, for example, with respect to articular cartilage, compressive stiffness is in the range of 0.79 MPa ⁇ 0.36 (Armstrong, C. G., et al.
  • Ligaments and tendons lack compressive stiffness. Ligaments have a tensile stiffness of about 600 MPa (Woo, S. et al. (1987), "The Biomechanical and Morphological Changes in the Medial Collateral Ligament of the Rabbit after Immobilization and Remobilization,” J.
  • the viscosity of the polymer may be varied, as well as the amount and rate of vacuum applied, compression applied prior to curing, and during curing, as well as curing temperature and temperatures during application of vacuum, and time periods for various process steps. These conditions may be varied in accordance with the properties desired in the implant material.
  • the process preferably utilizes higher vacuums while the polymer is wet. Rolling of the polymer at this stage tends to increase surface area leading to faster evaporation, breaking bubbles of trapped solvents and tending to cause formation of numerous pores.
  • the polymeric material is naturally elastic to visco-elastic, and may be made stiffer by longer curing at higher temperatures, and by higher vacuum to reduce solvent content of precipitants.
  • the implant materials of this invention may also include enzymes, cytokines, hormones, and medicinal substances for which a controlled, predictable release pattern is desired.
  • the invention has been illustrated using trypsin inhibitor as well as TGF- ⁇ .
  • the methods of making this invention include the use of polymeric materials of selected molecular weights.
  • a way to adjust the degradation period of biodegradable polymers is by control of molecular weight.
  • the degradation period is further a function of the mechanical properties and physical conformation of the implant material.
  • Applicants have found that their polymers do not show the type of bulk degradation found by prior workers to result in "dose dumping.” Instead, the implants of this invention deliver a smooth, predictable, amount of bioactive material over a predictable period of time, and may thus be used in therapeutic methods where accurate prediction of drug release is required so that dosage can be regulated within effective, non-toxic levels.
  • a two-phase implant comprising a bone phase and a cartilage phase is prepared substantially according to the method of U.S. patent application 08/123,812.
  • the bioactive agent, trypsin inhibitor (TI) is added only to the cartilage phase.
  • 50:50 poly(DL lactide co-glycolide) (PLG) copolymer with a small inherent viscosity and weight average molecular weight of 53 kD is solubilized in 6 ml acetone per 1 g of polymer and precipitated with 10 ml of ethanol per 1 g of polymers to form a solid, gummy mass.
  • Three mg of trypsin inhibitor (TI) is added per implant.
  • the bone phase contains 0.0675 g of polymer.
  • the cartilage phase which has the TI, contains 0.043 g of polymer.
  • the polymer is packed into a teflon mold and subjected to 10 m Torr vacuum at 4° C. for 24 hours, partially removed, and placed in a lyophilizer under the same conditions for another 24 hours.
  • the implants are completely removed from the mold and stored in the lyophilizer until tested.
  • the implants have a size of 4 mm diameter ⁇ 6 mm deep.
  • PBS phosphate buffered saline
  • TI release characteristics are quantified using the micro bichinonic acid (BCA) assay for protein content.
  • Implant degradation is monitored by measuring molecular weight using gel permeation chromatography, examining compressive properties (using an automated mechanical tester which measures stress relaxation and creep deformation), and performing scanning electron microscopy and gross morphology evaluations to quantitatively observe implant temporal changes.
  • FIG. 4 displays the cumulative percent release of TI from the carrier over the ten-week period. The release kinetics follow a sigmoidal pattern.
  • FIG. 5 displays the temporal change in average molecular weight.
  • the initial molecular weight of the carrier implant and control are 52.5 Kilo Dalton ("kD") and 60 kD respectively.
  • kD Kilo Dalton
  • a 34% reduction in molecular weight is seen in both groups during the first week, followed by a continued steady decrease until the molecular weight has decreased to less than 1 kD by the fourth week. There are no significant differences between the two groups at any time period.
  • FIG. 6 displays the temporal changes in surface axial strain, always measured at one hour after application of a 0.87N step load under conditions of creep indentation. There is a significant decrease during the first week of testing in both groups, followed by an increase during weeks 2-4.
  • the TI is released in a progressive, time-dependent fashion instead of in a rapid, burst release. Approximately 95% of the TI originally placed in the implant is released in a gradual fashion over the ten-week test period. This indicates that the TI is intimately associated with the polymer, probably due to its hydrophobic nature, and diffuses into the PBS together with the polymer fragments. Changes in polymer chain length and material weight parallel the release kinetics of TI. The lack of significant TI release (the release was less than 10%) during the first three weeks appears to be advantageous. It also suggests that breakdown of implant structure above a threshold level may be necessary to achieve higher levels of release. Furthermore, TI does not alter the degradation kinetics of the polymer, although there are distinct morphologic differences, supporting the hypothesis that polymer breakdown is the underlying mechanism of TI release.
  • the decrease in surface axial strain seen at one week indicates an increase in stiffness of the implants, probably due to an initial increase in crystallinity caused by hydrolytic scission of the amorphous regions. It is possible that the PLG material used in the present study has a very low degree of crystallinity, which increases upon degradation and manifests itself in a change in mechanical properties of the implant. The subsequent, twofold increase in surface axial strain indicates decreased stiffness of the implants, likely resulting from the ongoing, continuous breakdown of implant integrity due to polymer degradation.
  • the inventors suggest that the original homogenous implant placed in buffered saline or in the in vivo environment immediately begins to undergo hydrolytic scission of ester bonds.
  • the implants originally maintain their structural integrity despite the drop in their molecular weight in the first four weeks.
  • the initial degradation process is probably more pronounced at the surface of the implant compared to the core because the degradation products formed at the surface are able to freely diffuse into the PBS. This surface diffusion could contribute to the small release of TI seen in the first three weeks. It is likely that the breakdown products and TI released at the center could result in an increase in osmolarity which may have resulted in swelling.
  • the surface of the implant no longer has the ability to halt TI exudation from the center, thus causing rapid TI release. This is supported by the increase in porosity seen with scanning electron microscopy with time.
  • Two-phase biodegradable implants are designed and constructed using 50:50 poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) with inherent viscosity of 0.71 dl/gm (weight average molecular weight 65 kD).
  • PLG poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide)
  • the implant consists of a "bone” phase that abuts against the underlying bone for anchoring and a "cartilage” phase which interfaces with the adjacent layer of articular cartilage.
  • the polymer is solubilized in acetone and precipitated with ethanol.
  • the gummy "bone” composite is placed under 10 m Torr vacuum for six hours and then packed into a Teflon mold under 10 mTorr and 24° C. for 24 hours.
  • TGF- ⁇ Transforming Growth Factor- ⁇
  • the growth factor, recombinant human TGF- ⁇ 1 is solubilized in sterile water, stirred overnight and added to the soft polymer. 2 ⁇ g TGF- ⁇ 1 is dissolved in 0.2 ml sterile water.
  • the TGF- ⁇ preparation provided by R&D Systems contains 100 ⁇ g HSA.
  • the sterile water contains 0.1 mg/ml BSA for implants to be used with rabbits and 0.1 mg/ml of goat serum albumin (GSA) for implants to be used with goats.
  • GSA goat serum albumin
  • the appropriate volume of solution to give a total of 50 ng of TGF- ⁇ is used in the "cartilage" phase only of each implant.
  • the two-phase implants are placed in the mold under 10 mTorr and 4° C. for 24 hours, partially removed, and placed in a lyophilizer under the same conditions for another 24 hours. At the end of the curing period, the implants are completely removed from the mold and stored in the lyophilizer until required for implantation into the host.
  • the curing techniques used for the two phases render the implant porous and the "cartilage” phase softer than the "bone” phase.
  • the two phases are mechanically tested using an automated indenter and modeled using the linear biphasic theory (Mow, V. C. et. al. (1980), J. Biomech. Eng. 102:73-84).
  • Cylindrical, 4 mm ⁇ 6 mm, full-thickness defects are created with a low-speed drill, under saline irrigation, in the central posterior medial condyle of each right knee joint, through a posteromedial approach.
  • Defects are filled with carriers containing 50 ng of TGF- ⁇ , implants without growth factor, or are left empty as controls.
  • the animals are allowed free cage activity for either four or eight weeks, prior to sacrifice. A total of 72 New Zealand male white rabbits are used.
  • the quality of healing is examined at four weeks (36 rabbits) and at eight weeks (36 rabbits) using gross morphology, biomechanics, and histomorphometry. Statistically the results are compared with analysis of variance and multiple comparisons tests.
  • the repair osteochondral defect and adjacent site are biomechanically tested using an automated indenter, under conditions of biphasic creep indentation.
  • the three intrinsic material properties of repair and adjacent cartilage are obtained using a numerical algorithm (Athanasiou et al. (1992), Trans. Orth. Res. Soc. 17(1) :172) based on biphasic finite element methods (Spilker et al. (1990), Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 112:138) and nonlinear optimization techniques.
  • the adjacent site is tested 3 mm anterior to the defect.
  • each osteochondral specimen is sectioned, stained with Alcian blue, and digitized to obtain the geometric parameters needed in the finite element modeling.
  • the Cray supercomputer is used for these analyses. Histologically, each osteochondral specimen is decalcified and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Sections are analyzed with an image analysis system to measure the percent of trabecular bony repair in each defect.
  • TGF- ⁇ -containing polymeric implants Release kinetics of TGF- ⁇ -containing polymeric implants are studied using two-phase implants made in accordance with the procedure of Example 2 using BSA rather than GSA.
  • Each implant contains 180 ng of TGF- ⁇ from R & D Systems, containing 50 ⁇ g HSA per ⁇ g TGF- ⁇ .
  • the amount of TGF- ⁇ lost during the implant manufacture is determined by bioassay of the solvents used (stimulation of alkaline phosphatase in ROS 17/2.8 cells). When the TGF- ⁇ is dissolved in water alone, 12.6% is lost in the wash; when 0.1 mg/ml BSA is added, 46.5% is lost; and when TGF- ⁇ is dissolved in 1 mg/ml BSA+4 mM HCl, 71.5% is lost.
  • Implants ⁇ TGF- ⁇ (BSA/HCl) are incubated in 1 ml PBS for twelve weeks; every 3.5 days the PBS is removed and stored at -70° C., and fresh PBS applied. TGF- ⁇ release is assayed by radioimmunoassay (anti-TGF- ⁇ 1 ). Of the 12.64 ng TGF- ⁇ released, 7.4% is released during the first three weeks, 22.5% in the second quarter, 27.3% in the third quarter, and 42.8% in the last three weeks.
  • chondrocytes are cultured on implants ⁇ TGF- ⁇ in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 ⁇ g/ml ascorbate, and antibiotics. At confluence, fresh media are added and after 24 hours, 3 H!-thymidine and 3 H!-uridine incorporation and alkaline phosphatase specific activity are measured. All parameters are inhibited in cells cultured on the implants with respect to controls. These results indicate that there is a time-dependent, continuous release of TGF- ⁇ from the implants supporting previous observations using soybean trypsin inhibitor as a model protein.
  • a biodegradable, porous, two-phase osteochondral implant is made of 50:50 poly(DL) lactide-co-glycolide (PLG) and used as a controlled release delivery system for recombinant human transforming growth factor ⁇ 1 (rhTGF- ⁇ 1 ).
  • the two-phase implant consists of a stiffer bone phase which interfaces with subchondral bone to provide fixation, and a softer cartilage phase which interfaces with a chondral defect.
  • Other design considerations include high porosity at both macroscopic and microscopic levels and use as a scaffold for tissue ingrowth. 4 mm ⁇ 6 mm cylindrical two-phase polymeric implants are designed and produced in a mold for implantation in rabbits.
  • 7 mm ⁇ 7 mm cylindrical two-phase polymeric implants are designed and produced in a different mold for implantation in goats.
  • the molds are cylindrical in shape and pierced with holes to allow insertion of steel needles during the molding process.
  • Implants are made under sterile conditions; all equipment has been autoclaved and cleaned with a 70% ethanol-distilled water mixture. Containers are kept covered and sealed until used.
  • the bone phase for the goat implants is made by means of the following protocol:
  • the PGA/PLA is stored at -20° C. After removing from the freezer, it is opened under controlled conditions using nitrogen inside a closed plexiglas chamber so as not to expose it to atmospheric conditions.
  • the polymer is weighed in a 40 mL Teflon beaker. After weighing the beaker and zeroing the balance, the desired quantity of PLG is scooped into the beaker and weighed. For cylindrical implants 7 mm in diameter ⁇ 7 mm in length, 0.9 g PLG is required.
  • the polymer is solubilized in acetone at a ratio of 6 mL/mg polymer.
  • Acetone is poured into the beaker and stirred until all polymer is dissolved (substance is a yellowish liquid) Typically about 20 minutes of stirring is required.
  • ethyl alcohol is added to the solution at a ratio of 5 mL/mg polymer. The mixture is stirred for approximately five minutes to form a gum-like polymer in liquid ethanol. The excess ethanol is poured off. Additional ethyl alcohol is added at a ratio of 50 mL/mg polymer, and the mixture is left uncovered for 3-5 minutes at room temperature. The solid is then separated from the liquid.
  • the solid is placed in a Nalgene (PGC Scientifics, Gaithersburg, Md.) desiccator and flattened and sponged to allow escape of excess ethanol.
  • the vacuum pump is operated via a programmable timer. After three minutes, the vacuum is turned off and the polymer rolled with a Teflon bar three times to form a sheet approximately 0.5 mm thick. The sheet is again vacuumed for two minutes and rolling is repeated. After vacuuming for three additional minutes (eight minutes total), the machine is turned off and the polymer weighed.
  • the total mass is divided into twelve equal portions, weighing each portion, and each portion is placed into a mold, poking with a stainless steel poker.
  • the mold is placed under vacuum for an additional five minutes and examined for the formation of micropores. Following this, it is subjected to vacuum for 17 additional minutes, making a total time under vacuum of 30 minutes.
  • poking with a specially-designed stainless steel poker 7 mm on one end and 4 mm on the other, the implants are not handled during the five and 17 minute vacuum periods.
  • the molds are then placed in a water bath at 37° C., connected to a lyophilizer at high vacuum (approximately 10 microbars) for two hours. The entire molds are then removed from the water bath. Compressive pressure is then applied. For instance, in a preferred embodiment, the mold lids are secured with washers and wing nuts, and five stainless steel needles or pins are placed into the implants as mandated by holes drilled in the mold surface.
  • the mold and implants are placed into the lyophilizer for approximately 20 hours under high vacuum at room temperature. After removal from vacuum, the implants are removed from the molds. They should have a diameter of 7 mm and a height of 5 mm. They are placed in a petri dish taped closed in an oven at 47° C. for 24 hours. Following this they are stored under vacuum in the lyophilizer at -51° C.
  • the cartilage phase of the goat implant is then prepared.
  • the cartilage phase is designed to incorporate the bioactive agent.
  • the cartilage phase is 2 mm thick and is attached to the 5 mm bone phase after the bone phase has been heated and cooled. No chemicals are used to stick one phase to the other.
  • the same PLG is used to make the cartilage phase of the implants; however TGF- ⁇ is added only to this second phase.
  • TGF- ⁇ 1 is a stable, multifunctional polypeptide growth factor and is stimulatory for cells of mesenchymal origin. The purity is greater than 97% as determined by SDS-PAGE, visualized by silver stain.
  • the endotoxin level is determined to be less than 0.1 ng per 1 microgram of the cytokine.
  • the TGF- ⁇ 1 solution is prepared by reconstituting 2 micrograms thereof in 0.2 mL sterile filtered glass-distilled ultrapure water. All materials are handled under a hood. This will provide 180 ng TGF- ⁇ 1 per implant.
  • the same procedure is followed as in preparing the bone phase, using 0.36 g PGA:PLA to make the cartilage phase for twelve 7 mm ⁇ 7 mm implants.
  • a 25 mL Teflon beaker may be used to solubilize the polymer.
  • the solution may require 30 minutes of stirring because of the smaller amount. It is important to make sure the polymer is well-solubilized.
  • the TGF- ⁇ 1 solution is added by pipetting into the polymer/acetone solution and the mixture stirred for 3-5 minutes on the stirring machine.
  • the polymer is then precipitated with ethyl alcohol as with the bone phase.
  • the polymer is treated under vacuum in the Nalgene desiccator as for the bone phase, except that the polymer is rolled after 2 minutes of vacuum, rolled again after two more minutes of vacuum, and again after an additional two minutes of vacuum.
  • the bone phases are retrieved from the lyophilizer and placed into molds, rotated 180°, allowing the cartilage phase to be attached to what had been the bottom.
  • the cartilage polymer is divided into twelve portions, placed into the molds on top of the bone phases and poked into place.
  • the molds are vacuumed three minutes, and viewed under magnification, then poked again. This procedure is repeated with 4 additional minutes of vacuum, followed by 17 minutes of vacuum, for a total of 30 minutes under vacuum.
  • the molds are then subjected to high vacuum in the lyophilizer at 37° C. for four hours, pierced with five needles (or tines) per implant and placed into the lyophilizer for approximately 20 hours under high vacuum at room temperature.
  • the completed implants are removed from the molds and stored in petri dishes placed closed under vacuum lyophilization at -51° C.

Abstract

Biodegradable, porous, polymeric implant material provides substantially continuous release of bioactive agent during in vivo use. Bioactive agent is initially released in amounts that are less than degradation rate of polymer, thereby promoting migration of cells into material. Later larger amounts of bioactive agent are released, thereby promoting differentiation of cells. Method of making material includes steps of applying vacuum temperature and consession to form pores. Implant material may be adapted for one phase implant (e.g., for bone or cartilage) or for two phase layered implant (e.g., for cartilage layer on top of bone layer).

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a division of U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 08/196,970 filed Feb. 15, 1994, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 08/123,812 filed Sep. 20, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,474 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/837,401 filed Feb. 14, 1992 now abandoned, all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is in the field of biodegradable polymeric tissue implant materials used as carriers for bioactive agents. In a preferred embodiment, the implants of this invention provide a smooth, continuous release profile for such agents, and are especially useful for delivering growth factors for enhancing healing of bone and cartilage tissue.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The use of biodegradable or bioerodible polymers to provide sustained or controlled release of drugs or other hormones has been known since the 1960s. (Langer, R. (April 1981) "Controlled Release: A New Approach to Drug Delivery," Technology Review 26-34.) Biodegradable implants for the controlled release of hormones, particularly contraceptive hormones, were developed in the 1970s. (Beck, L. R. and Pope, V. Z. (1984), "Controlled-Release Delivery Systems for Hormones," Drugs 27:528-547.)
A number of biodegradable polymers have been used for controlled release of drugs including polyanhydrides (Mathiowitz, E., et al. (1988), "Polyanhydride Microspheres as Drug Carriers," J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 35:755-774; Lucas, P. A. et al. (1990), "Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water-soluble proteins from bovine bone using a polyanhydride delivery vehicle," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 24:901-911; Masters, D. B., et al. (1993), "Prolonged Regional Nerve Blockade by Controlled Release of Local Anesthetic from a Biodegradable Polymer Matrix," Anesthesiology 79:340-346); and poly(ortho esters) (Heller, J (1990), "Development of poly(ortho esters): a historical overview," Biomaterials 11:659-665).
Aliphatic polyesters comprise another important class of biodegradable polymers. Polymers of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) have been used as biodegradable implants for tissue repair for several decades. (See, e.g. Cutright, D. E., et al. (1974), "Degradation rates of polymers and copolymers of polylactic and polyglycolic acids," Oral Surg. 37:142-152; and Gilding, D. K. and Reed, A. M. (1979), "Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery--polyglycolic/polylactic acid homo-and copolymers:1," Polymer 20:1459-1464.)
It has been found that degradation of polyglycolic acid may. take place at essentially the same rate in vivo as in vitro. Schwope, A. D., et al. (1975), "Development of Polylactic/glycolic Acid Delivery Systems for Use in Treatment of Narcotic Addiction," Nat'l Inst. Drug Abuse Res. Monogr. Ser. 4:13-18, appears to disclose that 1/16" diameter beads and rods made from PLA/PGA copolymers to which naltrexone was added by dissolving the polymer and drug in a common solvent and casting, released the drug at the same rate in vivo as in vitro. Drug release in both cases appears to occur by essentially the same mechanism in vivo as in vitro, that is, by hydrolysis in an aqueous environment, and although one report appears to indicate that in the in vivo environment initiation of the degradation process is enhanced (Williams, D. F. (1979), "Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In-Vivo Degradation of Polymers," in Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials, ASTM STP 684, Syrett, B. C. and Acharya, A., eds., American Soc. for Testing and Materials 61-75), later reports appear to indicate that the in vivo degradation rate may be simulated in vitro using phosphate buffer solution. (Gilding, D. K. (1981), "Degradation of Polymers: Mechanisms and Implications for Biomedical Applications," In: Williams, D. F. ed. Fundamental aspects of biocompatibility," CRC Press, 44-65.) Macroscopic devices such as cylinders about 3×20 mm of polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid copolymers may degrade at the same rate in vivo as in vitro and cleavage may be due to simple hydrolysis with no enzymatic contributions. (Heller, J. (1984), "Biodegradable Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery," Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1(1):39-90.)
Aliphatic polyesters such as polymers based on lactic acid, glycolic acid and their copolymers appear to degrade by a bulk erosion process, so that rate of drug release from monolithic devices may not be either linear or predictable. (Heller, J. (1984), "Biodegradable Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery," Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1(1) :39-90.) These copolymers displaying bulk or homogenous erosion may display significant degradation in the matrix interior, which may result in "dose-dumping" in contrast to surface eroding systems such as those composed of polyanhydrides. (Langer, R. (1990), "New Methods of Drug Delivery," Science 249:1527-1533.)
50:50 glycolic acid:lactic acid copolymers appear to be described as inherently hydrophilic and useful for release of more hydrophobic drugs. (Reed, A. M. and Gilding, D. K. (1981), "Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery--poly(glycolic)/poly(lactic acid) homo and copolymers: 2. In vitro degradation," Polymer 22:494-498.)
A number of controlled release formulations appear to have been made using polylactic/polyglycolic acid copolymers in the form of microparticles or microspheres. U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919 to Albert, et al. issued Nov. 20, 1973 for "Polylactic-Drug Mixtures" appears to describe various methods for incorporating drugs into the polymer e.g. by coating, mixing the drug with melted polymer, or mixing with a common solvent and drying to form a film or powder. U.S. Pat. No. 4,622,244 to Lapka issued Nov. 11, 1986 for "Process for Preparation of Microcapsules" appears to disclose a process for preparing microspheres comprising active substances coated with polymer useful for injection. U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,542 to DeLuca et al. issued Apr. 4, 1989 "Porous Microspheres for Drug Delivery and Methods for Making Same" appears to disclose polymeric microspheres made with pores in which drugs are incorporated. U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,268 to Tice et al. issued Jan. 30, 1990 for "Drug Delivery System and Method of Making the Same" appears to describe the use of polymers degrading at different rates to form microcapsules for controlled release of active ingredients. U.K. Patent Application 2 234 896 A to Sandoz, Ltd. published Feb. 20, 1991 for "Delayed Release Formulations" appears to describe microparticles formed by a process in which the drug and polymer are dissolved in different phases. Rosilio, V. et al. (1991), "A physiochemical study of the morphology of progesterone-loaded microspheres fabricated from poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide), " J. Biomed. Materials Res. 25:667-682 appears to describe progesterone-loaded microspheres of polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid copolymer.
Studies of such microspheres reveal that proteins carried therein may be released before the polymer itself is degraded. (Wang, H. T., et al. (1990), "Degradation of poly(ester) microspheres," Biomaterials 11:679-685.) Nevertheless, microencapsulation with polylactic/polyglycolic copolymer does appear to slow down diffusion of locally administered antibiotics. (Jacob, E., et al. (1991), "Evaluation of Biodegradable Ampicillin Anhydrate Microcapsules for Local Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Osteomyelitis," Clin. Orthopaedics and Related Research 267:237-244.) Microspheres made of 75/25 polylactic/polyglycolic acid copolymers and molecular weights of 14 kDa or less appear to have released proteins over a four to six week period. (Cohen, S., et al. (1991), "Controlled Delivery Systems for Proteins Based on Poly(lactic/Glycolic acid) Microspheres," Proceed. Intern. Sympo. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 18:101-102.)
Efforts have been made to improve the predictability of drug release from PGA/PLA microspheres. PCT Publication WO 91/09079 published Jun. 27, 1991 by Farmitalia Carlo Erba S.R.L. for "Use of Supercritical Fluids to Obtain Porous Sponges of Biodegradable Polymers" appears to describe the use of supercritical fluids to manufacture porous microspheres for drug delivery. PCT Publication WO 92/11844 published Jul. 23, 1992 by Enzytech, Inc. for "Stabilization of Proteins by Cationic Biopolymers" appears to describe a method for incorporation of proteins in the form of specific noncovalent complexes with polycationic reagents into sustained release systems which are polymeric microcapsules.
Delivery forms other than microspheres utilizing polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid polymers also appear to have been formulated. U.S. Pat. No. 3,755,558 to Scribner, issued Aug. 28, 1973 for "Polylactide-Drug Mixtures for Topical Application," appears to disclose the preparation of polylactic acid films with active ingredients incorporated therein. A number of methods for incorporation of the active ingredient into the polymer (as described above with respect to U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919) also appear to have been taught. U.S. Pat. No. 3,887,699 to Yolles issued Jun. 3, 1975 for "Biodegradable Polymeric Article for Dispensing Drugs," appears to disclose the use of shaped polymeric articles such as films, hollow tubing, spheroids useful for injection or oral ingestion, or solid "spaghetti-like" or "fiber-like" configurations for controlled release of drugs wherein the device exudes the drug to the surface of the article. One method of mixing a drug with the polymer is to dissolve both in a suitable solvent, drive off solvent and mold the residue. Large implants and high molecular weight proteins do not appear to be taught as components of the invention described therein. U.S. Pat. No. 3,991,766 to Schmitt et al. issued Nov. 17, 1976 for "Controlled Release of Medicaments using Polymers from Glycolic Acid," appears to disclose filaments comprising PGA and antibiotics. No large proteins appear to be disclosed nor do release kinetics appear to be provided.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,118,470 to Casey et al. issued Oct. 3, 1978 for "Normally-solid, Bioabsorbable, Hydrolyzable, Polymeric Reaction Product," appears to disclose polymeric films for drug delivery. Hollow fibers of polylactic acid polymers also appear to have been described. (Schakenraad, J. M., et al. (1988), "Biodegradable hollow fibres for the controlled release of drugs," Biomaterials 9:116-120.) U.S. Pat. No. 4,801,739 to Franz et al. issued Jan. 31, 1989 for "Oligomeric Hydroxycarboxylic Acid Derivatives, Their Production and Use," appears to disclose polylactic/polyglycolic acid copolymers partially in the form of amides or esters with a sterol as carriers for active ingredients in the form of microparticles, 1 mm rods and films.
U.K. Patent Application No. 2 209 937 A published Jun. 1, 1989 appears to disclose the use of ground polymers as continuous drug release agents. U.S. Pat. No. 4,883,666 to Sabel et al. issued Nov. 28, 1989 for "Controlled Drug Delivery System for Treatment of Neural Disorders," appears to disclose the use of 3 mm diameter discs with pinholes therein for linear release of drugs. U.S. Pat. No. 4,962,091 to Eppstein et al. issued Oct. 9, 1990 for "Controlled Release of Macromolecular Polypeptides" appears to disclose polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymeric films and coated wires which release growth factors including TGF-β over a period of up to 100 days. The polymers appear to comprise a microsuspension of polypeptide and other water-soluble components in which the particles have a diameter of 10 microns or less. EPO Patent Application No. 0 473 268 A2 published Mar. 4, 1992 by Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC appears to disclose the use of 1 mm thick formulations of polypeptide used for continuous release of peptides, including growth hormones, covalently conjugated to the polymer. U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,122 to Orsolini issued Jul. 28, 1992 for "Method for Preparing a Pharmaceutical Composition in the Form of Microparticles," appears to teach a process for preparing a ground polymeric product containing salts of peptides including growth hormones comprising compressing, heating and extruding mixed polymeric powder and salts and grinding the resultant product. A sandwich device for release of insulin appears to be described in Yamakawa, I., et al. (1993), "Controlled Release of Insulin from Plasma-Irradiated Sandwitch Device Using Poly-DL-lactic acid," J. Pharm. Soc. Japan 16:182-187. A very small "implant" injectable through a 16-gauge needle appears to be disclosed in Stoeckemann, K. and Sandow, J. (1993), "Effects of the luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist ramorelix (hoe013) and the LHRH agonist buserelin on dimethylbenz a!anthracene-induced mammary carcinoma: studies with slow-release formulations," J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 119:457-462, which appears to have a longer release time and be more clinically effective than microparticles.
Polymeric implants made of polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid polymers and copolymers also appear to have been described. U.S. Pat. No. 4,801,739 to Bays et al. issued Mar. 17, 1987 for "Biodegradable Prosthetic Device," appears to disclose a ventilation tube for the ear in which the degradation rates of various portions of the implant are varied by adjusting the molecular weight of the polymer e.g. with irradiation.
Polymeric implants used for drug release appear to include those formed from polylactic and polyglycolic acid polymers and copolymers. U.S. Pat. No. 3,976,071 to Sadek issued Aug. 24, 1976 for "Methods of Improving Control of Release Rates and Products Useful in Same," appears to describe the effects of active agents dispersed in the polymer versus solid solutions of the active agent in the polymer. U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,312 to Reuter et al. issued Mar. 8, 1977 for "Prolonged Release Drug Form for the Treatment of Bovine Mastitis," appears to disclose a cylindrical bougie for insertion into the teat canal of a polymer and an antimicrobial agent dispersed therein.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,048,256, 4,095,600 and 4,122,129 to Casey, et al. issued Sep. 13, 1977, Jun. 20, 1978, and Oct. 24, 1978 respectively, for "Normally-Solid Bioabsorbably Hydrolyzable Polymeric Reaction Product," appear to disclose polymerization methods for producing polymers into which active ingredients may be incorporated. Such devices appear to include sandwich devices, intra-uterine devices, and bandages. U.S. Pat. No. 4,076,798 to Casey et al. issued Feb. 28, 1978 for "High Molecular Weight Polyester Resin, The Method of Making the Same, and the Use Thereof as a Pharmaceutical Composition," appears to be a related patent and also appears to disclose intrauterine devices for releasing drugs.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,293,539 to Ludwig et al. issued Oct. 6, 1981 for "Controlled Release Formulations and Method of Treatment," appears to disclose the incorporation of an active ingredient into a polymer by solubilization of the polymer and active agent in a common solvent and extruding into rods of 2 to 7 mm in diameter and 40 to 80 mm in length, followed by implantation of the rod under the skin of an animal. U.S. Pat. No. 4,832,686 to Anderson issued May 23, 1989 for "Method for Administering Interleukin-2," appears to disclose the use of low molecular weight polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid polymers or copolymers for implants of putty-like consistency for intracranial or other implantation. PCT Patent Publication WO 92/11843 published Jul. 23, 1992 by Alza Corporation for "Bioerodible Devices and Compositions for Diffusional Release of Agents," appears to disclose the preparation of sheets and rods (2 mm diameter×1 cm length) with polymers, active ingredients and "required excipients" in which the release rate is not dependent on erosion of the polymer.
Implants of polylactic or polyglycolic acid polymers or copolymers appears to have been used in bone healing applications. Tencer, A. F., et al. (1989), "The effect of local controlled release of sodium fluoride on the stimulation of bone growth," J. Biomed. Materials Res. 23:471-589, appears to disclose dissolution of sodium fluoride and polylactic acid polymer in acetone followed by driving off solvent and rolling into sheets or rods which were inserted into rabbit femurs. The sodium fluoride appears to have been released in a high initial burst followed by a decrease over a period of several days to a steady state. It appears that best healing was shown in rabbits having the sodium fluoride implants after eight weeks.
Biodegradable polymeric scaffold systems seeded with cells appear to be useful for culture of specific types of cells in vitro. U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,489 to Naughton et al. issued Oct. 16, 1990 for "Three-Dimensional Cell and Tissue Culture System," appear to disclose the use of a polymeric matrix which may be made of polyglycolic acid polymers, for culture of cells such as skin, liver, pancreas, bone marrow, osteoblasts and chondrocytes, etc. in vitro. The seeded matrix may be transplanted in vivo. Related U.S. Pat. No. 5,032,508 to Naughton et al. for "Three-Dimensional Cell and Tissue Culture System," contains a similar disclosure. These patents do not appear to disclose incorporation of growth factor into the polymeric matrix. A further related U.S. Pat. No. 5,160,490 to Naughton et al. issued Nov. 3, 1992 for "Three-Dimensional Cell and Tissue Culture Apparatus," appears to disclose that hip prostheses coated with three-dimensional cultures of cartilage may be implanted into patients. This patent also appears to disclose that proteins can be "added to" the matrix or coated on. No methods of "adding" such proteins or release kinetics appear to be described.
Polymeric scaffolds seeded with cells for cellular growth and implantation for cartilage regeneration made from polyglycolic acid/polylactic acid copolymers appear to be disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,041,138 to Vacanti, et al. issued Aug. 20, 1991 for "Neomorphogenesis of Cartilage in Vivo from Cell Culture." This patent appears to teach that growth factors may be incorporated into the polymers but does not appear to provide any methods for doing so. The patent also appears to teach that implantation of the polymeric scaffolding alone without chondrocytes does not result in cartilage formation. Freed, L. E., et al. (1993), "Neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers" J. Biomed. Materials Res. 27:11-23, appears to disclose the use of cell-seeded porous polylactic acid and fibrous polyglycolic acid polymers to prepare cartilaginous implants for use in reconstructive or orthopaedic surgery. Apparently no growth factors were added to the polymers. Vacanti, C. A., et al. (1993), "Tissue Engineered Growth of Bone and Cartilage," Transplantation Proc. 25:1019-1021, appears to disclose the use of cell-seeded polyglycolic acid polymeric mesh for implantation on the backs of nude mice to grow bone and cartilage. The use of growth factors in the polymer does not appear to be described. In a review article by Langer, R. and Vacanti, J. P. (1993), "Tissue Engineering," Science 260:921-926, cell seeded scaffolds for in vitro growth of cartilage and bone appear to be described and it is stated that TGF-β is important in bone repair and that effective delivery systems for this agent will be important.
A number of growth factors appear to have been found to be important in the healing of bone and cartilage, including bone morphogenic protein (BMP) platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (Hollinger, J. and Chaudhari, A (1992), "Bone Regeneration Materials for the Mandibular and Craniofacial Complex," Cells and Materials 2:143-151). As reported in Edelman, E. R. and Nugent, M. A. (1991), "Controlled Release of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor," Drug News & Perspectives 4:352-357, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) appears to be a mitogen for many different cells. However, this growth factor appears to lose most of its activity when subjected to organic solvents and heat in making controlled release implants. Edelman, E. R., et al. (1991), "Controlled and modulated release of basic fibroblast growth factor," Biomaterials 12:619-626, appears to state that polypeptide growth factors have in vivo half lives on the order of seconds to minutes, and that bFGF, a mitogen for fibroblasts and a potent angiogenesis factor useful in tissue repair, is best released by binding to heparin-Sepharose beads. U.S. Pat. No. 5,100,668 to Edelman et al. issued Mar. 31, 1992 appears to discuss systems for controlled release of bFGF, and apparently reveals a high initial release.
Hollinger, J. O., et al. (1990), "Osseous wound healing with xenogeneic bone implants with a biodegradable carrier," Surgery 107:50-54, appears to discuss experiments using implants comprising 50:50 polylactic/polyglycolic acid copolymer made by adding bone morphogenic protein (BMP) to polymer solution in acetone followed by vacuum curing for craniotomy repair. The article appears to report that contrary to earlier reports of successful bone regeneration using BMP, the study could not support such data. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 appears to have been found to improve bone healing in implants having a demineralized dog bone powder matrix (Toriumi, D. M. (1991), "Mandibular Reconstruction with a Recombinant Bone-Inducing Factor," Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117:1101-1112.) Heckman, J. D., et al. (1991), "The Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein in the Treatment of Non-Union in a Canine Model," J. Bone and Joint Surg. 73-A:750-764, appears to describe implants mimicking the size and shape of bone defects made of bone morphogenetic protein copolymerized with polylactic acid as useful in bone healing. Alper, J. (1993), "Will bone morphogenic proteins pay off?" Bio/Technology 11:649-651, appears to disclose that BMP in a bone powder matrix is used for fracture healing and causes cell differentiation. Marden, L. J. et al (1993), "rhBMP-2/ICBM is superior to DBM in repair of rat craniotomies," J. Dent. Res. Abstracts No. 130, appears to disclose that recombinant BMP in an insoluble collagenous bone matrix provides superior bone healing. Kleinschmidt, J. C. et al. (1993), "A Multiphase System Bone Implant for Regenerating the Calvaria," appears to disclose the use of two biodegradable polymeric disks with bone morphogenetic protein between them placed in craniotomy sites of rabbits to aid in healing and prevent prolapse of soft tissue in the defect.
Thyroid-derived chondrocyte stimulating factor (TDCSF) appears to be described in PCT Publication WO 92/14749 by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University Sep. 3, 1992, as useful for the culture of chondrocytes in vivo and for developing cartilage implants in vitro and for in vivo use in cartilage and bone defect repair. It does not appear that any methods for making implants or release kinetics are taught. PCT Publication WO 93/15767 by Merck & Co, Inc. Aug. 19, 1993 appears to disclose implants made of bioerodible polymers selected from poly(orthoester) or polyacetal and a prostaglandin or β-estradiol implanted at the site of desired bone growth as useful in bone healing.
Transforming Growth Factor β (TGF-β) has been studied for its effects on cell growth. Silberstein, G. B. and Daniel, C. W. (1987), "Reversible Inhibition of Mammary Gland Growth by Transforming Growth Factor--β," Science 237:291-293 appears to report that slow-release polymeric pellets (made of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer) inhibited mouse mammary growth. U.S. Pat. No. 5,053,050 to Itay issued Oct. 1, 1991 for "Compositions for Repair of Cartilage and Bone," appears to disclose a biodegradable viscoelastic matrix dipped in a solution comprising chondrocytes or osteoblasts which have been cultured in a medium containing TGF-β used for bone and cartilage repair. The growth factor does not appear to be incorporated into the polymer.
Hollinger, J. and Chaudhari, A (1992), "Bone Regeneration Materials for the Mandibular and Craniofacial Complex," Cells and Materials 2:143-151 appears to disclose that TGF-β is released in a latent form at a fracture site, and activated by proteolytic enzymes. In its activated form, TGF-β may be involved in bone remodeling, promote conversion of mesenchymal cells into cartilage cells and enhance production of collagen, fibronectin and plasminogen activating factor in osteoblasts. TGF-β belongs to a family of factors, including two cartilage induction factors previously known as CIF-A and CIF-B, now known as TGF-β1 and TGF-β2, inhibin, and the BMP's. TGF-β is known for its antiproliferative effects on cells, particularly epithelial cells, but inhibition is also common for mesenchymal cells such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells. In some cases such effects correlate with augmented cellular differentiation. TGF-β has been shown to have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on proliferation of cultured osteoblasts in different studies. It has been shown to be crucial for wound healing, and is transformed to its active form under acidic conditions such as those produced by bone resorption or macrophages.
Drug release kinetics from a polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer related to Nafarelin, a peptide hormone, have been reported in Sanders, L. M., et al. (1986), "Prolonged Controlled-Release of Nafarelin, a Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Analogue, From Biodegradable Polymeric Implants: Influence of Composition and Molecular Weight of Polymer" J. Pharm. Sciences 75:356-360. The implant appears to have been prepared by melt extrusion of a blend of the compound with the polymer and release has a triphasic profile characterized by a secondary phase of lower release preceded and followed by phases of higher release.
Lewis, D. H. (1990), "Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents from Lactide/Glycolide Polymers," in Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, Chasin, M. and Langer, R., eds, New York, 1-41, appears to disclose a number of factors affecting drug release kinetics. This reference also appears to report that growth hormones in these systems have at best been able to provide only about two week's duration of biological activity.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,602 to Hutchinson issued Apr. 2, 1991 for "Continuous Release Pharmaceutical Compositions Formed by Freeze Drying Acetic Acid Solutions of Polylactide" and related U.S. Pat. No. 4,767,628 to Hutchinson issued Aug. 30, 1988 for "Continuous Release Pharmaceutical Compositions," appear to disclose the use of low molecular weight polymers to cause the two phases of release caused by matrix diffusion and degradation of polymer to overlap.
Hollinger, J. (1993), "Factors for Osseous Repair and Delivery: Part II," reviews factors important in bone healing such as porosity of implants, and states that information relative to optimal pore sizes for osteoconduction is lacking. The article further appears to disclose that by manipulating the biodegradation of the delivery system, the release kinetics of regenerative factors can be tailored for the wound healing chronobiological continuum, and states that chondroosteogenic factor is not needed after the fifth day. Microencapsulating cytokines (bone growth and inductive factors) for pulsed release two to five days after implantation is apparently recommended.
K. Athanasiou et al. (1993), "Use of Biodegradable Implants for Repairing Large Articular Cartilage Defects in the Rabbit," Proc. 38th Ann. Mtg. Orthopaedic Research Soc. Feb. 18, 1992, discloses that 50:50 poly lactide-co-glycolide polymeric implants having an average molecular weight of 12-15 kD and containing demineralized bone powder used to fill osteochondral cylindrical defects of 4.0 mm diameter and 6 mm depth degraded over a period of 8 weeks under conditions of functional joint loading. Successful bone and cartilage repair were observed. Residual polymer was observed to be present at 8 weeks.
U.S. patent application 07/914,992 filed Jul. 16, 1992 discloses a resorbable implant based on independently gelling polymers of a single enantiomeric lactide. Said implant is capable of carrying a bioactive compound; however, said bioactive material is not released in a continuous manner over a period as long as eight weeks.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a two-phase layered structure/material;
FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view along plane A--A of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view along plane B--B of FIG. 1.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an example of a physiological system prepared for implantation of a tissue structure/material.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an example of a physiological system implanted with a tissue structure/material.
FIG. 4 is a cumulative release profile of polypeptide from an implant over a ten-week period. The release kinetics follow a sigmoidal pattern and more than 95% of the original polypeptide is released.
FIG. 5 shows changes in average molecular weight over 10 weeks. A 34% reduction in molecular weight is seen in both experimental and control implants in the first week. The molecular weight then decreases gradually until it has decreased to 1 kD by four weeks.
FIG. 6 displays changes in surface axial strain measured one hour after application of a 0.87N step load under conditions of creep indentation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A biodegradable, porous, polymeric implant structural material is provided which includes a bioactive agent which is preferably uniformly incorporated therein. In a preferred embodiment, during use in an in vivo environment the implant material provides continuous, smooth release of the bioactive agent over all or some of the degradation period of the polymer. In a preferred embodiment, the bioactive agent is released at all times during which the polymer remains undegraded.
The bioactive agent may be any substance, such as a therapeutic agent or enzyme, whose controlled, continuous release over a prolonged period (e.g., some or all of the degradation period of the polymer) is desired. The bioactive agent is preferably hydrophobic, i.e. does not readily dissolve in water. Preferably the bioactive agent is a protein, such as a degradation enzyme, cytokine or cytokine inhibitor, and more preferably a growth factor. Osteochondral growth factors are preferred. Preferred growth factors include platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), thyroid-derived chondrocyte stimulating factor (TDCSF), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β). TGF-β and growth factors having similar properties are more preferred. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, combinations of bioactive agents may be used. The bioactive agents may be derived from a variety of sources, synthetic and natural, and include recombinant polypeptides.
The amount of bioactive material in the implant structural material may be adjusted to achieve the desired dosage. Preferably, the implant material contains between about 0.01 ng and about 1 mg of the bioactive agent per milliliter of polymer or polymeric implant material.
The term "continuous" as used herein means that bioactive agent is released constantly without substantial interruption.
The term "uniform composition" referring to the implant material and "uniformly incorporated," referring to the bioactive agent, means that the chemical makeup of the implant material is substantially uniform throughout. In a preferred embodiment, Applicants have shown that the implant material preferably does not contain pockets of encapsulated bioactive agents or other materials. Its microporosity is also preferably substantially uniform.
The term "smooth" as used herein means that the graph of the cumulative amount of bioactive agent released over time rises smoothly without substantial and sudden changes in the slope of the curve (see e.g., FIG. 4, which shows a "smooth" graph of the cumulative amount of bioactive agent released over time).
The implant material preferably has a micropore size between about 50 and about 200 micrometers. More preferably the porosity of the implant matches the porosity of the tissue into which the implant material is intended to be placed. Preferably the porosity of the implant material accounts for more than 50% of the implant material's volume. The implant material may also comprise a plurality of passages (macropores) having a preferred diameter between about 1.0 and about 2.0 mm. The pores and passages are preferably designed to facilitate ingrowth of tissue into the implant in the in vivo environment. Although not necessary, the implant material may contain cells seeded into the implant or cultured therein in an in vitro environment prior to implantation.
Any suitable biodegradable polymeric material may be used, e.g. polyanhydrides and aliphatic polyesters. The implant structure/material is preferably composed. of an aliphatic polyester, more preferably comprising polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and mixtures thereof, and most preferably is composed of a 50:50 mixture of copolymer of PLA and PGA. The polymer preferably has an average molecular weight between about 10,000 daltons and about 100,000 daltons prior to use, preferably between about 40,000 daltons and about 70,000 daltons.
The polymeric implant structure/material may be manufactured so as to have mechanical properties, e.g. stiffness and compressibility, matching those of the surrounding tissue. Implant materials having mechanical properties matching those of bone, cartilage, tendon, skin, ligament, cementum, etc. may be manufactured by the processes of this invention.
The implant structure/material may be used to make various types of implants. Preferably the implants are used for tissue healing, more preferably healing of osteochondral defects. The implant structure/material of this invention may be used in combination with other phases, layers, or supporting structures. Preferred implants of this invention are the two-phase layered biodegradable polymeric implants described in U.S. Ser. No. 08/123,812 filed Sep. 20, 1993, incorporated herein by reference. Most preferred are two-phase implants having one phase with mechanical properties and/or porosity matching those of bone and a second phase with mechanical properties and/or porosity matching those of cartilage. The bioactive agent may be incorporated into both phases or, preferably, only into the bone or cartilage phase.
Another preferred embodiment of this invention is a single-phase implant having the mechanical properties and porosity of cartilage or bone and incorporating one or more bioactive agents.
The polymeric implant may be any size or shape. A preferable shape is cylindrical. A preferable size is less than or equal to about 1 cm×1 cm for an implant to be inserted at a bone/cartilage juncture.
Turning now to the drawings, a carrier/implant 10 is illustrated in FIG. 1 comprising a first bioerodible polymeric structure/material 14 and a second bioerodible polymeric structure/material 12. First structure/material 14 and second structure/material 12 are preferably made from a copolymer-based material of polyglycolic acid (PLG) and polylactic acid (PLA) in a 50/50 concentration of each. Also present in the PLA/PLG copolymer material may be an enzyme homogeneously dispersed within the copolymer which may enhance the degradation of the polymeric substance.
Referring to FIG. 1, first structure/material 14 is bonded to second structure/material 12, wherein structure/material 14 includes a body having dissimilar mechanical and porosity properties from material 12. Materials 14 and 12 may both include enzymes and therapeutic agents in addition to numerous pores 16 and 18 formed within first structure/material 14 and second structure/material 12, respectively. Pore size varies depending upon the process by which structures/ materials 12 and 14 are processed. Preferably, porosity within each structure/material 12 or structure/material 14 is more than 50% of the respective structure/material volumetric area. Moreover, pore size can range between 50 and 200 μm. However, it is to be appreciated that pore density as well as pore size can vary outside these ranges depending upon the particular manufacturing process chosen, as described herein below. Preferably, structure/material 12 is manufactured having a porosity which generally matches the porosity of the surrounding tissue into which carrier/implant 10 is placed. Similarly, structure/material 14 can be manufactured to a porosity substantially equal to its surrounding tissue. Thus, depending upon the specific application desired, the method of manufacturing carrier/implant 10 can be quickly and easily altered to contain pores of varying size and density.
Carrier/implant 10 can also be perforated with a plurality of passages 20 extending partially or completely through carrier/implant 10. Passages 20 are suitably placed to provide additional sites or locations into or onto which surrounding tissue can enter and/or temporarily bond. Passages 20 are generally larger in diameter than pores 16 or 18 and can be mechanically placed as described below.
Referring to FIG. 1A, a cross-sectional view of structure/material 12 is shown having numerous access sites or locations formed by pores 16 and passages 20. As shown by the comparisons of FIGS. 1A and 1B, structure/material 14 is less porous than structure/material 12 to substantially match a less porous tissue surrounding structure/material 14 than the tissue surrounding structure/material 12. Moreover, structure/ material 12 and 14 can be manufactured having porosity and mechanical properties (such as stiffness and compressibility) to substantially match the porosity and/or mechanical properties of surrounding tissue into which structure/ material 12 and 14 is placed.
Tissue carrier/implant 10, having structure/ materials 12 and 14 of possibly different porosity and/or mechanical properties, is particularly adapted for placement into a juncture region adjoining tissue areas having dissimilar porosity and/or mechanical properties. Structure/materials within carrier/implant 10 correspondingly can be processed to have porosity and mechanical properties such as stiffness, compressibility etc. to substantially match the properties of the tissue juncture region after implantation. As illustrated in FIG. 2, a physiological environment into which carrier/implant 10 can be placed includes, but is not limited to, a human or animal articular cartilage and underlying bone. Carrier/implant 10 is shown insertable into a bore 22 through skin 24, through underlying cartilage 26 and into bone 28. Alternatively, carrier/implant 10 can be placed entirely within bone 28 to provide structural support to the juncture region between cortical bone and cancellous bone. Accordingly, bore 22 and implantable carrier/implant 10 can be placed into any physiological system having a juncture between dissimilar types of tissue. As used herein, "tissue" includes cellular structure/material found subdermally anywhere within an animal or human anatomy. Any region joining two dissimilar types of tissue (i.e., bone, cartilage, tendon, skin, ligament, cementum, etc.) can be implanted with the bonded dissimilar structure/ materials 12 and 14 of carrier/implant 10. By bonding each structure/material together and implanting the combination within a tissue juncture, carrier/implant 10 ensures the tissue juncture remains together during the repair process, which may help to promote rapid healing.
FIG. 3 illustrates carrier/implant 10 fully implanted within dissimilar tissue regions, e.g., cartilage 26 and bone 28. After inserting carrier/implant 10 through hole 22, outer skin 24 is sutured over the bore passage to prevent infection from entering the underlying region. As can be appreciated from the present invention, carrier/implant 10 is produced in any desired shape with differing porosity and/or mechanical characteristics depending upon the size and composition of the target area. In this example, carrier/implant 10 is cylindrical in shape having an outer diameter generally matching the inner diameter of a bore or hole 22 created in the region of interest. However, other shapes can be produced and inserted into the hole. Regardless of the shape used, the carrier/implant can expand to match the internal cavity or bore size prior to or during the bioerodible process. Still further, the proportionate sizes of structure/ material 12 and 14 can be varied depending upon the relative location of carrier/implant 10 in relation to the interface region. For example, cartilage 26 may be thicker than that indicated in FIG. 3 such that its thickness would be equal to or greater than the bore 22 depth into bone 28. Consequently, structure/material 14 can be made larger or thicker than structure/material 12 to correspond with the relative shift in boundary between cartilage 26 and bone 28.
Bone 28 generally presents a less porous and stiffer structure/material than overlying cartilage 26. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 3, pores 18 can be made relatively smaller than pores 16. Accorded access sites or locations into pores 18 and 16 are dissimilar to generally match surrounding bone 28 and tissue 26, respectively. During the time in which bone 28 and cartilage 26 tissue regenerate and grow into the damaged region partially replaced with carrier/implant 10 and pores 18 and 16, respectively, carrier/implant 10 maintains a somewhat rigid support structure. As the structure of carrier/implant 10 gradually erodes or dissolves, regeneration of tissue takes place which replaces the structural support lost during erosion. Accordingly, the present invention serves to provide better anchorage of regenerated tissue in the damaged or defective region and also provides a temporary support structure which need not be subsequently removed as in conventional rods and pins. The bioerodible carrier/implant 10 is particularly useful in juncture regions where slow healing occurs due to lack of vasculature or cell population.
As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, carrier/implant 10 is insertable as a press-fit in the osteochondral defect region. The swelling characteristics of the bioerodible structure/ material 14 and 12 is expected to improve retention of carrier/implant 10 within the defect region. Comparable porosity and/or mechanical properties of structure/ materials 14 and 12 to that of surrounding tissue avoids stress concentrations during joint articulation. By matching characteristics such as porosity, exchange of nutrients from the tissue into carrier/implant 10 is provided as though normal growth patterns occur. Confocal laser scanning micrographs of carrier/implant 10 may illustrate carrier/implant 10 having pores 16 and 18 of varying sizes. The carrier/implant 10 is generally microporous and its pores are preferably interconnected throughout the cross-sectional area of the structure/material.
The polymeric implant material of this invention may comprise other additives such as surfactants, solubilization enhancers and the like. For example, Serum Albumin (SA), such as Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) or Human Serum Albumin (HSA) may be present. It is preferred that if serum albumin is present, it be kept to a minimum. Some commercial preparations of desired bioactive agents is contain HSA, e.g., TGF-β of R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn. 55413, which contains 50 μg HSA/μg recombinant human TGF-β1. It is preferred that the amount of serum albumin be kept to less than about 100 μg SA/μg bioactive agent. It has been discovered by the inventors herein that larger amounts of serum albumin may prevent uptake of polypeptides by the polymer during implant manufacture and may alter in vivo release kinetics (such as causing an initial large burst of polypeptide to be released after implantation). When serum albumin is kept to a minimum, the polypeptide may be incorporated into and onto the polymer so that it is continuously and smoothly released over some or all of the degradation period of the implant.
The implant material of this invention is capable of releasing the bioactive agent over its entire period of degradation. Preferably, this release period is at least about six weeks up to about twelve weeks and more preferably, at least about eight weeks up to about ten weeks. In use, it has been found that superior cartilage healing occurs when the growth factor is released over such a period of time.
The invention also relates to a method of making a biodegradable, porous, polymeric implant material having a biologically active agent incorporated therein, which during use in an in vivo environment preferably provides substantially continuous release of the bioactive agent over some or all of the degradation period of the polymer, comprising:
a. solubilization of said polymer in a suitable organic solvent to form a first solution. Any organic material capable of solubilizing the polymer may be used so long as evaporation of the solvent does not leave residues which cannot be removed and which would deleteriously alter the bioactive agent or polymer. Acetone and methylene chloride are preferred solvents with acetone being most preferred.
b. addition of a second solution or suspension, preferably an aqueous solution or suspension, of said bioactive agent to said first solution to form a third solution. Solubility enhancers such as surfactants as known to the art may be included as required. Bis phosphate which retards or inhibits osteoclasts, may be included, for example in patients suffering from osteoporosis, where bone formation is difficult to achieve, in part because osteoclasts are overactive. Otherwise bis phosphate would not be a desirable additive. It is preferred that less than about 100 μg serum albumin per μg bioactive agent be used.
c. removal of solvent from said third solution to form a solid mass. It is preferred to precipitate the polymer and associated bioactive agent from solution with a precipitating agent known to the art such as ethyl alcohol to form a solid gummy mass comprising polymer and bioactive agent. The third solution may also be subjected to drying such as with heat and/or vacuum. A precipitation step is preferred as this removes undesirable solvent residuals.
d. treatment of said solid mass in a mold with relatively high vacuum, such as between about 8 and about 20 microbars, preferably about 10 microbars.
The above steps are preferably performed at a temperature below the degradation temperature of the bioactive agent, e.g. preferably not more than about 42° C. when TGF-β is the bioactive agent. It is preferred that the completed implants be stored at low temperatures, e.g., about -50° C., prior to use so as to inhibit degradation of bioactive agents such as TGF-β which tend to degrade when stored at room temperature.
Preferably, the solid mass is subjected to vacuum in a lyophilizer at room temperature for at least about twenty hours. In a preferred embodiment, prior to this step, the polymer is subjected to vacuum via vacuum pump, e.g., about 20 millibars in a desiccator and rolled flat in several stages. The vacuum treatments help cause the polymer to achieve the desired porosity. Preferably, a uniform porosity with an average pore size between about 50 and about 200 micrometers with pores accounting for more than about 50% of the implant volume is achieved. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the viscosity of the polymer and the magnitude and duration of vacuum, as well as temperature conditions, can be varied to vary the porosity.
Uniform incorporation of the bioactive agent into the polymeric implant material may be achieved by solubilizing the polymer and mixing therewith a uniform solution or suspension of the bioactive agent such that the agent is substantially evenly distributed in the solution. Thereafter, the solvent may be removed, preferably by precipitation followed by treatment with low vacuum, and the polymer may be pressed into a mold and subjected to relatively high vacuum, e.g. about 8-20 μbars, until an implant material having the desired porosity and/or mechanical properties is achieved.
The method may also be varied in order to produce an implant material having mechanical properties and porosity matching those of the target tissues as described above. When the implant material is to have the properties of bone, it is preferably subjected to oven curing, preferably at a temperature of between about 40° and about 47° C. for a period of up to about 48 hours. As the implant material includes bioactive agents the temperature is preferably kept below temperatures which would cause substantial degradation of the bioactive agent.
The preferred method also involves piercing the polymer inside the mold with pins or other sharp implements prior to vacuum treatment in the lyophilizer so as to form passages through the implant having an average diameter of about 1.0 to about 2.0 mm. In another preferred method, the pins or other sharp implements are placed inside the mold and left there during the curing process to form the passages. Preferably such passages are placed substantially parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the implant and are spaced apart from each other a distance of about 1 to about 2 mm.
A method for using the implant material of this invention is also provided. The method allows continuous in vivo delivery to a patient of a regulated amount of a bioactive agent for a desired time period and includes implanting into tissue of said patient a porous implant material including a biodegradable polymer with a bioactive agent incorporated therein, said bioactive agent being present in an amount sufficient to provide a therapeutically effective dosage, and said implant material being present in an amount sufficient to degrade over the desired time period. A "regulated amount" of bioactive agent is an amount with a defined and predictable dosage at any given time. As shown herein, the implant materials of this invention are capable of delivering bioactive agents in slowly increasing amounts, rising to a predictable maximum peak, and slowly descending to a minimum amount. This predictability of release allows for the design of implants for delivering effective, non-toxic amounts of bioactive agents over a desired time period. This predictability of release also allows for the design of implants for delivering substantially low amounts of bioactive agents during the first weeks of use.
Preferably an implant composed of the biodegradable implant material of this invention is used for healing osteochondral defects and the bioactive agent is a growth factor, such as TGF-β1. The implant material of this invention is preferably present in an amount sufficient to provide a release period of eight weeks.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In a preferred embodiment, the implant materials of this invention are especially well-suited to promote healing of osteochondral tissue, and in particular articular cartilage defects. As shown herein, superior cartilage healing may be achieved using an implant made with the materials of this invention capable of controlled, smooth release of TGF-β over a period of at least about eight weeks.
The implant material of a preferred embodiment has an average pore size between about 50 and about 200 μm and its porosity accounts for more than 50% of its total volume. In addition, it has passages or macropores having a diameter of between about 1.0 and about 2.0 mm. The implant thus forms a scaffolding which promotes the flow of body fluids and allows ingrowth of cartilage cells during the healing process. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, applicants suggest that when TGF-β is uniformly incorporated in the polymer by the method disclosed herein, it has a chemotactic effect in promoting cell ingrowth and, in the in vivo environment surrounding the newly ingrowing cells, becomes released, in turn stimulating differentiation of the cartilage cells. Meanwhile, the polymer biodegrades by hydrolysis and the healing tissue fills the space.
It is preferable that the growth factor be continuously available over the entire healing period. Moreover, it is preferred that a reduced amount of growth factor be initially released. Furthermore, such a reduced amount of growth factor is preferably released while the implant is degrading at a substantially higher rate (on a percentage basis) than the growth factor is being released. If a relatively large amount of growth factor were to be released within the first few days of the healing process it is possible that such an initial burst might prevent migration of relatively undifferentiated mesenchymal cells throughout the defect by causing too early cell differentiation of chondrocytes. In tissues such as cartilage, where a surplus of mesenchymal cells is typically not available to migrate into the defect, it is preferable to ensure that those which are available are able to do so. Comparative data show improved migration of cells into the implant material when TGF-β is present.
By the methods of this invention, the bioactive material is intimately associated with the polymer. Tests of polymer fragments broken off during the degradation process have shown that they have growth factor attached. Thus, a continuous smooth release of growth factor may be provided over the entire degradation period of the polymer.
The implant materials of this invention preferably mimic the mechanical properties and porosity of the tissues in which they are placed. The methods of this invention allow the stiffness and compressibility as well as the porosity of the material to be varied as desired. Methods of testing such properties are well-known to the art, for example via measurements of creep deformation and stress relaxation as described in co-pending U.S. patent application 07/837,401 incorporated herein by reference. Numerical values for various mechanical properties of tissues are also known to the art, for example, with respect to articular cartilage, compressive stiffness is in the range of 0.79 MPa±0.36 (Armstrong, C. G., et al. (1982), "Variations in the Intrinsic Mechanical Properties of Human Articular Cartilage with Age, Degeneration, and Water Content," J. Bone and Joint Surgery 64A:88-94), and tensile stiffness is in the range of 1-15 MAa, and less than 30 MAa (Akizuki, et al. (1986), "Tensile Properties of Human Knee Joint Cartilage: I. Influence of Ionic Conditions, Weight Bearing, and Fibrillation on the Tensile Modulus," J. Orthopaedic Res. 4:379-392. Cortical bone has a compressive stiffness of about 7,000 MPa (Fung, Y. C. (1981), "Biomechanics-Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues," Springer Verlag, N.Y. pp. 384-385), and a tensile stiffness of about 17,000 MPa (Reilly et al. (1974), J. Biomech. 7:271-275; Reilly and Buskin (1974), J. Bone and Joint Surgery 56A:1001-1022. Ligaments and tendons lack compressive stiffness. Ligaments have a tensile stiffness of about 600 MPa (Woo, S. et al. (1987), "The Biomechanical and Morphological Changes in the Medial Collateral Ligament of the Rabbit after Immobilization and Remobilization," J. Bone and Joint Surgery 69A:1200-1211); and tendons have a tensile stiffness of about 800 MPa (Woo, S. (1982), "Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments," Biorheology 19:385-396). Further, such tissues are readily available to the skilled worker to use for comparison with the polymeric materials of this invention, in order to provide matching of the mechanical properties of the implant material to those of the tissue in which it is to be placed.
In preparing the polymeric implants of this invention, the viscosity of the polymer may be varied, as well as the amount and rate of vacuum applied, compression applied prior to curing, and during curing, as well as curing temperature and temperatures during application of vacuum, and time periods for various process steps. These conditions may be varied in accordance with the properties desired in the implant material.
To increase porosity the process preferably utilizes higher vacuums while the polymer is wet. Rolling of the polymer at this stage tends to increase surface area leading to faster evaporation, breaking bubbles of trapped solvents and tending to cause formation of numerous pores. The polymeric material is naturally elastic to visco-elastic, and may be made stiffer by longer curing at higher temperatures, and by higher vacuum to reduce solvent content of precipitants.
In addition to, or instead of growth factors such as TGF-β, the implant materials of this invention may also include enzymes, cytokines, hormones, and medicinal substances for which a controlled, predictable release pattern is desired. The invention has been illustrated using trypsin inhibitor as well as TGF-β.
As disclosed herein, the methods of making this invention include the use of polymeric materials of selected molecular weights. As is well-known to the art, a way to adjust the degradation period of biodegradable polymers is by control of molecular weight. The degradation period is further a function of the mechanical properties and physical conformation of the implant material. Applicants have found that their polymers do not show the type of bulk degradation found by prior workers to result in "dose dumping." Instead, the implants of this invention deliver a smooth, predictable, amount of bioactive material over a predictable period of time, and may thus be used in therapeutic methods where accurate prediction of drug release is required so that dosage can be regulated within effective, non-toxic levels.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been directed to particular embodiments. It will be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art, that modifications and changes in both the implant material and the method of making and using the material can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. It is the intention in the following claims to cover all such equivalent modifications and variations which fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.
EXAMPLES Example 1. Continuous Controlled Release
A two-phase implant comprising a bone phase and a cartilage phase is prepared substantially according to the method of U.S. patent application 08/123,812. The bioactive agent, trypsin inhibitor (TI) is added only to the cartilage phase. In each phase, 50:50 poly(DL lactide co-glycolide) (PLG) copolymer with a small inherent viscosity and weight average molecular weight of 53 kD is solubilized in 6 ml acetone per 1 g of polymer and precipitated with 10 ml of ethanol per 1 g of polymers to form a solid, gummy mass. Three mg of trypsin inhibitor (TI) is added per implant. The bone phase contains 0.0675 g of polymer. The cartilage phase, which has the TI, contains 0.043 g of polymer. The polymer is packed into a teflon mold and subjected to 10 m Torr vacuum at 4° C. for 24 hours, partially removed, and placed in a lyophilizer under the same conditions for another 24 hours. At the end of the curing period, the implants are completely removed from the mold and stored in the lyophilizer until tested. The implants have a size of 4 mm diameter×6 mm deep.
A total of 84 implants are constructed and divided into seven groups of six control implants and seven groups of six implants with TI. Degradation and enzyme release are examined at t=0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks. Implants are placed in plastic vials containing 5 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, at 37° C. Every 3.5 days, 1.5 ml aliquots of the PBS are aspirated and immediately frozen. At the end of the test period, implants are removed from the PBS solution, placed in a desiccator at 25 m Torr, and then placed in a freezer at -20° C. until testing. The collected aliquot is thawed for one hour at room temperature prior to testing. TI release characteristics are quantified using the micro bichinonic acid (BCA) assay for protein content. Implant degradation is monitored by measuring molecular weight using gel permeation chromatography, examining compressive properties (using an automated mechanical tester which measures stress relaxation and creep deformation), and performing scanning electron microscopy and gross morphology evaluations to quantitatively observe implant temporal changes.
TI is slowly released at a rate of approximately 1% every 3.5 days for the first three weeks, followed by larger protein release, and a peak of 14% is attained at six weeks. After seven weeks, release subsides to about 2% every 3.5 days. Cumulatively, about 95% of the original TI is released over the 10 week period. Enhanced release is between 3 and 7 weeks. FIG. 4 displays the cumulative percent release of TI from the carrier over the ten-week period. The release kinetics follow a sigmoidal pattern.
FIG. 5 displays the temporal change in average molecular weight. The initial molecular weight of the carrier implant and control are 52.5 Kilo Dalton ("kD") and 60 kD respectively. A 34% reduction in molecular weight is seen in both groups during the first week, followed by a continued steady decrease until the molecular weight has decreased to less than 1 kD by the fourth week. There are no significant differences between the two groups at any time period.
FIG. 6 displays the temporal changes in surface axial strain, always measured at one hour after application of a 0.87N step load under conditions of creep indentation. There is a significant decrease during the first week of testing in both groups, followed by an increase during weeks 2-4. The implants change from being smooth and translucent at t=0 week to chalkish white at t=1 week, soft and sticky at t=4 weeks, and dissolved completely by ten weeks. Scanning electron microscopy pictures indicate that TI incorporation increases both the number and size of pores in implants at all time groups.
The TI is released in a progressive, time-dependent fashion instead of in a rapid, burst release. Approximately 95% of the TI originally placed in the implant is released in a gradual fashion over the ten-week test period. This indicates that the TI is intimately associated with the polymer, probably due to its hydrophobic nature, and diffuses into the PBS together with the polymer fragments. Changes in polymer chain length and material weight parallel the release kinetics of TI. The lack of significant TI release (the release was less than 10%) during the first three weeks appears to be advantageous. It also suggests that breakdown of implant structure above a threshold level may be necessary to achieve higher levels of release. Furthermore, TI does not alter the degradation kinetics of the polymer, although there are distinct morphologic differences, supporting the hypothesis that polymer breakdown is the underlying mechanism of TI release.
The decrease in surface axial strain seen at one week indicates an increase in stiffness of the implants, probably due to an initial increase in crystallinity caused by hydrolytic scission of the amorphous regions. It is possible that the PLG material used in the present study has a very low degree of crystallinity, which increases upon degradation and manifests itself in a change in mechanical properties of the implant. The subsequent, twofold increase in surface axial strain indicates decreased stiffness of the implants, likely resulting from the ongoing, continuous breakdown of implant integrity due to polymer degradation.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory of how the invention works, and recognizing that there are many possible explanations, the inventors suggest that the original homogenous implant placed in buffered saline or in the in vivo environment immediately begins to undergo hydrolytic scission of ester bonds. The implants originally maintain their structural integrity despite the drop in their molecular weight in the first four weeks. The initial degradation process is probably more pronounced at the surface of the implant compared to the core because the degradation products formed at the surface are able to freely diffuse into the PBS. This surface diffusion could contribute to the small release of TI seen in the first three weeks. It is likely that the breakdown products and TI released at the center could result in an increase in osmolarity which may have resulted in swelling. In the 4-7 week period the surface of the implant no longer has the ability to halt TI exudation from the center, thus causing rapid TI release. This is supported by the increase in porosity seen with scanning electron microscopy with time.
Example 2. Cartilage Healing
Two-phase biodegradable implants are designed and constructed using 50:50 poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) with inherent viscosity of 0.71 dl/gm (weight average molecular weight 65 kD). The implant consists of a "bone" phase that abuts against the underlying bone for anchoring and a "cartilage" phase which interfaces with the adjacent layer of articular cartilage. The polymer is solubilized in acetone and precipitated with ethanol. The gummy "bone" composite is placed under 10 m Torr vacuum for six hours and then packed into a Teflon mold under 10 mTorr and 24° C. for 24 hours. The implants are then partially removed and allowed to remain under the same conditions for 24 hours. New polymer is then solubilized in acetone and combined with the appropriate amount of Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β). The growth factor, recombinant human TGF-β1, is solubilized in sterile water, stirred overnight and added to the soft polymer. 2 μg TGF-β1 is dissolved in 0.2 ml sterile water. The TGF-β preparation provided by R&D Systems contains 100 μg HSA. The sterile water contains 0.1 mg/ml BSA for implants to be used with rabbits and 0.1 mg/ml of goat serum albumin (GSA) for implants to be used with goats. The appropriate volume of solution to give a total of 50 ng of TGF-β is used in the "cartilage" phase only of each implant. The two-phase implants are placed in the mold under 10 mTorr and 4° C. for 24 hours, partially removed, and placed in a lyophilizer under the same conditions for another 24 hours. At the end of the curing period, the implants are completely removed from the mold and stored in the lyophilizer until required for implantation into the host. The curing techniques used for the two phases render the implant porous and the "cartilage" phase softer than the "bone" phase. The two phases are mechanically tested using an automated indenter and modeled using the linear biphasic theory (Mow, V. C. et. al. (1980), J. Biomech. Eng. 102:73-84).
Cylindrical, 4 mm×6 mm, full-thickness defects are created with a low-speed drill, under saline irrigation, in the central posterior medial condyle of each right knee joint, through a posteromedial approach. Defects are filled with carriers containing 50 ng of TGF-β, implants without growth factor, or are left empty as controls. The animals are allowed free cage activity for either four or eight weeks, prior to sacrifice. A total of 72 New Zealand male white rabbits are used. The quality of healing is examined at four weeks (36 rabbits) and at eight weeks (36 rabbits) using gross morphology, biomechanics, and histomorphometry. Statistically the results are compared with analysis of variance and multiple comparisons tests.
The repair osteochondral defect and adjacent site are biomechanically tested using an automated indenter, under conditions of biphasic creep indentation. The three intrinsic material properties of repair and adjacent cartilage are obtained using a numerical algorithm (Athanasiou et al. (1992), Trans. Orth. Res. Soc. 17(1) :172) based on biphasic finite element methods (Spilker et al. (1990), Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 112:138) and nonlinear optimization techniques. The adjacent site is tested 3 mm anterior to the defect. After biomechanical testing, each osteochondral specimen is sectioned, stained with Alcian blue, and digitized to obtain the geometric parameters needed in the finite element modeling. The Cray supercomputer is used for these analyses. Histologically, each osteochondral specimen is decalcified and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Sections are analyzed with an image analysis system to measure the percent of trabecular bony repair in each defect.
At four weeks, mild synovitis is observed in the majority of the group having the implant without TGF-β, in the group having the implant with TGF-β or the control group. There is no synovitis noted at eight weeks in any group. Histologically, new bone formation is noted in all control and experimental defect sites. However, control specimens show only partial bony healing with more fibrous tissue present than in either experimental group. This fibrous tissue is noted to reach the articular surface emphasizing the limited healing of control osteochondral defects at eight weeks.
Fifty percent of the animals implanted with TGF-β demonstrate the best osteochondral healing with greatest defect bone density and osteoblastic activity. Animals with the implant without TGF-β show gross destructive change without an obvious histologic etiology; furthermore all implant is resorbed and no foreign body giant cell reaction is present. Thus, histologically, a clear difference between implants with and without TGF-β is observed.
The material properties and thickness of repair and adjacent cartilage of only the eight-week group are shown in Table 1. Corresponding to the histologic findings, the repair cartilage associated with TGF-β appears to exhibit greater stiffness (aggregate modulus), and lower permeability, than control or implant alone.
                                  TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
Material properties and thickness of healing articular cartilage (mean
± SD)
         Compressive
                 V.sub.3 Apparent
                        Permeability k ×
                                Cartilage Height
HEALING  Modulus H (MPa)
                 Compressibility
                        10.sup.15 (m.sup.4 /Ns)
                                h (mm)
__________________________________________________________________________
Control (n = 4)
         .38 ± .13
                 .19 ± .18
                        2.55 ± 0.98
                                .39 ± .31
Empty Defect
Implant (n = 4) No
         .35 ± .12
                 .29 ± .10
                        2.32 ± 0.47
                                .49 ± .23
TGFβ
Carrier (n = 4)
         .51 ± .22
                 .14 ± .08
                        2.15 ± 0.69
                                .55 ± .22
50 ng TGFβ
__________________________________________________________________________
Example 3. Release of TGF-β
Release kinetics of TGF-β-containing polymeric implants are studied using two-phase implants made in accordance with the procedure of Example 2 using BSA rather than GSA. Each implant contains 180 ng of TGF-β from R & D Systems, containing 50 μg HSA per μg TGF-β. The amount of TGF-β lost during the implant manufacture is determined by bioassay of the solvents used (stimulation of alkaline phosphatase in ROS 17/2.8 cells). When the TGF-β is dissolved in water alone, 12.6% is lost in the wash; when 0.1 mg/ml BSA is added, 46.5% is lost; and when TGF-β is dissolved in 1 mg/ml BSA+4 mM HCl, 71.5% is lost.
Implants ±TGF-β (BSA/HCl) are incubated in 1 ml PBS for twelve weeks; every 3.5 days the PBS is removed and stored at -70° C., and fresh PBS applied. TGF-β release is assayed by radioimmunoassay (anti-TGF-β1). Of the 12.64 ng TGF-β released, 7.4% is released during the first three weeks, 22.5% in the second quarter, 27.3% in the third quarter, and 42.8% in the last three weeks.
Fourth passage resting zone chondrocytes are cultured on implants ±TGF-β in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 μg/ml ascorbate, and antibiotics. At confluence, fresh media are added and after 24 hours, 3 H!-thymidine and 3 H!-uridine incorporation and alkaline phosphatase specific activity are measured. All parameters are inhibited in cells cultured on the implants with respect to controls. These results indicate that there is a time-dependent, continuous release of TGF-β from the implants supporting previous observations using soybean trypsin inhibitor as a model protein.
Example 4. Preparation of Implant
A biodegradable, porous, two-phase osteochondral implant is made of 50:50 poly(DL) lactide-co-glycolide (PLG) and used as a controlled release delivery system for recombinant human transforming growth factor β1 (rhTGF-β1 ). The two-phase implant consists of a stiffer bone phase which interfaces with subchondral bone to provide fixation, and a softer cartilage phase which interfaces with a chondral defect. Other design considerations include high porosity at both macroscopic and microscopic levels and use as a scaffold for tissue ingrowth. 4 mm×6 mm cylindrical two-phase polymeric implants are designed and produced in a mold for implantation in rabbits. 7 mm×7 mm cylindrical two-phase polymeric implants are designed and produced in a different mold for implantation in goats. The molds are cylindrical in shape and pierced with holes to allow insertion of steel needles during the molding process. Implants are made under sterile conditions; all equipment has been autoclaved and cleaned with a 70% ethanol-distilled water mixture. Containers are kept covered and sealed until used.
The bone phase for the goat implants is made by means of the following protocol: The PGA/PLA is stored at -20° C. After removing from the freezer, it is opened under controlled conditions using nitrogen inside a closed plexiglas chamber so as not to expose it to atmospheric conditions. The polymer is weighed in a 40 mL Teflon beaker. After weighing the beaker and zeroing the balance, the desired quantity of PLG is scooped into the beaker and weighed. For cylindrical implants 7 mm in diameter×7 mm in length, 0.9 g PLG is required. The polymer is solubilized in acetone at a ratio of 6 mL/mg polymer. Acetone is poured into the beaker and stirred until all polymer is dissolved (substance is a yellowish liquid) Typically about 20 minutes of stirring is required. Upon completion of solution, ethyl alcohol is added to the solution at a ratio of 5 mL/mg polymer. The mixture is stirred for approximately five minutes to form a gum-like polymer in liquid ethanol. The excess ethanol is poured off. Additional ethyl alcohol is added at a ratio of 50 mL/mg polymer, and the mixture is left uncovered for 3-5 minutes at room temperature. The solid is then separated from the liquid. The solid is placed in a Nalgene (PGC Scientifics, Gaithersburg, Md.) desiccator and flattened and sponged to allow escape of excess ethanol. The vacuum pump is operated via a programmable timer. After three minutes, the vacuum is turned off and the polymer rolled with a Teflon bar three times to form a sheet approximately 0.5 mm thick. The sheet is again vacuumed for two minutes and rolling is repeated. After vacuuming for three additional minutes (eight minutes total), the machine is turned off and the polymer weighed.
The total mass is divided into twelve equal portions, weighing each portion, and each portion is placed into a mold, poking with a stainless steel poker. The mold is placed under vacuum for an additional five minutes and examined for the formation of micropores. Following this, it is subjected to vacuum for 17 additional minutes, making a total time under vacuum of 30 minutes. Other than poking (with a specially-designed stainless steel poker 7 mm on one end and 4 mm on the other), the implants are not handled during the five and 17 minute vacuum periods.
The molds are then placed in a water bath at 37° C., connected to a lyophilizer at high vacuum (approximately 10 microbars) for two hours. The entire molds are then removed from the water bath. Compressive pressure is then applied. For instance, in a preferred embodiment, the mold lids are secured with washers and wing nuts, and five stainless steel needles or pins are placed into the implants as mandated by holes drilled in the mold surface. The mold and implants are placed into the lyophilizer for approximately 20 hours under high vacuum at room temperature. After removal from vacuum, the implants are removed from the molds. They should have a diameter of 7 mm and a height of 5 mm. They are placed in a petri dish taped closed in an oven at 47° C. for 24 hours. Following this they are stored under vacuum in the lyophilizer at -51° C.
The cartilage phase of the goat implant is then prepared. The cartilage phase is designed to incorporate the bioactive agent. The cartilage phase is 2 mm thick and is attached to the 5 mm bone phase after the bone phase has been heated and cooled. No chemicals are used to stick one phase to the other. The same PLG is used to make the cartilage phase of the implants; however TGF-β is added only to this second phase. TGF-β1 is a stable, multifunctional polypeptide growth factor and is stimulatory for cells of mesenchymal origin. The purity is greater than 97% as determined by SDS-PAGE, visualized by silver stain. The endotoxin level is determined to be less than 0.1 ng per 1 microgram of the cytokine.
The TGF-β1 solution is prepared by reconstituting 2 micrograms thereof in 0.2 mL sterile filtered glass-distilled ultrapure water. All materials are handled under a hood. This will provide 180 ng TGF-β1 per implant.
The same procedure is followed as in preparing the bone phase, using 0.36 g PGA:PLA to make the cartilage phase for twelve 7 mm×7 mm implants. A 25 mL Teflon beaker may be used to solubilize the polymer. The solution may require 30 minutes of stirring because of the smaller amount. It is important to make sure the polymer is well-solubilized. The TGF-β1 solution is added by pipetting into the polymer/acetone solution and the mixture stirred for 3-5 minutes on the stirring machine. The polymer is then precipitated with ethyl alcohol as with the bone phase. The polymer is treated under vacuum in the Nalgene desiccator as for the bone phase, except that the polymer is rolled after 2 minutes of vacuum, rolled again after two more minutes of vacuum, and again after an additional two minutes of vacuum.
The bone phases are retrieved from the lyophilizer and placed into molds, rotated 180°, allowing the cartilage phase to be attached to what had been the bottom. The cartilage polymer is divided into twelve portions, placed into the molds on top of the bone phases and poked into place. The molds are vacuumed three minutes, and viewed under magnification, then poked again. This procedure is repeated with 4 additional minutes of vacuum, followed by 17 minutes of vacuum, for a total of 30 minutes under vacuum.
The molds are then subjected to high vacuum in the lyophilizer at 37° C. for four hours, pierced with five needles (or tines) per implant and placed into the lyophilizer for approximately 20 hours under high vacuum at room temperature. The completed implants are removed from the molds and stored in petri dishes placed closed under vacuum lyophilization at -51° C.

Claims (6)

We claim:
1. A porous bioerodible tissue implant device comprising a bioerodible synthetic polymeric material having a uniform non-fibrous composition characterized in that said material has a predetermined uniform porosity and is adapted to be implanted during use into cartilage, said polymeric material having the stiffness and compressibility properties of said cartilage.
2. A molded, porous bioerodible tissue implant device comprising a bioerodible polymeric material, said device having a uniform, substantially solid, composition throughout the volume enclosed by the implant, characterized in that said material has a predetermined uniform porosity and is adapted to be implanted during use into bone, said polymeric material having the stiffness and compressibility properties of said bone.
3. An implant device of claim 1 having access sites for receiving growth of tissue therein comprising passages extending into the material.
4. An implant device of claim 2 having access sites for receiving growth of tissue therein comprising passages extending into the material.
5. An implant device of claim 1 having a growth factor, bioactive agent to induce, promote, or support tissue ingrowth and repair incorporated into said polymeric material.
6. An implant device of claim 2 having a growth factor, bioactive agent to induce, promote, or support tissue ingrowth and repair incorporated into said polymeric material.
US08/452,796 1992-02-14 1995-05-30 Biodegradable implant Expired - Lifetime US5876452A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/452,796 US5876452A (en) 1992-02-14 1995-05-30 Biodegradable implant

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US83740192A 1992-02-14 1992-02-14
US08/123,812 US5607474A (en) 1992-02-14 1993-09-20 Multi-phase bioerodible implant/carrier and method of manufacturing and using same
US08/196,970 US6013853A (en) 1992-02-14 1994-02-15 Continuous release polymeric implant carrier
US08/452,796 US5876452A (en) 1992-02-14 1995-05-30 Biodegradable implant

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/196,970 Division US6013853A (en) 1992-02-14 1994-02-15 Continuous release polymeric implant carrier

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5876452A true US5876452A (en) 1999-03-02

Family

ID=26821925

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/452,796 Expired - Lifetime US5876452A (en) 1992-02-14 1995-05-30 Biodegradable implant

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US5876452A (en)

Cited By (210)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001006949A2 (en) * 1999-07-28 2001-02-01 Interface Biotech A/S In vitro repair of bone and/or cartilage defects
FR2799129A1 (en) 1999-10-04 2001-04-06 Medtronic Inc Medical electrical wire for stimulating or defibrillating the heart, including conductors and electrodes connected or integrated with biodegradable mounting block containing cardiac drug
US6245090B1 (en) 1997-11-07 2001-06-12 Salviac Limited Transcatheter occluding implant
US6248057B1 (en) 1998-07-28 2001-06-19 Innerdyne, Inc. Absorbable brachytherapy and chemotherapy delivery devices and methods
US20010031274A1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-10-18 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
WO2002007748A2 (en) * 2000-07-20 2002-01-31 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of cartilage growth with agonists of the non-proteolytically activated thrombin receptor
WO2002015950A1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2002-02-28 Synthes Ag Chur Bone-regeneration material
US20020052654A1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2002-05-02 C.R. Bard, Inc. Prosthetic repair fabric
US6395023B1 (en) * 1997-02-07 2002-05-28 Endovasc Ltd., Inc. Prosthesis with biodegradable surface coating and method for making same
WO2001070136A3 (en) * 2000-03-22 2002-05-30 Synthes Usa Plugs for filling bony defects
US6398808B1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2002-06-04 Scimed Life Systems, Inc. Localized delivery of genetic information from biostable materials
US20020072747A1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2002-06-13 Cohen Steven R. Partially resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US20020082679A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-06-27 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery or therapeutic capable agents
US6454811B1 (en) * 1998-10-12 2002-09-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Composites for tissue regeneration and methods of manufacture thereof
US6471980B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2002-10-29 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of mycophenolic acid
US20020165520A1 (en) * 2001-05-07 2002-11-07 Forman Michael R. Combination ionizing radiation and radiosensitizer delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US20020162791A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2002-11-07 Baxter International, Inc. Method for fabricating three dimensional structures
US6514286B1 (en) * 1996-12-03 2003-02-04 Osteobiologics, Inc. Biodegradable polymeric film
US20030033007A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-02-13 Avantec Vascular Corporation Methods and devices for delivery of therapeutic capable agents with variable release profile
US6520997B1 (en) 1999-12-08 2003-02-18 Baxter International Inc. Porous three dimensional structure
US20030050692A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-03-13 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US6537195B2 (en) 2001-05-07 2003-03-25 Xoft, Microtube, Inc. Combination x-ray radiation and drug delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US20030065400A1 (en) * 2001-04-12 2003-04-03 Beam Heather Ann Method and apparatus for engineered regenrative biostructures such as hydroxyapatite substrates for bone healing applications
US6548569B1 (en) 1999-03-25 2003-04-15 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
WO2003037223A1 (en) 2001-11-01 2003-05-08 Avantec Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for variably controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US6575888B2 (en) 2000-01-25 2003-06-10 Biosurface Engineering Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable brachytherapy device
US20030114936A1 (en) * 1998-10-12 2003-06-19 Therics, Inc. Complex three-dimensional composite scaffold resistant to delimination
US20030139801A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-07-24 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
WO2003061690A1 (en) * 2002-01-17 2003-07-31 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of bone growth and cartilage formation with thrombing peptide derivatives
EP1335686A2 (en) * 2000-10-24 2003-08-20 SDGI Holdings, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US6613432B2 (en) 1999-12-22 2003-09-02 Biosurface Engineering Technologies, Inc. Plasma-deposited coatings, devices and methods
US20030168396A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2003-09-11 Jacobson James D. Monolithic filter body and fabrication technique
US6652593B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2003-11-25 Synthes (Usa) Demineralized bone implants
US20040088053A1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2004-05-06 Hassan Serhan Regenerative implants for stabilizing the spine and devices for attachment of said implants
US20040110722A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2004-06-10 Ornberg Richard L. Modified hyaluronic acid polymers
US20040116332A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2004-06-17 Ornberg Richard L. Biopolymers modified with superoxide dismutase mimics
US20040138748A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2004-07-15 Synthes (Usa) Plugs for filling bony defects
US20040158317A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2004-08-12 Pharmasonics, Inc. Coated stent with ultrasound therapy
US20040180072A1 (en) * 2003-03-12 2004-09-16 Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Prosthesis with sustained release analgesic
US20040210218A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2004-10-21 Dixon Robert A. Vertebral implant for bone fixation or interbody use
US20040220680A1 (en) * 1995-10-16 2004-11-04 Depuy Acromed, Inc. Tissue repair matrix
US20040234576A1 (en) * 2003-05-08 2004-11-25 Tepha, Inc., State Of Incorporation Delaware Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US20050025809A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-02-03 Tepha, Inc. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate matrices for sustained drug delivery
US20050071003A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2005-03-31 Ku David N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US20050074481A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2005-04-07 Brekke John H. Device for regeneration of articular cartilage and other tissue
US20050075408A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2005-04-07 Ringeisen Timothy A. Method for making a porous polymeric material
US20050085922A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2005-04-21 Shappley Ben R. Shaped filler for implantation into a bone void and methods of manufacture and use thereof
US6894027B2 (en) 2000-07-19 2005-05-17 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of bone growth with thrombin peptide derivatives
US20050125054A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2005-06-09 Avantec Vascular Corporation Devices delivering therapeutic agents and methods regarding the same
US20050159812A1 (en) * 2004-01-16 2005-07-21 Dinger Fred B.Iii Bone-tendon-bone implant
US20050177118A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2005-08-11 Hoganson David M. Resorbable polymeric device for localized drug delivery
US20050177237A1 (en) * 2001-04-12 2005-08-11 Ben Shappley Spinal cage insert, filler piece and method of manufacturing
US20050177236A1 (en) * 2002-02-19 2005-08-11 Claude Mathieu Intervertebral implant
US6939375B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2005-09-06 Avantac Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US20050196452A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2005-09-08 Boyan Barbara D. Surface directed cellular attachment
US20050203612A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2005-09-15 Avantec Vascular Corporation Devices delivering therapeutic agents and methods regarding the same
US20050209705A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2005-09-22 Niederauer Gabriele G Implant scaffold combined with autologous or allogenic tissue
US20050222688A1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2005-10-06 Medtronic, Inc. Transmural concentric multilayer ingrowth matrix within well-defined porosity
US20050222687A1 (en) * 2004-04-02 2005-10-06 Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Cartilage implant assembly and method for implantation
US20050240281A1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2005-10-27 Slivka Michael A Fiber-reinforced, porous, biodegradable implant device
US6966918B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2005-11-22 Ethicon G.M.B.H. Reinforced areal implant
US20050273178A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2005-12-08 Boyan Barbara D Load bearing biocompatible device
US6974571B2 (en) * 1995-03-28 2005-12-13 Thomas Jefferson University Isolated stromal cells and methods of using the same
US20050278025A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Salumedica Llc Meniscus prosthesis
US20060029637A1 (en) * 2004-08-04 2006-02-09 Tice Thomas R Methods for manufacturing delivery devices and devices thereof
US20060045902A1 (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-03-02 Serbousek Jon C Polymeric wrap for in vivo delivery of osteoinductive formulations
US20060058470A1 (en) * 2004-08-03 2006-03-16 Tepha, Inc. Non-curling polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures
US20060057184A1 (en) * 2004-09-16 2006-03-16 Nycz Jeffrey H Process to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) with osteoinductive materials
US7018405B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2006-03-28 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of methylprednisolone
US20060085071A1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2006-04-20 Beat Lechmann Intervertebral implant
US20060153001A1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2006-07-13 Flavio Hoerger Method to impregnate a porous bone replacement material
US20060177513A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-10 Tepha, Inc. Embolization using poly-4-hydroxybutyrate particles
US20060212109A1 (en) * 2001-02-13 2006-09-21 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US20060287659A1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2006-12-21 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate nerve regeneration devices
US20070009610A1 (en) * 2005-07-11 2007-01-11 Carina Syring Engineered osteochondral construct for treatment of articular cartilage defects
US20070009606A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2007-01-11 Serdy James G Manufacturing process, such as three dimensional printing, including binding of water-soluble material followed by softening and flowing and forming films of organic-solvent-soluble material
US7226482B2 (en) 2003-09-02 2007-06-05 Synthes (U.S.A.) Multipiece allograft implant
US20070142898A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2007-06-21 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of mizoribine
US20070150051A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2007-06-28 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Vascular implants and methods of fabricating the same
US20070148242A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2007-06-28 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc Preparation for repairing cartilage tissue, especially articular cartilage defects
US20070179622A1 (en) * 2006-01-25 2007-08-02 Salumedica, Llc Methods of producing pva hydrogel implants and related devices
US20070185585A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2007-08-09 Brat Bracy Implant Scaffold Combined With Autologous Tissue, Allogenic Tissue, Cultured Tissue, or combinations Thereof
US20070221742A1 (en) * 2004-06-03 2007-09-27 Flavio Hoerger Device for impregnating a porous bone replacement material
US20070233264A1 (en) * 2006-03-28 2007-10-04 Nycz Jeffrey H Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US20070233135A1 (en) * 2006-03-28 2007-10-04 Gil Carlos E Osteochondral repair assembly including retracting spacer, kit and method
US20070239195A1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2007-10-11 Nocca David J Adjustable Prosthetic Band
US20070292470A1 (en) * 2006-06-15 2007-12-20 Medtronic Vascular, Inc. Implantable Medical Devices and Methods for Making the Same
WO2007146232A2 (en) * 2006-06-14 2007-12-21 University Of Delaware Compositions and methods for repair of tissues
EP1883398A2 (en) * 2005-02-01 2008-02-06 Osteobiologics, Inc. Method and device for selective addition of a bioactive agent to a multi-phase implant
US20080058953A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Scarborough Nelson L Demineralized cancellous strip DBM graft
KR100811765B1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2008-03-07 알데코아 에두아르도 아니투아 Method for surface treatment of implants or prosthesis made of titanium or other materials
US20080107711A1 (en) * 2006-11-08 2008-05-08 Alexis Paul Shelokov Bioabsorbable Implantable Material Fortified with Antibiotics for Localized Delivery of Drugs
US20080133008A1 (en) * 2003-04-29 2008-06-05 Muscuoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cartilage repair mixture containing allograft chondrocytes
US20080132602A1 (en) * 2006-12-01 2008-06-05 Tepha, Inc. Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers
US20080154233A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Apparatus for delivering a biocompatible material to a surgical site and method of using same
US20080183274A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2008-07-31 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Delivery devices for implanting devices at intersecting lumens
US20080188936A1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2008-08-07 Tornier, Inc. System and method for repairing tendons and ligaments
US20080214998A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2008-09-04 Ed Kurek Perfusion Device and Method
US20080243029A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US20080255676A1 (en) * 2007-01-24 2008-10-16 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Two piece cancellous construct for cartilage repair
US7442303B2 (en) 1999-12-08 2008-10-28 Baxter International Inc. Microporous filter membrane, method of making microporous filter membrane and separator employing microporous filter membranes
US20080274157A1 (en) * 2003-04-29 2008-11-06 Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Cartilage implant plug with fibrin glue and method for implantation
US20080300684A1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-04 Shelokov Alexis P System and method for controlled delivery of bone morphogenic protein and other bone graft substitutes for bone formation, repair and healing
US20080306608A1 (en) * 2005-12-07 2008-12-11 Nycz Jeffrey H Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US20090037148A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2009-02-05 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Biodegradable/bioresorbable tissue augmentation/reconstruction device
US20090043373A1 (en) * 2007-02-09 2009-02-12 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Vascular implants and methods of fabricating the same
US20090069901A1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2009-03-12 Katherine Gomes Truncale Cartilage allograft plug
US20090112332A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Alexis Paul Shelokov Bone graft and bone graft substitutes with antibiotics for sustained, localized release of antibiotics for reducing postoperative surgical wound infection in spinal and other bone surgery
US20090124535A1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2009-05-14 Peter Markland Viscous terpolymers as drug delivery platform
US20090142307A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2009-06-04 Athanasiou Kyriacos A Shape-Based Approach for Scaffoldless Tissue Engineering
US20090228031A1 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-09-10 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Instruments and methods used when repairing a defect on a tissue surface
US20090291112A1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2009-11-26 Truncale Katherine G Allograft osteochondral plug combined with cartilage particle mixture
US20100049322A1 (en) * 2008-08-19 2010-02-25 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Osteochondral repair implants and methods
US20100145459A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2010-06-10 Mcdonough William P Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US20100158978A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Peter Markland Bioactive spray coating compositions and methods of making and uses thereof
US20100160891A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Tipton Arthur J Elastic implantable composites and implants comprising same
US20100158969A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Tice Thomas R Flexible implantable composites and implants comprising same
US20100168807A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-07-01 Burton Kevin W Bioactive terpolymer compositions and methods of making and using same
US7763270B2 (en) 2002-09-10 2010-07-27 Scil Technology Gmbh Metal implant coated under reduced oxygen concentration with osteoinductive protein
US20100305704A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2010-12-02 Synthes Gmbh Intervertebral implant with fixation geometry
US20100305696A1 (en) * 2007-05-24 2010-12-02 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Hybrid soft tissue implants from progenitor cells and biomaterials
US20100312346A1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2010-12-09 Thomas Kueenzi Low profile intervertebral implant
US20100331979A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Mcdade Robert L Biphasic implant device transmitting mechanical stimulus
US20100330181A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Castiglione-Dodd Emme M Biphasic implant device providing gradient
US20100331998A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Ringeisen Timothy A Electrokinetic device for tissue repair
US20110015743A1 (en) * 2009-07-14 2011-01-20 Doctors Research Group, Inc. Multi-density polymeric interbody spacer
US20110012280A1 (en) * 2009-07-14 2011-01-20 Doctors Research Group, Inc. Method for fabricating a multi-density polymeric interbody spacer
US20110027181A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-02-03 Searete Llc Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US20110028945A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-02-03 Searete Llc, Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US20110091518A1 (en) * 2009-09-22 2011-04-21 Danielle Biggs Implant devices having varying bioactive agent loading configurations
US20110093088A1 (en) * 2008-05-02 2011-04-21 Steve Chen Self deploying implant in needle
US20110125284A1 (en) * 2008-05-28 2011-05-26 University Of Bath Improvements in or Relating to Joints and/or Implants
US20110142906A1 (en) * 2009-09-17 2011-06-16 Surmodics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Implant Devices that Differ by Release Profile and Methods of Making and Using Same
US20110172826A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-07-14 Amodei Dario G Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US20110223253A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Artimplant Ab Physically stabilized biodegradable osteochondral implant and methods for its manufacture and implantation
EP2407473A2 (en) 2002-02-01 2012-01-18 ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Method for producing phosphorus-containing compounds
US20120077028A1 (en) * 2010-08-30 2012-03-29 Howard Bowman Terpolymer blends and their use as pressure-sensitive adhesives
USRE43714E1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2012-10-02 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Preparation for repairing cartilage defects or cartilage/bone defects in human or animal joints
US8292968B2 (en) 2004-10-12 2012-10-23 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cancellous constructs, cartilage particles and combinations of cancellous constructs and cartilage particles
US20120271418A1 (en) * 2011-02-28 2012-10-25 Tissue Regeneration Systems, Inc. Modular tissue scaffolds
US20130006354A1 (en) * 2010-02-26 2013-01-03 Limacorporate Spa Integrated prosthetic element
US8435551B2 (en) 2007-03-06 2013-05-07 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cancellous construct with support ring for repair of osteochondral defects
US8435305B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2013-05-07 Zimmer, Inc. Osteochondral graft delivery device and uses thereof
US20130144400A1 (en) * 2009-01-15 2013-06-06 The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Scaffold for bone and tissue repair in mammals
US8480757B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2013-07-09 Zimmer, Inc. Implants and methods for repair, replacement and treatment of disease
US8497121B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2013-07-30 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Method of obtaining viable small tissue particles and use for tissue repair
US20130211536A1 (en) * 2010-02-18 2013-08-15 Biomet Manufacturing Corporation Method And Apparatus For Augumenting Bone Defects
US8518433B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2013-08-27 Zimmer, Inc. Method of treating an osteochondral defect
US8546334B2 (en) 2001-11-19 2013-10-01 Scil Technology Gmbh Device having osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties
US8691545B2 (en) 2005-12-14 2014-04-08 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Bone semi-permeable device
US8697139B2 (en) 2004-09-21 2014-04-15 Frank M. Phillips Method of intervertebral disc treatment using articular chondrocyte cells
US8728528B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2014-05-20 Evonik Corporation Process for preparing microparticles having a low residual solvent volume
US20140277401A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Micell Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable biomedical implants
US9039775B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2015-05-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Spinal fixation plates
US9113916B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2015-08-25 Zimmer, Inc. Drill bit for osteochondral drilling with guiding element and uses thereof
US9138318B2 (en) 2007-04-12 2015-09-22 Zimmer, Inc. Apparatus for forming an implant
US9155543B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2015-10-13 Cartiva, Inc. Tapered joint implant and related tools
US20150297349A1 (en) * 2012-12-11 2015-10-22 Dr. H.C. Robert Mathys Stiftung Bone substitute and method for producing the same
US9220604B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2015-12-29 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US9241809B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2016-01-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US9415197B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2016-08-16 Surmodics, Inc. Implantable suction cup composites and implants comprising same
US9555155B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2017-01-31 Tepha, Inc. Methods of orienting multifilament yarn and monofilaments of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US9603978B2 (en) 2011-08-17 2017-03-28 Meng Chen Plasma modified medical devices and methods
US9701940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2017-07-11 Histogenics Corporation Cell-support matrix having narrowly defined uniformly vertically and non-randomly organized porosity and pore density and a method for preparation thereof
US9724205B2 (en) 2004-11-03 2017-08-08 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Biodegradable implant for intertransverse process fusion
US9867718B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2018-01-16 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US9907663B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2018-03-06 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US9993441B2 (en) 2009-12-30 2018-06-12 Surmodics, Inc. Controlled release matrix barrier structure for subcutaneous medical devices
US20180177601A1 (en) * 2015-12-30 2018-06-28 Wasas, Llc. System and method for non-binding allograft subtalar joint implant
US10059621B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2018-08-28 Corning Incorporated Magnetizable glass ceramic composition and methods thereof
WO2018158311A1 (en) 2017-02-28 2018-09-07 University College Cork - National University Of Ireland, Cork An intravascular cell therapy device
US10077420B2 (en) 2014-12-02 2018-09-18 Histogenics Corporation Cell and tissue culture container
US10167447B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2019-01-01 Zimmer, Inc. Supports and methods for promoting integration of cartilage tissue explants
US10188772B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2019-01-29 Micell Technologies, Inc. Drug delivery medical device
US10232092B2 (en) 2010-04-22 2019-03-19 Micell Technologies, Inc. Stents and other devices having extracellular matrix coating
GB2567173A (en) * 2017-10-04 2019-04-10 Univ Oxford Innovation Ltd Cartilage plug
US10272606B2 (en) 2013-05-15 2019-04-30 Micell Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable biomedical implants
US10350072B2 (en) 2012-05-24 2019-07-16 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US10350391B2 (en) 2008-07-17 2019-07-16 Micell Technologies, Inc. Drug delivery medical device
US10420597B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2019-09-24 Arthrex, Inc. Surgical implant with porous region
US10426626B2 (en) 2016-05-03 2019-10-01 Additive Orthopaedics, LLC. Bone fixation device and method of use
US10500303B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2019-12-10 Tepha, Inc. Self-retaining sutures of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US10617795B2 (en) 2007-01-08 2020-04-14 Micell Technologies, Inc. Stents having biodegradable layers
US10626521B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2020-04-21 Tepha, Inc. Methods of manufacturing mesh sutures from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US10647962B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-05-12 Corning Incorporated Bioactive aluminoborate glasses
US10653820B2 (en) 2009-04-01 2020-05-19 Micell Technologies, Inc. Coated stents
US10676713B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-06-09 Corning Incorporated Bioactive borophosphate glasses
US10709818B2 (en) 2015-11-01 2020-07-14 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US10730983B2 (en) 2016-06-13 2020-08-04 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Biocompatible coatings and hydrogels for reducing foreign body response and fibrosis
US10751367B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-08-25 Corning Incorporated Bioactive glass microspheres
US10758374B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2020-09-01 Cartiva, Inc. Carpometacarpal (CMC) implants and methods
US10806586B2 (en) * 2016-05-19 2020-10-20 University Of Pittsburgh—Of The Commonwealth System Of Higer Education Biomimetic plywood motifs for bone tissue engineering
US10835396B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2020-11-17 Micell Technologies, Inc. Stent with polymer coating containing amorphous rapamycin
US10842753B2 (en) 2011-06-02 2020-11-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for cell encapsulation and cell therapy
US10857259B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2020-12-08 Corning Incorporated Chemically strengthened bioactive glass-ceramics
US10898443B2 (en) 2014-08-01 2021-01-26 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US10898353B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2021-01-26 Micell Technologies, Inc. Polymer coatings containing drug powder of controlled morphology
US11058468B2 (en) 2016-07-29 2021-07-13 Additive Orthopaedics, LLC Bone fixation device and method of use
US11147679B2 (en) 2018-02-05 2021-10-19 Paragon Advanced Technologies, Inc. Bone fixation device
US11198638B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2021-12-14 Corning Incorporated Bioactive borate glass and methods thereof
US11274059B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2022-03-15 Corning Incorporated Bioactive glass compositions and dentin hypersensitivity remediation
US11318231B2 (en) 2017-11-06 2022-05-03 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Anti-inflammatory coatings to improve biocompatibility of neurological implants
US11369498B2 (en) 2010-02-02 2022-06-28 MT Acquisition Holdings LLC Stent and stent delivery system with improved deliverability
US11384009B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2022-07-12 Corning Incorporated High liquidus viscosity bioactive glass
US11426494B2 (en) 2007-01-08 2022-08-30 MT Acquisition Holdings LLC Stents having biodegradable layers
US11478286B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2022-10-25 Paragon Advanced Technologies, Inc. Bone fixation devices
US20230000628A1 (en) * 2021-07-01 2023-01-05 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Multi-layered biomimetic osteochondral implants and methods of using thereof
US11638645B2 (en) 2016-05-19 2023-05-02 University of Pittsburgh—of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education Biomimetic plywood motifs for bone tissue engineering
US11814649B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2023-11-14 Corning Incorporated Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic compositions and methods thereof
US11904118B2 (en) 2010-07-16 2024-02-20 Micell Medtech Inc. Drug delivery medical device

Citations (62)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3755558A (en) * 1971-02-23 1973-08-28 Du Pont Polylactide drug mixtures for topical application atelet aggregation
US3773919A (en) * 1969-10-23 1973-11-20 Du Pont Polylactide-drug mixtures
US3887699A (en) * 1969-03-24 1975-06-03 Seymour Yolles Biodegradable polymeric article for dispensing drugs
US3976071A (en) * 1974-01-07 1976-08-24 Dynatech Corporation Methods of improving control of release rates and products useful in same
US3991766A (en) * 1973-05-31 1976-11-16 American Cyanamid Company Controlled release of medicaments using polymers from glycolic acid
US4011312A (en) * 1975-06-25 1977-03-08 American Home Products Corporation Prolonged release drug form for the treatment of bovine mastitis
US4048256A (en) * 1976-06-01 1977-09-13 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4076798A (en) * 1975-05-29 1978-02-28 American Cyanamid Company High molecular weight polyester resin, the method of making the same and the use thereof as a pharmaceutical composition
US4095600A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-06-20 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4118470A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-10-03 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4122129A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-10-24 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4186448A (en) * 1976-04-16 1980-02-05 Brekke John H Device and method for treating and healing a newly created bone void
US4199864A (en) * 1975-12-22 1980-04-29 Arthur Ashman Endosseous plastic implant method
US4246709A (en) * 1977-10-05 1981-01-27 N.V. Raychem S.A. Identification carrying means
US4261969A (en) * 1979-05-03 1981-04-14 World Health Organization Controlled drug release composition
US4293539A (en) * 1979-09-12 1981-10-06 Eli Lilly And Company Controlled release formulations and method of treatment
US4460562A (en) * 1982-01-06 1984-07-17 Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Polymeric diffusion matrix containing propranolol
US4532123A (en) * 1982-03-04 1985-07-30 Battelle Development Corporation Dual Microcapsules and process for their preparation
US4553272A (en) * 1981-02-26 1985-11-19 University Of Pittsburgh Regeneration of living tissues by growth of isolated cells in porous implant and product thereof
WO1986000526A1 (en) * 1984-07-05 1986-01-30 Caplan Arnold I Process for adapting soluble bone protein for use in stimulating osteoinduction
US4622244A (en) * 1979-09-04 1986-11-11 The Washington University Process for preparation of microcapsules
WO1987000059A1 (en) * 1985-07-09 1987-01-15 Materials Consultants Oy Surgical resorbable devices with layered composite structure
US4650488A (en) * 1984-05-16 1987-03-17 Richards Medical Company Biodegradable prosthetic device
US4655777A (en) * 1983-12-19 1987-04-07 Southern Research Institute Method of producing biodegradable prosthesis and products therefrom
US4719246A (en) * 1986-12-22 1988-01-12 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Polylactide compositions
WO1988003417A1 (en) * 1986-11-03 1988-05-19 Material Consultants Oy Surgical biocomposite material and a method for producing the material
EP0277678A1 (en) * 1987-01-19 1988-08-10 Stichting Science Park Groningen A graft suitable for treatment by reconstructive surgery and having tissue-specific porosity, and a process for making such graft
US4767628A (en) * 1981-02-16 1988-08-30 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Continuous release pharmaceutical compositions
FR2612392A1 (en) * 1987-03-19 1988-09-23 Audion Michel Interrupted biodegradable composites of variable strength
US4801739A (en) * 1982-12-17 1989-01-31 Sandoz Ltd. Oligomeric hydroxycarboxylic acid derivatives, their production and use
US4818542A (en) * 1983-11-14 1989-04-04 The University Of Kentucky Research Foundation Porous microspheres for drug delivery and methods for making same
US4832686A (en) * 1986-06-24 1989-05-23 Anderson Mark E Method for administering interleukin-2
GB2209937A (en) * 1987-09-21 1989-06-01 Depiopharm S A Water insoluble polypeptides
US4880429A (en) * 1987-07-20 1989-11-14 Stone Kevin R Prosthetic meniscus
US4883666A (en) * 1987-04-29 1989-11-28 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Controlled drug delivery system for treatment of neural disorders
US4897268A (en) * 1987-08-03 1990-01-30 Southern Research Institute Drug delivery system and method of making the same
US4962091A (en) * 1986-05-23 1990-10-09 Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. Controlled release of macromolecular polypeptides
US4961740A (en) * 1988-10-17 1990-10-09 Surgical Dynamics, Inc. V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint
US4963489A (en) * 1987-04-14 1990-10-16 Marrow-Tech, Inc. Three-dimensional cell and tissue culture system
US4968317A (en) * 1987-01-13 1990-11-06 Toermaelae Pertti Surgical materials and devices
GB2234896A (en) * 1989-07-07 1991-02-20 Sandoz Ltd Delayed release formulations
US4997440A (en) * 1985-04-25 1991-03-05 American Cyanamid Company Vascular graft with absorbable and nonabsorbable components
WO1991009079A1 (en) * 1989-12-14 1991-06-27 Farmitalia Carlo Erba S.R.L. Use of supercritical fluids to obtain porous sponges of biodegradable polymers
US5032508A (en) * 1988-09-08 1991-07-16 Marrow-Tech, Inc. Three-dimensional cell and tissue culture system
US5041138A (en) * 1986-11-20 1991-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture
US5053050A (en) * 1988-04-29 1991-10-01 Samuel Itay Compositions for repair of cartilage and bone
EP0473268A2 (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-03-04 Zeneca Limited Continuous release pharmaceutical compositions comprising a polypeptide covalently conjugated to a water soluble polymer
US5100668A (en) * 1988-06-14 1992-03-31 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Controlled release systems containing heparin and growth factors
WO1992011844A1 (en) * 1991-01-03 1992-07-23 Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Inc. Stabilization of proteins by cationic biopolymers
WO1992011843A1 (en) * 1991-01-09 1992-07-23 Alza Corporation Bioerodible devices and compositions for diffusional release of agents
US5134122A (en) * 1989-07-28 1992-07-28 Debiopharm S.A. Method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition in the form of microparticles
WO1992014749A1 (en) * 1991-02-13 1992-09-03 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Thyroid-derived chondrocyte-stimulating factor
US5152791A (en) * 1989-12-07 1992-10-06 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Prosthetic artificial bone having ceramic layers of different porosity
US5160490A (en) * 1986-04-18 1992-11-03 Marrow-Tech Incorporated Three-dimensional cell and tissue culture apparatus
WO1993001315A1 (en) * 1991-07-01 1993-01-21 The Blood Center Of Southeastern Wisconsin PEN POLYMORPHISM OF HUMAN PLATELET MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEIN IIIa AND DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION THEREOF
US5206023A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-04-27 Robert F. Shaw Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage
US5207705A (en) * 1988-12-08 1993-05-04 Brigham And Women's Hospital Prosthesis of foam polyurethane and collagen and uses thereof
WO1993015767A1 (en) * 1992-02-05 1993-08-19 Merck & Co., Inc. Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation
US5270300A (en) * 1991-09-06 1993-12-14 Robert Francis Shaw Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone
US5306311A (en) * 1987-07-20 1994-04-26 Regen Corporation Prosthetic articular cartilage
US5492697A (en) * 1990-03-05 1996-02-20 Board Of Regents, Univ. Of Texas System Biodegradable implant for fracture nonunions
US5522895A (en) * 1993-07-23 1996-06-04 Rice University Biodegradable bone templates

Patent Citations (66)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3887699A (en) * 1969-03-24 1975-06-03 Seymour Yolles Biodegradable polymeric article for dispensing drugs
US3773919A (en) * 1969-10-23 1973-11-20 Du Pont Polylactide-drug mixtures
US3755558A (en) * 1971-02-23 1973-08-28 Du Pont Polylactide drug mixtures for topical application atelet aggregation
US3991766A (en) * 1973-05-31 1976-11-16 American Cyanamid Company Controlled release of medicaments using polymers from glycolic acid
US3976071A (en) * 1974-01-07 1976-08-24 Dynatech Corporation Methods of improving control of release rates and products useful in same
US4076798A (en) * 1975-05-29 1978-02-28 American Cyanamid Company High molecular weight polyester resin, the method of making the same and the use thereof as a pharmaceutical composition
US4011312A (en) * 1975-06-25 1977-03-08 American Home Products Corporation Prolonged release drug form for the treatment of bovine mastitis
US4199864A (en) * 1975-12-22 1980-04-29 Arthur Ashman Endosseous plastic implant method
US4186448A (en) * 1976-04-16 1980-02-05 Brekke John H Device and method for treating and healing a newly created bone void
US4048256A (en) * 1976-06-01 1977-09-13 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4122129A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-10-24 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4118470A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-10-03 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4095600A (en) * 1976-06-01 1978-06-20 American Cyanamid Company Normally-solid, bioabsorbable, hydrolyzable, polymeric reaction product
US4246709A (en) * 1977-10-05 1981-01-27 N.V. Raychem S.A. Identification carrying means
US4261969A (en) * 1979-05-03 1981-04-14 World Health Organization Controlled drug release composition
US4622244A (en) * 1979-09-04 1986-11-11 The Washington University Process for preparation of microcapsules
US4293539A (en) * 1979-09-12 1981-10-06 Eli Lilly And Company Controlled release formulations and method of treatment
US5004602A (en) * 1981-02-16 1991-04-02 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Continuous release pharmaceutical compositions formed by freeze drying acetic acid solutions of polylactide
US4767628B1 (en) * 1981-02-16 1990-07-17 Ici Plc
US4767628A (en) * 1981-02-16 1988-08-30 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Continuous release pharmaceutical compositions
US4553272A (en) * 1981-02-26 1985-11-19 University Of Pittsburgh Regeneration of living tissues by growth of isolated cells in porous implant and product thereof
US4460562A (en) * 1982-01-06 1984-07-17 Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Polymeric diffusion matrix containing propranolol
US4532123A (en) * 1982-03-04 1985-07-30 Battelle Development Corporation Dual Microcapsules and process for their preparation
US4801739A (en) * 1982-12-17 1989-01-31 Sandoz Ltd. Oligomeric hydroxycarboxylic acid derivatives, their production and use
US4818542A (en) * 1983-11-14 1989-04-04 The University Of Kentucky Research Foundation Porous microspheres for drug delivery and methods for making same
US4655777A (en) * 1983-12-19 1987-04-07 Southern Research Institute Method of producing biodegradable prosthesis and products therefrom
US4650488A (en) * 1984-05-16 1987-03-17 Richards Medical Company Biodegradable prosthetic device
WO1986000526A1 (en) * 1984-07-05 1986-01-30 Caplan Arnold I Process for adapting soluble bone protein for use in stimulating osteoinduction
US4997440A (en) * 1985-04-25 1991-03-05 American Cyanamid Company Vascular graft with absorbable and nonabsorbable components
WO1987000059A1 (en) * 1985-07-09 1987-01-15 Materials Consultants Oy Surgical resorbable devices with layered composite structure
US5160490A (en) * 1986-04-18 1992-11-03 Marrow-Tech Incorporated Three-dimensional cell and tissue culture apparatus
US4962091A (en) * 1986-05-23 1990-10-09 Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. Controlled release of macromolecular polypeptides
US4832686A (en) * 1986-06-24 1989-05-23 Anderson Mark E Method for administering interleukin-2
WO1988003417A1 (en) * 1986-11-03 1988-05-19 Material Consultants Oy Surgical biocomposite material and a method for producing the material
US5041138A (en) * 1986-11-20 1991-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture
US4719246A (en) * 1986-12-22 1988-01-12 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Polylactide compositions
US4968317B1 (en) * 1987-01-13 1999-01-05 Biocon Oy Surgical materials and devices
US4968317A (en) * 1987-01-13 1990-11-06 Toermaelae Pertti Surgical materials and devices
EP0277678A1 (en) * 1987-01-19 1988-08-10 Stichting Science Park Groningen A graft suitable for treatment by reconstructive surgery and having tissue-specific porosity, and a process for making such graft
FR2612392A1 (en) * 1987-03-19 1988-09-23 Audion Michel Interrupted biodegradable composites of variable strength
US4963489A (en) * 1987-04-14 1990-10-16 Marrow-Tech, Inc. Three-dimensional cell and tissue culture system
US4883666A (en) * 1987-04-29 1989-11-28 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Controlled drug delivery system for treatment of neural disorders
US4880429A (en) * 1987-07-20 1989-11-14 Stone Kevin R Prosthetic meniscus
US5306311A (en) * 1987-07-20 1994-04-26 Regen Corporation Prosthetic articular cartilage
US4897268A (en) * 1987-08-03 1990-01-30 Southern Research Institute Drug delivery system and method of making the same
GB2209937A (en) * 1987-09-21 1989-06-01 Depiopharm S A Water insoluble polypeptides
US5053050A (en) * 1988-04-29 1991-10-01 Samuel Itay Compositions for repair of cartilage and bone
US5100668A (en) * 1988-06-14 1992-03-31 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Controlled release systems containing heparin and growth factors
US5032508A (en) * 1988-09-08 1991-07-16 Marrow-Tech, Inc. Three-dimensional cell and tissue culture system
US4961740A (en) * 1988-10-17 1990-10-09 Surgical Dynamics, Inc. V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint
US4961740B1 (en) * 1988-10-17 1997-01-14 Surgical Dynamics Inc V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint
US5207705A (en) * 1988-12-08 1993-05-04 Brigham And Women's Hospital Prosthesis of foam polyurethane and collagen and uses thereof
GB2234896A (en) * 1989-07-07 1991-02-20 Sandoz Ltd Delayed release formulations
US5134122A (en) * 1989-07-28 1992-07-28 Debiopharm S.A. Method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition in the form of microparticles
US5152791A (en) * 1989-12-07 1992-10-06 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Prosthetic artificial bone having ceramic layers of different porosity
WO1991009079A1 (en) * 1989-12-14 1991-06-27 Farmitalia Carlo Erba S.R.L. Use of supercritical fluids to obtain porous sponges of biodegradable polymers
US5492697A (en) * 1990-03-05 1996-02-20 Board Of Regents, Univ. Of Texas System Biodegradable implant for fracture nonunions
EP0473268A2 (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-03-04 Zeneca Limited Continuous release pharmaceutical compositions comprising a polypeptide covalently conjugated to a water soluble polymer
WO1992011844A1 (en) * 1991-01-03 1992-07-23 Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Inc. Stabilization of proteins by cationic biopolymers
WO1992011843A1 (en) * 1991-01-09 1992-07-23 Alza Corporation Bioerodible devices and compositions for diffusional release of agents
US5206023A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-04-27 Robert F. Shaw Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage
WO1992014749A1 (en) * 1991-02-13 1992-09-03 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Thyroid-derived chondrocyte-stimulating factor
WO1993001315A1 (en) * 1991-07-01 1993-01-21 The Blood Center Of Southeastern Wisconsin PEN POLYMORPHISM OF HUMAN PLATELET MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEIN IIIa AND DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION THEREOF
US5270300A (en) * 1991-09-06 1993-12-14 Robert Francis Shaw Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone
WO1993015767A1 (en) * 1992-02-05 1993-08-19 Merck & Co., Inc. Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation
US5522895A (en) * 1993-07-23 1996-06-04 Rice University Biodegradable bone templates

Non-Patent Citations (100)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Bone RegenerationMaterials For The Mandibular And Craniofacial Complex", Hollinger et al., vol. 2, No. 2, (1992) (pp. 143-151).
Akizuki, S. et al., "Tensile Properties of Human Knee Joint Cartilage. II. Correlations Between Weight Bearing and Tissue Pathology and the Kinetics of Swelling", J. Orthopaedic Res. (1987) 5:173-186.
Akizuki, S. et al., Tensile Properties of Human Knee Joint Cartilage. II. Correlations Between Weight Bearing and Tissue Pathology and the Kinetics of Swelling , J. Orthopaedic Res . (1987) 5:173 186. *
Alper, J., "Will bone morphogenic proteins pay off?", Bio/Technology (1993) 11:649-651.
Alper, J., Will bone morphogenic proteins pay off , Bio/Technology (1993) 11:649 651. *
Armstrong, C.G. and Mow, V.C., "Variations in the Intrinsic Mechanical Properties of Human Articular Cartilage with Age, Degeneration, and Water Content", J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1982) 64-A:88-94.
Armstrong, C.G. and Mow, V.C., Variations in the Intrinsic Mechanical Properties of Human Articular Cartilage with Age, Degeneration, and Water Content , J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1982) 64 A:88 94. *
Athanasiou, K. et al., Use of Biodegradable Implants for Repairing Large Articular Cartilage Defects in the Rabbit, Proc. 38th Ann. Mtg. Ortho. Res. Soc. Feb. 18, 1992. *
Beck, L.R. and Pope, V.Z., "Controlled-Release Delivery Systems for Hormones, A Review of their Properties and Current Therapeutic Use", Drugs (1984) 27:528-547.
Beck, L.R. and Pope, V.Z., Controlled Release Delivery Systems for Hormones, A Review of their Properties and Current Therapeutic Use , Drugs (1984) 27:528 547. *
Bone RegenerationMaterials For The Mandibular And Craniofacial Complex , Hollinger et al., vol. 2, No. 2, (1992) (pp. 143 151). *
Cohen, S. et al., "Controlled Delivery Systems for Proteins Based on Poly(Lactic/Glycolic Acid) Microspheres", Proceed. Int. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater., (1991) Controlled Release Soc., Inc. 18:101-102.
Cohen, S. et al., Controlled Delivery Systems for Proteins Based on Poly(Lactic/Glycolic Acid) Microspheres , Proceed. Int. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater., (1991) Controlled Release Soc., Inc. 18:101 102. *
Cutright, D.E.et al., "Degredation rates of polymers and copolymers of polyactic and polyglycolic acids", Oral Surg. (Jan. 1974) 37(1):142-152.
Cutright, D.E.et al., Degredation rates of polymers and copolymers of polyactic and polyglycolic acids , Oral Surg. (Jan. 1974) 37(1):142 152. *
D.F. Williams, "Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In-Vivo Degradation of Polymers", Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials, ASTM STP 684, B.C. Syrett and A. Acharya, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979, pp. 61-75.
D.F. Williams, Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In Vivo Degradation of Polymers , Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials, ASTM STP 684, B.C. Syrett and A. Acharya, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979, pp. 61 75. *
Edelman, E.R. and Nugent, M.A., "Controlled Release of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor", DN&P (1991) 4(6):352-357.
Edelman, E.R. and Nugent, M.A., Controlled Release of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor , DN & P (1991) 4(6):352 357. *
Edelman, E.R. et al., "Controlled and modulated release of basic fibroblast growth factor," Biomaterials (1991) 12(7):619-626.
Edelman, E.R. et al., Controlled and modulated release of basic fibroblast growth factor, Biomaterials (1991) 12(7):619 626. *
English Translation of French Patent No. 2,612,392. *
Freed,L. et al., "Neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers", J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1993) 27:11-23.
Freed,L. et al., Neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers , J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1993) 27:11 23. *
Fung, Y.C., "Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues", Springer-Verlag New York (1981) 384-385.
Fung, Y.C., Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , Springer Verlag New York (1981) 384 385. *
Gilding, D.K. "Degradation of Polymers: Mechanisms and Implications for Biomedical Applications", Fundamental Aspects of Biocompatibility Chapter 3, pp. 43-65.
Gilding, D.K. Degradation of Polymers: Mechanisms and Implications for Biomedical Applications , Fundamental Aspects of Biocompatibility Chapter 3, pp. 43 65. *
Gilding, D.K. et al., "Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery--polyglycolic/poly(actic acid) homo-and copolymers: 1", Polymer (1979) 20:1459-1464.
Gilding, D.K. et al., Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery polyglycolic/poly(actic acid) homo and copolymers: 1 , Polymer (1979) 20:1459 1464. *
Heckman, J.D., et al., "The use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein in the Treatment of Non-Union in a Canine Model", J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1991) 73-A:750-764.
Heckman, J.D., et al., The use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein in the Treatment of Non Union in a Canine Model , J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1991) 73 A:750 764. *
Heller, J., "Biodegradable Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery", CRC Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems (1985) 1(1):39-90.
Heller, J., "Development of poly(ortho esters): a historical overview", Biomaterials (1990) 1(1):659-665.
Heller, J., Biodegradable Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery , CRC Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems (1985) 1(1):39 90. *
Heller, J., Development of poly(ortho esters): a historical overview , Biomaterials (1990) 1(1):659 665. *
Hollinger, J. and Chaudhari, A., "Bone Regeneration Materials for the Mandibular and Craniofacial Complex", Cells and Materials (1992) 2(2):143-151.
Hollinger, J. and Chaudhari, A., Bone Regeneration Materials for the Mandibular and Craniofacial Complex , Cells and Materials (1992) 2(2):143 151. *
Hollinger, J., "Factors for Osseous Repair and Delivery: Part II", J. Craniofacial Surg. (1993) 4(3):135-141.
Hollinger, J., Factors for Osseous Repair and Delivery: Part II , J. Craniofacial Surg. (1993) 4(3):135 141. *
Hollinger, J.O. et al., "Osseous wound healing with xenogeneic bone implants with a biodegradable carrier", Surgery (Jan. 1990) 50-54.
Hollinger, J.O. et al., Osseous wound healing with xenogeneic bone implants with a biodegradable carrier , Surgery (Jan. 1990) 50 54. *
Jacob, E. et al., "Evaluation of Biodegradable Ampicillin Anhydrate Microcapsules for Local Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Osteomyelitis", Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (M.R. Urist, ed.), J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, (1989) 237-244.
Jacob, E. et al., Evaluation of Biodegradable Ampicillin Anhydrate Microcapsules for Local Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Osteomyelitis , Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (M.R. Urist, ed.), J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, (1989) 237 244. *
Kleinschmidt, J.C. et al., "A Multiphase System Bone Implant for Regenerating the Calvaria", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Apr. 1993) 91(4):581-588.
Kleinschmidt, J.C. et al., A Multiphase System Bone Implant for Regenerating the Calvaria , Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Apr. 1993) 91(4):581 588. *
Langer, R. and Vacanti, J.P., "Tissue Engineering", Science (May 14, 1993) 260:920-926.
Langer, R. and Vacanti, J.P., Tissue Engineering , Science (May 14, 1993) 260:920 926. *
Langer, R., "Controlled Release: A New Approach to Drug Delivery", Technology Review (Apr. 1981) 26-34.
Langer, R., "New Methods of Drug Delivery", Science (28 Sep. 1990) Articles 249:1527-1533.
Langer, R., Controlled Release: A New Approach to Drug Delivery , Technology Review (Apr. 1981) 26 34. *
Langer, R., New Methods of Drug Delivery , Science (28 Sep. 1990) Articles 249:1527 1533. *
Lewis, D.H., "Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents from Lactide/Glycolide Polymers", Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems (M. Chasin and R. Langer, eds.) Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York (1990) 1.
Lewis, D.H., Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents from Lactide/Glycolide Polymers , Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems (M. Chasin and R. Langer, eds.) Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York (1990) 1. *
Lucas, P. A. et al., "Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water--soluble proteins from bovine bone using a polyanhydride delivery vehicle", J. Biomed. Materials Res.(1990) 24:901-911.
Lucas, P. A. et al., Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water soluble proteins from bovine bone using a polyanhydride delivery vehicle , J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1990) 24:901 911. *
Masters, D.B. et al., "Prolonged Regional Nerve Blockade by controlled Release of Local Anesthetic from a Biodegradable Polymer Matrix", Anesthesiology (1993) 79:340-346.
Masters, D.B. et al., Prolonged Regional Nerve Blockade by controlled Release of Local Anesthetic from a Biodegradable Polymer Matrix , Anesthesiology (1993) 79:340 346. *
Mathiowitz, E. et al., "Polyanhydride Microspheres as Drug Carriers. II. Microencapsulation by solvent Removal", J. App. Polymer Sci. (1988) 35:755-774.
Mathiowitz, E. et al., Polyanhydride Microspheres as Drug Carriers. II. Microencapsulation by solvent Removal , J. App. Polymer Sci. (1988) 35:755 774. *
Mow, V.C. et al., "Biphasic Creep and Stress Relaxation of Articular Cartilage in Compression: Theory and Experiments", J. of Biomechanical Eng. (Feb. 1980) 102:73-83.
Mow, V.C. et al., Biphasic Creep and Stress Relaxation of Articular Cartilage in Compression: Theory and Experiments , J. of Biomechanical Eng. (Feb. 1980) 102:73 83. *
Reed, A.M. et al., "Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery--poly(glycolic)/poly(lactic acid) homo and copolymers: 2. In vitro degradation", Polymer (1981) 22:494-498.
Reed, A.M. et al., Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery poly(glycolic)/poly(lactic acid) homo and copolymers: 2. In vitro degradation , Polymer (1981) 22:494 498. *
Reilly, D.T. and Burstein, A.H., "The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone," J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1974) 56-A(5):1001-1022.
Reilly, D.T. and Burstein, A.H., The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone, J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1974) 56 A(5):1001 1022. *
Reilly, D.T. et al., "The Elastic Modulus for Bone", J. Biomechanics (1974)7:271-275.
Reilly, D.T. et al., The Elastic Modulus for Bone , J. Biomechanics (1974)7:271 275. *
Robert Langer, "Controlled Release: A New Approach to Drug Delivery" Technology Review pp. 26-34, Apr. 1981.
Robert Langer, Controlled Release: A New Approach to Drug Delivery Technology Review pp. 26 34, Apr. 1981. *
Rosilio, V. et al., "A physicochemical study of the morphology of progesterone-loaded microspheres fabricated from poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)", J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1991) 25:667-682.
Rosilio, V. et al., A physicochemical study of the morphology of progesterone loaded microspheres fabricated from poly (D,L lactide co glycolide) , J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1991) 25:667 682. *
Sanders, L.M. et al., "Prolonged Controlled-Release of Nafarelin, a Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Analogue, From Biodegradable Polymeric Implants: Influence of Composition and Molecular Weight of Polymer", J. Pharm. Sci. (1986) 75(4):356-360.
Sanders, L.M. et al., Prolonged Controlled Release of Nafarelin, a Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone Analogue, From Biodegradable Polymeric Implants: Influence of Composition and Molecular Weight of Polymer , J. Pharm. Sci. (1986) 75(4):356 360. *
Schakenraad, J.M. et al., "Biodegradable hollow fibres for the controlled release of drugs", Biomaterials (1988) 9:116-120.
Schakenraad, J.M. et al., Biodegradable hollow fibres for the controlled release of drugs , Biomaterials (1988) 9:116 120. *
Schwope, A.D. et al., "Development of Polylactic/Glycolic Acid Delivery Systems for Use in Treatment of Narcotic Addiction"; Natl Inst. on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 4, Narcotic Antagonists: The Search for Long-Acting Preparations (1975) 13-18.
Schwope, A.D. et al., Development of Polylactic/Glycolic Acid Delivery Systems for Use in Treatment of Narcotic Addiction ; Natl Inst. on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 4, Narcotic Antagonists: The Search for Long Acting Preparations (1975) 13 18. *
Silberstein, G.B. and Daniel, C.W., "Reversible Inhibition of Mammary Gland Growth by Transforming Growth Factor-β", Science 237:291-293.
Silberstein, G.B. and Daniel, C.W., Reversible Inhibition of Mammary Gland Growth by Transforming Growth Factor , Science 237:291 293. *
Spilker, R.L. and Suh, Jun Kyo, Effects of Friction on the Unconfined Compressive Response of Articular Cartilage: A Finite Element Analysis, J. Biomechanical Eng. (May 1990) 112:138 146. *
Spilker, R.L. and Suh, Jun-Kyo, "Effects of Friction on the Unconfined Compressive Response of Articular Cartilage: A Finite Element Analysis," J. Biomechanical Eng. (May 1990) 112:138-146.
Stoeckemann, K. and Sandow, J., "Effects of the luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist ramorelix (hoe013) and the LHRH agonist buserelin on demethylbenz a!anthracene-induced mammary carcinoma: studies with slow-release formulations," J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. (1993) 119:457-462.
Stoeckemann, K. and Sandow, J., Effects of the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist ramorelix (hoe013) and the LHRH agonist buserelin on demethylbenz a anthracene induced mammary carcinoma: studies with slow release formulations, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. (1993) 119:457 462. *
Tencer, A.F. et al., "The effect of local controlled release of sodium fluoride on the stimulation of bone growth", J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1989) 23:571-589.
Tencer, A.F. et al., The effect of local controlled release of sodium fluoride on the stimulation of bone growth , J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1989) 23:571 589. *
Toriumi, D.M. et al., "Mandibular Reconstruction with a Recombinant Bone-Inducing Factor: Functional and Biomechanical Evaluation," Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (Oct 1991) 117:1101-1112.
Toriumi, D.M. et al., Mandibular Reconstruction with a Recombinant Bone Inducing Factor: Functional and Biomechanical Evaluation, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (Oct 1991) 117:1101 1112. *
Vacanti, C.A. et al., "Tissue-Engineered Growth of bone and Cartilage", Transplantation Proceedings (Feb. 1993) 25(1):1019-1021.
Vacanti, C.A. et al., Tissue Engineered Growth of bone and Cartilage , Transplantation Proceedings (Feb. 1993) 25(1):1019 1021. *
Wang, H.T. et al., "Degradation of poly(ester) microspheres", Biomaterials (Nov. 1990) 11:679-685.
Wang, H.T. et al., Degradation of poly(ester) microspheres , Biomaterials (Nov. 1990) 11:679 685. *
Williams, D.F., "Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In--Vivo Degradation of Polymers", Materials (B.C. Syreti and A. Acharya, eds.), American Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, (1979).
Williams, D.F., Some Observations on the Role of Cellular Enzymes in the In Vivo Degradation of Polymers , Materials (B.C. Syreti and A. Acharya, eds.), American Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, (1979). *
Woo, S.L. et al., "The Biomechanical and Morphological Changes in the Medical Collateral Ligament of the Rabbit after Immobilization and Remobilization", J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1987) 69-A:1200-1211.
Woo, S.L. et al., The Biomechanical and Morphological Changes in the Medical Collateral Ligament of the Rabbit after Immobilization and Remobilization , J. Bone and Joint Surg. (1987) 69 A:1200 1211. *
Woo, S.L., "Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments", 4th Internat'l Congress of Biorheology, Symposium of Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Biorheology (1982) 19:385-396.
Woo, S.L., Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments , 4th Internat l Congress of Biorheology, Symposium of Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Biorheology (1982) 19:385 396. *
Yamakawa, I. et al., "Controlled Release of Insulin from Plasma-Irradiated Sandwitch Device Using Poly-DL-lactic Acid," Biol. Pharm. Bull (1993) 16(2):182-187.
Yamakawa, I. et al., Controlled Release of Insulin from Plasma Irradiated Sandwitch Device Using Poly DL lactic Acid, Biol. Pharm. Bull (1993) 16(2):182 187. *

Cited By (450)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8403996B2 (en) 1994-05-13 2013-03-26 Kensey Nash Corporation Device for regeneration of articular cartilage and other tissue
US8697108B2 (en) 1994-05-13 2014-04-15 Kensey Nash Corporation Method for making a porous polymeric material
US20050075408A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2005-04-07 Ringeisen Timothy A. Method for making a porous polymeric material
US20050074481A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2005-04-07 Brekke John H. Device for regeneration of articular cartilage and other tissue
US8795242B2 (en) 1994-05-13 2014-08-05 Kensey Nash Corporation Resorbable polymeric device for localized drug delivery
US20110112655A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2011-05-12 Brekke John H Device for regeneration of articular cartilage and other tissue
US20050177118A1 (en) * 1994-05-13 2005-08-11 Hoganson David M. Resorbable polymeric device for localized drug delivery
US7776100B2 (en) 1994-05-13 2010-08-17 Kensey Nash Corporation Device for regeneration of articular cartilage and other tissue
US6974571B2 (en) * 1995-03-28 2005-12-13 Thomas Jefferson University Isolated stromal cells and methods of using the same
US20090035347A1 (en) * 1995-03-28 2009-02-05 Thomas Jefferson University Isolated stromal cells and methods of using the same
US7842097B2 (en) 1995-10-16 2010-11-30 Depuy Spine, Inc. Tissue repair matrix
US20040220680A1 (en) * 1995-10-16 2004-11-04 Depuy Acromed, Inc. Tissue repair matrix
US6514286B1 (en) * 1996-12-03 2003-02-04 Osteobiologics, Inc. Biodegradable polymeric film
US6395023B1 (en) * 1997-02-07 2002-05-28 Endovasc Ltd., Inc. Prosthesis with biodegradable surface coating and method for making same
US7524335B2 (en) * 1997-05-30 2009-04-28 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Fiber-reinforced, porous, biodegradable implant device
US20050240281A1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2005-10-27 Slivka Michael A Fiber-reinforced, porous, biodegradable implant device
US6245090B1 (en) 1997-11-07 2001-06-12 Salviac Limited Transcatheter occluding implant
US6248057B1 (en) 1998-07-28 2001-06-19 Innerdyne, Inc. Absorbable brachytherapy and chemotherapy delivery devices and methods
US20060039947A1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2006-02-23 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
US6998134B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2006-02-14 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
US8114427B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2012-02-14 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
US20090317538A1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2009-12-24 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
US20010031274A1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-10-18 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
US10646622B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2020-05-12 Gerhard Schmidmaier Biologically active implants
US20030114936A1 (en) * 1998-10-12 2003-06-19 Therics, Inc. Complex three-dimensional composite scaffold resistant to delimination
US6454811B1 (en) * 1998-10-12 2002-09-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Composites for tissue regeneration and methods of manufacture thereof
US20050106255A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2005-05-19 Ku David N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US20050071003A1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2005-03-31 Ku David N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
US6867247B2 (en) 1999-03-25 2005-03-15 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US7179883B2 (en) 1999-03-25 2007-02-20 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US7553923B2 (en) 1999-03-25 2009-06-30 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US20080095823A1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2008-04-24 Metabolix, Inc. Medical Devices and Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Polymers
US20080051490A1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2008-02-28 Williams Simon F Medical Devices and Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Polymers
EP2305324A1 (en) 1999-03-25 2011-04-06 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US6838493B2 (en) 1999-03-25 2005-01-04 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US6548569B1 (en) 1999-03-25 2003-04-15 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US7268205B2 (en) 1999-03-25 2007-09-11 Metabolix, Inc. Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers
US20020052654A1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2002-05-02 C.R. Bard, Inc. Prosthetic repair fabric
US20040110722A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2004-06-10 Ornberg Richard L. Modified hyaluronic acid polymers
US7445641B1 (en) 1999-05-27 2008-11-04 Pharmacia Corporation Biomaterials modified with superoxide dismutase mimics
US20040116332A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2004-06-17 Ornberg Richard L. Biopolymers modified with superoxide dismutase mimics
US20060089710A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2006-04-27 Ornberg Richard L Biopolymers modified with superoxide dismutase mimics
US7004976B2 (en) 1999-05-27 2006-02-28 Pharmacia Corporation Biopolymers modified with superoxide dismutase mimics
US6398808B1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2002-06-04 Scimed Life Systems, Inc. Localized delivery of genetic information from biostable materials
WO2001006949A3 (en) * 1999-07-28 2001-05-10 Interface Biotech As In vitro repair of bone and/or cartilage defects
WO2001006949A2 (en) * 1999-07-28 2001-02-01 Interface Biotech A/S In vitro repair of bone and/or cartilage defects
US6966918B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2005-11-22 Ethicon G.M.B.H. Reinforced areal implant
US6385491B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2002-05-07 Medtronic, Inc. Temporary medical electrical lead having biodegradable electrode mounting pad loaded with therapeutic drug
FR2799129A1 (en) 1999-10-04 2001-04-06 Medtronic Inc Medical electrical wire for stimulating or defibrillating the heart, including conductors and electrodes connected or integrated with biodegradable mounting block containing cardiac drug
US6748653B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2004-06-15 Medtronic, Inc. Method of making a temporary medical lead having biodegradable electrode mounting pad loaded with therapeutic drug
US20030168396A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2003-09-11 Jacobson James D. Monolithic filter body and fabrication technique
US6982058B2 (en) 1999-12-08 2006-01-03 Baxter International, Inc. Method for fabricating three dimensional structures
US6520997B1 (en) 1999-12-08 2003-02-18 Baxter International Inc. Porous three dimensional structure
US7442303B2 (en) 1999-12-08 2008-10-28 Baxter International Inc. Microporous filter membrane, method of making microporous filter membrane and separator employing microporous filter membranes
US7784619B2 (en) 1999-12-08 2010-08-31 Baxter International Inc. Method of making microporous filter membrane
US20020162791A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2002-11-07 Baxter International, Inc. Method for fabricating three dimensional structures
US20020072747A1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2002-06-13 Cohen Steven R. Partially resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US7771427B2 (en) 1999-12-09 2010-08-10 Macropore Partially resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US8753349B2 (en) 1999-12-09 2014-06-17 Steven R Cohen Completely resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US20050021034A1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2005-01-27 Cohen Steven R. Completely resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US6786910B2 (en) 1999-12-09 2004-09-07 Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. Completely resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US8162944B2 (en) 1999-12-09 2012-04-24 Medtronic, Inc. Completely resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
US9468480B2 (en) 1999-12-09 2016-10-18 Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. Completely resorbable connective tissue distraction devices and techniques
USRE43714E1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2012-10-02 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Preparation for repairing cartilage defects or cartilage/bone defects in human or animal joints
US6613432B2 (en) 1999-12-22 2003-09-02 Biosurface Engineering Technologies, Inc. Plasma-deposited coatings, devices and methods
US20040126596A1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-07-01 Biosurface Engineering Technologies, Inc. Plasma-deposited coatings, devices and methods
US6575888B2 (en) 2000-01-25 2003-06-10 Biosurface Engineering Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable brachytherapy device
US6767369B2 (en) 2000-03-22 2004-07-27 Synthes (Usa) Plugs for filling bony defects
US20040138748A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2004-07-15 Synthes (Usa) Plugs for filling bony defects
WO2001070136A3 (en) * 2000-03-22 2002-05-30 Synthes Usa Plugs for filling bony defects
US20040158317A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2004-08-12 Pharmasonics, Inc. Coated stent with ultrasound therapy
US6914050B2 (en) 2000-07-19 2005-07-05 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of bone growth with thrombin peptide derivatives
US7304035B2 (en) 2000-07-19 2007-12-04 Orthologic Corp. Stimulation of bone growth with thrombin peptide derivatives
US20050227923A1 (en) * 2000-07-19 2005-10-13 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of bone growth with thrombin peptide derivatives
US6894027B2 (en) 2000-07-19 2005-05-17 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of bone growth with thrombin peptide derivatives
US20050181996A1 (en) * 2000-07-20 2005-08-18 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of cartilage growth with agonists of the non-proteolytically activated thrombin receptor
US6855687B2 (en) 2000-07-20 2005-02-15 The Board Of Regents The University Of Texas System Stimulation of cartilage growth with agonists of the non-proteolytically activated thrombin receptor
WO2002007748A2 (en) * 2000-07-20 2002-01-31 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of cartilage growth with agonists of the non-proteolytically activated thrombin receptor
US6815416B2 (en) 2000-07-20 2004-11-09 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of cartilage growth with agonists of the non-proteolytically activated thrombin receptor
WO2002007748A3 (en) * 2000-07-20 2002-09-12 Univ Texas Stimulation of cartilage growth with agonists of the non-proteolytically activated thrombin receptor
WO2002015950A1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2002-02-28 Synthes Ag Chur Bone-regeneration material
AU2001279535B2 (en) * 2000-08-22 2004-06-17 Synthes Gmbh Bone-regeneration material
US20050074433A1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2005-04-07 Thierry Stoll Bone-regeneration material
US8679072B2 (en) 2000-08-22 2014-03-25 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Bone-regeneration material
KR100834109B1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2008-06-02 신세스 게엠바하 Bone-regeneration material
US8540658B2 (en) * 2000-08-22 2013-09-24 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Bone-regeneration material
KR100811765B1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2008-03-07 알데코아 에두아르도 아니투아 Method for surface treatment of implants or prosthesis made of titanium or other materials
US8226729B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2012-07-24 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
EP2085055A1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-08-05 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion devices
EP1335686A2 (en) * 2000-10-24 2003-08-20 SDGI Holdings, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US20090298777A1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-12-03 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US20040034428A1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2004-02-19 Mckay William F Spinal fusion methods and devices
EP1335686A4 (en) * 2000-10-24 2005-06-01 Sdgi Holdings Inc Spinal fusion methods and devices
AU2005203606B2 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-01-08 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US20090298776A1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-12-03 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US8617252B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2013-12-31 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US20030033007A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-02-13 Avantec Vascular Corporation Methods and devices for delivery of therapeutic capable agents with variable release profile
US20070142898A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2007-06-21 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of mizoribine
US6858221B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2005-02-22 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of mycophenolic acid
US7018405B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2006-03-28 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of methylprednisolone
US6939375B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2005-09-06 Avantac Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US20020082679A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-06-27 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery or therapeutic capable agents
US20050131532A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2005-06-16 Avantec Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US20030050692A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-03-13 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US20060106453A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2006-05-18 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US20030139801A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-07-24 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US20050125054A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2005-06-09 Avantec Vascular Corporation Devices delivering therapeutic agents and methods regarding the same
US7077859B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2006-07-18 Avantec Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for variably controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US7083642B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2006-08-01 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US6471980B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2002-10-29 Avantec Vascular Corporation Intravascular delivery of mycophenolic acid
US20050107869A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2005-05-19 Avantec Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US20050203612A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2005-09-15 Avantec Vascular Corporation Devices delivering therapeutic agents and methods regarding the same
US20060212109A1 (en) * 2001-02-13 2006-09-21 Avantec Vascular Corporation Delivery of therapeutic capable agents
US20090005882A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2009-01-01 Boyer Iii Michael L Demineralized bone-derived implants
US7608113B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2009-10-27 Synthes Usa, Llc Demineralized bone implants
US7753963B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2010-07-13 Synthes Usa, Llc Demineralized bone-derived implants
US20040107003A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-06-03 Synthes (Usa) Demineralized bone implants
US6652593B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2003-11-25 Synthes (Usa) Demineralized bone implants
US6776800B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2004-08-17 Synthes (U.S.A.) Implants formed with demineralized bone
US7122057B2 (en) 2001-04-12 2006-10-17 Therics, Llc Method and apparatus for engineered regenerative biostructures such as hydroxyapatite substrates for bone healing applications
US20050177237A1 (en) * 2001-04-12 2005-08-11 Ben Shappley Spinal cage insert, filler piece and method of manufacturing
US20030065400A1 (en) * 2001-04-12 2003-04-03 Beam Heather Ann Method and apparatus for engineered regenrative biostructures such as hydroxyapatite substrates for bone healing applications
US7018371B2 (en) 2001-05-07 2006-03-28 Xoft, Inc. Combination ionizing radiation and radiosensitizer delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US20050124844A1 (en) * 2001-05-07 2005-06-09 Xoft Microtube, Inc. Combination ionizing radiation and radiosensitizer delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US6537195B2 (en) 2001-05-07 2003-03-25 Xoft, Microtube, Inc. Combination x-ray radiation and drug delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US7041046B2 (en) 2001-05-07 2006-05-09 Xoft, Inc. Combination ionizing radiation and immunomodulator delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US20020165520A1 (en) * 2001-05-07 2002-11-07 Forman Michael R. Combination ionizing radiation and radiosensitizer delivery devices and methods for inhibiting hyperplasia
US20040210218A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2004-10-21 Dixon Robert A. Vertebral implant for bone fixation or interbody use
US20060142765A9 (en) * 2001-10-15 2006-06-29 Dixon Robert A Vertebral implant for bone fixation or interbody use
WO2003037223A1 (en) 2001-11-01 2003-05-08 Avantec Vascular Corporation Apparatus and methods for variably controlled substance delivery from implanted prostheses
US8546334B2 (en) 2001-11-19 2013-10-01 Scil Technology Gmbh Device having osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties
WO2003061690A1 (en) * 2002-01-17 2003-07-31 The Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Stimulation of bone growth and cartilage formation with thrombing peptide derivatives
EP2407473A2 (en) 2002-02-01 2012-01-18 ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Method for producing phosphorus-containing compounds
US7232464B2 (en) 2002-02-19 2007-06-19 Synthes (Usa) Intervertebral implant
US7618456B2 (en) 2002-02-19 2009-11-17 Synthes Usa, Llc Intervertebral implant
US20100094421A1 (en) * 2002-02-19 2010-04-15 Claude Mathieu Intervertebral implant
US20050177236A1 (en) * 2002-02-19 2005-08-11 Claude Mathieu Intervertebral implant
US20110118843A1 (en) * 2002-02-19 2011-05-19 Claude Mathieu Intervertebral implant
US10492922B2 (en) 2002-02-19 2019-12-03 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implant
US9572681B2 (en) 2002-02-19 2017-02-21 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implant
US20050222688A1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2005-10-06 Medtronic, Inc. Transmural concentric multilayer ingrowth matrix within well-defined porosity
US7963997B2 (en) 2002-07-19 2011-06-21 Kensey Nash Corporation Device for regeneration of articular cartilage and other tissue
US7763270B2 (en) 2002-09-10 2010-07-27 Scil Technology Gmbh Metal implant coated under reduced oxygen concentration with osteoinductive protein
US20110020658A1 (en) * 2002-09-10 2011-01-27 Scil Technology Gmbh Metal implant coated under reduced oxygen concentration with osteoinductive protein
US8257728B2 (en) 2002-09-10 2012-09-04 Scil Technology Gmbh Metal implant coated under reduced oxygen concentration with osteoinductive protein
US7682392B2 (en) * 2002-10-30 2010-03-23 Depuy Spine, Inc. Regenerative implants for stabilizing the spine and devices for attachment of said implants
US20040088053A1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2004-05-06 Hassan Serhan Regenerative implants for stabilizing the spine and devices for attachment of said implants
US20060085071A1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2006-04-20 Beat Lechmann Intervertebral implant
US8764831B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2014-07-01 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Intervertebral implant
US8709085B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2014-04-29 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Intervertebral implant
US9463097B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2016-10-11 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implant
US8715354B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2014-05-06 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Intervertebral implant
US10660765B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2020-05-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implant
US7862616B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2011-01-04 Synthes Usa, Llc Intervertebral implant
US7846207B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2010-12-07 Synthes Usa, Llc Intervertebral implant
US10064740B2 (en) 2003-02-06 2018-09-04 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Intervertebral implant
US20110087327A1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2011-04-14 Beat Lechmann Intervertebral implant
US8173162B2 (en) * 2003-02-26 2012-05-08 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Preparation for repairing cartilage tissue, especially articular cartilage defects
US20070148242A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2007-06-28 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc Preparation for repairing cartilage tissue, especially articular cartilage defects
US9445901B2 (en) * 2003-03-12 2016-09-20 Deger C. Tunc Prosthesis with sustained release analgesic
US20040180072A1 (en) * 2003-03-12 2004-09-16 Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Prosthesis with sustained release analgesic
US9320549B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2016-04-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Spinal fixation plates
US9039775B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2015-05-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Spinal fixation plates
US20080133008A1 (en) * 2003-04-29 2008-06-05 Muscuoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cartilage repair mixture containing allograft chondrocytes
USRE43258E1 (en) 2003-04-29 2012-03-20 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Glue for cartilage repair
USRE42208E1 (en) 2003-04-29 2011-03-08 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Glue for cartilage repair
US20080274157A1 (en) * 2003-04-29 2008-11-06 Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Cartilage implant plug with fibrin glue and method for implantation
US9125719B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2015-09-08 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US10111738B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2018-10-30 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US10314683B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2019-06-11 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US10136982B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2018-11-27 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US20040234576A1 (en) * 2003-05-08 2004-11-25 Tepha, Inc., State Of Incorporation Delaware Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US9333066B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2016-05-10 Tepha, Inc. Method of making a medical textile from polyhydroxyalkanoate fibers
US8758657B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2014-06-24 Tepha, Inc. Process of making polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles
US8034270B2 (en) 2003-05-08 2011-10-11 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers
US20090069901A1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2009-03-12 Katherine Gomes Truncale Cartilage allograft plug
US20090291112A1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2009-11-26 Truncale Katherine G Allograft osteochondral plug combined with cartilage particle mixture
US7901457B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2011-03-08 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cartilage allograft plug
US8221500B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2012-07-17 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cartilage allograft plug
US20050025809A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-02-03 Tepha, Inc. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate matrices for sustained drug delivery
US7445633B2 (en) 2003-08-08 2008-11-04 Synthes (U.S.A.) Method to impregnate a porous bone replacement material
US8632242B2 (en) * 2003-08-08 2014-01-21 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Method to impregnate a porous bone replacement material
US8382836B2 (en) 2003-08-08 2013-02-26 Synthes Usa, Llc Method to impregnate a porous bone replacement material
US20090022878A1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2009-01-22 Flavio Hoerger Method to impregnate a porous bone replacement material
US20060153001A1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2006-07-13 Flavio Hoerger Method to impregnate a porous bone replacement material
US20060287659A1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2006-12-21 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate nerve regeneration devices
US20090209983A1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2009-08-20 Tepha, Inc. Polyhydroxyalkanoate nerve regeneration devices
US20070208424A1 (en) * 2003-09-02 2007-09-06 Dominique Messerli Multipiece allograft implant
US7226482B2 (en) 2003-09-02 2007-06-05 Synthes (U.S.A.) Multipiece allograft implant
US7601173B2 (en) 2003-09-02 2009-10-13 Synthes Usa, Llc Multipiece allograft implant
US20050085922A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2005-04-21 Shappley Ben R. Shaped filler for implantation into a bone void and methods of manufacture and use thereof
US20090037148A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2009-02-05 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Biodegradable/bioresorbable tissue augmentation/reconstruction device
US7979150B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2011-07-12 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Biodegradable/bioresorbable tissue augmentation/reconstruction device
US8765165B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2014-07-01 Zimmer, Inc. Particulate cartilage system
US8652507B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2014-02-18 Zimmer, Inc. Juvenile cartilage composition
US8518433B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2013-08-27 Zimmer, Inc. Method of treating an osteochondral defect
US8524268B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2013-09-03 Zimmer, Inc. Cadaveric allogenic human juvenile cartilage implant
US8784863B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2014-07-22 Zimmer, Inc. Particulate cadaveric allogenic cartilage system
US8834914B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2014-09-16 Zimmer, Inc. Treatment methods using a particulate cadaveric allogenic juvenile cartilage particles
WO2005069884A2 (en) 2004-01-16 2005-08-04 Osteobiologics, Inc. Bone-tendon-bone implant
US20050159812A1 (en) * 2004-01-16 2005-07-21 Dinger Fred B.Iii Bone-tendon-bone implant
US20110172771A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2011-07-14 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Hydrogel implant with superficial pores
US7682540B2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2010-03-23 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making hydrogel implants
US20080279943A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2008-11-13 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making hydrogel implants
US20050273178A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2005-12-08 Boyan Barbara D Load bearing biocompatible device
US8486436B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2013-07-16 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Articular joint implant
US8142808B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2012-03-27 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of treating joints with hydrogel implants
US7910124B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2011-03-22 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Load bearing biocompatible device
US8318192B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2012-11-27 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making load bearing hydrogel implants
US20050196452A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2005-09-08 Boyan Barbara D. Surface directed cellular attachment
US20090263446A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2009-10-22 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method of making load bearing hydrogel implants
US8002830B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2011-08-23 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Surface directed cellular attachment
US8895073B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2014-11-25 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Hydrogel implant with superficial pores
US20050209705A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2005-09-22 Niederauer Gabriele G Implant scaffold combined with autologous or allogenic tissue
US20070185585A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2007-08-09 Brat Bracy Implant Scaffold Combined With Autologous Tissue, Allogenic Tissue, Cultured Tissue, or combinations Thereof
US20090043389A1 (en) * 2004-04-02 2009-02-12 Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Cartilage implant plug with fibrin glue and method for implantation
US20050222687A1 (en) * 2004-04-02 2005-10-06 Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Cartilage implant assembly and method for implantation
US20070009606A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2007-01-11 Serdy James G Manufacturing process, such as three dimensional printing, including binding of water-soluble material followed by softening and flowing and forming films of organic-solvent-soluble material
US20080032083A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2008-02-07 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Manufacturing Process, Such as Three-Dimensional Printing, Including Solvent Vapor Filming and the Like
US7815826B2 (en) 2004-05-12 2010-10-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Manufacturing process, such as three-dimensional printing, including solvent vapor filming and the like
US20070239195A1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2007-10-11 Nocca David J Adjustable Prosthetic Band
US20070221742A1 (en) * 2004-06-03 2007-09-27 Flavio Hoerger Device for impregnating a porous bone replacement material
US8038962B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2011-10-18 Synthes Usa, Llc Device for impregnating a porous bone replacement material
US20050278025A1 (en) * 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Salumedica Llc Meniscus prosthesis
US20090142307A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2009-06-04 Athanasiou Kyriacos A Shape-Based Approach for Scaffoldless Tissue Engineering
US20100093237A1 (en) * 2004-08-03 2010-04-15 Tepha, Inc. Non-curling polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures
US8084125B2 (en) 2004-08-03 2011-12-27 Tepha, Inc. Non-curling polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures
US20060058470A1 (en) * 2004-08-03 2006-03-16 Tepha, Inc. Non-curling polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures
US7641825B2 (en) 2004-08-03 2010-01-05 Tepha, Inc. Method of making a polyhydroxyalkanoate filament
US8541028B2 (en) 2004-08-04 2013-09-24 Evonik Corporation Methods for manufacturing delivery devices and devices thereof
US20060029637A1 (en) * 2004-08-04 2006-02-09 Tice Thomas R Methods for manufacturing delivery devices and devices thereof
US20060045902A1 (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-03-02 Serbousek Jon C Polymeric wrap for in vivo delivery of osteoinductive formulations
US20060057184A1 (en) * 2004-09-16 2006-03-16 Nycz Jeffrey H Process to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) with osteoinductive materials
US8697139B2 (en) 2004-09-21 2014-04-15 Frank M. Phillips Method of intervertebral disc treatment using articular chondrocyte cells
US8292968B2 (en) 2004-10-12 2012-10-23 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cancellous constructs, cartilage particles and combinations of cancellous constructs and cartilage particles
US9724205B2 (en) 2004-11-03 2017-08-08 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Biodegradable implant for intertransverse process fusion
US20070150051A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2007-06-28 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Vascular implants and methods of fabricating the same
US20080183274A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2008-07-31 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Delivery devices for implanting devices at intersecting lumens
US20080275542A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2008-11-06 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Implantable devices for the treatment of intersecting lumens
US10179058B2 (en) 2005-01-10 2019-01-15 Taheri Laduca Llc Apparatus and method for deploying an implantable device within the body
US10729569B2 (en) 2005-01-10 2020-08-04 Taheri Laduca Llc Delivery devices for implanting devices at intersecting lumens
US20060177513A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-10 Tepha, Inc. Embolization using poly-4-hydroxybutyrate particles
EP1883398A2 (en) * 2005-02-01 2008-02-06 Osteobiologics, Inc. Method and device for selective addition of a bioactive agent to a multi-phase implant
EP1883398A4 (en) * 2005-02-01 2012-06-06 Osteobiologics Inc Method and device for selective addition of a bioactive agent to a multi-phase implant
US20070009610A1 (en) * 2005-07-11 2007-01-11 Carina Syring Engineered osteochondral construct for treatment of articular cartilage defects
US7815926B2 (en) 2005-07-11 2010-10-19 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Implant for articular cartilage repair
US10835396B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2020-11-17 Micell Technologies, Inc. Stent with polymer coating containing amorphous rapamycin
US11911301B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2024-02-27 Micell Medtech Inc. Polymer coatings containing drug powder of controlled morphology
US10898353B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2021-01-26 Micell Technologies, Inc. Polymer coatings containing drug powder of controlled morphology
US8480757B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2013-07-09 Zimmer, Inc. Implants and methods for repair, replacement and treatment of disease
US9701940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2017-07-11 Histogenics Corporation Cell-support matrix having narrowly defined uniformly vertically and non-randomly organized porosity and pore density and a method for preparation thereof
US20080214998A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2008-09-04 Ed Kurek Perfusion Device and Method
US8641667B2 (en) 2005-10-20 2014-02-04 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Perfusion device and method
US20090319051A9 (en) * 2005-12-07 2009-12-24 Nycz Jeffrey H Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US20080306608A1 (en) * 2005-12-07 2008-12-11 Nycz Jeffrey H Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US8795361B2 (en) 2005-12-07 2014-08-05 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US8734823B2 (en) 2005-12-14 2014-05-27 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US20110028945A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-02-03 Searete Llc, Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US20110027181A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-02-03 Searete Llc Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US8691545B2 (en) 2005-12-14 2014-04-08 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Bone semi-permeable device
US8682619B2 (en) 2005-12-14 2014-03-25 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US20110172826A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2011-07-14 Amodei Dario G Device including altered microorganisms, and methods and systems of use
US8038920B2 (en) * 2006-01-25 2011-10-18 Carticept Medical, Inc. Methods of producing PVA hydrogel implants and related devices
US20070179622A1 (en) * 2006-01-25 2007-08-02 Salumedica, Llc Methods of producing pva hydrogel implants and related devices
US11696837B2 (en) 2006-02-27 2023-07-11 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implant with fixation geometry
US10512548B2 (en) 2006-02-27 2019-12-24 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implant with fixation geometry
US20100305704A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2010-12-02 Synthes Gmbh Intervertebral implant with fixation geometry
US7572291B2 (en) 2006-03-28 2009-08-11 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Osteochondral repair assembly including retracting spacer, kit and method
US7427293B2 (en) 2006-03-28 2008-09-23 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US20070233264A1 (en) * 2006-03-28 2007-10-04 Nycz Jeffrey H Osteochondral plug graft, kit and method
US20070233135A1 (en) * 2006-03-28 2007-10-04 Gil Carlos E Osteochondral repair assembly including retracting spacer, kit and method
WO2007146232A3 (en) * 2006-06-14 2009-04-09 Univ Delaware Compositions and methods for repair of tissues
US20090162436A1 (en) * 2006-06-14 2009-06-25 Carson Daniel D Compositions and methods for repair of tissues
WO2007146232A2 (en) * 2006-06-14 2007-12-21 University Of Delaware Compositions and methods for repair of tissues
US20070292470A1 (en) * 2006-06-15 2007-12-20 Medtronic Vascular, Inc. Implantable Medical Devices and Methods for Making the Same
US20080058953A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Scarborough Nelson L Demineralized cancellous strip DBM graft
US9642936B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2017-05-09 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Demineralized cancellous strip DBM graft
US9066994B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2015-06-30 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Demineralized cancellous strip DBM graft
US20080107711A1 (en) * 2006-11-08 2008-05-08 Alexis Paul Shelokov Bioabsorbable Implantable Material Fortified with Antibiotics for Localized Delivery of Drugs
US7943683B2 (en) 2006-12-01 2011-05-17 Tepha, Inc. Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers
US20110189475A1 (en) * 2006-12-01 2011-08-04 Tepha, Inc. Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers
US20080132602A1 (en) * 2006-12-01 2008-06-05 Tepha, Inc. Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers
US8753555B2 (en) 2006-12-01 2014-06-17 Tepha, Inc. Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers
US8497121B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2013-07-30 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Method of obtaining viable small tissue particles and use for tissue repair
US20080154233A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Apparatus for delivering a biocompatible material to a surgical site and method of using same
US10617795B2 (en) 2007-01-08 2020-04-14 Micell Technologies, Inc. Stents having biodegradable layers
US11426494B2 (en) 2007-01-08 2022-08-30 MT Acquisition Holdings LLC Stents having biodegradable layers
US8906110B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2014-12-09 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Two piece cancellous construct for cartilage repair
US7837740B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2010-11-23 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Two piece cancellous construct for cartilage repair
US20080255676A1 (en) * 2007-01-24 2008-10-16 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Two piece cancellous construct for cartilage repair
US20080188936A1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2008-08-07 Tornier, Inc. System and method for repairing tendons and ligaments
US20090043373A1 (en) * 2007-02-09 2009-02-12 Duke Fiduciary, Llc Vascular implants and methods of fabricating the same
US9526642B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2016-12-27 Taheri Laduca Llc Vascular implants and methods of fabricating the same
US10639176B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2020-05-05 Taheri Laduca Llc Vascular implants and methods of fabricating the same
US8435551B2 (en) 2007-03-06 2013-05-07 Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Cancellous construct with support ring for repair of osteochondral defects
US9777257B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2017-10-03 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US20080243028A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US8696674B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2014-04-15 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US8795194B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2014-08-05 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US20080243029A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US9909103B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2018-03-06 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US9822341B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2017-11-21 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Tissue harvesting
US9138318B2 (en) 2007-04-12 2015-09-22 Zimmer, Inc. Apparatus for forming an implant
US20100305696A1 (en) * 2007-05-24 2010-12-02 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Hybrid soft tissue implants from progenitor cells and biomaterials
US9199002B2 (en) * 2007-05-24 2015-12-01 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Hybrid soft tissue implants from progenitor cells and biomaterials
US20080300684A1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-04 Shelokov Alexis P System and method for controlled delivery of bone morphogenic protein and other bone graft substitutes for bone formation, repair and healing
US20090112332A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Alexis Paul Shelokov Bone graft and bone graft substitutes with antibiotics for sustained, localized release of antibiotics for reducing postoperative surgical wound infection in spinal and other bone surgery
US20110129422A1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2011-06-02 Brookwood Pharmaceuticals Viscous Terpolymers as Drug Delivery Platform
US20090124535A1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2009-05-14 Peter Markland Viscous terpolymers as drug delivery platform
US9090737B2 (en) 2007-11-13 2015-07-28 Surmodics, Inc. Viscous terpolymers as drug delivery platform
US20100312346A1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2010-12-09 Thomas Kueenzi Low profile intervertebral implant
US10543102B2 (en) 2007-11-16 2020-01-28 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Low profile intervertebral implant
US9005295B2 (en) 2007-11-16 2015-04-14 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Low profile intervertebral implant
US9744049B2 (en) 2007-11-16 2017-08-29 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Low profile intervertebral implant
US8540774B2 (en) 2007-11-16 2013-09-24 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Low profile intervertebral implant
US10137003B2 (en) 2007-11-16 2018-11-27 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Low profile intervertebral implant
US8728528B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2014-05-20 Evonik Corporation Process for preparing microparticles having a low residual solvent volume
US8801725B2 (en) 2008-03-10 2014-08-12 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Instruments and methods used when repairing a defect on a tissue surface
US20090228031A1 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-09-10 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Instruments and methods used when repairing a defect on a tissue surface
US8652216B2 (en) * 2008-05-02 2014-02-18 Cook Biotech Incorporated Self deploying implant in needle
US20110093088A1 (en) * 2008-05-02 2011-04-21 Steve Chen Self deploying implant in needle
US20110125284A1 (en) * 2008-05-28 2011-05-26 University Of Bath Improvements in or Relating to Joints and/or Implants
US9370426B2 (en) * 2008-05-28 2016-06-21 Renishaw Plc Relating to joints and/or implants
US10350391B2 (en) 2008-07-17 2019-07-16 Micell Technologies, Inc. Drug delivery medical device
US20100049322A1 (en) * 2008-08-19 2010-02-25 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Osteochondral repair implants and methods
US9192419B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2015-11-24 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US20100145459A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2010-06-10 Mcdonough William P Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US9402735B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2016-08-02 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US10433976B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2019-10-08 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US11612492B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2023-03-28 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US9414935B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2016-08-16 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US10531960B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2020-01-14 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US11517444B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2022-12-06 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly
US20100168807A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-07-01 Burton Kevin W Bioactive terpolymer compositions and methods of making and using same
US8951546B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2015-02-10 Surmodics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Flexible implantable composites and implants comprising same
US20100158969A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Tice Thomas R Flexible implantable composites and implants comprising same
US20100160891A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Tipton Arthur J Elastic implantable composites and implants comprising same
US9415197B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2016-08-16 Surmodics, Inc. Implantable suction cup composites and implants comprising same
US20100158978A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Peter Markland Bioactive spray coating compositions and methods of making and uses thereof
US8974808B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2015-03-10 Surmodics, Inc. Elastic implantable composites and implants comprising same
US20130144400A1 (en) * 2009-01-15 2013-06-06 The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Scaffold for bone and tissue repair in mammals
US9456890B2 (en) * 2009-01-15 2016-10-04 The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Scaffold for bone and tissue repair in mammals
US10653820B2 (en) 2009-04-01 2020-05-19 Micell Technologies, Inc. Coated stents
US20100331865A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Gino Bradica Biphasic implant device providing joint fluid therapy
US10016278B2 (en) 2009-06-30 2018-07-10 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Biphasic implant device providing joint fluid therapy
US9744123B2 (en) 2009-06-30 2017-08-29 Kensey Nash Corporation Biphasic implant device providing gradient
US20100331998A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Ringeisen Timothy A Electrokinetic device for tissue repair
US20100330181A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Castiglione-Dodd Emme M Biphasic implant device providing gradient
US20100331979A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Mcdade Robert L Biphasic implant device transmitting mechanical stimulus
US20110012280A1 (en) * 2009-07-14 2011-01-20 Doctors Research Group, Inc. Method for fabricating a multi-density polymeric interbody spacer
US20110015743A1 (en) * 2009-07-14 2011-01-20 Doctors Research Group, Inc. Multi-density polymeric interbody spacer
US20110142906A1 (en) * 2009-09-17 2011-06-16 Surmodics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Implant Devices that Differ by Release Profile and Methods of Making and Using Same
US9399018B2 (en) 2009-09-17 2016-07-26 Evonik Corporation Implant devices that differ by release profile and methods of making and using same
US20110091518A1 (en) * 2009-09-22 2011-04-21 Danielle Biggs Implant devices having varying bioactive agent loading configurations
US9993441B2 (en) 2009-12-30 2018-06-12 Surmodics, Inc. Controlled release matrix barrier structure for subcutaneous medical devices
US11369498B2 (en) 2010-02-02 2022-06-28 MT Acquisition Holdings LLC Stent and stent delivery system with improved deliverability
US9289299B2 (en) * 2010-02-18 2016-03-22 Biomet Manufacturing, Llc Method and apparatus for augumenting bone defects
US20130211536A1 (en) * 2010-02-18 2013-08-15 Biomet Manufacturing Corporation Method And Apparatus For Augumenting Bone Defects
US20130006354A1 (en) * 2010-02-26 2013-01-03 Limacorporate Spa Integrated prosthetic element
US8864826B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2014-10-21 Limacorporate Spa Integrated prosthetic element
US20110223253A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Artimplant Ab Physically stabilized biodegradable osteochondral implant and methods for its manufacture and implantation
US10232092B2 (en) 2010-04-22 2019-03-19 Micell Technologies, Inc. Stents and other devices having extracellular matrix coating
US11904118B2 (en) 2010-07-16 2024-02-20 Micell Medtech Inc. Drug delivery medical device
US20120077028A1 (en) * 2010-08-30 2012-03-29 Howard Bowman Terpolymer blends and their use as pressure-sensitive adhesives
US9598532B2 (en) 2010-08-30 2017-03-21 Surmodics, Inc. Terpolymers as pressure-sensitive adhesives
US8920921B2 (en) * 2010-08-30 2014-12-30 Surmodics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Terpolymer blends and their use as pressure-sensitive adhesives
US9416221B2 (en) 2010-08-30 2016-08-16 Surmodics, Inc. Biodegradable terpolymers and terpolymer blends as pressure-sensitive adhesives
US8435305B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2013-05-07 Zimmer, Inc. Osteochondral graft delivery device and uses thereof
US8753406B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2014-06-17 Zimmer Inc. Osteochondral graft delivery device and uses thereof
US9113916B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2015-08-25 Zimmer, Inc. Drill bit for osteochondral drilling with guiding element and uses thereof
US9220604B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2015-12-29 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US10507117B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2019-12-17 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US9241809B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2016-01-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US9848992B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2017-12-26 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US11458027B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2022-10-04 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US20190000628A1 (en) * 2011-02-28 2019-01-03 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Modular tissue scaffolds
US11793644B2 (en) 2011-02-28 2023-10-24 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Modular tissue scaffolds
US9943410B2 (en) * 2011-02-28 2018-04-17 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Modular tissue scaffolds
US20120271418A1 (en) * 2011-02-28 2012-10-25 Tissue Regeneration Systems, Inc. Modular tissue scaffolds
US10500053B2 (en) * 2011-02-28 2019-12-10 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Modular tissue scaffolds
US9155543B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2015-10-13 Cartiva, Inc. Tapered joint implant and related tools
US10376368B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2019-08-13 Cartiva, Inc. Devices and methods for creating wedge-shaped recesses
US11278411B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2022-03-22 Cartiva, Inc. Devices and methods for creating wedge-shaped recesses
US9526632B2 (en) 2011-05-26 2016-12-27 Cartiva, Inc. Methods of repairing a joint using a wedge-shaped implant
US11337930B2 (en) 2011-06-02 2022-05-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for cell encapsulation and cell therapy
US10842753B2 (en) 2011-06-02 2020-11-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for cell encapsulation and cell therapy
US10016533B2 (en) 2011-08-17 2018-07-10 Meng Chen Plasma modified medical devices and methods
US9603978B2 (en) 2011-08-17 2017-03-28 Meng Chen Plasma modified medical devices and methods
US10188772B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2019-01-29 Micell Technologies, Inc. Drug delivery medical device
US10350072B2 (en) 2012-05-24 2019-07-16 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US20150297349A1 (en) * 2012-12-11 2015-10-22 Dr. H.C. Robert Mathys Stiftung Bone substitute and method for producing the same
US9907654B2 (en) * 2012-12-11 2018-03-06 Dr. H.C. Robert Mathys Stiftung Bone substitute and method for producing the same
US10167447B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2019-01-01 Zimmer, Inc. Supports and methods for promoting integration of cartilage tissue explants
US11039943B2 (en) * 2013-03-12 2021-06-22 Micell Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable biomedical implants
US20140277401A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Micell Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable biomedical implants
US10272606B2 (en) 2013-05-15 2019-04-30 Micell Technologies, Inc. Bioabsorbable biomedical implants
US11266606B2 (en) 2014-08-01 2022-03-08 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US10898443B2 (en) 2014-08-01 2021-01-26 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US11426484B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2022-08-30 Tepha, Inc. Self-retaining sutures of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US10500303B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2019-12-10 Tepha, Inc. Self-retaining sutures of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US11540927B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2023-01-03 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US10702394B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2020-07-07 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US9867718B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2018-01-16 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US10010432B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2018-07-03 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US10130492B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2018-11-20 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use
US10077420B2 (en) 2014-12-02 2018-09-18 Histogenics Corporation Cell and tissue culture container
US9555155B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2017-01-31 Tepha, Inc. Methods of orienting multifilament yarn and monofilaments of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US11828006B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2023-11-28 Tepha, Inc. Methods of orienting multifilament yarn and monofilaments of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US10227713B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2019-03-12 Tepha, Inc. Methods of orienting multifilament yarn and monofilaments of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US10590566B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2020-03-17 Tepha, Inc. Methods of orienting multifilament yarn and monofilaments of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US10626521B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2020-04-21 Tepha, Inc. Methods of manufacturing mesh sutures from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof
US11065044B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2021-07-20 Arthrex, Inc. Surgical implant with porous region
US10420597B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2019-09-24 Arthrex, Inc. Surgical implant with porous region
US9907663B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2018-03-06 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US10758374B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2020-09-01 Cartiva, Inc. Carpometacarpal (CMC) implants and methods
US10973644B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2021-04-13 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US11839552B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2023-12-12 Cartiva, Inc. Carpometacarpal (CMC) implants and methods
US11717411B2 (en) 2015-03-31 2023-08-08 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants with porous materials and methods
US10952858B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2021-03-23 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US11020231B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2021-06-01 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US11701231B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2023-07-18 Cartiva, Inc. Tooling for creating tapered opening in tissue and related methods
US10729818B2 (en) 2015-11-01 2020-08-04 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US11090413B2 (en) 2015-11-01 2021-08-17 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US10709818B2 (en) 2015-11-01 2020-07-14 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Modified alginates for anti-fibrotic materials and applications
US10123879B2 (en) * 2015-12-30 2018-11-13 Wasas, Llc. System and method for non-binding allograft subtalar joint implant
US20180177601A1 (en) * 2015-12-30 2018-06-28 Wasas, Llc. System and method for non-binding allograft subtalar joint implant
US10426626B2 (en) 2016-05-03 2019-10-01 Additive Orthopaedics, LLC. Bone fixation device and method of use
US11638645B2 (en) 2016-05-19 2023-05-02 University of Pittsburgh—of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education Biomimetic plywood motifs for bone tissue engineering
US10806586B2 (en) * 2016-05-19 2020-10-20 University Of Pittsburgh—Of The Commonwealth System Of Higer Education Biomimetic plywood motifs for bone tissue engineering
US10059621B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2018-08-28 Corning Incorporated Magnetizable glass ceramic composition and methods thereof
US10751367B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-08-25 Corning Incorporated Bioactive glass microspheres
US10676713B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-06-09 Corning Incorporated Bioactive borophosphate glasses
US11814649B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2023-11-14 Corning Incorporated Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic compositions and methods thereof
US10647962B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-05-12 Corning Incorporated Bioactive aluminoborate glasses
US11478286B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2022-10-25 Paragon Advanced Technologies, Inc. Bone fixation devices
US10730983B2 (en) 2016-06-13 2020-08-04 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Biocompatible coatings and hydrogels for reducing foreign body response and fibrosis
US11058468B2 (en) 2016-07-29 2021-07-13 Additive Orthopaedics, LLC Bone fixation device and method of use
WO2018158311A1 (en) 2017-02-28 2018-09-07 University College Cork - National University Of Ireland, Cork An intravascular cell therapy device
US11678967B2 (en) 2017-02-28 2023-06-20 Provasctec Limited Intravascular cell therapy device
GB2567173A (en) * 2017-10-04 2019-04-10 Univ Oxford Innovation Ltd Cartilage plug
US11318231B2 (en) 2017-11-06 2022-05-03 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Anti-inflammatory coatings to improve biocompatibility of neurological implants
US11384009B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2022-07-12 Corning Incorporated High liquidus viscosity bioactive glass
US11198638B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2021-12-14 Corning Incorporated Bioactive borate glass and methods thereof
US10857259B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2020-12-08 Corning Incorporated Chemically strengthened bioactive glass-ceramics
US11446410B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2022-09-20 Corning Incorporated Chemically strengthened bioactive glass-ceramics
US11274059B2 (en) 2017-11-28 2022-03-15 Corning Incorporated Bioactive glass compositions and dentin hypersensitivity remediation
US11766337B2 (en) 2018-02-05 2023-09-26 Paragon Advanced Technologies, Inc. Bone fixation device
US11147679B2 (en) 2018-02-05 2021-10-19 Paragon Advanced Technologies, Inc. Bone fixation device
US11801143B2 (en) * 2021-07-01 2023-10-31 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Multi-layered biomimetic osteochondral implants and methods of using thereof
US20230000628A1 (en) * 2021-07-01 2023-01-05 Hyalex Orthopaedics, Inc. Multi-layered biomimetic osteochondral implants and methods of using thereof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5876452A (en) Biodegradable implant
US6013853A (en) Continuous release polymeric implant carrier
US5422340A (en) TGF-βformulation for inducing bone growth
AU671721B2 (en) Tgf-beta formulation for inducing bone growth
US5492697A (en) Biodegradable implant for fracture nonunions
US7390498B2 (en) Method of forming bone with porous βtricalcium phosphate granules
US5158934A (en) Method of inducing bone growth using TGF-β
US8877221B2 (en) Osteoconductive matrices comprising calcium phosphate particles and statins and methods of using the same
Gombotz et al. Stimulation of bone healing by transforming growth factor‐beta1 released from polymeric or ceramic implants
US11324597B2 (en) Implantable composite containing carbonated hydroxyapatite
JP2005505351A (en) Improved bone graft
US20030049328A1 (en) Porous beta-tricalcium phosphate granules and methods for producing same
US20120107401A1 (en) Osteoconductive matrices comprising statins and methods of using the same
EP0759731A1 (en) DEVICE AND METHODS FOR $i(IN VIVO) CULTURING OF DIVERSE TISSUE CELLS
KR20190101298A (en) Demineralized bone matrix having improved handling characteristics
US11324806B2 (en) Sustained delivery of a growth differentiation factor
Arm The sustained release of proteins for mechanically loaded applications: System characterization and materials evaluation
Peel et al. Development of URIST™ a Multiphasic rhBMP-2 Bone Graft Substitute
Takahashi Material design of biodegradable cell
Takahashi MATERIAL DESIGN OF BIODEGRADABLE CELL SCAFFOLDS FOR CONTROLLED RELEASE OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2 AND THE BONE REGENERATION POTENTIAL

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, TEXA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ATHANASIOU, KYRIACOS A.;BOYAN, BARBARA D.;REEL/FRAME:007660/0658

Effective date: 19950609

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12