US3067032A - Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom - Google Patents

Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3067032A
US3067032A US17251A US1725160A US3067032A US 3067032 A US3067032 A US 3067032A US 17251 A US17251 A US 17251A US 1725160 A US1725160 A US 1725160A US 3067032 A US3067032 A US 3067032A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
powder
iron
present
nickel
hydrogen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US17251A
Inventor
William A Reed
Sheridan R Crooxs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Republic Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Republic Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Republic Steel Corp filed Critical Republic Steel Corp
Priority to US17251A priority Critical patent/US3067032A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3067032A publication Critical patent/US3067032A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0235Starting from compounds, e.g. oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/16Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using chemical processes
    • B22F9/18Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using chemical processes with reduction of metal compounds
    • B22F9/20Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using chemical processes with reduction of metal compounds starting from solid metal compounds
    • B22F9/22Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using chemical processes with reduction of metal compounds starting from solid metal compounds using gaseous reductors

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process of preparing a ferrous alloy-type powder for powder metallurgy, and more particularly for preparing such a powder capable of being formed into articles by more or less conventional powder metallurgy processes and wherein those articles have unusually high tensile strengths, both as sintered" and after subsequent heat treatment.
  • the powder produced by the process of the present invention is also characterized by low shrinkage, in that the reduction in any linear dimension of a part formed therefrom between the time of the completion of the compression of the powder in a mold and the completion of formation of the part including sintering and possibly also subsequent treatrnents is reduced to a tolerable minimum.
  • the present invention also includes the process of preparing high strength articles from powder prepared in accordance with this invention.
  • the present process may not be strictly stated as being for the preparation of a true alloy powder, as it seems wholly probable that the metals present are not all in complete solid solution in each other. There is, however, as far as is known, some alloying of the metals resent, although this is probably something less than 100% complete as has been evidenced by microphotographic examination of many samples of finished parts or test pieces made from the powder of the present invention. It is believed, therefore, more accurate to term it an alloy-type powder than a true alloy powder.
  • the process of the present invention produces a powder which not only has relatively high strength and low shrinkage characteristics when made into articles and tested on an as sintered basis, but also, such articles may be further treated, for example, by heat treatment steps, including tempering with subsequent drawing of the temper to a predetermined desired extent.
  • the powder of the present invention may be further densified, as contrasted with conventional pressing and sintering processes used in powder metallurgy, by pressing first at a pressure which may be relatively low or relatively high (it is more or less immaterial which), then annealing at a selected temperature, followed by a re-pressing operation at a pressure which is relatively high, preferably about 80,000 p.s.i.
  • the process of the present invention is particularly characterized by the materials used therein, which must be of the kind and present in the proportions specifically set out herein. These materials may be summarized as: manganese in a metallic form and present in an amount from about 0.1% to about 1%; molybdenum in the form of at least one hydrogen-reducible compound thereof and present in the amount of about 0.1% to about 1%; nic..el in the form of either metallic nickel or a hydrogen-reducible compound therecf and present in an amount from about /2% to about 2 /z%; and the balance additive iron containing not over about 1% oxygen as oxide impurities.
  • These materials in suitable particle size as hereinafter set out in detail are dry mixed, then introduced into a reducing zone and there exposed to a reducing gas containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen, while being kept at a temperature in the range of about 1200 F. to about 1600 F. for a time sufficient to efiect the reduction of substantially all the hydrogenreducible material present, usually about 30 to 40 minutes.
  • the powder is then cooled under non-oxidizing conditions, so as to prevent spontaneous combustion thereof. This powder so prepared may be transmitted to its point of use as such.
  • the present invention may in some instances also include the pressing and/ or sintering steps or any subsequent heat treatment steps. These steps will be described to a certain extent as they are also used in making practical tests of the essential characteristics and potentialities of the powder, which is valuable by reason of its peculiar properties when pressed and sintered and made into final articles.
  • the powder of the present invention may be used to form articles which will have tensile strength in the order of magnitude of 80,000 p.s.i. on an as sintered basis, and up to about 200,000 p.s.i. or more on a pressed, annealed, re-pressed, sintered and heat-treated basis.
  • the first ingredient of the starting material to be discussed is the iron.
  • This iron must be reasonably pure in order that it he usable in the present process with the maximum desired physical characteristics in the final product.
  • the impurities principally acidinsoluble in character, and consisting of one or more of the oxides of aluminum, silicon, titanium, chromium, calcium and magnesium, should be present in a total amount of not more than about 1% based upon the weight of the iron present. This limitation serves praccally to preclude many powdered iron materials which are produced directly by reducing iron ore without going through a melting process.
  • a preferred source of the iron for use as the iron in the present process is mill scale, which is a by-product or" iron and steel fabrication and which is usually available in sufiicient quantities to make the powder required in accordance with the present process. It is not meant to preclude positively all iron prepared by direct reduction. from iron ore as long as some process or processes are carried on with respect to this ore or with the reduced iron product thereof which will keep the oxide impurities within the limits hereinabove set out, i.e. not over about 1% total (calculated as weight of oxygen and substantially equivalent to hydrogen loss).
  • mill scale As a source of the iron in this case is that most mill scale contains a proportion of manganese, so that when the mill scale is reduced to metallic form, much, if not all, of the desired manganese content for the finished product will be found to be contained therein and a minimum amount of manganese need be added.
  • the next requirement as to the iron is that it be additive iron. This is a coined term which has been used to describe iron made in a particular way and usually substantially in accordance with the teachings of the patent to Crowley, No. 2,744,002, granted May 1, 1956. The term came into existence in order to describe generally the character of the iron so produced.
  • the iron powder so produced is termed additive iron.
  • the subtractive iron formed as aforesaid may be termed relatively hard, while the additive iron may be termed relatively soft.
  • relatively hard usually indicative of the degree of hardness or softness, is meant in this art the characteristic or ability of an iron powder to be compressed, so that for a given pressure a softer iron will make a more dense pressed body than a harder iron.
  • a softer iron powder will require less compacting pressure than a harder iron powder. It is desired in accordance with the present invention that the iron be quite soft and that the density of the pressed body thereof, sometimes termed the green density will be quite high, usually the higher the better.
  • additive iron therefore, as used throughout the present application and the appended claims, is intended to import iron particles or powder formed in a way so that the particles per se will not be porous to any substantial extent, but will be of the character of those made in accordance with the teaching of the Crowley patent aforesaid. It has been found that the use of a substantial amount, if not all, of additive iron in the present process is essential, so that the raw material for the present process is properly described to include iron, predominantly in the form of additive iron.
  • a softer powder which can be pressed with a given pressure into a more dense green pressed body will give a final article having a tensile strength which is relatively high, the green pressed density being generally indicative of the final tensile strength.
  • the amount of HCl present in the gases during the reduction of the iron oxide affects the shrinkage characteristics of the final product.
  • the finished powder will have the best (lowest) shrinkage characteristic, but the When the powder is prepared from iron oxide using a relatively low HCl concentration in the reducing gases, the shrinkage characteristics of the final product will be less desirable, although the strength will be somewhat greater.
  • the particle size of the iron ingredient of the starting material is not narrowly critical. It has been found, for
  • any form of metallic manganese may be used, which will include any or all the several known and/or available iron-manganese alloys and also will include metallic manganese.
  • the principles applying to iron as to particle size seem to apply more or less equally to the manganese, so that particle size i not a particularly critical characteristic as to the manganese ingredient.
  • the proportion desired for manganese is from about 0.1% to about 1%, these proportions being calculated as the Weight of metallic manganese based upon the weight of all the metals present (calculated as metals). In general, these limits are chosen on the basis that as the proportion of the manganese is increased above about 1%, the shrinkage characteristic of the final product gets to be too high. Thus, in a test wherein 2% manganese was used, the shrinkage was about 0.9%. The lower limit of 0.1% was set due to the fact that as the amount of manganese is reduced below about this amount, the final product has poorer characteristics as to its ability to be heat treated and the tensile strength of articles made therefrom tends to be reduced. The preferred amount of manganese is about /z%.
  • molybdenum is supplied in accordance with the present invention as a hydrogen-reducible molybdenum compound, e.g. molybdenum oxide and/ or chloride.
  • Molybdenum should be present to the extent of about 0.1% to about 1%, again calculated as metal and based on the total of all metals present. These limits are chosen for the following reason: as to the maximum limit, there seems to be no appreciable benefit to be gained by using more than about 1% and as molybdenum and its compounds are relatively expensive, there is an obvious economic limit at about this value.
  • the use of relatively high values of molybdenum up to about 1% are, however, usually desirable because as the amount of mol bdenum present is increased within the limits given, the
  • the minimum limit of about 0.1% is chosen for about the same reason as the minimum limit in the case of manganese, namely, that as the amount of molybdenum is decreased, the ability of parts made from the final product powder to be heat treated is more or less correspondingly reduced, so that molybdenum contributes to what may be termed the heat treatability of the final product or of articles made therefrom.
  • the particle size for the molybdenum and/ or the compounds thereof, as introduced, has been found to be relatively unimportant. This is believed to be true for the reason that at the temperature to which the molybdenum is subjected during the sintering of articles formed from the powder of this invention, it is the present theory that the molybdenum is effective more or less in a vapor phase; and that it probably sublimes to some extent. It is found, however, that this vaporization action, if the theory stated is correct, does not result in losing any substantial proportion of the molybdenum initially present. It is believed that at least 90% of the molybdenum originally present in the solid starting material finds its way into the final product.
  • molybdenum oxide (MoO )pigment grade which is about 95% 325 mesh in size.
  • the preferred amount of molybdenum used in accordance with the present invention is about Considering now the nickel ingredient, this metal is supplied in the form of metallic nickel (in fine powder form) or in the form of one or more of the hydrogenreducible compounds thereof, such compounds practically being those selected from the group consisting of the oxides and chlorides of nickel.
  • any metallic oxides usable in accordance with the pres ent invention such as molybdenum and/or nickel oxides.
  • nickel should be present to the extent of about /2% to about 2 /2%.
  • Nickel is used generally to impart strength characteristics to the final product.
  • powders, having a content of nickel less than about /2% wilt have tensile strengths on an as sintered basis of under 60,060 p.s.i., which is generally considered undesirable from the point of view of the present invention.
  • manganese can act to some extent to replace nickel in supplying the necessary tensile strength, so that low values of nickel are permissible with relatively high values of manganese.
  • the maximum limit as to nickel of 2 /2% is dictated by the fact that as the amount of nickel present is increased, the shrinkage characteristics also increase and at this value for nickel content, the shrinkage reaches a. tolerable limit according to the present invention.
  • Another thing which affects shrink age is the particle size of the nickel.
  • the particle size of the nickel oxide for example, and subsequently that of the reduced nickel formed therefrom, is decreased, the shrinkage is generally increased. Again, this limits the particle size in which the nickel may be introduced.
  • the preferred amount of nickel in accordance with the present invention is about 2% and the particle size not over about 75% of minus 325 mesh. Particle size is, however, not be considered as narrowly critical in this respect.
  • these several materials are mixed or blended together while dry and by the use of any suitable means, severai of which are known in the art.
  • suitable means may, for example, take the form of a rotating drum, similar to a concrete mixer, and of appropriate size in view of the size of the operation in question.
  • he intimately mixed and blended materials are then introduced into a reducing zone, which may comprise any suitable type of gas-to-solid contact equipment, i ciuding, for example, rotating drums, shaft furnaces, tray furnaces or even fluidized bed equipment, all of which are known in the art and which per se form no part of the present invention.
  • the temperature of the solid materials is maintained at a desired value or within a desired range of values, such value or values being in the range of about 1290 F. to about 1600 F. and preferably about 1509" F.
  • the limits of this range are chosen on the basis that if the temperature is too low, the desired reduction of the hydrogen-reducible compounds is either too slow or non-existent.
  • the heating action in the presence of a reducing gas as hereinafter set forth serves not only to effect the chemical reduction of the hydrogen-reducible material present, but also to soften the metallic constituents by a sort of annealing action, which may possibly also contribute to the forming of some true alloys, although the extent of this alloying is usually indefinite and difficult if not impossible to determine.
  • the heating action serves to render the reduced powder very soft as this term has been used herein'and as it is defined above.
  • the upper limit of this temperature range is chosen on the basis that as the temperature is progressively raised,
  • the upper temperature limit is placed at about 1600 F.
  • the reducing action must take place in the presence of a gas containing substantial proportions of hydrogen, even though this gas may also have other and preferably incrt ingredients Such as nitrogen. Excellent results are obtained, for example, using cracked ammonia gas.
  • Other sources of hydrogen which may or may not be reasonably pure may also be used including, for example, gases obtained as a by-product of the reforming of oil in so-called platinum reformers.” it is found, however, that increasing amounts of methane are somewhat detrimental to the process, in that they appear to cause increasing shrinkage characteristics in the final product.
  • the time for the reducing treatment should be such as to permit of substantial completion of the reducing reaction and is, of course, a function of the temperature, so that with relatively higher temperatures Within the range given, relatively shorter times are required and viceversa. With preferred temperatures and gas compositions, time periods in the order of magnitude of 30 to 40 minutes are usually adequate. It will be understood, of course, that there must be sufficient hydrogen available to react stoichiometrically with all the oxygen and/or chlorine present in combination with the hydrogen-reducible metals, and preferably an excess of hydrogen over this exact stoichiometric amount. In the event that the gas being employed in the reducing zone is relatively loW' in hydrogen, relatively longer times are usually required.
  • nickel and/or molybdenum may be introduced in the form of chlorides. If this is done, the product of the reduction reaction will obviously be hydrogen-chloride gas. However, it has been found in practice that the amount of hydrogenchloride gas which may reasonably be produced and/or present at any one time from this source is so small as not substantially to ailcct the type of iron present. As noted hereinabove, if the iron is reduced or in some Way formed in the presence of hydrogen chloride gas, there results additive iron. To a certain extent at least, additive iron may be produced by an after treatment of subtractive iron as hereinabove defined with a gas including a substantial amount of HCl.
  • the iron used in the present process is sufficiently converted to an additive, it may be adequate for the present process even though this conversion may not be arrived at exactly as in the Crowley patent aforesaid.
  • the amount of hydrogen chloride present as the result of either or both the molybdenum and/or nickel being introduced in the forms of their chlorides would be wholly insulficient to convert any substantial portion of the subtractive iron to additive iron.
  • the iron must be supplied in the desired form of additive iron.
  • the powder is complete except that it must be brought down to substantially room temperature under non-oxidizing conditions, as otherwise it would oxidize spontaneously if,'for example, itwere exposed to air at the high temperature at which it is treated as aforesaid. This is usually accomplished by cooling the material while in any suitable non-oxidizing gas, for example, the same gas used during the reduction.
  • the powder made in accordance with the present invention is sufliciently soft, so that it will be relatively dense when given a compacting pressure within normal operating values, for example, when articles formed from the powder of the present invention are pressed at 60,000 p.s.i., the density of the resulting compacts is usually from about 6.30 to about 6.35 gms./cc.; while at 80,000 p.s.i. pressure, green densities of about 6.57 to about 6.65 gms./cc. are usual; while at pressure of 150,000 p.s.i. green densities of about 6.95 to about 6.98 grns./cc. have been obtained.
  • the amount of carbon to be introduced may, in some instances, slightly exceed the amount desired .in the final article for the reason that during the subsequent sin tering operation, some carbon may react with a small amount of oxygen present in the powder in the form of one or more of the oxides of one or more of the metals present to form one or the other of the gaseous oxides of the carbon, which are dissipated during the sintering.
  • a small amount of oxygen present in the powder in the form of one or more of the oxides of one or more of the metals present to form one or the other of the gaseous oxides of the carbon, which are dissipated during the sintering.
  • a mold lubricant such as zinc stearate.
  • carbon in this way and the addition of a mold lubricant will be understood to have been accomplished in the same way on each of the several test specimens described in the examples which follow.
  • zinc stearate substantially the entire material is believed to be volatilized during the subsequent sintering or heat treatment operation, so that the addition thereof serves merely during the pressing operation as a lubricant and does not otherwise aiiect the properties of the finished product.
  • the process comprises pressing the powder prepared in accordance with this invention as aforesaid first at any desired pressure, usually about 50,000 to 100,000 p.s.i.; then anneal the pressed blank at temperatures, which may be as low as l275 F. in some instances and as high as about 1500 F. to ISO-0 F. in
  • the annealed article is then re-pressed, usually at a relatively high pressure, for'example, from about 80,000 to about ent invention will have tensile strengths in the order of magnitude of 80,000 to 100,000 p.s.i., and sometimes more in the case of pressed, annealed and re-pressed blanks or articles.
  • the as sintered articles may be subjected to a heat-treating step, somewhat similar to conventional heat treating practices.
  • a heat-treating step may be desired to bring such articles up to predetermined soaking temperatures, for example, from about 1500 to about 1600" F. for to minutes, then quench the so-heated articles in a quenching oil, which is heated to about 100 to 150 F, then temper the articles, for example, by holding them for 20 minutes at a temperature of from 400 to 600 F.
  • the heat treated articles thus produced will have very high tensile strengths, sometimes as high as about 200,000 p.s.i., as set forth hereinafter in examples which follow.
  • EXAMPLE I This example illustrates certain of the preferred embodiments of the present invention.
  • additive iron powder was used, which was made in accordance with the teachings of the Crowley patent aforesaid and produced by reducing mill scale (which contained an amount of manganese approximately equivalent to /2% in the final product of the present invention).
  • the several powdered materials were thoroughly mixed together, then heated at 1500 F. for about to minutes in a gas formed by cracking gaseous ammonia. The heated material was then cooled in the same gas to give the desired powder.
  • this powder In testing this powder, it was mixed with 1% graphite and 1% zinc stearate and pressed at 60,000 p.s.i. to form a green pressed blank, which had a density of 6.4 gms./cc.
  • This blank was sintered in an endo-gas for 30 minutes, the endo gas serving to maintain the carbon content of the materials substantially constant and at about 0.85% carbon, the sintering being carried on at a temperature in the range of about 2030 to 2060 F.
  • the endo gas used in this test had a composition as follows:
  • the pressed and sintered blank thus formed was then tested and was found to have a tensile strength of 60,000 p.s.i. This blank was also carefully measured to determine the shrinkage, which was found to be about 0.4%.
  • the exo gas used in the tests headed Test Piece Sintered in Exo Gas had a composition as follows:
  • the endo gas had the same composition as that given hereinabove.
  • run No. a employed nickel in the form of NiO having a particle size such that about 75% thereof was 325 mesh.
  • run No. b a different type of nickel was employed, also as NiO, but having a particle size such that about 90% was 325 mesh.
  • Ni G which was very fine (pigment grade), so that all of it would go through a 325 mesh screen, the particles averaging about 6 microns in size.
  • Run No. h was one in which the nickel was present to the extent of about 2% on the basis aforesaid, the nickel being in the form of nickel oxide (NiO) of a type in which about 75% was 325 mesh in particle size. This example also included about /2 molybdenum and about 0.3% manganese. Some samples of this run were also annealed and re-pressed as set forth for run No. g to give an article having a density as sintered of 7.32 gms./cc. and a tensile strength on an as sintered basis of 76,800 p.s.i. Some of these samples were further heat treated as set forth in connection with run No. g to give final heat-treated articles having a tensile strength of 190,000 p.s.i.
  • test pieces having tensile strengths ofl85,000 p.s.i.
  • EXAMPLE II This example is given to illustrate the manner in which powder made in accordance with the present invention and particularly in accordance with the preferred embodiment thereof given in Example I thereof may be further treated to give it a very high tensile strength.
  • the first portion of this treatment was a pressing, annealing and re-pressing operation, wherein the first pressing was substantially the same as given in Example I above, the blank being pressed at 60,000 p.s.i.
  • the annealing of this pressed blank was then carried on by heating the blank for about 30 minutes in a hydrogen atmosphere to a temperature in'the range of about l275 to 1300 F.
  • the re-pressing of the blank so annealed was then effected by first cooling the blank, then reinserting it in the same mold in which it was originally pressed and re-pressing it, this time at 100,000 p.s.i.
  • the density of the pressed, sintered and re-pressed blank formed in this way was 7.3 gms./ cc.
  • EXAMPLE III This example is given to illustrate the differences between the material produced in accordance with the present invention and that produced in accordance with applicants prior Eatent No. 2,799,570, granted July 16, Basically, these two processes differ in that the material in accordance with the prior patent and particularly including the iron ingredient thereof is co-reduced according to this prior patent along with most of the alloying ingredients; whereas in the present case the iron is introduced in a reduced or metallic state, but the present case is limited 'to a particular type of iron, namely, additive iron.
  • the greatest shrinkage is found to exist with blanks having the lowest values of the range of green densities found in various samples (due to low compacting pressures) and was about 0.2%. As the green density of the blanks was raised (by increasing the compacting pressure), the shrinkage was reduced to a value of about 0.1%. With the material of the prior patent aforesaid, and with the lowest values of green density, the shrinkage was slightly more than 0.6%; while with the highest values of green density, the shrinkage was still about 0.45%. It will be seen that with the arbitrarily imposed limit of shrinkage which some users of powdered metal have decided upon of 0.4%, the material of the present invention will 1500 F. under reducing conditions, so as to reduce all qualify; while the material of the prior patent Will not, 7
  • EXAMPLE IV This example is given to illustrate the comparative results in tests on the powder of the present invention as contrasted with powders made up in exactly the same Way, but with the sole exception that the iron powder used was not additive iron in accordance with the present invention, but rather was some commercially available type of iron powder which, from the point of view of the disclosure of this case, may be termed subtractive iron.
  • the amount and character of the alloying ingredients is exactly the same and includes about 2% nickel and [2% each of molybdenum and manganese.
  • the pressing was effected at 80,000 p.s.i. and the sintering under the same conditions as particularly set forth as in Example I here-of.
  • test'piece produced from the powder of the present invention had a tensile strength of 81,000 p.s.i.; whereas the test pieces produced using three different prior art iron powders available commercially were respectively 54,000, 60,000 and 62,000 p.s.i.
  • One of these types of commercially available powder is made from iron ore and is generally termed Swedish sponge.
  • Another is made by reducing mill scale, but wherein the reduction is etfected under conditions such that the iron powder is properly described as subtractive and-is relatively hard as contrasted with a relatively soft powder of the present invention.
  • EXAMPLE V This example is presented to illustrate the efiects of the variation in the amount of nickel and also variation resulting from different manners of introducing the nickel in' the case. As such it generally supports the conclusions hereinabove set out as to the results of such variations.
  • Table II which follows, various powderswere made substantially as set forth in Example I, but with the following particular variations.
  • the nickel was added as fine nickel oxide (NiO) with a particle size such that about would pass through a 325 mesh screen.
  • there was present in the powder about /2% molybdenum and about 0.3% manganese. After mixing the ingredient materials theywere'heated together at 1500 F.
  • EXAMPLE VI This example is presented to illustrate the effect of various amounts of molybdenum on the properties of the powder.
  • the powders contained 2% nickel, added'as nickel oxide, and 0.3% manganese added as manganese oxide. After mixing the ingredient materials, they were heated together at the reducible materials present. Since the purpose of molybdenum is to improve the heat treatability characteristic of the powder, some of the sintered bars were also 7 13 heat-treated by beating them at 1850 F. for about 1 /2 hours, then quenching them in oil, and drawing the temper at 650 F. for about 1 /2 hours. The results of this series of tests are set out in Table HI.
  • EXAMPLE VII This example is presented to illustrate the effect of various percentages of manganese in the powder. Except as to this variable, all the powders made and reported in this example included 2% nickel and /2% molybdenum added respectively as nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide.
  • EXAMPLE IX This example is given to illustrate the effect of progressively increasing amounts of methane in the treating gas during the reduction of the reducible materials of the powder, it being noted that in each instance the gas used is predominantly hydrogen.
  • the results of a series of tests with different percentages of methane admixed with the hydrogen are given in Table VI.
  • Table VI The several samples made as set forth in this example 30 l Tensie were reduced and parts were made therefrom by pressoHhpemnt Strength Shrinkagg ing at 80,000 p.s.i. and sinterrng as 1n previous examples. (p.s.i.) as percent The results of these tests are set out in Table IV which smiled follows: 3F 71 000 0 02 O Table IV 1 71,030 0. 2 00, 000 0. v 3 68,0)0 0.36 Tensile 4 71, 000 0. 46 Percent Manganese Strength Shrinkage, 5 69, 000 0, 51
  • the tensile strength of the test piece formed from the resulting powder was 83,000 p.s.i. and the shrinkage 0.5%.
  • manganese ingredient is added to impart desired characteristics of heat treatability as hereabove set out, although these factors per se are not illustrated in this example. In general, it is found, however, that the presence of manganese aids in permitting the parts to be hardened as set forth above.
  • EXAMPLE Vlil The purpose of this example is to illustrate the effects of different temperatures used during the reduction of the reducible materials or ingredients of the powder, the results being set forth in Table V showing the effect of such methane in the treating gases. For this reason, therefore, it is usually preferred that the proportion of methane be relatively low, on the basis that low shrinkage is usually one of the characteristics desired in the finished powder.
  • said process comprising the steps of blending together the named materials in solid, fine-particle form to provide a starting mixture, reducing the hydrogen-reducible ingredients of said starting mixture by contacting said starting mixture While in a reducing zone with a nonoxidizing gas containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen and while maintaining the temperature of all the materials in said reducing zone in the range of about 1200 F. to about 1600 F.
  • the powdered metal thus formed being capable of formation byconventional powder metallurgy practices into articles having high tensile strength and low shrinkage characteristics.

Description

asstaz Patented Dec. 4, 1962 lice PRDCESS F PREPARKBIG A FERRUUS ALLSY- TYPE PGWDER FQR POWDER METALLURGY AND 0F PREPARENG EHGH STRENGTH ARTI- CLES TEEREFRGM William A. Reed, West Richfield, and Sheridan R.
(Iroeirs, (Ileveiand Heights, Ohio, assignors to Republie Steei Corporation, Cleveland, Ghio, a corporation of New Jersey No Drawing. Fit-ed Mar. 24, 1960, Ser. No. 17,251
11 Claims. (Ci. 75-211) The present invention relates to a process of preparing a ferrous alloy-type powder for powder metallurgy, and more particularly for preparing such a powder capable of being formed into articles by more or less conventional powder metallurgy processes and wherein those articles have unusually high tensile strengths, both as sintered" and after subsequent heat treatment. The powder produced by the process of the present invention is also characterized by low shrinkage, in that the reduction in any linear dimension of a part formed therefrom between the time of the completion of the compression of the powder in a mold and the completion of formation of the part including sintering and possibly also subsequent treatrnents is reduced to a tolerable minimum.
The present invention also includes the process of preparing high strength articles from powder prepared in accordance with this invention.
As such, the present invention constitutes an improvement on the subject matter of United States Patent No. 2,799,570, granted July 16, 1957.
This prior patent disclosed and claimed the co-reduction of iron-oxide, nickel in the form of oxide and/or chloride, and molybdenum or manganese or possibly both in metallic form or in a hydrogen-reducible form. While the powder of this earlier invention exhibited desirable strength characteristics when made into parts, the shrinkage thereof as above defined was considered by some commercial users of this product to be excessive in that it Was about 0.8% to about 1% in many instances. It is desired that this shrinkage be reduced to about 0.4% or less. This is accomplished in accordance with the present invention.
A major distinction in substance between the disclosure of the earlier patent aforesaid and the present process lies in the fact that the iron, which is the principal ingredient of the powder, is not co-reduced along with the other reducible materials present, but rather is supplied to the present process in a reduced state and in the 0 form of additive iron, which is a particular and pecu liar type of iron powder as will be set forth in greater detail hereinafter. As such, the present process may sometimes be termed an after treatment as it is carried on following the substantial completion of the reduction of the iron to its metallic form.
Also, the present process, as well as the process of the earlier patent aforesaid, may not be strictly stated as being for the preparation of a true alloy powder, as it seems wholly probable that the metals present are not all in complete solid solution in each other. There is, however, as far as is known, some alloying of the metals resent, although this is probably something less than 100% complete as has been evidenced by microphotographic examination of many samples of finished parts or test pieces made from the powder of the present invention. It is believed, therefore, more accurate to term it an alloy-type powder than a true alloy powder.
As generally referred to hereinabove, the process of the present invention produces a powder which not only has relatively high strength and low shrinkage characteristics when made into articles and tested on an as sintered basis, but also, such articles may be further treated, for example, by heat treatment steps, including tempering with subsequent drawing of the temper to a predetermined desired extent. Also, the powder of the present invention may be further densified, as contrasted with conventional pressing and sintering processes used in powder metallurgy, by pressing first at a pressure which may be relatively low or relatively high (it is more or less immaterial which), then annealing at a selected temperature, followed by a re-pressing operation at a pressure which is relatively high, preferably about 80,000 p.s.i. to 100,000 p.s.i. or more, concluding with the usual sintering operation. This produces a very dense body, usually having a density substantially over 7 gms./cc., and also having relatively high tensile strength. Any desired special heat treatment steps may be performed on the re-pressed blank or body prepared as aforesaid. All these subsequent treatment steps are to be included as parts of the present invention.
The process of the present invention is particularly characterized by the materials used therein, which must be of the kind and present in the proportions specifically set out herein. These materials may be summarized as: manganese in a metallic form and present in an amount from about 0.1% to about 1%; molybdenum in the form of at least one hydrogen-reducible compound thereof and present in the amount of about 0.1% to about 1%; nic..el in the form of either metallic nickel or a hydrogen-reducible compound therecf and present in an amount from about /2% to about 2 /z%; and the balance additive iron containing not over about 1% oxygen as oxide impurities. These materials in suitable particle size as hereinafter set out in detail are dry mixed, then introduced into a reducing zone and there exposed to a reducing gas containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen, while being kept at a temperature in the range of about 1200 F. to about 1600 F. for a time sufficient to efiect the reduction of substantially all the hydrogenreducible material present, usually about 30 to 40 minutes. The powder is then cooled under non-oxidizing conditions, so as to prevent spontaneous combustion thereof. This powder so prepared may be transmitted to its point of use as such.
At the point of fabrication of articles from the powder, it is normally mixed with from about /2% up to about 1% carbon, usually in the form of graphite, and with a mold lubricant, such as Zinc stearate, then pressed at a desired pressure and sintered. The present invention'may in some instances also include the pressing and/ or sintering steps or any subsequent heat treatment steps. These steps will be described to a certain extent as they are also used in making practical tests of the essential characteristics and potentialities of the powder, which is valuable by reason of its peculiar properties when pressed and sintered and made into final articles. The powder of the present invention may be used to form articles which will have tensile strength in the order of magnitude of 80,000 p.s.i. on an as sintered basis, and up to about 200,000 p.s.i. or more on a pressed, annealed, re-pressed, sintered and heat-treated basis.
The details of the requirements or" the present process will now be discussed individually.
The first ingredient of the starting material to be discussed is the iron. This iron must be reasonably pure in order that it he usable in the present process with the maximum desired physical characteristics in the final product. Thus the impurities, principally acidinsoluble in character, and consisting of one or more of the oxides of aluminum, silicon, titanium, chromium, calcium and magnesium, should be present in a total amount of not more than about 1% based upon the weight of the iron present. This limitation serves praccally to preclude many powdered iron materials which are produced directly by reducing iron ore without going through a melting process. A preferred source of the iron for use as the iron in the present process is mill scale, which is a by-product or" iron and steel fabrication and which is usually available in sufiicient quantities to make the powder required in accordance with the present process. It is not meant to preclude positively all iron prepared by direct reduction. from iron ore as long as some process or processes are carried on with respect to this ore or with the reduced iron product thereof which will keep the oxide impurities within the limits hereinabove set out, i.e. not over about 1% total (calculated as weight of oxygen and substantially equivalent to hydrogen loss).
Another reason which is present for using mill scale as a source of the iron in this case is that most mill scale contains a proportion of manganese, so that when the mill scale is reduced to metallic form, much, if not all, of the desired manganese content for the finished product will be found to be contained therein and a minimum amount of manganese need be added.
The next requirement as to the iron is that it be additive iron. This is a coined term which has been used to describe iron made in a particular way and usually substantially in accordance with the teachings of the patent to Crowley, No. 2,744,002, granted May 1, 1956. The term came into existence in order to describe generally the character of the iron so produced.
If one visualizes particles of iron oxide reduced b exposing them in a reducing zone to hydrogen, the hydrogen Will react with the oxygen of the iron oxide, abstracting this oxygen therefrom and leaving a porous or spongytype particle structure without refilling the spaces formerly occupied by the oxygen of the iron oxide. This type iron formed by abstracting oxygen from iron oxide may be termed subtractive iron, due to the fact that the oxygen is subtracted therefrom and the resulting U particles are porous in structure although outwardly resembling in shape and external dimensions the shape and corresponding dimensions of the Original iron oxide particles. Such particles are characteristic of some types of iron powder presently being sold commercially.
In accordance with the teachings of the Crowley patent aforesaid. when iron cxide is reduced in a reducing zone at a sufficiently high temperature so that the reaction proceeds, by the use of a gas containing not only hydrogen, but also gaseous HCI, it is a presentrtheory, which has considerable support, that the iron oxide reacts with the HCl to form ferrous chloride; that this ferrous chloride exists at least instantaneously in vapor form (due to the relatively high vapor pressure of ferrous chloride at the temperatures used in the reducing zone); and. that this ferrous chloride reacts with hydrogen in'the vapor phase, so that metallic iron is deposited as a result of this reaction onto some minute nuclear particles of iron, with the result that these particles are progressively built up as the reaction proceeds in a manner similar to the growth of a crystal. The particles of this type iron, which have been termed additive iron,
are not spongy or porous, but rather are solid and sometimes more or less dendritic in character. Due to the apparent building up or growth of the iron particles as lowest tensile strength.
aforesaid, the iron powder so produced is termed additive iron.
It has been found that the subtractive iron formed as aforesaid may be termed relatively hard, while the additive iron may be termed relatively soft. By these terms, usually indicative of the degree of hardness or softness, is meant in this art the characteristic or ability of an iron powder to be compressed, so that for a given pressure a softer iron will make a more dense pressed body than a harder iron. Also to make a pressed body of a given bulk. density, a softer iron powder will require less compacting pressure than a harder iron powder. It is desired in accordance with the present invention that the iron be quite soft and that the density of the pressed body thereof, sometimes termed the green density will be quite high, usually the higher the better.
The term additive iron, therefore, as used throughout the present application and the appended claims, is intended to import iron particles or powder formed in a way so that the particles per se will not be porous to any substantial extent, but will be of the character of those made in accordance with the teaching of the Crowley patent aforesaid. It has been found that the use of a substantial amount, if not all, of additive iron in the present process is essential, so that the raw material for the present process is properly described to include iron, predominantly in the form of additive iron.
In general, a softer powder which can be pressed with a given pressure into a more dense green pressed body will give a final article having a tensile strength which is relatively high, the green pressed density being generally indicative of the final tensile strength.
Again, some detailed investigations have indicated that the amount of HCl present in the gases during the reduction of the iron oxide affects the shrinkage characteristics of the final product. For example, when the iron oxide is reduced in a relatively high l-lCl concen tration, i.e. about 3% or more, the finished powder will have the best (lowest) shrinkage characteristic, but the When the powder is prepared from iron oxide using a relatively low HCl concentration in the reducing gases, the shrinkage characteristics of the final product will be less desirable, although the strength will be somewhat greater. Here again, there is a balance, which must be effected, between shrinkage and tensile strength, recognizing that the attainment o these two characteristics respectively seems to be varied in inverse relation by the amount of I-iCl used during the reduction of the iron oxide. In general, it is found that medium values of HCl concentration are best for most purposes, thus obtaining the best average characteristics as to both tensile strength and shrinkage.
The particle size of the iron ingredient of the starting material is not narrowly critical. It has been found, for
example, that if less than about 30% of the iron powder used as starting material is minus 325 mesh in size (standard Tyler mesh), the strength of the final product tends to be reduced; while if'over 60% of this iron powder is minus 325 mesh in size, the shrin e tends by reducing mill scale (a preferred embodiment of the .present' process), much if not all of the manganese is present thereinalloyed with the iron, so that when e mill scale isfully reduced, the manganese in the starting material is present probably alloyed with the iron and in metallic form. If it is necessary to add manganese in order to obtain the desired: proportions of this element, any form of metallic manganese may be used, which will include any or all the several known and/or available iron-manganese alloys and also will include metallic manganese. The principles applying to iron as to particle size seem to apply more or less equally to the manganese, so that particle size i not a particularly critical characteristic as to the manganese ingredient.
As stated hereinabove, the proportion desired for manganese is from about 0.1% to about 1%, these proportions being calculated as the Weight of metallic manganese based upon the weight of all the metals present (calculated as metals). In general, these limits are chosen on the basis that as the proportion of the manganese is increased above about 1%, the shrinkage characteristic of the final product gets to be too high. Thus, in a test wherein 2% manganese was used, the shrinkage was about 0.9%. The lower limit of 0.1% was set due to the fact that as the amount of manganese is reduced below about this amount, the final product has poorer characteristics as to its ability to be heat treated and the tensile strength of articles made therefrom tends to be reduced. The preferred amount of manganese is about /z%.
The next ingredient to be considered is molybdenum. This material is supplied in accordance with the present invention as a hydrogen-reducible molybdenum compound, e.g. molybdenum oxide and/ or chloride. Molybdenum should be present to the extent of about 0.1% to about 1%, again calculated as metal and based on the total of all metals present. These limits are chosen for the following reason: as to the maximum limit, there seems to be no appreciable benefit to be gained by using more than about 1% and as molybdenum and its compounds are relatively expensive, there is an obvious economic limit at about this value. The use of relatively high values of molybdenum up to about 1% are, however, usually desirable because as the amount of mol bdenum present is increased within the limits given, the
product exhibits lower shrinkage characteristics, which is desirable. The minimum limit of about 0.1% is chosen for about the same reason as the minimum limit in the case of manganese, namely, that as the amount of molybdenum is decreased, the ability of parts made from the final product powder to be heat treated is more or less correspondingly reduced, so that molybdenum contributes to what may be termed the heat treatability of the final product or of articles made therefrom.
The particle size for the molybdenum and/ or the compounds thereof, as introduced, has been found to be relatively unimportant. This is believed to be true for the reason that at the temperature to which the molybdenum is subjected during the sintering of articles formed from the powder of this invention, it is the present theory that the molybdenum is effective more or less in a vapor phase; and that it probably sublimes to some extent. It is found, however, that this vaporization action, if the theory stated is correct, does not result in losing any substantial proportion of the molybdenum initially present. It is believed that at least 90% of the molybdenum originally present in the solid starting material finds its way into the final product.
One satisfactory form of molybdenum for use in accordance with the present invention is molybdenum oxide (MoO )pigment grade, which is about 95% 325 mesh in size. The preferred amount of molybdenum used in accordance with the present invention is about Considering now the nickel ingredient, this metal is supplied in the form of metallic nickel (in fine powder form) or in the form of one or more of the hydrogenreducible compounds thereof, such compounds practically being those selected from the group consisting of the oxides and chlorides of nickel.
In this connection, it may be mentioned that when the oxides of a metal are referred to herein, it is contemplated that any compound, such as the carbonate, which would be reduced to and/ or through the oxide state when subjected to reduction, is to be considered generally as equivalent of the oxide, as such a compound when exposed to the temperature of the reducing zone in accordance with the present invention will be reduced first to the oxide and then to the metallic state. This applies to any metallic oxides usable in accordance with the pres ent invention, such as molybdenum and/or nickel oxides.
As stated generally hereinabove, nickel should be present to the extent of about /2% to about 2 /2%. Nickel is used generally to impart strength characteristics to the final product. The minimum proportion of nickel, therefore, is that proportion below which the strength imparted thereby is too small to comply with the requirements for the product of the present invention. Thus, powders, having a content of nickel less than about /2% wilt have tensile strengths on an as sintered basis of under 60,060 p.s.i., which is generally considered undesirable from the point of view of the present invention. 0n the other hand, manganese can act to some extent to replace nickel in supplying the necessary tensile strength, so that low values of nickel are permissible with relatively high values of manganese. The maximum limit as to nickel of 2 /2% is dictated by the fact that as the amount of nickel present is increased, the shrinkage characteristics also increase and at this value for nickel content, the shrinkage reaches a. tolerable limit according to the present invention. Another thing which affects shrink age is the particle size of the nickel. Thus as the particle size of the nickel oxide, for example, and subsequently that of the reduced nickel formed therefrom, is decreased, the shrinkage is generally increased. Again, this limits the particle size in which the nickel may be introduced.
The preferred amount of nickel in accordance with the present invention is about 2% and the particle size not over about 75% of minus 325 mesh. Particle size is, however, not be considered as narrowly critical in this respect.
Once the solid starting material has been decided upon and the ingredient materials made available in accordance with the principles hereinabove set out, these several materials, all of which are in relatively fine powder form, are mixed or blended together while dry and by the use of any suitable means, severai of which are known in the art. Such means may, for example, take the form of a rotating drum, similar to a concrete mixer, and of appropriate size in view of the size of the operation in question. he intimately mixed and blended materials are then introduced into a reducing zone, which may comprise any suitable type of gas-to-solid contact equipment, i ciuding, for example, rotating drums, shaft furnaces, tray furnaces or even fluidized bed equipment, all of which are known in the art and which per se form no part of the present invention.
While in this reducing zone the temperature of the solid materials is maintained at a desired value or within a desired range of values, such value or values being in the range of about 1290 F. to about 1600 F. and preferably about 1509" F. The limits of this range are chosen on the basis that if the temperature is too low, the desired reduction of the hydrogen-reducible compounds is either too slow or non-existent. in this connection it is believed, as a matter of theory, that the heating action in the presence of a reducing gas as hereinafter set forth, serves not only to effect the chemical reduction of the hydrogen-reducible material present, but also to soften the metallic constituents by a sort of annealing action, which may possibly also contribute to the forming of some true alloys, although the extent of this alloying is usually indefinite and difficult if not impossible to determine. In any event, the heating action serves to render the reduced powder very soft as this term has been used herein'and as it is defined above.
The upper limit of this temperature range is chosen on the basis that as the temperature is progressively raised,
there is an increasing tendency for the powder to cake or sinter together. if this trend were allowed to proceed too far, there would not result a loose, flowable powder as is desired, but rather a sintered porous cake, which is undesired, and which could be reduced to powder form only at the expense of considerable work and cost and possibly also would result in work-hardening of the resulting powder. For this reason, therefore, the upper temperature limit is placed at about 1600 F.
The reducing action must take place in the presence of a gas containing substantial proportions of hydrogen, even though this gas may also have other and preferably incrt ingredients Such as nitrogen. Excellent results are obtained, for example, using cracked ammonia gas. Other sources of hydrogen which may or may not be reasonably pure may also be used including, for example, gases obtained as a by-product of the reforming of oil in so-called platinum reformers." it is found, however, that increasing amounts of methane are somewhat detrimental to the process, in that they appear to cause increasing shrinkage characteristics in the final product.
The time for the reducing treatment should be such as to permit of substantial completion of the reducing reaction and is, of course, a function of the temperature, so that with relatively higher temperatures Within the range given, relatively shorter times are required and viceversa. With preferred temperatures and gas compositions, time periods in the order of magnitude of 30 to 40 minutes are usually adequate. it will be understood, of course, that there must be sufficient hydrogen available to react stoichiometrically with all the oxygen and/or chlorine present in combination with the hydrogen-reducible metals, and preferably an excess of hydrogen over this exact stoichiometric amount. In the event that the gas being employed in the reducing zone is relatively loW' in hydrogen, relatively longer times are usually required.
It is noted that it is possible that the nickel and/or molybdenum may be introduced in the form of chlorides. If this is done, the product of the reduction reaction will obviously be hydrogen-chloride gas. However, it has been found in practice that the amount of hydrogenchloride gas which may reasonably be produced and/or present at any one time from this source is so small as not substantially to ailcct the type of iron present. As noted hereinabove, if the iron is reduced or in some Way formed in the presence of hydrogen chloride gas, there results additive iron. To a certain extent at least, additive iron may be produced by an after treatment of subtractive iron as hereinabove defined with a gas including a substantial amount of HCl. If the iron used in the present process is sufficiently converted to an additive, it may be adequate for the present process even though this conversion may not be arrived at exactly as in the Crowley patent aforesaid. On the other hand, if what is supplied to the present process is a commercial form of subtractive iron, of which there are several, the amount of hydrogen chloride present as the result of either or both the molybdenum and/or nickel being introduced in the forms of their chlorides would be wholly insulficient to convert any substantial portion of the subtractive iron to additive iron. Thus the iron must be supplied in the desired form of additive iron.
Once the heat treatment and/or reduction has been substantially completed in accordance with the principles herein outlined, the powder is complete except that it must be brought down to substantially room temperature under non-oxidizing conditions, as otherwise it would oxidize spontaneously if,'for example, itwere exposed to air at the high temperature at which it is treated as aforesaid. This is usually accomplished by cooling the material while in any suitable non-oxidizing gas, for example, the same gas used during the reduction.
it has been found that the powder made in accordance with the present invention is sufliciently soft, so that it will be relatively dense when given a compacting pressure within normal operating values, for example, when articles formed from the powder of the present invention are pressed at 60,000 p.s.i., the density of the resulting compacts is usually from about 6.30 to about 6.35 gms./cc.; while at 80,000 p.s.i. pressure, green densities of about 6.57 to about 6.65 gms./cc. are usual; while at pressure of 150,000 p.s.i. green densities of about 6.95 to about 6.98 grns./cc. have been obtained.
In order to get relatively hightensile strengths in articles made from powder in accordance with the present invention, it is usually desired to use a certain amount of carbon in the final articles. This carbon, while possibly present to some very small extent in the powder prepared as aforesaid, is usually introduced for most part after the powder has been completely prepared as hereinabove set forth and prior to the pressing of the powder into the desired shape. It is quite usual for example, to mix the powder with carbon in the form of powdered graphite. The amount of carbon to be introduced may, in some instances, slightly exceed the amount desired .in the final article for the reason that during the subsequent sin tering operation, some carbon may react with a small amount of oxygen present in the powder in the form of one or more of the oxides of one or more of the metals present to form one or the other of the gaseous oxides of the carbon, which are dissipated during the sintering. it will' be understod that practically all metal powdenparticularly ferrous metal powder, has some oxide contents which are usually represented by what'is known as hydrogen loss. This is determined practically by heating the powder with hydrogen at a certain temperature and for a certain time, with the loss in weight resulting from this treatment representing the so-called hydrogen loss. The powder metallurgy fabrication industry usually requires that the hydrogen loss shall not exceed 1 /2%, although good metal powder usually has a very'much lower hydrogen loss value than this.
Also in preparing the powder for actual fabrication; into articles, it'is quite usual to mix therewith about 1% of a mold lubricant, such as zinc stearate. The addition of carbon in this way and the addition of a mold lubricant will be understood to have been accomplished in the same way on each of the several test specimens described in the examples which follow. In the case of zinc stearate, substantially the entire material is believed to be volatilized during the subsequent sintering or heat treatment operation, so that the addition thereof serves merely during the pressing operation as a lubricant and does not otherwise aiiect the properties of the finished product.
There is further provided as a part of the present invention a process for obtaining very high densities and relatively high tensile strengthseven without special heat treatment. To this end, the process comprises pressing the powder prepared in accordance with this invention as aforesaid first at any desired pressure, usually about 50,000 to 100,000 p.s.i.; then anneal the pressed blank at temperatures, which may be as low as l275 F. in some instances and as high as about 1500 F. to ISO-0 F. in
. other cases, depending on the type of results to be desired.
Following this annealing operation, which takes place in a reducing gas atmosphere or in an endo-gas atmosphere (which is specially designed to maintain the carbon content of the articles substantially constant), the annealed article is then re-pressed, usually at a relatively high pressure, for'example, from about 80,000 to about ent invention will have tensile strengths in the order of magnitude of 80,000 to 100,000 p.s.i., and sometimes more in the case of pressed, annealed and re-pressed blanks or articles.
In some instances it may be desired to subject the as sintered articles to a heat-treating step, somewhat similar to conventional heat treating practices. Thus, it may be desired to bring such articles up to predetermined soaking temperatures, for example, from about 1500 to about 1600" F. for to minutes, then quench the so-heated articles in a quenching oil, which is heated to about 100 to 150 F, then temper the articles, for example, by holding them for 20 minutes at a temperature of from 400 to 600 F. The heat treated articles thus produced will have very high tensile strengths, sometimes as high as about 200,000 p.s.i., as set forth hereinafter in examples which follow.
From the point of view of shrinkage, it is found that the dimensional change of articles made from powder produced in accordance with the present process is in many instances not over and sometimes less than 0.4%, which value has been set up as a standard to be met by some commercial users of metal powder. Articles subjected to subsequent heat treatment as aforesaid usually shrink somewhat more during this heat treatment, so that it is usual, for example, to expect a shrinkage of about 0.15% greater for a heat treated article than for an as sintered article.
The present invention will be further illustrated by the following examples:
EXAMPLE I This example illustrates certain of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. In accordance with one preferred embodiment, additive iron powder was used, which was made in accordance with the teachings of the Crowley patent aforesaid and produced by reducing mill scale (which contained an amount of manganese approximately equivalent to /2% in the final product of the present invention). To this was added sufficient molybdenum in the form of M00 pigment grade (about 95% 325 mesh) to give /2% molybdenum in the final product, and nickel oxide in the form of NiO (75% 325 mesh) in an amount sufficient to give about 2% nickel in final product. The several powdered materials were thoroughly mixed together, then heated at 1500 F. for about to minutes in a gas formed by cracking gaseous ammonia. The heated material was then cooled in the same gas to give the desired powder.
In testing this powder, it was mixed with 1% graphite and 1% zinc stearate and pressed at 60,000 p.s.i. to form a green pressed blank, which had a density of 6.4 gms./cc. This blank was sintered in an endo-gas for 30 minutes, the endo gas serving to maintain the carbon content of the materials substantially constant and at about 0.85% carbon, the sintering being carried on at a temperature in the range of about 2030 to 2060 F. The endo gas used in this test had a composition as follows:
The pressed and sintered blank thus formed was then tested and was found to have a tensile strength of 60,000 p.s.i. This blank was also carefully measured to determine the shrinkage, which was found to be about 0.4%.
Other tests were conducted with powders of substantially the same identical composition, treated in substan tially the same way as above set out, except that the pressure was 80,000 p.s.i. In certain of these tests the form in which the nickel was introduced was varied as hereinafter set forth. The results of the tests are shown in the following table.
Table I Test Piece sintered in Test Piece sintered in Exo Gas Endo Gas Run sintered Shrinlr- Tensile Sintcred Shrink- Tensile Density age, Strength, Density age, Strength, (gm/cc.) Percent p.s.i. (gm/cc.) Percent p.s.i.
6. 59 0. 30 78, 000 6. 59 0. 81, 000 6 60 0.50 82, 000 6.62 0.65 88, 000 6. 63 0.30 84, 000 6. 66 0. 45 92,000 6. 54 0. 20 66, 000 6. 56 0. 34 65, 000 6. 52 0. 31 74, 000 6. 52 0.37 73, 000 6. 58 0. 23 74, 000 6. 57 0.37 80, 000 6. 59 0.14 75,000 It 6. 57 0. 09 ,400 1' 6. 87 0.76 80, 000 j 6. 63 0. 51 84,
The exo gas used in the tests headed Test Piece Sintered in Exo Gas had a composition as follows:
The endo gas had the same composition as that given hereinabove.
in the examples summarized in Table I, run No. a employed nickel in the form of NiO having a particle size such that about 75% thereof was 325 mesh. In run No. b, a different type of nickel was employed, also as NiO, but having a particle size such that about 90% was 325 mesh.
In run No. g 2% nickel was used in the form of Ni G which was very fine (pigment grade), so that all of it would go through a 325 mesh screen, the particles averaging about 6 microns in size. Some samples of this run, after the initial pressing operation, were heated at a temperature in the range of about 1275 to about 1300 F. for 30 minutes, then re-pressed at 100,000 psi. and sintered in the usual way as aforesaid to give a test piece having a density (as sintered) of 7.27 gms./cc. and a tensile strength of 93,400 p.s.i. Some samples of the same run were further heat-treated at 1625 F. for about 20 minutes, then quenched in oil heated to F, then the temper drawn at 450 F. for about 30 minutes to give a final heat treated article having a density of 7.29 gms./ cc. and a tensile strength of 200,000 p.s.i.
Run No. h was one in which the nickel was present to the extent of about 2% on the basis aforesaid, the nickel being in the form of nickel oxide (NiO) of a type in which about 75% was 325 mesh in particle size. This example also included about /2 molybdenum and about 0.3% manganese. Some samples of this run were also annealed and re-pressed as set forth for run No. g to give an article having a density as sintered of 7.32 gms./cc. and a tensile strength on an as sintered basis of 76,800 p.s.i. Some of these samples were further heat treated as set forth in connection with run No. g to give final heat-treated articles having a tensile strength of 190,000 p.s.i.
in run No. i the nickel (2% on a metal basis) was introduced in the form of nickel chloride (Nicl Following the initial pressing thereof, certain samples were treated as set forth for run No. g above, including annealing 30 minutes and re-pressing as stated to give an article having on an as sintered basis a density of 7.13 gins/cc. and a tensile strength of 90,600 p.s.i. Some samples of this same run were further heat-treated asset forth in detail as to run No. g to give final articles having tensile strengths of 183,000 p.s.i.
In run No. j the nickel used was the same as in run No. h above-described. Certain samples or this test run were re-pressed as set forth in run No. g above to given test pieces having a density of 7.30 gms./cc. and a tensile strength of 79,200 p.s.i. on an as sintered basis. Some samples of this run were additionally heat-treated as set '1957, and hereinabove referred to.
oneness a1 forth in run No. g to give test pieces having tensile strengths ofl85,000 p.s.i.
EXAMPLE II This example is given to illustrate the manner in which powder made in accordance with the present invention and particularly in accordance with the preferred embodiment thereof given in Example I thereof may be further treated to give it a very high tensile strength.
The first portion of this treatment was a pressing, annealing and re-pressing operation, wherein the first pressing was substantially the same as given in Example I above, the blank being pressed at 60,000 p.s.i. The annealing of this pressed blank was then carried on by heating the blank for about 30 minutes in a hydrogen atmosphere to a temperature in'the range of about l275 to 1300 F. The re-pressing of the blank so annealed was then effected by first cooling the blank, then reinserting it in the same mold in which it was originally pressed and re-pressing it, this time at 100,000 p.s.i. The density of the pressed, sintered and re-pressed blank formed in this way was 7.3 gms./ cc. Several of these blanks were then sintered for a time and temperature as set forth in Example I above, so that this formed the first stage of the process. Some of the blanks formed in this way were tested and found to have tensile strengths in the range of 75,000 to 100,000 p.s.i. and elongations of about 6% to 8%. 7
Others of the blanks formed in this way were then heated to 1625 F. for 20 minutes in a non-oxidizing atmosphere, then quenched in oil, which had been preheated to a temperature in the range of 120 to 140 F, then tempered at various temperatures from 350 to 500 F., the tempering time being from 30 minutes to one hour (but being found not to be critical in any event). The heat treated and tempered blanks thus prepared were tested for tensile strength and found to have tensile strengths between about 180,000 to 200,000 p.s.i.
EXAMPLE III This example is given to illustrate the differences between the material produced in accordance with the present invention and that produced in accordance with applicants prior Eatent No. 2,799,570, granted July 16, Basically, these two processes differ in that the material in accordance with the prior patent and particularly including the iron ingredient thereof is co-reduced according to this prior patent along with most of the alloying ingredients; whereas in the present case the iron is introduced in a reduced or metallic state, but the present case is limited 'to a particular type of iron, namely, additive iron.
stant so that a comparison may fairly be made there between.
With the material of the present invention, the greatest shrinkage is found to exist with blanks having the lowest values of the range of green densities found in various samples (due to low compacting pressures) and was about 0.2%. As the green density of the blanks was raised (by increasing the compacting pressure), the shrinkage was reduced to a value of about 0.1%. With the material of the prior patent aforesaid, and with the lowest values of green density, the shrinkage was slightly more than 0.6%; while with the highest values of green density, the shrinkage was still about 0.45%. It will be seen that with the arbitrarily imposed limit of shrinkage which some users of powdered metal have decided upon of 0.4%, the material of the present invention will 1500 F. under reducing conditions, so as to reduce all qualify; while the material of the prior patent Will not, 7
fact been found to be satisfactory from other points of view. 4
EXAMPLE IV This example is given to illustrate the comparative results in tests on the powder of the present invention as contrasted with powders made up in exactly the same Way, but with the sole exception that the iron powder used was not additive iron in accordance with the present invention, but rather was some commercially available type of iron powder which, from the point of view of the disclosure of this case, may be termed subtractive iron. In each instance, the amount and character of the alloying ingredients is exactly the same and includes about 2% nickel and [2% each of molybdenum and manganese. In each instance the pressing was effected at 80,000 p.s.i. and the sintering under the same conditions as particularly set forth as in Example I here-of. The test'piece produced from the powder of the present invention had a tensile strength of 81,000 p.s.i.; whereas the test pieces produced using three different prior art iron powders available commercially were respectively 54,000, 60,000 and 62,000 p.s.i. One of these types of commercially available powder is made from iron ore and is generally termed Swedish sponge. Another is made by reducing mill scale, but wherein the reduction is etfected under conditions such that the iron powder is properly described as subtractive and-is relatively hard as contrasted with a relatively soft powder of the present invention.
EXAMPLE V This example is presented to illustrate the efiects of the variation in the amount of nickel and also variation resulting from different manners of introducing the nickel in' the case. As such it generally supports the conclusions hereinabove set out as to the results of such variations. In the tests which are summarized in Table II which follows, various powderswere made substantially as set forth in Example I, but with the following particular variations. In each instance set out in Table II, the nickel was added as fine nickel oxide (NiO) with a particle size such that about would pass through a 325 mesh screen. In each instance there was present in the powder about /2% molybdenum and about 0.3% manganese. After mixing the ingredient materials theywere'heated together at 1500 F. under reducing conditions, so as to reduce all the reducible materials present. The powders were tested as aforesaid, except that the pressing (to form test pieces) was done at 80,000 p.s.i. and the sintering was done in an endo gas atmosphere having the composition set out in Example I.
Table 11 Tensile Strength as Sintcred S rinkage,
EXAMPLE VI This example is presented to illustrate the effect of various amounts of molybdenum on the properties of the powder. In all the test results given in this example and specifically in Table III thereof. which follows, the powders contained 2% nickel, added'as nickel oxide, and 0.3% manganese added as manganese oxide. After mixing the ingredient materials, they were heated together at the reducible materials present. Since the purpose of molybdenum is to improve the heat treatability characteristic of the powder, some of the sintered bars were also 7 13 heat-treated by beating them at 1850 F. for about 1 /2 hours, then quenching them in oil, and drawing the temper at 650 F. for about 1 /2 hours. The results of this series of tests are set out in Table HI.
14: different temperatures, the tensile strength of articles made at those temperatures, and the respective shrinkages.
Table V Tensile Temperature, F. Strength Shrinkage,
(p.s.i) as percent sintered It is noted from the results of the tests set out in this example that the addition of molybdenum tends to decrease the amount of shrinkage and to increase the tensile strength of the articles as heat treated. It seems to have little or no effect upon the tensile strength of the parts upon an as sintered basis.
EXAMPLE VII This example is presented to illustrate the effect of various percentages of manganese in the powder. Except as to this variable, all the powders made and reported in this example included 2% nickel and /2% molybdenum added respectively as nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide.
From the above it will be noted that there is relatively little change in tensile strength of test pieces with change in the reducing temperature for the powder; but the shrinkage seems progressively to decrease with increasing reduction temperatures.
EXAMPLE IX This example is given to illustrate the effect of progressively increasing amounts of methane in the treating gas during the reduction of the reducible materials of the powder, it being noted that in each instance the gas used is predominantly hydrogen. The results of a series of tests with different percentages of methane admixed with the hydrogen are given in Table VI.
Table VI The several samples made as set forth in this example 30 l Tensie were reduced and parts were made therefrom by pressoHhpemnt Strength Shrinkagg ing at 80,000 p.s.i. and sinterrng as 1n previous examples. (p.s.i.) as percent The results of these tests are set out in Table IV which smiled follows: 3F 71 000 0 02 O Table IV 1 71,030 0. 2 00, 000 0. v 3 68,0)0 0.36 Tensile 4 71, 000 0. 46 Percent Manganese Strength Shrinkage, 5 69, 000 0, 51
(p.s.i.) as percent sintered It is noted from the above that while the tensile 8 Zg ggg 8g strength of the finished parts varies within relatively 5: 77,000 1 narrow limits and without any definite trend, the shrink- 77,000 (3-63 age is progressively greater with increasing amounts of In each of the tests set out in this example, the manganese was added in the form of electrolytic manganese powder.
A further test was made in which manganese was added as ferro manganese powder with a total of 0.5% man ganese present in the finished powder. In this test, the resulting test piece was found to have a tensile strength on as sintered basis of 80,000 p.s.i. and a shrinkage of 0.55%.
When the same amount of manganese was added in a further test in the form of manganese carbonate, other factors being the same, the tensile strength of the test piece formed from the resulting powder was 83,000 p.s.i. and the shrinkage 0.5%.
It may be concluded, therefore, that the variation in the amount of manganese has little effect upon the tensile strength on an as sintered basis; but that increased amounts of manganese tend to cause somewhat higher shrinkages. The manganese ingredient is added to impart desired characteristics of heat treatability as hereabove set out, although these factors per se are not illustrated in this example. In general, it is found, however, that the presence of manganese aids in permitting the parts to be hardened as set forth above.
EXAMPLE Vlil The purpose of this example is to illustrate the effects of different temperatures used during the reduction of the reducible materials or ingredients of the powder, the results being set forth in Table V showing the effect of such methane in the treating gases. For this reason, therefore, it is usually preferred that the proportion of methane be relatively low, on the basis that low shrinkage is usually one of the characteristics desired in the finished powder.
While there is herein specifically given data on but a few of the many tests which have been made with respect to this invention, and some of the alternatives have been pointed out or generally suggested, other alternatives will occur to those skilled in the art from the foregoing particular disclosure. We do not wish to be limited, therefore, except by the scope of the appended claims, which are to be construed validly as broadly as the state of the art permits.
What is claimed is:
1. The process of preparing a powdered metal product for use in powder metallurgy from a solid starting material consisting essentially of (1) iron, predominantly in the form of additive iron, and containing not over about 1% of impurities selected from the group consisting of the oxides of aluminum, silicon, titanium, chromium, calcium and magnesium, (2) metallic manganese, which is present in the amount of about 0.1% to about 1%, (3) molybdenum in the form of at least one hydrogenreducible compound thereof selected from the group consisting of the oxides and chlorides of molybdenum, and which is present in the amount of about 0.1% to about 1%, and (4) nickel in a form selected from the group consisting of (a) metallic nickel and (b) the hydrogenreducible compounds thereof which are selected from the group consisting of the oxides and chlorides of nickel,
and which is present in the amount of about /2'% to about 2 /2'%, all percentages given being based upon the weight of the final product and all except that of the iron impurities being based on the respective metals as such; said process comprising the steps of blending together the named materials in solid, fine-particle form to provide a starting mixture, reducing the hydrogen-reducible ingredients of said starting mixture by contacting said starting mixture While in a reducing zone with a nonoxidizing gas containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen and while maintaining the temperature of all the materials in said reducing zone in the range of about 1200 F. to about 1600 F. for a time sufficient to effect the reduction of substantially all the hydrogen-reducible material present; and cooling the remaining solid material, following the reduction aforesaid, under non-oxidizing conditions and to a-temperature such that it may be exposed to the atmosphere without substantial spontaneous oxdiation, the powdered metal thus formed being capable of formation byconventional powder metallurgy practices into articles having high tensile strength and low shrinkage characteristics.
2. The process in accordance with claim 1, in which the iron ingredient of said solid starting material and at least a part of the manganese of said solid starting material are derived from mill scale, which was reduced by hydrogen in the presence of gaseous HCl to form said additive iron.
3. The process in accordance with claim '1, in which the manganese content of said solid starting material (calculated as metallic manganese as a percentage based on the total of the metals present) is about /z%.
4. The process in accordance with claim 1, in which the molybdenum content of said solid starting material (calculated as metallic molybdenum as a percentage based on the total of the metals present) is about 72%.
5. The process in accordance'with claim 1, in which the nickel content of said solid starting material (calculated as metallic nickel as apercentage' based on the total of the metals present) is about 2%.
6. The process in accordance with claim '1, in which said solid starting material contains about /2% manganese, about /2% molybdenum and about 2% nickel, the percent'of each metal being a weight percentage based upon the total weight of all the metals: present.
7. The process in accordance with claim 1, in which there is added to the powdered metal produced as aforesaid about 0.6% to about 1% carbon, and then pressing the metallic powder mixture thus prepared to a desired 7) form.
8. The process in accordance with claim 1, in which the temperature at which said materials are maintained in said reducing zones is about 1500 F. and'the time in which said materials remain in the reducing zone-at this temperature is about to minutes. v
9. The process in accordance with claim 7, comprising the further steps of heating the pressed powdered metal product produced as aforesaid to atemperature in they powder metallurgy, comprising the steps of preparing a powdered metal product for, use therein from a solid starting material consisting essentially of ,(1) iron, pre dominantly in the form of additive iron, and containing not over about 1% of impurities selected from the group consisting of the oxides of aluminum, silicon, titanium, chromium, calcium and magnesium, (2) metallic manganese, which is present in the amount of about 0.1% to about 1%, (3) molybdenum in the form of at least one hydrogen-reducible compound thereof selected from the group consisting of the oxides and chlorides or" molybdenum, and which is present in the amount of about 0.1% to about 1%, and (4) nickel in a form selected from (a) metallic nickel and (b) the hydrogen-reducible compounds thereof which are selectedrfrom the group consisting of the oxides and chlorides or nickel, and which is present in the amount of about to about 2 /2 all percentages given being based uponthe weight oi the final product and all except that of the iron impurities being based on'the respective metals as such; said process comprising the steps of blending together the named materials in solid, fine-particle form to provide a starting mixture, reducing the hydrogen-reducible ingredients of said starting'rnixture by contacting said starting mixture while in a reducingzone with a nonoxidizing gas containing a substantial proportion 'of hydrogen and While maintaining the temperature of all the materials in said reducing zone in the range of about 1200" F. to about 1600 F. for a time su-fiicient to effect the reduction of substantially all the hydrogen reducible material present; cooling the remaining solidmaterial, following the reduction aforesaid, under nonoxidizing conditions andto atemperature such that it may be exposed to the atmosphere without substantial spontaneous oxidation; forming the powder to a desiredshape forthe article to be made by pressingrit in a mold of a shape to form the desired article and at a pressure in the range of about 50,000 to about 100,000 p.s.i., annealing the pressed article at a temperature in the range of about 1275" to about 1800 F. in a nonas aforesaid to a temperature in the range of about 1500 to about 1600 F. for about 15 to 20 minutes, quenching the thus-heated articlein a quenching oil which has been heated prior to the quenching to the temperature range of about to about F, jandtempering the quenched article by holding it at a selected temperature in therange of about 400 to about 600 F.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,453,057 Williams Apr. 24, 1923 2,295,334 Clark Sept. 8, 1942 2,352,316 Goetzel June 27, 1944 2,744,002 Crowley May 1, 1956 2,799,570 Reed et al. July 16, 1957 2,811,433
Whitehouse et al. Oct. 29, 1857

Claims (1)

1. THE PROCESS OF PREPARING A POWDERED METAL PRODUCT FOR USE POWDER METALLURGY FROM A SOLID STARTING MATERIAL CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF (1) IRON, PREDOMINATLY IN THE FORM OF ADDITIVE IRON, AND CONTINING NOT OVER ABOUT 1% OF IMPURITIES SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF THE OXIDES OF ALUMINUM, SILICON, TITANIUM, CHROMIUM CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM, (2) METALLIC MANGANESE, WHICH IS PRESENT IN THE AMOUNT OF ABOUT 0.1% TO ABOUT 1%, (3) MOLYBDENUM IN THE FORM OF AT LEAST ONE HYDROGENREDUCIBLE COMPOUND THEREOF SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF THE OXIDES AND CHLORIDES OD MOLYBDENUM, AND WHICH IS PRESENT IN THE AMOUNT OF ABOUT 0.1% TO ABOUT 1%, AND (4) NICKEL IN A FORM SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF (A) METALLIC MICKEL AND (B) THE HYDROGENREDUCIBLE COMPOUNDS THEREOF WHICH ARE SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF THE OXIDES AND CHLORIDES OF NICKEL, AND WHICH IS PRESENT IN THE AMOUNT OF ABOUT 1/2% TO ABOUT 21/2%, ALL PERCENTAGES GIVEN BEING BASED UPON THE WEIGHT OF THE FINAL PRODUCT AND ALL EXCEPT THAT OF THE IRON IMPURITIES BEING BASED ON THE RESPECTIVE METALS AS SUCH; SAID PROCESS COMPRISING THE STEPS OF BLENDING TOGETHER THE NAMED MATERIALS IN SOLID, FINE-PARTICLE FORM TO PROVIDE A STARTING MIXTURE, REDUCING THE HYDROGEN-REDUCIBLE INGREDIENTS OF SAID STARTING MIXTURE BY CONTACTING SAID STARTING MIXTURE WHILE IN A REDUCING ZONE WITH A NONOXIDIZING GAS CONTAINING A SUBSTANTIAL PROPORTION OF HYDROGEN AND WHILE MAINTAINING THE TEMPERATURE OF ALL THE MATERIALS IN SAID REDUCING ZONE IN THE RANGE OF ABOUT 1200*F. TO ABOUT 1600*F. FOR A TIME SUFFICIENT TO EFFECT THE REDUCTION OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL THE HYDROGEN-REDUCIBLE MATERIAL PRESENT; AND COOLING THE REMAINING SOLID MATERIAL, FOLLOWING THE REDUCTION AFORESAID, UNDER NON-OXIDIZING CONDITIONS AND TO A TEMPERATURE SUCH THAT IT MAY BE EXPOSED TO THE ATMOSPHERE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL SPONTANEOUS OXIDIATION, THE POWDERED METAL THUS FORMED BEING CAPABLE OF FORMATION BY CONVENTIONAL POWDER METALLURGY PRACTICES INTO ARTICLES HAVING HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH AND LOW SHRINKAGE CHARACTERISTICS.
US17251A 1960-03-24 1960-03-24 Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom Expired - Lifetime US3067032A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17251A US3067032A (en) 1960-03-24 1960-03-24 Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17251A US3067032A (en) 1960-03-24 1960-03-24 Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3067032A true US3067032A (en) 1962-12-04

Family

ID=21781576

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17251A Expired - Lifetime US3067032A (en) 1960-03-24 1960-03-24 Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3067032A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3214262A (en) * 1961-11-24 1965-10-26 Huettenwerk Oberhausen Ag Process for producing dense iron powders from sponge iron
US3269806A (en) * 1961-11-09 1966-08-30 Siemens Planiawerke Ag Sintered resistance body, preferably for use as heating element
US3424572A (en) * 1966-09-13 1969-01-28 Niranjan M Parikh Alloyed metallic powder process
US3434810A (en) * 1965-06-30 1969-03-25 Fansteel Inc Nickel-base dispersion hardened alloy
US3989559A (en) * 1973-03-22 1976-11-02 Gte Sylvania Incorporated Superalloys containing nitrides and process for producing same
US4049429A (en) * 1973-03-29 1977-09-20 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Ferritic alloys of low flow stress for P/M forgings
US4128420A (en) * 1976-03-27 1978-12-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh High-strength iron-molybdenum-nickel-phosphorus containing sintered alloy

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1453057A (en) * 1920-12-06 1923-04-24 Joseph A Williams Process of making iron, steel, or steel alloys
US2295334A (en) * 1939-07-15 1942-09-08 Frances H Clark Metallurgy of ferrous metals
US2352316A (en) * 1941-08-09 1944-06-27 American Electro Metal Corp Method of producing shaped bodies from powdery ferrous material
US2744002A (en) * 1953-08-24 1956-05-01 Republic Steel Corp Process of making powdered iron in a discrete crystalline form
US2799570A (en) * 1956-04-10 1957-07-16 Republic Steel Corp Process of making parts by powder metallurgy and preparing a powder for use therein
US2811433A (en) * 1955-01-14 1957-10-29 Republic Steel Corp Process of treating iron in gas-pervious form to improve its characteristics

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1453057A (en) * 1920-12-06 1923-04-24 Joseph A Williams Process of making iron, steel, or steel alloys
US2295334A (en) * 1939-07-15 1942-09-08 Frances H Clark Metallurgy of ferrous metals
US2352316A (en) * 1941-08-09 1944-06-27 American Electro Metal Corp Method of producing shaped bodies from powdery ferrous material
US2744002A (en) * 1953-08-24 1956-05-01 Republic Steel Corp Process of making powdered iron in a discrete crystalline form
US2811433A (en) * 1955-01-14 1957-10-29 Republic Steel Corp Process of treating iron in gas-pervious form to improve its characteristics
US2799570A (en) * 1956-04-10 1957-07-16 Republic Steel Corp Process of making parts by powder metallurgy and preparing a powder for use therein

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3269806A (en) * 1961-11-09 1966-08-30 Siemens Planiawerke Ag Sintered resistance body, preferably for use as heating element
US3214262A (en) * 1961-11-24 1965-10-26 Huettenwerk Oberhausen Ag Process for producing dense iron powders from sponge iron
US3434810A (en) * 1965-06-30 1969-03-25 Fansteel Inc Nickel-base dispersion hardened alloy
US3424572A (en) * 1966-09-13 1969-01-28 Niranjan M Parikh Alloyed metallic powder process
US3989559A (en) * 1973-03-22 1976-11-02 Gte Sylvania Incorporated Superalloys containing nitrides and process for producing same
US4049429A (en) * 1973-03-29 1977-09-20 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Ferritic alloys of low flow stress for P/M forgings
US4128420A (en) * 1976-03-27 1978-12-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh High-strength iron-molybdenum-nickel-phosphorus containing sintered alloy

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3369891A (en) Heat-treatable nickel-containing refractory carbide tool steel
KR100249006B1 (en) Water spray iron powder for powder plating and its manufacturing method
US4681629A (en) Powder metallurgical process for manufacturing copper-nickel-tin spinodal alloy articles
WO1996028580A1 (en) Stainless steel powders and articles produced therefrom by powder metallurgy
US3067032A (en) Process of preparing a ferrous alloytype powder for powder metallurgy and of preparing high strength articles therefrom
US2333573A (en) Process of making steel
US5892164A (en) Carbon steel powders and method of manufacturing powder metal components therefrom
US2799570A (en) Process of making parts by powder metallurgy and preparing a powder for use therein
US2827407A (en) Method of producing powdered steel products
US2765227A (en) Titanium carbide composite material
US2831243A (en) Sintered powdered copper base bearing
US3897618A (en) Powder metallurgy forging
US3533760A (en) Dispersion strengthened nickel-chromium alloy composition
US2894319A (en) Sintered powdered aluminum base bearing
US3809540A (en) Sintered steel bonded titanium carbide tool steel characterized by an improved combination of transverse rupture strength and resistance to thermal shock
US2352316A (en) Method of producing shaped bodies from powdery ferrous material
US2763918A (en) Process of making a ferroalloying material and product obtained thereby
US5777247A (en) Carbon steel powders and method of manufacturing powder metal components therefrom
US2284638A (en) Metallurgy of ferrous metals
US3009809A (en) Sintering of iron-aluminum base powders
US2489838A (en) Powder metallurgy process for producing steel parts
US3196007A (en) Beryllium copper composition and method of producing green compacts and sintered articles therefrom
JPS61231102A (en) Powder based on iron containing ni and mo for producing highstrength sintered body
JP3351844B2 (en) Alloy steel powder for iron-based sintered material and method for producing the same
US2315302A (en) Process of manufacturing shaped bodies from iron powders