US20160302933A9 - Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants - Google Patents
Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20160302933A9 US20160302933A9 US11/075,840 US7584005A US2016302933A9 US 20160302933 A9 US20160302933 A9 US 20160302933A9 US 7584005 A US7584005 A US 7584005A US 2016302933 A9 US2016302933 A9 US 2016302933A9
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- bone
- implant body
- implant
- prosthesis
- implantable
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/17—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
- A61B17/1739—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
- A61B17/1757—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body for the spine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/10—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges for stereotaxic surgery, e.g. frame-based stereotaxis
-
- A61F2/39—
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/17—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
- A61B17/1739—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
- A61B17/1764—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body for the knee
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/38—Joints for elbows or knees
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/38—Joints for elbows or knees
- A61F2/3859—Femoral components
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/1662—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body
- A61B17/1671—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body for the spine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/1662—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body
- A61B17/1675—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body for the knee
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B2017/1602—Mills
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2002/30001—Additional features of subject-matter classified in A61F2/28, A61F2/30 and subgroups thereof
- A61F2002/30621—Features concerning the anatomical functioning or articulation of the prosthetic joint
- A61F2002/30649—Ball-and-socket joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/38—Joints for elbows or knees
- A61F2002/3895—Joints for elbows or knees unicompartimental
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2310/00—Prostheses classified in A61F2/28 or A61F2/30 - A61F2/44 being constructed from or coated with a particular material
- A61F2310/00005—The prosthesis being constructed from a particular material
- A61F2310/00011—Metals or alloys
Definitions
- This invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for prosthetic implant devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to prosthetic implants for joints that are conformable, preferably both at the time of implant and over the life of the implant.
- TKA Total knee arthroplasty
- U.S. Publ. Appl. 2003/0028196A1 and the PFC RP Knee Replacement manual provide a good background for the techniques and devices used as part of these arthroplasty procedures.
- the prosthetic implant devices for use in arthroplasty procedures are typically metallic devices or devices that have a combination of metallic and plastic components. Because of the high loads and strains that these devices must endure for years, almost invariably the design of these prosthetic implant devices relies on the rigid structure and durability of the metallic components to support the loads and strains. While the rigid structure and durability of metallic implants is beneficial in most regards, these features make the fit or interface between the metallic implant and the resected bone surface critical to the long term viability of an implant.
- a series of planar and/or curvilinear surfaces, or “resections,” are created to allow for the attachment of prosthetic or other devices to the femur, tibia and/or patella.
- resections planar and/or curvilinear surfaces, or “resections”
- the location and orientation of these resections are critical in that they dictate the final location and orientation of the distal femoral implant.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,906,550 and 4,693,721 describe a porous metallic fabric for use as a medical implant.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,169 describes a porous nickel-titanium metal alloy for use as a medical implant.
- European Publ. Appl. 0 761 242 A1 describes a molded polymer orthopedic implant with a bearing surface formed of a porous metal layer.
- PCT Publ. Appl. WO 02/34310 A2 describes a shape memory polymer material that is used as a connective tissue replacement material for orthopedic applications.
- the present invention is a biomechanical optimization (BMO) prosthetic implant that utilizes a thin cross-section of metallic material that is conformable.
- BMO prosthetic implant is conformable both at the time of implant in response to manipulation and fixation by the surgeon, as well as during the life of the implant in response to stresses and loads experienced by the implant and thereby communicated and responded to by living bone tissue.
- the BMO prosthetic implant will have an effective cross-sectional thickness of 3 mm or less.
- the BMO prosthetic implant is provided with one or more fins extending from the fixation surface(s) of the implant which preferably includes retaining structures, such as cross-pinned apertures or T-shaped edge ridge.
- the BMO Prosthetic implant is a composite of porous metal or ‘Trabecular Metal’ bone interface features joined to a thin layer of articular surface material such as cobalt chrome or titanium.
- This embodiment of the present invention is particularly advantageous as much of the literature available on both ActiporeTM (a porous nitinol, which forms a TiNi intermetallic molecule marketed by Biorthex, Inc.) and Trabecular Metal (chemical vapor deposition of tantalum on a porous carbon matrix manufactured by Implex, Inc. and distributed by Zimmer, Inc.) cites that the modulus of elasticity or stiffness of these materials is similar to that of living bone.
- the composite structure of the present invention creates an interfacial mechanical environment motivating a highly favorable biological response from the living bone while the articular surface of the present invention will providing for excellent articular function.
- this embodiment of the present invention may allow for the prosthesis, for example, a femoral or tibial component for use in knee replacement, to have a linear or curvilinear fixation profile of flexible porous material that is substantially thicker (at least 10% thicker, and in one preferred embodiment closer to 500% thicker) than the thickness of the composite articular surface, for intraoperative attachment to condylar cuts having a linear cutting profile of sufficient interfacial area to avoid subsidence of the implant into bone leading to failure.
- This embodiment can significantly improve the arthroplasty continuum of care for a given patient, as surgeons performing revision procedures will commonly remove necrotic tissue to a depth sufficient to reveal bleeding bone prior to implantation of the revision prostheses.
- porous metals are capable of accommodating healthy living bone within their interstices, this ensures that this embodiment of the present invention will require a minimum of bony material removal both intraoperatively during primary intervention and intraoperatively during revision intervention.
- Another alternate embodiment would further have the fin and/or keel and/or crosspin be constructed of such porous material.
- the present invention provides for embodiments of prosthetic implant designs facilitating intraoperative and postoperative efficacy and ease of use.
- the present invention utilizes a number of embodiments of prosthetic implants, or prosthetic implant features to facilitate clinical efficacy of arthroplasty procedures.
- the overriding objects of the embodiments are to facilitate short and long term fixation of the implant with respect to the bone, enable bone preservation to facilitate ease and efficacy of revision, and/or to take advantage of the natural physiological phenomenon determining bone growth response to load stimuli.
- science is beginning to understand the manner in which bone responds to mechanical stimuli to an extent that allows for at least first order prediction of the clinical performance of prosthetic implants attached to bone.
- Certain theories regarding bone response to prosthetic implant load transfer to bone are postulated herein and prosthetic implant design embodiments proposed to take advantage of these biomechanical characteristics in facilitating clinical performance are disclosed.
- FIGS. 32-34 and 98-127 show various depictions of embodiments and methods in accordance with alternate embodiments of the present invention.
- the cut surface created by the cutting tool are shown as having already been completed for the sake of clarity.
- the bones may be shown as being transparent or translucent for the sake of clarity.
- the guides/pins, cutting tool, bones, and other items disclosed are may be similarly represented for the sake of clarity or brevity.
- FIGS. 99 through 127 generally represent prosthesis and prosthesis fixation feature embodiments of the present invention.
- FIGS. 99 through 102 show representations of a tongue in groove fixation feature applied to a Unicondylar femoral component enabling anterior insertion of one tongue element into a ‘t-slot’ style groove formed in bone and a progressively increasing press fit obtained by forcing the implant posteriorly, as is represented in comparing FIGS. 99 and 100 .
- the t-slot feature, or groove, formed in the femur is easily formed by, in one embodiment, providing a trial component possessing a contoured groove and slot for guiding a t-slot cutter along its length.
- Such a contour groove would be responsible for controlling the depth of the t-slot in the bone with respect to the cut surface to which the implant fixation surface is attached, while the slot in the trial would dictate the mediolateral location of the t-slot style groove. It is preferable to include an aperture in the slot and/or contour groove in the trial component to allow for insertion and plunging of the wider T cutting surfaces prior to sweeping.
- FIGS. 103 through 112 represent combinations of finned and/or crosspinned implants.
- the AP Fin Profile of the fin may be linear as shown in FIG. 106 (in other words, the fin may be may be planar), or it could be slightly tapered to achieve an interference fit with the walls of the groove as the implant fixation surfaces are forced into contact with the cut surfaces to which they are mated (see FIGS. 107 through 109 ), or in could be curved as looked at from the viewpoint of FIG. 106 to further provide stability of fixation.
- the fixation aperture created to fix a cutting guide to the bone could be utilized to cross pin a flange or fin of a femoral prosthesis.
- a tapered pin is used to engage the cross pin hole in the fin of the prosthesis.
- the tapered pin may be utilized to facilitate a resulting press fit between the pin and the fixation surfaces of the implant and/or ease of introducing the pin into the hole in the fin.
- the pin could be of any known material, but resorbable materials are especially interesting as they are ‘consumed’ by the body leaving minimal hardware within the body after a fairly predictable amount of time has passed.
- PLA/PGA compositions, Tricalcium Phosphate, allograft and autograft bone, bone substitutes, and the aforementioned slurry type compositions may serve well. Additionally, as the apertures shown in FIG.
- a very thin walled coring saw can be used to create the aperture and simultaneously form the crosspin that will be used to facilitate fixation of the implant.
- bone cement or other liquid or semi-liquid material may be injected into the portals/apertures to achieve intimate interdigitation, and the crosspins optionally inserted thereafter, but prior to complete hardening or curing.
- the crosspin(s) could be hollow with radially extending holes allowing the pins to be inserted and then have bone cement injected into them and up under the implant.
- the cross pin could be threaded to engage threads in the fin, or to engage the bone (both for short term stability and to facilitate removal) or both.
- the crosspin(s) could be formed of bone cement for use in cemented procedures.
- apertures may be present in the implant about more medial or lateral locations that allow the crosspins to mate with said apertures to create the aforementioned intimate fit or conformability in either or both of the ML and AP directions.
- the condylar sections, and patellofemoral sections of the implant could be wholely separate, modularly joined, be composed of a dual condylar prosthesis and separate patellofemoral prosthesis, or any combination of the above as generally indicated in FIGS. 120 through 127 .
- FIGS. 107 through 112 demonstrate another embodiment of the present invention allowing for benefits well above and beyond those of the prior art.
- This will be referred to herein as a BMO Prosthesis or BMO Cortical type implant (Biomechanical Optimization Prosthesis).
- This embodiment has several applications. For instance, if the resected surfaces will to vary significantly from the fixation surface geometries, as may be seen in unguided kinematic resection, it may be advantageous to implement fixation surface geometries that can conform to variation in resection geometry. Most implant materials in joint replacement are thought of as being rigid, and that their rigidity is a desirable characteristic for achieving stable fixation. In the case of surface replacement, that is not necessarily the case.
- the construct or prosthesis resulting from applying the present invention to a femoral component in Unicondylar knee replacement may start out being a 1′′ wide be 3′′ long strip of 1.5 mm thick material curved in a manner to generally look like the curved cutting path and curved cutting profile of a natural, healthy femur.
- a process such as Tecotex from Viasys Healthcare of Wilmington, Mass. is used to remove material from the strip down to a nominal thickness of perhaps 0.1 mm thick while leaving multiple protruding ‘hooks’ (almost like the hook and eye concept of Velcro) emerging from the thin fixation surface to engage the bone.
- One or more fins can be attached or be made a continuous part of this construct as shown in FIG. 107 .
- the anterior most cross pin could lock that portion of the prosthesis in place, then the prosthesis could be wrapped around the remaining, more posteriorly resected surfaces and the posterior cross pin inserted (see FIG. 111 ).
- the fins can be located about the periphery of the articular surfaces of the condyle in the form of tabs and the cross pins or screws or tapered dowels, etc. known in the art inserted through holes in the tabs and into bone to fix the cortical implant. The combination of fins and tabs may also be useful.
- the flexibility of the implant in accordance with the present invention allows the implant to conform to the resection surface and the stability of the crosspin fixation would assist in reducing interfacial micromotion known to inhibit bone ingrowth and fixation (this concept could be used with PMMA, but it is also desirable to avoid the tissue necrosis and bone preservation for revision issues associated with the use of bone cement if the patients health/comorbidities/indications allow).
- This kind of implant has some very interesting clinical benefits beyond simple bone preservation.
- BMO The concept of BMO depends on the concept that not only do human bones and articular surfaces in healthy patients seek uniform stresses in bearing, but that bone continues to seek this uniform state despite the pathologies of osteoarthritis. If an implant design is properly designed to allow for localized load transfer to underlying living bone, given that bone will seek an ideal, uniform stress state, it is believed that the bone will adapt its geometry and shape as per the loading it experiences and thus change the shape of the articular surfaces of the BMO implant to reflect ideal or uniform contact stress bearing between the implant articular surfaces.
- Another interesting embodiment of the present invention is to make both opposing implants BMO Cortical type implants and allow the bone to modify the geometry of both to reach an ideal ‘state’ for that patient (utilizing Liquid Metal as a metal on metal bearing in this scenario could yield phenomenal results not to mention unheard of bone preservation).
- the primary objectives of this embodiment of the present invention are to preserve viable bone, to increase prosthesis survival durations, to promote optimal joint kinematics, load transfer, articulation contact areas, and patient satisfaction, reduce intraoperative trauma and patient recovery time, reduce or eliminate proprioceptive compromise, reduce intraoperative time, and generally make the art of joint arthroplasty cheaper, better, and faster in all ways.
- BMO Cortical type prostheses would enable a given patient who, at younger than normal ages, experiences the debilitating or crippling effects of Osteoarthritis or Post-Traumatic arthritis to be able to be treated by arthroplasty over a period of decades, and a series of revisions that is simply not attainable today given the monolithic nature of conventional implants.
- bone morphogenic proteins bone graft, or other means of promoting or accelerating healing, fixation, and/or ingrowth of devices derived from this concept could be beneficial.
- application of these inventions to all joint arthroplasty procedures including TKA, hip, ankle, metatarsul, metacarpal, wrist, spine, elbow, shoulder, mandible, or finger or any other joint or bone or bone feature identified in Gray's Anatomy or effected in the aforementioned procedures is likely to provide significant clinical and economic benefit.
- Implantation of these devices could also be performed via standard surgical approaches or more exotic methods in the art including arthroscopic means or by what has been described as the Transosseous Core approach in the patent literature.
- the process of ‘packing’ the bone could be affected by simply reducing the joint and allowing the compression across the joint to pack the bone, by injection of osteoslurries into the interfacial area after placement of the implant, or by other currently known methods or those methods to be discovered.
- the work of Frost, et al and Lanyon, et al may also have identified several of the characteristics needed for successful replication of bone mechanics. Specifically, it has been identified that living bone tissue experiencing strain states between 50 microstrain to 4,000 microstrain achieves steady state growth balancing out consumption of bone by osteoclast activity and creation of new bone by osteoblast activities.
- FIGS. 113 through 115 are an embodiment of the present invention that may prove to be a very usefully alternative to conventional rectilinear based referencing techniques.
- conventional alignment techniques once having established appropriate flexion extension angulation and varus valgus angulation of desired implant location, reference the anterior cortex, distal most femoral condylar surface, and posterior most condylar surface (indicated in FIG.
- the embodiment of the present invention is an alternative alignment technique with an object to overcome the errors inherent in prior art. As shown in FIG.
- the femur possesses two distinct kinematic features and functions that lend themselves to physical referencing; the patellofemoral articular surface and the tibiofemoral articular surfaces, both of which are curved, more specifically these surfaces represent logarithmic curves.
- the one codependency between the two articular functions, and therefore any geometric approximation made of them in referencing, is that they must allow for smooth kinematically appropriate articulation of the patella as it passes from its articulation with the trochlear groove (shown in blue in FIG. 115 ) to its articulation with intercondylar surfaces between the femoral condyles (shown in red in FIG. 115 ).
- a referencing device which contacts at least one femoral condyle at three points to determine both an approximation of arc radius and centerpoint location, while independently or simultaneously referencing the trochlear groove at three points to determine both an approximation of arc radius and centerpoint location.
- the referencing system would further need to provide for the need of the articular surfaces of the trochlear articular surfaces to smoothly transition to those of the intercondylar surfaces.
- This embodiment of the present invention is especially useful in determining the proper location, orientation, and implant size for the modular tricompartment components shown in FIGS. 120 through 124 , the non-modular implants shown in FIGS. 125 through 127 , and standard implants where the appropriate size, location, and orientation would be determined by that which best mimics existing articular bone surfaces thus resulting in optimal postoperative kinematic function.
- FIG. 123 represents one method of fixing the patellofemoral implant with respect to the condylar implant(s) so as to maintain smooth transitional articulation.
- this crosspin method of interconnecting the separate components could be augmented by tongue and groove interlocking between the medial side of the condylar component shown and the lateral side of the patellofemoral component shown. What is critical is that the transition between the patellofemoral component and the condylar component surfaces responsible for patellofemoral articulation are and remain tangent at least one point.
- FIGS. 32 through 34 An implant design embodying fixation geometries for mating with such tibial cut surfaces as are shown in FIGS. 32 through 34 is highly desirable.
- the fixation surfaces would be intended to mate, directly or indirectly, with cut surfaces represented in FIG. 33 and/or 34 (the tibia in the right side of the FIG. 34 ).
- the tibial implant would possess a planar or gently curvilinear ‘rim’ for contacting the ‘cortical skim cut’ surface (represented in FIG. 32 ), and convex fixation surfaces for direct or indirect fixation to the concave tibial cuts represented in FIGS. 33 and 34 .
- Direct fixation to such surfaces could be achieved by high precision resection of both the cortical rim, for attachment of the rim of the tibial prosthesis, and the concave surface(s), for intimate apposition to the convex implant surfaces.
- Such fixation, specifically of the concave bone cuts to the convex implant surfaces could be achieved by way of an interference fit between the cuts and the implant along one axis (for instance, a front to back—AP—axis or direction), or along two axes (for instance, AP and Side to Side—ML—axes), or circumferentially (in other words a bit like a pin of a given diameter being forced into a hole of a lesser diameter), or both circumferentially and along an axis at roughly a 90 degree angle or normal to the skim cut surface when viewed in one or two orthogonal planes (an “up and down axis” or superior-inferior or proximal distal direction).
- an interference fit in a roughly superior-inferior direction may call for a textured surface on the bottom most surface of the convex fixation surfaces presenting a small surface area of contact at initial contact with the bottom of the concave cut to allow the implant to compact a reduced area of cancellous bone as the implant is impacted in a superior to inferior direction until it reaches its desired superior-inferior location and/or contact between the rim of the implant and the skim cut of the cortices.
- these embodiments of the present invention yield superior stability of implant fixation to bone to an extent pronounced of the difference between riding a horse wearing a deeply dished saddle and riding a very sweaty horse bareback.
- concave surface may be ‘excavated’ in any desired manner (such as the Cutting Trials shown in FIG.
- This form is beneficially shaped in a manner related to the shape of the convex implant fixation surface shape so as to create a specific geometric relationship between the implant fixation surfaces and the Impacted Surface geometry.
- the fit between the implant and the Impacted Surface would be an interference fit or press fit.
- the fit would leave a significant gap, perhaps 0.2 mm to 4.0 mm in width, between portions or all of the convex fixation surfaces of the implant and the convex cut(s), into which bone cement or other substance would then be injected or impacted achieving interdigitation with both the surfaces of the prosthesis and the material of the Impacted Surface.
- such a method prevents excessive micromotion or strain at the interface between the implant (and/or the composite interface) and living tissue during the postoperative healing process, which, in essence, gives the bone a chance to further stabilize its fixation to the implant by way of bone modeling or remodeling in response to load transfer.
- it is highly beneficial to maintain the strain state within living bone at and/or beneath and/or in the general vicinity of the bone implant interface within a range of 50 microstrain to 4000 microstrain so as to elicit the formation of bone tissue at and around the interface—strain levels in excess of 4000 microstrain or less than 50 microstrain are very likely to elicit the formation of fibrocartilagenous tissues at the interface which may lead to aseptic loosening of the implant.
- a small hole located at or beneath the skim cut allows for the injection of the material beneath the implant to achieve intimate and controlled interdigitation.
- the implant could be seated ‘over’ the freshly cut concave surfaces, and a slurry of biologically active and/or mechanically robust material(s) injected into the gaps between the implant and the bone under controlled pressure. Injection could be achieved via the portal shown in FIG. 34 .
- a slurry may comprise a mixture of substances such as morselized patient bone and bone cement, but alternative or additional materials including bone substitutes, osteobiologicals such as bone morphogenic proteins, antibiotics, or even living cells such as T cells known to promote post-operative healing and long term implant fixation.
- a fin feature may be added to these embodiments to facilitate additional mechanical stability, and said stem feature could beneficially possess an aperture for cross-pin fixation as described below for use in conjunction with the cross pins represented in FIG. 111 .
- the location and geometry of the concave tibial cut allows for the use of a bearing insert (conventionally made of materials such as polyethylene or other materials capable of ‘whetting’ or mimicking the benefits of ‘whetting’ during bearing contact; mimicking constituting, in one embodiment, the absence or mitigation of wear debris generation despite the application of significant bearing forces, in TKA in excess of 200 lbs and often as much as 500 lbs or more) whose ‘underside’ is convexly shaped to mate with a concavely shaped mating or accommodating surface in the upper surface of the tibial implant or ‘baseplate’ as it is sometimes referred to.
- tibial insert(s) whose thickness, in the areas beneath where the femoral implant bears against the tibial insert, may be equal to or greater than those insert thicknesses used in the past (those associated with predominantly planar tibial cuts) while require removal of significantly less structurally viable bone from the cortical rim of the proximal tibia than past efforts. Determination of the geometry and location of the baseplate's concave surface and therefore the areas of greatest insert or bearing surface are easily determined by analysis of the wear patterns of retrieved tibial inserts.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,631, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONFORMABLE PROSTHETIC IMPLANTS,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,080, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PIVOTABLE GUIDE SURFACES FOR ARTHROPLASTY,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,078, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE RESECTION,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,096, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCED RETENTION OF PROSTHETIC IMPLANTS,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,307, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED CUTTING TOOLS FOR RESECTION,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,262, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED DRILLING AND MILLING TOOLS FOR RESECTION,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,160, filed Mar. 8, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED PROFILE BASED RESECTION,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/036,584, filed Jan. 14, 2005, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PINPLASTY BONE RESECTION,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/536,320, filed Jan. 14, 2004, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/049,634, filed Feb. 3, 2005, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR WIREPLASTY BONE RESECTION,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/540,992, filed Feb. 2, 2004, entitled, “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR WIREPLASTY BONE RESECTION,” the entire disclosures of which are hereby fully incorporated by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for prosthetic implant devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to prosthetic implants for joints that are conformable, preferably both at the time of implant and over the life of the implant.
- 2. Background Art
- The replacement or augmentation of joints with artificial or prosthetic implants is well known in the field of orthopedics. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures involving the replacement of the knee joint are a good example. U.S. Publ. Appl. 2003/0028196A1 and the PFC RP Knee Replacement manual provide a good background for the techniques and devices used as part of these arthroplasty procedures.
- The prosthetic implant devices for use in arthroplasty procedures are typically metallic devices or devices that have a combination of metallic and plastic components. Because of the high loads and strains that these devices must endure for years, almost invariably the design of these prosthetic implant devices relies on the rigid structure and durability of the metallic components to support the loads and strains. While the rigid structure and durability of metallic implants is beneficial in most regards, these features make the fit or interface between the metallic implant and the resected bone surface critical to the long term viability of an implant.
- In total knee replacements, for example, a series of planar and/or curvilinear surfaces, or “resections,” are created to allow for the attachment of prosthetic or other devices to the femur, tibia and/or patella. In the case of the femur, it is common to use the central axis of the femur, the posterior and distal femoral condyles, and/or the anterior distal femoral cortex as guides to determine the location and orientation of distal femoral resections. The location and orientation of these resections are critical in that they dictate the final location and orientation of the distal femoral implant. It is commonly thought that the location and orientation of the distal femoral implant are critical factors in the success or failure of the artificial knee joint. Additionally, with any surgical procedure, time is critical, and methods and apparatus that can save operating room time, are valuable. Past efforts have not been successful in consistently and/or properly locating and orienting distal femoral resections in a quick and efficient manner.
- Over the years, alternatives to metallic prosthetic implants have been proposed. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,906,550 and 4,693,721 describe a porous metallic fabric for use as a medical implant. U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,169 describes a porous nickel-titanium metal alloy for use as a medical implant. European Publ. Appl. 0 761 242 A1 describes a molded polymer orthopedic implant with a bearing surface formed of a porous metal layer. PCT Publ. Appl. WO 02/34310 A2 describes a shape memory polymer material that is used as a connective tissue replacement material for orthopedic applications. These alternatives have met with little success or acceptance in the orthopedic implant field.
- It would be desirable to provide for an orthopedic prosthetic implant that could be implanted more consistently and effectively, yet provided or exceeded the ideal long term wear and stability of current rigid metallic implants.
- The present invention is a biomechanical optimization (BMO) prosthetic implant that utilizes a thin cross-section of metallic material that is conformable. Preferably, the BMO prosthetic implant is conformable both at the time of implant in response to manipulation and fixation by the surgeon, as well as during the life of the implant in response to stresses and loads experienced by the implant and thereby communicated and responded to by living bone tissue. For most metallic alloys, the BMO prosthetic implant will have an effective cross-sectional thickness of 3 mm or less. In one embodiment, the BMO prosthetic implant is provided with one or more fins extending from the fixation surface(s) of the implant which preferably includes retaining structures, such as cross-pinned apertures or T-shaped edge ridge.
- In another embodiment of the present invention, the BMO Prosthetic implant is a composite of porous metal or ‘Trabecular Metal’ bone interface features joined to a thin layer of articular surface material such as cobalt chrome or titanium. This embodiment of the present invention is particularly advantageous as much of the literature available on both Actipore™ (a porous nitinol, which forms a TiNi intermetallic molecule marketed by Biorthex, Inc.) and Trabecular Metal (chemical vapor deposition of tantalum on a porous carbon matrix manufactured by Implex, Inc. and distributed by Zimmer, Inc.) cites that the modulus of elasticity or stiffness of these materials is similar to that of living bone. As a result, the composite structure of the present invention creates an interfacial mechanical environment motivating a highly favorable biological response from the living bone while the articular surface of the present invention will providing for excellent articular function.
- Additionally, this embodiment of the present invention may allow for the prosthesis, for example, a femoral or tibial component for use in knee replacement, to have a linear or curvilinear fixation profile of flexible porous material that is substantially thicker (at least 10% thicker, and in one preferred embodiment closer to 500% thicker) than the thickness of the composite articular surface, for intraoperative attachment to condylar cuts having a linear cutting profile of sufficient interfacial area to avoid subsidence of the implant into bone leading to failure. This embodiment can significantly improve the arthroplasty continuum of care for a given patient, as surgeons performing revision procedures will commonly remove necrotic tissue to a depth sufficient to reveal bleeding bone prior to implantation of the revision prostheses. Because these porous metals are capable of accommodating healthy living bone within their interstices, this ensures that this embodiment of the present invention will require a minimum of bony material removal both intraoperatively during primary intervention and intraoperatively during revision intervention. Another alternate embodiment would further have the fin and/or keel and/or crosspin be constructed of such porous material.
- The present invention provides for embodiments of prosthetic implant designs facilitating intraoperative and postoperative efficacy and ease of use. The present invention utilizes a number of embodiments of prosthetic implants, or prosthetic implant features to facilitate clinical efficacy of arthroplasty procedures. The overriding objects of the embodiments are to facilitate short and long term fixation of the implant with respect to the bone, enable bone preservation to facilitate ease and efficacy of revision, and/or to take advantage of the natural physiological phenomenon determining bone growth response to load stimuli. Specifically, science is beginning to understand the manner in which bone responds to mechanical stimuli to an extent that allows for at least first order prediction of the clinical performance of prosthetic implants attached to bone. Certain theories regarding bone response to prosthetic implant load transfer to bone are postulated herein and prosthetic implant design embodiments proposed to take advantage of these biomechanical characteristics in facilitating clinical performance are disclosed.
- It should be clear that applications of the present invention is not limited to Total Knee Arthroplasty or the other specific applications cited herein, but are rather universally applicable to any form of surgical intervention where the resection of bone is required. These possible applications include, but are not limited to Unicondylar Knee Replacement, Hip Arthroplasty, Ankle Arthroplasty, Spinal Fusion, Osteotomy Procedures (such as High Tibial Osteotomy), ACL or PCL reconstruction, and many others. In essence, any application where an expense, accuracy, precision, soft tissue protection or preservation, minimal incision size or exposure are required or desired for a bone resection and/or prosthetic implantation is a potential application for this technology. In addition, many of the embodiments shown have unique applicability to minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures and/or for use in conjunction with Surgical Navigation, Image Guided Surgery, or Computer Aided Surgery systems.
- Other important objects and features of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the invention taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
-
FIGS. 32-34 and 98-127 show various depictions of embodiments and methods in accordance with alternate embodiments of the present invention. - It should be noted that, in many of the figures, the cut surface created by the cutting tool are shown as having already been completed for the sake of clarity. Similarly, the bones may be shown as being transparent or translucent for the sake of clarity. The guides/pins, cutting tool, bones, and other items disclosed are may be similarly represented for the sake of clarity or brevity.
-
FIGS. 99 through 127 FIGS. 99 through 127 generally represent prosthesis and prosthesis fixation feature embodiments of the present invention. -
FIGS. 99 through 102 show representations of a tongue in groove fixation feature applied to a Unicondylar femoral component enabling anterior insertion of one tongue element into a ‘t-slot’ style groove formed in bone and a progressively increasing press fit obtained by forcing the implant posteriorly, as is represented in comparingFIGS. 99 and 100 . The t-slot feature, or groove, formed in the femur is easily formed by, in one embodiment, providing a trial component possessing a contoured groove and slot for guiding a t-slot cutter along its length. Such a contour groove would be responsible for controlling the depth of the t-slot in the bone with respect to the cut surface to which the implant fixation surface is attached, while the slot in the trial would dictate the mediolateral location of the t-slot style groove. It is preferable to include an aperture in the slot and/or contour groove in the trial component to allow for insertion and plunging of the wider T cutting surfaces prior to sweeping. - Alternatively,
FIGS. 103 through 112 represent combinations of finned and/or crosspinned implants. It should be noted that the AP Fin Profile of the fin may be linear as shown inFIG. 106 (in other words, the fin may be may be planar), or it could be slightly tapered to achieve an interference fit with the walls of the groove as the implant fixation surfaces are forced into contact with the cut surfaces to which they are mated (seeFIGS. 107 through 109 ), or in could be curved as looked at from the viewpoint ofFIG. 106 to further provide stability of fixation. Interestingly, the fixation aperture created to fix a cutting guide to the bone could be utilized to cross pin a flange or fin of a femoral prosthesis. It should be noted that although the embodiment shown is a Unicondylar femoral prosthesis, this concept could be applied to tibial, femoral, or patellofemoral prostheses in any application, or in other joint, trauma, spine, or oncology procedures, as is generally represented inFIGS. 120 through 127 . - In
FIGS. 105 through 112 , a tapered pin is used to engage the cross pin hole in the fin of the prosthesis. The tapered pin may be utilized to facilitate a resulting press fit between the pin and the fixation surfaces of the implant and/or ease of introducing the pin into the hole in the fin. The pin could be of any known material, but resorbable materials are especially interesting as they are ‘consumed’ by the body leaving minimal hardware within the body after a fairly predictable amount of time has passed. PLA/PGA compositions, Tricalcium Phosphate, allograft and autograft bone, bone substitutes, and the aforementioned slurry type compositions may serve well. Additionally, as the apertures shown inFIG. 109 resides close to the natural articular surface and extends through cortical and very robust dense subcondylar bone, a very thin walled coring saw can be used to create the aperture and simultaneously form the crosspin that will be used to facilitate fixation of the implant. Alternatively, bone cement or other liquid or semi-liquid material may be injected into the portals/apertures to achieve intimate interdigitation, and the crosspins optionally inserted thereafter, but prior to complete hardening or curing. Alternatively, the crosspin(s) could be hollow with radially extending holes allowing the pins to be inserted and then have bone cement injected into them and up under the implant. Alternatively, the cross pin could be threaded to engage threads in the fin, or to engage the bone (both for short term stability and to facilitate removal) or both. Alternatively, the crosspin(s) could be formed of bone cement for use in cemented procedures. - These embodiments hold significant promise in both providing for intraoperatively stable cemented or cementless fixation as well as facilitating long term biological ingrowth. It should be noted that the use of multiple holes, pins, and apertures in the prosthesis could be used and that the holes in the bone need not be fixation holes to which guides are attached. It also should be noted that such crosspins used in conjunction with the mating features of the present invention will act to cause the prosthesis to conform to the bone surface about the fixation path of the prosthesis (i.e.; in an anterioposterior direction along the implant fixation surface), but that it may leave something to be desired in its ability to induce similar conformity of implant bone interfaces along the fixation profile of the prosthesis. For clinical applications of embodiments of the present invention where this is a factor, apertures may be present in the implant about more medial or lateral locations that allow the crosspins to mate with said apertures to create the aforementioned intimate fit or conformability in either or both of the ML and AP directions. Also it should be noted the condylar sections, and patellofemoral sections of the implant could be wholely separate, modularly joined, be composed of a dual condylar prosthesis and separate patellofemoral prosthesis, or any combination of the above as generally indicated in
FIGS. 120 through 127 . Although the bone/implant interface shown is curved in two planes, these concepts apply to implants with 3 planar curved geometry (where the cutting path and cutting profiles of the resected surface geometry and therefore the fixation surface geometry do not remain in two planes through the entirety of the cutting path, or where the cutting path is contained within multiple or single curved surfaces), entirely planar geometries, or anything in between. -
FIGS. 107 through 112 demonstrate another embodiment of the present invention allowing for benefits well above and beyond those of the prior art. This will be referred to herein as a BMO Prosthesis or BMO Cortical type implant (Biomechanical Optimization Prosthesis). This embodiment has several applications. For instance, if the resected surfaces will to vary significantly from the fixation surface geometries, as may be seen in unguided kinematic resection, it may be advantageous to implement fixation surface geometries that can conform to variation in resection geometry. Most implant materials in joint replacement are thought of as being rigid, and that their rigidity is a desirable characteristic for achieving stable fixation. In the case of surface replacement, that is not necessarily the case. Anecdotally, picture a bar of aluminum 2 inches square and 5 inches long—now picture trying to manually bend it. At these dimensions, aluminum is rigid; however, it is obvious that aluminum foil is not so rigid. The point to this is that very thin (less than 3 mm thick, probably closer to a range of 1.5 to 0.01 mm thick) sections of many metals, including implant grade metals and alloys cobalt chrome, titanium, zirconium, and liquid metal, can be processed into very thin forms capable of conforming to variations in the resected surface and yet still have bearing surfaces that are highly polished and provide significant contact area, where desirable, for bearing against the bearing or articular surfaces of the opposing implant. The construct or prosthesis resulting from applying the present invention to a femoral component in Unicondylar knee replacement, for example, may start out being a 1″ wide be 3″ long strip of 1.5 mm thick material curved in a manner to generally look like the curved cutting path and curved cutting profile of a natural, healthy femur. A process such as Tecotex from Viasys Healthcare of Wilmington, Mass. is used to remove material from the strip down to a nominal thickness of perhaps 0.1 mm thick while leaving multiple protruding ‘hooks’ (almost like the hook and eye concept of Velcro) emerging from the thin fixation surface to engage the bone. One or more fins can be attached or be made a continuous part of this construct as shown inFIG. 107 . During insertion, the anterior most cross pin could lock that portion of the prosthesis in place, then the prosthesis could be wrapped around the remaining, more posteriorly resected surfaces and the posterior cross pin inserted (seeFIG. 111 ). Alternatively, the fins can be located about the periphery of the articular surfaces of the condyle in the form of tabs and the cross pins or screws or tapered dowels, etc. known in the art inserted through holes in the tabs and into bone to fix the cortical implant. The combination of fins and tabs may also be useful. In using the tabs it is critical to keep all features of the implanted device ultralow profile to avoid irritating the surrounding soft tissues (perhaps creating recesses in the bone underlying the tabs would be desirable to allow for a form of countersinking of the tabs and/or the pins or screws or other fixation devices). - The flexibility of the implant in accordance with the present invention allows the implant to conform to the resection surface and the stability of the crosspin fixation would assist in reducing interfacial micromotion known to inhibit bone ingrowth and fixation (this concept could be used with PMMA, but it is also desirable to avoid the tissue necrosis and bone preservation for revision issues associated with the use of bone cement if the patients health/comorbidities/indications allow). This kind of implant has some very interesting clinical benefits beyond simple bone preservation. Given how well this kind of conformable implant impart load to underlying bone, thus avoiding stress shielding, it is possible not only to promote healthy bone ingrowth into and around the interfacial features, but the bearing contact and strains/stresses imparted to the bone could motivate the bone to change its shape (and therefore the shape of the conformable implant also changes over time because of the flexibility) to ideally conform to the tibial component bearing surface such that bearing stresses are carried through the broadest desirable contact area (just like modeling/remodeling in a healthy unmodified joint).
- The manner in which bone may be motivated to change shape needs to be explained in more detail and is derived from extrapolations of Wolff's Law. One of the modern interpretations of Wolff's Law is that bone ‘seeks’ a uniform stress state under load through the addition or subtraction of bone material and/or changes in density of bony material. In considering Mattheck's “Axiom Uniform Stress” (“Design in Nature—Learning from Trees” published by Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, N.Y., copyright 1998. Mattheck's publications are included herein by reference) which may be paraphrased as “the ideal shape of a given mechanical component is that which results in the component experiencing uniform external stresses during use”. Mattheck further provided empirical evidence that the external shape of human and animal bones (and even things like tiger claws and tree limbs) reflect this ‘design paradigm’ in nature.
- The concept of BMO depends on the concept that not only do human bones and articular surfaces in healthy patients seek uniform stresses in bearing, but that bone continues to seek this uniform state despite the pathologies of osteoarthritis. If an implant design is properly designed to allow for localized load transfer to underlying living bone, given that bone will seek an ideal, uniform stress state, it is believed that the bone will adapt its geometry and shape as per the loading it experiences and thus change the shape of the articular surfaces of the BMO implant to reflect ideal or uniform contact stress bearing between the implant articular surfaces. This change in articular geometry would be based on the kinematics of that particular patient's knee joint and the geometry of the articulating surface of the opposing tibial implant (whether it be UHMWPE or any other bearing material) and thereby the stress experienced by living tissues resulting in ideal tibiofemoral articular constraint and conformity. It is believed this biomechanical optimization of articular geometry would yield ideal tibiofemoral contact area and kinematics that are tuned to an individual patient in a manner which standard rigid implants could not hope to match. The debate over what ideal tibiofemoral and patellofemoral prosthesis articular geometries should be has been the topic of heated debate for decades with no clear winner or universally accepted scientific model. The present invention avoids this debate by allowing Mother Nature to cast her vote.
- Another interesting embodiment of the present invention is to make both opposing implants BMO Cortical type implants and allow the bone to modify the geometry of both to reach an ideal ‘state’ for that patient (utilizing Liquid Metal as a metal on metal bearing in this scenario could yield phenomenal results not to mention unheard of bone preservation). The primary objectives of this embodiment of the present invention are to preserve viable bone, to increase prosthesis survival durations, to promote optimal joint kinematics, load transfer, articulation contact areas, and patient satisfaction, reduce intraoperative trauma and patient recovery time, reduce or eliminate proprioceptive compromise, reduce intraoperative time, and generally make the art of joint arthroplasty cheaper, better, and faster in all ways. Further, and perhaps most importantly, the ability to preserve bone to the extent made possible by BMO Cortical type prostheses would enable a given patient who, at younger than normal ages, experiences the debilitating or crippling effects of Osteoarthritis or Post-Traumatic arthritis to be able to be treated by arthroplasty over a period of decades, and a series of revisions that is simply not attainable today given the monolithic nature of conventional implants.
- The use of bone morphogenic proteins, bone graft, or other means of promoting or accelerating healing, fixation, and/or ingrowth of devices derived from this concept could be beneficial. Also, application of these inventions to all joint arthroplasty procedures including TKA, hip, ankle, metatarsul, metacarpal, wrist, spine, elbow, shoulder, mandible, or finger or any other joint or bone or bone feature identified in Gray's Anatomy or effected in the aforementioned procedures is likely to provide significant clinical and economic benefit. Implantation of these devices could also be performed via standard surgical approaches or more exotic methods in the art including arthroscopic means or by what has been described as the Transosseous Core approach in the patent literature. Given that properly compacted morselized cancellous bone graft approaches 80% of the Modulus of Elasticity of cortical bone (in compression as per the work of Bonutti, et al), this impaction of graft could actually lend some initial rigidity to the implant. Actually, blood loss from bone surfaces into the joint space has been referred to as problematic in press fit knees, and packing morselized bone graft into living bone and the implant at the bone/implant interface could act as an effective form of tamponade. The process of ‘packing’ the bone could be affected by simply reducing the joint and allowing the compression across the joint to pack the bone, by injection of osteoslurries into the interfacial area after placement of the implant, or by other currently known methods or those methods to be discovered.
- The work of Frost, et al and Lanyon, et al may also have identified several of the characteristics needed for successful replication of bone mechanics. Specifically, it has been identified that living bone tissue experiencing strain states between 50 microstrain to 4,000 microstrain achieves steady state growth balancing out consumption of bone by osteoclast activity and creation of new bone by osteoblast activities. As this strain range is effective in maintaining living tissue, it is likely very beneficial to assume that the healing of interfacial tissues in the postoperative recovery and recuperation periods would be facilitated by ensuring that the fixation apparatus and methods of the present invention be implemented in a manner that maintains the healing interfacial tissues within the aforementioned strain range to facilitate healing and ingrowth of living tissue into the bone-implant interface and avoid the formation of fibrocartilageneous tissue associated with excessive micromotion at this interface (which is known to lead to implant loosening). Fibrocartilagenous tissue is analogous to scar tissue formed by skin after a cut, abrasion, or burn in that it is not generally suited to stable fix a bone-implant interface. Generally, it is known in art of arthroplasty that the formation of fibrocartilagenous tissue at a bone implant interface results in significant pain, sometimes elicited by resulting soft tissue inflammation, for the patient which is something that must be avoided or eliminated for any prosthetic system to be considered successful.
-
FIGS. 113 through 115 are an embodiment of the present invention that may prove to be a very usefully alternative to conventional rectilinear based referencing techniques. In essence, conventional alignment techniques, once having established appropriate flexion extension angulation and varus valgus angulation of desired implant location, reference the anterior cortex, distal most femoral condylar surface, and posterior most condylar surface (indicated inFIG. 114 by stars) to dictate the anterior posterior location, proximal distal location (otherwise known as distal resection depth), and appropriate implant size in determining the ‘perfect’ location and orientation for the appropriately sized implant (mediolateral location is normally ‘eyeballed’ by comparison of some visual reference of the mediolateral border surrounding the distal cut surface and some form of visual guide reference). These conventional techniques fail to directly reference the distinctly different anatomic bone features that dictate the performance of distinctly separate, but functionally interrelated, kinematic phenomena, and they also attempt to reference curvilinear articular surfaces by way of rectilinear approximations. The embodiment of the present invention is an alternative alignment technique with an object to overcome the errors inherent in prior art. As shown inFIG. 115 , the femur possesses two distinct kinematic features and functions that lend themselves to physical referencing; the patellofemoral articular surface and the tibiofemoral articular surfaces, both of which are curved, more specifically these surfaces represent logarithmic curves. The one codependency between the two articular functions, and therefore any geometric approximation made of them in referencing, is that they must allow for smooth kinematically appropriate articulation of the patella as it passes from its articulation with the trochlear groove (shown in blue inFIG. 115 ) to its articulation with intercondylar surfaces between the femoral condyles (shown in red inFIG. 115 ). Thus, knowing that three points define an arc and may be used to approximate a curve or sections of a curve, what is proposed is to use a referencing device which contacts at least one femoral condyle at three points to determine both an approximation of arc radius and centerpoint location, while independently or simultaneously referencing the trochlear groove at three points to determine both an approximation of arc radius and centerpoint location. The referencing system would further need to provide for the need of the articular surfaces of the trochlear articular surfaces to smoothly transition to those of the intercondylar surfaces. Armed with this information, a surgeon may most appropriately determine appropriate implant location and orientation. - This embodiment of the present invention is especially useful in determining the proper location, orientation, and implant size for the modular tricompartment components shown in
FIGS. 120 through 124 , the non-modular implants shown inFIGS. 125 through 127 , and standard implants where the appropriate size, location, and orientation would be determined by that which best mimics existing articular bone surfaces thus resulting in optimal postoperative kinematic function.FIG. 123 represents one method of fixing the patellofemoral implant with respect to the condylar implant(s) so as to maintain smooth transitional articulation. It should be noted that this crosspin method of interconnecting the separate components could be augmented by tongue and groove interlocking between the medial side of the condylar component shown and the lateral side of the patellofemoral component shown. What is critical is that the transition between the patellofemoral component and the condylar component surfaces responsible for patellofemoral articulation are and remain tangent at least one point. -
FIGS. 32 through 34 - An implant design embodying fixation geometries for mating with such tibial cut surfaces as are shown in
FIGS. 32 through 34 is highly desirable. In one embodiment of such a tibial prosthesis design, the fixation surfaces would be intended to mate, directly or indirectly, with cut surfaces represented inFIG. 33 and/or 34 (the tibia in the right side of theFIG. 34 ). In essence, the tibial implant would possess a planar or gently curvilinear ‘rim’ for contacting the ‘cortical skim cut’ surface (represented inFIG. 32 ), and convex fixation surfaces for direct or indirect fixation to the concave tibial cuts represented inFIGS. 33 and 34 . Direct fixation to such surfaces could be achieved by high precision resection of both the cortical rim, for attachment of the rim of the tibial prosthesis, and the concave surface(s), for intimate apposition to the convex implant surfaces. Such fixation, specifically of the concave bone cuts to the convex implant surfaces, could be achieved by way of an interference fit between the cuts and the implant along one axis (for instance, a front to back—AP—axis or direction), or along two axes (for instance, AP and Side to Side—ML—axes), or circumferentially (in other words a bit like a pin of a given diameter being forced into a hole of a lesser diameter), or both circumferentially and along an axis at roughly a 90 degree angle or normal to the skim cut surface when viewed in one or two orthogonal planes (an “up and down axis” or superior-inferior or proximal distal direction). It should be noted that an interference fit in a roughly superior-inferior direction may call for a textured surface on the bottom most surface of the convex fixation surfaces presenting a small surface area of contact at initial contact with the bottom of the concave cut to allow the implant to compact a reduced area of cancellous bone as the implant is impacted in a superior to inferior direction until it reaches its desired superior-inferior location and/or contact between the rim of the implant and the skim cut of the cortices. As compared to previous methods of achieving implant fixation, these embodiments of the present invention yield superior stability of implant fixation to bone to an extent reminiscent of the difference between riding a horse wearing a deeply dished saddle and riding a very sweaty horse bareback. - An alternative fixation paradigm allows for less intensive demands for the precision of the fit between concave tibial cuts and convex fixation surface. In essence, the concave surface may be ‘excavated’ in any desired manner (such as the Cutting Trials shown in
FIG. 31 which cut the proximal tibia while the tibia is moved through at least a portion of its range of motion about the femur), and a morselized or granular osteobiological substance, perhaps tricalcium phosphate, HATCP, or other substances generally described as ‘bone substitutes’ or autograft or allograft cancellous or cortical bone (it would be very useful to use the bone which was removed from the tibia or other patient bone during the creation of the cut(s) in that it is readily available and completely avoids the issues of disease transmission or immune response), is then impacted into the concave surface using a ‘form’ to create a surface of impact material (referred to herein as the “Impacted Surface”) of specific shape and location/orientation with respect to the cortical skim cut and/or the tibia or femur. This form is beneficially shaped in a manner related to the shape of the convex implant fixation surface shape so as to create a specific geometric relationship between the implant fixation surfaces and the Impacted Surface geometry. In one embodiment of the present invention, the fit between the implant and the Impacted Surface would be an interference fit or press fit. As properly impacted morselized cancellous bone is known to achieve stiffnesses (or modulus of elasticity) that approach as much as 80% of the stiffness of cortical bone in compression, robust intraoperative fixation may be achieved in this manner. In another embodiment, the fit would leave a significant gap, perhaps 0.2 mm to 4.0 mm in width, between portions or all of the convex fixation surfaces of the implant and the convex cut(s), into which bone cement or other substance would then be injected or impacted achieving interdigitation with both the surfaces of the prosthesis and the material of the Impacted Surface. This results in what could be described as composite interface of both biologically active and non-living but structurally robust materials to facilitate both immediate intraoperative stability by way of simple mechanics and long term stability by way of improved load transfer between the implant and the bone eliciting a beneficial biological response by the bone to said loading resulting in intimate and mechanically robust apposition between the composite interface and living tissue over time. It should be noted that such a method prevents excessive micromotion or strain at the interface between the implant (and/or the composite interface) and living tissue during the postoperative healing process, which, in essence, gives the bone a chance to further stabilize its fixation to the implant by way of bone modeling or remodeling in response to load transfer. Specifically, it is highly beneficial to maintain the strain state within living bone at and/or beneath and/or in the general vicinity of the bone implant interface within a range of 50 microstrain to 4000 microstrain so as to elicit the formation of bone tissue at and around the interface—strain levels in excess of 4000 microstrain or less than 50 microstrain are very likely to elicit the formation of fibrocartilagenous tissues at the interface which may lead to aseptic loosening of the implant. In the embodiment where the bone cement is injected, a small hole located at or beneath the skim cut allows for the injection of the material beneath the implant to achieve intimate and controlled interdigitation. Alternatively, the implant could be seated ‘over’ the freshly cut concave surfaces, and a slurry of biologically active and/or mechanically robust material(s) injected into the gaps between the implant and the bone under controlled pressure. Injection could be achieved via the portal shown inFIG. 34 . Such a slurry may comprise a mixture of substances such as morselized patient bone and bone cement, but alternative or additional materials including bone substitutes, osteobiologicals such as bone morphogenic proteins, antibiotics, or even living cells such as T cells known to promote post-operative healing and long term implant fixation. Beneficially, a fin feature may be added to these embodiments to facilitate additional mechanical stability, and said stem feature could beneficially possess an aperture for cross-pin fixation as described below for use in conjunction with the cross pins represented inFIG. 111 . - Importantly, it is an objective of the embodiments of the present invention to preserve living, structurally viable bone tissue to facilitate the efficacy of any subsequent revision procedures. Further, the location and geometry of the concave tibial cut allows for the use of a bearing insert (conventionally made of materials such as polyethylene or other materials capable of ‘whetting’ or mimicking the benefits of ‘whetting’ during bearing contact; mimicking constituting, in one embodiment, the absence or mitigation of wear debris generation despite the application of significant bearing forces, in TKA in excess of 200 lbs and often as much as 500 lbs or more) whose ‘underside’ is convexly shaped to mate with a concavely shaped mating or accommodating surface in the upper surface of the tibial implant or ‘baseplate’ as it is sometimes referred to. This allows for a tibial insert(s) whose thickness, in the areas beneath where the femoral implant bears against the tibial insert, may be equal to or greater than those insert thicknesses used in the past (those associated with predominantly planar tibial cuts) while require removal of significantly less structurally viable bone from the cortical rim of the proximal tibia than past efforts. Determination of the geometry and location of the baseplate's concave surface and therefore the areas of greatest insert or bearing surface are easily determined by analysis of the wear patterns of retrieved tibial inserts. These embodiments of the present inventions also facilitate significant clinical benefits when applied to meniscal or rotating platform TKA designs as a high degree of conformity may be achieved while constraint is mitigated while preserving significantly more bone than prior art devices. Further, the reproducibility of the methods and apparatus described herein enable independent attachment of single compartment implants to bone to achieve Unicondylar, Bicondylar, Bicondylar and Patellofemoral, or Unicompartmental and Patellofemoral replacement of damaged bone surfaces while achieving the objectives of bone preservation, robust immediate and short and long term fixation, reproducibility of implant fixation and resulting location and orientation, and intraoperative ease of use.
- The complete disclosures of the patents, patent applications and publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each were individually incorporated. Various modifications and alterations to this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention. It should be understood that this invention is not intended to be unduly limited by the illustrative embodiments and examples set forth herein and that such examples and embodiments are presented by way of example only with the scope of the invention intended to be limited only by the claims set forth herein.
Claims (25)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/075,840 US9814539B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
US15/810,726 US20180125602A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2017-11-13 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
Applications Claiming Priority (12)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US53632004P | 2004-01-14 | 2004-01-14 | |
US54099204P | 2004-02-02 | 2004-02-02 | |
US55108004P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US55109604P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US55126204P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US55163104P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US55130704P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US55107804P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US55116004P | 2004-03-08 | 2004-03-08 | |
US11/036,584 US7815645B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-01-14 | Methods and apparatus for pinplasty bone resection |
US11/049,634 US20060030854A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2005-02-02 | Methods and apparatus for wireplasty bone resection |
US11/075,840 US9814539B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
Related Parent Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/036,584 Continuation-In-Part US7815645B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-01-14 | Methods and apparatus for pinplasty bone resection |
US11/049,634 Continuation-In-Part US20060030854A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-02-02 | Methods and apparatus for wireplasty bone resection |
US11/075,840 Continuation-In-Part US9814539B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/075,840 Continuation-In-Part US9814539B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
US15/810,726 Continuation US20180125602A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2017-11-13 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060058882A1 US20060058882A1 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
US20160302933A9 true US20160302933A9 (en) | 2016-10-20 |
US9814539B2 US9814539B2 (en) | 2017-11-14 |
Family
ID=35717493
Family Applications (7)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/074,599 Abandoned US20060015115A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for pivotable guide surfaces for arthroplasty |
US11/075,553 Abandoned US20060030855A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for improved profile based resection |
US11/075,840 Expired - Fee Related US9814539B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
US11/075,836 Active 2029-07-24 US8287545B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for enhanced retention of prosthetic implants |
US11/825,857 Expired - Fee Related US8353914B2 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2007-07-09 | Methods and apparatus for improved profile based resection |
US12/187,210 Expired - Fee Related US8298238B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2008-08-06 | Methods and apparatus for pivotable guide surfaces for arthroplasty |
US15/810,726 Abandoned US20180125602A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2017-11-13 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/074,599 Abandoned US20060015115A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for pivotable guide surfaces for arthroplasty |
US11/075,553 Abandoned US20060030855A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for improved profile based resection |
Family Applications After (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/075,836 Active 2029-07-24 US8287545B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-03-08 | Methods and apparatus for enhanced retention of prosthetic implants |
US11/825,857 Expired - Fee Related US8353914B2 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2007-07-09 | Methods and apparatus for improved profile based resection |
US12/187,210 Expired - Fee Related US8298238B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2008-08-06 | Methods and apparatus for pivotable guide surfaces for arthroplasty |
US15/810,726 Abandoned US20180125602A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2017-11-13 | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (7) | US20060015115A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11278416B2 (en) | 2019-11-14 | 2022-03-22 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Concentric keel TKA |
Families Citing this family (70)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6695848B2 (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 2004-02-24 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods for femoral and tibial resection |
US7635390B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2009-12-22 | Marctec, Llc | Joint replacement component having a modular articulating surface |
US8062377B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2011-11-22 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for knee arthroplasty |
US7708741B1 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2010-05-04 | Marctec, Llc | Method of preparing bones for knee replacement surgery |
DE10243132B4 (en) * | 2002-09-17 | 2006-09-14 | Biocer Entwicklungs Gmbh | Anti-infective, biocompatible titanium oxide coatings for implants and methods of making them |
US7094241B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-08-22 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for achieving correct limb alignment in unicondylar knee arthroplasty |
AU2003299851B2 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2009-12-10 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | High performance knee prostheses |
EP1470787B1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2006-05-31 | Zimmer GmbH | Device for preparation of a femoral condyle |
US7534270B2 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2009-05-19 | Integra Lifesciences Corporation | Modular total ankle prosthesis apparatuses and methods |
EP1491166B1 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2005-03-02 | Zimmer GmbH | Adjusting device |
WO2005037147A1 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2005-04-28 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | High flexion articular insert |
US7815645B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2010-10-19 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for pinplasty bone resection |
US20060030854A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2006-02-09 | Haines Timothy G | Methods and apparatus for wireplasty bone resection |
US7857814B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2010-12-28 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for minimally invasive arthroplasty |
US20060015115A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2006-01-19 | Haines Timothy G | Methods and apparatus for pivotable guide surfaces for arthroplasty |
US8021368B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2011-09-20 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improved cutting tools for resection |
US8114083B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2012-02-14 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improved drilling and milling tools for resection |
US20050261701A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2005-11-24 | Mcguire David A | Surgical device for a anterolateral reconstruction |
US8167888B2 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2012-05-01 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tibial spacer blocks and femoral cutting guide |
WO2006023824A2 (en) * | 2004-08-19 | 2006-03-02 | Kinetikos Medical Incorporated | Ankle prosthesis and method of curved resection |
AU2006213882A1 (en) * | 2005-02-08 | 2006-08-17 | Ibalance Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for forming a wedge-like opening in a bone for an open wedge osteotomy |
US8828080B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2014-09-09 | Barry M. Fell | Method and system for knee joint repair |
US20060217734A1 (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2006-09-28 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Femoral resection guide apparatus and method |
US7740593B2 (en) | 2005-12-09 | 2010-06-22 | Senorx, Inc | Guide block for biopsy or surgical devices |
US7780671B2 (en) * | 2006-01-23 | 2010-08-24 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Bone resection apparatus and method for knee surgery |
US7662183B2 (en) | 2006-01-24 | 2010-02-16 | Timothy Haines | Dynamic spinal implants incorporating cartilage bearing graft material |
US20070233156A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2007-10-04 | Robert Metzger | Surgical instrument |
AU2007269203B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2014-03-06 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Anatomical motion hinged prosthesis |
CN101534750B (en) * | 2006-09-06 | 2015-12-16 | 史密夫和内修有限公司 | With implant and the relevant method of transitional surface |
GB2447702A (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-24 | Univ Leeds | Surgical bone cutting template |
US8328874B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-12-11 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Mobile bearing assembly |
US8764841B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2014-07-01 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Mobile bearing assembly having a closed track |
US8147558B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-04-03 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Mobile bearing assembly having multiple articulation interfaces |
US8142510B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-03-27 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Mobile bearing assembly having a non-planar interface |
US8147557B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-04-03 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Mobile bearing insert having offset dwell point |
US20090018544A1 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2009-01-15 | Zimmer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for soft tissue balancing |
JP5404342B2 (en) * | 2009-01-06 | 2014-01-29 | キヤノン株式会社 | Optical scanning device and image forming apparatus using the same |
US20100250284A1 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2010-09-30 | Martin Roche | System and method for an orthopedic dynamic data repository and registry for request |
CA2763997A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for performing knee arthroplasty |
US8911474B2 (en) | 2009-07-16 | 2014-12-16 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Suture anchor implantation instrumentation system |
CA2713309C (en) | 2009-08-20 | 2013-07-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Flexible acl instrumentation, kit and method |
US8974459B1 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2015-03-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Natural alignment knee instruments |
EP2603173B1 (en) | 2010-08-12 | 2016-03-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Structures for use in orthopaedic implant fixation |
US9795398B2 (en) | 2011-04-13 | 2017-10-24 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Flexible ACL instrumentation, kit and method |
US20130006378A1 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2013-01-03 | Wogoman Thomas E | Polymer femoral trial component |
US8968412B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2015-03-03 | Depuy (Ireland) | Trialing system for a knee prosthesis and method of use |
US8926619B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2015-01-06 | Depuy (Ireland) | Method of surgically preparing a tibia for implantation of a prosthetic component |
US8852197B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2014-10-07 | Depuy (Ireland) | Surgical instrument assemblies for use in surgically preparing a tibia for implantation of a prosthetic component |
US8986390B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2015-03-24 | Depuy (Ireland) | Method of trialing a knee prosthesis |
US8939986B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2015-01-27 | Depuy (Ireland) | Surgical instruments for use in surgically preparing a tibia for implantation of a prosthetic component |
US8951301B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2015-02-10 | Depuy (Ireland) | Method of using a trialing system for a knee prosthesis |
US9445803B2 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2016-09-20 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Filamentary suture anchor |
US8821494B2 (en) | 2012-08-03 | 2014-09-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Surgical instruments and methods of use |
US9861336B2 (en) * | 2012-09-07 | 2018-01-09 | Gynesonics, Inc. | Methods and systems for controlled deployment of needle structures in tissue |
EP2908780B1 (en) | 2012-10-18 | 2021-09-29 | Smith&Nephew, Inc. | Alignment devices and methods of manufacturing |
US9078740B2 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2015-07-14 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Instrumentation and method for positioning and securing a graft |
US9402620B2 (en) | 2013-03-04 | 2016-08-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Knotless filamentary fixation devices, assemblies and systems and methods of assembly and use |
US9788826B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-10-17 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Filamentary fixation device and assembly and method of assembly, manufacture and use |
US9463013B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-10-11 | Stryker Corporation | Adjustable continuous filament structure and method of manufacture and use |
WO2014176270A1 (en) | 2013-04-22 | 2014-10-30 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for attaching tissue to bone |
US10610211B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2020-04-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Filament engagement system and methods of use |
US9655727B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2017-05-23 | Stryker Corporation | Extended patellofemoral |
US9861491B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2018-01-09 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Tibial trial system for a knee prosthesis |
US9986992B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 | 2018-06-05 | Stryker Corporation | Suture anchor and associated methods of use |
US10568616B2 (en) | 2014-12-17 | 2020-02-25 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Instruments and methods of soft tissue fixation |
US10537445B2 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2020-01-21 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Surgical instruments for preparing a patient's tibia to receive an implant |
US10195056B2 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2019-02-05 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Method for preparing a patient's tibia to receive an implant |
USD902405S1 (en) | 2018-02-22 | 2020-11-17 | Stryker Corporation | Self-punching bone anchor inserter |
CN109700532B (en) * | 2018-12-17 | 2021-07-30 | 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 | Individualized craniomaxillary face navigation registration guide plate and registration method thereof |
CN112914724B (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2022-02-11 | 北京长木谷医疗科技有限公司 | Design method of total knee replacement surgical guide plate and related equipment |
Family Cites Families (406)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2697433A (en) | 1951-12-04 | 1954-12-21 | Max A Zehnder | Device for accurately positioning and guiding guide wires used in the nailing of thefemoral neck |
US3457922A (en) | 1966-12-13 | 1969-07-29 | Charles D Ray | Stereotaxic surgical instrument and method |
US3739662A (en) | 1971-01-15 | 1973-06-19 | Matthews J & Co | Retread tire marking method and apparatus |
GB1360485A (en) | 1971-04-21 | 1974-07-17 | Helfet Arthur Jacob | Replacements for bicondylar joints in natural or artificial human limbs |
GB1395896A (en) | 1971-06-01 | 1975-05-29 | Nat Res Dev | Endoprosthetic knee joint devices |
US3798679A (en) | 1971-07-09 | 1974-03-26 | Ewald Frederick | Joint prostheses |
US3774244A (en) | 1972-02-08 | 1973-11-27 | Relief Ruptured And Crippled S | Knee-joint prosthesis |
CH555671A (en) | 1972-09-01 | 1974-11-15 | Sulzer Ag | ENDO-PROSTHESIS FOR A KNEE JOINT. |
US3977289A (en) | 1973-01-08 | 1976-08-31 | National Research Development Corporation | Saws and blades therefor |
GB1462876A (en) | 1973-05-17 | 1977-01-26 | Thackray C F Ltd | Knee arthroplasty |
US3906550A (en) * | 1973-12-27 | 1975-09-23 | William Rostoker | Prosthetic device having a porous fiber metal structure |
GB1509194A (en) | 1974-04-22 | 1978-05-04 | Nat Res Dev | Endoprosthetic devices |
US3943934A (en) | 1974-09-30 | 1976-03-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Quick release mechanism for surgical devices |
SE7500547L (en) | 1975-01-20 | 1976-01-19 | Saab Scania Ab | DEVICE FOR THE SUBSTANCE OF PLANA AND RELATIVELY EACH OTHER SPECIFIC SAFETY THROUGH A SURGICAL BENSAG |
US4016606A (en) | 1975-07-14 | 1977-04-12 | Research Corporation | Knee joint prosthesis |
US4000525A (en) | 1975-08-21 | 1977-01-04 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Ceramic prosthetic implant suitable for a knee joint plateau |
SU577020A1 (en) | 1976-06-08 | 1977-10-25 | Центральный Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательский Институт Травматологии И Ортопедии Им. Н.Н.Приорова | Device for working ends of joints |
US4069824A (en) * | 1976-07-12 | 1978-01-24 | Weinstock Robert E | Method of and apparatus for forming a crescentic joint in a bone |
DE2703059C3 (en) | 1977-01-26 | 1981-09-03 | Sanitätshaus Schütt & Grundei, Werkstätten für Orthopädie-Technik, 2400 Lübeck | Knee joint endoprosthesis |
US4349058A (en) | 1977-01-28 | 1982-09-14 | Comparetto John E | Cutting tool and a method of using same |
DE2845231A1 (en) | 1977-10-21 | 1979-05-03 | Indong Oh | JOINT PROSTHESIS AND PROCEDURE FOR IMPLANTING THEREOF |
US4213209A (en) | 1978-05-22 | 1980-07-22 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled | Knee joint prosthesis |
CH632151A5 (en) * | 1978-10-06 | 1982-09-30 | Sulzer Ag | ENDOPROTHESIS FOR A KNEE JOINT. |
US4207627A (en) | 1979-01-18 | 1980-06-17 | Cloutier Jean Marie | Knee prosthesis |
US4340978A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1982-07-27 | Biomedical Engineering Corp. | New Jersey meniscal bearing knee replacement |
US4358859A (en) | 1979-10-04 | 1982-11-16 | Schurman David J | Articulated prosthetic knee and method for implanting same |
EP0052631A4 (en) | 1980-05-02 | 1983-09-07 | Acufex Microsurgical Inc | Microsurgical scissors. |
US4353135A (en) | 1980-05-09 | 1982-10-12 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Patellar flange and femoral knee-joint prosthesis |
CH653238A5 (en) | 1981-07-14 | 1985-12-31 | Richard Arnegger | SAW BLADE. |
US5147364A (en) | 1981-08-20 | 1992-09-15 | Ohio Medical Instrument Company | Osteotomy saw/file, cutting guide and method |
US4479271A (en) * | 1981-10-26 | 1984-10-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Prosthetic device adapted to promote bone/tissue ingrowth |
US4487203A (en) | 1981-11-03 | 1984-12-11 | Androphy Gary W | Triplanar knee resection method |
US4524766A (en) | 1982-01-07 | 1985-06-25 | Petersen Thomas D | Surgical knee alignment method and system |
US4653488A (en) | 1982-02-18 | 1987-03-31 | Howmedica, Inc. | Prosthetic knee implantation |
GB2120943B (en) | 1982-03-13 | 1985-04-11 | Thackray C F Ltd | Knee prosthesis |
US4421112A (en) | 1982-05-20 | 1983-12-20 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Tibial osteotomy guide assembly and method |
US4457307A (en) | 1982-08-20 | 1984-07-03 | Stillwell William T | Bone cutting device for total knee replacement |
NZ205096A (en) | 1982-09-10 | 1986-03-14 | Univ Kingston | Mounting apparatus for bone cutting device |
US4567886A (en) | 1983-01-06 | 1986-02-04 | Petersen Thomas D | Flexion spacer guide for fitting a knee prosthesis |
US4501266A (en) | 1983-03-04 | 1985-02-26 | Biomet, Inc. | Knee distraction device |
US4566448A (en) | 1983-03-07 | 1986-01-28 | Rohr Jr William L | Ligament tensor and distal femoral resector guide |
US4502483A (en) * | 1983-03-09 | 1985-03-05 | Dow Corning Corporation | Method and apparatus for shaping a distal femoral surface |
US4474177A (en) | 1983-03-09 | 1984-10-02 | Wright Manufacturing Company | Method and apparatus for shaping a distal femoral surface |
DE3315401A1 (en) | 1983-04-28 | 1984-10-31 | Feldmühle AG, 4000 Düsseldorf | Knee-joint prosthesis |
JPS6077752A (en) | 1983-09-30 | 1985-05-02 | 東海林 宏 | Meniscal artificial knee joint |
US4659331A (en) | 1983-11-28 | 1987-04-21 | Regents Of University Of Michigan | Prosthesis interface surface and method of implanting |
NL8304339A (en) * | 1983-12-16 | 1985-07-16 | Jonas Lindwer | WEIGHT PROSTHESIS AND A TOOL TO BE USED THEREOF. |
DE8406730U1 (en) | 1984-03-05 | 1984-04-26 | Waldemar Link (Gmbh & Co), 2000 Hamburg | Surgical chisel |
JPS60240660A (en) | 1984-05-01 | 1985-11-29 | 日本クラウンコルク株式会社 | Vessel cover consisting of combination of shell made of metal and top cover made of synthetic resin |
DE3433264C2 (en) | 1984-09-11 | 1986-10-02 | S + G Implants GmbH, 2400 Lübeck | Tibial part for a knee joint endoprosthesis |
CA1264674A (en) | 1984-10-17 | 1990-01-23 | Paul Ducheyne | Porous flexible metal fiber material for surgical implantation |
DE3444001C2 (en) | 1984-11-29 | 1986-12-18 | L. Prof. Dr.med. 1000 Berlin Hanslik | Knee joint prosthesis |
EP0189253A2 (en) | 1985-01-18 | 1986-07-30 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Press fit knee prosthesis and instrumentation |
JPS61182729A (en) | 1985-02-09 | 1986-08-15 | Fanuc Ltd | Tapering controller of wire-cut electric discharge machine |
GB8516167D0 (en) | 1985-06-26 | 1985-07-31 | Finsbury Instr Ltd | Surgical tool |
US4714473A (en) | 1985-07-25 | 1987-12-22 | Harrington Arthritis Research Center | Knee prosthesis |
US4721104A (en) | 1985-12-02 | 1988-01-26 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Femoral surface shaping apparatus for posterior-stabilized knee implants |
US4787383A (en) | 1985-12-19 | 1988-11-29 | Howmedica, Inc. | Prosthetic knee implantation |
US4808185A (en) * | 1986-02-07 | 1989-02-28 | Penenberg Brad L | Tibial prosthesis, template and reamer |
US4703751A (en) | 1986-03-27 | 1987-11-03 | Pohl Kenneth P | Method and apparatus for resecting a distal femoral surface |
US4736737A (en) | 1986-03-31 | 1988-04-12 | William Fargie | Tibial cutting jig |
US4722330A (en) | 1986-04-22 | 1988-02-02 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Femoral surface shaping guide for knee implants |
US4822365A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1989-04-18 | Walker Peter S | Method of design of human joint prosthesis |
US4709699A (en) | 1986-08-06 | 1987-12-01 | Fort Wayne Metals Research Products Corporation | Surgeon's Gigli saw and method |
US4739751A (en) | 1986-10-03 | 1988-04-26 | Temple University | Apparatus and method for reconstructive surgery |
US4759350A (en) | 1986-10-17 | 1988-07-26 | Dunn Harold K | Instruments for shaping distal femoral and proximal tibial surfaces |
US4963152A (en) | 1986-10-27 | 1990-10-16 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Asymmetric prosthetic tibial component |
US5041138A (en) | 1986-11-20 | 1991-08-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture |
US4718413A (en) | 1986-12-24 | 1988-01-12 | Orthomet, Inc. | Bone cutting guide and methods for using same |
US4714472A (en) | 1987-01-20 | 1987-12-22 | Osteonics Corp. | Knee prosthesis with accommodation for angular misalignment |
US5002547A (en) | 1987-02-07 | 1991-03-26 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
US5250050A (en) | 1987-02-07 | 1993-10-05 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
US4841975A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1989-06-27 | Cemax, Inc. | Preoperative planning of bone cuts and joint replacement using radiant energy scan imaging |
US4731086A (en) * | 1987-04-20 | 1988-03-15 | Dow Corning Wright | Shim for femoral knee joint prosthesis and method of using |
CH672419A5 (en) | 1987-06-30 | 1989-11-30 | Sulzer Ag | |
US4880429A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1989-11-14 | Stone Kevin R | Prosthetic meniscus |
US5007934A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1991-04-16 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic meniscus |
US4844064A (en) | 1987-09-30 | 1989-07-04 | Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. | Surgical cutting instrument with end and side openings |
DE3878156T2 (en) | 1987-10-21 | 1993-05-27 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc | SURGICAL INSTRUMENT. |
JP2604605B2 (en) | 1987-10-30 | 1997-04-30 | 京セラ株式会社 | Angle setting device for total knee arthroplasty |
US4938762A (en) | 1987-12-16 | 1990-07-03 | Protek Ag | Reference system for implantation of condylar total knee prostheses |
US4893619A (en) | 1988-02-04 | 1990-01-16 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Humeral osteotomy guide |
GB8802671D0 (en) | 1988-02-05 | 1988-03-02 | Goodfellow J W | Orthopaedic joint components tools & methods |
FR2629339B1 (en) | 1988-04-01 | 1997-09-12 | Broc Christian | LAYING MATERIAL FOR PARTICULARLY A TIBIAL AND / OR FEMORAL ELEMENT OF A BI-COMPARTMENTAL KNEE JOINT PROSTHESIS |
US4950298A (en) | 1988-04-08 | 1990-08-21 | Gustilo Ramon B | Modular knee joint prosthesis |
US4979949A (en) | 1988-04-26 | 1990-12-25 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
US4834758A (en) | 1988-05-26 | 1989-05-30 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled, Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Bone prosthesis for the leg and thigh |
JP2582129B2 (en) | 1988-07-29 | 1997-02-19 | 日本農産工業株式会社 | Sea urchin cultivation method |
FR2635675B1 (en) | 1988-08-23 | 1990-11-30 | Laboureau Jacques Philippe | ANCILLARY INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE IMPLANTATION OF A TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS AND SECONDARY FOR AXIAL CORRECTION OSTEOTOMIES |
US4896663A (en) * | 1988-10-14 | 1990-01-30 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Self centering femoral drill jig |
US4892093A (en) | 1988-10-28 | 1990-01-09 | Osteonics Corp. | Femoral cutting guide |
US4944757A (en) | 1988-11-07 | 1990-07-31 | Martinez David M | Modulator knee prosthesis system |
US4919667A (en) * | 1988-12-02 | 1990-04-24 | Stryker Corporation | Implant |
DE3842645A1 (en) | 1988-12-14 | 1990-06-28 | Mecron Med Prod Gmbh | SAFE GAUGE SYSTEM |
US4926847A (en) | 1988-12-27 | 1990-05-22 | Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc. | Surgical cutting block |
US4872452A (en) | 1989-01-09 | 1989-10-10 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Bone rasp |
US4935023A (en) | 1989-01-09 | 1990-06-19 | Dow Corning Wright | Femoral surface shaping guide for knee implants |
US4936853A (en) | 1989-01-11 | 1990-06-26 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Modular knee prosthesis |
IT1227847B (en) | 1989-01-11 | 1991-05-10 | Cremascoli Spa G | EQUIPMENT FOR THE CORRECT FEMORAL RESECTION AND FOR THE APPLICATION OF REPLACEMENT PROSTHESES OF THE KNEE ARTICULATION. |
US5178626A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1993-01-12 | Pappas Michael J | Stepped surgical saw blade |
US5002545A (en) * | 1989-01-30 | 1991-03-26 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Tibial surface shaping guide for knee implants |
US5007933A (en) | 1989-01-31 | 1991-04-16 | Osteonics Corp. | Modular knee prosthesis system |
US4952213A (en) | 1989-02-03 | 1990-08-28 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Tibial cutting guide |
US4986833A (en) * | 1989-05-05 | 1991-01-22 | Worland Richard L | Glenoid component for an artificial shoulder joint |
US4938769A (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1990-07-03 | Shaw James A | Modular tibial prosthesis |
JP2846347B2 (en) | 1989-06-30 | 1999-01-13 | 京セラ株式会社 | Artificial patella placement device |
DE3921973C1 (en) | 1989-07-04 | 1990-10-31 | Rainer Dr. 8000 Muenchen De Baumgart | |
FR2651114B1 (en) | 1989-08-29 | 1991-10-18 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | DEVICE FOR POSITIONING AND GUIDING THE BLADE OF A SURGICAL SAW. |
US5021056A (en) | 1989-09-14 | 1991-06-04 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Upper tibial osteotomy system |
DE3931397A1 (en) | 1989-09-20 | 1991-03-28 | Star Gmbh | ROLLER BEARING FOR LINEAR MOVEMENT KEYWORD: RAIL GUIDE WITH PRELOAD ADJUSTMENT |
US5234433A (en) | 1989-09-26 | 1993-08-10 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
US5122144A (en) | 1989-09-26 | 1992-06-16 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
NZ235844A (en) | 1989-10-26 | 1993-02-25 | Western Mining Corp | Liquid phase sintering of silicon carbide/alumina source mixtures in the presence of a magnesium source |
US4971075A (en) | 1989-11-17 | 1990-11-20 | Hans Lee | Surgical kit and method for tendon repair |
FR2656217B1 (en) | 1989-12-26 | 1997-04-25 | Kyocera Corp | ARTIFICIAL KNEE JOINT. |
US5171244A (en) | 1990-01-08 | 1992-12-15 | Caspari Richard B | Methods and apparatus for arthroscopic prosthetic knee replacement |
US5035699A (en) | 1990-01-09 | 1991-07-30 | Dow Corning Wright | Patella track cutter and guide |
US5147405A (en) | 1990-02-07 | 1992-09-15 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Knee prosthesis |
US5062852A (en) | 1990-02-09 | 1991-11-05 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Tibial prosthesis with independent medial and lateral baseplates |
GB9005496D0 (en) | 1990-03-12 | 1990-05-09 | Howmedica | Tibial component for a replacement knee prosthesis and total knee prosthesis incorporating such a component |
JPH03267055A (en) * | 1990-03-16 | 1991-11-27 | Koshino Nariko | Shank side component of artificial knee joint |
US5217463A (en) | 1990-04-11 | 1993-06-08 | Mikhail W F Michael | Method for performing knee surgery and retractors for use therein |
US5358531A (en) | 1990-06-12 | 1994-10-25 | British Technology Group Limited | Prosthetic knee joint devices |
IT1248971B (en) | 1990-06-22 | 1995-02-11 | Cremascoli G Srl | EQUIPMENT SUITABLE TO ALLOW THE PERFORMANCE OF A CORRECT FEMORAL AND TIBIAL RESECTION FOR THE APPLICATION OF REPLACEMENT PROSTHESES OF THE KNEE JOINT |
FR2664157B1 (en) | 1990-07-06 | 1992-10-30 | Jbs Sa | FEMORAL CUTTING GUIDE. |
US5116375A (en) | 1990-08-27 | 1992-05-26 | Hofmann Aaron A | Knee prosthesis |
GB9018782D0 (en) | 1990-08-28 | 1990-10-10 | Goodfellow John W | Phosthetic femoral components |
US5021061A (en) | 1990-09-26 | 1991-06-04 | Queen's University At Kingston | Prosthetic patello-femoral joint |
US5370701A (en) | 1990-09-28 | 1994-12-06 | Arch Development Corporation | Rotating/sliding contrained prosthetic knee |
US5108398A (en) | 1990-10-16 | 1992-04-28 | Orthopaedic Research Institute | Orthopaedic knee fusion apparatus |
EP0511323B1 (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1997-10-15 | BERKSHIRE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC. | Adjustable intra-luminal valvulotome |
US5129907A (en) | 1990-12-10 | 1992-07-14 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patellar clamp and reamer with adjustable stop |
US5176710A (en) | 1991-01-23 | 1993-01-05 | Orthopaedic Research Institute | Prosthesis with low stiffness factor |
US5206023A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1993-04-27 | Robert F. Shaw | Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage |
GB9102348D0 (en) | 1991-02-04 | 1991-03-20 | Inst Of Orthopaedics The | Prosthesis for knee replacement |
GB9102633D0 (en) | 1991-02-07 | 1991-03-27 | Finsbury Instr Ltd | Knee prosthesis |
US5180384A (en) | 1991-02-08 | 1993-01-19 | Mikhail Michael W E | Method for implanting a patellar prosthesis |
US5391170A (en) * | 1991-12-13 | 1995-02-21 | David A. McGuire | Angled surgical screw driver and methods of arthroscopic ligament reconstruction |
US5092869A (en) * | 1991-03-01 | 1992-03-03 | Biomet, Inc. | Oscillating surgical saw guide pins and instrumentation system |
US5098436A (en) | 1991-03-07 | 1992-03-24 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Modular guide for shaping of femur to accommodate intercondylar stabilizing housing and patellar track of implant |
US5100409A (en) | 1991-03-07 | 1992-03-31 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Shaping and trial reduction guide for implantation of femoral prosthesis and method of using same |
US5053037A (en) | 1991-03-07 | 1991-10-01 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Femoral instrumentation for long stem surgery |
US5100408A (en) | 1991-03-07 | 1992-03-31 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Femoral instrumentation for long stem surgery |
US5129909A (en) | 1991-03-13 | 1992-07-14 | Sutherland Charles J | Apparatus and method for making precise bone cuts in total knee replacement |
US5236461A (en) | 1991-03-22 | 1993-08-17 | Forte Mark R | Totally posterior stabilized knee prosthesis |
US5358527A (en) | 1991-03-22 | 1994-10-25 | Forte Mark R | Total knee prosthesis with resurfacing and posterior stabilization capability |
US5112336A (en) | 1991-05-14 | 1992-05-12 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Drill guide and template for prosthetic devices |
US5133759A (en) | 1991-05-24 | 1992-07-28 | Turner Richard H | Asymmetrical femoral condye total knee arthroplasty prosthesis |
JPH04361746A (en) | 1991-06-07 | 1992-12-15 | I N R Kenkyusho:Kk | Dental bone processing tool and device |
JP3020655B2 (en) | 1991-06-28 | 2000-03-15 | 京セラ株式会社 | Surgical sawing and aiming guide members |
US5203807A (en) | 1991-07-10 | 1993-04-20 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Knee joint prosthesis articular surface |
US5201881A (en) | 1991-08-13 | 1993-04-13 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Joint prosthesis with improved shock absorption |
US5147365A (en) | 1991-08-19 | 1992-09-15 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Patellar osteotomy guide |
CH685669A5 (en) | 1991-08-28 | 1995-09-15 | Sulzer Aktiengesellschaftprote | Knee joint prosthesis. |
US5133758A (en) | 1991-09-16 | 1992-07-28 | Research And Education Institute, Inc. Harbor-Ucla Medical Center | Total knee endoprosthesis with fixed flexion-extension axis of rotation |
FR2681778B1 (en) | 1991-10-01 | 1997-11-28 | Impact | MODULAR ANCILLARY FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A KNEE PROSTHESIS. |
US5514143A (en) | 1991-11-27 | 1996-05-07 | Apogee Medical Products, Inc. | Apparatus and method for use during surgery |
DE69228047T2 (en) | 1991-12-10 | 1999-05-27 | Bristol Myers Squibb Co | Guide to shin osteotomy |
US5344423A (en) | 1992-02-06 | 1994-09-06 | Zimmer, Inc. | Apparatus and method for milling bone |
GB9202561D0 (en) | 1992-02-07 | 1992-03-25 | Howmedica | Orthopaedic instrument |
US5330534A (en) | 1992-02-10 | 1994-07-19 | Biomet, Inc. | Knee joint prosthesis with interchangeable components |
US5932214A (en) | 1994-08-11 | 1999-08-03 | Biogen, Inc. | Treatment for inflammatory bowel disease with VLA-4 blockers |
US5520695A (en) | 1992-02-14 | 1996-05-28 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Instruments for use in knee replacement surgery |
US5269786A (en) | 1992-02-20 | 1993-12-14 | Arthrex Inc. | PCL oriented placement tibial guide method |
US5275603A (en) | 1992-02-20 | 1994-01-04 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Rotationally and angularly adjustable tibial cutting guide and method of use |
US5263956A (en) | 1992-03-04 | 1993-11-23 | Neuro Navigational Corporation | Ball joint for neurosurgery |
US5234432A (en) | 1992-03-13 | 1993-08-10 | Brown Byron L | Method and apparatus for definitive cutting of a femur |
US5197944A (en) | 1992-03-30 | 1993-03-30 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Ankle clamp |
ZA933167B (en) | 1992-05-03 | 1993-11-14 | Technology Finance Corp | Surgical instruments |
US5207680A (en) | 1992-05-11 | 1993-05-04 | Zimmer, Inc. | Front milling guide for use in orthopaedic surgery |
US5190547A (en) * | 1992-05-15 | 1993-03-02 | Midas Rex Pneumatic Tools, Inc. | Replicator for resecting bone to match a pattern |
SE9201557D0 (en) | 1992-05-18 | 1992-05-18 | Astra Ab | JOINT PROSTHESIS AND APPARATUS FOR PREPARING THE BONE PRIOR TO FITTING OF THE PROSTHESIS |
US5282867A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1994-02-01 | Mikhail Michael W E | Prosthetic knee joint |
DE4219939C2 (en) | 1992-06-18 | 1995-10-19 | Klaus Dipl Ing Radermacher | Device for aligning, positioning and guiding machining tools, machining or measuring devices for machining a bony structure and method for producing this device |
US5824102A (en) | 1992-06-19 | 1998-10-20 | Buscayret; Christian | Total knee prosthesis |
US5342368A (en) | 1992-07-08 | 1994-08-30 | Petersen Thomas D | Intramedullary universal proximal tibial resector guide |
DE4223844A1 (en) | 1992-07-20 | 1994-01-27 | Rene P Schmid | Device and method for injecting injection material into concrete joint systems |
US5417695A (en) | 1992-07-27 | 1995-05-23 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Instrumentation for preparing a distal femur |
US5344458A (en) | 1992-08-06 | 1994-09-06 | Bonutti Peter M | Arthroplasty component |
US5279575A (en) * | 1992-08-13 | 1994-01-18 | Brigham & Women's Hospital | Locking pivotal surgical orifice |
CA2144337A1 (en) | 1992-09-10 | 1994-03-17 | Donald E. Mcnulty | Method and apparatus for installing a femoral component |
US5364401A (en) | 1992-10-08 | 1994-11-15 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | External alignment system for preparing a femur for an implant |
US5312411A (en) | 1992-10-27 | 1994-05-17 | Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc. | Uni-compartmental femoral knee instruments and prosthesis |
US5413604A (en) | 1992-12-24 | 1995-05-09 | Osteonics Corp. | Prosthetic knee implant for an anterior cruciate ligament deficient total knee replacement |
EP0675698A4 (en) | 1992-12-28 | 1997-03-05 | Synvasive Technology Inc | Surgical cutting block and method of use. |
DE9300271U1 (en) | 1993-01-12 | 1993-03-11 | Howmedica Gmbh, 2314 Schoenkirchen, De | |
US5370699A (en) | 1993-01-21 | 1994-12-06 | Orthomet, Inc. | Modular knee joint prosthesis |
US5340129A (en) | 1993-01-21 | 1994-08-23 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Saw blade retention system |
US5728162A (en) | 1993-01-28 | 1998-03-17 | Board Of Regents Of University Of Colorado | Asymmetric condylar and trochlear femoral knee component |
FR2701387B1 (en) | 1993-02-10 | 1995-06-23 | Reach | POSTERO-STABILIZED KNEE PROSTHESIS. |
US5730130A (en) | 1993-02-12 | 1998-03-24 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Localization cap for fiducial markers |
US5443464A (en) | 1993-02-16 | 1995-08-22 | Memphis Orthopaedic Design, Inc. | External fixator apparatus |
US5358529A (en) * | 1993-03-05 | 1994-10-25 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Plastic knee femoral implants |
GB9306898D0 (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1993-05-26 | Ang Swee C | Implantable prosthetic patellar components |
DE69418040T2 (en) | 1993-06-21 | 1999-12-16 | Osteonics Corp | DEVICE FOR ALIGNING A KNEE PROSTHESIS |
CA2126627C (en) | 1993-07-06 | 2005-01-25 | Kim C. Bertin | Femoral milling instrumentation for use in total knee arthroplasty with optional cutting guide attachment |
US5474559A (en) | 1993-07-06 | 1995-12-12 | Zimmer, Inc. | Femoral milling instrumentation for use in total knee arthroplasty with optional cutting guide attachment |
GB9314832D0 (en) | 1993-07-16 | 1993-09-01 | Walker Peter S | Prostheses for knee replacement |
US5364402A (en) | 1993-07-29 | 1994-11-15 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Tibial spacer saw guide |
FR2710258B1 (en) | 1993-09-20 | 1995-12-15 | Medinov Sa | Knee prosthesis. |
CA2106887A1 (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1995-03-25 | Stuart Lee Axelson Jr. | Instrumentation for preparing a distal femur |
US5571100B1 (en) | 1993-11-01 | 1998-01-06 | Gyrus Medical Ltd | Electrosurgical apparatus |
US5417694A (en) | 1993-11-08 | 1995-05-23 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Distal femoral cutting guide apparatus with anterior or posterior referencing for use in knee joint replacement surgery |
US5405349A (en) | 1993-11-24 | 1995-04-11 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Cutting jig for posterior stabilized knee prosthesis |
US5415663A (en) | 1993-12-02 | 1995-05-16 | Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc. | Orthopaedic cutting guides with retractable saw blade slots |
US5540695A (en) | 1994-02-18 | 1996-07-30 | Howmedica Inc. | Osteotomy cutting guide |
US5601566A (en) | 1994-02-22 | 1997-02-11 | Osteonics Corp. | Method and apparatus for the alignment of a femoral knee prosthesis |
US6093207A (en) * | 1994-03-18 | 2000-07-25 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Middle expanded, removable intervertebral disk stabilizer disk |
US5462551A (en) | 1994-04-04 | 1995-10-31 | Innovative Medical Products Inc. | Knee positioner |
DE4412748A1 (en) * | 1994-04-15 | 1995-10-19 | Flachglas Ag | Transfer device for curved glass panes |
BE1008372A3 (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1996-04-02 | Materialise Nv | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A perfected MEDICAL MODEL BASED ON DIGITAL IMAGE INFORMATION OF A BODY. |
US5908424A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1999-06-01 | Zimmer, Inc, By Said Stalcup, Dietz, Bays And Vanlaningham | Tibial milling guide system |
DE4423717C1 (en) | 1994-07-08 | 1996-01-04 | Eska Medical Gmbh & Co | Device for determining resection surfaces on the femur and on the tibia for preparing an implantation of a total knee joint endoprosthesis |
FR2722392A1 (en) | 1994-07-12 | 1996-01-19 | Biomicron | APPARATUS FOR RESECTING KNEE CONDYLES FOR PLACING A PROSTHESIS AND METHOD FOR PLACING SUCH AN APPARATUS |
GB9415180D0 (en) | 1994-07-28 | 1994-09-21 | Walker Peter S | Stabilised mobile bearing knee |
US5549688A (en) | 1994-08-04 | 1996-08-27 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Asymmetric femoral prosthesis |
US6676704B1 (en) * | 1994-08-12 | 2004-01-13 | Diamicron, Inc. | Prosthetic joint component having at least one sintered polycrystalline diamond compact articulation surface and substrate surface topographical features in said polycrystalline diamond compact |
US5769899A (en) * | 1994-08-12 | 1998-06-23 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
US5810827A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1998-09-22 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for bony material removal |
US5755803A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1998-05-26 | Hudson Surgical Design | Prosthetic implant |
US5514139A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1996-05-07 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for femoral resection |
US5643272A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1997-07-01 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tibial resection |
US6695848B2 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2004-02-24 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods for femoral and tibial resection |
US5597379A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1997-01-28 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for femoral resection alignment |
US5514136A (en) * | 1994-09-06 | 1996-05-07 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Surgical instrument for driving and rotating a long bone prosthesis |
GB9418492D0 (en) | 1994-09-14 | 1994-11-02 | Goodfellow John W | Prosthetic knee joint device |
EP1201199B1 (en) | 1994-10-07 | 2006-03-15 | St. Louis University | Surgical navigation systems including reference and localization frames |
EP0797417B1 (en) | 1994-10-28 | 2000-01-05 | Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. | Knee prosthesis with shims |
US5702458A (en) | 1994-12-09 | 1997-12-30 | New York Society For The Ruptured And Crippled Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Joint prosthesis |
IT1277091B1 (en) | 1994-12-30 | 1997-11-04 | Jbs Sa | STABILIZED RECOVERY PROSTHESIS FROM BEHIND BY KNEE ARTICULATION |
AUPN089495A0 (en) | 1995-02-03 | 1995-03-02 | Denupo Pty. Ltd. | Knee prosthesis |
US5613969A (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1997-03-25 | Jenkins, Jr.; Joseph R. | Tibial osteotomy system |
US5639279A (en) | 1995-02-09 | 1997-06-17 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Posteriorly-stabilized prosthetic knee |
US5611802A (en) * | 1995-02-14 | 1997-03-18 | Samuelson; Kent M. | Method and apparatus for resecting bone |
US5578039A (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1996-11-26 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Tibial resection instrumentation and surgical method |
US5609642A (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1997-03-11 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Tibial trial prosthesis and bone preparation system |
US5562674A (en) | 1995-02-27 | 1996-10-08 | Zimmer, Inc. | Intramedullary rod with guide member locator |
US5593411A (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1997-01-14 | Zimmer, Inc. | Orthopaedic milling guide for milling intersecting planes |
FR2732886B1 (en) | 1995-04-13 | 1997-10-31 | France Bloc Sa | PATELLAR CUTTING GUIDE FOR PLACEMENT OF THE PROSTHETIC KNEE PROSTHESIS PATELLA |
US5542947A (en) | 1995-05-12 | 1996-08-06 | Huwmedica Inc. | Slotted patella resection guide and stylus |
US5569262A (en) | 1995-05-19 | 1996-10-29 | Carney; William P. | Guide tool for surgical devices |
US5776137A (en) | 1995-05-31 | 1998-07-07 | Katz; Lawrence | Method and apparatus for locating bone cuts at the distal condylar femur region to receive a knee prosthesis |
DE19521597A1 (en) | 1995-06-14 | 1996-12-19 | Kubein Meesenburg Dietmar | Artificial joint, especially an endoprosthesis to replace natural joints |
US5643270A (en) | 1995-08-03 | 1997-07-01 | Combs; C. Robert | Multi-plane curvilinear saw, guide and method |
EP0761242A1 (en) | 1995-08-21 | 1997-03-12 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Orthopaedic implant with bearing surface |
US5601563A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1997-02-11 | Zimmer, Inc. | Orthopaedic milling template with attachable cutting guide |
US5697935A (en) | 1995-09-12 | 1997-12-16 | Medex Marketing, Inc. | Device and method for removing fastening implements from bone |
US5871546A (en) * | 1995-09-29 | 1999-02-16 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Femoral component condyle design for knee prosthesis |
US5658293A (en) | 1995-10-10 | 1997-08-19 | Zimmer, Inc. | Guide platform associated with intramedullary rod |
US5690632A (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1997-11-25 | Schwartz; Paul Steven | Osteosynthesis screw fastener having angularly adjustable threads and methods of use therefor |
US5682886A (en) | 1995-12-26 | 1997-11-04 | Musculographics Inc | Computer-assisted surgical system |
US5681354A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-10-28 | Board Of Regents, University Of Colorado | Asymmetrical femoral component for knee prosthesis |
ES2165538T3 (en) | 1996-02-21 | 2002-03-16 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | ENDOPROTESIS OF THE ARTICULATION OF THE KNEE. |
DE19606462C1 (en) | 1996-02-21 | 1997-10-16 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Knee joint endoprosthesis |
US5653714A (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1997-08-05 | Zimmer, Inc. | Dual slide cutting guide |
WO1997030648A1 (en) | 1996-02-23 | 1997-08-28 | Midwest Orthopedic Research Foundation | Device and method for distal femur cutting and prothesis measuring |
GB9609609D0 (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1996-07-10 | Midland International Orthopae | Knee prosthesis |
US5799055A (en) | 1996-05-15 | 1998-08-25 | Northwestern University | Apparatus and method for planning a stereotactic surgical procedure using coordinated fluoroscopy |
US5725530A (en) * | 1996-06-19 | 1998-03-10 | Popken; John A. | Surgical saw and methods therefor |
US5782921A (en) | 1996-07-23 | 1998-07-21 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Modular knee prosthesis |
GB9620998D0 (en) * | 1996-10-09 | 1996-11-27 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Shoulder prosthesis |
US5824100A (en) | 1996-10-30 | 1998-10-20 | Osteonics Corp. | Knee prosthesis with increased balance and reduced bearing stress |
DE19646891A1 (en) | 1996-11-13 | 1998-05-14 | Kubein Meesenburg Dietmar | Artificial joint, especially an endoprosthesis to replace natural joints |
DE19647155C2 (en) | 1996-11-14 | 1998-11-19 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Implant |
US6203576B1 (en) | 1996-12-09 | 2001-03-20 | Groupe Controle Dedienne Gcd Societe De Droit Francais | Complete knee joint prosthesis |
US7618451B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US5766257A (en) | 1997-01-28 | 1998-06-16 | Implant Manufacturing And Testing Corporation | Artificial joint having natural load transfer |
AU737097B2 (en) | 1997-01-28 | 2001-08-09 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled, Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Method and apparatus for femoral resection |
US5980526A (en) | 1997-02-12 | 1999-11-09 | Orthopaedic Innovations, Inc. | Wedge osteotomy device including a guide for controlling osteotomy depth |
FR2760352B3 (en) | 1997-03-10 | 1999-04-16 | Philippe Berret | TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS |
GB2323034B (en) | 1997-03-13 | 2001-07-25 | Zimmer Ltd | Prosthesis for knee replacement |
GB9707717D0 (en) | 1997-04-16 | 1997-06-04 | Walker Peter S | Knee prosthesis having guide surfaces for control of anterior-posterior translation |
US6139581A (en) | 1997-06-06 | 2000-10-31 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Posterior compensation tibial tray |
RU2121319C1 (en) | 1997-08-14 | 1998-11-10 | Акционерное общество открытого типа "Санкт-Петербургский институт огнеупоров" | Knee joint endoprosthesis |
US6039764A (en) * | 1997-08-18 | 2000-03-21 | Arch Development Corporation | Prosthetic knee with adjusted center of internal/external rotation |
US6206926B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2001-03-27 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Prosthetic knee joint with enhanced posterior stabilization and dislocation prevention features |
DE59711302D1 (en) | 1997-10-28 | 2004-03-18 | Ct Pulse Orthopedics Ltd | knee prosthesis |
US5782925A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 1998-07-21 | Howmedica Inc. | Knee implant rotational alignment apparatus |
CA2254218C (en) | 1997-11-18 | 2003-11-25 | Michael J. Pappas | Prosthetic knee joint with enhanced posterior stabilization and dislocation prevention features |
ES2226186T3 (en) * | 1997-11-29 | 2005-03-16 | Surgicraft Limited | SURGICAL IMPLANT AND SURGICAL FIXING SCREW. |
US6325828B1 (en) | 1997-12-02 | 2001-12-04 | Rose Biomedical Research | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
US6348058B1 (en) * | 1997-12-12 | 2002-02-19 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Image guided spinal surgery guide, system, and method for use thereof |
BE1011626A3 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 1999-11-09 | Memento S A | A total knee prosthesis tibial plateau mobile rotating. |
EP0923916A1 (en) | 1997-12-19 | 1999-06-23 | Sulzer Orthopädie AG | Knee joint prosthesis |
US5986169A (en) | 1997-12-31 | 1999-11-16 | Biorthex Inc. | Porous nickel-titanium alloy article |
US6171340B1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2001-01-09 | Mcdowell Charles L. | Method and device for regenerating cartilage in articulating joints |
US6123729A (en) | 1998-03-10 | 2000-09-26 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Four compartment knee |
FR2777452B1 (en) | 1998-04-15 | 2000-12-15 | Aesculap Sa | KNEE PROSTHESIS |
US6090144A (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2000-07-18 | Letot; Patrick | Synthetic knee system |
EP0956836B1 (en) * | 1998-05-13 | 2004-07-28 | DePuy Products, Inc. | Tibial tray with adjustable keel |
US6083228A (en) | 1998-06-09 | 2000-07-04 | Michelson; Gary K. | Device and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insert |
US6110182A (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2000-08-29 | Ohio Medical Instruments Company, Inc. | Target socket |
ES2304794T3 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 2008-10-16 | Ao Technology Ag | PAREO OF LOCATION THROUGH LOCALIZATION SCREWS. |
US6080195A (en) | 1998-07-08 | 2000-06-27 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Rotatable and translatable joint prosthesis with posterior stabilization |
US6477400B1 (en) | 1998-08-20 | 2002-11-05 | Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc. | Fluoroscopic image guided orthopaedic surgery system with intraoperative registration |
US6132468A (en) * | 1998-09-10 | 2000-10-17 | Mansmann; Kevin A. | Arthroscopic replacement of cartilage using flexible inflatable envelopes |
US6443991B1 (en) | 1998-09-21 | 2002-09-03 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Posterior stabilized mobile bearing knee |
US6195577B1 (en) * | 1998-10-08 | 2001-02-27 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for positioning a device in a body |
US6340363B1 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2002-01-22 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Image guided vertebral distractor and method for tracking the position of vertebrae |
US6500208B1 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2002-12-31 | Biomet, Inc. | Nonmodular joint prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular prosthesis |
US6430434B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2002-08-06 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | Method for determining the location and orientation of a bone for computer-assisted orthopedic procedures using intraoperatively attached markers |
US6623526B1 (en) | 1999-01-08 | 2003-09-23 | Corin Limited | Knee prosthesis |
US6306172B1 (en) | 1999-01-28 | 2001-10-23 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Modular tibial insert for prosthesis system |
US6361564B1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2002-03-26 | Aesculap | Total knee joint comprising an insert movable relative to a tenon |
US6285902B1 (en) * | 1999-02-10 | 2001-09-04 | Surgical Insights, Inc. | Computer assisted targeting device for use in orthopaedic surgery |
US6368353B1 (en) | 1999-02-24 | 2002-04-09 | Michel A. Arcand | Shoulder prosthesis apparatus and methods |
US6413279B1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2002-07-02 | Biomet, Inc. | Floating bearing knee joint prosthesis with a fixed tibial post |
US6165223A (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2000-12-26 | Biomet, Inc. | Floating bearing knee joint prosthesis with a fixed tibial post |
US6470207B1 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2002-10-22 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Navigational guidance via computer-assisted fluoroscopic imaging |
US6491699B1 (en) | 1999-04-20 | 2002-12-10 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Instrument guidance method and system for image guided surgery |
US6966928B2 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2005-11-22 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having keels |
US7297161B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2007-11-20 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US7491235B2 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2009-02-17 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US7338524B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2008-03-04 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US6911044B2 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2005-06-28 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having medially shifted tibial surface |
US20050033424A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-02-10 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US6923831B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-08-02 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having attachment apertures |
US6855165B2 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2005-02-15 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having enlarged femoral surface |
US6866684B2 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2005-03-15 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having different tibial and femoral surface profiles |
US6302892B1 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 2001-10-16 | Percardia, Inc. | Blood flow conduit delivery system and method of use |
EP1204382B2 (en) * | 1999-08-14 | 2006-09-27 | Aesculap AG & Co. KG | Bone screw |
GB9919954D0 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 1999-10-27 | Walker Peter S | Linked condylar total knee replacement |
DE50007272D1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2004-09-09 | Ct Pulse Orthopedics Ltd | Tibial part for a knee joint prosthesis and kit with such a tibial part |
US6620198B2 (en) | 1999-10-07 | 2003-09-16 | Exactech, Inc. | Composite bearing inserts for total knee joints |
US6401346B1 (en) | 1999-11-24 | 2002-06-11 | Russell Brett Roberts | Power coping band saw |
US6379388B1 (en) | 1999-12-08 | 2002-04-30 | Ortho Development Corporation | Tibial prosthesis locking system and method of repairing knee joint |
ES2330829T3 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2009-12-16 | Zimmer Gmbh | KIT FOR A PROTECTION OF KNEE ARTICULATION. |
US7104996B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2006-09-12 | Marctec. Llc | Method of performing surgery |
US6702821B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2004-03-09 | The Bonutti 2003 Trust A | Instrumentation for minimally invasive joint replacement and methods for using same |
CN1243520C (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2006-03-01 | 维亚科公司 | Tissue annuloplasty band and apparatus and method for fashioning, sizing and implanting the same |
US6342075B1 (en) * | 2000-02-18 | 2002-01-29 | Macarthur A. Creig | Prosthesis and methods for total knee arthroplasty |
WO2001062172A1 (en) | 2000-02-23 | 2001-08-30 | Ethicon, Inc. | Apparatus and method for reconstructing a ligament |
FR2805454B1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2003-01-10 | Aesculap Sa | KNEE PROSTHESIS WITH CAVITY IN THE TROCHLE |
US6523681B1 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2003-02-25 | Technicor, Inc. | Absorbent/adsorbent pads |
WO2001064124A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2001-09-07 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Multiple cannula image guided tool for image guided procedures |
US6491726B2 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2002-12-10 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Posterior stabilized prosthetic knee replacement with bearing translation and dislocation prevention features |
JP5026651B2 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2012-09-12 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | Device used for knee arthroplasty |
US6475241B2 (en) | 2000-03-13 | 2002-11-05 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Posterior stabilized knee replacement with bearing translation for knees with retained collateral ligaments |
US6306146B1 (en) | 2000-04-06 | 2001-10-23 | Ohio Medical Instrument Company, Inc. | Surgical instrument support and method |
US6711432B1 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2004-03-23 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-aided orthopedic surgery |
US6701174B1 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2004-03-02 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-aided bone distraction |
US6375658B1 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2002-04-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Cartilage grafting |
US6520964B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2003-02-18 | Std Manufacturing, Inc. | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US6679917B2 (en) * | 2000-05-01 | 2004-01-20 | Arthrosurface, Incorporated | System and method for joint resurface repair |
DE20008103U1 (en) | 2000-05-05 | 2001-09-13 | Coripharm Medizinprodukte Gmbh | Preparation and application device for materials, in particular bone cement, to be prepared from at least one powdery or granular and a liquid component immediately before use to form a pasty, flowable mass |
US6436145B1 (en) | 2000-06-02 | 2002-08-20 | Zimmer, Inc. | Plug for a modular orthopaedic implant and method for assembly |
JP3679315B2 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2005-08-03 | 経憲 武井 | Knee prosthesis |
DE10037345A1 (en) | 2000-07-29 | 2002-02-07 | Juergen Buchholz | Surgical element |
WO2002034310A2 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2002-05-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Self-forming orthopedic implants |
DE10057675C2 (en) | 2000-11-21 | 2003-02-13 | Andrej Nowakowski | Knee endoprosthesis |
US6645251B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2003-11-11 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surfaces and processes for wear reducing in orthopaedic implants |
US6458128B1 (en) | 2001-01-24 | 2002-10-01 | Ethicon, Inc. | Electrosurgical instrument with a longitudinal element for conducting RF energy and moving a cutting element |
US7018418B2 (en) | 2001-01-25 | 2006-03-28 | Tecomet, Inc. | Textured surface having undercut micro recesses in a surface |
US6719800B2 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2004-04-13 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Constrained prosthetic knee with rotating bearing |
US6485519B2 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2002-11-26 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Constrained prosthetic knee with rotating bearing |
US6773461B2 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2004-08-10 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Constrained prosthetic knee with rotating bearing |
US20020120340A1 (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-29 | Metzger Robert G. | Knee joint prosthesis |
JP4113779B2 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2008-07-09 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | Single-compartment knee joint surgical guidance system and method |
US7547307B2 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2009-06-16 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer assisted knee arthroplasty instrumentation, systems, and processes |
US6685711B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2004-02-03 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Apparatus used in performing femoral and tibial resection in knee surgery |
US6595997B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-07-22 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Methods used in performing femoral and tibial resection in knee surgery |
US8062377B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2011-11-22 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for knee arthroplasty |
US6934655B2 (en) | 2001-03-16 | 2005-08-23 | Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmission line analysis |
US6672224B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2004-01-06 | Asf-Keystone, Inc. | Railway car truck with a rocker seat |
JP2002274214A (en) | 2001-03-22 | 2002-09-25 | Nissan Diesel Motor Co Ltd | Rollover preventer of vehicle |
US7776085B2 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2010-08-17 | Amedica Corporation | Knee prosthesis with ceramic tibial component |
US6554838B2 (en) | 2001-05-31 | 2003-04-29 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Method and apparatus for implanting a prosthetic device |
US6482209B1 (en) | 2001-06-14 | 2002-11-19 | Gerard A. Engh | Apparatus and method for sculpting the surface of a joint |
FR2826254B1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2004-06-18 | Aesculap Sa | DEVICE FOR POSITIONING A CUTTING PLAN OF A BONE CUTTING GUIDE |
US6942627B2 (en) | 2001-07-19 | 2005-09-13 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Surgical biopsy device having a flexible cutter |
CN1194792C (en) * | 2001-08-14 | 2005-03-30 | 吕应中 | Frostless cryogenic gas dewatering device |
US6858032B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2005-02-22 | Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation | Rotating track cutting guide system |
US7618421B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2009-11-17 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Tools for femoral resection in knee surgery |
US7060074B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-06-13 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Instrumentation for minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
US7141053B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-11-28 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Methods of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
US20030158606A1 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2003-08-21 | Coon Thomas M. | Knee arthroplasty prosthesis and method |
JP4277199B2 (en) * | 2002-03-05 | 2009-06-10 | ジンマー インコーポレーテッド | Total knee arthroplasty methods and instruments to minimize injury |
US6875222B2 (en) | 2002-03-12 | 2005-04-05 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Blade for resection of bone for prosthesis implantation, blade stop and method |
US7048741B2 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2006-05-23 | Swanson Todd V | Method and apparatus for minimally invasive knee arthroplasty |
US20040039396A1 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2004-02-26 | Orthosoft Inc. | Universal positioning block |
US20040122305A1 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Grimm James E. | Surgical instrument and method of positioning same |
US7029477B2 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2006-04-18 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Surgical instrument and positioning method |
AU2003299851B2 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2009-12-10 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | High performance knee prostheses |
DE20300987U1 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2003-04-10 | Stryker Trauma Gmbh | Implant for osteosynthesis |
US7660623B2 (en) | 2003-01-30 | 2010-02-09 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Six degree of freedom alignment display for medical procedures |
US7241298B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2007-07-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Universal alignment guide |
US20040153066A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-05 | Coon Thomas M. | Apparatus for knee surgery and method of use |
US7175630B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2007-02-13 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Bone cutting template and method of use |
ATE534965T1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2011-12-15 | Z Kat Inc | COMPUTER-ASSISTED KNEE REPLACEMENT DEVICE |
US6916324B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2005-07-12 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Provisional orthopedic prosthesis for partially resected bone |
EP1605810A2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2005-12-21 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
EP1631192B1 (en) | 2003-05-16 | 2012-12-05 | Mazor Robotics Ltd. | Robotic total/partial knee arthoplastics |
AU2003902467A0 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2003-06-05 | Boris Rjazancev | A prosthetic component, a method of attaching a prosthetic component to a bone, a method of performing knee replacement surgery and a frame for application to a knee joint during knee replacement surgery |
US7252685B2 (en) * | 2003-06-05 | 2007-08-07 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Fusion implant and method of making same |
US7104966B2 (en) | 2003-07-16 | 2006-09-12 | Samuel Shiber | Guidewire system with exposed midsection |
ES2343007T3 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2010-07-21 | Exactech, Inc. | KNEE PROTESIS WITH MOBILE SUPPORT. |
US6898858B1 (en) | 2003-08-12 | 2005-05-31 | Barry Spell | Folding concealed hacksaw |
US20060015115A1 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2006-01-19 | Haines Timothy G | Methods and apparatus for pivotable guide surfaces for arthroplasty |
US8114083B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2012-02-14 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improved drilling and milling tools for resection |
US7857814B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2010-12-28 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for minimally invasive arthroplasty |
US8021368B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2011-09-20 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improved cutting tools for resection |
US20060030854A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2006-02-09 | Haines Timothy G | Methods and apparatus for wireplasty bone resection |
US7815645B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2010-10-19 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for pinplasty bone resection |
US20050171604A1 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2005-08-04 | Alexander Michalow | Unicondylar knee implant |
US20070179607A1 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-02 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Cartilage resurfacing implant |
GB2447702A (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-24 | Univ Leeds | Surgical bone cutting template |
-
2005
- 2005-03-08 US US11/074,599 patent/US20060015115A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-03-08 US US11/075,553 patent/US20060030855A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-03-08 US US11/075,840 patent/US9814539B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-03-08 US US11/075,836 patent/US8287545B2/en active Active
-
2007
- 2007-07-09 US US11/825,857 patent/US8353914B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-08-06 US US12/187,210 patent/US8298238B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-11-13 US US15/810,726 patent/US20180125602A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11278416B2 (en) | 2019-11-14 | 2022-03-22 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Concentric keel TKA |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20060030944A1 (en) | 2006-02-09 |
US20060015115A1 (en) | 2006-01-19 |
US20060030855A1 (en) | 2006-02-09 |
US9814539B2 (en) | 2017-11-14 |
US8298238B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 |
US20180125602A1 (en) | 2018-05-10 |
US8287545B2 (en) | 2012-10-16 |
US20060058882A1 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
US8353914B2 (en) | 2013-01-15 |
US20090138018A1 (en) | 2009-05-28 |
US20090076514A1 (en) | 2009-03-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20160302933A9 (en) | Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants | |
EP1870060B1 (en) | Tibial insert having a reinforced keel | |
Hungerford et al. | Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement | |
US7819919B2 (en) | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis | |
US6797006B2 (en) | Porous unicondylar knee | |
JP5410027B2 (en) | Movable support assembly | |
US7520901B2 (en) | Bicompartmental implants and method of use | |
US7641689B2 (en) | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis | |
AU2006272871B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for sculpting the surface of a joint | |
EP1380273A2 (en) | Prosthetic knee system | |
US20040006393A1 (en) | Implantable prosthetic knee for lateral compartment | |
US20070100460A1 (en) | Orthopaedic implant systems with anti-abrasion studs | |
EP1870058B1 (en) | Tibial insert | |
US9861485B2 (en) | Reverse knee prosthesis | |
CN106031667A (en) | Artificial knee joint and tibia component and femur component thereof | |
Hintermann | Current designs of total ankle prostheses | |
Dubrana et al. | History of Unicompartmental Prostheses | |
Cushner et al. | Managing Patella Defects | |
Laskin et al. | The spectrum of total knee replacement | |
Hofmann et al. | Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty | |
Miniaci | Arthrosurface Inlay Resurfacing: Indications, Surgical Technique, and Results | |
Ip | Total Joint Surgery | |
Hofmann et al. | Copyright Protected |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HUDSON SURGICAL DESIGN, INC.,WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HAINES, TIMOTHY G;REEL/FRAME:024462/0563 Effective date: 20100505 Owner name: HUDSON SURGICAL DESIGN, INC., WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HAINES, TIMOTHY G;REEL/FRAME:024462/0563 Effective date: 20100505 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PUGET BIOVENTURES LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HUDSON SURGICAL DESIGN, INC.;REEL/FRAME:029691/0033 Effective date: 20130115 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.) |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PTGR) |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BIOMET MANUFACTURING, LLC, INDIANA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PUGET BIOVENTURES, LLC;REEL/FRAME:047106/0766 Effective date: 20180827 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20211114 |