|Publication number||US2558030 A|
|Publication date||26 Jun 1951|
|Filing date||23 Sep 1948|
|Priority date||23 Sep 1948|
|Publication number||US 2558030 A, US 2558030A, US-A-2558030, US2558030 A, US2558030A|
|Inventors||O'rear Jacques G, Spessard Dwight R, Zisman William A|
|Original Assignee||O'rear Jacques G, Spessard Dwight R, Zisman William A|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (20), Classifications (32)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
June 26, 1951 2.3mm Er AL 2,558,030
NONINFLAWABLE HYDRAULIC FLUID AND LUBRICANT Filed Sept. 23, 1948 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 ILE- 1 FREEZING POINTS OF GLYCOL-WATER SOLUTIONS TEMPERATURE |O 2O 3O 4O 5O 6O 7O 8O 90 I00 VOLUME-Flo GLYCOL IN WATER INVENTORS WILLIAM A. ZISMAN JACQUES e. O'REAR BY DWIGHT R.SPESSARD June 26, 1951 w. A. ZISMAN El AL 2,558,030
NONINFLAMMABLE HYDRAULIC FLUID AND LUBRICANT Filed Sept. 23, 1.948 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 SHEAR BREAK OF ACRYSOL G 3650 IN HYDROLUBE A (HYDRAULIC BENCH TEST-USING PESCO |P349 PUMP) V I SCOSITY CYCLES 0F FLUID THROUGH SYSTEM mmvrom WILLIAM A.ZISMAN JACQUES e. O'REAR Y DWIGHT R. SPESSARD 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 W. A. ZISMAN ET AL NONINFLAIMABLE HYDRAULIC FLUID AND LUBRICANT Filed Sept. 23, 1948 June 26, 1951 A hm mwzurons WILLIAM A.ZISMAN JACQUES G.O'REAR BY DWIGHT R. SPESSARD Patented June 26, 1951 E HYDRAULIC FLUIDS AND LUBRICANTS William A. Zismau, Washington, D. 0., Dwight n. Spcssard, Schenectady, N. Y., and Jacques G. ORear, Washington, D. 0.
Application September 23, 1948, Serial No. 50,724 6 Claims. (01. 252-76) (Granted under-the act of March 3, 1883, as amended April 30, 1928; 370 O. G. 75'!) This invention relates to hydraulic-fluid compositions for use in devices and systems for the transmission of mechanical energy by fluid pressure and to additives for such compositions for the prevention of oxidation, the inhibition of corrosive action and the improvement of wear resisting qualities thereof.
A hydraulic fluid which is essentially an aqueous solution must have a freezing point low enough to avoid any possibility of the separation of solid phases within the system at any temperature to which the fluid may be exposed. In modern military operations, it is not unusual for hydraulic systems, for example, those in aircraft for operation of landing gear, to be exposed for long periods of time to temperatures as low as minus 60 to minus 70 F. Accordingly it is the general object of the invention to provide a hydraulic fluid having an extremely low freezing point to obviate the possibility of solid separation at very low temperatures.
Within any hydraulic system there 'will be found such metals as iron, brass, solder, bronze, aluminum, zinc, cadmium, copper and other more or less commonly used metals. The presence of several metals in a single hydraulic system pre sents the possibility of the formation of a large number of electrical couples within the system thereby providing ideal corrosion conditions. Ac-
cordingly it is a further object of the invention to inhibit the hydraulic fluid composition against corrosive action so that'all metals in the system will be protected therefrom.
Also, within the common hydraulic system, there is always at some point a reservoir for excess fluid. Such a reservoir is never full and, being a closed container, it will define a vapor space above the fluid contained therein. Even within the simplest hydraulic systems, humid corrosion within such space presents a serious problem. In the more complex systems, found in military or commercial aircraft or in naval vessels where service conditions are extremely severe and the system is exceedingly complex, the corrosion problem is correspondingly more difficult. It is therefore a still further object of the invention to provide hydraulic fluid compositions which will inhibit adequately both the humid and contact corrosion of the system.
"An additional object of the invention to provide a hydraulic fluid composition to which the above properties have been imparted and which. also possesses a viscosity index sufficiently high to make it a desirable hydraulic fluid.
In any military application, a property, in addition to those above mentioned, which a hydraulic fluid should have is that of non-inflammability and, accordingly, it is also an object of the invention to provide a fluid which is substantially non-inflammable.
For the accomplishment of these and other objects of the invention hydraulic compositions are prepared consisting essentially of water as a solvent and flame retarder, a water soluble organic polymeric thickener, a water-miscible freezing point depressant, balancing ingredients in relatively small proportions for the inhibition of corrosion, oxidation and frictional wear and preferably a solublizer for certain wear inhibitors.
The name Hydrolube as used in this specification is a generic name for any polymer-thickened, corrosion inhibited aqueous fluid having one or more of the glycols as major constituents. The Hydrolubes herein defined are further idenifled by the letter "0" which designates fluids thickened with polyalkylene glycol copolymers. Specific examples of such compositions containing various corrosion inhibitors, wear reducing additives, antioxidants and metal deactivators are designated herein below as Hydrolube U-2, Hydrolube U-3, etc.
The water soluble polyhydric alcohols or ethers used as freezing point depressants may be any of the common glycols or glycol ethers having from about 2 to about 14 carbon atoms such as ethylene, glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycolj ethylene glycol ethers such as the ethyl, methyl, propyl and butyl ethers thereof, and similar ethers of diethylene and triethylene glycol. In general it is preferred to use the simpler compounds as represented by the polyhydric alcohols such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, butylene glycol and diethylene glycol for they are easily obtainable and blend easily with water to give very low-freezing mixtures which form good bases for the fluid compositions. As the basis of the hydraulic fluid composition it is necessary to balance the non-inflammable character of the water component against the low freezing point P ur point depressant effect of the polyhydric alcohol which limits the water content to a maximum of about forty-five percent. The relative proportions of the two components are further influenced by the fact that there is a well defined eutectic mixture of glycol and water consisting e. g. in the case of ethylene glycol, of 67% glycol and 33% water. The freezing point of such a mixture is 65 F. It is readily apparent that evaporation of water from this mixture would be Tempera- Viscosity ture in T. in csks.
The Bureau of Aeronautics of the Navy Department has specified that the finished aircraft hydraulic fluid should have a viscosity of not less than centistokes (csks.) at 130 F., and not over 2,000 csks. at -40 F., and that the freezing point, should be not higher than 50 F., and as low as -65 F. if possible. For use on ships, the Bureau of Ordnance has specified that the viscosity should be not less than 10 csks. at 210 F. and not over 215 csks. at 0 F., while the pour point should be below 40 F.
-The preferred, soluble organic polymeric thickener of the hydraulic fluids of this invention consists essentially of a copolymer of ethylene oxide and 1,2-propylene or 1,3-propylene oxide, preferably one containing about '75 mole percent of ethylene oxide and about 25 mole percent'of propylene oxide, copolymerized to a thick fluid polymer having an average molecular weight not in excess of about 15,000 to 20,000. This particular polymer thus formed is a fluid designated by the manufacturer, for example, as U-75-H69.400. The figures 69,400 indicate the viscosity of the pure polymer in Salbolt Universal seconds at 100 F. The effect of this fluid and that of other analogous polymers on the viscosity of the base stock is given in the following table.
TABLE I weight Wt no? Viscosity in centistokes mar in glycol-wafer 8m 210 F. 130 F. 100 F. 0" F. -40 F 0.0 0.70 1.74 12.00 25.0 104.0 5.0 U-7s-n-00,000 1.00 4.53 86.0 552.1 10.0 U-75H00,000 3.00 10.00 220.0 1, 500.0 0.8 U75-H-00,000 10.0 1, 470. 0 10.7 U75-H-60,400 0.0 10.3 210.0 1,470.0 20.0 U-75-H-90,000 10.0 35.0 1,007.0 00.0 11-75-11 04.05 98.95 3,130.0 40.0 mun-00,000---" 70.1 2302 50.0 U75-H-00,000 150.0 408.7
Inithis table the base stock has a volume ratio of ethylene glycol to water of 55 to 45. The increased effect on the viscosity accomplished by U-75-H-90,000 over that of U-75-H69,400 is shown by tests 3 and 5 above where the polymer content of the two compositions was very close. By interpolation it is possible to determine the relative proportion of the polymer to the base stock to meet either of the above referenced specifications.
Specific examples of complete hydrolube compositions, based upon the above tests, are given hereinafter.
In general, the greater the average molecular weight of the co-polymer used the less the weight percentage necessary for a given thickening effect. Of course, if the base stock is to be thickened to a higher viscosity at 130 F. a higher concentration of the co-polymer must be used. For instance, to produce from the above base stock a fluid having a viscosity of 20 csks. at 130 F. it is necessary to use 21% of U-75-H-69,400 and 79% of the base stock.
Other properties and characteristics which are essential to hydraulic fluids are: resistance to corrosion of the common metals used in bydraulic systems, stability as to thermal oxidation in the atmosphere, inertness as to effect on rubber or plastic parts in present equipment, resistance to wear of metallic parts exposed to friction, and resistance to break-down of the fluid due to shearing action thereon.
To increase the resistance to corrosive action on the metals commonly present in hydraulic systems or to inhibit the basic hydraulic fluid against corrosion the applicants have found that a class of amine nitrites which can be represented bythe following general formula wherein R1 and R: are any alkyl, aryl, alkaryl or aralkyl organic radicals of which diisopropyl amine nitrite, diisobutyl amine nitrite and dicyclohexyl' amine nitrite are typical, possess characteristics which render them ideally adapted to incorporation into corrosion preventing hydraulic compositions. The compounds of low molecular weight, such as\the isobutyl, isopropyl and cyclohexyl compounds, have relatively high vapor pressures at ambient temperatures, adsorb strongly onto metal surfaces with which they come into contact and have a suflicient degree of solubility in aqueous organic media to maintain an equilibrium concentration of the amine nitrite vapor in the space above the liquid so that a protective film can be adsorbed onto the metal enclosing such space. Since the solubility of these compounds in aqueous-organic media is limited, adsorption equilibria from dilute solutions are sufllciently favorable to leave on the adsorbent surface a substantially complete layer of adsorbed moleciiles through a wide range of temperatures without danger of redissolution of the compound, so that the surface once covered thereby is well protected under' a wide variety of conditions. In general, the greater the proportion of'the organic constituent (e. g. ethylene glycol) in the fluid medium the less soluble the inhibitor and the less that is required.
According to accepted theories of adsorption, when a compound of the nature of a di-substituted amine nitrite, is adsorbed onto a metal surface the nitrite end of the molecule is the one which is adjacentto the surface and attached thereto. The process of attachment to the surface may or may not include actual chemical reaction of the polar end of the molecule with the metal of the surface. When such perpendicular orientation of the molecules takes place, it is apparent that the hydrocarbon ends of the molecules project out from the surface, thereby interposing between the surface and atmosphere or liquid an interface comprising a complete uniform outer layer of contiguous hydrocarbon groups.
water is prevented from wetting the underlying metallic surface and the latter is thereby inhibited from aqueous corrosion.
Of the vapor phase corrosion inhibitors above given, the applicants have found that diisopropylammonium nitrite is somewhat more effective because of its higher vapor pressure. For that reason the majority of the fluids prepared for serviceuse have contained diisopropylammonium nitrite. In the following compositions it will be referred to as DIPAN.
For liquid phase inhibition of corrosion of aqueous hydraulic fluids it is necessary that the inhibitor or combinations of inhibitors used be thermally stable to oxidation at temperatures as high as 180 F. They should be effective in small concentrations, e. g. from 0.1% to They should'be soluble in the base fluid at temperatures ranging from below. 0 F. to 180 F. depending .upon the intended service. They should not interfere either with the thickening action or solubility of the polymer thickener, or give rise on oxidation to detrimental products. Finally, they should not cause the fluid or its vapor to be too toxic for safe use when the fluid leaks out or is spilled in oorly ventilated compartments.
Thus, for reasons of compatibilitywith andnon-interference in the function of the other components of the hydraulic fluid the inhibitor was limited to certain amine salts of which diamylammonium laurate, hereinafter referred to as DIAL, was found to be the most eflective.
But this inhibitor was not sufliciently soluble in.
the base fluid. It produced a turbid solution which was necessary to-be made clear by the addition of solubilizing agents, for the reason that in a test pump run of one hundred hours the turbidity became a flocculent precipitate.
As solubilizers of the diamylammonium laurate, salicylal ethanolamine and a combination of butyl Cellosolve (ethylene glycol monobutyl ether) and 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were found to be very effective. The function of the 2- methyl-2,4-pentanediol is to hold the diamylammonium laurate in solution at extremely low temperatures, so that it operates to form a-hydrophobic film on the metallic surfaces over a range of temperature of about 50 F. to about 160 F. This hydrophobic film not only reduces the corrosion by the base fluid of the metals on which adsorbed but it also reduces the wear loss of the metals which are in frictional engagement with each other.
But this hydrophobic film does not eliminate corrosion of certain of the metals entirely. Copper, copper alloys and 50/50 solder in contact therewith were corroded to some extent. It was found necessary to add a copper deactivator in order to overcome the corrosion of this metal and its alloys. The most effective copper deactivator was found to be sodium mercaptobenzothiazole Since these hydrocarbon groups are hydrophobic,
"In the matter of shear breakdown of the polymer thickener the applicants have found that polymers having a molecular weight greater than 15,000 are increasingly subject to shear breakdown or mechanical degradation, this effect becoming very marked where the molecular weights are of the order of 50,000 or more. This means that the viscosity increase and V. I. improvement obtained by the addition of high polymers decreases with time due to the mechanical working of the hydraulic systems. Shear breakdown is indicated by a drop in the viscosity of the fluid which, if it occurs during operation in service, results in great difficulty in maintaining pressure, and faulty operation of the system. Shear breakdown of a polymer thickener is shown graphically in Figure 2 of the drawings. Here the drop in viscosity in centistokes' at three fixed temperatures is plotted as a function of the number of cycles of the fluid through an aircraft pump. This particular polymer thickener was "Acrysol G 3667 which is a sodium polymethacrylate resin. The complete composition of HydrolubeA is as follows:
sodium polymethacrylate ethylene glycol water triethanolamine phosphoric acid 1.6% DIPAN 0.2% MBT soft waxy residue which does not cause the' threaded fittings to seize.
The Hydrolubes of this invention are also superior to the standard petroleum base hydraulic fluid in the matter of their effect on rubber packings. In the following table the effect on rubber packing made by three manufacturers in a seven day immersion test at 158 F. is given. These data show that the percentage volume change is much less for the Hydrolubes than for the petroleum .base hydraulic fluid. The complete com: position of Hydrolube U-l is as follows:
10.2% 75H-69,400 I 49.7% ethylene glycol 36.4% water 1.5% diethylethanolamine 0.5%. phosphoric acid 1.6% DIPANf 0.1% MBT TABLE II Rubber packing teats 2.11am q may [1 as at 15s in] mm Petroleum no mo Property Unused r g i B51311. Q
. Fluid Pour point: Below -50.
EXAMPLE III.-HYDBOLUBE U-4 zf f f g gflf i 1' 257 1,395 1,435 L163 Composition percentage by weight Per Cent Elongam Polymer 75-H-69,400 10.0 flg ggggrggg i' Ethylene gly 38.1 nes e n 68 68 65 66 Water I 36.8
' 16 Butyl Cellosolve 10.0
+1.21 +5.48 +10.o 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol 2.0
M 9 Diamylammonium laurate 1.0 Tensile Strength..- 1,688 1,619 1, 0 1. Diisopropylammonium nitrite 1.7 g gffff ffi m m 200 5 Sodium merceptobenzothiazole 0.2 Duronieter hflrd- 20 Salicylalethanolamine 0.2
nessnnnvam 68 68 62 68 I Per +4.64 +2.18 +17 1009 Rubber 10' v Tensile Strengtl1--.. 1,860 1,534 1,762 1,980 Temmgw 242 150 167 m stokes Durometer hardnesnyvafa 71 70 70 64 130 10. 1 2518112; +6.36 +3.76 +11 3 1 23 4 Rubber s-goody ar n i mi e r camlgany. 3523: iT-f i gir i a ki 0211131.? Pour point: Below 50 F. g
The above data. show that the Hydrolubes have EXAMPLE IV.--HYDBOLUBE U-5 a decidedly less effect on the swelling, i. e. the [5 cake. at 130 ml per cent volume change on the th e ru r pa Polyme 75 -90 0 ings t st Glycol 41.3 The method of practicing this invention by emwater 9p bodying it in hydraulic fluids Will be mo e 00 Butyl ceuosolve 10,0 pletely understood by reference o the f l i 2-methy1-2,4-pentanedi01 2,0 examples which comprise description of specific 40 niamylammomum lam-ate (DIAL) 1 0. embodiments typifying preferred hydraulic fluid VPI 20() (dfisoprop lammonium t t L7 compositions of the lnventmn- NaMBT (sodium mercaptobenzothiazole) 0.2 EXAMPLE I.HYDBOLUBE U-2 SMEA (salicylalethanolamine) 0.2 Composition percentage by weight 7 Polymer 75-H-69,400 10.7 c I o v Ethylene glycol 5 csks. at 130 F. 760 csks. at 40 F. Water 36.5 EXAMPLE V.HYDBOLUBE U-o Salicylal ethanolamine 0.4 [20 n at m Diamylammonium laurate DIAL 0.8 Po er o 1437 Diisopropylammonium nitrit DIPA.N" 1.6 50 m Sodium mercaptobenzothiazole MBT 0.1 wateri 343 Butyl Cellosolve 10.0 loo-0 Hexylene glycol 2.0
Tempew Y i eo t y VPI-220 -'1.'I ture 111 F. 11 NaMBT 0.2 SMEA 0.2
130 10 -40 1,563 100.0 20 csks. at 130 F. 7.6 csks. at 210 F. I Pour point: Below -40 F. Surface tension: EXAMPLE VL HYDROLUBE U4 dynes/cm- [30 cake. at 130 m].
EXAMPLE PHYDROLUBE Polymer 7541-90000; 18,2 Composition percentageby weight Glycol 33.4 Polymer H69,400 10.0 Water 33.3 Ethylene glycol 38.2 Butyl Cellosolve 10.0 Water 36.9 Hexylene glycol 2.0 Butyl Cellosolve 10.0 DIAL 1.0 2-methyl-2,4-pentanedio1 2.0 v1=1-22o 1.7 Diamylammonium laurate 1.0 NaMBT 0.2 Diisopropylammonlum nitrite 1.7 SMEA 0.2 Sodium mercaptobenzothiazole 0.2
30 csks. at F. 11.4 csks. at 210 1?.
EXAMPLE VIL-HYDROLUBE U-8 [40 cake. at 130 F.]
Polymer 75-H-90,000 20.8 Glycol 31.9 Water 32.2 Butyl Cellosolve 10.0 Hexylene gly l 2.0 DIAL 1.0 VPI-220 1.7 NaMIBT 0.2 SMEA 0.2
100.0 .40 csks; at 130" F. 19.6 csks. at 210 F.
EXAMPLE VIII.-HYDROLUBE n-o v cake. at 130= F.]
Polymer van-90,000-- 25.2
Glycol v 29.4
Water 30.3 Butyl Cellosolve 10.0 Hexylene glycol 2.0 DIAL 1.0
NaMBT 0.2 SMEA 0.2
60 csks. at 130 F. 21.3 csks. at 210 F. The additives to the base fluid in the above Butyl Cellosolve and 2-Methyl- Solubilizers for the Diamylam- 2,4-pentanediol.
In general, the range in composition of the Hydrolube fluids of the invention, depending upon the particular intended service, will vary within the following limits: v V
I From about 30% to about 55% by weight of a polyhydric alcohol From about to about 30% by weight of water From about 5% to about 20% by weight oi a polyalkylene glycol as a thickener for the solution From about 0.7% to about 2.0% by weight of a wear preventer From about 0.3% to about 15.0% by weight of solubilizers for said wear preventer From about 1.0% to about 2.0% by weight of a vapor phase inhibitor From about 0.1% to about 0.3% of a metal deactivator From about 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight of an oxidation inhibitor for the metal deactivator Some of the above described hydraulic fluids were tested in a hydraulic bench system. Reference is here made to Figure 3 of the drawings in which this system, comprised of standard aircraft parts, is shown to include for the gear pump test, Pesco (1P-349N) gear pumps l0 operating at 1800 and 3600 R. P. M. to circulate the fluid, a brass reservoir 12 (approximately 1 gal. capacity), a manometer I4, a line filter I 8 having a filter element and hydraulic tubing 20 which usually consisted of 24S-T aluminum or 528-0 aluminum although copper tubing was used in a few runs. After the fluid passed through the pump and was compressed to 1,000 or 1,500 p. s. i., it was passed through a Vickers Model -167-E relief valve i6 and dropped to 25 p. s. i. It then circulated through a. copper coil 22 immersed in a thermostated water bath coil- (serving as a heat exchanger), through a rotome'ter 30, and flnallyflowed back to reservoir l2 where the fluid pressure was again atmospheric. The temperature of the fluid being tested was controlled by thermoswitch 24 which cut 011 motor ll if temperature exceeded that desired. Thermoswitch 26 through control of solenoid operated valve 28 regulated the flow of water through water jacket tube 23. Overflow water from tube 23 passed out of the system through outlet tube 25. The entire system contained between three and four gallons of fluid. The thermostat 24 controlling the water bath for the heat exchanger was immersed in the fluid in the reservoir and could be set for any temperature desired. This was usually F., F. or F. The length of the test varied from 50 to 500 hours.
' Test run data TABLE III Bench tests using "Pesco" gear pumps Fluid Hydrolnbe gf j f P 133%,?- gg Comments 1 000 3 600 100 100 G68! we ht losses averaged 15 mgs.l100 hrs. (1st 100 hrs); bushing U 2 weight fosses averaged 10 mgs.l100 hrs. (1st 100 hrs.). These weight Lin are very low and both the gears and bushings showed very e mg. U-3 1,000 3,600 100 100 Gear We ght losses averaged 6.3 m .ll00 hrs. bushing weight losses averaged 16 mgs./l00 hrs. Spec reservoir employed. U-4 l, 500 3, 600 140 100 Gear weight losses averaglerd 103.5 mgs./100 hrs. bushing Weight losses averaged 12.3 mgs.ll00 s. (1st 100 hrs.). A 1,000 1,800 100 400 Gear weight losses averaged 50 mgSJlOU hrs. (70 mgs. 1st 100 hrs); bushing weight losses averaged 2 mgs./l00 hrs. (5 mg. 1st 100 hrs); viscosity dropped considers ly. I
AN-VV-0366b 1,500 3,600 180 100 Gear weight losses averaged 53.3 mgs. 1st 100 hrs; bushing weight 10m averaged 6.3 mgs. 1st 100 hrs.
' rams rv Bench tests using Vickers PF9-Z713-10Z8 Piston Pump 8% Tempera- Time, Fluid Hydrolube p- B. i. B i m or. hr Oommenhi l 000 000 100 104.5 Bell bearings failedgreen depomts on inside of pump; drain line is U xm plump housing to reservoir imtead oi through internal relief ve pump. U-z 1,000 3,000 100 100 Ball failed; purelator filter element attacked somewhat by pH 8.0. Viscos- 140 100 fluid; ilui turbid at end ity at 130 F. 180 76 10.5 asks. ----2m I U2 1,)0 3, 600 100 648 Ball tailed- F8F reservoir (with internal filter) used, aswell pH 8.6. Viscosas drain from pump housing back to mervoir. Otherwise ity at 130 F.-- conditions same as in above run. Fluid turbid at end of run.
.5 I 7 f9??? 1,4110 3,000 140 1,000 Shut down. Pum p had not failed. FSF reservoir and drain line Viscosity at 130 used. Fluid circulated through bearings at rate of .33 gaL/min.
F 10.7 oaks 140 382 Pum shutdowmballbearmgs' beginningtoiaEFSFreservoirem. log aflum dreulatedhtihaliggh m mseat z a t orss al. min. 140 182 arings felledrun 0 ymer enerwas con m 1 541-904100 and the mar. was Sharp as 120. No pump modificaons. 140 374 Thrust bearings failed. In this run the polymer thickener was Ucon 5m mo 75-H-90,000 and the DIAL was Sharple's pilot plant product. This product was of very high purity. No pump modifications.
In the above Viclrers pump test runs all runs were carried on to pump failure excepting those runs where non-failure is noted. In none of the tests of the Ucon base fluids was there any significant change in the viscosity of the fluid at the end of the run. There was a noticeable drop in the viscosity of Hydrolube A in which the thickener consisted of a polymethacrylate resin. Also turbidity developed in Hydrolube U-2 fluid in the runs on the Vickers pump. This turbidity reflects the relative insolubility of the diamylammonium laurate in the base fluid. In the fluids where a more eflicient solvent for this laurate was used, viz, Hydrolubes U-3 and 4there was no turbidity developed.
A bench test of the above types of one hundred hours duration is more than the equivalent of one year's flying time in actual service. This is borne out by the fact that Hydrolube A when tested in the hydraulic system of a Grumman F6F fighter plane operated effectively for a long period of time, viz, after a four months period and a total of 100 flight hours all of the hydraulically operated parts were still in satisfactory operating condition. Hydrolube U was also tested in the hydraulic systems of ten new Chance- Vought 4-F-U fighter planes and AN-VV-O-366b (petroleum base) aircraft hydraulic fluid was tested in another group of ten planes. These tests were discontinued after a period of fourteen months. There were no mechanical failures attributable to the Hydrolube U fluid. Hydrolube U is therefore suitable for use in fiighter planes.
While the bench tests; above given, were carried to pump failure in most cases, it should be noted that these runs were from 100 to as high as 1000 hours duration. This is equivalent to several years flyingtime and in case of the higher times of duration would be more than the normal life expectancy of the plane. Hydrolubes U-2, 3 and 4 are therefore very efficient hydraulic fluids.
The particular compositions given for the different Hydrolubes are merely by way of example since obviously one skilled in the art could vary the percentages slightly from those given without changing the general eflect. Such changes are included within thescope of the invention to the extent as defined by the herewith appended claims.
The invention described herein may be manu factored and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.
What is claimed is:
1. A non-inflammable hydraulic fluid consisting essentially of from about 30% to about 50% by weight water, from about 30% to about 55% by weight of a freezing point depressant selected from the group consisting of glycols and glycol ethers having from 2 to 14 carbon atoms, from about 4.5% to about 25% by weight of a polyalblene glycol copolymer having anavera'ge molecular weight of from about 15,000 to about 20,000, from about 0.7% to about 2% by weight of diamylammonium laurate, from about 0.3% to about 15% by weight ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, from about 1% to about 2% by weight of a vapor phase inhibitor selected from the group consisting of diisopropyl ammonium nitrite, diisobutyl ammonium nitrite and dicyclohexyl ammonium nitrite, from about 0.1% to about 0.3%, by weight of sodium mercaptobenzothiazole and from about 0.1% to about 1% by weight of salicylalethanolamine.
2. A non-inflammable hydraulic fluid consisting essentially of from about 30% to about 50% by weight water, from about 30% to about 55% by weight of a freezing point depressant selected from the group consisting ofglycols and glycol ethers having from 2 to 14 carbon atoms, from about 4.5% to about 25% by weight of a polyalkylene g ycol made by eopolymerizing about 75 mol percent of ethylene oidde with about 25 mol percent of 1,2-propylene oxide and having an average molecular weight of about 15,000 to about 20,000, from about 0.7% to about 2% by weight of diamylammonium laurate, from about 0.3% to about 15% by weight ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, from about 1% to about 2% by weight of a vapor phase inhibitor selected from the group consisting of diisopropyl ammonium nitrite, diisobutyi ammonium nitrite and dicyclohexyl ammonium nitrite, from about 0.1% to about 0.3% by weight of sodium mercaptobenzothiazole and from about 0.1% to about 1 by weight of salicylalethanolamine.
3. A non-inflammable hydraulic fluid consisting essentially of about 15% by weightof a copolymer of 75 mol percent ethylene oxide and 25 mol percent 1,2-propylene oxide. having an average molecular welght from about 15,000 to about having an average molecular weight of about 15,000 to about 20,000, about 38% by weight ethylene glycol, about 37% by weight oi. water, about 10% by weight ofethylene glycol monobutyl ether, about 2% by weight of 2-methyl-2,4-pentanedlol, about 1% by weight diisopropylammonium nitrite, and about 0.2% by weight sodium mercaptobenzothiazole. I
5. A non-inflammable hydraulic fluid consisting essentially of about 5% by weight of a copolymer of about 75 mol percent ethylene oxide and about 25 mol percent 1,2-propylene oxide having an average molecular weight of about 15,000 to about 20,000, about 41% by weight ethylene glycol, about 39% by weight water, about by weight ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, about 2% by weight 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, about 1% by weight diamylammonium laurate, about 1.7% by weight diisopropylammonium nitrite, about 0.2% by weight sodium mercaptobenzothiazole, and about 0.2% by weight salicylalethanolamine.
6. A non-inflammable hydraulic fluid consisting essentially of from about 30% to about 50% by weight water, from about 30% to about 55% by weight of a freezing point depressant selected from the group consisting of glycols and glycol ethers having from 2 to 14 carbon atoms, a highly viscous polyalkylene glycol copolymer having an average molecular weight up to about 20,000 in amount sufllcient to thicken the hydraulic fluid, from about 0.7 to about 2% by weight of diamyl ammonium laurate, from about 0.3% to about 15% by weight of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, from about 1% to about 2% by weight of a vapor phase inhibitor selected from the group consisting of diisopropyl ammonium nitrite, diisobutyl ammonium nitrite and dicyclohexyl ammonium nitrite, from about 0.1% to about 0.3% by weight of sodium mercaptobenzothiazole and from about 0.1% to about 1% by weight salicylalethanolamine.
WILLIAM A. ZISMAN.
DWIGHT R. SPESSARD.
JACQUES G. OREAR.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS .Number -Name Date 1,970,564 Hoover Aug. 21, 1934 1,984,421 Muench et a1. Dec. 18, 1934 2,060,110 Paxton Nov. 10, 1936 2,162,454 Guthmann June 13, 1939 2,228,325 Olin et al Jan. 14, 1941 2,337,650 Dolian Dec. 28, 1943 2,352,462 Weiss et a1 June 27, 1944 2,361,339 White et al. Oct. 24, 1944 2,425,845 Toussaint et a1 Aug. 19, 1947 2,451,523 Walb Oct. 19, 1948 2,451,999 Walker Oct. 19, 1948
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1970564 *||17 Mar 1932||21 Aug 1934||Ass Of American Soap & Glyceri||Noncorrosive fluid and method of compounding the same|
|US1984421 *||13 Nov 1930||18 Dec 1934||Ig Farbenindustrie Ag||Liquid for transferring energy and lubricating|
|US2060110 *||7 Sep 1934||10 Nov 1936||Chicago Hydraulic Oil Co||Hydraulic pressure fluid|
|US2162454 *||2 Apr 1937||13 Jun 1939||Production Oil Products Inc||Cutting compound|
|US2228325 *||27 Jul 1937||14 Jan 1941||Sharples Solvents Corp||Lubricant|
|US2337650 *||3 Aug 1940||28 Dec 1943||Commercial Solvents Corp||Fluid for hydraulic systems|
|US2352462 *||24 Jul 1942||27 Jun 1944||Shell Dev||Metal deactivator|
|US2361339 *||8 Jun 1940||24 Oct 1944||Sheil Dev Company||Metal deactivators|
|US2425845 *||21 Apr 1945||19 Aug 1947||Carbide & Carbon Chem Corp||Mixtures of polyoxyalkylene diols and methods of making such mixtures|
|US2451523 *||30 Jun 1945||19 Oct 1948||Walb Thomas A||Corrosion inhibitor|
|US2451999 *||28 Sep 1944||19 Oct 1948||Du Pont||Hydraulic fluids|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2692860 *||20 Oct 1950||26 Oct 1954||Gulf Research Development Co||Antifreeze compositions|
|US2737497 *||2 Jan 1952||6 Mar 1956||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Non-inflammable hydraulic fluid|
|US2944976 *||19 Mar 1956||12 Jul 1960||Celanese Corp||Functional fluids|
|US2947699 *||14 Sep 1955||2 Aug 1960||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Non-inflammable hydraulic fluid|
|US2965574 *||12 Jul 1956||20 Dec 1960||Texaco Inc||Fire resistant hydraulic fluid|
|US3341456 *||11 Jun 1964||12 Sep 1967||Olin Mathieson||Water-based hydraulic fluid|
|US3763046 *||2 Feb 1971||2 Oct 1973||English Clays Lovering Pochin||Hydraulic fluids|
|US3931089 *||6 Jun 1974||6 Jan 1976||General Mills Chemicals, Inc.||Acid compositions comprised of polymeric 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid as thickener|
|US4389371 *||8 Jul 1981||21 Jun 1983||Basf Wyandotte Corporation||Process for inhibiting the corrosion of aluminum|
|US4452758 *||16 May 1983||5 Jun 1984||Basf Wyandotte Corporation||Compositions and process for inhibiting corrosion of aluminum|
|US4855070 *||16 Sep 1988||8 Aug 1989||Union Carbide Corporation||Energy transmitting fluid|
|US7741259||28 Apr 2006||22 Jun 2010||Enbio Industries, Inc.||Environmentally compatible hydraulic fluid|
|US9695380||2 Jul 2008||4 Jul 2017||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Water-glycol hydraulic fluid compositions|
|US20100197539 *||2 Jul 2008||5 Aug 2010||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Water-glycol hydraulic fluid compositions|
|US20100204075 *||21 Apr 2010||12 Aug 2010||Enbio Industries, Inc.||Environmentally compatible hydraulic fluid|
|EP0025011A1 *||16 Jul 1980||11 Mar 1981||Scheller AG||Fluid heat-carrier preparation, and its use|
|EP1899442A2 *||28 Jun 2006||19 Mar 2008||Enbio Industries, Inc.||Environmentally compatible hydraulic fluid|
|EP1899442A4 *||28 Jun 2006||13 Jan 2010||Enbio Ind Inc||Environmentally compatible hydraulic fluid|
|WO2009012058A3 *||2 Jul 2008||4 Jun 2009||Dow Global Technologies Inc||Water-glycol hydraulic fluid compositions|
|WO2010027707A3 *||21 Aug 2009||17 Jun 2010||Basf Corporation||Hydraulic fluid and method of preventing vapor corrosion|
|U.S. Classification||252/75, 252/79, 252/76, 508/548, 508/547, 252/392, 252/389.62, 252/391, 252/403, 252/402|
|Cooperative Classification||C10M2215/14, C10M2219/10, C10M2207/04, C10N2220/02, C10M2219/104, C10M173/02, C10M2209/084, C10M2209/104, C10M2219/106, C10M2215/06, C10M2215/042, C10N2240/08, C10M2215/04, C10M2201/085, C10M2207/022, C10M2201/02, C10M2215/26, C10M2215/044, C10M2219/102, C10N2250/02|