US4920084A - Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses - Google Patents

Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4920084A
US4920084A US07/239,175 US23917588A US4920084A US 4920084 A US4920084 A US 4920084A US 23917588 A US23917588 A US 23917588A US 4920084 A US4920084 A US 4920084A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
particles
refractory
composition
mean
mixture
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US07/239,175
Inventor
Pierre Robyn
Leon-Philippe Mottet
Pierre Deschepper
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fosbel Intellectual Ltd
Original Assignee
Glaverbel Belgium SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10573469&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US4920084(A) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Glaverbel Belgium SA filed Critical Glaverbel Belgium SA
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US4920084A publication Critical patent/US4920084A/en
Assigned to FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG reassignment FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GLAVERBEL
Assigned to FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED reassignment FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME AND ADDRESS Assignors: HAILJUMPER LIMITED
Assigned to HAILJUMPER LIMITED reassignment HAILJUMPER LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG
Assigned to FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG reassignment FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG CHANGE OF ADDRESS Assignors: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG
Assigned to FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED reassignment FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED CORRECTION OF ADDRESS RE CHANGE OF NAME AND ADDRES Assignors: HAILJUMPER LIMITED
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED
Assigned to FOSBEL, INC., FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED reassignment FOSBEL, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/622Forming processes; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/653Processes involving a melting step
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/622Forming processes; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/626Preparing or treating the powders individually or as batches ; preparing or treating macroscopic reinforcing agents for ceramic products, e.g. fibres; mechanical aspects section B
    • C04B35/63Preparing or treating the powders individually or as batches ; preparing or treating macroscopic reinforcing agents for ceramic products, e.g. fibres; mechanical aspects section B using additives specially adapted for forming the products, e.g.. binder binders
    • C04B35/6303Inorganic additives
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/01Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on oxide ceramics
    • C04B35/10Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on oxide ceramics based on aluminium oxide
    • C04B35/101Refractories from grain sized mixtures
    • C04B35/106Refractories from grain sized mixtures containing zirconium oxide or zircon (ZrSiO4)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/622Forming processes; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/64Burning or sintering processes
    • C04B35/65Reaction sintering of free metal- or free silicon-containing compositions
    • C04B35/651Thermite type sintering, e.g. combustion sintering
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/66Monolithic refractories or refractory mortars, including those whether or not containing clay
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B41/00After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
    • C04B41/45Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements
    • C04B41/50Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements with inorganic materials
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27DDETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
    • F27D1/00Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
    • F27D1/16Making or repairing linings increasing the durability of linings or breaking away linings
    • F27D1/1636Repairing linings by projecting or spraying refractory materials on the lining
    • F27D1/1642Repairing linings by projecting or spraying refractory materials on the lining using a gunning apparatus
    • F27D1/1647Repairing linings by projecting or spraying refractory materials on the lining using a gunning apparatus the projected materials being partly melted, e.g. by exothermic reactions of metals (Al, Si) with oxygen
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B2111/00Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
    • C04B2111/00034Physico-chemical characteristics of the mixtures
    • C04B2111/00146Sprayable or pumpable mixtures
    • C04B2111/00155Sprayable, i.e. concrete-like, materials able to be shaped by spraying instead of by casting, e.g. gunite
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B2111/00Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
    • C04B2111/72Repairing or restoring existing buildings or building materials

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process of forming a refractory mass on a surface, which process comprises spraying against that surface a mixture of refractory particles and oxidisable particles which react exothermically with oxygen to generate sufficient heat to soften or melt at least the surfaces of the refractory particles and so bring about formation of said refractory mass.
  • This invention also relates to a composition of matter for spraying against a surface to form a refractory mass, such composition being a mixture comprising refractory particles, together with particles of exothermically oxidisable material.
  • Processes of the kind referred to are particularly suitable for the hot repair of furnaces and other refractory devices. They are also useful in the formation of refractory components, for example for the surfacing of refractory metals or other refractory substrates, and in particular for the formation of refractory linings on parts which are especially susceptible to erosion.
  • furnace repair such processes can be, and indeed preferably are, operated substantially at the working temperature of the furnace.
  • repair can be effected while the furnace is still operating.
  • the refractory mass formed should be of a high quality so that it will have a long useful working life. It has been found that the ability of such a mass to resist erosion and other stresses, in particular thermal stresses, to which it is likely to be subjected during its working life is dependent not only on its composition, but also on its structure, and that the structure of the refractory mass is strongly influenced by the way the mass forms from the sprayed material.
  • a process of forming a refractory mass on a surface comprises spraying against that surface a mixture of refractory particles and oxidisable particles which react exothermically with oxygen to generate sufficient heat to soften or melt at least the surfaces of the refractory particles and so bring about formation of said refractory mass, characterised in that the granulometry of the particles which are sprayed in the mixture is such that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles and that the size range spread factory (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.2.
  • % grain size used herein in relation to particles of material denotes that that % proportion by weight of the particles will pass a screen having a mesh of that size, and references to the mean of two grain sizes are references to half the sum of those grain sizes.
  • size range spread factor [f(G)] is used herein in respect of a given species of particles to denote the factor: ##EQU2## where G 80 denotes the 80% grain size of the particles of that species, and G 20 denotes the 20% grain size of the particles of that species.
  • samples of particles of a given material have a size range distribution which follows a bell curve, and when the cumulative distribution, that is the proportion by weight which will pass a screen having a mesh of a given size, is plotted on a linear scale against the screen mesh size plotted on a logarithmic scale, the result is a sigmoid curve which is generally straight between the points which correspond to the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the particles under test.
  • the reliable and consistent formation of a durable refractory mass by the adoption of a process according to this invention is attributed to a tendency for that refractory product to be comparatively less porous and comparatively free from cracks with respect to a refractory product formed by a process in which the said particle granulometry conditions are not observed but which is otherwise similar.
  • the high size range spread factor presumably contributes to this result, but it has been found that reliance on that factor alone is not sufficient to give good results. Notwithstanding the wide size range spread of the refractory particles, it has been found that the oxidisable particles must be of a lower mean size (as hereinbefore defined), or the advantage referred to pertaining to the quality of the refractory masses formed by the process will not be achieved.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 2.5 mm.
  • the adoption of this condition favours the smooth progression of the process as regards the particle supply to and flow through the lance.
  • the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 4 mm.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 1 mm, and the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 2 mm.
  • the adoption of this feature yet further promote smooth operation, but also, it has been found that if larger particles are used, they occasionally tend to rebound from a surface against which they are sprayed so reducing the amount of material deposited to form a refractory mass. This is especially so when the particles are sprayed against an overhead surface.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles and their 90% grain size down to those values, this tendency is much reduced.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is at least 50 ⁇ m.
  • the adoption of this preferred feature helps to avoid smothering of the oxidation reactions which take place during spraying of the mixture, by refractory particles which are too small.
  • the size range spread factory (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.3. This further promotes a reduction in porosity of a refractory product formed on spraying of the mixture.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is not greater than 1.9. This condition is beneficial for reducing segregation of different sizes of refractory particles by settling during storage or handling, for example during feed to the lance.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 1.4.
  • a high size range spread factor for the oxidisable particles is not to be sought after as it militates against the uniformity of the oxidation reactions which is desirable for the formation of a high quality refractory mass.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles may for example be 1.3 or less.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 ⁇ m. Particles of such grain sizes are easily oxidised, so promoting rapid evolution of heat during spraying of the mixture.
  • Such rapid oxidation and evolution of heat during spraying is further promoted when, as is preferred, the 90% grain size of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 ⁇ m.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 15 ⁇ m.
  • Incombustible particles of various compositions can be used in the present invention, depending of course on the required composition of the refractory mass to be deposited on spraying of the mixture.
  • the deposit should include material having a similar chemical composition to material included in the substrate. Problems which can arise if this general guideline is not followed may be due to chemical incompatibility between the deposit and the substrate, or to a wide difference between their coefficients of thermal expansion which could lead to excessive thermal stress at their boundary and flaking off of the deposited refractory mass.
  • the most useful materials for forming said refractory particles comprise one or more of sillimanite, mullite, zircon, SiO 2 , ZrO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , MgO.
  • the refractory material has previously been fired to a temperature in excess of 0.7 times its melting point expressed in kelvins.
  • a heat treatment has a beneficial effect on various refractory materials for promoting the formation of a high quality refractory deposit.
  • some materials such as magnesia
  • magnesia such a heat treatment drives off any molecular water bound in that material.
  • other materials for example silica
  • such a heat treatment favourably alters the crystallographic structure for the purpose in view.
  • the refractory material comprises particles of silica
  • the mineralogical form of the silica has an important effect on the form of the silica incorporated in a refractory mass formed by spraying the mixture, notwithstanding that the silica may have been completely melted during such spraying.
  • at least 90% by weight of any silica present in said refractory material of said mixture is in the form of tridymite and/or cristobalite, as this gives the best results.
  • the crystallographic structure of the refractory product formed by a process according to this invention is strongly influenced, if not even determined, by the form and size of the material sprayed. It is assumed that even if the refractory particles sprayed do become completely melted, some crystallites remain in the fluid state to influence the way in which recrystallisation takes place on subsequent solidification.
  • said oxidisable particles comprise particles of one or more of silicon, aluminium, magnesium and zirconium. Particles of such materials can be oxidised rapidly with a high accompanying evolution of heat and themselves form refractory oxides, and are thus very suitable for use in the present invention.
  • said oxidisable particles are present in an amount not exceeding 20% by weight of said mixture. There is also a technical reason for that limit, in that if greater proportions of oxidisable material are used, the working surface may be liable to overheat.
  • the present invention also provides a composition of matter for spraying against a surface to form a refractory mass, such composition being a mixture comprising refractory particles, together with particles of exothermically oxidisable material, characterised in that the exothermically oxidisable particles are present in an amount between 5% and 30% by weight of said mixture and the granulometry of said particles is such that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles and that the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.2.
  • Such a composition contributes to the facility with which durable refractory masses can be formed by causing combustion of the oxidisable particles during spraying, and the latitude allowed for the grain size range spread of the refractory particles has a favourable effect on the production costs of the composition.
  • the said mixture can be formed using refractory particles which are readily obtainable by an appropriate selection of sizing operations.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 2.5 mm.
  • the adoption of this condition is favourable for smooth feed of the particles to and through a lance which is to be used for spraying the particles.
  • the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 4 mm.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 1 mm, and the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 2 mm.
  • the adoption of this feature yet further promote smooth feed of the particles, but also, it has been found that if larger particles are used, they occasionally tend to rebound when they are sprayed against a surface, so reducing the amount of material which would be deposited to form a refractory mass. This is especially so when the particles are to be sprayed against an overhead surface.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles and their 90% grain size down to those values, this tendency is much reduced.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is at least 50 ⁇ m.
  • the adoption of this preferred feature helps to avoid smothering of the oxidation reactions which take place when the mixture is sprayed, by refractory particles which are too small.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.3. This further promotes a reduction in porosity of a refractory formed when the mixture is sprayed.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is not greater than 1.9. This limits the size range spread of those particles so that a given sample will have a relatively low proportion of particles which are either comparatively very small or very large. The adoption of this feature gives a reduced tendency for the particles to segregate by settling during transport from place to place or even while they are contained in a hopper of a spraying machine.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 1.4.
  • a high size range spread factor for the oxidisable particles is not to be sought after as it militates against the uniformity of the oxidation reactions which is desirable for the formation of a high quality refractory mass when the mixture is sprayed.
  • the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles may for example be 1.3 or less.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 ⁇ m. Particles of such grain sizes are easily oxidised, so promoting rapid evolution of heat when the mixture is sprayed.
  • Such rapid oxidation and evolution of heat when the mixture is sprayed is further promoted when, as is preferred, the 90% grain size of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 ⁇ m.
  • the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 15 ⁇ m.
  • Incombustible particles of various compositions can be used in the present invention, depending of course on the required composition of the refractory mass to be deposited on spraying of the mixture.
  • the deposit should include material having a similar composition to material included in the substrate. Problems which can arise if this general guideline is not followed may be due to chemical incompatibility between the deposit and the substrate, or to a wide difference between their coefficients of thermal expansion which could lead to excessive thermal stress at their boundary and flaking off of the deposited refractory mass.
  • the most useful materials for forming said refractory particles comprise one or more of sillimanite, mullite, zircon, SiO 2 , ZrO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , MgO.
  • the refractory material has previously been fired to a temperature in excess of 0.7 times its melting point expressed in °Kelvin.
  • a heat treatment has a beneficial effect on various refractory materials for promoting the formation of a high quality refractory deposit when the mixture is sprayed.
  • some materials such as magnesia
  • magnesia such a heat treatment drives off any molecular water bound in that material.
  • other materials for example silica
  • such a heat treatment favourably alters the crystallographic structure for the purpose in view.
  • the refractory particles can readily be obtained by an appropriate selection of sizing operations.
  • the refractory material comprises particles of silica
  • the mineralogical form of the silica has an important effect on the form of the silica incorporated in a refractory mass formed by spraying the mixture, notwithstanding that the silica may have been completely melted during such spraying.
  • at least 90% by weight of any silica present in said refractory material of said mixture should be in the form of tridymite and/or cristobalite, as is preferred.
  • the crystallographic structure of the refractory product formed by a process according to this invention is strongly influenced, if not even determined, by the form and size of the material sprayed. It is assumed that even if the refractory particles sprayed do become completely melted, some crystallites remain in the fluid state to influence the way in which recrystallisation takes place on subsequent solidification.
  • said oxidisable particles comprise particles of one or more of silicon, aluminium, magnesium and zirconium. Particles of such materials can be oxidised rapidly with a high accompanying evolution of heat and themselves form refractory oxides, and are thus very suitable for use in the present invention.
  • said oxidisable particles are present in an amount not exceeding 20% by weight of said mixture.
  • a mixture of particles comprising by weight 20% silicon and 80% silica.
  • the silica was obtained by crushing bricks made from quartz sand which had previously been fired at a temperature of at least 1400° C. Due to the firing, two parts by weight of the silica were in the form of tridymite and three parts by weight were in the form of cristobalite.
  • G 20 , G 80 and G 90 respectively are the 20%, 80% and 90% grain sizes of the particles and f(G) is their size range spread factor as herein defined.
  • the mixture of particles was projected at a rate of 1 kg/min in a stream of oxygen delivered at 200 L/min using apparatus as described in British Patent Specification No 1,330,895 to form a uniform adherent refractory coating on a silica furnace wall which was at a temperature of 1200° C. to 1250° C.
  • the use of the mixture led to the formation of substantially crack-free refractory coatings which adhered very well to the working surface.
  • the presence of boundary cracks is a particular problem when depositing silica coatings on silica walls.
  • the particulate refractory material substituted into the starting mixture for the purposes of this comparison was natural quartz sand having the following granulometry.
  • a mixture of particles was prepared comprising by weight 8% silicon, 4% aluminium and 88% magnesia.
  • the magnesia used was natural magnesia which had been fired at 1900° C. in order to dehydrate it.
  • the silicon used had the granulometry specified in Example 1. Cumulative size range distribution graphs of the aluminium and magnesia used are also shown in the accompanying drawing.
  • the mixture of particles was projected using the same apparatus as in Example 1, to form a uniform adherent refractory coating on a furnace wall which built up of basic refractory blocks mainly consisting of magnesia and which was at a temperature in excess of 1000° C.
  • the use of the mixture led to the formation of low-porosity refractory coatings which adhered very well to the working surface.
  • a mixture of particles was prepared comprising by weight 6% silicon, 6% aluminium and 88% zircon/zirconia and alumina.
  • the refractory particles were obtained by crushing used or broken electrocast refractory blocks of the type available under the Trade Mark "Corhart Zac". The approximate composition by weight of those blocks was: Al 2 O 3 65-75%; ZrO 2 15-20%; SiO 2 8-12%.
  • the silicon, aluminium and refractory particles had the following granulometry:
  • This starting mixture was projected using the same apparatus as in the previous Examples onto an aluminous refractory wall to deposit substantially crack-free, low porosity coatings.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)
  • Ceramic Products (AREA)
  • Coating By Spraying Or Casting (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)

Abstract

In processes of forming a refractory mass on a surface, a mixture of refractory particles and oxidizable particles which react exothermically with oxygen to generate sufficient heat to soften or melt at least the surfaces of the refractory particles are sprayed against that surface to bring about formation of said refractory mass. To promote the reliable and consistent formation of a durable refractory mass, the granulometry of the particles which are sprayed in the mixture is such that the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles (that is, the screen mesh sizes G80 and G20 through which respectively 80% and 20% by weight of the particles will pass) have a mean greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidizable particles and the size range spread factor f(G) of the refractory particles is at least 1.2, where ##EQU1## In a composition of matter for spraying against a surface to form a refractory mass, which consists of such a mixture, the granulometric requirements are the same, and the exothermically oxidizable particles are present in an amount between 5% and 30% by weight of the mixture, and the granulometry of said particles is such that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidizable particles and that the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.2.

Description

This is a division of application Ser. No. 06/803,782 filed Dec. 2, 1985, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,468.
This invention relates to a process of forming a refractory mass on a surface, which process comprises spraying against that surface a mixture of refractory particles and oxidisable particles which react exothermically with oxygen to generate sufficient heat to soften or melt at least the surfaces of the refractory particles and so bring about formation of said refractory mass.
This invention also relates to a composition of matter for spraying against a surface to form a refractory mass, such composition being a mixture comprising refractory particles, together with particles of exothermically oxidisable material.
Processes of the kind referred to are particularly suitable for the hot repair of furnaces and other refractory devices. They are also useful in the formation of refractory components, for example for the surfacing of refractory metals or other refractory substrates, and in particular for the formation of refractory linings on parts which are especially susceptible to erosion. In the case of furnace repair, such processes can be, and indeed preferably are, operated substantially at the working temperature of the furnace. In addition, in some cases, for example the repair of a glass melting furnace superstructure, repair can be effected while the furnace is still operating.
It is important that the refractory mass formed should be of a high quality so that it will have a long useful working life. It has been found that the ability of such a mass to resist erosion and other stresses, in particular thermal stresses, to which it is likely to be subjected during its working life is dependent not only on its composition, but also on its structure, and that the structure of the refractory mass is strongly influenced by the way the mass forms from the sprayed material.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a new process of forming a refractory mass on a surface, which process provides certain advantages as will hereinafter be adverted to.
According to the present invention, there is provided a process of forming a refractory mass on a surface, which process comprises spraying against that surface a mixture of refractory particles and oxidisable particles which react exothermically with oxygen to generate sufficient heat to soften or melt at least the surfaces of the refractory particles and so bring about formation of said refractory mass, characterised in that the granulometry of the particles which are sprayed in the mixture is such that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles and that the size range spread factory (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.2.
The expression "% grain size" used herein in relation to particles of material denotes that that % proportion by weight of the particles will pass a screen having a mesh of that size, and references to the mean of two grain sizes are references to half the sum of those grain sizes.
The expression "size range spread factor" [f(G)] is used herein in respect of a given species of particles to denote the factor: ##EQU2## where G80 denotes the 80% grain size of the particles of that species, and G20 denotes the 20% grain size of the particles of that species.
In general, samples of particles of a given material have a size range distribution which follows a bell curve, and when the cumulative distribution, that is the proportion by weight which will pass a screen having a mesh of a given size, is plotted on a linear scale against the screen mesh size plotted on a logarithmic scale, the result is a sigmoid curve which is generally straight between the points which correspond to the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the particles under test.
It has been found that the observance of the specified conditions in respect of the granulometry of the sprayed particles promotes the reliability and consistency with which highly durable refractory deposits can be formed under given process conditions. It is extremely surprising that the granulometry of the sprayed particles should have such an effect on the quality of the refractory product, particularly since it has been found that this advantage accrues even when the process is performed under conditions such that the refractory particles sprayed become completely melted. The reliable and consistent formation of a durable refractory mass by the adoption of a process according to this invention is attributed to a tendency for that refractory product to be comparatively less porous and comparatively free from cracks with respect to a refractory product formed by a process in which the said particle granulometry conditions are not observed but which is otherwise similar. The high size range spread factor presumably contributes to this result, but it has been found that reliance on that factor alone is not sufficient to give good results. Notwithstanding the wide size range spread of the refractory particles, it has been found that the oxidisable particles must be of a lower mean size (as hereinbefore defined), or the advantage referred to pertaining to the quality of the refractory masses formed by the process will not be achieved. It will be appreciated that for any given proportion of oxidisable particles of a given composition present in the mixture, the number of such particles present will vary inversely with the cube of their mean size. It is important to have a large number of such particles present to allow direct radiant heating of substantially all the refractory particles during spraying.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 2.5 mm. The adoption of this condition favours the smooth progression of the process as regards the particle supply to and flow through the lance. In order further to promote this smooth operation it is particularly preferred that the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 4 mm.
Advantageously, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 1 mm, and the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 2 mm. Not only does the adoption of this feature yet further promote smooth operation, but also, it has been found that if larger particles are used, they occasionally tend to rebound from a surface against which they are sprayed so reducing the amount of material deposited to form a refractory mass. This is especially so when the particles are sprayed against an overhead surface. By keeping the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles and their 90% grain size down to those values, this tendency is much reduced.
Advantageously, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is at least 50 μm. The adoption of this preferred feature helps to avoid smothering of the oxidation reactions which take place during spraying of the mixture, by refractory particles which are too small.
Preferably, the size range spread factory (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.3. This further promotes a reduction in porosity of a refractory product formed on spraying of the mixture.
Advantageously, the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is not greater than 1.9. This condition is beneficial for reducing segregation of different sizes of refractory particles by settling during storage or handling, for example during feed to the lance.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 1.4. As contrasted with the size range spread factor of the refractory component of the mixture, a high size range spread factor for the oxidisable particles is not to be sought after as it militates against the uniformity of the oxidation reactions which is desirable for the formation of a high quality refractory mass. The size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles may for example be 1.3 or less.
Advantageously, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 μm. Particles of such grain sizes are easily oxidised, so promoting rapid evolution of heat during spraying of the mixture.
Such rapid oxidation and evolution of heat during spraying is further promoted when, as is preferred, the 90% grain size of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 μm.
In order further to promote rapid oxidation, it is preferred that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 15 μm. The adoption of this preferred feature enables the oxidation reactions to proceed sufficiently rapidly to ensure substantially complete combustion of the oxidisable particles without adding unnecessarily to the cost of the starting materials.
Incombustible particles of various compositions can be used in the present invention, depending of course on the required composition of the refractory mass to be deposited on spraying of the mixture. In general, for compatibility between such a refractory deposit and a surface of a refractory substrate on which it is formed and to which it is to remain adherent, it is desirable that the deposit should include material having a similar chemical composition to material included in the substrate. Problems which can arise if this general guideline is not followed may be due to chemical incompatibility between the deposit and the substrate, or to a wide difference between their coefficients of thermal expansion which could lead to excessive thermal stress at their boundary and flaking off of the deposited refractory mass. The most useful materials for forming said refractory particles comprise one or more of sillimanite, mullite, zircon, SiO2, ZrO2, Al2 O3, MgO.
Preferably, at least some of the refractory material has previously been fired to a temperature in excess of 0.7 times its melting point expressed in kelvins. Such a heat treatment has a beneficial effect on various refractory materials for promoting the formation of a high quality refractory deposit. In the case of some materials, such as magnesia, such a heat treatment drives off any molecular water bound in that material. In the case of other materials, for example silica, such a heat treatment favourably alters the crystallographic structure for the purpose in view.
When the refractory material comprises particles of silica, it has been found that the mineralogical form of the silica has an important effect on the form of the silica incorporated in a refractory mass formed by spraying the mixture, notwithstanding that the silica may have been completely melted during such spraying. Preferably, at least 90% by weight of any silica present in said refractory material of said mixture is in the form of tridymite and/or cristobalite, as this gives the best results.
Indeed, it has been found in general that the crystallographic structure of the refractory product formed by a process according to this invention is strongly influenced, if not even determined, by the form and size of the material sprayed. It is assumed that even if the refractory particles sprayed do become completely melted, some crystallites remain in the fluid state to influence the way in which recrystallisation takes place on subsequent solidification.
Advantageously, said oxidisable particles comprise particles of one or more of silicon, aluminium, magnesium and zirconium. Particles of such materials can be oxidised rapidly with a high accompanying evolution of heat and themselves form refractory oxides, and are thus very suitable for use in the present invention.
For economic reasons, it is preferred that said oxidisable particles are present in an amount not exceeding 20% by weight of said mixture. There is also a technical reason for that limit, in that if greater proportions of oxidisable material are used, the working surface may be liable to overheat.
The present invention also provides a composition of matter for spraying against a surface to form a refractory mass, such composition being a mixture comprising refractory particles, together with particles of exothermically oxidisable material, characterised in that the exothermically oxidisable particles are present in an amount between 5% and 30% by weight of said mixture and the granulometry of said particles is such that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles and that the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.2.
Such a composition contributes to the facility with which durable refractory masses can be formed by causing combustion of the oxidisable particles during spraying, and the latitude allowed for the grain size range spread of the refractory particles has a favourable effect on the production costs of the composition. The said mixture can be formed using refractory particles which are readily obtainable by an appropriate selection of sizing operations.
Advantageously, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 2.5 mm. The adoption of this condition is favourable for smooth feed of the particles to and through a lance which is to be used for spraying the particles. In order further to promote this smooth feed it is particularly preferred that the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 4 mm.
Preferably, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 1 mm, and the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 2 mm. Not only does the adoption of this feature yet further promote smooth feed of the particles, but also, it has been found that if larger particles are used, they occasionally tend to rebound when they are sprayed against a surface, so reducing the amount of material which would be deposited to form a refractory mass. This is especially so when the particles are to be sprayed against an overhead surface. By keeping the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles and their 90% grain size down to those values, this tendency is much reduced.
Advantageously, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is at least 50 μm. The adoption of this preferred feature helps to avoid smothering of the oxidation reactions which take place when the mixture is sprayed, by refractory particles which are too small.
Preferably, the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is at least 1.3. This further promotes a reduction in porosity of a refractory formed when the mixture is sprayed.
Advantageously, the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the refractory particles is not greater than 1.9. This limits the size range spread of those particles so that a given sample will have a relatively low proportion of particles which are either comparatively very small or very large. The adoption of this feature gives a reduced tendency for the particles to segregate by settling during transport from place to place or even while they are contained in a hopper of a spraying machine.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 1.4. As contrasted with the size range spread factor of the refractory component of the mixture, a high size range spread factor for the oxidisable particles is not to be sought after as it militates against the uniformity of the oxidation reactions which is desirable for the formation of a high quality refractory mass when the mixture is sprayed. The size range spread factor (as herein defined) of the oxidisable particles may for example be 1.3 or less.
Advantageously, the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 μm. Particles of such grain sizes are easily oxidised, so promoting rapid evolution of heat when the mixture is sprayed.
Such rapid oxidation and evolution of heat when the mixture is sprayed is further promoted when, as is preferred, the 90% grain size of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 μm.
In order further to promote rapid oxidation, it is preferred that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 15 μm. The adoption of this preferred feature enables the oxidation reactions which take place when the mixture is sprayed to proceed sufficiently rapidly to ensure substantially complete combustion of the oxidisable particles without adding unnecessarily to the cost of the starting materials.
Incombustible particles of various compositions can be used in the present invention, depending of course on the required composition of the refractory mass to be deposited on spraying of the mixture. In general, for compatibility between such a refractory deposit and a surface of a refractory substrate on which it is to be deposited and to which it is to remain adherent, it is desirable that the deposit should include material having a similar composition to material included in the substrate. Problems which can arise if this general guideline is not followed may be due to chemical incompatibility between the deposit and the substrate, or to a wide difference between their coefficients of thermal expansion which could lead to excessive thermal stress at their boundary and flaking off of the deposited refractory mass. The most useful materials for forming said refractory particles comprise one or more of sillimanite, mullite, zircon, SiO2, ZrO2, Al2 O3, MgO.
Preferably, at least some of the refractory material has previously been fired to a temperature in excess of 0.7 times its melting point expressed in °Kelvin. Such a heat treatment has a beneficial effect on various refractory materials for promoting the formation of a high quality refractory deposit when the mixture is sprayed. In the case of some materials, such as magnesia, such a heat treatment drives off any molecular water bound in that material. In the case of other materials, for example silica, such a heat treatment favourably alters the crystallographic structure for the purpose in view. The refractory particles can readily be obtained by an appropriate selection of sizing operations.
When the refractory material comprises particles of silica, it has been found that the mineralogical form of the silica has an important effect on the form of the silica incorporated in a refractory mass formed by spraying the mixture, notwithstanding that the silica may have been completely melted during such spraying. For the best results, it has been found that at least 90% by weight of any silica present in said refractory material of said mixture should be in the form of tridymite and/or cristobalite, as is preferred.
Indeed, it has been found in general that the crystallographic structure of the refractory product formed by a process according to this invention is strongly influenced, if not even determined, by the form and size of the material sprayed. It is assumed that even if the refractory particles sprayed do become completely melted, some crystallites remain in the fluid state to influence the way in which recrystallisation takes place on subsequent solidification.
Advantageously, said oxidisable particles comprise particles of one or more of silicon, aluminium, magnesium and zirconium. Particles of such materials can be oxidised rapidly with a high accompanying evolution of heat and themselves form refractory oxides, and are thus very suitable for use in the present invention.
For economic reasons, it is preferred that said oxidisable particles are present in an amount not exceeding 20% by weight of said mixture.
The following are some examples of processes and compositions of matter according to the invention.
In Examples 1 and 2, reference will also be made to the accompanying drawing which shows a graph of the cumulative distribution of various species of particles used, that is the proportion by weight which will pass a screen having a mesh of a given size, in which the cumulative proportion is plotted on a linear scale against the screen mesh size plotted on a logarithmic scale.
EXAMPLE 1
A mixture of particles was prepared comprising by weight 20% silicon and 80% silica. The silica was obtained by crushing bricks made from quartz sand which had previously been fired at a temperature of at least 1400° C. Due to the firing, two parts by weight of the silica were in the form of tridymite and three parts by weight were in the form of cristobalite.
Cumulative size range distribution graphs of the silicon and silica used are shown in the accompanying drawing.
The granulometry of the various particles is also given in the following table in which G20, G80 and G90 respectively are the 20%, 80% and 90% grain sizes of the particles and f(G) is their size range spread factor as herein defined.
______________________________________                                    
Material  G.sub.20 μm                                                  
                   G.sub.80 μm                                         
                              G.sub.90 μm                              
                                     f(G)                                 
______________________________________                                    
Si         3        14          19.5 1.29                                 
SiO.sub.2 170      1020       1450   1.43                                 
______________________________________                                    
The mixture of particles was projected at a rate of 1 kg/min in a stream of oxygen delivered at 200 L/min using apparatus as described in British Patent Specification No 1,330,895 to form a uniform adherent refractory coating on a silica furnace wall which was at a temperature of 1200° C. to 1250° C. The use of the mixture led to the formation of substantially crack-free refractory coatings which adhered very well to the working surface. In addition, it was found that the boundary between the deposited coating and the original wall was substantially crack-free even when the coating was deposited to a thickness of 5 cm or more. The presence of boundary cracks is a particular problem when depositing silica coatings on silica walls. By way of comparison it has been found that when a mixture which did not have a granulometry in accordance with this invention was sprayed by a similar method, even when the coating thickness was as low as 1 cm, cracks were present both in the coating layer itself and at its boundary with the working surface of the wall.
The particulate refractory material substituted into the starting mixture for the purposes of this comparison was natural quartz sand having the following granulometry.
______________________________________                                    
Material   G.sub.20 μm                                                 
                    G.sub.80 μm                                        
                               G.sub.90 μm                             
                                      f(G)                                
______________________________________                                    
Quartz sand                                                               
           55       190        250    1.1                                 
______________________________________                                    
EXAMPLE 2
A mixture of particles was prepared comprising by weight 8% silicon, 4% aluminium and 88% magnesia. The magnesia used was natural magnesia which had been fired at 1900° C. in order to dehydrate it.
The silicon used had the granulometry specified in Example 1. Cumulative size range distribution graphs of the aluminium and magnesia used are also shown in the accompanying drawing.
The granulometry of the various particles is also given in the following table.
______________________________________                                    
Material  G.sub.20 μm                                                  
                   G.sub.80 μm                                         
                              G.sub.90 μm                              
                                     f(G)                                 
______________________________________                                    
Si        3        14         19.5   1.29                                 
Al        4.6      15         19.5   1.06                                 
Si + Al   3.5        14.4     19.5   1.22                                 
MgO       90       1110       1500   1.7                                  
______________________________________                                    
The mixture of particles was projected using the same apparatus as in Example 1, to form a uniform adherent refractory coating on a furnace wall which built up of basic refractory blocks mainly consisting of magnesia and which was at a temperature in excess of 1000° C. The use of the mixture led to the formation of low-porosity refractory coatings which adhered very well to the working surface.
EXAMPLE 3
A mixture of particles was prepared comprising by weight 6% silicon, 6% aluminium and 88% zircon/zirconia and alumina. The refractory particles were obtained by crushing used or broken electrocast refractory blocks of the type available under the Trade Mark "Corhart Zac". The approximate composition by weight of those blocks was: Al2 O3 65-75%; ZrO2 15-20%; SiO2 8-12%.
The silicon, aluminium and refractory particles had the following granulometry:
______________________________________                                    
Material   G.sub.20 μm                                                 
                    G.sub.80 μm                                        
                               G.sub.90 μm                             
                                      f(G)                                
______________________________________                                    
Si         3        14         19.5   1.29                                
Al         4.6      15         19.5   1.06                                
Si + Al    3.6      14.8       19.5   1.21                                
Refractory 52.5     248        ˜330                                 
                                      1.3                                 
______________________________________                                    
This starting mixture was projected using the same apparatus as in the previous Examples onto an aluminous refractory wall to deposit substantially crack-free, low porosity coatings.

Claims (16)

We claim:
1. A composition of matter for spraying against a surface to form a refractory mass, such composition being a mixture comprising refractory particles, together with particles of exothermically oxidisable material, wherein the exothermically oxidisable particles are present in an amount between 5% and 30% by weight of said mixture and the granulometry of said particles is such that the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is greater than the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles and that the size range spread factor, f(G), of the refractory particles is at least 1.2 wherein the % grain size of the particles of material denotes that % proportion by weight of the particles which will pass a screen having a mesh of that size, and the mean of two % grain sizes refers to half of the sum of those grain sizes, and ##EQU3## where G80 denotes the 80% grain size of particles of that species and G20 denotes the 20% grain size of particles of that species.
2. A composition of matter according to claim 1, wherein the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 2.5 mm.
3. A composition of matter according to claim 1, wherein the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 4 mm.
4. A composition of matter according to claims 2 or 3, wherein the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is not greater than 1 mm, and the 90% grain size of the refractory particles is not greater than 2 mm.
5. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the refractory particles is at least 50 μm.
6. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the size range spread factor of the refractory particles is at least 1.3.
7. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the size range spread factor of the refractory particles is not greater than 1.9.
8. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the size range spread factor of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 1.4.
9. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 μm.
10. A composition of matter according to claim 9, wherein the 90% grain size of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 50 μm.
11. A composition of matter according to claim 10, wherein the mean of the 80% and 20% grain sizes of the oxidisable particles is not greater than 15 μm.
12. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein said refractory particles comprise one or more of sillimanite, mullite, zircon, SiO2, ZrO2, Al2 O3, MgO.
13. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein at least some of the refractory material has previously been fired to a temperature in excess of 0.7 times its melting point expressed in °Kelvins.
14. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein at least 90% by weight of any silica present in said refractory material of said mixture is in the form of tridymite and/or cristobalite.
15. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein said oxidisable particles comprise at least one of silicon, aluminum, magnesium or zirconium.
16. A composition of matter according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein said oxidisable particles are present in an amount not exceeding 20% by weight of said mixture.
US07/239,175 1985-01-26 1988-10-06 Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses Expired - Lifetime US4920084A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8502008 1985-01-26
GB08502008A GB2170191B (en) 1985-01-26 1985-01-26 Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/803,782 Division US4792468A (en) 1985-01-26 1985-12-02 Method of forming refractory masses from compositions of matter of specified granulometry

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4920084A true US4920084A (en) 1990-04-24

Family

ID=10573469

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/803,782 Expired - Lifetime US4792468A (en) 1985-01-26 1985-12-02 Method of forming refractory masses from compositions of matter of specified granulometry
US07/239,175 Expired - Lifetime US4920084A (en) 1985-01-26 1988-10-06 Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/803,782 Expired - Lifetime US4792468A (en) 1985-01-26 1985-12-02 Method of forming refractory masses from compositions of matter of specified granulometry

Country Status (20)

Country Link
US (2) US4792468A (en)
JP (1) JPS61275170A (en)
KR (1) KR910006896B1 (en)
CN (1) CN85108731B (en)
AU (1) AU578987B2 (en)
BE (1) BE903711A (en)
BR (1) BR8506188A (en)
CA (1) CA1247150A (en)
DE (1) DE3540887A1 (en)
ES (1) ES8802605A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2576592B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2170191B (en)
IL (1) IL77490A (en)
IN (1) IN170071B (en)
IT (1) IT1185836B (en)
LU (1) LU86175A1 (en)
MX (1) MX163419B (en)
NL (1) NL194439C (en)
SE (2) SE8505523L (en)
ZA (1) ZA859145B (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5061526A (en) * 1989-06-30 1991-10-29 Glaverbel Process for forming a porous refractory mass
US5229337A (en) * 1989-06-30 1993-07-20 Glaverbel Composition of matter for use in a process of forming a porous refractory mass
US5266099A (en) * 1992-08-11 1993-11-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for producing closed cell spherical porosity in spray formed metals
US5780114A (en) * 1994-11-28 1998-07-14 Glaverbel Production of a siliceous refractory mass
US5928717A (en) * 1995-06-09 1999-07-27 Fosbel International Limited Process for forming a refractory repair mass
US6186869B1 (en) 1999-02-12 2001-02-13 Cetek Limited Cleaning using welding lances and blasting media
US20050181928A1 (en) * 2004-02-12 2005-08-18 Hayward Peter J. Reaction-bonded porous magnesia body
US20160318805A1 (en) * 2013-12-19 2016-11-03 Fib-Services Intellectual S.A. Siliceous composition and method for obtaining same

Families Citing this family (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2170191B (en) * 1985-01-26 1988-08-24 Glaverbel Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses
LU86431A1 (en) * 1986-05-16 1987-12-16 Glaverbel METHOD FOR FORMING A REFRACTORY MASS ON A SURFACE AND MIXING PARTICLES TO FORM SUCH A MASS
GB8729418D0 (en) * 1987-12-17 1988-02-03 Glaverbel Surface treatment of refractories
US4946806A (en) * 1988-10-11 1990-08-07 Sudamet, Ltd. Flame spraying method and composition
US4981628A (en) * 1988-10-11 1991-01-01 Sudamet, Ltd. Repairing refractory linings of vessels used to smelt or refine copper or nickel
US5013499A (en) * 1988-10-11 1991-05-07 Sudamet, Ltd. Method of flame spraying refractory material
WO1990013526A1 (en) * 1989-04-28 1990-11-15 Kazakhsky Mezhotraslevoi Nauchno-Tekhnichesky Tsentr Svs Refractory material
GB2233078B (en) * 1989-06-20 1993-03-24 Glaverbel Ceramic welding repair process
US5242639A (en) * 1989-07-25 1993-09-07 Glaverbel Ceramic welding process
GB8916951D0 (en) * 1989-07-25 1989-09-13 Glaverbel Ceramic welding process and powder mixture for use in the same
LU87602A1 (en) * 1989-10-05 1991-05-07 Glaverbel PROCESS FOR FORMING A REFRACTORY MASS AND SPRAY LANCE OF A MIXTURE OF PARTICLES
FR2670481B1 (en) * 1990-12-18 1994-01-21 Albert Duval COMPOSITION FOR SITE WELDING REPAIR OF REFRACTORY PRODUCTS.
FR2671073B1 (en) * 1991-01-02 1993-04-23 Lorraine Laminage PROCESS FOR FORMING A REFRACTORY MASS AND COMPOSITION OF A MIXTURE OF PARTICLES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH A PROCESS.
GB9113370D0 (en) * 1991-06-20 1991-08-07 Coal Industry Patents Ltd Improvements in or relating to ceramic welding
US5380563A (en) * 1991-06-20 1995-01-10 Coal Industry (Patents) Limited Ceramic welding
GB9113365D0 (en) * 1991-06-20 1991-08-07 Coal Industry Patents Ltd Improvements in or relating to ceramic welding
GB9113369D0 (en) * 1991-06-20 1991-08-07 Coal Industry Patents Ltd Improvements in or relating to ceramic welding
LU87969A1 (en) * 1991-07-03 1993-02-15 Glaverbel PROCESS AND MIXTURE FOR FORMING A CONSISTENT REFRACTORY MASS ON A SURFACE
US5686028A (en) * 1991-07-03 1997-11-11 Glaverbel Process for forming a coherent refractory mass on a surface
GB9121880D0 (en) * 1991-10-15 1991-11-27 Glaverbel Ceramic welding method and apparatus
GB2269223B (en) * 1992-07-31 1996-03-06 Fosbel Int Ltd Surface treatment of refractories
US5700309A (en) * 1993-12-01 1997-12-23 Glaverbel Method and powder mixture for repairing oxide based refractory bodies
GB9423984D0 (en) 1994-11-28 1995-01-11 Glaverbel Process for making a crystalline siliceous refractory mass
GB9604344D0 (en) 1996-02-01 1996-05-01 Glaverbel Formation of a refractory repair mass
GB9707369D0 (en) 1997-04-11 1997-05-28 Glaverbel Lance for heating or ceramic welding
US7169439B2 (en) * 2002-08-07 2007-01-30 Fosbel Intellectual Limited Methods for repairing a refractory wall of a high temperature process vessel utilizing viscous fibrous refractory material
US6969214B2 (en) 2004-02-06 2005-11-29 George Jay Lichtblau Process and apparatus for highway marking
EP1711658A4 (en) * 2004-02-06 2008-11-26 Gjl Patents Llc Process and apparatus for highway marking
US7449068B2 (en) * 2004-09-23 2008-11-11 Gjl Patents, Llc Flame spraying process and apparatus
JP4109663B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2008-07-02 黒崎播磨株式会社 Thermal spraying material for industrial kiln repair
US20070113781A1 (en) * 2005-11-04 2007-05-24 Lichtblau George J Flame spraying process and apparatus
US20070116516A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Lichtblau George J Process and apparatus for highway marking
US20070116865A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Lichtblau George J Process and apparatus for highway marking
LU92340B1 (en) * 2013-12-19 2015-06-22 Fib Services Intellectual Sa Powdering composition based on porous silica for ceramic welding and the process for obtaining it
JP6147298B2 (en) * 2015-07-13 2017-06-14 品川リフラクトリーズ株式会社 Thermal spray material
US10336579B2 (en) * 2016-03-29 2019-07-02 Otis Elevator Company Metal coating of load bearing member for elevator system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3684560A (en) * 1969-11-04 1972-08-15 Glaverbel Method of forming refractory masses
US3800983A (en) * 1969-11-04 1974-04-02 Glaverbel Apparatus for forming refractory masses
US4222782A (en) * 1979-09-04 1980-09-16 Norton Company Refractory ramming mix containing aluminum powder for metal melting furnaces
US4489022A (en) * 1981-11-25 1984-12-18 Glaverbel Forming coherent refractory masses
US4792468A (en) * 1985-01-26 1988-12-20 Glaverbel Method of forming refractory masses from compositions of matter of specified granulometry

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3343915A (en) * 1964-10-30 1967-09-26 Ronald C Rossi Densification of refractory compounds
AU5848165A (en) * 1965-05-06 1966-11-10 Prabhas Ranjan Chaki Basic, fireclay and high aluminous refractory bricks or shapes
US3333971A (en) * 1965-12-29 1967-08-01 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Refractory composition
US3544666A (en) * 1967-01-10 1970-12-01 Asahi Glass Co Ltd Method for producing a heat insulating refractory using calcined geyserite having a high tridymite content
US3591668A (en) * 1968-05-28 1971-07-06 Henry P Kirchner Strengthening fully sintered alumina and titania articles by reheating in a fluorine atmosphere
US3615778A (en) * 1969-03-10 1971-10-26 Du Pont Process for the preparation of mullite bonded refractory materials
US3715220A (en) * 1969-03-19 1973-02-06 Corning Glass Works Ceramic article and method of making it
US3666851A (en) * 1969-11-10 1972-05-30 Canadian Patents Dev Preparing high density magnesia refractories
US3698922A (en) * 1970-04-13 1972-10-17 Gen Refractories Co Dolomitic refractory
US3708317A (en) * 1970-12-07 1973-01-02 Koninklijke Hoogovens En Staal Metallurgical furnace lining and method of production
JPS4946364A (en) * 1972-09-06 1974-05-02
US3900542A (en) * 1973-04-26 1975-08-19 Little Inc A Process for sintering finely divided particulates and resulting ceramic products
JPS6024068B2 (en) * 1976-02-17 1985-06-11 黒崎窯業株式会社 Method for producing spalling-resistant dense refractories
JPS6022670B2 (en) * 1978-05-12 1985-06-03 日本碍子株式会社 Polycrystalline transparent alumina and its manufacturing method, and arc tube for high-pressure steam radiation lamps
JPS591232B2 (en) * 1979-09-28 1984-01-11 住友アルミニウム製錬株式会社 Manufacturing method of zirconia sintered body
US4416999A (en) * 1981-08-05 1983-11-22 Nippon Steel Corporation Refractory powder flame projection moldings
US4503093A (en) * 1981-08-19 1985-03-05 Iseli Robert W Thermally sprayable ceramics
GB2154228B (en) * 1981-11-25 1986-04-23 Glaverbel Composition of matter for use in forming refractory masses in situ
US4400335A (en) * 1981-12-15 1983-08-23 Hoganas Ab Process for repairing refractory linings
US4427785A (en) * 1982-05-25 1984-01-24 General Electric Company Optically translucent ceramic
GB2138927B (en) * 1983-02-18 1986-09-03 Glaverbel Adding to silica refractory structures

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3684560A (en) * 1969-11-04 1972-08-15 Glaverbel Method of forming refractory masses
US3800983A (en) * 1969-11-04 1974-04-02 Glaverbel Apparatus for forming refractory masses
US3684560B1 (en) * 1969-11-04 1991-09-03 Glaverbel
US4222782A (en) * 1979-09-04 1980-09-16 Norton Company Refractory ramming mix containing aluminum powder for metal melting furnaces
US4489022A (en) * 1981-11-25 1984-12-18 Glaverbel Forming coherent refractory masses
US4489022B1 (en) * 1981-11-25 1991-04-16 Glaverbel
US4792468A (en) * 1985-01-26 1988-12-20 Glaverbel Method of forming refractory masses from compositions of matter of specified granulometry

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5061526A (en) * 1989-06-30 1991-10-29 Glaverbel Process for forming a porous refractory mass
US5229337A (en) * 1989-06-30 1993-07-20 Glaverbel Composition of matter for use in a process of forming a porous refractory mass
US5266099A (en) * 1992-08-11 1993-11-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for producing closed cell spherical porosity in spray formed metals
US5780114A (en) * 1994-11-28 1998-07-14 Glaverbel Production of a siliceous refractory mass
US5928717A (en) * 1995-06-09 1999-07-27 Fosbel International Limited Process for forming a refractory repair mass
US6186869B1 (en) 1999-02-12 2001-02-13 Cetek Limited Cleaning using welding lances and blasting media
US20050181928A1 (en) * 2004-02-12 2005-08-18 Hayward Peter J. Reaction-bonded porous magnesia body
US20160318805A1 (en) * 2013-12-19 2016-11-03 Fib-Services Intellectual S.A. Siliceous composition and method for obtaining same
US9776923B2 (en) * 2013-12-19 2017-10-03 Fib-Services Intellectual S.A. Siliceous composition and method for obtaining same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE8505523L (en) 1986-07-27
LU86175A1 (en) 1986-03-24
GB2170191B (en) 1988-08-24
JPS61275170A (en) 1986-12-05
DE3540887C2 (en) 1990-01-18
ES8802605A1 (en) 1988-09-16
CN85108731A (en) 1986-11-05
KR860005766A (en) 1986-08-13
ES549704A0 (en) 1988-09-16
FR2576592B1 (en) 1992-04-17
KR910006896B1 (en) 1991-09-10
GB8502008D0 (en) 1985-02-27
NL194439B (en) 2001-12-03
BE903711A (en) 1986-05-26
IT1185836B (en) 1987-11-18
IT8567978A0 (en) 1985-11-21
NL194439C (en) 2002-04-04
BR8506188A (en) 1986-08-26
MX163419B (en) 1992-05-12
JPH0521865B2 (en) 1993-03-25
SE462970B (en) 1990-09-24
CA1247150A (en) 1988-12-20
SE8505523D0 (en) 1985-11-22
IN170071B (en) 1992-02-08
ZA859145B (en) 1986-08-27
NL8503317A (en) 1986-08-18
US4792468A (en) 1988-12-20
DE3540887A1 (en) 1986-07-31
CN85108731B (en) 1988-11-30
IL77490A (en) 1989-08-15
AU578987B2 (en) 1988-11-10
AU5032485A (en) 1986-07-31
FR2576592A1 (en) 1986-08-01
GB2170191A (en) 1986-07-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4920084A (en) Forming refractory masses and composition of matter for use in forming such refractory masses
US4489022A (en) Forming coherent refractory masses
US5928717A (en) Process for forming a refractory repair mass
KR20020063573A (en) Insulating refractory material
GB2154228A (en) Composition of matter for use in forming refractory masses in situ
US5780114A (en) Production of a siliceous refractory mass
US20040241446A1 (en) Thermally insulating coating material, for refractory containing carbon
JPH01160854A (en) Fire-proof castables of high strength and abrasion resistance
GB2155461A (en) Refractory lining
AU2008270261B2 (en) Dry mix for treating refractory substrates and process using same
CZ289860B6 (en) Method for repairing parts from oxide based refractory material and a powder mixture for making the same
JPS6090867A (en) Improved alkali-resistant refractory composition
JP3357701B2 (en) Method for improving molten aluminum resistance of refractory and refractory
KR100196061B1 (en) Improvements in or relating to ceramic welding
JP3009815B2 (en) Aluminum titanate-alumina spray material
JP2000095528A (en) Refractory for molten glass feeder
KR950007711B1 (en) Composition and method for coating refractrories mass
CA1244486A (en) Insulating refractory
JPH04332386A (en) Method of coating inner surface of pottery furnace
MXPA97009794A (en) Procedure to form a repara refractory mass
JPH01313167A (en) Vessel for molten metal
MXPA97003791A (en) Production of a siliceous refractory mass
JPH054875A (en) Spraying refractory
JPH08210783A (en) Flame spraying repairing material and flame spraying repairing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GLAVERBEL;REEL/FRAME:013089/0136

Effective date: 20020620

AS Assignment

Owner name: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: CHANGE OF ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG;REEL/FRAME:016216/0787

Effective date: 20030213

Owner name: HAILJUMPER LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL AG;REEL/FRAME:016216/0792

Effective date: 20030728

Owner name: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED, ENGLAND

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME AND ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:HAILJUMPER LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:016216/0801

Effective date: 20040520

AS Assignment

Owner name: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED, ENGLAND

Free format text: CORRECTION OF ADDRESS RE CHANGE OF NAME AND ADDRES;ASSIGNOR:HAILJUMPER LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:017251/0092

Effective date: 20040520

AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT, CO

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:020478/0966

Effective date: 20080207

AS Assignment

Owner name: FOSBEL, INC., OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT;REEL/FRAME:029216/0096

Effective date: 20121026

Owner name: FOSBEL INTELLECTUAL LIMITED, OHIO

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT;REEL/FRAME:029216/0096

Effective date: 20121026